Assertion: black locust | /r/HasProperty | invasive species
Facets:
value: in new england
type: LOCATION
value: within the united states
type: LOCATION
value: in california
type: LOCATION
value: interestingly enough
type: OTHER
value: sometimes
type: TEMPORAL
value: in connecticut
type: LOCATION
value: in wisconsin
type: LOCATION
value: in many areas
type: LOCATION
value: in australia
type: LOCATION
value: formally
type: MANNER
value: in the western states
type: LOCATION
value: in the midwest
type: LOCATION
Source sentences:
text: For example, within the western United States, New England region, northern California, and in the Midwest, black locust is considered an invasive species.
text: While black locust is native to the Eastern United States, it is grown over large parts of Europe and Asia for its ornamental value and usefulness of its wood, and is invasive in parts of both regions.
text: We don't usually use the word "invasive" for trees, but apparently black locust is considered to be an invasive weed in Australia.
text: Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) is an invasive species in California.
text: Black locust is considered invasive in many areas, which means you should not plant it and should take action to kill existing trees to stop them from spreading.
text: Black locust has been formally listed as an invasive species in Wisconsin and Connecticut, and the state of Massachusetts prohibits it.
text: Interestingly enough, the black locust is sometimes considered an invasive species even within the United States, particularly in the Western states and in New England.