Assertion: invention | /r/HasProperty | patentable
Facets:
value: over all previously known inventions
type: OTHER
value: under this 1999 standard
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: While some inventions in the arts are patentable, others are not because they cannot fulfill the strict requirements governments have established for granting them.
text: Under this 1999 standard, an invention was considered patentable (nonobvious) unless there was some prior teaching, suggestion, or motivation to make the combination.
text: It may be possible that your invention is a patentable improvement over all previously known inventions, even if you cannot quickly determine that.
text: To be patentable, an invention must be novel , have utility , and be non-obvious.
text: Useful: For an invention to be patentable, it needs to have a use or application or be an improvement on something that already exists.
text: However, inventions that are of a technical nature which include a business method, or which are carried out or can be carried out by a computer program, can be patentable.
text: While some inventions are patentable, in my experience, patentability of an invention is often uncertain.
text: If the invention doesn’t provide an apparent value or use, it isn’t patentable.
text: Before you actually start a patent application, you need to research whether your invention is actually patentable.
text: To be patentable, an invention must have a technical character, which implies that it calls upon the forces of nature to solve the problem.
text: To be patentable, an invention must meet the following three basic conditions: