Assertion: dynamite | /r/CapableOf | file its motion
Facets:
value: for memorandum in support
type: PURPOSE
value: for summary judgment
type: PURPOSE
value: subsequently
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: Subsequently, Dynamite filed its motion for summary judgment and memorandum in support, contending that there was no genuine issue of fact that Bell was an at-will employee, was not discharged by Dynamite but resigned, and the "public policy" exception to at-will employment could not be addressed since it had not discharged Bell.