trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Substantial shareholdings
The voting rights in the table below have been determined in accordance with the requirements of the UK Listing Authority’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules DTR 5, and represent 3% or more of the voting rights attached to issued shares in the Company as at 28th February 2020 and 31st December 2019. There are no Controlling Founder Shareholders.

As at 31.12.19
As at 28.02.20
Substantial shareholdings
Number of Ordinary shares
% of issued share capital
Number of Ordinary shares
% of issued share capital
The Capital Group Companies, Inc.
6,584,006
8.9%
6,598,428
8.9%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
5,566,823
7.5%
5,481,561
7.4%
BlackRock, Inc.
4,624,204
6.3%
4,913,790
6.7%
Fiera Capital Corporation
4,764,251
6.5%
4,768,688
6.5%
APG Groep N.V.
4,068,000
5.5%
4,068,000
5.5%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
2,569,081
3.5%
2,637,287
3.6%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the number of ordinary shares for BlackRock, Inc. in 2020 from 2019?
Choices:
289586
0
-289586
2344709
290
Correct choice index: 0
Note 19—Earnings Per Share ("EPS")
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Leidos common stockholders by the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is calculated to give effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the reporting period. The dilutive effect of outstanding equity-based compensation awards is reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method, only in periods in which such effect would have been dilutive for the period.
The Company issues unvested stock awards that have forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. These stock awards are dilutive common share equivalents subject to the treasury stock method.
The weighted average number of shares used to compute basic and diluted EPS attributable to Leidos stockholders were:
Anti-dilutive stock-based awards are excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute diluted EPS. For fiscal 2019 and 2017, there were no significant anti-diluted equity awards. For fiscal 2018, there was 1 million of outstanding stock options and vesting stock awards that were anti-dilutive.

Year Ended
January 3, 2020
December 28, 2018
December 29, 2017
(in millions)
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding
143
151
152
Dilutive common share equivalents—stock options and other stock awards
2
2
2
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding
145
153
154


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding from 2017 to 2018?
Choices:
1
-2
-153
-3
-1
Correct choice index: 4
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
All share-based awards are measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards and recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss over the period during which the employee is required to perform services in exchange for the award (generally the vesting period of the award).
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which requires assumptions, including the fair value of the Company's underlying common stock, expected term, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield of the Company's common stock. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. If factors change and different assumptions are used, share-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
These assumptions are estimated as follows:
• Fair Value of Common Stock. The Company uses the five-day volume weighted average price for its common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
• #Expected Term. The Company determines the expected term based on the average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding. The Company bases the expected term assumptions on its historical behavior combined with estimates of the post-vesting holding period.
• Expected Volatility. The Company determines the price volatility factor based on the Company's historical volatility over the expected life of the stock options.
• Risk-Free Interest Rate. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes valuation model on the yield available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term of the stock options for each stock option group.
• Expected Dividend. The Company has not paid and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and, therefore, uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the option pricing model.
The grant weighted average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees were as follows:

Years ended
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Expected volatility
50.7%
54.2%
Risk-free interest rate
2.25%
2.72%
Dividend yield
Nil
Nil
Average expected life
4.77
5.31


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average expected volatility for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-1.75
3856.62
52.45
27.35
28
Correct choice index: 2
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
LKQ Corporation
$100
$55
$93
$108
$143
$201
NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index
$100
$59
$86
$100
$98
$114
Peer Group
$100
$83
$100
$139
$187
$210

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .
information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage of cumulative return for lkq corporation for the five years ended 12/31/2012?
Choices:
101
0.5
-1.01
0.99
1.01
Correct choice index: 4
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments .
backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months .
backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) .

2015
2014
(In millions, except percentages)
Silicon Systems
$1,720
55%
$1,400
48%
Applied Global Services
812
26%
775
27%
Display
525
16%
593
20%
Energy and Environmental Solutions
85
3%
149
5%
Total
$3,142
100%
$2,917
100%

applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations .
customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties .
delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations .
manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems .
applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia .
applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites .
although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible .
accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers .
applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in silicon systems from 2014 to 2015?
Choices:
-0.22857
0
1.59204
10666.66667
0.22857
Correct choice index: 4
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period .
the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends .
the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
State Street Corporation
$100
$111
$118
$105
$125
$198
S&P 500 Index
100
126
146
149
172
228
S&P Financial Index
100
117
132
109
141
191
KBW Bank Index
100
98
121
93
122
168

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment in kbw bank index from 2008 to 2011?
Choices:
93
-0.24
-0.08
-0.07
-0.01
Correct choice index: 3
Note 9 Earnings per share
The following table shows the components used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for earnings attributable to common shareholders.
(1) The calculation of the assumed exercise of stock options includes the effect of the average unrecognized future compensation cost of dilutive options. It excludes options for which the exercise price is higher than the average market value of a BCE common share. The number of excluded options was 61,170 in 2019 and 12,252,594 in 2018.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
2019
2018
Net earnings attributable to common shareholders – basic
3,040
2,785
Dividends declared per common share (in dollars)
3.17
3.02
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in millions)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic
900.8
898.6
Assumed exercise of stock options (1)
0.6
0.3
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted (in millions)
901.4
898.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total net earnings attributable to common shareholders - basic in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
5825
2788
3686
-5825
6080
Correct choice index: 0
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index .
the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions .
there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Vornado Realty Trust
$100
$123
$118
$128
$147
$201
S&P 500 Index
100
115
117
136
180
205
The NAREIT All Equity Index
100
128
139
166
171
218

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the five year change in the s&p 500 index?
Choices:
185
0
105
90
105.0
Correct choice index: 4
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% for the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the benefit related to the wind down of our solar inverter business and earnings in foreign jurisdictions, which are subject to lower tax rates, offset by the impact of U.S. tax reform. The principal causes of the difference between the federal statutory rate and the effective income tax rate for each the years below are as follows:

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Income taxes per federal statutory rate
$14,111
$36,199
$69,348
State income taxes, net of federal deduction
10
2,372
1,794
Transition tax - U.S. Tax Reform
—
1,174
61,690
Corporate tax rate changes - U.S. Tax Reform
—
(652)
11,177
Tax benefit associated with inverter business wind down
—
—
(33,837)
Stock based compensation
(97)
(974)
(5,263)
GILTI Tax
8,796
13,064
—
Tax effect of foreign operations
(13,086)
(19,162)
(47,482)
Uncertain tax position
(4,487)
(3,088)
4,948
Unremitted earnings
1,624
2,564
—
Tax credits
(6,280)
(9,844)
(658)
Change in valuation allowance
7,222
(1,306)
841
Withholding taxes
6,500
1,371
—
Other permanent items, net
(3,614)
3,509
(468)
Total provision for income taxes
$10,699
$25,227
$62,090


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in GILTI Tax between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
4268
1574
-46901
0
-4268
Correct choice index: 4
VI. REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS AND KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL
A. Remuneration to Managing Director, Whole-time Directors and / or Manager:

(` lakh)
Particulars of Remuneration
Name of MD/WTD/Manager
Rajesh Gopinathan Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director
N Ganapathy Subramaniam Chief Operating Officer and Executive Director
Total Amount
Gross salary
(a) Salary as per provisions contained in Section 17(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
115.74
109.02
224.76
(b) Value of perquisites u/s 17(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
126.76
13.30
140.06
(c) Profits in lieu of salary under Section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
-
-
-
2. Stock Option
-
-
-
3.Sweat Equity
-
-
-
4.Commission
1,300.00
900.00
2,200.00
as % of profit
0.03
0.02
0.05
5.Others, Allowances
60.35
138.76
199.11
Total (A)
1,602.85
1,161.08
2,763.93
Ceiling as per the Act (@ 10% of profits calculated under Section 198 of the Companies Act, 2013)
404,348.06


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total gross salary of the CEO and MD?
Choices:
117.7
1287.8
235.8
242.5
253.5
Correct choice index: 3
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 8: INTANGIBLE ASSETS/LIABILITIES OTHER THAN GOODWILL
Net Book Value of Intangible Assets other than Goodwill as at December 31, 2018
(**) During the year ended December 31, 2018, acquisition costs of $1,150 of favorable lease terms were capitalized as part of the cost of one vessel due to the exercise of the purchase option (See also Note 2(n)). As of December 31, 2018, intangible assets associated with the favorable lease terms included an amount of $31,342 associated with the favorable lease terms of certain charter out contracts of Navios Containers which were recognized as of November 30, 2018 (see Note 3). During the year ended December 31, 2017, acquisition costs of $10,398 and accumulated amortization of $7,001 of favorable lease terms were considered impaired and were written off resulting in a loss of $3,397 included in the statement of comprehensive (loss)/income within the caption of “Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net”.

Acquisition Cost
Accumulated Amortization
Transfer/ Write off
Net Book Value December 31, 2018
Trade name
$100,420
$(47,966)
$—
$52,454
Port terminal operating rights
53,152
(11,838)
—
41,314
Customer relationships
35,490
(19,520)
—
15,970
Favorable lease terms(**)
32,492
(2,143)
(1,150)
29,199
Total Intangible assets
$221,554
$(81,467)
$(1,150)
$138,937


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between the accumulated amortization between Customer relationships and favorable lease terms?
Choices:
-21663
-71974
-1407
-17377
43457
Correct choice index: 3
Compensation of Key Management Personnel (Including Directors)
Short-term employee benefits comprise fees, salaries, benefits and bonuses earned during the year as well as nonmonetary benefits.
Post-employment benefits comprise the cost of providing defined contribution pensions to senior management in respect of the current period.
Share-based payments comprise the cost of senior management’s participation in share-based payment plans for the period as measured by the fair value of awards in accordance with IFRS2.

Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018
$M
$M
Short-term employee benefits
6.6
9.1
Post-employment benefits
0.1
0.1
Share-based payments - equity-settled
10.4
17.7
Total
17.1
26.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Total compensation of key management personnel  in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
44
0.6
-9.2
-20.3
-9.8
Correct choice index: 4
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Date
PMI
PMI Peer Group<sup>(1)</sup>
S&P 500 Index
December 31, 2013
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
December 31, 2014
$97.90
$107.80
$113.70
December 31, 2015
$111.00
$116.80
$115.30
December 31, 2016
$120.50
$118.40
$129.00
December 31, 2017
$144.50
$140.50
$157.20
December 31, 2018
$96.50
$127.70
$150.30

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year .
the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi .
the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies .
as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage return for pmi common stock for the five years ended 2018?
Choices:
1
0.964
-0.035
1.965
-3.5
Correct choice index: 2
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Selected quarterly financial data is as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):
(1) In the quarter ended January 26, 2018, our provision for income taxes included significant charges attributable to United States tax reform.
(2) The quarters of fiscal 2018 have been adjusted for our retrospective adoption of the new accounting standard Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606).

Quarter Ended (2)
July 28, 2017
October 27, 2017
January 26, 2018
April 27, 2018
Net revenues
$ 1,321
$ 1,415
$ 1,539
$ 1,644
Gross profit
$ 824
$ 900
$ 956
$ 1,029
Provision for income taxes (1)
$ 14
$ 48
$ 983
$ 38
Net income (loss)
$ 131
$ 174
$(479 )
$ 290
Net income (loss) per share, basic
$ 0.49
$ 0.65
$(1.79 )
$ 1.09
Net income (loss) per share, diluted
$ 0.47
$ 0.63
$(1.79 )
$ 1.06


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the gross profit between the quarters of January 26 and April 27, 2018?
Choices:
27
73
7300
-955
-918
Correct choice index: 1
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2007 net revenue
$991.1
Retail electric price
(17.1)
Purchased power capacity
(12.0)
Net wholesale revenue
(7.4)
Other
4.6
2008 net revenue
$959.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 .
refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing .
the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 .
purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges .
see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales .
gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage .
the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Choices:
-31.9
-0.03219
-31616.09
-0.00032
-0.03326
Correct choice index: 1