Chappell &amp; Co Ltd v Nestle Co LtdChappell &amp; Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd  UKHL 1 is an important English contract law case, where the House of Lords confirmed the traditional doctrine that consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate. Facts. Chappell & Co. owned the copyright to "Rockin’ Shoes" (by The King Brothers). Nestle was giving away records of it to people who sent in three wrappers from 6d chocolate bars, as well as 1s 6d. The Copyright Act 1956 s 8 said a 6.25% royalty needed to be paid on the ‘ordinary retail selling price’ to  the owners of copyrights. Nestle said 1s 6d was the ordinary retail selling price, but Chappell & Co argued that it should be more and sought an injunction for breach of CA 1956 s 8. In this way the question arose as to whether the wrappers constituted partial consideration for the records. Mr Justice Upjohn granted an injunction, the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Jenkins and Ormerod; Lord Justice Romer dissenting) reversed his decision, and Chappell & Co appealed. Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd Chappell & Co Ltd v Nestle Co Ltd  UKHL 1 is an important English contract law