  Context: Code smells (CS) tend to compromise software quality and also demand
more effort by developers to maintain and evolve the application throughout its
life-cycle. They have long been catalogued with corresponding mitigating
solutions called refactoring operations. Objective: This SLR has a twofold
goal: the first is to identify the main code smells detection techniques and
tools discussed in the literature, and the second is to analyze to which extent
visual techniques have been applied to support the former. Method: Over 83
primary studies indexed in major scientific repositories were identified by our
search string in this SLR. Then, following existing best practices for
secondary studies, we applied inclusion/exclusion criteria to select the most
relevant works, extract their features and classify them. Results: We found
that the most commonly used approaches to code smells detection are
search-based (30.1%), and metric-based (24.1%). Most of the studies (83.1%) use
open-source software, with the Java language occupying the first position
(77.1%). In terms of code smells, God Class (51.8%), Feature Envy (33.7%), and
Long Method (26.5%) are the most covered ones. Machine learning techniques are
used in 35% of the studies. Around 80% of the studies only detect code smells,
without providing visualization techniques. In visualization-based approaches
several methods are used, such as: city metaphors, 3D visualization techniques.
Conclusions: We confirm that the detection of CS is a non trivial task, and
there is still a lot of work to be done in terms of: reducing the subjectivity
associated with the definition and detection of CS; increasing the diversity of
detected CS and of supported programming languages; constructing and sharing
oracles and datasets to facilitate the replication of CS detection and
visualization techniques validation experiments.
