Assertion: pascal's argument | /r/HasProperty | valid
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: If that is a further premise, then the argument is apparently valid; but that premise contradicts his subsequent assumption that you assign positive probability.
text: Perhaps, then, rationality actually requires us to refrain from assigning a probability to God’s existence (in which case at least the Argument from Superdominance would apparently be valid).
text: Pascal believed that even if these arguments were valid, few would reason well enough to be persuaded by them.