trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
entergy mississippi , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis other regulatory charges ( credits ) have no material effect on net income due to recovery and/or refund of such expenses .
other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the under-recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity charges .
2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy mississippi's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

(In Millions)
2002 net revenue
$380.2
Base rates
48.3
Other
(1.9)
2003 net revenue
$426.6

the increase in base rates was effective january 2003 as approved by the mpsc .
gross operating revenue , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase in base rates effective january 2003 and an increase of $ 29.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to quarterly changes in the fuel factor resulting from the increases in market prices of natural gas and purchased power .
this increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 35.9 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of decreased generation and purchases that resulted in less energy available for resale sales .
fuel and fuel-related expenses decreased primarily due to the decreased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and decreased generation , partially offset by an increase in the market price of purchased power .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to over-recovery of capacity charges related to the grand gulf rate rider and the cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 .
other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 6.6 million in customer service support costs ; and 2022 an increase of $ 3.7 million in benefit costs .
the increase was partially offset by the absence of the voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million that occurred in 2003 .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to a higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes compared to the same period in 2003 .
2003 compared to 2002 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million ; and 2022 an increase of $ 4.4 million in benefit costs. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue for entergy mississippi , inc . in 2003?
Choices:
0.10877
-333.8
-0.12204
0.12204
-0.87296
Correct choice index: 3
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 141 $ 137 sources of supply .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
404 303 total utility plant .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18099 16891 nonutility property .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .
the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 .
note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: .

2015
2014
2013
Balance as of January 1
$(35)
$(34)
$(27)
Amounts charged to expense
(32)
(37)
(27)
Amounts written off
38
43
24
Recoveries of amounts written off
(10)
(7)
(4)
Balance as of December 31
$(39)
$(35)
$(34)

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by how much did property , plant and equipment depreciation expense increase from 2013 to 2015?
Choices:
373.91711
31
0.08289
0.08201
0.0029
Correct choice index: 2
The following table represents the restricted stock units and SARS stock-based compensation information for the periods indicated (in thousands):
(1) Classified as income tax expense within the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
2019
2018
2017
Intrinsic value of SARS exercised
$335
$909
$5,053
Fair value of restricted stock units vested
$49,725
$62,592
$44,010
Tax benefit for stock compensation expense(1)
$611
$1,122
$560
Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense — restricted stock units
$41,778
Remaining weighted-average period for restricted stock units expense
1.3years


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in the Fair value of restricted stock units vested between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-25.88
-29.69
-99.11
-20.56
-1146.79
Correct choice index: 3
In accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, the Company has adopted the accounting policy that interest and penalties recognized are classified as part of its income taxes
The following shows the changes in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
The Company does not anticipate that its total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due to settlement of examination or the expiration of statute of limitations during the next 12 months.
The Company files U.S. and foreign income tax returns with varying statutes of limitations. Due to the Company’s net carry-over of unused operating losses and tax credits, all years from 2003 forward remain subject to future examination by tax authorities

2019
2018
2017
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of the year
$6,029
$3,004
$2,460
Increases related to prior year tax position
—
1,050
—
Decreases related to prior year tax positions
(48)
—
(3)
Increases related to current year tax positions
2,984
1,975
547
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year
$8,965
6,029
3,004


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average increases related to current year tax positions between 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
5506
1835.33
1835333333.33
1470.67
1657
Correct choice index: 1
.

Year Ended December 31, 2014
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
1st Qtr
2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr<sup>(3)</sup>
Sales and service revenues
$1,594
$1,719
$1,717
$1,927
Operating income (loss)
159
181
171
144
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
132
152
144
79
Net earnings (loss)
90
100
96
52
Dividends declared per share
$0.20
$0.20
$0.20
$0.40
Basic earnings (loss) per share
$1.83
$2.05
$1.97
$1.07
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
$1.81
$2.04
$1.96
$1.05

( 3 ) in the fourth quarter of 2014 , the company recorded a $ 47 million goodwill impairment charge .
item 9 .
changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a .
controls and procedures disclosure controls and procedures the company's management , with the participation of the company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer , has evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures ( as defined in rules 13a-15 ( e ) and 15d-15 ( e ) under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the "exchange act" ) ) as of december 31 , 2015 .
based on that evaluation , the company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that , as of december 31 , 2015 , the company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the company files or submits under the exchange act is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in sec rules and forms , and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to management to allow their timely decisions regarding required disclosure .
changes in internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended december 31 , 2015 , no change occurred in the company's internal control over financial reporting that materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , the company's internal control over financial reporting. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the net income margin in the q1 of 2014?
Choices:
-1504
1771.11111
0.05646
1
0.06023
Correct choice index: 2
Net periodic benefit cost — The components of the fiscal year net periodic benefit cost were as follows (in thousands):
Changes in presentation —As discussed in Note 1, Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, we adopted ASU 2017-07 during the first quarter of 2019 using the retrospective method, which changed the financial statement presentation of service costs and the other components of net periodic benefit cost. The service cost component continues to be included in operating income; however, the other components are now presented in a separate line below earnings from operations captioned “Other pension and post-retirement expenses, net” in our consolidated statements of earnings. Further, in connection with the adoption, plan administrative expenses historically presented as a component of service cost are now presented as a component of expected return on plan assets. The prior year components of net periodic benefit costs and assumptions on the long-term rate of return on assets have been recast to conform to current year presentation.
Prior service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis from date of participation to full eligibility. Unrecognized gains or losses are amortized using the “corridor approach” under which the net gain or loss in excess of 10% of the greater of the PBO or the market-related value of the assets, if applicable, is amortized. For our Qualified Plan, actuarial losses are amortized over the average future expected lifetime of all participants expected to receive benefits. For our SERP, actuarial losses are amortized over the expected remaining future lifetime for inactive participants, and for our postretirement health plans, actuarial losses are amortized over the expected remaining future lifetime of inactive participants expected to receive benefits.

2019
2018
2017
Qualified Plan:
Interest cost
$19,825
$19,463
$19,889
Expected return on plan assets
(26,334)
(26,467)
(26,811)
Actuarial loss
2,754
3,331
4,455
Net periodic benefit credit
$(3,755)
$(3,673)
$(2,467)
SERP:
Service cost
$—
$490
$855
Interest cost
3,080
2,894
2,850
Actuarial loss
1,207
1,538
1,659
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
115
146
153
Net periodic benefit cost
$4,402
$5,068
$5,517
Postretirement health plans:
Interest cost
$997
$955
$1,003
Actuarial (gain) loss
(159)
(27)
162
Net periodic benefit cost
$838
$928
$1,165


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. For SERP, what is the average actuarial loss for the years 2017-2019?
Choices:
1468
4404
15
0
4407
Correct choice index: 0
2. Fixed assets
Accounting policies
Shares in Group undertakings are stated at cost less any provision for impairment and capital related to share-based payments. Contributions in respect of share-based payments are recognised in line with the policy set out in note 7 “Share-based payments”.
The Company assesses investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an investment may not be recoverable. If any such indication of impairment exists, the Company makes an estimate of the recoverable amount. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than the value of the investment, the investment is considered to be impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in the income statement.
Shares in Group undertakings

2019
2018
€m
€m
Cost:
1 April
91,905
91,902
Capital contributions arising from share-based payments
137
130
Contributions received in relation to share-based payments
(92)
(127)
31 March
91,950
91,905
Amounts provided for:
1 April
8,177
7,911
Impairment losses
–
266
31 March
8,177
8,177
Net book value:
31 March
83,773
83,728


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between 2019 average net book value and 2019 average total costs of shares in Group undertakings as at 31 March?
Choices:
7698974089
8200
8177
91928
75551
Correct choice index: 2
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
Our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $11.2 million and $7.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Included in these amounts are unrecognized tax benefits totaling $10.2 million and $5.4 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
these amounts are unrecognized tax benefits totaling $10.2 million and $5.4 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively,
which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within our global operations in income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized the following income tax expense: $0.5 million, $0.5 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, for the potential payment of interest and penalties. Accrued interest and penalties were $1.7 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. We conduct business globally and, as a result, files income tax returns in the United State federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions. We are generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local, or non-US income tax examinations for the years before 2012. Due to the expiration of statutes of limitations in multiple jurisdictions globally during 2020, the Company anticipates it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by $3.1 million.

December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1,   
(7,113 )   
(7,419 )   
(6,938 ) 
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during a prior period
(2,428 )     
(873 )     
(789 ) 
Gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a Gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during a prior period
445
233
145
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
(2,489 )     
(78 )     
-
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits relating to settlements with taxing authorities
-
349
-
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations
346
675
163
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31,   
(11,239 )   
(7,113 )   
(7,419 ) 


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in unrecognised tax benefits between December 31, 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
4126
10366
-7106
18352
306
Correct choice index: 0
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information .
the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 .
the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .
price range of common stock .

2001
High
Low
2000
High
Low
First Quarter
$60.15
$41.30
First Quarter
$44.72
$34.25
Second Quarter
52.25
39.95
Second Quarter
49.63
35.56
Third Quarter
44.50
12.00
Third Quarter
70.25
45.13
Fourth Quarter
17.80
11.60
Fourth Quarter
72.81
45.00

( b ) holders .
as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .
( c ) dividends .
under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay .
in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met .
the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty .
the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries .
such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was average of high and low stock prices for the first quarter of 2000?
Choices:
43.25
39.485
161.515
122.86
5.235
Correct choice index: 1
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth selected consolidated cash flow information (in thousands):
Operating Activities Net cash provided by operating activities during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019 was primarily due to increased accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, decreased inventories and non-cash expenses, partially offset by increased contract assets and accounts receivable. The increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities is primarily due to the timing of collections on accounts receivable sold under the securitization programs and the timing of purchases and cash payments. The decrease in inventories is primarily due to the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and the reclassification to contract assets for revenue recognized for over time customers, partially offset by an increase in inventories to support expected sales levels in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The increase in contract assets is due to the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and the timing of revenue recognition for over time customers. The increase in accounts receivable is primarily driven by the amended and new securitization programs and higher sales and timing of collections.
Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019 consisted primarily of capital expenditures principally to support ongoing business in the DMS and EMS segments and expenditures for assets acquired in connection with the initial and second closings of the acquisition of certain assets of JJMD, partially offset by proceeds and advances from the sale of property, plant and equipment and cash receipts on sold receivables under the asset-backed securitization programs.
Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019 was primarily due to: (i) payments for debt agreements, (ii) the repurchase of our common stock, (iii) dividend payments and (iv) treasury stock minimum tax withholding related to vesting of restricted stock. Net cash used in financing activities was partially offset by: (i) borrowings under debt agreements and (ii) net proceeds from the exercise of stock options and issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan.

Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$1,193,066
$(1,105,448)
$(1,464,085)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(872,454)
1,240,914
2,141,263
Net cash used in financing activities
(415,772)
(47,044)
(404,546)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
554
(20,392)
5,228
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
$(94,606)
$68,030
$277,860


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total percentage change in Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents between 2017 and 2019?
Choices:
-89.4
-843.7
-4674
-1909.6
-990200
Correct choice index: 0
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Earnings
A detail of related party items included in Revenues is as follows (in millions):
(1) Transactions with FNF are summarized through November 30, 2019, the date after which FNF is no longer considered a related party.

Year ended December 31,
2019 (1)
2018
2017
Software services
$40.2
$35.9
$32.8
Data and analytics services
19.3
21.7
24.0
Total related party revenues
$59.5
$57.6
$56.8


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in software services between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-3.1
68.7
0
0.1
3.1
Correct choice index: 4
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
* $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes .
copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial .
all rights reserved .
copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co .
all rights reserved .
september september september september september september .

September 2010
September 2011
September 2012
September 2013
September 2014
September 2015
Apple Inc.
$100
$138
$229
$170
$254
$294
S&P 500 Index
$100
$101
$132
$157
$188
$187
S&P Information Technology Index
$100
$104
$137
$147
$190
$194
Dow Jones U.S. Technology Supersector Index
$100
$103
$134
$141
$183
$183

apple inc .
| 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for the five years ended 2015?
Choices:
1.94
0
0.38
-2.06
194
Correct choice index: 0