Assertion: circumcision | /r/HasAspect | no effect
Facets:
value: on masturbation
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: on function
type: OTHER
value: on erectile function
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: on a man’s fertility
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: on the male reproductive system
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: on a man’s ability
type: OTHER
value: on prostate cancer risk
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: despite rumors to the contrary
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Despite rumors to the contrary, circumcision has no effect on a man’s fertility, and there are mixed results from the few studies on how circumcision affects sexual pleasure.
text: Exactly why, or if, circumcision has any effect on prostate cancer risk is not known.
text: Truth: Circumcision has no effect on a man’s ability to make his partner pregnant.
text: Considered cosmetic surgery for the most part, circumcision has no effect on the male reproductive system.
text: Extensive studies, however, have found that circumcision has no effect on the sensation or function of the penis, says Herati.
text: Some scientists claim that circumcision has no effect on erectile function and the possibility of prolonging the sexual act.
text: As it is absolutely unlikely that circumcision would have no effect on masturbation, and masturbation was one of the key reasons why circumcision was introduced into western medicine, we have to write something there - or just that.
text: In addition, circumcision had no effect on rates of premature ejaculation or erection or ejaculation difficulties.