Assertion: parody | /r/HasAspect | some claim
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: As the Supreme Court explained in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., “Parody needs to mimic an original to make its point, and so has some claim to use the creation of its victim’s (or collective victims’) imagination, whereas satire can stand on its own two feet and so requires justification for the very act of borrowing.
text: The question whether burlesque has a claim to rank as art is, I think, one of degree.
text: Quoting the opinion of the Supreme Court, "Parody needs to mimic an original to make its point, and so has some claim to use the creation of its victim's (or collective victims') imagination.." and "...it can provide social benefit, by shedding light on an earlier work, and, in the process, creating a new one.
text: According to the Supreme Court in the 2 Live Crew case cited above: “Parody needs to mimic an original to make its point, and so has some claim to use the creation of its victim’s (or collective victims’) imagination, whereas satire can stand on its own two feet and so requires justification for the very act of borrowing.