Assertion: disparagement's product | /r/HasProperty | superior
Facets:
value: to that of the competitor
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Positive comparison, wherein one shows their products or services to be superior to their competitors is allowed.
text: The court found no potential for liability based on disparagement, either express or implied, reasoning that the insured was not alleged to have identified the competitor or its product, or to have suggested that the insured’s product was superior to that of the competitor.
text: The court found no potential for liability based on disparagement, either express or implied, reasoning that the insured was not alleged to have identified the competitor or its product, or to have suggested that the insured’s product was superior to that of the competitor.
text: For example, courts have found potential liability for implied disparagement where the insureds have falsely suggested that their products are superior to those of their competitors, even if no specific reference to the competitor is made.