Battle honours of the British and Imperial Armies
The following battle honours were awarded to units of the British Army and the armies of British India and the Dominions of the British Empire. From their institution until the end of the Second World War, awards were made by, or in consultation with, the British government, but, since 1945, the individual countries of the former British Empire have awarded battle honours to their forces independently. Origins. The first battle honour was the motto "Virtutis Namurcensis Præmium" (Reward for valour at Namur), ordered by King William III to be emblazoned on the  colour of the 18th Regiment of Foot, later the Royal Irish Regiment, for their part in the Siege of Namur in 1695. Many years later, in 1910, the honour "Namur 1695" was awarded to 14 regiments, including the Royal Irish. In 1768, the 15th Light Dragoons, later 15th The King's Hussars, were uniquely awarded the honour "Emsdorf" to be worn on their helmets in commemoration of their success at the Battle of Emsdorf in 1760. The first battle honour displayed on the colours in the modern manner was awarded in 1784 when four infantry regiments that took part in  the defence of Gibraltar of 1779–83 were ordered to display the word "Gibraltar" on a scroll on their Second (now Regimental) Colour. Later, a badge of the Castle and Key was added, with a scroll carrying the motto "Montis Insignia Calpe" below it, and the word "Gibraltar" was changed to "Gibraltar 1779–83". Although this award was made promptly after the event, this is not always the case: the oldest battle honours, "Tangier 1662–1680" and "Tangier 1680", were awarded in 1909, over 220 years after the temporary but tumultuous occupation of that port. Development and formalization. The procedure for awarding battle  honours was originally extremely arbitrary. For example, the victories of the Duke of Wellington in the Napoleonic Wars were copiously honoured, but those of the Duke of Marlborough in the War of Spanish Succession were entirely ignored. By the mid-19th Century, honours were being awarded for contemporary actions that were little more than skirmishes compared with the great European battles of the 18th Century. Much, too, depended on the persistence (or lack thereof) of successive individual colonels in badgering Horse Guards for honours for their regiments: to give but one example, the honour for Corunna was first awarded (to three  battalions) in 1811; between then and 1842, it was awarded to a further 27 regiments and battalions. A committee was therefore set up under Major-General Sir Archibald Alison in 1881 to determine the honours that should be awarded to the various regiments for past battles. Although the Alison Committee remedied the worst of the injustices when it reported in 1882 (by, "inter alia", awarding the honours "Blenheim", "Ramillies", "Oudenarde" and "Malplaquet"), another committee had to be set up in 1909 under the chairmanship of Lieutenant General Sir Spencer Ewart to continue the work. Until 1832, battle honours were awarded  to a specific unit and, if it was disbanded, the honour was lost. After this date, honours were awarded to the parent regiment of the battalion whose actions led to the award. During the Second Boer War, however, some honours were awarded to the Militia battalions of infantry regiments in their own right. Also, the honours "Mediterranean 1901–02" and "St Helena" were awarded to the Militia battalions of several regiments for garrison and prisoner-of-war camp duty. When the Militia was disbanded, these honours (and the earlier "Mediterranean", earned for similar service during the Crimean War) were allowed to  lapse. In 1917, in recognition of their sacrifice in the Great War, the battalions of the Territorial Force were permitted to carry the honours of their parent regular battalions on their badges, a practice that had previously been forbidden. Also in 1832, the motto "Ubique" (Everywhere) was awarded by King William IV to the Royal Artillery and the Royal Engineers in recognition of their universal service. It was stipulated that this was considered to be a battle honour, substituting for all other prior and future distinctions. As such, it did not initially appear on the badges or appointments of the  Territorial, Militia or Volunteer regiments of these Corps. Despite it being the sole battle honour of the Royal Artillery, a number of Artillery officers who served in the First China War were awarded the personal honour "China". This honour was displayed on their appointments and was not extended to other ranks or to the regiment as a whole. It was a unique award which was allowed to lapse in time, and the procedure was never repeated. King William IV was also responsible for a most peculiar guidon-shaped standard presented to the Royal Horse Guards on 13 August 1832, which , in addition to carrying the battle honours "Peninsula" and "Waterloo", bore the words "Dettingen, Minden, Warbourg" and "Cateau". None of these last four were battle honours to which the Royal Horse Guards were entitled at the time the standard was presented. The regiment was awarded "Dettingen" (with 1st and 2nd Life Guards) in 1882 and "Warburg" (so spelled) in 1909. "Cateau" was never awarded as such, but "Beaumont" was awarded for the same battle, again in 1909. No cavalry regiment was ever honoured for Minden because of the cavalry's conspicuous lack of activity in that battle. In 1834, the  guidons of the light cavalry (Light Dragoons, Lancers and Hussars) were withdrawn in order to improve the mobility of these regiments. Until they were restored (in a purely ceremonial role) by King George VI in 1952, these regiments displayed their honours on their officers' saddle cloths, their drums, drum banners and other appointments. In 1844, the display of honours and badges on the infantry's colours was standardized. Embellishments that had previously been borne on either, or both, of a battalion's colours were, after this, only permitted to appear on the Second Colour, which was renamed the "Regimental Colour . The First Colour was renamed the Royal Colour" and was to be free of decoration other than for the Royal Crown and the regimental number. The Foot Guards, however, continued to display their awards on all their colours (as they do, with some variation between the regiments, to this day). In addition, the 1857 Dress Regulations ordered that the blades of the Foot Guards officers' swords be embossed with the regiment's device and battle honours. The Boer War. The Second Boer War came as an unpleasant surprise to a British military establishment that had stagnated for decades under the  command of the hidebound and reactionary Duke of Cambridge. As Lord Kitchener observed, 'The Boers are not like the Sudanese who stood up to a fair fight. They are always running away on their little ponies', and the disasters of Black Week demonstrated that the Regular army was numerically, technologically and tactically ill-prepared to face a militarily competent and well-equipped adversary. Among the responses of the British government to these setbacks were the formation of the Imperial Yeomanry and the embodiment of the Militia and Volunteer battalions of the infantry regiments for overseas service. Many more corps, therefore , became eligible for campaign honours than had been the case in any previous war: including the Regular Army, Yeomanry, Militia and Volunteers, a total of 196 British regiments were awarded "South Africa" with appropriate year dates between 1899 and 1902. The award was also made to a further 22 Canadian, 37 Australian, 23 New Zealand and 12 South African regiments. As pointed out above, the awards made to the Militia battalions lapsed when the Militia was disbanded. It was at this time that the rule was instituted that, for a cavalry regiment or infantry battalion to be eligible for an  award, the Headquarters and fifty per cent or more of its strength must have been present. Exception was made for the Yeomanry regiments, which had contributed company-sized contingents to the Imperial Yeomanry, but not their individual regimental headquarters. These regiments were considered to be eligible if parties of 20 or more had been present. These principles (presence of a unit's headquarters and fifty per cent or more of its strength) were continued by General Ewart's and subsequent Battle Honours committees, but, again, numerous exceptions were made. The World Wars. The sheer scale of the Great War led  to a previously unheard of number of honours being awarded and it was simply impractical to emblazon every one of them on the Regimental Colour. It was at first ordered, in September 1922, that regiments should select up to 10 honours to be emblazoned on their Regimental Colours along with previous awards, up to a total of 24. This led to a storm of protest, since many regiments would have had to remove previous honours. The order was, therefore, amended the following December to allow each infantry regiment to select up to 10 honours to be emblazoned on its King 's Colour, honours from other conflicts continuing to be displayed on the Regimental Colour. After the Second World War, a further 10 honours from that conflict were added to the King's Colour. Owing to amalgamations, more than the total of 20 First and Second World War awards may be found on the Queen's Colour of modern regiments. Cavalry regiments emblazoned honours from the World Wars on the reverse side of their standards and guidons. Battle honours of the Great War were almost invariably only awarded for engagements specifically named by the Battles Nomenclature Committee. A particularly poignant exception  to this rule is that of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment which applied for the honour "Beaumont Hamel" in memory of the first day of the Battle of the Somme, when the regiment was virtually wiped out. The award was declined by the Battle Honours Committee because there was no official battle of that name. After considerable correspondence between the Colonial Office and the government of Newfoundland, a compromise was reached whereby the regiment would be awarded the honour "Albert (Beaumont Hamel) 1916", but only with the personal approval of the King. Needless to say, the King approved the award without  hesitation. The procedures after the Second World War were similar to those following the First. The re-formed Battles Nomenclature Committee made every effort to avoid using names that had been used by the Great War committee but, if this was not practicable, the awards were differenced by year date (e.g. "Baghdad", "Baghdad 1941"). If two separate engagements took place at the same location in the same year, they were differenced by Roman numerals (e.g. "Cassino I", "Cassino II"). In several instances, the Battles Nomenclature Committee felt it was desirable to indicate the aim or nature of the operation, particularly  when two separate operations took place at the same location (e.g. "Capture of Tobruk", "Defence of Tobruk"). Territorial Army honorary distinctions of the Second World War. During the Second World War, a number of Territorial Army infantry battalions and Yeomanry regiments were temporarily re-roled to other arms (particularly artillery, signals and reconnaissance) for the duration of the conflict and resumed their normal function at its end. It was decided that such units were not eligible for battle honours "per se", but could apply for "Honorary Distinctions" commemorating service in actions and theatres that would, had they taken part in  their normal roles, have entitled them to battle honours. (Units whose conversion to the new arm was permanent were awarded battle honours appropriate to their new arm.) In the case of infantry battalions, these distinctions were awarded solely to the battalion concerned and were not borne by the other battalions of the regiment, and, unlike actual battle honours from the World Wars, were carried on the Regimental Colour. It appears that this decision was poorly received by the units concerned, particularly the Yeomanry, and relatively few applications were made. Badges. The majority of battle honours are displayed simply as the  name of the award inscribed on a decorative scroll. A number of honours, particularly those which were considered to be of particular significance, were awarded with a badge that in some way represented the engagement or theatre. Early examples were the castle and key for "Gibraltar", mentioned above, and the sphinx for "Egypt". Tiger and elephant badges were frequently awarded for engagements on the Indian sub-continent. Different badges might be awarded to different units for the same battle or campaign: the award "Hindoostan", for example, was awarded without a badge to some regiments, with a tiger to others, and  with an elephant to yet others.