Assertion: nobility's title | /r/HasProperty | false
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: This was somewhat indirectly suggested by Prince Karl and may have merit in conjunction with the idea that Wikipedia does not want to be in the business of saying that these various (whatever) titles are actually "false.
text: If there are false titles that are not considered self-styled, then the title of the article should either remain as it is or be called something other than "self-styled.
text: A self-styled title is indeed false (and the selling of false titles considered legally fraudulent) as far as I and everyone else knowledgeable on these matters is concerned, but this does not have to be stated in any Wikipedia articles; rather that determination can be left to the readers.
text: With regard to the idea of naming the whole article "Self-styled titles of nobility" is it the case that: although all self-styled titles are false, not all false titles are self-styled?