Assertion: haddock's interview | /r/HasProperty | suppressed
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Haddock next contends that because a part of his interview with police was suppressed by the trial judge, the prosecutor's statement in closing argument that "the defendant, the entire night, never once ... inquired about the safety of his family" (emphasis added) was improper because it necessarily referred to a portion of the interview that was suppressed, as well as the portion not suppressed.