Assertion: defendant's motion | /r/CapableOf | misapprehend the evidence
Facets:
value: on that issue
type: OTHER
value: before them
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: In this case, the Divisional Court found that the motions judge below had both applied a higher standard of 'meritorious' rather than the lower standard of having an 'arguable defence on the merits', and as well had misapprehended the evidence before them on that issue.