trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plans
Pension Benefit Plan
We maintain a defined benefit pension plan covering employees in certain foreign countries.
The pension benefit plan obligations and funded status as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, were as follows:
The accumulated benefit obligation was $43.9 million and $37.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in the accumulated benefit obligation and the actuarial loss was primarily attributable to a decrease in the discount rate during 2019.

(In thousands)
2019
2018
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period
$37,245
$34,893
Service cost
1,471
1,193
Interest cost
634
727
Actuarial loss - experience
453
38
Actuarial loss - assumptions
5,091
2,139
Benefit payments
(166)
(138)
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate changes
(826)
(1,607)
Projected benefit obligation at end of period
43,902
37,245
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
24,159
26,624
Actual gain (loss) on plan assets
4,392
(2,024)
Contributions
—
688
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate changes
(535)
(1,129)
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
28,016
24,159
Unfunded status at end of period
$(15,886)
$(13,086)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in interest cost between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
93
-1505
466
-93
-8
Correct choice index: 3
Note 19 Goodwill
The following table provides details about the changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. BCE’s groups of CGUs correspond to our reporting segments.

BELL WIRELESS
BELL  WIRELINE
BELL  MEDIA
BCE
Balance at January 1, 2018
3,032
4,497
2,899
10,428
Acquisitions and other
16
182
32
230
Balance at December 31, 2018
3,048
4,679
2,931
10,658
Acquisitions and other
–
(6)
15
9
Balance at December 31, 2019
3,048
4,673
2,946
10,667


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the Balance comparing January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 for BCE?
Choices:
111235476
21095
239
-5755
2
Correct choice index: 2
Subscription Revenue by Segment
Our subscription revenue is comprised primarily of fees we charge for our subscription and hosted service offerings including Creative Cloud and certain of our Digital Experience and Document Cloud services. We recognize subscription revenue ratably over the term of agreements with our customers, beginning with commencement of service.
We have the following reportable segments: Digital Media, Digital Experience and Publishing. Subscription revenue by reportable segment for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
(*) Percentage is less than 1%
Our product revenue is primarily comprised of revenue from distinct on-premise software licenses recognized at a point in time and certain of our OEM and royalty agreements. Our services and support revenue is comprised of consulting, training and maintenance and support, primarily related to the licensing of our enterprise offerings and the sale of our hosted Digital Experience services. Our support revenue also includes technical support and developer support to partners and developer organizations related to our desktop products. Our maintenance and support offerings, which entitle customers to receive desktop product upgrades and enhancements or technical support, depending on the offering, are generally recognized ratably over the term of the arrangement.

(dollars in millions)
2019
2018
2017
% Change 2019 - 2018
Digital Media
$7,208.3
$5,857.7
$4,480.8
23%
Digital Experience
2,670.7
1,949.3
1,552.5
37%
Publishing
115.5
115.2
100.6
*
Total subscription revenue
$9,994.5
$7,922.2
$6,133.9
26%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the sum of digital media and digital experience revenue in 2017?
Choices:
7410.2
1.3
8961.6
4481
6033.3
Correct choice index: 4
* Recast to reflect segment changes.
Global Technology Services revenue decreased 0.2 percent as reported (1 percent adjusted for currency) in 2018 compared to the prior year, with Infrastructure & Cloud Services up 0.8 percent as reported (flat adjusted for currency) offset by a decline in Technology Support Services.
In Infrastructure & Cloud Services, the business focused on prioritizing the portfolio to deliver high-value solutions to bring productivity to clients and allow for expanding workloads, while it exited some lower-value offerings. Technology Support Services was impacted by the hardware product cycle dynamics in 2018 but grew its multivendor services offerings. Within GTS, cloud revenue of $8.0 billion grew 22 percent as reported and 21 percent adjusted for currency compared to the prior year.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018
2017
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency
Global Technology Services external revenue
$29,146 *
$29,213 *
(0.2)%
(0.8)%
Infrastructure & Cloud Services
$22,185*
$22,016*
0.8%
0.0%
Technology Support Services
6,961
7,196
(3.3)
(3.5)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Technology Support Services from 2017 to 2018
Choices:
-235
-7175
235
14157
-7200
Correct choice index: 0
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties at october 30 , 2016 is set forth below: .

(Square feet in thousands)
United States
Other Countries
Total
Owned
3,745
1,629
5,374
Leased
564
1,103
1,667
Total
4,309
2,732
7,041

because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country .
the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california .
products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore .
remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas .
products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany ; tainan , taiwan ; and santa clara , california .
other products are manufactured in treviso , italy .
applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan .
these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support .
applied also owns a total of approximately 280 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space .
applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements .
applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of company's properties are located in united states?
Choices:
-2732
0.61199
-5373.38801
0.02855
0.23676
Correct choice index: 1
Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA represents our net loss before interest and investment income, net and interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization expense, loss on extinguishment of convertible notes and stock-based compensation expense. We do not consider these items to be indicative of our core operating performance. The items that are non-cash include depreciation and amortization expense and stock-based compensation expense.
Adjusted EBITDA is a measure used by management to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends and to generate future operating plans, make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital and invest in initiatives that are focused on cultivating new markets for our solutions. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating adjusted EBITDA facilitates comparisons of our operating performance on a period-to-period basis.
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. We believe that adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors. Nevertheless, use of adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our financial results as reported under GAAP.
Some of these limitations are: (1) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the capitalized software that is amortized will need to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements; (2) adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
(3) adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation; (4) adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments or receipts that may represent a reduction or increase in cash
available to us; and (5) other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate adjusted EBITDA or similarly titled measures
differently, which reduces the usefulness of the metric as a comparative measure.
Because of these and other limitations, you should consider adjusted EBITDA alongside our other GAAP-based financial performance measures, net loss and our other GAAP financial results. The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net loss
$(52,250)
$(47,515)
$(19,634)
Interest and investment (income) expense, net
2,979
4,504
216
Provision for income taxes
425
796
47
Depreciation and amortization
19,671
13,693
10,207
Loss on extinguishment of convertible notes
1,406
—
—
Stock-based compensation
33,489
25,825
9,299
Adjusted EBITDA
$5,720
$(2,697)
$135


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Interest and investment (income) expense, net for 2017-2019?
Choices:
1064.67
2566.33
-7699
-16351.67
7699
Correct choice index: 1
Trade Accounts Receivable
The Company’s trade accounts receivable, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
(1) Included in “Receivables, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) Included in “Deferred charges and other assets” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company’s noncurrent trade accounts receivable result from (1) contracts with customers that include renewal provisions, and (2) contracts with customers under multi-year arrangements. For contracts that include renewal provisions, revenue is recognized up-front upon satisfaction of the associated performance obligations, but payments are received upon renewal. Renewals occur in bi-annual and annual increments over the associated expected contract term, the majority of which range from two to five years. The Company’s contracts with customers under multi-year arrangements generally have three-year terms and are invoiced annually at the beginning of each annual coverage period. The Company records a receivable related to revenue recognized under multi-year arrangements as the Company has an unconditional right to invoice and receive payment in the future related to these arrangements.
Where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing and payment, the Company has determined that its contracts do not include a significant financing component. A substantial amount of the consideration promised by the customer under the contracts that include renewal provisions is variable, and the amount and timing of that consideration varies based on the occurrence or nonoccurrence of future events that are not substantially within the Company’s control. With respect to multi-year year arrangements, there is minimal difference between the consideration received and the cash selling price, any offered discounts are driven by volume, and the contracts are of short duration resulting in insignificant interest. Thus, the primary purpose of the invoicing terms on the multi-year arrangements is to provide the customer with a simplified and predictable way of purchasing certain products, not to provide financing or to receive financing from the Company’s customer.

December 31,
2019
2018
Trade accounts receivable, net, current (1)
$375,136
$335,377
Trade accounts receivable, net, noncurrent (2)
26,496
15,948
$401,632
$351,325


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in Trade accounts receivable, net, noncurrent in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-66.14
66.14
166.15
221818.2
2.63
Correct choice index: 1
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2006 4 .
stock-based compensation ( continued ) same period was $ 1988000 lower , than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no .
25 .
basic and diluted earnings per share for the year ended december 31 , 2006 were both $ 0.02 lower than if the company had continued to account for share-based compensation under apb no .
25 .
prior to the adoption of sfas no .
123 ( r ) , the company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from share-based payment arrangements as operating cash flows in the statements of cash flows .
sfas no .
123 ( r ) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those share awards ( excess tax benefits ) to be classified as financing cash flows .
the excess tax benefit of $ 2885000 classified as a financing cash inflow for the year ended december 31 , 2006 would have been classified as an operating cash inflow if the company had not adopted sfas no .
123 ( r ) .
as a result of adopting sfas no 123 ( r ) , unearned compensation previously recorded in stockholders 2019 equity was reclassified against additional paid in capital on january 1 , 2006 .
all stock-based compensation expense not recognized as of december 31 , 2005 and compensation expense related to post 2005 grants of stock options and amortization of restricted stock will be recorded directly to additional paid in capital .
compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock recognized in the statements of income for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was as follows : year ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) 2006 2005 2004 .

Year Ended December 31,
<i>(In thousands)</i>
2006
2005
2004
Stock options
$(3,273)
$—
$—
Restricted stock
(2,789)
(1,677)
(663)
Impact on income before income taxes
(6,062)
(1,677)
(663)
Income tax benefit
2,382
661
260
Impact on net income
$(3,680)
$(1,016)
$(403)

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in thousands in impact on net income due to compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock between 2004 and 2005?
Choices:
-280
-0.9
258
-403
613.0
Correct choice index: 4
GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Details of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of $4.7 million, of which approximately $3.9 million have an indefinite life. NOLs of $0.8 million will begin to expire in 2030. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had federal and state tax credit carryforwards of $0.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, which will begin to expire in 2028 and 2038. The Company believes as of December 31, 2019, it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the NOLs and tax credits and, as such, no valuation allowance was recorded.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Deferred tax assets:
Investment in partnership
$358,024
$299,466
Net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits
5,160
5,634
Other
1,657
1,879
Total
364,841
306,979
Valuation allowance
—
—
Total deferred tax assets
364,841
306,979
Total deferred tax liabilities
—
—
Deferred tax assets, net
$364,841
$306,979


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the the Total deferred tax assets between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
65375
-306974
57862
271951
364840
Correct choice index: 2
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share .
our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt .
information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .

Dividends Paid Per Share
Quarter
2018
2017
First
$2.00
$1.82
Second
2.00
1.82
Third
2.00
1.82
Fourth
2.20
2.00
Year
$8.20
$7.46

stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index .
the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation .
the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018?
Choices:
0.1473
0.0992
0.0902
99195.7105
0.8552
Correct choice index: 1
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

December 29, 2001
December 28, 2002
January 3, 2004
January 1, 2005
December 31, 2005
December 30, 2006
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
100.00
54.38
81.52
61.65
75.54
79.96
S & P 500
100.00
77.90
100.24
111.15
116.61
135.03
NASDAQ Composite
100.00
71.97
107.18
117.07
120.50
137.02
S & P Information Technology
100.00
62.59
92.14
94.50
95.44
103.47

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the rate of return of an investment in s&p500 inc from 2001 to 2005?
Choices:
0.1115
8.9686
-0.1115
0.6015
2.23
Correct choice index: 0
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
Current Liabilities
Ship management creditors’ liability is comprised of cash collected from Egypt LNG Shipping Ltd. to cover the obligations of its vessel under the Group’s management
Amounts due to related parties of $200 (December 31, 2018: $169) are expenses paid by a related party on behalf of the Group and payables to other related parties for the office lease and other operating expenses.

As of December 31,
2018
2019
Ship management creditors
268
328
Amounts due to related parties
169
200


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in amounts due to related parties from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
159
369
31
0
200
Correct choice index: 2
2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .
operating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .

Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2015
2014
$ Change
% Change
North America
$460,961
$372,347
$88,614
23.8%
EMEA
3,122
(11,763)
14,885
126.5
Asia-Pacific
36,358
21,858
14,500
66.3
Latin America
(30,593)
(15,423)
(15,170)
(98.4)
Connected Fitness
(61,301)
(13,064)
(48,237)
(369.2)
Total operating income
$408,547
$353,955
$54,592
15.4%

the increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .
this increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .
2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .
these acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .
seasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .
seasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .
the level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .
we generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the operating margin for connected fitness in 2014?
Choices:
-369.88042
-0.00399
-84.83117
-0.68042
6.136
Correct choice index: 3