Assertion: subcontract's subcontractor | /r/HasProperty | employee
Facets:
value: by the australian tax office
type: OTHER
value: despite any written agreement
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: If so, this is likely a subcontractor, not an employee.
text: If not, despite any written agreement, a subcontractor may be considered an employee (having regard to the relevant tests) by the courts and/or agencies such as the Australian Tax Office.
text: If, for example, the subcontractor is considered to be an employee by the Australian Tax Office, then the employer may be liable for PAYG payments that should have been made as well as interest and penalties.