trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
For the full year 2019, our ADG revenues increased 1.4% compared to the previous period. The increase was primarily due to improved average selling prices of approximately 9%, which was entirely due to a better product mix, and partially offset by a decrease in volumes by approximately 8%.
AMS revenues grew 4.6%, mainly due to the double-digits growth in Imaging. The increase was due to higher average selling prices of approximately 12%, as a result of a better product mix, and was partially offset by lower volumes of approximately 7%.
MDG revenues were down by 10.3%, mainly due to Microcontrollers. The decrease was due to lower volumes of approximately 10% while average selling prices remained substantially flat.
In 2018, all product groups registered double-digit revenue increase. Our ADG revenues increased 16.2% for the full year 2018 compared to the full year 2017 on growth in both Power Discrete and Automotive. The increase was primarily due to improved average selling prices of approximately 21% and volumes decreased by approximately 5%. The increase in average selling prices was entirely due to improved product mix, while selling prices remained substantially flat.
AMS revenues grew 19.9%, mainly on the strong increase in Imaging. The increase was due to higher volumes of approximately 12% and higher average selling prices of approximately 8%, which was entirely due to improved product mix of approximately 13%, while selling prices decreased by approximately 5%.
MDG revenues were up by 11.1%, with Digital and Microcontrollers & Memories equally contributing. The increase was primarily due to higher average selling prices of approximately 11%, while volumes remained substantially flat. The increase in average selling prices was due to a better product mix of approximately 13%, while the selling prices effect was negative of approximately 2%.

Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
% Variation
% Variation
2019 vs 2018 2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
(In millions)
(In millions)
(In millions)
Automotive and Discrete Group (ADG)
$3,606
$3,556
$3,059
1.4%
16.2%
Analog MEMS and Sensors Group (AMS)
3,299
3,154
2,630
4.6
19.9
Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG)
2,638
2,940
2,646
(10.3)
11.1
Others
13
14
12
—
—
Total consolidated net revenues
$9,556
$9,664
$8,347
(1.1)%
15.8%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What are the average net revenues by Analog MEMS and Sensors Group (AMS)?
Choices:
0.96
0
302766.67
3027.67
9086
Correct choice index: 3
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2019
The following table sets forth certain details with respect to each of the Named Executive Officers concerning the exercise of stock options and vesting of stock in Fiscal 2019:
(1) “Value realized on exercise” is the excess of the market price, at date of exercise, of the shares underlying the options over the exercise price of the options.
(2) “Value realized on vesting” is the market price of the underlying Common Shares on the vesting date.
(3) Relates to the vesting of PSUs and RSUs under our Fiscal 2018 LTIP.

Option Awards
Stock Awards (3)
Name
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)
Value Realized on Exercise(1) ($)
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized on Vesting(2) ($)
Mark J. Barrenechea
135,208
$2,801,023
65,820
$7,625,905
Madhu Ranganathan
—
$—
—
$—
Muhi Majzoub
100,000
$2,592,411
10,900
$1,263,646
Gordon A. Davies
—
$—
12,840
$1,486,870
Simon Harrison
26,504
$714,495
8,980
$346,808


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the Total Value Realized on Exercise?
Choices:
5899317
6107929
3524498
7985845
6108
Correct choice index: 1
Life Sciences Segment
Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses from our Life Sciences segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased $5.0 million to $8.6 million from $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease was driven by comparably fewer expenses at the Pansend holding company, which incurred additional compensation expense in the prior period related to the performance of the segment. The decrease was also due to a reduction in costs associated with the sale of BeneVir in the second quarter of 2018.

Life Sciences Segment
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Increase / (Decrease)
Selling, general and administrative
$8.6
$13.6
$(5.0)
Depreciation and amortization
0.3
0.2
0.1
Loss from operations
(8.9)
$(13.8)
$4.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average depreciation and amortization expense?
Choices:
0.3
0.25
-9.15
250000
1.67
Correct choice index: 1
The following is a roll-forward of the Company’s uncertain tax positions, recorded in other long-term liabilities, from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019:
The majority of the net increase for positions relates to the potential tax on freight income on changes for positions taken in prior years and an increased number of voyages for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits are included in the roll-forward schedule above, and are increases of approximately $13.2 million, $9.2 million and $6.4 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
December 31,
December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
$
$
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as at January 1
40,556
31,061
19,492
Increases for positions related to the current year
5,829
9,297
2,631
Changes for positions taken in prior years
19,119
981
3,475
Decreases related to statute of limitations
(2,546)
(783)
(1,562)
Increase due to acquisition of TIL
—
—
8,528
Decrease due to deconsolidation of Altera
—
—
(1,503)
Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as at December 31
62,958
40,556
31,061


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Balance of unrecognized tax benefits as at January 1 from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
Choices:
0
1
9495
34727
-9495
Correct choice index: 2
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2012 .
it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that all dividends were reinvested .
the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization .
total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/07 ) total return analysis .

12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
Ball Corporation
$100.00
$93.28
$117.01
$155.14
$164.09
$207.62
DJ US Containers & Packaging
$100.00
$61.55
$84.76
$97.78
$96.27
$107.76
S&P 500
$100.00
$61.51
$75.94
$85.65
$85.65
$97.13

source : bloomberg l.p .
aecharts .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. the five year total return for the period ending 12/31/2012 on ball corporation stock was how much greater than the same return on the s&p 500?
Choices:
2.13755
2137547.6166
95.41755
2.12334
-2.13755
Correct choice index: 0
12. Earnings per share How are earnings per share calculated?
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit after tax attributable to equity shareholders by the weighted average number of shares in issue after deducting the own shares held by employee share ownership trusts and treasury shares.
In calculating the diluted earnings per share, share options outstanding and other potential shares have been taken into account where the impact of these is dilutive. Options over 36m shares (2017/18: 23m shares, 2016/17: 27m shares) were excluded from the calculation of the total diluted number of shares as the impact of these is antidilutive.
The earnings per share calculations are based on profit after tax attributable to equity shareholders of the parent company which excludes non-controlling interests. Profit after tax was £2,159m (2017/18: £2,032m, 2016/17: £1,908m) and profit after tax attributable to non-controlling interests was £3m (2017/18: £4m, 2016/17: £1m). Profit attributable to non-controlling interests is not presented separately in the financial statements as it is not material.

Year ended 31 March
2019
2018
2017
Basic weighted average number of shares (millions)
9,912
9,911
9,938
Dilutive shares from share options (millions)
6
2
27
Dilutive shares from executive share awards (millions)
57
48
29
Diluted weighted average number of shares (millions)
9,975
9,961
9,994
Basic earnings per share
21.8p
20.5p
19.2p
Diluted earnings per share
21.6p
20.4p
19.1p


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Dilutive shares from share options (millions) in 2017-2019?
Choices:
17.5
0.09
12.33
11.67
13.67
Correct choice index: 3
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations:
For the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company granted 33,000 nonvested shares to certain key employees, 55,000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 35,000 shares granted to the Chief Executive Officer, and 20,000 nonvested shares
to its non-employee directors. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company granted 12,000 nonvested shares to certain key employees, 40,000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 30,000 to its Chief Executive Officer and 20,000 nonvested
shares to its non-employee directors.
The Company measures the fair value of nonvested stock awards based upon the market price of its common stock as of the date of grant. The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock options. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the Company’s stock price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate and the weighted average expected life of the options, at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is equal to the divided per share declared, divided by the closing share price on the date the options were granted. All equity compensation awards granted for the years ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018 were nonvested stock awards.

Years Ended
September 30, 2019
September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)
Cost of sales
$7
$5
Engineering and development
49
32
Selling, general and administrative
736
654
Total
$792
$691


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities?
Choices:
0
785
787
23
799
Correct choice index: 1
Segment Financial Results
Revenues
The following table sets forth revenues by segment for the periods presented (in millions):
(1) Revenues for Corporate and Other represent deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustments recorded in accordance with GAAP.
Software Solutions
Revenues were $962.0 million in 2018 compared to $904.5 million in 2017, an increase of $57.5 million, or 6%. Our servicing software solutions revenues increased 7%, or $52.5 million, primarily driven by loan growth on MSP® from new and existing  clients. Our origination software solutions revenues increased 3%, or $5.0 million, primarily driven by growth in our loan origination system solutions and a software license fee in our Lending Solutions business, partially offset by the effect of lower volumes on our Exchange and eLending platforms primarily as a result of the 26% decline in refinancing originations as reported by the Mortgage Bankers Association.
Data and Analytics
Revenues were $154.5 million in 2018 compared to $151.6 million in 2017, an increase of $2.9 million, or 2%. The increase was primarily driven by growth in our property data and multiple listing service businesses, partially offset by upfront revenues from long-term strategic license deals in 2017.

Year ended December 31
Variance
2018
2017
$
%
Software Solutions
$962.0
$904.5
$57.5
6%
Data and Analytics
154.5
151.6
2.9
2%
Corporate and Other(1)
(2.5)
(4.5)
2.0
NM
Total
$1,114.0
$1,051.6
$62.4
6%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average total revenue between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-866.2
1080.8
2165.6
1
1082.8
Correct choice index: 4
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners .
one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 .
the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

September 29, 2007
September 30, 2006
September 24, 2005
Beginning allowance balance
$52
$46
$47
Charged to costs and expenses
12
17
8
Deductions
(17)
(11)
(9)
Ending allowance balance
$47
$52
$46

vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company .
the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers .
these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively .
the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales .
derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk .
foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales .
the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments .
the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in non-trade receivables , included in other current assets , between september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , in billions?
Choices:
0.8
2.3
22.4
28.4
0.4
Correct choice index: 0
j.p .
morgan chase & co .
/ 2003 annual report 33 corporate credit allocation in 2003 , tss was assigned a corporate credit allocation of pre- tax earnings and the associated capital related to certain credit exposures managed within ib 2019s credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with tss .
prior periods have been revised to reflect this allocation .
for 2003 , the impact to tss of this change increased pre-tax operating results by $ 36 million and average allocated capital by $ 712 million , and it decreased sva by $ 65 million .
pre-tax operating results were $ 46 million lower than in 2002 , reflecting lower loan volumes and higher related expenses , slightly offset by a decrease in credit costs .
business outlook tss revenue in 2004 is expected to benefit from improved global equity markets and from two recent acquisitions : the november 2003 acquisition of the bank one corporate trust portfolio , and the january 2004 acquisition of citigroup 2019s electronic funds services business .
tss also expects higher costs as it integrates these acquisitions and continues strategic investments to sup- port business expansion .
by client segment tss dimensions of 2003 revenue diversification by business revenue by geographic region investor services 36% ( 36 % ) other 1% ( 1 % ) institutional trust services 23% ( 23 % ) treasury services 40% ( 40 % ) large corporations 21% ( 21 % ) middle market 18% ( 18 % ) banks 11% ( 11 % ) nonbank financial institutions 44% ( 44 % ) public sector/governments 6% ( 6 % ) europe , middle east & africa 27% ( 27 % ) asia/pacific 9% ( 9 % ) the americas 64% ( 64 % ) ( a ) includes the elimination of revenue related to shared activities with chase middle market in the amount of $ 347 million .
year ended december 31 , operating revenue .

Year ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
(in millions)
2003
2002
Change
Treasury Services
$1,927
$1,818
6%
Investor Services
1,449
1,513
(4)
Institutional Trust Services<sup>(a)</sup>
928
864
7
Other<sup>(a)(b)</sup>
(312)
(303)
(3)
Total Treasury & Securities Services
$3,992
$3,892
3%

( a ) includes a portion of the $ 41 million gain on sale of a nonstrategic business in 2003 : $ 1 million in institutional trust services and $ 40 million in other .
( b ) includes the elimination of revenues related to shared activities with chase middle market , and a $ 50 million gain on sale of a non-u.s .
securities clearing firm in 2002. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how much was 2003 total treasury & securities services without the benefit of the special gain ( in us$ m ) ?
Choices:
0
-34
3951.0
3851
395100
Correct choice index: 2
Beginning fiscal 2011, we replaced the ownership share grants with time-vested RSUs for certain Vice Presidents and Officers that vest ratably overfour to five years and have a 50% or 100% holding requirement on settled shares, which must be held until termination. There were146,268 of such RSUs outstanding as of September 29, 2019. RSUs issued to non-management directors and certain other employees vest12 months from the date of grant, or upon termination of board service if the director or employee elects to defer receipt, and totaled 69,411 units outstanding as of September 29, 2019. RSUs issued to certain other employees either cliff vest or vest ratably over three years and totaled 35,864 units outstanding as of September 29, 2019. These awards are amortized to compensation expense over the estimated vesting period based upon the fair value of our common stock on the award date discounted by the present value of the expected dividend stream over the vesting period.
The following is a summary of RSU activity for fiscal 2019:
As of September 29, 2019, there was approximately $7.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of awards granted was$86.08, $94.93, and $102.42 in fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. In fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017, the total fair value of RSUs that vested and were released was$4.7 million, $4.4 million, and $4.4 million, respectively.

Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair
Shares
Value
RSUs outstanding at September 30, 2018
288,098
$64.57
Granted
93,686
$86.08
Released
(55,642)
$84.23
Forfeited
(14,297)
$94.00
RSUs outstanding at September 29, 2019
311,845
$66.18


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the weighted-average grant date fair value between granted RSUs and released RSUs?
Choices:
170.31
0
1.85
-79.53
-7.92
Correct choice index: 2
7. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following components at June 30, 2019 and 2018:

June 30,
($ in millions)
2019
2018
Land
$35.6
$34.8
Buildings and building equipment
512.9
500.0
Machinery and equipment
2,183.6
2,129.0
Construction in progress
150.7
83.6
Total at cost
2,882.8
2,747.4
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,516.6
1,434.0
Total property, plant, and equipment
$1,366.2
$1,313.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Buildings and building equipment in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-12.9
1
12.9
2382.8
-2369.9
Correct choice index: 2
The Company maintains a general allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical experience, along with additional customer specific allowances. The Company regularly monitors credit risk exposures in consolidated receivables. In estimating the necessary level of our allowance for doubtful accounts, management considers the aging of accounts receivable, the creditworthiness of customers, economic conditions within the customer’s industry, and general economic conditions, among other factors.
The following reflects activity in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts receivable for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Provision increases recorded in general and administrative expense during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, reflect increases in the allowance for doubtful accounts based upon collection experience in the geographic regions in which the Company conducts business, net of collection of customer-specific receivables that were previously reserved for as doubtful of collection.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Balance, beginning of period
-$3,912
-$4,799
-$3,873
Provision increase
-2,561
-1,505
-2,086
Amounts written off, net of recoveries
1,368
2,269
1,305
Foreign currency translation adjustments and other
-44
123
-145
Balance, end of period
-$5,149
-$3,912
-$4,799


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in balance at the end of period between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-1276
-9061
-1237
-350
-1
Correct choice index: 2
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .
as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards .
this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 .
during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested .
pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 .
earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method .
basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

For the Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)
2017
2016
2015
Net earnings attributable to PMI
$6,035
$6,967
$6,873
Less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards
14
19
24
Net earnings for basic and diluted EPS
$6,021
$6,948
$6,849
Weighted-average shares for basic EPS
1,552
1,551
1,549
Plus contingently issuable performance stock units (PSUs)
1
—
—
Weighted-average shares for diluted EPS
1,553
1,551
1,549

for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in weighted-average shares for diluted eps from 2016 to 2017 , in millions?
Choices:
2000
2.0
0
-2
1
Correct choice index: 1