Assertion: elisa's sensitivity | /r/HasProperty | 100%
Facets:
value: respectively
type: MANNER
value: in the current study
type: OTHER
value: from 16 and 30 samples
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Sensitivity 100%
text: Sensitivity 100%
text: The reported sensitivity and specificity are 100% (from 16 and 30 samples, respectively).
text: Sensitivity 100% Specificity 100% Phase of development Not approved for diagnostic use; for research use only Proposed release available for purchase by research labs/healthcare providers, but not for diagnostic use Date March 20, 2020
text: Sensitivity 100%
text: Sensitivity 93.2% Specificity 100% Phase of development
text: Sensitivity 93% Specificity 100% Phase of development Research use only; currently has CE/IVD approval (EU) and HSA approval (Singapore
text: Sensitivity 100% (Genscript N protein, IgG), 61% (IgA), 65% (IgM) Specificity
text: The relative speciﬁcity and sensitivity of the C-ELISA were 100% and 86%,
text: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ECOTEST-RPR were 100%, 80.8%, 76.2%, and 100%, respectively.
text: In the current study, the overall sensitivity and specificity of ECOTEST-RPR as compared to Randox-TPHA were 100% and 80.8%, respectively.
text: Based on our finding, the highest sensitivity (100%) is considered as a limitation of the ECOTEST-RPR serological test as its false positivity is enormous due to cross-reactive antibodies.