Assertion: haddock's statement | /r/HasProperty | suppressed
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Haddock first makes the argument that whether he was in "custody" is irrelevant to the question of whether his statements should be suppressed.
text: Haddock argues on appeal that such evidence was "fruit of the poisonous tree" and should have been suppressed after the trial judge ruled that his statements beyond page 31 of the transcript were suppressed.