Assertion: mark's ending | /r/HasProperty | lost
Facets:
value: really
type: DEGREE
value: accidentally
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: In the early 20th century, the view prevailed that the original ending was lost, but in the second part of the 20th century the view prevailed that verse 8 was the original ending, as intended by the author.[note 11]
text: Some scholars argue that Mark never intended to end so abruptly: either he planned another ending that was never written, or the original ending has been lost.
text: It appears that the ending of Mark may have been lost, and someone rewrote it and attached it to a copy at some time.
text: The original ending (beyond verse 16:8) was accidentally lost.
text: One popular theory is that the original ending (beyond verse 16:8) was lost when part of a scroll accidentally broke off.
text: If the original ending really was lost or destroyed, it probably happened within a few years after the gospel was written.
text: This section is a later addition; the original ending of Mark appears to have been lost.