  We examine vote delegation when delegators do not know the preferences of
representatives. We show that free delegation favors minorities, that is,
alternatives that have a lower chance of winning ex-ante. The same--but to a
lesser degree--occurs if the number of voting rights actual voters can have is
capped. However, when the fraction of delegators increases, the probability
that the ex-ante minority wins under free and capped delegation converges to
the one under conventional voting--albeit non-monotonically. Finally, when the
total number of voters is converging to infinity with a fixed fraction of the
majority, all three probabilities converge to one, no matter the number of
delegators. Therefore, vote delegation is safe on a large scale.
