Adverse childhood experiences
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) encompass various forms of physical and emotional abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction experienced in childhood. ACEs have been linked to premature death as well as to various health conditions, including those of mental disorders. Toxic stress linked to childhood maltreatment is related to a number of neurological changes in the structure of the brain and its function. The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study, published in 1998, was the first large scale study to look at the relationship between ten categories of adversity in childhood and health outcomes in adulthood. Subsequent research is beginning to  identify specific biomarkers associated with different kinds of ACEs. Long term effects of ACEs. According to the Center for Youth Wellness website, "Exposure without a positive buffer, such as a nurturing parent or caregiver, can lead to a Toxic Stress Response in children, which can, in turn, lead to health problems like asthma, poor growth and frequent infections, as well as learning difficulties and behavioral issues. In the long term, exposure to ACEs can also lead to serious health conditions like heart disease, stroke, and cancer later in life." Adverse childhood experiences are equal to various stresses, and a serious  adversity is defined as a trauma. The World Health Organization (WHO) recognises that prolonged stress in childhood can have life-long implications for the development of many diseases. Moreover ACEs can disrupt early brain development leading to the possible development of several disorders. WHO has designed a screening questionnaire to be used internationally in order to list adverse effects, and relate them to future developments in the hope of possible preventive interventions. The questionnaire is titled the Adverse Childhood Experiences International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ). Neurobiology of stress. Cognitive and neuroscience researchers have examined possible mechanisms that might explain the negative  consequences of adverse childhood experiences on adult health. Adverse childhood experiences can alter the structural development of neural networks and the biochemistry of neuroendocrine systems and may have long-term effects on the body, including speeding up the processes of disease and aging and compromising immune systems. "Allostatic load" refers to the adaptive processes that maintain homeostasis during times of toxic stress through the production of mediators such as adrenaline, cortisol and other chemical messengers. According to researcher Bruce S. McEwen, who coined the term: Additionally, epigenetic transmission may occur due to stress during pregnancy or during interactions between mother  and newborns. Maternal stress, depression, and exposure to partner violence have all been shown to have epigenetic effects on infants. Implementing practices. As knowledge about the prevalence and consequences of adverse childhood experiences increases, trauma-informed and resilience-building practices based on the research is being implemented in communities, education, public health departments, social services, faith-based organizations and criminal justice. A few states are considering legislation. Communities. As knowledge about the prevalence and consequences of ACEs increases, more communities seek to integrate trauma-informed and resilience-building practices into their agencies and systems. Research with American Indian tribal communities  has demonstrated that social support and cultural involvement can ameliorate the effects of ACEs. Additionally, focus group research with over 100 low-income urban youth indicates that the common systems of classifying ACEs are not currently sufficient in capturing community stressors, such as racial discrimination, poverty, and community violence, that can also result in childhood trauma. Qualitative studies have proposed a handful of models on how best to disseminate information about ACEs to community members in order to create trauma-informed systemic change. For example, after conducting a series of interviews and focus groups in 10 cities around the US , Ellis & Dietz (2017) proposed the Building Community Resilience model, a two-phase model that emphasizes collaboration across public sectors in order to create a coordinated array of community services. The focus of phase 1 is developing shared goals and understanding between different stakeholders (community health workers, pediatricians, parents, etc) in order to assess areas of strength, design interventions, and create a broader network of care. Phase 2 then utilizes the established community care network to create coordinated initiatives aimed at prevention of toxic stress. Data collection and community feedback is to be conducted continuously in order to refine strategies. The  empower action model (created as part of the South Carolina ACE Initiative) also recommends a collaborative approach to knit together different community stakeholders and uses data-driven feedback to inform decision-making. The authors created concrete steps for implementation after studying the shortcomings of previous models and examining 3 years of post-ACE training survey data, then refining the model through a series of focus groups with participants who work in child welfare. In the empower action model, community resilience is built by reinforcing 5 protective factors across multiple social levels (individual, organizational, community, and public policy) and throughout the  lifespan. Racial equity is fundamental for creating healthy communities, and in this model, ACE prevalence is expected to diminish as systemic barriers are removed for entire populations. Currently, 3 different state-funded agencies have implemented the empower action model and from these experiences the authors recommended the following: having representation from multiple stakeholders, selecting a facilitator for meetings, developing a formalized “readiness process” prior to application of the model, celebrating progress, and understanding that sustainable change takes time and flexibility. There is a paucity of empirical research documenting the experiences of communities who have attempted to implement information about ACEs  and trauma-informed practice into widespread public action. The Matlin et al. (2019) article on Pottstown, Pennsylvania’s process demonstrated the challenges associated with community implementation. The Pottstown Trauma-Informed Community Connection (PTICC) initiative evolved from a series of prior collectives that all had similar goals of creating community resilience in order to prevent and treat ACEs. Over the course of the two year study, over 230 individuals from nearly 100 organizations attended one training offered by the PTICC, raising the number of engaged public sectors from 2 to 14. Participation in training and events was fairly steady and this  was largely due to community networking. However, the PTICC faced several challenges similar to those predicted by the Building Community Resilience model. These barriers included availability of resources over time, competition for power within the group, and the lack of systemic change needed to support long-term goals. Still, Pottstown has built a trauma-informed community foundation and offers lessons to other communities who have similar goals: start with a dedicated small team, identify community connectors, secure long term financial backing, and conduct data-informed evaluations throughout. Other community examples exist, such as Tarpon Springs, Florida which became the first  trauma-informed community in 2011. Trauma-informed initiatives in Tarpon Springs include trauma-awareness training for the local housing authority, changes in programs for ex-offenders, and new approaches to educating students with learning difficulties. Education. ACEs exposure is widespread in the US, one study from the National Survey of Children's Health reported that approximately 68% of children 0–17 years old had experienced one or more ACEs. The impact of ACEs on children can manifest in difficulties focusing, self regulating, trusting others, and can lead to negative cognitive effects. One study found that a child with 4 or more  ACEs was 32 times more likely to be labeled with a behavioral or cognitive problem than a child with no ACEs. Another study by the Area Health Education Center of Washington State University found that students with at least three ACEs are three times as likely to experience academic failure, six times as likely to have behavioral problems, and five times as likely to have attendance problems. The trauma-informed school movement aims to train teachers and staff to help children self-regulate, and to help families that are having problems that result in children's normal response to trauma . It also seeks to provide behavioral consequences that will not re-traumatize a child. Trauma-informed education refers to the specific use of knowledge about trauma and its expression to modify support for children to improve their developmental success. The National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) describes a trauma-informed school system as a place where school community members work to provide trauma awareness, knowledge and skills to respond to potentially negative outcomes following traumatic stress. The NCTSN published a study that discussed the ARC (attachment, regulation and competency) model, which other researchers have based their subsequent studies of trauma -informed education practices off of. Trauma-sensitive or trauma-informed schooling has become increasingly popular in Washington, Massachusetts, and California in the last 10 years. One study details how several San Francisco schools provided trauma-informed support based on the ARC model to students, adults in the system, and the school system as a whole through universal learning strategies, plans and techniques for children with trauma, and by providing trauma-informed therapy to those children. At El Dorado, an elementary school in this study in San Francisco, trauma-informed practices were associated with a suspension reduction of 89%. Lincoln High  School in Walla Walla, Washington, adapted a trauma-informed approached to discipline and reduced its suspensions by 85%. Rather than standard punishment, students are taught to recognize their reaction to stress and learn to control it. Spokane, Washington, schools conducted a research study that demonstrated that academic risk was correlated with students’ experiences of traumatic events known to their teachers. The same school district has begun a study to test the impact of trauma-informed intervention programs, in an attempt to reduce the impact of toxic stress. In Brockton, Massachusetts, a community-wide meeting led to a trauma-informed approach  being adopted by the Brockton School District. So far, all of the district's elementary schools have implemented trauma-informed improvement plans, and there are plans to do the same in the middle school and high school. About one-fifth of the district teachers have participated in a course on teaching traumatized students. Police alert schools when they have arrested someone or visited at a student's address. Massachusetts state legislation has sought to require all schools to develop plans to create "safe and supportive schools". Social services. Social service providers—including welfare systems, housing authorities, homeless shelters, and domestic  violence centers – are adopting trauma-informed approaches that help to prevent ACEs or minimize their impact. Utilizing tools that screen for trauma can help a social service worker direct their clients to interventions that meet their specific needs. Trauma-informed practices can also help social service providers look at how trauma impacts the whole family. Trauma-informed approaches can improve child welfare services by 1) openly discussing trauma and 2) addressing parental trauma. The New Hampshire Division for Children Youth and Families (DCYF) is taking a trauma-informed approach to their foster care services by educating staff about childhood trauma , screening children entering foster care for trauma, using trauma-informed language to mitigate further traumatization, mentoring birth parents and involving them in collaborative parenting, and training foster parents to be trauma-informed. In Albany, New York the HEARTS Initiative has led to local organizations developing trauma-informed practice. Senior Hope Inc., an organization serving adults over the age of 50, began implementing the 10-question ACE survey and talking with their clients about childhood trauma. The LaSalle School, which serves orphaned and abandoned boys, began looking at delinquent boys in from a trauma-informed perspective and began administering the ACE  questionnaire to their clients. Housing authorities are also becoming trauma-informed. Supportive housing can sometimes recreate control and power dynamics associated with clients’ early trauma. This can be reduced through trauma-informed practices, such as training staff to be respectful of clients' space by scheduling appointments and not letting themselves into clients' private spaces, and also understanding that an aggressive response may be trauma-related coping strategies. The housing authority in Tarpon Springs provided trauma-awareness training to staff so they could better understand and react to their clients' stress and anger resulting from poor employment, health, and housing. A  survey of 200 homeless individuals in California and New York demonstrated that more than 50% had experienced at least four ACEs. In Petaluma, California, the Committee on the Shelterless (COTS) uses a trauma-informed approach called Restorative Integral Support (RIS) to reduce intergenerational homelessness. RIS increases awareness of and knowledge about ACEs, and calls on staff to be compassionate and focus on the whole person. COTS now consider themselves ACE-informed and focus on resiliency and recovery. Health care services. Screening for or talking about ACEs with parents and children can help to foster healthy physical and psychological development and  can help doctors understand the circumstances that children and their parents are facing. By screening for ACEs in children, pediatric doctors and nurses can better understand behavioral problems. Some doctors have questioned whether some behaviors resulting in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnoses are in fact reactions to trauma. Children who have experienced four or more ACEs are three times as likely to take ADHD medication when compared with children with less than four ACEs. Screening parents for their ACEs allows doctors to provide the appropriate support to parents who have experienced trauma, helping them to build resilience, foster attachment  with their children, and prevent a family cycle of ACEs. Trauma-informed pediatric care also allows doctors to develop a more trusting relationship with parents, opening the lines of communication. At Montefiore Medical Center ACEs screenings will soon be implemented in 22 pediatric clinics. In a pilot program, any child with one parent who has an ACE score of four or higher is offered enrollment and receive a variety of services. For families enrolled in the program parents report fewer ER visits and children have healthier emotional and social development, compared with those not enrolled. Public health. Most American doctors  as of 2015 do not use ACE surveys to assess patients. Objections to doing so include that there are no randomized controlled trials that show that such surveys can be used to actually improve health outcomes, there are no standard protocols for how to use the information gathered, and that revisiting negative childhood experiences could be emotionally traumatic. Other obstacles to adoption include that the technique is not taught in medical schools, is not billable, and the nature of the conversation makes some doctors personally uncomfortable. Some public health centers see ACEs as an important way (especially for mothers and  children) to target health interventions for individuals during sensitive periods of development early in their life, or even in utero. For example, Jefferson Country Public Health clinic in Port Townsend, Washington, now screens pregnant women, their partners, parents of children with special needs, and parents involved with CPS for ACEs. With regard to patient counseling, the clinic treats ACEs like other health risks such as smoking or alcohol consumption. Psychologists, politicians, therapists, educators, and countless other professionals interested in advocating for universal screening for ACEs while creating awareness of ACEs and possible treatments for their residual effects has resulted in  the launching of a public health campaign "Stress Health Public Education Campaign" to bring greater attention to the problems implicated by stress and toxic stress in childhood. Resilience and Resources. Resilience is not a trait that people either have or do not have. It involves behaviors, thoughts and actions that can be learned and developed in anyone. According to the American Psychological Association (2017), resilience is the ability to adapt in the face of adversity, tragedy, threats or significant stress — such as family and relationship problems, serious health problems or workplace and financial stressors. Resilience refers to bouncing back from  difficult experiences in life. There is nothing extraordinary about resilience. People often demonstrate resilience in times of adversity. However, being resilient does not mean that a person will not experience difficulty or distress, as emotional pain is common for people when they suffer from a major adversity or trauma. In fact, the path to resilience often involves considerable emotional pain . Resilience and access to other resources are protective factors. Having resilience can benefit children who have been exposed to trauma and have a higher ACE score. Children who can learn to develop it, can use resilience to build themselves  up after trauma. A child who has not developed resilience will have a harder time coping with the challenges that can come in adult life. People and children who are resilient, embrace the thinking that adverse experiences do not define who they are. They also can think about past events in their lives that were traumatic, and, try to reframe them in a way that is constructive. They are able to find strength in their struggle and ultimately can overcome the challenges and adversity that was faced in childhood. In childhood, resiliency can come from having a caring adult in  a child's life. Resiliency can also come from having meaningful moments such as an academic achievement or getting praise from teachers or mentors. Criminal justice. Since research on decarceration in the United States suggests that incarcerated individuals are much more likely to have been exposed to violence and suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a trauma-informed approach may better help to address some of these criminogenic risk factors and can create a less traumatizing criminal justice experience. Programs, like Seeking Safety, are often used to help individuals in the criminal justice system learn how to better cope with  trauma, PTSD, and substance abuse. Juvenile courts better help deter children from crime and delinquency when they understand the trauma many of these children have experienced. The criminal justice system itself can also retraumatize individuals. This can be prevented by creating safer facilities where correctional and police officers are properly trained to keep incidents from escalating. Partnerships between police and mental health providers can also reduce the possible traumatizing effects of police intervention and help provide families with the proper mental health and social services. The Women's Community Correctional Center of Hawaii began a Trauma-Informed Care Initiative that  aims to train all employees to be aware and sensitive to trauma, to screen all women in their facility for trauma, to assess those who have experienced trauma, and begin providing trauma-informed mental health care to those women identified. Legislation. Vermont has passed a bill, Act 43(H.508), an act relating to building resilience for individuals experiencing adverse childhood experiences which acknowledges the life span effects of ACEs on health outcomes, seeks wide use of ACE screening by health providers and aims to educate medical and health school students about ACEs. Previously Washington State passed legislation to set up a  public-private partnership to further community development of trauma-informed and resilience-building practices that had begun in that state; but it was not adequately funded. On August 18, 2014, California lawmakers unanimously passed ACR No. 155, which encourages policies reducing children's exposure to adverse experiences. Recent Massachusetts legislation supports a trauma-informed school movement as part of The Reduction of Gun Violence bill (No. 4376). This bill aims to create "safe and supportive schools" through services and initiatives focused on physical, social, and emotional safety. ACEs score. To determine someone's ACEs score, they answer the 10 Adverse  Childhood Experiences questions relating to events prior to their eighteenth birthday. The questions are: Adverse Childhood Experiences movement. The Adverse Childhood Experiences movement is an initiative to revolutionize national awareness, and understanding of the health impacts of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), and toxic stress, and to implement programs and protocols to prevent, recognize, and address them when they have occurred. Adverse childhood experiences are defined as potentially traumatic experiences that can occur between the ages of 0 and 17. The movement is being driven by pediatric clinicians, educators, parents, policymakers and other child-serving professionals and advocates who are working  to implement universal screening for adverse childhood experiences. Start of the ACE-aware movement. The ACE aware movement arose out of the need for a bidirectional effort to create a public health change, with both individuals and institutions/ government systems. Change on the individual level is essential, because individual change is self-directed. The institutions and government systems engagement is essential, because without the structure surrounding individuals changing, the very systems that are intended to help, can perpetuate the cycle of trauma. In the book "Anna, Age Eight: The data-driven prevention of childhood trauma and maltreatment", the authors Katherine  Ortega Courtney, PhD and Dominic Cappello proposed that to prevent ACEs and trauma, a new way of approaching ACEs prevention was required, one that was data-driven to achieve measurable and meaningful results. The author’s strategy for preventing ACEs was also guided by decades of research focused on the social determinants of health, acknowledging the impact of socio-economic class and racial injustice on family health. This was a significant departure from viewing ACEs as only an individual problem, to be addressed solely with a trauma-informed approach in schools and healthcare settings. In the article "A Critical Assessment  of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study at 20 Years", authors Craig A. McEwen, PhD and Scout F. Gregerson call for an ACEs prevention strategy guided by the framework of the social determinants of health in order to acknowledge the impact of poverty and social hierarchies such as race. International adoption of the ACEs model. The U.S. ACEs list was created in 1997 when a study was conducted to examine different childhood traumas. From 1995-1997, the CDC Kaiser ACE study involved more than 17,000 people sharing their stories about their unforgettable childhood trauma experiences. They used this study to make  a list of ACEs to determine and examine how these traumatizing experiences can lead to health issues and stunt developmental growth. ACEs are divided into three categories: abuse, household challenges, and neglect. Examples of ACEs include being exposed to abuse and neglect, violence in the family, mental illness, parental divorce or substance abuse. It is said to disrupt a child's development, leading to poor health outcomes and low life expectancy. In the UK in 2017 a study was made based on the original US study and presented together with recommendations for early intervention to the UK parliament. The World  Health Organization has designed a far more extensive screening questionnaire than the original US version, designed to be used internationally in order to relate adverse conditions to future developments in the hope of possible preventive interventions. In addition to the ACEs identified in the US questionnaire it includes questions related to such adverse experiences as warfare. The questionnaire is titled the Adverse Childhood Experiences International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ). Adverse Childhood Experiences Study. The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study (ACE Study) is a research study conducted by the U.S. health maintenance organization Kaiser Permanente and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  that was originally published in the "American Journal of Preventive Medicine". Participants were recruited to the study between 1995 and 1997 and have since been in long-term follow up for health outcomes. The study has demonstrated an association of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) with health and social problems across the lifespan. The study has produced many scientific articles and conference and workshop presentations that examine ACEs. In the 1980s, the dropout rate of participants at Kaiser Permanente's obesity clinic in San Diego, California, was about 50%; despite all of the dropouts successfully losing weight under the program. Vincent  Felitti, head of Kaiser Permanente's Department of Preventive Medicine in San Diego, conducted interviews with people who had left the program, and discovered that a majority of 286 people he interviewed had experienced childhood sexual abuse. The interview findings suggested to Felitti that weight gain might be a coping mechanism for depression, anxiety, and fear. Felitti and Robert Anda from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) went on to survey childhood trauma experiences of over 17,000 Kaiser Permanente patient volunteers. The 17,337 participants were volunteers from approximately 26,000 consecutive Kaiser Permanente members. About half were female; 74.8 % were white; the average age was 57; 75.2% had attended college; all had jobs and good health care, because they were members of the Kaiser health maintenance organization. Participants were asked about different types of adverse childhood experiences that had been identified in earlier research literature: Findings. According to the United States' Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the ACE study found that: About two-thirds of individuals reported at least one adverse childhood experience; 87% of individuals who reported one ACE reported at least one additional ACE. The number of ACEs was strongly associated with adulthood high-risk  health behaviors such as smoking, alcohol and drug abuse, promiscuity, and severe obesity, and correlated with ill-health including depression, heart disease, cancer, chronic lung disease and shortened lifespan. The ACE study's results suggest that maltreatment and household dysfunction in childhood contribute to health problems decades later. These include chronic diseases—such as heart disease, cancer, stroke, and diabetes—that are the most common causes of death and disability in the United States. The study's findings, while relating to a specific population within the United States, might reasonably be assumed to reflect similar trends in other parts of  the world, according to the World Health Organization. Subsequent surveys. The ACE Study has produced more than 50 articles that look at the prevalence and consequences of ACEs. It has been influential in several areas. Subsequent studies have confirmed the high frequency of adverse childhood experiences, or found even higher incidences in urban or youth populations. The original study questions have been used to develop a 10-item screening questionnaire. Numerous subsequent surveys have confirmed that adverse childhood experiences are frequent. The CDC runs the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), an annual survey conducted by individual state health departments  in all 50 states. An expanded survey instrument in several states found each state to be similar. Some states have collected additional local data. Adverse childhood experiences were even more frequent in studies in urban Philadelphia and in a survey of young mothers (mostly younger than 19). Internationally, an Adverse Childhood Experiences International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ) is undergoing validation testing. Surveys of adverse childhood experiences have been conducted in Romania, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Macedonia, Norway, the Philippines, the United Kingdom, Canada, China and Jordan. Child Trends used data from the 2011/12 National Survey of Children's Health  (NSCH) to analyze ACEs prevalence in children nationally, and by state. The NSCH's list of "adverse family experiences" includes a measure of economic hardship and shows that this is the most common ACE reported nationally. Additional Information. Sandra Bloom and Brian Farragher's book "Destroying Sanctuary" states in its introduction that 17th century philosophers like Descartes took apart the person and "turned over the body to physicians and the mind to philosophers and clergy," and in the ACEs movement society is now trying to bring them back together. ACE Nashville has repurposed the acronym, ACE to stand for All  Children Excel and is trying to raise awareness about adverse childhood experiences in Nashville, Tennessee.