Assertion: trust | /r/HasProperty | rational
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Thus, trust can be rational depending on whether one conceives of rationality as truth-directed or end-directed.
text: Moreover, if it is likely that they will respond well, then the trust in them must be rational.
text: Philosophers who agree that trust can be rational—regardless, perhaps, of whether it is “substantial” (to use McGeer’s language)—tend to disagree about the extent to which reasons that confer rationality must be accessible to the trustor.
text: Some say that all of these reasons must be available to this person in order for the trust to be rational; in that case, the person is or could be internally justified in trusting as s/he does.
text: Some epistemologists of trust write as though trust is only rational if the trustor him or herself has rationally estimated the likely trustworthiness of the trustee.
text: For example, Russell Hardin implies that if my trust in you is rational, then “I make a rough estimate of the truth of [the] claim … that you will be trustworthy under certain conditions