Assertion: actor | /r/CapableOf | explain behavior
Facets:
value: the same way
type: MANNER
value: across the board
type: LOCATION
value: by reference to the situation
type: MANNER
value: namely
type: MANNER
value: as evidence
type: MANNER
value: as attributions to either stable dispositions
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Malle (2006) interpreted this result not so much as proof that actors and observers explained behavior exactly the same way but as evidence that the original hypothesis was fundamentally flawed in the way it framed people's explanations of behavior—namely, as attributions to either stable dispositions or to the situation.
text: The authors found initial evidence for the hypothesis, and so did Storms (1973), who also examined one possible explanation of the hypothesis: that actors explain their behaviors by reference to the situation because they attend to the situation (not to their own behaviors) whereas observers explain the actor's behavior by reference to the actor's dispositions because they attend to the actor's behavior (not to the situation).
text: The result of the meta-analysis implied that, across the board, actors and observers explain behaviors the same way.