trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

Shares (thous.)
<i>Weighted-Average</i><i>Grant-Date Fair Value</i>
Nonvested at January 1, 2009
873
$ 50.70
Granted
449
47.28
Vested
(240)
43.23
Forfeited
(22)
53.86
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
1,060
$ 50.88

at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years .
a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants .
5 .
retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans .
qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements .
other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees .
these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses .
the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 .
funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability .
the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets .
the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases .
the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases .
plan assets are measured at fair value .
we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the annual compensation expense for the remaining unvested performance retention awards?
Choices:
7598.46154
-372.30769
4400000
671538461.53846
16923076.92308
Correct choice index: 4
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
Accounts Receivable and Deferred Rent Asset—The Company derives the largest portion of its revenues and corresponding accounts receivable and the related deferred rent asset from a relatively small number of tenants in the telecommunications industry, and 54% of its current-year revenues are derived from four tenants.
The Company’s deferred rent asset is associated with non-cancellable tenant leases that contain fixed escalation clauses over the terms of the applicable lease in which revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company mitigates its concentrations of credit risk with respect to notes and trade receivables and the related deferred rent assets by actively monitoring the creditworthiness of its borrowers and tenants. In recognizing tenant revenue, the Company assesses the collectibility of both the amounts billed and the portion recognized in advance of billing on a straight-line basis. This assessment takes tenant credit risk and business and industry conditions into consideration to ultimately determine the collectibility of the amounts billed. To the extent the amounts, based on management’s estimates, may not be collectible, revenue recognition is deferred until such point as collectibility is determined to be reasonably assured. Any amounts that were previously recognized as revenue and subsequently determined to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense included in Selling, general, administrative and development expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Accounts receivable is reported net of allowances for doubtful accounts related to estimated losses resulting from a tenant’s inability to make required payments and allowances for amounts invoiced whose collectibility is not reasonably assured. These allowances are generally estimated based on payment patterns, days past due and collection history, and incorporate changes in economic conditions that may not be reflected in historical trends, such as tenants in bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization. Receivables are written-off against the allowances when they are determined to be uncollectible. Such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account. Changes in the allowances were as follows:
(1) In 2019, write-offs are primarily related to uncollectible amounts in India. In 2018 and 2017, recoveries include recognition of revenue resulting from collections of previously reserved amounts.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Balance as of January 1,
$282.4
$131.0
$45.9
Current year increases
104.3
157.8
87.2
Write-offs, recoveries and other (1)
(223.4)
(6.4)
(2.1)
Balance as of December 31,
$163.3
$282.4
$131.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in current year increases between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
53.5
245
0
70.6
70600000
Correct choice index: 3
abiomed , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 3 .
acquisitions ( continued ) including the revenues of third-party licensees , or ( ii ) the company 2019s sale of ( a ) ecp , ( b ) all or substantially all of ecp 2019s assets , or ( c ) certain of ecp 2019s patent rights , the company will pay to syscore the lesser of ( x ) one-half of the profits earned from such sale described in the foregoing item ( ii ) , after accounting for the costs of acquiring and operating ecp , or ( y ) $ 15.0 million ( less any previous milestone payment ) .
ecp 2019s acquisition of ais gmbh aachen innovative solutions in connection with the company 2019s acquisition of ecp , ecp acquired all of the share capital of ais gmbh aachen innovative solutions ( 201cais 201d ) , a limited liability company incorporated in germany , pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated as of june 30 , 2014 , by and among ecp and ais 2019s four individual shareholders .
ais , based in aachen , germany , holds certain intellectual property useful to ecp 2019s business , and , prior to being acquired by ecp , had licensed such intellectual property to ecp .
the purchase price for the acquisition of ais 2019s share capital was approximately $ 2.8 million in cash , which was provided by the company , and the acquisition closed immediately prior to abiomed europe 2019s acquisition of ecp .
the share purchase agreement contains representations , warranties and closing conditions customary for transactions of its size and nature .
purchase price allocation the acquisition of ecp and ais was accounted for as a business combination .
the purchase price for the acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values .
the acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred is as follows : acquisition date fair value ( in thousands ) .

Total Acquisition Date Fair Value (in thousands)
Cash consideration
$15,750
Contingent consideration
6,000
Total consideration transferred
$21,750

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for the ecp and ais transactions , what portion of the total consideration was paid immediately in cash?
Choices:
724.13793
0.72414
787.5
201.72414
1
Correct choice index: 1
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and .

Year ended December 31,
Total PCI
(in millions, except ratios)
2010
2009
2008
Balance, January 1
$25,544
$32,619
$—
Washington Mutual acquisition
—
—
39,454
Accretion into interest income
(3,232)
(4,363)
(1,292)
Changes in interest rates on variable rate loans
(819)
(4,849)
(5,543)
Other changes in expected cash flows<sup>(a)</sup>
(2,396)
2,137
—
Balance, December 31
$19,097
$25,544
$32,619
Accretable yield percentage
4.35%
5.14%
5.81%

( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions .
for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference .
such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage .
the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions .
to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods .
certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) .
extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average balance of total pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009?
Choices:
7124
22320.5
0
11574
12890
Correct choice index: 1
2018 Compensation
The following table provides information regarding the total compensation that was earned by each of our non-employee directors in 2018.
(1) The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSU awards calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”). The amount does not necessarily correspond to the actual value recognized by the non-employee director. The valuation assumptions used in determining such amounts are described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
(2) The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column representing the annual awards or initial awards, as applicable, granted to our non-employee directors in 2018 are detailed below. Each of these awards vests and settles on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date or the date of our Annual Meeting, subject to the director’s continued service through the vesting date.
(3) The amounts included in the “Stock Awards” column representing the awards of RSUs granted to our non-employee directors in lieu of cash retainers in 2018 are described below. Each of these awards vested and settled in full on the grant date.
(4)  As of December 31, 2018, Dr. Simmons also held a fully vested option to purchase 38,000 shares of our Class B common stock.
(5)  As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Viniar also held 8,750 RSUs granted in 2015 to be settled in shares of our Class B common stock, which shares vest in full on the earlier of June 21, 2019 or the 2019 annual meeting subject to Mr. Viniar’s continued service with us through such vesting date. As of December 31, 2018, Mr. Viniar also held a fully vested option to purchase 326,950 shares of our Class B common stock.

Director
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($)
Stock Awards ($)(1)(2)(3)
Total ($)
Roelof Botha
—
305,119
305,119
Paul Deighton
45,000
249,998
294,998
Randy Garutti
42,500
249,998
292,488
James McKelvey
—
290,041
290,041
Mary Meeker
—
305,119
305,119
Anna Patterson
50,000
249,988
299,988
Naveen Rao
45,000
249,988
294,988
Ruth Simmons (4)
—
300,132
300,132
Lawrence Summers
50,903
249,988
300,891
David Viniar (5)
—
382,610
382,610


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in Fees Earned between Paul Deighton and Randy Garutti?
Choices:
87500
1912500000
2500
40000
2500000
Correct choice index: 2
Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
(1) In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, we invested 3.0 million Euro ($3.4 million) in 3D-Micromac AG, a private company in Germany. The investment is included in other assets and is being carried on a cost basis and will be adjusted for impairment if we determine that indicators of impairment exist at any point in time.

Fiscal year-end
2019
2018
Assets related to deferred compensation arrangements (see Note 13)
$35,842
$37,370
Deferred tax assets (see Note 16)
87,011
64,858
Other assets(1)
18,111
9,521
Total other assets
$140,964
$111,749


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Other assets in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
27632
2
8590
0
102228
Correct choice index: 2
The following table presents total stock-based compensation cost included in income from continuing operations.
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards at December 31, 2019 was $1.2 billion and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.5 years.
Capitalized stock-based compensation cost was not material at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
2017
Cost
$100
$82
$91
Selling, general and administrative
453
361
384
Research, development and engineering
126
67
59
Pre-tax stock-based compensation cost
679
510
534
Income tax benefits
(155)
(116)
(131)
Net stock-based compensation cost
$524
$393
$403


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Selling, general and administrative?
Choices:
3.99
144159.33
399.33
232.67
407
Correct choice index: 2
We utilized a comprehensive approach to evaluate and document the impact of the guidance on our current accounting policies and practices in order to identify material differences, if any, that would result from applying the new requirements to our revenue contracts. We did not identify any material differences resulting from applying the new requirements to our revenue contracts. In addition, we did not identify any significant changes to our business processes, systems, and controls to support recognition and disclosure requirements under the new guidance. We adopted the provisions of Topic 606 in fiscal 2019 utilizing the modified retrospective method. We recorded a $0.5 million cumulative effect adjustment, net of tax, to the opening balance of fiscal 2019 retained earnings, a decrease to receivables of $7.6 million, an increase to inventories of $2.8 million, an increase to prepaid expenses and other current assets of $6.9 million, an increase to other accrued liabilities of $1.4 million, and an increase to other noncurrent liabilities of $0.2 million. The adjustments primarily related to the timing of recognition of certain customer charges, trade promotional expenditures, and volume discounts.
The effect of the changes made to our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 26, 2019 for the adoption of Topic 606 was as follows:
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Current assets
As Reported
Adjustments
Balances without Adoption of Topic 606
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts
$831.7
$8.7
$840.4
Inventories .
1,571.7
(3.1)
1,568.6
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
93.8
(16.6)
77.2
Current liabilities
Other accrued liabilities
691.6
(1.1)
690.5
Other noncurrent liabilities .
1,951.8
(2.5)
1,949.3


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage of adjustment to the balance of as reported prepaid expenses and other current assets?
Choices:
0.2
17.7
155708
565.1
100
Correct choice index: 1
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 19: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company through August 30, 2019 had three reportable segments from which it derived its revenues: Dry Bulk Vessel Operations, Logistics Business and Containers Business. The Containers Business became a reportable segment as a result of the consolidation of Navios Containers since November 30, 2018 (date of obtaining control) (see also Note 3). Following the reclassification of the results of Navios Containers as discontinued operations (see also Note 3), the Company currently has two reportable segments from which it derives its revenues: Dry Bulk Vessel Operations and Logistics. The reportable segments reflect the internal organization of the Company and are strategic businesses that offer different products and services. The Dry Bulk Vessel Operations consists of the transportation and handling of bulk cargoes through the ownership, operation, and trading of vessels. The Logistics Business consists of operating ports and transfer station terminals, handling of vessels, barges and pushboats as well as upriver transport facilities in the Hidrovia region.
The Company measures segment performance based on net income/ (loss) attributable to Navios Holdings common stockholders. Inter-segment sales and transfers are not significant and have been eliminated and are not included in the following tables. Summarized financial information concerning each of the Company’s reportable segments is as follows:

Dry Bulk Vessel Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Logistics Business for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Total for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
Revenue
$254,178
$228,271
$482,449
Administrative fee revenue from affiliates
16,991
—
16,991
Interest income
9,610
1,052
10,662
Interest expense and finance cost
(92,948)
(40,531)
(133,479)
Depreciation and amortization
(52,288)
(29,435)
(81,723)
Equity in net (losses)/earnings of affiliated companies
(9,185)
—
(9,185)
Net (loss)/ income attributable to Navios Holdings common
stockholders
(212,623)
20,513
(192,110)
Total assets
1,511,517
631,338
2,142,855
Goodwill
56,240
104,096
160,336
Capital expenditures
(36,628)
(7,943)
(44,571)
Investment in affiliates
64,352
—
64,352
Cash and cash equivalents
32,386
45,605
77,991
Restricted cash
736
—
736
Long-term debt, net (including current and noncurrent portion)
$1,048,318
$514,929
1,563,247


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in revenue between dry bulk vessel operations and logistics business?
Choices:
25907
482449
254175
254159
254148
Correct choice index: 0
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased $71.5 million, or 66.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018, due to an increase of $28.7 million in employee-related costs ($12.2 million of which related to stock-based compensation and related payroll taxes), a $14.9 million increase in finance costs, which include an estimated net liability for non-recurring HST payable to the Government of Canada in the amount of $8.1 million related to 2019 and prior years, sales and use and other value added taxes, insurance, and bank fees, a $9.0 million increase in Shopify Payments losses driven by increased GMV processed through Shopify Payments, a $8.6 million increase in losses and insurance related to Shopify Capital driven by an expansion of our Capital offerings and programs, a $6.9 million increase in professional services fees for legal and tax services, including those related to our international expansion and the growth of our business, a $1.8 million increase in computer and software costs, and a $1.6 million increase in general bad debt expense. General and administrative expenses increased $71.5 million, or 66.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018, due to an increase of $28.7 million in employee-related costs ($12.2 million of which related to stock-based compensation and related payroll taxes), a $14.9 million increase in finance costs, which include an estimated net liability for non-recurring HST payable to the Government of Canada in the amount of $8.1 million related to 2019 and prior years, sales and use and other value added taxes, insurance, and bank fees, a $9.0 million increase in Shopify Payments losses driven by increased GMV processed through Shopify Payments, a $8.6 million increase in losses and insurance related to Shopify Capital driven by an expansion of our Capital offerings and programs, a $6.9 million increase in professional services fees for legal and tax services, including those related to our international expansion and the growth of our business, a $1.8 million increase in computer and software costs, and a $1.6 million increase in general bad debt expense.
General and administrative expenses increased $39.7 million, or 58.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017, due to an increase of $30.3 million in employee-related costs, a $4.5 million increase in professional services fees for legal and tax services, a $4.0 million increase in finance costs, which includes insurance, sales and use and other value added taxes, and a $1.7 million increase in computer and software costs.

Years ended December 31,
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
% Change
% Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
General and administrative
$ 178,934
$ 107,444
$ 67,719
66.5 %
58.7 %
Percentage of total revenues
11.3 %
10.0 %
10.1 %


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the average general administrative expenses between 2017-2018, and 2018-2019?
Choices:
55607.5
45876.2
91352.5
-55607.5
-155214.7
Correct choice index: 0
Under Article 35 of our Articles of Association, our financial year extends from January 1 to December 31, which is the period end of each fiscal year. In 2019, the first quarter ended on March 30, the second quarter ended on June 29, the third quarter ended on September 28 and the fourth quarter ended on December 31.
In 2020, the first quarter will end on March 28, the second quarter will end on June 27, the third quarter will end on September 26 and the fourth quarter will end on December 31.
Based on our fiscal calendar, the distribution of our revenues and expenses by quarter may be unbalanced due to a different number of days in the various quarters of the fiscal year and can also differ from equivalent prior years’ periods, as illustrated in the below table for the years 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Days
Days
Days
Days
2018
90
91
91
93
2019
89
91
91
94
2020
88
91
91
96


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Q1 days from 2018 to 2020?
Choices:
59
1
0
-2
-3
Correct choice index: 3