Assertion: wrath | /r/AtLocation | the word
Facets:
value: frequently
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: wrath and anger are frequently mentioned in the Word, but in the internal sense they do not signify wrath and anger, but repugnance, and this for the reason that whatever is repugnant to any affection produces wrath or anger, so that in the internal sense they are only repugnances; but the repugnance of truth is called wrath , and the repugnance of good is called anger ; and in the opposite sense wrath is the repugnance of falsity or its affection, that is, of the principles of falsity; and anger is the repugnance of evil or its cupidity, that is, of the love of self and the love of the world.
text: wrath and anger are frequently mentioned in the Word, but in the internal sense they do not signify wrath and anger, but repugnance, and this for the reason that whatever is repugnant to any affection produces wrath or anger, so that in the internal sense they are only repugnances; but the repugnance of truth is called wrath , and the repugnance of good is called anger ; and in the opposite sense wrath is the repugnance of falsity or its affection, that is, of the principles of falsity; and anger is the repugnance of evil or its cupidity, that is, of the love of self and the love of the world.