Assertion: inheritance | /r/HasProperty | object-oriented programming
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: When I see Inheritance (object-oriented programming), I am expecting there to be a non-OOP inheritance page in programming, such as Inheritance (functional programming), which does not exist.
text: The article Inheritance (computer science) can discuss inheritance outside of the OOP context then; inheritance in an OOP context is of sufficient depth and complexity to deserve its own article, since that is where it is predominantly (or always, depending on your perspective) used; thus: Inheritance (object-oriented programming).
text: Regarding Inheritance (object-oriented programming): I may be completely wrong, but it appears to me that you don't have a lot of experience with OOP?
text: There's more on the disagreement and more examples at Talk:Inheritance (object-oriented programming) and Talk:Class (object-oriented programming).
text: Inheritance (object-oriented programming))
text: Keep in accordance with the opinion poll on Talk:Inheritance (object-oriented programming)) (and move this discussion there).
text: Inheritance (object-oriented programming))
text: Do you object the name inheritance (computer science) or do you think while it can be acceptable, inheritance (object-oriented programming) is better than it?
text: I suggested the name inheritance in object-oriented programming because if we have two articles inheritance (computer science) and inheritance (object-oriented programming), the readers might wonder isn't it oop is part of cs?
text: inheritance (computer science) - to make a room to rename inheritance (object-oriented programming).