Assertion: breed's owner | /r/HasProperty | known liable
Facets:
value: for any resultant injury
type: PURPOSE
Source sentences:
text: Courts often hold that for a dog owner to be liable under a common law rule regarding dangerous dogs (based on behavior, not breed), the owner must have known that the dog was "vicious" or had a "vicious propensity," and that if the owner had no knowledge or reason to know that the dog could be vicious, she could not be held liable for any resultant injury.