trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the aggregate fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.5 billion ( $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.0 billion in 2013 ) , which represents the market value of our common stock on the date that the rsus vested .
the grant-date fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.1 billion ( $ 949 million in 2014 and $ 899 million in 2013 ) .
the number of rsus vested includes shares of common stock that we withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements .
rsus that are expected to vest are net of estimated future forfeitures .
as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 1.8 billion in unrecognized compensation costs related to rsus granted under our equity incentive plans .
we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of 1.2 years .
stock option awards as of december 26 , 2015 , options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest were as follows : number of options ( in millions ) weighted average exercise weighted average remaining contractual ( in years ) aggregate intrinsic ( in millions ) .

Number ofOptions(In Millions)
WeightedAverageExercisePrice
WeightedAverageRemainingContractualTerm(In Years)
AggregateIntrinsicValue(In Millions)
Vested
43.8
$21.07
1.8
$609
Expected to vest
9.6
$24.07
4.1
$104
Total
53.4
$21.61
2.2
$713

aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and $ 34.98 , the closing price of our common stock on december 24 , 2015 , as reported on the nasdaq global select market , for all in-the-money options outstanding .
options outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated future option forfeitures .
options with a fair value of $ 42 million completed vesting in 2015 ( $ 68 million in 2014 and $ 186 million in 2013 ) .
as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 13 million in unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options granted under our equity incentive plans .
we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of approximately eight months. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. as of december 26 , 2015 , what was the expected unrecognized compensation costs to be recognized per year in billions
Choices:
1.5
0
1.2
2.2
0.1
Correct choice index: 0
Income Tax Provision Reconciliation
The difference between the income tax benefit (provision) and income taxes computed using the U.S. federal income tax rate was as follows for the years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017 (amounts shown in thousands):

2019
2018
2017
Amount computed using statutory rate
$841
$2,122
$(1,078)
Net change in valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets
(459)
(367)
10,058
AMT and other
—
(191)
20
Foreign rate differential
664
22
(169)
Non-deductible items
(151)
(276)
(370)
State income tax
(370)
50
(34)
Impact of tax reform on deferred taxes
—
(4,901)
—
Research and development credits
1,694
475
2,494
Foreign income tax
(494)
—
—
Stock compensation, net
1,539
—
—
Income tax benefit (provision)
$3,264
$(3,066)
$10,921


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the sum of amount computed using statutory rate and foreign rate differential in 2018 as a percentage of 2019?
Choices:
1.42
2144
3022.97
1.16
3.3
Correct choice index: 0
the company granted 1020 performance shares .
the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period .
beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests .
the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .

Number of Shares
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
116,677
$280
Granted
134,245
275
Vested
(34,630)
257
Cancelled
(19,830)
260
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
196,462
283

the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively .
eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration .
shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq .
compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price .
in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees .
these shares are subject to a six-month holding period .
annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 .
non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution .
as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions .
expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for 2010 , assuming all of the outstanding restricted stock and performance shares were exercised , what would be the increase in stockholders equity?
Choices:
37991335
55598746.0
-55598746
55598.7
-55598739.8
Correct choice index: 1
2016 Collective Bargaining Negotiations
During 2016, we adopted changes to our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans to reflect the agreed upon terms and conditions of the collective bargaining agreements ratified in June 2016. The impact includes a net increase to Accumulated other comprehensive income of $2.9 billion (net of taxes of $1.8 billion).
The amount recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified to net periodic benefit cost on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of the respective plans’ participants, which, on a weighted-average basis, is 12.2 years for defined benefit pension plans and 7.8 years for other postretirement benefit plans.
The above-noted reclassification resulted in a decrease to net periodic benefit cost and increase to pre-tax income of approximately $658 million during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets follows:
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets follows:

(dollars in millions)
At December 31,
2019
2018
Projected benefit obligation
$ 21,190
$ 19,510
Accumulated benefit obligation
21,134
19,461
Fair value of plan assets
19,388
17,757


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average accumulated benefit obligation for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
9731.4
40597
18609
2.1
20297.5
Correct choice index: 4
j a c k h e n r y .
c o m 1 5 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the company 2019s common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201cjkhy 201d .
the company established a practice of paying quarterly dividends at the end of fiscal 1990 and has paid dividends with respect to every quarter since that time .
the declaration and payment of any future dividends will continue to be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon , among other factors , our earnings , capital requirements , contractual restrictions , and operating and financial condition .
the company does not currently foresee any changes in its dividend practices .
on august 15 , 2019 , there were approximately 145300 holders of the company 2019s common stock , including individual participants in security position listings .
on that same date the last sale price of the common shares as reported on nasdaq was $ 141.94 per share .
issuer purchases of equity securities the following shares of the company were repurchased during the quarter ended june 30 , 2019 : total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ) .

Total Number of Shares Purchased<sup>(1)</sup>
Average Price of Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans<sup>(1)</sup>
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans<sup>(2)</sup>
April 1- April 30, 2019
—
$—
—
3,732,713
May 1- May 31, 2019
250,000
$134.35
250,000
3,482,713
June 1- June 30, 2019
—
$—
—
3,482,713
Total
250,000
$134.35
250,000
3,482,713

( 1 ) 250000 shares were purchased through a publicly announced repurchase plan .
there were no shares surrendered to the company to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with employee restricted stock awards .
( 2 ) total stock repurchase authorizations approved by the company 2019s board of directors as of february 17 , 2015 were for 30.0 million shares .
these authorizations have no specific dollar or share price targets and no expiration dates. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage of the shares purchase of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans
Choices:
0.06698
0.00001
870678250000
0.07178
48517159.36148
Correct choice index: 3
Computer Equipment, Software, Furniture, and Leasehold Improvements, Net
Computer equipment, software, and furniture are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lease term. Depreciation expense was $59.2 million in fiscal 2019, $67.6 million in fiscal 2018, and $73.1 million in fiscal 2017
Computer equipment, software, furniture, leasehold improvements and the related accumulated depreciation at January 31 were as follows:
Costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized for application development activities, if material, and immediately expensed for preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities. These capitalized costs are amortized over the software’s expected useful life, which is generally three years.

2019
2018
Computer hardware, at cost
$190.2
$217.1
Computer software, at cost
66.7
72.6
Leasehold improvements, land and buildings, at cost
247.8
228.9
Furniture and equipment, at cost
67.2
63.4
Computer software, hardware, leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment, at cost
571.9
582.0
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(422.2)
(437.0)
Computer software, hardware, leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment, net
$149.7
$145.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much did the computer hardware, at cost change in 2019 compared to 2018?
Choices:
-14.14
-17.83
187.61
-12.39
0
Correct choice index: 3
For the full year 2019, our ADG revenues increased 1.4% compared to the previous period. The increase was primarily due to improved average selling prices of approximately 9%, which was entirely due to a better product mix, and partially offset by a decrease in volumes by approximately 8%.
AMS revenues grew 4.6%, mainly due to the double-digits growth in Imaging. The increase was due to higher average selling prices of approximately 12%, as a result of a better product mix, and was partially offset by lower volumes of approximately 7%.
MDG revenues were down by 10.3%, mainly due to Microcontrollers. The decrease was due to lower volumes of approximately 10% while average selling prices remained substantially flat.
In 2018, all product groups registered double-digit revenue increase. Our ADG revenues increased 16.2% for the full year 2018 compared to the full year 2017 on growth in both Power Discrete and Automotive. The increase was primarily due to improved average selling prices of approximately 21% and volumes decreased by approximately 5%. The increase in average selling prices was entirely due to improved product mix, while selling prices remained substantially flat.
AMS revenues grew 19.9%, mainly on the strong increase in Imaging. The increase was due to higher volumes of approximately 12% and higher average selling prices of approximately 8%, which was entirely due to improved product mix of approximately 13%, while selling prices decreased by approximately 5%.
MDG revenues were up by 11.1%, with Digital and Microcontrollers & Memories equally contributing. The increase was primarily due to higher average selling prices of approximately 11%, while volumes remained substantially flat. The increase in average selling prices was due to a better product mix of approximately 13%, while the selling prices effect was negative of approximately 2%.

Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
% Variation
% Variation
2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
Automotive and Discrete Group (ADG)
$3,606
$3,556
$3,059
1.4%
16.2%
Analog MEMS and Sensors Group (AMS)
3,299
3,154
2,630
4.6
19.9
Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG)
2,638
2,940
2,646
(10.3)
11.1
Others
13
14
12
—
—
Total consolidated net revenues
$9,556
$9,664
$8,347
(1.1)%
15.8%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What are the average net revenues by Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG)?
Choices:
2781
3.12
2741.33
2741333333.33
8224
Correct choice index: 2
As of December 31, 2019, exercisable options had an intrinsic value of less than $0.1 million. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $0.4 million in 2019 and $0.1 million in 2018. The following are the assumptions used in valuing the 2019 and 2018 stock option grants:
In January 2020, we issued options to employees for the purchase of up to 591,004 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $1.23 per share which vest and become exercisable in four annual installments ending in January 2024. The options have a grant date fair value per share of $1.26.

Year Ended December 31
2019
2018
Assumed volatility
64% - 69%
75% - 81%
(67% weighted average)
(78% weighted average)
Assumed risk free interest rate
1.8% - 2.7%
2.2% - 2.8%
(2.4% weighted average)
(2.5% weighted average)
Average expected life of options (in years)
6.1 - 6.3
6.2
(6.2 weighted average)
(6.2 weighted average)
Expected dividends
-
-


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average assumed volatility in 2018?
Choices:
1
81
78
233
25
Correct choice index: 2
MEDIA FINANCIAL RESULTS
REVENUE
Media revenue is earned from:
• advertising sales across its television, radio, and digital media properties; • subscriptions to televised and OTT products; • ticket sales, fund redistribution and other distributions from MLB, and concession sales; and • retail product sales.
The 4% decrease in revenue this year was a result of: • the sale of our publishing business in the second quarter of 2019; and • lower revenue at the Toronto Blue Jays, primarily as a result of a distribution from Major League Baseball in 2018; partially offset by • higher revenue generated by Sportsnet and TSC. Excluding the sale of our publishing business and the impact of the distribution from Major League Baseball last year, Media revenue would have increased by 1% this year.
OPERATING EXPENSES
We record Media operating expenses in four primary categories:
• the cost of broadcast content, including sports programming
and production;
• Toronto Blue Jays player compensation;
• the cost of retail products sold; and
• all other expenses involved in day-to-day operations.
The 2% decrease in operating expenses this year was a result of:
• lower Toronto Blue Jays player compensation; and
• lower publishing-related costs due to the sale of this business;
partially offset by
• higher programming costs; and
• higher cost of sales as a result of higher revenue at TSC.
ADJUSTED EBITDA
The 29% decrease in adjusted EBITDA this year was a result of the
revenue and expense changes described above. Excluding the
impact of the sale of our publishing business in the second quarter
of 2019 and the distribution from Major League Baseball last year,
adjusted EBITDA would have increased by 1% this year.

Years ended December 31
(In millions of dollars, except margins)
2019
2018
%Chg
Revenue
2,072
2,168
(4)
Operating expenses
1,932
1,972
(2)
Adjusted EBITDA
140
196
(29)
Adjusted EBITDA margin
6.8%
9.0%
(2.2pts)
Capital expenditures
102
90
13


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in Adjusted EBITDA from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-7840
-196
-56
27440
0
Correct choice index: 2
The following is a roll-forward of the Company’s uncertain tax positions, recorded in other long-term liabilities, from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019:
The majority of the net increase for positions relates to the potential tax on freight income on changes for positions taken in prior years and an increased number of voyages for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits are included in the roll-forward schedule above, and are increases of approximately $13.2 million, $9.2 million and $6.4 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
December 31,
December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
$
$
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as at January 1
40,556
31,061
19,492
Increases for positions related to the current year
5,829
9,297
2,631
Changes for positions taken in prior years
19,119
981
3,475
Decreases related to statute of limitations
(2,546)
(783)
(1,562)
Increase due to acquisition of TIL
—
—
8,528
Decrease due to deconsolidation of Altera
—
—
(1,503)
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as at December 31
62,958
40,556
31,061


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Decreases related to statute of limitations from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
Choices:
-38010
1763
18709
18336
2545
Correct choice index: 1
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

December 31,(in dollars)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
JPMorgan Chase
$100.00
$80.03
$108.98
$148.98
$163.71
$177.40
KBW Bank Index
100.00
76.82
102.19
140.77
153.96
154.71
S&P Financial Index
100.00
82.94
106.78
144.79
166.76
164.15
S&P 500 Index
100.00
102.11
118.44
156.78
178.22
180.67

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the 5 year return of the s&p 500 index?
Choices:
0.8067
1.2396
0.5731
1.008
80.67
Correct choice index: 0
11. Reportable Segments, Geographic Information and Major Customers
Reportable segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or group, in assessing performance and allocating resources. The Company uses an internal management reporting system, which provides important financial data to evaluate performance and allocate the Company’s resources on a regional basis. Net sales for the segments are attributed to the region in which the product is manufactured or the service is performed. The services provided, manufacturing processes used, class of customers serviced and order fulfillment processes used are similar and generally interchangeable across the segments. A segment’s performance is evaluated based upon its operating income (loss). A segment’s operating income (loss) includes its net sales less cost of sales and selling and administrative expenses, but excludes corporate and other expenses. Corporate and other expenses  fiscal 2019 and the $13.5 million one-time employee bonus paid to full-time, non-executive employees during fiscal 2018 due to the Company's ability to access overseas cash as a result of Tax Reform (the "one-time employee bonus"). These costs are not allocated to the segments, as management excludes such costs when assessing the performance of the segments. Inter-segment transactions are generally recorded at amounts that approximate arm’s length transactions. The accounting policies for the segments are the same as for the Company taken as a whole.
Information about the Company’s three reportable segments for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

2019
2018
2017
Depreciation:      
AMER 
$22,531
$21,224
$19,694
APAC 
16,905
15,954
15,588
EMEA 
6,105
6,054
5,467
Corporate 
5,344
4,863
4,581
50,885
48,095
45,330
Capital expenditures:
AMER
$42,459
$17,690
$18,111
APAC
33,454
33,018
13,816
EMEA
5,186
7,923
5,748
Corporate
9,501
4,149
863
$90,600
$62,780
$38,538


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Corporate Depreciation between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
481
10207
0
763
17668
Correct choice index: 0
Non‐executive Director fees are paid from an aggregate annual fee pool of $4,000,000, as approved by shareholders at the AGM on 18 November 2010. Total board and committee fees paid during F19 were $2,859,903 (refer to section 5.1).
Non‐executive Directors do not receive variable pay and no Directors’ fees are paid to Executive Directors.
In recognition of the equal importance and workload of all of the Board’s Committees, the Board reviewed Non‐executive Director fees and determined to increase Chair and Member fees for the People Performance Committee and Sustainability Committee as detailed in the table below, effective 1 July 2019. The table below provides a summary of F19 and F20 Board and Committee fees:

CHAIR
MEMBER
F19 FEE
F20 FEE
F19 FEE
F20 FEE
BOARD AND COMMITTEE FEES ($)
INCL. SUPER
INCL. SUPER
INCL. SUPER
INCL. SUPER
Board
$790,531
$790,531
$254,990
$254,990
Audit, Risk Management and Compliance Committee
$65,000
$65,000
$32,500
$32,500
People Performance Committee
$54,525
$65,000
$27,265
$32,500
Sustainability Committee
$45,000
$65,000
$22,500
$32,500
Nomination Committee
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between the fees paid to a member in the board compared to a member in the sustainability committee in F19?
Choices:
189990
232490
227725
-232490
487480
Correct choice index: 1