Assertion: envelope | /r/CapableOf | be larger
Facets:
value: always
type: DEGREE
value: equally
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: So though the specific calculation performed in step 6 was incorrect (there is no proper prior distribution such that, given what is in the first envelope A, the other envelope is always equally likely to be larger or smaller) a correct calculation, depending on what prior we are using, does lead to the result E ( B | A