Assertion: god's word | /r/HasProperty | with god
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: John states that “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word [Jesus] was God” (John 1:1).
text: A literal translation begins to clear up any confusion: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and the Word was God.
text: The Logos or Word in John 1:1 ("In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God), is often interpreted, especially by Trinitarians, to identify the pre-existent Jesus with this Word.[citation needed]
text: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
text: The Prologue to Gospel of John begins with: "In the beginning was the Word, & the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
text: The Gospel of John has been seen as especially aimed at emphasizing Jesus' divinity, presenting Jesus as the Logos, pre-existent and divine, from its first words: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1).
text: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
text: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
text: When applied to John 1:1-2, this definition becomes interesting: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
text: As we have seen, John's gospel begins, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
text: While the inerrant Word of God states, “ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God
text: In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God . . .
text: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
text: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God . . .
text: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.