Assertion: argument's fallacy | /r/HasProperty | argument
Facets:
value: according to whately
type: OTHER
value: from ignorance
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: It could be fallacious because a disposition to make a certain argument does not make the argument invalid; this overlaps with the genetic fallacy (an argument that a claim is incorrect due to its source).
text: The fallacy is also called “Argument from Ignorance.
text: The fallacy of equivocation is an argument which exploits the ambiguity of a term or phrase which has occurred at least twice in an argument, such that on the first occurrence it has one meaning and on the second another meaning.
text: SDF has three necessary conditions: a fallacy (i) is an argument, (ii) that is invalid, and (iii) appears to be valid.
text: This shares only one condition with SDF: that a fallacy is an argument.
text: Existential fallacy – an argument that has a universal premise and a particular conclusion.
text: According to Whately, logical fallacies are arguments where the conclusion does not follow from the premises.
text: Informal fallacies – arguments that are fallacious for reasons other than structural (formal) flaws and that usually require examination of the argument's content.