Assertion: constitution's provision | /r/HasProperty | inconsistent
Facets:
value: with the voting rights act
type: OTHER
value: with the constitution
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: If such an interpretation is not possible because of inconsistency (and where separation is possible), the provision which is inconsistent with the constitution is considered void.
text: However, in 1981, the federal Justice Department ruled that this provision was inconsistent with the Voting Rights Act.
text: Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provisions thereof shall be deemed to be void, or ever to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this Part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or Tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.