trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
The following table provides reconciliation from U.S. GAAP Net income to non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA (amounts in thousands):
(1) Fiscal years ending March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
(2) $0.9 million in costs incurred during fiscal year 2018 related to the relocation of the Company's tantalum powder facility equipment from Carson City, Nevada to its existing Matamoros, Mexico plant were reclassified from “Plant start-up costs” to “Restructuring charges” during fiscal year 2019.

Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net income (U.S. GAAP) (1)
$206,587
$254,127
$47,157
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Income tax expense (benefit)
(39,460)
9,132
4,294
Interest expense, net
19,204
32,073
39,731
Depreciation and amortization
52,628
50,661
38,151
EBITDA (non-GAAP) (1)
238,959
345,993
129,333
Excluding the following items:
Equity (income) loss from equity method investments
3,304
(76,192)
(41,643)
Acquisition (gain) loss
—
(130,880)
—
Change in value of TOKIN options
—
—
(10,700)
(Gain) loss on write down and disposal of long-lived assets
1,660
(992)
10,671
ERP integration costs/IT transition costs
8,813
80
7,045
Stock-based compensation
12,866
7,657
4,720
Restructuring charges (2)
8,779
14,843
5,404
R&D grant reimbursements and grant income
(4,559)
—
—
Legal expenses/fines related to antitrust class actions
11,896
16,636
2,640
Net foreign exchange (gain) loss
(7,230)
13,145
(3,758)
TOKIN investment-related expenses
—
—
1,101
Plant start-up costs (2)
(927)
929
427
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
15,946
486
—
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) (1)
$289,507
$191,705
$105,240


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Net foreign exchange (gain) loss between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
4859
6398
-49398910
16903
-16903
Correct choice index: 3
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis regulatory asset associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , in which entergy mississippi agreed not to pursue recovery of the costs deferred by an mpsc order in the new nuclear generation docket .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation .
net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$5,735
Retail electric price
187
Volume/weather
95
Louisiana business combination customer credits
(107)
MISO deferral
(35)
Waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision
(32)
Other
(14)
2015 net revenue
$5,829

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 formula rate plan increases at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 ; 2022 an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2015 and july 2014 , and new energy efficiency riders at entergy louisiana and entergy mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014 .
energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income ; and 2022 an annual net rate increase at entergy mississippi of $ 16 million , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate and regulatory proceedings .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather .
the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers .
the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination .
consistent with the terms of an agreement with the lpsc , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of net revenue of 2015 is attributed to the growth from to retail electric price?
Choices:
-13.35714
0.03261
0.00003
0.03208
0.0163
Correct choice index: 3
humana inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .
cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .
total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .
we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .
restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .
compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .
the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .
activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Shares
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2006
1,107,455
$45.86
Granted
852,353
63.59
Vested
(51,206)
56.93
Forfeited
(63,624)
49.65
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2007
1,844,978
$53.61

the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .
total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .
we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .
there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for the year ended december 31 , 2007 what was the ratio of the shares granted to the shares vested
Choices:
1
16.64557
-1
0.16646
1420588.33333
Correct choice index: 1
average revenue per car 2008 2007 2006 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 % (  % ) change 2007 v 2006 .

<i></i> <i>Average Revenue per Car</i><i></i>
<i>2008</i>
<i>2007</i>
<i>2006</i>
<i>% Change 2008 v 2007</i>
<i>% Change 2007 v 2006</i>
Agricultural
$3,352
$2,888
$2,584
16 %
12%
Automotive
2,017
1,766
1,710
14
3
Chemicals
2,818
2,464
2,326
14
6
Energy
1,622
1,363
1,285
19
6
Industrial Products
2,620
2,322
2,167
13
7
Intermodal
955
847
813
13
4
Average
$1,848
$1,591
$1,501
16 %
6%

agricultural products 2013 price improvements , fuel surcharges , and volume growth generated higher agricultural freight revenue in 2008 versus 2007 .
strong global demand for grain and a weak dollar drove higher shipments of corn and feed grains and shipments of wheat and food grains for 2008 .
shipments of ethanol , a grain product used as an alternative fuel and fuel additive , and its co- products ( primarily livestock feed ) also increased .
price increases were the primary drivers of agricultural freight revenue in 2007 versus 2006 , partially offset by a decline in volume levels .
shipments of whole grains used in feed declined as barge operators captured more shipments destined for export from the gulf coast due to both favorable barge rates and improved navigation conditions on the mississippi river .
conversely , wheat and food grain shipments improved as a strong wheat crop generated record shipments to the gulf coast for export .
shipments of ethanol and its co-products also increased substantially .
automotive 2013 double-digit declines in shipments of both finished vehicles and auto parts drove freight revenue lower in 2008 compared to 2007 .
price improvements and fuel surcharges partially offset these lower volumes .
the manufacturers experienced poor sales and reduced vehicle production during 2008 due to the recessionary economy , which in turn reduced shipments of finished vehicles and parts .
in addition , a major parts supplier strike reduced volume levels compared to 2007 .
shipments of finished vehicles decreased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2008 versus 2007 .
in 2007 , price increases drove the growth in automotive revenue , partially offset by lower finished vehicle shipments versus 2006 .
a decline in vehicle production levels primarily drove the volume decline .
conversely , automotive parts shipments grew due to increased volumes from domestic manufacturers , new business acquired in the middle of 2006 , and our new intermodal train service between mexico and michigan .
2008 agricultural revenue 2008 automotive revenue .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2008 what was the ratio of the average revenue per car for the agriculture products to energy
Choices:
2.06658
1.78052
176.42105
1
206.65845
Correct choice index: 0
entergy arkansas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .
2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$1,216.7
Retail electric price
31.0
ANO decommissioning trust
26.4
Transmission revenue
13.1
Volume/weather
(15.9)
Net wholesale revenue
(11.9)
Capacity acquisition recovery
(10.3)
Other
3.2
2011 net revenue
$1,252.3

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .
the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .
the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent increase in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Choices:
1
0.02926
0.02843
-1.00978
1.14839
Correct choice index: 1
transfer agent and registrar for common stock the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is : computershare shareowner services llc 480 washington boulevard 29th floor jersey city , new jersey 07310 telephone : ( 877 ) 363-6398 sales of unregistered securities not applicable .
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2015 to december 31 , 2015 .
total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

Total Number ofShares (or Units)Purchased<sup>1</sup>
Average Price Paidper Share (or Unit)<sup>2</sup>
Total Number ofShares (or Units)Purchased as Part ofPublicly AnnouncedPlans or Programs<sup>3</sup>
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs<sup>3</sup>
October 1 - 31
2,140,511
$20.54
2,139,507
$227,368,014
November 1 - 30
1,126,378
$22.95
1,124,601
$201,557,625
December 1 - 31
1,881,992
$22.97
1,872,650
$158,553,178
Total
5,148,881
$21.96
5,136,758

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .
we repurchased 1004 withheld shares in october 2015 , 1777 withheld shares in november 2015 and 9342 withheld shares in december 2015 .
2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program .
3 in february 2015 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2015 share repurchase program 201d ) .
on february 12 , 2016 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock .
the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2015 share repurchase program .
there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the average number of total shares purchased in october and november?
Choices:
1
6806
1633444.5
16334.4
3266889
Correct choice index: 2
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc .
under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing .
the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group .
the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc .
the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims .
many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking .
the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any .
the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only .
they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock .
s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

5/9/2013
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
Q
$100
$110
$140
$163
$181
Peer Group
$100
$116
$143
$151
$143
S&P 500
$100
$114
$127
$126
$138

item 6 .
selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the return on investment for q if the investment is sold at the end of year 2014?
Choices:
40
0.4
0.3
0.1
140
Correct choice index: 1
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d .
the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2015 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 78.97 .
holders there were 28 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2015 .
dividend policy during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.16 per share , $ 0.13 per share and $ 0.11 per share , respectively .
on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share .
in january 2015 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.20 per share payable on february 26 , 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 12 , 2015 .
any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors .
the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual obligations , legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to their respective parent entities , and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant .
recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .

2014:
High
Low
January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014
$67.16
$57.99
April 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014
$59.65
$50.30
July 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014
$62.05
$47.50
October 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014
$73.25
$61.15
2013:
High
Low
January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2013
$41.85
$34.79
April 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013
$47.80
$37.09
July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013
$61.47
$47.59
October 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013
$70.60
$61.34

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by how much did the high of mktx stock increase from april 12 , 2014 to march 31 , 2014?
Choices:
20.1259
7.51
0.1259
0.1228
0.1836
Correct choice index: 2
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 8 — Costs Associated with Exit and Restructuring Activities
2016 Plan
In June 2016, we announced plans to restructure operations by phasing out production at our Elkhart, IN facility and transitioning it into a research and development center supporting our global operations ("June 2016 Plan"). Additional organizational changes were also implemented in various other locations. In 2017, we revised this plan to include an additional $1,100 in planned costs related to the relocation of our corporate headquarters in Lisle, IL and our plant in Bolingbrook, IL, both of which have now been consolidated into a single facility. Restructuring charges under this plan, which is substantially complete, were $4,284, $4,559, and $4,139 during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The total restructuring liability related to the June 2016 Plan was $233 and $668 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Any additional costs related to line movements, equipment charges, and other costs will be expensed as incurred.
The following table displays the restructuring charges associated with the June 2016 Plan as well as a summary of the actual costs incurred through December 31, 2019:
(1) Other charges include the effects of currency translation, travel, legal and other charges.

June 2016 Plan
Planned Costs
Actual costs incurred through December 31, 2019
Workforce reduction
$3,075
$3,340
Building and equipment relocation
9,025
10,534
Asset impairment charge
—
1,168
Other charges (1)
1,300
988
Restructuring charges
$13,400
$16,030


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between the planned costs and actual costs incurred for Building and Equipment Relocation?
Choices:
-4466
19559
-8037
1509
9546
Correct choice index: 3
The following table presents franchise revenues and costs in each fiscal year and other information we believe is useful in analyzing the change in franchise operating results (dollars in thousands):
Franchise rental revenues increased $13.8 million, or 5.3%, in 2019 versus a year ago due primarily to an increase in the number of franchised restaurants and, to a lesser extent, an increase in franchise same-store sales. The increase in the number of restaurants leased or subleased from the Company due to our refranchising strategy, contributed additional rental revenues of $12.4 million in 2019.

2019
2018
Franchise rental revenues
$272,815
$259,047
Royalties
163,047
155,939
Franchise fees and other
6,764
6,646
Franchise royalties and other
169,811
162,585
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services
170,674
—
Total franchise revenues
$613,300
$421,632
Franchise occupancy expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization)
$166,584
$158,319
Franchise support and other costs
12,110
11,593
Franchise advertising and other services expenses
178,093
—
Total franchise costs
$356,787
$169,912
Franchise costs as a % of total franchise revenues
58.2%
40.3%
Average number of franchise restaurants
2,081
2,028
% increase
2.6%
Franchised restaurant sales
$3,167,920
$3,018,067
Franchise restaurant AUV
$1,523
$1,488
Increase in franchise-operated same-store sales
1.3%
0.1%
Royalties as a percentage of total franchise restaurant sales
5.1%
5.2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the total franchise revenues between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
450253
-265693
-229964
191668
1034932
Correct choice index: 3