Assertion: athlete's size | /r/HasProperty | key
Facets:
value: to them
type: TRANSITIVE-OBJECT
Source sentences:
text: The point is, CAS were clear in their explanations that a) there was insufficient evidence to argue that elevated T was the source of a competitive advantage; b) the size of the advantage is key to them, because it has to be greater than any other normal genetic advantage (see point 517); and c) the “degree of competitive advantage over non-hyperandrogenic females” had to be of “commensurate significance to the competitive advantage that male athletes enjoy over female athletes” (From point 533).