Assertion: judgment | /r/HasProperty | valid
Facets:
value: for many years
type: TEMPORAL
value: objectively
type: MANNER
value: usually
type: DEGREE
value: for a very long time
type: TEMPORAL
value: universally
type: MANNER
value: for all human beings
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: A judgment is valid and of legal effect only if the court that issued it had competence to decide the questions of law presented by the case, as well as jurisdiction over the persons or things involved (see competence and jurisdiction).
text: So a judgment is objectively valid if and only if it is logically well-formed and all of its constituent intuitions and concepts are objectively valid (A155–156/B194–195).
text: This results directly from the conjunction of the centrality thesis and the transcendental idealism thesis: judgment is the central cognitive activity of the human mind, and judgments are objectively valid and true if and only if the metaphysics of transcendental idealism is correct.
text: By contrast, Kant thinks that although we sometimes speak as if our judgments of the agreeable are universally valid
text: This criticism is distinct from criticism of the idea that judgments of beauty are valid for all human beings.
text: Judgments in Texas are valid for 10 years.
text: Judgments are valid for a very long time and can be renewed.
text: Judgments can be valid for many years, and creditors can continue to try to collect what the judgment allows for long after they win a lawsuit against a delinquent borrower.
text: Judgments are valid for many years and can be renewed if they expire.
text: But, judgments are usually valid for about seven to 20 years before they expire.