Assertion: reasoning | /r/HasProperty | defeasible
Facets:
value: hypothetically
type: DEGREE
value: in the sense
type: OTHER
value: to the extent
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Reasoning is defeasible when the corresponding argument is rationally compelling but not deductively valid.
text: To the extent that our practical reasoning is guided at all by general rules or principles (something that Dancy explicitly denies), the reasoning must be defeasible, as John Horty has argued (Horty 2007b).
text: This can represent reasoning that is hypothetically or counterfactually defeasible, in the sense that what “follows” from a conjunctive proposition \((p \amp q)\) need not be a superset of what “follows” from \(p\) alone.