Assertion: argument | /r/CapableOf | end with conclusion
Facets:
value: usually
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: The Toulmin model assumes that an argument starts with a fact or claim and ends with a conclusion, but ignores an argument's underlying questions.
text: The argument will usually end up with a conclusion of whether the pros or cons are stronger, thus precipitating a 'reasonable' conclusion.
text: Teleological arguments (or arguments from design) by contrast begin with a much more specialized catalogue of properties and end with a conclusion concerning the existence of a designer with the intellectual properties (knowledge, purpose, understanding, foresight, wisdom, intention) necessary to design the things exhibiting the special properties in question.
text: Arguments begin with a premise or premises and end with a conclusion.