Assertion: goldbrick | /r/CapableOf | work for two years
Facets:
value: for 3.2 million
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: Here TED would argue (the flip side of PBS's argument above) that the parties' true understanding was that Goldbrick would work for TED for two years for $3.2 million, and that the casting of the deal in two contracts was a formality intended not to operate between the parties, but instead to get around the restrictions of the PBS refusal clause.