trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
The tax credit/(charge) for the period differs from the standard rate of corporation tax in the United Kingdom of 19.0% (2017/18: 19.0%). The reasons for this are explained below:
The movements in losses recognised for the period ended 30 March 2019 is £nil (2017/18: £1.1m). Corporation tax losses are not recognised where future recoverability is uncertain.
The adjustments to prior periods of £1.7m (2017/18: £(8.1m)) relate mainly to the adjustment of prior period losses and capital allowances which have been revised following submission of tax returns.

52 weeks ended 30 Mar 2019 £m
52 weeks ended 31 Mar 2018 £m
(Loss)/profit before taxation
(42.7)
20.9
Tax credit/(charge) at the domestic income tax rate of 19.0% (2017/18: 19.0%)
8.2
(4.0)
Tax effect of:
Non-deductible items
(0.9)
(0.1)
Other disallowable items
-
(0.4)
Impairment of goodwill
-
(0.8)
Adjustment for share-based payments
(0.4)
(0.6)
Adjustment due to current period deferred tax being provided at 17.0% (2017/18: 17.0%)
(0.8)
0.7
Movements in losses recognised
-
1.1
Adjustment to restate opening deferred tax at 17.0% (2017/18: 17.0%)
-
(2.3)
Adjustments to prior periods
1.7
(8.1)
Current tax relating to overseas business
1.1
0.8
Income tax credit/(charge)
8.9
(13.7)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the (Loss)/profit before taxation from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-12.7
-63.6
-2
-20.7
7.9
Correct choice index: 1
Note 9 – Leases
We have operating leases for office space, automobiles and various other equipment in the U.S. and in certain international locations. We also reviewed other contracts, such as manufacturing agreements and service agreements, for potential embedded leases. We specifically reviewed these other contracts to determine whether we have the right to substantially all of the economic benefit from the use of any specified assets or the right to direct the use of any specified assets, either of which would indicate the existence of a lease.
As of December 31, 2019, our operating leases had remaining lease terms of one month to six years, some of which included options to extend the leases for up to nine years, and some of which included options to terminate the leases within three months. For those leases that are reasonably assured to be renewed, we have included the option to extend as part of our right of use asset and lease liability. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less were not recorded on the balance sheet and lease expense for these leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Lease expense related to these short-term leases was $0.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, and is included in cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Lease expense related to variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or rate, such as real estate taxes and insurance reimbursements, was $0.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. For lease agreements entered into or reassessed after the adoption of Topic 842, we elected to not separate lease and nonlease components. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating leases is as follows:
(1) Reflects the adoption of the new lease accounting standard on January 1, 2019.

(In thousands)
Classification
December 31, 2019
January 1, 2019 (1)
Assets
Right of use lease assets
Other Assets
$8,452
$10,322
Total lease asset
$8,452
$10,322
Liabilities
Current lease liability
Accrued expenses
$2,676
$2,948
Non-current lease liability
Other non-current liabilities
5,818
7,374
Total lease liability
$8,494
$10,322


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in current lease liability between January and December?
Choices:
-2939
-272
5546
5624
272
Correct choice index: 1
Note 6 Interest expense
Included in interest expense on long-term debt is interest on lease liabilities of $220 million for 2019 and interest on finance leases of $142 million for 2018.
Capitalized interest was calculated using an average rate of 3.96% and 3.88% for 2019 and 2018, respectively, which represents the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding long-term debt.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
2019
2018
Interest expense on long-term debt
(1,024)
(918)
Interest expense on other debt
(153)
(133)
Capitalized interest
45
51
Total interest expense
(1,132)
(1,000)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in capitalized interest in 2019?
Choices:
-6
6
-306
198
0
Correct choice index: 0
management 2019s discussion and analysis 158 jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of other liquid securities collateral , for the dates indicated .
ratings profile of derivative receivables .

Rating equivalent
2012
2011
December 31,(in millions, except ratios)
Exposure net of all collateral
% of exposure net of all collateral
Exposure net of all collateral
% of exposure net of all collateral
AAA/Aaa to AA-/Aa3
$20,040
33%
$25,100
35%
A+/A1 to A-/A3
12,169
20
22,942
32
BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3
18,197
29
9,595
14
BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3
9,636
16
10,545
15
CCC+/Caa1 and below
1,283
2
2,488
4
Total
$61,325
100%
$70,670
100%

as noted above , the firm uses collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk .
the percentage of the firm 2019s derivatives transactions subject to collateral agreements 2013 excluding foreign exchange spot trades , which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity 2013 was 88% ( 88 % ) as of december 31 , 2012 , unchanged compared with december 31 , 2011 .
credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) when the reference entity suffers a credit event .
if no credit event has occurred , the protection seller makes no payments to the protection purchaser .
for a more detailed description of credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 6 on pages 218 2013227 of this annual report .
the firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes : first , in its capacity as a market-maker ; and second , as an end-user , to manage the firm 2019s own credit risk associated with various exposures .
included in end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities ( loans and unfunded commitments ) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the firm 2019s wholesale businesses ( 201ccredit portfolio management 201d activities ) .
information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below .
in addition , the firm uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures , including credit risk arising from certain afs securities and from certain securities held in the firm 2019s market making businesses .
these credit derivatives , as well as the synthetic credit portfolio , are not included in credit portfolio management activities ; for further information on these credit derivatives as well as credit derivatives used in the firm 2019s capacity as a market maker in credit derivatives , see credit derivatives in note 6 on pages 226 2013227 of this annual report. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of derivative receivables was junk rated in 2012?
Choices:
15
156
-10529
0.1
14.0
Correct choice index: 4
Net Loss per Share
The Company applies the two-class method to calculate its basic and diluted net loss per share as both classes of its voting shares are participating securities with equal participation rights and are entitled to receive dividends on a share for share basis.
The following table summarizes the reconciliation of the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding and the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding:
In the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company was in a loss position and therefore diluted loss per share is equal to basic loss per share.

Years ended
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding
113,026,424
105,671,839
The following items have been excluded from the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding because they are anti-dilutive:
Stock options
3,812,242
5,476,790
Restricted share units
1,939,918
2,473,665
Deferred share units
673
347
5,752,833
7,950,802


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average anti-dilutive deferred share units for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
3975738
510
3
347
510000
Correct choice index: 1
Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)
The Company estimates the fair value of its ESPP share options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of highly subjective estimates and assumptions. The Company estimates the expected term of ESPP share options based on the length of each offering period, which is six months.
The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the ESPP share option. Expected volatility is based on the Company’s historical volatility. The Company uses an expected dividend rate of zero as it currently has no history or expectation of paying dividends on its ordinary shares.
The grant date fair value per ordinary share is based on the closing market value of its ordinary shares on the first day of each ESPP offering period. The first authorized offering period under the ESPP commenced on July 1, 2017.
The fair value of each ESPP option grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model that used the following weighted-average assumptions:
The weighted-average per share fair value of ESPP share options granted to employees during the years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, was $9.58 and $6.41, respectively.

Year ended March 31,
2019
2018
Expected term (in years)
0.5
0.5
Risk-free interest rate
2.3%
1.4%
Expected volatility
39.1%
29.9%
Expected dividend yield  
—%
—%
Grant date fair value per ordinary share
$36.69
$27.15


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Risk-free interest rate from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0.9
3.2
1.3
-1.4
-0.4
Correct choice index: 0
FY19 EAIP Payout Results:
(1) Calculated in FY19 plan exchange rates and excludes stock-based compensation expense, charges related to the amortization of intangible assets, restructuring, separation, transition and other related expenses, contract liabilities fair value adjustment, acquisition-related costs and certain litigation settlement gains.
(2) Calculated in FY19 plan exchange rates and excludes contract liabilities fair value adjustment.

Weighted Average Company Performance Funding
Company Performance Metric
Target ($) (millions)
Threshold ($)(millions)
Actual ($) (millions)
Threshold Funding (%)
Funding (%)
Non-GAAP Operating Income
1,630
1,428
1,427(1)
40
0.0
Non-GAAP Revenue
4,943
4,760
4,804(2)
40
71.2
FY19 Funding
.
.
.
.
35.6


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between Actual and Target for Non-GAAP Operating Income?
Choices:
203000
203
-203
-1391
1
Correct choice index: 1
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented below has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. This data should be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report.
(1) We elected to early adopt Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09 “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”) in 2016, which requires us, among other things, to prospectively record excess tax benefits as a reduction of the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations, whereas they were previously recognized in equity.
(2) We retrospectively adopted ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” in 2018. As a result, we have adjusted balances for 2017 and 2016. We have not adjusted 2015 for ASU 2014-09.

(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data (1) (2):
Revenue:
Perpetual license
$80,015
109,863
132,883
145,053
166,305
Term license
199,433
178,256
206,411
152,231
109,283
Maintenance
280,580
263,875
242,320
218,635
202,802
Cloud
133,746
82,627
51,097
40,647
30,626
Consulting
217,609
256,960
255,756
205,663
173,679
Total revenue
$911,383
891,581
888,467
762,229
682,695
(Loss) income from operations
$(134,878)
$(17,032)
$93,177
$50,644
$64,661
Net (loss) income
$(90,433)
$10,617
$98,548
$45,015
$36,322
(Loss) earnings per share
Basic
$(1.14)
$0.14
$1.27
$0.59
$0.47
Diluted
$(1.14)
$0.13
$1.19
$0.56
$0.46
Cash dividends declared per common share
$0.12
$0.12
$0.12
$0.12
$0.12


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total revenue earned from maintenance in 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
506195
925015
1
394551
519631
Correct choice index: 0
Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table shows, for FY19 and FY18, the actual expenditure and percentage change in total employee costs and percentage change in distributions to shareholders.
1 Represents dividends paid in each financial year
2 Total employee expenditure includes wages and salaries, social security costs, pension and other costs and share-based payments, see note 10 of the Financial Statements

FY19
FY18
Change
$M
$M
%
Shareholder distributions – dividends1
23.9
21.8
10%
Total employee expenditure2
370.1
361.9
2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Shareholder distributions – dividends in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
0
2.1
-20.8
340.1
-346.2
Correct choice index: 1
Assets in the combined schemes increased by £177.1m to £5,040.7m in the period. RHM scheme assets increased by £149.1m to £4,333.6m while the Premier Foods’ schemes assets increased by £28.0m to £707.1m. The most significant movement by asset class is that of government bonds which increased by £444.0m in the year, predominantly in the RHM scheme.
Liabilities in the combined schemes increased by £121.0m in the year to £4,667.6m. The value of liabilities associated with the RHM scheme were £3,495.8m, an increase of £65.3m while liabilities in the Premier Foods schemes were £55.7m higher at £1,171.8m. The increase in the value of liabilities in both schemes is due to a lower discount rate assumption of 2.45% (31 March 2018: 2.70%) and an increase in the RPI inflation rate assumption; from 3.15% to 3.25%.
The Group’s Pension Trustees have just commenced the triennial actuarial valuation process of the Group’s pension schemes as at 31 March 2019 (RHM scheme) and 5 April 2019 (Premier Foods main scheme). This exercise typically takes a number of months to conclude; the output of which will be provided in due course.
The net present value of future deficit payments, to the end of the respective recovery periods remains at circa £300–320m.

Combined pensions schemes (£m)
30 March 2019
31 March 2018
Assets
Equities
179.5
296.5
Government bonds
1,490.4
1,046.4
Corporate bonds
26.9
20.7
Property
436.5
391.0
Absolute return products
1,141.2
1,323.3
Cash
38.1
32.4
Infrastructure funds
256.1
254.6
Swaps
556.4
715.3
Private equity
446.1
344.0
Other
469.5
439.4
Total Assets
5,040.7
4,863.6
Liabilities
Discount rate
2.45%
2.70%
Inflation rate (RPI/CPI)
3.25%/2.15%
3.15%/2.05%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average government bonds for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
523.2
1268.4
5.7
2538.8
Correct choice index: 2
humana inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 .
cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively .
total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 .
we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years .
restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant .
compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant .
the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively .
activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Shares
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2006
1,107,455
$45.86
Granted
852,353
63.59
Vested
(51,206)
56.93
Forfeited
(63,624)
49.65
Nonvested restricted stock at December 31, 2007
1,844,978
$53.61

the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively .
total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 .
we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years .
there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the change in the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards from 2006 to 2007
Choices:
0.17217
0.1859
0.25357
0.20126
0.16979
Correct choice index: 4
1 Interest on borrowings includes interest on short-term borrowings and on long-term debt.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE AND CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS We recognized $79 million in net foreign exchange gains in 2019 (2018 – $136 million in net losses). These gains and losses were primarily attributed to our US dollar-denominated commercial paper (US CP) program borrowings (see note 17).
These foreign exchange gains (2018 – losses) were partially offset by the $80 million loss related to the change in fair value of derivatives (2018 – $95 million gain) that was primarily attributed to the debt derivatives, which were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, we used to substantially offset the foreign exchange risk related to these US dollar-denominated borrowings.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, after determining we would not be able to exercise our outstanding bond forward derivatives (bond forwards) within the designated time frame, we discontinued hedge accounting and reclassified a $21 million loss from the hedging reserve within shareholders’ equity to “change in fair value of derivative instruments” within finance costs.
We subsequently extended the bond forwards and redesignated them as effective hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we exercised these bond forwards. See note 17 for more information on our bond forwards.
NOTE 11: FINANCE COSTS

Years ended December 31
Years ended December 31
Years ended December 31
(In millions of dollars)
Note
2019
2018
Interest on borrowings 1
746
709
Interest on post-employment benefits liability
23
11
14
Loss on repayment of long-term debt
21
19
28
(Gain) loss on foreign exchange
(79)
136
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
80
(95)
Capitalized interest
(19)
(20)
Other
21
21
Finance costs before interest on lease liabilities
779
793
Interest expense on lease liabilities
8
61
-
Total finance costs
840
793


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Interest on borrowings from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-37
0
1
1455
37
Correct choice index: 4
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Company/Index
December 30, 2006
December 29, 2007
January 3, 2009
January 2, 2010
January 1, 2011
December 31, 2011
Advance Auto Parts
$100.00
$108.00
$97.26
$116.01
$190.41
$201.18
S&P 500 Index
100.00
104.24
65.70
78.62
88.67
88.67
S&P Retail Index
100.00
82.15
58.29
82.36
101.84
104.81

stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. compared to the lowest stock price , how much did advanced auto parts outperform the overall market?
Choices:
0.65038
96.54114
0.71886
0.80943
0.60843
Correct choice index: 2