Assertion: person's will | /r/HasProperty | own free
Facets:
value: outside of appearance
type: OTHER
value: in itself
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: On this model of human agency, then, when a person acts of her own free will, she could have acted otherwise.
text: The argument, then, is that if a person has free will, then they are the ultimate cause of their actions.
text: While hallucinating, she might “act as she wants unencumbered,” but she could hardly be said to be acting of her own free will.
text: In other words, the compatibilist might sidestep the issues raised by the Consequence Argument by directly attacking the first premise of the Classical Incompatibilist Argument, which states is if a person acts of her own free will, then she could have done otherwise.
text: On this model of human agency, then, when a person acts of her own free will, she could have acted otherwise.
text: To cite just one shortcoming, various mental illnesses can cause a person to act as she wants and do so unencumbered; yet, intuitively, it would seem that she does not act of her own free will.
text: While hallucinating, she might “act as she wants unencumbered,” but she could hardly be said to be acting of her own free will.
text: In other words, the compatibilist might sidestep the issues raised by the Consequence Argument by directly attacking the first premise of the Classical Incompatibilist Argument, which states is if a person acts of her own free will, then she could have done otherwise.
text: Arthur Schopenhauer claimed that phenomena do not have freedom of the will, but the will as noumenon is not subordinate to the laws of necessity (causality) and is thus free.
text: Thus, the will, in itself and outside of appearance, is free.
text: It has traditionally meant (until the Enlightenment proposed its own meanings) lack of necessity in human will, so that "the will is free" meant "the