Assertion: privacy | /r/CapableOf | increase the employer's profit
Facets:
value: more than surveillance could do
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: Hence, when we observe workplace surveillance, then the costs (say, the worker's disutility caused by the loss of privacy) must be smaller than the benefit (say, the additional profit due to a reduction of shirking), because otherwise the parties would abolish surveillance (the worker would be willing to accept a smaller wage in exchange for more privacy, which would increase the employer's profit more than surveillance could do).