Assertion: fructose | /r/HasProperty | reducing sugar
Facets:
value: under most conditions
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: They all say that fructose is a reducing sugar, but that goes against all that I've learned at the University and from books.
text: To summerise: fructose is a non-reducing sugar under most conditions used to assess reducing sugars (ie Benedicts, Fehlings, Tollens) AndrewMT 07:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
text: Hmm I came on here to try and find out the saem kind of thing, why *is* fructose a reducing sugar, all iv read is that 'fructose is also a reducing sugar which is surprising' or words to that effect.
text: Fructose is a reducing sugar, as are all monosaccharides.
text: Fructose is a reducing sugar, as are all monosaccharides.