Assertion: anhydrous crystalline β maltose | /r/HasProperty | converted by the ethanol treatment
Facets:
value: in example
type: OTHER
value: as a base for powderizing alcohols
type: PURPOSE
value: as a base
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: Specific Surface Area of the Anhydrous Crystalline β-Maltose Converted by the Ethanol Treatment
text: Pore Size Distribution of the Anhydrous Crystalline β-Maltose Converted by the Ethanol Treatment
text: Hygroscopicity of the Anhydrous Crystalline β-Maltose Converted by the Ethanol Treatment
text: Specific Surface Area of the Anhydrous Crystalline β-Maltose Converted by the Ethanol Treatment
text: Pore Size Distribution of the Anhydrous Crystalline β-Maltose Converted by the Ethanol Treatment
text: Hygroscopicity of the Anhydrous Crystalline β-Maltose Converted by the Ethanol Treatment
text: 12 shows pore size distributions of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, measured by the mercury filling method, and those of the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose of Control 2 and anhydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 3.
text: 13 shows a photograph showing the results of a deionized water-solidifying test (after 2 hours from the dissolution of samples) comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the solidification.
text: 14 shows a photograph showing the results of a deionized water-solidifying test (after 20 hours from the dissolution of samples) comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the solidification.
text: 15 shows a photograph showing the results of a deionized water-admixing test comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the powderization.
text: 16 shows a photograph showing the results of an ethanol-admixing test comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the powderization.
text: a to e: Samples prepared by dissolving 18.8, 13.3, 11.5, 10.0 or 8.2 g of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment
text: a: Sample prepared by admixing 1.25 ml of deionized water with 10 g of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention)
text: Sample prepared by admixing 6 ml of ethanol with 10 g of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) b:
text: Based on the result, the anhydrous crystalline maltose converted by the ethanol treatment is called as “the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment”, hereinafter.
text: The specific surface area of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was measured by a nitrogen adsorption isotherms using “MODEL ASAP-2400”, a specific surface area/pore size distribution analyzer commercialized by Micromeritics, Georgia, USA.
text: The specific surface area of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was determined to be 3.39 m2/g, and those of the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose of Control 2 and anhydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 3 were 0.48 m2/g, and 0.82 m2/g, respectively.
text: The specific surface area of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was about 7- to 4-folds larger than those of the controls.
text: The anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment showed a relatively large specific surface area due to a number of pores.
text: The pore size distribution and intrusion volume of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment were measured by a mercury filling method using “AUTOPORE 9520
text: As is evident from Table 3, the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment showed a relatively large intrusion volume, i.e., 1.05 ml/g and a clear peak in the pore size diameter of less than 5 μm ( FIG.
text: Hygroscopicity of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was compared with those of the hydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 1, anhydrous crystalline α-maltose of Control 2, and anhydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 3 by conventional hygroscopicity test.
text: While, it was revealed that the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment gradually absorbed moisture, with requiring 2 to 6 hours under the condition of RH 75% and zero to 4 hours under the condition of RH 90%, and was converted into hydrous crystalline maltose without showing an excess moisture content of over about 5.3% (w/w) as described above.
text: 44 mm, Height: 57 mm), and then, 8.2, 10.0, 11.5, 13.3, or 18.8 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, obtained by the method in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the deionized water in one minute and dissolved with stirring at 240 to 250 rpm using a stirring bar.
text: As is evident from Table 5 and FIG. 13 , in the case of the test solution prepared by dissolving 18.8 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, the crystallization was started at 3 min after the dissolution and the solidification was completed at 3.5 min after the dissolution (Symbol “a” in FIG. 13 ).
text: In the case of the test solution prepared by dissolving 13.3 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, the crystallization of hydrous crystalline maltose was started at 6 min after the dissolution and the solidification was completed at 8 min after the dissolution (Symbol “b” in FIG. 13 ).
text: However, in the cases of test solutions prepared by dissolving 11.5 g or lower of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment
text: Also, as is evident from Table 6 and FIG. 14 , in the cases of the test samples prepared by dissolving 18.8 g and 13.3 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, which were solidified at 3.5 min and 8 min after the dissolution, the test samples kept their solidified phases even after 20 hours (Symbols “a” and “b” in FIG. 14 ).
text: In the case of the test sample prepared by dissolving 11.5 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, which was not solidified during 2 hours after the dissolution, partial crystallization of hydrous crystalline maltose was observed but the solidification was not observed even after 20 hours (Symbol “c” in FIG.
text: Also, in the cases of test samples prepared by dissolving 10.0 g or lower of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Symbols
text: Fifteen parts by weight of a commercially produced whiskey (40% proof) was put in a vessel, and then 20 parts by weight of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose, converted by the ethanol treatment in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the whiskey with stirring.
text: Fourteen parts by weight of the diluted maple syrup was put in a vessel, and then nine parts by weight of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose, converted by the ethanol treatment in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the syrup with stirring.
text: Fifteen parts by weight of a commercially produced whipping cream (amount of milkfat: 40% (w/w), a solid non fat: 4% (w/w)) was put in a vessel, and then 13.8 parts by weight of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose, converted by the ethanol treatment in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the whipping cream with stirring.
text: In order to investigate the effect of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment as a base for powderizing moisture-containing compositions, a powderizing test was carried out using deionized water as a model of moisture-containing compositions as follows.
text: Ten grams of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, obtained by the method in Example 1, was placed in a 200-ml glass beaker, and then 0.25 ml per once of deionized water was admixed with the crystal with stirring using a spoon.
text: As is evident from the results in Table 7, the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment kept its good powdery form when 1.25 ml or lower amount of deionized water was admixed (Symbol “a” in FIG. 15 ).
text: The results indicate that the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment is more useful than the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose, as a base for powderizing moisture-containing compositions.
text: Except for using dehydrated ethanol as a substitute of deionized water and admixing with 0.5 ml per once, the usefulness of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment as a base for powderizing alcohols was investigated by the same procedure as in Example 8.
text: As is evident from the results in Table 8, the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment kept its good powdery form when 8.0 ml or lower amount of dehydrated ethanol was admixed.
text: The results indicate that the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment is more useful than anhydrous crystalline α-maltose, as a base for powderizing alcohol-containing compositions.
text: 12 shows pore size distributions of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, measured by the mercury filling method, and those of the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose of Control 2 and anhydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 3.
text: 13 shows a photograph showing the results of a deionized water-solidifying test (after 2 hours from the dissolution of samples) comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the solidification.
text: 14 shows a photograph showing the results of a deionized water-solidifying test (after 20 hours from the dissolution of samples) comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the solidification.
text: 15 shows a photograph showing the results of a deionized water-admixing test comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the powderization.
text: 16 shows a photograph showing the results of an ethanol-admixing test comparing the usefulness of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) and the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose (Control) as a base for the powderization.
text: a to e: Samples prepared by dissolving 18.8, 13.3, 11.5, 10.0 or 8.2 g of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment
text: a: Sample prepared by admixing 1.25 ml of deionized water with 10 g of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention)
text: Sample prepared by admixing 6 ml of ethanol with 10 g of an anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Present invention) b:
text: Based on the result, the anhydrous crystalline maltose converted by the ethanol treatment is called as “the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment”, hereinafter.
text: The specific surface area of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was measured by a nitrogen adsorption isotherms using “MODEL ASAP-2400”, a specific surface area/pore size distribution analyzer commercialized by Micromeritics, Georgia, USA.
text: The specific surface area of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was determined to be 3.39 m2/g, and those of the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose of Control 2 and anhydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 3 were 0.48 m2/g, and 0.82 m2/g, respectively.
text: The specific surface area of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was about 7- to 4-folds larger than those of the controls.
text: The anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment showed a relatively large specific surface area due to a number of pores.
text: The pore size distribution and intrusion volume of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment were measured by a mercury filling method using “AUTOPORE 9520
text: As is evident from Table 3, the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment showed a relatively large intrusion volume, i.e., 1.05 ml/g and a clear peak in the pore size diameter of less than 5 μm ( FIG.
text: Hygroscopicity of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment was compared with those of the hydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 1, anhydrous crystalline α-maltose of Control 2, and anhydrous crystalline β-maltose of Control 3 by conventional hygroscopicity test.
text: While, it was revealed that the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment gradually absorbed moisture, with requiring 2 to 6 hours under the condition of RH 75% and zero to 4 hours under the condition of RH 90%, and was converted into hydrous crystalline maltose without showing an excess moisture content of over about 5.3% (w/w) as described above.
text: 44 mm, Height: 57 mm), and then, 8.2, 10.0, 11.5, 13.3, or 18.8 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, obtained by the method in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the deionized water in one minute and dissolved with stirring at 240 to 250 rpm using a stirring bar.
text: As is evident from Table 5 and FIG. 13 , in the case of the test solution prepared by dissolving 18.8 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, the crystallization was started at 3 min after the dissolution and the solidification was completed at 3.5 min after the dissolution (Symbol “a” in FIG. 13 ).
text: In the case of the test solution prepared by dissolving 13.3 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, the crystallization of hydrous crystalline maltose was started at 6 min after the dissolution and the solidification was completed at 8 min after the dissolution (Symbol “b” in FIG. 13 ).
text: However, in the cases of test solutions prepared by dissolving 11.5 g or lower of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment
text: Also, as is evident from Table 6 and FIG. 14 , in the cases of the test samples prepared by dissolving 18.8 g and 13.3 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, which were solidified at 3.5 min and 8 min after the dissolution, the test samples kept their solidified phases even after 20 hours (Symbols “a” and “b” in FIG. 14 ).
text: In the case of the test sample prepared by dissolving 11.5 g of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, which was not solidified during 2 hours after the dissolution, partial crystallization of hydrous crystalline maltose was observed but the solidification was not observed even after 20 hours (Symbol “c” in FIG.
text: Also, in the cases of test samples prepared by dissolving 10.0 g or lower of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment (Symbols
text: Fifteen parts by weight of a commercially produced whiskey (40% proof) was put in a vessel, and then 20 parts by weight of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose, converted by the ethanol treatment in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the whiskey with stirring.
text: Fourteen parts by weight of the diluted maple syrup was put in a vessel, and then nine parts by weight of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose, converted by the ethanol treatment in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the syrup with stirring.
text: Fifteen parts by weight of a commercially produced whipping cream (amount of milkfat: 40% (w/w), a solid non fat: 4% (w/w)) was put in a vessel, and then 13.8 parts by weight of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose, converted by the ethanol treatment in Example 1, was gradually admixed with the whipping cream with stirring.
text: In order to investigate the effect of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment as a base for powderizing moisture-containing compositions, a powderizing test was carried out using deionized water as a model of moisture-containing compositions as follows.
text: Ten grams of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment, obtained by the method in Example 1, was placed in a 200-ml glass beaker, and then 0.25 ml per once of deionized water was admixed with the crystal with stirring using a spoon.
text: As is evident from the results in Table 7, the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment kept its good powdery form when 1.25 ml or lower amount of deionized water was admixed (Symbol “a” in FIG. 15 ).
text: The results indicate that the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment is more useful than the anhydrous crystalline α-maltose, as a base for powderizing moisture-containing compositions.
text: Except for using dehydrated ethanol as a substitute of deionized water and admixing with 0.5 ml per once, the usefulness of the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment as a base for powderizing alcohols was investigated by the same procedure as in Example 8.
text: As is evident from the results in Table 8, the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment kept its good powdery form when 8.0 ml or lower amount of dehydrated ethanol was admixed.
text: The results indicate that the anhydrous crystalline β-maltose converted by the ethanol treatment is more useful than anhydrous crystalline α-maltose, as a base for powderizing alcohol-containing compositions.