trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Software Development Costs
We capitalize purchased software upon acquisition if it is accounted for as internal-use software or if it meets the future alternative use criteria. We capitalize incurred labor costs for software development from the time technological feasibility of the software is established, or when the preliminary project phase is completed in the case of internal-use software, until the software is available for general release. Research and development costs and other computer software maintenance costs related to software development are expensed as incurred.
We estimate the useful life of our capitalized software and amortize its value over that estimated life. If the actual useful life is shorter than our estimated useful life, we will amortize the remaining book value over the remaining useful life or the asset may be deemed to be impaired and, accordingly, a write-down of the value of the asset may be recorded as a charge to earnings.
Upon the availability for general release, we commence amortization of the capitalized software costs on a product by product basis. Amortization of capitalized software is recorded using the greater of (i) the ratio of current revenues to total and anticipated future revenues for the applicable product or (ii) the straightline method over the remaining estimated economic life, which is estimated to be three to five years.
At each balance sheet date, the unamortized capitalized costs of a software product are compared with the net realizable value of that product. The net realizable value is the estimated future gross revenues from that product reduced by the estimated future costs of completing and disposing of that product, including the costs of performing maintenance and client support required to satisfy our responsibility set forth at the time of sale.
The amount by which the unamortized capitalized costs of a software product exceed the net realizable value of that asset is written off. If we determine that the value of the capitalized software could not be recovered, a write-down of the value of the capitalized software to its recoverable value is recorded as a charge to earnings. The unamortized balances of capitalized software were as follows:

December 31,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
Software development costs
$428,641
$317,637
Less: accumulated amortization
(184,712)
(107,977)
Software development costs, net
$243,929
$209,660


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the Software development costs from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
111004
206633
-425614
-111004
0
Correct choice index: 0
Profit or loss for the period after taxes
The current result of METRO China was reclassified in the consolidated income statement under the item ‘profit or loss for the period from discontinued operations after taxes’, taking into account necessary consolidation measures. To increase the economic meaningfulness of the earnings statement of the continuing sector, its shares in the consolidation effects were also included in the discontinued section of the earnings statement as far as they were related to business relations that are to be upheld in the long term even after the planned disposal. The previous year’s figures of the income statement were adjusted accordingly.
Profit or loss for the period from discontinued operations after taxes is attributable to the shareholders of METRO AG in the amount of €118 million (2017/18: €87 million). Noncontrolling interests account for €5 million of earnings (2017/18: €1 million).
In connection with the divestment process, expenses in the low 2-digit million euros range have been incurred to date.
As a result, profit or loss for the period from discontinued operations after taxes is made up as follows for METRO China:

€ million
2017/2018
2018/2019
Sales
2,680
2,901
Expenses
−2,563
−2,736
Current earnings from discontinued operations before taxes
117
165
Income taxes on gains/losses on the current result
−29
−43
Current earnings from discontinued operations after taxes
88
122
Gains/losses from the remeasurement or disposal of discontinued operations before taxes
0
0
Gains/losses from the remeasurement or disposal of discontinued operations after taxes
0
0
Profit or loss for the period from discontinued operations after taxes
88
122


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Sales in FY2019 from FY2018?
Choices:
2883
221
-221
56
309
Correct choice index: 1
Capital expenditures
For 2019, capital expenditure was SEK 5.1 (4.0) billion, representing 2.3% of sales. Expenditures are largely related to test sites and equipment for R&D, network operation centers and manufacturing and repair operations.
The increase in 2019 was mainly due to investments in 5G test equipment.
Annual capital expenditures are normally around 2% of sales. This corresponds to the needs for keeping and maintaining the current capacity level. The Board of Directors reviews the Company’s investment plans and proposals.
As of December 31, 2019, no material land, buildings, machinery or equipment were pledged as collateral for outstanding indebtedness.

Capital expenditures 2017–2019
SEK billion
2019
2018
2017
Capital expenditures
5.1
4.0
3.9
Of which in Sweden
2.0
1.3
1.5
Share of annual sales
2.3%
1.9%
1.9%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in share of annual sales between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-0.4
0
0.1
0.4
2
Correct choice index: 3
Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the RSU transactions for the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows (number of shares in millions):
During 2019, the Company awarded 2.6 million RSUs to certain officers and employees of the Company that vest upon the achievement of certain performance criteria and market conditions. The number of units expected to vest is evaluated each reporting period and compensation expense is recognized for those units for which achievement of the performance criteria is considered probable. Compensation expense for RSUs with market conditions are recognized based on the grant date fair value irrespective of the achievement of the condition.
As of December 31, 2019, unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures related to non-vested RSUs granted under the Amended and Restated SIP with service, performance and market conditions, was $60.9 million, $10.1 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
For RSUs with time-based service conditions, expense is being recognized over the vesting period; for RSUs with performance criteria, expense is recognized over the period during which the performance criteria is expected to be achieved; for RSUs with market conditions expense is recognized over the period in which the condition is assessed irrespective of whether it would be achieved or not.
Unrecognized compensation cost related to awards with certain performance criteria that are not expected to be achieved is not included here. Total compensation expense related to performance-based, service-based, and market-based RSUs was $69.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which included $48.4 million for RSUs with time-based service conditions that were granted in 2019 and prior that are expected to vest.

Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Nonvested shares of RSUs at December 31, 2018
8.6
$16.59
Granted
5.4
21.64
Achieved
0.2
24.46
Released
(4.8)
14.41
Canceled
(0.5)
19.74
Nonvested shares of RSUs at December 31, 2019
8.9
20.84


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value of Nonvested shares of RSUs from year ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-4.25
1.1
4.25
31.81
5.05
Correct choice index: 2
The net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following (in thousands):
A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized based on an assessment of positive and negative evidence, including estimates of future taxable income necessary to realize future deductible amounts. A significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated was the cumulative loss incurred over the three-year period ended December 31, 2019. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence such as its projections for future growth. On the basis of this evaluation, at December 31, 2019 and 2018, a valuation allowance of $24.6 million and $25.1 million, respectively, has been recorded.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company has accumulated federal and state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $165.0 million and $134.3 million, respectively. Of the $165.0 million of federal NOL carryforwards, $57.9 million was generated before January 1, 2018 and is subject to the 20-year carryforward period (“pre-Tax Act losses”). The remaining $107.1 million (“post-Tax Act losses”) can be carried forward indefinitely but is subject to the 80% taxable income limitation. The pre-Tax Act U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will expire in varying amounts through 2037. The Company completed a Section 382 study for the period through March 31, 2019 and determined that a Section 382 ownership change occurred on December 31, 2017 subjecting all pre-Tax Act losses to a utilization limitation; however, such limitation is not expected to result in NOLs expiring unused. Any future annual limitation may result in the expiration of NOLs before utilization.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had combined foreign net operating loss carry-forwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $25.6 million and $25.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, valuation allowances of $24.6 million and $25.1 million, respectively, had been recorded against the related deferred tax assets for those loss carry-forwards that are not more likely than not to be fully utilized in reducing future taxable income.

As of December 31
2019
2018
Deferred tax assets
Lease liability
$4,295
$278
AMT credit
9
11
Accrued expenses
2,837
2,057
Deferred revenue
—
549
Net operating loss carryforward
50,950
34,662
Other assets
6,967
2,343
Property and equipment
—
123
Intangible assets
2,416
836
Valuation allowance
(24,637)
(25,079)
Total net deferred tax assets
42,837
15,780
Deferred tax liabilities
Deferred commissions
(4,308)
(3,215)
Deferred revenue
(336)
—
Intangible assets
(7,948)
(7,295)
Property and equipment
(296)
—
Debt discount
(26,589)
(4,986)
Right-of-use asset
(3,909)
—
Deferred state taxes
(1,101)
(1,233)
Other
(352)
—
Total deferred tax liabilities
(44,839)
(16,729)
Total non-current deferred income tax liabilities
$(2,002)
$(949)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the lease liability from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
3746
4017
4130
2559
4018
Correct choice index: 1
FNF
We are party to certain agreements with FNF, including agreements that were entered into when we were related parties. As a result of the Distribution, FNF no longer has an ownership interest in us, but was still considered a related party until December 1, 2019 due to the combination of certain shared board members, members of senior management and various agreements. As of December 1, 2019, the Chairman of our Board of Directors no longer serves as one of our executive officers, and FNF is no longer considered a related party.
We have various agreements with FNF to provide software, data and analytics services, as well as corporate shared services and information technology. We are also a party to certain other agreements under which we incur other expenses or receive revenues from FNF.
A detail of the revenues and expenses, net from FNF is as follows (in millions):
(1) Transactions with FNF are summarized through November 30, 2019, the date after which FNF is no longer considered a related party.
We paid to FNF a guarantee fee of 1.0% of the outstanding principal of the Senior Notes (as defined in Note 12 — Long Term Debt) in exchange for the guarantee by FNF of the Senior Notes. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the guarantee fee was included in Interest expense, net on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings. On April 26, 2017, the Senior Notes were redeemed, and we are no longer required to pay a guarantee fee.

Year ended December 31,
2019 (1)
2018
2017
Revenues
$59.5
$57.6
$56.8
Operating expenses
12.5
12.1
12.3
Guarantee fee
—
—
1.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in operating expenses between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
0
12.5
-0.2
-200
0.2
Correct choice index: 2
Expenditure on R&D
TCS Innovation Labs are located in India and other parts of the world. These R&D centers, as certified by Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR) function from Pune, Chennai, Bengaluru, Delhi- NCR, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai.
Expenditure incurred in the R&D centers and innovation centers during FY 2019 and FY 2018 are given below:

Expenditure on R&D and innovation
Unconsolidated
Consolidated
FY 2019
FY 2018
FY 2019
FY 2018
a. Capital
2
-
2
-
b. Recurring
303
295
306
298
c. Total R&D expenditure (a+b)
305
295
308
298
d. Innovation center expenditure
1,285
1,079
1,352
1,202
e. Total R&D and innovation expenditure (c+d)
1,590
1,374
1,660
1,500
f. R&D and innovation expenditure as a percentage of total turnover
1.3%
1.4%
1.1%
1.2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in consolidated Capital Expenditure on R&D and innovation between FY 2018 and FY 2019?
Choices:
-1283
2
0
200
-1350
Correct choice index: 1
The Group’s measure of segment profit, adjusted EBITDA, excludes depreciation, amortisation, impairment loss, restructuring costs, loss on disposal of fixed assets, the Group’s share of results in associates and joint ventures and other income and expense. A reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to operating profit is shown below. For a reconciliation of operating profit to profit for the financial year, see the Consolidated income statement on page 111.
Note: 1 Share of adjusted results in equity accounted associates and joint ventures excludes amortisation of acquired customer bases and brand intangible assets, restructuring costs and other costs of €0.6 billion (2018: €0.4 billion, 2017: €0.1 billion) which are included in amortisation of acquired customer base and brand intangible assets, restructuring costs and other income and expense respectively
2 See note 31 “IAS 18 basis primary statements” for further details.

2019 €m
2018 €m
2017 €m
Adjusted EBITDA
14,139
14,737
14,149
Depreciation, amortisation and loss on disposal of fixed assets
(9,665)
(9,910)
(10,179)
Share of adjusted results in equity accounted associates and joint ventures1
(291)
389
164
Adjusted operating profit
4,183
5,216
4,134
Impairment losses
(3,119)
–
–
Restructuring costs
(486)
(156)
(415)
Amortisation of acquired customer based and brand intangible assets
(583)
(974)
(1,046)
Other (expense)/income
(262)
213
1,052
Operating (loss)/profit (IAS 18 basis)
(267)
4,299
3,725
Impact of adoption of IFRS 152
(684)
Operating loss (IFRS 15 basis)
(951)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in average adjusted EBITDA between 2018 and 2019, and 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-7318
14438
-5
12453
-689
Correct choice index: 2
3.6 PROFIT FOR THE YEAR
(1) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued operations. For further details, please consult the "Accounting policies" and "Discontinued operations" sections.
(2) The non-controlling interest represents a participation of 21% in Atlantic Broadband's results by Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec ("CDPQ"), effective since the MetroCast acquisition on January 4, 2018.
Fiscal 2019 profit for the year from continuing operations and profit for the year from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Corporation decreased by 7.2% and 9.4%, respectively, as a result of: • last year's $94 million income tax reduction following the United States tax reform; and • the increase in depreciation and amortization mostly related to the impact of the MetroCast acquisition; partly offset by • higher adjusted EBITDA mainly as a result of the impact of the MetroCast acquisition; • the decrease in financial expense; and • the decrease in integration, restructuring and acquisition costs.
Fiscal 2019 profit for the year and profit for the year attributable to owners of the Corporation increased by 20.0% and 18.4%, respectively, mainly due to a profit for the year from discontinued operations of $75.4 million resulting from the sale of Cogeco Peer 1 in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 compared to a loss for the year from discontinued operations of $24.4 million for the prior year in addition to the elements mentioned above.

Years ended August 31,
2019
2018 (1)
Change
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages and earnings per share)
$
$
%
Profit for the year from continuing operations
356,908
384,578
(7.2)
Profit for the year
432,288
360,197
20.0
Profit for the year from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Corporation
339,973
375,214
(9.4)
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Corporation
415,353
350,833
18.4
Profit for the year from continuing operations attributable to non-controlling interest(2)
16,935
9,364
80.9
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
6.89
7.61
(9.5)
Basic earnings per share
8.41
7.12
18.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the Basic earnings per share from continuing operations from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-11.21
-0.72
14.5
-16928.11
-0.23
Correct choice index: 1
2017 Acquisitions
Cloudmark, Inc
On November 21, 2017 (the “Cloudmark Acquisition Date”), pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the Company acquired all shares of Cloudmark, Inc. (“Cloudmark”), a leader in messaging security and threat intelligence for internet service providers and mobile carriers worldwide. As part of the acquisition, Cloudmark’s Global Threat Network was incorporated into Company’s cloud-based Nexus platform, which powers its email, social media, mobile, and SaaS security effectiveness. 

On November 21, 2017 (the “Cloudmark Acquisition Date”), pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the Company acquired all shares of Cloudmark, Inc. (“Cloudmark”), a leader in messaging security and threat intelligence for internet service providers and mobile carriers worldwide. As part of the acquisition, Cloudmark’s Global Threat Network was incorporated into Company’s cloud-based Nexus platform, which powers its email, social media, mobile, and SaaS security effectiveness.
The Company believes that with this acquisition, it will benefit from increased messaging threat intelligence from the analysis of billions of daily emails, malicious domain intelligence, and visibility into fraudulent and malicious SMS messages directed to mobile carriers worldwide. The Company also expects to achieve savings in corporate overhead costs for the combined entities. These factors, among others, contributed to a purchase price in excess of the estimated fair value of acquired net identifiable assets and, as a result, goodwill was recorded in connection with the acquisition.
At the Cloudmark Acquisition Date, the consideration transferred was $107,283, net of cash acquired of $31,973.
Per the terms of the merger agreement, unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock units held by Cloudmark employees were canceled and exchanged for the Company’s unvested stock options and unvested restricted stock units, respectively. The fair value of $91 of these unvested awards was attributed to pre-combination services and included in consideration transferred. The fair value of $1,180 was allocated to post-combination
Proofpoint, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) (dollars and share amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
services. The unvested awards are subject to the recipient’s continued service with the Company, and $1,180 is recognized ratably as stock-based compensation expense over the required remaining service period.
The following table summarizes the fair values of tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, intangible assets and goodwill:

Estimated
Useful Life
Fair value
(in years)
Current assets
$37,390
N/A
Fixed assets
543
N/A
Non-current assets
74
N/A
Liabilities
(4,422)
N/A
Deferred revenue
(15,400)
N/A
Customer relationships
15,300
8
Order backlog
1,400
1
Core/developed technology
18,500
4
Deferred tax liability, net
(7,905)
N/A
Goodwill
93,776
Indefinite
$139,256


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average fair value of Order backlog?
Choices:
8
1400
350
1400000
-1400
Correct choice index: 1
Deferred Revenues
Deferred revenues consist primarily of prepayments for license fees, and other products or services for which we have been paid in advance, and earn the revenue when we transfer control of the product or service. Deferred revenues may also include upfront payments for consulting services to be performed in the future, such as non-recurring engineering services.
We defer license fees until we have met all accounting requirements for revenue recognition, which is when a license is made available to a customer and that customer has a right to use the license. Engineering development fee revenues are deferred until engineering services have been completed and accepted by our customers. We defer AirBar and sensor modules revenues until distributors sell the products to their end customers
Under U.S. GAAP, companies may make reasonable aggregations and approximations of returns data to accurately estimate returns. Our AirBar and sensor module returns and warranty experience to date has enabled us to make reasonable returns estimates, which are supported by the fact that our product sales involve homogenous transactions. The reserve for future sales returns is recorded as a reduction of our accounts receivable and revenue and was insignificant as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
The following table presents our deferred revenues by source (in thousands);

Years ended December 31,
2019
2018
Deferred license fees revenues
$28
$-
Deferred NRE revenues
20
-
Deferred AirBar revenues
6
59
Deferred sensor modules revenues
13
16
$67
$75


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of deferred license fees and NRE revenues over total deferred revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019?
Choices:
48
1.54
1.3
1.4
0.72
Correct choice index: 4
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

DATE
CITI
S&P 500
S&P FINANCIALS
31-Dec-2011
100.0
100.0
100.0
31-Dec-2012
150.6
116.0
128.8
31-Dec-2013
198.5
153.6
174.7
31-Dec-2014
206.3
174.6
201.3
31-Dec-2015
197.8
177.0
198.2
31-Dec-2016
229.3
198.2
243.4

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between citi common stock and the s&p 500 for the five years ended december 31 , 2016?
Choices:
0.982
0.311
0.133
321.543
-0.671
Correct choice index: 1