trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Disaggregation of Revenue
The tables below present the Company’s revenue disaggregated by type of revenue. Refer to Note 13, Reportable Segment Information, for disaggregated revenue by type and reportable segment. The majority of the Company’s revenue is earned domestically, with revenue from customers outside the United States comprising less than 1% of total revenue.

Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Processing
$594,202
$550,058
$506,555
Outsourcing & Cloud
405,359
361,922
327,738
Product Delivery & Services
231,982
251,743
256,794
In-House Support
321,148
307,074
297,203
Services & Support
958,489
920,739
$881,735
Total Revenue
$1,552,691
$1,470,797
$1,388,290


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between the average processing revenue and the average outsourcing & cloud revenue for 2018-2019?
Choices:
572130
94244.8
-73353597869
188489.5
572127.4
Correct choice index: 3
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding at fiscal year-end are summarized in U.S. dollar equivalents as follows (in millions):
At July 27, 2019 and July 28, 2018, we had no option contracts outstanding.
We conduct business globally in numerous currencies. The direct effect of foreign currency fluctuations on revenue has not been material because our revenue is primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. However, if the U.S. dollar strengthens relative to other currencies, such strengthening could have an indirect effect on our revenue to the extent it raises the cost of our products to non-U.S. customers and thereby reduces demand. A weaker U.S. dollar could have the opposite effect. However, the precise indirect effect of currency fluctuations is difficult to measure or predict because our revenue is influenced by many factors in addition to the impact of such currency fluctuations
Approximately 70% of our operating expenses are U.S.-dollar denominated. In fiscal 2019, foreign currency fluctuations, net of hedging, decreased our combined R&D, sales and marketing, and G&A expenses by approximately $233 million, or 1.3%, as compared with fiscal 2018. In fiscal 2018, foreign currency fluctuations, net of hedging, increased our combined R&D, sales and marketing, and G&A expenses by approximately $93 million, or 0.5%, as compared with fiscal 2017. To reduce variability in operating expenses and service cost of sales caused by non-U.S.-dollar denominated operating expenses and costs, we may hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions with currency options and forward contracts. These hedging programs are not designed to provide foreign currency protection over long time horizons. In designing a specific hedging approach, we consider several factors, including offsetting exposures, significance of exposures, costs associated with entering into a particular hedge instrument, and potential effectiveness of the hedge. The gains and losses on foreign exchange contracts mitigate the effect of currency movements on our operating expenses and service cost of sales.
We also enter into foreign exchange forward and option contracts to reduce the short-term effects of foreign currency fluctuations on receivables and payables that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies of the entities. The market risks associated with these foreign currency receivables, investments, and payables relate primarily to variances from our forecasted foreign currency transactions and balances. We do not enter into foreign exchange forward or option contracts for speculative purposes

July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
Notional Amount
Fair Value
Notional Amount
Fair Value
Forward contracts:
Purchased
$2,239
$14
$1,850
$(2)
Sold
$1,441
$(14)
$845
$2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the fair value of sold forward contracts between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-859
-12
16
-14
-16
Correct choice index: 4
Loss per share
Basic loss per share are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings/loss per share reflect the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards. Included in the weighted average shares outstanding is the share consideration in connection with the Restaurant Magic Acquisition (See Note 2 - Acquisitions) in the amount of 908,192 for the period after the close of the transaction. The shares were issued in January 2020, however, no contingencies existed as of the date of the acquisition.
The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding for the basic and diluted loss per share computations (in thousands, except share and per share data):
At December 31, 2019 and 2018 there were 383,000 and 750,000 incremental shares, respectively, from the assumed exercise of stock options that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because of the anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share. There were 308,000 restricted stock awards excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the fiscal year ended 2019 and 113,000 for the fiscal year ended 2018.

2019
2018
Net Loss
$(15,571)
$(24,122)
Basic:
Weighted average shares outstanding at beginning of year
16,041
15,949
Weighted average shares issued during the year, net
182
92
Weighted average common shares, basic
16,223
16,041
Loss from per common share, basic
$(0.96)
$(1.50)
Diluted:
Weighted average common shares, basic
16,223
16,041
Dilutive impact of stock options and restricted stock awards
—
—
Weighted average common shares, diluted
16,223
16,041
Loss per common share, diluted
$ (0.96)
$ (1.50)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Net Loss for December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
12062
0
19.8
15571
19846.5
Correct choice index: 4
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables .
goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments .
each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation .
there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment .
the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

Reporting Unit
December 31, 2011
U.S. Brokerage
$1,751.2
Capital Markets
142.4
Retail Bank
40.6
Total goodwill
$1,934.2

in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 .
the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations .
we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization .
effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary .
estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons .
if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner .
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives .
if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. as of december 31 , what was percent of the capital markets goodwill to the total
Choices:
0.07362
1
-1791.8
0.08132
13.58287
Correct choice index: 0
d) Transaction with other related parties:
Net revenues/(expenses): The transactions with other related parties for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:
(i) The Cool Pool - On July 8, 2019 GasLog's vessel charter contracts had concluded and withdrew their participation from the Cool Pool. Following Gaslog's departure, we assumed sole responsibility for the management of the Cool Pool and consolidate the Cool Pool. From point of consolidation, the Cool Pool ceased to be a related party.
(ii) Magni Partners - Tor Olav Trøim is the founder of, and partner in, Magni Partners (Bermuda) Limited, a privately held Bermuda company, and is the ultimate beneficial owner of the company. Receivables and payables from Magni Partners comprise primarily of the cost (without mark-up) or part cost of personnel employed by Magni Partners who have providedadvisory and management services to Golar. These costs do not include any payment for any services provided by Tor Olav Trøim himself.
iii) Borr Drilling - Tor Olav Trøim is the founder, and director of Borr Drilling, a Bermuda company listed on the Oslo and NASDAQ stock exchanges. Receivables comprise primarily of management and administrative services provided by our Bermuda corporate office.
iv) 2020 Bulkers - 2020 Bulkers is a related party by virtue of common directorships. Receivables comprise primarily of management and administrative services provided by our Bermuda corporate office.

(in thousands of $)
2019
2018
2017
The Cool Pool (i)
39,666
151,152
59,838
Magni Partners (ii)
(858)
(375)
(260)
Borr Drilling (iii)
542
—
—
2020 Bulkers (iv)
265
—
—
Total
39,615
150,777
59,578


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total transaction with other related parties from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
39990
-111162
111162
-111
Correct choice index: 2
Pro forma consolidated results of operations
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents combined results of operations for each of the periods presented as if the acquisitions of MOI and GP had been completed on January 1, 2018. The pro forma information includes adjustments to depreciation expense for property and equipment acquired and amortization expense for the intangible assets acquired and the elimination of transaction expenses recognized in each period. Transaction-related expenses associated with the acquisition and excluded from pro forma income from continuing operations were $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no transaction-related expenses associated with the acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2018. The pro forma data are for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations or the combined business had the acquisitions of MOI and GP occurred on January 1, 2018, or the results of future operations of the combined business. For instance, planned or expected operational synergies following the acquisition are not reflected in the pro forma information. Consequently, actual results will differ from the unaudited pro forma information presented below.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
(unaudited) 
(unaudited)
Revenue
$72,576,902
$60,249,896
Income from continuing operations
$6,912,802
$1,559,008


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Revenue for December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
85
66413399
30124948
1
60249896
Correct choice index: 1
part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .

Issued
In Treasury
Shares Outstanding
Balance, January 1, 2007
1,334
(156)
1,178
Shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged
–
14
14
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
–
2
2
Stock repurchase program
–
(16)
(16)
Issued on conversions of debentures
–
18
18
Balance, December 31, 2007
1,334
(138)
1,196
Shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged
–
5
5
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
–
2
2
Stock repurchase program
–
(21)
(21)
Issued on conversions of debentures
–
12
12
Balance, December 31, 2008
1,334
(140)
1,194
Shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged
–
4
4
Vesting of restricted stock
–
1
1
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
–
4
4
Stock repurchase program
–
(8)
(8)
Balance, December 31, 2009
1,334
(139)
1,195

see the notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how many shares were repurchased in this period?
Choices:
45
40000000
45000000.0
3000000
-44999979
Correct choice index: 2
s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s .
dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Direct Amount
Ceded To Other Companies
Assumed From Other Companies
Net Amount
Percentage of Amount Assumed to Net
2008
$16,087
$6,144
$3,260
$13,203
25%
2007
$14,673
$5,834
$3,458
$12,297
28%
2006
$13,562
$5,198
$3,461
$11,825
29%

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate of net amount from 2007 to 2008?
Choices:
0.10287
0.07368
-0.73489
73676.50646
0.06862
Correct choice index: 1
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a) Cisco common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CSCO. Information regarding quarterly cash dividends declared on Cisco’s common stock during fiscal 2019 and 2018 may be found in Supplementary Financial Data on page 106 of this report. There were 39,216 registered shareholders as of August 30, 2019.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Issuer purchases of equity securities (in millions, except per-share amounts):
On September 13, 2001, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program. On February 13, 2019, our Board of Directors authorized a $15 billion increase to the stock repurchase program. As of July 27, 2019, the remaining authorized amount for stock repurchases under this program, including the additional authorization, is approximately $13.5 billion with no termination date.
For the majority of restricted stock units granted, the number of shares issued on the date the restricted stock units vest is net of shares withheld to meet applicable tax withholding requirements. Although these withheld shares are not issued or considered common stock repurchases under our stock repurchase program and therefore are not included in the preceding table, they are treated as common stock repurchases in our financial statements as they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting (see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 28, 2019 to May 25, 2019
42
$54.33
42
$15,700
May 26, 2019 to June 22, 2019
22
$55.07
22
$14,465
June 23, 2019 to July 27, 2019
18
$56.46
18
$13,460
Total
82
$54.99
82


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of Average Price Paid per Share in the three period?
Choices:
-0.22
50.93
55.53
55.29
55286.67
Correct choice index: 3
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees for professional audit services and other services rendered to our company by KPMG for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018.
(1) Audit Fees consist of professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including audited financial statements presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018 and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.
(2) Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for professional services for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services could include accounting consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, due diligence procedures in connection with acquisition and procedures related to other attestation services.
(3) Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include consultation on tax matters and assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance.
(4) All Other Fees consist of license fees for the use of accounting research software.

2017
2018
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Audit Fees (1)
$3,747
$4,476
Audit-Related Fees (2)
—
—
Tax Fees (3)
—
—
All Other Fees (4)
$3
$3
Total Fees
$3,750
$4,479


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average total fees paid to KPMG from 2017 to 2018?
Choices:
4479
8227
-2057.2
8229
4114.5
Correct choice index: 4
Note 13 Contract costs
The table below provides a reconciliation of the contract costs balance.
Contract costs are amortized over a period ranging from 12 to 84 months.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
2019
2018
Opening balance, January 1
707
636
Incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs
602
567
Amortization included in operating costs
(523)
(477)
Impairment charges included in operating costs
(3)
(19)
Ending balance, December 31
783
707


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs in 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
567
3500
35
1079
-586
Correct choice index: 2
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Amount (In Thousands)
2009
$47,760
2010
48,569
2011
49,437
2012
49,959
2013
50,546
Years thereafter
103,890
Total
350,161
Less: Amount representing interest
54,857
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$295,304

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent lower is the net present than the total payments value of lease payments?
Choices:
0.01186
1.18576
415208.48319
103403943944
0.16918
Correct choice index: 1
PREPAYMENTS, DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Note: (a) As at 31 December 2019, the balances of loans to investees and investees’ shareholders are mainly repayable within a period of one to five years (included in non-current assets), or within one year (included in current assets), and are interest-bearing at rates of not higher than 12.0% per annum (31 December 2018: not higher than 12.0% per annum).
(b) Running royalty fees for online games comprised prepaid royalty fees, unamortised running royalty fees and deferred Online Service Fees.
As at 31 December 2019, the carrying amounts of deposits and other assets (excludes prepayments and refundable value-added tax) approximated their fair values. Deposits and other assets were neither past due nor impaired.

As at 31 December
2019
2018
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
Included in non-current assets:
Prepayments for media contents
15,731
13,652
Loans to investees and investees’ shareholders (Note (a))
937
3,864
Prepayments for capital investments in investees
587
619
Running royalty fees for online games (Note (b))
564
99
Others
5,623
3,297
23,442
21,531
Included in current assets:
Running royalty fees for online games (Note (b))
10,888
5,230
Prepayments and prepaid expenses
8,353
7,532
Interest receivables
2,774
1,697
Lease deposits and other deposits
1,107
693
Dividend and other investment-related receivables
1,034
338
Refundable value-added tax
629
915
Loans to investees and investees’ shareholders (Note (a))
447
225
Others
2,608
1,863
27,840
18,493
51,282
40,024


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much did the prepayments for media contents change by between 2018 year end and 2019 year end?
Choices:
29383
15731
2079
-2079
-13652
Correct choice index: 2
(1) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued operations. For further details, please consult the "Accounting policies" and "Discontinued operations" sections.
(2) The non-controlling interest represents a participation of 21% in Atlantic Broadband's results by Caisse de dépot et placement du Québec ("CDPQ"), effective since the MetroCast acquisition on January 4, 2018.
Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter profit for the period from continuing operations and profit for the period from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Corporation increased by 21.8% and 20.8%, respectively, as a result of: • higher adjusted EBITDA; and • the decrease in financial expense.
Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter profit for the period and profit for the period attributable to owners of the Corporation increased by 26.1% and 25.2%, respectively, mainly due to a profit for the period from discontinued operations of $1.9 million due to working capital adjustments during the fourth quarter related to the sale of Cogeco Peer 1 compared to a loss for the period from discontinued operations of $1.1 million for the comparable period of the prior year in addition to the elements mentioned above.

Three months ended August 31,
2019
2018(2)
Change
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages and earnings per share)
$
$
%
Profit for the period from continuing operations
92,403
75,870
21.8
Profit for the period
94,323
74,818
26.1
Profit for the period from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Corporation
87,850
72,753
20.8
Profit for the period attributable to owners of the Corporation
89,770
71,701
25.2
Profit for the period from continuing operations attributable to non-controlling interest(2)
4,553
3,117
46.1
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
1.78
1.48
20.3
Basic earnings per share
1.82
1.45
25.5


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Profit for the period from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Corporation from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
21570
1
87852
16149
15097
Correct choice index: 4
The following table summarizes information regarding shares of common stock granted and vested (in thousands, except per common stock amounts):
As of December 31, 2019, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of actual forfeitures, related to nonvested common stock. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.2 years.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Number of shares of common stock granted
16
16
13
Weighted average grant-date fair value per common stock
$29.10
$28.48
$30.49
Fair value of common stock vested
$320
$315
$334
Cash used to settle the obligation
$366
$804
$1,134


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in Fair value of common stock vested in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
1.56
0.25
1.59
158.73
100
Correct choice index: 2