trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2009 net revenue
$536.7
Volume/weather
18.9
Other
(0.3)
2010 net revenue
$555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates .
fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year .
depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service .
interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2010 what was the net change in net revenue in millions
Choices:
22.3
555.6
19.2
23.8
18.6
Correct choice index: 2
The total remuneration of the Group’s auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, for services provided to the Group during the year ended 31 March 2019 is analysed below
Notes: 1 Fees during the implementation phase of new accounting standards, notably preparations for IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” in the year ended 31 March 2018 and preparations for IFRS 16 “Leases” in the year ended 31 March 2019.
2 Relates to fees for statutory and regulatory filings during the year. In addition, the amount for the year ended 31 March 2018 includes non-recurring fees that were incurred during the preparations for a potential IPO of Vodafone New Zealand and the merger of Vodafone India and Idea Cellular. The amount for the year ended 31 March 2017 primarily arose from work on regulatory filings prepared in anticipation of a potential IPO of Vodafone India that was under consideration prior to the agreement for the merger of Vodafone India and Idea Cellular.
A description of the work performed by the Audit and Risk Committee in order to safeguard auditor independence when non-audit services are provided is set out in the Audit and Risk Committee report on pages 71 to 76.

2019
2018
2017
€m
€m
€m
Parent company
2
2
2
Subsidiaries
14
14
13
Subsidiaries – new accounting standards1
1
5
1
Audit fees:
17
21
16
Audit-related fees2
2
5
4
Non-audit fees:
2
5
4
Total fees
19
26
20


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between the average audit fees and the average total fees for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-14.9
18
-11.5
-3.5
156
Correct choice index: 3
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 31 , 2010 through october 25 , 2015 .
this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 31 , 2010 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any .
dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar .
the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/31/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

10/31/2010
10/30/2011
10/28/2012
10/27/2013
10/26/2014
10/25/2015
Applied Materials
100.00
104.54
90.88
155.43
188.13
150.26
S&P 500 Index
100.00
108.09
124.52
158.36
185.71
195.37
RDG Semiconductor Composite Index
100.00
110.04
104.07
136.15
172.41
170.40

dividends during each of fiscal 2015 and 2014 , applied's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share .
during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share .
dividends paid during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 amounted to $ 487 million , $ 485 million and $ 456 million , respectively .
applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders .
104 136 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 applied materials , inc .
s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the yearly rate of return of s&p500 if the investment occurs in 2010 and it is liquidated one year later?
Choices:
0
0.0809
103.9891
8.09
-91.91
Correct choice index: 1
RSUs/PSUs
RSUs/PSUs are granted to executives and other eligible employees. The value of an RSU/PSU at the grant date is equal to the value of one BCE common share. Dividends in the form of additional RSUs/PSUs are credited to the participant’s account on each dividend payment date and are equivalent in value to the dividend paid on BCE common shares. Executives and other eligible employees are granted a specific number of RSUs/PSUs for a given performance period based on their position and level of contribution. RSUs/PSUs vest fully after three years of continuous employment from the date of grant and, in certain cases, if performance objectives are met, as determined by the board of directors.
The following table summarizes outstanding RSUs/PSUs at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
(1) The weighted average fair value of the RSUs/PSUs granted was $58 in 2019 and $57 in 2018
(2) The RSUs/PSUs vested on December 31, 2019 were fully settled in February 2020 with BCE common shares and/or DSUs.

NUMBER OF RSUs/PSUs
2019
2018
Outstanding, January 1
2,812,697
2,740,392
Granted (1)
975,348
1,006,586
Dividends credited
149,648
149,258
Settled
(932,133)
(1,027,321)
Forfeited
(90,442)
(56,218)
Outstanding, December 31
2,915,118
2,812,697
Vested, December 31 (2)
904,266
880,903


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the weighted average fair value of the RSUs/PSUs granted?
Choices:
1
-58
58
3306
-1
Correct choice index: 0
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

<i>Cash Flows</i><i>Millions</i>
<i>2014</i>
<i>2013</i>
<i>2012</i>
Cash provided by operating activities
$7,385
$6,823
$6,161
Cash used in investing activities
(4,249)
(3,405)
(3,633)
Cash used in financing activities
(2,982)
(3,049)
(2,682)
Net change in cash and cashequivalents
$154
$369
$(154)

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .
2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) .
higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 .
in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 .
lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases .
federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .
as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .
congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 .
investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 .
significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .
capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions .
lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 .
included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the cost per car for the buyout of locomotives in 2012?
Choices:
75000165
-22026.43172
454545.45455
-1219.09091
75000000
Correct choice index: 2
Adjusted Revenue has limitations as a financial measure, should be considered as supplemental in nature, and is not meant as a substitute for the related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. These limitations include the following:
• Adjusted Revenue is net of transaction-based costs, which is our largest cost of revenue item; • Adjusted Revenue is net of bitcoin costs, which could be a significant cost; • The deferred revenue adjustment that is added back to Adjusted Revenue will never be recognized as revenue by the Company; and • other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted Revenue differently or not at all, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Because of these limitations, you should consider Adjusted Revenue alongside other financial performance measures, including total net revenue and our financial results presented in accordance with GAAP.
The following table presents a reconciliation of total net revenue to Adjusted Revenue for each of the periods indicated:

Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
(in thousands)
Total net revenue
$3,298,177
$2,214,253
$1,708,721
$1,267,118
$850,192
Less: Starbucks transaction-based revenue
—
—
78,903
142,283
123,024
Less: transaction-based costs
1,558,562
1,230,290
943,200
672,667
450,858
Less: bitcoin costs
164,827
—
—
—
—
Add: deferred revenue adjustment related to purchase accounting
$12,853
$—
$—
$—
$—
Adjusted Revenue
$1,587,641
$983,963
$686,618
$452,168
$276,310


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of total revenue in 2018 to 2017?
Choices:
1.93
4.8
1.49
0.04
0.67
Correct choice index: 2
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
Depreciation and amortization expense was $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

As of December 31,
2019
2018
Computers, software, furniture and fixtures
$1,406
$1,407
Equipment under capital lease  3,348
3,348
3,525
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(3,171)
(2,448)
Property and equipment, net
$1,583
$2,484


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of depreciation and amortization expense for the year 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0.25
1111.11
-3523.33
1.11
3013.2
Correct choice index: 3
Profitability Measures
Net income:
The net income in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2018 was $16.6 million as compared to a net loss of $7.9 million in the same period last year. The increase is primarily the result of the $28.3 million non-operating gain from the legal settlement with a former supplier of LoJack, which was recognized during fiscal 2018. This gain was partially offset by higher tax expense in fiscal 2018 due to U.S. and foreign taxes on the $28.3 million legal settlement gain as well as the revaluation of our net deferred income tax assets that occurred in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 as we adopted the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act which was enacted on December 22, 2017.
Adjusted EBITDA:
Adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2018 increased $1.5 million compared to the same period last year due to higher MRM products revenue. Adjusted EBITDA for Software and Subscription Services increased $5.2 million compared to the same period last year due primarily to lower selling and marketing expenses and lower general and administrative expenses.
See Note 20 for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA by reportable segments and a reconciliation to GAAP-basis net income (loss).

Fiscal years ended
February 28,
(In thousands)
2018
2017
$ Change
% Change
Segment
Telematics Systems
$48,943
$47,432
$1,511
3.2%
Software & Subscription Services
8,233
3,075
5,158
167.7%
Satellite
-
2,447
(2,447)
(100.0%)
Corporate Expense
(4,794)
(3,586)
(1,208)
33.7%
Total Adjusted EBITDA
$52,382
$49,368
$3,014
6.1%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average corporate expense for both years, 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-4190
-3352
4190
4
2
Correct choice index: 0
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 9 — Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
The components of accrued expenses and other liabilities are as follows:

As of December 31,
2019
2018
Accrued product-related costs
$4,464
$4,377
Accrued income taxes
7,903
6,914
Accrued property and other taxes
1,574
1,976
Accrued professional fees
1,599
3,350
Contract liabilities
2,877
1,981
Dividends payable
1,299
1,310
Remediation reserves
11,444
11,274
Other accrued liabilities
5,218
6,165
Total accrued expenses and other liabilities
$36,378
$37,347


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in contract liabilities between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1774976
-382
89600
896
4858
Correct choice index: 3
29. Related party transactions
The Group has a number of related parties including joint arrangements and associates, pension schemes and Directors and Executive Committee members (see note 12 “Investments in associates and joint arrangements”, note 24 “Post employment benefits” and note 22 “Directors and key management compensation”).
Transactions with joint arrangements and associates
Related party transactions with the Group’s joint arrangements and associates primarily comprise fees for the use of products and services including network airtime and access charges, fees for the provision of network infrastructure and cash pooling arrangements.
No related party transactions have been entered into during the year which might reasonably affect any decisions made by the users of these consolidated financial statements except as disclosed below.
Note: 1 Amounts arise primarily through VodafoneZiggo, Vodafone Idea, Vodafone Hutchison Australia and Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Limited. Interest is paid in line with market rates.
Dividends received from associates and joint ventures are disclosed in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

2019
2018
2017
€m
€m
€m
Sales of goods and services to associates
27
19
37
Purchase of goods and services from associates
3
1
90
Sales of goods and services to joint arrangements
242
194
19
Purchase of goods and services from joint arrangements
192
199
183
Net interest income receivable from joint arrangements1
96
120
87
Trade balances owed:
by associates
1
4
–
to associates
3
2
1
by joint arrangements
193
107
158
to joint arrangements
25
28
15
Other balances owed by joint arrangements1
997
1,328
1,209
Other balances owed to joint arrangements1
169
150
127


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the 2018 average sales of goods and services to associates?
Choices:
-28
28
-9
30
2800
Correct choice index: 1
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note .
geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs .
the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly .
the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly .
the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .

Floating rate due December 15, 2015
$500
Floating rate due December 15, 2016
350
1.20% due December 15, 2016<sup>(1)</sup>
650
2.25% due December 15, 2018
750
Discount and issuance costs
(2)
Net proceeds
$2,248

( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 .
the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 .
on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt .
additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs .
in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s .
in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the ratio of the floating rate due december 2015 compared to 2016
Choices:
0.7
0.00286
0.03214
150
1.42857
Correct choice index: 4
Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2017:
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $7.5 million to $55.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to $48.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. In determining net cash provided by operating activities, net loss is adjusted for the effects of certain non-cash items, which may be analyzed in detail as follows:

(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net loss
$(265,511)
$(164,787)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
102,839
104,112
Amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs
7,880
6,391
Amortization of deferred drydock and special survey costs
13,828
14,727
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
575
269
Share based compensation
4,556
4,296
Gain on bond and debt extinguishment
(6,464)
(185)
Bargain gain upon obtaining control
(58,313)
—
Income tax benefit
(1,108)
(3,192)
Impairment losses
200,657
50,565
Gain on sale of assets
(894)
(1,064)
Loss/(equity) in affiliates, net of dividends received
84,317
4,610
Net income adjusted for non-cash items
$82,362
$15,742


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Impairment losses between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
150092
33752
-150092
200609
0
Correct choice index: 0