Assertion: inductor | /r/HasProperty | proportional
Facets:
value: to its diameter
type: OTHER
value: to the length of the core
type: OTHER
value: directly
type: MANNER
value: inversely
type: DEGREE
value: to turns squared
type: OTHER
value: linearly
type: DEGREE
value: to core
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: to the material
type: OTHER
value: to the wire
type: LOCATION
value: to the energy
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: proportional to the cross sectional area
type: LOCATION
value: to the square of turns ratio
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: The inductance is directly proportional to the number of turns in the coil.
text: The inductance is proportional to the square of the number of turns in the coil, assuming full flux linkage.
text: Inductance is therefore also proportional to the energy stored in the magnetic field for a given current.
text: If the inductors are wound on the same core and with the same geometry, then this expression is equal to the turns ratio of the two inductors because inductance is proportional to the square of turns ratio.
text: The inductance is directly proportional to the permeability of the core material.
text: The inductance is inversely proportional to the length of the core and directly proportional to the cross sectional area.
text: The inductance measured in henrys, is proportional to the number of turns of wire, the wire loop diameter and the material or core the wire is wound around.
text: The inductance of any one turn is linearly proportional to its diameter; so you want a large diameter to get the most inductance.
text: The inductance is inversely proportional to the length of the core and directly proportional to the cross-sectional area.
text: Since inductance is proportional to turns squared, I divide inductance by square of the turns (400 in this case) to find my core does 125nH/T2.