Assertion: sids | /r/HasProperty | a diagnosis of exclusion
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion and should be applied to only those cases in which an infant's death is sudden and unexpected, and remains unexplained after the performance of an adequate postmortem investigation, including:
text: By definition, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is of unknown cause and is a diagnosis of exclusion (unexplained after review of history, autopsy, and death scene investigation); if evidence of a specific cause of death is found, then it is not SIDS.
text: SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, meaning that other causes of death must be ruled out.
text: SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, meaning that other causes of death must be ruled out.
text: Thus, SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion: SIDS as a cause of death is determined only when all other causes have been excluded.
text: Since SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, given when the investigation provides no other explanation, there is not a specific list of symptoms to determine whether a baby is in danger of succumbing to SIDS.
text: As SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, all other causes of death must initially be ruled out, including unintentional or intentional injury, cardiovascular anomalies, and metabolic or genetic
text: SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, so the more we know, the less likely SIDS will remain useful as a diagnosis.'
text: SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion given after autopsy when all other explanations have been ruled out.
text: As SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, much research has been done into the underlying mechanisms that may underpin known risk factors.
text: A death is diagnosed as SIDS only after all other alternatives have been eliminated: SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion.
text: As SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion, there has been considerable research into the underlying mechanisms that may underpin known risk factors.