trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 .
the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .
$ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Masco
$128.21
$120.32
$102.45
$165.80
$229.59
S&P 500 Index
$125.92
$144.58
$147.60
$171.04
$225.85
S&P Industrials Index
$120.19
$151.89
$150.97
$173.87
$243.73
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index
$136.29
$177.91
$191.64
$232.84
$316.28

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .
at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares .
during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards .
we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2013?
Choices:
1.6309
-2.5544
1.0374
0.0374
74.9709
Correct choice index: 3
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

December 31,
Company/Index
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.
$100
$144
$215
$283
$311
$269
S&P 500 Retail Index
100
144
158
197
206
265
S&P 500
$100
$130
$144
$143
$157
$187

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 from 2014 to 2016?
Choices:
0.95139
0.09028
13
1872
0.09722
Correct choice index: 1
Invested capital:
TORM defines invested capital as the sum of intangible assets, tangible fixed assets, investments in joint ventures, bunkers, accounts receivables, assets held-for-sale (when applicable), deferred tax liability, trade payables, current tax liabilities and deferred income. Invested capital measures the net investment used to achieve the Company’s operating profit. The Company believes that invested capital is a relevant measure that Management uses to measure the overall development of the assets and liabilities generating the net profit. Such measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Invested capital is calculated as follows:
¹⁾ Accounts receivables includes Freight receivables, Other receivables and Prepayments.
²⁾ Trade payables includes Trade payables and Other liabilities.

USDm
2019
2018
2017
Tangible and intangible fixed assets
1,782.2
1,445.0
1,384.8
Investments in joint ventures
1.2
0.1
0.3
Bunkers
34.8
39.4
33.2
Accounts receivables ¹⁾
99.5
96.3
87.5
Assets held-for-sale
9.1
6.2
6.6
Deferred tax liability
-44.9
-44.9
-44.9
Trade payables ²⁾
-94.4
-71.6
-60.0
Current tax liabilities
-1.5
-1.0
-1.4
Deferred income
-
-0.1
-0.1
Invested capital
1,786.0
1,469.4
1,406.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in invested capital in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
312.8
-1430
341
316.6
31660
Correct choice index: 3
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 9. ACCOUNTS AND OTHER RECEIVABLE
Accounts and other receivable are recorded at net realizable value. Components of accounts and other receivable, net of reserves, are as follows:
Amounts billed, net consist of amounts that have been invoiced to our customers in accordance with terms and conditions, and are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. These receivables are all short term in nature and do not include any financing components.
Unbilled receivables consist of amounts where we have satisfied our contractual obligations related to inventory stocking contracts with customers. Such amounts are typically invoiced to the customer upon their consumption of the inventory managed under the stocking contracts. We anticipate that substantially all unbilled receivables will be invoiced and collected over the next twelve months. These contracts do not include any financing components.

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Amounts billed, net
$227,528
$80,709
Unbilled receivables
19,036
19,733
Total receivables, net
$246,564
$100,442


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in unbilled receivables between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
375637388
0
19036
-81406
-697
Correct choice index: 4
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table summarizes the equity awards made to our named executive officers that were outstanding at December 31, 2019

Name
No. of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable No. of Securities Underlying Unexercised
No. of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable No. of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Option Exercise Price
Option Expiration Date
Garo H. Armen (1)
500,000
-
$1.25
April 16, 2026
Garo H. Armen (2)
184,028
65,972
$1.75
October 16, 2027
Alexander K. Arrow (3)
100,000
-
$1.25
February 12, 2026
Alexander K. Arrow (3)
140,000
-
$1.25
April 15, 2026
Alexander K. Arrow (4)
55,208
19,792
$1.75
October 16, 2027
Alexander K. Arrow (5)
41,667
-
$1.00
February 1, 2029


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How many options would expire on October 16, 2027?
Choices:
121180
23923600
128820
184025
239236
Correct choice index: 4
Revenues
Revenues for our reportable segments were as follows:
The increase in Semiconductor Test revenues of $60.2 million, or 4%, from 2018 to 2019 was driven primarily by an increase in semiconductor tester sales for 5G infrastructure and image sensors and higher service revenue, partially offset by a decrease in sales in the automotive and analog test segments.
The increase in Industrial Automation revenues of $36.6 million, or 14%, from 2018 to 2019 was primarily due to higher demand for collaborative robots. The MiR acquisition was completed in April 2018.
The increase in System Test revenues of $71.4 million, or 33%, from 2018 to 2019 was primarily due to higher sales in Storage Test of 3.5” hard disk drive testers, higher sales in Defense/Aerospace test instrumentation and systems, and higher sales in Production Board Test from higher 5G demand.
The increase in Wireless Test revenues of $25.3 million, or 19%, from 2018 to 2019 was primarily due to higher demand for millimeter wave and cellular test products driven by new wireless standards and 5G, partially offset by lower sales in connectivity test products and services.

2019
2018
2018-2019 Dollar Change
(in millions)
Semiconductor Test
$1,552.6
$1,492.4
$60.2
Industrial Automation
298.1
261.5
36.6
System Test
287.5
216.1
71.4
Wireless Test
157.3
132.0
25.3
Corporate and Other
(0.5)
(1.2)
0.7
$2,295.0
$2,100.8
$194.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average revenue from System Test in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
35.7
240.8
4.2
251.8
179.4
Correct choice index: 3
NOTE 17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments include:
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable equal their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

December 31,
2018
2019
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
285,907
497,874
Accounts receivable
173,450
199,535
Financial liabilities:
Accounts payable
80,640
119,712


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in accounts payable from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
205267
119712
39072
-53738
9653575680
Correct choice index: 2
NOTE 21—EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income, attributable to OpenText, by the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income, attributable to OpenText, by the shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share plus the dilutive effect of Common Share equivalents, such as stock options, using the treasury stock method. Common Share equivalents are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive.
(1) Please also see note 14 "Income Taxes" for details relating to a one-time tax benefit of $876.1 million recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2016 in connection with an internal reorganization of our subsidiaries.
(2) Represents options to purchase Common Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the stock options was greater than or equal to the average price of the Common Shares during the period.

Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Basic earnings per share
Net income attributable to OpenText
$285,501
$242,224
$1,025,659(1)
Basic earnings per share attributable to OpenText
$1.06
$0.91
$4.04
Diluted earnings per share
Net income attributable to OpenText
$285,501
$242,224
$1,025,659(1)
Diluted earnings per share attributable to OpenText
$1.06
$0.91
$4.01
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding (in 000's)
Basic
268,784
266,085
253,879
Effect of dilutive securities
1,124
1,407
1,926
Diluted
269,908
267,492
255,805
Excluded as anti-dilutive(2)
2,759
2,770
1,371


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the Effect of dilutive securities expressed as a percentage of Excluded as anti-dilutive for fiscal year 2019?
Choices:
245.46
12.22
81.98
10000
40.74
Correct choice index: 4
9. Audit, audit related and other non-audit services  The following fees were paid or are payable to the company’s auditors, KPMG LLP and other firms in the KPMG network, for the year ended 31 March 2019. Figures in the table below for the years ended 31 March 2017 and 2018 are in respect of fees paid to the company’s previous auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
a Services in relation to the audit of the parent company and the consolidated financial statements, including fees for reports under section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This also includes fees payable for the statutory audits of the financial statements of subsidiary companies. This excludes amounts for the audit of BT Group Employee Share Ownership Trust and Ilford Trustees (Jersey) Limited amounting to £32,000.
b During the year a further £446,000 of fees were payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in relation to the audit of 2017/18 subsidiary accounts and the audit of our restated IAS 19 accounting valuation of retirement benefit obligations, which have not been included in the 2019 balances in the above table.
c Services in relation to other statutory filings or engagements that are required by law or regulation to be carried out by an appointed auditor. This includes fees for the review of interim results, the accrued fee for the audit of the group’s regulatory financial statements and reporting associated with the group’s US debt shelf registration. d Services relating to tax returns, tax audits, monitoring and enquiries.
e Fees payable for all taxation advisory services not falling within taxation compliance. All other assurance services include fees payable to KPMG LLP for agreed upon procedures performed on the estimated impact of the new IFRS 15 revenue accounting standard, which took effect from 1 April 2018 for the 2017/18 audit. g Fees payable for all non-audit services not covered above, principally comprising other advisory services.
f All other assurance services include fees payable to KPMG LLP for agreed upon procedures performed on the estimated impact of the new IFRS 15 revenue accounting standard, which took effect from 1 April 2018 for the 2017/18 audit.
g Fees payable for all non-audit services not covered above, principally comprising other advisory services.

2019
2018
2017
Year ended 31 March
£000
£000
£000
Fees payable to the company’s auditors and its associates for:
Audit services a,b
The audit of the parent company and the consolidated financial statements
8,165
5,418
4,316
The audit of the company’s subsidiaries
6,061
5,877
5,675
14,226
11,295
9,991
Audit related assurance services c
2,236
1,771
1,865
Other non-audit services
Taxation compliance services d
–
–
366
Taxation advisory services e
–
–
111
All other assurance services f
748
211
200
All other services g
210
592
2,332
958
803
3,009
Total services
17,420
13,869
14,865


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average The audit of the company’s subsidiaries from 2017-2019?
Choices:
4982
5871
11938
1
59
Correct choice index: 1
humana inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) amortization expense for other intangible assets was approximately $ 75 million in 2017 , $ 77 million in 2016 , and $ 93 million in 2015 .
the following table presents our estimate of amortization expense for each of the five next succeeding fiscal years: .

(in millions)
For the years ending December 31,
2018
$64
2019
54
2020
52
2021
19
2022
16

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the decline in amortization expense for other intangible assets from 2016 to 2017
Choices:
75
0
-0.02597
-0.02151
-2964.5
Correct choice index: 2
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s .
technology index .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s .
technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 .
data points on the graph are annual .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc .
s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending september 30 .
copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved .
september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

September 30,  2007
September 30,  2008
September 30,  2009
September 30,  2010
September 30,  2011
September 30,  2012
Apple Inc.
$100
$74
$121
$185
$248
$437
S&P 500
$100
$78
$73
$80
$81
$105
S&P Computer Hardware
$100
$84
$99
$118
$134
$214
Dow Jones US Technology
$100
$76
$85
$95
$98
$127

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage 5 year cumulative total return for apple inc . for the the period ended september 30 , 2012?
Choices:
237
0.77
337
0.3
3.37
Correct choice index: 4
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period .
the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 .
it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends .
the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies .
the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
State Street Corporation
$100
$159
$172
$148
$178
$227
S&P 500 Index
100
132
151
153
171
208
S&P Financial Index
100
136
156
154
189
230
KBW Bank Index
100
138
151
151
195
231

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment is state street corporation from 2012 to 2015?
Choices:
1
0.48
0.32
2.48
0.21
Correct choice index: 1
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc .
class b common stock and the walt disney company .
the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 .
december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

December 31,2008
December 31,2009
December 31,2010
December 31,2011
December 31,2012
DISCA
$102.53
$222.09
$301.96
$296.67
$459.67
DISCB
$78.53
$162.82
$225.95
$217.56
$327.11
DISCK
$83.69
$165.75
$229.31
$235.63
$365.63
S&P 500
$74.86
$92.42
$104.24
$104.23
$118.21
Peer Group
$68.79
$100.70
$121.35
$138.19
$190.58

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by what percent did the c series outperform the s&p 500 over 5 years?
Choices:
0.47777
3.22976
0.6767
1.76719
2.09305
Correct choice index: 4
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations as of August 31, 2019 are summarized below. As disclosed below, while we have certain non-cancelable purchase order obligations for property, plant and equipment, we generally do not enter into non-cancelable purchase orders for materials until we receive a corresponding purchase commitment from our customer. Non-cancelable purchase orders do not typically extend beyond the normal lead time of several weeks, at most. Purchase orders beyond this time frame are typically cancelable.
(1) Consists of interest on notes payable and long-term debt outstanding as of August 31, 2019. Certain of our notes payable and long-term debt pay interest at variable rates. We have applied estimated interest rates to determine the value of these expected future interest payments.
(2) Consists of purchase commitments entered into as of August 31, 2019 primarily for property, plant and equipment and software pursuant to legally enforceable and binding agreements.
(3) Includes the estimated company contributions to funded pension plans during fiscal year 2020 and the expected benefit payments for unfunded pension and postretirement plans from fiscal years 2020 through 2029. These future payments are not recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets but will be recorded as incurred.
(4) Includes (i) a $28.5 million capital commitment, (ii) a $16.2 million obligation related to a new human resource system and (iii) $33.0 million related to the one-time transition tax as a result of the Tax Act that will be paid in annual installments through fiscal year 2026.
(5) As of August 31, 2019, we have $1.5 million and $103.7 million recorded as a current and a long-term liability, respectively, for uncertain tax positions. We are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of payments, or the amount by which our liability for these uncertain tax positions will increase or decrease over time, and accordingly, this liability has been excluded from the above table.

Payments due by period (in thousands)
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
After 5 years
Notes payable and long-term debt
$2,496,465
$375,181
$491,655
$1,134,733
$494,896
Future interest on notes payable and long-term debt(1)
373,762
109,506
142,082
55,463
66,711
Operating lease obligations
603,185
118,312
187,644
114,297
182,932
Capital lease obligations
77,829
6,038
11,726
10,928
49,137
Non-cancelable purchase order obligations(2)
351,230
289,516
61,537
177
—
Pension and post retirement contributions and payments(3)
14,618
1,135
1,904
2,396
9,183
Other(4)
77,669
17,922
27,863
14,214
17,670
Total contractual obligations(5)
$3,994,758
$917,610
$924,411
$1,332,208
$820,529


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between total operating lease obligations and total capital lease obligations?
Choices:
-525356
525356
681014
2418636
8
Correct choice index: 1
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel related expenditures for IT, finance, legal and human resources support functions; and professional services fees.
(1) Excluding stock-based compensation
Excluding the effects of currency rate fluctuations, total general and administrative expenses increased in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 primarily due to increased professional services fees

Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
General and administrative (1)
$1,093
-1%
2%
$1,102
Stock-based compensation
172
-5%
-5%
180
Total expenses
$1,265
-1%
1%
$1,282
% of Total Revenues
3%
3%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. By how much less did the company spend for stock-based compensation in 2019 compared to 2018?
Choices:
352
-8
-172
0
8
Correct choice index: 4