Assertion: synecdoche | /r/HasProperty | a type of metonymy
Facets:
value: really
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Some experts debate that synecdoche is a type of metonymy, but we’ll leave that to them to figure out.
text: A synecdoche is a kind of metonym, but the associated thing is actually a component part, a piece, of whatever you are characterizing.
text: Synecdoche is really a kind of metonymy, just that the related object is a part of the object referred to.
text: Synecdoche is a type of metonymy, because it refers to its target by using a related term.
text: A synecdoche is a type of metonymy, where the word substitution must be a part of the the word being substituted.
text: Synecdoche is a type of metonymy.
text: Since synecdoche is a type of metonymy, it is fair to say that all types of metonymy that are not synecdoche are metonymy.
text: However, synecdoche is still a type of metonymy, so anything that is synecdoche is also metonymy.
text: In fact, some consider synecdoche to be a type of metonymy.
text: Synecdoche is a type of metonymy, because it refers to its target by using a related term.