Assertion: sequence | /r/CapableOf | think valuable
Facets:
value: in correcting for it
type: MANNER
value: extremely
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Lay out some reasons that I find sequence thinking valuable, even if one accepts that cluster thinking results in superior decisions, and defend the idea of switching between “sequence” and “cluster” styles for different purposes.
text: I do not believe scope insensitivity is the only, or most important, danger in making giving decisions, but I do find sequence thinking extremely valuable in correcting for it.