Representation theory of diffeomorphism groups
In mathematics, a source for the representation theory of the group of diffeomorphisms of a smooth manifold "M" is the initial observation that (for "M" connected) that group acts transitively on "M". History. A survey paper from 1975 of the subject by Anatoly Vershik, Israel Gelfand and M. I. Graev attributes the original interest in the topic to research in theoretical physics of the local current algebra, in the preceding years. Research on the "finite configuration" representations was in papers of R. S. Ismagilov (1971), and A. A. Kirillov (1974). The representations of interest in  physics are described as a cross product "C"("M")·Diff("M"). Constructions. Let therefore "M" be a "n"-dimensional connected differentiable manifold, and "x" be any point on it. Let Diff("M") be the orientation-preserving diffeomorphism group of "M" (only the identity component of mappings homotopic to the identity diffeomorphism if you wish) and Diff("M") the stabilizer of "x". Then, "M" is identified as a homogeneous space From the algebraic point of view instead, formula_1 is the algebra of smooth functions over "M" and formula_2 is the ideal of smooth functions vanishing at "x". Let formula_3 be the ideal of smooth functions which vanish  up to the n-1th partial derivative at "x". formula_3 is invariant under the group Diff("M") of diffeomorphisms fixing x. For "n" > 0 the group Diff("M") is defined as the subgroup of Diff("M") which acts as the identity on formula_5. So, we have a descending chain Here Diff("M") is a normal subgroup of Diff("M"), which means we can look at the quotient group Using harmonic analysis, a real- or complex-valued function (with some sufficiently nice topological properties) on the diffeomorphism group can be decomposed into Diff("M") representation-valued functions over "M". The supply of representations. So what are the  representations of Diff("M")? Let's use the fact that if we have a group homomorphism φ:"G" → "H", then if we have a "H"-representation, we can obtain a restricted "G"-representation. So, if we have a rep of we can obtain a rep of Diff("M"). Let's look at first. This is isomorphic to the general linear group GL("n", R) (and because we're only considering orientation preserving diffeomorphisms and so the determinant is positive). What are the reps of GL("n", R)? We know the reps of SL("n", R) are simply tensors over "n" dimensions. How about the R part? That  corresponds to the "density", or in other words, how the tensor rescales under the determinant of the Jacobian of the diffeomorphism at "x". (Think of it as the conformal weight if you will, except that there is no conformal structure here). (Incidentally, there is nothing preventing us from having a complex density). So, we have just discovered the tensor reps (with density) of the diffeomorphism group. Let's look at This is a finite-dimensional group. We have the chain Here, the "⊂" signs should really be read to mean an injective homomorphism, but since it is canonical, we can  pretend these quotient groups are embedded one within the other. Any rep of can automatically be turned into a rep of if "n" > "m". Let's say we have a rep of which doesn't arise from a rep of Then, we call the fiber bundle with that rep as the fiber (i.e. Diff/Diff is the structure group) a jet bundle of order "p". Side remark: This is really the method of induced representations with the smaller group being Diff(M) and the larger group being Diff("M"). Intertwining structure. In general, the space of sections of the tensor and  jet bundles would be an irreducible representation and we often look at a subrepresentation of them. We can study the structure of these reps through the study of the intertwiners between them. If the fiber is not an irreducible representation of Diff("M"), then we can have a nonzero intertwiner mapping each fiber pointwise into a smaller quotient representation. Also, the exterior derivative is an intertwiner from the space of differential forms to another of higher order. (Other derivatives are not, because connections aren't invariant under diffeomorphisms, though they are covariant.) The partial derivative isn't diffeomorphism invariant. There is  a derivative intertwiner taking sections of a jet bundle of order "p" into sections of a jet bundle of order "p" + 1.