Lo ngumbuzo olula kabi uKazembe uthi akudingeki ukuthi uze uyevotela lapho ohlala lilakho ukuvota inqe indawo eseduzane lani. Njalo akudingeki ukuthi umuntu abe ngobhalise ukuvota okuvoters role. AbeZEC bathi bazasebenzisa zonezo indawo ezisetshenziswe ngokhetho luka2008 njalo kwengezelelwe ezinye. Nxa usulibele lezi ndawo ulakho ukuzithola emaphephandabeni njalo lingakhohlwa ukuthi lezi ndawo zivame ukuba sezikolo lakumaCommunity Centres. Today, JIsui from Singapore is standing in the kitchen. Did she read Yudai’s mind? Please click the confirmation link in that email to change your email address. Sgwili Babo – Akasoze Angidele Worship melody. ▼ The Tang dynasty official Chu Guangxi was a well-regarded poet with a place in the literary circle of the eighth century, that most famous era of poetic production known as the High Tang, and yet he was not canonized by posterity in the way that many of his contemporaries were. Perhaps as a direct result of this, there exists no modern critical edition of Chu’s poetry, and very little has been written about him in Western languages. Thus, I offer here an introduction to the life and poetry of Chu Guangxi, a High Tang poet possessing something of a “silver” status. In the course of examining his poetic corpus, I attempt to challenge the one analytical strain that still persists in the majority of Chinese-language scholarship on Chu, namely that his best poetry shows him to be an epigone of the Six Dynasties poet-recluse Tao Qian and a waypoint in the teleological trajectory of pastoral verse. In my reading of Chu’s poems, I find that while some owe an undeniable stylistic debt to Tao Qian, these and many others also evince a strong poetic tension between Chu and his famous reclusive forebear, a tension made manifest in a literary consciousness aswim with the work not just of Tao, but of countless other earlier poets as well. Building on the critical writings of T. S. Eliot and Harold Bloom, I analyze Chu’s poetry as the work of an author who is both conscious of his place in the grand historical matrix of literary tradition, and also working to forge his own poetic identity. Advisors/Committee Members: Paul W. Kroll, Antje Richter, Matthias L. Richter.