Assertion: logic | /r/HasProperty | correct
Facets:
value: about cook
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: When logic is correct, the statements are said to "follow" from each other.
text: However, while we countenanced the possibility of disagreement over which logic is correct, we have simply presupposed that there must be a unique correct logic.
text: Logical pluralism takes many forms, but the most philosophically interesting and controversial forms of the view hold that more than one logic can be correct, that is:
text: It is hard to see how we could escape this obligation, given that logic 1 tells us that the premises entail the conclusion, and logic 1 is correct.
text: It also highlights the extent to which it is odd to call Carnap a logical pluralist, since in a way his view is not that there is more than one correct logic, but that there is nothing for logic to be correct about (Cook 2010, 498).
text: They they are standardly described as logical pluralisms anyway, presumably because they are views on which it can reasonably be claimed that more than one logic is correct.