Assertion: helm's sentence | /r/HasProperty | imposed on other criminals
Facets:
value: in the same jurisdiction
type: LOCATION
Source sentences:
text: Compare the nature and gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty, Compare the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction; i.e., whether more serious crimes are subject to the same penalty or to less serious penalties, and Compare the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.
text: (a) Criteria that have been recognized in this Court's prior cases include (i) the gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty; (ii) the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction, that is, whether more serious crimes are subject to the same penalty or to less serious penalties; and (iii) the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.
text: Second, it may be helpful to compare the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction.
text: In sum, a court's proportionality analysis under the Eighth Amendment should be guided by objective criteria, including (i) the gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty; (ii) the sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction; and (iii) the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.
text: We next consider the sentences that could be imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction.
text: The Court then sets forth three assertedly "objective" factors to guide the determination of whether a given sentence of imprisonment is constitutionally excessive: (1) the "gravity of the offense and the harshness of the penalty," ante at 463 U. S. 290-291; (2) a comparison of the sentence imposed with "sentences imposed on other criminals in the same jurisdiction," ante at 463 U. S. 291 (emphasis added); (3) and a comparison of "the sentences imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions.