Arrest Ratzinger | Nathan Bond's TART Remarks
Religion: Respect? Ridicule! Arrest Ratzinger
11 April 2010. In one of my favourite movies, And Justice for All, the character Arthur Kirkland, played by my all-time favourite actor, Al Pacino, screams: “And ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the prosecution is not going to get that man today, no, because I’m gonna get him! My client, the Honorable Henry T. Fleming, should go right to fucking jail! The son of a bitch is guilty!”
Likewise Ratzinger. The son of a bitch is guilty! He should go right to fucking jail!
Richard Dawkins said earlier today that Ratzinger should be arrested during his next trip to Britain. Dawkins, immeasurably more dignified than I, called the son of a bitch “Pope Benedict XVI”, Ratzinger’s ecclesiastical title.
I scorn the fucking ridiculous title “Pope”. What consumate folderol!
I do not wish to waste time on the absolutely obvious – if even an isolated case of paedophilia is exposed at a child facility, the facility is closed down. On what possible basis can the “Catholic Church” still be operational? The nidus should be wound down and entrepreneurial business be given the opprtunity to run the multi-billion dollar parts for the betterment of humankind.
Will the Catholic Church be brought down? Of course not. Too many idiots around. But my revulsion of religion has registered a new apex. And tomorrow will doubtlessly see this record bettered. It’s not just the Catholics. It’s religion. It’s the mind fucking, more even than the physical revulsion of paedophilia. It’s the systematic dumbing down of children to ensure sufficient idiocy in future generations to tolerate and promote ridiculous myth.
The buck stops with Ratzinger. Point. Had he even a veleity of non-mythological ethics, he would have resigned over the abuse scandal, the bulk of which, I am convinced, not having been revealed yet.
Written by Nathan Bond April 11, 2010 at 07:22
« On being a Kafir. Proudly.
Title Page Cartoons »
So you say, Hanswors, and yet, revealingly, you still comment. You should at least make an effort towards understanding the grand mythology of Mickey Mouse and its deep meaning. I know it’s beyond your capabilities but you’ve got to start somewhere. Then maybe you’ll begin to see your strong attraction to blatant self-contradiction.
April 26, 2011 at 18:24	Con-Tester, not worthy of comment.
March 18, 2011 at 21:45	ErickV, siestog, jy rafel uit.
March 18, 2011 at 21:42	Hans
Nou, terwyl ek de bliksem is vir Vicar en sy medegelowiges soos jy!
Fok jou nou ook en al die fokken gotte wat jy ook aanhang!!
Jy is net so fokken siek in jou fokken kop!!!!
Wil jy dit nie fokken besef nie???!!!
Gaan sny jou eie keel af, jou fokken kont!!!
March 14, 2011 at 06:21	Hmm, “anythingg.”
I see you haven’t yet experienced the deep and mystical profundity of Mickey Mouse yet, Hanswors. That’s because you’re as blind as those who won’t look at comics in the right light. Praise be to Mickey! Goofylujah! You have to read it before you can believe it. So you see, that’s why you can’t debate comics with me.
March 13, 2011 at 22:33	“Bishop Hanswors.” I like it! It has a certain ring to it, a certain je ne sais quoi. Actually, more ne sais quoi than anythinh else.
March 13, 2011 at 22:26	Con-Tester, it would appear that comics are the only thing you are able to discuss.
March 13, 2011 at 22:24	McBrolloks, I share the consern as the RCC does not follow the recipe as shown in the Bible:
March 13, 2011 at 22:20	No Hanswors, with all your jaw-dropping gibberish it is impossible to have a sensible discussion with you. My offer to you to discuss a Mickey Mouse comic with you remains open, though. In all fairness, I must warn you that you will not be able to refute the truth of any of my interpretations. The reason is because I reserve the right to make any convenient stuff up as we go along. Will that be okay with you?
March 13, 2011 at 22:20	ErickV, jy is weer te dof om te besef, dat julle die Bybel afmaak as iets wat dit nie is nie en julle is te lamsakkig om julle punte te staaf omdat julle argumente buite die Bybel, wat ter sprake is, wil voer. Julle wil ook in julle argumente veralgemeen en ons is nie swaksinnig soos hulle wat saam met julle op julle wa klim nie.
March 13, 2011 at 22:08	DW, net soos in die geval van Con-Tester ontbreek daar by julle waardigheid om met julle ‘n debat te voer. Siestog!
March 13, 2011 at 21:54	Con-Tester, met al jou kennis is jy nie in staat om ‘n sinvolle debat te voer oor die Bybel nie. Dit mag wees a.g.v. jou gebrek aan intelligensie, wat dan veroorsaak, dat jy neerdaal tot op die vlak van modderslyk en soos jy spartel, gooi jy net modder.
March 13, 2011 at 21:50	http://www.news24.com/World/News/Concern-over-unmonitored-abusive-priests-20110308
Concern over unmonitored abusive priests
March 8, 2011 at 16:08	😆 So tell us D’anus-booi Van der Moerig, what exactly do you do hanging about those street corners in the evenings? 😆
😆 Nice fantasy there, ol’ D’anus-booi Van der Moerig. My, my, what lengths you have gone to. Is that why it took near enough two days to scrape together around 300 words, hmm? And, wow, your ability to pull stuff kicking and screaming from your fundamental orifice is as endearingly impressive as your ability to reason or your talent for assimilating new information. Your article’s just bursting with razor-sharp wit, insight and flair. It’s a masterpiece, no doubt your magnum opus, your pièce de résistance. You should write much, much more than you do, perhaps for a market that loves your style – maybe someone like Hallmark. 😆
Remember that you started this shit-flinging, D’anus-booi Van der Moerig. You can stop it anytime should you suffer a moment of lucidity, as unlikely as such an event might be. Until you do though, I’ll carry on playing on your terms.
March 8, 2011 at 13:31	DW!!!!
🙂 Goed om jou weer te lees.
March 8, 2011 at 12:02	Goeie berig in gisteraand se koerant. Ek kry nie ‘n link nie so ek sal maar copy en paste.
JOHANNESBURG – Pandimonium het vanoggend buite die Randse Strafhof losgebars toe Dominee Egbertus Dooieweerdt agtien keer lewenslank tronk toe gestuur is nadat hy deur Regter Thomas Broomberg en twee assesore skuldig bevind is op 18 klagtes van misdade teen die mensdom. Regskenners het die uitspraak as ‘n sleutelsaak in, nie net Suid-Afrikaanse nie, maar wêreldregsgeskiedenis beskryf. Dominee Dooieweerdt het tereg gestaan op 18 klagtes van misdade teen die mensdom nadat hy daarvan beskuldig is dat hy tydens 18 agtereenvolgende Sondae, fantasië as die waarheid in die openbaar verkondig het. Van hierdie skreiende verdigsels sluit in ‘n kind wat uit ‘n maagd gebore is, ‘n man wie, nadat hy drie dae dood was, uit sy graf opgestaan het nadat sy lyk reeds in ‘n gevorderde stadium van ontbinding was, en, die beste een, dat hierdie selfde man 40 dae later eenvoudig net die ruimte vanaf die Olyfberg oorkant die Hinnomsdal buite Jerusalem, ingevaar het.
Regter Broomberg het in sy uitspraak gesê dat hy geweldig beindruk is met die getuienis van die staat se hoofgetuie, Professor Doktor Cont Poester, PhD(Biologie), PhD(Argeologie), PhD(Dierkunde),PhD(Paleontolgie),PhD(Kosmologie),PhD(Kakpraat).
Professor Poester het met onvergeleke, onaanvegbare logika aan die hof verduidelik hoe die mites wat Dooieweerdt so onbeskaamd as die waarheid verkondig het, die mensdom in grenslose ellende gedompel het. Terwyl Professor Poester getuig het, was die walging en skok duidelik op Regter Broomberg se gesig te bespeur. Die regter het dit dan ook duidelik tydens vonnisoplegging gestel dat Dominee Dooieweerdt sy sterre, sy gode, sy engeltjies, die hele lot, kan dank dat die doodstraf in Suid-Afrika afgeskaf is. Niks sou hom en sy assesore meer plesier gegee het as om Dooieweerdt 18 keer galg toe te stuur nie.
Die reaksie op die saak was ook oorweldigend in die buiteland. Verskeie anti-godsdienstige organisasies wêreldwyd het reeds aangekondig dat hulle alle predikante, priesters, pastore en evangeliste met valkoë dophou. Uit Parys, Frankryk word berig dat die voorsitter van l’Alliance Croire de Pas, ‘n radikale atheistiese organisasie, Professor Poester 600 000,00 Euro’s aangebied het om vir hulle te getuig, sou hulle ‘n prediker betrap in die verkondiging van fantasië as die waarheid.
March 8, 2011 at 12:00	Annika
Ek ken nie jou tipe baie goed nie. Ek sien maar net jou tipe party aande op straathoeke staan.
March 8, 2011 at 11:54	Hans
Die probleem met jou is dat jy te dof is om agter te kom dat jy ore aangesit word.
Jou intelegensie is beperk tot die bybel. Jy kan nie buite daardie box dink nie. Al wat jy en al die ander christene doen is om versies uit die ou boek aan te haal en dit as feite voor te hou. Dan kom jy en se dat dit “geestelik” gesien moet word.
Wat ‘n groot pot stront!!
Skrik vir ‘n slag, al is dit net wakker!!!
March 8, 2011 at 05:58	Welkom terug, DW!
March 7, 2011 at 21:27	Good news: One down, several thousands to go.
March 7, 2011 at 13:30	Hans , ek het regtig gehoop jy kom ‘n by maar nee wat , dis is haas onmoontlik , die spoke en gode raas nog steeds in jou kop. Gaan sien ‘n dokter man , jy is foking mal verby .
March 7, 2011 at 10:23	Daan , moet jy nou hier ook weer kom kakpraat.
Jirre tog man , bekeer jou of laat jou doop , so kan dit nie aangaan nie.
March 7, 2011 at 10:21	Hanswors, when I read the drivel that you and your intellectual equal, ol’ D’anus-booi Van der Moerig, regularly spew forth, no mirror is required. It’s as plain as day that you morons are completely clueless – so clueless, in fact, that you aren’t capable of recognising your cluelessness. If you okes even had a smidgen of intelligence, there’d be at least some hope and I’d point you to some reading material that’ll perhaps clear things up for you dopes. As things are, all that’s left is to laugh at your stupidity whenever you put it on display.
March 6, 2011 at 20:59	Annika, jy dwaal lekker as jy dink daardie twee het my ore aangesit. Siestog!
March 6, 2011 at 20:35	Daan, Con-Tester should have a look at himself, when he looks into a mirror, as it appears that he only see’s others and not himself. No wonder he appears so queer and can’t seem to recognise himself so that he does’t even use his own name.
March 6, 2011 at 20:31	Ek lees nou al ‘n rukkie stilletjies en plesierig uit hierdie blog. Mooi so Nathan, ons kort meer soos jy om geloof se onnoselhede bloot te le. Ek geniet ook van die kommentaar veral hoe Con-Tester, McBrolloks en andere keer op keer vir Hans, Daan en die res van die jafelbende ore aan sit. Ek ken Daan se tipe baie goed want ek was aan een soos hy getroud. Ek is amper skaam om dit te se maar van ons leer gelukkig uit ons foute. Hulle talente begin en eindig met hul knaters wat soos vuiste gebal is.
March 6, 2011 at 19:42	😆 Whatever tickles that sterile little nonentity of yours you call a “brain,” D’anus-booi Van der Moerig. A drooling, grunting, lobotomised caveman-in-a-suit like you is as transparent as a fart in a Jiffy bag – and about as amusing. That’s why you keep responding and I keep pushing all the right buttons. Now stop trying so desperately to make sense – you’re utterly useless at it, in case that fact had escaped your feeble cognitive abilities – and get on with the much more pressing business of trying to insult me and fantasising about blikseming me, please. 😆
March 6, 2011 at 15:58	Teehee, you are guilty of crimes against humanity, Cont-Poester. You are promoting fantasies as the truth. Silly fuckin little queer.
March 6, 2011 at 07:54	😆 What a sad, boring little joke you are, D’anus-booi Van der Moerig. As for “intimidation,” “living up to expectations,” “pathetic response,” and “spouting bullshit,” that’s your view, amply helped along with great gobs of fantasy and delusions of mental acuity. Long may it keep you warm in bed. Just don’t admit it, that’s all. 😆
March 5, 2011 at 09:32	Poor Cont-Poester.
Do you really think you can intimidate me? A silly little faggot like you? Especially on my terms? If and whenever you spout the kind of bullshit as you did above, I will comment on it.
And if your only pathetic response is “brain-dead, arrogant, incapable, standard-three, warthog-shit-for-brains, argumentum-ad-ignorantiam-loving blah, blah blah…”, that’s fine with me.
After all, you are only living up to everybody’s expectations.
March 5, 2011 at 06:21	😆 D’anus-booi Van der Moerig, if you want to torture invented meaning from what I wrote then I can’t stop you doing that. You’re just too thick to realise that all it does is demonstrate what a brain-dead, arrogant, incapable, standard-three, warthog-shit-for-brains, argumentum-ad-ignorantiam-loving, graceless prick you are. 😆
March 4, 2011 at 08:10	No, Cont-Poester. Your post under discussion was a crock of warthogshit, as pointed out.
But instead of gracefully admitting it, you resort back to your usual infantile insulting lines of “…standard-three runny-rhinosaurusshit-for-brains facility…”, “…argumentum ad ignorantiam…”. “…proven non-ability…”
Please state it clearly: “The holocaust was a crime against humanity because it was a fantasy promoting by the Nazi’s as truth.”
Silly little fuckin faggot.
March 4, 2011 at 06:23	Ooops, I forgot my coda. Twice. Silly me.
March 3, 2011 at 21:43	😆 D’anus-booi Van der Moerig, your reasoning abilities are showing. Plain as daylight. Again. Even your spelling is orders of magnitude better than that festering pile of “rhinosaurus”-shit you call a brain. 😆
March 3, 2011 at 21:34	I see. So Sadam Hussein’s actions for which he was executed, were mere fantasies that were promoted as truth. Interesting. So the Nazi persecution of Jews did not really happen. It was a mere fantasy promoted as truth. Fucking interesting.
So the murder and mayhem perpetrated by the Cruisaders were fantasies promoted as truth. Fuckin’ remarkable.
So from an atheist’s point of view, every relegious preacher commits a crime against humanity every time he preaches.
What abominable cowshit! Cont-Poester, you are more fucked up than even I fathomed.
March 3, 2011 at 21:10	Well, D’anus-booi Van der Moerig, that’s what happens when you combine a standard-three runny-rhinosaurusshit-for-brains facility for argumentum ad ignorantiam with a proven non-ability to see obvious implications. Crimes against humanity are almost universally predicated on fantasies that are or were promoted as truth.
March 3, 2011 at 08:20	Promoting fantasies as truth is a crime against humanity!?!? Rhinosaurusshit!!!
March 3, 2011 at 06:06	Hanswors, promoting fantasies as truth is a crime against humanity. It’s the promoters who need a wake-up prosecution.
March 2, 2011 at 21:52	Glad you atheists are not in charge as you would persecute many for the sins of a few. Crimes against humanity would increase drastically.
March 2, 2011 at 21:49	I always knew the Germans are crazy. The pope guilty of crimes against humanity!?!? Fuckin loony tunes.
February 27, 2011 at 06:43	It will be interesting to see how it is handled. I bet the RCC are lobbying like they always do to get away with their crimes.
February 26, 2011 at 23:45	Charges initiated against Pope for crimes against humanity:
Their charges concern “three worldwide crimes which until now have not been denounced … (as) the traditional reverence toward ‘ecclesiastical authority’ has clouded the sense of right and wrong”.
The emphasised bit says it just beautifully what is putrid at the core of all religion. Let’s hope that the ICC entertains the case in the light that it properly deserves. It’s just a pity that the Hitchens/Dawkins initiative last year in September fell flat.
February 26, 2011 at 23:16	On every site that I can that mentions the unholy catholic church, I post a plea to the police to do what they SAY they will do: Go after paedophiles with all their might. If there’s one crime cops hate it’s child abuse. EXCEPT when its perpetrated by men in funny dresses and hats. Then the officers seem to stand back in awe. I urge all cops everywhere to investigate all catholic churches – help protect the kids and show the priests that The Law (not Their Lies) is paramount.
August 5, 2010 at 01:32	Funny you should mention “obsessed,” Hans. Just too precious for words.
July 6, 2010 at 11:45	I should think my comment goes for you all.
July 6, 2010 at 10:46	Con-Tester, your reasoning in this matter is very immature as one who is blind because you seem obsessed.
July 6, 2010 at 10:44	But of course the religiose must protest! Just see the logic of it, pointed out by Jesus Himself.
June 26, 2010 at 08:20	http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0625/breaking41.html Vatican protests over Belgian raids
June 25, 2010 at 22:51	http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/10403961.stm
This is very good news. Once the ball starts rolling, and they throw a few cardinals in jail, the RCC tower built on sand might just come tumbling down.
June 25, 2010 at 05:55	http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/8734850.stm
‘Holy Father, what shall we do?’ From the article: “Catholic priests are the Pope’s foot soldiers.”
Old Ratzi will probably answer: “My soldiers, just take care that you are not caught.”
June 25, 2010 at 05:52	Roman Catholics screw up. Yet again. This time, it’s the cover of a Vermont magazine, and the coverage thereof is rightly barbed.
June 15, 2010 at 10:13	Hans, you can stop making stuff up. And stop avoiding the subject, too. Because, more and more, it looks like you can’t actually answer any questions and instead just pull the same old smelly diversions out of your arse.
June 13, 2010 at 11:50	Con-Tester, you seem to claim, that you know more about me, than myself, so what can I say?
June 12, 2010 at 19:23	Hans, you’re avoiding the subject again by changing it. That’s what believers always do when they’re cornered. You don’t hold with RC doctrine because you never grew up with it or contemplated it seriously. Your latest comment proves it. Now try being a little more consequent with your arguments.
June 7, 2010 at 21:07	Con-Tester, sorry to disapoint you as my sundayschool days were Methodist. I was confirmed as a Dutch Reform and have since found a more exilent way of salvation. My parents were Duch Reform and did not appreciate all my questions.
June 7, 2010 at 20:40	No Hans, that’s definitely not why you “do not regard the RCC as the Church God established through Jesus Christ.” The real reason is that you never seriously contemplated any religious precepts other than the ones you grew up with. You’re just perpetuating the same thing your parents and peers drummed into you from your earliest age, namely, “It’s true because I say it’s true. I can show you an old book. You can’t prove me wrong.”
May 25, 2010 at 20:13	Con-Tester and that is why I do not regard the RCC as the Church God established through Jesus Christ.
May 25, 2010 at 20:08	But their clergy aren’t married men, Hans. That’s because their clergy are embodiments of Jeeeesusss on Earth, and Jeeeesusss was never married, Hans. And Hans, who the hell are you to challenge nearly 2,000 years of apostolic succession and papal infallibility, hmm? Still Hans, the fact remains that the RCC clergy is bound by its own traditions and rules, which make them commit depravities. So much for the moral mitigations of religion.
May 19, 2010 at 21:16	Con-Tester, I am not trying to cover anything up or don’t you understand the English language very well?
I point out again, why they appear to have a problem with child abuse.
1 Tim. 3:2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behavior, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
Their clergy should be married men, as prescribed in the Bible.
May 19, 2010 at 20:33	Oh, and I neglected to mention explicitly the glaringly obvious fact something about the RCC appears to encourage its servants to commit child abuses and then to try covering them up.
May 19, 2010 at 09:10	Hans, the fact remains that among these essentially self-appointed religious guardians of society’s morality, the incidence of both child abuse and its cover-up is much, much higher than elsewhere. Notwithstanding your infantile and failed attempts to conjure up an excuse for it, one can expect that said incidence should be exactly zero. But your god-addled brain is apparently incapable of understanding that these abuses and their deliberate cover-up constitute a betrayal of trust of the most egregious kind. So please carry on with this boring clowning about in the hope that someone – anyone – who has thought about it for even half a second might start believing you.
May 19, 2010 at 09:02	McBrollocks and Savage, the fact remains that the greater majority of RCC clergy and members are good people, who do not indulge in unacceptable behavior.
May 19, 2010 at 07:45	Old Ratzi is trying to get out jail free here. “The Vatican is expected to assert that bishops aren’t its employees because they aren’t paid by Rome, don’t act on Rome’s behalf and aren’t controlled day-to-day by the pope — factors courts use to determine whether employers are liable for the actions of their employees..”
May 17, 2010 at 08:45	Slippery and slimy fucking cunts!!!!!!!!!
It’s really all about the money to them.
Rape and destroy, then get some expensive and clever lawyers to help you out of a jam.
But please, be sensitive, they are a “force for good” around the globe. Do not persecute them. It wasn’t your children. They will try and do better from now on forward.
May 17, 2010 at 02:15	Sam Harris has spoken out about the RCC and their accountability in all the child rape and torture that occurred and still occurs in their organisation.
May 15, 2010 at 21:49	I agree, he should be put in jail if found guilty.
April 19, 2010 at 22:17	Allegations of repeated pederasty against an Italian priest in Kenya were never properly investigated by the RCC, and the police investigation is suspect.
April 13, 2010 at 11:01	While I really do admire Dawkins’ and Hitchens’ determination and initiative, I’m not convinced that they’ll succeed, despite, of course, really hoping that they will. Some excuse or other will be cooked up that will facilitate Ratzi’s slithering through some legal loophole or other, maybe something like the sovereignty of the RCC being globally inviolable or something similarly contrived and trite.
Meanwhile, in an unprecedented move of moral courage, the Archbishop of Johannesburg, Buti Tlhagale, has examined the wider implications of RC priests’ unsavoury behaviour, and indicated that there likely are numerous unreported instances of it in Africa. Elsewhere, an Irish victim wrote an open letter of “appreciation” to Benny Dick concerning his recent apology.
April 11, 2010 at 10:13	Leave a Reply Cancel reply	Enter your comment here...