Assertion: secession | /r/HasProperty | justified
Facets:
value: morally
type: MANNER
value: under any conditions
type: OTHER
value: sometimes
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: For example, while acknowledging that secession may sometimes be morally justified (where this presumably means the group in question has the claim-right to secede), Cass Sunstein has argued that constitutional recognition of a right to secede is incompatible with the principles of constitutionalism (or at least democratic constitutionalism)
text: Waters and Buckley are right to argue that secession is justifiable in a wider range of circumstances than conventionally thought.
text: If I should stop someone on the street and ask whether he thinks secession is ever justified, the person might not have a ready answer, but he would know what I was asking.
text: The secession of a group within the state could be justified only as the aggregate right of the individuals making up the group.
text: When is secession justified?
text: But to affirm a right of secession is not to say that secession is morally justified under any conditions, but only that there can be conditions under which it is justified, and even then there might be reasons for not exercising the right.
text: But to affirm a right of secession is not to say that secession is morally justified under any conditions, but only that there can be conditions under which it is justified, and even then there might be reasons for not exercising the right.
text: It examines such questions as: When is secession justified?
text: Therefore we have a moral obligation to allow for secession, and secession is thus morally justified.