trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
The total fair value of RSUs and PSUs granted and vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
As of December 31, 2019, there was $1.1 billion of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs, which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining weighted average contractual term of approximately 2.5 years.
In connection with vesting and release of RSUs and PSUs, the tax benefits realized by the company for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $131 million, $117 million and $180 million, respectively.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
2017
RSUs
Granted
$674
$583
$484
Vested
428
381
463
PSUs
Granted
$164
$118
$113
Vested
118
101
51


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average RSUs vested?
Choices:
809
3
25
1269
424
Correct choice index: 4
contracts as of december 31 , 2006 , which all mature in 2007 .
forward contract notional amounts presented below are expressed in the stated currencies ( in thousands ) .
forward currency contracts: .

(Pay)/Receive
U.S. dollars
(114,000)
Euros
(4,472)
Singapore dollars
37,180
Canadian dollars
81,234
Malaysian ringgits
85,963

a movement of 10% ( 10 % ) in the value of the u.s .
dollar against foreign currencies would impact our expected net earnings by approximately $ 0.1 million .
item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data the financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are included herein , commencing on page f-1 .
item 9 .
changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure item 9a .
controls and procedures ( a ) evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures our management , with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer , evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report .
based on that evaluation , the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the securities exchange act of 1934 is ( i ) recorded , processed , summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the sec 2019s rules and forms and ( ii ) accumulated and communicated to our management , including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer , as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure .
a controls system cannot provide absolute assurance , however , that the objectives of the controls system are met , and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud , if any , within a company have been detected .
( b ) management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting our management 2019s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page f-2 of this annual report on form 10-k and is incorporated by reference herein .
( c ) change in internal control over financial reporting no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected , or is reasonably likely to materially affect , our internal control over financial reporting .
item 9b .
other information .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is a rough estimate of the ratio of securities given to securities received?
Choices:
204377
322849
0.57967
0.76142
57.96738
Correct choice index: 2
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 .
the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .
$ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Masco
$128.21
$120.32
$102.45
$165.80
$229.59
S&P 500 Index
$125.92
$144.58
$147.60
$171.04
$225.85
S&P Industrials Index
$120.19
$151.89
$150.97
$173.87
$243.73
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index
$136.29
$177.91
$191.64
$232.84
$316.28

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .
at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares .
during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards .
we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the increase in the performance of s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2010
Choices:
0.005
0.00912
225.84088
0.01121
0.00009
Correct choice index: 1
The provision for income taxes differed from the provision computed by applying the Federal statutory rate to income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes due to the following:
The effective income tax rate was 18.9% and (141.8)% during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The decrease in 2019 compared to statutory tax rate of 21% was primarily due to deferred tax adjustments related to foreign tax credit carryforwards and state taxes, offset by changes in the valuation allowance and excess tax benefits resulting from the exercise of non-qualified stock options.
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31,2018 was significantly impacted by recording a substantial increase in a valuation allowance on the entire deferred tax assets.

Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
Federal statutory tax rate
21.0%
21.0%
State taxes
(4.5)
4.4
Non deductible expenses
(0.3)
(0.6)
Tax credits
4.0
4.6
Expired tax credit
(1.3)
(3.9)
Deferred tax adjustment
(4.8)
—
Stock based compensation
1.9
0.8
Valuation allowance
3.2
(167.0)
Contingent purchase revaluation
—
(1.0)
Other
(0.3)
(0.1)
18.9%
(141.8)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Non deductible expenses between December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-300000
0.1
-0.3
-0.4
-0.6
Correct choice index: 2
The weighted-average grant date fair value of VMware stock options can fluctuate from period to period primarily due to higher valued options assumed through business combinations with exercise prices lower than the fair market value of VMware’s stock on the date of grant.
For equity awards granted under the VMware equity plan, volatility was based on an analysis of historical stock prices and implied volatilities of VMware’s Class A common stock. The expected term was based on historical exercise patterns and post-vesting termination behavior, the term of the option period for grants made under the ESPP, or the weighted-average remaining term for options assumed in acquisitions. VMware’s expected dividend yield input was zero as the Company has not historically paid, nor expects in the future to pay, regular dividends on its common stock. The risk-free interest rate was based on a U.S. Treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected term of the stock options.
For equity awards granted under the Pivotal equity plan, volatility was based on the volatility of a group of comparable public companies based on size, stage of life cycle, profitability, growth and other factors. The expected term was estimated using the simplified method and was determined based on the vesting terms, exercise terms and contractual lives of the options. Pivotal’s expected dividend yield input was zero as the Company has not historically paid regular dividends on its common stock. The risk-free interest rate was based on a U.S. Treasury instrument whose term was consistent with the expected term of the stock options.

For the Year Ended
VMware Employee Stock Purchase Plan
January 31, 2020
February 1, 2019
February 2, 2018
Dividend yield
None
None
None
Expected volatility
27.4%
33.5%
22.6%
Risk-free interest rate
1.7%
2.0%
1.2%
Expected term (in years)
0.6
0.8
0.9
Weighted-average fair value at grant date
$35.66
$34.72
$21.93


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the absolute percentage change in risk-free interest rate between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-0.8
3.2
1
2.4
0.8
Correct choice index: 4
entergy arkansas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .
2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$1,216.7
Retail electric price
31.0
ANO decommissioning trust
26.4
Transmission revenue
13.1
Volume/weather
(15.9)
Net wholesale revenue
(11.9)
Capacity acquisition recovery
(10.3)
Other
3.2
2011 net revenue
$1,252.3

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .
the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .
the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Choices:
1287.9
35.6
-1215.7
0
2469
Correct choice index: 1
Cost of revenues. Cost of revenues increased by 23% year-on-year to RMB209.8 billion. The increase primarily reflected greater content costs, costs of FinTech services and channel costs. As a percentage of revenues, cost of revenues increased to 56% for the year ended 31 December 2019 from 55% for the year ended 31 December 2018. The following table sets forth our cost of revenues by line of business for the years ended 31 December 2019 and 2018:
Cost of revenues for VAS increased by 27% year-on-year to RMB94,086 million. The increase was mainly due to greater content costs for services and products such as live broadcast services, online games and video streaming subscriptions, as well as channel costs for smart phone games.
Cost of revenues for FinTech and Business Services increased by 35% year-on-year to RMB73,831 million. The increase primarily reflected greater costs of payment-related and cloud services due to the enhanced scale of our payment and cloud activities.
Cost of revenues for Online Advertising decreased by 6% year-on-year to RMB34,860 million. The decrease was mainly driven by lower content costs for our advertising-funded long form video service resulting from fewer content releases and improved cost efficiency, partly offset by other cost items.

Year ended 31 December
2019
2018
% of
% of
segment
segment
Amount
revenues
Amount
revenues
(Restated)
(Restated)
(RMB in millions, unless specified)
VAS
94,086
47%
73,961
42%
FinTech and Business Services
73,831
73%
54,598
75%
Online Advertising
34,860
51%
37,273
64%
Others
6,979
92%
4,742
98%
Total cost of revenues
209,756
170,574


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much did the total cost of revenues increase by from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
21550
-39182
1
39182
380330
Correct choice index: 3
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .

December 31,
Company/Index
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
$100
$132
$148
$213
$319
$419
S&P 500 Retail Index
100
103
128
185
203
252
S&P 500
$100
$100
$113
$147
$164
$163

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment in the s&p500 from 2010 to 2011?
Choices:
2
0
500
0.0
4
Correct choice index: 3
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2009 net revenue
$536.7
Volume/weather
18.9
Other
(0.3)
2010 net revenue
$555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .
fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .
depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .
interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the average price of the increased electricity usage per gwh?
Choices:
0.3415
859090.90909
0.00006
4846153.84615
18068.83365
Correct choice index: 4
9. DEFERRED REVENUES
Deferred revenues consisted of the following:
Deferred cloud services and license support revenues and deferred hardware revenues substantially represent customer payments made in advance for cloud or support contracts that are typically billed in advance with corresponding revenues generally being recognized ratably over the contractual periods. Deferred services revenues include prepayments for our services business and revenues for these services are generally recognized as the services are performed. Deferred cloud license and on-premise license revenues typically resulted from customer payments that related to undelivered products and services or specified enhancements.
In connection with our acquisitions, we have estimated the fair values of the cloud services and license support performance obligations assumed from our acquired companies. We generally have estimated the fair values of these obligations assumed using a cost build-up approach. The cost build-up approach determines fair value by estimating the costs related to fulfilling the obligations plus a normal profit margin. The sum of the costs and operating profit approximates, in theory, the amount that we would be required to pay a third party to assume these acquired obligations. These aforementioned fair value adjustments recorded for obligations assumed from our acquisitions reduced the cloud services and license support deferred revenues balances that we recorded as liabilities from these acquisitions and also reduced the resulting revenues that we recognized or will recognize over the terms of the acquired obligations during the post-combination periods.

May 31,
(in millions)
2019
2018
Cloud services and license support
$7,340
$7,265
Hardware
635
645
Services
360
404
Cloud license and on-premise license
39
27
Deferred revenues, current
8,374
8,341
Deferred revenues, non-current (in other non-current liabilities)
669
625
Total deferred revenues
$9,043
$8,966


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the total deferred revenues from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
8418
77
-625
0
117
Correct choice index: 1
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 .
the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 .
on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan .
the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no .
133 .
the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes .
a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities .
the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness .
it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .
principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

December 31,   2006
January 18, 2007   Refinancing
2007
$61,661
$96,161
2008
257,541
282,041
2009
68,129
145,129
2010
33,586
215,586
2011
941,875
165,455
Thereafter
1,646,709
2,105,129
Total
$3,009,501
$3,009,501

fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the yearly interest expense associated with the certegy merger , ( in millions ) ?
Choices:
9.5
4210.5
40000
0
950
Correct choice index: 0
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following tables present the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) for the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:

Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) Available-for-sale Securities
Minimum Pension Liability
Foreign Currency
Total
Balance at March 31, 2017
$0.3
$(5.3)
$(9.4)
$(14.4)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(13.6)
(5.6)
—
(19.2)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
15.2
0.8
—
16.0
Net other comprehensive loss
1.6
(4.8)
—
(3.2)
Balance at March 31, 2018
$1.9
$(10.1)
$(9.4)
$(17.6)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the balance of minimum pension liability between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-4.8
-4.5
9.1
0
-480
Correct choice index: 0
Note 8: Net Income per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the treasury stock method, for dilutive stock options, restricted stock units, and convertible notes.
The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted computations for net income per share.
(1) Diluted shares outstanding do not include any effect resulting from note hedges associated with the Company’s 2018 Notes as their impact would have been anti-dilutive.

YearEnded
June 30, 2019
June 24, 2018
June 25, 2017
(in thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Net income
$2,191,430
$2,380,681
$1,697,763
Denominator:
Basic average shares outstanding
152,478
161,643
162,222
Effect of potential dilutive securities:
Employee stock plans
1,323
2,312
2,058
Convertible notes
5,610
12,258
16,861
Warrants
504
4,569
2,629
Diluted average shares outstanding
159,915
180,782
183,770
Net income per share-basic
$14.37
$14.73
$10.47
Net income per share-diluted
$13.70
$13.17
$9.24


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage change in the net income from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
85.65
-2.38
219143000
0
-7.95
Correct choice index: 4