Assertion: linguist's language | /r/CapableOf | use abstract
Facets:
value: for the sake of concision
type: PURPOSE
Source sentences:
text: Language as Analogous to Mathematics” would have been a more apt title for this section, but for the sake of concision, I’ll use ‘abstract’ as shorthand for ‘whatever the ontology of mathematical objects is,’ even if that ontology turns out not to be abstract (e.g., nominalist).