Assertion: kite's angle | /r/HasProperty | supplementary
Facets:
value: to two other congruent angles
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: Reason for statement 7: If two angles are supplementary to two other congruent angles (angle CHS and angle AHS), then they’re congruent.
text: While the method above was an in-depth way to solve the exercise, we could have also just used the property that opposite angles of isosceles trapezoids are supplementary.