Assertion: anarchist's action | /r/HasProperty | unlibertarian
Facets:
value: inherently
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: The only argument even worth considering, for those who still wish to describe V as an anarchist despite his inhumane treatment of Evey, is that perhaps V knew that his action was inherently unlibertarian, inherently archistic (i.e., anti-anarchistic), but was (A) banking on the hope that Evey would not demand any restitution for his crime, and was (B) willing to pay whatever restitution Evey demanded should she choose that V ought to be punished, even if the price Evey were to demand were his life; that V was prepared to commit immediate suicide for Evey if she requested it of him.