trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
system energy resources , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions .
see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits .
in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements .
as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly .
sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities .
system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable .
all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval .
debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements .
system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs .
system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

2016
2015
2014
2013
(In Thousands)
$33,809
$39,926
$2,373
$9,223

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool .
the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 .
as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity .
see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility .
system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity .
see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?
Choices:
-0.15321
-30.43284
-0.18093
-6117
0.84379
Correct choice index: 0
Note 23 Other (Expense) Income, net
The following table provides details of other (expense) income, net:
(1) Cryovac Brasil Ltda., a Sealed Air subsidiary, received a final decision from the Brazilian court regarding a claim in which Sealed Air contended that certain indirect taxes paid were calculated on an incorrect amount. As a result, for the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded income of $4.8 million to Other, net for a claim of overpaid taxes related to 2015 through 2018.

Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)
2019
2018
2017
Net foreign exchange transaction loss
$ (7.7)
$ (16.7)
$ (5.9)
Bank fee expense
(5.0)
(4.4 )
(5.8)
Pension income other than service costs
1.0
3.9
16.7
Loss on debt redemption and refinancing activities
(16.1)
(1.9 )
—
Other, net(1)
8.3
1.0
1.2
Other (expense) income, net
$ (19.5)
$ (18.1)
$ 6.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. Excluding the net for a claim of overpaid taxes related to 2015 through 2018 for 2019, what is the Other, net for 2019?
Choices:
-56.4
0
13.1
13.3
3.5
Correct choice index: 4
(c) Additional Segment Information
The majority of our assets as of July 27, 2019 and July 28, 2018 were attributable to our U.S. operations. In fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of revenue.
Property and equipment information is based on the physical location of the assets. The following table presents property and equipment information for geographic areas (in millions):

July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
July 29, 2017
Property and equipment, net:
United States
$2,266
$2,487
$2,711
International
523
519
611
Total
$2,789
$3,006
$3,322


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in net property and equipment from United States between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
0
-224
-2188
5198
-519
Correct choice index: 1
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions .
the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance .
the goldman sachs group , inc .
s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions .
the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .

12/26/08
12/31/09
12/31/10
12/31/11
12/31/12
12/31/13
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$100.00
$224.98
$226.19
$123.05
$176.42
$248.36
S&P 500 Index
100.00
130.93
150.65
153.83
178.42
236.20
S&P 500 Financials Index
100.00
124.38
139.47
115.67
148.92
201.92

218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for goldman sachs group inc . and the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 12/31/13?
Choices:
-2.8456
0.0012
-34.7164
0.1216
-3.7549
Correct choice index: 3
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 .
gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively .
gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively .
gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 .
there were no gross realized losses for 2003 .
maturities stated are effective maturities .
f .
restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash .
at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements .
g .
property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively .
in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized .
there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment .
additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated .
the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 .
h .
investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc .
( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 .
the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .

2005
2004
Furniture and equipment
$98,387
$90,893
Leasehold improvements
66,318
65,294
Computers
18,971
18,421
Software
18,683
16,411
Total property and equipment, gross
202,359
191,019
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
147,826
126,794
Total property and equipment, net
$54,533
$64,225

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent change in net loss on disposal of assets between 2004 and 2005?
Choices:
7000000
-7
0.5
0.9
7.0
Correct choice index: 4
entergy mississippi , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income increased $ 0.8 million primarily due to higher other income , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower interest expense , substantially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax rate .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$705.4
Volume/weather
(18.2)
Retail electric price
13.5
Other
2.4
2017 net revenue
$703.1

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in rates , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in the energy efficiency rider , effective with the first billing cycle of february 2017 , each as approved by the mpsc .
the increase was partially offset by decreased storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the november 2016 billing cycle .
entergy mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the september 2017 billing cycle .
see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. without the loss of in volume/weather , what percent increase would net revenue have experienced between 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
0
20.2
721.3
1406.2
705.5
Correct choice index: 2
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities consisted of the following (in thousands):
We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale. All marketable securities represent the investment of funds available for current operations, notwithstanding their contractual maturities. Such marketable securities are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized.
We typically invest in highly-rated securities with low probabilities of default. Our investment policy requires investments to be rated single A or better, limits the types of acceptable investments, concentration as to security holder and duration of the investment. The gross unrealized gains and losses in fiscal 2019 and 2018 were caused primarily by changes in interest rates.
The longer the duration of marketable securities, the more susceptible they are to changes in market interest rates and bond yields. As yields increase, those securities with a lower yield-at-cost show a mark-to-market unrealized loss. We anticipate recovering the full cost of the securities either as market conditions improve, or as the securities mature. Accordingly, we believe that the unrealized losses are not other-than-temporary.
When evaluating the investments for otherthan- temporary impairment, we review factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below the amortized cost basis, current market liquidity, interest rate risk, the financial condition of the issuer, and credit rating downgrades. As of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, gross unrealized losses related to our marketable securities portfolio were not material.

December 28, 2019
Amortized Cost  
Gains  
Losses  
Fair Value  
U.S. Treasuries
$10,458
$11
$—
$10,469
Commercial paper
3,914
1
(4)
3,911
Corporate bond
33,867
68
(7)
33,928
Certificate of deposit
3,584
5
—
3,589
Agency securities
24,408
38
(16)
24,430
$76,231
$123
$(27)
$76,327
December 29, 2018
Amortized Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Treasuries
$7,997
$1
$(1)
$7,997
Commercial paper
2,296
—
(1)
2,295
Corporate bond
30,833
1
(160)
30,674
Certificate of deposit
960
—
(3)
957
Agency securities
8,667
—
(59)
8,608
$50,753
$2
$(224)
$50,531


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Amortized Cost of Commercial paper from Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2019 to December 29, 2018?
Choices:
1615
-1618
1618
-2295
6210
Correct choice index: 2
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS
Nordic American Tankers Limited (“NAT”) was formed on June 12, 1995 under the laws of the Islands of Bermuda. The Company’s shares trade under the symbol “NAT” on the New York Stock Exchange. The Company was formed for the purpose of acquiring and chartering out double-hull tankers.
The Company is an international tanker company that currently has a fleet of 23 Suezmax tankers. The Company has not disposed of or acquired new vessels in 2019. The 23 vessels the Company operated per December 31, 2019, average approximately 156,000 dwt each. In 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company chartered out its operating vessels primarily in the spot market.
The Company’s Fleet
The Company’s current fleet consists of 23 Suezmax crude oil tankers of which the vast majority have been built in Korea.

Vessel
Built in
Deadweight Tons
Delivered to NAT in
Nordic Freedom
2005
159,331
2005
Nordic Moon
2002
160,305
2006
Nordic Apollo
2003
159,998
2006
Nordic Cosmos
2003
159,999
2006
Nordic Grace
2002
149,921
2009
Nordic Mistral
2002
164,236
2009
Nordic Passat
2002
164,274
2010
Nordic Vega
2010
163,940
2010
Nordic Breeze
2011
158,597
2011
Nordic Zenith
2011
158,645
2011
Nordic Sprinter
2005
159,089
2014
Nordic Skier
2005
159,089
2014
Nordic Light
2010
158,475
2015
Nordic Cross
2010
158,475
2015
Nordic Luna
2004
150,037
2016
Nordic Castor
2004
150,249
2016
Nordic Sirius
2000
150,183
2016
Nordic Pollux
2003
150,103
2016
Nordic Star
2016
159,000
2016
Nordic Space
2017
159,000
2017
Nordic Tellus
2018
157,000
2018
Nordic Aquarius
2018
157,000
2018
Nordic Cygnus
2018
157,000
2018


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average weight of the Nordic Freedom and Nordic Moon?
Choices:
159818
1
318293
-159818
319636
Correct choice index: 0
Note 8: Balance Sheet Information
Certain significant amounts included in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following (in millions):
Assets classified as held-for-sale, consisting primarily of properties, are required to be recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell. The carrying value of these assets as of December 31, 2019 was $1.4 million, and is reported as other current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment, including amortization of finance leases, totaled $409.7 million, $359.3 million and $325.2 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Included within sales related reserves are ship and credit reserves for distributors amounting to $178.7 million and $230.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

As of
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Inventories:
Raw materials
$138.4
$137.3
Work in process
772.9
760.7
Finished goods
321.1
327.2
$1,232.4
$1,225.2
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Land
$125.2
$125.5
Buildings
860.6
820.4
Machinery and equipment
4,275.2
3,980.2
Property, plant and equipment, gross
5,261.0
4,926.1
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(2,669.4)
(2,376.5)
$2,591.6
$2,549.6
Accrued expenses:
Accrued payroll and related benefits
$153.4
$240.8
Sales related reserves
247.3
294.8
Income taxes payable
22.5
38.2
Other
115.6
85.3
$538.8
$659.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Inventories: Work in process for December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0.8
772.9
293972.5
6134.4
766.8
Correct choice index: 4
Restricted Share Units
The following table illustrates the number and WASP on date of award, and movements in, restricted share units (“RSUs”) and cash-based awards granted under the 2015 LTIP:
RSUs and cash-based awards have a vesting period between two to five years, with no award vesting within the first 12 months of the grant.

Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018
Number
WASP
Number
WASP
Restricted share units
000’s
£ pence
000’s
£ pence
Outstanding at the start of the year
14,840
316.09
15,350
215.92
Awarded
8,749
478.44
6,337
453.14
Forfeited
(1,421)
426.11
(1,421)
284.15
Released
(6,822)
309.77
(5,426)
218.49
Outstanding at the end of the year
15,346
401.27
14,840
316.09


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the number of RSUs and cash-based awards outstanding at the end of the year in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
15130
510
15030
506
14893
Correct choice index: 3
humana inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) amortization expense for other intangible assets was approximately $ 75 million in 2017 , $ 77 million in 2016 , and $ 93 million in 2015 .
the following table presents our estimate of amortization expense for each of the five next succeeding fiscal years: .

(in millions)
For the years ending December 31,
2018
$64
2019
54
2020
52
2021
19
2022
16

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2017 what was the percent of the total amortization expense that was due in 2019
Choices:
0.19926
0.26341
0.25962
0.32335
0.31395
Correct choice index: 1
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .
the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .
the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .
the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

12/29/2012
12/28/2013
12/27/2014
12/26/2015
12/31/2016
12/30/2017
Tractor Supply Company
$100.00
$174.14
$181.29
$201.04
$179.94
$180.52
S&P 500
$100.00
$134.11
$155.24
$156.43
$173.74
$211.67
S&P Retail Index
$100.00
$147.73
$164.24
$207.15
$219.43
$286.13

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage growth in the stock price performance for tractor supply company from 2012 to 2013
Choices:
0.4257
-25.86
1
0.0036
0.7414
Correct choice index: 4
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2007 .
period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( b ) .

<i>Period</i>
<i>Total Number of</i><i>Shares Purchased</i>
<i>Average Price</i><i>Paid Per</i><i>Share</i>
<i>Total Number of Shares</i><i>Purchased as Part of</i><i>PubliclyAnnounced</i><i>Program<sup>(a)</sup></i>
<i>Maximum Number of</i><i>Shares That May Yet Be</i><i>Purchased Under the</i><i>Program<sup>(b)</sup></i>
October
127,100
$108.58
127,100
35,573,131
November
1,504,300
109.07
1,504,300
34,068,831
December
1,325,900
108.78
1,325,900
32,742,931

( a ) we repurchased a total of 2957300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2002 .
( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 128 million shares of our common stock from time-to-time , including 20 million shares approved for repurchase by our board of directors in september 2007 .
under the program , management has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases , in compliance with applicable law and regulation .
as of december 31 , 2007 , we had repurchased a total of 95.3 million shares under the program .
in 2007 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 what was the percent of the shared bought in october
Choices:
23.26751
0.04298
-0.04298
1168.41331
11.52025
Correct choice index: 1
Relative importance of the spend on pay
The following table shows the total expenditure on pay for all of the Company’s employees compared to distributions to shareholders by way of dividend. In order to provide context for these figures, adjusted operating profit is also shown.
Notes
1. Remuneration, social security costs, pension and other related costs and expense of share-based payment (see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
2. Dividends declared and paid in the year include a special dividend paid in 2018 (see Note 12 of the Consolidated Financial Statements). Removing the Special Dividend would give a figure for 2018 of $24.9 million with an increase of 14.86 per cent to the 2019 figure of $28.6 million.
3. Before exceptional items, acquisition related costs, acquired tangible asset amortisation and share-based payment amounting to $4.3 million in total (2018 $19.6 million) (see Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements).

2019
2018
Per cent
$ million
$ million
change
Employee remuneration costs1
220.5
208.9
5.6
Distributions to shareholders2
28.6
54.8
(47.8)
Adjusted operating profit3
92.9
77.1
20.5


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in adjusted operating profit?
Choices:
140.7
0.8
0
15.8
-22.3
Correct choice index: 3