Assertion: argument's conclusion | /r/HasProperty | valid
Facets:
value: deductively
type: MANNER
Source sentences:
text: As mentioned, an inconsistent counter-example set implies that a conclusion is valid because it means that there is no situation under which the premises are all true and the conclusion is false (the negation of the conclusion is true).
text: The conclusion is invalid, because there can be a correlation between two phenomena without one causing the other.
text: An argument in which the premises do succeed in guaranteeing the conclusion is called a (deductively) valid argument.