Assertion: thought experiment | /r/HasProperty | entertained by disputing parties
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: In light of cases where the discussion of one and the same thought experiment played an important role in settling a dispute, the following problem arises: how can one and the same thought experiment support opposing views about a particular matter if the arguments that correspond to the different versions of the thought experiment that were entertained by the disputing parties are significantly different?