Assertion: civil disobedience | /r/HasProperty | violent
Facets:
value: due date
type: OTHER
value: depending upon the situation
type: OTHER
value: above else
type: DEGREE
value: necessarily
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: There have been debates as to whether civil disobedience must necessarily be non-violent.
text: Why must civil disobedience be non-violent?
text: Such a conception allows that civil disobedience can be violent, partially covert, and revolutionary.
text: Civil disobedience can be violent or non-violent, depending upon the situation.
text: Civil disobedience can be violent or non-violent, depending upon the situation.
text: Above all else, civil disobedience is non-violent.
text: For example, when civil disobedience is non-violent and respectfully undertaken – for example, by giving the authorities advance notice of actions which will inconvenience the public – is it in the public interest that activists should be charged?
text: some state that civil disobedience can be violent and/or partially covert.
text: It is non-violent and conscientious.
text: Due date: 02/05/12 Should Civil disobedience be violent or non-violent?
text: Due date: 02/05/12 Should Civil disobedience be violent or non-violent?
text: some state that civil disobedience can be violent and/or partially covert.