List of Scientology security checks
In Scientology, the security check (or sec check) is an interrogation technique put into practice by founder L. Ron Hubbard in 1960. It involves an "Ethics officer" probing the thoughts, attitudes and behavior of an individual member by asking them large numbers of questions. The bulk of the questions deal with criminal or sexual activity or intentions, or other things that the interviewee might be ashamed of. The questions also probe negative thoughts that the person might have about Scientology or Hubbard. As with traditional auditing, the subject holds the electrodes of the E-meter , a simple lie-detector device that measures electrical conductivity in the human body, while they are given a series of highly probing, personal questions. Hubbard described security checking as a remedy for "unreasonable action", specifically "the compulsion or obsession to commit actions" the person feels must be kept secret. Checks are given to all Scientologists on the Bridge to Total Freedom, every six months to all Operating Thetans, according to officials, "to make sure they're using the tech correctly", and to members who are leaving staff. In a "Code of Reform" issued in 1968, Hubbard announced that he was  cancelling security checks, along with the policies of Fair Game and Disconnection. However, later Scientology documents refer to the practice, and former members report that it still continues. Sec Checks are also known in the Scientology Justice system as "Integrity Processing" or "Confessional Auditing". Security checks. A security check resembles the confessional in traditional religions. However, it also differs from them in that it is not voluntary. Hubbard told security checkers that "you are not merely an observer, or an auditor, you are a detective." Susan Raine of the University of Alberta observes that the questions asked in security checks  show that L. Ron Hubbard was intensely preoccupied with scrutiny, surveillance and betrayal. She notes that this intense form of surveillance makes sense from a bureaucratic perspective as a way of making sure all individuals follow (and internalize) the organisational goals. Bent Corydon, an ex-Scientologist, compares security checking to the use of thought police in the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. He writes that Scientologists are punished for having negative thoughts about Hubbard or Scientology and so learn to think only positively. David Mayo, another former member, reported that sec checks included the question, "Have you ever had any unkind  thoughts about LRH?" and that such "discreditable thoughts" could land a follower in trouble. In 1972, the South African Commission of Enquiry published a report on Scientology. It recommended that there should be legislation against sec checks. However, no legislative action was taken as a result. HGC Pre-processing Security Check. HGC stands for "Hubbard Guidance Centre". Sociologist Roy Wallis quotes some questions from this security check dating from 1961. Johannesburg Security Check. The Johannesburg (also known as "Joburg") Security Check was described by Hubbard as "the roughest security check in Scientology". An amended form continued to be used for  some time thereafter. Amongst Hubbard's list of primarily crime-related questions is the question "Have you ever slept with a member of a race of another color?" Other questions include: Only Valid Security Check. The contents of the Joburg security check were later revised into what became "The Only Valid Security Check". Added to the Sec Check are new questions such as: Auditor's Sec Check. This sec check, comprising 170 questions, was meant for staff auditors and field auditors. Security Check Children. Designed to be applied to children aged 6 to 12. Issued by Hubbard as HCO Bulletin  of 21 September 1961, also known as "HCO WW Security Form 8". The procedure runs through 99 questions, such as: Whole Track Security Check. This long Sec Check, consisting of hundreds of questions, takes stock of the subject's entire time track, including their "recollections" of any "past lives" they believe they have had. It includes questions such as: Controversy. Potential blackmail. Scientology researcher Jon Atack — a critic of Scientology, and himself a former Scientologist — explains in his book "A Piece of Blue Sky" that sec checks could be applied either as a "confidential" Confessional or as a non-confidential  investigation. He alleges that former members have been silenced by the fear that their "confidential" secrets will be used in blackmail against them.