Assertion: license | /r/HasProperty | incompatible
Facets:
value: with the gpl
type: OTHER
value: with the gnu general public license
type: OTHER
value: with its free software guidelines
type: OTHER
value: because of its requirements
type: CAUSE
Source sentences:
text: This is discouraged, however, since such a license might be incompatible with the GPL and causes a perceived license proliferation.
text: The license is thus incompatible with the GNU General Public License and some other free software licenses, and inconsistent with the Open Source Definition, which requires that a license not discriminate against fields of endeavor.
text: The Debian project found the license to be incompatible with its Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) because of its attribution requirement.
text: If there is no way to satisfy both licenses at once, they are incompatible.
text: If a programming language interpreter has a license that is incompatible with the GPL, can I run GPL-covered programs on it?
text: Can I use snippets of GPL-covered source code within documentation that is licensed under some license that is incompatible with the GPL?
text: If there is no way to satisfy both licenses at once, they are incompatible.
text: Please note that this license is incompatible with version 2 of the GPL, because of its requirements that apply to all documentation in the distribution that contain acknowledgements.