Assertion: cysteine's effect | /r/CapableOf | argue against general gfp modulation
Facets:
value: as a function of time
type: CAUSE
Source sentences:
text: The main effect of treatment did not reach the 0.05 significance criterion (F (1, 6) =0.081; p=0.785; η p 2=0.013), providing no evidence for a global change in GFP amplitude with NAC treatment and also arguing against a general GFP modulation as a function of time (ie the majority of patients received NAC and then placebo).