Assertion: consensus | /r/HasProperty | sham
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: A conflict between two or more policies, guidelines, and ArbCom decisions (such as between WP:IGNORE and another policy) may create uncertainty about whether a consensus is a sham.
text: Not every editor need agree that a consensus is a sham, because your determining that a consensus is a sham is not the end of the matter.
text: Not every editor need agree that a consensus is a sham, because your determining that a consensus is a sham is not the end of the matter.
text: If you believe that a consensus is a sham, you may consider any of the various procedures and remedies provided for Wikipedia.
text: Remedies for a sham consensus depend on why the consensus is a sham.