Assertion: dismissal | /r/HasProperty | harsh
Facets:
value: to the misconduct
type: OTHER
value: in this case
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: the dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable; and
text: He felt that dismissal was too harsh a penalty and filed an unjust dismissal complaint with the Labour Program.
text: The arbitrator found that dismissal was too harsh a sanction in this case because the charge had been “unauthorised possession” of the cell phone and had not alleged that the employee had been dishonest.
text: Also, where an employer fails to prove an employee’s intention to steal, dismissal without notice will be considered too harsh a response to the misconduct.
text: a person has been dismissed; the dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable; it was not consistent with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code; and it was not a case of genuine redundancy.
text: The Fair Work Commission will decide if a dismissal is harsh, unjust or unreasonable, and they consider all of the following circumstances:
text: Where an employee has been dismissed without notice (summary dismissal) for serious misconduct the Commission may find that, although there was a valid reason for the dismissal, the dismissal was harsh because summary dismissal was a disproportionate response.
text: If widespread breaches of policy occur without an employer response then this weighs against a decision that the dismissal was justified and not harsh, unjust or unreasonable.
text: The dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable; and
text: When the Fair Work Commission considers whether they are satisfied that the dismissal was harsh, unjust or reasonable, they must take into account:
text: Although the degree and nature of this incident of sexual harassment was very serious the CCMA found that the dismissal was too harsh because it was an isolated incident and was unlikely to be repeated.
text: However, the arbitrator found that the dismissals were too harsh because the dismissed employees had shown “genuine” remorse.
text: The remarkable point relating to this finding are that the dismissals were found to be too harsh, not because other employees had only received final warnings for the very same offence, but because the employees had shown “genuine remorse”.
text: the dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable, and
text: In considering whether a dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable, the Commission must take into account:
text: your dismissal was harsh, unjust or unreasonable, and