  Those working on policy, digital ethics and governance often refer to issues
in `computer science', that includes, but is not limited to, common subfields
of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Computer Science (CS) Computer Security
(InfoSec), Computer Vision (CV), Human Computer Interaction (HCI), Information
Systems, (IS), Machine Learning (ML), Natural Language Processing (NLP) and
Systems Architecture. Within this framework, this paper is a preliminary
exploration of two hypotheses, namely 1) Each community has differing inclusion
of minoritised groups (using women as our test case); and 2) Even where women
exist in a community, they are not published representatively. Using data from
20,000 research records, totalling 503,318 names, preliminary data supported
our hypothesis. We argue that ACM has an ethical duty of care to its community
to increase these ratios, and to hold individual computing communities to
account in order to do so, by providing incentives and a regular reporting
system, in order to uphold its own Code.
