trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
13. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period.
On March 29, 2019, the Company launched an ATM program of our common shares for up to $40.0 million. The Company has issued 5,260,968 shares with net proceeds of $17.9 million under its At-the-Market as of December 31, 2019. The Company has not issued any shares subsequent to the balance sheet date.
The remaining available proceeds through the offering is $21.4 million as of the date of this report. Based on the share price of the Company of $3.47 per share as of April 3, 2020 it would have resulted in 6,173,500 new shares being issued, if fully utilizing the remaining balance available through the ATM.

All figures in USD except number of shares and earnings (loss) per common share
2019
2018
2017
Numerator:      
Net Loss  
(10,352)
(95,306)
(204,969)
Denominator:            
Basic - Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding  
142,571,361
141,969,666
103,832,680
Dilutive – Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding  
142,571,361
141,969,666
103,832,680
Loss per Common Share:            
Basic  
(0.07)
(0.67)
(1.97)
Diluted  
(0.07)
(0.67)
(1.97)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average net loss in 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
150137.5
100091.7
47673
95306
0
Correct choice index: 0
Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table shows, for FY19 and FY18, the actual expenditure and percentage change in total employee costs and percentage change in distributions to shareholders.
1 Represents dividends paid in each financial year
2 Total employee expenditure includes wages and salaries, social security costs, pension and other costs and share-based payments, see note 10 of the Financial Statements

FY19
FY18
Change
$M
$M
%
Shareholder distributions – dividends1
23.9
21.8
10%
Total employee expenditure2
370.1
361.9
2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average total employee expenditure across 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
36600
370
185
34
366
Correct choice index: 4
Note 15. Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plans
The Company has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain French and German employees. Most of these defined pension plans, which were acquired in the Atmel and Microsemi acquisitions, are unfunded. Plan benefits are provided in accordance with local statutory requirements. Benefits are based on years of service and employee compensation levels. Pension liabilities and charges are based upon various assumptions, updated annually, including discount rates, future salary increases, employee turnover, and mortality rates. The Company’s French pension plan provides for termination benefits paid to covered French employees only at retirement, and consists of approximately one to five months of salary. The Company's German pension plan provides for defined benefit payouts for covered German employees following retirement.
The aggregate net pension expense relating to these two plans is as follows (in millions):
Interest costs and amortization of actuarial losses are recorded in the other (loss) income, net line item in the statements of income.

Year Ended March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Service costs
$1.5
$2.2
$1.4
Interest costs
1.1
1.0
1.0
Amortization of actuarial loss
0.4
0.8
—
Settlements
—
—
0.5
Net pension period cost
$3.0
$4.0
$2.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Amortization of actuarial loss between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
2.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.3
1.2
Correct choice index: 1
Capital stock 2019
Capital stock at December 31, 2019, consisted of the following:
The capital stock of the Parent Company is divided into two classes: Class A shares (quota value SEK 5.00) and Class B shares (quota value SEK 5.00). Both classes have the same rights of participation in the net assets and earnings.Class A shares, however, are entitled to one vote per share while Class B shares are entitled to one tenth of one vote per share.
At December 31, 2019, the total number of treasury shares was 19,853,247 (37,057,039 in 2018 and 50,265,499 in 2017) Class B shares.

Capital stock
Parent Company
Number of shares
Capital stock (SEK million)
Class A shares
261,755,983
1,309
Class B shares
3,072,395,752
15,363
Total
3,334,151,735
16,672


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the number of shares between class A and class B?
Choices:
-261754674
2810639769
0
3334151735
2811
Correct choice index: 1
Uncertain Tax Positions
In accordance with authoritative guidance, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018,and 2017 (amounts shown in thousands):
Of the total unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2019, $1.6 million will impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate that there will be a substantial change in unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
The Company's practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2019, no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is subject to income taxation in the U.S. at the federal and state levels. All tax years are subject to examination by U.S., California, and other state tax authorities due to the carryforward of unutilized net operating losses and tax credits. The Company is also subject to foreign income taxes in the countries in which it operates. The Company’s U.S. federal tax return for the year ended September 30, 2017 is currently under examination. To our knowledge, the Company is not currently under examination by any other taxing authorities.

2019
2018
2017
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year
$1,321
$1,181
$—
Additions from tax positions taken in the current year
213
140
140
Additions from tax positions taken in prior years
73
—
1,041
Reductions from tax positions taken in prior years
—
—
—
Tax settlements
—
—
—
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of the year
$1,607
$1,321
$1,181


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average gross unrecognized tax benefit at the end of the year from 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
582.33
2568.12
1369.67
1152656
0
Correct choice index: 2
In the fourth quarter of 2019, we recognized other income, net of expenses, of $54 million, increasing from a negative $2 million in the prior quarter and from an income of $16 million in the year-ago quarter, reflecting higher R&D grants in Italy associated with the IPCEI program.
Other income and expenses, net

Three Months Ended
December 31, 2019
September 29,2019
December 31, 2018
(Unaudited, in millions)
Research and development funding
$68
$14
$19
Phase-out and start-up costs
(16)
(15)
(1)
Exchange gain (loss), net
1
(1)
—
Patent costs
(1)
(1)
(1)
Gain on sale of non-current assets
1
—
1
Other, net
1
1
(2)
Other income and expenses, net
$54
$(2)
$16
As percentage of net revenues
2.0%
(0.1)%
0.6%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Research and development funding from the period December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
52
87
29182
35
49
Correct choice index: 4
The activity for unrecognized gross tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
Included in the December 31, 2019 balance of $130.0 million is $97.2 million related to unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the annual effective tax rate. Also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2019 is $32.8 million of benefit that, if recognized, would result in adjustments to other tax accounts, primarily deferred taxes.
Although the Company cannot predict the timing of resolution with taxing authorities, if any, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that its unrecognized tax benefits will be reduced by $1.5 million in the next 12 months due to settlement with tax authorities or expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. The Company did not recognize any additional tax benefit or expense for interest and penalties during the year ended December 31, 2019.
The Company recognized approximately $0.8 million of tax benefit and $1.5 million of tax expense for interest and penalties during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company had approximately $5.1 million, $5.1 million, and $5.9 million of accrued interest and penalties at December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued in relation to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.
Tax years prior to 2016 are generally not subject to examination by the IRS except for items involving tax attributes that have been carried forward to tax years whose statute of limitations remains open. The Company is not currently under IRS examination. For state returns, the Company is generally not subject to income tax examinations for years prior to 2015.
The Company is also subject to routine examinations by various foreign tax jurisdictions in which it operates. With respect to jurisdictions outside the United States, the Company's subsidiaries are generally no longer subject to income tax audits for years prior to 2009. The Company is currently under audit in the following jurisdictions including, but not limited to, Canada, China, the Czech Republic, the Philippines, Singapore and the United Kingdom.

2019
2018
2017
Balance at beginning of year
$112.2
$114.8
$136.7
Acquired balances
15.5
—
—
Additions for tax benefits related to the current year
9.4
7.4
23.6
Additions for tax benefits of prior years
8.0
2.8
4.7
Reductions for tax benefits of prior years
(0.2)
(1.9)
(1.6)
Lapse of statute
(8.2)
(10.9)
(16.3)
Settlements
(6.7)
—
(4.9)
Change in rate due to U.S. Tax Reform
—
—
(27.4)
Balance at end of year
$130.0
$112.2
$114.8


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Additions for tax benefits related to the current year for December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
8.4
16.8
11.2
33.6
9.7
Correct choice index: 0
(11) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following tables summarize the Company’s stock-based compensation expense for liability and equity classified awards included in the consolidated statements of operations:
CII Common and Preferred Units
Prior to the Company’s IPO, the Company was given authorization by Communications Infrastructure Investments, LLC (“CII”) to award 625,000,000 of CII’s common units as profits interests to employees, directors, and affiliates of the Company. The common units were historically considered to be stock-based compensation with terms that required the awards to be classified as liabilities due to cash settlement features. The vested portion of the awards was reported as a liability and the fair value was re-measured at each reporting date until the date of settlement, with a corresponding charge (or credit) to stock-based compensation expense. On December 31, 2016, the CII common units became fully vested and as such there is no remaining unrecognized compensation cost associated with CII common units for any period subsequent to December 31, 2016.
The value of the CII common units was derived from the value of CII’s investments in the Company and Onvoy, LLC and its subsidiaries (“OVS”), a company that provided voice and managed services which the Company spun off during the year ended June 30, 2014. As the value derived from each of these investments was separately determinable and there was a plan in place to distribute the value associated with the investment in Company shares separate from the value derived from OVS, the two components were accounted for separately. The OVS component of the CII awards was adjusted to fair value each reporting period. On December 31, 2015, CII entered into an agreement to sell OVS to a third party. The sale was completed in May 2016. Based on the sale price, the estimated fair value of OVS awards was increased, resulting in an increase to stock based compensation expense and corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital of $12.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2016. Proceeds from the sale to be distributed to the Company’s employees was paid by CII.

Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
(in millions)
Included in:
Operating costs
$11.3
$9.9
$11.3
Selling, general and administrative expenses
98.0
86.8
102.8
Total stock-based compensation expense
$109.3
$96.7
$114.1
CII common and preferred units $ — $ — $10.1
$ —
$ —
$10.1
Part A restricted stock units
93.8
82.3
76.5
Part B restricted stock units
13.0
12.4
26.0
Part C restricted stock units
2.5
2.0
1.5
Total stock-based compensation expense
$109.3
$96.7
$114.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What were the total operating costs for all 3 years?
Choices:
32.7
33.6
119.2
0.3
32.5
Correct choice index: 4
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .

(Dollars in thousands)
2010
2009
2008
Balance at January 1
$29,010
$34,366
$29,132
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
7,119
6,997
5,234
Additions for tax positions of prior years
-
-
-
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
-
-
-
Settlements with taxing authorities
(12,356)
(12,353)
-
Lapses of applicable statutes of limitations
-
-
-
Balance at December 31
$23,773
$29,010
$34,366

the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized .
in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand .
in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
the company is no longer subject to u.s .
federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 .
the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes .
during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties .
included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date .
for u.s .
income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 .
in addition , for u.s .
income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire .
management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented .
tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent change in net expense in interest and penalties between 2008 and 2009?
Choices:
-883
-0.026
-29010.361
0.619
-0.361
Correct choice index: 4
14. INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rates for each of the periods presented are the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates. The more significant provisions of the Tax Act as applicable to us are described in Note 1 above under “Impacts of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.” During fiscal 2019, we recorded a net benefit of $389 million in accordance with SAB 118 related to adjustments in our estimates of the one-time transition tax on certain foreign subsidiary earnings, and the remeasurement of our net deferred tax assets and liabilities affected by the Tax Act. Our provision for income taxes for fiscal 2019 varied from the 21% U.S. statutory rate imposed by the Tax Act primarily due to earnings in foreign operations, state taxes, the U.S. research and development tax credit, settlements with tax authorities, the tax effects of stock-based compensation, the Foreign Derived Intangible Income deduction, the tax effect of GILTI, and a reduction to our transition tax recorded consistent with the provision of SAB 118. Our provision for income taxes for fiscal 2018 varied from the 21% U.S. statutory rate imposed by the Tax Act primarily due to the impacts of the Tax Act upon adoption, state taxes, the U.S. research and development tax credit, settlements with tax authorities, the tax effects of stock-based compensation and the U.S. domestic production activity deduction. Prior to the January 1, 2018 effective date of the Tax Act, our provision for income taxes historically differed from the tax computed at the previous U.S. federal statutory income tax rate due primarily to certain earnings considered as indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations, state taxes, the U.S. research and development tax cr edit, settlements with tax authorities, the tax effects of stock-based compensation and the U.S. domestic production activity deduction.
The following is a geographical breakdown of income before the provision for income taxes:

Year Ended May 31
(in millions)
2019
2018
2017
Domestic
$3,774
$3,366
$3,674
Foreign
8,494
9,058
8,006
Income before provision for income taxes
$12,268
$12,424
$11,680


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average total income before provision of income taxes for the 3 year period from 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
12124
10
36375
0
8039
Correct choice index: 0
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
JKHY
100.00
138.34
177.10
195.72
267.64
322.60
Peer Group
100.00
117.87
161.90
203.87
233.39
271.10
S&P 500
100.00
120.60
150.27
161.43
167.87
197.92

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .
total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .
peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .
companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in the s&p 500 stock performance from 2014 to 2015
Choices:
0.00074
13.46505
2.07427
0.07427
-139.11
Correct choice index: 3
The Group reported a loss before tax of £(42.7)m in the year, compared to a profit before tax of £20.9m in 2017/18. A loss after tax was £(33.8)m, compared to a £7.2m profit in the prior year.
Adjusted profit before tax was £88.0m in the year, an increase of £9.4m compared to the prior year due to growth both in Trading profit and lower interest costs as described above. Adjusted profit after tax increased £7.6m to £71.3m in the year after deducting a notional 19.0% tax charge of £16.7m. Based on average shares in issue of 841.5 million shares, adjusted earnings per share in the year was 8.5 pence, growth in the year of +11.5%.

Adjusted earnings per share (£m)
2018/19
2017/18
Change
Trading profit
128.5
123.0
+4.5%
Less: Net regular interest
(40.5)
(44.4)
+8.9%
Adjusted profit before tax
88.0
78.6
+12.1%
Less: Notional tax (19%)
(16.7)
(14.9)
(12.1%)
Adjusted profit after tax6
71.3
63.7
+12.1%
Average shares in issue (millions)
841.5
836.8
+0.6%
Adjusted earnings per share (pence)
8.5
7.6
+11.5%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average trading profit for 2017/18 and 2018/19?
Choices:
3.2
125.75
42.9
7902.75
2.86
Correct choice index: 1
Change in Product Mix and Technology Migration
Because the price of wafers processed with different technologies varies significantly, the mix of wafers that we produce is among the primary factors that affect our revenues and profitability. The value of a wafer is determined principally by the complexity and performance of the processing technology used to produce the wafer, as well as by the yield and defect density. Production of devices with higher levels of functionality and performance, with better yields and lower defect density as well as with greater system-level integration requires better manufacturing expertise and generally commands higher wafer prices. The increase in price generally has more than offset associated increases in production cost once an appropriate economy of scale is reached.
Prices for wafers of a given level of technology generally decline over the processing technology life cycle. As a result, we have continuously been migrating to increasingly sophisticated technologies to maintain the same level of profitability. We began our volume production with 65-nanometer and 40-nanometer technologies in 2006 and 2009, respectively. We introduced our 28-nanometer technology to customers in 2011 and started large-scale commercial production in 2014. Our 28nm and below technologies contributed approximately 17.1%, 15.2% and 11.3% of our foundry revenue in 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively.

Years Ended December 31,
Process Technologies
2017
2018
2019
%
%
%
14 nanometers and under
0.9
2.6
0.0
28 nanometers
16.2
12.6
11.3
40 nanometers
28.4
25.3
23.1
65 nanometers
12.3
12.5
14.7
90 nanometers
4.9
8.3
13.6
0.11/0.13 micron
11.5
11.6
12.6
0.15/0.18 micron
12.4
13.7
13.1
0.25/0.35 micron
10.0
10.1
8.7
0.50 micron or higher
3.4
3.3
2.9
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in 28 nanometers from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
100
1.3
-1.3
-0.3
Correct choice index: 3