Eduard Daelen
Eduard Adolf Daelen (18 March 1848 – 9 May 1923) was a German painter and writer. For some of his writings he used the pseudonyms Ursus teutonicus, Angelo Dämon, Edu Daelen-Bachem and Michel Bär. He became known above all for the first biography of Wilhelm Busch, which he wrote in 1886. Life. Born in Hörde, Daelen was the son of a senior engineer. Although he much preferred to study art, he was first forced to study mechanical engineering. To this end, he was enrolled at the trade school in Barmen from 1863 to 1865 and at the trade  academy in Berlin from 1867 to 1868. It was not until the autumn of 1868 that he entered the elementary class with Andreas Müller at the Kunstakademie Düsseldorf, but left again in the autumn of 1869 "because he could not yet get a place in the antique hall". He therefore went first to the Berlin and until 1875 to the Munich Academy of Arts, where Otto Seitz and Wilhelm von Diez were his teachers. After a short stay in Rome, he settled in Düsseldorf in 1875. From 1877 to 1923, he was a member of the Malkasten and chairman of  the local association of the . He also belonged to the academic artists' association "Orient", the artists' group "Laetitia" and the "Düsseldorfer Schriftstellerverein". In 1900, he was the initiator of the "Goethe-Bund". In near Düsseldorf, the Eduard-Daelen-Straße was named after him. Activity. Daelen's painting is assigned to the Düsseldorf school of painting and Munich School. He dealt with activities of the Düsseldorf school in numerous paintings and writings. His painting style can be described as "realistic", However, he also incorporated Impressionist influences in his colouring and application of paint. He probably had financial success mainly with portraits , e.g. of the German Emperor Wilhelm I or Otto von Bismarck's for local and public clients. In addition, he also produced "surreal" compositions, such as "Größenwahn" (1891), "Aschermittwoch" (1892), or "Der Clown", an allegory of "contemporary artistic excesses" (1892), as well as landscape depictions and numerous other portraits. After the outbreak of the First World War, he produced "patriotic" works such as the paintings "Der deutsche Adler. Kampf des germanischen Adlers mit dem gallischen Hahn", "Des Weltbrands Licht!, Allegorie auf den Weltkrieg" or "Mit eiserner Ruhe. The "German Michel" leaning on a sword, the blade of which is inscribed  with "Siegfried", stands upright before a dragon". In addition, he became involved with appeals, posters and war postcards. Among other things, Daelen wrote art criticism, which appeared under the pseudonyms "Ursos teutonicus" and "Angelo Dämon" in various papers. In them he occasionally used language that bordered on insults. In addition, he published titles such as "Das Hohe Lied vom Bier", "Schüttle dich, Germania! ", "Skizzen vom Rhein", "Triumph der Hansa", biographies (among others on Eduard Bendemann, Wilhelm Camphausen, Carl Müller, Eduard Steinbrück and Benjamin Vautier) for thee "Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie", poems as well as festive and slow plays for performance in  the Künstlerverein Malkasten. He was editor and co-author of the art volumes "Die Schönheit der Frauen", 280 photographic outdoor studies by Ed Büchler, J. Agélou, G. Plüschow and E. Schneider (with Paul Hirth), Stuttgart, Schmidt 1905, "Die Schönheit des menschlichen Körpers", with 322 painterly nude studies after nature (with contributions by Gustav Fritsch, Josef Kirchner among others), Stuttgart, Kunstverlag Klemm & Beckmann 1905, and "Nackte Schönheit. Ein Buch für Künstler und Ärzte", with 336 artistic nude studies after photographic images (with the collaboration of Dr. Gustav Fritsch, Professor of Anatomy at the University of Berlin and J. Paar), Stuttgart, Hermann  Schmidt 1907. Eduard Daelen and Wilhelm Busch. A vehement anti-Catholic, he believed he had found a kindred spirit in Wilhelm Busch. This seemed to be indicated by Wilhelm Busch's anti-clerical picture stories such as ', ' and "". When Daelen's work "Über Wilhelm Busch und seine Bedeutung" appeared, however, both Wilhelm Busch and his circle of friends were embarrassed. In the scurrilous laudation, Eduard Daelen equated Wilhelm Busch with greats such as Leonardo da Vinci, Peter Paul Rubens and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and quoted uncritically from a noncommittal correspondence with Busch. He described the author Busch as the "archetype  of the genuine German folk spirit" and "embodiment of the mythical ancestor Teut". The "pious Helene", which in today's view caricatures above all religious hypocrisy and dubious bourgeois morality, Daelen saw as an attack on "female mischievousness, curiosity and vanity, as well as the always speculative sophistication despite all laziness and narrow-mindedness". The literary scholar Friedrich Theodor Vischer, who in his essay "Über neuere deutsche Karikatur" (On Recent German Caricature) found a respectful appreciation of Busch as well as some critical remarks, attacked Daelen in page-long tirades as a "literary bonze" and accused him of the "eunuch  envy of the dried-up philistine". One of the first to respond to Daelen's biographical attempt was the literary historian . His essay, which appeared in the "Frankfurter Zeitung", contained a number of incorrect biographical data and was the occasion for Wilhelm Busch to comment on his person in the same newspaper. Busch felt exposed by the biography and felt that the denigration by Kaspar Braun went too far. He also found the treatment of his relationship with Johanna Keßler, who had strongly supported him in his Frankfurt years, indiscreet and tastelessly illuminated. Daelen died in Düsseldorf at the age  of 75.