trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2015 net revenue
$637.2
Reserve equalization
14.3
Purchased power capacity
12.4
Transmission revenue
7.0
Retail electric price
5.4
Net wholesale
(27.8)
Other
(4.3)
2016 net revenue
$644.2

the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts .
the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in millions , what is the total impact on the change in net revenue from the reserve equalization , the purchased power capacity , and the transmission revenue?
Choices:
3370
33.7
184.3
26.7
53.4
Correct choice index: 1
13. SHARE-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Stock incentive plans — We offer share-based compensation plans to attract, retain, and motivate key officers, employees, and non-employee directors to work toward the financial success of the Company.
Our stock incentive plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and have been approved by the stockholders of the Company. The terms and conditions of our share-based awards are determined by the Compensation Committee for each award date and may include provisions for the exercise price, expirations, vesting, restriction on sales, and forfeitures, as applicable. We issue new shares to satisfy stock issuances under our stock incentive plans.
Our Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of up to11,600,000 common shares in connection with the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, or performance units to key employees, directors, and other designated employees. There were 1,677,983 shares of common stock available for future issuance under this plan as of September 29, 2019.
We also maintain a deferred compensation plan for non-management directors under which those who are eligible to receive fees or retainers may choose to defer receipt of their compensation. The deferred amounts are converted to stock equivalents. The plan requires settlement in shares of our common stock based on the number of stock equivalents and dividend equivalents at the time of a participant’s separation from the Board of Directors. This plan provides for the issuance of up to 350,000 shares of common stock in connection with the crediting of stock equivalents. There were143,122 shares of common stock available for future issuance under this plan as of September 29, 2019.
Compensation expense — The components of share-based compensation expense, included within “Selling, general, and administrative expenses” in our consolidated statement of earnings, in each fiscal year are as follows (in thousands):
Nonvested restricted stock units — Nonvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are generally issued to executives, non-management directors and certain other members of management and employees. Prior to fiscal 2011, RSUs were granted to certain Executive and Senior Vice Presidents pursuant to our share ownership guidelines. These awards vest upon retirement or termination based on years of service. There were 60,272 of such RSUs outstanding as of September 29, 2019.

2019
2018
2017
Nonvested stock units
$5,458
$5,737
$5,873
Stock options
936
1,790
1,826
Performance share awards
1,417
1,236
2,580
Nonvested restricted stock awards
—
33
88
Non-management directors’ deferred compensation
263
350
270
Total share-based compensation expense
$8,074
$9,146
$10,637


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the total share-based compensation expense between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
341926
1101
1072
17220
-5494
Correct choice index: 2
Note 3. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Contract Assets
Our contract assets consist of capitalized commission costs and upfront payments made to customers. The current portion of capitalized commission costs and upfront payments made to customers are included in other current assets within our consolidated balance sheets. The non-current portion of capitalized commission costs and upfront payments made to customers are reflected in other assets within our consolidated balance sheets. Our amortization of contract assets during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $2.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively. There were no amortized commission costs during the year ended December 31, 2017.
We review the capitalized costs for impairment at least annually. Impairment exists if the carrying amount of the asset recognized from contract costs exceeds the remaining amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing the goods and services to which such asset relates, less the costs that relate directly to providing those good and services and that have not been recognized as an expense. We did not record an impairment loss on our contract assets during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
The changes in our contract assets are as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Beginning of period balance
$2,881
$—
Commission costs and upfront payments to a customer capitalized in period
4,141
4,864
Amortization of contract assets
(2,444)
(1,983)
End of period balance
$4,578
$2,881


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change between the beginning of period balance and end of period balance in 2019?
Choices:
0
437
4576
2
1697
Correct choice index: 4
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500 index" ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor's industrials index ( "s&p industrials index" ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor's consumer durables & apparel index ( "s&p consumer durables & apparel index" ) , from december 31 , 2012 through december 31 , 2017 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 43.94 .
the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .
the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2012 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Masco
$138.48
$155.26
$200.79
$227.08
$318.46
S&P 500 Index
$132.04
$149.89
$151.94
$169.82
$206.49
S&P Industrials Index
$140.18
$153.73
$149.83
$177.65
$214.55
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index
$135.84
$148.31
$147.23
$138.82
$164.39

$ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $ 350.00 masco s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2017?
Choices:
1.4838
4.9718
2.1846
218.46
0.686
Correct choice index: 2
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 .
equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Plan category
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights<sup>(1)</sup> (a)(b)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options,Warrants and Rights<sup>(2)</sup>
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding SecuritiesReflected in Column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
1,424,356
$33.90
4,281,952
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders<sup>(3)</sup>
—
—
—
Total
1,424,356
$33.90
4,281,952

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .
of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .
in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .
( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only .
( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .
item 13 .
certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in the "2011 plan" what was the ratio of the stock option stock option stock to the stock rights
Choices:
9.84291
0.1016
533397
0.00006
479206
Correct choice index: 0
16. Quarterly Financial Data: (unaudited, amount in thousands, except per share data):
During the Company's second quarter of fiscal 2019 and second quarter of fiscal 2018, we recorded $2.3 million and $80.8 million, respectively, primarily related to the legal settlement of several antitrust claims against the Company. Also during the second quarter of fiscal 2018, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was enacted. This resulted in an initial revaluation of our deferred tax liabilities during the third quarter which favorably impacted our results by $35.0 million. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, we completed our analysis of the Act and recorded additional tax benefit of $8.0 million.

Fiscal Year 2019
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Net sales
$340,583
$356,040
$383,993
$280,572
Gross profit
57,128
70,535
82,441
12,755
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
12,406
21,807
39,777
(19,761)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic
$0.26
$0.45
$0.82
$(0.41)
Diluted
$0.26
$0.45
$0.82
$(0.41)
Fiscal Year 2018
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Net sales
$262,845
$361,172
$435,820
$443,095
Gross profit
17,336
82,396
120,098
141,216
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
(15,993)
(26,136)
96,294
71,767
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic
$(0.33)
$(0.54)
$1.99
$1.48
Diluted
$(0.33)
$(0.54)
$1.99
$1.48


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase in the gross profit in 2019 from 1st quarter to 2nd quarter?
Choices:
0
13407000
127663
14639
13407
Correct choice index: 4
Orders at Mobility grew to a record high on a sharp increase in volume from large orders, which the Strategic Company won across the businesses, most notably in the rolling stock and the customer services businesses. Among the major contract wins were a € 1.6 billion order for metro trains in the U. K., a € 1.2 billion contract for high-speed trains including maintenance in Russia, a € 0.8 billion order for trainsets including service in Canada, a € 0.7 billion contract for diesel-electric locomotives including a service agreement in the U. S. and two orders in Germany worth € 0.4 billion and € 0.3 billion, respectively, for regional multiple-unit trainsets. In fiscal 2018, Mobility also gained a number of significant contracts across the regions.
Revenue grew slightly as double-digit growth in the customer services business was largely offset by a decline in the rail infrastructure business. Revenue in the rolling stock business remained close to the prior-year level due to unfavorable timing effects related to the execution of large rail projects, which the business began to ramp up late in the fiscal year. Mobility continued to operate with high profitability in fiscal 2019, including a strong contribution to Adjusted EBITA from the services business. Severance charges were € 20 million, up from € 14 million in fiscal 2018. Mobility’s order backlog was € 33 billion at the end of the fiscal year, of which € 8 billion are expected to be converted into revenue in fiscal 2020.
Order growth reflected overall strong markets for Mobility in fiscal 2019, with different dynamics among the regions. Market development in Europe was characterized by continuing awards of mid-size and large orders, particularly in the U. K., Germany and Austria. Within the C. I. S., large projects for high-speed trains and services were awarded in Russia. Demand in the Middle East and Africa was held back by ongoing uncertainties related to budget constraints and political climates. In the Americas region, stable investment activities were driven by demand for mainline
and urban transport, especially in the U. S. and Canada.
Within the Asia, Australia region, Chinese markets saw ongoing investments in high-speed trains, urban transport, freight logistics and rail infrastructure, while India continues to invest in modernizing the country’s transportation infrastructure. For fiscal 2020, we expect markets served by Mobility to grow moderately with increasing demand for digital solutions. Overall, rail transport and intermodal mobility solutions are expected to remain a focus as urbanization continues to progress around the world. In emerging countries, rising incomes are expected to result in greater demand for public transport solutions.

Fiscal year
% Change
(in millions of €)
2019
2018
Actual
Comp.
Orders
12,894
11,025
17 %
16 %
Revenue
8,916
8,821
1 %
0 %
Adjusted EBITA
983
958
3 %
Adjusted EBITA margin
11.0 %
10.9 %


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average orders for 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
12
6452.5
11959.5
14949.4
934.5
Correct choice index: 2
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as ofSeptember 29, 2019 (in thousands):
(1) Includes mandatory principal and interest payments on our Class A-2 Notes. Amounts are reflected through the anticipated repayment dates as described further above in “Liquidity and capital resources.”
(2)  Includes purchase commitments for food, beverage, and packaging items to support system-wide restaurant operations.
(3)  Includes expected payments associated with our non-qualified defined benefit plan, postretirement healthcare plans and our non-qualified deferred compensation plan through fiscal 2029.
(4)  Consists primarily of letters of credit for interest reserves required under the Indenture and insurance.
We maintain a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (“Qualified Plan”) covering substantially all full-time employees hired before January 1, 2011.  Our policy is to fund our Qualified Plan at amounts necessary to satisfy the minimum amount required by law, plus additional amounts as determined by management to improve the plan’s funded status. Contributions beyond fiscal 2019 will depend on pension asset performance, future interest rates, future tax law changes, and future changes in regulatory funding requirements. Based on the funding status of our Qualified Plan as of our last measurement date, there was no minimum contribution required in 2019. For additional information related to our pension plans, refer to Note 12,Retirement Plans, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Payments Due by Fiscal Year
Less than
Total
1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
After 5 years
Contractual Obligations:
Long-term debt obligations (1)
1,708,916
65,087
115,141
667,245
861,443
Capital lease obligations
3,937
879
1,758
1,260
40
Operating lease obligations
1,094,011
193,313
332,020
205,173
363,505
Purchase commitments (2)
1,906,900
854,100
722,900
308,400
21,500
Benefit obligations (3)
74,714
15,068
13,499
13,533
32,614
Total contractual obligations
$4,788,478
$1,128,447
$1,185,318
$1,195,611
$1,279,102
Other Commercial Commitments:
Stand-by letters of credit (4)
$45,600
$45,600
$—
$—
$—


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the total benefit obligations and total capital lease obligations?
Choices:
-3932
70777
1124510
7077700
78651
Correct choice index: 1
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table summarizes the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which is reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Expressed in US $000's except share and per share amounts

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years ended
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
$
$
Balance, beginning of the year
(12,216)
3,435
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
12,865
(19,821)
Loss on cash flow hedges reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings were as follows:
Cost of revenues
279
255
Sales and marketing
1,538
1,224
Research and development
2,620
2,063
General and administrative
744
628
Tax effect on unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
(4,784)
—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
13,262
(15,651)
Balance, end of the year
1,046
(12,216)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average reclassification of sales and marketing for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1292
157
1381
2762
14
Correct choice index: 2
Subsequent to origination, the delinquency and write-off experience is monitored as key credit quality indicators for the portfolio of device payment plan agreement receivables and fixed-term service plans. The extent of collection efforts with respect to a particular customer are based on the results of proprietary custom empirically derived internal behavioral-scoring models that analyze the customer’s past performance to predict the likelihood of the customer falling further delinquent.
These customer-scoring models assess a number of variables, including origination characteristics, customer account history and payment patterns. Based on the score derived from these models, accounts are grouped by risk category to determine the collection strategy to be applied to such accounts.
Collection performance results and the credit quality of device payment plan agreement receivables are continuously monitored based on a variety of metrics, including aging. An account is considered to be delinquent and in default status if there are unpaid charges remaining on the account on the day after the bill’s due date.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance and aging of the device payment plan agreement receivables on a gross basis was as follows:

2019
2018
Unbilled
$ 22,827
$ 24,282
Billed:
Current
1,286
1,465
Past due
236
271
Device payment plan agreement receivables, gross
$ 24,349
$ 26,018


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average current billed for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
12146
1375.5
12056.5
2749
-1375.5
Correct choice index: 1