FLOW (programming language)
FLOW is an educational programming language designed by Jef Raskin and Jonathan (Jon) Collins, an undergraduate student in the UCSD Art Department, in 1970 and implemented on several minicomputers in the early 1970s. The goal of the language is to make it easy to explore algorithms through a highly interactive environment. The overall language is very similar in syntax and structure to the BASIC programming language, but has a number of changes in order to make typing code easier. Most notable among these was the concept of "typing amplification", in which short strings, often a single character , were expanded by the language into the complete "unamplified" source code. Modern integrated development environments and code-oriented text editors often include a similar feature, now normally referred to as autocomplete. The beginning programmer would first create a flow chart to solve the problem. Since the all of problems involved words (rather than mathematical problems) the solution was intuitive. The flow chart would be translated into the flow programming language using a top-down, mechanical method. History. In 1970, the English Department of the University of Kansas hosted a meeting on the use of computers in the humanities. The conference  was followed by a training session that ran from June 13 to August 18, where Jef Raskin was one of several teachers involved in training other teachers basic computer skills. During this period, Raskin developed the FLOW language concept. A key design element of FLOW was the attempt to avoid syntax errors by automating the entry of the language as much as possible. For instance, if one wanted to enter the statement , the user simply had to type and the interactive editor would expand it out as they typed. If the user entered an illegal command, it would flash on  the terminal and then be automatically erased so the user was "none the worse for hitting a wrong key". They referred to this concept as "typing amplification", and noted that it had the added advantage of removing an impediment for slow typers or those with physical problems using a terminal. Lewis and Norman later referred to this concept as "gag", in that it gagged the user's input until they typed something useful. They illustrated this by recounting one of Raskin's favorite demonstrations of FLOW, where he would close his eyes and hit random keys on the terminal, building  a syntactically correct, albeit meaningless, program. Another aspect of the FLOW system's approach to user interaction was its debugger. This included the command , an analog to BASIC's that delayed after executing each statement in a fashion similar to modern single-step systems. On his return to University of California, San Diego (UCSD), Raskin was able to arrange funding from UCSD and matching funds from the National Science Foundation to purchase equipment to develop the FLOW system, a total of $76,000 (). The initial system consisted of three Data General Nova minicomputers with 12k words of memory, several VST  1200 terminals, a Tektronix 4002 graphics terminal, and an HP 7200 plotter. In September 1973 the CPUs were updated to 32k words of memory. The first version of FLOW was programmed by Jonathan "Jon" Collins in FORTRAN for use at the summer institute. To facilitate a quick implementation (1 week), Jonathan restricted input to the first character of the command with the computer supplying the balance of the command letters. Hence, typing amplification was invented. Flow was later ported by two UCSD graduate students to Nova assembler language. Later ports included MICRO 800 assembler, BASIC and Algol. Description. Overall organization . Like BASIC, FLOW uses line numbers both as an editing aid as well as statement labels. Unlike most BASICs, FLOW automatically numbers programs starting at line 10 and incrementing by 10 as new lines are entered. The line numbers are formatted as three digits, so line 10 is displayed as 010. Users can also enter line numbers manually, and renumber the entire program with the command. In contrast to BASIC, the command can be instructed to stop once a given line was reached, for instance, . To enter this command, the user simply types , with the rest being "amplified" into the  command line. Syntax and capabilities. The most obvious difference between FLOW and BASIC was that FLOW has only one variable ( IT) and lacks mathematical operators. The language has only seven statements, all of which apply basic logic or string manipulation. There is no equivalent of the for loop either, looping is handled entirely through tests and statements. The language does not have direct user interaction like BASIC's , data is instead defined in FLOW's analog of BASIC's statement, . defines a quote-delimited string, like , which is then read character-at-a-time using the . is a meta-variable  that contains the last read character, and can then be used in other statements, like . becomes a blank -not an empty string but a single space- when the is completely read. Programs can contain multiple statements, but unlike BASIC's where all of the lines are considered to be one continuous block of data, only one statement is active at a time as they are encountered by the interpreter. In other words, if there are two statements in a program, they are not treated as one longer statement as is the case with , will return a blank when it runs  off the end of the active statement and will not return more data until the next statement is encountered in the code. Statements. From: Example. 010 COMMENT FIND IF A WORD HAS EITHER AN "F" OR A "G" IN IT