Assertion: sexual activity | /r/HasProperty | good
Facets:
value: nonmorally
type: DEGREE
value: perfectly
type: DEGREE
value: as fell in love
type: MANNER
value: similarly
type: DEGREE
value: practically
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Sex can also be practically or pragmatically good or bad: a “sexting” politician can ruin his career, unprotected anal sex risks contracting HIV, sex without contraception risks pregnancy (if undesired), and public sex risks arrest.
text: Similarly, sexual activity can be nonmorally good if it provides for us what we expect sexual activity to provide, which is usually sexual pleasure, and this fact has no necessary moral implications..
text: This letting go is important, because sex cannot only be as good, it can be better!
text: If you're wondering whether it's possible for sex to be as good as when you first fell in love, the answer is yes.
text: It is not difficult to see that the fact that a sexual activity is perfectly nonmorally good, by abundantly satisfying both persons, does not mean by itself that the act is morally good: some adulterous sexual activity might well be very pleasing to the participants, yet be morally wrong.