Assertion: human foreskin | /r/HasAspect | anatomical significance
Facets:
value: in sexual mechanics
type: OTHER
value: despite evolving over millions of years
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Arguably, claiming there's no evidence that circumcision diminishes sexual enjoyment is essentially implying the obverse: that it's perfectly safe and reasonable to assume that the human foreskin, despite evolving over millions of years, has no anatomical significance in sexual mechanics, and has zero relevance to sexual pleasure and satisfaction.