Opposition to Christianity in Chazalic literature
Opposition to Christianity in Chazalic literature consists of direct questioning and at times invalidating of Christianity as found in Chazalic literature. Of the notable reasons of Chazalic opposition to Christianity is that Christianity is founded on the belief of the Trinity, whereas Judaism now follows the belief of unitarian monotheism. Another source of opposition is the belief that the Torah, as given by Moshe Rabbeinu (exclusive of the New Testament), along with its interpretation by Chazal, is the supreme and exclusive indicator of Yahweh's instruction to Jews and mankind. Mishnaic sources. Tosefta. References  to Christianity are rarely found in Tosefta. A brief mention—albeit allegorically—is found in regards to a Jew who incises his skin on the Shabbat with the intent to engrave a tattoo. the Tanna Rabbi Eliezer is quoted as liableizing (for transgression of Shabbat) the offender for performing one of the activities prohibited on Shabbat, as this is a solid form of penmantry work. As proof, Rabbi Eliezer cites that the "Ben Sitda" stole his knowledge of sorcery from Egypt using this type penmantry -hence proving its potency as a viable form of writing. Chazal did not accept Rabbi  Eliezer's proof, with the counterclaim of "due to one shoteh (fool) we should make liable all the normal folk?" Following the debated assumption that ben sitida is indeed a reference to Yeshu, it is inferable from this mentioning that Yeshu -as founder of Christianity- used sorcery as a method of achieving supernatural events -a method discounted by Chazal as illegitimate. Midrashic sources. Midrashic literature contains a number of references to Christianity. Of note is the Midrash's insistence that the rise of Christianity—as well as its illegitimacy as being servicial to Yaweh—was foretold to all nations of  mankind by Bilaam the sorcerer: Midrash HaGadol. As the featured Midrashic text of Yemenite Jewry, the Midrash ha-Gadol—in relation to Yeshu—cites the ideal state of Judaism as that where no students or members of the religion "step out" and publicly profess the Rabbinic interpretation of the Torah as invalid. The Zohar. Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai—as the chief contributor to the Zohar and its associated works—is recorded as exclaiming dissatisfaction to those that forgo the Torah in favor of its antitheses: Talmudic sources. The Talmud—relative to other Rabbinic sources—takes a unique approach to Christianity  in the sense that in differentiates between Yeshu himself—who is portrayed as a complete Jew wanting to remain under his Rabbi's tutelage—and the religion he ultimately established -which the Talmud frowns upon. In "Sanhedrin 107b" and "Sotah 47a" Yeshu is mentioned as a student of Yehoshua ben Perachya who was sent away for misinterpreting a word that in context should have been understood as referring to the Inn, he instead understood it to mean the innkeeper's wife. His teacher said "Here is a nice Inn", to which he replied "Her eyes are crooked", to which his  teacher responded "Is this what your are occupied in?" After several returns for forgiveness he mistook Perachiah's signal to wait a moment as a signal of final rejection, and so he turned to idolatry; Rabbinic commentators to the Tanach. Among Rabbinic commentarians to Tanach, the Even Ezra and Radak