Arkansas Best Corp. v. Commissioner
Arkansas Best Corporation v. Commissioner, 485 U.S. 212 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court decision that helps taxpayers classify whether or not the sale of an asset is an ordinary or capital gain or loss for income tax purposes. Facts. Arkansas Best, a diversified holding company acquired a large percentage of the stock of the National Bank of Commerce in Dallas, Texas. When the real estate market in Dallas faltered, Arkansas Best sold a large portion of its stake in the Bank at a loss. Arkansas Best claimed a deduction for an ordinary loss  of nearly $10 million from the sale. The Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service disallowed the deduction, finding that it was a capital, not ordinary loss. Issue. Was the stock properly a capital asset as defined by I.R.C. § 1221? Should the Court read § 1221 broadly as it had in "Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner", 350 U.S. 46 (1955)? Holding. The Eighth Circuit reversed the Tax Court's determination that the loss was an ordinary loss since the Bank stock fell within the general definition of “capital asset” in I.R.C. § 1221 and did not fall within any of the  statutory exceptions in the section. A taxpayer's motivation in purchasing an asset is irrelevant to its classification. Notes. Section::::"Corn Products Refining Co. v. Commissioner", 350 U.S. 46 (1955). The Corn Products case involved discussion of whether income arising from the sale of corn futures by a company that refined corn into other forms and food products were entitled to capital gains treatment. The company bought corn futures to protect their future corn supply and pricing and would sell the futures if it had excess inventory corn for its processes. As the corn futures were essentially inventory, they were classified  as such property which would “properly be included in the inventory of the taxpayer … in the ordinary course of his trade or business.” I.R.C. § 1221(a)(1). IRC § 1221(a)(7). Since the time of "Corn Products", IRC §1221(a)(7) was added which specifically excludes from the definition of capital asset "any hedging transaction which is clearly identified as such before the close of the day on which it was acquired, originated, or entered into (or other such time as the Secretary may by regulations prescribe)." This is essentially a codification of the result in "Corn Products" and removes the necessity of classifying hedging transactions  as "inventory" under IRC § 1221(a)(1). Importance. This case signals that the Court will closely read the exclusions in I.R.C. § 1221 in classifying capital versus ordinary losses. By sticking with the explicit language of the section the Court clarifies this section for other courts and practitioners interpreting and implementing the Code.