Assertion: censorship's content | /r/HasProperty | sexual
Facets:
value: in any way
type: MANNER
value: in nature
type: LOCATION
Source sentences:
text: Google was criticized by the China Illegal Information Reporting Center (CIIRC) for allowing search results that included content that was sexual in nature, claiming the company was a dissemination channel for a “huge amount of porn and lewd content”.
text: Basically if the subject or content is sexual in any way then whether its obscene or not is up for majority vote; they actually said if the average person would be offended by it and think that it had no artistic value (if you weren't offended by it or thought it was a work of art