trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
underlying physical transaction occurs .
we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting .
as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations .
open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity .
at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities .
the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) .
the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability .
payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts .
as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: .

Option Expiration Date
2009
Option Contract Volumes<i>(Barrels per day)</i>:
Put options purchased
20,000
Call options sold
15,000
Average Exercise Price<i>(Dollars per barrel</i>):
Put options
$50.50
Call options
$90.50

in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 .
at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods .
starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products .
instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices .
additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments .
during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. using the above listed average exercise price , what were the value of the put options purchased?
Choices:
1010
-1010000
2550.2
1010000
1010000.0
Correct choice index: 4
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock-based awards, stock options, and shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
(1) These weighted shares relate to anti-dilutive restricted stock-based awards and stock options as calculated using the treasury stock method and contingently issuable shares under PSO and PSU agreements. Such shares could be dilutive in the future. See Note 13 for information regarding the exercise prices of our outstanding, unexercised stock options.

Year Ended May 31,
(in millions, except per share data)
2019
2018
2017
Net income
$11,083
$3,587
$9,452
Weighted average common shares outstanding
3,634
4,121
4,115
Dilutive effect of employee stock plans
98
117
102
Dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding
3,732
4,238
4,217
Basic earnings per share
$3.05
$0.87
$2.30
Diluted earnings per share
$2.97
$0.85
$2.24
Shares subject to anti-dilutive restricted stock-based awards and stock options excluded from calculation (1)
71
64
74


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. By how much did net income change from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-7496
-3585
7496
528
7496000
Correct choice index: 2
Gross Profit
Gross profit in fiscal year 2019 increased to $444.8 million, or 18.7 percent of net sales from $382.3 million, or 17.7 percent of net sales for fiscal year 2018. Excluding the impact of the surcharge revenue, our gross margin in fiscal year 2019 was 22.9 percent compared to 21.3 percent in fiscal year 2018. The results reflect the impact of improved product mix coupled with capacity gains and operating cost reductions compared to the same period a year ago. Fiscal year 2019 also reflects an $11.4 million benefit related to an insurance recovery in our third fiscal quarter.
Our surcharge mechanism is structured to recover increases in raw material costs, although in certain cases with a lag effect as discussed above. While the surcharge generally protects the absolute gross profit dollars, it does have a dilutive effect on gross margin as a percent of sales. The following represents a summary of the dilutive impact of the surcharge on gross margin. We present and discuss these financial measures because management believes removing the impact of surcharge provides a more consistent and meaningful basis for comparing results of operations from period to period. See the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for further discussion of these financial measures.

Fiscal Year
($ in millions)
2019
2018
Net sales
$2,380.2
$2,157.7
Less: surcharge revenue
438.1
365.4
Net sales excluding surcharge revenue
$1,942.1
$1,792.3
Gross profit
$444.8
$382.3
Gross margin
18.7%
17.7%
Gross margin excluding surcharge revenue
22.9%
21.3%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the amount of surcharge revenue from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
72.7
292.7
416.8
55.8
-1942.1
Correct choice index: 0
Free cash flow generation
Bridge from operating income to free cash flow (illustrative)
Focus on delivering a high conversion of operating income to free cash flow of operating income to free cash flow
of operating income to free cash flow
Ongoing activities to reduce costs “below operating income”, including restructuring, financial net and tax
Striving to maintain working capital efficiency but fluctuations may impact cash flow
Planning assumption for capex is about 2% of net sales, while expected to remain above 2% in 2020 due to the new factory in the US
Ambition to over time maintain restructuring charges to around 1% of net sales
M&A will vary depending on strategic decisions but assumed to be around 1–2% of net sales
Operating margin excluding restructuring charges. All numbers are in relation to net sales.
1) Restructuring charges as reported in the income statement for each year.

2018
2019
Ambition
Operating margin
4.4%
5.0%
>12%
financial net, tax and other
-3.8%
-2.5%
-4%
+ depreciation and amortization
+3.9%
+2.9%
+3 to 4%
+ depreciation of leased assets
–
+1.1%
+1%
± change in working capital
+3.7%
+1.0%
±0
- capex
- 2.4%
-2.8%
-2%
- leasing payment
-
-1.3%
-1%
-  restructuring costs1)
-3.8%
-0.4%
-1%
Free cash flow (before M&A)
2.0%
3.4%
>8%
- M&A
-0.6%
-0.7%
~1 to -2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in operating margin between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-1.4
0
2
0.6
5
Correct choice index: 3
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) asset divestitures in conjunction with the asset divestitures in 2013 and 2014 , devon removed $ 26 million and $ 706 million of goodwill , respectively , which were allocated to these assets .
impairment devon 2019s canadian goodwill was originally recognized in 2001 as a result of a business combination consisting almost entirely of conventional gas assets that devon no longer owns .
as a result of performing the goodwill impairment test described in note 1 , devon concluded the implied fair value of its canadian goodwill was zero as of december 31 , 2014 .
this conclusion was largely based on the significant decline in benchmark oil prices , particularly after opec 2019s decision not to reduce its production targets that was announced in late november 2014 .
consequently , in the fourth quarter of 2014 , devon wrote off its remaining canadian goodwill and recognized a $ 1.9 billion impairment .
other intangible assets as of december 31 , 2014 , intangible assets associated with customer relationships had a gross carrying amount of $ 569 million and $ 36 million of accumulated amortization .
the weighted-average amortization period for the customer relationships is 13.7 years .
amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $ 36 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 .
other intangible assets are reported in other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets .
the following table summarizes the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years .
year amortization amount ( in millions ) .

Year
Amortization Amount  (In millions)
2015
$45
2016
$45
2017
$45
2018
$45
2019
$44

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2014 , what percentage of the total amortization amount was from intangibles?
Choices:
446.7
116
100
36
80.0
Correct choice index: 4
Segment Results of Operations
In the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, other operating (income) expense includes (i) (gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets, (ii) lease termination costs, (iii)
asset impairment expense, (iv) accretion of asset retirement obligations, and (v) FCC reimbursements. Each table summarizes the results of operations of our operating
segments and compares the amount of the change between the periods presented (in millions).                                Marine Services Segment
Net revenue: Net revenue from our Marine Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $21.8 million to $172.5 million from $194.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline in the volume of projects under execution across multiple reporting lines, including power cable repair in offshore renewables, telecom installation work, and a reduction in CWind Group revenue due to focusing on a mix of more profitable projects.
Cost of revenue: Cost of revenue from our Marine Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $35.9 million to $127.1 million from $163.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was driven by the reduction in revenue, improved vessel utilization, and higher than expected costs on a certain power construction project in the comparable period that were not repeated.
Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses from our Marine Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $5.6 million to $25.8 million from $20.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to higher disposition costs in the fourth quarter of 2019 related to the sale of the Marine Services segment. This was partially offset by a reversal of an accrual of bad debt expense in the current period due to a favorable receivable settlement during the quarter. See Note 24. Subsequent Events for the summary of the subsequent events.
Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization from our Marine Services segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $1.5 million to $25.7 million from $27.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was largely attributable to the disposal of assets during the year.
Other operating income: Other operating income decreased $0.7 million from $0.7 million of income for the year ended December 31, 2018, as a result of an impairment expense recorded in 2019 due to the under-utilization of assets on one of the segment's barges.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Increase / (Decrease)
Net revenue
$172.5
$194.3
$(21.8)
Cost of revenue
127.1
163.0
(35.9)
Selling, general and administrative
25.8
20.2
5.6
Depreciation and amortization
25.7
27.2
(1.5)
Other operating income
—
(0.7)
0.7
Income (loss) from operations
$(6.1)
$(15.4)
$9.3


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average cost of revenue?
Choices:
1
93.5
-414.43
91.6
145.05
Correct choice index: 4
(12) Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive shares of common stock. Basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock were the same for all periods presented as the impact of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding was anti-dilutive. The Company uses the if converted method for calculating any potential dilutive effect on diluted loss per share.
The following common equivalent shares were excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
In connection with the issuance of the 2024 Notes in December 2019, the Company paid $44.9 million to enter into capped call option agreements to reduce the potential dilution to holders of the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the 2024 Notes. In connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes in November 2017, the Company paid $12.9 million to enter into capped call option agreements to reduce the potential dilution to holders of the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the 2022 Notes.
In December 2019, the Company partially terminated capped call options related to the 2022 Notes and received $5.8 million. The capped call option agreements are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders as their effect is antidilutive.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Convertible senior notes
6,733,914
3,411,199
3,411,199
Stock-based compensation grants
2,038,174
2,562,274
3,268,610
Total
8,772,088
5,973,473
6,679,809


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Convertible senior notes for the period December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
Choices:
5072556.5
3366951
5001262
5072544.5
-845426.1
Correct choice index: 0
Change in Product Mix and Technology Migration
Because the price of wafers processed with different technologies varies significantly, the mix of wafers that we produce is among the primary factors that affect our revenues and profitability. The value of a wafer is determined principally by the complexity and performance of the processing technology used to produce the wafer, as well as by the yield and defect density. Production of devices with higher levels of functionality and performance, with better yields and lower defect density as well as with greater system-level integration requires better manufacturing expertise and generally commands higher wafer prices. The increase in price generally has more than offset associated increases in production cost once an appropriate economy of scale is reached.
Prices for wafers of a given level of technology generally decline over the processing technology life cycle. As a result, we have continuously been migrating to increasingly sophisticated technologies to maintain the same level of profitability. We began our volume production with 65-nanometer and 40-nanometer technologies in 2006 and 2009, respectively. We introduced our 28-nanometer technology to customers in 2011 and started large-scale commercial production in 2014. Our 28nm and below technologies contributed approximately 17.1%, 15.2% and 11.3% of our foundry revenue in 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively.

Years Ended December 31,
Process Technologies
2017
2018
2019
%
%
%
14 nanometers and under
0.9
2.6
0.0
28 nanometers
16.2
12.6
11.3
40 nanometers
28.4
25.3
23.1
65 nanometers
12.3
12.5
14.7
90 nanometers
4.9
8.3
13.6
0.11/0.13 micron
11.5
11.6
12.6
0.15/0.18 micron
12.4
13.7
13.1
0.25/0.35 micron
10.0
10.1
8.7
0.50 micron or higher
3.4
3.3
2.9
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average of 40 nanometers?
Choices:
698.2
26.2
10000
25.6
3349.5
Correct choice index: 3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Reconciliations of total segment net revenues and total segment operating income to consolidated net revenues and consolidated income before income tax expense are presented in the table below (amounts in millions):
(1) Includes other income and expenses from operating segments managed outside the reportable segments, including our Distribution business. Also includes unallocated corporate income and expenses.
(2) Reflects the net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues, along with related cost of revenues, on certain of our online-enabled products.
(3) Intersegment revenues reflect licensing and service fees charged between segments.
(4) Reflects fees and other expenses, such as legal, banking, and professional services fees, related to the acquisition of King and associated integration activities, including related debt financings.
(5) Reflects restructuring initiatives, which include severance and other restructuring-related costs.
(6) Reflects a non-cash accounting charge to reclassify certain cumulative translation gains (losses) into earnings due to the substantial liquidation of certain of our foreign entities.
(7) Reflects the impact of other unusual or unique tax-related items and activities.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Reconciliation to consolidated net revenues:
Segment net revenues
$5,969
$6,835
$6,765
Revenues from non-reportable segments (1)
462
480
410
Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues (2)
101
238
(139)
Elimination of intersegment revenues (3)
(43)
(53)
(19)
Consolidated net revenues
$6,489
$7,500
$7,017
Reconciliation to consolidated income before income tax expense:
Segment operating income
$2,054
$2,446
$2,417
Operating income (loss) from non-reportable segments (1)
24
31
(19)
Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues and related cost of revenues (2)
52
100
(71)
Share-based compensation expense
(166)
(209)
(178)
Amortization of intangible assets
(203)
(370)
(757)
Fees and other expenses related to the acquisition of King (4)
—
—
(15)
Restructuring costs (5)
(137)
(10)
(15)
Other non-cash charges (6)
—
—
(14)
Discrete tax-related items (7)
(17)
—
(39)
Consolidated operating income
1,607
1,988
1,309
Interest and other expense (income), net
(26)
71
146
Loss on extinguishment of debt
—
40
12
Consolidated income before income tax expense
$1,633
$1,877
$1,151


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in consolidated net revenues between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
13989
-10
1
0
-1011
Correct choice index: 4
Noncurrent Assets and Liabilities
The increase in noncurrent assets of $39,531 million ($39,470 million adjusted for currency) was driven by: • A net increase in goodwill and net intangible assets of $34,104 million ($34,058 million adjusted for currency) due to the acquisition of Red Hat; and • An increase in operating right-of-use assets of $4,996 million ($5,010 million adjusted for currency) as a result of the adoption of the new leasing standard on January 1, 2019; and• An increase in prepaid pension assets of $2,199 million ($2,152 million adjusted for currency) driven by higher returns on plan assets and plan remeasurements; partially offset by • A decrease in net property, plant and equipment of $782 million ($785 million adjusted for currency).
Long-term debt increased $18,497 million ($18,550 million adjusted for currency) primarily driven by: • Issuances of $26,081 million; partially offset by • Reclassifications to short-term debt of $7,592 million to reflect upcoming maturities.
Noncurrent liabilities (excluding debt) increased $6,778 million ($6,911 million adjusted for currency) primarily driven by: • An increase in long-term operating lease liabilities of $3,879 million ($3,893 million adjusted for currency) as a result of the adoption of the new leasing standard on January 1, 2019; and • An increase in other liabilities of $2,352 million ($2,320 million adjusted for currency), primarily driven by increases in deferred tax liabilities of $1,534 million and income tax reserves of $923 million.

($ in millions)
At December 31:
2019
2018
Noncurrent assets
$113,767
$74,236
Long-term debt
$ 54,102
$35,605
Noncurrent liabilities (excluding debt)
$ 39,398
$32,621


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage increase / (decrease) in the Noncurrent liabilities (excluding debt) from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-17.2
0.21
20.77
4168.47
0
Correct choice index: 2
14. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in millions):

Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Current:
Federal
$ 26
$ 764
$ 22
State
27
10
3
Foreign
49
39
41
Total current
102
813
66
Deferred:
Federal
35
239
61
State
(6 )
27
17
Foreign
(32 )
4
(4 )
Total deferred
(3 )
270
74
Provision for income taxes
$ 99
$ 1,083
$ 140


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total percentage change in the provision for income taxes between 2017 and 2019?
Choices:
-15.19
29.29
-41
-29.29
-5.04
Correct choice index: 3
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 6: PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
Claims receivable mainly represents claims against vessels’ insurance underwriters in respect of damages arising from accidents or other insured risks, as well as claims under charter contracts including off-hires. While it is anticipated that claims receivable will be recovered within one year, such claims may not all be recovered within one year due to the attendant process of settlement. Nonetheless, amounts are classified as current as they represent amounts currently due to the Company. All amounts are shown net of applicable deductibles.
As of December 31, 2018, claims receivable include $11,571 related to insurance claim at the iron ore port terminal in Nueva Palmira, Uruguay.

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Prepaid voyage and operating costs
$5,726
$9,261
Claims receivable
3,826
22,224
Prepaid other taxes
1,012
2,682
Advances for working capital purposes
—
18
Other
1,675
6,005
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
$12,239
$40,190


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in claims receivable between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-8413
-18398
0
-16498
26050
Correct choice index: 1