Assertion: enemy combatant | /r/HasProperty | merged into this article
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Unlawful enemy combatant be merged into this article
text: Yes Unlawful enemy combatant should be merged into this article --Philip
text: I don't think enemy combatant should be merged into this article because under normal usage (Not under the current US administration's usage) a enemy combatant (just like a friendly combatant) can be either a privileged or unprivileged combatant.