Assertion: socialism | /r/HasProperty | compatible
Facets:
value: fully
type: DEGREE
value: with one-party states
type: OTHER
value: with constraints on freedom of speech
type: OTHER
value: with any form of competition
type: OTHER
value: with "big business,"
type: OTHER
value: with islamic teachings
type: OTHER
value: with crony capitalism
type: OTHER
value: with a market economy
type: OTHER
value: in principle
type: OTHER
value: with extensive use of markets
type: OTHER
value: with wage labor
type: OTHER
value: with profit-seeking firms
type: OTHER
value: completely
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: , hold that socialism is compatible, in principle, with wage labor, profit-seeking firms, and extensive use of markets to organize and coordinate production and investment.
text: We think that socialism is incompatible with one-party states, with constraints on freedom of speech, with an elite exercising power ‘on behalf of’ the people, with leader cults, with any of the other devices by which the dying society seeks to portray itself as the new society.
text: Although many people think that socialism and capitalism are completely incompatible systems, the fact is that most developed nations operate on a combination of both.
text: Critics of the free market and laissez-faire as commonly understood argue that socialism is fully compatible with a market economy and that a truly free-market or laissez-faire system would be anti-capitalist and socialist in practice.
text: Socialism is fully compatible with "big business," or crony capitalism.
text: Muslim socialists believe that socialism is compatible with Islamic teachings and usually embrace secular forms of socialism.
text: But behind this unanimity in denunciation can be discerned wide differences in approach and argument, differences which finally come into the open when any Socialist school tries to look beyond capitalist society and to answer the question whether Socialism itself is compatible with any form of competition.
text: We think that socialism is incompatible with one-party states, with constraints on freedom of speech, with an elite exercising power 'on behalf of' the people, with leader cults, with any of the other devices by which the dying society seeks to portray itself as the new society.