Assertion: emerald's inclusion | /r/HasProperty | visible
Facets:
value: barely
type: DEGREE
value: to the naked eye
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: Thus, if an emerald has no visible inclusions to the eye (assuming normal visual acuity) it is considered flawless.
text: Thus, if an emerald has no visible inclusions to the eye (assuming normal visual acuity) it is considered flawless.
text: Choose a stone with inclusions that are either invisible or barely visible to the naked eye, and avoid heavily included stones, which can easily break.