Assertion: buddha nature | /r/HasProperty | non-implicative negation
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: An early Tibetan translator, Ngok Lotsawa (1050–1109) argues in his commentary to the Uttaratantra that Buddha nature is a non-implicative negation, which is to say that it is emptiness, as a total negation of inherent existence (svabhava) that does not imply that anything is left un-negated (in terms of its svabhava).
text: The Kadampa tradition generally followed Ngok Lotsawa by holding that Buddha nature was a nonimplicative negation.
text: Another early figure, Chaba Chokyi Senge also argued that Buddha nature was a non-implicative negation.