Assertion: lsd | /r/HasProperty | addictive
Facets:
value: with a low abuse potential
type: OTHER
value: like other serotonergic psychedelics
type: OTHER
value: highly
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: The NIH states that LSD is addictive, while other sources state it is not.
text: ok so lsd is a non-addictive drug, has no long term affects and is not in realativly "normal" amounts toxic
text: While LSD is considered non-addictive and does not produce compulsive, drug-seeking behavior, it can be habit forming and does create a tolerance in heavy users.
text: Plus, should we put a little mini-article on the dispute between whether LSD is addictive or not?
text: Because I know for a fact that where I live they teach all our kids that LSD is addictive and all the parents seem to believe it too.
text: LSD is non addictive, doesnt cause brain damage and has very low toxicity" could replace the lead.
text: I'm suggesting: "LSD is non-addictive, is not known to cause brain damage, and has extremely low toxicity relative to dose.
text: The article opens with the statement that LSD is non-addictive and does not cause brain damage.
text: Someone had deleted Hoffman's blockquoted descriptions of its effects under the "Discovery" section and had replaced it with the text "LSD is highly addictive!!??!
text: Like other serotonergic psychedelics, LSD is considered to be non-addictive with a low abuse potential.
text: LSD is non-addictive, is not known to cause brain damage, and has extremely low toxicity relative to dose, although in rare cases adverse psychiatric reactions such as anxiety or delusions are possible.
text: Concerning the NIH document linked in reference number 16, the text of the Wiki article states that this document claims that LSD is addictive.
text: Is LSD addictive?
text: The NIH states that LSD is addictive, while other sources state it is not.
text: LSD is non-addictive and non-toxic.
text: The NIH states that LSD is addictive, while other sources state it is not.