Assertion: specific pocketknife | /r/HasProperty | weapon
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: The 2nd DCA, however, found that the term “common pocketknife” was unconstitutionally vague because it “impermissibly leaves the question of whether a specific pocketknife is or is not a weapon to the ‘whim of a jury.
text: The district court then concluded that the statute "impermissibly leaves the question of whether a specific pocketknife is or is not a weapon to the 'whim of a jury,'" and that "the statute is not reasonably certain and fails to provide guidance to citizens who wish to follow a lawful course of conduct.