Assertion: bailment's owner | /r/HasProperty | assumed in bailment
Facets:
Source sentences:
text: If the bailee does not attorn to the new owner the latter has no cause of action in bailment against the bailee (or indeed in tort based upon the higher duty of care assumed in a bailment) but he will have rights of suit in the usual way in negligence and conversion against the bailee and third parties dependent upon his proof of the immediate right to possession or damage to his reversionary interest as the case may be (Franklin v Neate 153 E.R. 200).