Assertion: enemy combatant | /r/CapableOf | fight within the laws of war
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: That some members of the Bush administration could not tell the difference between an enemy combatant who fight within the laws of war and an "enemy combatant who without uniform comes secretly through the lines for the purpose of waging war by destruction of life or property, [is a familiar example] of belligerents who are generally deemed not to be entitled to the status of prisoners of war" (Ex parte Quirin); is not reason why this article should follow that administration's lead.
text: That some members of the Bush administration could not tell the difference between an enemy combatant who fight within the laws of war and an "enemy combatant who without uniform comes secretly through the lines for the purpose of waging war by destruction of life or property, [is a familiar example] of belligerents who are generally deemed not to be entitled to the status of prisoners of war" (Ex parte Quirin); is not reason why this article should follow that administration's lead.