an attorney-general shall, unless the context indicates otherwise, be construed as a reference to the National Director; and an attorney-general or deputy attorney-general in respect of the area of jurisdiction of a High Court, shall be construed as a reference to a Director or Deputy Director appointed in terms of this Act, for the area of jurisdiction of that Court.'.
To make provision for procedures and related matters in criminal proceedings.
[Para. (a) deleted by s. 1 of Act 107 of 1990.
[Definition of 'bank' substituted by s. 1 (a) of Act 5 of 1991 and by s. 38 of Act 129 of 1993.
[Definition of 'Commissioner' inserted by s. 35 of Act 122 of 1991 and substituted by s. 137 of Act 111 of 1998.
[Definition of 'correctional official' inserted by s. 35 of Act 122 of 1991 and substituted by s. 137 of Act 111 of 1998.
[Definition of 'correctional supervision' inserted by s. 35 of Act 122 of 1991, amended by s. 16 of Act 116 of 1993 and substituted by s. 137 of Act 111 of 1998.
[Definition of 'law' deleted by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
[Definition of 'peace officer' amended by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996.
[Definition of 'police official' substituted by s. 1 (b) of Act 5 of 1991.
[Definition of 'province' deleted by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
[Definition of 'provincial administration' deleted by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
'regional court' means a court established for a regional division under the provisions of the Magistrates' Courts Act, 1944 (Act 32 of 1944).
[Definition of 'rules of court' substituted by s. 1 (c) of Act 5 of 1991.
'special superior court'.
[Definition of 'special superior court' deleted by s. 7 of Act 62 of 2000.
[Definition of 'State' deleted by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
'this Act' includes the rules of court and any regulations made under this Act.
Any reference in any law to an inferior court shall, unless the context of such law indicates otherwise, be construed as a reference to a lower court as defined in subsection (1).
[S. 2 repealed by s. 44 of Act 32 of 1998.
[S. 3 amended by s. 11 of Act 59 of 1983 and repealed by s. 8 (1) of Act 92 of 1992.
[S. 4 repealed by s. 8 (1) of Act 92 of 1992.
[S. 5 repealed by s. 44 of Act 32 of 1998.
at any time after an accused has pleaded, but before conviction, stop the prosecution in respect of that charge, in which event the court trying the accused shall acquit the accused in respect of that charge: Provided that where a prosecution is conducted by a person other than an attorney-general or a body or person referred to in section 8, the prosecution shall not be stopped unless the attorney-general or any person authorized thereto by the attorney-general, whether in general or in any particular case, has consented thereto.
[NB: A para. (c) and a sub-s. (2) have been added by s. 36 of the Correctional Services and Supervision Matters Amendment Act 122 of 1991, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
the wife or child or, if there is no wife or child, any of the next of kin of any deceased person, if the death of such person is alleged to have been caused by the said offence; or the legal guardian or curator of a minor or lunatic, if the said offence was committed against his ward, may, subject to the provisions of section 9 and section 59 (2) of the Child Justice Act, 2008, either in person or by a legal representative, institute and conduct a prosecution in respect of such offence in any court competent to try that offence.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
No private prosecutor under this section shall obtain the process of any court for summoning any person to answer any charge unless such private prosecutor produces to the officer authorized by law to issue such process a certificate signed by the attorney-general that he has seen the statements or affidavits on which the charge is based and that he declines to prosecute at the instance of the State.
The attorney-general shall, in any case in which he declines to prosecute, at the request of the person intending to prosecute, grant the certificate referred to in paragraph (a).
A certificate issued under this subsection shall lapse unless proceedings in respect of the offence in question are instituted by the issue of the process referred to in paragraph (a) within three months of the date of the certificate.
The provisions of paragraph (c) shall apply also with reference to a certificate granted before the commencement of this Act under the provisions of any law repealed by this Act, and the date of such certificate shall, for the purposes of this paragraph, be deemed to be the date of commencement of this Act.
Any body upon which or person upon whom the right to prosecute in respect of any offence is expressly conferred by law, may institute and conduct a prosecution in respect of such offence in any court competent to try that offence.
A body which or a person who intends exercising a right of prosecution under subsection (1), shall exercise such right only after consultation with the attorneygeneral concerned and after the attorney-general has withdrawn his right of prosecution in respect of any specified offence or any specified class or category of offences with reference to which such body or person may by law exercise such right of prosecution.
An attorney-general may, under subsection (2), withdraw his right of prosecution on such conditions as he may deem fit, including a condition that the appointment by such body or person of a prosecutor to conduct the prosecution in question shall be subject to the approval of the attorney-general, and that the attorney-general may at any time exercise with reference to any such prosecution any power which he might have exercised if he had not withdrawn his right of prosecution.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 39 of Act 129 of 1993.
the amount such court may determine as security for the costs which may be incurred in respect of the accused's defence to the charge.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 39 of Act 129 of 1993.
require the private prosecutor to deposit such additional amount as the court may determine with the magistrate's court in which the said amount was deposited; or direct that the private prosecutor enter into a recognizance, with or without sureties, in such additional amount as the court may determine.
Where a private prosecutor fails to prosecute a charge against an accused to a conclusion without undue delay or where a charge is dismissed under section 11, the amount referred to in subsection (1) (a) shall be forfeited to the State.
A private prosecution shall be instituted and conducted and all process in connection therewith issued in the name of the private prosecutor.
The indictment, charge-sheet or summons, as the case may be, shall describe the private prosecutor with certainty and precision and shall, except in the case of a body referred to in section 8, be signed by such prosecutor or his legal representative.
Two or more persons shall not prosecute in the same charge except where two or more persons have been injured by the same offence.
If the private prosecutor does not appear on the day set down for the appearance of the accused in the magistrate's court or for the trial of the accused, the charge against the accused shall be dismissed unless the court has reason to believe that the private prosecutor was prevented from being present by circumstances beyond his control, in which event the court may adjourn the case to a later date.
Where the charge is so dismissed, the accused shall forthwith be discharged from custody and may not in respect of that charge be prosecuted privately again but the attorney-general or a public prosecutor with the consent of the attorneygeneral may at the instance of the State prosecute the accused in respect of that charge.
A private prosecution shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be proceeded with in the same manner as if it were a prosecution at the instance of the State: Provided that the person in respect of whom the private prosecution is instituted shall be brought before the court only by way of summons in the case of a lower court, or an indictment in the case of a superior court, except where he is under arrest in respect of an offence with regard to which a right of private prosecution is vested in any body or person under section 8.
Where the prosecution is instituted under section 7 (1) and the accused pleads guilty to the charge, the prosecution shall be continued at the instance of the State.
An attorney-general or a local public prosecutor acting on the instructions of the attorney-general, may in respect of any private prosecution apply by motion to the court before which the private prosecution is pending to stop all further proceedings in the case in order that a prosecution for the offence in question may be instituted or, as the case may be, continued at the instance of the State, and the court shall make such an order.
A private prosecutor, other than a prosecutor contemplated in section 8, shall in respect of any process relating to the private prosecution, pay to the clerk or, as the case may be, the registrar of the court in question, the fees prescribed under the rules of court for the service or execution of such process.
The costs and expenses of a private prosecutor shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (2), be paid by the private prosecutor.
The court may order a person convicted upon a private prosecution to pay the costs and expenses of the prosecution, including the costs of any appeal against such conviction or any sentence: Provided that the provisions of this subsection shall not apply with reference to any prosecution instituted and conducted under section 8: Provided further that where a private prosecution is instituted after the grant of a certificate by an attorney-general that he declines to prosecute and the accused is convicted, the court may order the costs and expenses of the private prosecution, including the costs of an appeal arising from such prosecution, to be paid by the State.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 1 of Act 26 of 1987.
Where in a private prosecution, other than a prosecution contemplated in section 8, the charge against the accused is dismissed or the accused is acquitted or a decision in favour of the accused is given on appeal, the court dismissing the charge or acquitting the accused or deciding in favour of the accused on appeal, may order the private prosecutor to pay to such accused the whole or any part of the costs and expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution or, as the case may be, the appeal.
Where the court is of the opinion that a private prosecution was unfounded and vexatious, it shall award to the accused at his request such costs and expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution, as it may deem fit.
[S. 16 substituted by s. 40 of Act 129 of 1993.
The provisions of section 300 (3) shall apply with reference to any order or award made under section 15 or 16 in connection with costs and expenses.
Costs awarded under section 15 or 16 shall be taxed according to the scale, in civil cases, of the court which makes the award or, if the award is made by a regional court, according to the scale, in civil cases, of a magistrate's court, or, where there is more than one such scale, according to the scale determined by the court making the award.
the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, as contemplated in section 4 of the Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act, 2002; or trafficking in persons for sexual purposes by a person as contemplated in section 71 (1) or (2) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007; or using a child or person who is mentally disabled for pornographic purposes as contemplated in sections 20 (1) and 26 (1) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, shall, unless some other period is expressly provided for by law, lapse after the expiration of a period of 20 years from the time when the offence was committed.
[S. 18 substituted by s. 27 (1) of Act 105 of 1997, amended by s. 39 of Act 27 of 2002 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
The provisions of this Chapter shall not derogate from any power conferred by any other law to enter any premises or to search any person, container or premises or to seize any matter, to declare any matter forfeited or to dispose of any matter.
which may afford evidence of the commission or suspected commission of an offence, whether within the Republic or elsewhere; or which is intended to be used or is on reasonable grounds believed to be intended to be used in the commission of an offence.
by a magistrate or justice, if it appears to such magistrate or justice from information on oath that there are reasonable grounds for believing that any such article is in the possession or under the control of or upon any person or upon or at any premises within his area of jurisdiction; or by a judge or judicial officer presiding at criminal proceedings, if it appears to such judge or judicial officer that any such article in the possession or under the control of any person or upon or at any premises is required in evidence at such proceedings.
A search warrant issued under subsection (1) shall require a police official to seize the article in question and shall to that end authorize such police official to search any person identified in the warrant, or to enter and search any premises identified in the warrant and to search any person found on or at such premises.
A search warrant shall be executed by day, unless the person issuing the warrant in writing authorizes the execution thereof by night.
A search warrant may be issued on any day and shall be of force until it is executed or is cancelled by the person who issued it or, if such person is not available, by a person with like authority.
A police official executing a warrant under this section or section 25 shall, after such execution, upon demand of any person whose rights in respect of any search or article seized under the warrant have been affected, hand to him a copy of the warrant.
if the person concerned consents to the search for and the seizure of the article in question, or if the person who may consent to the search of the container or premises consents to such search and the seizure of the article in question; or if he on reasonable grounds believes that a search warrant will be issued to him under paragraph (a) of section 21 (1) if he applies for such warrant; and that the delay in obtaining such warrant would defeat the object of the search.
if he is a peace officer, search the person arrested and seize any article referred to in section 20 which is found in the possession of or in the custody or under the control of the person arrested, and where such peace officer is not a police official, he shall forthwith deliver any such article to a police official; or if he is not a peace officer, seize any article referred to in section 20 which is in the possession of or in the custody or under the control of the person arrested and shall forthwith deliver any such article to a police official.
On the arrest of any person, the person making the arrest may place in safe custody any object found on the person arrested and which may be used to cause bodily harm to himself or others.
[Sub-s. (2) added by s. 1 of Act 33 of 1986.
Any person who is lawfully in charge or occupation of any premises and who reasonably suspects that stolen stock or produce, as defined in any law relating to the theft of stock or produce, is on or in the premises concerned, or that any article has been placed thereon or therein or is in the custody or possession of any person upon or in such premises in contravention of any law relating to intoxicating liquor, dependence-producing drugs, arms and ammunition or explosives, may at any time, if a police official is not readily available, enter such premises for the purpose of searching such premises and any person thereon or therein, and if any such stock, produce or article is found, he shall take possession thereof and forthwith deliver it to a police official.
[S. 24 substituted by s. 12 of Act 59 of 1983.
of seizing any such article.
A warrant under subsection (1) may be issued on any day and shall be of force until it is executed or is cancelled by the person who issued it or, if such person is not available, by a person with like authority.
A police official may without warrant act under subparagraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of subsection (1) if he on reasonable grounds believes that a warrant will be issued to him under paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1) if he applies for such warrant; and that the delay in obtaining such warrant would defeat the object thereof.
Where a police official in the investigation of an offence or alleged offence reasonably suspects that a person who may furnish information with reference to any such offence is on any premises, such police official may without warrant enter such premises for the purpose of interrogating such person and obtaining a statement from him: Provided that such police official shall not enter any private dwelling without the consent of the occupier thereof.
A police official who may lawfully search any person or any premises or who may enter any premises under section 26, may use such force as may be reasonably necessary to overcome any resistance against such search or against entry of the premises, including the breaking of any door or window of such premises: Provided that such police official shall first audibly demand admission to the premises and notify the purpose for which he seeks to enter such premises.
The proviso to subsection (1) shall not apply where the police official concerned is on reasonable grounds of the opinion that any article which is the subject of the search may be destroyed or disposed of if the provisions of the said proviso are first complied with.
searches any person or container or premises or seizes or detains any article; or performs any act contemplated in subparagraph (i), (ii) or (iii) of section 25 (1), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding R600 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months, and shall in addition be subject to an award under subsection (2).
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1986.
Where any person falsely gives information on oath under section 21 (1) or 25 and a search warrant or, as the case may be, a warrant is issued and executed on such information, and such person is in consequence of such false information convicted of perjury, the court convicting such person may, upon the application of any person who has suffered damage in consequence of the unlawful entry, search or seizure, as the case may be, or upon the application of the prosecutor acting on the instructions of that person, award compensation in respect of such damage, whereupon the provisions of section 300 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to such award.
A search of any person or premises shall be conducted with strict regard to decency and order, and a woman shall be searched by a woman only, and if no female police official is available, the search shall be made by any woman designated for the purpose by a police official.
A police official who seizes any article referred to in section 20 or to whom any such article is under the provisions of this Chapter delivered may, if the article is perishable, with due regard to the interests of the persons concerned, dispose of the article in such manner as the circumstances may require; or may, if the article is stolen property or property suspected to be stolen, with the consent of the person from whom it was seized, deliver the article to the person from whom, in the opinion of such police official, such article was stolen, and shall warn such person to hold such article available for production at any resultant criminal proceedings, if required to do so; or shall, if the article is not disposed of or delivered under the provisions of paragraph (a) or (b), give it a distinctive identification mark and retain it in police custody or make such other arrangements with regard to the custody thereof as the circumstances may require.
If no criminal proceedings are instituted in connection with any article referred to in section 30 (c) or if it appears that such article is not required at the trial for purposes of evidence or for purposes of an order of court, the article shall be returned to the person from whom it was seized, if such person may lawfully possess such article, or, if such person may not lawfully possess such article, to the person who may lawfully possess it.
If no person may lawfully possess such article or if the police official charged with the investigation reasonably does not know of any person who may lawfully possess such article, the article shall be forfeited to the State.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 2 of Act 5 of 1991.
The person who may lawfully possess the article in question shall be notified by registered post at his last-known address that he may take possession of the article and if such person fails to take delivery of the article within thirty days from the date of such notification, the article shall be forfeited to the State.
If criminal proceedings are instituted in connection with any article referred to in section 30 (c) and the accused admits his guilt in accordance with the provisions of section 57, the article shall be returned to the person from whom it was seized, if such person may lawfully possess such article, or, if such person may not lawfully possess such article, to the person who may lawfully possess such article, or, if such person may not lawfully possess such article, to the person who may lawfully possess it, whereupon the provisions of section 31 (2) shall apply with reference to any such person.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 3 of Act 5 of 1991.
If criminal proceedings are instituted in connection with any article referred to in section 30 (c) and such article is required at the trial for the purposes of evidence or for the purposes of an order of court, the police official charged with the investigation shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (2) of this section, deliver such article to the clerk of the court where such criminal proceedings are instituted.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 4 of Act 5 of 1991.
If it is by reason of the nature, bulk or value of the article in question impracticable or undesirable that the article should be delivered to the clerk of the court in terms of subsection (1), the clerk of the court may require the police official in charge of the investigation to retain the article in police custody or in such other custody as may be determined in terms of section 30 (c).
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 4 of Act 5 of 1991.
The clerk of the court shall place any article received under subsection (1) in safe custody, which may include the deposit of money in an official banking account if such money is not required at the trial for the purposes of evidence.
of this subsection, advise the clerk or registrar of such other court of the fact of such custody or such deposit, as the case may be.
be returned to the person from whom it was seized, if such person may lawfully possess such article; or if such person is not entitled to the article or cannot lawfully possess the article, be returned to any other person entitled thereto, if such person may lawfully possess the article; or if no person is entitled to the article or if no person may lawfully possess the article or, if the person who is entitled thereto cannot be traced or is unknown, be forfeited to the State.
The court may, for the purpose of any order under subsection (1), hear such additional evidence, whether by affidavit or orally, as it may deem fit.
If the judge or judicial officer concerned does not, at the conclusion of the relevant proceedings, make an order under subsection (1), such judge or judicial officer or, if he is not available, any other judge or judicial officer of the court in question, may at any time after the conclusion of the proceedings make any such order, and for that purpose hear such additional evidence, whether by affidavit or orally, as he may deem fit.
Any order made under subsection (1) or (3) may be suspended pending any appeal or review.
Where the court makes an order under paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1), the provisions of section 31 (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to the person in favour of whom such order is made.
If the circumstances so require or if the criminal proceedings in question cannot for any reason be disposed of, the judge or judicial officer concerned may make any order referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c) of subsection (1) at any stage of the proceedings.
any weapon, instrument or other article by means whereof the offence in question was committed or which was used in the commission of such offence; or if the conviction is in respect of an offence referred to in Part 1 of Schedule 2, any vehicle, container or other article which was used for the purpose of or in connection with the commission of the offence in question or for the conveyance or removal of the stolen property, and which was seized under the provisions of this Act, forfeited to the State: Provided that such forfeiture shall not affect any right referred to in subparagraph (i) or (ii) of subsection (4) (a) if it is proved that the person who claims such right did not know that such weapon, instrument, vehicle, container or other article was being used or would be used for the purpose of or in connection with the commission of the offence in question or, as the case may be, for the conveyance or removal of the stolen property in question, or that he could not prevent such use, and that he may lawfully possess such weapon, instrument, vehicle, container or other article, as the case may be.
A court which convicts an accused or which finds an accused not guilty of any offence, shall declare forfeited to the State any article seized under the provisions of this Act which is forged or counterfeit or which cannot lawfully be possessed by any person.
Any weapon, instrument, vehicle, container or other article declared forfeited under the provisions of subsection (1), shall be kept for a period of thirty days with effect from the date of declaration of forfeiture or, if an application is within that period received from any person for the determination of any right referred to in subparagraph (i) or (ii) of subsection (4) (a), until a final decision in respect of any such application has been given.
if the State has disposed of the weapon, instrument, vehicle, container or other article in question, the court shall direct that the said seller be likewise compensated.
If a determination by the court under paragraph (a) is adverse to the applicant, he may appeal therefrom as if it were a conviction by the court making the determination, and such appeal may be heard either separately or jointly with an appeal against the conviction as a result whereof the declaration of forfeiture was made, or against a sentence imposed as a result of such conviction.
When determining any rights under this subsection, the record of the criminal proceedings in which the declaration of forfeiture was made, shall form part of the relevant proceedings, and the court making the determination may hear such additional evidence, whether by affidavit or orally, as it may deem fit.
there are reasonable grounds for believing that it will afford evidence as to the commission in a country outside the Republic of any offence or that it was used for the purpose of or in connection with such commission of any offence, the magistrate within whose area of jurisdiction the article was seized may, on application and if satisfied that such offence is punishable in such country by death or by imprisonment for a period of twelve months or more or by a fine of five hundred rand or more, order such article to be delivered to a member of a police force established in such country who may thereupon remove it from the Republic.
Whenever the article so removed from the Republic is returned to the magistrate, or whenever the magistrate refuses to order that the article be delivered as aforesaid, the article shall be returned to the person from whose possession it was taken, unless the magistrate is authorized or required by law to dispose of it otherwise.
[NB: The heading has been substituted and ss. 36A to 36C inclusive have been inserted by ss. 1 and 2, respectively, of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 6 of 2010, provisions which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
take such steps as he may deem necessary in order to ascertain whether the body of any person referred to in paragraph (a) (i) or (ii) has any mark, characteristic or distinguishing feature or shows any condition or appearance; Provided that no police official shall take any blood sample of the person concerned nor shall a police official make any examination of the body of the person concerned where that person is a female and the police official concerned is not a female.
take a photograph or may cause a photograph to be taken of a person referred to in paragraph (a) (i) or (ii).
[Para. (d) added by s. 1 (a) of Act 64 of 1982.
Any medical officer of any prison or any district surgeon or, if requested thereto by any police official, any registered medical practitioner or registered nurse may take such steps, including the taking of a blood sample, as may be deemed necessary in order to ascertain whether the body of any person referred to in paragraph (a) (i) or (ii) of subsection (1) has any mark, characteristic or distinguishing feature or shows any condition or appearance.
If any registered medical practitioner attached to any hospital is on reasonable grounds of the opinion that the contents of the blood of any person admitted to such hospital for medical attention or treatment may be relevant at any later criminal proceedings, such medical practitioner may take a blood sample of such person or cause such sample to be taken.
order that the steps, including the taking of a blood sample, be taken which such court may deem necessary in order to ascertain the state of health of any accused at such proceedings.
Any court which has convicted any person of any offence or which has concluded a preparatory examination against any person on any charge, or any magistrate, may order that the finger-prints, palm-prints or foot-prints, or a photograph, of the person concerned be taken.
[Sub-s. (4) substituted by s. 1 (b) of Act 64 of 1982.
Finger-prints, palm-prints or foot-prints, photographs and the record of steps taken under this section shall be destroyed if the person concerned is found not guilty at his trial or if his conviction is set aside by a superior court or if he is discharged at a preparatory examination or if no criminal proceedings with reference to which such prints or photographs were taken or such record was made are instituted against the person concerned in any court or if the prosecution declines to prosecute such person.
[Sub-s. (5) substituted by s. 1 (c) of Act 64 of 1982.
[NB: S. 37 has been substituted by s. 3 of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 6 of 2010, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
Subject to section 4 (2) of the Child Justice Act, the methods of securing the attendance of an accused who is eighteen years or older in court for the purposes of his or her trial shall be arrest, summons, written notice and indictment in accordance with the relevant provisions of this Act.
The methods of securing the attendance of an accused who is under the age of eighteen years at a preliminary inquiry or child justice court are those contemplated in section 17 of the Child Justice Act, 2008.
[S. 38 substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
An arrest shall be effected with or without a warrant and, unless the person to be arrested submits to custody, by actually touching his body or, if the circumstances so require, by forcibly confining his body.
The person effecting an arrest shall, at the time of effecting the arrest or immediately after effecting the arrest, inform the arrested person of the cause of the arrest or, in the case of an arrest effected by virtue of a warrant, upon demand of the person arrested hand him a copy of the warrant.
The effect of an arrest shall be that the person arrested shall be in lawful custody and that he shall be detained in custody until he is lawfully discharged or released from custody.
[Para. (d) substituted by s. 41 of Act 129 of 1993.
[Para. (m) amended by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996.
who is reasonably suspected of having committed an act of domestic violence as contemplated in section 12* of the Domestic Violence Act, 1998, which constitutes an offence in respect of which violence is an element.
[Para. (q) added by s. 20 of Act 116 of 1998.
If a person may be arrested under any law without warrant and subject to conditions or the existence of circumstances set out in that law, any peace officer may without warrant arrest such person subject to such conditions or circumstances.
who, in the opinion of the peace officer, may be able to give evidence in regard to the commission or suspected commission of any offence, to furnish such peace officer with his full name and address, and if such person fails to furnish his full name and address, the peace officer may forthwith and without warrant arrest him, or, if such person furnishes to the peace officer a name or address which the peace officer reasonably suspects to be false, the peace officer may arrest him without warrant and detain him for a period not exceeding twelve hours until such name or address has been verified.
Any person who, when called upon under the provisions of subsection (1) to furnish his name and address, fails to do so or furnishes a false or incorrect name and address, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 3 of Act 33 of 1986.
whom he sees engaged in an affray.
Any private person who may without warrant arrest any person under subsection (1) (a) may forthwith pursue that person, and any other private person to whom the purpose of the pursuit has been made known, may join and assist therein.
The owner, lawful occupier or person in charge of property on or in respect of which any person is found committing any offence, and any person authorized thereto by such owner, occupier or person in charge, may without warrant arrest the person so found.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 13 of Act 59 of 1983.
which alleges that such offence was committed within the area of jurisdiction of such magistrate or, in the case of a justice, within the area of jurisdiction of the magistrate within whose district or area application is made to the justice for such warrant, or where such offence was not committed within such area of jurisdiction, which alleges that the person in respect of whom the application is made, is known or is on reasonable grounds suspected to be within such area of jurisdiction; and which states that from information taken upon oath there is a reasonable suspicion that the person in respect of whom the warrant is applied for has committed the alleged offence.
A warrant of arrest issued under this section shall direct that the person described in the warrant shall be arrested by a peace officer in respect of the offence set out in the warrant and that he be brought before a lower court in accordance with the provisions of section 50.
A warrant of arrest may be issued on any day and shall remain in force until it is cancelled by the person who issued it or, if such person is not available, by any person with like authority, or until it is executed.
A warrant of arrest issued under any provision of this Act may be executed by a peace officer, and the peace officer executing such warrant shall do so in accordance with the terms thereof.
A telegraphic or similar written or printed communication from any magistrate, justice or peace officer stating that a warrant has been issued for the arrest of any person, shall be sufficient authority to any peace officer for the arrest and detention of that person.
The provisions of section 50 shall apply with reference to an arrest effected in accordance with subsection (1).
Any person who is authorized to arrest another under a warrant of arrest or a communication under section 45 and who in the reasonable belief that he is arresting such person arrests another, shall be exempt from liability in respect of such wrongful arrest.
Any person who is called upon to assist in making an arrest as contemplated in subsection (1) or who is required to detain a person so arrested, and who reasonable believes that the said person is the person whose arrest has been authorized by the warrant of arrest or the communication, shall likewise be exempt from liability in respect of such assistance or detention.
in detaining any person so arrested.
Any person who, without sufficient cause, fails to assist a police official as provided in subsection (1), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 4 of Act 33 of 1986.
Any person who may lawfully arrest another in respect of any offence and who knows or reasonably suspects such other person to be on any premises, may, if he first audibly demands entry into such premises and notifies the purpose for which he seeks entry and fails to gain entry, break open, enter and search such premises for the purpose of effecting the arrest.
'suspect' means any person in respect of whom an arrestor has or had a reasonable suspicion that such person is committing or has committed an offence.
that there is a substantial risk that the suspect will cause imminent or future death or grievous bodily harm if the arrest is delayed; or that the offence for which the arrest is sought is in progress and is of a forcible and serious nature and involves the use of life threatening violence or a strong likelihood that it will cause grievous bodily harm.
[S. 49 substituted by s. 7 of Act 122 of 1998.
Any person who is arrested with or without warrant for allegedly committing an offence, or for any other reason, shall as soon as possible be brought to a police station or, in the case of an arrest by warrant, to any other place which is expressly mentioned in the warrant.
A person who is in detention as contemplated in paragraph (a) shall, as soon as reasonably possible, be informed of his or her right to institute bail proceedings.
no charge is to be brought against him or her; or bail is not granted to him or her in terms of section 59 or 59A, he or she shall be brought before a lower court as soon as reasonably possible, but not later than 48 hours after the arrest.
[Sub-para. (ii) substituted by s. 3 (a) of Act 34 of 1998.
at a time when the arrested person is outside the area of jurisdiction of the lower court to which he or she is being brought for the purposes of further detention and he or she is at such time in transit from a police station or other place of detention to such court, the said period shall be deemed to expire at the end of the court day next succeeding the day on which such arrested person is brought within the area of jurisdiction of such court.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 1 of Act 56 of 1979 and substituted by s. 1 (a) of Act 85 of 1997.
'ordinary court hours' means the hours from 9:00 until 16:00 on a court day.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 1 (a) of Act 85 of 1997.
Subject to the provisions of subsection (6), nothing in this section shall be construed as modifying the provisions of this Act or any other law whereby a person under detention may be released on bail or on warning or on a written notice to appear in court.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 1 (a) of Act 75 of 1995 and by s. 8 (1) (a) of Act 62 of 2000.
[Sub-ss. (4) and (5) added by s. 37 of Act 122 of 1991 and deleted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
[Item (aa) substituted by s. 3 (b) of Act 34 of 1998.] (bb) be charged and be entitled to apply to be released on bail, and if the accused is not so charged or informed of the reason for his or her further detention, he or she shall be released; or was not arrested in respect of an offence, shall be entitled to adjudication upon the cause for his or her arrest.
An arrested person contemplated in paragraph (a) (i) is not entitled to be brought to court outside ordinary court hours.
The bail application of a person who is charged with an offence referred to in Schedule 6 must be considered by a magistrate's court: Provided that the Director of Public Prosecutions concerned, or a prosecutor authorised thereto in writing by him or her may, if he or she deems it expedient or necessary for the administration of justice in a particular case, direct in writing that the application must be considered by a regional court.
[Para. (c) substituted by s. 8 (1) (b) of Act 62 of 2000.
[Sub-para. (iii) deleted by s. 8 (1) (c) of Act 62 of 2000.
it appears to the court that it is necessary to provide the State with a reasonable opportunity to-(aa) procure material evidence that may be lost if bail is granted; or (bb) perform the functions referred to in section 37; or it appears to the court that it is necessary in the interests of justice to do so.
[Sub-s. (6) added by s. 1 (b) of Act 75 of 1995 and substituted by s. 1 (b) of Act 85 of 1997.
[Sub-s. (7) added by s. 1 (b) of Act 75 of 1995 and deleted by s. 1 (c) of Act 85 of 1997.
Any person who escapes or attempts to escape from custody after he or she has been lawfully arrested and before he or she has been lodged in any correctional facility, police-cell or lock-up, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties prescribed in section 117 of the Correctional Services Act, 1998 (Act 111 of 1998).
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 4 of Act 66 of 2008.
Any person who rescues or attempts to rescue from custody any person after he or she has been lawfully arrested and before he or she has been lodged in any correctional facility, police-cell or lock-up, or who aids the person to escape or to attempt to escape from custody, or who harbours or conceals or assists in harbouring or concealing any person who escapes from custody after he or she has been lawfully arrested and before he or she has been lodged in any correctional facility, police-cell or lock-up, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the penalties prescribed in section 117 of the said Correctional Services Act, 1998.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 4 of Act 66 of 2008.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law contained, a lower court shall have jurisdiction to try any offence under this section and to impose any penalty prescribed in respect thereof.
No provision of this Chapter relating to arrest shall be construed as removing or diminishing any authority expressly conferred by any other law to arrest, detain or put any restraint upon any person.
Subject to the provisions of sections 46 and 331, no provision of this Chapter relating to arrest shall be construed as removing or diminishing any civil right or liability of any person in respect of a wrongful or malicious arrest.
issue a summons containing the charge and the information handed to him by the prosecutor, and specifying the place, date and time for the appearance of the accused in court on such charge; and deliver such summons, together with so many copies thereof as there are accused to be summoned, to a person empowered to serve a summons in criminal proceedings.
Except where otherwise expressly provided by any law, the summons shall be served by a person referred to in subsection (1) (b) by delivering it to the person named therein or, if he cannot be found, by delivering it at his residence or place of employment or business to a person apparently over the age of sixteen years and apparently residing or employed there.
A return by the person who served the summons that the service thereof has been effected in terms of paragraph (a), may, upon the failure of the person concerned to attend the relevant proceedings, be handed in at such proceedings and shall be prima facie proof of such service.
A summons under this section shall be served on an accused so that he is in possession thereof at least fourteen days (Sundays and public holidays excluded) before the date appointed for the trial.
Subject to section 4 (2) of the Child Justice Act, 2008, an accused who is eighteen years or older and who is summoned under section 54 to appear at criminal proceedings and who fails to appear at the place and on the date and at the time specified in the summons or who fails to remain in attendance at such proceedings, shall be guilty of an offence and liable to the punishment prescribed under subsection (2).
The provisions of section 46 of the Child Justice Act, 2008, apply to an accused who is under the age of eighteen years and who fails to appear at a preliminary inquiry in terms of a summons issued under that Act.
[Sub-s. (1A) inserted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
may, where it appears to him that the accused received the summons in question and that the accused will appear in court in accordance with a warning under section 72; or shall, where it appears to him that the accused did not receive the summons in question or that the accused has paid an admission of guilt fine in terms of section 57 or that there are other grounds on which it appears that the failure of the accused to appear on the summons was not due to any fault on the part of the accused, for which purpose he may require the accused to furnish an affidavit or affirmation, release the accused on warning under section 72 in respect of the offence of failing to appear in answer to the summons, whereupon the provisions of that section shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to the said offence.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 5 (a) of Act 33 of 1986.
the court may make a further endorsement on the warrant to the effect that the accused may admit his guilt in respect of the failure to appear in answer to the summons or to remain in attendance at the criminal proceedings, and that he may upon arrest pay to a clerk of the court or at a police station a fine stipulated on the warrant in respect of such failure, which fine shall not exceed the amount to be imposed in terms of subsection (2), without appearing in court.
[NB: Para. (a) has been substituted by s. 5 of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 66 of 2008, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
The fine paid in terms of paragraph (a) at a police station or to a clerk of a magistrate's court other than the magistrate's court which issued the warrant of arrest, shall, as soon as is expedient, together with the warrant of arrest in question, be forwarded to the clerk of the court which issued that warrant, and such clerk of the court shall thereafter, as soon as is expedient, enter the essential particulars of such admission of guilt in the criminal record book for admission of guilt, whereupon the accused concerned shall be deemed to have been convicted by the court in respect of the offence in question.
[Sub-s. (2A) inserted by s. 5 (b) of Act 33 of 1986 and substituted by s. 3 of Act 4 of 1992.
(a) If, in any case in which a warrant of arrest is issued, it was permissible for the accused in terms of section 57 to admit his guilt in respect of the summons on which he failed to appear and to pay a fine in respect thereof without appearing in court, and the accused is arrested under such warrant in the area of jurisdiction of a magistrate's court other than the magistrate's court which issued the warrant of arrest, such other magistrate's court may, notwithstanding any provision of this Act or any other law to the contrary, and if satisfied that the accused has, since the date on which he failed to appear on the summons in question, admitted his guilt in respect of that summons and has paid a fine in respect thereof without appearing in court, in a summary manner enquire into his failure to appear on such summons and, unless the accused satisfies the court that his failure was not due to any fault on his part, convict him of the offence referred to in subsection (1) and sentence him to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 14 of Act 59 of 1983 and by s. 5 (c) of Act 33 of 1986.
In proceedings under paragraph (a) before such other magistrate's court, it shall be presumed, upon production in such court of the relevant warrant of arrest, that the accused failed to appear on the summons in question, unless the contrary is proved.
contain an endorsement in terms of section 57 that the accused may admit his guilt in respect of the offence in question and that he may pay a stipulated fine in respect thereof without appearing in court; and contain a certificate under the hand of the peace officer that he has handed the original of such written notice to the accused and that he has explained to the accused the import thereof.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 2 of Act 109 of 1984 and by s. 5 of Act 5 of 1991.
[NB: Sub-s. (1) has been substituted by s. 6 of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 66 of 2008, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
If the accused is in custody, the effect of a written notice handed to him under subsection (1) shall be that he be released forthwith from custody. [NB: Sub-s. (2) has been substituted by s. 6 of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 66 of 2008, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
The peace officer shall forthwith forward a duplicate original of the written notice to the clerk of the court which has jurisdiction.
The mere production to the court of the duplicate original referred to in subsection (3) shall be prima facie proof of the issue of the original thereof to the accused and that such original was handed to the accused.
The provisions of section 55 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to a written notice handed to an accused under subsection (1).
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 3 (a) of Act 109 of 1984 and by s. 6 (a) of Act 5 of 1991.
a written notice under section 56 (in this section referred to as the written notice) is handed to the accused and the endorsement in terms of paragraph (c) of subsection (1) of that section purports to have been made by a peace officer, the accused may, without appearing in court, admit his guilt in respect of the offence in question by paying the fine stipulated (in this section referred to as the admission of guilt fine) either to the clerk of the magistrate's court which has jurisdiction or at any police station within the area of jurisdiction of that court or, if the summons or written notice in question is endorsed to the effect that the fine may be paid at a specified local authority, at such local authority.
The summons or the written notice may stipulate that the admission of guilt fine shall be paid before a date specified in the summons or written notice, as the case may be.
An admission of guilt fine may be accepted by the clerk of the court concerned notwithstanding that the date referred to in paragraph (a) or the date on which the accused should have appeared in court has expired.
(i) Subject to the provisions of subparagraphs (ii) and (iii), an accused who intends to pay an admission of guilt fine in terms of subsection (1), shall surrender the summons or the written notice, as the case may be, at the time of the payment of the fine.
is available at the place of payment referred to in subsection (1), the admission of guilt fine may be accepted without the surrender of a copy of the summons or written notice, as the case may be.
If an accused in respect of whom a warrant has been endorsed in terms of section 55 (2A) intends to pay the relevant admission of guilt fine, the clerk of the court may, after he has satisfied himself that the warrant is so endorsed, accept the admission of guilt fine without the surrender of the summons, written notice or copy thereof, as the case may be.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 2 (a) of Act 26 of 1987.
A copy referred to in paragraph (a) (ii) may be obtained by the accused at the magistrate's court, police station or local authority where the copy of the summons or written notice in question known as the control document is filed.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1), an accused referred to in paragraph (a) (iii) may pay the admission of guilt fine in question to the clerk of the court where he appears in consequence of such warrant, and if the said clerk of the court is not the clerk of the magistrate's court referred to in subsection (1), he shall transfer such admission of guilt fine to the latter clerk of the magistrate's court.
[Para. (c) substituted by s. 2 (b) of Act 26 of 1987.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 6 of Act 33 of 1986.
No provision of this section shall be construed as preventing a public prosecutor attached to the court concerned from reducing an admission of guilt fine on good cause shown.
An admission of guilt fine stipulated in respect of a summons or a written notice shall be in accordance with a determination which the magistrate of the district or area in question may from time to time make in respect of any offence or, if the magistrate has not made such a determination, in accordance with an amount determined in respect of any particular summons or any particular written notice by either a public prosecutor attached to the court of such magistrate or a police official of or above the rank of non-commissioned officer attached to a police station within the magisterial district or area in question or, in the absence of such a police official at any such police station, by the senior police official then in charge at such police station.
An admission of guilt fine determined under paragraph (a) shall not exceed the maximum of the fine prescribed in respect of the offence in question or the amount6* determined by the Minister from time to time by notice in the Gazette, whichever is the lesser.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 3 (b) of Act 109 of 1984 and by s. 6 (b) of Act 5 of 1991.
An admission of guilt fine paid at a police station or a local authority in terms of subsection (1) and the summons or, as the case may be, the written notice surrendered under subsection (3), shall, as soon as is expedient, be forwarded to the clerk of the magistrate's court which has jurisdiction, and such clerk of the court shall thereafter, as soon as is expedient, enter the essential particulars of such summons or, as the case may be, such written notice and of any summons or written notice surrendered to the clerk of the court under subsection (3), in the criminal record book for admissions of guilt, whereupon the accused concerned shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (7), be deemed to have been convicted and sentenced by the court in respect of the offence in question.
The judicial officer presiding at the court in question shall examine the documents and if it appears to him that a conviction or sentence under subsection is not in accordance with justice or that any such sentence, except as provided in subsection (4), is not in accordance with a determination made by the magistrate under subsection (5) or, where the determination under that subsection has not been made by the magistrate, that the sentence is not adequate, such judicial officer may set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that the accused be prosecuted in the ordinary course, whereupon the accused may be summoned to answer such charge as the public prosecutor may deem fit to prefer: Provided that where the admission of guilt fine which has been paid exceeds the amount determined by the magistrate under subsection (5), the said judicial officer may, in lieu of setting aside the conviction and sentence in question, direct that the amount by which the said admission of guilt fine exceeds the said determination be refunded to the accused concerned. [NB: S. 57 has been substituted by s. 7 of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 66 of 2008, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
released on bail under section 59 or 60; or released on warning under section 72, the public prosecutor may, before the accused has entered a plea and if he or she on reasonable grounds believes that a magistrate's court, on convicting such accused of that offence, will not impose a fine exceeding the amount7* determined by the Minister from time to time by notice in the Gazette, hand to the accused a written notice, or cause such notice to be delivered to the accused by a peace officer, containing an endorsement in terms of section 57 that the accused may admit his or her guilt in respect of the offence in question and that he or she may pay a stipulated fine in respect thereof without appearing in court again. [NB: Sub-s. (1) has been substituted by s. 8 (a) of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 66 of 2008, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
of section 56 (1).
The public prosecutor shall endorse the charge-sheet to the effect that a notice contemplated in this section has been issued and he or she or the peace officer, as the case may be, shall forthwith forward a duplicate original of the notice to the clerk of the court which has jurisdiction.
The provisions of sections 55, 56 (2) and (4) and 57 (2) to (7), inclusive, shall apply mutatis mutandis to the relevant written notice handed or delivered to an accused under subsection (1) as if, in respect of section 57, such notice were the written notice contemplated in that section and as if the fine stipulated in such written notice were also the admission of guilt fine contemplated in that section. NB: Sub-s. (4) has been substituted by s. 8 (b) of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 66 of 2008, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation.
[S. 57A inserted by s. 1 of Act 86 of 1996.
the fact that the accused has been convicted of that offence; and the likely sentence which the court might impose.
[S. 58 amended by s. 2 of Act 85 of 1997.
An accused who is in custody in respect of any offence, other than an offence referred to in Part II or Part III of Schedule 2 may, before his or her first appearance in a lower court, be released on bail in respect of such offence by any police official of or above the rank of non-commissioned officer, in consultation with the police official charged with the investigation, if the accused deposits at the police station the sum of money determined by such police official.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 3 of Act 26 of 1987, by s. 1 of Act 126 of 1992 and by s. 2 of Act 75 of 1995.
The police official referred to in paragraph (a) shall, at the time of releasing the accused on bail, complete and hand to the accused a recognizance on which a receipt shall be given for the sum of money deposited as bail and on which the offence in respect of which the bail is granted and the place, date and time of the trial of the accused are entered.
The said police official shall forthwith forward a duplicate original of such recognizance to the clerk of the court which has jurisdiction.
Bail granted under this section shall, if it is of force at the time of the first appearance of the accused in a lower court, but subject to the provisions of section 62, remain in force after such appearance in the same manner as bail granted by the court under section 60 at the time of such first appearance.
An attorney-general, or a prosecutor authorised thereto in writing by the attorney-general concerned, may, in respect of the offences referred to in Schedule 7 and in consultation with the police official charged with the investigation, authorise the release of an accused on bail.
For the purposes of exercising the functions contemplated in subsections (1) and (3) an attorney-general may, after consultation with the Minister, issue directives.
subject to reasonable conditions imposed by the attorney-general or prosecutor concerned; or the payment of such sum of money or the furnishing of such guarantee to pay and the imposition of such conditions.
An accused released in terms of subsection (3) shall appear on the first court day at the court and at the time determined by the attorney-general or prosecutor concerned and the release shall endure until he or she so appears before the court on the first court day.
may extend the bail on the same conditions or amend such conditions or add further conditions as contemplated in section 62; or shall, if the court does not deem it appropriate to exercise the powers contemplated in paragraph (a), consider the bail application and, in considering such application, the court has the jurisdiction relating to the powers, functions and duties in respect of bail proceedings in terms of section 60.
The provisions of section 64 with regard to the recording of bail proceedings by a court apply, with the necessary changes, in respect of bail granted in terms of this section.
For all purposes of this Act, but subject to the provisions of this section, bail granted in terms of this section shall be regarded as bail granted by a court in terms of section 60.
[S. 59A inserted by s. 3 of Act 85 of 1997.
An accused who is in custody in respect of an offence shall, subject to the provisions of section 50 (6), be entitled to be released on bail at any stage preceding his or her conviction in respect of such offence, if the court is satisfied that the interests of justice so permit.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 9 (a) of Act 62 of 2000.
Subject to the provisions of section 50 (6) (c), the court referring an accused to any other court for trial or sentencing retains jurisdiction relating to the powers, functions and duties in respect of bail in terms of this Act until the accused appears in such other court for the first time.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 4 (a) of Act 85 of 1997 and by s. 5 (a) of Act 34 of 1998.
If the question of the possible release of the accused on bail is not raised by the accused or the prosecutor, the court shall ascertain from the accused whether he or she wishes that question to be considered by the court.
shall, where the prosecutor does not oppose bail in respect of matters referred to in subsection (11) (a) and (b), require of the prosecutor to place on record the reasons for not opposing the bail application.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 4 (b) of Act 85 of 1997.
The court must, before reaching a decision on the bail application, take into consideration any pre-trial services report regarding the desirability of releasing an accused on bail, if such a report is available.
[Sub-s. (2A) inserted by s. 4 of Act 55 of 2003.
(a) If the court is satisfied that the interests of justice permit the release of an accused on bail as provided for in subsection (1), and if the payment of a sum of money is to be considered as a condition of bail, the court must hold a separate inquiry into the ability of the accused to pay the sum of money being considered or any other appropriate sum.
unable to pay any sum of money, the court must consider setting appropriate conditions that do not include an amount of money for the release of the accused on bail or must consider the release of the accused in terms of a guarantee as provided for in subsection (13) (b); or able to pay a sum of money, the court must consider setting conditions for the release of the accused on bail and a sum of money which is appropriate in the circumstances.
[Sub-s. (2B) inserted by s. 9 (a) of Act 66 of 2008.
If the court is of the opinion that it does not have reliable or sufficient information or evidence at its disposal or that it lacks certain important information to reach a decision on the bail application, the presiding officer shall order that such information or evidence be placed before the court.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 4 (c) of Act 85 of 1997.
[Para. (e) added by s. 4 (d) of Act 85 of 1997.
[Sub-s. (4) amended by s. 9 (b) of 62 of 2000.
any evidence that the accused previously committed an offence referred to in Schedule 1 while released on bail; or any other factor which in the opinion of the court should be taken into account.
the binding effect and enforceability of bail conditions which may be imposed and the ease with which such conditions could be breached; or any other factor which in the opinion of the court should be taken into account.
the ease with which evidentiary material could be concealed or destroyed; or any other factor which in the opinion of the court should be taken into account.
any previous failure on the part of the accused to comply with bail conditions or any indication that he or she will not comply with any bail conditions; or any other factor which in the opinion of the court should be taken into account.
whether the release of the accused will undermine or jeopardize the public confidence in the criminal justice system; or any other factor which in the opinion of the court should be taken into account.
[Sub-s. (8A) inserted by s. 4 (e) of Act 85 of 1997.
the state of health of the accused; or any other factor which in the opinion of the court should be taken into account.
Notwithstanding the fact that the prosecution does not oppose the granting of bail, the court has the duty, contemplated in subsection (9), to weigh up the personal interests of the accused against the interests of justice.
in Schedule 5, but not in Schedule 6, the court shall order that the accused be detained in custody until he or she is dealt with in accordance with the law, unless the accused, having been given a reasonable opportunity to do so, adduces evidence which satisfies the court that the interests of justice permit his or her release.
[Sub-s. (11) substituted by s. 4 (f) of Act 85 of 1997.
(a) If the attorney-general intends charging any person with an offence referred to in Schedule 5 or 6 the attorney-general may, irrespective of what charge is noted on the charge sheet, at any time before such person pleads to the charge, issue a written confirmation to the effect that he or she intends to charge the accused with an offence referred to in Schedule 5 or 6.
The written confirmation shall be handed in at the court in question by the prosecutor as soon as possible after the issuing thereof and forms part of the record of that court.
Whenever the question arises in a bail application or during bail proceedings whether any person is charged or is to be charged with an offence referred to in Schedule 5 or 6, a written confirmation issued by an attorney-general under paragraph (a) shall, upon its mere production at such application or proceedings, be prima facie proof of the charge to be brought against that person.
[Sub-s. (11A) inserted by s. 4 (g) of Act 85 of 1997.
there are any charges pending against him or her and whether he or she has been released on bail in respect of those charges.
Where the legal adviser of an accused on behalf of the accused submits the information contemplated in paragraph (a), whether in writing or orally, the accused shall be required by the court to declare whether he or she confirms such information or not.
The record of the bail proceedings, excluding the information in paragraph (a), shall form part of the record of the trial of the accused following upon such bail proceedings: Provided that if the accused elects to testify during the course of the bail proceedings the court must inform him or her of the fact that anything he or she says, may be used against him or her at his or her trial and such evidence becomes admissible in any subsequent proceedings.
fails or refuses to comply with the provisions of paragraph (a); or furnishes the court with false information required in terms of paragraph (a), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years.
[Sub-s. (11B) inserted by s. 4 (g) of Act 85 of 1997.
The court may make the release of an accused on bail subject to conditions which, in the court's opinion, are in the interests of justice.
deposit with the clerk of any magistrate's court or the registrar of any High Court, as the case may be, or with a correctional official at the correctional facility where the accused is in custody or with a police official at the place where the accused is in custody, the sum of money determined by the court in question; or shall furnish a guarantee, with or without sureties, that he or she will pay and forfeit to the State the amount that has been set as bail, or that has been increased or reduced in terms of section 63 (1), in circumstances in which the amount would, had it been deposited, have been forfeited to the State.
[Sub-s. (13) substituted by s. 9 (b) of Act 66 of 2008.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law, no accused shall, for the purposes of bail proceedings, have access to any information, record or document relating to the offence in question, which is contained in, or forms part of, a police docket, including any information, record or document which is held by any police official charged with the investigation in question, unless the prosecutor otherwise directs: Provided that this subsection shall not be construed as denying an accused access to any information, record or document to which he or she may be entitled for purposes of his or her trial.
[Sub-s. (14) added by s. 4 (h) of Act 85 of 1997 and amended by s. 5 (b) of Act 34 of 1998.
[S. 60 amended by s. 2 of Act 56 of 1979 and by s. 2 of Act 64 of 1982 and substituted by s. 3 of Act 75 of 1995.
[S. 61 repealed by s. 4 of Act 75 of 1995.
which provides that the accused shall be placed under the supervision of a probation officer or a correctional official.
[Para. (f) added by s. 388* of Act 122 of 1991.
Any court before which a charge is pending in respect of which bail has been granted may, upon the application of the prosecutor or the accused, increase or reduce the amount of bail determined under section 59 or 60 or amend or supplement any condition imposed under section 60 or 62, whether imposed by that court or any other court, and may, where the application is made by the prosecutor and the accused is not present when the application is made, issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused and, when the accused is present in court, determine the application.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 5 of Act 75 of 1995.
If the court referred to in subsection (1) is a superior court, an application under that subsection may be made to any judge of that court if the court is not sitting at the time of the application.
amendment of the bail conditions imposed by that court on the accused.
contain an affidavit or affirmation by the Head of Prison to the effect that he or she is satisfied that the prison population of the prison concerned is reaching such proportions that it constitutes a material and imminent threat to the human dignity, physical health or safety of the accused concerned; and contain a written certificate by the Director of Public Prosecutions concerned, or a prosecutor authorised thereto by him or her in writing, to the effect that the prosecuting authority does not oppose the application.
The accused and his or her legal representative, if any, must be notified of an application referred to in subsection (1).
The clerk of the court must, without delay, cause the application to be placed before any magistrate or regional magistrate, as the case may be, who may consider the application in chambers.
The application may be considered in the presence of the accused if the magistrate or regional magistrate deems it necessary.
order the release of the accused from custody and, if the accused is present, warn him or her to appear before a specified court at a specified time on a specified date in connection with such offence or, as the case may be, to remain in attendance at the proceedings relating to the offence in question, and the court may, at the time of such order or at any time thereafter, impose any condition referred to in section 62 in connection with such release; or reduce the amount of bail determined under section 60 and, if deemed appropriate, amend or supplement any condition imposed under section 60 or 62.
hand to the accused a certified copy of the said order or of the bail conditions as amended and explain to the accused the import thereof; and return to the clerk of the court a certificate under the hand of that official and signed by the accused, that he or she has handed the certified copy of such order or conditions to the accused and that he or she has explained to the accused the import thereof, and the mere production to the court of the said certificate shall be prima facie proof that the said certified copy was handed and explained to the accused.
The provisions of section 72 (2) (a) apply, with the necessary changes, in respect of an accused released in terms of paragraph (a) (i).
the establishment of monitoring and consultative mechanisms for bringing an application contemplated in subsection (1); and the procedure to be followed by a Head of Prison and a Director of Public Prosecutions whenever it appears that it is necessary to bring an application contemplated in subsection (1).
Any directives issued in terms of paragraph (a) must be submitted to Parliament before they take effect.
[S. 63A inserted by s. 6 of Act 42 of 2001.
The court dealing with bail proceedings as contemplated in section 50 (6) or which considers bail under section 60 or which imposes any further condition under section 62 or which, under section 63 or 63A, amends the amount of bail or amends or supplements any condition or refuses to do so, shall record the relevant proceedings in full, including the conditions imposed and any amendment or supplementation thereof, or shall cause such proceedings to be recorded in full, and where such court is a magistrate's court or a regional court, any document purporting to be an extract from the record of proceedings of that court and purporting to be certified as correct by the clerk of the court, and which sets out the conditions of bail and any amendment or supplementation thereof, shall, on its mere production in any court in which the relevant charge is pending, be prima facie proof of such conditions or any amendment or supplementation thereof.
[S. 64 substituted by s. 6 of Act 75 of 1995, by s. 5 of Act 85 of 1997 and by s. 7 of Act 42 of 2001.
An accused who considers himself aggrieved by the refusal by a lower court to admit him to bail or by the imposition by such court of a condition of bail, including a condition relating to the amount of bail money and including an amendment or supplementation of a condition of bail, may appeal against such refusal or the imposition of such condition to the superior court having jurisdiction or to any judge of that court if the court is not then sitting.
The appeal may be heard by a single judge.
A local division of the Supreme Court shall have jurisdiction to hear an appeal under paragraph (a) if the area of jurisdiction of the lower court in question or any part thereof falls within the area of jurisdiction of such local division.
An appeal shall not lie in respect of new facts which arise or are discovered after the decision against which the appeal is brought, unless such new facts are first placed before the magistrate or regional magistrate against whose decision the appeal is brought and such magistrate or regional magistrate gives a decision against the accused on such new facts.
The accused shall serve a copy of the notice of appeal on the attorney-general and on the magistrate or, as the case may be, the regional magistrate, and the magistrate or regional magistrate shall forthwith furnish the reasons for his decision to the court or judge, as the case may be.
The court or judge hearing the appeal shall not set aside the decision against which the appeal is brought, unless such court or judge is satisfied that the decision was wrong, in which event the court or judge shall give the decision which in its or his opinion the lower court should have given.
The attorney-general may appeal to the superior court having jurisdiction, against the decision of a lower court to release an accused on bail or against the imposition of a condition of bail as contemplated in section 65 (1) (a).
The provisions of section 310A in respect of an application or appeal referred to in that section by an attorney-general, and the provisions of section 65 (1) (b) and (c) and (2), (3) and (4) in respect of an appeal referred to in that section by an accused, shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to a case in which the attorney-general appeals in terms of paragraph (a) of this subsection.
The attorney-general may appeal to the Appellate Division against a decision of a superior court to release an accused on bail.
The provisions of section 316 in respect of an application or appeal referred to in that section by an accused, shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to a case in which the attorney-general appeals in terms of paragraph (a) of this subsection.
Upon an appeal in terms of paragraph (a) or an application referred to in paragraph (b) brought by an attorney-general, the court may order that the State pay the accused concerned the whole or any part of the costs to which the accused may have been put in opposing the appeal or application, taxed according to the scale in civil cases of that court.
If the appeal of the attorney-general in terms of subsection (1) (a) or (2) (a) is successful, the court hearing the appeal shall issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused.
[S. 65A inserted by s. 7 of Act 75 of 1995.
If an accused is released on bail subject to any condition imposed under section 60 or 62, including any amendment or supplementation under section 63 of a condition of bail, and the prosecutor applies to the court before which the charge with regard to which the accused has been released on bail is pending, to lead evidence to prove that the accused has failed to comply with such condition, the court shall, if the accused is present and denies that he or she failed to comply with such condition or that his or her failure to comply with such condition was due to fault on his or her part, proceed to hear such evidence as the prosecutor and the accused may place before it.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 8 of Act 75 of 1995.
If the accused is not present when the prosecutor applies to the court under subsection (1), the court may issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused, and shall, when the accused appears before the court and denies that he failed to comply with the condition in question or that his failure to comply with such condition was due to fault on his part, proceed to hear such evidence as the prosecutor and the accused may place before it.
If the accused admits that he failed to comply with the condition in question or if the court finds that he failed to comply with such condition, the court may, if it finds that the failure by the accused was due to fault on his part, cancel the bail and declare the bail money forfeited to the State.
The proceedings and the evidence under this section shall be recorded.
appointed for his trial; or to which the proceedings relating to the offence in respect of which the accused is released on bail are adjourned; or fails to remain in attendance at such trial or at such proceedings, the court before which the matter is pending shall declare the bail provisionally cancelled and the bail money provisionally forfeited to the State, and issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused.
If the accused appears before court within fourteen days of the issue under subsection (1) of the warrant of arrest, the court shall confirm the provisional cancellation of the bail and the provisional forfeiture of the bail money, unless the accused satisfies the court that his failure under subsection (1) to appear or to remain in attendance was not due to fault on his part.
If the accused satisfies the court that his failure was not due to fault on his part, the provisional cancellation of the bail and the provisional forfeiture of the bail money shall lapse.
If the accused does not appear before court within fourteen days of the issue under subsection (1) of the warrant of arrest or within such extended period as the court may on good cause determine, the provisional cancellation of the bail and the provisional forfeiture of the bail money shall become final.
The court may receive such evidence as it may consider necessary to satisfy itself that the accused has under subsection (1) failed to appear or failed to remain in attendance, and such evidence shall be recorded.
Any person who has been released on bail and who fails without good cause to appear on the date and at the place determined for his or her appearance, or to remain in attendance until the proceedings in which he or she must appear have been disposed of, or who fails without good cause to comply with a condition of bail imposed by the court in terms of section 60 or 62, including an amendment or supplementation thereof in terms of section 63, shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be liable to a fine or to imprisonment not exceeding one year.
[S. 67A inserted by s. 9 of Act 75 of 1995.
further evidence has since become available or factors have arisen, including the fact that the accused has furnished false information in the bail proceedings, which might have affected the decision to grant bail; or it is in the interests of justice to do so, issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused and make such order as it may deem proper, including an order that the bail be cancelled and that the accused be committed to prison until the conclusion of the relevant criminal proceedings.
further evidence has since become available or factors have arisen, including the fact that the accused has furnished false information in the bail proceedings, which might have affected the decision to release the accused on bail; or it is in the interests of justice to do so, issue a warrant for the arrest of the accused, and may, if satisfied that the ends of justice may be defeated if the accused is not placed in custody, cancel the bail and commit the accused to prison, which committal shall remain of force until the conclusion of the relevant criminal proceedings unless the court before which the proceedings are pending sooner reinstates the bail.
[S. 68 substituted by s. 10 of Act 75 of 1995 and by s. 6 of Act 85 of 1997.
Any court before which a charge is pending in respect of which the accused has been released on bail may, upon application by the accused, cancel the bail and refund the bail money if the accused is in custody on any other charge or is serving a sentence.
[S. 68A inserted by s. 15 of Act 59 of 1983.
No provision of section 59 or 60 shall prevent the payment by any person, other that the accused, of bail money for the benefit of the accused.
Bail money, whether deposited by an accused or any other person for the benefit of the accused, shall, notwithstanding that such bail money or any part thereof may have been ceded to any person, be refunded only to the accused or the depositor, as the case may be.
No person shall be allowed to deposit for the benefit of an accused any bail money in terms of this section if the official concerned has reason to believe that such person, at any time before or after depositing such bail money, has been indemnified or will be indemnified by any person in any manner against loss of such bail money or that he has received or will receive any financial benefit in connection with the deposit of such bail money.
The Minister or any officer acting under his or her authority or the court concerned may remit the whole or any part of any bail money forfeited under section 66 or 67.
[S. 70 substituted by s. 11 of Act 75 of 1995.
[S. 71 substituted by s. 4 of Act 26 of 1987 and by s. 399* of Act 122 of 1991 and repealed by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
release the accused from custody and warn him to appear before a specified court at a specified time on a specified date in connection with such offence or, as the case may be, to remain in attendance at the proceedings relating to the offence in question, and the said court may, at the time of such release or at any time thereafter, impose any condition referred to in section 62 in connection with such release.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 7 (a) of Act 33 of 1986.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 7 (b) of Act 33 of 1986 and deleted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 5 of Act 26 of 1987, by s. 2 of Act 126 of 1992 and by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
An accused who is released under subsection (1) (a) and who fails to appear or, as the case may be, to remain in attendance at the proceedings in accordance with a warning under that paragraph, or who fails to comply with a condition imposed under subsection (1) (a), shall be guilty of an offence and liable to the punishment prescribed under subsection (4).
[Para. (b) deleted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 7 (c) of Act 33 of 1986.
A police official who releases an accused under subsection (1) (a) shall, at the time of releasing the accused, complete and hand to the accused and, in the case of subsection (1) (b), to the person in whose custody the accused is, a written notice on which shall be entered the offence in respect of which the accused is being released and the court before which and the time at which and the date on which the accused shall appear.
A court which releases an accused under subsection (1) shall, at the time of releasing the accused, record or cause the relevant proceedings to be recorded in full, and where such court is a magistrate's court or a regional court, any document purporting to be an extract from the record of proceedings of that court and purporting to be certified as correct by the clerk of the court and which sets out the warning relating to the court before which, the time at which and the date on which the accused is to appear or the conditions on which he was released, shall, on its mere production in any court in which the relevant charge is pending, be prima facie proof of such warning.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 7 (d) of Act 33 of 1986.
The court may, if satisfied that an accused referred to in subsection (2) (a) or a person referred to in subsection (2) (b), was duly warned in terms of paragraph (a) or, as the case may be, paragraph (b) of subsection (1), and that such accused or such person has failed to comply with such warning or to comply with a condition imposed, issue a warrant for his arrest, and may, when he is brought before the court, in a summary manner enquire into his failure and, unless such accused or such person satisfies the court that10* his failure was not due to fault on his part, sentence him to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Sub-s. (4) substituted by s. 7 (e) of Act 33 of 1986.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 72 (4), the provisions of section 68 (1) and (2) in respect of an accused who has been granted bail, are, with the necessary changes, applicable in respect of an accused who has been released on warning.
[S. 72A inserted by s. 7 of Act 85 of 1997.
An accused who is arrested, whether with or without warrant, shall, subject to any law relating to the management of prisons, be entitled to the assistance of his legal adviser as from the time of his arrest.
An accused shall be entitled to be represented by his legal adviser at criminal proceedings, if such legal adviser is not in terms of any law prohibited from appearing at the proceedings in question.
at his or her first appearance in court, be informed of his or her right to be represented at his or her own expense by a legal adviser of his or her own choice and if he or she cannot afford legal representation, that he or she may apply for legal aid and of the institutions which he or she may approach for legal assistance. [Sub-s. (2A) inserted by s. 2 of Act 86 of 1996.] (2B) Every accused shall be given a reasonable opportunity to obtain legal assistance. [Sub-s. (2B) inserted by s. 2 of Act 86 of 1996.] (2C) If an accused refuses or fails to appoint a legal adviser of his or her own choice within a reasonable time and his or her failure to do so is due to his or her own fault, the court may, in addition to any order which it may make in terms of section 342A, order that the trial proceed without legal representation unless the court is of the opinion that that would result in substantial injustice, in which event the court may, subject to the Legal Aid Act, 1969 (Act 22 of 1969), order that a legal adviser be assigned to the accused at the expense of the State: Provided that the court may order that the costs of such representation be recovered from the accused: Provided further that the accused shall not be compelled to appoint a legal adviser if he or she prefers to conduct his or her own defence.
[Sub-s. (2C) inserted by s. 2 of Act 86 of 1996.
In addition to the provisions of sections 3 (g), 38 (2), 44 (1) (b) and 65 of the Child Justice Act, 2008, relating to the assistance of an accused who is under the age of eighteen years by his or her parent or an appropriate adult at criminal proceedings, any accused who, in the opinion of the court, requires the assistance of another person at criminal proceedings, may, with the permission of the court, be so assisted at such proceedings.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
[S. 74 amended by s. 8 of Act 33 of 1986 and repealed by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
If an accused appears in a court which does not have jurisdiction to try the case, the accused shall at the request of the prosecutor be referred to a court having jurisdiction.
any other court which has jurisdiction and which has been designated by the attorney-general or any person authorized thereto by the attorney-general, whether in general or in any particular case, for the purposes of such summary trial.
[Para. (c) substituted by s. 9 of Act 33 of 1986.
magnitude that it merits punishment in excess of the jurisdiction of a magistrate's court but not of the jurisdiction of a regional court, the court shall if so requested by the prosecutor refer the accused to the regional court for summary trial without the accused having to plead to the relevant charge.
[Para. (b) added by s. 3 of Act 86 of 1996.
The court before whom an accused appears for the purposes of a bail application shall, at the conclusion of the bail proceedings or at any stage thereafter, but before the accused has pleaded, refer such accused to a court designated by the prosecutor for purposes of trial.
[Sub-s. (3) added by s. 8 of Act 85 of 1997.
[S. 75 substituted by s. 3 of Act 56 of 1979.
Unless an accused has been summoned to appear before the court, the proceedings at a summary trial in a lower court shall be commenced by lodging a charge-sheet with the clerk of the court, and, in the case of a superior court, by serving an indictment referred to in section 144 on the accused and the lodging thereof with the registrar of the court concerned.
The charge-sheet shall in addition to the charge against the accused include the name and, where known and where applicable, the address and description of the accused with regard to sex, nationality and age.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 13 of Act 139 of 1992.
The court shall keep a record of the proceedings, whether in writing or mechanical, or shall cause such record to be kept, and the charge-sheet, summons or indictment shall form part thereof.
Such record may be proved in a court by the mere production thereof or of a copy thereof in terms of section 235.
Where the correctness of any such record is challenged, the court in which the record is challenged may, in order to satisfy itself whether any matter was correctly recorded or not, either orally or on affidavit hear such evidence as it may deem necessary.
If it appears to the court at any stage of criminal proceedings that the accused is by reason of mental illness or mental defect not capable of understanding the proceedings so as to make a proper defence, the court shall direct that the matter be enquired into and be reported on in accordance with the provisions of section 79.
At proceedings in terms of sections 77 (1) and 78 (2) the court may, if it is of the opinion that substantial injustice would otherwise result, order that the accused be provided with the services of a legal practitioner in terms of section 3 of the Legal Aid Amendment Act, 1996 (Act 20 of 1996).
[Sub-s. (1A) inserted by s. 3 (a) of Act 68 of 1998.
If the finding contained in the relevant report is the unanimous finding of the persons who under section 79 enquired into the mental condition of the accused and the finding is not disputed by the prosecutor or the accused, the court may determine the matter on such report without hearing further evidence.
If the said finding is not unanimous or, if unanimous, is disputed by the prosecutor or the accused, the court shall determine the matter after hearing evidence, and the prosecutor and the accused may to that end present evidence to the court, including the evidence of any person who under section 79 enquired into the mental condition of the accused.
Where the said finding is disputed, the party disputing the finding may subpoena and cross-examine any person who under section 79 has enquired into the mental condition of the accused.
If the court finds that the accused is capable of understanding the proceedings so as to make a proper defence, the proceedings shall be continued in the ordinary way.
and if the court so directs after the accused has pleaded to the charge, the accused shall not be entitled under section 106 (4) to be acquitted or to be convicted in respect of the charge in question.
If the court makes a finding in terms of paragraph (a) after the accused has been convicted of the offence charged but before sentence is passed, the court shall set the conviction aside, and if the accused has pleaded guilty it shall be deemed that he has pleaded not guilty.
[Sub-s. (6) substituted by s. 10 of Act 33 of 1986, amended by s. 9 of Act 51 of 1991, by s. 42 (a) of Act 129 of 1993, by s. 3 (b) of Act 68 of 1998 and by s. 12 of Act 55 of 2002 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
Where a direction is issued in terms of subsection (6) or (9), the accused may at any time thereafter, when he or she is capable of understanding the proceedings so as to make a proper defence, be prosecuted and tried for the offence in question.
[Sub-s. (7) amended by s. 9 of Act 51 of 1991 and substituted by s. 42 (b) of Act 129 of 1993 and by s. 3 (c) of Act 68 of 1998.
under subsection (6) and against whom the finding is not made in consequence of an allegation by the accused under subsection (1), may appeal against such finding.
Such an appeal shall be made in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as an appeal against a conviction by the court for an offence.
Where an appeal against a finding in terms of subsection (5) is allowed, the court of appeal shall set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that the person concerned be detained in accordance with the provisions of subsection (6).
[Sub-s. (9) amended by s. 9 of Act 51 of 1991 and substituted by s. 42 (c) of Act 129 of 1993 and by s. 3 (d) of Act 68 of 1998.
Where an appeal against a finding under subsection (6) is allowed, the court of appeal shall set aside the direction issued under that subsection and remit the case to the court which made the finding, whereupon the relevant proceedings shall be continued in the ordinary way.
A person who commits an act or makes an omission which constitutes an offence and who at the time of such commission or omission suffers from a mental illness or mental defect which makes him or her incapable of appreciating the wrongfulness of his or her act or omission; or of acting in accordance with an appreciation of the wrongfulness of his or her act or omission, shall not be criminally responsible for such act or omission.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 5 (a) of Act 68 of 1998.
Every person is presumed not to suffer from a mental illness or mental defect so as not to be criminally responsible in terms of section 78 (1), until the contrary is proved on a balance of probabilities.
[Sub-s. (1A) inserted by s. 5 (b) of Act 68 of 1998.
Whenever the criminal responsibility of an accused with reference to the commission of an act or an omission which constitutes an offence is in issue, the burden of proof with reference to the criminal responsibility of the accused shall be on the party who raises the issue.
[Sub-s. (1B) inserted by s. 5 (b) of Act 68 of 1998.
If it is alleged at criminal proceedings that the accused is by reason of mental illness or mental defect or for any other reason not criminally responsible for the offence charged, or if it appears to the court at criminal proceedings that the accused might for such a reason not be so responsible, the court shall in the case of an allegation or appearance of mental illness or mental defect, and may, in any other case, direct that the matter be enquired into and be reported on in accordance with the provisions of section 79.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 5 (c) of Act 68 of 1998.
If the finding contained in the relevant report is the unanimous finding of the persons who under section 79 enquired into the relevant mental condition of the accused, and the finding is not disputed by the prosecutor or the accused, the court may determine the matter on such report without hearing further evidence.
Where the said finding is disputed, the party disputing the finding may subpoena and cross-examine any person who under section 79 enquired into the mental condition of the accused.
[Sub-s. (6) substituted by s. 11 of Act 33 of 1986, amended by s. 9 of Act 51 of 1991 and by s. 43 of Act 129 of 1993 and substituted by s. 5 (d) of Act 68 of 1998, by s. 13 of Act 55 of 2002 and by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
If the court finds that the accused at the time of the commission of the act in question was criminally responsible for the act but that his capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of the act or to act in accordance with an appreciation of the wrongfulness of the act was diminished by reason of mental illness or mental defect, the court may take the fact of such diminished responsibility into account when sentencing the accused.
An accused against whom a finding is made under subsection (6) may appeal against such finding if the finding is not made in consequence of an allegation by the accused under subsection (2).
Where an appeal against a finding under subsection (6) is allowed, the court of appeal shall set aside the finding and the direction under that subsection and remit the case to the court which made the finding, whereupon the relevant proceedings shall be continued in the ordinary course.
by a clinical psychologist where the court so directs.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 44 of Act 129 of 1993 and by s. 28 of Act 105 of 1997 and substituted by s. 6 (a) of Act 68 of 1998, by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007 and by s. 10 (a) of Act 66 of 2008.
in so far as it is within the knowledge of the prosecutor, the accused's social background and family composition and the names and addresses of his or her near relatives; and any other fact that may in the opinion of the prosecutor be relevant in the evaluation of the accused's mental condition or mental capacity.
[Sub-s. (1A) inserted by s. 6 (b) of Act 68 of 1998.
The court may for the purposes of the relevant enquiry commit the accused to a psychiatric hospital or to any other place designated by the court, for such periods, not exceeding thirty days at a time, as the court may from time to time determine, and where an accused is in custody when he is so committed, he shall, while he is so committed, be deemed to be in the lawful custody of the person or the authority in whose custody he was at the time of such committal.
When the period of committal is for the first time extended under paragraph (a), such extension may be granted in the absence of the accused unless the accused or his legal representative requests otherwise.
[Para. (b) added by s. 4 of Act 4 of 1992.
any other order.
[Para. (c) added by s. 6 (c) of Act 68 of 1998.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 44 of Act 129 of 1993.
The relevant report shall be in writing and shall be submitted in triplicate to the registrar or, as the case may be, the clerk of the court in question, who shall make a copy thereof available to the prosecutor and the accused.
The report shall include a description of the nature of the enquiry; and include a diagnosis of the mental condition of the accused; and if the enquiry is under section 77 (1), include a finding as to whether the accused is capable of understanding the proceedings in question so as to make a proper defence; or if the enquiry is in terms of section 78 (2), include a finding as to the extent to which the capacity of the accused to appreciate the wrongfulness of the act in question or to act in accordance with an appreciation of the wrongfulness of that act was, at the time of the commission thereof, affected by mental illness or mental defect or by any other cause.
[Para. (d) substituted by s. 6 (d) of Act 68 of 1998.
If the persons conducting the relevant enquiry are not unanimous in their finding under paragraph (c) or (d) of subsection (4), such fact shall be mentioned in the report and each of such persons shall give his finding on the matter in question.
Subject to the provisions of subsection (7), the contents of the report shall be admissible in evidence at criminal proceedings.
A statement made by an accused at the relevant enquiry shall not be admissible in evidence against the accused at criminal proceedings, except to the extent to which it may be relevant to the determination of the mental condition of the accused, in which event such statement shall be admissible notwithstanding that it may otherwise be inadmissible.
A psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist appointed under subsection (1), other than a psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist appointed for the accused, shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (10), be appointed from the list of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists referred to in subsection (9) (a).
[Sub-s. (8) substituted by s. 8 (a) of Act 42 of 2001.
286A (3), and shall provide the registrars of the High Courts and all clerks of magistrate's courts with a copy thereof.
[Sub-s. (9) substituted by s. 17 of Act 116 of 1993 and by s. 8 (b) of Act 42 of 2001.
Where the list compiled and kept under subsection (9) (a) does not include a sufficient number of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists who may conveniently be appointed for any enquiry under this section, a psychiatrist and clinical psychologist may be appointed for the purposes of such enquiry notwithstanding that his or her name does not appear on such list.
[Sub-s. (10) substituted by s. 8 (c) of Act 42 of 2001.
(11)11* (a) A psychiatrist or clinical psychologist designated or appointed under subsection (1) by or at the request of the court to enquire into the mental condition of an accused and who is not in the full-time service of the State, shall be compensated for his or her services in connection with the enquiry from public funds in accordance with a tariff12* determined by the Minister in consultation with the Minister of Finance.
A psychiatrist appointed under subsection (1) (b) (iii) for the accused to enquire into the mental condition of the accused and who is not in the full-time service of the State, shall be compensated for his or her services from public funds in the circumstances and in accordance with a tariff determined by the Minister in consultation with the Minister of Finance.
[Sub-s. (11) substituted by s. 8 (d) of Act 42 of 2001.
For the purposes of this section a psychiatrist or a clinical psychologist means a person registered as a psychiatrist or a clinical psychologist under the Health Professions Act, 1974 (Act 56 of 1974).
[Sub-s. (12) substituted by s. 8 (e) of Act 42 of 2001.
The National Director of Public Prosecutions must, in consultation with the Minister, issue directives regarding the cases and circumstances in which a prosecutor must apply to the court for the appointment of a psychiatrist as provided for in subsection (1) (b) (ii) and any directive so issued must be observed in the application of this section.
The Minister must submit any directives issued under this subsection to Parliament before those directives take effect, and the first directives so issued, must be submitted to Parliament within four months of the commencement of this subsection.
Any directive issued under this subsection may be amended or withdrawn in like manner.
[Sub-s. (13) added by s. 10 (b) of Act 66 of 2008.
An accused may examine the charge at any stage of the relevant criminal proceedings.
Any number of charges may be joined in the same proceedings against an accused at any time before any evidence has been led in respect of any particular charge, and where several charges are so joined, each charge shall be numbered consecutively.
The court may, if in its opinion it will be in the interests of justice to do so, direct that an accused be tried separately in respect of any charge joined with any other charge.
An order under paragraph (a) may be made before or during a trial, and the effect thereof shall be that the charge in respect of which an accused is not then tried, shall be proceeded with in all respects as if the accused had in respect thereof been charged separately.
Where an accused is in the same proceedings charged with more than one offence, and any one charge is for any reason to be disposed of by a regional court or a superior court, all the charges shall be disposed of by the same court in the same proceedings.
If by reason of any uncertainty as to the facts which can be proved or if for any other reason it is doubtful which of several offences is constituted by the facts which can be proved, the accused may be charged with the commission of all or any of such offences, and any number of such charges may be tried at once, or the accused may be charged in the alternative with the commission of any number of such offences.
Subject to the provisions of this Act and of any other law relating to any particular offence, a charge shall set forth the relevant offence in such manner and with such particulars as to the time and place at which the offence is alleged to have been committed and the person, if any, against whom and the property, if any, in respect of which the offence is alleged to have been committed, as may be reasonably sufficient to inform the accused of the nature of the charge.
Where any of the particulars referred to in subsection (1) are unknown to the prosecutor it shall be sufficient to state that fact in the charge.
In criminal proceedings the description of any statutory offence in the words of the law creating the offence, or in similar words, shall be sufficient.
[Para. (d) amended by s. 14 of Act 139 of 1992.
that the accused is not correctly named or described in the charge: Provided that the accused shall give reasonable notice to the prosecution of his intention to object to the charge and shall state the ground upon which he bases his objection: Provided further that the requirement of such notice may be waived by the attorney-general or the prosecutor, as the case may be, and the court may, on good cause shown, dispense with such notice or adjourn the trial to enable such notice to be given.
If the court decides that an objection under subsection (1) is well-founded, the court shall make such order relating to the amendment of the charge or the delivery of particulars as it may deem fit.
Where the prosecution fails to comply with an order under paragraph (a), the court may quash the charge.
Where a charge is defective for the want of any essential averment therein, or where there appears to be any variance between any averment in a charge and the evidence adduced in proof of such averment, or where it appears that words or particulars that ought to have been inserted in the charge have been omitted therefrom, or where any words or particulars that ought to have been omitted from the charge have been inserted therein, or where there is any other error in the charge, the court may, at any time before judgment, if it considers that the making of the relevant amendment will not prejudice the accused in his defence, order that the charge, whether it discloses an offence or not, be amended, so far as it is necessary, both in that part thereof where the defect, variance, omission, insertion or error occurs and in any other part thereof which it may become necessary to amend.
The amendment may be made on such terms as to an adjournment of the proceedings as the court may deem fit.
Upon the amendment of the charge in accordance with the order of the court, the trial shall proceed at the appointed time upon the amended charge in the same manner and with the same consequences as if it had been originally in its amended form.
The fact that a charge is not amended as provided in this section, shall not, unless the court refuses to allow the amendment, affect the validity of the proceedings thereunder.
An accused may at any stage before any evidence in respect of any particular charge has been led, in writing request the prosecution to furnish particulars or further particulars of any matter alleged in that charge, and the court before which a charge is pending may at any time before any evidence in respect of that charge has been led, direct that particulars or further particulars be delivered to the accused of any matter alleged in the charge, and may, if necessary, adjourn the proceedings in order that such particulars may be delivered: Provided that the provisions of this subsection shall not apply at the stage when an accused is required in terms of section 119 or 122A to plead to a charge in the magistrate's court.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 15 of Act 139 of 1992.
The particulars shall be delivered to the accused without charge and shall be entered in the record, and the trial shall proceed as if the charge had been amended in conformity with such particulars.
In determining whether a particular is required or whether a defect in the indictment before a superior court is material to the substantial justice of the case, the court may have regard to the summary of the substantial facts under paragraph of section 144 (3) or, as the case may be, the record of the preparatory examination.
Where a charge is defective for the want of an averment which is an essential ingredient of the relevant offence, the defect shall, unless brought to the notice of the court before judgement, be cured by evidence at the trial proving the matter which should have been averred.
Except where the fact of a previous conviction is an element of any offence with which an accused is charged, it shall not in any charge be alleged that an accused has previously been convicted of any offence, whether in the Republic or elsewhere.
In criminal proceedings any exception, exemption, proviso, excuse or qualification, whether it does or does not accompany in the same section the description of the offence in the law creating the offence, may be proved by the accused but need not be specified or negatived in the charge and, if so specified or negatived, need not be proved by the prosecution.
A charge need not set out the manner in which or the means or instrument by which any act was done, unless the manner, means or instrument is an essential element of the relevant offence.
for want of the statement of the value or price of any matter or thing, or the amount of damage, injury or spoil in any case where the value or price or the amount of damage, injury or spoil is not of the essence of the offence.
if the court considers that the accused is likely to be prejudiced thereby in his defence on the merits, it shall reject such proof, and the accused shall be deemed not to have pleaded to the charge.
If the defence of an accused is an alibi and the court before which the proceedings are pending is of the opinion that the accused may be prejudiced in making such defence if proof is admitted that the act or offence in question was committed on a day or at a time other than the day or time stated in the charge, the court shall reject such proof notwithstanding that the day or time in question is within a period of three months before or after the day or time stated in the charge, whereupon the same consequences shall follow as are mentioned in proviso (b) of section 92 (2).
Where it is alleged that an accused on divers occasions during any period committed an offence in respect of any particular person, the accused may be charged in one charge with the commission of that offence on divers occasions during a stated period.
A charge relating to a testamentary instrument need not allege that the instrument is the property of any person.
A charge relating to anything fixed in a square, street or open place or in a place dedicated to public use or ornament, or relating to anything in a public place or office or taken therefrom, need not allege that the thing in question is the property of any person.
A charge relating to a document which is the evidence of title to land or of an interest in land may describe the document as being the evidence of the title of the person or of one of the persons having an interest in the land to which the document relates, and shall describe the land or any relevant part thereof in a manner sufficient to identify it.
A charge relating to the theft of anything leased to the accused may describe the thing in question as the property of the person who leased it to the accused.
A charge against a person in the public service for an offence committed in connection with anything which came into his possession by virtue of his employment may describe the thing in question as the property of the State.
A charge relating to anything in the possession or under the control of any public officer may describe the thing in question as being in the lawful possession or under the lawful control of such officer without referring to him by name.
A charge relating to movable or immovable property whereof any body corporate has by law the management, control or custody, may describe the property in question as being under the lawful management or control or in the lawful custody of the body corporate in question.
If it is uncertain to which of two or more persons property in connection with which an offence has been committed belonged at the time when the offence was committed, the relevant charge may describe the property as the property of one or other of those persons, naming each of them but without specifying which of them, and it shall be sufficient at the trial to prove that at the time when the offence was committed the property belonged to one or other of those persons without proving which of them.
If property alleged to have been stolen was not in the physical possession of the owner thereof at the time when the theft was committed but in the physical possession of another person who had the custody thereof on behalf of the owner, it shall be sufficient to allege in a charge for the theft of that property that it was in the lawful custody or under the lawful control of that other person.
A charge relating to theft from any grave need not allege that anything in the grave is the property of any person.
In a charge in which any trade mark or forged trade mark is proposed to be mentioned, it shall be sufficient, without further description and without any copy or facsimile, to state that such trade mark or forged trade mark is a trade mark or forged trade mark.
A charge relating to housebreaking or the entering of any house or premises with intent to commit an offence, whether the charge is brought under the common law or any statute, may state either that the accused intended to commit a specified offence or that the accused intended to commit an offence to the prosecutor unknown.
A reference in a charge to a company, firm or partnership shall be sufficient if the reference is to the name of the company, firm or partnership.
A reference in a charge to joint owners of property shall be sufficient if the reference is to one specific owner and another owner or, as the case may be, other owners.
It shall be sufficient in a charge of murder to allege that the accused unlawfully and intentionally killed the deceased, and it shall be sufficient in a charge of culpable homicide to allege that the accused unlawfully killed the deceased.
In any charge relating to the forging, uttering, stealing, destroying or concealing of, or to some other unlawful dealing with any document, it shall be sufficient to describe the document by any name or designation by which it is usually known or by the purport thereof, without setting out any copy or facsimile thereof or otherwise describing it or stating its value.
Whenever it is necessary in any case not referred to in subsection (1) to make any allegation in any charge in relation to any document, whether it consists wholly or in part of writing, print or figures, it shall be sufficient to describe the document by any name or designation by which it is usually known or by the purport thereof, without setting out any copy or facsimile of the whole or any part thereof, unless the wording of the document is an element of the offence.
On a charge alleging the theft of money or property by a person entrusted with the control thereof, the charge may allege a general deficiency in a stated amount, notwithstanding that such general deficiency is made up of specific sums of money or articles or of a sum of money representing the value of specific articles, the theft of which extended over a period.
need not allege, nor need it be established at the trial, that the false evidence or statement was material to any issue at the relevant proceedings or that it was to the prejudice of any person.
A charge relating to the giving or the procuring or attempted procuring of false evidence need not allege the jurisdiction or state the nature of the authority of the court or tribunal before which or the officer before whom the false evidence was given or was intended or proposed to be given.
A charge relating to insolvency need not set forth any debt, act of insolvency or adjudication or any other proceeding in any court, or any order made or any warrant or document issued by or under the authority of any court.
In any charge in which it is necessary to allege that the accused performed an act with an intent to defraud, it shall be sufficient to allege and to prove that the accused performed the act with intent to defraud without alleging and proving that it was the intention of the accused to defraud any particular person, and such a charge need not mention the owner of any property involved or set forth the details of any deceit.
A charge of printing, publishing, manufacturing, making or producing blasphemous, seditious, obscene or defamatory matter, or of distributing, displaying, exhibiting, selling or offering or keeping for sale any obscene book, pamphlet, newspaper or other printed or written matter, shall not be open to objection or be deemed insufficient on the ground that it does not set out the words thereof: Provided that the court may order that particulars shall be furnished by the prosecution stating what passages in such book, pamphlet, newspaper, printing or writing are relied upon in support of the charge.
The charge shall be put to the accused by the prosecutor before the trial of the accused is commenced, and the accused shall, subject to the provisions of sections 77, 85 and 105A, be required by the court forthwith to plead thereto in accordance with section 106.
[S. 105 substituted by s. 1 of Act 62 of 2001.
if applicable, an award for compensation as contemplated in section 300.
the contents of the agreement; and (bb) the inclusion in the agreement of a condition relating to compensation or the rendering to the complainant of some specific benefit or service in lieu of compensation for damage or pecuniary loss.
The requirements of paragraph (b) (i) may be dispensed with if the prosecutor is satisfied that consultation with the person charged with the investigation of the case will delay the proceedings to such an extent that it could cause substantial prejudice to the prosecution, the accused, the complainant or his or her representative; and affect the administration of justice adversely.
be signed by the prosecutor, the accused and his or her legal representative; and if the accused has negotiated with the prosecutor through an interpreter, contain a certificate by the interpreter to the effect that he or she interpreted accurately during the negotiations and in respect of the contents of the agreement.
The court shall not participate in the negotiations contemplated in subsection (1).
require the accused to confirm that such an agreement has been entered into; and satisfy itself that the requirements of subsection (1) (b) (i) and (iii) have been complied with.
If the court is not satisfied that the agreement complies with the requirements of subsection (1) (b) (i) and (iii), the court shall inform the prosecutor and the accused of the reasons for noncompliance; and afford the prosecutor and the accused the opportunity to comply with the requirements concerned.
If the court is satisfied that the agreement complies with the requirements of subsection (1) (b) (i) and (iii), the court shall require the accused to plead to the charge and order that the contents of the agreement be disclosed in court.
the agreement was entered into freely and voluntarily in his or her sound and sober senses and without having been unduly influenced.
for any other reason, the court is of the opinion that the plea of guilty by the accused should not stand, record a plea of not guilty and inform the prosecutor and the accused of the reasons therefor.
If the court has recorded a plea of not guilty, the trial shall start de novo before another presiding officer: Provided that the accused may waive his or her right to be tried before another presiding officer.
If the court is satisfied that the accused admits the allegations in the charge and that he or she is guilty of the offence in respect of which the agreement was entered into, the court shall proceed to consider the sentence agreement.
must, if the offence concerned is an offence- (aa) referred to in the Schedule to the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997 (Act 105 of 1997); or (bb) for which a minimum penalty is prescribed in the law creating the offence, have due regard to the provisions of that Act or law.
If the court is satisfied that the sentence agreement is just, the court shall inform the prosecutor and the accused that the court is so satisfied, whereupon the court shall convict the accused of the offence charged and sentence the accused in accordance with the sentence agreement.
If the court is of the opinion that the sentence agreement is unjust, the court shall inform the prosecutor and the accused of the sentence which it considers just.
abide by the agreement with reference to the charge and inform the court that, subject to the right to lead evidence and to present argument relevant to sentencing, the court may proceed with the imposition of sentence; or withdraw from the agreement.
If the prosecutor and the accused abide by the agreement as contemplated in paragraph (b) (i), the court shall convict the accused of the offence charged and impose the sentence which it considers just.
If the prosecutor or the accused withdraws from the agreement as contemplated in paragraph (b) (ii), the trial shall start de novo before another presiding officer: Provided that the accused may waive his or her right to be tried before another presiding officer.
the prosecutor and the accused may not enter into a plea and sentence agreement in respect of a charge arising out of the same facts; and the prosecutor may proceed on any charge.
The National Director of Public Prosecutions, in consultation with the Minister, shall issue directives regarding all matters which are reasonably necessary or expedient to be prescribed in order to achieve the objects of this section and any directive so issued shall be observed in the application of this section.
must ensure that adequate disciplinary steps shall be taken against a prosecutor who fails to comply with any directive; and must ensure that comprehensive records and statistics relating to the implementation and application of this section are kept by the prosecuting authority.
The National Director of Public Prosecutions shall submit directives issued under this subsection to Parliament before those directives take effect, and the first directives so issued, must be submitted to Parliament within four months of the commencement of this section.
The National Director of Public Prosecutions shall at least once every year submit the records and statistics referred to in subsection (11) (b) (iv) to Parliament.
In this section 'sentence agreement' means an agreement contemplated in subsection (1) (a) (ii).
[S. 105A inserted by s. 2 of Act 62 of 2001.
that he is guilty of the offence charged or of any offence of which he may be convicted on the charge; or that he is not guilty; or that he has already been convicted of the offence with which he is charged; or that he has already been acquitted of the offence with which he is charged; or that he has received a free pardon under section 327 (6) from the State President for the offence charged; or that the court has no jurisdiction to try the offence; or that he has been discharged under the provisions of section 204 from prosecution for the offence charged; or that the prosecutor has no title to prosecute.
that the prosecution may not be resumed or instituted owing to an order by a court under section 342A (3) (c).
[Para. (i) added by s. 4 of Act 86 of 1996.
Two or more pleas may be pleaded together except that a plea of guilty may not be pleaded with any other plea to the same charge.
An accused shall give reasonable notice to the prosecution of his intention to plead a plea other than the plea of guilty or not guilty, and shall in such notice state the ground on which he bases his plea: Provided that the requirement of such notice may be waived by the attorney-general or the prosecutor, as the case may be, and the court may, on good cause shown, dispense with such notice or adjourn the trial to enable such notice to be given.
An accused who pleads to a charge, other than a plea that the court has no jurisdiction to try the offence, or an accused on behalf of whom a plea of not guilty is entered by the court, shall, save as is otherwise expressly provided by this Act or any other law, be entitled to demand that he be acquitted or be convicted.
A person charged with the unlawful publication of defamatory matter, who sets up as a defence that the defamatory matter is true and that it was for the public benefit that the matter should be published, shall plead such defence specially, and may plead it with any other plea except the plea of guilty.
If an accused pleads a plea other than a plea of guilty, he shall, subject to the provisions of sections 115, 122 and 141 (3), by such plea be deemed to demand that the issues raised by the plea be tried.
Where an accused in criminal proceedings refuses to plead to any charge, the court shall record a plea of not guilty on behalf of the accused and a plea so recorded shall have the same effect as if it had been actually pleaded.
after the accused has pleaded a plea of guilty or of not guilty; or where the accused has pleaded any other plea and the court has determined such plea against the accused, appears that the court in question does not have jurisdiction, the court shall for the purposes of this Act be deemed to have jurisdiction in respect of the offence in question.
Where an accused pleads that the court in question has no jurisdiction and the plea is upheld, the court shall adjourn the case to the court having jurisdiction.
At the conclusion of the trial against a person under this section, a copy of the proceedings, certified by the clerk of the court or registrar, together with any remarks as the prosecutor may wish to append thereto, must be submitted to the Minister of Foreign Affairs.
[S. 110A inserted by s. 11 of Act 66 of 2008.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 6 (a) of Act 26 of 1987 and deleted by s. 44 of Act 32 of 1998.
The direction of the National Director of Public Prosecutions contemplated in section 179 (1) (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, shall state the name of the accused, the relevant offence, the place at which (if known) and the Director in whose area of jurisdiction the relevant investigation and criminal proceedings shall be conducted and commenced.
A copy of the direction shall be served on the accused, and the original thereof shall, save as is provided in subsection (3) be handed in at the court in which the proceedings are to commence.
[Sub-s. (1), previously sub-s. (2), amended by s. 6 (b) of Act 26 of 1987 and renumbered and substituted by s. 44 of Act 32 of 1998.
The court in which the proceedings commence shall have jurisdiction to act with regard to the offence in question as if the offence had been committed within the area of jurisdiction of such court.
[Sub-s. (2), previously sub-s. (3), renumbered and substituted by s. 44 of Act 32 of 1998.
forward a copy of the record of the proceedings to the court in which the accused is to appear, and that court shall receive such copy and continue with the proceedings against the accused as if such proceedings had commenced before it.
[Sub-s. (3), previously sub-s. (4), amended by s. 6 (c) of Act 26 of 1987 and renumbered and substituted by s. 44 of Act 32 of 1998.
[Sub-s. (4) omitted by s. 44 of Act 32 of 1998.
[Sub-s. (5) deleted by s. 68 of Act 88 of 1996.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 4 (a) of Act 109 of 1984, by s. 7 (a) of Act 5 of 1991 and by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
the presiding judge, regional magistrate or magistrate shall, if he or she is of the opinion that the offence merits punishment of imprisonment or any other form of detention without the option of a fine or of a fine exceeding the amount14* determined by the Minister from time to time by notice in the Gazette, or if requested thereto by the prosecutor, question the accused with reference to the alleged facts of the case in order to ascertain whether he or she admits the allegations in the charge to which he or she has pleaded guilty, and may, if satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence to which he or she has pleaded guilty, convict the accused on his or her plea of guilty of that offence and impose any competent sentence.
[Para. (b) amended by s. 4 (b) of Act 109 of 1984 and substituted by s. 7 (b) of Act 5 of 1991 and by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
If an accused or his legal adviser hands a written statement by the accused into court, in which the accused sets out the facts which he admits and on which he has pleaded guilty, the court may, in lieu of questioning the accused under subsection (1) (b), convict the accused on the strength of such statement and sentence him as provided in the said subsection if the court is satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty: Provided that the court may in its discretion put any question to the accused in order to clarify any matter raised in the statement.
Nothing in this section shall prevent the prosecutor from presenting evidence on any aspect of the charge, or the court from hearing evidence, including evidence or a statement by or on behalf of the accused, with regard to sentence, or from questioning the accused on any aspect of the case for the purposes of determining an appropriate sentence.
If the court at any stage of the proceedings under section 112 (1) (a) or (b) or 112 (2) and before sentence is passed is in doubt whether the accused is in law guilty of the offence to which he or she has pleaded guilty or if it is alleged or appears to the court that the accused does not admit an allegation in the charge or that the accused has incorrectly admitted any such allegation or that the accused has a valid defence to the charge or if the court is of the opinion for any other reason that the accused's plea of guilty should not stand, the court shall record a plea of not guilty and require the prosecutor to proceed with the prosecution: Provided that any allegation, other than an allegation referred to above, admitted by the accused up to the stage at which the court records a plea of not guilty, shall stand as proof in any court of such allegation.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 5 of Act 86 of 1996.
If the court records a plea of not guilty under subsection (1) before any evidence has been led, the prosecution shall proceed on the original charge laid against the accused, unless the prosecutor explicitly indicates otherwise.
[Sub-s. (2) added by s. 8 of Act 5 of 1991.
[Para. (c) added by s. 18 (b) of Act 116 of 1993.
the court shall stop the proceedings and commit the accused for sentence by a regional court having jurisdiction.
Where an accused is committed under subsection (1) for sentence by a regional court, the record of the proceedings in the magistrate's court shall upon proof thereof in the regional court be received by the regional court and form part of the record of that court, and the plea of guilty and any admission by the accused shall stand unless the accused satisfies the court that such plea or such admission was incorrectly recorded.
is satisfied that a plea of guilty or an admission by the accused which is material to his guilt was incorrectly recorded; or is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence of which he has been convicted and in respect of which he has been committed for sentence, the court shall make a formal finding of guilty and sentence the accused.
If the court is satisfied that a plea of guilty or any admission by the accused which is material to his guilt was incorrectly recorded, or if the court is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence of which he has been convicted and in respect of which he has been committed for sentence or that he has no valid defence to the charge, the court shall enter a plea of not guilty and proceed with the trial as a summary trial in that court: Provided that any admission by the accused the recording of which is not disputed by the accused, shall stand as proof of the fact thus admitted.
The provisions of section 112 (3) shall apply with reference to the proceedings under this section.
Where an accused at a summary trial pleads not guilty to the offence charged, the presiding judge, regional magistrate or magistrate, as the case may be, may ask him whether he wishes to make a statement indicating the basis of his defence.
Where the accused does not make a statement under subsection (1) or does so and it is not clear from the statement to what extent he denies or admits the issues raised by the plea, the court may question the accused in order to establish which allegations in the charge are in dispute.
The court may in its discretion put any question to the accused in order to clarify any matter raised under subsection (1) or this subsection, and shall enquire from the accused whether an allegation which is not placed in issue by the plea of not guilty, may be recorded as an admission by the accused of that allegation, and if the accused so consents, such admission shall be recorded and shall be deemed to be an admission under section 220.
Where the legal adviser of an accused on behalf of the accused replies, whether in writing or orally, to any question by the court under this section, the accused shall be required by the court to declare whether he confirms such reply or not.
Where an accused pleads not guilty in a magistrate's court, the court shall, subject to the provisions of section 115, at the request of the prosecutor made before any evidence is tendered, refer the accused for trial to a regional court having jurisdiction.
The record of the proceedings in the magistrate's court shall upon proof thereof in the regional court be received by the regional court and form part of the record of that court.
[S. 115A inserted by s. 4 of Act 56 of 1979.
[Para. (c) added by s. 19 (b) of Act 116 of 1993.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 6 of Act 86 of 1996.
If a regional magistrate acts under the proviso to paragraph (a), he shall inform the accused accordingly and postpone the case to some future date pending the outcome of the review proceedings, and, if the accused is in custody, the regional magistrate may make such order with regard to the detention or release of the accused as he may deem fit.
Where an accused in a lower court pleads not guilty to the offence charged against him and a ground of his defence is the alleged invalidity of a provincial ordinance or a proclamation of the State President on which the charge against him is founded and upon the validity of which a magistrate's court is in terms of section 110 of the Magistrates' Courts Act, 1944 (Act 32 of 1944), not competent to pronounce, the accused shall be committed for a summary trial before a superior court having jurisdiction.
[S. 117 amended by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
If the judge, regional magistrate or magistrate before whom an accused at a summary trial has pleaded not guilty is for any reason not available to continue with the trial and no evidence has been adduced yet, the trial may be continued before any other judge, regional magistrate or magistrate of the same court.
When an accused appears in a magistrate's court and the alleged offence may be tried by a superior court only or is of such a nature or magnitude that it merits punishment in excess of the jurisdiction of a magistrate's court, the prosecutor may, notwithstanding the provisions of section 75, on the instructions of the attorneygeneral, whether in general or in any particular case, put the charge, as well as any other charge which shall, in terms of section 82, be disposed of in a superior court, to the accused in the magistrate's court, and the accused shall, subject to the provisions of sections 77 and 85, be required by the magistrate to plead thereto forthwith.
[S. 119 substituted by s. 5 of Act 56 of 1979, by s. 3 of Act 64 of 1982 and by s. 16 of Act 59 of 1983.
The proceedings shall be commenced by the lodging of a charge-sheet with the clerk of the court in question and the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) of section 76 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to the charge-sheet and the record of the proceedings.
Where an accused under section 119 pleads guilty to the offence charged, the presiding magistrate shall question him in terms of the provisions of paragraph (b) of section 112 (1).
If the magistrate is satisfied that the accused admits the allegations stated in the charge, he shall stop the proceedings.
If the magistrate is not satisfied as provided in paragraph (a), he shall record in what respect he is not so satisfied and enter a plea of not guilty and deal with the matter in terms of section 122 (1): Provided that an allegation with reference to which the magistrate is so satisfied and which has been recorded as an admission, shall stand at the trial of the accused as proof of such allegation.
institute a preparatory examination against the accused.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 6 of Act 56 of 1979.
in the magistrate's court concerned, dispose of the case on the charge on which the accused is arraigned; or in a regional court or superior court, adjourn the case for sentence by the regional court or superior court concerned.
The record of the proceedings in the magistrate's court shall, upon proof thereof in the court in which the accused is arraigned for sentence, be received as part of the record of that court against the accused or, if the accused is arraigned in the magistrate's court in which the proceedings were stopped under subsection (2) (a), the record of such proceedings shall stand as the record of that court, and the plea of guilty and any admission by the accused shall stand and form part of the record of that court unless the accused satisfies the court that such plea or such admission was incorrectly recorded.
The record of the proceedings in the magistrate's court shall, upon proof thereof in the court in which the accused is arraigned for a summary trial, be received as part of the record of that court against the accused, and any admission by the accused shall stand and form part of the record of that court against the accused, and any admission by the accused shall stand and form part of the record of that court unless the accused satisfies the court that such admission was incorrectly recorded.
Unless the accused satisfies the court that a plea of guilty or an admission was incorrectly recorded or unless the court is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty or that the accused has no valid defence to the charge, the court may convict the accused on his plea of guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty and impose any competent sentence.
[Para. (b) amended by s. 29 of Act 105 of 1997.
If the accused satisfies the court that the plea of guilty or an admission which is material to his guilt was incorrectly recorded, or if the court is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty or that the accused has no valid defence to the charge, the court shall record a plea of not guilty and proceed with the trial as a summary trial in that court: Provided that an admission by the accused the recording of which is not disputed by the accused, shall stand as proof of the fact thus admitted.
Where an accused under section 119 pleads not guilty to the offence charged, the court shall act in terms of section 115 and when that section has been complied with, the magistrate shall stop the proceedings and adjourn the case pending the decision of the attorney-general.
arraign the accused on any charge at a summary trial before a superior court or any other court having jurisdiction, including the magistrate's court in which the proceedings were adjourned under subsection (1); or institute a preparatory examination against the accused, and the attorney-general shall advise the magistrate's court concerned of his decision.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 16 of Act 139 of 1992.
in a regional court or a superior court, commit the accused for a summary trial before the court concerned.
The record of the proceedings in the magistrate's court shall, upon proof thereof in the court in which the accused is arraigned for a summary trial, be received as part of the record of that court against the accused, and any admission by the accused shall stand at the trial of the accused as proof of such an admission.
[Chapter 19A and heading inserted by s. 7 of Act 56 of 1979.
When an accused appears in a magistrate's court and the alleged offence may be tried by a regional court but not by a magistrate's court or the prosecutor informs the court that he is of the opinion that the alleged offence is of such a nature or magnitude that it merits punishment in excess of the jurisdiction of a magistrate's court but not of the jurisdiction of a regional court, the prosecutor may, notwithstanding the provisions of section 75, put the relevant charge, as well as any other charge which shall, in terms of section 82, be disposed of by a regional court, to the accused, who shall, subject to the provisions of sections 77 and 85, be required by the magistrate to plead thereto forthwith.
[S. 122A inserted by s. 7 of Act 56 of 1979 and substituted by s. 18 of Act 59 of 1983.
The provisions of section 120 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to the proceedings under section 122A and the record of the proceedings.
[S. 122B inserted by s. 7 of Act 56 of 1979.
Where an accused under section 122A pleads guilty to the offence charged, the presiding magistrate shall question him in terms of the provisions of paragraph of section 112 (1).
If the magistrate is satisfied that the accused admits the allegations stated in the charge, he shall adjourn the case for sentence by the regional court concerned.
If the magistrate is not satisfied as provided in paragraph (a), he shall record in what respect he is not so satisfied and enter a plea of not guilty and deal with the matter in terms of section 122D (1): Provided that an allegation with reference to which the magistrate is so satisfied and which has been recorded as an admission, shall stand at the trial of the accused as proof of such allegation.
The record of the proceedings in the magistrate's court shall, upon proof thereof in the regional court in which the accused is arraigned for sentence, be received as part of the record of that court against the accused, and the plea of guilty and any admission by the accused shall stand and form part of the record of that court unless the accused satisfies the court that such plea or such admission was incorrectly recorded.
Unless the accused satisfies the court that the plea of guilty or an admission was incorrectly recorded or unless the court is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty or that the accused has no valid defence to the charge, the court may convict the accused on his plea of guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty, and impose any competent sentence.
Nothing in this section shall prevent the prosecutor from presenting evidence on any aspect of the charge, or the court from hearing evidence, including evidence or a statement by or on behalf of the accused, with regard to sentence, or from questioning the accused on any aspect of the case for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence.
[S. 122C inserted by s. 7 of Act 56 of 1979.
The regional court may try the accused on the charge in respect of which he has been committed for a summary trial under subsection (1) or on any other or further charge which the prosecutor may prefer against the accused and which the court is competent to try.
The record of proceedings in the magistrate's court shall, upon proof thereof in the regional court in which the accused is arraigned for a summary trial, be received as part of the record of that court against the accused, and any admission by the accused shall stand at the trial of the accused as proof of such an admission.
[S. 122D inserted by s. 7 of Act 56 of 1979.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 8 of Act 56 of 1979.
that a trial in a magistrate's court or a regional court be converted into a preparatory examination, he may at any stage of the proceedings, but before sentence is passed, instruct that the trial be converted into a preparatory examination.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 9 of Act 56 of 1979.
and the accused has pleaded to a charge, the preparatory examination shall continue on the charge to which the accused has pleaded: Provided that where evidence is led at such preparatory examination which relates to an offence, other than the offence contained in the charge to which the accused has pleaded, allegedly committed by the accused, such evidence shall not be excluded on the ground only that the evidence does not relate to the offence to which the accused has pleaded.
Where an attorney-general instructs that a preparatory examination be instituted or that a trial be converted into a preparatory examination, he may, if it appears to him expedient on account of the number of accused involved or of excessive inconvenience or of possible disturbance of the public order, that the preparatory examination be held within his area of jurisdiction in a court other than the court in which the relevant proceedings were commenced, direct that the preparatory examination be instituted in such other court or, where a trial has been converted into a preparatory examination, be continued in such other court.
The magistrate or regional magistrate shall, after advice of the decision of the attorney-general, advise the accused of the decision of the attorney-general and adjourn the proceedings to such other court, and thereafter forward a copy of the record of the proceedings, certified as correct by the clerk of the court, to the court to which the proceedings have been adjourned.
The court to which the proceedings are adjourned under subsection (2), shall receive the copy of the record referred to in that subsection, which shall then form part of the proceedings of that court, and shall proceed to conduct the preparatory examination as if it were a preparatory examination instituted in that court.
Where an attorney-general instructs that a preparatory examination be held against an accused, the magistrate or regional magistrate shall, after advice of the decision of the attorney-general, advise the accused of the decision of the attorneygeneral and proceed in the manner hereinafter described to enquire into the charge against the accused.
Where an attorney-general instructs that a trial be converted into a preparatory examination, it shall not be necessary for the magistrate or regional magistrate to recall any witness who has already given evidence at the trial, but the record of the evidence thus given, certified as correct by the magistrate or regional magistrate, as the case may be, or, if such evidence was recorded in shorthand or by mechanical means, any document purporting to be a transcription of the original record of such evidence and purporting to be certified as correct under the hand of the person who transcribed it, shall have the same legal force and effect and shall be admissible in evidence in the same circumstances as the evidence given in the course of a preparatory examination: Provided that if it appears to the magistrate or regional magistrate concerned that it may be in the interests of justice to have a witness already examined recalled for further examination, then such witness shall be recalled and further examined and the evidence given by him shall be recorded in the same manner as other evidence given at a preparatory examination.
The prosecutor may, at a preparatory examination, call any witness in support of the charge to which the accused has pleaded or to testify in relation to any other offence allegedly committed by the accused.
The evidence given at a preparatory examination shall be recorded, and if such evidence is recorded in shorthand or by mechanical means, a document purporting to be a transcription of the original record of such evidence and purporting to be certified as correct under the hand of the person who transcribed such evidence, shall have the same legal force and effect as such original record.
The record of a preparatory examination may be proved in a court by the mere production thereof or of a copy thereof in terms of section 235.
The prosecutor shall, at the conclusion of the evidence in support of the charge, put to the accused such charge or charges as may arise from the evidence and which the prosecutor may prefer against the accused.
The magistrate or regional magistrate, as the case may be, shall, subject to the provisions of sections 77 and 85, require an accused to whom a charge is put under section 130 forthwith to plead to the charge.
Where an accused who has been required under section 131 to plead to a charge to which he has not pleaded before, pleads guilty to the offence charged, the presiding judicial officer shall question him in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b) of section 112 (1).
If the presiding judicial officer is not satisfied that the accused admits all the allegations in the charge, he shall record in what respect he is not so satisfied and enter a plea of not guilty: Provided that an allegation with reference to which the said judicial officer is so satisfied and which has been recorded as an admission, shall stand at the trial of the accused as proof of such allegation.
An accused may, after the provisions of section 132 have been complied with but subject to the provisions of section 151 (1) (b) which shall mutatis mutandis apply, give evidence or make an unsworn statement in relation to a charge put to him under section 130, and the record of such evidence or statement shall be received in evidence before any court in criminal proceedings against the accused upon its mere production without further proof.
An accused may call any competent witness on behalf of the defence.
As soon as a preparatory examination is concluded and the magistrate or regional magistrate, as the case may be, is upon the whole of the evidence of the opinion that no sufficient case has been made out to put the accused on trial upon any charge put to the accused under section 130 or upon any charge in respect of an offence of which the accused may on such charge be convicted, he may discharge the accused in respect of such charge.
The magistrate or regional magistrate, as the case may be, shall cause every document and every article produced or identified as an exhibit by any witness at a preparatory examination to be inventoried and labelled or otherwise marked, and shall cause such documents and articles to be kept in safe custody pending any trial following upon such preparatory examination.
The magistrate or regional magistrate, as the case may be, shall, at the conclusion of a preparatory examination and whether or not the accused is under section 135 discharged in respect of any charge, send a copy of the record of the preparatory examination to the attorney-general and, where the accused is not discharged in respect of all the charges put to him under section 130, adjourn the proceedings pending the decision of the attorney-general.
A preparatory examination may at any stage be continued by a judicial officer other than the judicial officer before whom the proceedings were commenced, and, if necessary, again be continued by the judicial officer before whom the proceedings were commenced.
decline to prosecute the accused, and the attorney-general shall advise the lower court concerned of his decision.
in the court concerned, dispose of the case on the charge on which the accused is arraigned; or in a court other than the court concerned, adjourn the case for sentence by such other court.
The record of the preparatory examination shall, upon proof thereof in the court in which the accused is arraigned for sentence, be received as part of the record of that court against the accused or, if the accused is arraigned in the court in which the preparatory examination was held, the record of the preparatory examination shall stand as the record of that court, and the plea of guilty and any admission by the accused shall stand and form part of the record of that court unless the accused satisfies the court that such plea or such admission was incorrectly recorded.
Unless the accused satisfies the court that the plea of guilty or an admission was incorrectly recorded or unless the court is not satisfied that the accused is guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty or that the accused has no valid defence to the charge, the court may convict the accused on his plea of guilty of the offence to which he has pleaded guilty and impose any competent sentence.
[Para. (b) amended by s. 30 of Act 105 of 1997.
Where an accused is under section 139 (b) arraigned for trial, a magistrate or regional magistrate of the court in which the preparatory examination was held shall advise the accused of the decision of the attorney-general and, if the accused is to be arraigned in a court other than the court concerned, commit the accused for trial by such other court.
Where an accused is arraigned for trial after a preparatory examination, the case shall be dealt with in all respects as with a summary trial.
the accused pleads guilty at his trial to the offence charged, or to an offence of which he may be convicted on the charge and the prosecutor accepts that plea; or the parties to the proceedings agree that any part of such evidence be admitted at the proceedings.
Where an accused who has been discharged under section 135 is arraigned for trial under section 139 (b), the clerk of the court where the preparatory examination was held shall issue to him a written notice to that effect and stating the place, date and time for the appearance of the accused in that court for committal for trial, or, if he is to be arraigned in that court, to plead to the charge on which he is to be arraigned.
The notice referred to in paragraph (a) shall be served on the accused in the manner provided for in sections 54 (2) and (3) for the service of a summons in a lower court and the provisions of sections 55 (1) and (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to such a notice.
If the accused is committed for trial by another court, the court committing the accused may direct that he be detained in custody, whereupon the provisions of Chapter 9 shall apply with reference to the release of the accused on bail.
Where an attorney-general under section 139 (c) declines to prosecute an accused, he shall advise the magistrate of the district in which the preparatory examination was held of his decision, and such magistrate shall forthwith have the accused released from custody or, if the accused is not in custody, advise the accused in writing of the decision of the attorney-general, whereupon no criminal proceedings shall again be instituted against the accused in respect of the charge in question.
An accused who is arraigned for sentence or for trial under section 139 may, without payment, inspect the record of the preparatory examination at the time of his arraignment before the court.
An accused who is arraigned for sentence or for trial under section 139 shall be entitled to a copy of the record of the preparatory examination upon payment, except where a legal practitioner under the Legal Aid Act, 1969 (Act 22 of 1969), or pro Deo counsel is appointed to defend the accused or where the accused is not legally represented, of a reasonable amount not exceeding twenty-five cents for each folio of seventy-two words or part thereof.
The clerk of the court shall as soon as possible provide the accused or his legal adviser with a copy of the preparatory examination record in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a).
Where an attorney-general arraigns an accused for sentence or trial by a superior court, the charge shall be contained in a document called an indictment, which shall be framed in the name of the attorney-general.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 10 (a) of Act 56 of 1979.
The indictment shall, in addition to the charge against the accused, include the name and, where known and where applicable, the address and a description of the accused with regard to sex, nationality and age.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 17 of Act 139 of 1992.
the omission of the name or address of a witness from such list shall in no way affect the validity of the trial.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 10 (b) of Act 56 of 1979.
Where the evidence for the State at the trial of the accused differs in a material respect from the summary referred to in paragraph (a), the trial court may, at the request of the accused and if it appears to the court that the accused might be prejudiced in his defence by reason of such difference, adjourn the trial for such period as to the court may seem adequate.
An indictment, together with a notice of trial referred to in the rules of court, shall, unless an accused agrees to a shorter period, be served on an accused at least ten days (Sundays and public holidays excluded) before the date appointed for the trial in accordance with the procedure and manner laid down by the rules of court, by handing it to him personally, or, if he cannot be found, by delivering it at his place of residence or place of employment or business to a person apparently over the age of sixteen years and apparently residing or employed there, or, if he has been released on bail, by leaving it at the place determined under section 62 for the service of any document on him; or by the magistrate or regional magistrate committing him to the superior court, by handing it to him.
A return of the mode of service by the person who served the indictment and the notice of trial, or, if the said documents were served in court on the accused by a magistrate or regional magistrate, an endorsement to that effect on the record of proceedings, may, upon the failure of the accused to attend the proceedings in the superior court, be handed in at the proceedings and shall be prima facie proof of the service.
The provisions of section 55 (1) and (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to a notice of trial served on an accused in terms of this subsection.
Except as provided in section 148, an accused arraigned before a superior court shall be tried by a judge of that court sitting with or without assessors in accordance with the provisions set out hereunder.
An assessor for the purposes of this section means a person who, in the opinion of the judge who presides at a trial, has experience in the administration of justice or skill in any matter which may be considered at the trial.
for trial and the accused pleads not guilty; or for sentence, or for trial and the accused pleads guilty, and a plea of not guilty is entered at the direction of the presiding judge, the presiding judge may summon not more than two assessors to assist him at the trial.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 2 of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 31 of Act 105 of 1997.
No assessor shall hear any evidence unless he first takes an oath or, as the case may be, makes an affirmation, administered by the presiding judge, that he will, on the evidence placed before him, give a true verdict upon the issues to be tried.
the presiding judge alone shall decide upon any other question of law or upon any question whether any matter constitutes a question of law or a question of fact, and he may for this purpose sit alone.
If an assessor is not in the full-time employment of the State, he shall be entitled to such compensation as the Minister, in consultation with the Minister of Finance, may determine in respect of expenses incurred by him in connection with his attendance at the trial, and in respect of his services as assessor.
[Sub-s. (4) substituted by s. 4 of Act 64 of 1982.
where he sits with assessors and there is a difference of opinion upon any question of fact or upon the question referred to in paragraph (b) of the proviso to section 145 (4), give the reasons for the decision or finding of the member of the court who is in the minority or, where the presiding judge sits with only one assessor, of such an assessor.
[S. 146 substituted by s. 5 of Act 64 of 1982.
that the trial proceed before the remaining member or members of the court; or that the trial start de novo, and for that purpose summon an assessor in the place of the assessor who has died or has become unable to act as assessor.
Where the presiding judge acts under subsection (1) (b), the plea already recorded shall stand.
[S. 148 repealed by s. 10 of Act 62 of 2000.
A superior court may, at any time after an indictment has been lodged with the registrar of that court and before the date of trial, upon application by the prosecution and after notice to the accused, or upon application by the accused after notice to the prosecution, order that the trial be held at a place within the area of jurisdiction of such court, other than the place determined for the trial, and that it be held on a date and at a time, other than the date and time determined for the trial.
If the accused is not present or represented at such an application by the prosecution or if the prosecution is not represented at such an application by the accused, the court shall direct that a copy of the order be served on the accused or, as the case may be, on the prosecution, and upon service thereof, the venue and date and time as changed shall be deemed to be the venue and date and time respectively that were originally appointed for the trial.
The prosecutor may at any trial, before any evidence is adduced, address the court for the purpose of explaining the charge and indicating, without comment, to the court what evidence he intends adducing in support of the charge.
The prosecutor may then examine the witnesses for the prosecution and adduce such evidence as may be admissible to prove that the accused committed the offence referred to in the charge or that he committed an offence of which he may be convicted on the charge.
Where any document may be received in evidence before any court upon its mere production, the prosecutor shall read out such document in court unless the accused is in possession of a copy of such document or dispenses with the reading out thereof.
If an accused is not under section 174 discharged at the close of the case for the prosecution, the court shall ask him whether he intends adducing any evidence on behalf of the defence, and if he answers in the affirmative, he may address the court for the purpose of indicating to the court, without comment, what evidence he intends adducing on behalf of the defence.
if the accused answers in the affirmative, he shall, except where the court on good cause shown allows otherwise, be called as a witness before any other witness for the defence; or if the accused answers in the negative but decides, after other evidence has been given on behalf of the defence, to give evidence himself, the court may draw such inference from the accused's conduct as may be reasonable in the circumstances.
The accused may then examine any other witness for the defence and adduce such other evidence on behalf of the defence as may be admissible.
Where any document may be received in evidence before any court upon its mere production and the accused wishes to place such evidence before the court, he shall read out the relevant document in court unless the prosecutor is in possession of a copy of such document or dispenses with the reading out thereof.
Except where otherwise expressly provided by this Act or any other law, criminal proceedings in any court shall take place in open court, and may take place on any day.
In addition to the provisions of section 63 (5) of the Child Justice Act, 2008, if it appears to any court that it would, in any criminal proceedings pending before that court, be in the interests of the security of the State or of good order or of public morals or of the administration of justice that such proceedings be held behind closed doors, it may direct that the public or any class thereof shall not be present at such proceedings or any part thereof.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 99 (1) of 75 of 2008.
that the identity of such person shall not be revealed or that it shall not be revealed for a period specified by the court.
any act for the purpose of furthering the commission of a sexual offence as contemplated in section 1 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, towards or in connection with any other person; or extortion or any statutory offence of demanding from any other person some advantage which was not due and, by inspiring fear in the mind of such other person, compelling him to render such advantage, the court before which such proceedings are pending may, at the request of such other person or, if he is a minor, at the request of his parent or guardian, direct that any person whose presence is not necessary at the proceedings or any person or class of persons mentioned in the request, shall not be present at the proceedings: Provided that judgment shall be delivered and sentence shall be passed in open court if the court is of the opinion that the identity of the other person concerned would not be revealed thereby.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
Any person whose presence is not necessary at criminal proceedings referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (3), shall not be admitted at such proceedings while the other person referred to in those paragraphs is giving evidence, unless such other person or, if he is a minor, his parent or guardian or a person in loco parentis, requests otherwise.
[Sub-s. (3A) inserted by s. 2 of Act 103 of 1987.
[Sub-s. (4) deleted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
Where a witness at criminal proceedings before any court is under the age of eighteen years, the court may direct that no person, other than such witness and his parent or guardian or a person in loco parentis, shall be present at such proceedings, unless such person's presence is necessary in connection with such proceedings or is authorized by the court.
The court may direct that no person under the age of eighteen years shall be present at criminal proceedings before the court, unless he is a witness referred to in subsection (5) and is actually giving evidence at such proceedings or his presence is authorized by the court.
Where a court under section 153 (1) on any of the grounds referred to in that subsection directs that the public or any class thereof shall not be present at any proceedings or part thereof, the court may direct that no information relating to the proceedings or any part thereof held behind closed doors shall be published in any manner whatever: Provided that a direction by the court shall not prevent the publication of information relating to the name and personal particulars of the accused, the charge against him, the plea, the verdict and the sentence, unless the court is of the opinion that the publication of any part of such information might defeat the object of its direction under section 153 (1), in which event the court may direct that such part shall not be published.
Where a court under section 153 (3) directs that any person or class of persons shall not be present at criminal proceedings or where any person is in terms of section 153 (3A) not admitted at criminal proceedings, no person shall publish in any manner whatever any information which might reveal the identity of any complainant in the proceedings: Provided that the presiding judge or judicial officer may authorize the publication of such information if he is of the opinion that such publication would be just and equitable.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 3 of Act 103 of 1987.
No person shall at any stage before the appearance of an accused in a court upon any charge referred to in section 153 (3) or at any stage after such appearance but before the accused has pleaded to the charge, publish in any manner whatever any information relating to the charge in question.
No person shall publish in any manner whatever any information which reveals or may reveal the identity of an accused under the age of eighteen years or of a witness at criminal proceedings who is under the age of eighteen years: Provided that the presiding judge or judicial officer may authorize the publication of so much of such information as he may deem fit if the publication thereof would in his opinion be just and equitable and in the interest of any particular person.
information for the purpose of reporting any question of law relating to the proceedings in question; or any decision or ruling given by any court on such question, if such report does not mention the name of the person charged or of the person against whom or in connection with whom the offence in question was alleged to have been committed or of any witness at such proceedings, and does not mention the place where the offence in question was alleged to have been committed.
Any person who publishes any information in contravention of this section or contrary to any direction or authority under this section or who in any manner whatever reveals the identity of a witness in contravention of a direction under section 153 (2), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three years or to both such fine and such imprisonment if the person in respect of whom the publication or revelation of identity was done, is over the age of 18 years, and if such person is under the age of 18 years, to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years or to both such fine and such imprisonment.
[Sub-s. (5) substituted by s. 12 of Act 33 of 1986 and by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
the criminal proceedings that gave rise to the publication of information or the revelation of identity as contemplated in that subsection related to a charge that an accused person committed or attempted to commit any sexual act as contemplated in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, towards or in connection with any other person or any act for the purpose of procuring or furthering the commission of a sexual act, as contemplated in that Act, towards or in connection with any other person; and the other person referred to in paragraph (a) suffered any physical, psychological or other injury or loss of income or support.
[Sub-s. (6) added by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
Any number of participants in the same offence may be tried together and any number of accessories after the same fact may be tried together or any number of participants in the same offence and any number of accessories after that fact may be tried together, and each such participant and each such accessory may be charged at such trial with the relevant substantive offence alleged against him.
A receiver of property obtained by means of an offence shall for purposes of this section be deemed to be a participant in the offence in question.
Any number of persons charged in respect of separate offences committed at the same place and at the same time or at about the same time, may be charged and tried together in respect of such offences if the prosecutor informs the court that evidence admissible at the trial of one of such persons will, in his opinion, also be admissible as evidence at the trial of any other such person or such persons.
An accused may be joined with any other accused in the same criminal proceedings at any time before any evidence has been led in respect of the charge in question.
Where two or more persons are charged jointly, whether with the same offence or with the different offences, the court may at any time during the trial, upon the application of the prosecutor or of any of the accused, direct that the trial of any one or more of the accused shall be held separately from the trial of the other accused, and the court may abstain from giving judgment in respect of any of such accused.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by this Act or any other law, all criminal proceedings in any court shall take place in the presence of the accused.
A court may, subject to section 153, on its own initiative or on application by the public prosecutor, order that a witness or an accused, if the witness or accused consents thereto, may give evidence by means of closed circuit television or similar electronic media.
A court may make a similar order on the application of an accused or a witness.
be in the interest of the security of the State or of public safety or in the interests of justice or the public; or prevent the likelihood that prejudice or harm might result to any person if he or she testifies or is present at such proceedings.
The court may, in order to ensure a fair and just trial, make the giving of evidence in terms of subsection (2) subject to such conditions as it may deem necessary: Provided that the prosecutor and the accused have the right, by means of that procedure, to question a witness and to observe the reaction of that witness.
The court shall provide reasons for refusing any application by the public prosecutor for the giving of evidence by a child complainant below the age of 14 years by means of closed circuit television or similar electronic media, immediately upon refusal and such reasons shall be entered into the record of the proceedings.
[Sub-s. (5) added by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
[S. 158 substituted by s. 7 of Act 86 of 1996.
If an accused at criminal proceedings conducts himself in a manner which makes the continuance of the proceedings in his presence impracticable, the court may direct that he be removed and that the proceedings continue in his absence.
direct that the proceedings be proceeded with in the absence of the accused concerned.
Where an accused becomes absent from the proceedings in the circumstances referred to in subsection (2), the court may, in lieu of directing that the proceedings be proceeded with in the absence of the accused concerned, upon the application of the prosecution direct that the proceedings in respect of the absent accused be separated from the proceedings in respect of the accused who are present, and thereafter, when such accused is again in attendance, the proceedings against him shall continue from the stage at which he became absent, and the court shall not be required to be differently constituted merely by reason of such separation.
If an accused who is in custody in terms of an order of court cannot, by reason of his physical indisposition or other physical condition, be brought before a court for the purposes of obtaining an order for his further detention, the court before which the accused would have been brought for purposes of such an order if it were not for the indisposition or other condition, may, upon application made by the prosecution at any time prior to the expiry of the order for his detention wherein the circumstances surrounding the indisposition or other condition are set out, supported by a certificate from a medical practitioner, order, in the absence of such an accused, that he be detained at a place indicated by the court and for the period which the court deems necessary in order that he can recover and be brought before the court so that an order for his further detention for the purposes of his trial can be obtained.
[Sub-s. (4) added by s. 9 of Act 5 of 1991.
'remote point' means the room or place at the designated correctional facility where the accused person appearing through audiovisual link is located.
[S. 159A inserted by s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 in respect of certain magisterial districts.
An accused person appearing before a court by audiovisual link must do so from a place at which the requirements referred to in subsections (2) and (3) and section 159C are complied with.
[S. 159B inserted by s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 in respect of certain magisterial districts.
any of the facilities referred to in subsection (1) malfunctioning, the court must, subject to paragraph (b), direct that the matter stand down and cause the accused person to be brought physically before the court on the day in question.
[S. 159C inserted by s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 in respect of certain magisterial districts.
Without limiting any other protection applying to it, a communication by audio link or audiovisual link, or a document transmitted between an accused person and his or her legal representative as provided for in section 159B (3), is confidential and inadmissible in any proceedings as if the communication took place or the document was produced while they were in the presence of each other.
[S. 159D inserted by s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 in respect of certain magisterial districts.
If an accused referred to in section 159 (1) or (2) again attends the proceedings in question, he may, unless he was legally represented during his absence, examine any witness who testified during his absence, and inspect the record of the proceedings or require the court to have such record read over to him.
If the examination of a witness under subsection (1) takes place after the evidence on behalf of the prosecution or any co-accused has been concluded, the prosecution or such co-accused may in respect of any issue raised by the examination, lead evidence in rebuttal of evidence relating to the issue so raised.
When the evidence on behalf of all the accused, other than an accused who is absent from the proceedings, is concluded, the court shall, subject to the provisions of paragraph (b), postpone the proceedings until such absent accused is in attendance and, if necessary, further postpone the proceedings until the evidence, if any, on behalf of that accused has been led.
If it appears to the court that the presence of an absent accused cannot reasonably be obtained, the court may direct that the proceedings in respect of the accused who are present be concluded as if such proceedings had been separated from the proceedings at the stage at which the accused concerned became absent from the proceedings, and when such absent accused is again in attendance, the proceedings against him shall continue from the stage at which he became absent, and the court shall not be required to be differently constituted merely by reason of such separation.
When, in the case of a trial, the evidence on behalf of all the accused has been concluded and any accused is absent when the verdict is to be delivered, the verdict may be delivered in respect of all the accused or be withheld until all the accused are present or be delivered in respect of any accused present and withheld in respect of the absent accused until he is again in attendance.
A witness at criminal proceedings shall, except where this Act or any other law expressly provides otherwise, give his evidence viva voce.
In this section the expression 'viva voce' shall, in the case of a deaf and dumb witness, be deemed to include gesture-language and, in the case of a witness under the age of eighteen years, be deemed to include demonstrations, gestures or any other form of non-verbal expression.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 1 of Act 135 of 1991.
'I swear that the evidence that I shall give, shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God.'.
If any person to whom the oath is administered wishes to take the oath with uplifted hand, he shall be permitted to do so.
'I solemnly affirm that the evidence that I shall give, shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth'.
Such affirmation shall have the same legal force and effect as if the person making it had taken the oath.
The validity of an oath duly taken by a witness shall not be affected if such witness does not on any of the grounds referred to in subsection (1) decline to take the oath.
Any person, who is found not to understand the nature and import of the oath or the affirmation, may be admitted to give evidence in criminal proceedings without taking the oath or making the affirmation: Provided that such person shall, in lieu of the oath or affirmation, be admonished by the presiding judge or judicial officer to speak the truth.
If such person wilfully and falsely states anything which, if sworn, would have amounted to the offence of perjury or any statutory offence punishable as perjury, he shall be deemed to have committed that offence, and shall, upon conviction, be liable to such punishment as is by law provided as a punishment for that offence.
Where the person concerned is to give his evidence through an interpreter or an intermediary appointed under section 170A (1), the oath, affirmation or admonition under section 162, 163 or 164 shall be administered by the presiding judge or judicial officer or the registrar of the court, as the case may be, through the interpreter or intermediary or by the interpreter or intermediary in the presence or under the eyes of the presiding judge or judicial officer, as the case may be.
[S. 165 substituted by s. 2 of Act 135 of 1991.
An accused may cross-examine any witness called on behalf of the prosecution at criminal proceedings or any co-accused who testifies at criminal proceedings or any witness called on behalf of such co-accused at criminal proceedings, and the prosecutor may cross-examine any witness, including an accused, called on behalf of the defence at criminal proceedings, and a witness called at such proceedings on behalf of the prosecution may be re-examined by the prosecutor on any matter raised during the cross-examination of that witness, and a witness called on behalf of the defence at such proceedings may likewise be re-examined by the accused.
The prosecutor and the accused may, with leave of the court, examine or cross-examine any witness called by the court at criminal proceedings.
If it appears to a court that any cross-examination contemplated in this section is being protracted unreasonably and thereby causing the proceedings to be delayed unreasonably, the court may request the cross-examiner to disclose the relevancy of any particular line of examination and may impose reasonable limits on the examination regarding the length thereof or regarding any particular line of examination.
The court may order that any submission regarding the relevancy of the crossexamination be heard in the absence of the witness.
[Sub-s. (3) added by s. 8 of Act 86 of 1996.
The court may at any stage of criminal proceedings examine any person, other than an accused, who has been subpoenaed to attend such proceedings or who is in attendance at such proceedings, and may recall and re-examine any person, including an accused, already examined at the proceedings, and the court shall examine, or recall and re-examine, the person concerned if his evidence appears to the court essential to the just decision of the case.
A court before which criminal proceedings are pending, may from time to time during such proceedings, if the court deems it necessary or expedient, adjourn the proceedings to any date on the terms which to the court may seem proper and which are not inconsistent with any provision of this Act.
A court before which criminal proceedings are pending, may from time to time during such proceedings, if the court deems it necessary or expedient that the proceedings be continued at any place within its area of jurisdiction other than the one where the court is sitting, adjourn the proceedings to such other place, or, if the court with reference to any circumstance relevant to the proceedings deems it necessary or expedient that the proceedings be adjourned to a place other than the place at which the court is sitting, adjourn the proceedings, on the terms which to the court may seem proper, to any such place, whether within or outside the area of jurisdiction of such court, for the purpose of performing at such place any function of the court relevant to such circumstance.
[S. 169 substituted by s. 19 of Act 59 of 1983.
An accused at criminal proceedings who is not in custody and who has not been released on bail, and who fails to appear at the place and on the date and at the time to which such proceedings may be adjourned or who fails to remain in attendance at such proceedings as so adjourned, shall be guilty of an offence and liable to the punishment prescribed under subsection (2).
The court may, if satisfied that an accused referred to in subsection (1) has failed to appear at the place and on the date and at the time to which the proceedings in question were adjourned or has failed to remain in attendance at such proceedings as so adjourned, issue a warrant for his arrest and, when he is brought before the court, in a summary manner enquire into his failure so to appear or so to remain in attendance and, unless the accused satisfies the court that his failure was not due to fault on his part, convict him of the offence referred to in subsection (1) and sentence him to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 13 of Act 33 of 1986.
[S. 170 amended by s. 11 of Act 56 of 1979 and substituted by s. 5 of Act 109 of 1984.
Whenever criminal proceedings are pending before any court and it appears to such court that it would expose any witness under the biological or mental age of eighteen years to undue mental stress or suffering if he or she testifies at such proceedings, the court may, subject to subsection (4), appoint a competent person as an intermediary in order to enable such witness to give his or her evidence through that intermediary.
No examination, cross-examination or re-examination of any witness in respect of whom a court has appointed an intermediary under subsection (1), except examination by the court, shall take place in any manner other than through that intermediary.
The said intermediary may, unless the court directs otherwise, convey the general purport of any question to the relevant witness.
which is so situated that any person whose presence may upset that witness, is outside the sight and hearing of that witness; and which enables the court and any person whose presence is necessary at the relevant proceedings to see and hear, either directly or through the medium of any electronic or other devices, that intermediary as well as that witness during his or her testimony.
The Minister may by notice in the Gazette19* determine the persons or the category or class of persons who are competent to be appointed as intermediaries.
An intermediary who is not in the full-time employment of the State shall be paid such travelling and subsistence and other allowances in respect of the services rendered by him or her as the Minister, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance, may determine.
No oath, affirmation or admonition which has been administered through an intermediary in terms of section 165 shall be invalid and no evidence which has been presented through an intermediary shall be inadmissible solely on account of the fact that such intermediary was not competent to be appointed as an intermediary in terms of a regulation referred to in subsection (4) (a), at the time when such oath, affirmation or admonition was administered or such evidence was presented.
the likelihood that real and substantial justice will be impaired if that evidence is admitted.
Subsection (5) does not prevent the prosecution from presenting anew any evidence which was presented through an intermediary referred to in that subsection.
the trial court; or the court considering an appeal or review, has not delivered judgment.
The court shall provide reasons for refusing any application or request by the public prosecutor for the appointment of an intermediary in respect of child complainants below the age of 14 years, immediately upon refusal and such reasons shall be entered into the record of the proceedings.
[Sub-s. (7) added by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
An intermediary referred to in subsection (1) shall be summoned to appear in court on a specified date and at a specified place and time to act as an intermediary.
[Sub-s. (8) added by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
direct that the appointment of the intermediary be revoked and that the proceedings continue in the absence of an intermediary.
[Sub-s. (9) added by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
The court shall immediately give reasons for any direction or order referred to in subsection (9) (iv), which reasons shall be entered into the record of the proceedings.
[Sub-s. (10) added by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
[S. 170A inserted by s. 3 of Act 135 of 1991 and substituted by s. 1 of Act 17 of 2001.
Whenever criminal proceedings are pending before any court and it appears to such court on application made to it that the examination of any witness who is resident in the Republic is necessary in the interests of justice and that the attendance of such witness cannot be obtained without undue delay, expense or inconvenience the court may dispense with such attendance and issue a commission to any magistrate.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 36 of Act 75 of 1996.
The specific matter with regard to which the evidence of the witness is required, shall be set out in the relevant application, and the court may confine the examination of the witness to such matter.
Where the application is made by the State, the court may, as a condition of the commission, direct that the costs of legal representation for the accused at the examination be paid by the State.
The magistrate to whom the commission is issued, shall proceed to the place where the witness is or shall summon the witness before him or her, and take down the evidence in the manner set out in paragraph (b).
The witness shall give his or her evidence upon oath or by affirmation, and such evidence shall be recorded and read over to the witness, and if he or she adheres thereto, be subscribed by him or her and the magistrate concerned.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 36 of Act 75 of 1996.
[Para. (c) deleted by s. 36 of Act 75 of 1996.
transmit interrogatories in writing which the court issuing the commission may think relevant to the issue, and the magistrate to whom the commission is issued, shall examine the witness upon such interrogatories; or appear before such magistrate, either by a legal representative or, in the case of an accused who is not in custody or in the case of a private prosecutor, in person, and examine the witness.
[S. 172 substituted by s. 36 of Act 75 of 1996.
The Magistrate shall return the evidence in question to the court which issued the commission, and such evidence shall be open to the inspection of the parties to the proceedings and shall, in so far as it is admissible as evidence in such proceedings, form part of the record of such court.
[S. 173 substituted by s. 36 of Act 75 of 1996.
If, at the close of the case for the prosecution at any trial, the court is of the opinion that there is no evidence that the accused committed the offence referred to in the charge or any offence of which he may be convicted on the charge, it may return a verdict of not guilty.
After all the evidence has been adduced, the prosecutor may address the court, and thereafter the accused may address the court.
The prosecutor may reply on any matter of law raised by the accused in his address, and may, with leave of the court, reply on any matter of fact raised by the accused in his address.
When by mistake a wrong judgment is delivered, the court may, before or immediately after it is recorded, amend the judgment.
The court may at criminal proceedings defer its reasons for any decision on any question raised at such proceedings, and the reasons so deferred shall, when given, be deemed to have been given at the time of the proceedings.
Where an offence is committed in the presence of the court, the presiding judge or judicial officer may order the arrest of the offender.
If any person, other than an accused, who is present at criminal proceedings, disturbs the peace or order of the court, the court may order that such person be removed from the court and that he be detained in custody until the rising of the court.
The prosecutor or an accused may compel the attendance of any person to give evidence or to produce any book, paper or document in criminal proceedings by taking out of the office prescribed by the rules of court the process of court for that purpose.
If any police official has reasonable grounds for believing that the attendance of any person is or will be necessary to give evidence or to produce any book, paper or document in criminal proceedings in a lower court, and hands to such person a written notice calling upon him to attend such criminal proceedings on the date and at the time and place specified in the notice, to give evidence or to produce any book, paper or document, likewise specified, such person shall, for the purposes of this Act, be deemed to have been duly subpoenaed so to attend such criminal proceedings.
Where an accused desires to have any witness subpoenaed, a sum of money sufficient to cover the costs of serving the subpoena shall be deposited with the prescribed officer of the court.
that he is unable to pay the necessary costs and fees; and that such witness is necessary and material for his defence, such officer shall subpoena such witness.
In any case where the prescribed officer of the court is not so satisfied, he shall, upon the request of the accused, refer the relevant application to the judge or judicial officer presiding over the court, who may grant or refuse the application or defer his decision until he has heard other evidence in the case.
For the purposes of this section 'prescribed officer of the court' means the registrar, assistant registrar, clerk of the court or any officer prescribed by the rules of court.
A subpoena in criminal proceedings shall be served in the manner provided by the rules of court by a person empowered to serve a subpoena in criminal proceedings.
A return by the person empowered to serve a subpoena in criminal proceedings, that the service thereof has been duly effected, may, upon the failure of a witness to attend the relevant proceedings, be handed in at such proceedings and shall be prima facie proof of such service.
Where a subpoena is served on a witness at a place outside the magisterial district from which the subpoena is issued, or, in the case of a superior court, at a place outside the magisterial district in which the proceedings at which the witness is to appear are to take place, and the witness is required to travel from such place to the court in question, the necessary expenses to travel to and from such court and of sojourn at the court in question, shall on demand be paid to such witness at the time of service of the subpoena.
A prisoner who is in a prison shall be subpoenaed as a witness on behalf of the defence or a private prosecutor only if the court before which the prisoner is to appear as a witness authorizes that the prisoner be subpoenaed as a witness, and the court shall give such authority only if it is satisfied that the evidence in question is necessary and material for the defence or the private prosecutor, as the case may be, and that the public safety or order will not be endangered by the calling of the witness.
Any person who is advised in writing by any police official that he will be required as a witness in criminal proceedings, shall, until such criminal proceedings have been finally disposed of or until he is officially advised that he will no longer be required as a witness, keep such police official informed at all times of his full residential address or any other address where he may conveniently be found.
Any person who fails to comply with the provisions of subsection (1), shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 14 of Act 33 of 1986.
Whenever any person is likely to give material evidence in criminal proceedings with reference to any offence, other than an offence referred to in Part III of Schedule 2 any magistrate, regional magistrate or judge of the court before which the relevant proceedings are pending may, upon information in writing and on oath that such person is about to abscond, issue a warrant for his arrest.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 3 of Act 126 of 1992.
If a person referred to in subsection (1) is arrested, the magistrate, regional magistrate or judge, as the case may be, may warn him to appear at the proceedings in question at a stated place and at a stated time and on a stated date and release him on any condition referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (e) of section 62, in which event the provisions of subsections (1), (3) and (4) of section 66 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to any such condition.
A person who fails to comply with a warning under subsection (2) shall be guilty of an offence and liable to the punishment contemplated in paragraph (b) of this subsection.
The provisions of section 170 (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to any person who is guilty of an offence under paragraph (a) of this subsection.
Whenever any person is likely to give material evidence in criminal proceedings, any magistrate, regional magistrate or judge of the court before which the relevant proceedings are pending may, upon information in writing and on oath that such person is evading service of the relevant subpoena, issue a warrant for his arrest, whereupon the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to such person.
is of the opinion that the personal safety of such person is in danger or that he may abscond or that he may be tampered with or that he may be intimidated; or deems it to be in the interests of such person or of the administration of justice that he be detained in custody, the attorney-general may by way of affidavit place such information before a judge in chambers and apply to such judge for an order that the person concerned be detained pending the relevant proceedings.
The Attorney-general may in any case in which he is of the opinion that the object of obtaining an order under paragraph (a) may be defeated if the person concerned is not detained without delay, order that such person be detained forthwith but such order shall not endure for longer than seventy-two hours unless the attorney-general within that time by way of affidavit places before a judge in chambers the information on which he ordered the detention of the person concerned and such further information as might become available to him, and applies to such judge for an order that the person concerned be detained pending the relevant proceedings.
The attorney-general shall, as soon as he applies to a judge under paragraph for an order of detention, in writing advise the person in charge of the place where the person concerned is being detained, that he has so applied for an order, and shall, where a judge under subsection (2) (a) refuses to issue a warrant for the detention of the person concerned, forthwith advise the person so in charge of such refusal, whereupon the person so in charge shall without delay release the person detained.
that there is a danger that the personal safety of the person concerned may be threatened or that he may abscond or that he may be tampered with or that he may be intimidated; or that it would be in the interests of the person concerned or of the administration of justice that he be detained in custody, issue a warrant for the detention of such person.
The decision of a judge under paragraph (a) shall be final: Provided that where a judge refuses an application and further information becomes available to the attorney-general concerning the person in respect of whom the application was refused, the attorney-general may again apply under subsection (1) (a) for the detention of that person.
A person in respect of whom a warrant is issued under subsection (2), shall be taken to the place mentioned in the warrant and, in accordance with regulations which the Minister is hereby authorized to make, be detained there or at any other place determined by any judge from time to time, or, where the person concerned is detained in terms of an order by the attorney-general under subsection (1) (b), such person shall, pending the decision of the judge under subsection (2) (a), be taken to a place determined by the attorney-general and detained there in accordance with the said regulations.
the attorney-general orders that he be released earlier; or such proceedings have not commenced within six months from the date on which he is so detained, in which case he shall be released after the expiration of such period.
[Sub-s. (4) substituted by s. 2 (1) of Act 79 of 1978.
No person, other than an officer in the service of the State acting in the performance of his official duties, shall have access to a person detained under subsection (2), except with the consent of and subject to the conditions determined by the attorney-general or an officer in the service of the State delegated by him.
Any person detained under subsection (2) shall be visited in private at least once during each week by a magistrate of the district or area in which he is detained.
For the purposes of section 191 any person detained under subsection (2) of this section shall be deemed to have attended the criminal proceedings in question as a witness for the State during the whole of the period of his detention.
[Sub-s. (8) deleted by s. 69 of Act 88 of 1996.
In this section the expression 'judge in chambers' means a judge sitting behind closed doors when hearing the relevant application.
No information relating to the proceedings under subsection (1) or (2) shall be published or be made public in any manner whatever.
[S. 185A inserted by s. 4 of Act 135 of 1991 and repealed by s. 24 (1) of Act 112 of 1998.
The court may at any stage of criminal proceedings subpoena or cause to be subpoenaed any person as a witness at such proceedings, and the court shall so subpoena a witness or so cause a witness to be subpoenaed if the evidence of such witness appears to the court essential to the just decision of the case.
A witness who is subpoenaed to attend criminal proceedings, shall attend the proceedings and remain in attendance at the proceedings, and a person who is in attendance at criminal proceedings, though not subpoenaed as a witness, and who is warned by the court to remain in attendance at the proceedings, shall remain in attendance at the proceedings, unless such witness or such person is excused by the court: Provided that the court may, at any time during the proceedings in question, order that any person, other than the accused, who is to be called as a witness, shall leave the court and remain absent from the proceedings until he is called, and that he shall remain in court after he has given evidence.
Any person who is subpoenaed to attend criminal proceedings and who fails to attend or to remain in attendance at such proceedings, and any person who is warned by the court to remain in attendance at criminal proceedings and who fails to remain in attendance at such proceedings, and any person so subpoenaed or so warned who fails to appear at the place and on the date and at the time to which the proceedings in question may be adjourned or who fails to remain in attendance at such proceedings as so adjourned, shall be guilty of an offence and liable to the punishment contemplated in subsection (2).
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 6 of Act 109 of 1984.
The provisions of section 170 (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to any person referred to in subsection (1).
If any person present at criminal proceedings is required to give evidence at such proceedings and refuses to be sworn or to make an affirmation as a witness, or, having been sworn or having made an affirmation as a witness, refuses to answer any question put to him or refuses or fails to produce any book, paper or document required to be produced by him, the court may in a summary manner enquire into such refusal or failure and, unless the person so refusing or failing has a just excuse for his refusal or failure, sentence him to imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or, where the criminal proceedings in question relate to an offence referred to in Part III of Schedule 2, to imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 20 of Act 59 of 1983 and by s. 4 of Act 126 of 1992.
After the expiration of any sentence imposed under subsection (1), the person concerned may from time to time again be dealt with under that subsection with regard to any further refusal or failure.
A court may at any time on good cause shown remit any punishment or part thereof imposed by it under subsection (1).
Any sentence imposed by any court under subsection (1) shall be executed and be subject to appeal in the same manner as a sentence imposed in any criminal case by such court, and shall be served before any other sentence of imprisonment imposed on the person concerned.
The court may, notwithstanding any action taken under this section, at any time conclude the criminal proceedings referred to in subsection (1).
No person shall be bound to produce any book, paper or document not specified in any subpoena served upon him, unless he has such book, paper or document in court.
Any lower court shall have jurisdiction to sentence any person to the maximum period of imprisonment prescribed by this section.
Any party may in criminal proceedings impeach or support the credibility of any witness called against or on behalf of such party in any manner in which and by any evidence by which the credibility of such witness might on the thirtieth day of May, 1961, have been impeached or supported by such party.
Any such party who has called a witness who has given evidence in any such proceedings (whether that witness is or is not, in the opinion of the court, adverse to the party calling him), may, after such party or the court has asked the witness whether he did or did not previously make a statement with which his evidence in the said proceedings is inconsistent, and after sufficient particulars of the alleged previous statement to designate the occasion when it was made have been given to the witness, prove that he previously made a statement with which such evidence is inconsistent.
Any person who attends criminal proceedings as a witness for the State shall be entitled to such allowance as may be prescribed under subsection (3): Provided that the judicial officer or the judge presiding at such proceedings may, if he thinks fit, direct that no such allowance or that only a part of such allowance shall be paid to any such witness.
Subject to any regulation made under subsection (3), the judicial officer or the judge presiding at criminal proceedings may, if he thinks fit, direct that any person who has attended such proceedings as a witness for the accused, shall be paid such allowance as may be prescribed by such regulation, or such lesser allowance as such judicial officer or such judge may determine.
(3)20* The Minister may, in consultation with the Minister of Finance, by regulation prescribe a tariff of allowances which may be paid out of public moneys to witnesses in criminal proceedings, and may by regulation prescribe different tariffs for witnesses according to their several callings, occupations or stations in life, and according also to the distances to be travelled by such witnesses to reach the place where the proceedings in question are to take place, and may by regulation further prescribe the circumstances in which such allowances may be paid to any witness for an accused.
The Minister may under subsection (3) empower any officer in the service of the State to authorize, in any case in which the payment of an allowance in accordance with the tariff prescribed21* may cause undue hardship or in the case of any person resident outside the Republic, the payment of an allowance in accordance with a higher tariff than the tariff prescribed.
For the purposes of this section 'witness' shall include any person necessarily required to accompany any witness on account of his youth, old age or infirmity.
The Minister has the power to determine services to be provided to a witness who is required to give evidence in any court of law.
the counselling of witnesses; and any other matter which the Minister deems expedient to prescribe in order to provide services to witnesses at courts.
Any regulation made under this section which may result in financial expenditure for the State must be made in consultation with the Minister of Finance.
Any regulation made under this section may provide that any person who contravenes a provision thereof or fails to comply therewith shall be guilty of an offence and on conviction be liable to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three years.
Any regulation made under this section must, before publication thereof in the Gazette, be submitted to Parliament.
[S. 191A inserted by s. 25 of Act 112 of 1998.
Every person not expressly excluded by this Act from giving evidence shall, subject to the provisions of section 206, be competent and compellable to give evidence in criminal proceedings.
The court in which criminal proceedings are conducted shall decide any question concerning the competency or compellability of any witness to give evidence.
No person appearing or proved to be afflicted with mental illness or to be labouring under any imbecility of mind due to intoxication or drugs or the like, and who is thereby deprived of the proper use of his reason, shall be competent to give evidence while so afflicted or disabled.
the statutory offence of making a false statement in any affidavit or any affirmed, solemn or attested declaration if it is made in connection with or for the purpose of any such proceedings as are mentioned in paragraph (h).
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 5 of Act 72 of 1985 and by s. 7 of Act 26 of 1987, substituted by s. 6 of Act 45 of 1988, amended by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996, by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996 and by s. 45 (1) of Act 99 of 1998 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
For the purposes of the law of evidence in criminal proceedings 'marriage' shall include a customary marriage or customary union concluded under the indigenous law and custom of any of the indigenous peoples of the Republic of South Africa or any marriage concluded under any system of religious law.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996.
the wife or husband of an accused shall not be a compellable witness where a co-accused calls that wife or husband as a witness for the defence.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 7 of Act 45 of 1988.
The evidence which an accused may, upon his own application, give in his own defence at joint criminal proceedings, shall not be inadmissible against a co-accused at such proceedings by reason only that such accused is for any reason not a competent witness for the prosecution against such co-accused.
An accused may not make an unsworn statement at his trial in lieu of evidence but shall, if he wishes to give evidence, do so on oath or, as the case may be, by affirmation.
the proceedings against him are such as are described in section 240 or 241 and the notice under those sections has been given to him; or the proof that he has committed or has been convicted of such other offence is admissible evidence to show that he is guilty of the offence with which he is charged.
A husband shall not at criminal proceedings be compelled to disclose any communication which his wife made to him during the marriage, and a wife shall not at criminal proceedings be compelled to disclose any communication which her husband made to her during the marriage.
Subsection (1) shall also apply to a communication made during the subsistence of a marriage or a putative marriage which has been dissolved or annulled by a competent court.
[Sub-s (2) substituted by s. 8 of Act 45 of 1988.
No person shall at criminal proceedings be compelled to answer any question or to give any evidence, if the question or evidence is such that under the circumstances the husband or wife of such person, if under examination as a witness, may lawfully refuse and cannot be compelled to answer or to give it.
A witness in criminal proceedings may not refuse to answer any question relevant to the issue by reason only that the answer establishes or may establish a civil liability on his part.
No legal practitioner qualified to practise in any court, whether within the Republic or elsewhere, shall be competent, without the consent of the person concerned, to give evidence at criminal proceedings against any person by whom he is professionally employed or consulted as to any fact, matter or thing with regard to which such practitioner would not on the thirtieth day of May, 1961, by reason of such employment or consultation, have been competent to give evidence without such consent: Provided that such legal practitioner shall be competent and compellable to give evidence as to any fact, matter or thing which relates to or is connected with the commission of any offence with which the person by whom such legal practitioner is professionally employed or consulted, is charged, if such fact, matter or thing came to the knowledge of such legal practitioner before he was professionally employed or consulted with reference to the defence of the person concerned.
Except as is in this Act provided and subject to the provisions of any other law, no witness in criminal proceedings shall be compellable or permitted to give evidence as to any fact, matter or thing or as to any communication made to or by such witness, if such witness would on the thirtieth day of May, 1961, not have been compellable or permitted to give evidence with regard to such fact, matter or thing or communication by reason that it should not, on the grounds of public policy or from regard to public interest, be disclosed, and that it is privileged from disclosure: Provided that any person may in criminal proceedings adduce evidence of any communication alleging the commission of an offence, if the making of that communication prima facie constitutes an offence, and the judge or judicial officer presiding at such proceedings may determine whether the making of such communication prima facie does or does not constitute an offence, and such determination shall, for the purpose of such proceedings, be final.
No witness in criminal proceedings shall, except as provided by this Act or any other law, be compelled to answer any question which he would not on the thirtieth day of May, 1961, have been compelled to answer by reason that the answer may expose him to a criminal charge.
that if he answers frankly and honestly all questions put to him, he shall be discharged from prosecution with regard to the offence so specified and with regard to any offence in respect of which a verdict of guilty would be competent upon a charge relating to the offence so specified; and such witness shall thereupon give evidence and answer any question put to him, whether by the prosecution, the accused or the court, notwithstanding that the reply thereto may incriminate him with regard to the offence so specified by the prosecutor or with regard to any offence in respect of which a verdict of guilty would be competent upon a charge relating to the offence so specified.
such witness shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (3), be discharged from prosecution for the offence so specified by the prosecutor and for any offence in respect of which a verdict of guilty would be competent upon a charge relating to the offence so specified; and the court shall cause such discharge to be entered on the record of the proceedings in question.
The discharge referred to in subsection (2) shall be of no legal force or effect if it is given at preparatory examination proceedings and the witness concerned does not at any trial arising out of such preparatory examination, answer, in the opinion of the court, frankly and honestly all questions put to him at such trial, whether by the prosecution, the accused or the court.
Where a witness gives evidence under this section and is not discharged from prosecution in respect of the offence in question, such evidence shall not be admissible in evidence against him at any trial in respect of such offence or any offence in respect of which a verdict of guilty is competent upon a charge relating to such offence.
The provisions of this subsection shall not apply with reference to a witness who is prosecuted for perjury arising from the giving of the evidence in question, or for a contravention of section 319 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1955 (Act 56 of 1955).
A judge of a High Court, a regional court magistrate or a magistrate may, subject to the provisions of subsection (4) and section 15 of the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-related Information Act, 2002, upon the request of a Director of Public Prosecutions or a public prosecutor authorized thereto in writing by the Director of Public Prosecutions, require the attendance before him or her or any other judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, for examination by the Director of Public Prosecutions or the public prosecutor authorized thereto in writing by the Director of Public Prosecutions, of any person who is likely to give material or relevant information as to any alleged offence, whether or not it is known by whom the offence was committed: Provided that if such person furnishes that information to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Prosecutions or public prosecutor concerned prior to the date on which he or she is required to appear before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, he or she shall be under no further obligation to appear before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate. [Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 59 of Act 70 of 2002.
The provisions of sections 162 to 165 inclusive, 179 to 181 inclusive, 187 to 189 inclusive, 191 and 204 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to the proceedings under subsection (1).
The examination of any person under subsection (1) may be conducted in private at any place designated by the judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate.
A person required in terms of subsection (1) to appear before a judge, a regional court magistrate or a magistrate for examination, and who refuses or fails to give the information contemplated in subsection (1), shall not be sentenced to imprisonment as contemplated in section 189 unless the judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate concerned, as the case may be, is also of the opinion that the furnishing of such information is necessary for the administration of justice or the maintenance of law and order.
[S. 205 substituted by s. 11 of Act 204 of 1993.
The law as to the competency, compellability or privilege of witnesses which was in force in respect of criminal proceedings on the thirtieth day of May, 1961, shall apply in any case not expressly provided for by this Act or any other law.
No provision of this Chapter shall be construed as modifying any provision of any other law whereby in any criminal proceedings referred to in such law a person is deemed a competent witness.
An accused may be convicted of any offence on the single evidence of any competent witness.
An accused may be convicted of any offence on the single evidence of a confession by such accused that he committed the offence in question, if such confession is confirmed in a material respect or, where the confession is not so confirmed, if the offence is proved by evidence, other than such confession, to have been actually committed.
No evidence as to any fact, matter or thing shall be admissible which is irrelevant or immaterial and which cannot conduce to prove or disprove any point or fact at issue in criminal proceedings.
Except where otherwise expressly provided by this Act or the Child Justice Act, 2008, or except where the fact of a previous conviction is an element of any offence with which an accused is charged, evidence shall not be admissible at criminal proceedings in respect of any offence to prove that an accused at such proceedings had previously been convicted of any offence, whether in the Republic or elsewhere, and no accused, if called as a witness, shall be asked whether he or she has been so convicted.
[S. 211 substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
that such act, transaction or occurrence took place; or that such functionary performed such act or took part in such transaction, and that there is no record thereof, shall, upon its mere production at such proceedings, be prima facie proof that the act, transaction or occurrence in question did not take place or, as the case may be, that the functionary concerned did not perform the act in question or did not take part in the transaction in question.
Whenever in criminal proceedings the question arises whether any person bearing a particular name did or did not furnish any particular officer in the service of the State or of a provincial administration with any particular information or document, a document purporting to be an affidavit made by a person who in that affidavit alleges that he is the said officer and that no person bearing the said name furnished him with such information or document, shall, upon its mere production at such proceedings, be prima facie proof that the said person did not furnish the said officer with any such information or document.
Whenever in criminal proceedings the question arises whether any matter has been registered under any law or whether any fact or transaction has been recorded thereunder or whether anything connected therewith has been done thereunder, a document purporting to be an affidavit made by a person who in that affidavit alleges that he is the person upon whom the law in question confers the power or imposes the duty to register such matter or to record such fact or transaction or to do such thing connected therewith and that he has registered the matter in question or that he has recorded the fact or transaction in question or that he has done the thing connected therewith or that he has satisfied himself that the matter in question was registered or that the fact or transaction in question was recorded or that the thing connected therewith was done, shall, upon its mere production at such proceedings, be prima facie proof that such matter was registered or, as the case may be, that such fact or transaction was recorded or that the thing connected therewith was done.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 12 of Act 56 of 1979.
in ballistics, in the identification of finger prints or palm-prints or in the examination of disputed documents, is or may become relevant to the issue at criminal proceedings, a document purporting to be an affidavit made by a person who in that affidavit alleges that he or she is in the service of the State or of a provincial administration or is in the service of or is attached to the South African Institute for Medical Research or any university in the Republic or any other body22* designated by the Minister for the purposes of this subsection by notice in the Gazette, and that he or she has established such fact by means of such an examination or process, shall, upon its mere production at such proceedings be prima facie proof of such fact: Provided that the person who may make such affidavit may, in any case in which skill is required in chemistry, anatomy or pathology, issue a certificate in lieu of such affidavit, in which event the provisions of this paragraph shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to such certificate.
[Para. (a) amended by ss. 46 and 47 of Act 97 of 1986, by s. 40 of Act 122 of 1991 and by s. 9 of Act 86 of 1996 and substituted by s. 6 of Act 34 of 1998.
[NB: Para. (a) has been substituted by s. 4 (a) of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 6 of 2010, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
Any person who issues a certificate under paragraph (a) and who in such certificate wilfully states anything which is false, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the punishment prescribed for the offence of perjury.
Whenever the question as to the existence and nature of a precious metal or any precious stone is or may become relevant to the issue in criminal proceedings, a document purporting to be an affidavit made by a person who in that affidavit alleges that he is an appraiser of precious metals or precious stones, that he is in the service of the State, that such precious metal or such precious stone is indeed a precious metal or a precious stone, as the case may be, that it is a precious metal or a precious stone of a particular kind and appearance and that the mass or value of such precious metal or such precious stone is as specified in that affidavit, shall, upon its mere production at such proceedings, be prima facie proof that it is a precious metal or a precious stone of a particular kind and appearance and the mass or value of such precious metal or such precious stone is as so specified.
[Sub-s. (5) substituted by s. 11 of Act 5 of 1991.
found such finger-print or palm-print at or in the article or in the position or circumstances stated in the affidavit; or dealt with such finger-print or palm-print in the manner stated in the affidavit, shall, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be prima facie proof that such finger-print or palm-print was so found or, as the case may be, was so dealt with. [NB: Sub-s. (6) has been substituted by s. 4 (b) of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 6 of 2010, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
that he is employed at or in connection with the hospital, nursing home, ambulance or mortuary in question; and that he during the performance of his official duties observed the physical characteristics or condition of the deceased person or of the dead body in question; and that while the deceased person or the dead body in question was under his care, such deceased person or such dead body had or sustained the injuries or wounds described in the affidavit, or sustained no injuries or wounds; or that he pointed out or handed over the deceased person or the dead body in question to a specified person or that he left the deceased person or the dead body in question in the care of a specified person or that the deceased person or the dead body in question was pointed out or handed over to him or left in his care by a specified person, shall, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be prima facie proof of the matter so alleged.
[Sub-para. (i) amended by s. 46 of Act 97 of 1986.
during a period specified in the affidavit, had a finger-print or palm-print, article of clothing, specimen, tissue or object described in the affidavit in his custody in the manner described in the affidavit, which was packed or marked in the manner described in the affidavit, shall, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be prima facie proof of the matter so alleged: Provided that the person who may make such affidavit in any case relating to any article of clothing, specimen or tissue, may issue a certificate in lieu of such affidavit, in which event the provisions of this paragraph shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to such certificate. [NB: Para. (a) has been substituted by s. 4 (c) of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 6 of 2010, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
that he in the performance of his official duties received or, as the case may be, handled or transhipped the goods referred to in the consignment note referred to in paragraph (a), shall, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be prima facie proof of the matter so alleged.
The Minister may in respect of any measuring instrument as defined in section 1 of the Trade Metrology Act, 1973 (Act 77 of 1973), by notice in the Gazette prescribe the conditions and requirements which shall be complied with before any reading by such measuring instrument may be accepted in criminal proceedings as proof of the fact which it purports to prove, and if the Minister has so prescribed such conditions and requirements and upon proof that such conditions and requirements have been complied with in respect of any particular measuring instrument, the measuring instrument in question shall, for the purposes of proving the fact which it purports to prove, be accepted at criminal proceedings as proving the fact recorded by it, unless the contrary is proved.
An affidavit in which the deponent declares that the conditions and requirements referred to in paragraph (a) have been complied with in respect of the measuring instrument in question shall, upon the mere production thereof at the criminal proceedings in question, be prima facie proof that such conditions and requirements have been complied with.
any such syringe or receptacle is immediately before being used for the said purpose, in a sealed condition, or contained in a holder which is sealed with a seal or in a manner prescribed by the Minister; and any such syringe, receptacle or holder bears an endorsement that the conditions and requirements prescribed by the Minister have been complied with in respect of such syringe or receptacle, proof at criminal proceedings that the seal, as thus prescribed, of such syringe or receptacle was immediately before the use of such syringe or receptacle for the said purpose intact, shall be deemed to constitute prima facie proof that the syringe or the receptacle in question was then free from any substance or contamination which could materially affect the result of the analysis in question.
and that the seal was intact immediately before the syringe or receptacle was used for the said purpose; and that the syringe, receptacle or, as the case may be, the holder contained the endorsement referred to in paragraph (a) (ii), shall, upon the mere production thereof at the proceedings in question, be prima facie proof that the syringe or receptacle was so sealed, that the seal was so intact and that the syringe, receptacle or holder, as the case may be, was so endorsed.
Any person who for the purposes of this subsection makes or causes to be made a false endorsement on any syringe, receptacle or holder, knowing it to be false, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to the punishment prescribed for the offence of perjury.
The court before which an affidavit or certificate is under any of the preceding provisions of this section produced as prima facie proof of the relevant contents thereof, may in its discretion cause the person who made the affidavit or issued the certificate to be subpoenaed to give oral evidence in the proceedings in question, or may cause written interrogatories to be submitted to such person for reply, and such interrogatories and any reply thereto purporting to be a reply from such person, shall likewise be admissible in evidence at such proceedings.
No provision of this section shall affect any other law under which any certificate or other document is admissible in evidence, and the provisions of this section shall be deemed to be additional to and not in substitution of any such law.
it is authenticated in the manner prescribed in the rules of court for the authentication of documents executed outside the Republic; or it is authenticated by a person, and in the manner, contemplated in section 8 of the Justices of the Peace and Commissioners of Oaths Act, 1963 (Act 16 of 1963).
The admissibility and evidentiary value of an affidavit contemplated in subsection (1) shall not be affected by the fact that the form of the oath, confirmation or attestation thereof differs from the form of the oath, confirmation or attestation prescribed in the Republic.
[S. 212A inserted by s. 5 of Act 157 of 1993.
If an accused has appointed a legal adviser and, at any stage during the proceedings, it appears to a public prosecutor that a particular fact or facts which must be proved in a charge against an accused is or are not in issue or will not be placed in issue in criminal proceedings against the accused, he or she may, notwithstanding section 220, forward or hand a notice to the accused or his or her legal adviser setting out that fact or those facts and stating that such fact or facts shall be deemed to have been proved at the proceedings unless notice is given that any such fact will be placed in issue.
The first-mentioned notice contemplated in subsection (1) shall be sent by certified mail or handed to the accused or his or her legal adviser personally at least 14 days before the commencement of the criminal proceedings or the date set for the continuation of the proceedings or within such shorter period as may be condoned by the court or agreed upon by the accused or his or her legal adviser and the prosecutor.
If any fact mentioned in such notice is intended to be placed in issue at the proceedings, the accused or his or her legal representative shall at least five days before the commencement or the date set for the continuation of the proceedings or within such shorter period as may be condoned by the court or agreed upon with the prosecutor deliver a notice in writing to that effect to the registrar or the clerk of the court, as the case may be, or orally notify the registrar or the clerk of the court to that effect in which case the registrar or the clerk of the court shall record such notice.
If, after receipt of the first-mentioned notice contemplated in subsection (1), any fact mentioned in that notice is not placed in issue as contemplated in subsection (3), the court may deem such fact or facts, subject to the provisions of subsections (5) and (6), to have been sufficiently proved at the proceedings concerned.
If a notice was forwarded or handed over by a prosecutor as contemplated in subsection (1), the prosecutor shall notify the court at the commencement of the proceedings of such fact and of the reaction thereto, if any, and the court shall thereupon institute an investigation into such of the facts which are not disputed and enquire from the accused whether he or she confirms the information given by the prosecutor and whether he or she understands his or her rights and the implications of the procedure and where the legal adviser of the accused replies to any question by the court under this section, the accused shall be required by the court to declare whether he or she confirms such reply or not.
The court may on its own initiative or at the request of the accused order oral evidence to be adduced regarding any fact contemplated in subsection (4).
[S. 212B inserted by s. 10 of Act 86 of 1996.
In criminal proceedings a written statement by any person, other than an accused at such proceedings, shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (2), be admissible as evidence to the same extent as oral evidence to the same effect by such person.
The statement shall purport to be signed by the person who made it, and shall contain a declaration by such person to the effect that it is true to the best of his knowledge and belief and that he made the statement knowing that, if it were tendered in evidence, he would be liable to prosecution if he wilfully stated in it anything which he knew to be false or which he did not believe to be true.
If the person who makes the statement cannot read it, it shall be read to him before he signs it, and an endorsement shall be made thereon by the person who so read the statement to the effect that it was so read.
A copy of the statement, together with a copy of any document referred to in the statement as an exhibit, or with such information as may be necessary in order to enable the party on whom it is served to inspect such document or a copy thereof, shall, before the date on which the document is to be tendered in evidence, be served on each of the other parties to the proceedings, and any such party may, at least two days before the commencement of the proceedings, object to the statement being tendered in evidence under this section.
If a party objects under paragraph (c) that the statement in question be tendered in evidence, the statement shall not, but subject to the provisions of paragraph (e), be admissible as evidence under this section.
If a party does not object under paragraph (c) or if the parties agree before or during the proceedings in question that the statement may be so tendered, the statement may, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be admitted as evidence in the proceedings.
When the documents referred to in paragraph (c) are served on an accused, the documents shall be accompanied by a written notification in which the accused is informed that the statement in question will be tendered in evidence at his trial in lieu of the State calling as a witness the person who made the statement but that such statement shall not without the consent of the accused be so tendered in evidence if he notifies the prosecutor concerned, at least two days before the commencement of the proceedings, that he objects to the statement so being tendered in evidence.
The parties to criminal proceedings may, before or during such proceedings, agree that any written statement referred to in subsections (2) (a) and (b) which has not been served in terms of subsection (2) (c) be tendered in evidence at such proceedings, whereupon such statement may, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be admitted as evidence in the proceedings.
the court may, of its own motion, and shall, upon the application of any party to the proceedings in question, cause such person to be subpoenaed to give oral evidence before the court or the court may, where the person concerned is resident outside the Republic, issue a commission in respect of such person in terms of section 171.
Any document or object referred to as an exhibit and identified in a written statement tendered in evidence under this section, shall be treated as if it had been produced as an exhibit and identified in court by the person who made the statement.
Any person who makes a statement which is admitted as evidence under this section and who in such statement wilfully and falsely states anything which, if sworn, would have amounted to the offence of perjury, shall be deemed to have committed the offence of perjury and shall, upon conviction, be liable to the punishment prescribed for the offence of perjury.
of paragraph (a), be read as evidence at such trial, if it appears from the preparatory examination record or it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that the accused or, as the case may be, the State had a full opportunity of cross-examining such witness.
The evidence of a witness given at a former trial may, in the circumstances referred to in section 214, mutatis mutandis be admitted in evidence at any later trial of the same person upon the same charge.
[S. 216 repealed by s. 9 of Act 45 of 1988.
[NB: Para. (a) has been substituted by s. 11 of the Criminal Procedure Amendment Act 86 of 1996, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
[Sub-para. (i) substituted by s. 13 of Act 56 of 1979.
be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been freely and voluntarily made by such person in his sound and sober senses and without having been unduly influenced thereto, if it appears from the document in which the confession is contained that the confession was made freely and voluntarily by such person in his sound and sober senses and without having been unduly influenced thereto.
The prosecution may lead evidence in rebuttal of evidence adduced by an accused in rebuttal of the presumption under proviso (b) to subsection (1).
if he adduces in the relevant proceedings any evidence, either directly or in cross-examining any witness, of any oral or written statement made by him either as part of or in connection with such confession; and if such evidence is, in the opinion of the judge or the judicial officer presiding at such proceedings, favourable to such person.
Evidence may be admitted at criminal proceedings of any fact otherwise admissible in evidence, notwithstanding that the witness who gives evidence of such fact, discovered such fact, or obtained knowledge of such fact only in consequence of information given by an accused appearing at such proceedings in any confession or statement which by law is not admissible in evidence against such accused at such proceedings, and notwithstanding that the fact was discovered or came to the knowledge of such witness against the wish or will of such accused.
Evidence may be admitted at criminal proceedings that anything was pointed out by an accused appearing at such proceedings or that any fact or thing was discovered in consequence of information given by such accused, notwithstanding that such pointing out or information forms part of a confession or statement which by law is not admissible in evidence against such accused at such proceedings.
No confession made by any person shall be admissible as evidence against another person.
be admissible in evidence against such person if it appears from such document that the admission was made by a person whose name corresponds to that of such person and, in the case of an admission made to a magistrate or confirmed in the presence of a magistrate through an interpreter, if a certificate by the interpreter appears on such document to the effect that he interpreted truly and correctly and to the best of his ability with regard to the contents of the admission and any question put to such person by the magistrate; and be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been voluntarily made by such person if it appears from the document in which the admission is contained that the admission was made voluntarily by such person.
The prosecution may lead evidence in rebuttal of evidence adduced by an accused in rebuttal of the presumption under subsection (1).
[S. 219A inserted by s. 14 of Act 56 of 1979.
An accused or his or her legal adviser or the prosecutor may in criminal proceedings admit any fact placed in issue at such proceedings and any such admission shall be sufficient proof of such fact.
[S. 220 substituted by s. 12 of Act 86 of 1996.
the document is or forms part of a record relating to any trade or business and has been compiled in the course of that trade or business, from information supplied, directly or indirectly, by persons who have or may reasonably be supposed to have personal knowledge of the matters dealt with in the information they supply; and the person who supplied the information recorded in the statement in question is dead or is outside the Republic or is unfit by reason of his physical or mental condition to attend as a witness or cannot with reasonable diligence be identified or found or cannot reasonably be expected, having regard to the time which has elapsed since he supplied the information as well as all the circumstances, to have any recollection of the matters dealt with in the information he supplied.
For the purpose of deciding whether or not a statement is admissible as evidence under this section, the court may draw any reasonable inference from the form or content of the document in which the statement is contained, and may, in deciding whether or not a person is fit to attend as a witness, act on a certificate purporting to be a certificate of a registered medical practitioner.
In estimating the weight to be attached to a statement admissible as evidence under this section, regard shall be had to all the circumstances from which any inference may reasonably be drawn as to the accuracy or otherwise of the statement, and, in particular, to the question whether or not the person who supplied the information recorded in the statement, did so contemporaneously with the occurrence or existence of the facts stated, and to the question whether or not that person or any person concerned with making or keeping the record containing the statement, had any incentive to conceal or misrepresent the facts.
No provision of this section shall prejudice the admissibility of any evidence which would be admissible apart from the provisions of this section.
'document' includes any device by means of which information is recorded or stored; and 'statement' includes any representation of fact, whether made in words or otherwise.
The provisions of sections 33 to 38 inclusive, of the Civil Proceedings Evidence Act, 1965 (Act 25 of 1965), shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to criminal proceedings.
[S. 223 repealed by s. 9 of Act 45 of 1988.
any law which purports to be published under the superintendence or authority of the Government Printer.
Whenever it is relevant at criminal proceedings to ascertain whether any finger-print, palm-print or foot-print of an accused at such proceedings corresponds to any other finger-print, palm-print or foot-print, or whether the body of such an accused has or had any mark, characteristic or distinguishing feature or shows or showed any condition or appearance, evidence of the finger-prints, palm-prints or foot-prints of the accused or that the body of the accused has or had any mark, characteristic or distinguishing feature or shows or showed any condition or appearance, including evidence of the result of any blood test of the accused, shall be admissible at such proceedings.
Such evidence shall not be inadmissible by reason only thereof that the fingerprint, palm-print or foot-print in question was not taken or that the mark, characteristic, feature, condition or appearance in question was not ascertained in accordance with the provisions of section 37, or that it was taken or ascertained against the wish or the will of the accused concerned. [NB: S. 225 has been substituted by s. 5 of the Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act 6 of 2010, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
For the purposes of rebutting the presumption that a child to whom a married woman has given birth is the offspring of her husband, such woman or her husband, such woman or her husband or both of them may in criminal proceedings give evidence that they had no sexual intercourse with one another during the period when the child was conceived.
Evidence as to the character of an accused or as to the character of any person against or in connection with whom a sexual offence as contemplated in the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, is alleged to have been committed, shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (2), be admissible or inadmissible if such evidence would have been admissible or inadmissible on the 30th day of May, 1961.
the court has, on application by any party to the proceedings, granted leave to adduce such evidence or to put such question; or such evidence has been introduced by the prosecution.
Before an application for leave contemplated in subsection (2) (a) is heard, the court may direct that any person, including the complainant, whose presence is not necessary may not be present at the proceedings.
The court shall, subject to subsection (6), grant the application referred to in subsection (2) (a) only if satisfied that such evidence or questioning is relevant to the proceedings pending before the court.
is not substantially outweighed by its potential prejudice to the complainant's personal dignity and right to privacy; or is likely to explain the presence of semen or the source of pregnancy or disease or any injury to the complainant, where it is relevant to a fact in issue.
is more likely to have consented to the offence being tried; or is less worthy of belief.
The court shall provide reasons for granting or refusing an application in terms of subsection (2) (a), which reasons shall be entered in the record of the proceedings.
[S. 227 substituted by s. 2 of Act 39 of 1989 and by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
Comparison at criminal proceedings of a disputed writing with any writing proved to be genuine, may be made by a witness, and such writings and the evidence of any witness with respect thereto, may be submitted as proof of the genuineness or otherwise of the writing in dispute.
The Minister may from time to time by notice in the Gazette approve of tables prepared at any official observatory in the Republic of the times of sunrise and sunset on particular days at particular places in the Republic or any portion thereof, and appearing in any publication specified in the notice, and thereupon such tables shall, until the notice is withdrawn, on the mere production thereof in criminal proceedings be admissible as proof of such times.
Tables in force immediately prior to the commencement of this Act by virtue of the provisions of section 26 of the General Law Amendment Act, 1952 (Act 32 of 1952), shall be deemed to be tables approved under subsection (1) of this section.
would have been deemed sufficient proof of the appointment of any person to any public office or of the authority of any person to act as a public officer, shall in criminal proceedings be deemed to be sufficient proof of such appointment or authority.
which purports to bear the signature of any person holding a public office; and which bears a seal or stamp purporting to be a seal or stamp of the department, office or institution to which such person is attached, shall, upon the mere production thereof at criminal proceedings, be prima facie proof that such person signed such document.
Any court may in respect of any article, other than a document, which any party to criminal proceedings may wish to produce to the court as admissible evidence at such proceedings, permit such party to produce as evidence, in lieu of such article, any photograph thereof, notwithstanding that such article is available and can be produced in evidence.
The court may, notwithstanding the admission under subsection (1) of the photograph of any article, on good cause require the production of the article in question.
Whenever any book or other document is of such a public nature as to be admissible in evidence upon its mere production from proper custody, any copy thereof or extract therefrom shall be admissible in evidence at criminal proceedings if it is proved to be an examined copy or extract, or if it purports to be signed and certified as a true copy or extract by the officer to whose custody the original is entrusted.
Such officer shall furnish such certified copy or extract to any person applying therefor, upon payment of an amount in accordance with the tariff of fees prescribed by or under any law or, if no such tariff has been so prescribed, an amount in accordance with such tariff of fees as the Minister, in consultation with the Minister of Finance, may from time to time determine.
It shall, at criminal proceedings, be sufficient to prove an original official document which is in the custody or under the control of any State official by virtue of his office, if a copy thereof or an extract therefrom, certified as a true copy or extract by the head of the department concerned or by any State official authorized thereto by such head, is produced in evidence at such proceedings.
An original official document referred to in subsection (1), other than the record of judicial proceedings, may be produced at criminal proceedings only upon the order of the attorney-general.
It shall not be necessary for the head of the department concerned to appear in person to produce an original document under paragraph (a), but such document may be produced by any person authorized thereto by such head.
Any official who, under subsection (1), certifies any copy or extract as true knowing that such copy or extract is false, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years.
It shall, at criminal proceedings, be sufficient to prove the original record of judicial proceedings if a copy of such record, certified or purporting to be certified by the registrar or clerk of the court or other officer having the custody of the record of such judicial proceedings or by the deputy of such registrar, clerk or other officer or, in the case where judicial proceedings are taken down in shorthand or by mechanical means, by the person who transcribed such proceedings, as a true copy of such record, is produced in evidence at such criminal proceedings, and such copy shall be prima facie proof that any matter purporting to be recorded thereon was correctly recorded.
Any person who, under subsection (1), certifies any copy as true knowing that such copy is false, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 12 (a) of Act 204 of 1993.
[Para. (d) substituted by s. 12 (b) of Act 204 of 1993.
be prima facie proof at such proceedings of the matters, transactions and accounts recorded in such accounting records or document.
that he has examined the entry, accounting record or document in question; and that a copy of such entry or document set out in the affidavit or in an annexure thereto is a correct copy of such entry or document.
Any party at the proceedings in question against whom evidence is adduced in terms of this section or against whom it is intended to adduce evidence in terms of this section, may, upon the order of the court before which the proceedings are pending, inspect the original of the document or entry in question and any accounting record in which such entry appears or of which such entry forms part, and such party may make copies of such document or entry, and the court shall, upon the application of the party concerned, adjourn the proceedings for the purpose of such inspection or the making of such copies.
No bank shall be compelled to produce any accounting record referred to in subsection (1) at any criminal proceedings, unless the court concerned orders that any such record be produced.
'entry' includes any notation in the accounting records of a bank by any means whatsoever.
[S. 236 substituted by s. 45 of Act 129 of 1993.
that the said entries have been made in the usual and ordinary course of the business of such institution; and that such accounting records are or document is in the custody or under the control of such institution, be prima facie proof at such proceedings of the matters, transactions and accounts recorded in such accounting records or document.
The admissibility and evidentiary value of an affidavit contemplated in subsections (1) and (2) shall not be affected by the fact that the form of the oath, confirmation or attestation thereof differs from the form of the oath, confirmation or attestation prescribed in the Republic.
A court before which an affidavit contemplated in subsections (1) and (2) is placed may, in order to clarify obscurities in the said affidavit, on the request of a party to the proceedings order that a supplementary affidavit be submitted or that oral evidence be heard: Provided that oral evidence shall only be heard if the court is of the opinion that it is in the interests of the administration of justice and that a party to the proceedings would be materially prejudiced should oral evidence not be heard.
'entry' includes any notation, by any means whatsoever, in the accounting records of an institution contemplated in subsection (1).
[S. 236A inserted by s. 6 of Act 157 of 1993.
At criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with bigamy, it shall, as soon as it is proved that a marriage ceremony, other than the ceremony relating to the alleged bigamous marriage, took place within the Republic between the accused and another person, be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, that the marriage was on the date of the solemnization thereof lawful and binding.
to be an extract from a marriage register kept according to law in the country where the marriage is alleged to have been solemnized; and to be certified as such an extract by the person having the custody of such register, if the signature of such person on the certificate is authenticated in accordance with any law of the Republic governing the authentication of documents executed outside the Republic.
that the accused had been treating and recognizing such person as a spouse; and of the performance of a marriage ceremony between the accused and such person, shall, as soon as the alleged bigamous marriage, wherever solemnized, has been proved, be prima facie proof that there was a lawful and binding marriage subsisting between the accused and such person at the time of the solemnization of the alleged bigamous marriage.
the accused shall be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have had knowledge, at the time of the alleged offence, of the relationship existing between him or her and the other party to the incest.
relevant to the issue at criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with incest as contemplated in section 12 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, such fact may be proved prima facie in the manner provided in section 237 for the proof of the existence of a lawful and binding marriage of a person charged with bigamy.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
At criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with the killing of a newly-born child, such child shall be deemed to have been born alive if the child is proved to have breathed, whether or not the child had an independent circulation, and it shall not be necessary to prove that such child was, at the time of its death, entirely separated from the body of its mother.
At criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with the concealment of the birth of a child, it shall not be necessary to prove whether the child died before or at or after birth.
At criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with receiving stolen property which he knew to be stolen property, evidence may be given at any stage of the proceedings that the accused was, within the period of twelve months immediately preceding the date on which he first appeared in a magistrate's court in respect of such charge, found in possession of other stolen property: Provided that no such evidence shall be given against the accused unless at least three days' notice in writing has been given to him that it is intended to adduce such evidence against him.
The evidence referred to in subsection (1) may be taken into consideration for the purpose of proving that the accused knew that the property which forms the subject of the charge was stolen property.
that the accused was at that time under the age of twenty-one years; or that the accused had good cause, other than the mere statement of the person from whom he received such property, to believe, and that he did believe, that such person had the right to dispose of such property.
If at criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with receiving stolen property which he knew to be stolen property, it is proved that such property was found in the possession of the accused, evidence may at any stage of the proceedings be given that the accused was, within the five years immediately preceding the date on which he first appeared in a magistrate's court in respect of such charge, convicted of an offence involving fraud or dishonesty, and such evidence may be taken into consideration for the purpose of proving that the accused knew that the property found in his possession was stolen property: Provided that not less than three days' notice in writing shall be given to the accused that it is intended to adduce evidence of such previous conviction.
If at criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with the unlawful publication of defamatory matter which is contained in a periodical, it is proved that such periodical or the part in which such defamatory matter is contained, was published by the accused, other writings or prints purporting to be other numbers or parts of the same periodical, previously or subsequently published, and containing a printed statement that they were published by or for the accused, shall be admissible in evidence without further proof of their publication.
while a clerk, servant or agent, of money or of property which belonged to his employer or principal or which came into the possession of the accused on account of his employer or principal, an entry in any book of account kept by the accused or kept under or subject to his charge or supervision, and which purports to be an entry of the receipt of money or of property, shall be proof that such money or such property was received by the accused.
on the examination of the books of account kept or the entries made by the accused or under or subject to his charge or supervision, there is proof of a general deficiency; and the court is satisfied that the accused stole the money or goods so deficient or any part thereof.
At criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with any offence relating to any seal or stamp used for the purposes of the public revenue or of the post office in any foreign country, a despatch purporting to be from the officer administering the government of such country and transmitting to the State President any stamp, mark or impression and stating it to be a genuine stamp, mark or impression of a die-plate or other instrument provided or made or used by or under the direction of the proper authority of such country for the purpose of denoting stamp duty or postal charge, shall on its mere production at such proceedings be prima facie proof of the facts stated in the despatch.
If at criminal proceedings at which an accused is charged with an offence of which a false representation is an element, it is proved that the false representation was made by the accused, he shall be deemed, unless the contrary is proved, to have made such representation knowing it to be false.
which on the face thereof discloses any object of such association, shall, upon the mere production thereof by the prosecution at criminal proceedings, be prima facie proof that the said object is an object of such association.
Any document, including any newspaper, periodical, book, pamphlet, letter, circular letter, list, record, placard or poster, on the face whereof it appears that a person of a name corresponding to that of an accused person has at any particular time been outside the Republic or has at any particular time made any statement outside the Republic, shall, upon the mere production thereof by the prosecution at criminal proceedings, be prima facie proof that the accused was outside the Republic at such time or, as the case may be, that the accused made such statement outside the Republic at such time, if such document is accompanied by a certificate, purporting to have been signed by the Secretary for Foreign Affairs, to the effect that he is satisfied that such document is of foreign origin.
If an act or an omission constitutes an offence only when committed by a person possessing a particular qualification or quality, or vested with a particular authority or acting in a particular capacity, an accused charged with such an offence upon a charge alleging that he possessed such qualification or quality or was vested with such authority or was acting in such capacity, shall, at criminal proceedings, be deemed to have possessed such qualification or quality or to have been vested with such authority or to have been acting in such capacity at the time of the commission of the offence, unless such allegation is at any time during the criminal proceedings expressly denied by the accused or is disproved.
If such allegation is denied or evidence is led to disprove it after the prosecution has closed its case, the prosecution may adduce any evidence and submit any argument in support of the allegation as if it had not closed its case.
When an accused is at criminal proceedings charged with any offence of which the failure to pay any tax or impost to the State, or of which the failure to furnish to any officer of the State any information relating to any tax or impost which is or may be due to the State is an element, the accused shall be deemed to have failed to pay such tax or impost or to furnish such information, unless the contrary is proved.
owned or had in his possession or custody or used any article; or was present at or entered any place, without being the holder of a licence, permit, permission or other authority or qualification (in this section referred to as the 'necessary authority'), an accused shall, at criminal proceedings upon a charge that he committed such an offence, be deemed not to have been the holder of the necessary authority, unless the contrary is proved.
Any peace officer and, where any fee payable for the necessary authority would accrue to the National Revenue Fund or the Railway and Harbour Fund or a provincial revenue fund, any person authorized thereto in writing by the head of the relevant department or sub-department or by the officer in charge of the relevant office, may demand the production from a person referred to in subsection (1) of the necessary authority which is appropriate.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996 and by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996.
Any peace officer, other than a police official in uniform, and any person authorized under paragraph (a) shall, when demanding the necessary authority from any person, produce at the request of that person, his authority to make the demand.
Any person who is the holder of the necessary authority and who fails without reasonable cause to produce forthwith such authority to the person making the demand under subsection (2) for the production thereof, or who fails without reasonable cause to submit such authority to a person and at a place and within such reasonable time as the person making the demand may specify, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 15 of Act 33 of 1986.
An instrument liable to stamp duty shall not be held inadmissible at criminal proceedings on the ground only that it is not stamped as required by law.
The law as to the admissibility of evidence which was in force in respect of criminal proceedings on the thirtieth day of May, 1961, shall apply in any case not expressly provided for by this Act or any other law.
Any law enforcement officer, official of the State or any other person authorised thereto for such purpose (hereinafter referred to in this section as an official or his or her agent) may make use of a trap or engage in an undercover operation in order to detect, investigate or uncover the commission of an offence, or to prevent the commission of any offence, and the evidence so obtained shall be admissible if that conduct does not go beyond providing an opportunity to commit an offence: Provided that where the conduct goes beyond providing an opportunity to commit an offence a court may admit evidence so obtained subject to subsection (3).
whether the official or his or her agent acted in good or bad faith; or any other factor which in the opinion of the court has a bearing on the question.
If a court in any criminal proceedings finds that in the setting of a trap or the engaging in an undercover operation the conduct goes beyond providing an opportunity to commit an offence, the court may refuse to allow such evidence to be tendered or may refuse to allow such evidence already tendered, to stand, if the evidence was obtained in an improper or unfair manner and that the admission of such evidence would render the trial unfair or would otherwise be detrimental to the administration of justice.
whether in the setting of a trap or the engagement of an undercover operation the means used was proportional to the seriousness of the offence; and any other factor which in the opinion of the court ought to be taken into account.
An attorney-general may issue general or specific guidelines regarding the supervision and control of traps and undercover operations, and may require any official or his or her agent to obtain his or her written approval in order to set a trap or to engage in an undercover operation at any place within his or her area of jurisdiction, and in connection therewith to comply with his or her instructions, written or otherwise.
An official or his or her agent who sets or participates in a trap or an undercover operation to detect, investigate or uncover or to obtain evidence of or to prevent the commission of an offence, shall not be criminally liable in respect of any act which constitutes an offence and which relates to the trap or undercover operation if it was performed in good faith.
No prosecution for an offence contemplated in paragraph (a) shall be instituted against an official or his or her agent without the written authority of the attorney-general.
If at any stage of the proceedings the question is raised whether evidence should be excluded in terms of subsection (3) the burden of proof to show, on a balance of probabilities, that the evidence is admissible, shall rest on the prosecution: Provided that the accused shall furnish the grounds on which the admissibility of the evidence is challenged: Provided further that if the accused is not represented the court shall raise the question of the admissibility of the evidence.
The question whether evidence should be excluded in terms of subsection (3) may, on application by the accused or the prosecution, or by order of the court of its own accord be adjudicated as a separate issue in dispute.
[S. 252A inserted by s. 1 of Act 85 of 1996.
No provision of this Chapter shall be construed as modifying any provision of any other law whereby in any criminal proceedings referred to in such law certain specified facts and circumstances are deemed to be evidence or a particular fact or circumstance may be proved in a manner specified therein.
[S. 254 amended by s. 8 of Act 26 of 1987 and repealed by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
(a) If in any court during the trial of a person who is charged with an offence, other than an offence referred to in section 18, it appears to the judge or judicial officer presiding at the trial that such person is probably a person as is described in section 21 (1) of the Prevention and Treatment of Drug Dependency Act, 1992 (in this section referred to as the said Act), the judge or judicial officer, may, with the consent of the prosecutor given after consultation with a social worker as defined in section 1 of the said Act, stop the trial and order that an enquiry be held in terms of section 22 of the said Act in respect of the person concerned by a magistrate as defined in section 1 of the said Act and indicated in the order.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 32 of Act 105 of 1997.
The prosecutor shall not give his consent in terms of paragraph (a) if the person concerned is a person in respect of whom the imposition of punishment of imprisonment would be compulsory if he were convicted at such trial.
If the person concerned is in custody he shall for all purposes be deemed to have been arrested in terms of a warrant issued under section 21 (1) of the said Act and shall as soon as practicable be brought before the said magistrate.
If the person concerned is not in custody the said judge or judicial officer shall determine the time when and the place where the person concerned shall appear before the said magistrate, and he shall thereafter for all purposes be deemed to have been summoned in terms of section 21 (1) of the said Act to appear before the said magistrate at the time and place so determined.
As soon as possible after an order has been made under subsection (1) of this section, a prosecutor attached to the court of the said magistrate shall obtain a report as is mentioned in section 21 (2) of the said Act.
The provisions of the said Act shall mutatis mutandis apply in respect of a person who appears before a magistrate, as defined in section 1 of the said Act, in pursuance of an order made under subsection (1) of this section as if he were a person brought before the said magistrate in terms of section 21 (1) of the said Act and as if the report obtained in terms of subsection (3) of this section were a report obtained in terms of section 21 (2) of the said Act.
If an order is made under subsection (1) in the course of a trial, whether before or after conviction, and a magistrate under the said Act orders that the person concerned be detained in a treatment centre or registered treatment centre, the proceedings at the trial shall be null and void in so far as such person is concerned.
A copy of the record of the proceedings at the trial, certified or purporting to be certified by the registrar or clerk of the court or other officer having custody of the record of such proceedings or by the deputy of such registrar, clerk or other officer or, in the case where the proceedings were taken down in shorthand or by mechanical means, by the person who transcribed the proceedings, as a true copy of such record, may be produced at the said enquiry as evidence.
[S. 255 substituted by s. 50 of Act 20 of 1992.
If the evidence in criminal proceedings does not prove the commission of the offence charged but proves an attempt to commit that offence or an attempt to commit any other offence of which an accused may be convicted on the offence charged, the accused may be found guilty of an attempt to commit that offence or, as the case may be, such other offence.
If the evidence in criminal proceedings does not prove the commission of the offence charged but proves that the accused is guilty as an accessory after that offence or any other offence of which he may be convicted on the offence charged, the accused may be found guilty as an accessory after that offence or, as the case may be, such other offence, and shall, in the absence of any punishment expressly provided by law, be liable to punishment at the discretion of the court: Provided that such punishment shall not exceed the punishment which may be imposed in respect of the offence with reference to which the accused is convicted as an accessory.
[S. 257 amended by s. 33 of Act 105 of 1997.
the offence of public violence; or the offence of pointing a fire-arm, air-gun or air-pistol in contravention of any law, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[Para. (g) deleted by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved, or, where the offence of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm or the offence of common assault and the offence of theft are proved, of both such offences.
having committed an act of consensual sexual penetration with a child as contemplated in section 15 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007; or having committed an act of consensual sexual violation with a child as contemplated in section 16 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
having committed an act of consensual sexual violation with a child as contemplated in section 16 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[S. 261 amended by s. 6 of Act 72 of 1985 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
If the evidence on a charge of housebreaking with intent to commit an offence specified in the charge, whether the charge is brought under a statute or the common law, does not prove the offence of housebreaking with intent to commit the offence so specified but the offence of housebreaking with intent to commit an offence other than the offence so specified or the offence of housebreaking with intent to commit an offence unknown or the offence of malicious injury to property, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 6 of Act 64 of 1982.
If the evidence on a charge of housebreaking with intent to commit an offence to the prosecutor unknown, whether the charge is brought under a statute or the common law, does not prove the offence of housebreaking with intent to commit an offence to the prosecutor unknown, but the offence of housebreaking with intent to commit a specific offence, or the offence of malicious injury to property, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 5 (a) of Act 4 of 1992.
If the evidence on a charge of attempted housebreaking with intent to commit an offence specified in the charge, or attempted housebreaking with intent to commit an offence to the prosecutor unknown, whether the charge is brought under a statute or the common law, does not prove the offence of attempted housebreaking with intent to commit the offence so specified, or attempted housebreaking with intent to commit an offence to the prosecutor unknown, but the offence of malicious injury to property, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[Sub-s. (3) added by s. 5 (b) of Act 4 of 1992.
If the evidence on a charge for the statutory offence in any province of breaking and entering or of the entering of any premises with intent to commit an offence specified in the charge, does not prove the offence of breaking and entering or of entering the premises with intent to commit the offence so specified but the offence of breaking and entering or of entering the premises with intent to commit an offence other than the offence so specified or of breaking and entering the premises with intent to commit an offence unknown, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved; or where it is a statutory offence within the province in question to be in or upon any dwelling, premises or enclosed area between sunset and sunrise without lawful excuse, of such offence, if such be the facts proved.
If the evidence on a charge for the statutory offence in any province of breaking and entering or of the entering of any premises with intent to commit an offence to the prosecutor unknown, does not prove the offence of breaking and entering or of entering the premises with intent to commit an offence to the prosecutor unknown but the offence of breaking and entering or of entering the premises with intent to commit a specific offence, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[Para. (d) deleted by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.] the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
If a charge of theft alleges that the property referred to therein was stolen on one occasion and the evidence proves that the property was stolen on different occasions, the accused may be convicted of the theft of such property as if it had been stolen on that one occasion.
[Para. (c) deleted by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.] the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
If the evidence on a charge of common assault proves the offence of sexual assault, compelled sexual assault or compelled self-sexual assault as contemplated in sections 5, 6 or 7 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, respectively, the accused may be found guilty of any such offence, or, if the evidence on such a charge does not prove the offence of common assault but the offence of pointing a fire-arm, air-gun or air-pistol in contravention of any law, the accused may be found guilty of that offence.
[S. 267 substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
conspiring with such other person to have unlawful carnal intercourse, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
[S. 268 substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
[S. 269 repealed by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
fraud; or extortion, the accused may be found guilty of the crime or offence so proved.
[S. 269A inserted by s. 36 (1) of Act 12 of 2004.
If the evidence on a charge for any offence not referred to in the preceding sections of this Chapter does not prove the commission of the offence so charged but proves the commission of an offence which by reason of the essential elements of that offence is included in the offence so charged, the accused may be found guilty of the offence so proved.
The prosecution may, after an accused has been convicted but before sentence has been imposed upon him, produce to the court for admission or denial by the accused a record of previous convictions alleged against the accused.
The court shall ask the accused whether he admits or denies any previous conviction referred to in subsection (1).
If the accused denies such previous conviction, the prosecution may tender evidence that the accused was so previously convicted.
If the accused admits such previous conviction or such previous conviction is proved against the accused, the court shall take such conviction into account when imposing any sentence in respect of the offence of which the accused has been convicted.
and has discharged that person in terms of section 297 without passing sentence or has not called upon him or her to appear before the court in terms of section 297 (3); or has discharged that person with a caution or reprimand in terms of section 297 (1) (c); or any offence in respect of which a sentence of imprisonment for a period not exceeding six months without the option of a fine, may be imposed, that conviction shall fall away as a previous conviction if a period of 10 years has elapsed after the date of conviction of the said offence, unless during that period the person has been convicted of an offence in respect of which a sentence of imprisonment for a period exceeding six months without the option of a fine, may be imposed.
[S. 271A inserted by s. 12 of Act 5 of 1991, amended by s. 6 of Act 4 of 1992 and substituted by s. 2 of Act 65 of 2008.
a sentence of periodical imprisonment, referred to in section 276 (1) (c).
who has been convicted of a sexual offence against a child or a person who is mentally disabled and whose name has been included in the National Register for Sex Offenders, as provided for in section 50 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 (Act 32 of 2007); or whose name has been included in the National Child Protection Register as a result of a conviction for an offence, as provided for in section 120 (1) (b) of the Children's Act, 2005 (Act 38 of 2005), does not qualify to have the criminal record in question expunged in terms of this section, unless his or her name has been removed from the National Register of Sex Offenders, as provided for in section 51 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, or section 128 of the Children's Act, 2005, as the case may be.
The Director-General: Justice and Constitutional Development must, on receipt of the written application of a person referred to in subsection (1), issue a certificate of expungement, directing that the criminal record of that person be expunged, if the Director-General is satisfied that the person applying for expungement complies with the criteria set out in subsection (1).
The Director-General: Justice and Constitutional Development must submit every certificate of expungement that has been issued as provided for in subsection to the head of the Criminal Record Centre of the South African Police Service, to be dealt with in accordance with section 271D.
[S. 271B inserted by s. 3 of Act 65 of 2008.
a contravention of section 2 or 3 of the Terrorism Act, 1967 (Act 83 of 1967); or a contravention of section 2 read with section 4 (1), of the Prohibition of Foreign Financing of Political Parties Act, 1968 (Act 51 of 1968).
a decree; or any other enactment having the force of law, other than those provisions referred to in subsection (1), which were enacted in the former Republic of South Africa, the former Republic of Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Ciskei or Venda, or in any former self-governing territory, as provided for in the Selfgoverning Territories Constitution Act, 1971 (Act 21 of 1971), before the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1993 (Act 200 of 1993), took effect, which created offences that were based on race or which created offences, which would not have been considered to be offences in an open and democratic society, based on human dignity, equality and freedom, under the constitutional dispensation after 27 April 1994, the criminal record, containing the conviction and sentence in question, of that person must, on the person's written application, subject to subsection (3) and section 271D, be expunged.
The Director-General: Justice and Constitutional Development must, on receipt of the written application of a person referred to in subsection (2) (a) or (b), issue a certificate of expungement, directing that the criminal record of the person be expunged, if the Director-General is satisfied that the person applying for expungement complies with the criteria set out in subsection (1) or subsection (2) (a), as the case may be.
The Director-General: Justice and Constitutional Development must submit every certificate of expungement that has been issued as provided for in subsection or (5) (b) to the head of the Criminal Record Centre of the South African Police Service, to be dealt with in accordance with section 271D.
In the case of a dispute or any uncertainty as to whether an offence is an offence as referred to in subsection (1) or (2) (a) or not, the matter must be referred to the Minister for a decision.
If the Minister decides that the offence is an offence as referred to in subsection (1) or (2) (a), he or she must issue a certificate of expungement, directing that the criminal record of the person be expunged.
[S. 271C inserted by s. 3 of Act 65 of 2008.
he or she is furnished with a certificate of expungement by the Director-General: Justice and Constitutional Development as provided for in section 271B (2) or section 271C (3) or by the Minister as provided for in section 271C (5); or that person qualifies for the automatic expungement of his or her criminal record as provided for in section 271C (1).
has applied to have his or her criminal record expunged in terms of section 271B or section 271C (2); or qualifies to have his or her criminal record expunged automatically in terms of section 271C (1), in writing, confirm that the criminal record in question has been expunged.
intentionally or in a grossly negligent manner, expunges the criminal record of any person or confirms that a criminal record has been expunged as provided for in subsection (2), is guilty of an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 10 years or to both a fine and that imprisonment.
[S. 271D inserted by s. 3 of Act 65 of 2008.
the manner in which the Director-General must submit certificates of expungement that have been issued, to the head of the Criminal Record Centre of the South African Police Service, as provided for in section 271B (3) and section 271C (4); and may make regulations regarding any other matter which is necessary or expedient in order to achieve the objects of sections 271B, 271C and 271D.
[S. 271E inserted by s. 3 of Act 65 of 2008.
When a previous conviction may be proved under any provision of this Act, a record, photograph or document which relates to a finger-print and which purports to emanate from the officer commanding the South African Criminal Bureau or, in the case of any other country, from any officer having charge of the criminal records of the country in question, shall, whether or not such record, photograph or document was obtained under any law or against the wish or the will of the person concerned, be admissible in evidence at criminal proceedings upon production thereof by a police official having the custody thereof, and shall be prima facie proof of the facts contained therein.
any telegram purporting to have been sent by the officer commanding the South African Criminal Bureau or by any court within the Republic; or any document purporting to be certified as correct by the officer referred to in paragraph (a) or by any registrar or clerk of any court within the Republic or by any officer in charge of any prison within the Republic, and which purports to furnish such particulars or such clarification, shall, upon the mere production thereof at the relevant proceedings be admissible as prima facie proof of the facts contained therein.
A court may, before passing sentence, receive such evidence as it thinks fit in order to inform itself as to the proper sentence to be passed.
The accused may address the court on any evidence received under subsection (1), as well as on the matter of the sentence, and thereafter the prosecution may likewise address the court.
If sentence is not passed upon an accused forthwith upon conviction in a lower court, or if, by reason of any decision or order of a superior court on appeal, review or otherwise, it is necessary to add to or vary any sentence passed in a lower court or to pass sentence afresh in such court, any judicial officer of that court may, in the absence of the judicial officer who convicted the accused or passed the sentence, as the case may be, and after consideration of the evidence recorded and in the presence of the accused, pass sentence on the accused or take such other steps as the judicial officer who is absent, could lawfully have taken in the proceedings in question if he or she had not been absent.
a judge is required to sentence an accused convicted by him or her of any offence; or any matter is remitted on appeal or otherwise to the judge who presided at the trial of an accused, and that judge is for any reason not available, any other judge of the provincial or local division concerned may, after consideration of the evidence recorded and in the presence of the accused, sentence the accused or, as the case may be, take such other steps as the former judge could lawfully have taken in the proceedings in question if he or she had been available.
[S. 275 substituted by s. 7 of Act 34 of 1998.
[Para. (a) deleted by s. 34 of Act 105 of 1997.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 3 of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 20 of Act 116 of 1993.
[Para. (g) deleted by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
[Para. (h) added by s. 41 (a) of Act 122 of 1991.
imprisonment from which such a person may be placed under correctional supervision in the discretion of the Commissioner or a parole board.
[Para. (i) added by s. 41 (a) of Act 122 of 1991 and substituted by s. 20 of Act 87 of 1997.
as authorizing any court to impose any sentence other than or any sentence in excess of the sentence which that court may impose in respect of any offence; or as derogating from any authority specially conferred upon any court by any law to impose any other punishment or to impose any forfeiture in addition to any other punishment.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any law contained, other than the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997 (Act 105 of 1997), the provisions of subsection shall not be construed as prohibiting the court from imposing imprisonment together with correctional supervision; or from imposing the punishment referred to in subsection (1) (h) or (i) in respect of any offence, whether under the common law or a statutory provision, irrespective of whether the law in question provides for such or any other punishment: Provided that any punishment contemplated in this paragraph may not be imposed in any case where the court is obliged to impose a sentence contemplated in section 51 (1) or (2), read with section 52, of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1997.
[Para. (b) amended by s. 5 of Act 22 of 2005.
[Sub-s. (3) added by s. 41 (b) of Act 122 of 1991 and substituted by s. 18 (1) of Act 139 of 1992 and by s. 5 of Act 55 of 2003.
after a report of a probation officer or a correctional official has been placed before the court; and for a fixed period not exceeding three years.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007 and substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
if the court is of the opinion that the offence justifies the imposing of imprisonment, with or without the option of a fine, for a period not exceeding five years; and for a fixed period not exceeding five years.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
Punishment imposed under paragraph (h) or (i) of section 276 (1) on a person convicted of any sexual offence shall, if practicable and if the convicted person demonstrates the potential to benefit from treatment, include the attendance of and participation in a sex offence specific treatment programme as prescribed in terms of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, the cost of which shall be borne by the convicted person himself or herself.
[Sub-s. (2A) inserted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
not exceeding five years; or exceeding five years, but his date of release in terms of the provisions of the Correctional Services Act, 1959 (Act 8 of 1959), and the regulations made thereunder is not more than five years in the future, and such a person has already been admitted to a prison, the Commissioner or a parole board may, if he or it is of the opinion that such a person is fit to be subjected to correctional supervision, apply to the clerk or registrar of the court, as the case may be, to have that person appear before the court a quo in order to reconsider the said sentence.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 46 (a) of Act 129 of 1993 and by s. 21 (a) of Act 87 of 1997.
On receipt of any application referred to in paragraph (a) the clerk or registrar of the court, as the case may be, shall, after consultation with the prosecutor, set the matter down for a specific date on the roll of the court concerned.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 46 (b) of Act 129 of 1993.
[Sub-para. (ii) substituted by s. 21 (b) of Act 87 of 1997.
submit any recommendation referred to in subparagraph (ii) to that judicial officer.
[Para. (c) amended by s. 46 (c) of Act 129 of 1993.
Whenever a court reconsiders a sentence in terms of this subsection, it shall have the same powers as if it were considering sentence after conviction of a person and the procedure adopted at such proceedings shall apply mutatis mutandis during such reconsideration: Provided that if the person concerned concurs thereto in writing, the proceedings contemplated in this subsection may be concluded in his absence: Provided further that he may nevertheless be represented at such proceedings or cause to submit written representations to the court.
Provided that the last-mentioned sentence, if imprisonment, shall not exceed the period of the unexpired portion of imprisonment still to be served at that point.
A court, whether constituted differently or not, which has imposed a punishment referred to in subsection (1) or (2) on a person or has converted his sentence under subsection (3) (e) (ii), may at any time, if it is found from a motivated recommendation by a probation officer, the Commissioner or the parole board that that person is not fit to be subject to correctional supervision or to serve the imposed punishment, reconsider that punishment and impose any other proper punishment.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 21 (c) of Act 87 of 1997.
The procedure referred to in subsection (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the reconsideration of any punishment under this subsection.
[S. 276A inserted by s. 42 of Act 122 of 1991.
If a court sentences a person convicted of an offence to imprisonment for a period of two years or longer, the court may as part of the sentence, fix a period during which the person shall not be placed on parole.
Such period shall be referred to as the non-parole-period, and may not exceed two thirds of the term of imprisonment imposed or 25 years, whichever is the shorter.
If a person who is convicted of two or more offences is sentenced to imprisonment and the court directs that the sentences of imprisonment shall run concurrently, the court shall, subject to subsection (1) (b), fix the non-parole-period in respect of the effective period of imprisonment.
[S. 276B inserted by s. 22 of Act 87 of 1997.
[S. 277 substituted by s. 4 of Act 107 of 1990 and repealed by s. 35 of Act 105 of 1997.
[S. 278 repealed by s. 35 of Act 105 of 1997.
[S. 279 amended by s. 5 of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996 and repealed by s. 35 of Act 105 of 1997.
When a person is at any trial convicted of two or more offences or when a person under sentence or undergoing sentence is convicted of another offence, the court may sentence him to such several punishments for such offences or, as the case may be, to the punishment for such other offence, as the court is competent to impose.
Such punishments, when consisting of imprisonment, shall commence the one after the expiration, setting aside or remission of the other, in such order as the court may direct, unless the court directs that such sentences of imprisonment shall run concurrently.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 47 (a) of Act 129 of 1993.
Such punishments, when consisting of correctional supervision referred to in section 276 (1) (h), shall commence the one after the expiration, setting aside or remission of the other, in such order as the court may direct, unless the court directs that such punishments of correctional supervision shall run concurrently: Provided that if such punishments in the aggregate exceed a period of three years, a period of not more than three years from the date on which the first of the said punishments has commenced shall be served, unless the court, when imposing sentence, otherwise directs.
[Sub-s. (3) added by s. 47 (b) of Act 129 of 1993.
to any fine of less than fifty rand which may not be exceeded in imposing or prescribing a fine, shall be construed as a reference to a fine of fifty rand.
Whenever any sentence of imprisonment, imposed on any person on conviction for an offence, is set aside on appeal or review and any sentence of imprisonment or other sentence of imprisonment is thereafter imposed on such person in respect of such offence in place of the sentence of imprisonment imposed on conviction, or any other offence which is substituted for that offence on appeal or review, the sentence which was later imposed may, if the court imposing it is satisfied that the person concerned has served any part of the sentence of imprisonment imposed on conviction, be antedated by the court to a specified date, which shall not be earlier than the date on which the sentence of imprisonment imposed on conviction was imposed, and thereupon the sentence which was later imposed shall be deemed to have been imposed on the date so specified.
[S. 282 substituted by s. 13 of Act 5 of 1991, amended by s. 48 of Act 129 of 1993 and substituted by s. 36 of Act 105 of 1997.
A person liable to a sentence of imprisonment for life or for any period, may be sentenced to imprisonment for any shorter period, and a person liable to a sentence of a fine of any amount may be sentenced to a fine of any lesser amount.
The provisions of subsection (1) shall not apply with reference to any offence for which a minimum penalty is prescribed in the law creating the offence or prescribing a penalty therefor.
No person shall be sentenced by any court to imprisonment for a period of less than four days unless the sentence is that the person concerned be detained until the rising of the court.
A court convicting a person of any offence, other than an offence in respect of which any law prescribes a minimum punishment, may, in lieu of any other punishment, sentence such person to undergo in accordance with the laws relating to prisons, periodical imprisonment for a period of not less than one hundred hours and not more than two thousand hours.
The court which imposes a sentence of periodical imprisonment upon any person shall cause to be served upon him a notice in writing directing him to surrender himself on a date and at a time specified in the notice or (if prevented from doing so by circumstances beyond his control) as soon as possible thereafter, to the officer in charge of a place so specified, whether within or outside the area of jurisdiction of the court, for the purpose of undergoing such imprisonment.
shall, subject to subsection (5), cause a notice as contemplated in paragraph (a) to be served on that person.
[Para. (b) added by s. 16 of Act 33 of 1986.
A copy of the said notice shall serve as a warrant for the reception into custody of the convicted person by the said officer.
without lawful excuse, the proof whereof shall be on such person, fails to comply with a notice issued under subsection (2); or when surrendering himself for the purpose of undergoing periodical imprisonment, is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs or the like; or impersonates or falsely represents himself to be a person who has been directed to surrender himself for the purpose of undergoing periodical imprisonment, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
is undergoing a punishment of any other form of detention imposed by any court; or after having surrendered himself or herself pursuant to the notice issued under subsection (2), without lawful excuse, the proof whereof shall be on that person, thereafter fails to surrender himself or herself for the purpose of undergoing periodical imprisonment, as required, any magistrate before whom that person is brought, may set aside the unexpired portion of the sentence of periodical imprisonment and, after considering the evidence recorded in respect of the offence in question, may impose in lieu of any unexpired portion any punishment within the limits of his or her jurisdiction and of any punishment prescribed by any law as a punishment for the offence in question.
[Sub-s. (5) substituted by s. 12 (a) of Act 66 of 2008.
Any magistrate may, if it appears from information on oath that a person who has been sentenced in terms of subsection (1) has failed to surrender himself or herself to undergo imprisonment as provided for in this section, issue a warrant for the arrest of that person in order to deal with him or her in terms of subsection (5) (b).
[Sub-s. (6) added by s. 12 (b) of Act 66 of 2008.
Subject to the provisions of subsection (2), a superior court or a regional court which convicts a person of one or more offences, may, if it is satisfied that the said person habitually commits offences and that the community should be protected against him, declare him an habitual criminal, in lieu of the imposition of any other punishment for the offence or offences of which he is convicted.
[Para. (b) deleted by s. 6 of Act 107 of 1990.
if in the opinion of the court the offence warrants the imposition of punishment which by itself or together with any punishment warranted or required in respect of any other offence of which the accused is simultaneously convicted, would entail imprisonment for a period exceeding 15 years.
[Para. (c) substituted by s. 37 of Act 105 of 1997.
A person declared an habitual criminal shall be dealt with in accordance with the laws relating to prisons.
Subject to the provisions of subsections (2), (3) and (4), a superior court or a regional court which convicts a person of one or more offences, may, if it is satisfied that the said person represents a danger to the physical or mental well-being of other persons and that the community should be protected against him, declare him a dangerous criminal.
include a description of the nature of the enquiry; and include a finding as to the question whether the accused represents a danger to the physical or mental well-being of other persons.
If the persons conducting the enquiry are not unanimous in their finding under paragraph (d) (ii), such fact shall be mentioned in the report and each of such persons shall give his finding on the matter in question.
A psychiatrist appointed under paragraph (a), other than a psychiatrist appointed by an accused, shall, subject to the provisions of paragraph (i), be appointed from the list of psychiatrists referred to in section 79 (9).
Where the list compiled and kept in terms of section 79 (9) does not include a sufficient number of psychiatrists who may conveniently be appointed for any enquiry under this subsection, a psychiatrist may be appointed for the purposes of such enquiry notwithstanding that his name does not appear on such list.
For the purposes of this subsection a psychiatrist means a person registered as a psychiatrist under the Medical, Dental and Supplementary Health Service Professions Act, 1974 (Act 56 of 1974).
If the said finding is not unanimous or, if unanimous, is disputed by the prosecutor or the accused, the court shall determine the matter after hearing evidence, and the prosecutor and the accused may to that end present evidence to the court, including the evidence of any person who under subsection (3) (a) conducted the enquiry.
Where the said finding is disputed, the party disputing the finding may subpoena and cross-examine any person who under subsection (3) (a) conducted the enquiry.
[S. 286A inserted by s. 21 of Act 116 of 1993.
The court which declares a person a dangerous criminal shall sentence such person to undergo imprisonment for an indefinite period; and direct that such person be brought before the court on the expiration of a period determined by it, which shall not exceed the jurisdiction of the court.
submit the case record to the judicial officer who is to reconsider the sentence; and inform the Commissioner in writing of the date for which the matter has been set down.
Whenever a court reconsiders a sentence in terms of this section, it shall have the same powers as it would have had if it were considering sentence after conviction of a person and the procedure adopted at such proceedings shall apply mutatis mutandis during such reconsideration: Provided that the court shall make no finding before it has considered a report of a parole board as contemplated in section 5C of the Correctional Services Act, 1959 (Act 8 of 1959).
where the person is brought before the court in terms of paragraph (b), again place the person under correctional supervision on the conditions it deems fit and for a period which shall not exceed the unexpired portion of the period of correctional supervision as converted in terms of subsection (4) (b) (ii).
For the purposes of subsection (4) (b) (i) or (5) (i), it shall not be regarded as exceeding the jurisdiction of the regional court if the further period contemplated in those subsections and the period contemplated in subsection (1) (b), together exceed such court's jurisdiction.
(i), the provisions of subsections (2) up to and including (6), as well as of this subsection, shall mutatis mutandis apply.
[S. 286B inserted by s. 21 of Act 116 of 1993.
Whenever a court convicts a person of any offence punishable by a fine (whether with or without any other direct or alternative punishment), it may, in imposing a fine upon such person, impose, as a punishment alternative to such fine, a sentence of imprisonment of any period within the limits of its jurisdiction: Provided that, subject to the provisions of subsection (3), the period of such alternative sentence of imprisonment shall not, either alone or together with any period of imprisonment imposed as a direct punishment, exceed the longest period of imprisonment prescribed by any law as a punishment (whether direct or alternative) for such offence.
Whenever a court has imposed upon any person a fine without an alternative sentence of imprisonment and the fine is not paid in full or is not recovered in full in terms of section 288, the court which passed sentence on such person (or if that court was a circuit local division of the Supreme Court, then the provincial or local division of the Supreme Court within whose area of jurisdiction such sentence was imposed) may issue a warrant directing that he be arrested and brought before the court, which may thereupon sentence him to such term of imprisonment as could have been imposed upon him as an alternative punishment in terms of subsection (1).
Whenever by any law passed before the date of commencement of the General Law Amendment Act, 1935 (Act 46 of 1935), a court is empowered to impose upon a person convicted by such court of an offence, a sentence of imprisonment (whether direct or as an alternative to a fine) of a duration proportionate to the sum of a fine, that court may, notwithstanding such law, impose upon any person convicted of such offence in lieu of a sentence of imprisonment which is proportionate as aforesaid, any sentence of imprisonment within the limits of the jurisdiction of the court.
act as if the person were sentenced to imprisonment as referred to in section 276 (1) (i); or apply in accordance with the provisions of section 276A (3) for the sentence to be reconsidered by the court a quo, and thereupon the provisions of section 276A (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis to such a case.
[Sub-s. (4) added by s. 43 of 122 of 1991 and amended by s. 23 of Act 87 of 1997.
Whenever a person is sentenced to pay a fine, the court passing the sentence may, in its discretion, issue a warrant addressed to the sheriff or messenger of the court authorizing him to levy the amount of the fine by attachment and sale of any movable property belonging to such person although the sentence directs that, in default of payment of the fine, such person shall be imprisoned.
The amount which may be levied shall be sufficient to cover, in addition to the fine, the costs and expenses of the warrant and of the attachment and sale thereunder.
If the proceeds of the sale of the movable property are insufficient to satisfy the amount of the fine and the costs and expenses aforesaid, a superior court may issue a warrant, or, in the case of a sentence by any lower court, authorize such lower court to issue a warrant for the levy against the immovable property of such person of the amount unpaid.
When a person is sentenced only to a fine or, in default of payment of the fine, imprisonment and the court issues a warrant under this section, it may suspend the execution of the sentence of imprisonment and may release the person upon his executing a bond with or without sureties as the court thinks fit, on condition that he appears before such court or some other court on the day appointed for the return of such warrant, such day being not more than fifteen days from the time of executing the bond, and in the event of the amount of the fine not being recovered, the sentence of imprisonment may be carried into execution forthwith or may be suspended as before for a further period or periods of not more than fifteen days, as the court may deem fit.
In any case in which an order for the payment of money is made on nonrecovery whereof imprisonment may be ordered, and the money is not paid forthwith, the court may require the person ordered to make such payment to enter into a bond as prescribed in subsection (3), and in default of his doing so, may at once pass sentence of imprisonment as if the money had not been recovered.
by ordering such employer to deduct from time to time a specified amount from the salary or wages so due and to pay over such amount to the clerk of the court in question.
S. 290 amended by s. 9 of Act 26 of 1987, by s. 7 of Act 107 of 1990, by s.
Act 122 of 1991 and by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997 and repealed by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
[S. 291 substituted by s. 10 of Act 26 of 1987, amended by s. 45 of Act 122 of 1991 and repealed by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
[S. 292 amended by s. 17 of Act 33 of 1986 and deleted by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
[S. 293 amended by s. 18 of Act 33 of 1986 and repealed by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
[S. 294 amended by s. 19 of Act 33 of 1986 and repealed by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
[S. 295 repealed by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
of the said Act, and such order shall for the purposes of the said Act be deemed to have been made under section 22 thereof: Provided that such order shall not be made in addition to any sentence of imprisonment (whether direct or as an alternative to a fine) unless the operation of the whole of such sentence is suspended.
Where a court has referred a person to a treatment centre under subsection (1) and such person is later found not to be fit for treatment in such treatment centre, such person may be dealt with mutatis mutandis in accordance with the provisions of section 276A (4).
For the purposes of the provisions of paragraph (a) the expression 'a probation officer or the Commissioner' in section 276A (4) shall be construed as the person at the head of the treatment centre or a person authorized by him.
S. 296 amended by s. 15 of Act 56 of 1979, by s. 7 of Act 64 of 1982, by s.
Act 26 of 1987 and by s. 46 of Act 122 of 1991 and substituted by s. 51 of Act 20 of 1992.
[Item (cc) substituted by s. 20 (a) of Act 33 of 1986.
[Item (ccA) inserted by s. 47 of Act 122 of 1991.
[Item (ee) amended by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996.
unconditionally, and order such person to appear before the court, if called upon before the expiration of the relevant period; or pass sentence but order the operation of the whole or any part thereof to be suspended for a period not exceeding five years on any condition referred to in paragraph (a) (i) which the court may specify in the order; or discharge the person concerned with a caution or reprimand, and such discharge shall have the effect of an acquittal, except that the conviction shall be recorded as a previous conviction.
[Sub-s. (1A) inserted by s. 20 (b) of Act 33 of 1986 and deleted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
Where a court has under paragraph (a) (i) of subsection (1) postponed the passing of sentence and the court, whether differently constituted or not, is at the expiration of the relevant period satisfied that the person concerned has observed the conditions imposed under that paragraph, the court shall discharge him without passing sentence, and such discharge shall have the effect of an acquittal, except that the conviction shall be recorded as a previous conviction.
Where a court has under paragraph (a) (ii) of subsection (1) unconditionally postponed the passing of sentence, and the person concerned has not at the expiration of the relevant period been called upon to appear before the court, such person shall be deemed to have been discharged with a caution under subsection (1) (c).
Where a court convicts a person of an offence in respect of which any law prescribes a minimum punishment, the court may in its discretion pass sentence but order the operation of a part thereof to be suspended for a period not exceeding five years on any condition referred to in paragraph (a) (i) of subsection (1).
until the expiration of a period not exceeding five years; or on condition that the fine is paid over a period not exceeding five years in instalments and at intervals determined by the court.
A court which sentences a person to a term of imprisonment as an alternative to a fine or, if the court which has imposed such sentence was a regional court or a magistrate's court, a magistrate, may, where the fine is not paid, at any stage before the expiration of the period of imprisonment, suspend the operation of the sentence and order the release of the person concerned on such conditions relating to the payment of the fine or such portion thereof as may still be due, as to the court or, in the case of a sentence imposed by a regional court or magistrate's court, the magistrate, may seem expedient, including a condition that the person concerned take up a specified employment and that the fine due be paid in instalments by the person concerned or his employer: Provided that the power conferred by this subsection shall not be exercised by a magistrate where the court which has imposed the sentence has so ordered.
suspended the operation of a sentence under subsection (1) (b) or (4); or suspended the payment of a fine under subsection (5), whether differently constituted or not, or any court of equal or superior jurisdiction may, if satisfied that the person concerned has through circumstances beyond his control been unable to comply with any relevant condition, or for any other good and sufficient reason, further postpone the passing of sentence or further suspend the operation of a sentence or the payment of a fine, as the case may be, subject to any existing condition or such further conditions as could have been imposed at the time of such postponement or suspension.
cancel the order of suspension and recommit the person concerned to serve the balance of the sentence.
[Sub-s. (6) substituted by s. 21 of Act 59 of 1983.
under subsection (4), on condition that the person concerned perform community service or that he submit himself to instruction or treatment or to the supervision or control of a probation officer or that he attend or reside at a specified centre for a specified purpose, may, whether or not the court is constituted differently than it was at the time of such postponement or suspension, at any time during the period of postponement or suspension on good cause shown amend any such condition or substitute any other competent condition for such condition, or cancel the order of postponement or suspension and impose a competent sentence or put the suspended sentence into operation, as the case may be.
[Sub-s. (8) amended by s. 20 (c) of Act 33 of 1986.
(a) A court which under this section has imposed a condition according to which the person concerned is required to perform community service, to undergo instruction or treatment or to attend or reside at a specified centre for a specified purpose, shall cause to be served upon the person concerned a notice in writing directing him to report on a date and time specified in the notice or (if prevented from doing so by circumstances beyond his control) as soon as practicable thereafter, to the person specified in that notice, whether within or outside the area of jurisdiction of the court, in order to perform that community service, to undergo that instruction or treatment or to attend that centre or to reside thereat, as the case may be.
A copy of the said notice shall serve as authority to the person mentioned therein to have that community service performed by the person concerned or to provide that instruction or treatment to the person concerned or to allow the person concerned to attend that centre or to reside thereat.
[Sub-s. (8A) inserted by s. 20 (d) of Act 33 of 1986.
when he reports to perform community service, to undergo instruction or treatment or to attend or reside at a specified centre for a specified purpose, is under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs or the like; or impersonates or falsely represents himself to be the person who has been directed to perform the community service in question, to undergo the instruction or treatment in question or to attend or reside at the specified centre for the specified purpose, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[Sub-s. (8B) inserted by s. 20 (d) of Act 33 of 1986.
was imposed under paragraph (a) (i) of subsection (1), be brought before the court which postponed the passing of sentence or before any court of equal or superior jurisdiction; or was imposed under subsection (1) (b), (4) or (5), be brought before the court which suspended the operation of the sentence or, as the case may be, the payment of the fine, or any court of equal or superior jurisdiction, and such court, whether or not it is, in the case of a court other than a court of equal or superior jurisdiction, constituted differently than it was at the time of such postponement or suspension, may then, in the case of subparagraph (i), impose any competent sentence or, in the case of subparagraph (ii), put into operation the sentence which was suspended.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 49 of Act 129 of 1993 and by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
A person who has been called upon under paragraph (a) (ii) of subsection (1) to appear before the court may, upon the order of the court in question, be arrested and brought before that court, and such court, whether or not constituted differently than it was at the time of the postponement of sentence, may impose upon such person any competent sentence.
If patrimonial loss may be recovered from an accused on the ground of a delict committed by him in the performance of community service in terms of section 297, that loss may, subject to subsection (3), be recovered from the State.
Subsection (1) shall not be construed as precluding the State from obtaining indemnification against its liability in terms of subsection (1) by means of insurance or otherwise.
The patrimonial loss which may be recovered from the State in terms of subsection (1) shall be reduced by the amount from any other source to which the injured person is entitled by reason of the patrimonial loss suffered by him.
In so far as the State has made a payment by virtue of a right of recovery in terms of subsection (1), all the relevant right and legal remedies of the injured person against the accused shall pass to the State.
If any person as a result of the performance of community service in terms of section 297 has suffered patrimonial loss which cannot be recovered from the State in terms of subsection (1), the Director-General: Justice may, with the concurrence of the Treasury, as an act of grace pay such amount as he may deem reasonable to that person.
[S. 297A inserted by s. 21 of Act 33 of 1986.
The State President may, on such conditions as he may deem necessary, enter into an international agreement with any state, so as to provide, on a reciprocal basis, for the putting into operation of suspended sentences in respect of persons convicted, within the jurisdiction of the Republic or of such state, of an offence mentioned in the agreement.
The State President may, if the parties agree, amend such an agreement to the extent which he deems necessary.
If an application is made for a suspended sentence, imposed by a court of a state referred to in subsection (1), to be put into operation, the court at which the application is made shall, subject to the terms of the agreement, proceed with that application as if the suspended sentence was imposed by a court in the Republic.
An agreement referred to in subsection (1), or any amendment thereof, shall only be in force after it has been published by the State President by proclamation in the Gazette.
The State President may at any time and in like manner withdraw any such agreement.
[S. 297B, previously s. 297A, inserted by s. 1 of Act 8 of 1989 and renumbered by s. 6 of Act 77 of 1989.
When by mistake a wrong sentence is passed, the court may, before or immediately after it is recorded, amend the sentence.
A warrant for the execution of any sentence may be issued by the judge or judicial officer who passed the sentence or by any other judge or judicial officer of the court in question, or, in the case of a regional court, by any magistrate, and such warrant shall commit the person concerned to the prison for the magisterial district in which such person is sentenced.
(a), any immediate relative of the deceased, if he or she is present that he or she has a right, subject to the directives issued by the Commissioner of Correctional Services under subsection (4), to make representations when placement of the prisoner on parole, on day parole or under correctional supervision is considered or to attend any relevant meeting of the parole board.
to inform the said Commissioner in writing of any change of address.
The Commissioner of Correctional Services shall inform the parole board in question accordingly and that parole board shall inform the complainant or relative in writing when and to whom he or she may make representations or when and where a meeting will take place.
The Commissioner of Correctional Services must issue directives regarding the manner and circumstances in which a complainant or relative contemplated in subsection (1) may exercise the right contemplated in that subsection.
Directives issued under paragraph (a) must be published in the Gazette27*.
Before the directives issued under paragraph (a) are published in the Gazette, the Commissioner of Correctional Services must submit them to Parliament, and the first directives so issued, must be submitted to Parliament within three months of the commencement of this section.
Any directive issued under paragraph (a) may be amended or withdrawn in like manner.
[S. 299A inserted by s. 6 of Act 55 of 2003.
a regional court or a magistrate's court shall not make any such award if the compensation applied for exceeds the amount28* determined by the Minister from time to time by notice in the Gazette in respect of the respective courts.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 16 of Act 56 of 1979, by s. 7 of Act 109 of 1984 and by s. 14 of Act 5 of 1991.
[Para. (b) deleted by s. 12 of Act 26 of 1987.
For the purposes of determining the amount of the compensation or the liability of the convicted person therefor, the court may refer to the evidence and the proceedings at the trial or hear further evidence either upon affidavit or orally.
by a regional court, shall have the effect of a civil judgment of the magistrate's court of the district in which the relevant trial took place.
Where a superior court makes an award under this section, the registrar of the court shall forward a certified copy of the award to the clerk of the magistrate's court designated by the presiding judge or, if no such court is designated, to the clerk of the magistrate's court in whose area of jurisdiction the offence in question was committed, and thereupon such award shall have the effect of a civil judgment of that magistrate's court.
Where money of the person convicted is taken from him upon his arrest, the court may order that payment be made forthwith from such money in satisfaction or on account of the award.
A person in whose favour an award has been made under this section may within sixty days after the date on which the award was made, in writing renounce the award by lodging with the registrar or clerk of the court in question a document of renunciation and, where applicable, by making a repayment of any moneys paid under subsection (4).
Where the person concerned does not renounce an award under paragraph (a) within the period of sixty days, no person against whom the award was made shall be liable at the suit of the person concerned to any other civil proceedings in respect of the injury for which the award was made.
Where a person is convicted of theft or of any other offence whereby he has unlawfully obtained any property, and it appears to the court on the evidence that such person sold such property or part thereof to another person who had no knowledge that the property was stolen or unlawfully obtained, the court may, on the application of such purchaser and on restitution of such property to the owner thereof, order that, out of any money of such convicted person taken from him on his arrest, a sum not exceeding the amount paid by the purchaser be returned to him.
[Sub-para. (i) substituted by s. 13 (a) of Act 26 of 1987 and by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
[Sub-para. (ii) substituted by s. 8 of Act 109 of 1984 and by s. 15 of Act 5 of 1991.
[Sub-para. (iii) deleted by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
shall be subject in the ordinary course to review by a judge of the provincial or local division having jurisdiction.
cease to apply in respect of an accused when judgment in the appeal is given.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 1 of Act 42 of 2003.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 11 of Act 105 of 1982.
each sentence on a separate charge shall be regarded as a separate sentence, and the fact that the aggregate of sentences imposed on an accused in respect of more than one charge in the same proceedings exceeds the periods or amounts referred to in that subsection, shall not render those sentences subject to review in the ordinary course.
[Para. (b) deleted by s. 22 of Act 59 of 1983.
with reference to a sentence which is imposed in respect of an accused who was not assisted by a legal adviser.
[Para. (b) deleted by s. 13 (b) of Act 26 of 1987.
The clerk of the court in question shall within one week after the determination of a case referred to in paragraph (a) of section 302 (1) forward to the registrar of the provincial or local division having jurisdiction the record of the proceedings in the case or a copy thereof certified by such clerk, together with such remarks as the presiding judicial officer may wish to append thereto, and with any written statement or argument which the person convicted may within three days after imposition of the sentence furnish to the clerk of the court, and such registrar shall, as soon as possible, lay the same in chambers before a judge of that division for his consideration.
[S. 303 amended by s. 12 of Act 105 of 1982.
If, upon considering the proceedings referred to in section 303 and any further information or evidence which may, by direction of the judge, be supplied or taken by the magistrate's court in question, it appears to the judge that the proceedings are in accordance with justice, he shall endorse his certificate to that effect upon the record thereof, and the registrar concerned shall then return the record to the magistrate's court in question.
If, upon considering the said proceedings, it appears to the judge that the proceedings are not in accordance with justice or that doubt exists whether the proceedings are in accordance with justice, he shall obtain from the judicial officer who presided at the trial a statement setting forth his reasons for convicting the accused and for the sentence imposed, and shall thereupon lay the record of the proceedings and the said statement before the court of the provincial or local division having jurisdiction for consideration by that court as a court of appeal: Provided that where the judge concerned is of the opinion that the conviction or sentence imposed is clearly not in accordance with justice and that the person convicted may be prejudiced if the record of the proceedings is not forthwith placed before the provincial or local division having jurisdiction, the judge may lay the record of the proceedings before that court without obtaining the statement of the judicial officer who presided at the trial.
[Para. (a) amended by s. 13 of Act 105 of 1982.
Such court may at any sitting thereof hear any evidence and for that purpose summon any person to appear to give evidence or to produce any document or other article.
[Sub-para. (v) amended by s. 13 of Act 105 of 1982.
make any such order in regard to the suspension of the execution of any sentence against the person convicted or the admission of such person to bail, or, generally, in regard to any matter or thing connected with such person or the proceedings in regard to such person as to the court seems likely to promote the ends of justice.
If the court desires to have a question of law or of fact arising in any case argued, it may direct such question to be argued by the attorney-general and by such counsel as the court may appoint.
If in any criminal case in which a magistrate's court has imposed a sentence which is not subject to review in the ordinary course in terms of section 302 or in which a regional court has imposed any sentence, it is brought to the notice of the provincial or local division having jurisdiction or any judge thereof that the proceedings in which the sentence was imposed were not in accordance with justice, such court or judge shall have the same powers in respect of such proceedings as if the record thereof had been laid before such court or judge in terms of section 303 or this section.
[Sub-s. (4) amended by s. 13 of Act 105 of 1982.
If a magistrate or regional magistrate after conviction but before sentence is of the opinion that the proceedings in respect of which he brought in a conviction are not in accordance with justice, or that doubt exists whether the proceedings are in accordance with justice, he shall, without sentencing the accused, record the reasons for his opinion and transmit them, together with the record of the proceedings, to the registrar of the provincial division having jurisdiction, and such registrar shall, as soon as is practicable, lay the same for review in chambers before a judge, who shall have the same powers in respect of such proceedings as if the record thereof had been laid before him in terms of section 303.
When a magistrate or a regional magistrate acts in terms of paragraph (a), he shall inform the accused accordingly and postpone the case to some future date pending the outcome of the review proceedings and, if the accused is in custody, the magistrate or regional magistrate may make such order with regard to the detention or release of the accused as he may deem fit.
[S. 304A inserted by s. 22 of Act 33 of 1986.
[S. 305 amended by s. 14 of Act 105 of 1982 and repealed by s. 1 of Act 76 of 1997.
A magistrate's court imposing sentence which under section 302 is subject to review, shall forthwith inform the person convicted that the record of the proceedings will be transmitted within one week, and such person may then inspect and make a copy of such record before transmission or whilst in the possession of the provincial or local division, and may set down the case for argument before the provincial or local division having jurisdiction in like manner as if the record had been returned or transmitted to such provincial or local division in compliance with any order made by it for the purpose of bringing in review the proceedings of a magistrate's court.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 15 of Act 105 of 1982.
Whenever a case is so set down, whether the offence in question was prosecuted at the instance of the State or at the instance of a private prosecutor, a written notice shall be served, by or on behalf of the person convicted, upon the attorney-general at his office not less than seven days before the day appointed for the argument, setting forth the name and number of the case, the court before which it was tried, the date for which the case has been set down for argument and the grounds or reasons upon which the judgment is sought to be reversed or altered.
Whether such judgment is confirmed or reversed or altered, no costs shall in respect of the proceedings on review be payable by the prosecution to the person convicted or by the person convicted to the prosecution.
Subject to the provisions of section 308, the execution of any sentence shall not be suspended by the transmission of or the obligation to transmit the record for review unless the court which imposed the sentence releases the person convicted on bail.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 8 of Act 64 of 1982 and by s. 12 (a) of Act 75 of 1995 and amended by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996.
on good cause shown, permit such person to furnish a guarantee, with or without sureties, that he will pay and forfeit to the State the sum of money determined under paragraph (b), in circumstances under which such sum, if it had been deposited, would be forfeited to the State.
It shall be a condition of the release of the person convicted that he shall at a time and place specified by the court; and upon service, in the manner prescribed by the rules of court, of a written order upon him or at a place specified by the court, surrender himself in order that effect may be given to any sentence in respect of the proceedings in question.
(a) If the order contemplated in subsection (3) (b) is not served on the convicted person within 14 days of the issuing thereof because he or she cannot be found at the address given by him or her at the time of the granting of bail to him or her, the bail shall be provisionally cancelled and the bail money provisionally forfeited and a warrant for his or her arrest shall be issued.
The provisions of section 67 (2) in respect of the confirmation or the lapsing of the provisional cancellation of bail or the forfeiture of bail money, and making final the provisional forfeiture of bail money, the provisions of section 67 (3) in respect of the hearing of evidence, and the provisions of section 70 in respect of the remission of forfeited bail money, shall mutatis mutandis apply in respect of bail pending review.
[Sub-s. (3A) inserted by s. 12 (b) of Act 75 of 1995.
any other matter relating to the conduct of such person.
The court which considers an application for bail under this section shall record the relevant proceedings in full, including the details referred to in subsection (3) and any conditions imposed under subsection (4).
The provisions of sections 63, 64, 65, 66 and 68 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to bail pending review.
[Sub-s. (6) substituted by s. 17 of Act 56 of 1979 and by s. 12 (c) of Act 75 of 1995.
[S. 308 amended by s. 16 of Act 105 of 1982 and by s. 23 of Act 33 of 1986 and repealed by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
on warning on a condition as contemplated in section 307 (3), in which case the provisions of section 72 shall mutatis mutandis apply to the extent to which they can be applied.
[S. 308A inserted by s. 50 of Act 129 of 1993.
Subject to section 84 of the Child Justice Act, 2008, any person convicted of any offence by any lower court (including a person discharged after conviction) may, subject to leave to appeal being granted in terms of section 309B or 309C, appeal against such conviction and against any resultant sentence or order to the High Court having jurisdiction: Provided that the provisions of section 302 (1) (b) shall apply in respect of a person who duly notes an appeal against a conviction, sentence or order as contemplated in section 302 (1) (a).
[Para. (a) amended by s. 17 of Act 105 of 1982 and substituted by s. 2 (a) of Act 76 of 1997, by s. 2 (a) of Act 42 of 2003, by s. 6 of Act 38 of 2007 and by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
Where, in the case of a regional court, a conviction takes place within the area of jurisdiction of one provincial division and any resultant sentence or order is passed or, as the case may be, is made within the area of jurisdiction of another provincial division, any appeal against such conviction or such sentence or order shall be heard by the last mentioned provincial division.
An appeal under this section shall be noted and be prosecuted within the period and in the manner prescribed by the rules of court: Provided that the magistrate against whose decision or order the appeal is to be noted, or if he or she is unavailable any other magistrate of the court concerned, may on application and on good cause shown, extend such period.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 17 of Act 105 of 1982 and substituted by s. 2 (b) of Act 76 of 1977.
The provincial or local division concerned shall thereupon have the powers referred to in section 304 (2), and, unless the appeal is based solely upon a question of law, the provincial or local division shall, in addition to such powers, have the power to increase any sentence imposed upon the appellant or to impose any other form of sentence in lieu of or in addition to such sentence: Provided that, notwithstanding that the provincial or local division is of the opinion that any point raised might be decided in favour of the appellant, no conviction or sentence shall be reversed or altered by reason of any irregularity or defect in the record or proceedings, unless it appears to such division that a failure of justice has in fact resulted from such irregularity or defect.
[Sub-s. (3) amended by s. 17 of Act 105 of 1982, by s. 8 of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 38 of Act 105 of 1997.
[Sub-s. (3A) inserted by s. 2 (c) of Act 76 of 1977, substituted by s. 2 (b) of Act 42 of 2003 and deleted by s. 13 of Act 66 of 2008.
[Para. (a) deleted by s. 2 (d) of Act 76 of 1997.
sections 307 and 308A shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to the sentence appealed against.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 51 of Act 129 of 1993 and by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
When a provincial or local division of the Supreme Court gives a decision on appeal against a decision of the magistrate's court and the former decision is appealed against, such division of the Supreme Court has the powers in respect of the granting of bail which a magistrate's court has in terms of section 307.
[Sub-s. (5) added by s. 13 of Act 75 of 1995.
uphold the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence.
The magistrate shall issue in respect of any person who has been sentenced to imprisonment under subsection (1), a warrant for his detention in a prison.
[S. 309A inserted by s. 2 of Act 34 of 1986.
(a) Subject to section 84 of the Child Justice Act, 2008, any accused, who wishes to note an appeal against any conviction or against any resultant sentence or order of a lower court, must apply to that court for leave to appeal against that conviction, sentence or order.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
within 14 days after the passing of the sentence or order following on the conviction; or within such extended period as the court may on application and for good cause shown, allow.
Any application in terms of subsection (1) must be heard by the magistrate whose conviction, sentence or order is the subject of the prospective appeal (hereinafter referred to as the trial magistrate) or, if the trial magistrate is not available, by any other magistrate of the court concerned, to whom it is assigned for hearing.
If the application is to be heard by a magistrate, other than the trial magistrate, the clerk of the court must submit a copy of the record of the proceedings before the trial magistrate to the magistrate hearing the application: Provided that where the accused was legally represented at a trial in a regional court the clerk of the court must, subject to paragraph (c), only submit a copy of the judgment of the trial magistrate, including the reasons for the conviction, sentence or order in respect of which the appeal is sought to be noted to the magistrate hearing the application.
The magistrate referred to in the proviso to paragraph (b) may, if he or she deems it necessary in order to decide the application, request the full record of the proceedings before the trial magistrate.
Notice of the date fixed for the hearing of the application must be given to the Director of Public Prosecutions concerned, or to a person designated thereto by him or her, and the accused.
Every application for leave to appeal must set forth clearly and specifically the grounds upon which the accused desires to appeal.
If the accused applies orally for such leave immediately after the passing of the sentence or order, he or she must state such grounds, which must be recorded and form part of the record.
If an application for leave to appeal under subsection (1) is granted, the clerk of the court must, in accordance with the rules of the court, transmit copies of the record and of all relevant documents to the registrar of the High Court concerned: Provided that instead of the whole record, with the consent of the accused and the Director of Public Prosecutions, copies (one of which must be certified) may be transmitted of such parts of the record as may be agreed upon by the Director of Public Prosecutions and the accused to be sufficient, in which event the High Court concerned may nevertheless call for the production of the whole record.
If any application referred to in this section is refused, the magistrate must immediately record his or her reasons for such refusal.
An application for leave to appeal may be accompanied by an application to adduce further evidence (hereafter referred to as an application for further evidence) relating to the conviction, sentence or order in respect of which the appeal is sought to be noted.
there is a reasonably acceptable explanation for the failure to produce the evidence before the close of the trial.
receive that evidence and further evidence rendered necessary thereby, including evidence in rebuttal called by the prosecutor and evidence called by the court; and record its findings or views with regard to that evidence, including the cogency and the sufficiency of the evidence, and the demeanour and credibility of any witness.
Any evidence received under subsection (5) shall for the purposes of an appeal be deemed to be evidence taken or admitted at the trial in question.
[S. 309B inserted by s. 3 of Act 76 of 1997 and substituted by s. 3 of Act 42 of 2003.
'petition', unless the context otherwise indicates, includes an application referred to in subsection (2) (b) (ii).
for leave to appeal, is refused by a lower court, the accused may by petition apply to the Judge President of the High Court having jurisdiction to grant any one or more of the applications in question.
within 21 days after the application in question was refused; or within such extended period as may on an application accompanying that petition, for good cause shown, be allowed.
If more than one application referred to in subsection (1) relate to the same matter, they should, as far as is possible, be dealt with in the same petition.
the magistrate's reasons for refusal of the application; and the record of the proceedings in the magistrate's court in respect of which the application was refused.
A petition as provided for in this section must be considered in chambers by two judges designated by the Judge President.
If the judges referred to in paragraph (a) differ in opinion, the petition must also be considered in chambers by the Judge President or by any other judge designated by the Judge President.
[Sub-s. (4) substituted by s. 14 of Act 66 of 2008.] [Sub-s. (5) substituted by s. 14 of Act 66 of 2008.
call for any further information from the magistrate who refused the application in question, or from the magistrate who presided at the trial to which the application relates, as the case may be; or in exceptional circumstances, order that the petition or any part thereof be argued before them at a time and place determined by them.
[Sub-s. (6) substituted by s. 14 of Act 66 of 2008.
in the case of an application referred to in subsection (2) (b) (ii), grant or refuse the application; and in the case of an application for condonation, grant or refuse the application, and if the application is granted direct that an application for leave to appeal must be made, within the period fixed by them, to the court referred to in section 309B (1); or if they deem it expedient, direct that an application for leave to appeal must be submitted under subsection (2) within the period fixed by them as if it had been refused by the court referred to in section 309B (1); and in the case of an application for leave to appeal, subject to paragraph (d), grant or refuse the application; and in the case of an application for further evidence, grant or refuse the application, and, if the application is granted the judges may, before deciding the application for leave to appeal, remit the matter to the magistrate's court concerned in order that further evidence may be received in accordance with section 309B (5).
All applications contained in a petition must be disposed of as far as is possible, simultaneously; and as a matter of urgency, where the accused was sentenced to any form of imprisonment that was not wholly suspended.
Notice of the date fixed for any hearing of a petition under this section, and of any place determined under subsection (6) for any hearing, must be given to the Director of Public Prosecutions concerned, or to a person designated by him or her, and the accused.
[S. 309C inserted by s. 3 of Act 76 of 1997 and substituted by s. 3 of Act 42 of 2003.
An accused, other than a child contemplated in the Child Justice Act, 2008, who is unrepresented at the time he or she is convicted and sentenced, must be informed by the presiding officer of his or her rights in respect of appeal and legal representation and of the correct procedures to give effect to these rights.
shall be suspended if he or she appeals against that conviction or sentence; and shall cease to apply once judgment in the appeal has been given.
An accused contemplated in subsection (1) (a) in respect of whom an application in terms of the proviso to section 309 (2) or 309B is refused, must be informed by the presiding officer of his or her rights in respect of the proceedings contemplated in section 309C and legal representation and of the correct procedures involved to give effect to these rights.
to any form of imprisonment that was not wholly suspended; or to any form of punishment which in view of the presiding officer may lead to substantial injustice for the accused, and he or she indicates to the presiding officer his or her intention to apply for leave to appeal in terms of section 309B (1) (a) or for leave to petition in terms of section 309C (2) (a), the presiding officer must refer the accused to the Legal Aid Board referred to in section 2 of the Legal Aid Act, 1969 (Act 22 of 1969), for the purpose of allowing him or her an opportunity to request legal representation to assist such accused in his or her application.
[S. 309D inserted by s. 3 of Act 76 of 1997 and substituted by s. 3 of Act 42 of 2003.
When a lower court has in criminal proceedings given a decision in favour of the accused on any question of law, including an order made under section 85 (2), the attorney-general or, if a body or a person other than the attorney-general or his representative, was the prosecutor in the proceedings, then such other prosecutor may require the judicial officer concerned to state a case for the consideration of the provincial or local division having jurisdiction, setting forth the question of law and his decision thereon and, if evidence has been heard, his findings of fact, in so far as they are material to the question of law.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 18 of Act 105 of 1982.
When such case has been stated, the attorney-general or other prosecutor, as the case may be, may appeal from the decision to the provincial or local division having jurisdiction.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 18 of Act 105 of 1982.
The provisions of section 309 (2) shall apply with reference to an appeal under this section.
If the appeal is allowed, the court which gave the decision appealed from shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (5) and after giving sufficient notice to both parties, reopen the case in which the decision was given and deal with it in the same manner as it should have dealt therewith if it had given a decision in accordance with the law as laid down by the provincial or local division in question.
[Sub-s. (4) amended by s. 18 of Act 105 of 1982.
In allowing the appeal, whether wholly or in part, the provincial or local division may itself impose such sentence or make such order as the lower court ought to have imposed or made, or it may remit the case to the lower court and direct that court to take such further steps as the provincial or local division considers proper.
[Sub-s. (5) amended by s. 18 of Act 105 of 1982.
The attorney-general may appeal against a sentence imposed upon an accused in a criminal case in a lower court, to the provincial or local division having jurisdiction, provided that an application for leave to appeal has been granted by a judge in chambers.
A written notice of such an application shall be lodged with the registrar of the provincial or local division concerned by the attorney-general, within a period of 30 days of the passing of sentence or within such extended period as may on application on good cause be allowed.
The notice shall state briefly the grounds for the application.
The attorney-general shall, at least 14 days before the day appointed for the hearing of the application, cause to be served by the deputy sheriff upon the accused in person a copy of the notice, together with a written statement of the rights of the accused in terms of subsection (4): Provided that if the deputy sheriff is not able so to serve a copy of the notice, it may be served in any other manner that may on application be allowed.
An accused may, within a period of 10 days of the serving of such a notice upon him, lodge a written submission with the registrar concerned, and the registrar shall submit it to the judge who is to hear the application, and shall send a copy thereof to the attorney-general.
Subject to the provisions of this section, section 309 shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to an appeal in terms of this section.
Upon an application for leave to appeal referred to in subsection (1) or an appeal in terms of this section, the judge or the court, as the case may be, may order that the State pay the accused concerned the whole or any part of the costs to which the accused may have been put in opposing the application or appeal, taxed according to the scale in civil cases of the provincial or local division concerned.
[S. 310A inserted by s. 9 of Act 107 of 1990.
Where the provincial or local division on appeal, whether brought by the attorney-general or other prosecutor or the person convicted, gives a decision in favour of the person convicted on a question of law, the attorney-general or other prosecutor against whom the decision is given may appeal to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, which shall, if it decides the matter in issue in favour of the appellant, set aside or vary the decision appealed from and, if the matter was brought before the provincial or local division in terms of section 309 (1), re-instate the conviction, sentence or order of the lower court appealed from, either in its original form or in such a modified form as the said Appellate Division may consider desirable; or section 310 (2), give such decision or take such action as the provincial or local division ought, in the opinion of the said Appellate Division, to have given or taken (including any action under section 310 (5)), and thereupon the provisions of section 310 (4) shall mutatis mutandis apply.
[Para. (b) amended by s. 19 of Act 105 of 1982.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 19 of Act 105 of 1982.
If an appeal brought by the attorney-general or other prosecutor under this section or section 310 is dismissed, the court dismissing the appeal may order that the appellant pay the respondent the costs to which the respondent may have been put in opposing the appeal, taxed according to the scale in civil cases of that court: Provided that where the attorney-general is the appellant, the costs which he is so ordered to pay shall be paid by the State.
Where a conviction and sentence under section 112 are set aside on review or appeal on the ground that any provision of subsection (1) (b) or subsection (2) of that section was not complied with, or on the ground that the provisions of section 113 should have been applied, the court in question shall remit the case to the court by which the sentence was imposed and direct that court to comply with the provision in question or to act in terms of section 113, as the case may be.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 23 of Act 59 of 1983.
or 112 (2), he shall enter a plea of not guilty whereupon the provisions of section 113 shall apply with reference to the matter.
The provisions of section 324 shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to any conviction and sentence of a lower court that are set aside on appeal or review on any ground referred to in that section.
Where a sentence or order imposed or made by a lower court is set aside on appeal or review and the person convicted is not in custody and the court setting aside the sentence or order remits the matter to the lower court in order that a fresh sentence or order may be imposed or made, the presence before that court of the person convicted may be obtained by means of a written notice addressed to that person calling upon him to appear at a stated place and time on a stated date in order that such sentence or order may be imposed or made.
The provisions of section 54 (2) and 55 (1) and (2) shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to a written notice issued under subsection (1).
In respect of appeals and questions of law reserved in connection with criminal cases heard by a High Court, the court of appeal shall be the Supreme Court of Appeal, except in so far as subsections (2) and (3) otherwise provides [sic].
[Paras. (b) and (c) deleted by s. 15 of Act 66 of 2008.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 11 of Act 62 of 2000 and by s. 4 (a) of Act 42 of 2003.
If an application for leave to appeal in a criminal case heard by a single judge of a High Court (irrespective of whether he or she sat with or without assessors) is granted under section 316, the court or judge or judges granting the application shall, if it, he or she or, in the case of the judges referred to in subsections (12) and (13) of that section, they or the majority of them, is or are satisfied that the questions of law and of fact and the other considerations involved in the appeal are of such a nature that the appeal does not require the attention of the Supreme Court of Appeal, direct that the appeal be heard by a full court.
Any such direction by the court or a judge of a High Court may be set aside by the Supreme Court of Appeal on application made to it by the accused or the Director of Public Prosecutions or other prosecutor within 21 days, or such longer period as may on application to the Supreme Court of Appeal on good cause shown, be allowed, after the direction was given.
Any application to the Supreme Court of Appeal under paragraph (b) shall be submitted by petition addressed to the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal, and the provisions of section 316 (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14) and (15) shall apply mutatis mutandis in respect thereof.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 39 (a) of Act 105 of 1997 and substituted by s. 4 (b) of Act 42 of 2003.
by the full court of the Transvaal Provincial Division, unless a direction by the judge president of that provincial division under subparagraph (ii) applies to it; or by the full court of the said local division if the said judge president has so directed in the particular instance.
An appeal in terms of this Chapter shall lie only as provided in sections 316 to 319 inclusive, and not as of right.
[Sub-s. (4) substituted by s. 10 of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 39 (b) of Act 105 of 1997.
'court of appeal' means, in relation to an appeal which in terms of subsection (3) is heard or is to be heard by a full court, the full court concerned and, in relation to any other appeal, the Supreme Court of Appeal.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 4 (c) of Act 42 of 2003.
'full court' means the court of a provincial division, or the Witwatersrand Local Division, sitting as a court of appeal and constituted before three judges.
[S. 315 substituted by s. 20 of Act 105 of 1982.
(a) Subject to section 84 of the Child Justice Act, 2008, any accused convicted of any offence by a High Court may apply to that court for leave to appeal against such conviction or against any resultant sentence or order.
[Para. (c) deleted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
An application referred to in subsection (1) must be made to the judge whose conviction, sentence or order is the subject of the prospective appeal (hereafter in this section referred to as the trial judge): Provided that if the trial judge is not available; or in the case of a conviction before a circuit court the said court is not in sitting, the application may be made to any other judge of the High Court concerned.
If the application is to be heard by a judge, other than the trial judge, the registrar of the court must submit a copy of the judgment of the trial judge, including the reasons for the conviction, sentence or order in respect of which the appeal is sought to be noted to the judge hearing the application.
The judge referred to in paragraph (b) may, if he or she deems it necessary in order to decide the application, request the full record of the proceedings before the trial judge.
No appeal shall lie against the judgment or order of a full court given on appeal to it in terms of section 315 (3), except with the special leave of the Supreme Court of Appeal on application made to it by the accused or, where a full court has for the purposes of such judgment or order given a decision in favour of the accused on a question of law, on application on the grounds of such decision made to that court by the Director of Public Prosecutions or other prosecutor against whom the decision was given.
within 21 days after the judgment or order against which appeal is to be made was given; or within such extended period as may on application and for good cause shown, be allowed.
The accused or Director of Public Prosecutions or other prosecutor shall, when submitting in accordance with paragraph (b) the application for special leave to appeal, at the same time give written notice that this has been done to the registrar of the court against whose decision he or she wishes to appeal, and thereupon such registrar shall forward a certified copy of the record prepared in terms of subsection for the purposes of such judgment or order, and of the reasons for such judgment or order, to the registrar of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
The provisions of subsections (4), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14) and (15) shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to any application and petition contemplated in paragraph (b) of this subsection.
Upon an appeal under this subsection the provisions of section 322 shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to the powers of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
An application for leave to appeal under subsection (1) may be accompanied by an application to adduce further evidence (hereafter in this section referred to as an application for further evidence) relating to the prospective appeal.
If an application under subsection (1) for leave to appeal is granted and the appeal is not under section 315 (3) to be heard by the full court of the High Court from which the appeal is made, the registrar of the court granting such application shall cause notice to be given accordingly to the registrar of the Supreme Court of Appeal without delay, and shall cause to be transmitted to the said registrar a certified copy of the record, including copies of the evidence, whether oral or documentary, taken or admitted at the trial, and a statement of the grounds of appeal: Provided that, instead of the whole record, with the consent of the accused and the Director of Public Prosecutions, copies (one of which must be certified) may be transmitted of such parts of the record as may be agreed upon by the Director of Public Prosecutions and the accused to be sufficient, in which event the judges of the Supreme Court of Appeal may nevertheless call for the production of the whole record.
If an application under subsection (1) for leave to appeal is granted and the appeal is under section 315 (3) to be heard by the full court of the High Court from which the appeal is made, the registrar shall without delay prepare a certified copy of the record, including copies of the evidence, whether oral or documentary, taken or admitted at the trial, and a statement of the grounds of appeal: Provided that, instead of the whole record, with the consent of the accused and the Director of Public Prosecutions, copies (one of which must be certified) may be prepared of such parts of the record as may be agreed upon by the Director of Public Prosecutions and the accused to be sufficient, in which event the judges of the full court of the High Court concerned may nevertheless call for the production of the whole record.
referred to in subsection (5) (a) to adduce further evidence (hereafter in this section referred to as an application for further evidence), is refused by a High Court, the accused may by petition apply to the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal to grant any one or more of the applications in question.
If more than one application referred to in subsection (8) (a) relate to the same matter, they should, as far as is possible, be dealt with in the same petition.
An accused who submits a petition referred to in subsection (8) (a), must at the same time give written notice thereof to the registrar of the High Court (other than a circuit court) within whose area of jurisdiction the trial took place, and of which the judge who presided at the trial was a member when he or she so presided.
the reasons for refusing the application or applications; and the record of the proceedings in the High Court in respect of which the application was refused.
[Sub-s. (10) substituted by s. 16 (a) of Act 66 of 2008.
A petition referred to in subsection (8), including an application referred to in subsection (8) (b) (ii), must be considered in chambers by two judges of the Supreme Court of Appeal designated by the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
If the judges differ in opinion, the petition shall also be considered in chambers by the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal or by any other judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal to whom it has been referred by the President.
call for any further information from the judge who refused the application in question, or from the judge who presided at the trial to which the application relates, as the case may be; or in exceptional circumstances, order that the application or applications in question or any of them be argued before them at a time and place determined by them.
[Sub-s. (12) substituted by s. 16 (b) of Act 66 of 2008.
in the case of an application referred to in subsection (8) (b) (ii), grant or refuse the application; and in the case of an application for condonation grant or refuse the application, and if the application is granted direct that an application for leave to appeal must be made, within the period fixed by them, to the High Court referred to in subsection (8) (a); or if they deem it expedient, direct that an application for leave to appeal must be submitted under subsection (8) within the period fixed by them as if it had been refused by the High Court referred to in subsection (8) (a); and in the case of an application for leave to appeal, subject to paragraph (d), grant or refuse the application; and in the case of an application for further evidence, grant or refuse the application, and, if the application is granted the judges may, before deciding the application for leave to appeal, remit the matter to the High Court concerned in order that further evidence may be received in accordance with subsection (5) (c); or in exceptional circumstances refer the petition to the Supreme Court of Appeal for consideration, whether upon argument or otherwise, and the Supreme Court of Appeal may thereupon deal with the petition in any manner referred to in this subsection.
Notice of the date fixed for the hearing of any application under this section, and of any time and place determined under subsection (12) for any hearing, must be given to the Director of Public Prosecutions concerned and the accused.
[S. 316 amended by s. 21 of Act 105 of 1982, by s. 15 of Act 26 of 1987 and by s. 12 of Act 62 of 2000 and substituted by s. 5 of Act 42 of 2003.
[S. 316A inserted by s. 11 of Act 107 of 1990 and repealed by s. 40 of Act 105 of 1997.
Subject to subsection (2), the attorney-general may appeal to the Appellate Division against a sentence imposed upon an accused in a criminal case in a superior court.
The provisions of section 316 in respect of an application or appeal referred to in that section by an accused, shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to a case in which the attorney-general appeals in terms of subsection (1) of this section.
Upon an appeal in terms of subsection (1) or an application referred to in subsection (2), brought by the attorney-general, the court may order that the State pay the accused concerned the whole or any part of the costs to which the accused may have been put in opposing the appeal or application, taxed according to the scale in civil cases of that court.
[S. 316B inserted by s. 11 of Act 107 of 1990.
If an accused is of the view that any of the proceedings in connection with or during his or her trial before a High Court are irregular or not according to law, he or she may, either during his or her trial or within a period of 14 days after his or her conviction or within such extended period as may upon application (in this section referred to as an application for condonation) on good cause be allowed, apply for a special entry to be made on the record (in this section referred to as an application for a special entry) stating in what respect the proceedings are alleged to be irregular or not according to law, and such a special entry shall, upon such application for a special entry, be made unless the court to which or the judge to whom the application for a special entry is made is of the opinion that the application is not made bona fide or that it is frivolous or absurd or that the granting of the application would be an abuse of the process of the court.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 6 (a) of Act 42 of 2003.
Save as hereinafter provided, an application for condonation or for a special entry shall be made to the judge who presided at the trial or, if he is not available, or, if in the case of a conviction before a circuit court the said court is not sitting, to any other judge of the provincial or local division of which that judge was a member when he so presided.
[Sub-s. (3) deleted by s. 13 of Act 62 of 2000.
The terms of a special entry shall be settled by the court which or the judge who grants the application for a special entry.
If an application for condonation or for a special entry is refused, the accused may, within a period of 21 days of such refusal or within such extended period as may on good cause shown, be allowed, by petition addressed to the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal, apply to the Supreme Court of Appeal for condonation or for a special entry to be made on the record stating in what respect the proceedings are alleged to be irregular or not according to law, as the case may be, and thereupon the provisions of subsections (11), (12), (13), (14) and (15) of section 316 shall mutatis mutandis apply.
[Sub-s. (5) amended by s. 22 of Act 105 of 1982 and substituted by s. 6 (b) of Act 42 of 2003.
If a special entry is made on the record, the person convicted may appeal to the Appellate Division against his conviction on the ground of the irregularity or illegality stated in the special entry if, within a period of twenty-one days after entry is so made or within such extended period as may on good cause be allowed, notice of appeal has been given to the registrar of the Appellate Division and to the registrar of the provincial or local division, other than a circuit court, within whose area of jurisdiction the trial took place, and of which the judge who presided at the trial was a member when he so presided.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 23 of Act 105 of 1982.
The registrar of such provincial or local division shall forthwith after receiving such notice give notice thereof to the attorney-general and shall transmit to the registrar of the Appellate Division a certified copy of the record, including copies of the evidence, whether oral or documentary, taken or admitted at the trial and of the special entry: Provided that with the consent of the accused and the attorneygeneral, the registrar concerned may, instead of transmitting the whole record, transmit copies, one of which shall be certified, of such parts of the record as may be agreed upon by the attorney-general and the accused to be sufficient, in which event the Appellate Division may nevertheless call for the production of the whole record.
[Sub-s. (2) amended by s. 23 of Act 105 of 1982.
If any question of law arises on the trial in a superior court of any person for any offence, that court may of its own motion or at the request either of the prosecutor or the accused reserve that question for the consideration of the Appellate Division, and thereupon the first-mentioned court shall state the question reserved and shall direct that it be specially entered in the record and that a copy thereof be transmitted to the registrar of the Appellate Division.
[Sub-s. (1) amended by s. 24 of Act 105 of 1982.
The grounds upon which any objection to an indictment is taken shall, for the purposes of this section, be deemed to be questions of law.
The provisions of sections 317 (2), (4) and (5) and 318 (2) shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to all proceedings under this section.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 14 of Act 62 of 2000.
The judge or judges, as the case may be, of any court before whom a person is convicted shall, in the case of an appeal under section 316 or 316B or of an application for a special entry under section 317 or the reservation of a question of law under section 319 or an application to the court of appeal for leave to appeal or for a special entry under this Act, furnish to the registrar a report giving his, her or their opinion upon the case or upon any point arising in the case, and such report, which shall form part of the record, shall without delay be forwarded by the registrar to the registrar of the court of appeal.
[S. 320 substituted by s. 12 of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 41 of Act 105 of 1997.
[Para. (a) deleted by s. 2 of Act 33 of 1997.
Provided that when the accused is ultimately sentenced to imprisonment the time during which he was so released on bail shall be excluded in computing the term for which he is so sentenced: Provided further that when the accused has been detained as an unconvicted prisoner, the time during which he has been so detained shall be included or excluded in computing the term for which he is ultimately sentenced, as the court of appeal may determine.
section 67 to the court which may act under that section, shall be deemed to be a reference to the magistrate's court within whose area of jurisdiction the accused is to surrender himself in order that effect be given to any sentence in respect of the proceedings in question; and section 68 to a magistrate shall be deemed to be a reference to a judge of the superior court in question.
allow the appeal if it thinks that the judgment of the trial court should be set aside on the ground of a wrong decision of any question of law or that on any ground there was a failure of justice; or give such judgment as ought to have been given at the trial or impose such punishment as ought to have been imposed at the trial; or make such other order as justice may require: Provided that, notwithstanding that the court of appeal is of opinion that any point raised might be decided in favour of the accused, no conviction or sentence shall be set aside or altered by reason of any irregularity or defect in the record or proceedings, unless it appears to the court of appeal that a failure of justice has in fact resulted from such irregularity or defect.
Upon an appeal under section 316 or 316B against any sentence, the court of appeal may confirm the sentence or may delete or amend the sentence and impose such punishment as ought to have been imposed at the trial.
[Sub-s. (2) substituted by s. 13 (a) of Act 107 of 1990.
[Sub-s. (2A) inserted by s. 13 (b) of Act 107 of 1990 and deleted by s. 42 (a) of Act 105 of 1997.
Where a conviction and sentence are set aside by the court of appeal on the ground that a failure of justice has in fact resulted from the admission against the accused of evidence otherwise admissible but not properly placed before the trial court by reason of some defect in the proceedings, the court of appeal may remit the case to the trial court with instructions to deal with any matter, including the hearing of such evidence, in such manner as the court of appeal may think fit.
Where a question of law has been reserved on the application of a prosecutor in the case of an acquittal, and the court of appeal has given a decision in favour of the prosecutor, the court of appeal may order that such of the steps referred to in section 324 be taken as the court may direct.
The order or direction of the court of appeal shall be transmitted by the registrar of that court to the registrar of the court before which the case was tried, and such order or direction shall be carried into effect and shall authorize every person affected by it to do whatever is necessary to carry it into effect.
The powers conferred by this section upon the court of appeal in relation to the imposition of punishments, shall include the power to impose a punishment more severe than that imposed by the court below or to impose another punishment in lieu of or in addition to such punishment.
[Sub-s. (6) substituted by s. 13 (c) of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 42 (b) of Act 105 of 1997.
[S. 323 amended by s. 25 of Act 105 of 1982, substituted by s. 14 of Act 107 of 1990 and repealed by s. 43 of Act 105 of 1997.
that the court which convicted the accused was not competent to do so; or that the indictment on which the accused was convicted was invalid or defective in any respect; or that there has been any other technical irregularity or defect in the procedure, proceedings in respect of the same offence to which the conviction and sentence referred may again be instituted either on the original charge, suitably amended where necessary, or upon any other charge as if the accused had not previously been arraigned, tried and convicted: Provided that no judge or assessor before whom the original trial took place shall take part in such proceedings.
Nothing in this Act shall affect the power of the State President to extend mercy to any person.
[S. 325A inserted by s. 15 of Act 107 of 1990 and repealed by s. 44 of Act 105 of 1997.
[S. 326 repealed by s. 44 of Act 105 of 1997.
If any person convicted of any offence in any court has in respect of the conviction exhausted all the recognized legal procedures pertaining to appeal or review, or if such procedures are no longer available to him or her, and such person or his or her legal representative addresses the Minister by way of petition, supported by relevant affidavit, stating that further evidence has since become available which materially affects his or her conviction, the Minister may, if he or she considers that such further evidence, if true, might reasonably affect the conviction, direct that the petition and the relevant affidavits be referred to the court in which the conviction occurred.
[Sub-s. (1) substituted by s. 16 (a) of Act 107 of 1990 and by s. 45 (a) of Act 105 of 1997.
The court shall receive the said affidavits as evidence and may examine and permit the examination of any witness in connection therewith, including any witness on behalf of the State, and to this end the provisions of this Act relating to witnesses shall apply as if the matter before the court were a criminal trial in that court.
Unless the court directs otherwise, the presence of the convicted person shall not be essential at the hearing of further evidence.
[Sub-s. (3) substituted by s. 45 (b) of Act 105 of 1997.
The court shall assess the value of the further evidence and advise the President whether, and to what extent, such evidence affects the conviction in question.
The court shall not, as part of the proceedings of the court, announce its finding as to the further evidence or the effect thereof on the conviction in question.
[Sub-s. (4) substituted by s. 45 (b) of Act 105 of 1997.
The court shall be constituted as it was when the conviction occurred or, if it cannot be so constituted, the judge-president or, as the case may be, the senior regional magistrate or magistrate of the court in question, shall direct how the court shall be constituted.
direct that the conviction in question be expunged from all official records by way of endorsement on such records, and the effect of such a direction and endorsement shall be that the person concerned be given a free pardon as if the conviction in question had never occurred; or substitute for the conviction in question a conviction of lesser gravity and substitute for the punishment imposed for such conviction any other punishment provided by law.
[Sub-para. (iii) deleted by s. 45 (c) of Act 105 of 1997.
The State President shall direct the Minister to advise the person concerned in writing of any decision taken under paragraph (a), other than a decision taken under subparagraph (iii) of that paragraph, and to publish a notice in the Gazette in which such decision, other than a decision taken under the said subparagraph (iii), is set out.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 16 (b) of Act 107 of 1990.
any aspect of the proceedings, finding or advice of the court under this section.
Any warrant, subpoena, summons or other process relating to any criminal matter shall be of force throughout the Republic and may be executed anywhere within the Republic.
Any police official shall, subject to the rules of court, be as qualified to serve or execute any subpoena or summons or other document under this Act as if he had been appointed deputy sheriff or deputy messenger or other like officer of the court.
Any document, order or other court process which under this Act or the rules of court is required to be served or executed with reference to any person, may be transmitted by telegraph or similar written or printed communication, and a copy of such telegraph or communication, served or executed in the same manner as the relevant document, order or other court process is required to be served or executed, shall be of the same force and effect as if the document, order or other court process in question had itself been served or executed.
Any person who acts under a warrant or process which is bad in law on account of a defect in the substance or form thereof shall, if he has no knowledge that such warrant or process is bad in law and whether or not such defect is apparent on the face of the warrant or process, be exempt from liability in respect of such act as if the warrant or process were good in law.
any act performed, with or without a particular intent, by or on instructions or with permission, express or implied, given by a director or servant of that corporate body; and the omission, with or without a particular intent, of any act which ought to have been but was not performed by or on instructions given by a director or servant of that corporate body, in the exercise of his powers or in the performance of his duties as such director or servant or in furthering or endeavouring to further the interests of that corporate body, shall be deemed to have been performed (and with the same intent, if any) by that corporate body or, as the case may be, to have been an omission (and with the same intent, if any) on the part of that corporate body.
the citation of a director or servant of a corporate body as aforesaid, to represent that corporate body in any prosecution instituted against it, shall not exempt that director or servant from prosecution for that offence in terms of subsection (5).
In criminal proceedings against a corporate body, any record which was made or kept by a director, servant or agent of the corporate body within the scope of his activities as such director, servant or agent, or any document which was at any time in the custody or under the control of any such director, servant or agent within the scope of his activities as such director, servant or agent, shall be admissible in evidence against the accused.
For the purposes of subsection (3) any record made or kept by a director, servant or agent of a corporate body or any document which was at any time in his custody or under his control, shall be presumed to have been made or kept by him or to have been in his custody or under his control within the scope of his activities as such director, servant or agent, unless the contrary is proved.
(5)30* When an offence has been committed, whether by the performance of any act or by the failure to perform any act, for which any corporate body is or was liable to prosecution, any person who was, at the time of the commission of the offence, a director or servant of the corporate body shall be deemed to be guilty of the said offence, unless it is proved that he did not take part in the commission of the offence and that he could not have prevented it, and shall be liable to prosecution therefor, either jointly with the corporate body or apart therefrom, and shall on conviction be personally liable to punishment therefor.
whether or not such corporate body is or was liable to prosecution for the said offence, any document, memorandum, book or record which was drawn up, entered up or kept in the ordinary course of business of that corporate body or which was at any time in the custody or under the control of any director, servant or agent of such corporate body, in his capacity as director, servant or agent, shall be prima facie proof of its contents and admissible in evidence against the accused, unless he is able to prove that at all material times he had no knowledge of the said document, memorandum, book or record, in so far as its contents are relevant to the offence charged, and was in no way partly to the drawing up of such document or memorandum or the making of any relevant entries in such book or record.
When a member of an association of persons, other than a corporate body, has, in carrying on the business or affairs of that association or in furthering or in endeavouring to further its interests, committed an offence, whether by the performance of any act or by the failure to perform any act, any person who was, at the time of the commission of the offence, a member of that association, shall be deemed to be guilty of the said offence, unless it is proved that he did not take part in the commission of the offence and that he could not have prevented it: Provided that if the business or affairs of the association are governed or controlled by a committee or other similar governing body, the provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any person who was not at the time of the commission of the offence a member of that committee or other body.
In any proceedings against a member of an association of persons in respect of an offence mentioned in subsection (7) any record which was made or kept by any member or servant or agent of the association within the scope of his activities as such member, servant or agent, or any document which was at any time in the custody or under the control of any such member, servant or agent within the scope of his activities as such member, servant or agent, shall be admissible in evidence against the accused.
For the purposes of subsection (8) any record made or kept by a member or servant or agent of an association, or any document which was at any time in his custody or under his control, shall be presumed to have been made or kept by him or to have been in his custody or under his control within the scope of his activities as such member or servant or agent, unless the contrary is proved.
In this section the word 'director' in relation to a corporate body means any person who controls or governs that corporate body or who is a member of a body or group of persons which controls or governs that corporate body or, where there is no such body or group, who is a member of that corporate body.
The provisions of this section shall be additional to and not in substitution for any other law which provides for a prosecution against corporate bodies or their directors or servants or against associations of persons or their members.
Where a summons under this Act is to be served on a corporate body, it shall be served on the director or servant referred to in subsection (2) and in the manner referred to in section 54 (2).
Whenever the Minister has any doubt as to the correctness of any decision given by any superior court in any criminal case on a question of law, or whenever a decision in any criminal case on a question of law is given by any division of the Supreme Court which is in conflict with a decision in any criminal case on a question of law given by any other division of the Supreme Court, the Minister may submit such decision or, as the case may be, such conflicting decisions to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court and cause the matter to be argued before that Court in order that it may determine such question of law for the future guidance of all courts.
(a)31* The Minister may by notice in the Gazette declare that any person who, by virtue of his office, falls within any category defined in the notice, shall, within an area specified in the notice, be a peace officer for the purpose of exercising, with reference to any provision of this Act or any offence or any class of offences likewise specified, the powers defined in the notice.
The powers referred to in paragraph (a) may include any power which is not conferred upon a peace officer by this Act.
(a)32* No person who is a peace officer by virtue of a notice issued under subsection (1) shall exercise any power conferred upon him under that subsection unless he is at the time of exercising such power in possession of a certificate of appointment issued by his employer, which certificate shall be produced on demand.
A power exercised contrary to the provisions of paragraph (a) shall have no legal force or effect.
any matter which shall appear in or on such certificate of appointment in addition to any matter which the employer may include in such certificate.
Where the employer of any person who becomes a peace officer under the provisions of this section would be liable for damages arising out of any act or omission by such person in the discharge of any power conferred upon him under this section, the State shall not be liable for such damages unless the State is the employer of that person, in which event the department of State, including a provincial administration, in whose service such person is, shall be so liable.
Whenever a person has in relation to any matter made to a peace officer a statement in writing or a statement which was reduced to writing, and criminal proceedings are thereafter instituted against such person in connection with that matter, the person in possession of such statement shall furnish the person who made the statement, at his request, with a copy of such statement.
No person shall, with regard to any offence referred to in section 153 (3) (a) and (b), as from the date on which the offence in question was committed or allegedly committed, until the prohibition in terms of section 154 (2) (b) of the publication of information relating to the charge in question commences, publish any information which might reveal the identity of the person towards or in connection with whom the offence was committed or allegedly committed, except with the authorization of a magistrate granted on application in chambers, with due regard to the wishes of the person towards or in connection with whom the offence was committed.
Any person who contravenes the provisions of subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three years or to both such fine and such imprisonment if the person whose identity has been revealed is over the age of 18 years, and if such person is under the age of 18 years, to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years or to both such fine and such imprisonment.
The provisions of section 300 are applicable, with the changes required by the context, upon the conviction of a person in terms of subsection (2) and if the person whose identity has been revealed suffered any physical, psychological or other injury or loss of income or support.
[Sub-s. (3) added by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
[S. 335A inserted by s. 4 of Act 103 of 1987.
is deceased, a magistrate may, on the written application of that police official and if he is satisfied that the medical examination is necessary, grant the necessary consent that such examination be conducted.
If a magistrate is not available to grant consent as referred to in subsection (1), a commissioned officer as defined in section 1 of the Police Act, 1958 (Act 7 of 1958), or the police official in charge of the local police station may in writing grant such consent if the police official charged with the investigation of the case declares under oath that the consent of a magistrate cannot be obtained within a reasonable period of time and the district surgeon or registered medical practitioner declares under oath that the purpose of the medical examination will be defeated if the examination is not conducted forthwith.
[S. 335B inserted by s. 7 of Act 4 of 1992.
Where an act or omission constitutes an offence under two or more statutory provisions or is an offence against a statutory provision and the common law, the person guilty of such act or omission shall, unless the contrary intention appears, be liable to be prosecuted and punished under either statutory provision or, as the case may be, under the statutory provision or the common law, but shall not be liable to more than one punishment for the act or omission constituting the offence.
it is subsequently proved that the said estimate was incorrect; and the accused at such proceedings could not lawfully have been convicted of the offence with which he or she was charged if the correct age had been proved.
[S. 337 substituted by s. 99 (1) of Act 75 of 2008.
Where any law requires any person to produce any document at any criminal proceedings at which such person is an accused, and such person fails to produce such document at such proceedings, such person shall be guilty of an offence, and the court may in a summary manner enquire into his failure to produce the document and, unless such person satisfies the court that his failure was not due to any fault on his part, sentence him to any punishment provided for in such law, or, if no punishment is so provided, to a fine not exceeding R300 or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months.
[S. 338 substituted by s. 24 of Act 33 of 1986.
Whenever an accused is in custody and it becomes necessary that he be removed from one prison to another prison for the purpose of attending his trial, the magistrate of the district in which the accused is in custody shall issue a warrant for the removal of the accused to such other prison.
of the unsentenced prisoners who, at such commencement, have been detained within his prison for a period of ninety days or longer; and of witnesses detained under section 184 or 185 and who, at such commencement, are being detained within his prison, and such list shall, in the case of each such prisoner and each such witness, specify the date of his admission to the prison and the authority for his detention which shall, in the case of a witness, state whether the detention is under section 184 or 185, and shall further specify, in the case of each such prisoner, the cause of his detention.
If a person receives from any peace officer a notification in writing alleging that such person has committed, at a place and upon a date and at a time or during a period specified in the notification, any offence likewise specified, of any class mentioned in Schedule 3, and setting forth the amount of the fine which a court trying such person for such offence would probably impose upon him, such person may within thirty days after the receipt of the notification deliver or transmit the notification, together with a sum of money equal to the said amount, to the magistrate of the district or area wherein the offence is alleged to have been committed, and thereupon such person shall not be prosecuted for having committed such offence.
Where a notification referred to in subsection (1) is issued by a peace officer in the service of a local authority in respect of an offence committed within the area of jurisdiction of such local authority, any person receiving the notification may deliver or transmit it together with a sum of money equal to the amount specified therein to such local authority.
[Para. (a) substituted by s. 9 of Act 64 of 1982.
Any sum of money paid to a local authority as provided in paragraph (a) shall be deemed to be a fine imposed in respect of the offence in question.
[Para. (b) substituted by s. 9 of Act 64 of 1982.
Not later than seven days after receipt of any sum of money as provided in paragraph (a), the local authority concerned shall forward to the magistrate of the district or area wherein the offence is alleged to have been committed a copy of the notification relating to the payment in question.
If the magistrate finds that the amount specified in the notification exceeds the amount determined in terms of subsection (5) in respect of the offence in question, he shall notify the local authority of the amount whereby the amount specified in the notification exceeds the amount so determined and the local authority concerned shall immediately refund the amount of such excess to the person concerned.
[Sub-para. (ii) amended by s. 4 of Act 18 of 1996.
a local government body contemplated in section 30 (2) (a) of the Black Administration Act, 1927 (Act 38 of 1927); and any committee referred to in section 17 (1) of the Promotion of Local Government Affairs Act, 1983 (Act 91 of 1983).
[Para. (e) substituted by s. 25 of Act 33 of 1986 and by s. 16 of Act 26 of 1987.
Any money paid to a magistrate in terms of subsection (1) shall be dealt with as if it had been paid as a fine for the offence in question.
The Minister may from time to time by notice in the Gazette add any offence to the offences mentioned in Schedule 3, or remove therefrom any offence mentioned therein.
The amount to be specified in any notification issued under this section as the amount of the fine which a court would probably impose in respect of any offence, shall be determined from time to time for any particular area by the magistrate of the district or area in which such area is situated, and may differ from the admission of guilt fine determined under section 57 (5) (a) for the offence in question. [NB: Sub-s. (5) has been substituted by s. 17 of the Judicial Matters Amendment Act 66 of 2008, a provision which will be put into operation by proclamation. See PENDLEX.
A conviction or an acquittal in respect of any offence shall not bar a civil action for damages at the instance of any person who has suffered damages in consequence of the commission of that offence.
A court before which criminal proceedings are pending shall investigate any delay in the completion of proceedings which appears to the court to be unreasonable and which could cause substantial prejudice to the prosecution, the accused or his or her legal adviser, the State or a witness.
any other factor which in the opinion of the court ought to be taken into account.
[Date of commencement of para. (e): to be proclaimed.
that the matter be referred to the appropriate authority for an administrative investigation and possible disciplinary action against any person responsible for the delay.
An order contemplated in subsection (3) (a), where the accused has pleaded to the charge, and an order contemplated in subsection (3) (d), shall not be issued unless exceptional circumstances exist and all other attempts to speed up the process have failed and the defence or the State, as the case may be, has given notice beforehand that it intends to apply for such an order.
The attorney-general and the accused may appeal against an order contemplated in subsection (3) (d) and the provisions of sections 310A and 316 in respect of an application or appeal referred to in that section by an accused, shall apply mutatis mutandis with reference to a case in which the attorney-general appeals and, in the case of an appeal by the accused, the provisions of section 309 and 316 shall apply mutatis mutandis.
the costs shall be taxed according to the scale the court deems fit; and the order shall have the effect of a civil judgment of that court.
[Date of commencement of sub-s. (5): to be proclaimed.
If, on notice of motion, it appears to a superior court that the institution or continuance of criminal proceedings is being delayed unreasonably in a lower court which is seized with a case but does not have jurisdiction to try the case, that superior court may, with regard to such proceedings, institute the investigation contemplated in subsections (1) and (2) and issue any order contemplated in subsection (3) to the extent that it is applicable.
six months from date of arrest, where the trial is to be conducted in a magistrate's court.
The Cabinet member responsible for the administration of justice must, within 14 days of receipt of a report contemplated in paragraph (a), table such report in Parliament.
[Sub-s. (7) added by s. 7 of Act 55 of 2003.
[S. 342A inserted by s. 13 of Act 86 of 1996.
[S. 343 repealed by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
Subject to the provisions of subsection (2), the laws specified in Schedule 4 are hereby repealed to the extent set out in the third column of that Schedule.
Any regulation, rule, notice, approval, authority, return, certificate, document, direction or appointment made, issued, given or granted, and any other act done under any provision of any law repealed by this Act shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (3), be deemed to have been made, issued, given, granted or done under the corresponding provisions of this Act.
Notwithstanding the repeal of any law under subsection (1), criminal proceedings which have under such law at the date of commencement of this Act been commenced in any superior court, regional court or magistrate's court and in which evidence has at such date been led in respect of the relevant charge, shall, if such proceedings have at that date not been concluded, be continued and concluded under such law as if it had not been repealed.
This Act shall be called the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977, and shall come into operation on a date to be fixed by the State President by proclamation in the Gazette.
The State President may under subsection (1) fix different dates in respect of different provisions of this Act.
[S. 345 amended by s. 1 of Act 49 of 1996.
(Sections 40 and 42) Schedule 1 substituted by s. 17 of Act 26 of 1987, amended by s.
1998 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
Sexual assault, compelled sexual assault or compelled self-sexual assault as contemplated in section 5, 6 or 7 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, respectively.
Any sexual offence against a child or a person who is mentally disabled as contemplated in Part 2 of Chapter 3 or the whole of Chapter 4 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, respectively.
Trafficking in persons for sexual purposes by a person contemplated in section 71 (1) or (2) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007.
Related Matters Amendment Act, 2007.
Assault, when a dangerous wound is inflicted.
Malicious injury to property.
Breaking or entering any premises, whether under the common law or a statutory provision, with intent to commit an offence.
Theft, whether under the common law or a statutory provision.
Receiving stolen property knowing it to have been stolen.
Forgery or uttering a forged document knowing it to have been forged.
Offences relating to the coinage.
Any offence, except the offence of escaping from lawful custody in circumstances other than the circumstances referred to immediately hereunder, the punishment wherefor may be a period of imprisonment exceeding six months without the option of a fine.
Escaping from lawful custody, where the person concerned is in such custody in respect of any offence referred to in this Schedule or is in such custody in respect of the offence of escaping from lawful custody.
Any conspiracy, incitement or attempt to commit any offence referred to in this Schedule.
[Schedule 2 amended by s. 5 of Act 126 of 1992, by s. 15 of Act 62 of 2000 and by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
(Section 35) Any offence under any law relating to the illicit possession, conveyance or supply of dependence-producing drugs or intoxicating liquor. Any offence under any law relating to the illicit dealing in or possession of precious metals or precious stones. Breaking or entering any premises, whether under the common law or a statutory provision, with intent to commit an offence. Theft, whether under the common law or a statutory provision.
[Part II amended by s. 15 of Act 62 of 2000 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.] Treason. Sedition. Murder. Rape or compelled rape as contemplated in sections 3 or 4 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, respectively.
Theft, whether under the common law or a statutory provision, receiving stolen property knowing it to have been stolen, fraud, forgery or uttering a forged document knowing it to have been forged, in each case if the amount or value involved in the offence exceeds R2 500.
Any offence under any law relating to the illicit dealing in or possession of precious metals or precious stones.
dagga exceeding 115 grams; or any other dependence-producing drugs; or conveyance or supply of dependence-producing drugs. Any offence relating to the coinage.
Any conspiracy, incitement or attempt to commit any offence referred to in this Part.
[Part III substituted by s. 5 of Act 126 of 1992.
Housebreaking, whether under the common law or a statutory provision, with intent to commit an offence.
Contravention of the provisions of section 1 and 1A of the Intimidation Act, 1982 (Act 72 of 1982).
[Schedule 3 amended by s. 18 of Act 56 of 1979.
Any contravention of a bye-law or regulation made by or for any council, board or committee established in terms of any law for the management of the affairs of any division, city, town, borough, village or other similar community.
driving a motor vehicle without holding a licence to drive it.
Act 38 of 1916 Mental Disorders Act, 1916 Sections 27, 28, 29 and 29bis.
Act 24 of 1922 South-West Africa Affairs Act, 1922 Section 2 (1), so much of section 3 as is unrepealed, and sections 4, 6 and 7.
Act 22 of 1926 South-West Africa Mental Disorder Act, 1926 So much as is unrepealed.
Act 46 of 1935 General Law Amendment Act, 1935 Section 78 and so much of section 101 as is unrepealed.
Act 32 of 1944 Magistrates' Courts Act, 1944 Sections 93, 93bis and 94 to 105 inclusive.
Act 32 of 1952 General Law Amendment Act, 1952 Section 9 and so much of section 26 as is unrepealed.
Act 40 of 1952 Magistrates' Courts Amendment Act, 1952 Sections 22 to 26 inclusive.
Act 56 of 1955 Criminal Procedure Act, 1955 The whole, except sections 319 (3) and 384.
Act 62 of 1955 General Law Amendment Act, 1955 Sections 13, 24, 25 and 26.
Act 50 of 1956 General Law Amendment Act, 1956 Sections 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29 and 31.
Act 33 of 1957 Interpretation Act, 1957 Section 9.
Act 68 of 1957 General Law Amendment Act, 1957 Section 5 in so far as it relates to criminal proceedings, and sections 40 and 45 to 59 inclusive.
Act 9 of 1958 Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1958 The whole.
Act 18 of 1958 Special Criminal Courts Amendment Act, 1958 The whole.
Act 16 of 1959 Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1959 Sections 3 to 8 inclusive, 10, 11 and 15 to 49 inclusive.
Act 75 of 1959 Criminal Law Further Amendment Act, 1959 Sections 3 to 6 inclusive.
Act 33 of 1960 Children's Act, 1960 Sections 98 to 102 inclusive.
Act 39 of 1961 General Law Amendment Act, 1961 Section 4.
Act 45 of 1961 Interpretation Amendment Act, 1961 Section 3.
Act 14 of 1962 Evidence Act, 1962 So much as is unrepealed.
Sections 17 and 18.
Sections 28 and 29.
Sections 16 to 20 inclusive.
Sections 1, 2 and 8 to 12 inclusive.
Sections 10 to 15 inclusive.
Sections 12 and 22 to 30 inclusive.
The amendment of section 261 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1955, contained in the Schedule.
Sections 7, 8 and 9.
Sections 7 to 12 inclusive.
Sections 31 and 37 to 41 inclusive.
Sections 1 to 32 inclusive.
Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
Sections 4 and 14.
In so far as it relates to the attendance by witnesses of criminal proceedings in courts in the Republic.
In so far as it applies to the Eastern Caprivi Zipfel.
1938 Proclamation 1938 relates to criminal proceedings.
1963 300 (3) and 370.
Ordinance 35 of Criminal Procedure Amendment The whole.
Ordinance 19 of Criminal Procedure Amendment The whole.
Ordinance 4 of 1968 General Law Amendment Ordinance, 1968 Sections 5 to 13 inclusive.
Ordinance 3 of 1969 Criminal Procedure Amendment Ordinance, 1969 The whole.
Ordinance 14 of Criminal Procedure Amendment The whole.
[Schedule 5 added by s. 14 of Act 75 of 1995, substituted by s. 9 of Act 85 of 1997, amended by s. 36 (1) of Act 12 of 2004 and by s. 27 (1) of Act 33 of 2004 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
Attempted murder involving the infliction of grievous bodily harm.
Rape or compelled rape as contemplated in section 3 or 4 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, respectively, in circumstances other than those referred to in Schedule 6.
of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007.
the value of the dependence-producing substance in question is more than R50 000,00; or the value of the dependence-producing substance in question is more than R10 000,00 and that the offence was committed by a person, group of persons, syndicate or any enterprise acting in the execution or furtherance of a common purpose or conspiracy; or the offence was committed by any law enforcement officer. Any offence relating to the dealing in or smuggling of ammunition, firearms, explosives or armament, or the possession of an automatic or semi-automatic firearm, explosives or armament.
of that Act.
involving amounts of more than R10 000,00; or as a member of a group of persons, syndicate or any enterprise acting in the execution or furtherance of a common purpose or conspiracy.
Sexual assault, compelled sexual assault or compelled self-sexual assault as contemplated in section 5, 6 or 7 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, respectively on a child under the age of 16 years.
and the accused has previously been convicted of an offence referred to in Schedule 1; or which was allegedly committed whilst he or she was released on bail in respect of an offence referred to in Schedule 1.
The offences referred to in section 4 (2) or (3), 13 or 14 (in so far as it relates to the aforementioned sections) of the Protection of Constitutional Democracy against Terrorist and Related Activities Act, 2004.
[Schedule 6 added by s. 10 of Act 85 of 1997, amended by s. 27 (1) of Act 33 of 2004 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.
the offence was committed by a person, group of persons or syndicate acting in the execution or furtherance of a common purpose or conspiracy.
is a person who is mentally disabled as contemplated in section 1 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007; or involving the infliction of grievous bodily harm.
Amendment Act, 2007.
the infliction of grievous bodily harm by the accused or any of the coperpetrators or participants; or the taking of a motor vehicle.
and the accused has previously been convicted of an offence referred to in Schedule 5 or this Schedule; or which was allegedly committed whilst he or she was released on bail in respect of an offence referred to in Schedule 5 or this Schedule.
(Act 46 of 1999).
[Schedule 7 added by s. 10 of Act 85 of 1997, amended by s. 10 of Act 34 of 1998 and by s. 16 of Act 62 of 2000 and substituted by s. 68 of Act 32 of 2007.] Public violence. Culpable homicide. Bestiality as contemplated in section 13 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007. Assault, involving the infliction of grievous bodily harm. Arson. Housebreaking, whether under the common law or a statutory provision, with intent to commit an offence. Malicious injury to property. Robbery, other than a robbery with aggravating circumstances, if the amount involved in the offence does not exceed R20 000,00. Theft and any offence referred to in section 264 (1) (a), (b) and (c), if the amount involved in the offence does not exceed R20 000,00. Any offence in terms of any law relating to the illicit possession of dependenceproducing drugs. Any offence relating to extortion, fraud, forgery or uttering if the amount of value involved in the offence does not exceed R20 000,00. Any conspiracy, incitement or attempt to commit any offence referred to in this Schedule.
the provisions of section 106 (4) shall not be applicable where such an accused has already pleaded to the charge.
the written admission referred to in subsection (1) (c) may not be used against such an accused during the prosecution.
the court may make a further endorsement on the warrant to the effect that the accused may admit his or her guilt in respect of the failure to appear in answer to the summons or to remain in attendance at the criminal proceedings, and that he or she may upon arrest pay to a clerk of the court or at a police station a fine stipulated on the warrant in respect of that failure, which fine shall not exceed the amount to be imposed in terms of subsection (2), without appearing in court.
contain an endorsement in terms of section 57 that the accused may admit his or her guilt in respect of the offence in question and that he or she may pay the stipulated fine as determined by the Minister in terms of section 57 (2) (b) in respect thereof without appearing in court; and contain a certificate under the hand of the peace officer that he or she has handed the original of that written notice to the accused and that he or she has explained to the accused the import thereof.
If the accused is in custody, the effect of a written notice handed to him or her under subsection (1) shall be that he or she be released forthwith from custody.
An admission of guilt fine referred to in this section may only be imposed and paid in respect of an offence which the Minister determines, as provided for in subsection (2).
the offences in respect of which an admission of guilt fine may be imposed and paid; and the amount of an admission of guilt fine which can be stipulated in a summons under section 54 (in this section referred to as the summons) or a written notice under section 56 (in this section referred to as the written notice), in respect of each offence.
a summons is issued against an accused under section 54 and the public prosecutor of the court concerned, in accordance with the directives issued by the National Director of Public Prosecutions provided for in subsection (11), endorses the summons to the effect that the accused may admit his or her guilt in respect of the offence in question and that he or she may pay a fine stipulated on the summons in respect of that offence without appearing in court; or a written notice under section 56 is handed to the accused and the endorsement in terms of subsection (1) (c) of that section purports to have been made by a peace officer, the accused may, without appearing in court, admit his or her guilt in respect of the offence in question by paying the fine stipulated (in this section referred to as the admission of guilt fine) either to the clerk of the magistrate's court which has jurisdiction or at any police station within the area of jurisdiction of that court or, if the summons or written notice in question is endorsed to the effect that the fine may be paid at a specified local authority, at that local authority.
is available at the place of payment referred to in subsection (3), the admission of guilt fine may be accepted without the surrender of a copy of the summons or written notice, as the case may be.
If an accused in respect of whom a warrant has been endorsed in terms of section 55 (2A) intends to pay the relevant admission of guilt fine, the clerk of the court may, after he or she has satisfied himself or herself that the warrant is so endorsed, accept the admission of guilt fine without the surrender of the summons, written notice or copy thereof, as the case may be.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (3), an accused referred to in paragraph (a) (iii) may pay the admission of guilt fine in question to the clerk of the court where he or she appears in consequence of that warrant, and if that clerk of the court is not the clerk of the magistrate's court referred to in subsection (3), he or she shall transfer that admission of guilt fine to the latter clerk of the magistrate's court.
No provision of this section shall be construed as preventing a public prosecutor attached to the court concerned from reducing an admission of guilt fine on good cause shown in writing.
An admission of guilt fine stipulated in respect of a summons or a written notice shall be in accordance with the determination made by the Minister from time to time in respect of the offence in question, as provided for in subsection (2).
An admission of guilt fine paid at a police station or a local authority in terms of subsection (3) and the summons or, as the case may be, the written notice surrendered under subsection (5), shall, as soon as is expedient, be forwarded to the clerk of the magistrate's court which has jurisdiction, and that clerk of the court shall thereafter, as soon as is expedient, enter the essential particulars of that summons or, as the case may be, that written notice and of any summons or written notice surrendered to the clerk of the court under subsection (5), in the criminal record book for admissions of guilt, whereupon the accused concerned shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (9), be deemed to have been convicted and sentenced by the court in respect of the offence in question.
The judicial officer presiding at the court in question shall examine the documents and if it appears to him or her that a conviction or sentence under subsection (8) is not in accordance with justice or, except as provided in subsection (6), is not in accordance with a determination made by the Minister under subsection or does not comply with a directive issued by the National Director of Public Prosecutions as provided for in subsection (11) that judicial officer may set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that the accused be prosecuted in the ordinary course, whereupon the accused may be summoned to answer that charge as the public prosecutor may deem fit to prefer: Provided that where the admission of guilt fine which has been paid exceeds the amount determined by the Minister under subsection (2), the judicial officer may, in lieu of setting aside the conviction and sentence in question, direct that the amount by which the admission of guilt fine exceeds the said determination be refunded to the accused concerned.
The National Director of Public Prosecutions must issue directives regarding the cases and circumstances in which a prosecutor may issue a summons referred to in subsection (3) (a) or a written notice referred to in section 57A (1) in which an admission of guilt fine may be imposed in respect of the offences which the Minister determines under subsection (2) and any directive so issued must be observed in the application of this section.
The Minister must submit any directives issued under this subsection to Parliament before those directives take effect, and the first directives so issued, must be submitted to Parliament within four months of the commencement of this section.
released on warning under section 72, the public prosecutor may, before the accused has entered a plea and in accordance with the directives issued by the National Director of Public Prosecutions under section 57 (11), hand to the accused a written notice, or cause the notice to be delivered to the accused by a peace officer, containing an endorsement in terms of section 57 that the accused may admit his or her guilt in respect of the offence in question and that he or she may pay the stipulated fine in respect of that offence, as determined by the Minister in terms of section 57 (2) (b), without appearing in court again.
The provisions of sections 55, 56 (2) and (4) and 57 (1), (2), (4) to (9), inclusive, shall apply mutatis mutandis to the relevant written notice handed or delivered to an accused under subsection (1) as if, in respect of section 57, the notice were the written notice referred to in that section and as if the fine stipulated in the written notice were also the admission of guilt fine referred to in that section.
The amount to be specified in any notification issued under this section as the amount of the fine which a court would probably impose in respect of any offence, shall be determined from time to time by the Minister by notice in the Gazette, after consultation with the Chief Justice, the National Director of Public Prosecutions and the Minister of Safety and Security, and may differ from the admission of guilt fine determined under section 57 (2) (b) for the offence in question.
Any determination made by the Minister under paragraph (a) must be tabled in Parliament for approval.
'South African Police Service Act' means the South African Police Service Act, 1995 (Act 68 of 1995).
ensure the presence of a parent or guardian of the child, a social worker or an appropriate person; and treat and address the child in a manner that takes into account his or her gender and age.
person convicted by a court in respect of any offence, which the Minister has by notice in the Gazette declared to be an offence for the purposes of this subsection.
fingerprints to be taken of any person arrested upon any charge; or fingerprints to be taken of a person deemed under section 57 (6) to have been convicted in respect of any offence, which the Minister has by notice in the Gazette declared to be an offence for the purposes of this subsection.
The fingerprints taken in terms of this section must be stored on the fingerprint database maintained by the National Commissioner, as provided for in Chapter 5A of the South African Police Service Act.
some or all of the fingerprints taken on the previous occasion are not of sufficient quality to allow satisfactory analysis, comparison or matching; or the fingerprints taken were lost, misfiled or not stored on the database.
The fingerprints taken under any power conferred by this section, may be the subject of a comparative search.
in a case where a decision was made not to prosecute a person, if the person is found not guilty at his or her trial, or if his or her conviction is set aside by a superior court or if he or she is discharged at a preparatory examination or if no criminal proceedings with reference to such fingerprints or body-prints were instituted against the person concerned in any court or if the prosecution declines to prosecute, must be destroyed within 30 days after the officer commanding the Division responsible for criminal records referred to in Chapter 5A of the South African Police Service Act has been notified.
Fingerprints retained in terms of this section, may only be used for purposes related to the detection of crime, the investigation of an offence, the identification of missing persons, the identification of unidentified human remains or the conducting of a prosecution.
Subparagraphs (a) (i) and (ii) do not prohibit the use of any fingerprints taken under any powers conferred by this section, for the purposes of establishing if a person has been convicted of an offence.
falsely claims such fingerprints, body-prints or images to have been taken from a specific person whilst knowing them to have been taken from another person or source, is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 15 years.
The National Commissioner must destroy the fingerprints of a child upon receipt of a Certificate of Expungement in terms of section 87 (4) of the Child Justice Act.
any person serving such a sentence at the time of the commencement of this section; and where applicable, any person released on parole in respect of such a sentence, irrespective of the fact that such a person was convicted of the offence in question, prior to the commencement of this section.
suspect that the person or that one or more of the persons in that group has committed an offence referred to in Schedule 1; and believe that the prints or the results of an examination thereof, will be of value in the investigation by excluding or including one or more of those persons as possible perpetrators of the offence.
be examined for the purposes of the investigation of the relevant offence or caused to be so examined; and be subjected to a comparative search.
in a case where a decision was made not to prosecute a person, if the person is found not guilty at his or her trial, or if his or her conviction is set aside by a superior court or if he or she is discharged at a preparatory examination or if no criminal proceeding with reference to such fingerprints or body-prints were instituted against the person concerned in any court or if the prosecution declines to prosecute, must be destroyed within 30 days after the officer commanding the Division responsible for criminal records referred to in Chapter 5A of the South African Police Service Act has been notified of such event as referred to in this paragraph.
Fingerprints or body-prints which may be retained in terms of this section, may only be used for purposes related to the detection of crime, the investigation of an offence, the identification of missing persons, the identification of unidentified human remains or the conducting of a prosecution.
Subparagraphs (a) (i) and (ii), does not prohibit the use of any fingerprints or body-prints taken under any powers conferred by this section, for the purposes of establishing if a person has been convicted of an offence.
The fingerprints or body-prints referred to in paragraph (a) must be stored on the database maintained by the National Commissioner, as provided for in Chapter 5A of the South African Police Service Act.
or (b) of section 36B (1).
Any medical officer of any prison or, if requested thereto by any police official, any registered medical practitioner or registered nurse may take such steps, including the taking of a blood sample, as may be deemed necessary in order to ascertain whether the body of any person referred to in paragraph (a) (i) or (ii) of subsection (1) or paragraph (a) or (b) of section 36B (1) has any mark, characteristic or distinguishing feature or shows any condition or appearance.
Any court which has convicted any person of any offence or which has concluded a preparatory examination against any person on any charge, or any magistrate, may order that the fingerprints, body-prints or a photographic image of the person concerned be taken.
Any fingerprints, body-prints or photographic images taken under any power conferred by this section, may be the subject of a comparative search.
in a case where a decision was made not to prosecute a person, if the person is found not guilty at his or her trial, or if his or her conviction is set aside by a superior court or if he or she is discharged at a preparatory examination or if no criminal proceeding with reference to such body-prints or photographic images was instituted against the person concerned in any court or if the prosecution declines to prosecute, must be destroyed within 30 days after the officer commanding the Division responsible for criminal records referred to in Chapter 5A of the South African Police Service Act has been notified.
Body-prints or photographic images which may be retained in terms of this section, may only be used for purposes related to the detection of crime, the investigation of an offence, the identification of a missing person, the identification of unidentified human remains or the conducting of a prosecution.
The body-prints or photographic images referred to in paragraph (a) (i) and (ii), must be stored on the database established by the National Commissioner, as provided for in Chapter 5A of the South African Police Service Act.
Subsection (6) does not prohibit the use of any body-prints or photographic image taken under any powers conferred by this section, for the purposes of establishing if a person has been convicted of an offence.
in biochemistry, in metallurgy, in microscopy, in any branch of pathology or in toxicology; or in ballistics, in the identification of fingerprints or body-prints or in the examination of disputed documents, is or may become relevant to the issue at criminal proceedings, a document purporting to be an affidavit made by a person who in that affidavit alleges that he or she is in the service of the State or of a provincial administration or any university in the Republic or any other body designated by the Minister for the purposes of this subsection by notice in the Gazette, and that he or she has established such fact by means of such an examination or process, shall, upon its mere production at such proceedings be prima facie proof of such fact: Provided that the person who may make such affidavit may, in any case in which skill is required in chemistry, anatomy or pathology, issue a certificate in lieu of such affidavit, in which event the provisions of this paragraph shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to such certificate.
found such fingerprint or body-print at or in the place or on or in the article or in the position or circumstances stated in the affidavit; or dealt with such fingerprint or bodyprint in the manner stated in the affidavit, shall, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be prima facie proof that such fingerprint or body-print, was so found or, as the case may be, was so dealt with.
during a period specified in the affidavit, had a fingerprint or body-print, article of clothing, specimen, tissue or object described in the affidavit in his or her custody in the manner described in the affidavit, which was packed or marked in the manner described in the affidavit, shall, upon the mere production thereof at such proceedings, be prima facie proof of the matter so alleged: Provided that the person who may make such affidavit in any case relating to any article of clothing, specimen or tissue, may issue a certificate in lieu of such affidavit, in which event the provisions of this paragraph shall mutatis mutandis apply with reference to such certificate.
Whenever it is relevant at criminal proceedings to ascertain whether any fingerprint or body-print of an accused at such proceedings corresponds to any other fingerprint or body-print or whether the body of such an accused has or had any mark, characteristic or distinguishing feature or shows or showed any condition or appearance, evidence of the fingerprints or body-prints of the accused or that the body of the accused has or had any mark, characteristic or distinguishing feature or shows or showed any condition or appearance, including evidence of the result of any blood test of the accused, shall be admissible at such proceedings.
Such evidence shall not be inadmissible by reason only thereof that the fingerprint or body-print in question was not taken or that the mark, characteristic, feature, condition or appearance in question was not ascertained in accordance with the provisions of sections 36B, 36C or 37, or that it was taken or ascertained against the wish or the will of the accused concerned.
1R1 500 - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003 2In the Afrikaans text of para. (q) the reference is to no particular section of Act 116 of 1998 but to the Act as a whole. 3In The Minister of Safety and Security and others In Re S v Walters and Another 2002 (2) SACR 105 (CC) & 2002 (4) SA 613 (CC) section 49 (2) was declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid. (See GN R745 in GG 23453 of 31 May 2002) 4R2 500 - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003 5R5 000 - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003 6R5 000 - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003. 7R5 000 - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003 8Section 38 of Act 122 of 1991 commenced on different dates in respect of different magisterial districts. 9Section 39 of Act 122 of 1991 commenced on different dates in respect of different magisterial districts. 10The omission from sub-s. (4) between the words 'that' and 'his failure' of the words 'there is a reasonable possibility that' was ordered inconsistent with the Constitution by the Constitutional Court and sub-s. (4) was ordered to be read as though the above omitted words appear therein - GN R888 in GG 23535 of 28 June 2002. (See S v Singo 2002 (2) SACR 160 (CC) & 2002 (4) SA 858 (CC)). 11Tariff of compensation to psychiatrists or clinical psychologists to enquire into the mental condition of an accused was determined under GN R393 in GG 30953 of 11 April 2008. 12Determination of tariff payable to psychiatrists or clinical psychologists for an enquiry into the mental condition of an accused has been published under GN R393 in GG 30953 of 11 April 2008 - see Regulations to the Act. 13R1 500 - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003 14R1 500 - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003 15See s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 16See s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 17See s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 18See s. 1 of Act 65 of 2008 19Persons or categories or classes of persons who are competent to be appointed as intermediaries were determined under GN R1374 in GG 15024 of 30 July 1993, as amended. 20Regulations prescribing the tariff of allowances payable to witnesses in criminal proceedings were published under GN R391 in GG 30953 of 11 April 2008. Regulations prescribing the tariff of allowances payable to psychiatrists and clinical psychologists who appear as witnesses in court were published under GN R392 in GG 30953 of 11 April 2008. 21Regulations prescribing the tariff of allowances of witnesses in criminal proceedings have been published under GN R391 in GG 30953 of 11 April 2008. 22The Board of Umgeni Water, a water board established in terms of s. 108 of the Water Act 54 of 1956, designated under GN R1507 in GG 16707 of 6 October 1995. The Agricultural Research Council, a council established in terms of s. 2 of the Agricultural Research Act 86 of 1990, designated under GN R889 in GG 26603 of 30 July 2004.
the Constitutional Court declared sections 245 and 332 (5) inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid.
24The English text of section 269A was inserted without a heading.
51 of 1977 inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid.
27Directives published under GN R248 in GG 28646 of 7 April 2006. 28R500 000 in respect of a regional court, and R100 000 in respect of a magistrates' court - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003. 29R3 000 in the case of a judicial officer who has not held the substantive rank of magistrate or higher for a period of seven years, and R6 000 in the case of a judicial officer who has held the substantive rank of magistrate or higher for a period of seven years or longer - GN R239 in GG 24393 of 14 February 2003 30In S v Coetzee and others 1997 (1) SACR 379 (CC) & 1997 (3) SA 527 (CC) the Constitutional Court declared sections 245 and 332 (5) inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore invalid. 31Declaration of peace officers published under GN R209 in GG 23143 of 19 February 2002, as amended. 32Requirements and certificate of peace officers published under GN R210 in GG 23144 of 19 February 2002. See Regulations to this Act. 33Requirements and certificate of peace officers published under GN R210 in GG 23144 of 19 February 2002. See Regulations to this Act.
"Copyright subsists in this content, © 2007 Juta and Company, Cape Town, South Africa; all rights reserved; No part of this content may be reproduced, re-published, re-used, reprinted, digitised, adapted, performed in public, broadcast, disseminated or stored in any manner or form, whether for commercial or non-commercial purposes, without prior written authorisation; contact Juta and Company for permissions and authorisations of any kind, EMAIL: statutes@juta.co.za, tel +27 (0)21 659 2506, fax +27 (0)21 797 0121, ADDRESS: 1st floor, Sunclare Building, 21 Dreyer Street, Claremont, 7708, Cape Town, South Africa."