Contio
The contio (plural "'contiones"', from the Latin word "'conventio"', meaning 'gathering') was a public assembly in Ancient Rome, which existed during the monarchy as well as in the Roman Republic and Roman Empire. At the "contio", magistrates informed the Roman citizens on various topics related to politics. The main difference between the "contio" and other public assemblies in Rome, such as the "comitia," is that the citizens who attended "contiones" did not get to vote. The "contio" merely served a communicative function, offering magistrates the opportunity to give the people a report of what had been decided during a  senate meeting or to discuss a proposed legislative bill ("rogatio)" in front of the citizens to help them make up their mind before they had to vote on it in other assemblies. Magistrates also used the "contio" as a means of self-promotion, presenting themselves as capable and honest politicians who kept the interests of the people in mind (in other words, adhered to the "popularis" ideology), hoping to gain sympathy and support from the people. Aside from this political assembly, the word "'contio"' could also refer to a type of Roman military speech. On this type of "contiones", see  section 5. Function in Roman politics. The practice of holding "contiones" is said to have started under the Roman Monarchy, where the king ("rex") was the only one who could summon a "contio" as well as the sole person who had the right to speak at this assembly. Therefore the "contio" is assumed to have originated earlier than the other public assemblies in Ancient Rome, since voting assemblies did not yet exist under the monarchy. The procedure and the function of "contiones" changed in the Republic and Empire. Every magistrate, as well as tribunes of the people, got the right  to call a "contio" and address the crowd, or invite others to give a speech on a topic of the convener's choice. In theory, a "contio" could be held anytime, on any day. However, "contiones" were usually held on two specific occasions: right after a senate meeting and when a new legislative bill ("rogatio)" had been proposed. Giving a report after a senate meeting. It was a common practice to hold a "contio" right after a senate meeting, to inform citizens about what had been discussed during the meeting and what decrees had been made. The magistrate who presided  over the senate meeting decided who got to speak at this "contio". He could choose to address the crowd himself or invite other senators to give a speech. Magistrates who were opposed to a decree that had been presented at this first "contio", often chose to hold their own "contio" a few days later, to share their different perspective. Roman citizens could not attend senate meetings themselves, for only senators were allowed inside the "curia" during those meetings. Therefore the "contio" was an important source of information for citizens to who wanted to know what was going on in politics . Discussing a bill ("rogatio"). "Contiones" formed a necessary step in the legislative process of validating new laws. When a magistrate or tribune wanted to propose a legislative bill ("rogatio)" which had to be validated by the voting process in the "comitia", the rules for legislative processes ordained the bill to be presented and discussed from various points of view before the people in "contiones" first. This allowed people to make up their minds on the bill before voting and gave supporters as well as opponents of the bill a chance to share their views and shape public opinion, either in  favor of the bill or against it. Other occasions. The two situations described above were the most common occasions on which a "contio" was held, but there were several special occasions on which this assembly could be summoned as well: The audience. In theory, every Roman citizen had the right to attend "contiones." The crowd at this assembly was seen as a representation of the Roman people ("populus") and therefore also referred to by speakers as "populus ("or "Quirites.")"." However, it is generally assumed that the audience mainly consisted of citizens living within the city of Rome, for those city -dwellers had easier access to the voting assemblies in which they would vote on the bills ("rogationes") that were the topic of many "contiones". They also seem to have been more willing to participate in politics than their fellow citizens from other areas. Over time, two distinct theories, which try to explain the composition of the audience in more detail, have developed. One theory assumes that "contiones" were mainly attended by lower-class locals, who lived near the "forum" on which the assembly gathered, while the second theory states that the crowd mainly consisted of well-to-do, high class  citizens: Theory 1: an audience of lower-class locals. This first theory implies that the largest part of the crowd at every "contio" consisted of the same group of local shopkeepers who lived near the "forum" and who sometimes seem to even have closed their businesses to attend a "contio". These lower-class shopkeepers would have had the most to gain from the measures that were discussed at the "contio," such as grain distributions, and therefore they would have been the most interested to go. According to this theory, these shopkeepers were joined by other lower-class Romans who sought  to escape their narrow housing conditions by hanging out in public places such as the "forum". Therefore, the majority of the crowd would have consisted of lower-class Romans. Theory 2: an audience of high class citizens. A second major theory states that the audience was mainly made up of wealthy, higher-class Romans. According to this theory, regularly attending "contiones" would have been easier for these well-to-do individuals, since they had more time to spare than lower-class citizens. Moreover, these higher-class Romans would have had the education that was needed to appreciate and understand the  argumentation the magistrates used in their speeches, which sometimes included complicated references to history or law. Lastly, this theory states that this class of citizens would have been the most interesting for magistrates to influence through "contiones", since these wealthy individuals would in turn have influenced the political opinion among lower-class Romans through patron-client relationships. Preserved speeches and other ancient sources. Despite the frequency with which "contiones" were held, very few of the speeches delivered in this assembly are fully preserved until this day. Many "contio" speeches have been lost over time or have never been recorded in  the first place, likely because the topics with which they dealt were not significant enough or because the speaker did not use interesting or engaging rhetorical strategies. Cicero is our main source for this type of oratory. The table below gives an overview of all of his extant "contio" speeches. Aside from the ones in the table above, no "contio" speeches have been fully preserved. There are, however, a few other ancient sources which provide knowledge on this topic. Historiographic works, mainly those of Sallust (a 1st century BC. Roman historiographer) describe some speeches that have been held at the  contio on significant topics in Roman history. Moreover, Cicero comments on "contiones" in several of his works: in "De Oratore", we find some theoretical remarks on how to address this assembly (eg. "De Oratore" 2.333-240) and his letters to Atticus include some references to the "contio" as well (eg. "Att." 7.8.5). Rhetoric. Judging from the ancient source material described above, speeches delivered at the "contio" seem to have shared several rhetorical and argumentative characteristics. This list gives an overview of such common characteristics of speeches addressed to this assembly: Military "contiones". Aside from the political assembly, the word "'contio ' could also refer to a type of military speech in which a commander addressed his troops. The rules for summoning contiones" of this kind were similar to those for the political assembly: under the monarchy only the king ("rex") had the right to do so, while later, during the Republic, every magistrate received this right. They usually appointed the general as the only speaker. Military "contiones" shared the communicative character of their political counterparts: they did not serve to cast votes or make decisions. A military "contio" could be held on various occasions: