trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations represents contract revenues that have not yet been recognized for contracts with a duration greater than one year. As of December 31, 2019, we did not have any significant performance obligations related to customer contracts that had an original expected duration of one year or more, other than maintenance services, which are satisfied over time. As a practical expedient, for certain contracts recognize revenue equal to the amounts we are entitled to invoice which correspond to the value of completed performance obligations to date. The amount related to these performance obligations was $13.3 million as of December 31, 2018. The amount related to these performance obligations was $13.6 million as of December 31, 2019, and the Company expects to recognize 64% of such revenue over the next 12 months with the remainder thereafter.
The following table provides information about accounts receivables, contract assets and unearned revenue from contracts with customers:
(1) Included in other receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Of the outstanding unearned revenue balance as of December 31, 2018, $12.7 million was recognized as revenue during the year ended December 31, 2019.

(In thousands)
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Accounts receivable
$90,531
$99,385
Contract assets (1)
$2,812
$3,766
Unearned revenue
$11,963
$17,940
Non-current unearned revenue
$6,012
$5,296


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in non-current unearned revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
716000
64820196
716
5999
0
Correct choice index: 2
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common stock and common stock equivalents, including stock options, RSUs and common stock subject to repurchase.
The following table reconciles the shares used in calculating basic net income per share and diluted net income per share (in thousands):

Fiscal Year Ended
December 28, 2019
December 29, 2018
December 30, 2017
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic net income per share
74,994
73,482
72,292
Add potentially dilutive securities
2,292
1,700
1,947
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted net income per share
77,286
75,182
74,239


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Weighted-average shares used in computing basic net income per share from Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2019 to December 29, 2018?
Choices:
1512
49
-73452
755
0
Correct choice index: 0
performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

12/11
12/12
12/13
12/14
12/15
12/16
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
100.00
139.36
198.03
350.40
437.09
362.38
S&P 500
100.00
116.00
153.58
174.60
177.01
198.18
Dow Jones US Travel & Leisure
100.00
113.33
164.87
191.85
203.17
218.56

the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested .
past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the mathematical range for royal caribean , s&p 500 and dow jones in december , 2014?
Choices:
0
173.39
250.4
-2.41
1.73
Correct choice index: 1
Restricted Stock Units
Certain key employees have been granted time-based, performance-based and market-based restricted stock units. The time-based restricted stock units granted generally vest on a graded vesting schedule over three years. The performance-based restricted stock units generally vest on a cliff vesting schedule over three years and up to a maximum of 150%, depending on the specified performance condition and the level of achievement obtained. The performance-based restricted stock units have a vesting condition that is based upon the Company’s cumulative adjusted core earnings per share during the performance period. The market-based restricted stock units generally vest on a cliff vesting schedule over three years and up to a maximum of 200%, depending on the specified performance condition and the level of achievement obtained. The market-based restricted stock units have a vesting condition that is tied to the Company’s total shareholder return based on the Company’s stock performance in relation to the companies in the Standard and Poor’s (S&P) Super Composite Technology Hardware and Equipment Index excluding the Company.
On October 6, 2017, the Company’s Compensation Committee approved the modification of vesting criteria for certain performance-based restricted stock units granted in fiscal year 2015. As a result of the modification, 0.8 million awards vested during the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, which resulted in approximately $24.9 million of stock-based compensation expense recognized.
The following table summarizes restricted stock units activity from August 31, 2018 through August 31, 2019:
(1) For those shares granted that are based on the achievement of certain performance criteria, the amount represents the maximum number of shares that can vest. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019, the Company awarded approximately 1.6 million time-based restricted stock units, 0.4 million performance based restricted stock units and 0.4 million market-based restricted stock units based on target performance criteria.

Shares
Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding as of August 31, 2018
8,352,307
$24.34
Changes during the period
Shares granted(1)
3,144,205
$25.25
Shares vested
(1,983,411)
$25.07
Shares forfeited
(2,347,628)
$24.78
Outstanding as of August 31, 2019
7,165,473
$26.27


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the weighted average grant-date fair value between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1.08
-8352280.73
-1.93
1.93
50.61
Correct choice index: 3
entergy mississippi , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis other regulatory charges ( credits ) have no material effect on net income due to recovery and/or refund of such expenses .
other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the under-recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity charges .
2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy mississippi's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

(In Millions)
2002 net revenue
$380.2
Base rates
48.3
Other
(1.9)
2003 net revenue
$426.6

the increase in base rates was effective january 2003 as approved by the mpsc .
gross operating revenue , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase in base rates effective january 2003 and an increase of $ 29.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to quarterly changes in the fuel factor resulting from the increases in market prices of natural gas and purchased power .
this increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 35.9 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of decreased generation and purchases that resulted in less energy available for resale sales .
fuel and fuel-related expenses decreased primarily due to the decreased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and decreased generation , partially offset by an increase in the market price of purchased power .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to over-recovery of capacity charges related to the grand gulf rate rider and the cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 .
other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 6.6 million in customer service support costs ; and 2022 an increase of $ 3.7 million in benefit costs .
the increase was partially offset by the absence of the voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million that occurred in 2003 .
taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to a higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes compared to the same period in 2003 .
2003 compared to 2002 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million ; and 2022 an increase of $ 4.4 million in benefit costs. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the increase in operation and maintenance expenses as a percentage of net revenue in 2003?
Choices:
41.41748
1
0.02414
2.34091
0.05724
Correct choice index: 2
Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018
The following tables in this section set forth our selected consolidated statements of operations (in thousands), data for the percentage change and data as a percentage of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation to reflect interest income as a separate line item, which was previously included in other income, net.
Cost of Revenue
(1) Excludes amortization and depreciation shown in operating expenses.
The $37.9 million increase in cost of revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018 was the result of a $32.8 million, or 32%, increase in cost of hardware and other revenue and a $5.1 million, or 11%, increase in cost of SaaS and license revenue. Our cost of software license revenue included within cost of SaaS and license revenue decreased $0.4 million to $1.3 million during 2019 as compared to $1.7 million during 2018. The increase in cost of Alarm.com segment hardware and other revenue related primarily to an increase in the number of hardware units shipped in 2019 as compared to 2018. The increase in cost of  corresponding increase in amounts paid to wireless network providers.
Cost of hardware and other revenue as a percentage of hardware and other revenue was 81% and 78% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Cost of SaaS and license revenue as a percentage of SaaS and license revenue was 15% for each of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Cost of software license revenue as a percentage of software license revenue was 3% and 4% for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in cost of hardware and other revenue as a percentage of hardware and other revenue in 2019 as compared to 2018 is a reflection of the mix of product sales during the periods.

Year Ended December 31,
% Change
2019 vs. 2018
2019
2018
2019 vs. 2018
Cost of revenue(1):
Cost of SaaS and license revenue
$50,066
$44,933
11%
Cost of hardware and other revenue
133,533
100,782
32%
Total cost of revenue
$183,599
$145,715
26%
% of total revenue
37%
35%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
2
-35
72
39
-100745
Correct choice index: 0
Remaining performance obligations
Remaining performance obligations represent contracted revenue that has not been recognized, which include contract liabilities and amounts that will be billed and recognized as revenue in future periods. As of March 29, 2019, we had $2,608 million of remaining performance obligations, which does not include customer deposit liabilities of approximately $505 million, and the approximate percentages expected to be recognized as revenue in the future are as follows:
Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Percent Expected to be Recognized as Revenue
(in millions, except percentages)
Total Remaining Performance Obligations
0-12 Months
13-24 Months
25-36 Months
Over 36 Months
Enterprise Security
$2,059
65%
24%
10%
2%
Consumer Cyber Safety
549
95%
4%
1%
-%
Total
$2,608
71%
19%
8%
1%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in Total Remaining Performance Obligations for Consumer Cyber Safety and Enterprise Security?
Choices:
-524
2059
-520
2608
1510
Correct choice index: 4
Non-current provisions
Non-current provisions consisted of the following:
The non-current provision for employee benefits includes long service leave as described above.
The dilapidation provision relates to certain lease arrangements for office space entered into by the Group. These lease arrangements require the Group to restore each premises to its original condition upon lease termination. Accordingly, the Group records a provision for the present value of the estimated future costs to retire long-lived assets at the expiration of these leases.

As of June 30,
2019
2018
(U.S. $ in thousands)
Employee benefits
$3,323
$2,094
Dilapidation provision
2,759
2,269
$6,082
$4,363


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average employee benefits for fiscal years 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
180.6
2.4
270850
614.5
2708.5
Correct choice index: 4
11 Intangible assets
(a) Intangible assets
RIGHTS AND LICENCES
Certain licences that NEXTDC possesses have an indefinite useful life and are carried at cost less impairment losses and are subject to impairment review at least annually and whenever there is an indication that it may be impaired.
Other licences that NEXTDC acquires are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Amortisation is recognised on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life. The estimated useful life and amortisation method are reviewed at the end of each annual reporting period.
INTERNALLY GENERATED SOFTWARE
Internally developed software is capitalised at cost less accumulated amortisation. Amortisation is calculated using the straight-line basis over the asset’s useful economic life which is generally two to three years. Their useful lives and potential impairment are reviewed at the end of each financial year.
SOFTWARE UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Costs incurred in developing products or systems and costs incurred in acquiring software and licenses that will contribute to future period financial benefits through revenue generation and/or cost reduction are capitalised to software and systems. Costs capitalised include external direct costs of materials and services and employee costs.
Assets in the course of construction include only those costs directly attributable to the development phase and are only recognised following completion of technical feasibility and where the Group has an intention and ability to use the asset.

Rights and licences
Internally generated software
Software under development
Total
Movements
$'000
$'000
$'000
$'000
30 June 2019
Opening net book amount at 1 July 2018
13
6,385
6,509
12,907
Additions – internally developed
-
-
11,896
11,896
Amortisation
-
(1,116)
-
(1,116)
Transfers between classes
-
2,121
(2,121)
-
Disposals
-
(9)
-
(9)
Closing net book amount
13
7,381
16,284
23,678


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in net book amount for software under development between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
6509
3377
16283
9775
6398
Correct choice index: 3
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2006 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

Balance, December 31, 2003
$514,177
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
82,551
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(1,390)
Balance, December 31, 2004
595,338
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
83,656
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(15,244)
Balance, December 31, 2005
663,750
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
89,564
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(12,807)
Balance, December 31, 2006
$740,507

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the average of the deductions during the period of 2003-2006?
Choices:
0.0001
-8423.66667
5611.66667
11089.33333
9813.66667
Correct choice index: 4
a valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized .
changes to our valuation allowance during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period and the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 are summarized below ( in thousands ) : .

Balance at May 31, 2014
$(7,199)
Utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards
3,387
Other
(11)
Balance at May 31, 2015
(3,823)
Allowance for foreign income tax credit carryforward
(7,140)
Allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards
(4,474)
Allowance for domestic net unrealized capital loss
(1,526)
Release of allowance of domestic capital loss carryforward
1,746
Other
98
Balance at May 31, 2016
(15,119)
Allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards
(1,504)
Release of allowance of domestic net unrealized capital loss
12
Balance at December 31, 2016
(16,611)
Allowance for foreign net operating loss carryforwards
(6,469)
Allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards
(3,793)
Allowance for state credit carryforwards
(685)
Rate change on domestic net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards
3,868
Utilization of foreign income tax credit carryforward
7,140
Balance at December 31, 2017
$(16,550)

the increase in the valuation allowance related to net operating loss carryforwards of $ 10.3 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 relates primarily to carryforward assets recorded as part of the acquisition of active network .
the increase in the valuation allowance related to domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $ 1.5 million and $ 4.5 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and the year ended may 31 , 2016 , respectively , relates to acquired carryforwards from the merger with heartland .
foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $ 43.2 million and domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $ 28.9 million at december 31 , 2017 will expire between december 31 , 2026 and december 31 , 2037 if not utilized .
we conduct business globally and file income tax returns in the domestic federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions .
in the normal course of business , we are subject to examination by taxing authorities around the world .
we are no longer subjected to state income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2008 , u.s .
federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before december 31 , 2013 and u.k .
federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2014 .
88 2013 global payments inc .
| 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2014 and 2015?
Choices:
3376.0
3376000000
0
-3833
-3376
Correct choice index: 0
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/01
12/31/02
12/31/03
12/31/04
12/31/05
12/31/06
United Parcel Service, Inc.
$100.00
$117.19
$140.49
$163.54
$146.35
$148.92
S&P 500 Index
$100.00
$77.90
$100.24
$111.15
$116.61
$135.02
Dow Jones Transportation Average
$100.00
$88.52
$116.70
$149.06
$166.42
$182.76

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/06?
Choices:
0.4892
0
2.4892
0.4906
0.6892
Correct choice index: 0
1 Interest on borrowings includes interest on short-term borrowings and on long-term debt.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS We recognized $79 million in net foreign exchange gains in 2019 (2018 – $136 million in net losses). These gains and losses were primarily attributed to our US dollar-denominated commercial paper (US CP) program borrowings (see note 17).
These foreign exchange gains (2018 – losses) were partially offset by the $80 million loss related to the change in fair value of derivatives (2018 – $95 million gain) that was primarily attributed to the debt derivatives, which were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, we used to substantially offset the foreign exchange risk related to these US dollar-denominated borrowings.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, after determining we would not be able to exercise our outstanding bond forward derivatives (bond forwards) within the designated time frame, we discontinued hedge accounting and reclassified a $21 million loss from the hedging reserve within shareholders’ equity to “change in fair value of derivative instruments” within finance costs.
We subsequently extended the bond forwards and redesignated them as effective hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we exercised these bond forwards. See note 17 for more information on our bond forwards.
NOTE 11: FINANCE COSTS

Years ended December 31
Years ended December 31
Years ended December 31
(In millions of dollars)
Note
2019
2018
Interest on borrowings 1
746
709
Interest on post-employment benefits liability
23
11
14
Loss on repayment of long-term debt
21
19
28
(Gain) loss on foreign exchange
(79)
136
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
80
(95)
Capitalized interest
(19)
(20)
Other
21
21
Finance costs before interest on lease liabilities
779
793
Interest expense on lease liabilities
8
61
-
Total finance costs
840
793


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Interest on post-employment benefits liability from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
826
-3
-3000
3
25
Correct choice index: 1