HomeJewelryEarrings6 Pairs/set Earrings
9885 in stock.
Brief stick Studs Earrings 0.6cm/1.2cm/2cm
Carved Flowers Vintage Godsdiensvryheid in Suid-Afrika Bedreig | Afrikaanse Nuus
PRETORIA – ‘n Nuwe wetsontwerp wat godsdiensvryheid in Suid-Afrika aan bande kan lê, word tans oorweeg en sal moontlik gedurende Maart 2017 aan die parlement voorgelê word.
Die wetsontwerp in sy huidige vorm het egter verreikende implikasies vir Christene, ander gelowe en vryheid van spraak, aangesien dit ‘n sterk klemverskuiwing bevat om politieke korrektheid te akkommodeer. Die “waarheid” en “politieke korrektheid” is egter telkens in ‘n tweestryd gewikkel, en die “waarheid” kan op hierdie wyse gesnoer word bloot op grond van ander se gemak sones.
Om polities korrek te wees, beteken bloot dat niks gesê mag word wat ander ongemaklik kan laat voel nie. ‘n Onlangse voorbeeld hiervan was die SABC se verbod op berigte oor onluste, bloot omdat dit die ANC-regering in ‘n ongemaklike situasie plaas.
Die implikasie vir Christene is egter verreikend aangesien ‘n verbod geplaas kan word op sekere gedeeltes van die Bybel, bloot omdat iemand byvoorbeeld ongemaklik kan voel wanneer hy hoor “dat die hel sy voorland is indien hy nie tot bekering sou kom nie”. Indien ‘n persoon dan nie gehoor gee aan beperkings wat deur die Suid-Afrikaanse regstelsel bepaal word nie, kan daardie persoon drie jaar gevangenisstraf opgelê word, wat verleng kan word na tien jaar indien ‘n oortreding herhaal sou word.
Suid-Afrikaners, Christene en alle ander belangegroepe wat voel dat hul vryhede hierdeur ingeperk kan word, word aangeraai om vroegtydig hul insette te lewer op die nuwe wetsontwerp. Die finale datum vir insette is uitgeskuif van 01 Desember 2016 tot 28 Februarie 2017. Kommentaar met spesifieke verwysing na aanhalings in die wetsontwerp kan per epos gestuur word aan hatecrimes@justice.gov.za
Hierna volg verskeie skakels na eksterne bronne vir addisionele informasie.
Die volgende gedeelte is in Engels aangesien dit aanhalings vanaf die betrokke webtuistes is.
Recently we saw the ANC government advocating a series of legislation that could pose some of the greatest threats to religious freedom and free speech ever seen in our country. On Wednesday 26 October 2016, the CRL Rights Commission released its report on what they called the “Commercialisation” of religion and “abuse of people’s belief systems” on its www.crlcommission.org.za website under Commercialisation Report. Pages 31 to 39 contain the Commission’s proposals for regulation of religious groups.
In another threat to religious freedom, the “Hate Speech” Bill was released in the same week as the CRL’s Report. The Bill’s extremely broad definition of hate speech under section 4 of the Bill includes in its scope any communication which is considered “abusive or insulting” and intended to “bring into contempt or ridicule” a person, or group of persons, on the basis of their gender, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc. This includes email, or social media communications as well as teachings from a pulpit, or in a Bible study. Instead of an objective definition of what constitutes “hate speech” (for example those who sing “Kill the Boer! Kill the Farmer!” or those advocating Islamic Jihad to behead Christians), this bill seeks to focus on subjective definitions of where an individual may feel offended, even if that was not the intention. “He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the just, both of them alike are an abomination to the Lord.” Proverbs 17:15
Read more at Christian Action
Katharine Child – 14 November, 2016
Six former Model C schools – whose pupils recite Christian prayers in assembly, pray before sport matches and describe themselves as having a predominantly “Christian ethos” – will have to defend their right in court to follow a single religion.
The case, to be heard by the Johannesburg High Court, will have implications for any state school that promotes one religion – in dress code, prayers or readings – even if the religion reflects the belief system of the majority.
Read more at Gateway News
Religious Leaders Concerned About State Capture of Religion
Read mote at For SA
The proposals contained in the CRL Report represent an unacceptable erosion of your rights to freedom of religion and association guaranteed by the South African Constitution. It is not for the State, or any other body, to decide which religions qualify as a “religion”, or to sit as “judge” over the doctrines of religious institutions, and decide whether they can operate.
Read more at Change
By: Pieter Coertzen – Unit for the Study of Law and Religion, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa
Read more at SA Legal Information Institution
CRL Rights Commission’s Preliminary Report of the Hearings on Commercialisation of Religion and Abuse of People’s Belief Systems
PETITION: Speak out against the draft Hate Speech Bill in South Africa
FACEBOOK:Freedom of Religion SA
WEBTUISTE: For SA