Assertion: put's risk | /r/HasProperty | limited
Facets:
value: to the premium
type: OTHER
value: minus the net credit
type: OTHER
value: during the life of the put
type: TEMPORAL
value: to an amount
type: OTHER
value: to the cost of the spread
type: OTHER
value: for long index put options
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: For long index put options, the risk is also limited to the premium paid, and the potential profit is capped at the index level, less the premium paid, as the index can never go below zero.
text: Binary options typically specify a fixed maximum payout, while maximum risk is limited to the amount invested in the option.
text: It’s another limited risk, limited profit strategy.
text: Risk is limited to the premium paid plus commissions, and a loss of this amount is realized if the put is held to expiration and expires worthless.
text: Risk is limited to the Premium.
text: Risk is limited to the amount of premium paid.
text: The risk is limited to the difference between the total cost of the stock plus the put and the strike price of the protective put option.
text: Risk is sought to be limited :
text: As this is a debit spread, the strategy’s risk is limited to the cost of the spread.
text: Risk is limited to an amount equal to stock price minus strike price plus put price plus commissions.
text: The first advantage is that risk is limited during the life of the put.
text: If established for a net credit, risk is limited to the difference between strike A and strike B, minus the net credit received.
text: If established for a net debit, risk is limited to the difference between strike A and strike B, plus the net debit paid.
text: Married puts have limited risk and unlimited upside potential but you must pay for the insurance protection.
text: The flip side is that these options can move against you very quickly as well, though the risk is limited to the amount paid for the option (assuming you are the option buyer and not the option writer).