Assertion: manuscript's text | /r/HasProperty | byzantine
Facets:
value: definitely
type: DEGREE
value: with alexandrian elements in mark
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: The text is definitely Byzantine; the Alands list it as Category V; von Soden lists it as Ki.
text: There is at least one counter-argument, though it is textual rather than physical or paleographic: The text of D is Byzantine, with Alexandrian elements in Mark; the text of G is purely and simply "Western.
text: The text is definitely Byzantine -- though Scrivener reports that some esteemed H as having somewhat greater value than G, meaning probably that it was a little less Byzanine.
text: The Alands give this their usual half-hearted endorsement by refusing to place 71 in a Category; this generally means that the manuscript belongs to the Byzantine text but not one of the mainstream Byzantine groups.