Assertion: speech | /r/HasProperty | protected
Facets:
value: from the government
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: The government may not criminally punish immigrants based on speech that would be protected if said by a citizen.
text: If speech is defended because it promotes autonomy, we no longer have grounds for protecting speech acts that undermine this value.
text: On entry across borders, the government may bar non-citizens from the United States based on their speech, even if that speech would have been protected if said by a citizen.
text: The right to think is the beginning of freedom, and speech must be protected from the government because speech is the beginning of thought.
text: And if we agree with John Stuart Mill (1978) that speech should be protected because it leads to the truth, there seems no reason to protect the speech of anti-vaccers or creationists.