Assertion: terrorist's act | /r/HasProperty | terrorism
Facets:
value: commonly
type: TEMPORAL
value: indisputably
type: DEGREE
value: sometimes
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: If one identifies with the victim of the violence, for example, then the act is terrorism.
text: For an act to be considered terrorism, it has to be an intentional act or threat of violence that also meets two of three additional stipulations.
text: Under the definition of terrorism in American law (18 U.S. Code § 2331), no act can be qualified as terrorist if there is no terror intended .
text: On this account, not only real, but also merely alleged injustice or oppression counts in determining the innocence of the victims and deciding which acts are acts of terrorism; thus such decisions are not hostage to endless debates about the moral status of contested policies.
text: IHL does not provide a definition of 'terrorism', but prohibits most acts committed in armed conflict that would commonly be considered 'terrorist'.
text: An act is terrorist if and only if (1) it is committed by an individual or group of individuals privately, i.e. without the legitimate authority of a recognized state; (2) it is directed indiscriminately against non-combatants; (3) the goal of it is to achieve something politically relevant; (4) this goal is pursued by means of fear-provoking violence.
text: It’s important to understand that not all violent acts are terrorist acts.
text: How do we decide what elements make a certain act one of terrorism?
text: An act of sabotage, sometimes regarded as an act of terrorism, was the peacetime sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, a ship owned by Greenpeace, which occurred while in port at Auckland, New Zealand on July 10, 1985.
text: If one identifies with the victim of the violence, for example, then the act is terrorism.
text: Stohl clarifies, however, that "[n]ot all acts of state violence are terrorism.
text: To a large extent the use of the term depends on one's world view: if the world is perceived as peaceful, violent acts appear to be terrorism.
text: Some acts -- like the attacks on the World Trade Center -- are indisputably terrorism, but others cause enormous debate.
text: They should include questions they think need to be answered to decide whether an act is terrorism or not.
text: Can the student raise additional questions about specific cases that would help them make a better decision about whether an act is terrorism?
text: Is the target of terrorism always human, or can acts of sabotage against property also be considered terrorism?
text: Is the target of terrorism always human, or can acts of sabotage against property also be considered terrorism?
text: Is the target of terrorism always human, or can acts of sabotage against property also be considered terrorism?
text: Is the target of terrorism always human, or can acts of sabotage against property also be considered terrorism?
text: Or the definition of terrorism in American law (18 U.S. Code § 2331), under which no act can be qualified as terrorist if there is no terror intended.1
text: They rely on state or federal guidelines when defining when violent acts are acts of terrorism.
text: IHL does not provide a definition of ‘terrorism’, but prohibits most acts committed in armed conflict that would commonly be considered ‘terrorist’.