Assertion: militia's right | /r/CapableOf | carry weapon
Facets:
value: to the demonstration
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: in public
type: LOCATION
value: in any manner
type: MANNER
value: in case of confrontation
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: After a lengthy historical discussion, the Court ultimately concluded that the second amendment "guarantee[s] the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation" (id. at 592); that "central to" this right is "the inherent right of self-defense" (i
text: California’s firearm regulations are much stricter, but the basic right to carry guns in public remains murky.
text: From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.
text: From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.
text: Some people argue that the Second Amendment only protects the right to carry weapons for those who are in organized militias, whether government sponsored or private.
text: Before the ban, Philip Van Cleave, the head of the VCDL, urged supporters not to bring assault-style rifles to the rally, but had not discouraged them from bringing handguns; he continues to complain that protestors will be defenseless without having the right to carry weapons to the demonstration.
text: A federal district judge ruled against them, saying the amendment doesn’t give individuals a right to carry guns except, perhaps, when serving in an organized militia such as today’s National Guard.