Assertion: dissenter's dissent | /r/CapableOf | presume repeal
Facets:
value: of demanding
type: MANNER
value: of 349
type: TEMPORAL
value: of 80
type: OTHER
value: of 335
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: Thus, instead of making “repeals by implication ․ disfavored,” Reg'l Rail, 419 U.S. at 133, 95 S.Ct. 335, and demanding that “the intention of the legislature to repeal ․ be clear and manifest,” Posadas v. Nat'l City Bank of N.Y., 296 U.S. 497, 503, 56 S.Ct. 349, 80 L.Ed. 351 (1936), the dissent presumes repeal because Congress never expressly declared that it wanted to avoid an implied repeal-all because of one paragraph from Sure-Tan the dissent misreads.