Assertion: nuclear weapon | /r/HasProperty | contrary
Facets:
value: to article
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: The court decided to comply with the request for an advisory opinion; The court replied that "There is in neither customary nor conventional international law any specific authorization of the threat or use of nuclear weapons"; The court replied that "There is in neither customary nor conventional international law any comprehensive and universal prohibition of the threat or use of nuclear weapons as such"; The court replied that "A threat or use of force by means of nuclear weapons that is contrary to Article 2, paragraph 4, of the United Nations Charter and that fails to meet all the requirements of Article 51, is unlawful"; The court replied that "A threat or use of nuclear weapons should also be compatible with the requirements of the international law applicable in armed conflict, particularly those of the principles and rules of humanitarian law, as well as with specific obligations under treaties and other undertakings which expressly deal with nuclear weapons