Assertion: free documentation license | /r/HasProperty | gfdl
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: For manuals and textbooks, though, the FSF recommends the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) instead, which it created for this purpose.
text: The only notable cases where Debian and Free Software Foundation disagree are over the Artistic License and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL).
text: Most of Wikipedia's text and many of its images are co-licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).
text: It is possible to use the GPL for a manual, but the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is much better for manuals.
text: The Open Content License, dated July 14, 1998, predates the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and other non-software public licenses.
text: It is possible to use the GPL for a manual, but the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is much better for manuals.