Assertion: algae's kingdom | /r/HasProperty | plantae
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: Archaeplastida includes land plants and things traditionally associated with the traditional kingdom Plantae so does it really make sense to include this taxonomic classification within Protista or to mention somewhere that this taxonomic group was once classified with the Kingdom Protista before it began including land plants? --Thenewguy34
text: Other eukaryotic kingdoms—the Plantae, Fungi, and Animalia—are each believed to be monophyletic .
text: Protista, that are either free-living or aggregated into simple colonies and that have diverse reproductive and nutritional modes, including the protozoans, eukaryotic algae, and slime molds: some classification schemes also include the fungi and the more primitive bacteria and blue-green algae or may distribute the organisms between the kingdoms Plantae and Animalia according to dominant characteristics.
text: While it is true that the majority of taxonomists would classify an alga as a protist, there still are a large number of modern taxonomists who place algae within the kingdom Plantae.
text: The other four kingdoms are: Monera, Fungi, Plantae, and Animalia.
text: When Carl Linneaus first started classifying plants and animals in the mid-1700s, there were two kingdoms: plantae (plants) and animalia (animals).