Assertion: cicero's law | /r/HasProperty | ius
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: This could be interpreted either as a strong normative claim —the people agree on ”law“ [ius], also translatable as right or justice, and share a common interest — or alternatively in a weaker deflationary manner, the people nominally accepting a common law and sharing a common conception of their self-interest which may or may not be in accord with justice.
text: In fact, Pomponius, in this conversation we are not seeking how to safeguard interests in law [ius], or how to respond to each consultation.
text: We must explain the nature of law [ius], and this must be traced from human nature.
text: Then we must treat the laws [ius] and orders of peoples that have been composed and written, in which what are called the civil laws [ius] of our people will not be hidden.
text: Then we must treat the laws [ius] and orders of peoples that have been composed and written, in which what are called the civil laws [ius] of our people will not be hidden.
text: That is not so, Quintus: ignorance of the law [ius] is conducive to more lawsuits than knowledge of it.