Assertion: vagueness | /r/HasProperty | reduced to ignorance
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: And because vagueness is reduced to ignorance, the account makes it possible to preserve the laws of classical first-order logic: vague expressions are not formally represented in any different way from precise expressions, so any prediction that follows from the formal semantics of a precise term should in principle hold in the case of a vague term, provided that ignorance is shown to not make a difference.