Hong Kong Reunification Ordinance
Hong Kong Reunification Ordinance, in short Reunification Ordinance, is a legislation of Hong Kong passed by the Provisional Legislative Council on 1 July 1997, the day of handover, to provide for the continuation of the administration of justice and the public service and to provide for associated matters to ensure the continuity of the social order of Hong Kong. Articles. The Ordinance contains 32 sections and 2 schedules, categorised in 9 parts: Background. Chris Patten, last Governor of Hong Kong, implemented the democratization of the Hong Kong parliament in early 1990s, which angered the Chinese Government  and abandoned the "through-train" plan. The decision means members of the Hong Kong colonial Legislative Council cannot continue to sit as members of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). On 24 March 1996, the Provisional Legislative Council (PLC) was established under the decisions by Beijing. The PLC, responsible for passing "essential" laws for the SAR and ratifying legislations after the handover, convened its first meeting on 25 January 1997 in Shenzhen. At midnight on 1 July 1997, the sovereignty of Hong Kong was transferred to China by the United Kingdom. Proceedings. At 02:45  on 1 July, members of the PLC entered the Hall 201 at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, convening the first meeting in Hong Kong and after the handover. After the address by Rita Fan, the President of PLC, the Hong Kong Reunification Bill was read for the first time. Elsie Leung, Secretary for Justice, then moved that the Bill be read a second time. All pro-Beijing legislators supported the bill, while Frederick Fung, chairman of the pan-democracy party ADPL and speaking on behalf of the only 4 democrats in the chamber, objected the amendments to Public  Order Ordinance, Societies Ordinance, Urban Council Ordinance, Regional Council Ordinance, and District Councils Ordinance, but agreed on the other sections of the Bill. The Bill was then read for the second time without objection, and entered the Committee stage. All sections were then passed, including the five amendment bills objected by the pan-democracy MPs. The Bill finally read for the third time, also without objection, and henceforth became the first bill of the SAR enacted. The PLC adjourned the meeting at 03:55 after the Bill was passed. Tung Chee-hwa, the Chief Executive of Hong Kong, gave his signature  to the Bill, the first after assuming office. Hong Kong Reunification Ordinance was gazetted on the same day. Reaction. The Reunification Ordinance was regarded as the most fundamental local legislation for the Hong Kong SAR as it settles the handover. In 2018, Wang Zhimin, the then-Director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in Hong Kong, described the Ordinance as the first gift of reassurance by the Chinese Government as the SAR was established. In the same month after the handover, the legality of the Hong Kong Reunification Ordinance and the PLC was challenged, arguing that  the PLC was not formed in accordance with the Basic Law and is hence an illegal organ, and that all laws passed by the PLC shall be null and void. The case was rejected by the High Court as it ruled the PLC is legal and that all legislations, including the Reunification Ordinance, were enacted validly. Labelled as "restoring evil laws", Part 2 of the Reunification Ordinance was the most controversial as it confirms the bills passed by the PLC before handover, which includes legislations criticised to have infringed human rights, such as amending the Public Order Ordinances to the  version before the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance was enacted, limiting the freedom of assembly. Furthermore, the Reunification Ordinance transfers executive, legislative, and judiciary powers of the Crown, British Government and British Forces Overseas Hong Kong to the Chinese Government and People's Liberation Army Hong Kong Garrison respectively, and the law stipulated that "[any] provision saving the rights of Her Majesty, Her Heirs and Successors shall be construed as saving the rights of the Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China and the rights of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region  under the Basic Law or other laws.", and was criticsed for the implication that governmental agencies of Chan can enjoy royal prerogatives of the British royal.