Assertion: alleged harasser | /r/HasProperty | supervisor
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: A quick and thorough response to a harassment complaint is always a good idea--regardless of whether the reported harassment is sexual harassment or non-sexual harassment, and regardless of whether the alleged harasser is a supervisor or another employee.
text: Factors used by the courts to determine whether harassment unreasonably interfered with work performance or created a hostile work environment include: • Whether the conduct was physically threatening or humiliating as opposed to a mere offensive utterance • How frequently it was repeated • Whether the conduct was hostile and patently offensive • Whether the alleged harasser was a coworker or a supervisor • Whether others joined in perpetrating the harassment •
text: For example, if the alleged harasser is a supervisor, the employer could place the alleged harasser on a leave of absence until the company has time to conduct and finalize its investigation.
text: Moreover, the employer should consider the following actions: (1) ongoing monitoring; (2) a change in the reporting relationship if the alleged harasser was a supervisor; and (3) workplace training on the issue implicated by the investigation.
text: Consequently, an important issue in a harassment case is whether the alleged harasser is a supervisor or a co-worker.
text: The Court noted that it typically will be known before litigation is commenced whether an alleged harasser was a supervisor, and if not, it will become clear to both sides after discovery.
text: Lower courts have disagreed on the test for deciding whether an alleged harasser is a “supervisor” or merely a co-worker.
text: whether the alleged harasser was a co-worker or supervisor;
text: Whether the alleged harasser was a co-worker or supervisor;
text: Whether the alleged harasser was a co-worker or supervisor of the targeted employee or employees;