Assertion: goldbrick | /r/CapableOf | work for ted
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Here TED would argue (the flip side of PBS's argument above) that the parties' true understanding was that Goldbrick would work for TED for two years for $3.2 million, and that the casting of the deal in two contracts was a formality intended not to operate between the parties, but instead to get around the restrictions of the PBS refusal clause.
text: If instead Goldbrick still prefers to work for TED, an alternate possibility would be for him to wait till January 15 and exercise his option on the performer's contract.