Assertion: shiner's population | /r/HasProperty | stable
Facets:
value: fairly
type: DEGREE
value: in stream
type: LOCATION
value: in most of its range
type: LOCATION
value: currently
type: TEMPORAL
value: only slowly
type: DEGREE
value: with abundances
type: OTHER
value: temporally
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Their populations are stable, but some issues of concern include habitat changes associated with flood control projects, siltation from development sites, deterioration of water quality, and recent water drawdown for mining and irrigation.
text: Though the warpaint shiner is considered a “special concern” in parts of Alabama and South Carolina, global populations are considered stable and secure.
text: From (Craig et al. 2017) "Populations of Texas Shiners were temporally stable or increasing in six streams or stream reaches (Bonner et al., 2005; Runyan, 2007; Perkin et al., 2010; Kollaus et al., 2015) with abundances categorized as occasional (7 to 22% in relative abundances) to frequent (30 to 37%) in 10 other streams or stream reaches among five drainages (Colorado River, Guadalupe River, San Antonio River, Nueces River, Pecos River, and Rio Grande).
text: It has also declined in the northern parts of its range but the population in New York's Bashakill wetlands is currently stable.
text: This is not unusual seeing how it is not listed as needing protection according to the IUCN red list of threatened species the population of Notropis volucellus is stable and its conservation status is of least concern.
text: The warpaint shiner is not a valued sport or pan fish and the population is relatively stable in most of its range.
text: This is a widespread species with many populations which are likely stable or declining only slowly.
text: There may be some minor threats, but populations appears to be fairly stable, as it is represented across a large and broad spectrum of locations.