trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
grants of restricted awards are subject to forfeiture if a grantee , among other conditions , leaves our employment prior to expiration of the restricted period .
new grants of restricted awards generally vest one year after the date of grant in 25% ( 25 % ) increments over a four year period , with the exception of tsrs which vest after a three year period .
the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the years ended may 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( share awards in thousands ) : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Shares
Weighted AverageGrant-DateFair Value
Non-vested at May 31, 2011
869
$40
Granted
472
48
Vested
(321)
40
Forfeited
(79)
43
Non-vested at May 31, 2012
941
44
Granted
561
44
Vested
(315)
43
Forfeited
(91)
44
Non-vested at May 31, 2013
1,096
$44

the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 13.6 million , $ 12.9 million and $ 10.8 million , respectively .
we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 16.2 million , $ 13.6 million , and $ 12.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
as of may 31 , 2013 , there was $ 33.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years .
employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized .
employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock .
the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period .
as of may 31 , 2013 , 1.0 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.4 million shares reserved for future issuance .
we recognized compensation expense for the plan of $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .
the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan during the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 6 , $ 7 and $ 6 , respectively , which represents the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount .
stock options stock options are granted at 100% ( 100 % ) of fair market value on the date of grant and have 10-year terms .
stock options granted vest one year after the date of grant in 25% ( 25 % ) increments over a four year period .
the plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions .
there were no options granted under the plans during the years ended may 31 , 2013 and may 31 , 2012. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock per year?
Choices:
14
36
16
13.4
1
Correct choice index: 3
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense increased by $8.6 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $3.7 million increase in employee-related costs, which includes stock-based compensation, associated with our increased headcount from 79 employees as of December 31, 2017 to 89 employees as of December 31, 2018. There was an additional increase of $2.8 million in depreciation and amortization, an increase of $1.5 million to support compliance as a public company, an increase of $0.4 million in software subscription cost and a $0.2 million increase in office related expenses to support the administrative team.

Year Ended December 31,
Change
2018
2017
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
General and administrative
$ 31,462
$ 22,895
$ 8,567
37.4%
% of revenue
21%
22%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the gross margin between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
1
8545
-1
-22
22873
Correct choice index: 2
Global Business Services
* Recast to reflect segment changes.
Global Business Services revenue increased compared to 2017 driven by strong growth in Consulting, led by key offerings in digital Global Business Services revenue increased compared to 2017 driven by strong growth in Consulting, led by key offerings in digital and cloud application, where the business has brought together technology and industry expertise to help clients on their digital journey. GPS grew year to year, while Application Management revenue was flat as reported and declined adjusted for currency compared to 2017.
While we continued to help clients move to the cloud with offerings such as Cloud Migration Factory and cloud application development, there were continued declines in the more traditional application management engagements. Within GBS, cloud revenue of $4.7 billion grew 20 percent as reported and 19 percent adjusted for currency compared to the prior year.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018
2017
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency
Global Business Services external revenue
$16,595*
$16,073*
3.2%
2.3%
Consulting
$7,705
$7,262
6.1%
5.1%
Application Management
7,852
7,821
0.4
(0.5)
Global Process Services
1,037*
990*
4.8
4.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average consulting?
Choices:
221.5
7541.5
14967
-337.5
7483.5
Correct choice index: 4
share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions .
the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data .
for fiscal 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost of $ 172 million , $ 179 million and $ 147 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations .
the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 .
options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions .
during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: .

2014
2013
2012
Expected term (in years)<sup>(1)</sup>
4.80
6.08
6.02
Risk-free rate of return<sup>(2)</sup>
1.3%
0.8%
1.2%
Expected volatility<sup>(3)</sup>
25.2%
29.3%
34.9%
Expected dividend yield<sup>(4)</sup>
0.8%
0.9%
0.9%
Fair value per option granted
$44.11
$39.03
$29.65

( 1 ) beginning in fiscal 2014 , assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa .
the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term .
the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2014 was approximately 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) , respectively .
in fiscal 2013 and 2012 , assumption was fully based on peer companies 2019 data .
( 2 ) based upon the zero coupon u.s .
treasury bond rate over the expected term of the awards .
( 3 ) based on the company 2019s implied and historical volatility .
in fiscal 2013 and 2012 , historical volatility was a blend of visa 2019s historical volatility and those of comparable peer companies .
the relative weighting between visa historical volatility and the historical volatility of the peer companies was based on the percentage of years visa stock price information is available since its initial public offering compared to the expected term .
the expected volatilities ranged from 22% ( 22 % ) to 26% ( 26 % ) in fiscal ( 4 ) based on the company 2019s annual dividend rate on the date of grant. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total share-based compensation cost in the last three years?
Choices:
498.0
2.4
140
505
491
Correct choice index: 0
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 18 — Income Taxes
Significant components of income tax provision/(benefit) are as follows:

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Current:
U.S.
$(391)
$(397)
$1,635
Non-U.S.
10,666
12,538
7,150
Total Current
10,275
12,141
8,785
Deferred:
U.S.
558
(330)
17,597
Non-U.S.
3,287
(240)
(577)
Total Deferred
3,845
(570)
17,020
Total provision for income taxes
$14,120
$11,571
$25,805


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the total current income tax provision  between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
1475
-3356
20926
3356
3753
Correct choice index: 3
1 As defined by the International Monetary Fund.
Revenue related to external customers went up moderately yearover- year on growth in nearly all industrial businesses. SGRE and Siemens Healthineers posted the highest growth rates, while revenue at Gas and Power declined moderately in a difficult market environment. The revenue decline in emerging markets was due mainly to lower revenue in Egypt, where in fiscal 2018 Gas and Power recorded sharply higher revenue from large orders.
Revenue in Europe, C. I. S., Africa, Middle East increased moderately on growth in a majority of industrial businesses, driven by substantial growth at SGRE. Gas and Power posted a clear decline in a difficult market environment. In Germany, revenue was up moderately with significant growth in Mobility and Gas and Power, partly offset by a decline in SGRE.
In the Americas, revenue came in clearly higher year-over-year, benefiting from positive currency translation effects. Siemens Healthineers, Smart Infrastructure and Gas and Power recorded the largest increases, while SGRE posted clearly lower revenue in the region. In the U. S., all industrial businesses posted higher revenues year-over-year, with SGRE and Smart Infrastructure recording the strongest growth rates.
Revenue in Asia, Australia rose moderately year-over-year on growth in the majority of industrial businesses, led by Siemens Healthineers and Digital Industries. Gas and Power and SGRE posted lower revenue year-over-year. In China, revenue was also
up in the majority of industrial businesses, led by Siemens Healthineers. In contrast, SGRE posted substantially lower revenue year-over-year in that country.

Fiscal year
% Change
(in millions of €)
2019
2018
Actual
Comp.
Europe, C. I. S., Africa, Middle East
44,360
42,782
4%
4%
therein: Germany
12,282
11,729
5%
4 %
Americas
23,796
22,115
8%
3%
therein: U. S.
17,993
16,012
12%
6%
Asia, Australia
18,693
18,147
3%
2%
therein: China
8,405
8,102
4%
3%
Siemens
86,849
83,044
5 %
3 %
therein: emerging markets1
27,607
28,272
(2) %
(2) %


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the orders for Asia and Australia from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-546
1
546
546000000
18693
Correct choice index: 2
2016 non-qualified deferred compensation as of december 31 , 2016 , mr .
may had a deferred account balance under a frozen defined contribution restoration plan .
the amount is deemed invested , as chosen by the participant , in certain t .
rowe price investment funds that are also available to the participant under the savings plan .
mr .
may has elected to receive the deferred account balance after he retires .
the defined contribution restoration plan , until it was frozen in 2005 , credited eligible employees 2019 deferral accounts with employer contributions to the extent contributions under the qualified savings plan in which the employee participated were subject to limitations imposed by the code .
defined contribution restoration plan executive contributions in registrant contributions in aggregate earnings in 2016 ( 1 ) aggregate withdrawals/ distributions aggregate balance at december 31 , ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) .

Name
Executive Contributions in 2016 (b)
Registrant Contributions in 2016 (c)
Aggregate Earnings in 2016<sup>(1)</sup> (d)
Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions (e)
Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2016(a) (f)
Phillip R. May, Jr.
$—
$—
$177
$—
$1,751

( 1 ) amounts in this column are not included in the summary compensation table .
2016 potential payments upon termination or change in control entergy corporation has plans and other arrangements that provide compensation to a named executive officer if his or her employment terminates under specified conditions , including following a change in control of entergy corporation .
in addition , in 2006 entergy corporation entered into a retention agreement with mr .
denault that provides possibility of additional service credit under the system executive retirement plan upon certain terminations of employment .
there are no plans or agreements that would provide for payments to any of the named executive officers solely upon a change in control .
the tables below reflect the amount of compensation each of the named executive officers would have received if his or her employment with their entergy employer had been terminated under various scenarios as of december 31 , 2016 .
for purposes of these tables , a stock price of $ 73.47 was used , which was the closing market price on december 30 , 2016 , the last trading day of the year. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the aggregate balance at december 31 2015 for phillip r . may jr.?
Choices:
1677.5
-1574
1574.0
-176
1928
Correct choice index: 2
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding .

Issued
In Treasury
Shares Outstanding
Balance, January 1, 2001
667,085,793
(94,361,099)
572,724,694
Employee stock purchase plan
–
1,752,833
1,752,833
Shares granted to Directors
–
4,800
4,800
Shares sold to optionees
8,385
1,399,686
1,408,071
Balance, December 31, 2001
667,094,178
(91,203,780)
575,890,398
Employee stock purchase plan
–
2,677,842
2,677,842
Shares granted to Directors
–
3,500
3,500
Shares sold to optionees
10,490
2,243,400
2,253,890
Acquisition of Technoguide
–
1,347,485
1,347,485
Balance, December 31, 2002
667,104,668
(84,931,553)
582,173,115
Employee stock purchase plan
–
2,464,088
2,464,088
Shares granted to Directors
–
3,500
3,500
Shares sold to optionees
1,320
1,306,305
1,307,625
Balance, December 31, 2003
667,105,988
(81,157,660)
585,948,328

see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. the acquisition of technoguide accounted for what percentage of shares outstanding?
Choices:
0.00423
-1347484.99769
1
432.04423
0.00231
Correct choice index: 4
Item 6: Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data is derived from our consolidated financial statements. This data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, and Item 7: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(1) Fiscal 2018 net income includes an income tax benefit of $75.8 million from a valuation allowance release against certain U.S. deferred tax assets. See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (2) Fiscal 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 net income (loss) includes restructuring charges, net, of $0.5 million, $0.2 million, $0.8 million, $7.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
(3) Fiscal 2016 net loss includes impairment charges of $12.4 million. (4) Fiscal 2015 net loss includes the following: i) a $1.5 million gain from a business interruption insurance claim relating to a factory fire at a customer's facility; and ii) a $1.0 million net gain from the sale of intellectual property.
(5) Fiscal 2016 includes the following as a result of the Cascade Microtech acquisition: i) $82.6 million in revenue; ii) $27.8 million of intangible amortization expense; and iii) a $7.6 million charge for inventory-related step-up amortization.

Fiscal 2019 (2)
Fiscal 2018(1)(2)
Fiscal 2017(2)
Fiscal 2016 (2)(3)(5)
Fiscal 2015(2)(4)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues
$589,464
$529,675
$548,441
$383,881
$282,358
Gross profit
237,496
210,339
215,597
102,682
85,738
Net income (loss)
39,346
104,036
40,913
(6,557)
(1,523)
Basic net income (loss) per share
0.52
1.42
0.57
(0.10)
(0.03)
Diluted net income (loss) per share
0.51
1.38
0.55
(0.10)
(0.03)
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
$220,872
$149,003
$140,172
$108,905
$187,589
Working capital
282,483
235,302
213,693
172,002
214,437
Total assets
839,882
728,222
646,574
618,982
342,723
Term loan, net of current portion
15,639
34,971
87,228
125,475
—
Total stockholders' equity
640,997
580,164
458,637
401,056
294,681
Number of employees
1,836
1,676
1,685
1,571
958


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Gross profit from 2019 to 2018?
Choices:
23059
27157
151758
379125
24963
Correct choice index: 1
Aging analysis of gross values by risk category at December 31, 2019
The distribution of trade receivables and contract assets closely follows the distribution of the Company’s sales, see note B1, “Segment information.” The ten largest customers represented 49% (53%) of the total trade receivables and contract assets in 2019.

Days past due
1–90
91–180
181–360
>360
Total
Country risk: Low
1,347
125
127
313
1,912
Country risk: Medium
891
725
600
819
3,035
Country risk: High
583
365
217
1,315
2,480
Total past due
2,821
1,215
944
2,447
7,427


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in low and medium country risk due for 1-90 days past due?
Choices:
456
-531
45600
-1688
2
Correct choice index: 0
The Company recognizes the employees and directors’ compensation in the profit or loss during the periods when earned for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019. The Board of Directors estimates the amount by taking into consideration the Articles of Incorporation, government regulations and industry averages.
If the Board of Directors resolves to distribute employee compensation
through stock, the number of stock distributed is calculated based on total employee compensation divided by the closing price of the day before the Board of Directors meeting. If the Board of Directors subsequently modifies the estimates significantly, the Company will recognize the change as an adjustment in the profit or loss in the subsequent period.
The distributions of employees and directors’ compensation for 2017 and 2018 were reported to the stockholders’ meeting on June 12, 2018 and June 12, 2019, respectively, while the distributions of employees and directors’ compensation for 2019 were approved through the Board of Directors meeting on February 26, 2020. The details of distribution are as follows:
The aforementioned employees and directors’ compensation for 2017 and 2018 reported during the stockholders’ meeting were consistent with the resolutions of the Board of Directors meeting held on March 7, 2018 and March 6, 2019, respectively.
Information relevant to the aforementioned employees and directors’ compensation can be obtained from the “Market Observation Post System” on the website of the TWSE.

2017
2018
2019
NT$(In Thousands)
NT$(In Thousands)
NT$(In Thousands)
Employees’ compensation – Cash
$1,032,324
$1,400,835
$1,132,952
Directors’ compensation
11,452
7,624
10,259


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Directors’ compensation?
Choices:
350466.67
1
977833.33
6361
9778.33
Correct choice index: 4
Note 6 Segments
The Company’s segment reporting structure consists of two reportable segments and a Corporate category as follows: • Food Care; and • Product Care.
The Company’s Food Care and Product Care segments are considered reportable segments under FASB ASC Topic 280. Our reportable segments are aligned with similar groups of products. Corporate includes certain costs that are not allocated to or monitored by the reportable segments' management. The Company evaluates performance of the reportable segments based on the results of each segment. The performance metric used by the Company's chief operating decision maker to evaluate performance of our reportable segments is Adjusted EBITDA. The Company allocates expense to each segment based on various factors including direct usage of resources, allocation of headcount, allocation of software licenses or, in cases where costs are not clearly delineated, costs may be allocated on portion of either net trade sales or an expense factor such as cost of goods sold.
We allocate and disclose depreciation and amortization expense to our segments, although depreciation and amortization are not included in the segment performance metric Adjusted EBITDA. We also allocate and disclose restructuring charges and impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets by segment. However, restructuring charges and goodwill are not included in the segment performance metric Adjusted EBITDA since they are categorized as certain specified items (“Special Items”), in addition to certain transaction and other charges and gains related to acquisitions and divestitures and certain other specific items excluded from the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA. The accounting policies of the reportable segments and Corporate are the same as those applied to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following tables show Net Sales and Adjusted EBITDA by reportable segment:

Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)
2019
2018
2017
Net Sales
Food Care
$ 2,880.5
$ 2,908.1
$ 2,815.2
As a % of Total Company net sales
60.1%
61.4%
63.1%
Product Care
1,910.6
1,824.6
1,646.4
As a % of Total Company net sales
39.9%
38.6%
36.9%
Total Company Net Sales
$ 4,791.1
$ 4,732.7
$ 4,461.6
Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)
2019
2018
2017
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations
Food Care
$ 629.3
$ 577.8
$ 538.1
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
21.8%
19.9%
19.1%
Product Care
349.9
318.6
292.2
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
18.3%
17.5%
17.7%
Corporate
(14.4)
(6.9)
3.0
Total Company Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations
$ 964.8
$ 889.5
$ 833.3
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
20.1%
18.8%
18.7%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average EBITDA Margin for years 2017-2019 for the whole company?
Choices:
19.2
-19.2
14.9
359
38.9
Correct choice index: 0
Debt
At both December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, our total outstanding debt was $2.7 billion, bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 3.18%.
A summary of our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2019, is as follows (amounts in millions):

December 31, 2019
Gross Carrying Amount
Unamortized Discount and Deferred Financing Costs
Net Carrying Amount
2021 Notes
$650
$(2)
$648
2022 Notes
400
(2)
398
2026 Notes
850
(7)
843
2027 Notes
400
(5)
395
2047 Notes
400
(9)
391
Total debt
$2,700
$(25)
$2,675


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in gross carrying amount between the 2021 and 2022 Notes?
Choices:
2
250
248
-250
250000000
Correct choice index: 1