  Solving planning and scheduling problems for multiple tasks with highly
coupled state and temporal constraints is notoriously challenging. An appealing
approach to effectively decouple the problem is to judiciously order the events
such that decisions can be made over sequences of tasks. As many problems
encountered in practice are over-constrained, we must instead find relaxed
solutions in which certain requirements are dropped. This motivates a
formulation of optimality with respect to the costs of relaxing constraints and
the problem of finding an optimal ordering under which this relaxing cost is
minimum. In this paper, we present Generalized Conflict-directed Ordering
(GCDO), a branch-and-bound ordering method that generates an optimal total
order of events by leveraging the generalized conflicts of both inconsistency
and suboptimality from sub-solvers for cost estimation and solution space
pruning. Due to its ability to reason over generalized conflicts, GCDO is much
more efficient in finding high-quality total orders than the previous
conflict-directed approach CDITO. We demonstrate this by benchmarking on
temporal network configuration problems, which involves managing networks over
time and makes necessary tradeoffs between network flows against CDITO and
Mixed Integer-Linear Programing (MILP). Our algorithm is able to solve two
orders of magnitude more benchmark problems to optimality and twice the
problems compared to CDITO and MILP within a runtime limit, respectively.
