Assertion: public license | /r/HasProperty | gpl
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Some are home-grown, while others are modeled after mainstream FOSS licenses such as Berkeley Software Distribution ("BSD"), Apache, MIT-style (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), or GNU General Public License ("GPL").
text: MySQL Client Libraries are typically licensed pursuant to version 2 of the General Public License ("GPL"), but this exception permits distribution of certain MySQL Client Libraries with a developer’s FOSS applications licensed under the terms of another FOSS license listed below, even though such other FOSS license may be incompatible with the GPL.
text: An example of a copyleft free software license is the often used GNU General Public License (GPL), also the first copyleft license.
text: The MIT license is compatible with many copyleft licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL); MIT licensed software can be re-licensed as GPL software, and integrated with other GPL software, but not the other way around.
text: In 1989, version 1 of the GNU General Public License (GPL) was published.
text: The main difference is the belief that the copyleft licenses, particularly the GNU General Public License (GPL), are undesirably complicated and/or restrictive.
text: The GNU General Public License (GPL), originally written by Richard Stallman, was the first software copyleft license to see extensive use, and continues to dominate in that area.
text: Copyleft licenses include several common open-source and free content licenses, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL) and the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike license (CC-BY-SA).
text: The RPL was inspired by the GNU General Public License (GPL) and authored to explicitly remove what the RPL's authors have referred to as the GPL's "privacy loophole".
text: Version 3 of PHP used a dual license—PHP 3's source is available under either the PHP License or the GNU General Public License (GPL).
text: The Eclipse Public License is designed to be a business-friendly free software license, and features weaker copyleft provisions than licenses such as the GNU General Public License (GPL).
text: It is a weak copyleft license, characterized as a middle ground between permissive software licenses and the GNU General Public License (GPL), that seeks to balance the concerns of proprietary and open-source developers.
text: GNU General Public License (GPL)
text: Definition - What does GNU General Public License (GPL) mean?
text: Examples include the source code of Mozilla Application Suite and previously Mozilla Thunderbird and Mozilla Firefox, that have used tri-licensing under the Mozilla Public License (MPL) 1.1, GNU General Public License (GPL) 2.0 or GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) 2.1 before the latter upgraded to GPL-compatible MPL 2.0, making the tri-licensing unnecessary.
text: : managed by a subscription for user or device, usually has an expiration date General Public License (GPL) : covers software that comes with no charge and can be used, shared, copied, and modified for free (freeware)
text: The most prominent and popular example is the GNU General Public License (GPL), which "allows free distribution under the condition that further developments and applications are put under the same licence", thus also free.
text: This page contains answers to commonly asked questions about the GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2.
text: The Free Software Foundation (FSF) considers it a free software license, but one which is incompatible with the GNU General Public License (GPL).
text: While the Free Software Foundation (FSF) also considered the CDDL a free software license, they saw some incompatibilities with their GNU General Public License (GPL).
text: 2.0/2.1/3.0 GNU General Public License (GPL)
text: An example of this kind of license is General Public License (GPL).
text: GNU General Public License (GPL)