  Reproducibility and comparability of empirical results are at the core tenet
of the scientific method in any scientific field. To ease reproducibility of
empirical studies, several benchmarks in software engineering research, such as
Defects4J, have been developed and widely used. For quantum software
engineering research, however, no benchmark has been established yet. In this
position paper, we propose a new benchmark -- named QBugs -- which will provide
experimental subjects and an experimental infrastructure to ease the evaluation
of new research and the reproducibility of previously published results on
quantum software engineering.
