trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
The Systems gross profit margin decrease year to year was driven by the mix away from IBM Z and margin declines in Power Systems and Storage Systems.
The pre-tax income decline was driven by the strong performance in IBM Z in the prior year and the continued investment in innovation across the Systems portfolio.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018
2017
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent/ Margin Change
Systems
External Systems Hardware gross profit
$2,590
$2,893
(10.5)%
External Systems Hardware gross profit margin
40.7%
44.6%
(3.8)pts
External Operating Systems Software gross profit
$1,412
$1,469
(3.9)%
External Operating Systems Software gross profit margin
84.5%
86.4%
(1.9)pts.
External total gross profit
$4,002
$4,362
(8.2)%
External total gross profit margin
49.8%
53.2%
(3.4)pts.
Pre-tax income
$ 904
$1,128
(19.9)%
Pre-tax margin
10.2%
12.6%
(2.4)pts.


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of External Systems Hardware gross profit?
Choices:
2741.5
5483
1
1.9
1290.9
Correct choice index: 0
3.2 Capital risk management
The Group’s objectives on managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern and support the sustainable growth of the Group in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain an optimal capital structure to enhance shareholders’ value in the long term.
Capital refers to equity and external debts (including borrowings and notes payable). In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Group may adjust the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, return capital to shareholders, issue new shares, repurchase the Company’s shares or raise/repay debts.
The Group monitors capital by regularly reviewing debts to adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (“EBITDA”) (Note) ratio, being the measure of the Group’s ability to pay off all debts that reflects financial health and liquidity position. The total debts/adjusted EBITDA ratio calculated by dividing the total debts by adjusted EBITDA is as follows:
Note: Adjusted EBITDA represents operating profit less interest income and other gains/(losses), net, and adding back depreciation of property, plant and equipment, investment properties as well as right-of-use assets, amortisation of intangible assets and equitysettled share-based compensation expenses.

As at 31 December
2019
2018
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
Borrowings (Note 35)
126,952
114,271
Notes payable (Note 36)
93,861
65,018
Total debts
220,813
179,289
Adjusted EBITDA (Note)
147,395
118,273
Total debts/Adjusted EBITDA ratio
1.50
1.52


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much did notes payable change from 2018 year end to 2019 year end?
Choices:
28843
158879
-65018
-65015
-64983
Correct choice index: 0
28. Contingent liabilities and legal proceedings
Contingent liabilities are potential future cash outflows, where the likelihood of payment is considered more than remote, but is not considered probable or cannot be measured reliably.
Notes: 1 Performance bonds require the Group to make payments to third parties in the event that the Group does not perform what is expected of it under the terms of any related contracts or commercial arrangements
2 Other guarantees principally comprise Vodafone Group Plc’s guarantee of the Group’s 50% share of an AUD1.7 billion loan facility and a US$3.5 billion loan facility of its joint venture, Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Limited. The Group’s share of these loan balances is included in the net investment in joint venture (see note 12 “Investments in associates and joint arrangements”).

2019
2018
€m
€m
Performance bonds1
337
993
Other guarantees and contingent liabilities2
2,943
4,036


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the 2019 average other guarantees and contingent liabilities?
Choices:
348950
6979
4036
3489.5
581.6
Correct choice index: 3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts) General
The Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 5) and the Term Loan Agreement generally require our ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA") to interest expense not to be less than 3.0 to 1.0 and our ratio of funded debt to EBITDA not to exceed certain decreasing specified levels, ranging from 5.875 through the first quarter of fiscal 2020 to 3.75 from the second quarter of fiscal 2023 and thereafter, with each ratio to be calculated on a rolling fourquarter basis. As of May 26, 2019, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan Agreement.
Net interest expense consists of:
Interest paid from continuing operations was $375.6 million, $164.5 million, and $223.7 million in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

2019
2018
2017
Long-term debt
$385.9
$161.2
$203.6
Short-term debt
15.0
4.8
0.6
Interest income
(6.8)
(3.8)
(3.7)
Interest capitalized
(2.7)
(3.5)
(5.0)
$391.4
$158.7
$195.5


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of net interest expense of long-term debt to interest paid from continuing operations in 2019?
Choices:
144944.04
1.03
385.9
-5.77
65.69
Correct choice index: 1
Discontinued Operations
In December 2015, we completed the wind down of engineering, manufacturing and sales of our solar inverter product line (the "inverter business"). Accordingly, the results of our inverter business have been reflected as “Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented herein.
The effect of our sales of the remaining extended inverter warranties to our customers continues to be reflected in deferred revenue in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred revenue for extended inverter warranties and the associated costs of warranty service will be reflected in Sales and Cost of goods sold, respectively, from continuing operations in future periods in our Consolidated Statement of Operations, as the deferred revenue is earned and the associated services are rendered. Extended warranties related to the inverter product line are no longer offered.
In May 2019, we divested our grid-tied central solar inverter repair and service operation. In conjunction with the divesture, the initial product warranty for the previously sold grid-tied central solar inverters was transferred to the buyer. Accordingly, a gain of $8.6 million net of tax expense of $2.4 million was recognized in Other income (expense) and Provision (benefit) for income taxes, respectively, in our discontinued operations for the year December 31, 2019. Operating income from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, also includes the impacts of changes in our estimated product warranty liability, the recovery of accounts receivable and foreign exchange gain or (losses).
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Sales
$  —
$  —
Cost of sales
(901)
(88)
Total operating expense
1,022
96
Operating income (loss) from discontinued operations
(121)
(8)
Other income (expense)
10,895
(24)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes
10,774
(32)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
2,294
6
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
$ 8,480
$  (38)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total operating expense between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
926
1143
-926
1
-8
Correct choice index: 0
8. Marketable Securities
The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair market value of available-for-sale securities at April 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, were as follows (in thousands):

April 30, 2019
Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Market Value
Fixed income securities
$8,152
$71
$(24)
$8,199
April 30, 2018
Cost
Gross Unrealized Gains
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair Market Value
Fixed income securities
$6,274
$10
$(135)
$6,149


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in cost of the fixed income securities between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1878
14426
1925
8144
0
Correct choice index: 0
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
Following the enactment of the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act and the associated one-time transition tax, in general, repatriation of foreign earnings to the US can be completed with no incremental US Tax. However, there are limited other taxes that continue to apply such as foreign withholding and certain state taxes. The company records a deferred tax liability for the estimated foreign earnings and state tax cost associated with the undistributed foreign earnings that are not permanently reinvested.
The Tax Act also includes provisions for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) wherein taxes on foreign income are imposed in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. We elected to recognize the tax on GILTI as an expense in the period the tax is incurred.
We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position when it is more-likely-than-not, based on its technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2019, we have approximately $5,016 of unrecognized tax benefits, which if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. We do not anticipate any significant changes in our unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits is provided below:
Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, $707 and $2,515, respectively, of interest and penalties were accrued.
We are subject to taxation in the U.S., various states, and in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Our U.S. income tax returns are primarily subject to examination from 2016 through 2018; however, U.S. tax authorities also have the ability to review prior tax years to the extent loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards are utilized. The open years for the non-U.S. tax returns range from 2008 through 2018 based on local statutes.

As of December 31,
2019
2018
Balance at January 1
$3,649
$4,670
Increase related to current year tax positions
2,834
55
(Decrease) increase related to prior year tax positions
(10)
46
Decrease related to lapse in statute of limitation
(1,457)
(1,076)
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities
—
(46)
Balance at December 31
$5,016
$3,649


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the balance at January 1 between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-1021
-1367
1
5106
-102100
Correct choice index: 0
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

DATE
CITI
S&P 500
S&P FINANCIALS
31-Dec-2012
100.0
100.0
100.0
31-Dec-2013
131.8
132.4
135.6
31-Dec-2014
137.0
150.5
156.2
31-Dec-2015
131.4
152.6
153.9
31-Dec-2016
152.3
170.8
188.9
31-Dec-2017
193.5
208.1
230.9

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. as of 2017 what was the ratio of the overall five-year cumulative total return for s&p 500 compared to citi
Choices:
1.15615
108.1
-3.12193
-1.15615
0.57647
Correct choice index: 0
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2002 2 .
summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) stock-based compensation pca entered into management equity agreements in june 1999 with 125 of its management-level employees .
these agreements provide for the grant of options to purchase up to an aggregate of 6576460 shares of pca 2019s common stock at $ 4.55 per share , the same price per share at which pca holdings llc purchased common stock in the transactions .
the agreement called for these options to vest ratably over a five-year period , or upon completion of an initial public offering , full vesting with contractual restrictions on transfer for a period of up to 18 months following completion of the offering .
the options vested with the initial public offering in january 2000 , and the restriction period ended august , 2001 .
in october 1999 , the company adopted a long-term equity incentive plan , which provides for grants of stock options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock and performance awards to directors , officers and employees of pca , as well as others who engage in services for pca .
option awards granted to officers and employees vest ratably over a four-year period , whereas option awards granted to directors vest immediately .
under the plan , which will terminate on june 1 , 2009 , up to 4400000 shares of common stock is available for issuance under the long-term equity incentive plan .
a summary of the company 2019s stock option activity , and related information for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 follows : options weighted-average exercise price .

Options
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Balance, January 1, 2000
6,569,200
$4.55
Granted
1,059,700
11.92
Exercised
(398,138)
4.55
Forfeited
(26,560)
6.88
Balance, December 31, 2000
7,204,202
$5.62
Granted
953,350
15.45
Exercised
(1,662,475)
4.59
Forfeited
(16,634)
11.18
Balance, December 31, 2001
6,478,443
$7.31
Granted
871,000
19.55
Exercised
(811,791)
5.52
Forfeited
(63,550)
15.44
Balance, December 31, 2002
6,474,102
$9.10

clean proof : for cycle 12 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total value of the balance of options as of january 1 , 2000 , in millions?
Choices:
1320.4092
29.88986
-29.88986
30.15263
6262746.82
Correct choice index: 1
Net Revenues by Platform
The following tables detail our net revenues by platform (amounts in millions):
(1) Net revenues from “Mobile and ancillary” include revenues from mobile devices, as well as non-platform-specific game-related revenues, such as standalone sales of toys and accessories.
(2) Net revenues from “Other” primarily includes revenues from our Distribution business and the Overwatch League.
Console
The decrease in net revenues from console for 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily due to:
lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise (reflecting our sale of the publishing rights for Destiny to Bungie in December 2018); and lower revenues recognized from Call of Duty franchise catalog titles.
The decrease was partially offset by revenues recognized from Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled, which was released in June 2019.
PC
The decrease in net revenues from PC for 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily due to:
lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise; and lower revenues recognized from Hearthstone.
Mobile and Ancillary
The increase in net revenues from mobile and ancillary for 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily due to revenues recognized from Call of Duty: Mobile, which was released in October 2019.

For the Years
Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Increase/ (decrease)
% Change
Net revenues by platform:
Console
$1,920
$2,538
$(618)
(24)%
PC
1,718
2,180
(462)
(21)
Mobile and ancillary (1)
2,203
2,175
28
1
Other (2)
648
607
41
7
Total consolidated net revenues
$6,489
$7,500
$(1,011)
(13)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total consolidated net revenues of Console PC in 2018?
Choices:
4713
1
358
4718
2545
Correct choice index: 3
NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION
ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (Topic 280), establishes standards for reporting, by public business enterprises, information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method of determining what information, under Topic 280, to report is based on the way that an entity organizes operating segments for making operational decisions and how the entity’s management and chief operating decision maker (CODM) assess an entity’s financial performance. Our operations are analyzed by management and our CODM as being part of a single industry segment: the design, development, marketing and sales of Enterprise Information Management software and solutions.
The following table sets forth the distribution of revenues, by significant geographic area, for the periods indicated:

Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Revenues:
Canada
$153,890
$149,812
$227,115
United States
1,490,863
1,425,244
1,090,049
United Kingdom
182,815
201,821
159,817
Germany
203,403
198,253
166,611
Rest of Europe
534,204
517,693
394,132
All other countries
303,580
322,418
253,333
Total revenues
$2,868,755
$2,815,241
$2,291,057


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average annual Total revenue?
Choices:
2676189
1
2658351
1898005
53
Correct choice index: 2
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Amount (In Thousands)
2009
$47,760
2010
48,569
2011
49,437
2012
49,959
2013
50,546
Years thereafter
103,890
Total
350,161
Less: Amount representing interest
54,857
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$295,304

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the total minimum lease payments is related to interest?
Choices:
-0.15666
6.38316
0.15666
8594.01946
1.08529
Correct choice index: 2
34| | duke realty corporation annual report 2010 value of $ 173.9 million for which our 80% ( 80 % ) share of net proceeds totaled $ 138.3 million .
we expect , and are under contract , to sell additional buildings to duke/ princeton , llc by the end of the second quarter 2011 , subject to financing and other customary closing conditions .
the total 2011 sale is expected to consist of 13 office buildings , totaling over 2.0 million square feet , with an agreed upon value of $ 342.8 million , and is expected to generate proceeds of $ 274.2 million for the 80% ( 80 % ) portion that we sell .
uses of liquidity our principal uses of liquidity include the following : 2022 accretive property investment ; 2022 leasing/capital costs ; 2022 dividends and distributions to shareholders and unitholders ; 2022 long-term debt maturities ; 2022 repurchases of outstanding debt and preferred stock ; and 2022 other contractual obligations .
property investment we evaluate development and acquisition opportunities based upon market outlook , supply and long-term growth potential .
our ability to make future property investments is dependent upon our continued access to our longer-term sources of liquidity including the issuances of debt or equity securities as well as generating cash flow by disposing of selected properties .
in light of current economic conditions , management continues to evaluate our investment priorities and is focused on accretive growth .
we have continued to operate at a substantially reduced level of new development activity , as compared to recent years , and are focused on the core operations of our existing base of properties .
leasing/capital costs tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that had been previously under lease to tenants are referred to as second generation expenditures .
building improvements that are not specific to any tenant but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties are also second generation expenditures .
one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments .
the following is a summary of our second generation capital expenditures for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively ( in thousands ) : .

2010
2009
2008
Second generation tenant improvements
$36,676
$29,321
$36,885
Second generation leasing costs
39,090
40,412
28,205
Building improvements
12,957
9,321
9,724
Totals
$88,723
$79,054
$74,814

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2009 what was the percent of the total second generation capital expenditures associated with leasing costs
Choices:
1.9562
1
0.54017
-40411.48881
0.51119
Correct choice index: 4
FREE CASH FLOW AND DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIO
The terms free cash flow and dividend payout ratio do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS. Therefore, they are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers.
We define free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities, excluding acquisition and other costs paid (which include significant litigation costs) and voluntary pension funding, less capital expenditures, preferred share dividends and dividends paid by subsidiaries to NCI. We exclude acquisition and other costs paid and voluntary pension funding because they affect the comparability of our financial results and could potentially distort the analysis of trends in business performance. Excluding these items does not imply they are non-recurring.
We consider free cash flow to be an important indicator of the financial strength and performance of our businesses because it shows how much cash is available to pay dividends on common shares, repay debt and reinvest in our company. We believe that certain investors and analysts use free cash flow to value a business and its underlying assets and to evaluate the financial strength and performance of our businesses. The most comparable IFRS financial measure is cash flows from operating activities.
We define dividend payout ratio as dividends paid on common shares divided by free cash flow. We consider dividend payout ratio to be an important indicator of the financial strength and performance of our businesses because it shows the sustainability of the company’s dividend payments.
The following table is a reconciliation of cash flows from operating activities to free cash flow on a consolidated basis.

2019
2018
Cash flows from operating activities
7,958
7,384
Capital expenditures
(3,988)
(3,971)
Cash dividends paid on preferred shares
(147)
(149)
Cash dividends paid by subsidiaries to NCI
(65)
(16)
Acquisition and other costs paid
60
79
Voluntary DB pension plan contribution
–
240
Free cash flow
3,818
3,567


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total amount of acquisition and other costs paid in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
139
-5
120
3627
3897
Correct choice index: 0