trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc .
class b common stock and the walt disney company .
the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 .
december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

December 31,2008
December 31,2009
December 31,2010
December 31,2011
December 31,2012
DISCA
$102.53
$222.09
$301.96
$296.67
$459.67
DISCB
$78.53
$162.82
$225.95
$217.56
$327.11
DISCK
$83.69
$165.75
$229.31
$235.63
$365.63
S&P 500
$74.86
$92.42
$104.24
$104.23
$118.21
Peer Group
$68.79
$100.70
$121.35
$138.19
$190.58

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the 5 year average total return for the a and c series of stock?\\n\\n\\n
Choices:
346.37
297.47
6.76
692.74
0
Correct choice index: 0
The following tables present the recorded investment by portfolio segment and by class, excluding commercial financing receivables and other miscellaneous financing receivables at December 31, 2019 and 2018. Commercial financing receivables are excluded from the presentation of financing receivables by portfolio segment, as they are short term in nature and the current estimated risk of loss and resulting impact to the company’s financing results are not material.
Write-offs of lease receivables and loan receivables were $16 million and $47 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Provisions for credit losses recorded for lease receivables and loan receivables were a release of $6 million and an addition of $2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The average recorded investment of impaired leases and loans for Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific was $138 million, $49 million and $45 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Both interest income recognized, and interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired leases and loans were immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2019.

($ in millions)
At December 31, 2019:
Americas
EMEA
Asia Pacific
Total
Recorded investment:
Lease receivables
$ 3,419
$1,186
$  963
$ 5,567
Loan receivables
6,726
3,901
2,395
13,022
Ending balance
$10,144
$5,087
$3,359
$18,590
Recorded investment, collectively evaluated for impairment
$10,032
$5,040
$3,326
$18,399
Recorded investment, individually evaluated for impairment
$   112
$   47
$   32
$   191
Allowance for credit losses
Beginning balance at January 1, 2019
Lease receivables
$    53
$   22
$   24
$     99
Loan receivables
105
43
32
179
Total
$   158
$   65
$   56
$   279
Write-offs
(42)
(3)
(18)
(63)
Recoveries
1
0
1
2
Provision
5
(7)
(3)
(5)
Other*
(1)
0
(1)
(2)
Ending balance at December 31, 2019
$   120
$   54
$   36
$   210
Lease receivables
$    33
$   23
$   16
$    72
Loan receivables
$    88
$   31
$   20
$   138
Related allowance, collectively evaluated for impairment
$    25
$   11
$    4
$    39
Related allowance, individually evaluated for impairment
$    96
$   43
$   32
$   171


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Recorded investment of Lease receivables for Americas and EMEA for December 2019?
Choices:
1712.5
139.5
2302.5
143.9
0
Correct choice index: 2
jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 .

December 31,(in dollars)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
JPMorgan Chase
$100.00
$136.18
$186.17
$204.57
$221.68
$298.31
KBW Bank Index
100.00
133.03
183.26
200.42
201.40
258.82
S&P Financial Index
100.00
128.75
174.57
201.06
197.92
242.94
S&P 500 Index
100.00
115.99
153.55
174.55
176.95
198.10

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. based on the review of the simultaneous investments of the jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices what was the performance ratio of the jpmorgan chase compared to kbw bank index
Choices:
86.76209
1.15258
-1.15258
1.6278
1152577.0806
Correct choice index: 1
11. Stockholders’ Equity
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense within selling, general and administrative expense as follows (in thousands):
(1) For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2018, represents a one-time cash-settled stock award that vested on November 30, 2017.

Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
2019
2018
2017
Restricted stock units
$53,766
$84,082
$42,122
Employee stock purchase plan (1)
7,580
6,891
6,334
Other
—
7,538
88
Total
$61,346
$98,511
$48,544


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the restricted stock units between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-30316
0
-35538
30316
1
Correct choice index: 0
Beginning fiscal 2011, we replaced the ownership share grants with time-vested RSUs for certain Vice Presidents and Officers that vest ratably overfour to five years and have a 50% or 100% holding requirement on settled shares, which must be held until termination. There were146,268 of such RSUs outstanding as of September 29, 2019. RSUs issued to non-management directors and certain other employees vest12 months from the date of grant, or upon termination of board service if the director or employee elects to defer receipt, and totaled 69,411 units outstanding as of September 29, 2019. RSUs issued to certain other employees either cliff vest or vest ratably over three years and totaled 35,864 units outstanding as of September 29, 2019. These awards are amortized to compensation expense over the estimated vesting period based upon the fair value of our common stock on the award date discounted by the present value of the expected dividend stream over the vesting period.
The following is a summary of RSU activity for fiscal 2019:
As of September 29, 2019, there was approximately $7.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of awards granted was$86.08, $94.93, and $102.42 in fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. In fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, the total fair value of RSUs that vested and were released was$4.7 million, $4.4 million, and $4.4 million, respectively.

Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair
Shares
Value
RSUs outstanding at September 30, 2018
288,098
$64.57
Granted
93,686
$86.08
Released
(55,642)
$84.23
Forfeited
(14,297)
$94.00
RSUs outstanding at September 29, 2019
311,845
$66.18


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total fair value of RSUs outstanding at September 29, 2019?
Choices:
1432497422663.1
4593620
311778.8
-20637902.1
20637902.1
Correct choice index: 4
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income increased $ 0.8 million primarily due to higher other income , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower interest expense , substantially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax rate .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$705.4
Volume/weather
(18.2)
Retail electric price
13.5
Other
2.4
2017 net revenue
$703.1

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in rates , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in the energy efficiency rider , effective with the first billing cycle of february 2017 , each as approved by the mpsc .
the increase was partially offset by decreased storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the november 2016 billing cycle .
entergy mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the september 2017 billing cycle .
see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions
Choices:
1
704.65
1410.5
705.25
-0.15
Correct choice index: 3
Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEM”) are the end-customers to which we provide direct marketing application engineering support, while Distribution customers refers to the distributors and representatives that we engage to distribute our products around the world.
By market channel, our fourth quarter revenues in Distribution amounted to 28% of our total revenues, flat compared to the previous quarter and decreasing on a year-over-year basis.

Three Months Ended
December 31, 2019
September 29, 2019
December 31, 2018
(Unaudited, in %)
OEM
72%
72%
69%
Distribution
28
28
31
Total
100%
100%
100%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average net revenues from Distribution for the period December 31, 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
28.5
29.5
2
2950
826
Correct choice index: 1
Effective Income Tax Rate
A reconciliation of the United States federal statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate is as follows:
In 2019 and 2018 we had pre-tax losses of $19,573 and $25,403, respectively, which are available for carry forward to offset future taxable income. We made determinations to provide full valuation allowances for our net deferred tax assets at the end of 2019 and 2018, including NOL carryforwards generated during the years, based on our evaluation of positive and negative evidence, including our history of operating losses and the uncertainty of generating future taxable income that would enable us to realize our deferred tax.

Year Ended
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
United States federal statutory rate
21.00%
21.00%
State taxes, net of federal benefit
1.99%
(0.01)%
Valuation allowance
(21.96)%
(24.33)%
Cumulative effect of accounting change
—
2.07%
R&D Credit
1.34%
1.53%
Other
(0.38)%
(0.27)%
Effective income tax rate
1.99%
(0.01)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the United States federal statutory rate between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
441
42
21
-22
Correct choice index: 0
Note 19 – Summarized Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table presents unaudited quarterly operating results for each of our last eight fiscal quarters. This information has been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the data.
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS
(In thousands, except for per share amounts)
(1) Assumes exercise of dilutive securities calculated under the treasury stock method.

Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
June 30, 2019
September 30, 2019
December 31, 2019
Net sales
$143,791
$156,391
$114,092
$115,787
Gross profit
$60,612
$65,015
$46,331
$47,209
Operating income (loss)
$(6,167)
$562
$(20,288)
$(14,070)
Net income (loss)
$770
$3,995
$(46,123)
$(11,624)
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic
$0.02
$0.08
$(0.96)
$(0.25)
Earnings (loss) per common share - diluted
$0.02(1)
$0.08(1)
$(0.96)
$(0.25)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total net sales of the 3 highest earning quarters in 2019?
Choices:
415969
0
259578
415988
403369
Correct choice index: 0
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 .
period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) .

Period
Total Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid Per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program<sup>(</sup><sup>a</sup><sup>)</sup>
Amount Available for Future Share Repurchases Under the Program<sup>(</sup><sup>b</sup><sup>)</sup> (in millions)
October 1, 2012 – October 28, 2012
842,445
$93.38
842,445
$2,522
October 29, 2012 – November 25, 2012
872,973
90.86
872,973
2,443
November 26, 2012 – December 31, 2012
1,395,288
92.02
1,395,288
2,315
Total
3,110,706
$92.07
3,110,706
$2,315

( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 .
( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion .
under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation .
the program does not have an expiration date .
as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the repurchases of common stock during the three-month ended december 312012 that was bought in october
Choices:
1
0.27082
3.69247
0.00002
0.60378
Correct choice index: 1
13 .
pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries .
as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s .
defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest .
however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula .
for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula .
in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s .
retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans .
the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans .
net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: .

Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement Benefits
Years Ended December 31
2013
2012
2011
2013
2012
2011
Service cost
$682
$555
$619
$102
$82
$110
Interest cost
665
661
718
107
121
141
Expected return on plan assets
(1,097)
(970)
(972)
(126)
(136)
(142)
Net amortization
336
185
201
(50)
(35)
(17)
Termination benefits
58
27
59
50
18
29
Curtailments
(23)
(10)
(86)
(11)
(7)
1
Settlements
23
18
4
—
—
—
Net periodic benefit cost
$644
$466
$543
$72
$43
$122

the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate .
the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s .
pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck .
also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans .
in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans .
table of contents .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the years 2012 and 2013 , what is the increase observed in the service cost?
Choices:
-63
22.88288
226.33333
0.22883
-0.18622
Correct choice index: 3
1.25% Notes Embedded Cash Conversion Option
The embedded cash conversion option within the 1.25% Notes is required to be separated from the 1.25% Notes and accounted for separately as a derivative liability, with changes in fair value recognized immediately in our consolidated statements of operations in Other income (loss), net until the cash conversion option settles or expires.
The initial fair value liability of the embedded cash conversion option was $82.8 million, which simultaneously reduced the carrying value of the 1.25% Notes (effectively an original issuance discount). The embedded cash conversion option is measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For further discussion of the inputs used to determine the fair value of the embedded cash conversion option, refer to Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies.”
The following table shows the net impact of the changes in fair values of the 1.25% Call Option and 1.25% Notes embedded cash conversion option in the consolidated statements of operations:

Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
1.25% Call Option
$ (9,020)
$ (37,474)
$ 29,498
1.25% Embedded cash conversion option
9,789
37,803
(30,118)
Net (loss) income included in other income, net
$ 769
$ 329
$ (620)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average 1.25% Embedded cash conversion option between 2017-2019?
Choices:
6031.33
0
3056.33
5824.67
2561.67
Correct choice index: 3
Trade accounts receivable past due is defined as the amount outstanding beyond normal credit terms and conditions for the respective customers. A large portion of the Corporation’s customers are billed and pay before the services are rendered. The Corporation considers the amount outstanding at the due date as trade accounts receivable past due.
The following table provides further details on trade accounts receivable past due net of allowance for doubtful accounts at August 31, 2019 and 2018:

At August 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
$
$
Less than 60 days past due
18,645
32,857
60 to 90 days past due
899
3,022
More than 90 days past due
3,074
4,923
22,618
40,802


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in trade accounts receivable less than 60 days past due?
Choices:
-10239
13722
51502
-12776588
-14212
Correct choice index: 4
Constant underlying earnings per share
Constant underlying earnings per share (constant underlying EPS) is calculated as underlying profit attributable to shareholders’ equity at constant exchange rates and excluding the impact of both translational hedges and price growth in excess of 26% per year in hyperinflationary economies divided by the diluted average number of ordinary share units. This measure reflects the underlying earnings for each ordinary share unit of the Group in constant exchange rates.
The reconciliation of underlying profit attributable to shareholders’ equity to constant underlying earnings attributable to shareholders’ equity and the calculation of constant underlying EPS is as follows:
(a) Restated following adoption of IFRS 16. See note 1 and note 24 for further details.
(b) See note 7.
(c) See pages 28 and 29 for further details.

€ million
€ million
2019
2018
(Restated)(a)
Underlying profit attributable to shareholders’ equity(b)
6,688
6,345
Impact of translation from current to constant exchange rates and translational hedges
13
46
Impact of price growth in excess of 26% per year in hyperinflationary economies(c)
(108)
(10)
Constant underlying earnings attributable to shareholders’ equity
6,593
6,381
Diluted combined average number of share units (millions of units)
2,626.7
2,694.8
Constant underlying EPS (€)
2.51
2.37


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Constant underlying earnings attributable to shareholders’ equity?
Choices:
5474
12974
0
6487
6469
Correct choice index: 3
Geographic Information
The amounts for revenue by region in the following tables are based on the location of customers. The regions in the following table are EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa), Americas (North America and Latin America), and APJ (Asia Pacific Japan).
Total Revenue by Region

€ millions
2019
2018
2017
Germany
3,948
3,658
3,352
Rest of EMEA
8,158
7,446
7,063
EMEA
12,105
11,104
10,415
United States
9,085
7,880
7,436
Rest of Americas
2,109
1,832
1,911
Americas
11,194
9,713
9,347
Japan
1,180
963
885
Rest of APJ
3,074
2,928
2,814
APJ
4,254
3,891
3,699
SAP Group
27,553
24,708
23,461


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in APJ in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
57
306
363
7213
-2928
Correct choice index: 2