Unlimited atonement
Unlimited atonement (sometimes called general atonement or universal atonement) is a doctrine in Protestant Christianity that is normally associated with Amyraldism (four-point Calvinism), as well as Arminianism and other non-Calvinist traditions. The doctrine states that Jesus died as a propitiation for the benefit of all humans without exception. It is a doctrine distinct from other elements of the Calvinist acronym TULIP and is contrary to the Calvinist doctrine of limited atonement. A doctrinal issue that divides Christians is the question of the extent of the atonement. This question typically goes as follows: "Did Christ bear the  sins of the elect alone on the cross, or did his death expiate the sins of all human beings?" Those who take this view read scriptures such as ; ; ; ; to say that the Bible teaches "unlimited" atonement. Historical background. In response to the Remonstrants' Five articles of Remonstrance, the Synod of Dort published the Canons of Dort which included limited atonement. One of the stronger, more vocal proponents of unlimited atonement was Methodist leader John Wesley. George Whitefield opposed the view. The namesake of the Calvinist systematic theological viewpoint, John Calvin, seemingly expressed an unlimited atonement position in several passages from  his published Commentaries. Doctrine. The terms "unlimited", "universal", and "general" are somewhat of a misnomer and have been adopted primarily to distinguish this doctrine from a Calvinist understanding of "limited" atonement. More accurately, the call of the Gospel is "universal" and there are "no limits" on who can believe through faith, but the legal payment is still regarded as "limited" only to those that respond through faith in Jesus. Thus, it is not the same as the doctrine of universal salvation, which holds that all souls will ultimately be reconciled to God, irrespective of faith. The following statements regarding what  it states and what it does not state are subject to close scrutiny of which many distinguished theologians on both sides of this issue disagree. Amyraldism (commonly called "four-point Calvinism" holds to a view of Unlimited atonement that is very similar but not synonymous with the traditional Arminian understanding) teaches that God has provided Christ's atonement for all alike, but seeing that none would believe on their own, he then elects those whom he will bring to faith in Christ, thereby preserving the Calvinist doctrine of the unconditional election of individuals. Unlimited atonement has a number of important  points in common with traditional formulations of limited atonement. Both positions affirm that: Biblical passages. "All quotes from the NKJV unless otherwise noted, emphasis added:" Scriptures used in support of unlimited atonement. These are Scriptures commonly used by those who support Unlimited atonement: Scriptures used to criticize unlimited atonement. These are Scriptures commonly used by those who deny Unlimited atonement: