Assertion: headphone's quality | /r/HasProperty | good
Facets:
value: very
type: DEGREE
value: as wired headphones
type: OTHER
value: with a vibrant, lively character
type: OTHER
value: with well-balanced soundstage
type: OTHER
value: undeniably
type: DEGREE
value: as the design
type: OTHER
value: as the qc 35 ii
type: OTHER
value: built in microphone
type: OTHER
value: rarely
type: DEGREE
value: with plush sheepskin leather earpads
type: OTHER
value: with stainless steel sliders
type: OTHER
value: pretty damn
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Ear pad headphones were much more popular before the advent of the iPod, but they still have some good qualities that make them worthy of consideration.
text: Additionally, they provide pretty good sound quality given the fact the speakers are small.
text: Call quality is good -- they have a sidetone feature that lets you hear your voice in the buds -- but I've used other models with better noise reduction during calls.
text: premium Bluetooth headphones such as the Sony WH-1000XM3, but the audio quality is pretty good, which is all you can ask for noise-canceling headphones at this price.
text: The sound quality is undeniably good, with a vibrant, lively character and well-balanced soundstage.
text: Build quality is good and they're an easy listen.
text: The sound quality is good, but not entirely accurate.
text: Noise isolation in such a product design is non-existent and the quality of the sound is quite good.
text: If you opt for one of the more versatile headsets without an integrated boom mic, the quality will still be good but there are some things to be aware of:
text: Build quality is exceptionally good, with plush sheepskin leather earpads and stainless steel sliders.
text: The sound quality of in-ear headphones can be just as good as any on-ear or over-ear model, but they do tend to be a bit less open or airy.
text: These are better than Bose, plus the sound quality is pretty damn good.
text: Long standby time of 60 days Audio quality is good
text: Audio quality is good Built-in microphone
text: The problem with wireless headphones is that you have to recharge them or swap out batteries often, and sound quality is rarely as good as wired headphones.
text: Like the SE215, the HF5 isolates very well (maybe even a little more than the SE215), and the build quality is very good.
text: Audio quality is just as good as the design.
text: The sound quality is undeniably good, with a vibrant, lively character and well-balanced soundstage.
text: As with any pair of headphones, the sound quality needs to be good, even if your focus is blocking out the world around you.
text: Build-quality is good and the bits that need to be metal are metal, rather than plastic.
text: Build quality is good and they're an easy listen.
text: Sound quality is just as good as the QC 35 II, and perhaps even better for movies and TV shows, though some audiophiles may notice a slight tendency to overemphasize the high frequencies.
text: Audio quality is good, and the earbuds keep the sound inside (and other noises out).
text: The RS 170's headphone is closed-back, and has very good sound quality for both music and movies.