Assertion: crampon's point | /r/HasProperty | short
Facets:
value: far
type: DEGREE
value: based on the second photo
type: OTHER
value: with the crampons
type: OTHER
value: on the second photo
type: LOCATION
value: relatively
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: These points, like the bottom points on the crampon, are built into the frame and are relatively short when compared to frontpoints for ice climbing.
text: Based on the second photo, with the crampons viewed from the side, those secondary points are far too short and not nearly protruding past the front of the boot.
text: https://willgadd.com/a-simple-fix-frontpoints-and-tibialis-anterior/ ​​​Based on the second photo, with the crampons viewed from the side, those secondary points are far too short and not nearly protruding past the front of the boot.
text: Based on the second photo, with the crampons viewed from the side, those secondary points are far too short and not nearly protruding past the front of the boot.
text: Having this capability is critical in many mixed-climbing situations, and one that I have found lacking in some crampons I’ve tested over the years, where the secondary points are too long or short or poorly articulated, making it impossible/awkward to get the side- and front-point on the same hold without cocking your foot or raising your heel too high.