Assertion: immortality | /r/HasProperty | bad
Facets:
value: for humanity
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: ultimately
type: DEGREE
value: very
type: DEGREE
value: for society
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: from a secular viewpoint
type: OTHER
value: in this case
type: TEMPORAL
value: of itself
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Why Immortality is Not So Bad.
text: But in this case, the immortality is bad news.
text: Immortality is bad in and of itself, even if attained without using evil means.
text: From a secular viewpoint, perhaps immortality is bad for society even if it's great for individuals.
text: Interesting arguments have also been made for the related conclusion that, given our uncertainty about whether immortality would be good (or very bad!) for us, we have strong reasons to choose not to be immortal, were we given the option.
text: Ultimately, is a person’s immortality good or bad for humanity?
text: I, however, believe that death is bad, agreeing with Nagel in most parts but at the same time believe that immortality, never dying is also bad, this is not a contradiction.
text: Although I have argued that immortality is bad, this is not to say that it is a good thing that we die when we do, in accordance with all above arguments one can still think that we die too soon.