trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 .

Company/Index
January 3, 2009
January 2, 2010
January 1, 2011
December 31, 2011
December 29, 2012
December 28, 2013
Advance Auto Parts
$100.00
$119.28
$195.80
$206.86
$213.14
$327.63
S&P 500 Index
100.00
119.67
134.97
134.96
150.51
197.62
S&P Retail Index
100.00
141.28
174.70
179.79
219.77
321.02

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. from 2009 to 2012 , what percentage return did advance auto parts beat the overall market?
Choices:
78.18
163.63
62.63
-30.84
175.77
Correct choice index: 2
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are outlined below.
The increase in the Company's deferred tax liability is primarily attributable to the Company's decision to take bonus depreciation on qualifying assets placed in service during fiscal 2019.
Included in the deferred tax assets at October 31, 2019, is a federal NOL carryforward of $255.4 million. All of the NOL carryforward was incurred subsequent to the enactment of the TCJA and therefore has an indefinite carryforward period. The Company has significant deferred tax liabilities, primarily related to property, plant and equipment, which are expected to reverse and allow for the full utilization of the NOL carryforward. As such, the Company has not recorded a valuation allowance related to the NOL carryforward. Also included in the deferred tax assets are North Carolina Investing in Business Property Credit and North Carolina Jobs Credits totaling $4.9 million, as well as Georgia Job Tax Credits totaling $2.6 million. The North Carolina Investing in Business Property Credit provides a 7% investment tax credit for property located in a North Carolina development area, the North Carolina Creating Jobs Credit provides a tax credit for increased employment in North Carolina, and the Georgia Job Tax Credit provides a tax credit for creation and retention of qualifying jobs in Georgia. It is management’s opinion that the majority of the North Carolina and Georgia income tax credits will not be utilized before they expire, and a $5.6 million valuation allowance has been recorded as of October 31, 2019. The North Carolina credits began to expire during fiscal 2018, and the remaining credits expire between fiscal years 2020 and 2023.

October 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands)
Deferred tax liabilities: 
Property, plant and equipment
$148,505
$88,351
Prepaid and other assets 
1,911
1,751
Total deferred tax liabilities 
150,416
90,102
Deferred tax assets: 
Accrued expenses and accounts receivable 
8,172
7,814
Inventory 
1,155
2,862
Compensation on restricted stock 
7,528
8,280
State income tax credits 
9,333
12,235
Other 
1,272
654
Valuation allowance 
(5,637)
(11,017)
Net operating loss 
54,461
6,481
Total deferred tax assets 
76,284
27,309
Net deferred tax liabilities
$74,132
$62,793


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Net deferred tax liabilities for fiscal years 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
0
69538.5
136925
68462.5
17.5
Correct choice index: 3
The weighted-average grant date fair value of VMware stock options can fluctuate from period to period primarily due to higher valued options assumed through business combinations with exercise prices lower than the fair market value of VMware’s stock on the date of grant.
For equity awards granted under the VMware equity plan, volatility was based on an analysis of historical stock prices and implied volatilities of VMware’s Class A common stock. The expected term was based on historical exercise patterns and post-vesting termination behavior, the term of the option period for grants made under the ESPP, or the weighted-average remaining term for options assumed in acquisitions. VMware’s expected dividend yield input was zero as the Company has not historically paid, nor expects in the future to pay, regular dividends on its common stock. The risk-free interest rate was based on a U.S. Treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected term of the stock options.
For equity awards granted under the Pivotal equity plan, volatility was based on the volatility of a group of comparable public companies based on size, stage of life cycle, profitability, growth and other factors. The expected term was estimated using the simplified method and was determined based on the vesting terms, exercise terms and contractual lives of the options. Pivotal’s expected dividend yield input was zero as the Company has not historically paid regular dividends on its common stock. The risk-free interest rate was based on a U.S. Treasury instrument whose term was consistent with the expected term of the stock options.

For the Year Ended
VMware Employee Stock Purchase Plan
January 31, 2020
February 1, 2019
February 2, 2018
Dividend yield
None
None
None
Expected volatility
27.4%
33.5%
22.6%
Risk-free interest rate
1.7%
2.0%
1.2%
Expected term (in years)
0.6
0.8
0.9
Weighted-average fair value at grant date
$35.66
$34.72
$21.93


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the absolute percentage change in Expected volatility between 2019 and 2020?
Choices:
-0.2
-33.5
-7.3
-6100
-6.1
Correct choice index: 4
(1) Include cost of equipment sold, content and programming costs, payments to other carriers, franchise fees and network costs.
(2) Include advertising and marketing expenses, selling costs, billing expenses, bad debts and collection expenses.
(3) Include office building expenses, professional service fees, Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (“CRTC”) fees, losses and gains on disposals and write-offs of property, plant and equipment and other administrative expenses.
9. OPERATING EXPENSES

Years ended August 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
$
$
(restated, Note 3)
Salaries, employee benefits and outsourced services
345,041
317,118
Service delivery costs(1)
661,214
615,267
Customer related costs(2)
83,401
68,744
Other external purchases(3)
114,324
120,496
1,203,980
1,121,625


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Salaries, employee benefits and outsourced services from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
27923
345038
345042
345032
-270226
Correct choice index: 0
b. Categories of equity shareholding as on March 31, 2019:
c. Top ten equity shareholders of the Company as on March 31, 2019:
* Shareholding is consolidated based on Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the shareholder.

Category
Number of equity shares held
Percentage of holding
Promoters
2,702,450,947
72.0
Other Entities of the Promoter Group
1,091,053
-
Mutual Funds & UTI
93,357,668
2.5
Banks, Financial Institutions, States and Central Government
2,750,113
0.1
Insurance Companies
196,172,807
5.2
Foreign Institutional Investors and Foreign Portfolio Investors - Corporate
592,842,601
15.8
NRI's / OCB's / Foreign Nationals
4,854,682
0.1
Corporate Bodies / Trust
26,208,151
0.7
Indian Public & Others
130,744,399
3.6
Alternate Investment Fund
1,663,495
-
IEPF account
248,790
-
GRAND TOTAL
3,752,384,706
100.0
Name of the shareholder*
Number of equity shares held
Percentage of holding
1. Tata Sons Private Limited
2,702,450,947
72.0
2. Life Insurance Corporation of India
152,493,927
4.1
3. SBI Mutual Fund
21,680,561
0.6
4. First State Investments Icvc- Stewart Investors Asia Pacific Leaders Fund
19,248,438
0.5
5. Government of Singapore
18,028,475
0.5
6. Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund
16,731,906
0.5
7. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd
16,139,316
0.4
8. Axis Mutual Fund Trustee Limited
15,244,614
0.4
9. Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
15,036,984
0.4
10. Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund, A Series of Vanguard International Equity Index Funds
14,112,213
0.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between number of equity shares held between Promoters and Insurance Companies?
Choices:
0
2109608346
2702450947
2549957020
2506278140
Correct choice index: 4
part i item 1 entergy corporation , utility operating companies , and system energy employment and labor-related proceedings ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states louisiana , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , entergy texas , and system energy ) the registrant subsidiaries and other entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees .
generally , the amount of damages being sought is not specified in these proceedings .
these actions include , but are not limited to , allegations of wrongful employment actions ; wage disputes and other claims under the fair labor standards act or its state counterparts ; claims of race , gender and disability discrimination ; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements ; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the national labor relations board ; claims of retaliation ; and claims for or regarding benefits under various entergy corporation sponsored plans .
entergy and the registrant subsidiaries are responding to these suits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants .
employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers .
as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy employed 14669 people .
utility: .

Entergy Arkansas
1,526
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
858
Entergy Louisiana
1,008
Entergy Mississippi
828
Entergy New Orleans
378
Entergy Texas
744
System Energy
-
Entergy Operations
2,448
Entergy Services
3,179
Entergy Nuclear Operations
3,620
Other subsidiaries
80
Total Entergy
14,669

approximately 5000 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , the international brotherhood of teamsters union , and the united government security officers of america. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of entergy's total employees are employed in entergy arkansas?
Choices:
0.42155
0.05849
79.89597
16195
0.10403
Correct choice index: 4
8.1 CAPITAL STRUCTURE
The table below summarizes debt-related financial ratios over the last two fiscal years and the fiscal 2020 guidelines:
(1) Based on mid-range guidelines. (2) Excludes amortization of deferred transaction costs and commitment fees but includes the impact of interest rate swaps. Potential variations in the US LIBOR rates in fiscal 2020 have not been considered. (3) Taking into consideration the interest rate swaps in effect at the end of each fiscal year. (4) Net indebtedness is defined as the aggregate of bank indebtedness, balance due on business combinations and principal on long-term debt, less cash and cash equivalents. (5) Adjusted EBITDA and financial expense for fiscal year 2018 include only eight months of MetroCast operations. (6) Specific guidance on interest coverage cannot be provided given that financial expense guidance is not provided.
In fiscal 2019, the financial leverage ratio relating to net indebtedness over adjusted EBITDA has declined as a result of the sale of Cogeco Peer 1 on April 30, 2019 for a net cash consideration of $720 million and to a lesser extent growing adjusted EBITDA and a reduction in net indebtedness from generated free cash flow. In fiscal 2020, prior to the adoption of IFRS 16 Leases, the financial leverage ratio relating to net indebtedness over adjusted EBITDA should continue to decline as a result of growing adjusted EBITDA and a projected reduction in net indebtedness from generated free cash flow.

Years ended August 31,
2020 Guidelines(1)
2019
2018
Average cost of indebtedness(2)
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
Fixed rate indebtedness(3)
78%
78%
72%
Average term: long-term debt (in years)
3.9
4.9
5.7
Net indebtedness(4) / adjusted EBITDA(5)
2.3
2.6
3.8
Adjusted EBITDA / financial expense(5)
N/A (6)
6.3
5.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the Average cost of indebtedness from 2019 to 2020?
Choices:
3
-1
0
-3
1
Correct choice index: 2
Pre-tax income from international operations was $214 million, $890 million, and $353 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The components of income tax expense (benefit) recorded in continuing operations are as follows:
As of December 28, 2018, we have completed our accounting for the effects of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R.1) (the 2017 Tax Act) in accordance with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, and the amounts are no longer considered provisional. We will continue to evaluate any new guidance from the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as issued.

Year Ended
(In millions)
March 29, 2019
March 30, 2018
March 31, 2017
Current:
Federal
$73
$1,011
$108
State
15
40
6
International
74
107
68
Total
162
1,158
182
Deferred:
Federal
(52)
(1,664)
(177)
State
(2)
(151)
(17)
International
(16)
(33)
(14)
Total
(70)
(1,848)
(208)
Income tax expense (benefit)
$92
$(690)
$(26)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Total current income tax expense for the fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-0.9
1502
500.67
1320
4506
Correct choice index: 2
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2005 9 .
shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share .
the company did not sell any shares in , or receive any proceeds from , the secondary offering .
concurrent with the closing of the secondary offering on december 21 , 2005 , the company entered into a common stock repurchase agreement with pca holdings llc .
pursuant to the repurchase agreement , the company purchased 4500000 shares of common stock directly from pca holdings llc at the initial price to the public net of the underwriting discount or $ 20.69 per share , the same net price per share received by pca holdings llc in the secondary offering .
these shares were retired on december 21 , 2005 .
10 .
commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital expenditures of approximately $ 33.1 million and $ 55.2 million as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment .
operating leases pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 108000 acres of timberland under long-term leases .
the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases of a duration generally of three years .
the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

2006
$24,569
2007
21,086
2008
14,716
2009
9,801
2010
6,670
Thereafter
37,130
Total
$113,972

capital lease obligations were not significant to the accompanying financial statements .
total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively .
these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , in millions?
Choices:
0.1
71.6
14751.8
68.8
66.1
Correct choice index: 3
a) Vessels Under Construction and Upgrades
Teekay LNG's share of commitments to fund newbuilding and other construction contract costs as at December 31, 2019 are as follows:
(i) In June 2019, Teekay LNG entered into an agreement with a contractor to supply equipment on certain of its LNG carriers in 2021 and 2022, for an estimated installed cost of approximately $60.6 million. As at December 31, 2019, the estimated remaining cost of this installation is $49.7 million.
(ii) Teekay LNG has a 30% ownership interest in the Bahrain LNG Joint Venture which has an LNG receiving and regasification terminal in Bahrain. The Bahrain LNG Joint Venture has secured undrawn debt financing of $34 million, of which $10 million relates to Teekay LNG's proportionate share of the commitments included in the table above.

Total
2020
2021
2022
$
$
$
$
Consolidated LNG carriers (i)
49,652
11,979
22,382
15,291
Bahrain LNG Joint Venture (ii)
11,351
11,351
—
—
61,003
23,330
22,382
15,291


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Consolidated LNG carriers from 2021 to 2022?
Choices:
-71
7091
-22382
-7091
37673
Correct choice index: 3
Market and Market Prices of Common Stock
During 2016 fiscal year and through February 22, 2017, our common stock was traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “ACUR”. On February 23, 2017, our common stock was delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market due to our failure to comply with Nasdaq’s Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), which requires that we maintain $2.5 million in stockholders’ equity for continued listing (or meet the alternatives of market value of listed securities of $35 million or net income from continuing operations). NASDAQ had granted us a grace period through February 10, 2017, to regain compliance with Listing Rule 5550(b)(1), but we were unable to regain compliance within such period.
Commencing on February 23, 2017, our common stock was quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “ACUR”, however commencing June 4, 2018 and lasting until July 2, 2018 it was quoted on the OTC Markets OTC Pink tier. The downgrade was a result of the late filing of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K beyond any applicable grace periods. The Company regained compliance with the OTCQB and effective July 3, 2018 it was quoted on the OTCQB. However, commencing May 20, 2019 as a result of late filing of our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K our common stock was again relegated to the OTC Markets OTC Pink tier. The Company regained compliance with the OTCQB in March, 2020 and effective March 23, 2020 it was quoted on the OTCQB.
Set forth below for the period indicated are the high and low sales prices for our common stock in the OTC Market of OTCQB and Pink tier.
On March 27, 2020 the closing sales price of our common stock was $0.22.

Period
Sales Prices
High
Low
2019 Fiscal Year
First Quarter
$0.29
$0.11
Second Quarter
0.28
0.13
Third Quarter
0.45
0.14
Fourth Quarter
0.63
0.20
2020 Fiscal Year
First Quarter thru March 27, 2020
0.47
$0.12


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the stock fluctuation between high and low in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019?
Choices:
0.18
34.89
0.07
0.01
-5.56
Correct choice index: 0
Foreign exchange earnings and outgo
Export revenue constituted 93.3 percent of the total unconsolidated revenue in FY 2019 (92.2 percent in FY 2018).

(` crore)
Foreign exchange earnings and outgo
FY 2019
FY 2018
a. Foreign exchange earnings
119,499
92,258
b. CIF Value of imports
447
768
c.Expenditure in foreign currency
49,336
33,014


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of foreign exchange earnings to expenditure in foreign currency in FY 2019?
Choices:
0.41
1
2.42
0
-2.42
Correct choice index: 2
(1) No dividend is proposed by the Board of Directors related to the financial year 2019.
(2) Includes net sales to other segments.
The figures are derived from our consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. Year-on-year
change is in parenthesis.
All Nokia Technologies IPR and Licensing net sales are allocated to Finland.

Financial highlights
For the year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Continuing operations
EURm
EURm
EURm
Net sales
23,315
22,563
23,147
Gross profit
8,326
8,446
9,139
Gross margin
35.7%
37.4%
39.5%
Operating profit/(loss)
485
(59)
16
Operating margin
2.1%
(0.3)%
0.1%
Profit/(loss) for the year
18
(549)
(1,437)
EUR
EUR
EUR
Earnings per share, diluted
0.00
(0.10)
(0.26)
Dividend per share(1)
0.00
0.10
0.19
2019
2018
2017
As of December 31
EURm
EURm
EURm
Net cash and current financial investments
1,730
3,053
4,517


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in Gross profit from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
8326
-669
-120
-12000
-8447
Correct choice index: 2
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue .
2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 .
the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

(In Millions)
2003 net revenue
$208.3
Base rates
10.6
Volume/weather
8.3
2004 deferrals
7.5
Price applied to unbilled electric sales
3.7
Other
0.6
2004 net revenue
$239.0

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 .
the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector .
the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors .
the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 .
the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset .
the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively .
the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements .
the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the net change in net revenue during 2004 occurred due to the volume/weather?
Choices:
0.27036
0.03482
7.78502
0.03598
30.7
Correct choice index: 0