Assertion: license's work | /r/HasProperty | licensed under the gpl
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: The EPL 1.0 is not compatible with the GPL, and a work created by combining a work licensed under the GPL with a work licensed under the EPL cannot be lawfully distributed.
text: The software modules that link with the library may be under various GPL compatible licenses, but the work as a whole must be licensed under the GPL.
text: The software modules that link with the library may be under various GPL compatible licenses, but the work as a whole must be licensed under the GPL.
text: You obey the GPL in all respects for the Program and all portions (including modifications) of the Program included in the Derivative Work (provided that this condition does not apply to Independent Works); The Derivative Work does not include any work licensed under the GPL other than the Program; You distribute Independent Works subject to a license listed in the section below titled "FOSS License List"; You distribute Independent Works in object code or executable form with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code on the same medium and under the same FOSS license applying to the object code or executable forms; All works that are aggregated with the Program or the Derivative Work on a medium or volume of storage are not derivative works of the Program, Derivative Work or FOSS Application, and must reasonably be considered independent and separate works.