Assertion: mind's property | /r/HasProperty | mental
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Again, it is hard to see why not, since the fundamental properties instantiated at such a world are mental, though of course they are also physical.
text: The mere fact that every particular has a physical property does not rule out the possibility that some particulars also have non-supervenient mental properties, i.e. mental properties that are only contingently related to the physical.
text: For if a property is mental and physical, then, given the Via Negativa, it will be both mental and non-mental which (of course) it can't be!