Square root of 2
</math> The square root of 2 (approximately 1.4142) is a positive real number that, when multiplied by itself, equals the number 2. It may be written in mathematics as formula_1 or formula_2, and is an algebraic number. Technically, it should be called the principal square root of 2, to distinguish it from the negative number with the same property. Geometrically, the square root of 2 is the length of a diagonal across a square with sides of one unit of length; this follows from the Pythagorean theorem. It was probably the first number known  to be irrational. The fraction (≈ 1.4142857) is sometimes used as a good rational approximation with a reasonably small denominator. Sequence in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences consists of the digits in the decimal expansion of the square root of 2, here truncated to 65 decimal places: History. The Babylonian clay tablet YBC 7289 (c. 1800–1600 BC) gives an approximation of in four sexagesimal figures, , which is accurate to about six decimal digits, and is the closest possible three-place sexagesimal representation of : Another early approximation is given in ancient Indian mathematical texts, the Sulbasutras (c. 800–200 BC ), as follows: "Increase the length [of the side] by its third and this third by its own fourth less the thirty-fourth part of that fourth." That is, This approximation is the seventh in a sequence of increasingly accurate approximations based on the sequence of Pell numbers, which can be derived from the continued fraction expansion of . Despite having a smaller denominator, it is only slightly less accurate than the Babylonian approximation. Pythagoreans discovered that the diagonal of a square is incommensurable with its side, or in modern language, that the square root of two is irrational. Little is known  with certainty about the time or circumstances of this discovery, but the name of Hippasus of Metapontum is often mentioned. For a while, the Pythagoreans treated as an official secret the discovery that the square root of two is irrational, and, according to legend, Hippasus was murdered for divulging it. The square root of two is occasionally called Pythagoras's number or Pythagoras's constant, for example by . Ancient Roman architecture. In ancient Roman architecture, Vitruvius describes the use of the square root of 2 progression or "ad quadratum" technique. It consists basically in a geometric, rather than arithmetic, method  to double a square, in which the diagonal of the original square is equal to the side of the resulting square. Vitruvius attributes the idea to Plato. The system was employed to build pavements by creating a square tangent to the corners of the original square at 45 degrees of it. The proportion was also used to design atria by giving them a length equal to a diagonal taken from a square, whose sides are equivalent to the intended atrium's width. Decimal value. Computation algorithms. There are a number of algorithms for approximating as a ratio of integers or  as a decimal. The most common algorithm for this, which is used as a basis in many computers and calculators, is the Babylonian method for computing square roots. It goes as follows: First, pick a guess, ; the value of the guess affects only how many iterations are required to reach an approximation of a certain accuracy. Then, using that guess, iterate through the following recursive computation: The more iterations through the algorithm (that is, the more computations performed and the greater ""), the better the approximation. Each iteration roughly doubles the number of correct digits. Starting with , the results of the  algorithm are as follows: Rational approximations. A simple rational approximation (≈ 1.4142857) is sometimes used. Despite having a denominator of only 70, it differs from the correct value by less than (approx. ). The next two better rational approximations are (≈ 1.4141414...) with a marginally smaller error (approx. ), and (≈ 1.4142012) with an error of approx . The rational approximation of the square root of two derived from four iterations of the Babylonian method after starting with () is too large by about ; its square is ≈ . Records in computation. In 1997 the value of was calculated to 137,438,953,444 decimal places by Yasumasa  Kanada's team. In February 2006 the record for the calculation of was eclipsed with the use of a home computer. Shigeru Kondo calculated 1 trillion decimal places in 2010. Among mathematical constants with computationally challenging decimal expansions, only , , and the golden ratio have been calculated more precisely as of March 2022. Such computations aim to check empirically whether such numbers are normal. This is a table of recent records in calculating the digits of . Proofs of irrationality. A short proof of the irrationality of can be obtained from the rational root theorem, that is, if is a monic polynomial  with integer coefficients, then any rational root of is necessarily an integer. Applying this to the polynomial , it follows that is either an integer or irrational. Because is not an integer (2 is not a perfect square), must therefore be irrational. This proof can be generalized to show that any square root of any natural number that is not a perfect square is irrational. For other proofs that the square root of any non-square natural number is irrational, see Quadratic irrational number or Infinite descent. Proof by infinite descent. One proof of the number's irrationality is the following  proof by infinite descent. It is also a proof by contradiction, also known as an indirect proof, in that the proposition is proved by assuming that the opposite of the proposition is true and showing that this assumption is false, thereby implying that the proposition must be true. Because there is a contradiction, the assumption (1) that is a rational number must be false. This means that is not a rational number. That is, is irrational. This proof was hinted at by Aristotle, in his "Analytica Priora", §I.23. It appeared first as a full proof in Euclid's "Elements", as  proposition 117 of Book X. However, since the early 19th century, historians have agreed that this proof is an interpolation and not attributable to Euclid. Proof by unique factorization. As with the proof by infinite descent, we obtain formula_6. Being the same quantity, each side has the same prime factorization by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, and in particular, would have to have the factor 2 occur the same number of times. However, the factor 2 appears an odd number of times on the right, but an even number of times on the left—a contradiction. Geometric proof. A simple  proof is attributed by John Horton Conway to Stanley Tennenbaum when the latter was a student in the early 1950s and whose most recent appearance is in an article by Noson Yanofsky in the May–June 2016 issue of "American Scientist". Given two squares with integer sides respectively "a" and "b", one of which has twice the area of the other, place two copies of the smaller square in the larger as shown in Figure 1. The square overlap region in the middle () must equal the sum of the two uncovered squares (). However, these squares on the diagonal have positive  integer sides that are smaller than the original squares. Repeating this process, there are arbitrarily small squares one twice the area of the other, yet both having positive integer sides, which is impossible since positive integers cannot be less than 1. Another geometric reductio ad absurdum argument showing that is irrational appeared in 2000 in the American Mathematical Monthly. It is also an example of proof by infinite descent. It makes use of classic compass and straightedge construction, proving the theorem by a method similar to that employed by ancient Greek geometers. It is essentially the same algebraic proof  as in the previous paragraph, viewed geometrically in another way. Let be a right isosceles triangle with hypotenuse length and legs as shown in Figure 2. By the Pythagorean theorem, . Suppose and are integers. Let be a ratio given in its lowest terms. Draw the arcs and with centre . Join . It follows that , and the and coincide. Therefore, the triangles and are congruent by SAS. Because is a right angle and is half a right angle, is also a right isosceles triangle. Hence implies . By symmetry, , and is also a right isosceles triangle. It also follows that . Hence, there is  an even smaller right isosceles triangle, with hypotenuse length and legs . These values are integers even smaller than and and in the same ratio, contradicting the hypothesis that is in lowest terms. Therefore, and cannot be both integers, hence is irrational. Constructive proof. In a constructive approach, one distinguishes between on the one hand not being rational, and on the other hand being irrational (i.e., being quantifiably apart from every rational), the latter being a stronger property. Given positive integers and such that (as satisfies these bounds), because the valuation (i.e., highest power of 2 dividing a number) of  is odd, while the valuation of is even, they must be distinct integers; thus . Then the latter inequality being true because it is assumed that , giving (otherwise the quantitative apartness can be trivially established). This gives a lower bound of for the difference , yielding a direct proof of irrationality not relying on the law of excluded middle; see Errett Bishop (1985, p. 18). This proof constructively exhibits a discrepancy between and any rational. Proof by Pythagorean triples. This proof uses the following property of primitive Pythagorean triples: This lemma can be used to show that two identical perfect squares can  never be added to produce another perfect square. Suppose the contrary that formula_8 is rational. Therefore, Here, is a primitive Pythagorean triple, and from the lemma is never even. However, this contradicts the equation which implies that must be even. Multiplicative inverse. The multiplicative inverse (reciprocal) of the square root of two (i.e., the square root of ) is a widely used constant. One-half of , also the reciprocal of , is a common quantity in geometry and trigonometry because the unit vector that makes a 45° angle with the axes in a plane has the coordinates This number satisfies Properties . One interesting property of is since This is related to the property of silver ratios. for square roots and only one minus sign. Similar in appearance but with a finite number of terms, appears in various trigonometric constants: It is not known whether is a normal number, which is a stronger property than irrationality, but statistical analyses of its binary expansion are consistent with the hypothesis that it is normal to base two. Representations. Series and product. The identity , along with the infinite product representations for the sine and cosine, leads to products such as and or equivalently, The number  can also be expressed by taking the Taylor series of a trigonometric function. For example, the series for gives The Taylor series of with and using the double factorial gives The convergence of this series can be accelerated with an Euler transform, producing It is not known whether can be represented with a BBP-type formula. BBP-type formulas are known for and , however. The number can be represented by an infinite series of Egyptian fractions, with denominators defined by 2&hairsp;th terms of a Fibonacci-like recurrence relation "a"("n") = 34"a"("n"−1) − "a"("n"−2), "a"(0) = 0, "a"(1) = 6. Continued  fraction. The square root of two has the following continued fraction representation: The convergents formed by truncating this representation form a sequence of fractions that approximate the square root of two to increasing accuracy, and that are described by the Pell numbers (known as side and diameter numbers to the ancient Greeks because of their use in approximating the ratio between the sides and diagonal of a square). The first convergents are: . The convergent differs from by almost exactly and then the next convergent is . Nested square. The following nested square expressions converge to : Applications. Paper size. In 1786, German  physics professor Georg Christoph Lichtenberg found that any sheet of paper whose long edge is times longer than its short edge could be folded in half and aligned with its shorter side to produce a sheet with exactly the same proportions as the original. This ratio of lengths of the longer over the shorter side guarantees that cutting a sheet in half along a line results in the smaller sheets having the same (approximate) ratio as the original sheet. When Germany standardised paper sizes at the beginning of the 20th century, they used Lichtenberg's ratio to create the "A