trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
5. Income taxes:
On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "TCJA"). The TCJA amended the Internal Revenue Code and reduced the corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate. The rate reduction was effective on January 1, 2018. The Company's net deferred tax assets represent a decrease in corporate taxes expected to be paid in the future. Under generally accepted accounting principles deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company's net deferred tax asset was determined based on the current enacted federal tax rate of 35% prior to the passage of the Act. As a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and other provisions under the TCJA, the Company made reasonable estimates of the effects of the TCJA and revalued its net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2017 resulting in a reduction in the value of its net deferred tax asset of approximately $9.0 million and recorded a transition tax of $2.3 million related to its foreign operations for a total of $11.3 million, which was recorded as additional noncash income tax expense in the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had collected all of the necessary data to complete its analysis of the effect of the TCJA on its underlying deferred income taxes and recorded a $0.1 million reduction in the value to its net deferred tax asset. The TCJA subjects a U.S. shareholder to current tax on global intangible low-taxed income earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. FASB Staff Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5, "Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income", states that the Company is permitted to make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred income taxes for temporary basis differences expected to reverse as global intangible low-taxed income in future years or provide for the income tax expense related to such income in the year the income tax is incurred. The Company has made an accounting policy to record these income taxes as a period cost in the year the income tax in incurred.
The components of income (loss) before income taxes consist of the following (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Domestic
$72,773
$63,878
$52,250
Foreign
(20,099)
(22,496)
(21,132)
Total income before income taxes
$52,674
$41,382
$31,118


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average domestic income before income taxes in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
650719
68325500
136651
68325.5
68325.6
Correct choice index: 3
Note 8: Balance Sheet Information
Certain significant amounts included in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following (in millions):
Assets classified as held-for-sale, consisting primarily of properties, are required to be recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell. The carrying value of these assets as of December 31, 2019 was $1.4 million, and is reported as other current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment, including amortization of finance leases, totaled $409.7 million, $359.3 million and $325.2 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Included within sales related reserves are ship and credit reserves for distributors amounting to $178.7 million and $230.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

As of
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Inventories:
Raw materials
$138.4
$137.3
Work in process
772.9
760.7
Finished goods
321.1
327.2
$1,232.4
$1,225.2
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Land
$125.2
$125.5
Buildings
860.6
820.4
Machinery and equipment
4,275.2
3,980.2
Property, plant and equipment, gross
5,261.0
4,926.1
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(2,669.4)
(2,376.5)
$2,591.6
$2,549.6
Accrued expenses:
Accrued payroll and related benefits
$153.4
$240.8
Sales related reserves
247.3
294.8
Income taxes payable
22.5
38.2
Other
115.6
85.3
$538.8
$659.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Inventories: Finished goods from year ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-0.3
648.3
-289
-6100000
-6.1
Correct choice index: 4
Diluted earnings per share. Diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2019 and 2018, as well as information as to the effects of special events that occurred in the indicated periods, as previously discussed and detailed below, were as follows (dollars in millions):
(1) We believe the non-GAAP presentation of diluted earnings per share excluding special tax items, consisting of those related to Tax Reform and a change in our permanent reinvestment assertions related to undistributed earnings of two foreign subsidiaries, as well as restructuring costs and the one-time employee bonus, provide additional insight over the change from the comparative reporting periods by eliminating the effects of special or unusual items. In addition, the Company believes that its diluted earnings per share, as adjusted, enhances the ability of investors to analyze the Company’s operating performance and supplements, but does not replace, its diluted earnings per share calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Diluted earnings per share increased to $3.50 in fiscal 2019 from $0.38 in fiscal 2018 primarily as a result of increased net income due to the factors discussed above and a reduction in diluted shares outstanding due to repurchase activity under the Company's stock repurchase plans.

2019
2018
Diluted earnings per share, as reported (GAAP)
$3.50
$0.38
Restructuring costs, net of tax 
0.05
—
U.S. Tax Reform 
0.23
2.46
Accumulated foreign earnings assertion 
(0.35)
One-time employee bonus, net of tax 
—
0.39
Diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (non-GAAP) (1)
$3.43
$3.23


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the amount of U.S Tax Reform between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-2.07
-2.23
0.09
0
-3
Correct choice index: 1
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 .
also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses .
the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income .
see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 .
also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income .
the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses .
see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$2,438.4
Regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate
55.5
Retail electric price
42.8
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation
17.2
Volume/weather
(12.4)
Other
19.0
2017 net revenue
$2,560.5

the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) .
the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how much higher was net revenue in 2017 than in 2016 ? ( in millions )
Choices:
1.4
122100000
-2421.2
-122.1
122.1
Correct choice index: 4
entergy arkansas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue .
the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case .
the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements .
2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate .
the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue .
net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2007 net revenue
$1,110.6
Rider revenue
13.6
Purchased power capacity
4.8
Volume/weather
(14.6)
Other
3.5
2008 net revenue
$1,117.9

the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 .
the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income .
also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues .
the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class .
billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors .
see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008 for entergy arkansas?
Choices:
7.3
0.02243
0.00657
152.13699
0.00653
Correct choice index: 2
note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .
postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .
the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .
effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .
pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

Pension Plans
(Millions of dollars)
2019
2018
2017
Service cost
$134
$136
$110
Interest cost
107
90
61
Expected return on plan assets
( 180)
( 154)
( 112)
Amortization of prior service credit
( 13)
( 13)
( 14)
Amortization of loss
78
78
92
Settlements
10
2
—
Net pension cost
$135
$137
$138
Net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans
$32
$34
$43

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .
the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .
supplemental pension plan .
the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year .
as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average net pension cost from 2017 to 2019 in millions
Choices:
0.00732
18860
101.66667
136.66667
272
Correct choice index: 3
stock performance graph the line graph that follows compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones u.s .
technology index* and the standard & poor 2019s s&p 500* index for the five years ended december 28 , 2013 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 ( the last day of trading for the fiscal year ended december 27 , 2008 ) in each of our common stock , the dow jones u.s .
technology index , and the s&p 500 index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the dow jones u.s .
technology index , and the s&p 500 index are based on our fiscal year .
comparison of five-year cumulative return for intel , the dow jones u.s .
technology index* , and the s&p 500* index .

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Intel Corporation
$100
$148
$157
$191
$163
$214
Dow Jones U.S. Technology Index
$100
$170
$191
$191
$209
$270
S&P 500 Index
$100
$132
$151
$154
$175
$236

table of contents .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the increase in the dow jones u.s . technology index from 2011 to 2012
Choices:
174.55024
0.00587
-200.99427
1.09424
0.00573
Correct choice index: 4
management 2019s priorities management has re-evaluated its priorities following the appointment of its new ceo in september 2011 .
management is focused on the following priorities : 2022 execution of our geographic concentration strategy to maximize shareholder value through disciplined capital allocation including : 2022 platform expansion in brazil , chile , colombia , and the united states , 2022 platform development in turkey , poland , and the united kingdom , 2022 corporate debt reduction , and 2022 a return of capital to shareholders , including our intent to initiate a dividend in 2012 ; 2022 closing the sales of businesses for which we have signed agreements with counterparties and prudently exiting select non-strategic markets ; 2022 optimizing profitability of operations in the existing portfolio ; 2022 integration of dpl into our portfolio ; 2022 implementing a management realignment of our businesses under two business lines : utilities and generation , and achieving cost savings through the alignment of overhead costs with business requirements , systems automation and optimal allocation of business development spending ; and 2022 completion of an approximately 2400 mw construction program and the integration of new projects into existing businesses .
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , the following projects commenced commercial operations : project location fuel aes equity interest ( percent , rounded ) aes solar ( 1 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
various solar 62 50% ( 50 % ) .

Project
Location
Fuel
Gross MW
AES Equity Interest (Percent, Rounded)
AES Solar<sup>(1)</sup>
Various
Solar
62
50%
Angamos
Chile
Coal
545
71%
Changuinola
Panama
Hydro
223
100%
Kumkoy<sup>(2)</sup>
Turkey
Hydro
18
51%
Laurel Mountain
US-WV
Wind
98
100%
Maritza
Bulgaria
Coal
670
100%
Sao Joaquim
Brazil
Hydro
3
24%
Trinidad<sup>(3)</sup>
Trinidad
Gas
394
10%

trinidad ( 3 ) .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
trinidad gas 394 10% ( 10 % ) ( 1 ) aes solar energy ltd .
is a joint venture with riverstone holdings and is accounted for as an equity method investment .
plants that came online during the year include : kalipetrovo , ugento , soemina , francavilla fontana , latina , cocomeri , francofonte , scopeto , sabaudia , aprilla-1 , siracusa 1-3 complex , manduria apollo and rinaldone .
( 2 ) joint venture with i.c .
energy .
( 3 ) an equity method investment held by aes .
key trends and uncertainties our operations continue to face many risks as discussed in item 1a . 2014risk factors of this form 10-k .
some of these challenges are also described below in 201ckey drivers of results in 2011 201d .
we continue to monitor our operations and address challenges as they arise .
operations in august 2010 , the esti power plant , a 120 mw run-of-river hydroelectric power plant in panama , was taken offline due to damage to its tunnel infrastructure .
aes panama is partially covered for business .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in gross mw , what is the company's total coal capacity?
Choices:
746
125
1215.0
542
1340
Correct choice index: 2
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other expense, net decreased by $31 thousand in 2019 compared to 2018 as a result of the recognition of a $1.4 million loss on extinguishment related to the partial repurchase of our 2022 Notes and a $1.1 million increase in interest expense related to our convertible senior notes, offset by an increase of $2.7 million of interest income earned on our investment as a result of proceeds invested from our convertible note and common stock offerings.

Year Ended December 31,
Change
2019
2018
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Other expense, net
$ 4,597
$ 4,628
$ (31)
(0.7)%
% of revenue
2%
3%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Other expense, net for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
4628
46.1
4612.5
-15.5
18450
Correct choice index: 2
Write-offs of lease receivables and loan receivables were $15 million and $20 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018. Provisions for credit losses recorded for lease receivables and loan receivables were $14 million and $2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The average recorded investment of impaired leases and loans for Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific was $138 million, $55 million and $73 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018. Both interest income recognized, and interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired leases and loans were immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2018.

($ in millions)
At December 31, 2018:
Americas
EMEA
Asia Pacific
Total
Recorded investment:
Lease receivables
$ 3,827
$1,341
$1,152
$ 6,320
Loan receivables
6,817
3,675
2,489
12,981
Ending balance
$10,644
$5,016
$3,641
$19,301
Recorded investment, collectively evaluated for impairment
$10,498
$4,964
$3,590
$19,052
Recorded investment, individually evaluated for impairment
$   146
$   52
$   51
$   249
Allowance for credit losses
Beginning balance at January 1, 2018
Lease receivables
$    63
$    9
$   31
$   103
Loan receivables
108
52
51
211
Total
$   172
$   61
$   82
$   314
Write-offs
(10)
(2)
(23)
(35)
Recoveries
0
0
2
2
Provision
7
9
0
16
Other*
(11)
(3)
(4)
(19)
Ending balance at December 31, 2018
$   158
$   65
$   56
$   279
Lease receivables
$    53
$   22
$    24
$    99
Loan receivables
$   105
$   43
$    32
$   179
Related allowance, collectively evaluated for impairment
$    39
$   16
$    5
$     59
Related allowance, individually evaluated for impairment
$   119
$   49
$    51
$   219


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Recorded investment of Lease receivables for Americas and EMEA for December 2018?
Choices:
258400
5168
1
0
2584
Correct choice index: 4
3. EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic earnings per share available to common shareholders is calculated by dividing net income less preferred stock dividend requirements by the weighted average common shares outstanding for each period. Diluted earnings per share available to common shareholders is calculated by dividing income from operations less preferred stock dividend requirements (when anti-dilutive) by the sum of the weighted average common shares outstanding and the weighted average dilutive equity awards.

For Fiscal Years
2019 Basic
2018 Basic
Weighted average common shares outstanding
597,961
660,925
Net income available to common shareholders
$3,202,943
$3,614,610
Net earnings per share available to common shareholders
$5.36
$5.47


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average net earnings per share available to common basic shareholders in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0.18
5.47
5.42
3.61
10.83
Correct choice index: 2
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that reflects an additional way of viewing our liquidity that, when viewed with our GAAP results, provides a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our cash flows. Free cash flow is calculated by subtracting capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. We believe it is a more conservative measure of cash flow since purchases of fixed assets are necessary for ongoing operations.
Free cash flow has limitations due to the fact that it does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures. For example, free cash flow does not incorporate payments made on finance lease obligations or cash payments for business acquisitions or wireless licenses. Therefore, we believe it is important to view free cash flow as a complement to our entire consolidated statements of cash flows.
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to Free cash flow:
The increase in free cash flow during 2019 is a reflection of the increase in operating cash flows, partially offset by the increase in capital expenditures discussed above.

(dollars in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Net cash provided by operating activities
$ 35,746
$ 34,339
Less Capital expenditures (including capitalized software)
17,939
16,658
Free cash flow
$ 17,807
$ 17,681


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the net cash provided by operating activities from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
1
17939
19214
1407
-1407
Correct choice index: 3