Assertion: pursuer | /r/HasProperty | injured
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: (2) that the operation on which the pursuer was engaged when he was injured involved a risk of his being injured in the sense that there was a foreseeable possibility of injury and this placed on his employers the onus of proving that it was not reasonably practicable for them to have avoided the need for him to have undertaken the operation (p 747B, D and H-J);
text: To make a prima facie case under reg 4 (1) , a pursuer must show, first, that the operation which he was undertaking when he was injured was a manual handling operation; and secondly, that it involved a risk of his being injured.
text: To make a prima facie case under reg 4 (1) , a pursuer must show, first, that the operation which he was undertaking when he was injured was a manual handling operation; and secondly, that it involved a risk of his being injured.