Assertion: gaskin's activity | /r/HasProperty | provided for remuneration
Facets:
value: normally
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: He emphasised that the Directive defines "service", in what he characterised as the broadest terms, as "any self-employed economic activity, normally provided for remuneration" (see Article 4 which, but for the removal of the comma, is repeated in Regulation 2 of the Services Regulations).
text: Although we acknowledge that "service", as used in the Services Directive, is a word whose meaning is ultimately a matter of construction, we nonetheless consider that a good starting point is the common use of that word together with the term "self-employed economic activity provided for remuneration".
text: We see no reason why these do not amount to activities which, together, comprise a "self-employed economic activity provided for remuneration".
text: In both cases it can be said that a service is being provided which constitutes "self-employed economic activity provided for remuneration".
text: It is defined in Article 4 of the Services Directive (and in Regulation 2 of the Services Regulations) as meaning "any self-employed economic activity" which is "normally provided for remuneration" (emphasis added).
text: That language is inconsistent with an intention to restrict the scope of the self-employed activities to which the Services Directive beyond the requirement that the activities are "normally provided for remuneration".
text: It encompasses any self-employed economic activity which is normally provided for remuneration, as referred to in Article 50 of the EC Treaty.
text: Moreover, the activity must normally be provided for remuneration; in other words, it must be of an economic nature.