trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds .
the yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) .
historically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments .
the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios .
assumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes .
based on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets .
the company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases .
assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans .
the health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions .
a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .

One-Percentage-PointIncrease
One-Percentage-PointDecrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
$7,367
$(5,974)
Effect on other postretirement benefit obligation
$72,238
$(60,261)

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the one-percentage-point increase of effect on total of service and interest cost components as a percentage of the effect on other postretirement benefit obligation?
Choices:
1
-0.10198
0.10198
101982.33617
7366.89802
Correct choice index: 2
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $269.4 million, or 45.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018. As a percentage of total revenues, gross profit decreased from 55.6% in the year ended December 31, 2018 to 54.9% in the year ended December 31, 2019, due to Shopify Payments representing a larger percentage of total revenue and an increase in amortization of technology related to the 6RS acquisition as well as other platform enhancements. This was partly offset by lower third-party infrastructure and hosting costs and employee-related costs as a percentage of revenues as well as the relative growth of higher-margin merchant solutions products, namely Shopify Capital and referral fees from partners.
Gross profit increased $216.0 million, or 56.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017. As a percentage of total revenues, gross profit decreased from 56.5% in the year ended December 31, 2017 to 55.6% in the year ended December 31, 2018, due to Shopify Payments representing a larger percentage of total revenue, increasing the functionality and flexibility of our hosting infrastructure, and higher product costs associated with expanding our product offerings. This was partly offset by the relative growth of higher-margin merchant solutions products, namely referral fees from partners, Shopify Capital, and Shopify Shipping.

Years ended December 31
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
% Change
% Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
Gross profit
$ 865,643
$ 596,267
$ 380,253
45.2 %
56.8 %
Percentage of total revenues
54.9 %
55.6 %
56.5 %


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average gross profit for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
731000
730955000
730955
134688
1461910
Correct choice index: 2
The following table shows the activity of our U.S. and international plan assets, which are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs.
(1) Balances as of December 31, 2018 have been revised from our 2018 Form 10-K filing to reflect changes in leveling classification of specific funds. These reclassifications did not impact the fair value of any of our pension plan assets.
(2) Purchases of Level 3 assets in 2018 primarily represent the purchase of bulk annuity contracts (buy-ins) in some of our international plans.

December 31,
(In millions)
2019
2018
Balance at beginning of period(1)
$ 150.1
$ 71.5
Gains (losses) on assets still held at end of year
16.8
(16.0)
Purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements(2)
8.3
103.7
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
—
1.0
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
5.0
(10.1)
Balance at end of period(1)
$ 180.2
$ 150.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between the Balance at end of period for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
171.9
330.3
27048
182.2
30.1
Correct choice index: 4
Periodic Benefit Costs The aggregate net pension cost recognized in the consolidated statements of operations were costs of $6.5 million and $4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows (in millions):
Of the amounts presented above, income of $1.4 million has been included in cost of revenue and loss of $7.9 million included in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2019, and income of $2.1 million has been included in cost of revenue and loss of $6.7 million included in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Service cost—benefits earning during the period
$-
$-
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
5.3
5.3
Expected return on assets
(6.7)
(7.5)
Actuarial (gain) loss
7.9
6.7
Foreign currency gain (loss)
-
0.1
Net pension (benefit) cost
$ 6.5
$ 4.6


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average actuarial (gain) loss?
Choices:
14.6
0.1
1
26.5
7.3
Correct choice index: 4
Segment operating results
Enterprise Security segment
Revenue increased $199 million primarily due to increases of $331 million in revenue from sales of our network and web security solutions and $36 million from sales of endpoint and information protection solutions, partially offset by a $184 million decrease in revenue as a result of the divestiture of our WSS and PKI solutions. Revenue during fiscal 2018 was also unfavorably affected by a shift in the mix of sales towards subscription and cloud-delivered solutions subject to ratable revenue recognition, which resulted in less in-period recognized revenue and more revenue deferred to the balance sheet as compared to fiscal 2017. Operating income increased $286 million primarily due to higher revenue discussed above, a $51 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses and a $38 million decrease in cost of revenues.

Fiscal Year
Variance in
(In millions, except for percentages)
2018
2017
Dollars
Percent
Net revenues
$2,554
$2,355
$199
8%
Percentage of total net revenues
53%
59%
Operating income
$473
$187
$286
153%
Operating margin
19%
8%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total net revenue for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018?
Choices:
3027
4909
199
0
2592
Correct choice index: 1
3.1 Financial risk factors (continued)
(a) Market risk (continued)
(i) Foreign exchange risk (continued)
As at 31 December 2019, the Group’s major monetary assets and liabilities exposed to foreign exchange risk are listed below:
During the year ended 31 December 2019, the Group reported exchange gains of approximately RMB77 million (2018: RMB229 million) within “Finance costs, net” in the consolidated income statement.
As at 31 December 2019, management considers that any reasonable changes in foreign exchange rates of the above currencies against the two major functional currencies would not result in a significant change in the Group’s results, as the net carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the respective subsidiaries’ functional currency are considered to be not significant, given the exchange rate peg between HKD and USD. Accordingly, no sensitivity analysis is presented for foreign exchange risk.

USD denominated RMB’Million
Non-USD denominated RMB’Million
As at 31 December 2019
Monetary assets, current
27,728
2,899
Monetary assets, non-current
373
–
Monetary liabilities, current
(4,273)
(14,732)
Monetary liabilities, non-current
(91)
(5,739)
23,737
(17,572)
As at 31 December 2018
Monetary assets, current
18,041
1,994
Monetary assets, non-current
2,642
–
Monetary liabilities, current
(3,434)
(4,587)
Monetary liabilities, non-current
(3,733)
(9,430)
13,516
(12,023)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total USD denominated monetary assets as at 31 December 2019?
Choices:
779184528
27731
24110
10342544
28101
Correct choice index: 4
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased 15%, or $144.4 million, in 2019 compared to 2018, with gross margin increasing approximately 70 basis points to 14.7% of net sales. Our gross profit and gross profit as a percent of net sales by operating segment for 2019 and 2018 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
North America’s gross profit in 2019 increased 19% compared to 2018, and as a percentage of net sales, gross margin increased by approximately 80 basis points year over year. The year over year net increase in gross margin was primarily attributable to the following:
• A net increase in product margin, which includes partner funding and freight, of 30 basis points year over year. This increase was due primarily to improvements in hardware and software product margin partially as a result of improvements in core business margins on product net sales and also as a result of PCM.
• Services margin improvement year over year of 50 basis points was generated from increased vendor funding, cloud solution offerings and referral fees. In addition, there was a 21 basis point improvement in margins from Insight delivered services.
EMEA’s gross profit in 2019 increased 3% (increased 8% excluding the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates), compared to 2018. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin increased by approximately 40 basis points year over year.
APAC’s gross profit in 2019 increased 1% (increased 6% excluding the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates), compared to 2018, with gross margin increasing to 22.1% in 2019 from 21.2% in 2018. The improvement in gross margin for both EMEA and APAC in 2019 compared to 2018 was due primarily to changes in sales mix to higher margin products and services.

2019
% of Net
Sales
2018
% of Net Sales
NorthAmerica
$ 871,114
14.5%
$732,695
13.7%
EMEA
$227,083
14.9%
$221,467
14.5%
APAC
$39,901
22.1%
$39,556
21.2%
Consolidated
$1,138,098
14.7%
$993,718
14.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Net sales of North America between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
138
-122604
0
138419
1
Correct choice index: 3
The tax holidays represent a tax exemption period aimed to attract foreign technological investment in certain tax jurisdictions. The effect of the tax benefits, from tax holidays for countries which are profitable, on basic earnings per share was $0.14, $0.15 and $0.13 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. These agreements are present in various countries and include programs that reduce up to and including 100% of taxes in years affected by the agreements.
The Company’s tax holidays expire at various dates through the year ending December 31, 2028. In certain countries, tax holidays can be renewed depending on the Company still meeting certain conditions at the date of expiration of the current tax holidays.
In May 2019, Switzerland voted a tax reform which cancelled all favourable tax regimes and introduced a single tax rate for all companies, which triggered the revaluation of all deferred tax assets and liabilities. Enactment of this law occurred in third quarter of 2019, which resulted in a tax benefit of $20 million. The remeasurement of deferred taxes was reconciled in the fourth quarter of 2019 to include the current year activity, which did not have a material impact on the net remeasurement.

Year ended December 31, 2019
Year ended December 31, 2018
Year ended December 31, 2017
Income tax benefit (expense) computed at statutory rate
(297)
(353)
(238)
Non-deductible and non-taxable permanent differences, net
4
45
17
Income (loss) on equity-method investments
—
—
—
Valuation allowance adjustments
2
141
92
Effect on deferred taxes of changes in enacted tax rates
14
(62)
(70)
Current year credits
50
43
40
Other tax and credits
(51)
(20)
(36)
Benefits from tax holidays
129
135
114
Net impact of changes to uncertain tax positions
(5)
(16)
(43)
Earnings of subsidiaries taxed at different rates
(2)
(9)
(19)
Income tax benefit (expense)
(156)
(96)
(143)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Income tax benefit (expense) computed at statutory rate from December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-496
-212
306
-336
-56
Correct choice index: 4
As a result of the adoption of ASC 606, our deferred product revenues and deferred product costs for the fleet management and auto vehicle finance verticals increased as balances are now amortized over the estimated average in-service lives of these devices. Deferred income tax assets and accumulated deficit increased as a result of the changes made to our deferred product revenues and deferred product costs. The cumulative effect of the changes made to our consolidated balance sheet for the adoption of ASC 606 were as follows (in thousands):
(1) Deferred product costs included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other assets amounted to $5.4 million and $6.0 million, respectively, as of March 1, 2018.

Balance at
ASC 606
Balance at
February 28, 2018
Adjustments
March 1, 2018
Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1)
$12,000
1,891
$13,891
Deferred income tax assets
31,581
532
32,113
Other assets (1)
18,829
3,145
21,974
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deferred revenue
$17,757
2,156
19,913
Other non-current liabilities
24,249
5,007
29,256
Stockholders' equity


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What were the balance of total assets at February 28, 2018?
Choices:
43582
65555
43581
62410
820586649
Correct choice index: 3
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position Data:
* Adjusted IFRS balances to reflect the impact of the full retrospective adoption of IFRS 15. See Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further details.

As of June 30,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(U.S. $ in thousands)
*As Adjusted
*As Adjusted
Cash and cash equivalents
$1,268,441
$1,410,339
$244,420
$259,709
$187,094
Short-term investments
445,046
323,134
305,499
483,405
30,251
Derivative assets
215,233
99,995
3,252
—
—
Working capital
(287,597)
1,377,145
296,984
542,038
50,477
Total assets
2,977,258
2,421,828
1,282,117
990,973
397,161
Deferred revenue
468,820
342,871
245,195
181,068
136,565
Derivative liabilities
855,079
207,970
—
—
—
Exchangeable senior notes, net
853,576
819,637
—
—
—
Total liabilities
2,411,791
1,514,508
379,424
259,310
207,107
Share capital
24,199
23,531
22,726
21,620
18,461
Total equity
565,467
907,320
902,693
731,663
190,054


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average  Total equity  for fiscal years 2015 to 2019?
Choices:
659439.4
1648598.5
677034.2
539075.2
626200.2
Correct choice index: 0
Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets
The following table presents the amortization of purchased intangible assets (in millions):
The decrease in amortization of purchased intangible assets was due largely to the purchased intangible assets related to the divestiture of SPVSS business on October 28, 2018, partially offset by amortization from our recent acquisitions.

Years Ended
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
July 29, 2017
Amortization of purchased intangible assets:
Cost of sales
$624
$640
$556
Operating expenses
Amortization of purchased intangible assets
150
221
259
Restructuring and other charges
—
—
38
Total
$774
$861
$853


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in the total amortization of purchased intangible assets between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-10.1
-27.5
-33.6
160.1
-0.1
Correct choice index: 0
allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows: .

2010
2009
2008
Balance at beginning of year
$160
$133
$86
Provision
38
54
65
Amounts written off
(13)
(27)
(18)
Balance at end of year
$185
$160
$133

discontinued operations during the fourth quarter of 2009 , schlumberger recorded a net $ 22 million charge related to the resolution of a customs assessment pertaining to its former offshore contract drilling business , as well as the resolution of certain contingencies associated with other previously disposed of businesses .
this amount is included in income ( loss ) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income .
during the first quarter of 2008 , schlumberger recorded a gain of $ 38 million related to the resolution of a contingency associated with a previously disposed of business .
this gain is included in income ( loss ) from discon- tinued operations in the consolidated statement of income .
part ii , item 8 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the net change in the allowance in doubtful accounts in 2009
Choices:
-1458
27.0
36
41
38
Correct choice index: 1
NOTE 8. INVENTORIES
The changes in the allowance for obsolescence are as follows:
On December 31, 2019, our allowance for inventory obsolescence amounted to €12,527, which is 6.7% of total inventory. The major part of the allowance is related to components and raw materials. The additions for the years 2018 and 2019 mainly relate to inventory items which ceased to be used due to technological developments and design changes which resulted in obsolescence of certain parts.
The cost of inventories recognized as costs and included in cost of sales amounted to €510.2 million (2018: €365.8 million).

December 31,
2018
2019
Balance at beginning of year
(12,749)
(13,364)
Charged to cost of sales
(2,958)
(4,748)
Reversals
723
915
Utilization of the provision
1,978
4,994
Foreign currency translation effect
(358)
(324)
Balance at end of year
(13,364)
(12,527)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in reversals from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
2
1273
192
-192
1638
Correct choice index: 2
1.2 Data Centres
Note: 1. Due to its business nature, the significant air emissions of the Group are GHG emissions, arising mainly from fuels and purchased electricity produced from fossil fuels.
2. The Group’s GHG inventory includes carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. GHG emissions data for the year ended 31 December 2019 is presented in carbon dioxide equivalent and is calculated based on the “2017 Baseline Emission Factors for Regional Power Grids in China for CDM and CCER Projects” issued by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, and the “2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories” issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
3. Diesel is consumed by backup power generators.
4. Hazardous waste produced by the Group’s office buildings mainly includes waste toner cartridge and waste ink cartridge from printing equipment. Waste toner cartridge and waste ink cartridge are centralised and disposed of by printing suppliers. Such data covers all office buildings of the Group in Mainland China.
5. Non-hazardous waste produced by the Group’s office buildings mainly includes domestic waste and non-hazardous office waste. Domestic waste is disposed of by the property management companies and kitchen waste recycling vendors, and its data is not available, therefore estimation of domestic waste is made with reference to “Handbook on Domestic Discharge Coefficients for Towns in the First Nationwide Census on Contaminant Discharge” published by the State Council. Non-hazardous office waste is centralised for disposal by vendors; hence such data covers all office buildings of the Group in Mainland China.
6. Hazardous waste produced by the Group’s data centres mainly includes waste lead-acid accumulators. Waste lead-acid accumulators are disposed of by qualified waste recycling vendors.
7. Non-hazardous waste produced by the Group’s data centres mainly includes waste servers and waste hard drives. Waste servers and destroyed waste hard drives are centralised and recycled by waste recycling vendors. Such data covers all the Group’s data centres.

Indicators
For the year ended 31 December
2019
2018
Total GHG emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) (tonnes)
743,287.01
612,521.16
Direct GHG emissions (Scope 1) (tonnes)
316.35
36.76
Including: Diesel (tonnes)
316.35
36.76
Indirect GHG emissions (Scope 2) (tonnes)
742,970.66
612,484.40
Including: Purchased electricity (tonnes)
742,970.66
612,484.40
Hazardous waste (tonnes)
8.00
–
Non-hazardous waste (tonnes)
1,811.27
1,350.76


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change between 2018 and 2019 direct GHG emissions in tonnes?
Choices:
279.59
315.35
612484.4
308.35
27959
Correct choice index: 0