Assertion: euthanasia's decision | /r/CapableOf | withhold treatment
Facets:
value: as the legitimate rejection
type: MANNER
value: for any patient
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: Making such decision to either withhold or withdraw treatment for any patient is not an easy decision to make based on the cultural, religious and legal factors.
text: The law also considers end-of-life decisions to withdraw, limit or to withhold treatment as the legitimate rejection of what it describes as ‘unreasonable obstinacy,’  thereby reaffirming the basis for the ethical legitimacy of the practice.
text: Those who use the strict definition maintain that the decision to withdraw or to withhold treatment is in no way a form of euthanasia, since there is a clear difference between the administration of a lethal injection and the withdrawal of treatment.
text: Thus, a negative decision to withhold treatment is actually a disguised positive decision – either to not-treat (as though that is a verb in its own right), or to do something else.
text: Acts are acts; omissions are omissions; and there is no particular reason to suppose that a medical decision to withhold treatment, qua omission, has to be an “act of omission”.