Assertion: gully | /r/HasProperty | interpreted with 82.3% of the relative errors
Facets:
value: from the image
type: OTHER
value: generally
type: MANNER
value: accurately
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: Results showed that gullies could generally be accurately interpreted from the image, with an average relative error of gully area and gully perimeter being 11.1% and 8.9%, respectively, and 74.2% and 82.3% of the relative errors for gully area and gully perimeter were within 15%.