Assertion: intentional trespass | /r/CapableOf | entitle landowner
Facets:
value: irrespective of actual harm
type: OTHER
value: to damages
type: PURPOSE
Source sentences:
text: See also Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co., 709 P.2d 782 (Wash. 1985), adopting Martin in a case involving deposit of airborne particles from a copper smelter, but rejecting the Restatement view that an intentional trespass entitles a landowner to damages irrespective of actual harm.