Assertion: gambling game's outcome | /r/CapableOf | happen by chance
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: But the upshot of the present discussion is that even in those cases, whether an outcome happens by chance is fixed by the properties of the process leading up to it, the causal situation in which it occurs, and not simply by the fact that an event of a given character was the product of that process.
text: The truth of RCT explains this useful constraint on the epistemology of chance, since if we saw an actual finite random sequence, we could infer that the outcomes constituting that sequence happened by chance.
text: Nevertheless if such a sequence of outcomes did occur, it would have happened by chance—assuming, plausibly, that if each individual outcome happens by chance, the complex event composed by all of them also happens by chance.
text: But in that case we would have an outcome that happened by chance and yet the obvious suitable sequence of outcomes is not KML-random.
text: But such a sequence, and any particular outcome in that sequence, happens by chance.
text: So on the standard account of randomness, no sequences of outcomes of a biased chance process are random, but of course these outcomes happened by chance.