Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party
Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party is a 2016 American political documentary film about 2016 American presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and a critique of the Democratic Party. The film is written and directed by conservative political commentator Dinesh D'Souza and Bruce Schooley. The film had a limited release on July 15, 2016, before a wide release on July 22, 2016, and accompanies a book by D'Souza by the same name. The film was the top-grossing political documentary of 2016, grossing $13 million against a  $5 million budget. It was heavily panned by critics; review aggregation website Metacritic declared it the worst-received film of 2016. It was nominated for five Golden Raspberry Awards, and won four, including Worst Picture (a first for a documentary film), as well as Worst Director and Worst Actor for D'Souza. Background. Dinesh D'Souza, a conservative author and commentator who co-directed "Hillary's America", is known for also directing "" (2012), which criticized incumbent president Barack Obama during the 2012 presidential election, and "" (2014) arguing against liberal critiques of its history, including the theft of Native American and Mexican  lands, black slavery, contemporary foreign policy, and its capitalist system. Synopsis. The film begins with scenes of D'Souza at the halfway house where he spent time due to a conviction for making an illegal political contribution. The film then switches to examining and criticizing the history of the Democratic Party, from Andrew Jackson to the present day. D'Souza is portrayed going into a basement archive of the DNC Headquarters where he reveals secrets of the party's history. The film offers an interpretation of the origins of the Democratic Party in a brief outline, then examines the racism of one  of its founders, President Andrew Jackson. It goes on to describe how Jackson and the Democratic Party passed legislation that brutally expelled Native Americans from their land and created the reservation system. This is followed by a political analysis of the historical record of the Democratic Party in the North and South in supporting and defending the institution of slavery, and ensuring its spread into the western territories. It examines the founding of the Republican Party which D'Souza personally suggests was a reaction to the support of slavery by the Democratic Party and their endorsement and defense of fugitive slave  laws. The film then argues the Democratic Party opposed the Reconstruction Amendments to the United States Constitution. The film argues that the Democratic Party had close ties to the Ku Klux Klan in the 19th and 20th centuries, including the accusation that Democratic President Woodrow Wilson supported the KKK and racial segregation, opposed anti-lynching legislation, manipulated New Deal legislation in the 1930s to keep African Americans from benefiting, and opposed civil rights legislation of the 1960s. The film also examines the validity of the common argument made by leaders of the Democratic Party that the parties "switched positions", with  the Democratic Party becoming progressive and Southern racists becoming Republicans, which it rebuts by arguing that fewer than 1 percent of Southern Democrats who opposed civil rights legislation changed parties. The film examines the record of the Democratic Party in its use of social welfare programs and machine politics, particularly in urban areas, to create what has been described as a new plantation system, enabling the Democratic Party to exploit and coerce residents. The film then describes the rise and activities of radicals such as Saul Alinsky, who D'Souza believes affected both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton greatly. The film  proceeds to examine and criticize the actions of Clinton, questioning her ethics, honesty, and motivations. In a post-credits scene, Dinesh D'Souza appears in front of a classroom, saying "So how will you know when you have become an American? You'll know, when you become a Republican", followed by an applause by the students in the classroom. Interviews. D'Souza presents various interviews in the film, including: Release. "Hillary's America" had a limited release on July 15, 2016, playing in three theaters in Dallas, Houston, and Phoenix, and making a box office of $77,500. The success of the  film during that period was described as "massively frontloaded" because it made about $41,000 on the first day. On July 22, 2016, "Hillary's America" got a nationwide expansion, entering 1,217 theaters. This date fell between the end of the 2016 Republican National Convention and the beginning of the 2016 Democratic National Convention. On its opening weekend, the film's box office was $3.7 million, in the top ten that weekend. On July 23, 2016, Larry Gatlin and the Gatlin Brothers released the music video "Stand Up and Say So (Hillary's America)", a song they wrote and  performed for the film. Reception. Box office. "Hillary's America: The Secret of the Democratic Party" became the highest grossing documentary of 2016 and the 20th-highest domestically of all-time, grossing $13.1 million at the box office. In its opening weekend of wide release it grossed $4 million, finishing 9th at the box office. Critical response. On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 4% based on 28 reviews, and an average rating of 1.7/10. The site's critics consensus reads, ""Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party" finds Dinesh  D'Souza once again preaching to the right-wing choir – albeit less effectively than ever." On Metacritic the film has a weighted average score of 2 out of 100, based on 17 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike". The film has the second all-time lowest score in the site's history, after six films ("The Garbage Pail Kids Movie", "Bio-Dome", "The Singing Forest", "Chaos", "United Passions" and "Death of a Nation" (also directed by D'Souza)) tied with a score of 1. Alan Zilberman's Washington Post review calls the documentary "too incoherent for argument" and boring, its only redeeming moments being  unintentional comedy, while Glenn Kenny wrote in the New York Times that it's a masterpiece if the criterium for evaluation were "the extent to which it communicates the personality and character of its director." In a review for "IndieWire", film critic David Ehrlich wrote, "This is the same old dog and pony show upon which D’Souza has built his brand. It’s his usual shtick of piggybacking a baseless personal attack onto a pseudo history lesson, a feature-length dog whistle that’s blown at a pitch so high that only the most ignorant or paranoid of people are  capable of hearing it." Writing in "The Guardian", Jordan Hoffman described the film as "paranoid" and "so demented that no synopsis could do it justice" and D'Souza as a "simpleton". He goes on to say that the basis of the film, the "purposely misunderstood fact" that "the Republicans used to be the good guys when it came to the issue of racial equality in America" is as surprising a discovery as the Soviet Union being an ally of the United States in World War II because: "things change, and labels are semantics, and the concepts that bind a political party  then might not be the same ones that bind them now." Dann Gire of the "Boston Herald" called the film "an embarrassment to propaganda films", full of "mind-boggling conspiracy theories" and "fried thoughts and lapses of basic journalistic practices". Alex Shephard of "The New Republic" said: "Because he is a very dumb man, D’Souza doesn’t even make a credible argument that Bill and Hillary are corrupt, even though in many ways it’s low-hanging fruit. Instead, like every fringe weirdo who comes after the Clintons does, he overreaches and invents an absurd conspiracy ... It’s not enough  for, say, the Clinton Foundation to have taken money from, say, Saudi Arabia—instead, Clinton is literally presented as selling America to foreign countries. Why? D’Souza never explains." Kurt Hyde of the John Birch Society publication "The New American" called the film "a mixed bag", stating that, among other reasons, although "parts of the movie were well-researched, the accounts of numerous other events, especially those more than 100 years in the past could have been researched more thoroughly" and that "[t]here isn't any great difference between the two parties", contrary to what the film claimed. John Fund of  National Review stated that "[the film] is over the top in places and definitely selective, but the troubling facts are accurate and extensively documented in the D’Souza book that accompanies the movie [and that] the film is intensely patriotic". Accolades. In response to the Golden Raspberry Awards nominations, D'Souza stated that he was "actually quite honored" and called the nominations "petty revenge" in response to Trump's election and that "the film might have played an important role in the election." After learning his film had won four of its five nominations, D'Souza recorded a short video accepting the awards , and repeating his view that he won because Razzie members were upset over Trump's election victory. Other. On July 23, 2016, Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee (and eventual victor) against Clinton, called on supporters to see the film.