Assertion: patent | /r/HasProperty | granted on application
Facets:
value: for patent
type: PURPOSE
value: by another
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Any patent granted on an application filed by a person other than the inventor shall be granted to the real party in interest.
text: In view of this amendment, is a reissue application still required to add or correct a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) after a patent has been granted on the application?
text: (e) the invention was described in - (1) an application for patent, published under section 122(b), by another filed in the United States before the invention by the applicant for patent or (2) a patent granted on an application for patent by another filed in the United States before the invention by the applicant for patent, except that an international application filed under the treaty defined in section 351(a) shall have the effects for the purposes of this subsection of an application filed in the United States only if the international application designated the United States and was published under Article 21(2) of such treaty in the English language; or
text: No, a reissue application is no longer required to add or correct a benefit claim under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) after a patent has been granted on an application filed on or after November 29, 2000.
text: A patent granted on a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part application that was filed on or after June 8, 1995, will have a term which ends twenty years from the filing date of earliest application for which a benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) regardless of whether the application for which a benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or 365(c) was filed prior to June 8, 1995.