Assertion: debater's argument | /r/HasProperty | invalid
Facets:
value: simply
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Too often debaters will produce one answer as to why an argument by an opponent is invalid, when it is far more devastating to provide four, five, or even six reason why an opponent’s argument should be rejected.
text: This is the fallacy of assuming that something is false simply because a proof or argument that someone has offered for it is invalid; this reasoning is fallacious because there may be another proof or argument that successfully supports the proposition.