Diwan (poetry)
In Islamic cultures of the Middle East, North Africa, Sicily and South Asia, a Diwan (, "divân", , "dīwān") is a collection of poems by one author, usually excluding his or her long poems (mathnawī). These poems, frequently sung or set to music, were often composed and collected in the imperial courts of various sultanates and were very well known for their ability to inspire. In modern-times, the inspirational, linguistic, verse, meter, and other design features of the Diwan or Masnavi poetry, are found echoing in other cultures, same or similar to the relaying of hidden messages, safety, and  support, left for those ex-slaves on the Underground Railroad, during the American Civil War. Thus, themes that emerge from traditional Islamic origins can again portray of and evoke the persistence of life, or whatever continuances, admirable to the old or traditional ways and wisdoms. Where these are found in freeform variants, like an enigma, the modern Diwan, as powers brings a peculiar message encompassing for the divinities. The vast majority of Diwan poetry was lyric in nature: either ghazals or "gazel"s (which make up the greatest part of the repertoire of the tradition), or "kasîde"s. There were, however, other  common genres, most particularly the "mesnevî", a kind of verse romance and thus a variety of narrative poetry; the two most notable examples of this form are the "Layla and Majnun" (ليلى و مجنون) of Fuzûlî and the "Hüsn ü Aşk" (حسن و عشق; "Beauty and Love") of Şeyh Gâlib. Originating in Persian literature, the idea spread to the Arab and Turkish worlds, and South Asia, and the term was sometimes used in Europe, not always in the same way. Etymology. The English usage of the phrase "diwan poetry" comes from the Arabic word "diwan" (دیوان), which is loaned from  Persian, and designated a list or register. The Persian word derived from the Persian "dibir" meaning "writer" or "scribe". "Diwan" was also borrowed into Armenian, Georgian, Arabic, Urdu, Turkish. In Persian, Turkish and other languages the term "diwan" came to mean a collection of poems by a single author, as in "selected works", or the whole body of work of a poet. Thus "Diwan-e Mir" would be the "Collected works of Mir Taqi Mir" and so on. The first use of the term in this sense is attributed to Rudaki. The term "divan" was used in titles of poetic  works in French, beginning in 1697, but was a rare and didactic usage, though one that was revived by its famous appearance in Goethe's "West–östlicher Divan" (Poems of West and East), a work published in 1819 that reflected the poet's abiding interest in Middle Eastern and specifically Persian literature. This word has also been applied in a similar way to collections of Hebrew poetry and to poetry of al-Andalus. Symbolism. Ottoman Divan poetry was a highly ritualized and symbolic art form. From the Persian poetry that largely inspired it, it inherited a wealth of symbols whose  meanings and interrelationships—both of similitude (مراعات نظير "mura'ât-i nazîr" / تناسب "tenâsüb") and opposition (تضاد "tezâd")—were more or less prescribed. Examples of prevalent symbols that, to some extent, oppose one another include, among others: As the opposition of "the ascetic" and "the darvish" suggests, Divan poetry—much like Turkish folk poetry—was heavily influenced by Sufi thought. One of the primary characteristics of Divan poetry, however—as of the Persian poetry before it—was its mingling of the mystical Sufi element with a profane and even erotic element. Thus, the pairing of "the nightingale" and "the rose" simultaneously suggests  two different relationships: Similarly, "the world" refers simultaneously to the physical world and to this physical world considered as the abode of sorrow and impermanence, while "the rosegarden" refers simultaneously to a literal garden and to the garden of Paradise. "The nightingale", or suffering lover, is often seen as situated—both literally and figuratively—in "the world", while "the rose", or beloved, is seen as being in "the rosegarden". Divan poetry was composed through the constant juxtaposition of many such images within a strict metrical framework, thus allowing numerous potential meanings to emerge. A brief example is the following line  of verse, or "mısra" (مصراع), by the 18th-century judge and poet Hayatî Efendi: Here, the nightingale is only implied (as being the poet/lover), while the rose, or beloved, is shown to be capable of inflicting pain with its thorns (خار "hâr"). The world, as a result, is seen as having both positive aspects (it is a rosegarden, and thus analogous to the garden of Paradise) and negative aspects (it is a rosegarden full of thorns, and thus different from the garden of Paradise). Development. As for the development of Divan poetry over the more than 500 years of  its existence, that is—as the Ottomanist Walter G. Andrews points out—a study still in its infancy; clearly defined movements and periods have not yet been decided upon. Early in the history of the tradition, the Persian influence was very strong, but this was mitigated somewhat through the influence of poets such as the Azerbaijani Imadaddin Nasimi (?–1417?) and the Uyghur Ali-Shir Nava'i (1441–1501), both of whom offered strong arguments for the poetic status of the Turkic languages as against the much-venerated Persian. Partly as a result of such arguments, Divan poetry in its strongest period—from  the 16th to the 18th centuries—came to display a unique balance of Persian and Turkish elements, until the Persian influence began to predominate again in the early 19th century. Despite the lack of certainty regarding the stylistic movements and periods of Divan poetry, however, certain highly different styles are clear enough, and can perhaps be seen as exemplified by certain poets: Urdu variation. In Urdu poetry diwan are also a collection of poems, but here they are mainly ghazals.