Assertion: restitution | /r/HasProperty | inadequate
Facets:
value: to compensate the victim
type: PURPOSE
Source sentences:
text: The Third Circuit, in United States v. Himler, observed that the return of the property would be inadequate to compensate the victim, and explicitly disagreed with the Ninth Circuit’s view that value of the property is “as of the date the victim took control of [it].”
text: Accordingly, when the return of the property is inadequate restitution, the MVRA states that the offset value must be determined as of the date the property is returned.