  (Maher 2012) introduced an approach for relative expressiveness of defeasible
logics, and two notions of relative expressiveness were investigated. Using the
first of these definitions of relative expressiveness, we show that all the
defeasible logics in the DL framework are equally expressive under this
formulation of relative expressiveness. The second formulation of relative
expressiveness is stronger than the first. However, we show that logics
incorporating individual defeat are equally expressive as the corresponding
logics with team defeat. Thus the only differences in expressiveness of logics
in DL arise from differences in how ambiguity is handled. This completes the
study of relative expressiveness in DL begun in \cite{Maher12}.
