Assertion: circumcision's health benefit | /r/CapableOf | outweigh risk
Facets:
value: to the minority
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) found that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend universalnewborn circumcision.
text: In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which previously had been neutral on the subject, issued a task force report concluding that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh its risks and justify access to the procedure.3,4
text: After reviewing multiple studies on circumcision, the AAP reports that "the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks.
text: (Ultimately, the American Academy of Pediatrics says these health benefits outweigh the risks, but they’re not great enough to recommend circumcision for all baby boys.)
text: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has the viewpoint that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks.
text: In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a statement saying that notwithstanding the potential rare complications of circumcision, including bleeding, infection, and (shudder) penile necrosis, "the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks.
text: From the AAP: "Current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and that the procedure's benefits justify access to this procedure for families who choose it.
text: The scientific evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, it adds.
text: For instance, the American Academy of Pediatrics’ position statement (AAP, 2012) on newborn circumcision (now expired) concluded “the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks; furthermore, the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for families who choose it.
text: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision.
text: In 2012, the American Academy of Paediatrics issued a statement saying that notwithstanding the potential rare complications of circumcision, including bleeding, infection and (shudder) penile necrosis, "the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks".
text: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines state that the health benefits of circumcision in newborns outweigh the risks, but they neither recommend nor advise against circumcision.
text: Meanwhile, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says “the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend universal newborn circumcision.
text: In 2012, the AAP’s “Task Force on Circumcision” issued a revised policy statement and technical report, which concluded that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks, and argued that the procedure should be reimbursed by insurance.
text: The AAP’s most recent policy statement, issued in 2012, went further than it had in previous years, arguing that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks.
text: Defenders of the practice, which includes the American Academy of Pediatrics, however claim that the health benefits outweigh the risks to the minority.
text: Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks and that the procedure's benefits justify access to this procedure for families who choose it, however, existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine circumcision.
text: While the American Academy of Paediatrics (APP) has concluded that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh the risks and the procedure is a matter of parental choice, outraged opponents call it male genital mutilation, or child abuse.
text: In 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which previously had been neutral on the subject, issued a task force report concluding that the health benefits of circumcision outweigh its risks and justify access to the procedure.