Assertion: gaskin's house | /r/HasProperty | suitable
Facets:
value: for occupation
type: PURPOSE
value: reasonably
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: (a) that the house is reasonably suitable for occupation by not more than the maximum number of households or persons mentioned in subsection (4) or that it can be made so suitable by the imposition of conditions under section 67;
text: He drew attention to the fact that section 64(3)(a) of the 2004 Act requires that the licensing authority be satisfied that "the house is reasonably suitable for occupation by not more than the maximum number of households or persons mentioned in subsection (4) or that it can be made so suitable by the imposition of conditions under section 67"; and, he submitted, this underlines the point that the Council has no right to regulate the terms under which occupants of the HMO occupy, in particular in relation to the rent which they must pay.
text: Although, as Mr Butler emphasised, section 64(3)(a) requires that the authority be satisfied that "the house is reasonably suitable for occupation by not more than the maximum number of households or persons mentioned in subsection (4) or that it can be made so suitable by the imposition of conditions under section 67", his submission overlooks the fact that, as other provisions in the 2004 Act make abundantly clear, the licensing regime is concerned not only with the suitability of the HMO but also with its management.