Assertion: interpreter | /r/HasProperty | required
Facets:
value: versus is not necessary
type: OTHER
value: depending on the duration
type: OTHER
value: during iep meetings
type: TEMPORAL
value: immediately
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: A court interpreter shall not accept money or consideration or favors from anyone other than the court for the performance of an act the interpreter would be required or expected to perform in the regular course of assigned duties.
text: VRI is provided on a fee-for-service basis by several interpreting agencies; costs may vary based on whether an interpreter is needed immediately or is scheduled ahead of time.
text: So when is an interpreter necessary?
text: In the second example, the same deaf person has just had a stroke and needs a more thorough examination; an interpreter is considered necessary because the communication is more in depth.
text: Due to the physical and mental demands of interpreting, two or more interpreters may be required depending on the duration and/or intensity of the work involved.
text: However, if the patient has a pre-existing condition that would cause a side effect, an interpreter may be required.
text: Because many states and localities don’t use tested court interpreters and ignore federal rules for when interpreters are required, many criminal defendants and civil litigants with limited English skills are not equipped to navigate the complex legal system, jeopardizing their constitutional rights.
text: The following are some questions third party neutrals should ask themselves where an interpreter might be needed.
text: If an interpreter is needed during IEP meetings, another interpreter should have this responsibility.
text: The Technical Assistance Manual has specific examples of when an interpreter is necessary versus when an interpreter is not necessary.
text: Situations where such interpreters are necessary are typical include medical, educational, housing, social security and legal areas.