  We study how publicity in the science press, in the form of highlighting,
affects the citations of research papers. Using multiple linear regression, we
quantify the citation advantage associated with several highlighting platforms
for papers published in Physical Review Letters (PRL) from 2008-2018. We thus
find that the strongest predictor of citation accrual is a Viewpoint in Physics
magazine, followed by a Research Highlight in Nature, an Editors' Suggestion in
PRL, and a Research Highlight in Nature Physics. A similar hierarchical pattern
is found when we search for extreme, not average, citation accrual, in the form
a paper being listed among the top-1% cited papers in physics by Clarivate
Analytics. The citation advantage of each highlighting platform is stratified
according to the degree of vetting for importance that the manuscript received
during peer review. This implies that we can view highlighting platforms as
predictors of citation accrual, with varying degrees of strength that mirror
each platform's vetting level.
