Assertion: presumption | /r/HasProperty | rebuttable
Facets:
value: always
type: DEGREE
value: of fact
type: OTHER
value: by testimony
type: OTHER
value: of law
type: OTHER
value: as in every other state
type: OTHER
value: more easily
type: DEGREE
value: by evidence
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: A presumption is rebuttable in that it can be refuted by factual evidence.
text: In fact, every presumption is rebuttable unless someone comes forward with evidence to the contrary.
text: A presumption is rebuttable in that it can be refuted by factual evidence.
text: Such a presumption may legitimately arise from a rule of law or a procedural rule of the court or other adjudicating body which determines how the facts in the case are to be proved, and may be either rebuttable or irrebuttable.
text: A presumption is rebuttable in that it can be refuted by factual evidence.
text: Most presumptions are rebuttable, meaning that they are rejected if proven to be false or at least thrown into sufficient doubt by the evidence.
text: The presumption here is at the discretion of the court and it is also rebuttable.
text: The presumption is rebuttable by evidence.
text: The High Court said that they presumption exited here is rebuttable and such presumption can be escalated whenever the circumstances of the case match the essentials or the interpretation of the legal provisions.
text: Presumption of fact is always rebuttable and goes away when explained or rebutted by establishment of positive proof.
text: A presumption is either conclusive or rebuttable.
text: A presumption is rebuttable in that it can be refuted by factual evidence.
text: The IRS is entitled to formulate a presumption from these filed forms, but this presumption is also rebuttable.
text: Is this presumption rebuttable?
text: The presumption of legitimacy is more easily rebuttable where there is no evidence of a marriage.
text: Most presumptions are "rebuttable", which means that the person against whom the presumption applies may present evidence to the contrary, which then has the effect of nullifying the presumption.
text: The presumption is rebuttable:
text: The presumption is rebuttable under the usual “more likely than not” evidentiary standard.
text: The presumption is rebuttable.
text: As in every other state, the presumption is rebuttable.
text: The presumption is rebuttable:
text: The presumption was rebuttable by “testimony that a different warning would not have made a difference in the actions of the physician.
text: Finally, the presumption is rebuttable.
text: Presumptions may be either of law or fact and when of law may be either conclusive or rebuttable but when of fact are always rebuttable.
text: Presumptions may be either of law or fact and when of law may be either conclusive or rebuttable but when of fact are always rebuttable.
text: Most presumptions are "rebuttable", which means that the person against whom the presumption applies may present evidence to the contrary, which then has the effect of nullifying the presumption.
text: Presumptions can and are rebuttable –