North Kanto Serial Young Girl Kidnapping and Murder Case
The is a serial kidnapping and murder case that has been going on since 1979 in Japan's Tochigi and Gunma prefectures. The Ashikaga murder case is included in this. Background. Since 1979, there have been five cases of kidnapping and/or murder of young girls between ages four and eight (four kidnappings and murders, one kidnapping where the kidnapped girl was never found) occurring within a radius, near the border between Tochigi and Gunma prefectures. All of these cases took place in Ota City of Gunma prefecture or Ashikaga city of  Tochigi prefecture. Discovery of the case. In 2007, investigative journalist Kiyoshi Shimizu began investigations into the similarities between the five cases, and came across how the Ashikaga murder case had already been solved, with the supposed culprit Toshikazu Sugaya having admitted, (but not been charged with) two other murders. Shimizu's reporting on the subject led to the discovery that Sugaya was innocent, and the National Police Agency and Prosecutor's Office later acknowledged their wrongdoing and the nature of the five cases as a single serial case, and this was further affirmed by minister Kansei Nakano in a Diet  session. The statute of limitations is commonly brought up as all, but the last of the 5 cases has had it pass. This was addressed in a diet meeting in 2011 in which then-prime minister Naoto Kan urged the police to catch the true culprit. The parents of the five girls have also urged the police to continue investigating, as has Sugaya. Despite acknowledging the serial nature of the cases, however, the police have not made any arrests in connection with them, and informed the mother of Mami Matsuda, the victim of the Ashikaga case, that they were no  longer investigating her daughter's case due to the statute of limitations. Miscarriage of justice in the Ashikaga case. While investigating the Ashikaga murder case, Shimizu discovered, among other things, Sugaya also professes that his confession had been beaten out of him by detective Fumio Hashimoto, who had been in charge of the case. Sugaya had previously been denied new DNA tests and a retrial despite DNA evidence presented by his lawyers and the support of the Japan Federation of Bar Associations. Shimizu reported widely on his findings, resulting in a DNA test and Sugaya's release from prison in  2009, and a retrial in 2010 which found him innocent. Shimizu won the Editors' Choice Magazine Journalism Award for exposing this miscarriage of justice. Murders and kidnappings included in the case. The following are used as reasoning behind the definition of this as a serial case: All five crimes have not been resolved, with the culprit not arrested. The case has been given extensive media coverage, and has been brought up in the Japanese Diet multiple times, and was also addressed by then-prime minister Naoto Kan, who appealed to the police to solve the case. Security camera footage of  the culprit exists from the 1996 kidnapping case, and eyewitnesses from the Ashikaga case have stated that he strongly resembles the man they saw. In 2010 and 2011, Shimizu reported strong evidence that the perpetrator had been found, including DNA test results connecting him to the Ashikaga case (a 100% match to the results of new tests of the perpetrator's DNA) and video recordings of him talking to young girls and making them sit on his lap, and gave this information to the police, but no arrest was made. The reasoning given for the refusal to arrest the alleged  perpetrator was that his DNA does not match that of the culprit previously found in the Ashikaga case. Shimizu professes that the DNA testing methods used in the Ashikaga case were flawed, and that arresting the perpetrator would require the prosecutor's office to acknowledge this. However, the same testing methods were also used in the Iizuka case, in which the alleged culprit was executed in 2008 despite requests for new DNA tests and a retrial, and acknowledging that the testing methods were flawed would lead to a massive scandal around that case. Shimizu's investigations into the Iizuka case  found the possibility that a large amount of the evidence was doctored, and he concludes that it was the amount, and not quality of the evidence which led to the conviction, and that overturning even one piece of evidence would have caused the prosecutor's case to fall apart. Additionally, when the mother of Mami Matsuda was informed by the police that they were no longer investigating her daughter's case due to the statute of limitations, she requested that they return her daughter's belongings, but they refused to return the shirt which has the true culprit's semen  stains on it. They refused to give a straight answer as to why, and Shimizu suspects that this is because they are afraid that others might have the DNA of the true culprit tested by modern means, proving that the methods previously used returned wrong results.