Assertion: negligence's injury | /r/HasProperty | foreseeable
Facets:
value: within reason
type: OTHER
value: in order
type: DEGREE
value: by the manufacturer
type: OTHER
value: "reasonably foreseeable"
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: The injury you suffered must be foreseeable or predictable.
text: In order for such a duty to exist, the injury to the claimant must be "reasonably foreseeable", meaning, for example, that the type of employment must be one in which an unfit employee could cause harm of the type which occurred, and the claimant is the type of person to whom such harm would be a "reasonably foreseeable consequence".
text: It is not the precise injury that the plaintiff suffered that needs to be foreseeable, it is enough that an injury is foreseeable.
text: Then the court will have to examine the alleged harm to determine whether the injury was foreseeable, meaning that it was a harm that a teacher should have expected and prevented.
text: The injury sustained by the plaintiff must be foreseeable by the manufacturer, within reason.