Assertion: suit injunction | /r/Causes | interference
Facets:
value: by another court
type: OTHER
value: in exercise of jurisdiction
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: non conveniens must also have jurisdiction to entertain the matter, however, it refrains from entertaining the matter because it considers itself to be an inappropriate forum; The doctrine of forum non conveniens is invoked by a court to not entertain a matter presented before it in view of the fact that there exists a more appropriate court of competent jurisdiction which would be in a better position to decide the lis between the parties; Doctrine of forum conveniens requires the parties to agitate issues before a court of competent jurisdiction which is also a convenient court apropos all the parties to the dispute; Doctrine of anti-suit injunction which is premised on the doctrine of forum non-conveniens, has to be applied with due care and caution as it involves issues as regards, respect for corresponding international forums; Rule of comity of courts requires that exercise of this power, that is, grant of anti-suit injunction, must be exercised sparingly because an anti-suit injunction though is directed against a person, in effect, it causes interference in exercise of jurisdiction by another court; Fundamental principle behind the grant of an anti-suit injunction is to choose that forum in which the case can be tried more properly/suitably, keeping in mind the interest of all the parties to the dispute.