Assertion: biological warfare's use | /r/HasProperty | chemical warfare
Facets:
value: formerly
type: TEMPORAL
Source sentences:
text: The offensive use of living organisms (such as anthrax) is considered biological warfare rather than chemical warfare; however, the use of nonliving toxic products produced by living organisms (e.g. toxins such as botulinum toxin, ricin, and saxitoxin) is considered chemical warfare under the provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).
text: Formerly, the use of smoke, flares, flamethrowers, napalm, and the like was considered to be chemical warfare, but now the term is generally limited to the use of toxic agents on the battlefield.
text: The offensive use of living organisms (such as anthrax) is considered biological warfare rather than chemical warfare; however, the use of nonliving toxic products produced by living organisms (e.g. toxins such as botulinum toxin, ricin, and saxitoxin) is considered chemical warfare under the provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).