Wooden v. United States. According to the commander of the Hungarian Air Force Attila Kositzky, the latter was excluded also because the weather in the evening was clear, cloudless, the moon shone from the south and the visibility reached up to . In addition, Hungarian settlements were lit by public lighting, unlike those on the other side of the border that were darkened, so the difference between them is clearly visible. Finally, the intent was evidenced by the fact that the pilot made one full circle over the Barcs area before releasing the tape to clearly spot the target. Therefore, the attack was indisputably carried 	Bombing of Barcs
21895072	out, targeted, deliberate and planned in advance. György Keleti then showed a letter from the British military attaché containing an official statement from the British Ministry of Defense confirming that Britain had sold such cluster bombs to Yugoslavia a few years earlier. By showing a photo taken in 1988 at the airport near Zagreb, the Hungarian government irrefutably proved that the JNA presented these bombs to the public at an air force show in May that year (a BL 775 cluster bomb can be seen under the wing of MiG-21). in addition, the bombs were being offered to customers by 	Bombing of Barcs
21895073	a Yugoslav arms export company. The unanimous conclusion of the commission was that Barcs was deliberately bombed. Hungarian investigators concluded that it was greatly fortunate that the bombs did not fall a few hundred meters closer to the city center, because then there would be many casualties considering that 288 bombs exploded on the ground. Reactions. After the news was spread by the Hungarian media, there was concern in the country. Hungary did not respond to the attack with an armed involvement in the war, but it did increase the number of soldiers on the border with SR Serbia. The 	Bombing of Barcs
21895074	Yugoslav side claimed it was a Swedish-made cluster bomb, trying to deny any involvement in the incident. The Yugoslav media were completely silent about the bombing. Afterwards, Serbia's foreign minister called the attack an accident. Bombing of Barcs The bombing of Barcs was a military air attack of the Yugoslav Air Force on the Hungarian town of Barcs that occurred on 27 October 1991. Prelude. Tense relations between Hungary and Yugoslavia began when Hungary openly supported Slovenia and Croatia on the path to independence. The Hungarian government led by József Antall closely monitored the crisis in Yugoslavia and 	Bombing of Barcs
21895075	William Talataina William Talataina William Talataina (born 5 August 1995) is a Samoan rugby union player, currently playing for the Old Glory DC of Major League Rugby (MLR). His preferred position is centre. Professional career. Talataina signed for Major League Rugby side Old Glory DC for the 2022 Major League Rugby season. He has also previously played for and . William Talataina William Talataina (born 5 August 1995) is a Samoan rugby union player, currently playing for the Old Glory DC of Major League Rugby (MLR). His preferred position is centre. Professional career. Talataina signed for Major League Rugby side Old Glory DC 	William Talataina
21895076	Wooden v. United States Wooden v. United States Wooden v. United States, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), was a Supreme Court of the United States case dealing with the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). In a unanimous decision, the court ruled that multiple criminal offenses that a person commits during a single criminal episode do not count as separate convictions when considering the number of prior convictions a criminal has under the ACCA. Background. In 1997, William Wooden was involved with the burglary of a self-storage space, breaking into ten adjacent units within a single night. He was convicted on ten counts of burglary and 	Wooden v. United States
21895077	served an eight-year prison sentence. Later, in 2014, Wooden was arrested for possession of a rifle under Georgia law when a police officer, out of uniform and without a warrant, entered his home and discovered the rifle. The charges were later dismissed due to the irregularities of the discovery, but federal officers stepped in to charge Wooden for possession of firearms under the ACCA. While a first-time conviction under the ACCA would normally lead to a sentence of 21 to 27 months, federal prosecutors believed that the ten prior convictions from the storage burglary were separate occasions" under  the ACCA, and triggered the enhanced sentencing provision of the ACCA for criminals that have been convictions on three or more separate occasions, setting a minimum sentence of 15 years. While Wooden argued that the ten burglary convinctions should be treated as a single occasion for purposes of the ACCA, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee found in favor of the government's argument, as this stance was based on current case law for the Sixth Circuit. The decision was upheld on appeal at the Sixth Circuit. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court granted Wooden's  petition in February 2021. The case was argued on October 4, 2021. The Court issued its decision on March 8, 2022. The judgement was unanimous, reversing the decision of the lower courts. The majority opinion was written by Justice Elena Kagan, joined in whole by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and all but Part II-B by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett. Kagan wrote that based both on the legislative history of the ACCA and the ordinary meaning of "occasion", that the ten burglary convictions that Wooden had received  were all within the same occasion. "Consider first how an ordinary person (a reporter; a police officer; yes, even a lawyer) might describe Wooden’s 10 burglaries — and how she would not", Kagan wrote. While Justice Barrett wrote a concurrence in part and in the judgment which was joined by Justice Thomas, she wrote that she took issue with Justice Kagan's use of legislative history as part of the rationale. Kagan had pointed to a 1988 amendment where Congress had made it clear that they intended that the enhanced sentencing was to come from separate episodes by referring to  a person that was convicted under the enhanced provisions of the ACCA after performing a stick-up of six people at the same time. Barrett stated this was too much of a stretch for statutory interpretation and that they should defer to what Congress explicitly stated in the law. Justice Neil Gorsuch also wrote a concurrence in judgement, joined in the most part by Justice Sotomayor. Gorsuch wrote that Wooden's case calls for the use of the rule of lenity, deferring in favor of the defendant when there is ambiguity in criminal law. Gorsuch also expressed concern that the  ACCA created enhanced penalties to be decided by a judge rather than by a jury, which may be a violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendment. Wooden v. United States Wooden v. United States, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), was a Supreme Court of the United States case dealing with the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). In a unanimous decision, the court ruled that multiple criminal offenses that a person commits during a single criminal episode do not count as separate convictions when considering the number of prior convictions a criminal has under the ACCA. Background. In 1997, William Wooden was involved