Assertion: worker | /r/HasAspect | no country
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Workers Have No Country
text: 111ff): 'The statement that the proletarian has no country is amended where, when and to the extent that he can participate as a full citizen in the government and legislation of his country, and is able to change its institutions according to his wishes.'
text: Today (1848) the worker has no country, he does not take part in the life of the nation, has no share in its material and spiritual wealth.
text: In what sense do the workers have 'no country', and how is it that, nonetheless, even after acquiring supremacy, they will still remain 'so far, national'?
text: When the Manifesto says that the workers 'have no country', this refers to the bourgeois national state, not to nationality in the ethnical sense.
text: The workers 'have no country' because according to Marx and Engels, they must regard the bourgeois national state as a machinery for their oppression - and after they have achieved power they will likewise have 'no country' in the political sense, inasmuch as the separate socialist national states will be only a transitional stage on the way to the classless and stateless society of the future, since the construction of such a society is possible only on the international scale!