Assertion: religion | /r/HasProperty | wrong
Facets:
value: through philosophical speculation
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: Ironically, two views that otherwise have little in common, scientific materialism and extreme biblical literalism, both assume a conflict model: both assume that if science is right, religion is wrong, or vice versa.
text: The (implicit) implications of the statement are 1) that all sensible people know that religion is wrong because it is not based on evidence;
text: What is the alternative to deciding whether religion is right or wrong through philosophical speculation?
text: Sociologists aren't interested in whether a religion is right or wrong.