Assertion: happiness | /r/HasProperty | eudaimonia
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Happiness ( eudaimonia ), therefore, with Aristotle, is not identical with pleasure ( edone ), or even with the sum of pleasures.
text: but for now, it suffices to say that eudaemonist theories of happiness define ‘happiness’ (eudaimonia) as a state in which an individual strives for the highest human good.
text: Happiness (eudaimonia), to Aristotle, meant attaining the ‘daimon’ or perfect self (Waterman, 1990).
text: A bit of reflection tells us that the goal that we all have is happiness or flourishing (eudaimonia).
text: This is not the place to determine precisely Aristotle’s ethical position, but we may point out that his conception of happiness (eudaimonia) is not identical with felicity