Assertion: giant sequoia's genus | /r/HasAspect | common name
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Another thing to consider is that if a genus did have a common name that is identical to another genus name in which it was formerly included, then that is not a "common" name at all, just an incorrect or outdated name; and that would be good information for notes within the articles, not a means of changing standard Wikipedia policy of structuring article names.