Assertion: ontology | /r/HasProperty | applicable
Facets:
value: in almost all sectors including iot
type: OTHER
value: in a wide array of industries
type: LOCATION
value: to the thing in itself
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: That is to say, for me ontology is not a science that is applicable to the thing in itself, but only to appearances.
text: Additionally, NEO mostly targets the financial industry while Ontology is applicable in a wide array of industries.
text: Ontology can be applicable in almost all sectors including IoT (Internet of Things), finance, insurance, media, software development, payments, medical field, asset titles, and so on.