Assertion: speech | /r/Causes | direct harm
Facets:
value: to rights
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: The first is that the harm principle would actually allow religious and political speech for the same reasons that it allows most pornography and hate speech, namely that it is not possible to demonstrate that such speech does cause direct harm to rights.
text: Very few, if any, liberal democracies are willing to support the Millian view that only speech causing direct harm to rights should be prohibited.