Assertion: discrimination | /r/HasProperty | motivating factor
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: In the landmark case, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (490 U.S. 228 (1989)), the Supreme Court has ruled that direct evidence is not required for a plaintiff to prove that discrimination was a motivating factor in a "mixed-motive" case, i.e., a case in which an employer had both legitimate and illegitimate reasons for making an employment decision.