I Lost It at the Movies
I Lost It at the Movies is a 1965 book that serves as a compendium of movie reviews written by Pauline Kael, a film critic from "The New Yorker", from 1954 to 1965. The book was published prior to Kael's long stint at "The New Yorker". As a result, the pieces in the book are culled from radio broadcasts that she did while she was at KPFA, as well as numerous periodicals, including "Moviegoer", the "Massachusetts Review", "Sight and Sound", "Film Culture", "Film Quarterly" and "Partisan Review". It contains her negative review of  the then widely acclaimed "West Side Story", glowing reviews of other movies such as "The Golden Coach" and "Seven Samurai", as well as longer polemical essays such as her largely negative critical responses to Siegfried Kracauer's "Theory of Film" and Andrew Sarris's "Film Culture" essay Notes on the Auteur Theory, 1962. The book was a bestseller upon its first release, and is now published by Marion Boyars Publishers. Kael's first book is characterized by an approach where she would often quote contemporary critics such as Bosley Crowther and Dwight Macdonald as a springboard to debunk their assertions  while advancing her own ideas. This approach was later abandoned in her subsequent reviews, but is notably referred to in Macdonald's book, "Dwight Macdonald On Movies" (1969). When an interviewer asked her in later years as to what she had "lost", as indicated in the title, Kael averred: "There are so many kinds of innocence to be lost at the movies." It is the first in a series of titles of books that would have a deliberately erotic connotation, typifying the sensual relation Kael perceived herself as having with the movies, as opposed to the theoretical bent that some  among her colleagues had. Contents. The book is divided into an introduction and four sections. These sections are entitled as such: I) Broadsides; II) Retrospective Reviews: Movies Remembered with Pleasure; III) Broadcasts and Reviews, 1961–1963; and IV) Polemics. The introduction is entitled "Zeitgeist and Poltergeist; Or, Are Movies Going to Pieces?" The contents of Section One (Broadsides): Movies reviewed in Section Two (Retrospective Reviews): Movies reviewed and titles of articles in Section Three (Broadcasts and Reviews): Contents of Section Four (Polemics): Critical responses. In "Dwight Macdonald On Movies", Macdonald includes a brief five-page review of "I Lost It at  the Movies". While he states in the beginning of his review that he has, on the whole, favorable sentiments towards the book, he nevertheless criticizes Kael for being "stronger on the intellectual side than on the aesthetic side" as well as her persistence in quoting other critics out of context. In the process, Macdonald confutes some of the assertions Kael makes about his own opinions regarding certain movies. Dwight Macdonald writes: Nevertheless, Macdonald goes on to say that some of the quotes that Kael utilizes in her reviews are often used incorrectly especially in regards to him, creating a distorted  view of the opinions he had on certain movies such as "Jules and Jim". He also questions the validity of some of her assessments of a few movies, including "Hiroshima Mon Amour", "8½", and "Last Year in Marienbad", stating that she is "perversely literal-minded" and comments upon "her ascetic insensibility to the sensual pleasures of cinema...when she dislikes the literary content." When Kael ponders in the book "it [is] difficult to understand why Dwight Macdonald with his dedication to high art sacrifices his time to them," Macdonald contends that he has always considered movies to be a high  art. This, in a way, highlights the differences in their perspectives on movies: Pauline Kael sees movies as a fusion of pop and art elements (a mixture of lowbrow and highbrow), while Macdonald sees it in more highbrow terms. On the whole, Macdonald seems to respect her critical acumen, but not her methods. A more adverse reaction comes from the auteurist Andrew Sarris, mainly as a result of the essay '"Circles and Squares", which was originally published in "Film Quarterly". Sarris's reaction was in response to Kael's denunciation of the Auteur theory's merits, and has, in later  years, occasionally jabbed at Kael's work. Examples of his critical observations are available in his books, e.g., "The Primal Screen" and "Politics and Cinema". With the exception of "Circles and Squares", Kael has rarely responded. Notwithstanding Kael's unresponsive silence, this has gone down in film lore as the Sarris-Kael feud. Further reading. The book actually does not contain the full range of Kael's writings published in magazines from this period. From 1962–64, Kael had written for a short-lived section of "Film Quarterly" entitled Films of the Quarter, alongside other critics such as Stanley Kauffmann and  the screenwriter Gavin Lambert. Some, but not all, of these writings are included in this book. Miscellaneous. In reference to the title of the book, the critic Jonathan Rosenbaum wrote an article entitled "I Missed It at the Movies: Objections to Raising "Kane"" as a rebuttal to Kael's essay on "Citizen Kane", which had been entitled "Raising Kane". In "", the book is referenced under the parody title "I Lost Something at the Movies", and a short snippet of the made-up book is included, where the author theorizes (correctly) that the (fictional) film titled "Zombies in the Snow" awkward  dialogue is actually written as such in order to pass on messages in a secret code. The name of the fictional author given, "Lena Pukalie", is also an anagram of Pauline Kael.