Sabinet | 'n Nuwe benadering tot grondhervorming as 'n ontwikkelingsfaktor in die Suid-Afrikaanse politieke landskap : navorsings- en oorsigartikel : grondberaad
n Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe - 'n Nuwe benadering tot grondhervorming as 'n ontwikkelingsfaktor in die Suid-Afrikaanse politieke landskap : navorsings- en oorsigartikel : grondberaad
Author Herman Van der Elst1
Source : Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, Volume 52, Issue 4, Dec 2012, p. 566 - 580
Keyword(s) : Armoedeverligting en voorheen benadeelde individue en gemeenskappe, Constitution, Development, Grondhervorming, Grondwet, Land reform, Legislative and executive processes, New approach, Nuwe benadering, Onderontwikkeling, Ontwikkeling, Poverty reduction and previously disadvantaged individuals and communities, Sustainability, Underdevelopment, Verdeling, Volhoubaarheid and Wetgewende en uitvoerende prosesse
In die African National Congress (ANC) se 1994 verkiesingsmanifes (die Heropbou en Ontwikkelingsprogram - HOP) is onderneem dat grondhervorming 'n prioriteit in die postapartheidsbedeling sou wees. 'n Klem sou geplaas word op die verdeling van grond aan individue en gemeenskappe wat ingevolge apartheidswetgewing grond verloor het, of die geleentheid ontsê is om grondeienaars te wees. Die doelwit was dat grondhervorming die wanbalanse in grondeienaarskap, verblyfreg, en vlakke van onderontwikkeling in Suid-Afrika, moes regstel.
In 2012 is die realiteit egter dat grondhervorming slegs gedeeltelik suksesvol was. Altesame 87 persent van alle bewerkbare grond word nog besit deur kommersiële boere en grondherverdeling geskied traag en voldoen nie aan die vereistes vir volhoubare onwikkeling en armoedeverligting nie. Tydens die ANC se beleidskonferensie van Junie 2012 is daar derhalwe besluit dat die funksionele prosesse van grondhervorming drasties gewysig moet word - 'n sogenaamde nuwe benadering moet gevolg word. Dit kan met sekerheid aanvaar word dat baie aspekte van die grondhervormingsproses ná die ANC se leierskapskongres in Desember 2012, hersien, gewysig en versnel sal word. Met dié aanname as uitgangspunt word in hierdie artikel beoog om die verloop, omvang en vordering van grondhervorming krities te analiseer deur op die volgende sake te fokus:
Die rasionaal agter grondhervorming;
Die grondhervorming se beleidsdoelstellings;
Die grondhervorming se implementeringsprosedures; en
'n Perspektief op die suksesse en tekortkominge van grondhervorming sedert 1994.
Daar sal gepoog word om die leemtes in die proses aan te toon en 'n vooruitskouing te maak rakende spesifieke beleids- en implementeringsaspekte wat waarskynlik na 2012, as deel van die nuwe benadering, sal verander.
A new approach to land reform as a developmental factor in the South African political landscape
In its 1994 election manifesto (the Reconstruction and Development Programme - RDP) the African National Congress (ANC), undertook, if elected, to ensure that pro-active land reform takes place in post-apartheid South Africa. The RDP elaborated on the legacy of apartheid as a key cause of the current skewed pattern of land ownership in South Africa as well as the importance of ownership of land for the African people. For this reason the manifesto emphasised that land reform must be one of the key transformation priorities for the new Government in order to rectify the wrongs of the past. In terms of post-apartheid land reform arrangements there would be a specific focus on the following aspects:
Returning land to those that lost their property as a result of apartheid legislation since 1913;
Redistributing land to those that were denied the opportunity to become land owners or right of residence.
Against the background of these objectives the post-apartheid land reform aim of the RDP was to ensure the enforcement of justice, poverty relief to the poorest of the poor and the creation of a situation of sustainable development.
In 2012 the reality is, however, that land reform has only partially been effective. Eighty seven per cent of all arable land is still owned by white commercial farmers, redistribution is slow and sustainable development is not taking place. The majority of the South African population, in specifically the rural areas, are still exposed to extreme poverty and continued underdevelopment.
At the ANC's June 2012 policy conference this partial effectiveness of land reform since 1994 was recognised. To overcome this situation a so-called new approach to land reform was called for. There was consensus that the functional processes of land reform must be changed drastically. This must be done in order to speed up the pace of redistribution, simultaneously ensuring that sustainable development and poverty reduction continue after land has been transferred to beneficiaries.
The urgency of implementing the new approach was expressed as follows in the land reform policy discussion document of June 2012 (South Africa 2012:2):
"Land reform must represent a radical and rapid break from the past without significantly disrupting production and food security."
At this stage the exact format, content and implications of this "radical and rapid break" is, however, uncertain. In the advent of the ANC's December 2012 leadership elections it can be expected with certainty that many key aspects of the current land reform arrangements will be reviewed, changed or even scrapped in order to speed up the process. This assumption also serves as rationale behind this research. It is firstly the purpose of this article to analyse descriptively the unfolding, scope and progress of land reform in South Africa since 1994. In order to achieve this objective the article focuses on the following key aspects:
The rationale behind the current format of land reform;
The land reform policy and legislative objectives;
The land reform implementation procedures;
A holistic perspective on the progress made thus far; and
The identification of the weaknesses and strong points of land reform since 1994.
Through this analysis the article will secondly identify the shortcomings in the current process. Against the above-mentioned background an attempt will lastly be made to provide a scenario perspective with regard to the unfolding of this so-called new approach. An emphasis will be placed on the identification of possible key functional policy and implementation arrangements that might change after 2012.
Persistent Link : https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC129924