Assertion: embezzler | /r/HasProperty | accountant
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: C supposedly strengthens the argument because if there are 8 accountants while only 2 actuaries, statistically speaking it's more likely that the embezzler is an accountant.
text: That just because there are more accountants, it doesn't mean that the embezzler is more likely to be an accountant?
text: C supposedly strengthens the argument because if there are 8 accountants while only 2 actuaries, statistically speaking it's more likely that the embezzler is an accountant.
text: That just because there are more accountants, it doesn't mean that the embezzler is more likely to be an accountant?