trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
C. Remuneration to Key Managerial Personnel other than MD / Manager / WTD
Note: For more information, please refer to the Corporate Governance Report.

Particulars of Remuneration
Key Managerial Personnel
Ramakrishnan V Chief Financial Officer
Rajendra Moholkar Company Secretary
Total
1. Gross salary
(a) Salary as per provisions contained in Section 17(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
72.06
21.66
93.72
(b) Value of perquisites u/s 17(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
43.54
1.20
44.74
(c) Profits in lieu of salary under Section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
-
-
-
2. Stock Option
-
-
-
3. Sweat Equity
-
-
-
4. Commission
-
-
-
as % of profit
-
-
-
5. Others, Allowances
297.47
117.29
414.76
Total
413.07
140.15
553.22


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in total gross salary of the CFO and Company Secretary?
Choices:
20.68
-298.67
92.74
-92.74
113.4
Correct choice index: 2
Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock unit activity is as follows:
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
Performance-based restricted stock units are eligible to vest at the end of each fiscal year in a three-year performance period based on the Company’s annual growth rate in net sales and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (subject to certain adjustments) over a multiple of four times the related results for the fourth quarter of 2018 relative to the growth rates for a peer group of companies for the same metrics and periods.
For the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2019, 60% of each performance-based award is subject to the net sales metric for the performance period and 40% is subject to the non-GAAP diluted earnings per share metric for the performance period. The maximum percentage for a particular metric is2 50% of the target number of units subject to the award related to that metric, however, vesting of the performance stock units is capped at 30% and 100%, respectively, of the target number of units subject to the award in years one and two, respectively, of the three-year performance period.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company believes that it is probable that the Company will achieve performance metrics specified in the award agreement based on its expected revenue and non-GAAP diluted EPS results over the performance period and calculated growth rates relative to its peers’ expected results based on data available, as defined in the award agreement.

Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant-Date
(in thousands)
Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
3,263
$20.23
Granted
1,580
23.23
Vested
(1,541)
20.16
Canceled
(378)
21.52
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
2,924
21.72


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average vested and canceled in 2019?
Choices:
-959.5
20648.4
-957.5
-199.8
-581.5
Correct choice index: 0
Note: The scope of use of resources data is appended to include 12 new office buildings which were put into operation in 2019.
Total energy consumption is calculated based on the data of purchased electricity and fuel with reference to the coefficients in the National Standards of the PRC “General Principles for Calculation of the Comprehensive Energy Consumption (GB/T 2589-2008)”.
The Group’s water supply resources are from the municipal water supply.
Recycled water consumption is the reclaimed domestic water treated by the wastewater treatment system equipped at Tencent Tower A and Tower B in Chengdu.
Data of diesel consumption reported above only covers the data centres whose diesel fees are directly borne by the Group.
Average PUE (Power Usage Efficiency) is the annual average data of PUE of the Group’s data centres. PUE, an indicator of the power efficiency of a data centre, is the ratio of total facility energy over IT equipment energy.
Data of running water consumption reported above only covers those data centres wholly used by the Group where operators could provide such data.
Data of packaging materials is not applicable to the Group

2.1 Office Buildings
Indicators
For the year ended 31 December
2019
2018
Total energy consumption (MWh)
205,092.26
167,488.48
Direct energy consumption (MWh)
19,144.17
12,852.04
Including: Gasoline (MWh)
805.77
780.24
Diesel (MWh)
41.33
42.10
Natural gas (MWh)
18,297.07
12,029.70
Indirect energy consumption (MWh)
185,948.09
154,636.44
Including: Purchased electricity (MWh)
185,948.09
154,636.44
Total energy consumption per employee (MWh per employee)
3.44
3.28
Total energy consumption per floor area (MWh per square metre)
0.12
0.14
Running water consumption (tonnes)
1,283,749.73
973,413.06
Running water consumption per employee (tonnes per employee)
21.52
19.07
Recycled water consumption (tonnes)
4,076
5,461


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change between running water consumption (MWh) in 2018 and 2019 year end?
Choices:
310336.67
-973401.06
1249618752953.47
2257162.79
0
Correct choice index: 0
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the plans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
The components of net periodic pension cost other than the service cost component are included in other, net within other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.
In 2019, we purchased a group annuity contract to transfer the pension benefit obligations and annuity administration for a select group of retirees or their beneficiaries to an annuity provider. Upon issuance of the group annuity contract, the pension benefit obligation of $24.4 million for approximately 500 participants was irrevocably transferred to the annuity provider. The purchase of the group annuity was funded directly by the assets of the Pension Plans. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized a pension settlement charge of $6.7 million as a result of the transfer of the pension liability to the annuity provider and other lump sum payments made during the year.
In 2018 and 2017, the Retirement Plan was amended to freeze benefit accruals under the cash balance benefit plan for certain participants under collective bargaining agreements. As a result of these amendments, we recognized a pre-tax curtailment gain of $1.2 million and $1.3 million as a component of net periodic pension cost during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Service cost
$ 50
$ 5,809
$ 3,055
Interest cost
30,327
28,870
21,882
Expected return on plan assets
(34,627)
(38,640)
(28,459)
Amortization of:
Net actuarial loss
2,890
6,110
6,244
Prior service cost (credit)
123
(204)
(316)
Plan curtailment
—
(1,156)
(1,337)
Plan settlement
6,726
94
17
Net periodic pension cost
$ 5,489
$ 883
$ 1,086


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the service cost increase / (decrease) from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
-5785
351
-28820
-5759
Correct choice index: 4
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$644.2
Net wholesale revenue
(35.1)
Purchased power capacity
(5.9)
Transmission revenue
(5.4)
Reserve equalization
5.6
Retail electric price
19.0
Other
4.4
2017 net revenue
$626.8

the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso .
the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent did net revenue decrease between 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
-0.49573
-0.02701
4.42701
17.4
0.02701
Correct choice index: 4
Research and development
Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries and other personnel-related costs; the cost of products, materials, and outside services used in our R&D activities; and depreciation and amortization expense associated with R&D specific facilities and equipment. We maintain a number of programs and activities to improve our technology and processes in order to enhance the performance and reduce the costs of our solar modules.
The following table shows research and development expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
Research and development expense in 2019 increased compared to 2018 primarily due to increased material and module testing costs and higher employee compensation expense.

Year Ended
Change
(Dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
2019 over 2018
2018 over 2017
Research and development
$96,611
$84,472
$88,573
$12,139
14%
$(4,101)
(5)%
% of net sales .
3.2%
3.8%
3.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the amount of net sales derived in 2017?
Choices:
3220366.67
2952433.33
-2952433.33
2330868.42
1.27
Correct choice index: 1
Reporting Channels and Whistleblower Protection
To ensure that our conduct meets relevant legal requirements and the highest ethical standards under the Ethics Code, TSMC provides multiple channels for reporting business conduct concerns.
First of all, our Audit Committee approved and we have implemented the “Complaint Policy and Procedures for Certain Accounting and Legal Matters” and “Procedures for Ombudsman System” that allow employees or any whistleblowers with relevant evidence to report any financial, legal, or ethical irregularities anonymously through either the Ombudsman or directly to the Audit Committee.
TSMC maintains additional internal reporting channels for our employees. To foster an open culture of ethics compliance, we encourage our employees and the third parties we do business with to report any suspected noncompliance with law or relevant TSMC policy.
TSMC treats any complaint and the investigation thereof in a confidential and sensitive manner, and strictly prohibits any form of retaliation against any individual who in good faith reports or helps with the investigation of any complaint. Due to the open reporting channels, TSMC receives reports on various issues from employees and external parties such as our customers and suppliers from time to time. Below is a summary of the Number of Reported Incidents.
Note 1: Among the 205 cases, 132 were related to employee relationship, 47 cases related to other matters (e.g. employee’s individual interest or private matters), and 26 cases related to ethical matters.
Note 2: One case involved an employee who requested a supplier to reserve a hotel and pay advance accommodation fees during his business trip, actions which violate TSMC policy, and the employee was disciplined. Another case involved an employee who abused his work relationship by requesting a supplier to make a personal loan to the employee, a severe violation of our Ethics Code, and the employee was terminated.
Note 3: After the investigation by TSMC’s Sexual Harassment Investigation Committee, four employees involved in confirmed cases of sexual harassment received severe discipline from the Company.

Year
FY 2016
FY 2017
FY 2018
FY 2019
Total reported cases
116
113
150
205 (Note 1)
Ethics-related cases
16
20
14
26
Cases investigated and verified as ethics violations
2
4
1
2 (Note 2)
Sexual Harassment Investigation Committees Formed
5
7
3
4
Cases investigated and verified as violations
5
3
3
4 (Note 3)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Cases investigated and verified as ethics violations between FY 2016 and FY 2017?
Choices:
-1
3
148
0
2
Correct choice index: 4
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a) Cisco common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CSCO. Information regarding quarterly cash dividends declared on Cisco’s common stock during fiscal 2019 and 2018 may be found in Supplementary Financial Data on page 106 of this report. There were 39,216 registered shareholders as of August 30, 2019.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Issuer purchases of equity securities (in millions, except per-share amounts):
On September 13, 2001, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program. On February 13, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized a $15 billion increase to the stock repurchase program. As of July 27, 2019, the remaining authorized amount for stock repurchases under this program, including the additional authorization, is approximately $13.5 billion with no termination date.
For the majority of restricted stock units granted, the number of shares issued on the date the restricted stock units vest is net of shares withheld to meet applicable tax withholding requirements. Although these withheld shares are not issued or considered common stock repurchases under our stock repurchase program and therefore are not included in the preceding table, they are treated as common stock repurchases in our financial statements as they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting (see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019
42
$54.33
42
$15,700
May 26, 2019 to June 22, 2019
22
$55.07
22
$14,465
June 23, 2019 to July 27, 2019
18
$56.46
18
$13,460
Total
82
$54.99
82


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total amount paid for the shares during the period from April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019 and May 26, 2019 to June 22, 2019?
Choices:
2281.9
64.3
3548.5
4563.7
3493.4
Correct choice index: 4
As of December 31, 2019, exercisable options had an intrinsic value of less than $0.1 million. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.4 million in 2019 and $0.1 million in 2018. The following are the assumptions used in valuing the 2019 and 2018 stock option grants:
In January 2020, we issued options to employees for the purchase of up to 591,004 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $1.23 per share which vest and become exercisable in four annual installments ending in January 2024. The options have a grant date fair value per share of $1.26.

Year Ended December 31
2019
2018
Assumed volatility
64% - 69%
75% - 81%
(67% weighted average)
(78% weighted average)
Assumed risk free interest rate
1.8% - 2.7%
2.2% - 2.8%
(2.4% weighted average)
(2.5% weighted average)
Average expected life of options (in years)
6.1 - 6.3
6.2
(6.2 weighted average)
(6.2 weighted average)
Expected dividends
-
-


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average assumed risk free rate in 2018?
Choices:
0.4
5
2.5
1.4
4
Correct choice index: 2
Restricted Stock Grants—During 2019 and 2018, the Company granted 0.321 and 0.410 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to certain employee and director participants under its share-based compensation plans. Restricted stock grants generally vest over a period of 1 to 4 years. The Company recorded $72.5, $109.7 and $63.0 of compensation expense related to outstanding shares of restricted stock held by employees and directors during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In 2018, this expense included $29.4 associated with accelerated vesting due to the passing of our former executive chairman. A summary of the Company’s nonvested shares activity for 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
At December 31, 2019, there was $77.9 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested awards granted to both employees and directors under the Company’s share-based compensation plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. Unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested shares of restricted stock grants is recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in stockholder’s equity at December 31, 2019.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan—During 2019, 2018 and 2017, participants of the ESPP purchased 0.021, 0.020 and 0.020 shares, respectively, of Roper’s common stock for total consideration of $6.8, $5.4, and $4.2, respectively. All of these shares were purchased from Roper’s treasury shares.

Number of shares
Weighted-average grant date fair value
Nonvested at December 31, 2017
0.859
$ 187.01
Granted
0.410
278.29
Vested
(0.492)
204.24
Forfeited
(0.038)
191.51
Nonvested at December 31, 2018
0.739
$ 225.93
Granted
0.321
318.75
Vested
(0.290)
209.05
Forfeited
(0.061)
225.23
Nonvested at December 31, 2019
0.709
$ 275.00


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of compensation expense related to outstanding shares of restricted stock during 2018 to the total price of restricted stock shares granted between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
0.96
1.97
-6.46
114.1
-0.96
Correct choice index: 0
Stock Options
Our stock options are generally exercisable in increments of either one-fourth or one-third per year beginning one year from the date of grant. Stock options issued after February 2014 expire eight years from the date of grant. Options issued prior to February 2014 expire six years from the date of grant. Option activity for 2019 is summarized as follows:
The total intrinsic value was $108 million, $446 million, and $198 million for options exercised in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (In Years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding as of August 30, 2018
18
$23.38
Granted
—
44.30
Exercised
(5)
17.50
Canceled or expired
(1)
22.60
Outstanding as of August 29, 2019
12
25.94
4.3
$220
Exercisable as of August 29, 2019
7
$25.37
3.7
$143
Unvested as of August 29, 2019
5
26.94
5.5
77


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of exercisable shares among the total outstanding shares as of August 29, 2019?
Choices:
1
0.58
58.33
0.24
-0.58
Correct choice index: 1
Asset Retirement Obligations
At December 31, 2019, our asset retirement obligations balance was primarily related to estimated future costs of removing equipment from leased properties and estimated future costs of properly disposing of asbestos and other hazardous materials upon remodeling or demolishing buildings. Asset retirement obligations are included in other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
As of the Level 3 acquisition date, we recorded liabilities to reflect our fair values of Level 3’s asset retirement obligations. Our fair value estimates were determined using the discounted cash flow method.
The following table provides asset retirement obligation activity:
(1) The liabilities assumed during 2018 relate to purchase price adjustments during the year.
The 2019, 2018 and 2017 change in estimates are offset against gross property, plant and equipment.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions)
Balance at beginning of year
$190
115
95
Accretion expense
11
10
6
Liabilities assumed in acquisition of Level 3(1)
—
58
45
Liabilities settled
(14)
(14)
(3)
Liabilities transferred to Cyxtera
—
—
(20)
Change in estimate
10
21
(8)
Balance at end of year
$197
190
115


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average accretion expense across 2017, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
21
1
9
15
Correct choice index: 3
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 31 , 2013 .
( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .
company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Company Index
November 17, 2011
December 31, 2011
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
Delphi Automotive PLC (1)
$100.00
$100.98
$179.33
$285.81
S&P 500 (2)
100.00
100.80
116.93
154.80
Automotive Supplier Peer Group (3)
100.00
89.27
110.41
166.46

dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares .
the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 .
in addition , in january 2014 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2014 .
in october 2011 , the board of managers of delphi automotive llp approved a distribution of approximately $ 95 million , which was paid on december 5 , 2011 , principally in respect of taxes , to members of delphi automotive llp who held membership interests as of the close of business on october 31 , 2011. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the increase in the dividend in total for the year of 2014?
Choices:
32
0.24
-39
0.32
5.88
Correct choice index: 3