Suid Afrika op die rand van totale ekonomiese ineenstorting? - Page 5 - Stormfront
03-16-2013, 12:44 PM #41
Soewereine Onafhanklikheid vir die Boervolk: Die enigste volhoubare alternatief na 20 jaar se mislukking met betrekking tot minderheidsregte, burgerregte en menseregte. Wat aanbetref soos in die verlede bewys, niks beteken in die nuwe Suid-Afrika nie. Want minderheidsregte het nog nooit iets beteken in swart Afrika nie. Die swart meerderheid stem net die swart diktator in mag in. Meerderheidsregering word internasionaal as 'n volwaardige demokrasie voor gestel en hou die stempel van goedkeuring in deur die VN vernaamlik in die nuwe Suid Afrika. Demokrasie = Meerderheidsregering en in Suid Afrika is dit 'n SWART meerderheidsregering. Hierdie skyn demokrasie wat op ons Volk deur ons vyande toegepas word word aan getalle gemeet en is getalle alles as dit by MAG kom in donker Afrika.
Die ANC se diskrimineerende wette het in die laaste twee dekades met snelle vaart duisende volksgenote se lewens verwoes, verarm, sonder werk gelaat, en onmeetbare skade aan families berokken en in die toekoms nog duisende volksgenote verder in verknorsing gaan bring.
Teenkanting in die bestel teen die ANC-Regering en sy meelopers wat regstellende aksie, BEE, en diskrimineerende wette op blankes en vernaam teen die Boervolk toegepas het en in die toekoms met toeneemende erns afgedwing gaan word, op bitter min sukses en eerder op 'n ronde nul uitgeloop het. As hierdie benadering van drukgroepe geslaagd was of op sukses geloop het of kon loop sou hierdie oorgrote menigheid van ons volksgenote wat deur die ANC-Regering se kranksinnigheid geraak was nie in hierdie verknorsing wat tans ons lewe oorheers en ons verkneg en duisende lewe verwoes het nooit gerealiseer het nie! Die feite, eerder die onmeetbare getal onskuldige volksgenote wat prooi was van die ANC se vernietigende laakbaarheid spreek vir homself. En dit sonder om die onomkeerbare misdaad en ander gruwels wat op ons mense toegespits word, in ag te neem.
Die vraag wat dus eerder gevra moet word is: is dit na byna 20 jaar vir die grootste deel van
ons volk nog duidelik dat daar vir die Boervolk geen plek is
in die Suid-Afrika wat deur die ANC regeer word nie? Mens is sekerlik blind en hoorende doof om nie die waarheid te erken nie:
Waarom klou aan onwerkbaarhede?
Na byna 20 jaar is dit vir seker die grootste deel van
ons volk duidelik dat daar vir die Boervolk geen plek is
in die Suid-Afrika wat deur die ANC regeer word nie.
Ons is vreemdelinge in ons eie land. Ons verdwaal
na bekende plekke omdat plek- en straatname verander
word. Ons kruip weg agter maksimale beveiligingsnetwerke
omdat feitlik geen gesin daarop aanspraak
kan maak dat hy nog nie ‘n slagoffer van misdaad was
Ons kinders word van ons vervreem deur vreemde
leerplanne wat in die skole op hulle afgeforseer
word. Ons grond, waarvoor ons met bloed geoffer het,
word beskou as gesteel en word van ons weggeneem.
Ons word van ons regmatige brood en botter ontneem
deur “affirmative action”, en ons word tot ‘n nuwe armoedeklas
belas, sodat die staat nog meer geld kan mors
en korrupsie kan pleeg.
Vir byna 20 jaar is daar mense wat probeer het om
iets aan hierdie sake te doen. Ten spyte van klein en
soms feitlik betekenislose suksessies, is daar in die
geheel net agteruitgang te sien, en verslegting van die
Boervolk se posisie in die land.
Geen wonder nie dat daar steeds meer stemme begin
opgaan van mense en instansies wat die lig begin sien
en besef dat daar behoefte aan verandering is. Met
daardie verandering word bedoel dat die Boervolk nie
so kan aangaan nie, en dat daar beweeg moet word na
een of ander vorm van selfbeskikking.
Die Boere-Afrikaner Volksraad, en die organisasies wat hulle ondersteun,
is seker op die voorpunt van hierdie beweging,
en wil dan ook die uiteindelike doelwit sien as volkome
vryheid – onafhanklik van die ANC-Suid-Afrika, in ‘n
eie vrye Volksrepubliek, met Gods Woord as basis.
Ander groepe of individue sal selfs met minder tevrede
wees, soos kulturele selfbeskikking, ‘n kantonstelsel
Waar daar op hierdie stadium nog niks van dié aard
is nie, kan enige van hierdie vorme dien as betekenisvolle
tussenstap, om ons mense te beskerm en ons
waardes so ver moontlik te bewaar. Maar solank enige
instelling onderhorig is aan ‘n sentrale kommunistiese
bewind, wat die mag het om met die trek van ‘n streep
enige ooreenkoms te verbreek, is dit maar steeds ‘n
uiters riskante situasie.
Uiteindelik is volkome selfstandigheid, vryheid in ‘n
eie staat, met ‘n eie regering, die enigste waarborg vir
oorlewing as volk, en die herstel van ons Christelike
waardes. Slegs daarin sal God weer geëer en geroem
kan word soos Hy dit verwag.
Terwyl daar dan sodanige gedagtes en bewegings is,
is dit vreemd dat daar dan skielik weer ‘n sterk teenbeweging
kom om in te koop in die nuwe Suid-Afrika.
Skielik is daar mense wat behoefte het om hulle trou
aan die Grondwet van Suid-Afrika te bewys – ‘n Grondwet
wat alle euwels wat teen ons volk gepleeg word,
magtig en selfs aanspoor!
Skielik vind vreemde gebeurtenisse plaas op plekke
waar beweer word dat dit iets vir ons volk moet beteken.
Soos by die Solidariteit Beweging se Akademia se
gradeplegtigheid waar die nuwe Suid-Afrikaanse saamgeflanste
volkslied gesing word! Soos by Afriforum se
kongres waar dit sterk gestel word dat Afriforum oop is
vir almal. Soos die FAK se nuwe Federale Netwerk
(waarbinne die Solidariteit Beweging ook weer ‘n groot
rol speel) wat in sy grondslagdokument, nogal onder
die opskrif “Waardes” verklaar: “Samewerking met die
breë Afrikaanse en ander kultuurgemeenskappe; opbouende
betrokkenheid in Suid-Afrika; aktiewe burgerskap:
deelname eerder as onttrekking...”
Waarom sal mense en instansies na byna 20 jaar se
mislukkings, nou skielik weer hunker om deel te word
van hierdie bestel, wat selfs vanuit hulle kringe al beskryf
is as die “falende staat”?
Ons moet ons eerder losser maak van die bestel in
plaas van hegter daaraan vasheg deur trou aan sy grondwet
te wil betuig, om deelname daaraan te bevorder of
sy volkslied te sing.
Laat ons ons nie weer laat mislei op dieselfde wyse
as deur die ou NP en sy frontorganisasies nie. Hierdie
lyk op ‘n herhaling daarvan!
Bron: Die Afrikaner 15 - 21 Maart 2013
03-16-2013, 12:47 PM #42
Suid Afrika as een van die mees gevaarlikste lande ter wereld erken:
Volgens hierdie bron is Suid Afrika eerste op die lys van die 5 mees gevaarlikste lande ter wereld:
Read more at 5 Most Dangerous Countries on Earth
Skakel: 5 Most Dangerous Countries on Earth
03-16-2013, 12:54 PM #43
Not considered in this report is the impact of the early release of well over 100 000 criminals including murderers and rapists from South African prisons
The full report, Murder in South Africa: A Comparison of Past and Present http://www.christianaction.org.za/uc...outhafrica.doc by Robert McCafferty, is available from United Christian Action.
03-17-2013, 03:12 PM #44
Suid Afrika word wereldwyd deur kenners as die gevaarlikste land met een van die hoogste (geweldadige) misdaad syfers erken, al meen die liberale media en die ANC-Regering en hul meeloopers anders.
Die ANC-Regering en die liberale pers sal alles in hul mag doen om hierdie waarhede te verbloem en as minder belangrik te ag en onder die mat te vee. Elke jaar word daar met meer erns hierdie feite afgemaak as leuns en 'n ander prentjie geteken.
Hier is 'n paar uittreksels (alhoewel 'n hele paar jaar terug berig) wat die feite agter die denkbeeldige gordyn lig wat die man op die straat skynbaar niks van weet nie:
World crime capital?
Number 1, January - February
Many refer to South Africa as the crime capital of the world. This has been disputed by the minister for safety and security, Steve Tshwete, and the national police commissioner, Jackie Selebi. What do the figures say? Interpol data and South African crime statistics show that South Africa’s high level of violent crime sets the country apart from other crime ridden societies.
One way of evaluating South Africa’s crime levels is to compare crime statistics of selected countries published by the International Criminal Police Organisation (Interpol) with crime data released by the Crime Information Analysis Centre (CIAC) of the South African Police Service. This comparison is done for 1998 — the last year for which Interpol statistics are available. Levels of recorded crime in South Africa are compared with those in a number of countries in southern Africa, Latin and North America, Europe including some former communist states, and Australia.
Comparing recorded crime rates between countries is fraught with difficulties. This is so for a number of reasons:
1. Countries have different legal and criminal justice systems. Crime definitions vary from one country to the next. For example, a serious assault in one country could be recorded as an attempted murder somewhere else. Moreover, what constitutes a recordable crime in one country might not be a criminal offence in another.
2. The likelihood of victims reporting crime, and the police recording them, is not the same in every country. Crime victims are less likely to report crime in a country with an oppressive or incompetent police force than in a country where the police is helpful and trustworthy. The distances people have to travel to the nearest police station, and the availability of transport to get there, is another factor which can affect crime reporting rates.
3. Multiple offences are not recorded uniformly in all countries. In some countries only the most serious offence reported in a single incident is recorded while in others all offences reported are recorded.
4. Differences in data quality between countries is also a factor. In developed countries recorded crimes are entered in a computerised database and channelled to a central point for analysis. In many less developed countries crime statistics are recorded on paper which can easily result in the loss of some of the statistics.
Crime statistics are only one measurement of police performance — and a limited one at that. Victim surveys are another valuable measurement and should be used in conjunction with crime statistics to make up for the shortcomings of the former. Victim surveys provide information on crimes which have not been reported to the police. It is estimated that victim surveys uncover between 60% and 70% more crime than that reported by official sources.
Interpol provides statistics on the total number of crimes which are recorded in various countries as a ratio to their population. In Canada, for example, 8453 crimes were recorded in 1998 for 100000 of the population. According to this indicator South Africa compares favourably to many developed countries. Ranking below countries such as Canada, Australia and France, some 5065 crimes were recorded in South Africa per 100000 of the population (Figure 1). Care needs to be taken with these figures, however. It is likely that in a country such as Canada more victims report crime, and more reported crimes are recorded by the police, than in South Africa or other developing countries such as Brazil or Colombia.
Figure 1: Total number of offences recorded per 100 000 of the population, 1998:
Skakel: South Africa, World Crime Capital? - Nedbank ISS Crime Index vol 5 No 1
03-17-2013, 03:21 PM #45
Murder is the most suitable crime to compare between countries. There are few definitional disputes about what constitutes a murder and most murders are recorded because the evidence of the crime, in the form of the body of the victim, is rarely concealed permanently. In 1998 South Africa had the highest recorded per capita murder rate of the countries selected in the 1998 Interpol report. In 1998 there were 59 recorded murders in South Africa per 100000 of the population, followed by Colombia with 56 murders per 100000. While Nambia’s murder rate was high (45 per 100000) the murder rate in Swaziland was approximately a third of South Africa’s and Zimbabwe’s less than one-sixth (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Number of murders recorded per 100 000 of the population, 1998
03-17-2013, 03:23 PM #46
During 1998 South Africa also had high recorded rates of robbery and violent theft. 208 robberies and violent thefts were recorded in South Africa per 100000 of the population, followed by Swaziland and Spain (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Number of robberies and violent thefts recorded per 100 000 of the population, 1998
03-17-2013, 03:25 PM #47
Australia had the highest level of recorded serious assaults of the countries selected with 714 per 100000 of the population, followed by South Africa (550 per 100000). Swaziland and Namibia follow at positions four and five respectively (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Number of serious assaults recorded per 100 000 of the population, 1998
03-17-2013, 03:27 PM #48
The Interpol figures reveal that South Africa is plagued by high levels of violent crime. This is confirmed by CIAC crime data between 1994 and 1999 according to which one out of three crimes recorded in South Africa involves violence or the threat of violence. (See Nedbank ISS Crime Index Vol 4, No 3, pp. 1—4.) According to Interpol, Australia had high levels of recorded serious assaults in 1998, but had lower levels of robbery and violent theft and very low levels of murder. Colombia had high levels of recorded murders — possibly because of the low-intensity civil war that has been raging in that country for some time — but low levels of recorded robbery and violent theft and serious assaults. It is only in South Africa where recorded levels of all three categories of serious violent crimes were exceptionally high of the countries covered in the Interpol report.
Property and commercial crime
In terms of recorded property and commercial crime South Africa compares favourably to most developed countries but unfavourably to developing countries. In 1998 South Africa had the fourth highest (848 per 100000 of the population) ratio of burglaries after Australia, Canada and Hungary (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Number of burglaries recorded per 100 000 of the population, 1998
03-17-2013, 03:31 PM #49
Australia, Canada, France and Spain had higher recorded ratios of vehicle theft than South Africa (Figure 6). Similar patterns also exist for recorded fraud and general theft. A reason why the wealthier developed countries have such high levels of recorded property and commercial crime is the existence of relatively large volumes of property which can be stolen in those countries in comparison to the poorer developing countries.
Figure 6: Number of vehicle thefts recorded per 100 000 of the population, 1998
03-17-2013, 03:44 PM #50
The use of a per capita ratio when measuring property crimes does not give a true reflection on the extent of crime. An appropriate indication to measure property crime is to measure it in relation to the number of units of property. For example, in 1998 some of 253 cars were stolen per 100000 of the population in South Africa. In France 546 cars were stolen per 100000 of the population. What is omitted in these figures is that there are about seven times as many cars in France than in South Africa. This means that the chance of a car being stolen in South Africa is about twice as high compared to France. Measured in this way levels of recorded property crime for South Africa would tend to be higher when compared to most developed countries.
Based on Interpol figures South Africa has high but manageable levels of property crime but an extraordinary high level of violent crime. It is South Africa’s high level of violent crime which sets the country apart from other crime ridden societies. This finding is supported by CIAC data indicating that since 1994 recorded violent crime has been escalating at a faster rate than any other crime category. It is primarily violent crime which fuels people’s fear of crime. To lose its label as crime capital of the world, violent crime levels have to drop substantially in South Africa.
A Louw (1999) Who Suffers Most? The National Victim of Crime Survey, Crime & Conflict, No. 16.
B Naude (2000) To Catch a Cheat: Comparing Corruption and Fraud Victimisation Data, Crime & Conflict, No. 21.