Assertion: marriage | /r/HasProperty | valid
Facets:
value: according to church law
type: OTHER
value: in both california
type: LOCATION
value: legally
type: MANNER
value: in the state
type: LOCATION
value: in the form
type: OTHER
value: in use in their meetings
type: TEMPORAL
value: in nevada
type: LOCATION
value: canonically
type: MANNER
value: verily
type: DEGREE
value: in australia
type: LOCATION
value: for tax purposes
type: PURPOSE
value: civilly
type: MANNER
value: in the eternities
type: LOCATION
value: in the future
type: TEMPORAL
value: in roman catholic countries
type: LOCATION
value: in the event
type: OTHER
value: in armenia
type: LOCATION
value: in england
type: LOCATION
value: traditionally
type: OTHER
value: from this date
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: But if they attempt to marry in California, their attempt will be successful and the marriage will be valid in both California and Nevada, notwithstanding the marriage could not be legally contracted in Nevada.
text: Traditionally, a marriage was considered valid if the requirements of the marriage law of the state where the marriage took place were fulfilled.
text: While referred to as a "sham" or "fake" because of its motivation, the union itself is legally valid if it conforms to the formal legal requirements for marriage in the jurisdiction.
text: This changed in July 2017, when the Ministry of Justice revealed that all marriages performed abroad are valid in Armenia, including marriages between people of the same sex.
text: In the event that no competent layperson is found, the marriage is valid even if done in the presence of two witnesses alone.
text: The Council of Trent (convened 1545–1563) ruled that in the future a marriage was only valid in Roman Catholic countries if it was witnessed by a priest of the Roman Catholic Church or, if obtaining a priest were impractical, by other witnesses.
text: Many Mormons believe that all these marriages will be valid in the eternities and the husband will live together in the celestial kingdom as a family with all to whom he was sealed.
text: From this date, a marriage was only legally valid, if it followed the calling of banns in church or the obtaining of a licence —the
text: If the marriage is recognized under the law and customs of the state or jurisdiction in which the marriage takes place (even in a foreign country), the marriage is valid for tax purposes (Rev. Rul.
text: But if they attempt to marry in California, their attempt will be successful and the marriage will be valid in both California and Nevada, notwithstanding the marriage could not be legally contracted in Nevada.
text: Colorado, by statute, no longer recognizes common law marriages entered by minors in Colorado, and also does not recognize foreign common law marriages entered into by minors, even if that marriage would have been valid where entered into under local law.
text: California Family Code Section 308 provides that a marriage validly contracted in another jurisdiction is valid in California.
text: In England, under the provisions of Lord Hardwicke's Act of 1753, a marriage was only legally valid if the banns had been called or a marriage licence had been obtained, codifying earlier practice within the Church of England.
text: And further provides that, "All marriages solemnized among the society called Friends, or Quakers, in the form previously practiced and in use in their meetings shall be good and valid and shall not be construed as affected by any of the foregoing provisions of this act.
text: Nevada law provides that, "All marriages solemnized among the people called 'Friends' or 'Quakers,' in the forms heretofore practiced and in use in their meetings, shall be good and valid.
text: The Roman Catholic Church deems forced marriage grounds for granting an annulment—for a marriage to be valid both parties must give their consent freely.
text: Some require cohabitation to last a certain length of time (e.g. three years) for the marriage to be valid.
text: (In many jurisdictions, they must do so for a certain length of time for the marriage to be valid.)
text: The marriage is valid, may be annulled if contested in court by one of the parties to the marriage.
text: For annulment, proof is required of the existence of one of these defects, since canon law presumes all marriages are valid until proven otherwise.
text: An annulment is a declaration by a Church tribunal (a Catholic church court) that a marriage thought to be valid according to Church law actually fell short of at least one of the essential elements required for a binding union.
text: Rather, a Church tribunal (a Catholic Church court) declares that a marriage thought to be valid according to Church law actually fell short of at least one of the essential elements required for a binding union.
text: It means that a marriage that was thought to be valid civilly and canonically was in fact not valid according to Church law.
text: It means that a marriage that was thought to be valid civilly and canonically was in fact not valid according to Church law.
text: Only a marriage between two individuals who are not otherwise prohibited from marrying is valid in this State.
text: In the Catholic Church, it is the bride and groom who perform the Sacrament of Matrimony (marriage), but a marriage can only be valid if the Church has a witness at the wedding ceremony whose function is to question the couple to ensure that they have no obstacle to marriage (such as an un-annulled previous marriage or certain undisclosed facts between the couple) and that they are freely choosing to wed each other.
text: Marriage is just as valid today as it ever was (Hebrews 13:4).The above cynical quotations are striking in their inherent selfishness.
text: Qazi said: ‘There is an unanimous agreement that whoever performs permanent marriage but his intent is to stay with her for a specific period, verily his marriage is valid, and it is not Mut’ah marriage, because Mut’ah marriage is based on a conditional period.
text: For a marriage to be valid under the law, it is not enough that the couple had a real marriage ceremony and got all the right governmental stamps on their marriage certificate.
text: Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, and the marriage had not already been consummated.
text: If you are common law married and you move to a state that does not allow such marriages, you are still married in the new state because your marriage was valid in the state where it occurred.
text: A marriage shall be void if:The children of a void marriage will only be considered legitimate if at the time of the solemnisation, the parties to the marriage reasonably believed that the marriage was valid and this only applies if:A voidable marriage is a legal marriage that can be cancelled at the option of one of the parties and it is subject to cancellation if contested in court.
text: Such a marriage would be valid but non-sacramental.
text: Calvin believed that for a marriage to be valid it needed to be both recorded by the state and officiated by the church.
text: It appears that the permission of an under-age bride is indeed necessary for her marriage to be considered valid.
text: the parties did not comply with the marriage laws in the jurisdiction where they were married (note that although a marriage contracted abroad is in general considered valid in Australia, in certain cases, such as when there are serious contradictions with the marriage laws of Australia, the marriage is void)
text: The question presented to voters on the ballot read: "Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to provide that only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Minnesota?