Assertion: bestiality | /r/Desires | penetration
Facets:
value: accordingly
type: MANNER
value: historically
type: TEMPORAL
value: by combining these two
type: MANNER
value: after the key amendments
type: TEMPORAL
value: at para
type: LOCATION
Source sentences:
text: Bestiality Requires Penetration
text: Thus, the court ruled by a 7–1 majority that bestiality required penetration.
text: The majority judgment held that bestiality requires penetration and, on that basis, held that a dog licking a vagina is not bestiality.
text: the majority judgment authored by Justice Cromwell and concurred in by Chief Justice McLachlin and Justices Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, and Brown, which held that bestiality requires penetration (the “Majority”); and
text: The Majority held that bestiality requires penetration (at para 4).
text: The “Contemporary Inquiry”: whether bestiality requires penetration today, after the Key Amendments.
text: By combining these two holdings—(1) bestiality historically requiring penetration; and (2) Parliament never changing that requirement—the Majority held that bestiality still requires penetration and, accordingly, acquitted the step-father of bestiality (at paras 123–24).
text: By combining these two holdings—(1) bestiality historically requiring penetration; and (2) Parliament never changing that requirement—the Majority held that bestiality still requires penetration and, accordingly, acquitted the step-father of bestiality (at paras 123–24).