Assertion: negligence | /r/HasProperty | remote
Facets:
value: from the plaintiff's injury
type: OTHER
value: despite the fact
type: OTHER
value: in england
type: LOCATION
Source sentences:
text: We say that one's negligence is 'too remote' (in England) or not a 'proximate cause' (in the U.S.) of another's harm
text: The defendant train company argued it should not be liable as a matter of law, because despite the fact that they employed the employee, who was negligent, his negligence was too remote from the plaintiff's injury.