Assertion: prion's nucleic acid | /r/HasProperty | either dna
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Thus, viral nucleic acids can be either DNA or RNA.
text: The hypothesized role of a protein as an infectious agent stands in contrast to all other known infectious agents such as viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites, all of which contain nucleic acids (DNA, RNA or both).
text: This is in contrast to all other known infectious agents (virus/bacteria/fungus/parasite) which must contain nucleic acids (either DNA, RNA, or both).
text: This is in contrast to all other known infectious agents (virus /bacteria/fungus/parasite) which must contain nucleic acids (either DNA, RNA, or both).
text: This would be in contrast to all other known infectious agents, like viruses, bacteria, fungi or parasites—which must contain nucleic acids (either DNA, RNA, or both).
text: Contain a single type of nucleic acid, either DNA or RNA.
text: The debate revolves around two issues: Firstly, is a nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) a part of the agent which determines what the agent does.
text: The hypothesized role of a protein as an infectious agent stands in contrast to all other known infectious agents such as viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites, all of which contain nucleic acids (DNA, RNA or both).
text: When Prusiner looked in the prion for a nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) that could direct the synthesis of progeny prions, he was unable to find one.