Assertion: disparagement's product | /r/HasProperty | inferior
Facets:
value: to that of the insured
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: The court reasoned that “reference to the study was not, by implication, a reference to” the competitor’s product, and the insured was not alleged to have suggested that the competitor’s product was inferior to that of the insured.
text: One can further add that the new technology available and used by one is far more superior to the known technology, but one cannot say that the known technology is bad and harmful or that the product made with the known technology is inferior.