Assertion: arsonist's fire | /r/HasProperty | arson
Facets:
value: probably
type: DEGREE
value: by definition
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: If the fire appears to be an arson, rather than an accident, the investigators will try to figure out where in the house the fire started and what was used to start it.
text: There are numerous indications of the deliberate ignition of a fire, also known as arson.
text: But even when something like a match or lighter turns up, it's difficult to figure out from the physical evidence alone whether a fire started by a human was accidental or an act of arson.
text: A fire is only considered arson after all accidental causes have been ruled out, which means investigators have to prove an individual caused a fire deliberately and with harmful intent.
text: A fire that starts in the middle of a barn is less likely to be arson than a fire that started on an outside wall.
text: By definition a fire is considered an arson fire when all other accidental caused have been ruled out.
text: In determining whether the fire was arson, investigators look for crude ignition devices, such as a matchbook left to burn with a rock placed on top or a can with an incendiary concoction of brake fluid, aluminum foil and chlorine inside.
text: Investigators determined the fire was probably arson.
text: Boyle, who has been on duty for 16 hours, stares at the police do not cross tape that now guards the building, and makes it clear that already he has no doubt what caused the fire: arson.
text: An arson investigator studies a fire to determine how it was started, and by whom with the ultimate goal of determining whether a fire was an accident or arson.