Housing Act of 1949
The American Housing Act of 1949 () was a landmark, sweeping expansion of the federal role in mortgage insurance and issuance and the construction of public housing. It was part of President Harry Truman's program of domestic legislation, the Fair Deal. Provisions. The main elements of the Act included: Creation of the legislation. In the State of the Union address unveiling the Fair Deal, Truman observed that "Five million families are still living in slums and firetraps. Three million families share their homes with others." He also presented a policy statement on housing: In Congress, the  bill was sponsored by Republican Sen. Robert A. Taft. The act was known as the Taft-Ellender-Wagner (T-E-W) Act for Taft and Democratic backers Allen J. Ellender and Robert F. Wagner. Legacy. The Act governed the way the immense financial resources of the federal government would shape the growth of American cities in the post-war era. For instance, in one survey of the top "influences on the postwar American metropolis," the FHA's mortgage financing program ranks second, and urban renewal programs rank fourth. The law facilitated a rise in homeownership and the building of huge  public housing projects that would become fixtures in many American cities and these public housing developments were often pejoratively referred to as “The Projects” or “Ghettos”. The legislation's legacy is mixed, particularly with regard to the success of the urban renewal and public housing elements. The government fell far short of its goal to build 810,000 units of new public housing by 1955, providing little aid to cities suffering from housing shortages. In fact, because of projects like Lincoln Center, a New York City cultural development including 4400 apartments for which 7000 apartments were torn down, the Act's  urban redevelopment programs actually destroyed more housing units than they built. Meanwhile, the massive urban redevelopment efforts prompted by the Act came under fire for poor planning, failings with regard to social equity and fairness, and sometimes corruption (see, e.g., Manhattantown). Urban renewal also came under fire for discriminating against minorities, in that it often resulted in minority-heavy slums being destroyed and replaced with more expensive housing or non-residential public works that were not accommodating to the original inhabitants. The slogan adopted by critics equated "urban renewal" with "Negro removal." The federal government spent $13.5 billion on  urban redevelopment and slum clearance projects between 1953 and 1986.