Assertion: fund's shareholder | /r/CapableOf | retain substantial pecuniary interest
Facets:
value: in the company
type: LOCATION
Source sentences:
text: See also Investors Mutual (presumption of non-control not rebutted where, among other factors, holder of 15% of voting stock of company elected two seats on company's ten-member board of directors but failed to reach accord with 33% shareholder; evidence did not support conclusion that such holder actually exercised a controlling influence over the company's management and policies; and other shareholders continued to exercise a dominant role and to retain a substantial pecuniary interest in the company).