Assertion: elisa's specificity | /r/HasProperty | 100%
Facets:
value: respectively
type: DEGREE
value: in the current study
type: OTHER
value: considering this cutoff
type: OTHER
value: from 16 and 30 samples
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: In a study with 18 healthy and 18 COVID-19 positive patients, the sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 100%.
text: Second, although the specificity was almost 100%, only a few authors included groups of controls of patients with other diseases such as tuberculosis, and most authors used endemic control samples and a few samples of nonendemic controls.
text: Sensitivity was approximately 87.5% and specificity is approximately 100%.
text: The reported sensitivity and specificity are 100% (from 16 and 30 samples, respectively).
text: Considering this cutoff, the specificity of the test is 100% while the sensitivity lowered to 23%.
text: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ECOTEST-RPR were 100%, 80.8%, 76.2%, and 100%, respectively.
text: In the current study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of ECOTEST-RPR as compared to Randox-TPHA were 100% and 80.8%, respectively.