Assertion: vagueness | /r/HasProperty | understood
Facets:
value: semantically
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: If we add that the vagueness in the premise has to be semantically understood (Sider assumes this), then, what (3) states is that, in any case (in any situation involving certain times and certain objects corresponding to them in the way seen before—having whatever properties and standing in whatever relations) in which it is asked whether there is an object that exists only at the specified times and that is composed at each one of them by the corresponding objects (having the properties they have and standing in the relations they stand in), our notion of object is such that it determines that definitely there is such an object or definitely there is no such object, i.e., either according to all admissible precisifications of the notion of object there is such an object or according to all admissible precisifications of the notion of object there is not such an object.