Parker v British Airways Board
Parker v British Airways Board  1 QB 1004 is an English property law case ordered by the Court of Appeal. The case establishes the rights that a person has to a chattel found on the surface of the land. Facts. A passenger named Parker found a gold bracelet on the floor of an executive lounge at Heathrow airport. He handed it to the owners of the land (British Airways Board) in order for them to attempt to find the true owner; requesting that the item be returned to him should the original owner not  be found. When British Airways Board sold the unclaimed bracelet for £850, Mr Parker sued for damages, challenging their claim to the bracelet. At first instance, he was successful, and was awarded £850 as damages and £50 as interest. Court of Appeal decision. Judgment. The judgment of Donaldson LJ begins the facts in a rather poetic manner: "On 15 November 1978, the plaintiff, Alan George Parker, had a date with fate - and perhaps with legal immortality. He found himself in the international executive lounge at terminal one, Heathrow Airport. And that is not all he found. He  also found a gold bracelet lying on the floor. "We know very little about the plaintiff, and it would be nice to know more. He was lawfully in the lounge and, as events showed, he was an honest man. Clearly he had not forgotten the schoolboy maxim "Finders keepers." But, equally clearly, he was well aware of the adult qualification "unless the true owner claims the article". ..". Result. The court upheld Mr Parker's claim, as the bracelet had been found in an area frequented by the public that British Airways Board did not exercise sufficient control over. British Airways  Board were thus unable to assert superior title over the bracelet. Donaldson LJ held that this was a case of "finders keepers". The defendants could not assert any title to the bracelet based upon the rights of an occupier over chattels attached to a building. Here, the bracelet was lying loose on the floor. There was no sufficient manifestation of any intention of the defendant to exercise control over lost property before it was found which would otherwise give the defendants a right superior to that of the plaintiff or indeed any right over the bracelet. The judgement laid out  clear rules for both the Finder, and the Occupier of the Premises: