Assertion: ignorance | /r/HasProperty | invincible
Facets:
value: in terms of human responsibility
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Ignorance is said to be invincible when a person is unable to rid himself of it notwithstanding the employment of moral diligence, that is, such as under the circumstances is, morally speaking, possible and obligatory.
text: Ignorance is said to be invincible when a person is unable to rid himself of it notwithstanding the employment of moral diligence, that is, such as under the circumstances is, morally speaking, possible and obligatory.
text: Ignorance is invincible if it a person could not remove it by applying reasonable diligence in determining the answer.
text: Ignorance is invincible if a person could not remove it by applying reasonable diligence in determining the answer.
text: As the Catechism of the Catholic Church explains: “If the ignorance is invincible or the moral subject is not responsible for his erroneous judgment, the evil committed by the person cannot be imputed to him.
text: In terms of human responsibility, ignorance can either be “invincible” or “vincible.
text: Ignorance is invincible when a person is unable to rid himself of it.