Assertion: supreme court's judge | /r/CapableOf | issue advocacy communication
Facets:
value: in favor of the judge
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: Instead, during its 2009-2010 term and by a 4-3 vote, the Court adopted a rule that recusal is not required based solely on any endorsement or receipt of a lawful campaign contribution from a party or entity involved in the proceeding, and that a judge does not need to seek recusal where it would be based solely on a party in the case sponsoring an independent expenditure or issue advocacy communication in favor of the judge.