Assertion: starling | /r/HasProperty | nuisance
Facets:
value: in north america
type: LOCATION
value: generally
type: MANNER
value: at times
type: TEMPORAL
value: in both urban and rural areas
type: LOCATION
value: due to living
type: CAUSE
value: in alberta
type: LOCATION
value: due to their nesting
type: CAUSE
value: due to habits
type: CAUSE
value: due to eating
type: CAUSE
value: to livestock producers
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: Starlings are generally a nuisance to have on your property, especially when large flocks are present.
text: Starlings are considered a nuisance species in North America.
text: Starlings destroy some insects, but they are generally considered a nuisance since they drive away smaller, desirable birds.
text: In Alberta, starlings can be a nuisance to livestock producers.
text: Starlings can be a nuisance in both urban and rural areas due to their nesting, eating and living habits.
text: I believe starlings can be a nuisance at times as some people say but the drawbacks to them are greatly exaggerated.
text: Starlings are considered a nuisance species in North America.
text: Starlings are considered a nuisance species in North America.
text: Starlings are considered a nuisance species in North America.