Assertion: audio | /r/HasProperty | made for hire
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: If the sound recording was not a work made for hire, any one of those coauthors (or, in the case of coauthors joining in a single grant, any group of coauthors) would have a right to terminate pursuant to section 203.
text: The result would be that the sound recording would be a joint work that is in part a work made for hire and in part a work of individual authors.(23)
text: But because that right pertains only to grants made before 1978, when most if not all sound recordings probably were works made for hire under the more liberal definition of the 1909 Act, the section 304 termination right is not likely to be significant for sound recordings.