An = Anum
An = Anum, also known as the Great God List, is the longest preserved Mesopotamian god list, a type of lexical list cataloging the deities worshiped in the Ancient Near East, chiefly in modern Iraq. While god lists are already known from the Early Dynastic period, "An = Anum" has most likely only been composed in the Kassite period. While often mistakenly described as a list of Sumerian deities and their Akkadian equivalents, "An = Anum" is focused on presenting the familial relationships between deities, as well as their courts and spheres of influence. The first four  tablets list the major gods and goddesses (Anu, Enlil, Ninhursag, Enki, Sin, Shamash, Adad and Ishtar) and their courts, arranged according to theological principles, but tablets V and VI do not appear to follow a clear system, and tablet VII is a late appendix listing the names of Marduk and one of his courtiers. Many other works of ancient scholarship were influenced by "An = Anum", including a similar list of temples and various theological commentaries. It has also been proposed that it was the basis for the remodeling of the pantheon of Uruk in the Seleucid period. History of  god lists in ancient Mesopotamia. The oldest known god lists come from the Early Dynastic period, and like other cuneiform lexical lists were presumably copied by scribes as exercises. The first known document of this type is usually called the Fara god list, though it is also known from copies from Abu Salabikh and Uruk. 466 names can be read from the surviving fragments, though it is estimated that it originally contained 560. While it begins with the head of the pantheon, Enlil (or, in some of the copies, Anu and Enlil), the gods are otherwise arranged based on lexical , rather than theological criteria, for example deities whose names start with the sign NIN are grouped together. Due to many of the names from it being otherwise unknown, little can be said about its contents otherwise. No god lists are known from between the end of the Early Dynastic period and the late third or early second millennium BCE, when the so-called "Weidner list" has been compiled, though it is assumed that they were still being created through the second half of the third millennium BCE and examples simply have yet to be discovered. The arrangement of deities in  the Weidner list does not appear to follow any specific principles, and it has been proposed that it was the result of compiling various shorter lists together. Copies are known from many locations in historical Babylonia and Assyria, as well as from Emar, Ugarit and Amarna. The list was still in circulation in the late first millennium BCE. Some versions contain additional columns with explanations of the names. A copy from Ugarit adds columns listing Ugaritic and Hurrian deities. In the Old Babylonian period, god lists were often the product of strictly local scribal traditions, and distinct ones are known  from Nippur, Isin, Uruk, Susa, Mari and perhaps Ur. Each of these lists most likely documented only the hierarchy of deities recognized in the respective localities. Fragments of many further god lists are known, chiefly from Assyrian copies, but their origin and scope are not fully understood. Some of them focus on geographical distribution on deities, and mention many foreign gods as a result. While it was common to arrange the names of gods in lists, no analogous scholarly practice is attested for demons, and the incantation series "Utukku Lemnutu" outright states demons were not counted in the "census of  Heaven and Earth," indicating the reasons behind this might have been theological. Section::::"An = Anum" and its forerunners. It is usually assumed that "An = Anum" has been composed in the Kassite period, though a text regarded as its forerunner has been dated to the Old Babylonian period. The most probable date of composition is assumed to be the period between 1300 and 1100 BCE. The name of the list used in modern literature is based on its first line, explaining that the Sumerian name An corresponds to Akkadian Anum. Wilfred G. Lambert proposed that it originated in the city  of Babylon. However, according to Jeremiah Peterson, documents from Old Babylonian Nippur indicate that both the "An = Anum" forerunner and other texts showing the beginning of the development of new lists fleshing out the relations between deities were also present among the theologians of that city. While the forerunner, sometimes called the "Genouillac god list" after its original publisher, Henri de Genouillac, has only 473 entries, over 2000 names are listed in "An = Anum" (2123 in the most complete known copy). However, this should not be understood as analogous to the presence of 2000 individual deities, as many  of the names are instead epithets or alternate names. It is nonetheless the most extensive known god list. YBC 2401, the most complete known example, was copied by the Assyrian scribe Kidin-Sin during the reign of Tiglath-Pileser I according to its colophon. This indicates that while Babylonian in origin, "An = Anum" already reached Assyria by the final decades of the second millennium BCE. Kidin-Sin wrote that he relied on "old tablets" containing the list. "An = Anum" continued to be copied in the first millennium BCE. For example, both the list itself and various references to  it are known from an archive from Seleucid Uruk. Some of the known copies slightly differ from each other. Modern research and publication. While fragments of "An = Anum" had already been published in the first half of the twentieth century, a transcription of the most complete known copy, presently in the collection of the Yale University, has only been compiled by Richard L. Litke in 1958, and remained unpublished for a long time. In 1976 permission to use Litke's translation was granted to Dietz-Otto Edzard, who was the editor of "Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie" at  the time. Many entries in subsequently compiled volumes of this encyclopedia rely on it. Litke's reconstruction was later published as a book in 1998 in the series "Texts from Yale Babylonian Collection". While a second edition of "An = Anum" was being prepared by Wilfred G. Lambert for a time, according to William W. Hallo only three first tablets were finished by 1998. Subsequently Lambert also compiled his edition of tablet V. His version remained unpublished as of 2017. Early restorations sometimes confused fragments of "An = Anum" and "An = Anu ša amēli", but the latter list is  now considered to be a distinct work of Mesopotamian scholarship and differs from "An = Anum" due to having three columns, with the third providing an explanation of the first two. Contents. "An = Anum" is commonly understood as a list documenting Akkadian equivalents of Sumerian gods in a manner similar to the process of interpretatio graeca, but according to Richard L. Litke this view is mistaken. The primary goal of the compilers of "An = Anum" was to clarify the familial relationships between deities, briefly describe their functions and characterize each god's household, rather than to provide Sumerian  deities with Akkadian equivalents. The commentary, when present, is in Sumerian, rather than Akkadian, which is different from most lexical lists. The gods do not appear to be separated into strictly Sumerian and Akkadian columns. Furthermore, some gods are listed with no equivalents at all, for example Zababa, who was a well established deity. Some deities listed are not Sumerian or Akkadian, but Elamite, "Subarian" (Hurrian), or Gutian. The list documents many associations between deities and aspects of their character which are otherwise unknown. Explanations frequently use the sign MIN in a role analogous to the modern ditto mark. The  entry of each deity is followed by their epithets and alternate names, the name of their spouse, children, and finally servants, if any were known. In some cases the chief attendant deity, so-called sukkal, is listed before the children. Seemingly only the best established deities had a sukkal. The number and precise designation of various divine servants varies, and there seemingly was no standard composition of a divine court, though some titles, such as "doorkeeper" (NI.GAB) or "counselor" (gu.DÚB), recur more often than others. "An = Anum" consists of seven tablets. The initial four tablets list the deities  in order of seniority, alongside their courts, but the rest of the list does not appear to follow similar principles. It is possible that it was a result of adding groups of deities from originally distinct texts to "An = Anum" without rearranging them. Jeremiah Peterson remarks that the reliance on theological factors is nonetheless more evident in "An = Anum" than in any other known god list. Some of the known copies preserve all the material on a single tablet, with a brief summary marked by pairs of horizontal lines indicating the end of each originally separate section. Copies  of long works such as god lists or literary composition inscribed on a single tablet are known as "dubgallu" or "tupkallu", or as "monster tablets." YBC 2401 is one such example, and measures 30,5 x 39,5 centimeters (roughly 12 x 15 inches), which makes it one of the biggest clay tablets known. Tablet I. Tablet I starts with Anu, Antu and their ancestors. It includes their various servants as well. A sub-section is dedicated to Papsukkal and his circle, including his wife Amasagnudi. The Enlil section follows the Anu one. It begins with his ancestors, the so-called Enki -Ninki deities, and includes his wife Ninlil, primordial deities Lugaldukuga (explained as Enlil's father) and Enmesharra, as well as various courtiers, among them the goddess of writing, Nisaba, and her husband Haia, Enlil's sukkal Nuska and his wife Sadarnunna, the scribe goddess Ninimma, and the beer goddess Ninkasi. A separate sub-section is dedicated to Ninurta, his wife Nin-Nibru, and his own courtiers. The Syrian god Dagan also appears in the Enlil section. It is additionally possible that a deity whose name is not preserved, identified as "Enlil of Subartu," might be Hurrian Kumarbi. Tablet II. Ninhursag  (Digirmah, Belet-ili) occupies the beginning of tablet II. Deities listed in her section include her husband Shulpa'e, her sons Panigingarra and Ashgi, the couple Lisin and Ninsikila, and various courtiers. The same tablet also covers Enki (Ea), accompanied by his wife Damkina. A sub-section is dedicated to Marduk and includes his wife Sarpanit. Nabu appears in it as Marduk's sukkal alongside his wife Tashmetum, but he is not yet identified as his son. Other deities present on tablet II include courtiers of Enki, the river god Id, the fire god Gibil, and various minor deities associated  with craftsmen and other professions. Tablet III. Tablet III describes the moon god Sin (unusually not identified directly as a son of Enlil), the sun god Shamash (Utu) and the weather god Adad (Ishkur). The circle of Sin includes his wife Ningal and various deities associated with cattle herding. Nanshe and deities associated with her, including her husband Nindara, who precedes her, separate his section from that of Shamash. While "An = Anum" appears to equate Nindara with Sin, there is no evidence for close association between Nanshe and the moon god otherwise. The circle of the sun god includes  his wife Aya, as well as two distinct groups of courtiers, deities of justice and deities of dreams. The cattle god Sakkan is included in this section too. While Sin and Shamash occur in the proximity of each other because they were viewed as father and son, Adad is most likely included on this tablet because of the well established connection between him and Shamash. The section dedicated to him includes his wife Shala, their children (such as Usuramassu), as well as another weather god, Wer, though other foreign weather gods are absent, in contrast with a later god list , K 2100, whose Adad section contains "Subarian" (Hurrian) Teshub and Kassite Buriyash. The tablet ends with a group of various gods mostly associated with Adad or Shamash, such as Shullat and Hanish, though with some exceptions which were instead linked with Ea, Nisaba or Ishtar. It has been proposed that what unified these deities was their possible Syrian origin, but this view is not universally accepted. Tablet IV. Tablet IV documents the circle of Ishtar (Inanna). Due to its contents, it has been nicknamed "the Ištar tablet" by Richard L. Litke. It is less well preserved than other tablets, and  full restoration is presently impossible. Among the deities listed are Ninegal and various astral deities, such as Ninsianna and Kabta. It also most likely originally included Dumuzi and Nanaya sub-sections, which are not preserved. It ends with short sections dedicated to Ishara (who also appears in the Enlil section and in the end of tablet III) and Manzat, which do survive. Tablet V. Tablet V starts with the deified hero Lugalbanda and his wife Ninsun, but it also contains sections dedicated to Lugal-Marada, the tutelary god of Marad, the mongoose deity Ninkilim, the agricultural god Urash (his court  includes Lagamal, in other lists present among underworld deities), the war god Zababa (whose section also includes Nergal's sukkal Ugur, explicitly identified as such), and a number of names which seem to be grouped together only because they belong to gods originating in Lagash, among them Ningirsu. This god was usually syncretised with Ninurta and as such regarded as a son of Enlil, but in this case appears on a different tablet. Other deities of Lagash listed there include Bau and Gatumdag. Juxtaposition of various deities originating in this area is not exclusive to "An = Anum", as attested  in a small fragment of an otherwise unknown god list found in Nippur. The next sub-section is centered on medicine goddesses (Ninisina, Ninkarrak, Nintinugga, Gula) and their families (including Pabilsag, Damu and Gunura). They are in turn followed by sections dedicated to the prison goddess Manungal, the underworld goddess Ereshkigal, a group of gods associated with snakes and the underworld (Ninazu, Ningishzida, Tishpak, Inshushinak and Ishtaran), the pair Lugal-irra and Meslamta-ea, who were also underworld deities, but have no apparent connection with the preceding gods, and a number of minor figures of similar character, such as Lugal -a'abba ("lord of the sea"). Tablet VI. Tablet VI starts with Nergal, his titles, family and court (including Las, Mammitum and Ishum), continues with various figures explained as "ilu lemnu" ("evil god"), such as Kingaludda, the weaver goddess Uttu, a group of deities possibly originating in Dilmun, the Sebitti and other groups of seven (as well as the closely connected Elamite goddess Narundi), Amurru, the divine representation of Amorite nomads, and his wife Ashratum, the deified hero Gilgamesh and his companion Enkidu, a number of names belonging to deities of uncertain identity, assumed to be of very minor importance, and  a list of collective terms for deities. Tablet VII. Tablet VII lists various names of Marduk and of his throne bearer Mandanu, and is assumed to be a late addition. According to Wilfred G. Lambert, it should be considered an appendix loosely connected with the rest of the composition, similar to the case of the final tablet of the standard edition of "Epic of Gilgamesh". Influence in antiquity. "An = Anum" was itself most likely used as a model for other similar scholarly compositions, for example the so-called "Canonical Temple List," which documents temple names rather than god names , though the deities venerated in them are arranged according to similar theological principles. In some cases, the order of deities in "An = Anum" has been used to support proposed restoration of passages in the Canonical Temple List, for example Andrew R. George notes that the order in which temples of Enlil's courtiers are listed in the latter matches the order of these deities in the former, making it plausible that three missing lines referred to Ninkasi, Ninmada and Ugelamma. Paul-Alain Beaulieu proposed in 1992 that the changes in the religion of Seleucid Uruk were inspired by adherence  to "An = Anum". The entire pantheon of the city was restructured, with Ishtar, Nanaya and their court, encompassing deities such as Usuramassu, surpassed in prominence by Anu and Antu. While Anu was not completely absent from Uruk at any point in time between the third and first millennium BCE, his position was that of a "figurehead" and "otiose deity," in contrast with "An = Anum", where he is the foremost god. Beaulieu considers the position of Marduk to be the main difference between "An = Anum" the Seleucid pantheon of Uruk, as the position of this god was much  lower in the latter case, possibly due to theological conflict between Uruk and Babylon. Today it is agreed that both the elevation of Anu and Antu and the introduction of many new deities, such as Amasagnudi, relied on the study of this god list conducted by priests.