trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The maximum aggregate number of shares that are available for issuance under the 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) is 12,000,000.
Employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP after 90 days of employment with the Company. The ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 10% of an employee’s compensation, as defined in the ESPP, at a price equal to 85% of the fair value of the common stock at the beginning or end of the offering period, whichever is lower. The ESPP is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. As of August 31, 2019, 3,397,019 shares remained available for issue under the 2011 ESPP.
The fair value of shares issued under the ESPP was estimated on the commencement date of each offering period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following weighted-average assumptions were used in the model for each respective period:
(1) The expected volatility was estimated using the historical volatility derived from the Company’s common stock.

Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
2019
2018
2017
Expected dividend yield
0.6%
0.6%
0.8%
Risk-free interest rate
2.3%
1.4%
0.5%
Expected volatility(1)
28.6%
23.0%
33.0%
Expected life
0.5 years
0.5 years
0.5 years


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in expected volatility between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
28.3
0.1
-11999971.4
5.6
27.8
Correct choice index: 3
The Company recorded amortization expense of $4.8 million, $1.5 million and $0.1 million for the years ended March 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Amortization relating to developed technology and capitalized software was recorded within cost of revenue and amortization of customer relationships and trade names was recorded within sales and marketing expenses.
Future estimated amortization expense of intangible assets as of March 31, 2019 is as follows:

Purchased Intangible Assets
Capitalized Software
2020
$ 2,582
$ 3,522
2021
2,560
2,790
2022
2,560
1,420
2023
2,560
528
Thereafter
12,012
89
Total
$ 22,274
$ 8,349


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Capitalized Software from 2021 to 2022?
Choices:
892
-2262
-2701
-1
-1370
Correct choice index: 4
Note 18 – Restructuring
During the second half of 2019, the Company implemented a restructuring plan to realign its expense structure with the reduction in revenue experienced in recent years and overall Company objectives. Management assessed the efficiency of our operations and consolidated locations and personnel, among other things, where possible. As part of this restructuring plan, the Company announced plans to reduce its overall operating expenses, both in the U.S and internationally.
In February 2019, the Company announced the restructuring of certain of our workforce predominantly in Germany, which included the closure of our office location in Munich, Germany accompanied by relocation or severance benefits for the affected employees. We also offered voluntary early retirement to certain other employees, which was announced in March 2019.
In January 2018, the Company announced an early retirement incentive program for employees that met certain defined requirements. The cumulative amount incurred during the year ended December 31, 2018 related to this restructuring program was $7.3 million. We did not incur any additional expenses related to this restructuring program during the year ended December 31, 2019.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending restructuring liability, which is included in accrued wages and benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, is as follows:

(In thousands)
2019
2018
Balance at beginning of period
$185
$205
Plus: Amounts charged to cost and expense
6,014
7,261
Less: Amounts paid
(4,631)
(7,281)
Balance at end of period
$1,568
$185


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the balance at the beginning of the period and end of the period in 2019?
Choices:
290080
0
1383
5829
6199
Correct choice index: 2
the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 14 .
leases ( continued ) to the sale transaction on april 12 , 1999 .
therefore , the remaining outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Remainder of 1999
$7,606
2000
7,583
2001
4,891
2002
3,054
2003
1,415
Thereafter
1,178
Total
$25,727

15 .
sale of assets in the second quarter of 1996 , packaging entered into an agreement to form a joint venture with caraustar industries whereby packaging sold its two recycled paperboard mills and a fiber recycling operation and brokerage business to the joint venture in return for cash and a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture .
proceeds from the sale were approximately $ 115 million and the group recognized a $ 50 million pretax gain ( $ 30 million after taxes ) in the second quarter of 1996 .
in june , 1998 , packaging sold its remaining 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture to caraustar industries for cash and a note of $ 26000000 .
the group recognized a $ 15 million pretax gain on this transaction .
at april 11 , 1999 , the balance of the note with accrued interest is $ 27122000 .
the note was paid in june , 1999 .
16 .
subsequent events on august 25 , 1999 , pca and packaging agreed that the acquisition consideration should be reduced as a result of a postclosing price adjustment by an amount equal to $ 20 million plus interest through the date of payment by packaging .
the group recorded $ 11.9 million of this amount as part of the impairment charge on the accompanying financial statements , representing the amount that was previously estimated by packaging .
pca intends to record the remaining amount in september , 1999 .
in august , 1999 , pca signed purchase and sales agreements with various buyers to sell approximately 405000 acres of timberland .
pca has completed the sale of approximately 260000 of these acres and expects to complete the sale of the remaining acres by mid-november , 1999. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2001?
Choices:
0.00078
-0.19011
0.19011
5.26007
19.01116
Correct choice index: 2
Our CODM evaluates each segment based on Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), and we therefore consider Adjusted EBITDA to be a primary measure of operating performance of our operating segments. We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before investment income, interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation and other adjustments as identified below. The adjustments to our financial results prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to calculate Adjusted EBITDA are itemized below (in thousands):
It is not practicable for us to report identifiable assets by segment because these businesses share resources, functions and facilities
We do not have significant long-lived assets outside the United States.

Year Ended February 28,
2019
2018
2017
Net income (loss)
$18,398
$16,617
$(7,904)
Investment income
(5,258)
(2,256)
(1,691)
Interest expense
16,726
10,280
9,896
Income tax provision (benefits)
(1,330)
10,681
(1,563)
Depreciation and amortization
20,016
22,957
23,469
Stock-based compensation
11,029
9,298
7,833
Impairment loss and equity in net loss of affiliate
6,787
1,411
1,284
Loss on extinguishment of debt
2,033
-
-
Acquisition and integration related expenses
935
-
4,513
Non-recurring legal expenses, net of reversal of litigation
provision
(11,020)
10,738
9,192
Gain on LoJack battery performance legal Settlement
(18,333)
(28,333)
-
Restructuring
8,015
-
-
Other
217
989
4,339
Adjusted EBITDA
$48,215
$52,382
$49,368


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in interest expense between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-39088
20176
-384
384
26
Correct choice index: 3
Intellectual Property and Custom Development Income
Licensing of intellectual property including royalty-based fees decreased 49.2 percent in 2019 compared to 2018. This was primarily due to a decline in new partnership agreements compared to the prior year. The timing and amount of licensing, sales or other transfers of IP may vary significantly from period to period depending upon the timing of licensing agreements, economic conditions, industry consolidation and the timing of new patents and know-how development.

($ in millions)
Percent
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Licensing of intellectual property including royalty-based fees
$367
$723
(43.2)%
Custom development income
246
275
(10.5)
Sales/other transfers of intellectual property
34
28
22.6
Total
$648
$1,026
(36.9)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the Sales/other transfers of intellectual property from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-6
71
0
62
6
Correct choice index: 4
The funded status of the plans was as follows:
(in thousands)

Years Ended March 31,
2019
2018
Fair value of plan assets
$90,365
$84,718
Less: projected benefit obligations
143,662
128,915
Underfunded status
$(53,297)
$(44,197)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase in the fair value of plan assets from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
5647000000
96012
134562
5647
0
Correct choice index: 3
Our net sales by offering category for EMEA for 2019 and 2018, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Net sales in EMEA remained flat (increased 5% excluding the effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates), or down $3.6 million, in 2019 compared to 2018. Net sales of hardware declined 5%, year to year, while net sales of software and services were up 2% and 7%, respectively, year over year. The changes were the result of the following:
• Lower volume of net sales of networking solutions, partially offset by higher volume of net sales of devices, to large enterprise and public sector clients in hardware net sales. • Higher volume of software net sales to large enterprise and public sector clients.
• Higher volume of net sales of cloud solution offerings and increased software referral fees that are recorded on a net sales recognition basis. In addition, there was an increase in the volume of Insight delivered services.

EMEA
Sales Mix
2019
2018
%Change
Hardware
$622,949
$653,499
(5%)
Software
753,729
736,509
2%
Services
149,966
140,233
7%
$1,526,644
$1,530,241
—


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Sales Mix of Hardware between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
622949
-30550
1
-30550000
1276448
Correct choice index: 1
grants of restricted awards are subject to forfeiture if a grantee , among other conditions , leaves our employment prior to expiration of the restricted period .
new grants of restricted awards generally vest one year after the date of grant in 25% ( 25 % ) increments over a four year period , with the exception of tsrs which vest after a three year period .
the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the years ended may 31 , 2013 and 2012 ( share awards in thousands ) : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Shares
Weighted AverageGrant-DateFair Value
Non-vested at May 31, 2011
869
$40
Granted
472
48
Vested
(321)
40
Forfeited
(79)
43
Non-vested at May 31, 2012
941
44
Granted
561
44
Vested
(315)
43
Forfeited
(91)
44
Non-vested at May 31, 2013
1,096
$44

the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 13.6 million , $ 12.9 million and $ 10.8 million , respectively .
we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 16.2 million , $ 13.6 million , and $ 12.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively .
as of may 31 , 2013 , there was $ 33.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years .
employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized .
employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock .
the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period .
as of may 31 , 2013 , 1.0 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.4 million shares reserved for future issuance .
we recognized compensation expense for the plan of $ 0.5 million in the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 .
the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan during the years ended may 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 was $ 6 , $ 7 and $ 6 , respectively , which represents the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount .
stock options stock options are granted at 100% ( 100 % ) of fair market value on the date of grant and have 10-year terms .
stock options granted vest one year after the date of grant in 25% ( 25 % ) increments over a four year period .
the plans provide for accelerated vesting under certain conditions .
there were no options granted under the plans during the years ended may 31 , 2013 and may 31 , 2012. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the net change of the total fair value balance of non-vested shares during 2013?
Choices:
6820.0
24699
48035.8
-6820
-386644
Correct choice index: 0
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
JKHY
100.00
127.44
148.62
205.60
263.21
290.88
Peer Group
100.00
136.78
148.10
174.79
239.10
301.34
S&P 500
100.00
130.69
137.81
166.20
207.10
222.47

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .
total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .
peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .
companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. .
micros systems , inc .
was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for the 2010 , what was the cumulative total return on jkhy?
Choices:
27.44
-95.03
2744
3496.95
107.1
Correct choice index: 0
3.4 FINANCIAL EXPENSE
(1) Fiscal 2018 was restated to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued operations. For further details, please consult the "Discontinued operations" section.
Fiscal 2019 financial expense decreased by 5.4% mainly due to:
• the reimbursement at maturity of the Senior Secured Notes Series B on October 1, 2018; • the reimbursements of $65 million and US$35 million under the Canadian Revolving Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2019 and of US$328 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2019 following the sale of Cogeco Peer 1; and
• early reimbursement of the US$400 million Senior Unsecured Notes during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 which resulted in a $6.2 million redemption premium and the write-off of the unamortized deferred transaction costs of $2.5 million; partly offset by • higher interest cost on the First Lien Credit Facilities resulting from the full year impact of the financing of the MetroCast acquisition; and • the appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar compared to the prior year.

Years ended August 31,
2019
2018 (1)
Change
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
$
$
%
Interest on long-term debt
176,798
179,680
(1.6)
Net foreign exchange gains
(2,744)
(2,134)
28.6
Amortization of deferred transaction costs
1,836
1,884
(2.5)
Capitalized borrowing costs
(690)
(2,074)
(66.7)
Other
302
8,100
(96.3)
175,502
185,456
(5.4)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the interest on long-term debt from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-2882
176894
-2882000000
2882
-179615
Correct choice index: 0
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Interest and penalty charges, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are classified as income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had immaterial accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The Company is subject to taxation in the United Kingdom and several foreign jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2019, the Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities in the United Kingdom for years prior to March 31, 2017. The significant foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates are no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years prior to March 31, 2016. In addition, net operating loss carryforwards in certain jurisdictions may be subject to adjustments by taxing authorities in future years when they are utilized.
The Company had approximately $24.9 million of unremitted foreign earnings as of March 31, 2019. Income taxes have been provided on approximately $10.0 million of the unremitted foreign earnings. Income taxes have not been provided on approximately $14.9 million of unremitted foreign earnings because they are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. The tax payable on the earnings that are indefinitely reinvested would be immaterial.

Year ended March 31,
2019
2018
Beginning balance
$6,164
$4,931
Additions based on tax positions related to current year
164
142
Additions for tax positions of prior years
231
1,444
Reductions due to change in foreign exchange rate  
(301)
(353)
Expiration of statutes of limitation
(165)
—
Reductions due to settlements with tax authorities
(77)
—
Ending balance
$6,016
$6,164


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Beginning balance from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-4789
1233
1085
1
-1233
Correct choice index: 1
The Corporation’s segment profit (loss) is reported in two operating segments: Canadian broadband services and American broadband services. The reporting structure reflects how the Corporation manages its business activities to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance.
The Canadian and American broadband services segments provide a wide range of Internet, video and telephony services primarily to residential customers as well as business services across their coverage areas. The Canadian broadband services activities are carried out by Cogeco Connexion in the provinces of Québec and Ontario and the American broadband services activities are carried out by Atlantic Broadband in 11 states: Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia.
The previously reported Business ICT services segment, comprised of the Cogeco Peer 1 operations, is now reported in discontinued operations following the sale on April 30, 2019 of the Cogeco Peer 1 subsidiary. Information about the discontinued segment is provided in Note 8.
The Corporation and its chief operating decision maker assess the performance of each operating segment based on its segment profit (loss), which is equal to revenue less operating expenses. The other expenses, except for management fees, financial expense and income taxes, are reported by segment solely for external reporting purposes.
(1) Revenue by geographic market includes $1,294,967 in Canada and $1,036,853 in the United States. (2) Comprised of restructuring costs within the Canadian broadband services segment and acquisition and integration costs related to the FiberLight network acquisition in the American broadband services segment.

Year ended August 31, 2019
Canadian broadband services
American broadband services
Inter-segment eliminations and other
Consolidated
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
$
$
$
$
Revenue (1)
1,294,967
1,036,853
—
2,331,820
Operating expenses
606,286
571,208
26,486
1,203,980
Management fees – Cogeco Inc.
—
—
19,900
19,900
Segment profit (loss)
688,681
465,645
(46,386)
1,107,940
Integration, restructuring and acquisition costs (2)
9,299
1,851
—
11,150
Depreciation and amortization
254,345
226,301
79
480,725
Financial expense
175,502
Profit before income taxes
440,563
Income taxes
83,655
Profit for the year from continuing operations
356,908
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
241,940
192,605
—
434,545


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What are the average Operating expenses from Canadian and American broadband services for year ended August 31, 2019?
Choices:
588747
571208
59
481597
303158
Correct choice index: 0
For the periods indicated, the weighted-average fair value of options and weighted-average assumptions were as follows:
*Options valued using Monte Carlo Valuation Method
As of June 30, 2019, the total compensation cost related to the unvested stock option awards not yet recognized was approximately $24.1 million, which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3.0 years.
No cash was used by us to settle equity instruments granted under share-based compensation arrangements in any of the periods presented.
We have not capitalized any share-based compensation costs as part of the cost of an asset in any of the periods presented.
For the year ended June 30, 2019, cash in the amount of $35.6 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 2019 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $2.9 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2018, cash in the amount of $54.4 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 2018 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $1.5 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2017, cash in the amount of $20.8 million was received as the result of the exercise of options granted under share-based payment arrangements. The tax benefit realized by us during the year ended June 30, 2017 from the exercise of options eligible for a tax deduction was $2.2 million.

Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Weighted–average fair value of options granted
$8.39
$7.58
$7.06
Weighted-average assumptions used:
Expected volatility
25.72%
26.95%
28.32%
Risk–free interest rate
2.57%
2.18%
1.46%
Expected dividend yield
1.54%
1.50%
1.43%
Expected life (in years)
4.44
4.38
4.51
Forfeiture rate (based on historical rates)
6%
6%
5%
Average exercise share price
$38.81
$34.60
$31.75
Derived service period (in years)*
N/A
N/A
1.79


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total tax benefit for fiscal years 2017-2019?
Choices:
3.6
5.2
4.1
6.6
6.2
Correct choice index: 3