Assertion: breed's standard | /r/HasProperty | accessible
Facets:
value: to dog owners
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
value: readily
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: the dog owners felt the term "pit bull" was imprecise and, thus, unconstitutionally vague because the average dog owner is not afforded fair warning of the act prohibited by the ordinance; however, the higher court found the standards for determining whether a dog is a pit bull are readily accessible to dog owners, and because most dog owners are capable of determining the breed or phenotype of their dog, the trial court properly determined that the ordinance provides adequate notice to dog owners and is not unconstitutionally vague.