WAT IS DAAR IN DIE DE KLERKONDERHANDELDE GRONDWET WAT DIE KIESER NIE VERSTAAN NIE? - Afrikanervolksparty
WAT IS DAAR IN DIE DE KLERKONDERHANDELDE GRONDWET WAT DIE KIESER NIE VERSTAAN NIE?
Gepubliseer op 24 Mei 2017 | Geskryf deur Redaksie | | Trefslae: 980
Wat meer is, wat is daar van getallepolitiek wat die hofaansoekers vir geheime stemming in die parlement, nie verstaan nie? Die uitvloeisel daarvan in praktyk is só elementêr dat selfs Zuma dit verstaan en goed verstaan!
In die ontplooiing en toepassing sedert 1994 is dit duidelik dat behalwe vir die ware nasionaalgesinde Afrikaners wat daarteen gewaarsku het en nie daarvoor gestem het nie, Zuma en sy ANC kaders strate meer van die politiek af weet as al die blankes wat oortuig was dat hulle die regte pad volg. Dat hulle die morele hoë grond beset terwyl die sg. Regses ‘n bedreiging inhou vir die veelgeroemde “eerste democracy” in Suid Afrika.
Behalwe dat hy begin knor en tande wys vir die swart lakeie wat ge-oormerk is om hom uit die kussings te lig, verduidelik hy grondig van hoe getallepolitiek nou eintlik werk, noudat hulle nie meer daarvan hou nie!
Zuma said that the UDM’s application resorted to judicial intervention‚ when the majority party was legitimately exercising its rights. “The applicant asserts that without a secret ballot there is no realistic possibility that the motion of confidence will succeed‚ unless the majority party decree that it must. “As a matter of fact‚ that is the advantage of enjoying a majority in Parliament and that is how the mandate of the majority is carried out by the majority party.”
As die majority aanvanklik uit alle swart volke in Suid Afrika bestaan het en nou gegroei het na net een etniese groep, doen dit niks af aan die magte van die nuwe majority nie! Afrika as aanskouingsles en dr. Verwoerd se insig en uitleg én waarskuwings ten spyt, is Suid Afrika deur die NP en al die verdwaalde nasionaliste wat hom sedert 1993 se referendum nog gesteun het, uitgelewer aan ‘n rowerbende wat ons land daagliks beroof en verinneweer tot ‘n rommelhoop. En daar is niks wat hulle daaraan kan doen nie, met of sonder die hulp en bystand van die internasionale magte wat hulle tot abdikasie oorreed het!
Vir diegene wat hulle hoop op Ramaphosa het, veral as hulle blank is, wag daar ‘n yslike ontnugtering. Om swart steun te kry, het die AVP al by herhaling gesê sal daar hoër gebie moet word as die ANC, wat alreeds die blanke se totale besit en lewens gebie het deur doof en blind te wees vir misdaad, moord en verkragting van blankes. Ontleders wat nou nog ontken dat daar ‘n politieke volksmoord op die blanke in Suid Afrika geloods word deur dit as gewone misdaad te bestempel, is bepaald deel van die probleem en beslis nie van die oplossing nie!
PRESIDENT JACOB ZUMA HAS STRUCK BACK AT HIS CRITICS‚ INCLUDING THOSE IN THE ANC‚ SAYING THAT HIS DECISION TO RESHUFFLE THE CABINET WAS LAWFUL AND WAS RATIONAL.
In an affidavit filed in the Constitutional Court on Thursday‚ Zuma said that the president must exercise his powers within the law. The Constitution does not require the consequences of such decisions to have a positive or negative outcome‚ he said.
“I note the utterances attributed to the Secretary General of the ANC‚ Mr Gwede Mantashe‚ and the Deputy President‚ Mr Cyril Ramaphosa‚ regarding a perceived failure on my part to consult with ANC leaders and/or officials about changes to the cabinet.
“What I do as President of the ruling party are matter political. What I do as the President of the Republic requires compliance with the Constitution and the law.
“Public office requires the exercise of public power to be done within the constitutional constraints‚ least of which is rationality. My decision to reshuffle the cabinet was done for rational purposes.”
Zuma was responding to a court application launched by United Democratic Movement. The party approached the Constitutional Court on Monday after the Speaker of the National Assembly‚ Baleka Mbete‚ refused its request to have the pending motion of no confidence against Zuma conducted by way of a secret ballot.
Zuma said that the UDM’s application resorted to judicial intervention‚ when the majority party was legitimately exercising its rights.
“The applicant asserts that without a secret ballot there is no realistic possibility that the motion of confidence will succeed‚ unless the majority party decree that it must.
“As a matter of fact‚ that is the advantage of enjoying a majority in Parliament and that is how the mandate of the majority is carried out by the majority party.”
The president also argued that the UDM’s claim that MPs participating in the motion of no confidence vote could be intimidated or suffer career-limiting consequences if the vote is done openly is spurious and without evidence.
Speaker Baleka Mbete also filed an affidavit at the court in which she said she is “personally not averse to having a motion of no confidence in the President being decided by secret ballot”.
“I am however‚ bound by the Constitution of the Rules that the (National Assembly) has adopted. Accordingly‚ I have no authority or discretion to accede to the applicant’s request.”
Zuma said that the Constitution permits Parliament to develop its own rules in order to run its affairs
UDM leader Bantu Holomisa said the motion of no confidence in the president‚ which were this week postponed‚ was critical in light of the country’s economic and political crisis.
Two of the three ratings agencies have downgraded South Africa’s long-term foreign currency sovereign rating from investment grade to “junk” status since the reshuffle‚ he said.