Assertion: mugger | /r/CapableOf | interfere with the muggee's individual_right
Facets:
value: to keep his wallet
type: PURPOSE
Source sentences:
text: I will decide to side with the Muggee, not the Mugger, because I have the notion that the Mugger is interfering with the Muggee's individual_right to keep his wallet, rather than the Muggee interfering with the Mugger's individual_right to take it.