Assertion: snowmobile | /r/HasProperty | a motor vehicle
Facets:
value: like a car
type: OTHER
value: in part
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: It also reasoned that although the trial judge said that a snowmobile is a motor vehicle in part because a snowmobile must be licensed (at least in some situations), the legislature’s definition of “motor vehicle” says nothing about a licensing requirement.
text: 2229 Snowmobile, not a motor vehicle.
text: A snowmobile is a motor vehicle, just like a car, and is subject to many of the same laws.
text: 2229 Snowmobile, not a motor vehicle.
text: In an interesting turn – and a razor-thin 5-4 decision – the WA Supreme Court’s State v. Tucker reversed an earlier decision by the WA Court of Appeals and found that a snowmobile IS, in fact, a “motor vehicle” for purposes of Washington’s Theft of a Motor Vehicle statute.