Assertion: conclusion | /r/HasProperty | false
Facets:
value: with a counterexample
type: OTHER
value: with other means
type: OTHER
value: under that interpretation
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: …unexpected way that allows the conclusion to be false, are ruled out.
text: premisses necessitate the conclusion, even if one or more of the premisses is false and the conclusion is false; in a sound argument, true premisses necessitate a true conclusion.
text: In other words, it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if all the premises are true.
text: This can be done by giving a counter example of the same form of argument with premises that are true under a given interpretation, but a conclusion that is false under that interpretation.
text: The conclusion might be true, and might be thought probably true, yet it can be false.
text: Inductive reasoning is a form of argument that—in contrast to deductive reasoning—allows for the possibility that a conclusion can be false, even if all of the premises are true.
text: If the conclusion is false, then the hypothesis must be false.
text: In a valid argument, if the conclusion is false, then the hypothesis
text: In logic, an argument can be invalid even if its conclusion is true, and an argument can be valid even if its conclusion is false.
text: An argument is “valid” if it is impossible for its premises to be true while its conclusion is false.
text: In cases of inductive reasoning, even though the premises are true and the argument is “valid”, it is possible for the conclusion to be false (determined to be false with a counterexample or other means).
text: In cases of inductive reasoning, even though the premises are true and the argument is “valid”, it is possible for the conclusion to be false (determined to be false with a counterexample or other means).
text: If the hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false, then the conditional statement is false.