Assertion: agency's agent | /r/HasAspect | intention
Facets:
value: in cases of intentional omission
type: OTHER
value: usually
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: According to the standard theory, thinking that p is an intentional action only if the agent has an intention that includes “think that p” in its content.
text: Suppose the agent decides to A. For this to be an action, it is not required that the agent has the intention to decide to A.
text: In reply, Clarke (2010a) has argued that in cases of intentional omission the agent usually does have an intention not to act that plays an important causal role, and he has identified various parallels between intentional actions and intentional omissions.
text: For if the agent has the intention to settle the question by making a decision, making the decision is intentional under a description.