Assertion: contractor's work | /r/HasProperty | done under the direction of the employer
Facets:
value: by a specialist without supervision
type: OTHER
value: usually
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: Whether the worker performing services holds themselves out as being engaged in an occupation or business distinct from that of the employer; Whether the work is a regular or integral part of the employer’s business; Whether the employer or the worker supplies the instrumentalities, tools, and the place for the worker doing the work; Whether the worker has invested in the business, such as in the equipment or materials required by their task; Whether the service provided requires a special skill; The kind of occupation, and whether the work is usually done under the direction of the employer or by a specialist without supervision; The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss depending on their managerial skill; The length of time for which the services are to be performed; The degree of permanence of the working relationship; The method of payment, whether by time or by the job; Whether the worker hires their own employees; Whether the employer has a right to fire at will or whether a termination gives rise to an action for breach of contract; and Whether or not the worker and the potential employer believe they are creating an employer-employee relationship (this may be relevant, but the legal determination of employment status is not based on whether the parties believe they have an employer-employee relationship).