Revision as of 17:47, 22 April 2018 by 213.46.29.138 (Talk)
5059 bc spongegar and patar die 5068 bc squog dies
Retrieved from "http://en.spongepedia.org/index.php?title=SpongeBob_SquarePants_Timeline&oldid=168924" Are we evolving stupidity? | Just Fletcher
For sale Uranium Ore – Just too funny not to share	Judging People
Aug 28, 2014 @ 05:54:50
>>this could be because intelligent women tend to have less children than women who are not as clever
Maybe because smart women knows to obtain and handle contraceptives?
Aug 28, 2014 @ 08:43:46
I guess there you have a valid point
Aug 28, 2014 @ 06:14:36
Am not surprised either.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 08:44:18
Aug 28, 2014 @ 08:14:09
Interessante stelling, maar is IK nog die maatstaf om intelligensie te meet?
Aug 28, 2014 @ 08:46:20
O! ja want selfs die IK toetse het evolve, nie net n goeie maatstaf van inteliigensie nie maar ook van sielkundige afwykings.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 09:11:48
Die vraag is of ‘n beter maatstaf bestaan.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 09:25:23
Nee (nog) nie! As jy nou ‘n naald in die brein kon steek…..
Maar ons het darem ‘n hele reeks kultuurvrye toetse vir mense wat nie goed lees en skryf nie
I forgot that you would understand Afrikaans, clever man!
Aug 28, 2014 @ 09:28:13
Nederlands is my moedertaal, dus ek kan Afrikaans verstaan.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 09:42:54
ja natuurlik soos ek ‘n baie klein bietjie nederalnds kan verstaan – as jy stadig praat!
Ek weet die woord baie bestaan nie in Nederlands nie
Aug 28, 2014 @ 12:39:13
Die moderne mens is baie minder aangewese op eie kennis. Ons kan bv die TV aanskakel of die motor bestuur maar ons weet bitter min van die onderliggende tegnologie. Ons kan nie self ‘n motor bou of krag opwek nie. Pre-historiese mense het ‘n veel intiemer kennis van diere en plante gehad en moes meer op intelligensie en kennis staat maak om te oorleef.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 12:50:24
Dit is n faktor , maar dit verduidelik nie die huidige toenemende tekort van intellek nie. Die studie praat van Westerns have lost 14 IQ points on average since the Victorian age . In elk geval kan ons maar net rofweg raai wat die oermens se intelligensiepeil was.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 13:28:35
Pre-historiese seleksiedruk ten gunste van intelligensie was veel hoër as vandag – danksy moderne tegnologie kan dommer mense suksesvol oorleef. Daar is (gelukkig!) steeds slim mense – uit 7 biljoen sekerlik meer as ooit tevore in die mens se geskiedenis, maar die gemiddelde IK is nou laer omdat dommer mense steeds suksesvol voortplant.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 13:33:09
Absoluut. En die dommes word gedra deur die samelewing wat die slimmes met tegnologie en finanasiele hulp skep, Ek skat, ek het nie bewys hiervoor nie aar dis seker heel logies , dat die oermens totdat hy taal ontwikkel het se regterbrein baie sterker was as die linker?
Aug 28, 2014 @ 12:57:20
Ek het te veel spel en taalfoute op my tablet gemaak en het dus die antwoord oorgeskryf as jy wonder
Aug 28, 2014 @ 15:15:05
Dumber, I do believe. Maybe due to no exercise of intellect. The conclusion linking it to smarter women not breeding may be accurate, but so could any coinciding fact such as that the star ‘Whatever’ has been at its closest to Earth during the same period.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 16:18:48
Protection of the dumbest who are left to breed? I do remember that my history professor telling us, his naive and young students that WW1 decimated a lot of the intelligencia which did not mean much to me at age 17!
Aug 28, 2014 @ 16:21:11
Retrograde evolution could be the explanation!
Aug 28, 2014 @ 16:51:24
How can we have clever children if we have stupid parents?
Aug 28, 2014 @ 15:21:17
I am thick as two short planks when it comes to computers, but razor sharp wen it comes to spelingg.
And talking stupid…
Aug 28, 2014 @ 16:20:12
Oh come off it Ark you are very , very smart ha but maybe your kids are smarter?
Aug 28, 2014 @ 16:33:07
Haha for Sunelle I rest my case!
Aug 28, 2014 @ 16:56:22
Ek glo vas dat net soos die mens se IK kan verbeter … die mens se potensiaal is onbeperk maar min of geen mense bereik werkilik die volle potensiaal … omdat die samelewing eerder die die klem op die stupid deel van die mens wil plaas as op die potensiaal.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 17:13:04
Teoreties ja. Maar in die praktyk word ons beperk tot genetiese materiaal.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 17:34:41
Ek wonder tog of as mens ‘n tweeling sou neem en hulle in verskillende omstandighede laat groot word, hoe groot die invloed van die genetiese materiaal sal wees.
Dit was my lewenstaak om kinders te probeer leer dat ‘n toetspunt die heel laaste is wat jou potensiaal is … dat ‘n mens in werklikheid baie meer as 100% kan wees… dus geen plafon nie. Grinnik … nie almal het my geglo nie … veral omdat hulle met mekaar vergelyk
Aug 28, 2014 @ 20:23:06
Daar is al baie toetse op identiese tweelinge gedoen en die met meer bv stimulasie sal n hoër telling hê maar nie dramaties nie. Kinders behoort nooit te hoor wat hulle IK is nie, soos nooit nie, dis onprofessioneel om sulke syfers bekend te maak. Verder bestaan IK uit verskillende aspekte, party kinders gaan beter in sekere vakke vaar as ander bv. En eintlik moet ek hier byvoeg dat IK toetse deur professionele mense afgeneem en interpreteer behoort te word. Die massa toetse kan ‘n hoë fout element bevat.
Aug 29, 2014 @ 09:49:16
Ek stem Die laaste toetse wat ek laat aflê het, het tekeninge van antieke goed in gehad wat my effe laat giggel het. Daar is ook soveel invloede wat die telling kan beïnvloed dat dit hoogstens as hulpmiddel gebruik kan word.
Ek verkies ook enige tyd ‘n gawe mens bo ‘n slim een… Lekker naweek
Aug 29, 2014 @ 10:15:56
jy ook lekker naweek. So terloops baie IK toetse word afgeneem om te bepaal wat fout is met ‘n kind en nie noodwendig hoe slik hy is nie.
Aug 29, 2014 @ 10:22:40
Ek verstaan dit … dis ‘n goeie hulpmiddel onder gewone omstandighede maar baie mense heg daar te veel waarde aan want dit bepaal nie iemand se menswaardigheid nie Of sy volle potensiaal nie
Aug 28, 2014 @ 17:44:31
that’s interesting that reaction time has decreased, especially when you consider how quick people can type on smartphones and computers now, whether it be text or games. I would have thought it would have increased. Quite a lot to think about here.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 20:26:38
That is practice (makes perfect) 🙂 with a subject that is known to the subject.. When they refer to reaction time I assume they refer to psychological tests etc.
Kids are much better at games than adults 😀 but not smarter.
Aug 28, 2014 @ 21:01:09
This new form shorthand and lack of interest in improving oneself is disturbing. I noticed before I retired from teaching that many parents didn’t give their children the time of day when picking them up from school – iPhones/smart (or not so smart) phones in hand. It wouldn’t have surprised me if they took the wrong child by the hand while texting and ignoring. So sad.
Aug 29, 2014 @ 05:59:51
Yes that is true. It is all very brainless and superficial!
Aug 29, 2014 @ 08:02:05
This reminds me of a bumper sticker that said “ Why are there so many smart phones, and so many stupid people ? “ 🙂
Aug 29, 2014 @ 10:16:24
I like!!!! Many a true word spoken in jest
Aug 31, 2014 @ 08:34:15
I have a smartphone but it it`s usually only carried for it`s camera. 🙂 I still prefer the old qwerty keyboard type as it is difficult using a smartphone when traveling, especially on a bus in the UK although most have WiFi.
Aug 30, 2014 @ 07:09:47
Great post and very true indeed. I think it’s because most people are so quick to believe what they read and hear and never bother looking it up or to think for themselves.
Aug 30, 2014 @ 07:11:39
I believe thinking for oneself has become a scarce commodity 😉
Sep 02, 2014 @ 12:32:24
I can remember doing an IQ test online. The score wasn’t too bad. Then I learned how to do a few of the maths equations used (which I’ve never been all that good at). Then I redid the test. My score rose accordingly.
Could it be as simple as this? We, the general population, hardly use our brains for thinking things through. We, more often than not, go to our computers and calculators for assistance. Perhaps we are not more stupid; perhaps we are more lazy…!
Sep 02, 2014 @ 12:39:15
I don’t think these on_line I Q tests are reliable. But doing math is important and low scorers on tests are often anxious people. Once you feel more confident it will also reflect I n your score. I know we are just too lazy to think_ I see from myself when I play candy crunch (not often) I skip studying my next move….. 😦
Sep 02, 2014 @ 22:56:39
About the only online game I play is Solitaire… I remember playing it when a small child on my grandmother’s farm. As for Candy Crush – I googled it.! I’ll leave that for you, Mel. Looks like it could be frustrating.. 😉
Sep 28, 2014 @ 19:46:46
These things happen when we’re not required to use our brains.
Sep 28, 2014 @ 20:01:55
Very true. And that is one of the reasons why I am against giving young children an iPad. It stunts brain growth.
Sep 28, 2014 @ 20:06:59
I don’t mind them having access to a computer as long as they learn how to play chess on it………LOL