Concision (media studies)
In media studies, concision is a form of broadcast media censorship by limiting debate and discussion of important topics on the rationale of time allotment. Media critics such as Noam Chomsky contend that this practice, especially on commercial broadcasts with advertising, encourages broadcasters to exclude people and ideas that they judge cannot conform to the time limits of a particular program. This leads to a limited number of "the usual suspects" who will say expected ideas that will not require extensive explanation such as mainstream political ones. Furthermore, introducing controversial or unexpected statements that do not  conform to those conventional ideas are discouraged as time inefficient because the person will be required to explain and support them in detail. Since this can often take considerable time in itself and digress from the primary discussion topic of the broadcast, this is discouraged. Alternatively, the explanation could be subject to extensive editing for time which could lead to an inadequate presentation of the subject's thoughts. Illustration. This media control idea is illustrated in the film documentary, "", where journalist Jeff Greenfield explains why a person like Chomsky may be excluded from being interviewed on air because he takes  too long to warm up. The film then follows up with Chomsky himself explaining the concept while the film gives examples of controversial statements he has made in the past that would require extensive explanation in an interview. The 1999 feature film "The Insider" has a dramatization of the media concept where journalist Mike Wallace goes public on a news show about the censoring of a controversial story on "60 Minutes". When Wallace sees his interview broadcast, he is furious that his testimony is limited to a curt statement that does not adequately explain his position and the only excuse  from the producers he receives is that it had to be cut for time.