Assertion: terrorism | /r/HasProperty | wrong
Facets:
value: absolutely
type: DEGREE
value: accordingly
type: DEGREE
value: almost
type: DEGREE
value: by definition
type: OTHER
value: in itself
type: OTHER
value: within a nonconsequentialist approach to morality
type: OTHER
value: always
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Experts disagree about "whether terrorism is wrong by definition or just wrong as a matter of fact; they disagree about whether terrorism should be defined in terms of its aims, or its methods, or both, or neither
text: Within a nonconsequentialist approach to morality, terrorism is considered wrong in itself, because of what it is, rather than only because (and insofar as) its consequences are bad on balance.
text: But these people also believe the terrorism is always wrong.
text: Accordingly, terrorism is almost absolutely wrong (Primoratz 2013: chapter 6).
text: Some hold that terrorism is absolutely wrong.
text: Whether terrorism is wrong is a question that is often answered badly or at least inadequately, according to Walzer, who defines terrorism as the random killing of innocent people, in the hope of creating pervasive fear.