Assertion: elisa's specificity | /r/HasProperty | 98.4%
Facets:
value: respectively
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: When used as a stand-alone test, the C6 EIA is more sensitive than the current 2-tiered test for patients with early Lyme disease (64% vs. 48%) but is hampered by decreased specificity (98.4% vs 99.5%) and thus is more prone to false-positive results (12,17).
text: However, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of DIALAB-ELISA were 98.4%, 94.9%, 92.3%, and 98.9%, respectively.
text: The sensitivity and specificity of DIALAB-ELISA with respect to Randox-TPHA are 98.4% and 94.9%, respectively.