trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Stock Options
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Company’s stock option plans during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
The Company recognized $0.7 million, $1.4 million, and $1.0 million in stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding stock options in the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. As of September 30, 2019, the Company had $2.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately three years.
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value of the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the fiscal period in excess of the weighted-average exercise price, multiplied by the number of options outstanding and exercisable. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $11.1 million, $1.4 million, and $1.4 million, respectively. The per-share weighted-average fair value of options granted during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $5.07, $4.56, and $4.28, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of September 30, 2019 and 2018, was $4.9 million and $8.7 million, respectively.

Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years)
Outstanding at September 30, 2016
3,015,374
$3.95
6.4
Granted
147,800
$7.06
Exercised
(235,514)
$2.92
Canceled
(81,794)
$3.59
Outstanding at September 30, 2017
2,845,866
$4.21
5.4
Granted
299,397
$8.60
Exercised
(250,823)
$2.96
Canceled
(88,076)
$5.23
Outstanding at September 30, 2018
2,806,364
$4.75
4.6
Granted
409,368
$9.59
Exercised
(1,384,647)
$3.25
Canceled
(144,183)
$6.62
Outstanding at September 30, 2019
1,686,902
7.00
5.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of granted shares between 2017 and 2018 over outstanding shares at September 30, 2017?
Choices:
1
0
0.11
0.14
42407.51
Correct choice index: 2
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes key cash flow activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 (in thousands):
Operating Activities
The increase in net cash provided by operating activities during 2019 was primarily driven by higher cash proceeds from sales of systems projects, including the Sunshine Valley, Sun Streams, and California Flats projects, and advance payments received for sales of solar modules prior to the step down in the U.S. investment tax credit as discussed above. These increases were partially offset by operating expenditures associated with initial ramp of certain Series 6 manufacturing lines and expenditures for the construction of certain projects.
Investing Activities
The decrease in net cash used in investing activities during 2019 was primarily due to higher net sales of marketable securities and restricted investments, partially offset by proceeds associated with the sale of our interests in 8point3 and its subsidiaries in 2018.
Financing Activities
The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities during 2019 was primarily the result of lower net proceeds from borrowings under project specific debt financings associated with the construction of certain projects in Australia, Japan, and India.

2019
2018
2017
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$174,201
$(326,809)
$1,340,677
Net cash used in investing activities
(362,298)
(682,714)
(626,802)
Net cash provided by financing activities
74,943
255,228
192,045
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash.
(2,959)
(13,558)
8,866
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$(116,113)
$(767,853)
$914,786


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in net cash and cash equivalents between 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
566601
-883966
651740
652
2108530
Correct choice index: 2
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index .
the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions .
there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .

2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Vornado Realty Trust
$100
$123
$118
$128
$147
$201
S&P 500 Index
100
115
117
136
180
205
The NAREIT All Equity Index
100
128
139
166
171
218

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the five year change in the vornado realty trust index?
Choices:
101.0
301
20100
35
86
Correct choice index: 0
part ii .
item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns .
as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock .
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 29 .
copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc .
s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

12/28/2013
1/3/2015
1/2/2016
12/31/2016
12/30/2017
12/29/2018
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
$100.00
$135.18
$149.39
$181.05
$300.22
$311.13
Nasdaq Composite
100.00
112.60
113.64
133.19
172.11
165.84
S&P 500
100.00
110.28
109.54
129.05
157.22
150.33
S&P 500 Information Technology
100.00
115.49
121.08
144.85
201.10
200.52

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the period ending 12/29/2018?
Choices:
211.13
310.4716
1.4529
-2.7697
0
Correct choice index: 2
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our future payments due under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
(1) Our debt obligations consist of principal and interest repayments due on our Credit Facility based on current interest rates.
(2) Amounts represent the minimum contractual cash commitments, including the effects of fixed rental escalation clauses and deferred rent, exclusive of certain contingent rents that are not determinable for future periods.
(3) Our purchase obligations consist of purchase commitments with various manufacturing suppliers to ensure the availability of components.
(4) Income tax obligations are a result of the Tax Act and include a transition tax on unremitted foreign earnings and profits, of which we have elected to pay the estimated amount over an eight-year period.
(5) Our pension funding commitments represent the amounts that we are required to pay to fund our pension plans.

Total
1 year
Less than 1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Debt obligations(1)
$341,250
$17,500
35,000
288,750
—
Interest payments associated with debt obligations(1)
36,555
8,532
15,726
12,297
—
Operating lease obligations(2)
152,778
22,727
33,275
20,387
76,389
Purchase obligations(3)
192,981
192,803
178
—
—
Income tax obligations(4)
11,724
1,117
2,234
4,884
3,489
Pension funding commitment(5)
173,830
6,113
12,712
20,203
134,802
Total
$909,118
$ 248,792
$ 99,125
$ 346,521
$ 214,680


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between total operating lease obligations and total purchase obligations?
Choices:
345759
-152773
0
-40203
40203
Correct choice index: 4
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments not applicable .
item 2 .
properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .

(Square Feet in Millions)
UnitedStates
OtherCountries
Total
Owned facilities<sup>1</sup>
29.9
16.7
46.6
Leased facilities<sup>2</sup>
2.3
6.0
8.3
Total facilities
32.2
22.7
54.9

1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .
2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option .
our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .
and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .
in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 .
we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead .
we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated .
we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies .
outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland .
our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 .
our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam .
in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .
we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .
we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .
for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 3 .
legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures not applicable .
table of contents .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent of the square feet in owned facilities in other countries?
Choices:
0.00036
2.01205
0.04936
0.35837
0.42918
Correct choice index: 3
S. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
Quarterly financial data for fiscal 2020 and 2019 were as follows (tables in millions, except per share amounts):
(1) Adjusted to reflect the recast of prior period information due to the Pivotal acquisition, which was accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control (refer to Note B).

Fiscal 2020
Q1 2020 (1)
Q2 2020 (1)
Q3 2020 (1)
Q4 2020
Total revenue
$2,450
$2,632
$2,656
$3,073
Net income attributable to VMware, Inc.
380
5,303
407
321
common stockholders, basic for Classes A and B Net income per weighted-average share attributable to VMware, Inc. common stockholders, basic for Classes A and B
$0.91
$12.72
$0.98
$0.77
Net income per weighted-average share attributable to VMware, Inc. common stockholders, diluted for Classes A and B
$0.89
$12.47
$0.96
$0.76


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the total revenue between Q3 and Q4  2020?
Choices:
417
0
636.9
15.7
-15.7
Correct choice index: 3
Other income, net
The components of other income, net from continuing operations for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
In 2018, we recorded a $0.5 million adjustment to decrease the fair value of the Company's contingent consideration related to the Brink Acquisition. Also, during 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred a net loss on rental contracts of approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

Year ended December 31 (in thousands)
2019
2018
Foreign currency loss
$(83)
$(258)
Rental loss-net
(996)
(865)
Gain on sale of real estate
—
649
Fair value adjustment contingent consideration
—
450
Other
(424)
330
Other income, net
$(1,503)
$306


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Foreign currency loss for December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-170.5
343
170.5
42
-0.8
Correct choice index: 2
Discontinued Operations
On October 27, 2017, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell the Compute business. In consideration for the transfer and sale of the Compute business, we received an equity interest in the buyer valued at approximately $36.5 million, representing the carrying value of the assets divested and representing less than 20.0% of the buyer's total outstanding equity. The operations of the Compute business were accounted for as discontinued operations through the date of divestiture.
We also entered into a transition services agreement (the "Compute TSA"), pursuant to which we agreed to perform certain primarily general and administrative functions on the buyer's behalf during a migration period and for which we are reimbursed for costs incurred.
During the fiscal year 2019, we received $0.1 million of reimbursements under the Compute TSA, which was recorded as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses. During the fiscal year 2018, we received $3.6 million of reimbursements under the Compute TSA, which was recorded as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses.
In August of fiscal year 2015, we sold our Automotive business, as the Automotive business was not consistent with our long-term strategic vision from both a growth and profitability perspective.
Additionally, we entered into a Consulting Agreement with the buyer pursuant to which we were to provide the buyer with certain non-design advisory services for a period of two years following the closing of the transaction for up to $15.0 million, from which we have recorded $7.5 million as other income during both fiscal years 2017 and 2016. No income was recognized during fiscal years 2019 or 2018. During fiscal year 2017, we received $18.0 million, the full amount of the indemnification escrow.
The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations includes the following operating results related to these discontinued operations (in thousands):
(1) Amounts are associated with the Compute business. (2) Amounts are associated with the Automotive business.

Fiscal Years
2018
2017
Revenue (1)
$—
$660
Cost of revenue (1)
(596)
2,252
Gross profit (loss)
596
(1,592)
Operating expenses:   
Research and development (1)
5,251
29,167
Selling, general and administrative (1)
1,560
13,840
Total operating expenses
6,811
43,007
Loss from discontinued operations (1)
(6,215)
(44,599)
Other income (2)
—
7,500
Gain on sale (2)
—
18,022
Loss income before income taxes
(6,215)
(19,077)
Income tax provision (benefit)
—
—
Loss income from discontinued operations
(6,215)
(19,077)
Cash flow used in Operating Activities (1)
(10,734)
(42,776)
Cash flow from Investing Activities (2)
—
25,522


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Research and development for 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
9561
76577958
17209
29167
-2
Correct choice index: 2
Operating costs
Total Group adjusted operating costs were up $8.3 million or 3.1 per cent in 2019 compared to last year, broadly in line with inflation. The emphasis remained on effective resource allocation and careful cost management. The overall investment in product development was maintained, with continuing focus on high-growth, high-margin areas. Investment in the sales and marketing organisation was targeted on expanding our key account management programme to drive incremental business with our most valuable customers and developing routes to market for our new technologies to a broadening customer base. Administration costs in 2019 reflected an inflationary increase and higher corporate costs, primarily due to CEO transition.
Segmentally, investment continued in Networks & Security, where we see the most near-term opportunities for growth, particularly in relation to 400G high-speed Ethernet and our Positioning business. A new General Manager joined Lifecycle Service Assurance in October and a review is in progress to evolve the business and optimise the organisational structure to expand the customer base and deliver on our growth agenda. Proactive cost management has once again been demonstrated within Connected Devices, where we have seen a decrease in legacy product revenue year-on-year. As stated above, corporate costs in 2019 included costs associated with CEO transition.
Note
1. Before exceptional items, acquisition related costs, acquired intangible asset amortisation and share-based payment amounting to $4.3 million in total (2018 $19.6 million).

$ million
2019
2018
Product development
96.5
96.9
Selling and marketing
129.2
123.9
Administration1
50.0
46.6
Adjusted operating costs1
275.7
267.4
Networks & Security
158.4
148.9
Lifecycle Service Assurance
70.5
70.5
Connected Devices
38.2
40.8
Corporate
8.6
7.2
Adjusted operating costs1
275.7
267.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in costs under Corporate?
Choices:
0
15.8
-1.4
1.4
1.1
Correct choice index: 3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts) Lamb Weston Spinoff
On November 9, 2016, we completed the Spinoff of our Lamb Weston business. As of such date, we did not beneficially own any equity interest in Lamb Weston and no longer consolidated Lamb Weston into our financial results. The business results were previously reported in the Commercial segment. We reflected the results of this business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The summary comparative financial results of the Lamb Weston business through the date of the Spinoff, included within discontinued operations, were as follows:
During fiscal 2017, we incurred $74.8 million of expenses in connection with the Spinoff primarily related to professional fees and contract services associated with preparation of regulatory filings and separation activities. These expenses are reflected in income from discontinued operations. During fiscal 2019 and 2018, we recognized income tax expense of $2.8 million and an income tax benefit of $14.5 million, respectively, due to adjustments of the estimated deductibility of these costs.
In connection with the Spinoff, total assets of $2.28 billion and total liabilities of $2.98 billion (including debt of $2.46 billion) were transferred to Lamb Weston. As part of the consideration for the Spinoff, the Company received a cash payment from Lamb Weston in the amount of $823.5 million. See Note 4 for discussion of the debt-for-debt exchange related to the Spinoff.
We entered into a transition services agreement in connection with the Lamb Weston Spinoff and recognized $2.2 million and $4.2 million of income for the performance of services during fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, classified within SG&A expenses.

2019
2018
2017
Net sales
$—
$—
$1,407.9
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings
$—
$(0.3)
$172.3
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity method investment earnings
—
(0.3)
172.3
Income tax expense (benefit)
2.8
(14.6)
87.5
Equity method investment earnings
—
—
15.9
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax .
(2.8)
14.3
100.7
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests .
—
—
6.8
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Conagra Brands, Inc
$(2.8)
$14.3
$93.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the net profit margin in 2017?
Choices:
0.07
0.11
1501.8
66.7
-0.07
Correct choice index: 0
Non-Management Director Compensation in Fiscal 2019
The non-management directors received the following compensation during fiscal 2019:
(1) This column represents the fair value of the stock award on the grant date determined in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718. As per SEC rules relating to executive compensation disclosure, the amounts shown exclude the impact of forfeitures related to service based vesting conditions. For additional information regarding assumptions made in calculating the amount reflected in this column, please refer to Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2019.
(2) Dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock.

Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($) (1)
Option Awards ($)
All Other Compensation ($) (2)
Total ($)
Robert D. Rosenthal
95,000
40,000
-
25,900
160,900
Chad M. Lindbloom
95,00
40,000
-
13,800
148,800
Paul S. Pearlman
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850
Lawrence Reinhold
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total compensation received by Robert D. Rosenthal and Chad M. Lindbloom during fiscal 2019?
Choices:
149650
309700
321800
308850
266750
Correct choice index: 1
Amortization of Intangible Assets: Substantially all of our intangible assets were acquired through our business combinations. We amortize our intangible assets over, and monitor the appropriateness of, the estimated useful lives of these assets. We also periodically review these intangible assets for potential impairment based upon relevant facts and circumstances. Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual report has additional information regarding our intangible assets and related amortization.
Amortization of intangible assets increased in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 primarily due to additional amortization from intangible assets, which primarily included developed technology that we acquired in connection with our recent acquisitions, partially offset by a reduction in expenses associated with certain of our intangible assets that became fully amortized.

Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
Developed technology
$857
13%
14%
$758
Cloud services and license support agreements and related relationships
712
-3%
-3%
731
Other
120
-9%
-9%
131
Total amortization of intangible assets
$1,689
4%
4%
$1,620


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much was the average total amortization of intangible assets in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1238.5
1654.5
49.6
1620
1689
Correct choice index: 1