trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
eog resources , inc .
supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities .
the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2017 and 2016: .

2017
2016
Proved properties
$48,845,672
$45,751,965
Unproved properties
3,710,069
3,840,126
Total
52,555,741
49,592,091
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
(29,191,247)
(26,247,062)
Net capitalized costs
$23,364,494
$23,345,029

costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities .
the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and a gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) .
acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property .
exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses .
development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the year 2016 , what is the percentage of unproved properties among the total properties?
Choices:
1
48845672.07743
0.07862
0.07743
0.07481
Correct choice index: 3
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2014 .
the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2009 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
HUM
$100
$125
$201
$160
$244
$342
S&P 500
$100
$115
$117
$136
$180
$205
Peer Group
$100
$112
$123
$144
$198
$252

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
table of contents .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2010 to 2011
Choices:
3.8
0.378
0.618
0.608
201
Correct choice index: 3
entergy arkansas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges .
the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue .
2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 .
the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges .
net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

(In Millions)
2003 net revenue
$998.7
Deferred fuel cost revisions
(16.9)
Other
(3.4)
2004 net revenue
$978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis .
deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million .
the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the net change in net revenue during 2004 for entergy arkansas inc.?
Choices:
-20.3
-989.1
20.3
-0.2
0
Correct choice index: 0
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 .
the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

2012
2011
Statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes
35%
35%
Effects of foreign operations, including foreign tax credits
18
6
Change in permanent reinvestment assertion
—
5
Adjustments to valuation allowances
21
14
Tax law changes
—
1
Effective income tax rate on continuing operations
74%
61%

the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income .
the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments .
the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below .
effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent .
change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s .
tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations .
offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million .
in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s .
tax on previously undistributed earnings .
adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s .
benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes .
discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by how much did the effective income tax rate on continuing operations increase from 2011 to 2012?
Choices:
0.13
5.69
0
1.35
227.39
Correct choice index: 0
Research and development
Research and development expense consists primarily of salaries and other personnel-related costs; the cost of products, materials, and outside services used in our R&D activities; and depreciation and amortization expense associated with R&D specific facilities and equipment. We maintain a number of programs and activities to improve our technology and processes in order to enhance the performance and reduce the costs of our solar modules.
The following table shows research and development expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
Research and development expense in 2019 increased compared to 2018 primarily due to increased material and module testing costs and higher employee compensation expense.

Year Ended
Change
(Dollars in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
2019 over 2018
2018 over 2017
Research and development
$96,611
$84,472
$88,573
$12,139
14%
$(4,101)
(5)%
% of net sales .
3.2%
3.8%
3.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in net sales amount between 2018 and 2017?
Choices:
-729485.96
-2867961.3
729485.96
-621564.91
-72948596.49
Correct choice index: 0
other purchases or sales of equity securities the following chart discloses information regarding shares of snap-on 2019s common stock that were sold by citibank , n.a .
( 201ccitibank 201d ) during the fourth quarter of 2013 pursuant to a prepaid equity forward transaction agreement ( the 201cagreement 201d ) with citibank that is intended to reduce the impact of market risk associated with the stock-based portion of the company 2019s deferred compensation plans .
the company 2019s stock-based deferred compensation liabilities , which are impacted by changes in the company 2019s stock price , increase as the company 2019s stock price rises and decrease as the company 2019s stock price declines .
pursuant to the agreement , citibank may purchase or sell shares of the company 2019s common stock ( for citibank 2019s account ) in the market or in privately negotiated transactions .
the agreement has no stated expiration date , but the parties expect that each transaction under the agreement will have a term of approximately one year .
the agreement does not provide for snap-on to purchase or repurchase shares .
the following chart discloses information regarding citibank 2019s sales of snap-on common stock during the fourth quarter of 2013 pursuant to the agreement : period shares sold average per share .

Period
Shares sold
Averagepriceper share
09/29/13 to 10/26/13
–
–
10/27/13 to 11/23/13
–
–
11/24/13 to 12/28/13
5,000
$106.32
Total/Average
5,000
$106.32

2013 annual report 23 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total cash received from the sales of common stock during the 4th quarter of 2013?
Choices:
-531600
0.5
11303.9
531600.0
531600
Correct choice index: 3
the company further presents total net 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure , net of deferred compensation investments and hedged investments , to reflect another gauge for investors as the economic impact of investments held pursuant to deferred compensation arrangements is substantially offset by a change in compensation expense and the impact of hedged investments is substantially mitigated by total return swap hedges .
carried interest capital allocations are excluded as there is no impact to blackrock 2019s stockholders 2019 equity until such amounts are realized as performance fees .
finally , the company 2019s regulatory investment in federal reserve bank stock , which is not subject to market or interest rate risk , is excluded from the company 2019s net economic investment exposure .
( dollar amounts in millions ) december 31 , december 31 .

<i>(Dollar amounts in millions)</i>
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2011
Total investments, GAAP
$1,750
$1,631
Investments held by consolidated sponsored investmentfunds<sup>(1)</sup>
(524)
(587)
Net exposure to consolidated investment funds
430
475
Total investments, as adjusted
1,656
1,519
Federal Reserve Bank stock<sup>(2)</sup>
(89)
(328)
Carried interest
(85)
(21)
Deferred compensation investments
(62)
(65)
Hedged investments
(209)
(43)
Total “economic” investment exposure
$1,211
$1,062

total 201ceconomic 201d investment exposure .
.
.
$ 1211 $ 1062 ( 1 ) at december 31 , 2012 and december 31 , 2011 , approximately $ 524 million and $ 587 million , respectively , of blackrock 2019s total gaap investments were maintained in sponsored investment funds that were deemed to be controlled by blackrock in accordance with gaap , and , therefore , are consolidated even though blackrock may not economically own a majority of such funds .
( 2 ) the decrease of $ 239 million related to a lower holding requirement of federal reserve bank stock held by blackrock institutional trust company , n.a .
( 201cbtc 201d ) .
total investments , as adjusted , at december 31 , 2012 increased $ 137 million from december 31 , 2011 , resulting from $ 765 million of purchases/capital contributions , $ 185 million from positive market valuations and earnings from equity method investments , and $ 64 million from net additional carried interest capital allocations , partially offset by $ 742 million of sales/maturities and $ 135 million of distributions representing return of capital and return on investments. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in the balance of total investments gaap from 2011 to 2012?
Choices:
0
0.07296
0.61803
0.07186
0.068
Correct choice index: 1
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. A summary of the tax effect of the significant components of deferred income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
At December 31, 2019, we had state and foreign net operating losses of approximately $12.2 million and $7.9 million, respectively. The state net operating losses expire beginning 2027 through 2038. We recorded a full valuation allowance against the foreign net operating losses and a partial valuation allowance against the state net operating losses, as we do not believe those losses will be fully utilized in the future.

December 31,
2019
2018
Goodwill and other intangibles
$136,882
$114,532
Lease arrangements
31,128
—
Property and equipment
13,270
8,168
Unbilled receivables - IRC Section 481(a)
5,878
8,816
Gross deferred tax liabilities
187,158
131,516
Lease obligations
(34,146)
—
Retirement and other liabilities
(18,614)
(20,707)
Allowance for potential contract losses and other contract reserves
(2,205)
(1,681)
Foreign and state operating loss carryforwards
(2,239)
(1,709)
Less: Valuation allowance
1,828
1,537
Gross deferred tax assets
(55,376)
(22,560)
Net deferred tax liabilities
$131,782
$108,956


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of gross deferred tax to net deferred tax liabilities on December 31, 2018?
Choices:
240472
1
0.83
1.21
0
Correct choice index: 3
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) provide renewal options for terms of 3 to 7 additional years .
leases for retail space are for terms of 5 to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options .
as of september 29 , 2007 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 1.1 billion related to leases for retail space .
rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 151 million , $ 138 million , and $ 140 million in 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .
future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2007 , are as follows ( in millions ) : fiscal years .

2008
$155
2009
172
2010
173
2011
160
2012
148
Thereafter
617
Total minimum lease payments
$1,425

accrued warranty and indemnifications the company offers a basic limited parts and labor warranty on its hardware products .
the basic warranty period for hardware products is typically one year from the date of purchase by the end-user .
the company also offers a 90-day basic warranty for its service parts used to repair the company 2019s hardware products .
the company provides currently for the estimated cost that may be incurred under its basic limited product warranties at the time related revenue is recognized .
factors considered in determining appropriate accruals for product warranty obligations include the size of the installed base of products subject to warranty protection , historical and projected warranty claim rates , historical and projected cost-per-claim , and knowledge of specific product failures that are outside of the company 2019s typical experience .
the company assesses the adequacy of its preexisting warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates .
for products accounted for under subscription accounting pursuant to sop no .
97-2 , the company recognizes warranty expense as incurred .
the company periodically provides updates to its applications and system software to maintain the software 2019s compliance with specifications .
the estimated cost to develop such updates is accounted for as warranty costs that are recognized at the time related software revenue is recognized .
factors considered in determining appropriate accruals related to such updates include the number of units delivered , the number of updates expected to occur , and the historical cost and estimated future cost of the resources necessary to develop these updates. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year are due after 2012?
Choices:
879225
1
369.52998
0.43298
0.14105
Correct choice index: 3
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
IV. Our 2019 Compensation Program and Components of Pay The table below shows (i) the length of the “protected period” afforded to officers following a change of control and (ii) the multiple of salary and bonus payment and years of welfare benefits to which officers will be entitled if change of control benefits become payable under our agreements and related policies:
For more information on change of control arrangements applicable to our executives, including our rationale for
providing these benefits, see “Executive Compensation—Potential Termination Payments—Payments Made
Upon a Change of Control.” For information on change of control severance benefits payable to our junior
officers and managers, see “—Severance Benefits” in the next subsection below.

Protected Period
Multiple of Annual Cash Compensation
Years of Welfare Benefits
CEO
2 years
3 times
3 years
Other Executives
1.5 years
2 times
2 years
Other Officers
1 year
1 time
1 year


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the protected period between CEO and Other Executives?
Choices:
0.3
1.3
500000
0.5
-0.5
Correct choice index: 3
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET:
Property and equipment at September 2019 and September 2018 consisted of the following:

2019
2018
Land
$773,068
$773,068
Buildings and improvements
12,574,893
12,206,908
Warehouse equipment
15,011,605
13,424,236
Furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements
13,155,606
12,018,984
Vehicles
3,687,901
3,229,551
Construction in progress
617,881
743,278
45,820,954
42,396,025
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization:
(28,165,539)
(26,627,541)
Owned property and equipment
$ 17,655,415
$ 15,768,484


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the company's net owned property and equipment between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-1886931
30052470
0
1886931
1886931000
Correct choice index: 3
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 .
also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses .
the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income .
see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 .
also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income .
the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses .
see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$2,438.4
Regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate
55.5
Retail electric price
42.8
Louisiana Act 55 financing savings obligation
17.2
Volume/weather
(12.4)
Other
19.0
2017 net revenue
$2,560.5

the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) .
the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2017 what was the percentage change in the net revenue
Choices:
2.22
0.05007
-0.05007
1
2438.45007
Correct choice index: 1