trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements stock-based performance unit awards 2013 during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 we granted 754140 , 563631 and 1205517 stock- based performance unit awards to officers .
at december 31 , 2018 , there were 1196176 units outstanding .
total stock-based performance unit awards expense was $ 13 million in 2018 , $ 8 million in 2017 and $ 6 million in 2016 .
the key assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation to determine the fair value of stock-based performance units granted in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were: .

2018
2017
2016
Valuation date stock price
$14.17
$14.17
$14.17
Expected annual dividend yield
1.4%
1.4%
1.4%
Expected volatility
39%
43%
52%
Risk-free interest rate
2.5%
2.6%
2.4%
Fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding
$19.60
$19.45
$21.51

18 .
defined benefit postretirement plans and defined contribution plan we have noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all domestic employees , as well as u.k .
employees who were hired before april 2010 .
certain employees located in e.g. , who are u.s .
or u.k .
based , also participate in these plans .
benefits under these plans are based on plan provisions specific to each plan .
for the u.k .
pension plan , the principal employer and plan trustees reached a decision to close the plan to future benefit accruals effective december 31 , 2015 .
we also have defined benefit plans for other postretirement benefits covering our u.s .
employees .
health care benefits are provided up to age 65 through comprehensive hospital , surgical and major medical benefit provisions subject to various cost- sharing features .
post-age 65 health care benefits are provided to certain u.s .
employees on a defined contribution basis .
life insurance benefits are provided to certain retiree beneficiaries .
these other postretirement benefits are not funded in advance .
employees hired after 2016 are not eligible for any postretirement health care or life insurance benefits. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by how much did the fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding decrease from 2016 to 2018?
Choices:
-0.9758
-0.0888
1
-88795.9089
1.9112
Correct choice index: 1
Dividends
The following is a summary of our fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 activities related to dividends on our common stock (in millions, except per share amounts).
On May 22, 2019, we declared a cash dividend of $0.48 per share of common stock, payable on July 24, 2019 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 5, 2019. The timing and amount of future dividends will depend on market conditions, corporate business and financial considerations and regulatory requirements. All dividends declared have been determined by the Company to be legally authorized under the laws of the state in which we are incorporated.

Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Dividends per share declared
$ 1.60
$ 0.80
$ 0.76
Dividend payments allocated to additional paid-in capital
$ 403
$ 106
$ 88
Dividend payments allocated to retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
$ —
$ 108
$ 120


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Dividends per share declared between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-86.4
27.2
4.2
-0.8
0.8
Correct choice index: 4
The following table provides a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP Net income to non-GAAP Adjusted net income (amounts in thousands):
(1) Fiscal years ending March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
(2) $0.9 million in costs incurred during fiscal year 2018 related to the relocation of the Company's tantalum powder facility equipment from Carson City, Nevada to its existing Matamoros, Mexico plant were reclassified from “Plant start-up costs” to “Restructuring charges” during fiscal year 2019.

Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net income (GAAP) (1)
$206,587
$254,127
$47,157
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Equity (income) loss from equity method investments
3,304
(76,192)
(41,643)
Acquisition (gain) loss
—
(130,880)
—
Change in value of TOKIN options
—
—
(10,700)
(Gain) loss on write down and disposal of long-lived assets
1,660
(992)
10,671
Restructuring charges (2)
8,779
14,843
5,404
R&D grant reimbursements and grant income
(4,559)
—
—
ERP integration costs/IT transition costs
8,813
80
7,045
Stock-based compensation
12,866
7,657
4,720
Legal expenses/fines related to antitrust class actions
11,896
16,636
2,640
Net foreign exchange (gain) loss
(7,230)
13,145
(3,758)
TOKIN investment-related expenses
—
—
1,101
Plant start-up costs (2)
(927)
929
427
Amortization included in interest expense
1,872
2,467
761
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments
(50,012)
(30)
(741)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
15,946
486
—
Adjusted net income (non-GAAP) (1)
$208,995
$102,276
$23,084


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Legal expenses/fines related to antitrust class actions between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-52652
19276
23866
140
13996
Correct choice index: 4
3.3 Fair value estimation The table below analyses the Group’s financial instruments carried at fair value as at 31 December 2019 by level of the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Such inputs are categorised into three levels within a fair value hierarchy as follows:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1);
Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2); and
Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (level 3).
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is determined with reference to quoted market prices at the end of the reporting period. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. These instruments are included in level 1.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required for evaluating the fair value of a financial instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.
If one or more of the significant inputs are not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3.
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments mainly include: • Dealer quotes for similar instruments; • The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield curves; and • Other techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for financial instruments.

Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
As at 31 December 2019
FVPL
14,766
5,091
116,079
135,936
FVOCI
74,707
–
7,014
81,721
OFA
–
375
–
375
Other financial liabilities
–
523
1,873
2,396
As at 31 December 2018
FVPL
10,875
5,009
81,993
97,877
FVOCI
41,578
–
1,941
43,519
OFA
–
2,032
–
2,032
Other financial liabilities
–
40
4,466
4,506


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much did the level 1 FVPL change by from 2018 year end to 2019 year end?
Choices:
-3891
-10500
3891
-10874
7752
Correct choice index: 2
Acquisition of Fagerdala
On October 2, 2017, the Company acquired Fagerdala Singapore Pte Ltd., a manufacturer and fabricator of polyethylene foam based in Singapore, to join its Product Care division. We acquired 100% of Fagerdala shares for estimated consideration of S$144.7 million, or $106.2 million, net of cash acquired of $13.3 million, inclusive of purchase price adjustments which were finalized in the third quarter of 2018. We acquired Fagerdala to leverage its manufacturing footprint in Asia, experience in foam manufacturing and fabrication and commercial organization to expand our presence across multiple industries utilizing fulfillment to distribute goods.
The following table summarizes the consideration transferred to acquire Fagerdala and the final allocation of the purchase price among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. price among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Preliminary Allocation
Measurement Period
Final Allocation
(In millions)
As of October 2, 2017
Adjustments
As of December 31, 2018
Total consideration transferred
$ 106.6
$ (0.4)
$ 106.2
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
13.3
—
13.3
Trade receivables, net
22.4
—
22.4
Inventories, net
10.0
0.1
10.1
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
8.4
—
8.4
Property and equipment, net
23.3
—
23.3
Identifiable intangible assets, net
41.4
0.7
42.1
Goodwill
39.3
(1.5)
37.8
Total assets
$ 158.1
$ (0.7)
$ 157.4
Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings
14.0
—
14.0
Accounts payable
6.9
—
6.9
Other current liabilities
15.1
(0.1)
15.0
Long-term debt, less current portion
3.8
—
3.8
Non-current deferred taxes
11.7
(0.2)
11.5
Total liabilities
$ 51.5
$ (0.3)
$ 51.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the value of 1 USD to SGD at time of calculation?
Choices:
1.48
1.36
0.73
1
146.06
Correct choice index: 1
A summary of option activity under all of the Company’s equity incentive plans at December 31, 2019 and changes during the period then ended is presented in the following table:
There were no options granted for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $215.5 million, $74.6 million, and $41.2 million, respectively.

Number of Options Outstanding (in thousands)
Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share
Weighted- Average Contractual Term (in Years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
7,384
$10.59
5.3
$74,065
Granted
25
23.99
Exercised
(1,722)
10.39
Canceled/Forfeited
(401)
16.04
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
5,286
$10.30
4.2
$201,480
Granted
-
-
Exercised
(1,138)
8.17
Canceled/Forfeited
(17)
18.79
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
4,131
$10.86
3.3
$295,921
Granted
-
-
Exercised
(1,742)
8.53
Canceled/Forfeited
(132)
2.73
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
2,257
$13.13
2.5
$351,428
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2019
2,259
$13.13
2.5
$351,362
Excercisable as of December 31, 2019
2,243
$13.10
2.5
$349,002


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average total intrinsic value of options exercised during year ended December 31, 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
-110.43
1.1
110.43
0.01
82.97
Correct choice index: 2
.

Years ended December 31
2018
2017
2016
Statutory tax rate
19.0%
19.3%
20.0%
U.S. state income taxes, net of U.S. federal benefit
(0.4)
(1.5)
0.4
Taxes on international operations<sup>(1)</sup>
(7.3)
(30.3)
(12.2)
Nondeductible expenses
2.7
3.4
1.4
Adjustments to prior year tax requirements
0.9
2.0
(1.2)
Adjustments to valuation allowances
3.8
(1.8)
(2.2)
Change in uncertain tax positions
0.9
1.6
3.2
Excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation<sup>(2)</sup>
(3.6)
(8.0)
—
U.S. Tax Reform impact<sup>(3)</sup>
7.1
51.2
—
Loss on disposition
(10.2)
—
—
Other — net
(1.2)
0.6
1.2
Effective tax rate
11.7%
36.5%
10.6%

( 1 ) the company determines the adjustment for taxes on international operations based on the difference between the statutory tax rate applicable to earnings in each foreign jurisdiction and the enacted rate of 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) , 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) and 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively .
the benefit to the company 2019s effective income tax rate from taxes on international operations relates to benefits from lower-taxed global operations , primarily due to the use of global funding structures and the tax holiday in singapore .
the impact decreased from 2017 to 2018 primarily as a result of the decrease in the u.s .
federal tax ( 2 ) with the adoption of asu 2016-09 in 2017 , excess tax benefits and deficiencies from share-based payment transactions are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income .
( 3 ) the impact of the tax reform act including the transition tax , the re-measurement of u.s .
deferred tax assets and liabilities from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , withholding tax accruals , and the allocation of tax benefit between continuing operations and discontinued operations related to utilization of foreign tax credits. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
Choices:
-200.635
1.007
0.558
0.891
0.172
Correct choice index: 4
Customers and Markets
Our primary customers, in terms of our sales revenues, include premier integrated device manufacturers, such as Texas Instruments and Intel Mobile, plus leading fabless design companies, such as Broadcom, MediaTek, Realtek, Qualcomm and Novatek. Although we are not dependent on any single customer, a significant portion of our operating revenues has been generated from sales to a few customers. Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 51.3% of our operating revenues in 2019. Set forth below is a geographic breakdown of our operating revenues in 2017, 2018 and 2019 by the location of our customers.

Years Ended December 31,
Region
2017
2018
2019
%
%
%
Taiwan
32.8
36.4
36.4
Singapore
20.6
16.4
16.2
China (including Hong Kong)
12.7
12.2
12.9
Japan
3.2
3.9
6.6
USA
12.2
15.6
13.5
Europe
9.6
8.3
4.7
Others
8.9
7.2
9.7
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average customers from Singapore?
Choices:
172.01
0.18
17.73
5.98
19.13
Correct choice index: 2
This section highlights the Group’s transactions with its related parties, such as its subsidiaries and Key Management Personnel.
During the reporting period and previous reporting periods, Woolworths Group Limited advanced loans to, received and repaid loans from, and provided treasury, accounting, legal, taxation, and administrative services to other entities within the Group.
Entities within the Group also exchanged goods and services in sale and purchase transactions. All transactions occurred on the basis of normal commercial terms and conditions. Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.
All transactions with directors and Key Management Personnel (including their related parties) were conducted on an arm’s length basis in the ordinary course of business and under normal terms and conditions for customers and employees. Related parties of Key Management Personnel who are employees received normal employee benefits on standard terms and conditions.
The total remuneration for Key Management Personnel of the Group is as follows:
Details of equity instruments provided as compensation to Key Management Personnel and shares issued on exercise of these instruments, together with the terms and conditions of the instruments, are disclosed in the Remuneration Report.

2019
2018
$
$
Short-term employee benefits
12,175,184
14,217,931
Post employment benefits
322,733
297,319
Other long-term benefits
161,569
139,776
Share-based payments
9,177,425
6,594,300
21,836,911
21,249,326


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average post employment benefits for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
231254
310026
0
2
620052
Correct choice index: 1
Consolidated Financial Results
Operating Expenses
The following table sets forth operating expenses by segment for the periods presented (in millions):
The increase in Operating Expenses was primarily driven by higher net personnel costs, technology-related costs and acquisition-related costs in our Software Solutions segment. The increase in our Data and Analytics segment primarily related to higher net personnel costs and higher data costs related to revenue growth. The decrease in Corporate and Other was primarily driven by lower incentive bonus expense.

Year ended December 31,
Variance
2019
2018
$
%
Software Solutions
$412.7
$394.8
$17.9
5%
Data and Analytics
123.4
115.0
8.4
7%
Corporate and Other
109.9
115.6
(5.7)
(5)%
Total
$646.0
$625.4
$20.6
3%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the percent variance between Software Solutions and Data and Analytics?
Choices:
2
-1
2000000
-108
5
Correct choice index: 0
have access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets .
at december 31 , 2009 , we had a working capital surplus of approximately $ 1.0 billion , which reflects our decision to maintain additional cash reserves to enhance liquidity in response to difficult economic conditions .
at december 31 , 2008 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 100 million .
historically , we have had a working capital deficit , which is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity .
we maintain adequate resources and , when necessary , have access to capital to meet any daily and short-term cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 .

<i>Millions of Dollars</i>
<i>2009</i>
2008
2007
Cash provided by operating activities
$3,234
$4,070
$3,277
Cash used in investing activities
(2,175)
(2,764)
(2,426)
Cash used in financing activities
(458)
(935)
(800)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
$601
$371
$51

operating activities lower net income in 2009 , a reduction of $ 184 million in the outstanding balance of our accounts receivable securitization program , higher pension contributions of $ 72 million , and changes to working capital combined to decrease cash provided by operating activities compared to 2008 .
higher net income and changes in working capital combined to increase cash provided by operating activities in 2008 compared to 2007 .
in addition , accelerated tax deductions enacted in 2008 on certain new operating assets resulted in lower income tax payments in 2008 versus 2007 .
voluntary pension contributions in 2008 totaling $ 200 million and other pension contributions of $ 8 million partially offset the year-over-year increase versus 2007 .
investing activities lower capital investments and higher proceeds from asset sales drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2009 versus 2008 .
increased capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2008 compared to 2007. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2008 to 2009?
Choices:
-0.20541
1.39066
-0.00205
1.79459
1.82533
Correct choice index: 0
NOTE 4 – REMUNERATION TO AUDITORS APPOINTED AT THE PARENT COMPANY’S ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Under SEC regulations, the remuneration of the auditor of USD 0.7m (2018: USD 0.8m, 2017: USD 1.0m) is required to be presented as follows: Audit USD 0.6m (2018: USD 0.6m, 2017: USD 0.6m) and other audit-related services USD 0.1m (2018: USD 0.2m, 2017: USD 0.4m).
Our Audit Committee pre-approves all audit, audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by our independent auditors and associated fees prior to the engagement of the independent auditor with respect to such services.

USDm
2019
2018
2017
Audit fees
Fees payable to the Company's auditor for the audit of the Company's annual accounts
0.4
0.4
0.4
Audit of the Company's subsidiaries pursuant to legislation
0.2
0.2
0.2
Total audit fees
0.6
0.6
0.6
Non-audit fees
Audit-related services
0.1
0.2
0.4
Tax services
0.0
-
-
Total non-audit fees
0.1
0.2
0.4
Total
0.7
0.8
1.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the the total remuneration to the auditor in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-0.1
-0.8
1.5
-0.7
-0.2
Correct choice index: 0
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes .
the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 .
market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated .
price range of common stock .

2003
High
Low
2002
High
Low
First Quarter
$4.04
$2.72
First Quarter
$17.84
$4.11
Second Quarter
8.37
3.75
Second Quarter
9.17
3.55
Third Quarter
7.70
5.91
Third Quarter
4.61
1.56
Fourth Quarter
9.50
7.57
Fourth Quarter
3.57
0.95

holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share .
dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends .
in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests .
our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to .
see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in the low price for the first quarter of 2003 and the high price for the fourth quarter of 2003?
Choices:
6.28
-8.34
4.85
-6.78
6.78
Correct choice index: 4
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Significant components of the income tax expense (benefit) were as follows:

Fiscal
2019
2018
2017
(in millions)
Current income tax expense (benefit):
U.S.:
Federal
$ (28)
$ 20
$ (9)
State
2
21
9
Non-U.S.
229
406
322
203
447
322
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
U.S.:
Federal
(25)
499
(119)
State
(8)
(30)
(15)
Non-U.S.
(185)
(1,260)
(8)
(218)
(791)
(142)
Income tax expense (benefit)
$ (15)
$ (344)
$ 180


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Current income tax expense (benefit) in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-244
-267
650
-203
182
Correct choice index: 0