trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Other (Income) and Expense
NM—Not meaningful
Total consolidated other (income) and expense was income of $968 million in 2019 compared to expense of $1,152 million in 2018. The year-to-year change was primarily driven by: • Lower non-operating retirement-related costs ($957 million). Refer to “Retirement-Related Plans” for additional information. • Higher gains from divestitures ($833 million) reflected in Other; and • Higher net exchange gains (including derivative instruments) ($272 million). The company’s hedging programs help mitigate currency impacts in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Operating (non-GAAP) other (income) and expense was $1,431 million of income in 2019 and increased $1,010 million compared to the prior-year period. The year-to-year change was primarily driven by the same factors excluding lower non-operating retirement-related costs.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Other (income) and expense
Foreign currency transaction losses/(gains)
$(279)
$(427)
(34.6)%
(Gains)/losses on derivative instruments
15
434
(96.6)
Interest income
(349)
(264)
32.2
Net (gains)/losses from securities and investment assets
(32)
(101)
(67.9)
Retirement-related costs/(income)
615
1,572
(60.9)
Other
(937)
(63)
NM
Total consolidated other (income) and expense
$(968)
$1,152
NM
Non-operating adjustments
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
(2)
(2)
50.0%
Acquisition-related charges
154
0
NM
Non-operating retirement related costs/(income)
(615)
(1,572)
(60.9)%
Operating (non-GAAP) other (income) and expense
$(1,431)
$(422)
239.4%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the Foreign currency transaction losses/(gains) from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
148
1
-148
-131
Correct choice index: 1
Foreign Currency Translation Impact on Consolidated Financial Results
Since we are a U.S. domiciled company, we translate our foreign currency-denominated financial results into US Dollars. Due to the changes in the value of foreign currencies relative to the US Dollar, translating our financial results from foreign currencies to US Dollars may result in a favorable or unfavorable impact. Historically, the most significant currencies that have impacted the translation of our consolidated financial results are the euro, the Australian dollar, the Mexican peso, the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Chinese Renminbi.
The following table presents the approximate favorable or (unfavorable) impact foreign currency translation had on certain of our consolidated financial results

(In millions)
2019 vs. 2018
2018 vs. 2017
Net sales
$ (137.2)
$ (43.4)
Cost of sales
98.4
31.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses
16.3
1.0
Net earnings
(15.7)
(8.2)
Non-U.S. GAAP Adjusted EBITDA
(25.3)
(11.1)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total favourable impact foreign currency translation had on certain of their consolidated financial results?
Choices:
-6.1
-5.8
147.4
138.2
132.1
Correct choice index: 2
22 2002subsequent events in january 2011 , we purchased cif 2019s 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) interest in 521 fifth avenue , thereby assuming full ownership of the building .
the transaction values the consolidated interest at approximately $ 245.7 a0million .
in january 2011 , we repaid our $ 84.8 a0million , 5.15% ( 5.15 % ) unsecured notes at par on their maturity date .
in january 2011 , we , along with the moinian group , completed the recapitalization of 3 columbus circle .
the recapitalization included a $ 138 a0million equity investment by sl a0green , a portion of which was in the form of sl a0green operating partnership units .
we believe the property is now fully capitalized for all costs necessary to complete the redevelop- ment and lease-up of the building .
the previously existing mortgage has been refinanced with a bridge loan provided by sl a0green and deutsche bank , which we intend to be further refinanced by third-party lenders at a later date .
on february a010 , 2011 , the company and the operating partnership entered into atm equity offering sales agreements with each of merrill lynch , pierce , fenner a0& smith incorporated and morgan stanley a0& a0co .
incorporated , to sell shares of the company 2019s common stock , from time to time , through a $ 250.0 a0 million 201cat the market 201d equity offering program under which merrill lynch , pierce , fenner a0& smith incorporated and morgan stanley a0& a0co .
incorporated are acting as sales agents .
as of february a022 , 2011 , we sold approximately 2.0 a0million shares our common stock through the program for aggregate proceeds of $ 144.1 a0million .
2009 quarter ended december a031 september a030 june a030 march a031 .

2009 Quarter Ended
December 31
September 30
June 30
March 31
Total revenues
$243,040
$245,769
$248,251
$258,787
Income (loss) net of noncontrolling interests and before gains on sale
(380)
4,099
(10,242)
(26,600)
Equity in net gain (loss) on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/ real estate
—
(157)
(2,693)
9,541
Gain on early extinguishment of debt
606
8,368
29,321
47,712
Gain (loss) on equity investment in marketable securities
(232)
(52)
127
(807)
Net income from discontinued operations
1,593
1,863
999
1,319
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations
(1,741)
(11,672)
—
6,572
Net income (loss) attributable to SL Green
(154)
2,449
17,512
37,737
Preferred stock dividends
(4,969)
(4,969)
(4,969)
(4,969)
Net income (loss) attributable to SL Green common stockholders
$(5,123)
$(2,520)
$12,543
$32,768
Net income (loss) per common share-Basic
$(0.07)
$(0.03)
$0.19
$0.57
Net income (loss) per common share-Diluted
$(0.07)
$(0.03)
$0.18
$0.57

88 sl green realty corp .
2010 annual report notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2011 what was the ratio of the recapitalization of 3 columbus circle to the 5.15% ( 5.15 % ) unsecured notes repayment
Choices:
-0.36316
222.8
1.62736
0.61449
0.23585
Correct choice index: 2
10. Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
Trade creditors are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 to 60-day terms. Other creditors are non-interest bearing.
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade creditors approximates their fair value.

2019
2018
Notes
£ million
£ million
Trade creditors
2.3
1.4
Owed to subsidiaries
90.4
84.8
Accruals
5.1
4.5
Deferred income
3.2
4.4
Lease liabilities
14
0.1
–
Other taxes and social security costs
0.4
0.5
Government grants
12
0.7
0.3
102.2
95.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Accruals?
Choices:
-79.7
2.8
60
9.6
0.6
Correct choice index: 4
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
2018 Transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the allocation of the final purchase price for the acquisition of Idea Cellular Infrastructure Services Limited was finalized with no material post-closing adjustments. During the year ended December 31, 2019, there were no material post-closing adjustments that impacted other 2018 acquisitions.
Pro Forma Consolidated Results (Unaudited)
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma financial results as if the 2019 acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2018 and the 2018 acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2017. The pro forma results do not include any anticipated cost synergies, costs or other integration impacts. Accordingly, such pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results that actually would have occurred had the transactions been completed on the dates indicated, nor are they indicative of the future operating results of the Company.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Pro forma revenues
$7,904.2
$7,936.0
Pro forma net income attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders
$1,844.9
$1,122.6
Pro forma net income per common share amounts:
Basic net income attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders
$4.17
$2.55
Diluted net income attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders
$4.14
$2.53


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Diluted net income attributable to American Tower Corporation common stockholders between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
161
-1.61
1.61
0.92
0
Correct choice index: 2
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup .
in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield .
accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above .
in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield .
however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield .
where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method .
the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 .
the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

In millions of dollars
Accretable yield
Carrying amount of loan receivable
Allowance
Beginning balance
$27
$920
$95
Purchases(1)
1
130
—
Disposals/payments received
(11)
(594)
—
Accretion
(44)
44
—
Builds (reductions) to the allowance
128
—
(18)
Increase to expected cash flows
(2)
19
—
FX/other
17
(50)
—
Balance at December 31, 2010(2)
$116
$469
$77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method .
these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date .
the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates .
( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. at december 31 , 2010 what was the percent of the net allowance to the the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio
Choices:
-0.11224
0.19643
11.19643
0.00255
196.42857
Correct choice index: 1
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

2011
$82,184
2012
77,110
2013
75,970
2014
75,970
2015
75,970
Thereafter
390,239
Total minimum lease payments
777,443
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments
(357,982)
Net minimum lease payments
419,461
Less: Amount representing interest
(132,490)
Present value of net minimum lease payments
286,971
Less: Current portion
(24,801)
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
$262,170

the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2010 is included in the commitments table in note 14 .
10 .
income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .
deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .
we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .
determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .
as of december 31 , 2010 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes .
the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 .
in addition , there are $ 11 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 42 million of capital loss carryforwards which were fully offset by a valuation allowance .
the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2011. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total minimum lease payments are due in 2015?
Choices:
419461.09772
9.77178
1
0.09772
0.09918
Correct choice index: 3
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth, as of August 31, 2019, certain information related to our compensation plans under which Accenture plc Class A ordinary shares may be issued
(1) Consists of 68,253 restricted share units
(2) Consists of 19,464,437 restricted share units, with performance-based awards assuming maximum performance, and 3,751 stock options
(3) Does not reflect restricted stock units because these awards have no exercise price.
The remaining information called for by Item 12 will be included in the section captioned “Beneficial Ownership” included in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2020 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Accenture plc to be held on January 30, 2020 and is incorporated herein by reference. Accenture plc will file such definitive proxy statement with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of our 2019 fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

Plan Category
Number of Shares to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (3)
Number of shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in 1st Column)
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
2001 Share Incentive Plan
68,253
---
---
Amended and Restated 2010 Share Incentive Plan
19,468,186
48.105
16,684,906
Amended and Restated 2010 Employee Share Purchase Plan
---
N/A
30,454,275
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
---
N/A
---
Total
19,536,441
47,139,181


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total value of outstanding options and warrants under the Amended and Restated 2010 Share Incentive Plan?
Choices:
936517087.53
2314.09
233618232
1328762099058
-96.21
Correct choice index: 0
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis .
as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions .
as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Amount (In Thousands)
2009
$32,452
2010
35,138
2011
50,421
2012
39,067
2013
26,301
Years thereafter
137,858
Total
321,237
Less: Amount representing interest
73,512
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$247,725

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million .
the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf .
the leases expire in 2015 .
under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases .
at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate .
in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf .
the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs .
system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements .
for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation .
however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes .
consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. not including years 'thereafter' , what is the total lease payments ? ( in $ thousands )
Choices:
-183379
-137846
109867
183379.0
459095
Correct choice index: 3
Stock Option Award Amendment
The Board of Directors has in 2019 amended and restated the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan to reserve an additional 1,000,000 stock options for issuance. The stock options have been allocated amongst management and employees of the Company.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company has granted 755,000 and 234,000 options with vesting over a period of two and three years, respectively, and an exercise price of $4.70 per share.
The Company has used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the grant date fair value of the options with the following assumptions applied to the model;
The expected volatility was based on historical volatility observed from historical company-specific data during the two years prior to the grant date.
The compensation expense related to the stock option awards was $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and the remaining unrecognized cost related to non-vested stock options was $0.5 million with a remaining average remaining vesting period of 2.1 years.

Options with two year vesting
Options with three year vesting
Volatility
57.5%
52.5%
Dividend yield
10.0 %
10.0%
Risk-free interest rate
1.64%
1.65%
Weighted-average grant date fair value
$0.59
$0.58


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Weighted-average grant date fair value between the options with two year vesting and three year vesting?
Choices:
0.02
0.01
1
-0.48
0
Correct choice index: 1
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .
the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .
snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Fiscal Year Ended (2)
Snap-on Incorporated
Peer Group (3)
S&P 500
December 31, 2002
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
December 31, 2003
118.80
126.16
128.68
December 31, 2004
130.66
152.42
142.69
December 31, 2005
146.97
157.97
149.70
December 31, 2006
191.27
185.10
173.34
December 31, 2007
198.05
216.19
182.87

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .
( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation .
( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w .
grainger , inc. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Choices:
-0.22158
0.23647
0.22158
0.20341
40.51969
Correct choice index: 2