Assertion: parody | /r/HasProperty | fair use
Facets:
value: in certain situations
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: Why is parody considered fair use but satire isn’t?
text: Inc. (1994) stated in no uncertain terms that a parody as a form of criticism or comment could be fair use of a copyrighted work.
text: Campbell countered that his parody was fair use.
text: That being said, while parody can be deemed a fair use in certain situations – that is by no means an absolute truth that all parodies constitute a fair use.
text: Should the parody fair-use defense be made more expansive to ensure that copyright infringement does not prohibit a use that in all likelihood would not be licensed from the copyright owner?
text: Parody is one of those “fair uses.
text: Both parody and satire employ humor in commentary and criticism, but the key distinction, and the reason that parodies are more likely to be considered fair use than satires, is the purpose each serves.
text: Parody is also considered one of the “fair use” defenses.
text: Question: Why is parody considered fair use but satire isn’t?
text: A parody is fair use of a copyrighted work when it is a humorous form of social commentary and literary criticism in which one work imitates another.