Assertion: sexual intercourse | /r/HasProperty | zoology
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: For copulation among other animals, see Copulation (zoology)
text: For copulation among other animals, see Copulation (zoology)
text: There is no need to link to the Copulation (zoology) article in the section, especially not repeatedly (which is WP:OVERLINKING).
text: For copulation among other animals, see Copulation (zoology)
text: For copulation among other animals, see Copulation (zoology)
text: Also, there is no need link the Copulation (zoology) again; it's already linked at the top of the article and in the 'Other animals' section, where it is best served.
text: The Copulation (zoology) link is in the Other animals section where it belongs.
text: The Copulation (zoology) article was specifically created to cover copulation among non-human animals, and substantial comparative material would obviously fit there.
text: Then, once the Copulation (zoology) article is created in its place, you don't even focus on expanding that article.
text: We also have the Copulation (zoology) article which is specifically for such material, including comparison to human sexual intercourse/mating.
text: The only things I cut was unnecessary focus on animals in general, the repeated Copulation (zoology) link, and unnecessary genital text that is already covered (without being unnecessary) in the "Bonding and stimulus variation" section.