Assertion: atheist's god | /r/HasProperty | good
Facets:
value: without being inconsistent
type: OTHER
value: completely
type: DEGREE
value: truly
type: DEGREE
Source sentences:
text: God is Great, God is Good:
text: In 'Is God Good
text: God is Great, God is Good:
text: If God is all good, he would not want evil and suffering to exist.
text: Since evil and suffering exist, God is either not all good (which means he is not perfect and not God), or he is not all powerful (and limited in abilities and scope).
text: There would be no way of predicting what in particular the god might desire next, and it would be entirely meaningless to assert that “God is good.
text: It's a question that has puzzled believers and non-believers alike throughout the ages: If God is truly good—or if "the gods" have humanity's best interests in mind—why does evil still exist in the world?
text: If God is good and all powerful,
text: If God is good and almighty, he would not allow his creatures to suffer, and there would be no evil in the world.
text: Since God is good, the creation he made was good.
text: If God is good and all powerful, why is there evil and suffering in the world?”
text: The argument goes like this: Most religions say that God is completely good, knows everything, and is all-powerful.
text: If they appeal to subjectivity, they cannot assert the universal negative that God is not necessary to be good without being inconsistent with her own subjectivity.
text: If God is perfect, then God is “good.
text: If God is good, then God must support what I know to be good and oppose what I know to be evil.