trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
entergy new orleans , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue .
2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 .
the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

(In Millions)
2003 net revenue
$208.3
Base rates
10.6
Volume/weather
8.3
2004 deferrals
7.5
Price applied to unbilled electric sales
3.7
Other
0.6
2004 net revenue
$239.0

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 .
the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector .
the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors .
the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 .
the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset .
the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively .
the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements .
the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Choices:
6394.81
0.14738
1.10754
147383.58137
-0.14738
Correct choice index: 1
Debt
Our funding requirements are continually monitored and we execute our strategies to manage the overall asset and liability profile. Additionally, we maintain sufficient flexibility to access global funding sources as needed.
Total debt of $62,899 million increased $17,087 million from December 31, 2018, driven by issuances of $32,415 million; partially offset by debt maturities of $12,673 million and a decrease in commercial paper of $2,691 million.
Non-Global Financing debt of $38,173 million increased $23,587 million from prior year-end levels primarily driven by issuances to fund the Red Hat acquisition.
Global Financing debt of $24,727 million decreased $6,500 million from December 31, 2018, primarily due to the wind down of OEM IT commercial financing operations.
Global Financing provides financing predominantly for IBM’s external client assets, as well as for assets under contract by other IBM units. These assets, primarily for GTS, generate long-term, stable revenue streams similar to the Global Financing asset portfolio. Based on their attributes, these GTS assets are leveraged with the balance of the Global Financing asset base.
The debt used to fund Global Financing assets is composed of intercompany loans and external debt. Total debt changes generally correspond with the level of client and commercial financing receivables, the level of cash and cash equivalents, the change in intercompany and external payables and the change in intercompany investment from IBM. The terms of the intercompany loans are set by the company to substantially match the term, currency and interest rate variability underlying the financing receivable and are based on arm’s-length pricing. The Global Financing debt-to-equity ratio remained at 9 to 1 at December 31, 2019.
As previously stated, we measure Global Financing as a stand-alone entity, and accordingly, interest expense relating to debt supporting Global Financing’s external client and internal business is included in the “Global Financing Results of Operations” and in note D, “Segments.” In the Consolidated Income Statement, the external debt-related interest expense supporting Global Financing’s internal financing to IBM is reclassified from cost of financing to interest expense.

($ in millions)
At December 31:
2019
2018
Total company debt
$62,899
$45,812
Total Global Financing segment debt
$24,727
$31,227
Debt to support external clients
21,487
27,536
Debt to support internal clients
3,239
3,690
Non-Global Financing debt
38,173
14,585


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the total company debt from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
-7639
19778
-13397
17087
Correct choice index: 4
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Measurement PointDecember 31
Booking Holdings Inc.
NASDAQComposite Index
S&P 500Index
RDG InternetComposite
2012
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
2013
187.37
141.63
132.39
163.02
2014
183.79
162.09
150.51
158.81
2015
205.51
173.33
152.59
224.05
2016
236.31
187.19
170.84
235.33
2017
280.10
242.29
208.14
338.52

sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 .
the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election .
in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) .
the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage difference between booking holdings inc . and the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 2017?
Choices:
0.7196
108.14
-1.6656
1.801
0.8763
Correct choice index: 0
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
LKQ Corporation
$100
$140
$219
$187
$197
$204
S&P 500 Index
$100
$113
$147
$164
$163
$178
Peer Group
$100
$111
$140
$177
$188
$217

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .
information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative return for lkq corporation and the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 12/31/2016?
Choices:
-0.27
0.04
0.66
0.15
0.26
Correct choice index: 4
Assumptions
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost and projected benefit obligation for the plans for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
(1) The expected return on plan assets assumption used in calculating net periodic benefit cost is based on historical return experience and estimates of future long-term performance with consideration to the expected investment mix of the plan.
(2) The discount rate is used to state expected cash flows relating to future benefits at a present value on the measurement date. This rate represents the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments whose timing would match the cash outflow of retirement benefits. Other assumptions include demographic factors such as retirement, mortality and turnover.

Pension
2019
2018
2017
Net periodic benefit cost:
Expected long-term return on plan assets(1)
3.6%
3.8%
3.3%
Rate of compensation increase
4.4%
3.3%
2.7%
Discount rate
2.2%
2.1%
1.9%
Projected benefit obligation:
Expected long-term return on plan assets
2.0%
3.6%
4.0%
Rate of compensation increase
4.3%
4.4%
4.4%
Discount rate(2)
1.7%
2.2%
2.3%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in the net periodic benefit cost rate of compensation increase between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
3.3
0
600000
-0.6
0.6
Correct choice index: 4
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 7 .
dispositions outside-operated norwegian properties 2013 on october 31 , 2008 , we closed the sale of our norwegian outside-operated properties and undeveloped offshore acreage in the heimdal area of the norwegian north sea for net proceeds of $ 301 million , with a pretax gain of $ 254 million as of december 31 , 2008 .
pilot travel centers 2013 on october 8 , 2008 , we completed the sale of our 50 percent ownership interest in ptc .
sale proceeds were $ 625 million , with a pretax gain on the sale of $ 126 million .
immediately preceding the sale , we received a $ 75 million partial redemption of our ownership interest from ptc that was accounted for as a return of investment .
operated irish properties 2013 on december 17 , 2008 , we agreed to sell our operated properties located in ireland for proceeds of $ 180 million , before post-closing adjustments and cash on hand at closing .
closing is subject to completion of the necessary administrative processes .
as of december 31 , 2008 , operating assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale , as disclosed by major class in the following table : ( in millions ) 2008 .

<i>(In millions)</i>
2008
Current assets
$164
Noncurrent assets
103
Total assets
267
Current liabilities
62
Noncurrent liabilities
199
Total liabilities
261
Net assets held for sale
$6

8 .
discontinued operations on june 2 , 2006 , we sold our russian oil exploration and production businesses in the khanty-mansiysk region of western siberia .
under the terms of the agreement , we received $ 787 million for these businesses , plus preliminary working capital and other closing adjustments of $ 56 million , for a total transaction value of $ 843 million .
proceeds net of transaction costs and cash held by the russian businesses at the transaction date totaled $ 832 million .
a gain on the sale of $ 243 million ( $ 342 million before income taxes ) was reported in discontinued operations for 2006 .
income taxes on this gain were reduced by the utilization of a capital loss carryforward .
exploration and production segment goodwill of $ 21 million was allocated to the russian assets and reduced the reported gain .
adjustments to the sales price were completed in 2007 and an additional gain on the sale of $ 8 million ( $ 13 million before income taxes ) was recognized .
the activities of the russian businesses have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for 2006 .
revenues applicable to discontinued operations were $ 173 million and pretax income from discontinued operations was $ 45 million for 2006. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is working capital for 2008?
Choices:
102.0
226
10168
111
0
Correct choice index: 0
Hotels sales improvement in the second half was driven by Bars, Food and Accommodation, benefitting from venue refurbishments completed in the year.
Hotels sales increased by 3.7% in F19 or 1.8% on a normalised basis. Comparable sales increased by 1.9% with 3.0% growth in Q4. Sales growth accelerated in the second half due to continued growth in Bars, Food and Accommodation benefitting from venue refurbishments with 49 completed during the year. Gaming sales continue to be more subdued, particularly in Victoria. During the year, five venues were opened or acquired with 328 hotels at year‐end.
Normalised gross profit declined by 54 bps reflecting business mix and increasing input cost prices on Food margins. CODB was well controlled and declined by 18 bps on a normalised basis.
EBIT of $261 million decreased by 0.5% on a normalised basis reflecting a weaker first half trading performance. Normalised EBIT in the second half increased by 1.3%.
Normalised ROFE decreased by 38 bps due to an increase in funds employed driven by refurbishments and acquisitions of hotels.

F19
F18
$ MILLION
53 WEEKS
52 WEEKS
CHANGE
CHANGE NORMALISED
Sales
1,671
1,612
3.7%
1.8%
EBITDA
372
361
3.5%
2.5%
Depreciation and amortisation
(111)
(102)
9.9%
9.9%
EBIT
261
259
1.0%
(0.5)%
Gross margin (%)
83.6
84.2
(55) bps
(54) bps
Cost of doing business (%)
68.0
68.1
(12) bps
(18) bps
EBIT to sales (%)
15.6
16.1
(43) bps
(35) bps
Funds employed
2,068
1,995
3.7%
ROFE (%)
12.9
13.1
(20) bps
(38) bps


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the nominal difference in EBITDA between F19 and F18?
Choices:
-361
11
0
134292
733
Correct choice index: 1
This section presents the Group’s contractual obligation to make a payment in the future in relation to purchases of property, plant and equipment, and lease commitments.
Capital expenditure and operating lease commitments of the Group at the reporting date are as follows:
The commitments set out above do not include contingent turnover rentals, which are charged on many retail premises leased by the Group. These rentals are calculated as a percentage of the turnover of the store occupying the premises, with the percentage and turnover threshold at which the additional rentals commence varying with each lease agreement.
The Group leases retail premises and warehousing facilities which are generally for periods up to 40 years. The operating lease commitments include leases for the Norwest office and distribution centres. Generally the lease agreements are for initial terms of between five and 25 years and most include multiple renewal options for additional five to 10-year terms. Under most leases, the Group is responsible for property taxes, insurance, maintenance, and expenses related to the leased properties. However, many of the more recent lease agreements have been negotiated on a gross or semi-gross basis, which eliminates or significantly reduces the Group’s exposure to operational charges associated with the properties.
From 1 July 2019, the Group adopted AASB 16 Leases and as a result the operating lease commitments set out above have been recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, with the exception of the service component of lease payments. Refer to Note 1.2.6 for a reconciliation between the operating lease commitments at 30 June 2019 and the lease liabilities recognised at 1 July 2019.

2019
2018
$M
$M
Capital expenditure commitments
Estimated capital expenditure under firm contracts, payable:
Not later than one year
398
416
Later than one year, not later than two years
–
–
Later than two years, not later than five years
–
–
Total capital expenditure commitments
398
416
Operating lease commitments
Future minimum rentals under non-cancellable operating leases, payable:
Not later than one year
1,998
2,089
Later than one year, not later than five years
7,415
7,484
Later than five years
12,378
13,331
Total operating lease commitments
21,791
22,904
Total commitments for expenditure
22,189
23,320


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average total commitments for expenditures for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
45507
22546.5
23320
-22754.5
22754.5
Correct choice index: 4
The differences between income tax expense (benefit) at the Company’s effective income tax rate and income tax
expense at the statutory federal income tax rate were as follows:
In December 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”), which among other matters reduced the United States corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. In fiscal 2018, the Company recorded a $43 million tax benefit primarily related to the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Federal and state income taxes of $36.5 million, $2.1 million, and $3.7 million were paid in fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Federal and state income taxes of $418,000, $47.2 million, and $17.6 million were refunded in fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company measures the tax benefits recognized based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. As of June 1, 2019, there were no uncertain tax positions that resulted in any adjustment to the Company’s provision for income taxes.
We are under audit by the IRS for the fiscal years 2013 through 2015. We are subject to income tax in many jurisdictions within the U.S., and certain jurisdictions are under audit by state and local tax authorities. The resolutions of these audits are not expected to be material to our consolidated financial statements. Tax periods for all years beginning with fiscal year 2013 remain open to examination by federal and state taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.

Fiscal year end
June 1, 2019
June 2, 2018
June 3, 2017
Statutory federal income tax (benefit)
$14,694
$34,105
$(39,950)
State income tax (benefit)
2,164
3,200
(3,193)
Domestic manufacturers deduction
—
(2,545)
4,095
Enacted rate change
—
(42,973)
—
Tax exempt interest income
(197)
(101)
(206)
Other, net
(918)
(545)
(613)
$15,743
$(8,859)
$(39,867)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the Statutory federal income tax (benefit) from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-42964
-74055
-19411
-18362
0
Correct choice index: 2
Summarized 100% statement of financial position information for ASMPT equity method investment excluding basis adjustments (foreign currency exchange rate per December 31, 2019 was 1 HK$: €0.11432 for December 31, 2018: 1 HK$: €0.11151).
Equity of ASMPT per December 31, 2019 translated into euros at a rate of 0.11432 was €1,329 million (our 25.19% share: €335 million).
The ASMPT Board is responsible for ongoing monitoring of the performance of the Back-end activities. The actual results of the Back-end operating unit are discussed with the ASMPT Audit Committee, which includes the representative of ASMI. The ASMI representative reports to the ASMI Management Board and the Audit Committee of ASMI on a quarterly basis.
Our share of income taxes incurred directly by the associates is reported in result from investments in associates and as such is not included in income taxes in our consolidated financial statements.

December 31,
(HK$ million)
2018
2019
Current assets
15,168
13,381
Non-current assets
5,907
7,464
Current liabilities
7,792
4,432
Non-current liabilities
1,122
4,781
Equity
12,161
11,632


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the current liability to current assets ratio for 2019?
Choices:
-0.33
0.36
13380.67
0.33
0
Correct choice index: 3
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

2007
High
Low
Quarter ended March 31
$41.31
$36.63
Quarter ended June 30
43.84
37.64
Quarter ended September 30
45.45
36.34
Quarter ended December 31
46.53
40.08
2006
High
Low
Quarter ended March 31
$32.68
$26.66
Quarter ended June 30
35.75
27.35
Quarter ended September 30
36.92
29.98
Quarter ended December 31
38.74
35.21

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse .
as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders .
dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock .
we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .
the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .
the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .
in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization .
for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?
Choices:
-0.20653
-0.17387
-0.178
0.01775
-0.21046
Correct choice index: 1
Interest and Other Income (Loss), Net
Interest Income (Expense), Net The following table summarizes interest income and interest expense (in millions):
Interest income decreased, driven by a decrease in the average balance of cash and available-for-sale debt investments. The decrease in interest expense was driven by a lower average debt balance, partially offset by the impact of higher effective interest rates.

Years Ended
2019 vs. 2018
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
July 29, 2017
Variance in Dollars
Interest income
$1,308
$1,508
$1,338
$(200)
Interest expense
(859)
(943)
(861)
84
Interest income (expense), net
$449
$565
$477
$(116)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Interest expense between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
82
-1508
-82
-1
-1804
Correct choice index: 2