Assertion: obscenity | /r/HasProperty | utterance
Facets:
value: by definition
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Adjudication over the constitutional law of obscenity began in Roth v. United States, in which the Court in an opinion by Justice Brennan settled in the negative the “dispositive question” “whether obscenity is utterance within the area of protected speech and press.
text: An obscenity is any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time.
text: Proceeding from the premise that 'no issue is presented in either case, concerning the obscenity of the material involved,' the Court finds the 'dispositive question' to be 'whether obscenity is utterance within the area of protected speech and press,' and then holds that 'obscenity' is not so protected because it is 'utterly without redeeming social importance.'
text: Adjudication over the constitutional law of obscenity began in Roth v. United States, in which the Court in an opinion by Justice Brennan settled in the negative the dispositive question whether obscenity is utterance within the area of protected speech and press.
text: By definition, obscenity is any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time.
text: An obscenity is any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time.