  Harrigan and Spekkens give formal definitions for the wavefunction in quantum
mechanics to be $\psi$-ontic or $\psi$-epistemic, such that the wavefunction
can only be one or the other. We argue that nothing about the informal ideas of
epistemic and ontic interpretations rules out wavefunctions representing both
reality and knowledge. The implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph theorem
and many other issues need to be rethought in the light of our analysis.
