Creation in Eden - Stormfront
Creation in Eden
09-25-2006, 02:06 AM #1
Did Adam and Eve have a bellybutton.?????????
And did Adam have a widgy and Eve a womb??????
09-25-2006, 04:57 PM #2
Re: Creation in Eden
Baie goeie vraag
Ek vra ook sommer, wie was eerste, die hoender of die eier?
09-26-2006, 10:56 AM #3
Die vraag van my is nie a strikvraag nie.
Dit is belangryk om die genesis te verstaan.
Wie gaan hom beantwoord
10-23-2006, 05:41 AM #4
Adam en Eva is na God se beeld geskape. Hulle was geestelike wesens en nie vlees en bloed soos algemeen aanvaar word nie.
Nie Adam, of Eva het ontstaan as gevolg van seksuele of geslagtelike voortplanting nie. Die ribbebeen verhaal is maar 'n primitiewe manier om hierdie konsep oor te dra.
Die geslagtelike liggaam sou eers heelwat later kom.
10-23-2006, 09:09 AM #5
Waar was jy al die tyd??????????
Niemand het dit beantwoord en ek het al die vyggieboom beklim,maar nie 'n blaar van my grote gekry nie.
Jy moet dan reg wees
10-23-2006, 10:54 AM #6
Ek was onder andere by die volgende plekke.
St Pauls Katedraal
Saint Sulpice katedraal
Basilique Du Sacre-Ceur De Montmartre
10-23-2006, 11:06 AM #7
ek kry heimweh naar hierdie plekke
Die andere het ek nie gesien nie
10-26-2006, 09:42 AM #8
Dus het hulle nie 'n bellybutton gehad nie.
Cain and Abel must have been the first ones to have a belly button.
What I am thinking of must be stupid to many,but it is essential to understand that when Adam and Eve were created without a belly button and all things connected with it,then WHEN came the belly button in the story or for that matter the whole concept of womb and birth.
There are plenty queries on the Genesis story,like the tree of everlasting life.
For what??????? when Adam and Eve had everlasting life as geestelyke wesens.
Anyone believing in the ribbebeen story is misguided and in my opinion a slap in the face of women.
The same is :"Go and multiply" and why would God punish the animals the same way He did Adam and Eve.
Then we have the story of Noah and collecting all animals,2 of a kind
which raises the question whether a dinosaur was in Eden,but possibly not in the Ark. And the tower of Baal,hey was a Hebrew-Papuan also making bricks on his way to heaven,but gave up because he could not speak Hebrew any more and left in disgust for Papua-New Guinea.
And the dumb Hebrew later speaking Diets left in disgust for Holland and on the way making clogs and cheese.
All what I am trying to point out is the Biblical correctness of the Old Testament.It does not make sense
Than Deutronomy,what a piece of filthy scripture,see chapter 29,30,31
I have no problem with the New Testament
10-26-2006, 12:59 PM #9
Ek gaan nie eens probeer om jou aan te haal nie, want ek wil nie vanaand laat gaan slaap nie.
My siening van Genesis is soos volg.
Dit is 'n primitiewe verduideliking van iets hoogs wetenskaplik aan 'n hoogs primitiewe wese van die tyd.
In vandag se dae sal ons 'n vergelyk kan tref deur te s'e: "Gaan verduidelik die Internet sinvol aan 'n tradisionele nomadiese Boesman in die Kalahari." As 'n ander IT deskundige die verduideliking aan die Boesman moet vertolk, gaan dit geen sin maak nie. Dit is waar ek en jy ons bevind.
11-08-2006, 04:26 AM #10
Ou man,ek is in 'n septiese tenk op die oontblik,die verdomde regering en my familie is in 'n tweestryd.
Ek sal later beantwoord.
Meanwhile STICK to your point of view.
Old fashioned Christianity is an abomination to GOD.
"From Eden we come. . . to Eden we shall return" Edelweiss Culture and Customs 6 01-30-2015 02:22 PM
The Eden Project Wolf Science and Technology 7 09-22-2005 03:48 PM
Return from Eden. Wolf Lounge 16 12-03-2003 01:47 PM
Inferno In Eden Jack_Knife Poetry and Creative Writing 0 11-04-2002 10:30 PM
Page generated in 0.94632 seconds with 11 queries