17. Re lokela ho etsang e le hore re utlwisise dinnete tse mabapi le Mmuso, empa re boetse re hlokang? Ho sa le joalo, ho 3 Lipitsa tsa matshwao afe Gold hodima a tsoasa 2, 3 kapa 4 e etsa hore lipitsa tsa khauta, silevera kapa tsa boronse ho ohla hoo e ka bang skrineng. E mong le e nang le bohlokoa fapaneng le ea phahameng bonase e ka ba 500 ka makhetlo a thupeng hammoho. Pitsa khauta ho sebele o na boleng phahameng ka ho fetisisa. Eo ke pitsa ho leka ho ha a ntse a bapala. Hoa makatsa kamoo batho ba bangata ba whooped ka thabo ka la nailing pitsa itseng. Banana ba rata Tattoo e ntle ea Disney mahetleng a bona. Enke ena ea tattoo e etsa hore e shebahale eka e khahleha The question is, if indeed the Brigadier had his hands and gun raised why shoot him? Equally important, Hashatsi was not armed at all and the Minister said that very clearly, why shoot him when he had his hands raised in surrender mode? The man was not even wearing an armed vest according to his mother and there was no sign of struggle, so why shoot them? The Minister further alleged that, Hashatsi had a hand grenade where he fell. The question is where did he get it from? Yet when he was shot there was no hand grenade and when he got into his Commander’s office he had no grenade? We expect the investigations to answer some of these questions? We all know that Geneva Conventions and laws of engagement mandate that, you cannot shoot someone who raised his hands in surrender mode just like it has been alleged that Sechele and Hashatsi did. These conventions also mandate soldiers to treat prisoners humanly. The Commission of Enquiry must come up with lucid explanation here.