Assertion: gun's ban | /r/HasProperty | unconstitutional
Facets:
value: facially
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: On June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5 to 4) that this ban was unconstitutional.
text: On April 17, 2018, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in Ramirez v. Commonwealth, ruled that the state’s 2004 ban on stun guns is unconstitutional.
text: On April 26, 2017 the lawsuit was settled by agreeing that the ban was unconstitutional and to promulgate regulations to allow for the possession of stun guns.
text: On March 21, 2019, the Supreme Court of Illinois ruled unanimously that the ban on possession or carriage of stun guns in public is facially unconstitutional.
text: It ruled that a section of law which prohibits the carrying or transportation of stun guns is unconstitutional because an exception against the prohibition (possessing a concealed carry permit) only covers handguns, thus there is no exception for stun guns, and therefore the ban is unconstitutional.