Assertion: evidence | /r/HasProperty | admissible
Facets:
value: for another purpose
type: PURPOSE
value: in court
type: LOCATION
value: at trial
type: TEMPORAL
value: under rule
type: OTHER
value: in respect of the other charges
type: OTHER
value: from evidence of previous convictions
type: OTHER
value: as to one party
type: OTHER
value: against a party
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: as long as it is
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: If Evidence Is Admissible?
text: Such evidence is also admissible for Impeachment purposes, (for example, if a defendant takes the stand) and when a defendant seeks to introduce the evidence in his or her defense.
text: Under English law, evidence that would otherwise be admissible at trial may be excluded at the discretion of the trial judge if it would be unfair to the defendant to admit it.
text: Rules of evidence are, as the name indicates, the rules by which a court determines what evidence is admissible at trial.
text: For evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant and "not excluded by the rules of evidence", which generally means that it must not be unfairly prejudicial, and it must have some indicia of reliability.
text: For evidence to be admissible, it must tend to prove or disprove some fact at issue in the proceeding.
text: For evidence to be admissible enough to be admitted, the party proffering the evidence must be able to show that the source of the evidence makes it so.
text: Whether evidence is admissible or not depends on several different factors that the court must analyze.
text: There are two basic factors that are considered when determining whether evidence is admissible or not:
text: However, that doesn't mean that the evidence is admissible in court.
text: Under evidence law, in order for evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant, material, and competent.
text: Under evidence law, in order for evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant, material and competent.
text: While situations will arise which call for the exclusion of evidence offered to prove a point conceded by the opponent, the ruling should be made on the basis of such considerations as waste of time and undue prejudice (see Rule 403), rather than under any general requirement that evidence is admissible only if directed to matters in dispute.
text: To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay).
text: Wherein Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was "the best that the nature of the case will allow".
text: This evidence may be admissible for another purpose, such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident.
text: However such evidence may be admissible if the defense has argued the defendant had no knowledge driving impaired was a crime.
text: For evidence to be admissible in court, it must e.g. be a personal observation rather than hearsay.
text: The general rule is that evidence unlawfully obtained is admissible as long as it is relevant.
text: In England and Wales, hearsay is generally admissible in civil proceedings, but is only admissible in criminal proceedings if it falls within a statutory or a preserved common law exception, all of the parties to the proceedings agree, or the court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice that the evidence is admissible.
text: If the court admits evidence that is admissible against a party or for a purpose — but not against another party or for another purpose — the court, on timely request, must restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.
text: (now Rule 105 in the bill) dealt with the subject of evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but is not admissible against another party or for another purpose.
text: Apart from evidence of previous convictions, other evidence, amounting to "reprehensible behaviour" is admissible.
text: "Examples of where it might be appropriate to admit such evidence include circumstances where evidence on a number of charges being tried concurrently is cross-admissible in respect of the other charges.
text: A judge typically has broad discretion in determining whether evidence is admissible or not.
text: This evidence may be admissible for another purpose, such as proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake, or lack of accident.
text: Nor is the amendment intended to redefine what evidence would otherwise be admissible under Rule 404(b).