Assertion: interface's method | /r/HasProperty | abstract
Facets:
value: implicitly
type: MANNER
value: by definition
type: OTHER
value: by the omission of a body
type: CAUSE
Source sentences:
text: The body of the interface contains abstract methods, but since all methods in an interface are, by definition, abstract, the abstract keyword is not required.
text: An Interface can have only Abstract methods and Constants , which are always implicitly public, static, and final.
text: Now let us take this concept of abstract class to an extreme and think about a class which has all the methods marked as abstract i.e. a pure abstract class.
text: All the methods of the interface are public and abstract and, we will define an interface using the interface keyword as shown below −
text: Since all the methods of the interface are abstract and user doesn’t know how a method is written except the method signature/prototype.
text: Interface is a way of achieving abstraction, and it consists of abstract methods.
text: Interfaces and their methods are implicitly abstract and adding that modifier makes no difference.
text: Closed Issue: Can an event accessor be (implicitly) abstract by the omission of a body, similarly to the way that methods in interfaces and property accessors are (implicitly) abstract by the omission of a body?
text: All methods defined on an interface are public and abstract by definition.