Assertion: gypsum's patent | /r/HasProperty | invalid
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: In a suit to restrain alleged violations of the Sherman Act, in which the defendants rely upon patents, the Government is entitled to an opportunity to prove that the patents are invalid.
text: The United States does not claim that the patents are invalid because they have been employed in violation of the Sherman Act, and that a decree should issue canceling the patents; rather, the government charges that the defendants have violated the Sherman Act because they granted licenses under patents which in fact were invalid.
text: The United States does not claim that the patents are invalid because they have been employed in violation of the Sherman Act, and that a decree should issue canceling the patents; rather, the government charges that the defendants have violated the Sherman Act because they granted licenses under patents which in fact were invalid.
text: If the government were to succeed in showing that the patents were in fact invalid, such a finding would not, in itself, result in a judgment for cancellation of the patents.