“Bonang! sengwe se se fetang Solomone se fano.”—Mathaio 12:42 Jwale seo sa momakatsa. “Ho tlile jwang, O entse seo jwang? Na ua tseba? Tlaleho ea likotopo tsena e ile ea thunngoa motseng oa Rossosh, sebakeng sa Voronezh. Joale lihekthere tse 420 li tlosoa hekthara. Economic Club ea New York ka 2013. O sebelitse Bapresidente In the development of the Just War theory, St. Augustine (354-430) argued that “the justness of action could be judged without evaluating the driving intention, so also with the state action of going to war”. St Thomas Aquinas (1224-74), on the other hand, argues that, war must be waged by a competent authority and there must be a just cause for that war, so that those who were invaded must deserve to have been attacked. Therefore, “Just cause for war could be found in self-defence; restoration of peace; assistance of neighbours against attack and, most notably, defence of the poor and the oppressed”. For Suárez, the defence of innocent people, no matter where in the world, would be a just cause. This line of argument anticipated the findings of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), which identified six criteria for military intervention that conform to the UN Charter and the Security Council Articles. These were: just cause, right authority, right intention, last resort, proportional means and reasonable prospects.