Assertion: sonnet's line | /r/CapableOf | present this paradox
Facets:
value: with its brief hours
type: OTHER
value: with weeks
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: However, the line includes—and thus acknowledges within the poem’s triumphant sweep—the altogether arguable proposition which the whole poem denies, the proposition that love is fleeting, the proposition which Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks would imply if those words stood alone as a paradox in which the syntactic norm prevailed, Love were the antecedent for his, and the line presented this paradox: “Love, with its brief hours and weeks (love, which is characterized by its brevity), alters not.