Assertion: civil disobedience | /r/HasProperty | justified
Facets:
value: morally
type: MANNER
value: in democracies
type: LOCATION
value: in some cases
type: TEMPORAL
value: always
type: DEGREE
value: potentially
type: DEGREE
value: according to this democratic theory
type: OTHER
value: with the idea
type: OTHER
value: sometimes
type: TEMPORAL
value: against governmental entities
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: to this condition
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: When is Civil Disobedience Justified?
text: While there is some merit to this condition, civil disobedience that does not meet it might still be justifiable.
text: No Civil disobedience is unjust in democracies; sufficient means for change exist.
text: However, while I believe civil disobedience is justify, Lewis Van Dusen wrote Civil Disobedience: Destroyer of Democracy, in which he declares that “civil disobedience… whatever the rationalization, is still an assault on our democratic society, an affront to our legal order” (Dusen).
text: While there is some merit to this condition, civil disobedience that does not meet it might still be justifiable.
text: If obedience to law were unconditional and absolute by virtue of the democratic process, it would follow that civil disobedience is always unjustified.
text: In such situations some Christians have decided that civil disobedience is a justifiable option.
text: Civil Disobedience Can Be Justified
text: Some theories of civil disobedience hold that civil disobedience is only justified against governmental entities.
text: It is often argued that civil disobedience can only be justified if there is a high probability of producing positive change through that disobedience.
text: When should civil disobedience be justified?
text: With civil disobedience, an interesting philosophical question arises: how are we to reconcile the idea that civil disobedience is sometimes morally justified with the idea that citizens of liberal democracies ought to respect the opinion of their fellow citizens and follow democratically enacted laws, even when these laws are unjust or wrong?
text: Rawls, for example, argues that civil disobedience is only justified when used to fight clear violations of liberty rights, further provided that dissenters have already tried the legal channels of political participation that are available in a liberal democracy to no avail and that they accept their punishment for breaking the law.
text: They argue that civil disobedience is justified when it is used to remedy failures in democratic processes (See for example Markovits, D. 2005; Smith, W. 2011).
text: According to this democratic theory, civil disobedience is also justified in fighting another type of deliberative inertia: when a political view that enjoys wide public support is not being considered by policy-makers and legislators.
text: ‘On Civil Disobedience and Liberal Democracy’ (2019), I develop a framework for civil disobedience that deviates from democratic and liberal approaches in that it avoids restricting the class of causes it is justified to protest: it is not only when either liberty rights violations or democratic deficits occur that civil disobedience may be justified.
text: Instead, civil disobedience is justified when used to protest a high-stakes political decision.
text: Past disobedients such as Martin Luther King Jr. , best known for his inspiration of civil disobedience to end racial segregation and discrimination, and Gandhi, who utilized mass civil disobedience to fight for India’s independence, are great examples of when civil disobedience can be justified, as well as showing the great positive social changes possible from civil disobedience.
text: When is civil disobedience justified?
text: Civil disobedience is morally justified Have you ever heard of civil disobedience, Or even have an idea of what it means?
text: Civil disobedience in a democracy is morally justified.
text: Yes civil disobedience is morally justified.
text: Some people think that civil disobedience is morally justified if they consider a law unfair on subjective grounds.
text: Is civil disobedience every justified in a functioning democracy?
text: If these fail, civil disobedience is justified, and may be an obligation.
text: Past disobedients such as Martin Luther King Jr., best known for his inspiration of civil disobedience to end racial segregation and discrimination, and Gandhi, who utilized mass civil disobedience to fight for India’s independence, are great examples of when civil disobedience can be justified, as well as showing the great positive social changes possible from civil disobedience.
text: So, when is civil disobedience justified, if ever?
text: After defining what civil disobedience is, the three minute theory attempts to answer this question: When is civil disobedience justified?
text: Since there is no prima facie duty to obey laws, it follows that civil disobedience is always justified.
text: Past disobedients such as Martin Luther King Jr., best known for his inspiration of civil disobedience to end racial segregation and discrimination, and Gandhi, who utilized mass civil disobedience to fight for India’s independence, are great examples of when civil disobedience can be justified, as well as showing the great positive social changes possible from civil disobedience.
text: Some would be content to leave the argument there, and conclude that civil disobedience is justified when free speech is either outlawed or unable to affect government conduct.
text: Civil disobedience may be justifiable, in some cases, when and if an individual disobeys a law in order to bring an issue to court, as a test case.
text: Its primary finding may be summarized in this lesson: Civil disobedience is justifiable but dangerous.
text: It is justifiable, where circumstances warrant, by the first principles of the American republic and of free, constitutional government, and it is dangerous in that it poses a threat to the rule of law.
text: First of all, one might argue that civil disobedience is potentially justifiable when the mechanisms of democracy are not working properly, such that laws do not represent the will of the people.
text: Civil disobedience may be justifiable, in some cases, when and if an individual disobeys a law in order to bring an issue to court, as a test case.