Assertion: microscope's resolution | /r/HasProperty | possible
Facets:
value: in tem
type: LOCATION
value: in stem
type: LOCATION
value: with a transmission electron microscope
type: OTHER
value: in sem
type: OTHER
value: in stem modes
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Stimulated emission depletion is a simple example of how higher resolution surpassing the diffraction limit is possible, but it has major limitations.
text: Until now, resolutions of 30 nanometer are possible using the Fresnel zone plate lens which forms the image using the soft x-rays emitted from a synchrotron.
text: Resolutions of a few nm are possible in TEM, SEM and STEM modes.
text: Temporal resolution down to hundreds of femtoseconds and spatial resolution comparable to that available with a Schottky field emission source is possible in ultrafast TEM, but the technique can only image reversible processes that can be reproducibly triggered millions of times.
text: The spot size and the interaction volume are both large compared to the distances between atoms, so the resolution of the SEM is not high enough to image individual atoms, as is possible with a transmission electron microscope (TEM).
text: The high resolution of the TEM is thus possible in STEM.
text: The axial resolution is worse than the lateral (about a factor of 4), but it can be improved by using a thinner lightsheet in which case nearly isotropic resolution is possible.