Assertion: disclosure's information | /r/HasProperty | published
Facets:
value: previously
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: Furthermore, though, and consistent with the D.C. Circuit’s note in Pilon , one might argue that to say that no “disclosure” occurs for previously published or public information is at least somewhat inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in DOJ v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press , 489 U.S 749, 762-71 (1989), which held that a privacy interest can exist, under the FOIA, in publicly available –