Yes–no question
In linguistics, a yes–no question, also known as a polar question or a general question is a question whose expected answer is one of two choices, one that provides an affirmative answer to the question versus one that provides a negative answer to the question. Typically, in English, the choices are either "yes" or "no". Yes/no questions present an exclusive disjunction, namely a pair of alternatives of which only one is a felicitous answer. In English, such questions can be formed in both positive and negative forms Yes–no questions are in contrast with non -polar wh-questions, with the five Ws, which do not necessarily present a range of alternative answers, or necessarily restrict that range to two alternatives. (Questions beginning with "which", for example, often involve a set of several alternatives, from which one is to be drawn.) They are a subset of closed-ended questions. Grammatical form. Yes–no questions take many forms cross-linguistically. Many languages mark them with word order or verb morphology. Others use question particles or question intonation. These strategies are often mixed and matched from language to language. Hindi-Urdu. In Hindi-Urdu (Hindustani), Yes/No questions  have rising intonation on the verbal complex, whereas declaratives generally have falling intonation. Unlike English, they do not involve inversion of the finite verb. Y/N questions optionally co-occur with the wh-word क्या ("kyā") [PQP - polar question particle]. The presence of the polar particle क्या ("kyā") does not make the characteristic prosody optional. In the sentences (A) and (B) above, क्या ("kyā") is not the argument of any predicate and hence acts as a yes-no question particle. But क्या ("kyā") can also function as an argument of a predicate with the meaning ‘"what"’ as shown in (C ) The question particle क्या ("kyā") has a flat intonation while the thematic क्या ("kyā") has a pitch accent, which also appears more generally on "wh-phrases" in Hindi. The most unmarked location for polar-question particle क्या ("kyā") is the clause-initial position. But it can appear in almost any other position. It can be clause-medial or clause-final. In an almost mirror image pattern, thematic क्या ("kyā") "what", is natural in the immediately preverbal position but odd/marked elsewhere. Some examples sentences with varied positions of the yes-no particle are shown in the table below: Note: "क्या  (kyā) can only be interpreted as "what" in the second last sentence in the table above." Latin. In Latin, the enclitic particle "-ne" (sometimes just "-n" in Old Latin) can be added to the emphatic word to turn a declarative statement into a yes–no question. It usually forms a neutral yes–no question, implying neither answer (except where the context makes it clear what the answer must be). For example: Yes–no questions are also formed in Latin using the word "nonne" to imply that the interrogator thinks the answer to be the affirmative and with "num" to imply  that the interrogator thinks the answer to be the negative. For example: Mandarin. In Chinese, yes–no questions typically take an A-not-A form. The resulting response is usually an echo response. Germanic languages. In Germanic languages, yes-no questions are marked by word order. The following Dutch example shows how questions can be formed using subject inversion. Esperanto. In Esperanto, the word "ĉu" added to the beginning of a statement makes it a polar question. Russian. In Russian, the word “li” act as an unambiguous signal to a yes-no question interrogatives. (1) "Kupila li Maša knigu?" bought  li M. book “Did Maša buy a book?” Intonation is also another way that makes a declarative sentence into an interrogative sentence. (2a) "Maša KUPILA knigu?" M. bought book (2b) "Maša kupila KNIGU?" M. bought book In (2a) there are no particular context requirement, but the finite verb is the position of the pitch accent. For (2b), there is no particular context as well, but the sentence-final internal argument is where the focus is. Ambiguities. There is an ambiguity in English as to whether certain questions actually "are" yes–no questions in the first place. Syntactically identical questions can  be semantically different. It can be seen by considering the following ambiguous example: The question could be a yes–no question or could be an alternative question. Possible ways to reply to this question: Another such ambiguous question is "Would you like an apple or an orange?" to which the responses can be "An apple", "An orange", "Yes", and "No", depending from whether the question is seen as an alternative question or a yes–no question. (The "yes." answer involves a further ambiguity, discussed below.) A related ambiguity is questions with the form of yes–no questions but intended not  to be. They are a class of questions that encompass "indirect speech acts". The question "Can you reach the mustard?" is an example. In form and semantics, it is a straightforward yes–no question, which can be answered either "Yes, I can" or "No, I cannot". There is, however, an indirect speech act (which Clark calls an "elective construal") that can optionally be inferred from the question, namely "please pass the mustard". Such indirect speech acts flout Grice's maxim of manner. The inference on the part of the listener is optional, one that can legitimately remain untaken. Clark  describes one study where a researcher telephoned fifty restaurants around Palo Alto, California, asking without embellishment the question "Do you accept credit cards?" The three forms of reply given were: Another part of the same study was the question "Do you have a price on a fifth of Jim Beam?" Out of 100 merchants, 40 answered "Yes". A non-response bias forced researchers to disregard the survey question asking tobacconists "Do you have Prince Albert?" as although the researchers' intent was to observe whether the merchants specified that they offered the tobacco brand as packaged in a can and/or a  pouch, the merchants frequently hung up the phone, presumably because they believed themselves to be the victims of a popular prank call. Answers. According to Grimes, the answer "yes" asserts a positive answer and the answer "no" asserts a negative answer, irrespective of the form of the question. However, simple "yes" or "no" word sentence answers to yes–no questions can be ambiguous in English. For example, a "yes" response to the question "You didn't commit the crime?" could mean either "yes, I didn't commit the crime" or "yes, I did commit the crime" depending from whether the  respondent is replying with the truth-value of the situation or to the polarity used in the question. The ambiguity does not exist in languages that employ echo answers. In the Welsh language, for example, the response "ydw" ("I am") has no such ambiguity when it is used to reply to a question. Other languages also do not follow the custom, given by Grimes, with respect to the answers "yes" and "no". In New Guinea Pidgin, Polish and Huichol, the answer given has the logical polarity implied by the form of the question. • Positive form: ""Bai Renjinal i ranewe, o  nogat?""; English translation: “Will Reginald escape?” • Possible Answers: “Yes” (agreement, he will escape) or "nogat" (disagreement, he will not escape). However in the negative form, the senses of the answers take the opposite polarity to English, following instead of the polarity of the question. • Negative form: ""Bai Rejinal i no ranewe, o nogat"?" ; English translation: ("Won't Reginald escape?") • Possible Answers: “Yes” (agreement, he "will not" escape) or “nogayt” (disagreement, he "will" escape) A further ambiguity with yes–no questions, in addition to that of polarity, is the ambiguity of whether an "exclusive" or "inclusive" disjunction is meant by the  word "or", as it can represent either. Conventionally, in English yes–no questions the "or" represents an exclusive disjunction. However, as with the "Would you like an apple or an orange?" question mentioned earlier, to which one possible answer, as a yes–no question, is "yes.", yes–no questions can also be taken to be "inclusive" disjunctions. The informativeness of the "or" in the question is low, especially if the second alternative in the question is "something" or "things". The "exclusive" and "inclusive" can be determined often in spoken language (the speaker will often lower their pitch at the end  of an "exclusive" question, as opposed to raising it at the end of an "inclusive" question), but it is a frequent source of humour for computer scientists and others familiar with Boolean logic, who will give responses such as "yes" to questions such as "Would you like chicken or roast beef for dinner?". However, the ambiguity is not confined to humour. The apple-or-orange question may be legitimately asking whether either is wanted, for example, and "Would you like an apple or something?" is indeed "expecting" either "yes" or "no" as a proper answer rather than the answer "Something  that an exclusive disjunction would be requesting. This ambiguity does not exist only in English. It exists in West Greenlandic Kalaallisut, for example. The question Maniitsu-mi Nuum-mi=luunniit najugaqar-pa" ("Does he live in Maniitsoq or Nuuk?") is ambiguous as to whether exclusive or inclusive disjunction is meant. Commonly, this is clarified either by intonation (if the question is spoken) or the inclusion of an explicit question-word such as "sumi" ("where"). Suggestibility. Yes–no questions are believed to carry some suggestibility load. For instance, in response to yes-no questions, children tend to display a compliance  tendency: they comply with the structure of the question, negative or positive, by responding in the same way. For example, if preschoolers are asked, "Is this book big?", they will tend to respond "Yes, it is". But if they are asked, "Is this book not big?" they are more likely to say, "No, it is not".