Assertion: child pornography | /r/HasProperty | taken
Facets:
value: illegally
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: It is generally thought to follow that child pornography, which is taken to involve the actual sexual abuse or exploitation of children (with or without their apparent consent), can legitimately be banned in order to protect the interests of children, who are not yet competent to fully understand the nature of the choice they are making or to grasp the impact of their decisions on their present and future interests.
text: For instance, the defendant might argue that the child pornography seized by law enforcement was taken illegally.
text: For instance, the defendant might argue that the child pornography seized by law enforcement was taken illegally.