Assertion: albinism's article | /r/HasProperty | albinism
Facets:
value: in popular culture
type: LOCATION
value: in humans
type: OTHER
value: with no mention of the article
type: OTHER
Source sentences:
text: Main article: Albinism in popular culture
text: It's not exactly about whether you care about albino animals(seeing as, obviously, there are others who do care), but that the article should, in a logical and common-sense POV, cover albino animals and plants as well as albinism in humans, seeing as the article is titled 'Albinism' with no mention of the article covering only/mainly albinism in humans.
text: I am thinking we should have an article called "Albinism in Humans".
text: Merge completed, and later re-merged; new article is Albinism in popular culture
text: It has been proposed (and recently attempted, with rather mixed results) to split this article into a general article, Albinism, and a human-focused article Albinism (human).
text: It has been proposed (and recently attempted, with rather mixed results) to split this article into a general article, Albinism, and a human-focused article Albinism (human).
text: Shouldn't their entries be moved to a similar list in the article Albinism in humans?
text: This article is titled "albinism in popular culture", not "the evil albino stereotype in popular culture".