Arkadaşlar reklam için mi ne için gönderdiler bilmiyom. Size zahmet biri bunu özetlesin. ICANN is about to renew the. org, . biz, and. info registry contracts with a HUGE loophole to allow each registry to charge different scaled pricing on a per-domain basis and to provide each registry with a presumptive perpetual monopoly. This means your best domains may very soon cost you thousands per year in renewal fees. We need your help to halt the approval of these contract proposals. Everyone who owns a domain and cares about its value should post a comment TODAY to: http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-28jul06.htm Its easy: Just email your comments to each of the three following email addresses: , , and then approve the email links they respond with. The comment period will remain open until 5:00 PM PDT, August 28, 2006. THAT'S TODAY! The comments will be submitted to the ICANN Board of Directors for the Board to consider at its meeting on September 13, 2006. If Registries can set &quot;market prices&quot; for each. biz, . info, . org domain name (ie. $500 or $1 million per year for cars. org or Google. org etc.. ), then ICANN will have to provide Verisign the same terms for.com and. net in 2012. ALL of your businesses could be in serious jeopardy. So we all have a vested interest in this not happening. If you CHOOSE to remain silent the fallout will jeopardize all of our futures. We need your help. Please take a moment to read the comments others have posted, then create one of your own and mail it off. http://forum.icann. org/lists/biz-tld-agreement http://forum.icann. org/lists/info-tld-agreement http://forum.icann. org/lists/org-tld-agreement Below are sample letters that were forwarded to us. They give some good ideas and the consequences of staying silent. Please remember that the deadline is 5pm today. THANK YOU!! The Parked.com Team Sample #1 To the ICANN Board, The proposed TLD Registry Renewal Contracts for. info, . biz, and. org domains have a seriously flawed component whereby a Registry will be able to set arbitrary rates without price caps at whatever the market will bear. This will create a financially devastating impact on the business models of millions of domain and web site owners worldwide. The impact will be especially damaging to. org and. info domain owners and site operators who for the most part use. org and. info domains for non-profit, charitable organizations, and educational purposes. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been invested into the core domain name infrastructure of the Internet with the secured expectation that acquiring, owning and maintaining domains would always be affordable and make economic sense for a long term investment. To enable and facilitate a way for registry's to financially exploit and gouge the marketplace would not only be a business tragedy, but it goes against the grain of all the base principles upon which the Internet was conceived. It would certainly deter new entrepreneurs from considering venturing onto the Net if there is no certainty what their site's URL location will be costing them each year they renew. And the vast multitude of current domain owners and web site operators would close up shop if their costs of doing business skyrocketed on every domain they own. Even more importantly, this flaw would give an unfair economic advantage to individuals and corporations who have substantial capital resources who could outbid less fortunate and startup entrepreneurs with limited capital. And inevitably, there would be a tidal wave of costly and time consuming lawsuits and litigation that ICANN itself would have to deal with from the millions of impacted domain owners. Thus, I respectfully request that you reconsider and reconstruct the contracts and remove this no price caps clause completely. Sample #2 I wish to express my profound concern that the proposed registry agreements for. org, . biz and. info do not prohibit predatory price rises by the registries. ICANN was entirely right to object to Verisign's SiteFinder service, and for all the right reasons, but appears not to have learned the obvious lesson: that registries can be motivated to do things that are not in registrants' interests. Given that reality, removal of price caps is likely to result in anticompetitive practices that seriously impact internet stakeholders. I hope that you will reconsider this aspect of the agreements. Sample #3 In permitting even the theoretical hiking of fees for domain name renewals, ICANN is threatening nothing less than the democratic nature of the Internet. As an individual, I have been using a. org domain for some years for a political and social blog website. The relatively low cost of renewing my domain name and hosting the site is extremely important to me. Operating such a site now feels like an extension of my free speech rights! I am counting on you not to do anything to erode that. Thank you. Sample #4 As a small business operator, with substantial goodwill invested in our domain names, I wish to express my strong opposition to the lifting of price controls. One of ICANN's core principles is the encouragement of competition at both the registry and registrar levels. Such competition is incompatible with the kind of unrestricted monopoly that these proposed agreements would create. I therefore urge the board to reject the agreements.

Konu daha once acildi: http://forum.iyinet.com/webmaster-g... o-domainlerde-yeni-fiyatland-rmaya-tepki.html