Assertion: trespass | /r/HasProperty | actionable
Facets:
value: per se
type: MANNER
value: without prove of damage
type: OTHER
value: in the courts
type: LOCATION
value: of itself
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Trespass to land is actionable per se.
text: A trespass is also known as ‘actionable per se’.
text: For a trespass to be actionable, the tortfeasor must voluntarily go to a specific location, but need not be aware that he entered the property of a particular person.
text: If a trespass is actionable and no action is taken within reasonable or prescribed time limits, the land owner may forever lose the right to seek a remedy, and may even forfeit certain property rights.
text: Trespass to land does not require proof of damage for it to be actionable in the courts.
text: If a trespass occurred, it is actionable in and of itself, without having to prove that the possessor of the land was actually damaged by the trespass.
text: That there was direct interference with the possession of his land, though actual damage need not be proved, since trespass is actionable per se.
text: For trespass to be actionable, the owner should at least sustain a legal injury, which entitles the owner to a verdict for some damages.
text: Trespass is actionable whether or not there is damage to the land, and whether or not the trespasser intended to trespass.
text: Trespass in all its forms is actionable per se, i.e., without the need for the plaintiff to prove he has sustained actual damage…
text: Trespass is actionable per se (without proof of actual damage).
text: Trespass to land is actionable per se.
text: Trespass is actionable per se.
text: Trespass to person are actionable without prove of damage which is actionable per se.
text: As with trespass generally, most authorities hold that trespass to goods is actionable, without proof of damage.