Assertion: pornography | /r/CapableOf | define as explicit material
Facets:
value: purely functionally
type: MANNER
value: sexually
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: I draw attention to the two-stages of the definition to reinforce a point made in section 1: that one might agree with Dworkin and MacKinnon that pornography, defined purely functionally or conceptually as sexually explicit material that subordinates women, would be a bad thing; and yet disagree that the material with the features that they go on to list in fact does this.