Assertion: prohibition | /r/HasProperty | success
Facets:
value: quite
type: DEGREE
value: in a sense
type: OTHER
value: in reducing the amount of liquor
type: OTHER
value: after five years
type: TEMPORAL
value: signally
type: DEGREE
value: in some respects
type: OTHER
value: m. actually
type: DEGREE
value: for the fact
type: CAUSE
Source sentences:
text: Moore, M. Actually, Prohibition Was a Success.
text: Prohibition was successful in reducing the amount of liquor consumed, cirrhosis death rates, admissions to state mental hospitals for alcoholic psychosis, arrests for public drunkenness, and rates of absenteeism.
text: Actually, Prohibition Was a Success,” The New York Times, October 16, 1989.
text: Is Prohibition a Success after Five Years?
text: In a sense, Prohibition was a success if only for the fact that it took years after repeal before consumption rates reached those of pre-Prohibition.
text: Amazingly, some people today insist that Prohibition was a success!
text: Was prohibition really a success.?
text: Prohibition was successful in reducing the amount of liquor consumed, cirrhosis death rates, admissions to state mental hospitals for alcoholic psychosis, arrests for public drunkenness, and rates of absenteeism.
text: In 1920, the prohibition was brought in, and was successful in bringing down the amount of liquor consumed, but also brought out secret drinking clubs, which were very popular.
text: The actions of these bureaus to enforce prohibition decrees have an effect, and when a prohibition survives long enough to be enforced it is successful in a political sense.
text: Prohibition was quite successful,” argues Rev. Mark H. Green, head of the Christian Action League of North Carolina.
text: Yet it is undeniable that prohibition has in some respects been signally successful.