Klon language
Kelon, or Klon, (pronounced [kəlon]) is a Papuan language of the western tip of Alor Island in the Alor archipelago of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Classification. Klon is a member of the Alor–Pantar languages, within the Timor–Alor–Pantar language family. Klon is part of the Alor subgroup along with Abui, Adang, Blagar, Kamang, Kui, Sawila, and Wersing. Klon is closely related to the Adang language, spoken across Kalabahi Bay to the north. Phonology. All the information in this section is from Louise Baird's grammar. Klon has 17 consonant phonemes and 13 vowel phonemes. Consonants. Aspiration  is sometimes produced with voiceless stops. The voiced labio-velar approximant /w/ is infrequently produced as a voiced bilabial fricative [β] by some speakers. Some of the consonants have a limited distribution. The voiced velar stop /g/ only occurs syllable initially. The voiced velar nasal /ŋ/ only occurs syllable finally. The voiced palatal stop /ɟ/, which only occurs word-finally, in a limited number of words. Some older speakers use the voiced alveolar stop [d] for /ɟ/. The rhotic trill /r/ and the voiceless alveolar fricative /s/ occur both syllable finally and syllable initially. They occur word initially in only  a few lexical items each. Some of these lexical items are clearly borrowings. The voiced labio-velar approximant /w/ and the voiced palatal approximant /j/ do not occur syllable-finally. Vowels. Monophthongs. The mid-front unrounded vowel /e/ and the open mid back rounded vowel /ɔ/ occur infrequently. Schwa only occurs in unstressed syllables. Diphthongs. Diphthongs occur in both open and closed syllables. Grammar. Grammatical relations. Klon has split-S alignment. The alignment can be considered agentive. In Klon, the only argument of an intransitive clause (S) is sometimes treated the same as an agent-like argument of a transitive  clause (S=A), and sometimes treated the same as a patient-like argument of a transitive clause (S=O). Whether S patterns with A or with O depends on the properties of the S argument, as well as the lexical class of the verb. In one class of verbs, S is coded like A, in another class of verbs S is treated as O, and in the third class of verbs, S can align with A or O, depending on the agentive properties of the S argument. The first verb class, the one which invariably aligns S as  A, is the largest class. Only the third class of verbs exhibits fluid S alignment. For the third verb class, when S has characteristics of an Actor, it patterns like A. When it has characteristics of an Undergoer, (more specifically, when S is an affected participant, but not a volitional and controlling participant) it patterns like O. The argument of an intransitive may be realized in several ways. A full NP can be used alone, a full NP can be used in combination with a pronoun, or only a pronoun can be used. In all cases the free pronoun is  only used with S arguments, and the bound pronoun with S arguments. Grammatical relations are not morphologically indicated when arguments are full NPs. Klon has multiple pronominal paradigms. Free pronouns mark A and S arguments, while bound pronouns indicate O and S arguments. In example 1 below, the A argument is indicated by the free pronoun "ini", while the O argument instead has the bound pronoun "g-". In example 2, the S argument is indicated with the bound pronoun "n-", and the A argument is represented by the free pronoun "na". In example 3, S is indicated by the free  pronoun "ini". Anaphoric co-reference When co-referring A and S arguments occur in paratactically conjoined clauses, the argument in the second clause can be either reduced to a pronoun or deleted. Similarly, co-referring O and S arguments which occur in paratactically conjoined clauses allow reduction or deletion of the argument in the second clause. Word order The word order of intransitives is SV. Transitive clauses can have AOV, OAV, or AVO word order. AOV word order disambiguates the A and O arguments when their animacy is equivalent and which argument is which is not otherwise inferrable from context . Voice. Papuan languages generally lack active-passive voice distinctions. Due to the absence of mention of this topic in Baird's grammar, it is assumed that Klon is a typical Papuan language in this regard. Valence. Most verbs can occur in intransitive and transitive constructions. Klon speakers seldom use ditransitive clauses. Only the verb "en" 'to give' is always ditransitive (trivalent). In "en" constructions, the Primary Undergoer, the recipient, is indicated by a pronominal prefix on the verb; the Secondary Undergoer, the theme, occurs as a full NP. Valency-decreasing operations The reciprocal marker "t-/to-/tin-/te-" indicates that the Actor and  Undergoer within a clause are the same referent. Thus, it makes a divalent verb monovalent. The reciprocal marker can only occur with non-singular Actors. Noun incorporation also decreases valency in Klon. Valency-increasing operations The verbal prefix "u-" increases valency by adding an Undergoer argument. The possible role of the Undergoer includes those of Patient, Theme, Recipient, or Goal. In the following example, "ebeer" 'die' has a single Undergoer NP argument "doqom" 'grandfather'. In the next example, the Undergoer argument associated with the verb "ebeer" 'die' is indicated by a third person pronoun verbal prefix, as well as with  a full NP "Labgei ong" 'this Labgei'. Example 3 is similar to example 2, except now only the pronominal prefix is used to indicate the Undergoer. Example 4 is in reference to a story about a grandfather beating his grandchildren if they did not get out of bed early in the morning. The speaker uses the inanimate Undergoer argument "haib" 'danger', as the reason for dying. "Hok" 'some', refers to the people who die. The "u-" prefix is used so that "ebeer" can take the additional argument "haib". The applicative verbal prefix "mi-" allows an added Undergoer argument as well , but this Undergoer can only be an Instrument. These two valency-increasing prefixes cannot co-occur on the same verb. Writing system. The consonant phonemes are written as follows: All other consonants use the same graphemes as IPA. The short vowel phonemes are written as follows: The long vowels are written as double graphemes such as "ee" for /ɛː/. References.