Afterwardsness
In the psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud, afterwardsness is a "mode of belated understanding or retroactive attribution of sexual or traumatic meaning to earlier events... [from the German word] "Nachträglichkeit", translated as deferred action, retroaction, , afterwardsness". As summarized by another scholar, 'In one sense, Freud's theory of deferred action can be simply stated: memory is reprinted, so to speak, in accordance with later experience'. History and development of the term. Freud. The psychoanalytical concept of "afterwardsness" () appeared initially in Freud's writings in the 1890s in the commonsense form of the German adjective-adverb "afterwards" or "deferred" ("nachträglich"): as  Freud wrote in the unfinished and unpublished "A Project for a Scientific Psychology" of 1895, 'a memory is repressed which has only become a trauma "after the event" '. However the 'theory of deferred action had already been [publicly] put forward by Freud in the "Studies on Hysteria" (1895)', and in a paper of 1898 'he elaborates on the idea of "deferred action": the pathogenic effect of a traumatic event occurring in childhood...[manifesting] retrospectively when the child reaches a subsequent phase of sexual development'. The same idea would feature prominently a couple of decades later in his study of the  Wolf Man: 'The effects of the scene were deferred, but...had the same effect as though it were a recent experience'. 'Thus although he never offered a definition, much less a general theory, of the notion of deferred action, it was indisputably looked on by Freud as part of his conceptual equipment'. Lacan. It was Lacan who brought the term back from obscurity after Freud's death—his translation in the French language as the "" fits into the context of his "return to Freud" ("rapport de Rome", 1953)—and certainly French psychoanalysis has since taken the lead in its explication. Lacan  himself claimed in his Seminar that "the real implication of the "nachträglich", for example, has been ignored, though it was there all the time and had only to be picked up," while writing in Ecrits of "'deferred action' ("Nachtrag"), to rescue another of these terms from the facility into which they have since fallen...they were unheard of at that time." Jean Laplanche. After Lacan's "après-coup", Jean Laplanche’s contribution to the concept of the afterwardsness signifies something very different: with Jean Laplanche and in the relation to Freud (theory of the seduction, "neurotica"), Lacan's "Other" loses  its capital letter of the "Symbolic", that links Lacan to French structuralism (Saussure's linguistics, Lévi-Strauss's ethnology), and that links also Lacan "afterwards" in the history of the ideas (from the 1960s on)—by "inversion in the opposite direction" (a "destiny of the drive" in psychoanalytic theory)—to the at the place of Jacques Derrida's deconstruction. "Afterwardsness" becomes the key concept in Laplanche’s "theory of the general seduction" ("") and of the corresponding importance of 'the act of "psychic translation"... of [enigmatic] deposits by the other'—an approach which develops further Freud's letter 52/112 (to Wilhelm Fliess). In his  Notes on Afterwardsness (1992), based on a conversation of Jean Laplanche with Martin Stanton, there is an excellent definition of "afterwardsness" in Laplanche's sense, including the category of the "enigmatic message", that highlights Laplanche's contribution to Freud's concept: Deferred obedience. For Freud, deferred obedience was closely related to deferred action: again, "a "deferred" effect...a 'deferred obedience' under the influence of repression". Thus for instance Freud explored the different phases of a man's infantile attitude to his father: "As long as his father was alive it showed itself in unmitigated rebelliousness and open discord, but immediately  after his death it took the form of a neurosis based on abject submission and deferred obedience to him". In "Totem and Taboo" he generalised the principle and "depicted the social contract also as based on posthumous obedience to the father's authority"—offset at times by its converse, occasional Carnival-like licence such as "the memorial festival of the totem meal, in which the "restrictions" of deferred obedience no longer held".