Assertion: daredevil | /r/HasProperty | marvel comics
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: or so when Daredevil (Marvel Comics) was given that name.
text: If the issue is the article title, we could move it to Daredevil (Marvel Comics series) or something else more appropriate?
text: I have just modified 39 external links on Daredevil (Marvel Comics character).
text: Regardless, obviously, that article doesn't focus very much at all on his solo title, where as the Daredevil (Marvel Comics) article focuses quite a lot on his title.
text: Given how lengthy Daredevil (Marvel Comics) is, it's not unreasonable to split it.
text: Also, If we go that way, I'd suggest that Daredevil (Marvel Comics) should then redirect to Daredevil (Marvel Comics series)" since most of the mentions I found are referring to the comic book rather than to the character, though a couple refer to the character.
text: Daredevil (Marvel Comics) appears to be locked, so an admin has to be requested to move it.
text: Oppose per BOZ at AfD: "that there is some redundancy remaining from the Daredevil (Marvel Comics) article, but I also believe that these are two valid topics on their own and meet the notability guidelines" .
text: Also, If we go that way, I'd suggest that Daredevil (Marvel Comics) should then redirect to Daredevil (Marvel Comics series)" since most of the mentions I found are referring to the comic book rather than to the character, though a couple refer to the character.
text: The page on Daredevil (Marvel Comics series) is an unnecessary WP:REDUNDANTFORK.
text: Daredevil (Marvel Comics character) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time.