trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Disaggregation of revenue
To provide visibility into our transition from older products to our newer, higher growth products and clarity into the dynamics of our product revenue, we have historically grouped our products by “Strategic” and “Mature” solutions. Strategic solutions include Clustered ONTAP, branded E-Series, SolidFire, converged and hyper-converged infrastructure, ELAs and other optional add-on software products. Mature solutions include 7-mode ONTAP, add-on hardware and related operating system (OS) software and original equipment manufacturers (OEM) products. Both our Mature and Strategic product lines include a mix of disk, hybrid and all flash storage media. Additionally, we provide a variety of services including software maintenance, hardware maintenance and other services including professional services, global support solutions, and customer education and training.
The following table depicts the disaggregation of revenue by our products and services (in millions):
Revenues by geographic region are presented in Note 16 – Segment, Geographic, and Significant Customer Information

Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Product revenues
$ 3,755
$  3,525
$  3,060
Strategic
2,709
2,468
2,000
Mature
1,046
1,057
1,060
Software maintenance revenues
946
902
905
Hardware maintenance and other services revenues
1,445
1,492
1,526
Hardware maintenance support contracts
1,182
1,214
1,258
Professional and other services
263
278
268
Net revenues
$ 6,146
$  5,919
$  5,491


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the company's product revenue between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
465
816
465000000
-465
1057
Correct choice index: 0
5.2 Employee share plans (continued)
Shares issued under the FY2019, FY2018 and FY2017 Performance Rights plans
For the purposes of Sections 200B and 200E of the Corporations Act, iSelect shareholders have approved the giving of any potential benefits under the Performance Rights Plan provided in connection with any future retirement of a participant who holds a ‘managerial or Executive office’ such that for the purposes of the provisions, those benefits will not be included in the statutory limit.
Change in control
Upon a ‘change of control’, the Board has discretion to determine that some or all of the participants’ Performance Rights vest immediately.
FY2018 Performance Rights Plan
The following table illustrates the number of, and movements in, shares issued during the year:

2019 NUMBER
2018 NUMBER
Outstanding at the beginning of the period
547,949
-
Granted during the period
-
772,303
Forfeited during the period
(140,687)
(224,354)
Exercised during the period
-
-
Outstanding at the end of the period
407,262
547,949


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage change in the number of shares forfeited during the period from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-281.53
-59.47
-37.29
140724.29
-418335
Correct choice index: 2
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .
the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .
snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Fiscal Year Ended (2)
Snap-on Incorporated
Peer Group (3)
S&P 500
December 31, 2002
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
December 31, 2003
118.80
126.16
128.68
December 31, 2004
130.66
152.42
142.69
December 31, 2005
146.97
157.97
149.70
December 31, 2006
191.27
185.10
173.34
December 31, 2007
198.05
216.19
182.87

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .
( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation .
( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w .
grainger , inc. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi in snap-on if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Choices:
0.25791
0.30142
2.43238
1
0.34755
Correct choice index: 4
Products
The Registrant has the ability to produce a wide range of processed chicken products and prepared chicken items.
Processed chicken is first salable as an ice-packed, whole chicken. The Registrant adds value to its ice-packed, whole chickens by removing the giblets, weighing, packaging and labeling the product to specific customer requirements and cutting and deboning the product based on customer specifications. The additional processing steps of giblet removal, close tolerance weighing and cutting increase the value of the product to the customer over whole, ice-packed chickens by reducing customer handling and cutting labor and capital costs, reducing the shrinkage associated with cutting, and ensuring consistently sized portions.
The Registrant adds additional value to the processed chicken by deep chilling and packaging whole chickens in bags or combinations of fresh chicken parts, including boneless product, in various sized, individual trays under the Registrant’s brand name, which then may be weighed and pre-priced, based on each customer’s needs. This chill-pack process increases the value of the product by extending shelf life, reducing customer weighing and packaging labor, and providing the customer with a wide variety of products with uniform, well designed packaging, all of which enhance the customer’s ability to merchandise chicken products.
To satisfy some customers’ merchandising needs, the Registrant freezes the chicken product, which adds value by meeting the customers’ handling, storage, distribution and marketing needs and by permitting shipment of product overseas where transportation time may be as long as 60 days.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the contribution, as a percentage of net sales dollars, of each of the Registrant’s major product lines.

Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Registrant processed chicken:   
Value added:   
Fresh vacuum-sealed 
38.3 %
35.2 %
39.8 %  
37.6 %
35.2%
Fresh chill-packed 
32.9
35.6
31.0
34.7
36.9
Fresh bulk-packed 
14.4
15.1
16.4
15.1
13.9
Frozen 
6.2
6.5
6.7
5.1
6.3
Subtotal 
91.8
92.4
93.9
92.5
92.3
Non-value added:   
Fresh ice-packed 
1.2
1.2
1.0
0.9
1.0
Subtotal 
1.2
1.2
1.0
0.9
1.0
Total Company processed chicken 
93.0
93.6
94.9
93.4
93.3
Minimally prepared chicken 
7.0
6.4
5.1
6.6
6.7
Total 
100.0 %
100.0 %
100.0 % 
100.0 %
100.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average contribution from minimally prepared chicken from fiscal years 2017 to 2019 as a percentage of net sales dollars?
Choices:
13.4
0.18
21.5
6.17
6.2
Correct choice index: 3
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 .
the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
12/31/2017
12/31/2018
HUM
$100
$140
$176
$202
$247
$287
S&P 500
$100
$114
$115
$129
$157
$150
Peer Group
$100
$128
$135
$137
$173
$191

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the lowest return for the first year of investment?
Choices:
57
14000000
-14
0
14.0
Correct choice index: 4
4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
We grow and maintain flocks of layers (mature female chickens), pullets (female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), and breeders (male and female chickens used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks). Our total flock at June 1, 2019, consisted of approximately 9.4 million pullets and breeders and 36.2 million layers.

June 1, 2019
June 2, 2018
Flocks, net of accumulated amortization
$105,536
$96,594
Eggs
14,318
17,313
Feed and supplies
52,383
54,737
$172,237
$168,644


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in total inventory in 2019 compared to 2018?
Choices:
3593000
1
3593
-151331
3629
Correct choice index: 2
sales of unregistered securities not applicable .
repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 .
total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

Total Number ofShares (or Units)Purchased<sup>1</sup>
Average Price Paidper Share (or Unit)<sup>2</sup>
Total Number ofShares (or Units)Purchased as Part ofPublicly AnnouncedPlans or Programs<sup>3</sup>
Maximum Number (orApproximate Dollar Value)of Shares (or Units)that May Yet Be PurchasedUnder the Plans orPrograms<sup>3</sup>
October 1 - 31
1,231,868
$20.74
1,230,394
$214,001,430
November 1 - 30
1,723,139
$18.89
1,722,246
$181,474,975
December 1 - 31
1,295,639
$20.25
1,285,000
$155,459,545
Total
4,250,646
$19.84
4,237,640

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .
we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period .
2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program .
3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) .
on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock .
the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program .
there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total cash outflow for the repurchase of shares in the last three months of year , ( in millions ) ?
Choices:
84.07478
42166408.32
84332816.64
1
84.33282
Correct choice index: 4
(1) Represents accelerated vesting of 48,849 stock options. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley’s stock option agreements (dated January 17, 2019),
if Mr. Dooley’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason within six months following a “change in control”, he will
become immediately vested in all outstanding unvested stock options, and all of Mr. Dooley’s outstanding options shall remain
exercisable in accordance with their terms, but in no event for less than 90 days after such termination.
(2) Represents accelerated vesting of 15,000 unvested restricted stock units. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley’s restricted stock unit agreement
(dated March 1, 2012), upon a “change in control” all non-vested units shall accelerate and be vested as of the date of the “change in
control” and if Mr. Dooley’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, all non-vested units shall accelerate and be
vested as of the date of termination
(3) Represents accelerated vesting of 7,500 unvested restricted stock units. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley’s restricted stock unit agreement
(dated March 1, 2012), on the event of Mr. Dooley’s death or total disability, 7,500 restricted stock units (50% of the unvested restricted
stock units granted under such agreement at December 31, 2018) would vest.
(4) Represents accelerated vesting of 10,630 unvested performance restricted stock units. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley's performance restricted
stock unit agreement (dated January 17, 2019), if Mr. Dooley’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason within six
months following a “change in control” or if Mr. Dooley's employment is terminated due to death or total disability, all non-vested units
shall accelerate and be vested as of the date of termination.

Type of Payment
Termination by Systemax without “Cause” or Resignation by Employee for “good reason” ($)
Termination Due to Death or Total Disability ($)
Change In Control Only ($)
Termination by Systemax without “Cause” or Resignation by Employee for “good reason” within a certain period of time following a Change in Control ($)
Cash Compensation (Salary & Non-Equity Incentive Compensation)
-
-
-
-
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Stock Option Awards
-
-
-
505,100 (1)
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Unit Awards
377,400 (2)
188,700 (3)
377,400 (2)
-
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Awards
-
267,500 (4)
-
267,500 (4)
Medical and Other Benefits
-
-
-
-
Total
377,400
456,200
377,400
772,600


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What are the accelerated vesting of Robert Dooley's unvested restricted stock units for termination by Systemax without "cause" or termination due to death?
Choices:
15000
7499
22500
527600
30000
Correct choice index: 2
In November 2017, GMSL acquired the trenching and cable laying services business from Fugro N.V. ("Fugro"). As part of the transaction, Fugro became a 23.6% holder of GMSL's parent, Global Marine Holdings, LLC ("GMH"). GMSL, in the normal course of business, incurred revenue and expenses with Fugro for various services.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, GMSL recognized $11.3 million and $9.3 million respectively, of expenses for transactions with Fugro. For the year ended December 31, 2019 GMSL recognized $0.8 million of revenues. The parent company of GMSL, GMH, incurred management fees of $0.6 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
GMSL also has transactions with several of their equity method investees. A summary of transactions with such equity method investees and balances outstanding are as follows (in millions):

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Net revenue
$ 6.4
$ 21.8
Operating expenses
$ 1.0
$ 4.8
Interest expense
$ 1.0
$ 1.3
December 31,
2019
2018
Accounts receivable
$ 1.2
$ 5.0
Long-term obligations
$ 22.5
$ 28.5
Accounts payable
$ 0.1
$ 2.2
Dividends
$ 4.5
$ 25.8


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average operating expenses?
Choices:
9.7
2.9
5.8
2.8
7
Correct choice index: 1
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
BCE capital expenditures totaled $3,988  million for the year, up $17 million over 2018. This corresponded to a capital intensity ratio of 16.6%, down 0.3 pts compared to last year. Capital spending in the year reflected the following:
• Greater capital investments in our wireless segment of $33 million in 2019, compared to 2018, as we advanced the build-out of our LTE-A network, continued to deploy wireless small-cells to expand capacity to support subscriber growth and increase network speeds, coverage and signal quality, as well as to expand data fibre backhaul in preparation for 5G technology
• A modest reduction in capital spending in our wireline segment of $10 million in 2019, compared to last year, as we continued to focus our investments on the ongoing deployment of FTTP to more homes and businesses, the roll-out of fixed WTTP to rural locations in Ontario and Québec, the connection of fibre Internet and TV services to more homes and businesses and the execution of business customer contracts
• Lower capital expenditures at Bell Media of $6 million in 2019, compared to 2018, mainly due to production equipment and IT upgrades in 2018

2019
2018
$ CHANGE
% CHANGE
Bell Wireless
697
664
(33)
(5.0%)
Capital intensity ratio
7.6%
7.5%
(0.1) pts
Bell Wireline
3,183
3,193
10
0.3%
Capital intensity ratio
25.8%
26.0%
0.2 pts
Bell Media
108
114
6
5.3%
Capital intensity ratio
3.4%
3.7%
0.3 pts
BCE
3,988
3,971
(17)
(0.4%)
Capital intensity ratio
16.6%
16.9%
0.3 pts


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What are the capital expenditures for Bell Media in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
124
222000000
222
114
2
Correct choice index: 2
This section presents the Group’s contractual obligation to make a payment in the future in relation to purchases of property, plant and equipment, and lease commitments.
Capital expenditure and operating lease commitments of the Group at the reporting date are as follows:
The commitments set out above do not include contingent turnover rentals, which are charged on many retail premises leased by the Group. These rentals are calculated as a percentage of the turnover of the store occupying the premises, with the percentage and turnover threshold at which the additional rentals commence varying with each lease agreement.
The Group leases retail premises and warehousing facilities which are generally for periods up to 40 years. The operating lease commitments include leases for the Norwest office and distribution centres. Generally the lease agreements are for initial terms of between five and 25 years and most include multiple renewal options for additional five to 10-year terms. Under most leases, the Group is responsible for property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and expenses related to the leased properties. However, many of the more recent lease agreements have been negotiated on a gross or semi-gross basis, which eliminates or significantly reduces the Group’s exposure to operational charges associated with the properties.
From 1 July 2019, the Group adopted AASB 16 Leases and as a result the operating lease commitments set out above have been recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, with the exception of the service component of lease payments. Refer to Note 1.2.6 for a reconciliation between the operating lease commitments at 30 June 2019 and the lease liabilities recognised at 1 July 2019.

2019
2018
$M
$M
Capital expenditure commitments
Estimated capital expenditure under firm contracts, payable:
Not later than one year
398
416
Later than one year, not later than two years
–
–
Later than two years, not later than five years
–
–
Total capital expenditure commitments
398
416
Operating lease commitments
Future minimum rentals under non-cancellable operating leases, payable:
Not later than one year
1,998
2,089
Later than one year, not later than five years
7,415
7,484
Later than five years
12,378
13,331
Total operating lease commitments
21,791
22,904
Total commitments for expenditure
22,189
23,320


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in total operating lease commitments between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
1113
20678
-21790
9573
Correct choice index: 1
Acquisitions and divestments
Acquisitions
In 2019, Ericsson made acquisitions with a negative cash flow effect amounting to SEK 1,815 (1,220) million. The acquisitions presented below are not material, but the Company gives the information to provide the reader a summarized view of the content of the acquisitions made. The acquisitions consist primarily of:
Kathrein: On October 2, 2019, the Company acquired assets from Kathrein, a world leading provider of antenna and filter technologies with approximately 4,000 employees. Kathrein’s antenna and filters business has a strong R&D organization with extensive experience in antenna design and research, coupled with a strong IPR portfolio. In addition to broadening Ericsson’s portfolio of antenna and filter products, the acquisition will bring vital competence for the evolution of advanced radio network products. The acquired Kathrein business has had a negative impact of SEK –0.5 billion since the acquisition, corresponding to –1 percentage point in Networks operating margin. Balances to facilitate the Purchase price allocation are preliminary.
CSF: On August 20, 2019, the Company acquired 100% of the shares in CSF Holdings Inc. a US-based technology company with approximately 25 employees. CSF strengthens iconectiv’s Business to Consumer (B2C) product platforms to enable growth in messaging and Toll-Free Number (TFN) management. Balances to facilitate the Purchase price allocation are final.
ST-Ericsson: Before ST-Ericsson was a joint venture where Ericsson and ST Microelectronics had a 50/50 ownership. This joint venture consisted of a number of legal entities where the two parties owned different stakes in the different legal entities. In December 2019 the Company initiated transactions to wind-down the legal structure of ST-Ericsson by acquiring the remaining shares in two legal ST-Ericsson entities and costs of SEK –0.3 billion impacted the result. The Company now owns 100% of the shares in those entities.
In order to finalize a Purchase price allocation all relevant information needs to be in place. Examples of such information are final consideration and final opening balances, they may remain preliminary for a period of time due
to for example adjustments of working capital, tax items or decisions from local authorities.
1) Acquisition-related costs are included in Selling and administrative expenses in the consolidated income statement.

Acquisitions 2017–2019
2019
2018
2017
Total consideration, including cash
1,957
1,314
62
Net assets acquired
Cash and cash equivalents
142
94
–
Property, plant and equipment
353
4
12
Intangible assets
497
481
101
Investments in associates
101
64
–
Other assets
1,357
254
1
Provisions, incl. post-employment benefits
–102
–
–
Other liabilities
–743
–494
25
Total identifiable net assets
1,605
403
139
Costs recognized in net income
153
–
–
Goodwill
199
911
–77
Total
1,957
1,314
62
Acquisition-related costs 1)
85
24
49


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total acquisition-related costs from 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
60
158
150
15800
135
Correct choice index: 1