Assertion: chaos's potential | /r/HasProperty | good book
Facets:
value: really
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: Chaos had the potential to be a really good book.
text: Chaos had potential to be either a good examination of what really happened in 1969 or to be a study in what happens when someone is consumed by something for twenty years; instead, it’s a convoluted narrative that seems to be largely based on speculation and circumstantial evidence which may or may not come from credible sources, it feels like a vendetta against Bugliosi, and it is in dire need of editing (for length as well as grammatical errors and typos) as well as fact-checking, as I’m not convinced that O’Neill himself is a credible source.
text: Chaos had the potential to be a really good book.