Assertion: amendment | /r/HasProperty | ratified within contemporaneoustimeframe
Facets:
value: sufficiently
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: This gives women's rights advocates hope that there might be a legal way to revive the ERA, as it seems to contradict an oft-cited precedent: the Supreme Court ruled in 1921 that amendments must be ratified within a "sufficiently contemporaneous" timeframe, which is determined by Congress.