trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
12 .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business .
citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices .
credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question .
citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines .
margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required .
where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level .
exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi .
credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

December 31,
In millions of dollars
2017
2016
Receivables from customers
$19,215
$10,374
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
19,169
18,513
Total brokerage receivables<sup>(1)</sup>
$38,384
$28,887
Payables to customers
$38,741
$37,237
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
22,601
19,915
Total brokerage payables<sup>(1)</sup>
$61,342
$57,152

payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. as of december 31 2016 what is the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Choices:
929.6008
0.0287
-0.9296
0.9625
0.9296
Correct choice index: 4
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc .
the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges .
the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding .
entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$2,224
Nuclear realized price changes
(310)
Vermont Yankee shutdown in December 2014
(305)
Nuclear volume, excluding Vermont Yankee effect
20
Other
37
2015 net revenue
$1,666

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 .
the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of the decline in net revenue is attributed to the variance in nuclear realized price?
Choices:
0.55556
868
-0.55556
103.33333
1
Correct choice index: 0
entergy new orleans , inc .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue .
2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$272.9
Retail electric price
(16.9)
Net gas revenue
(9.1)
Gas cost recovery asset
(3.0)
Volume/weather
5.4
Other
(2.3)
2011 net revenue
$247.0

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing .
the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 .
the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset .
see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Choices:
-0.98021
0
0.8941
247.09491
-0.09491
Correct choice index: 4
4.6 Adjusted EBITDA
BCE
BCE’s adjusted EBITDA grew by 6.0% in 2019, compared to 2018, attributable to growth from all three of our segments. Higher revenues coupled with reduced operating expenses drove the year-over-year growth in adjusted EBITDA. This corresponded to an adjusted EBITDA margin of 42.2% in 2019, up 1.6 pts over last year, mainly driven by the favourable impact from the adoption of IFRS 16 in 2019, and greater service revenue flow-through, moderated by greater low-margin product sales in our total revenue base.

2019
2018
$ CHANGE
% CHANGE
Bell Wireless
3,842
3,521
321
9.1%
Bell Wireline
5,414
5,321
93
1.7%
Bell Media
850
693
157
22.7%
Total BCE adjusted EBITDA
10,106
9,535
571
6.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the Adjusted EBITDA for Bell Wireless and Bell Wireline in 2018?
Choices:
-1800
8842
0
1800
5319
Correct choice index: 3
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage of revenue for certain items in our statements of operations for the periods indicated:
Impact of inflation and product price changes on our revenue and on income was immaterial in 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Fiscal Years
2019
2018
2017
Statements of Operations:
Revenue
100%
100%
100%
Cost of revenue
43%
50%
55%
Gross profit
57%
50%
45%
Operating expenses:
Research and development
120%
79%
79%
Selling, general and administrative
86%
79%
81%
Loss from operations
(149)%
(108)%
(115)%
Interest expense
(3)%
(1)%
(1)%
Interest income and other expense, net
2%
1%
—%
Loss before income taxes
(150)%
(108)%
(116)%
Provision for income taxes
1%
1%
1%
Net loss
(151)%
(109)%
(117)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total proportion of cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue in 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
100
2750
0
56
105
Correct choice index: 4
volume declines in cement , some agricultural products , and newsprint shipments partially offset the increases .
operating expenses millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 % (  % ) change 2007 v 2006 .

<i>Millions of Dollars</i>
<i>2008</i>
<i>2007</i>
<i>2006</i>
<i>% Change 2008 v 2007</i>
% Change 2007 v 2006
Compensation and benefits
$4,457
$4,526
$4,535
(2)%
-%
Fuel
3,983
3,104
2,968
28
5
Purchased services and materials
1,902
1,856
1,756
2
6
Depreciation
1,387
1,321
1,237
5
7
Equipment and other rents
1,326
1,368
1,396
(3)
(2)
Other
840
733
802
15
(9)
Total
$13,895
$12,908
$12,694
8 %
2%

operating expenses increased $ 987 million in 2008 .
our fuel price per gallon rose 39% ( 39 % ) during the year , increasing operating expenses by $ 1.1 billion compared to 2007 .
wage , benefit , and materials inflation , higher depreciation , and costs associated with the january cascade mudslide and hurricanes gustav and ike also increased expenses during the year .
cost savings from productivity improvements , better resource utilization , and lower volume helped offset these increases .
operating expenses increased $ 214 million in 2007 versus 2006 .
higher fuel prices , which rose 9% ( 9 % ) during the period , increased operating expenses by $ 242 million .
wage , benefit and materials inflation and higher depreciation expense also increased expenses during the year .
productivity improvements , better resource utilization , and a lower fuel consumption rate helped offset these increases .
compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs .
productivity initiatives in all areas , combined with lower volume , led to a 4% ( 4 % ) decline in our workforce for 2008 , saving $ 227 million compared to 2007 .
conversely , general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and postretirement benefits increased expenses in 2008 , partially offsetting these reductions .
operational improvements and lower volume levels in 2007 led to a 1% ( 1 % ) decline in our workforce , saving $ 79 million in 2007 compared to 2006 .
a smaller workforce and less need for new train personnel reduced training costs during the year , which contributed to the improvement .
general wage and benefit inflation mostly offset the reductions , reflecting higher salaries and wages and the impact of higher healthcare and other benefit costs .
fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment .
diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.15 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2008 compared to $ 2.27 per gallon in 2007 , increased expenses by $ 1.1 billion .
a 4% ( 4 % ) improvement in our fuel consumption rate resulted in $ 136 million of cost savings due to the use of newer , more fuel 2008 operating expenses .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of total operating expenses was fuel in 2007?
Choices:
1
0.24047
16012
0.00116
4.15851
Correct choice index: 1
Cash Flow Information
Cash flows in foreign currencies have been converted to U.S. Dollars at an approximate weighted-average exchange rate for the respective reporting periods. The weighted-average exchange rates for the consolidated statements of operations were as follows:

Years ended December 31,
2019
2018
Swedish Krona
9.46
8.70
Japanese Yen
109.01
110.43
South Korean Won
1,165.70
1,100.50
Taiwan Dollar
30.90
30.15


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of the weighted average exchange rate of Swedish Krona to Taiwan Dollar for the year ended December 31, 2019?
Choices:
30.9
1
-0.31
0.31
3.27
Correct choice index: 3
equipment and energy .

2013
2012
2011
Sales
$451.1
$420.1
$400.6
Operating income
65.5
44.6
62.8

2013 vs .
2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity .
operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity .
the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september 2012 .
it is expected that approximately $ 250 of the backlog will be completed during 2014 .
2012 vs .
2011 sales of $ 420.1 increased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 19.5 , reflecting higher air separation unit ( asu ) activity .
operating income of $ 44.6 decreased 29% ( 29 % ) , or $ 18.2 , reflecting lower lng project activity .
the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2012 was $ 450 , compared to $ 334 at 30 september 2011 .
other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses .
also included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments .
other also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 .
2013 vs .
2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year .
the current year includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 .
the prior year loss included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10 .
2012 vs .
2011 other operating loss was $ 6.6 , compared to $ 39.3 in the prior year , primarily due to a reduction in stranded costs , a decrease in the lifo adjustment as a result of decreases in inventory values , and favorable foreign exchange , partially offset by gains on asset sales in the prior year. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the year 2012 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?
Choices:
1
1.6804
9.41928
0.11211
9.01345
Correct choice index: 2
14. Fair Value Measures
The Company is required to categorize both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy. The fair value of an asset is the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated, knowledgeable, and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.
• Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. • Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The disclosure of fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at cost are as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable: The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Long-term debt: The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is at its stated value. We have not elected to carry our long-term debt at fair value. Fair values for debt are based on quoted market prices or published forward interest rate curves, which are level 2 inputs. Estimated fair values are management’s estimates, which is a level 3 input; however, when there is no readily available market data, the estimated fair values may not represent the amounts that could be realized in a current transaction, and the fair values could change significantly. The fair value of the Company’s debt is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. Under its current policies, the Company does not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. A one percent (1%) decrease in interest rates would increase the net fair value of the Company’s debt by $23,000 at June 1, 2019. The fair value and carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):

June 1, 2019
June 2, 2018
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Note payable
$1,283
$1,309
$4,750
$4,732
Long-term leases
1,054
940
1,340
1,171
$2,337
$2,249
$6,090
$5,903


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the carrying value and the fair value of Notes Payable in 2019?
Choices:
-1308
1281
2592
-26
-21717
Correct choice index: 3
3. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
The increase in live inventories is attributable to an increase in the quantity of live birds in inventory at the Company's Tyler, Texas facility as it increased production during fiscal 2019, as well as the value at which the Company's live poultry inventories of broilers are recorded. In periods where the Company estimates that the cost to grow live birds in inventory to a marketable age and then process and distribute those birds will be lower in the aggregate than the anticipated sales proceeds, the Company values the broiler inventories on hand at cost and accumulates costs as the birds are grown to a marketable age subsequent to the balance sheet date. In periods where the Company estimates that the cost to grow live birds in inventory to a marketable age and then process and distribute those birds will be higher in the aggregate than the anticipated sales proceeds, the Company will make an adjustment to lower the value of live birds in inventory to the net realizable value. The significant judgments that management makes in order to assess the net realizable value of its broiler inventory include estimating future selling prices of finished products and the related cost of sales to complete. The Company recorded a charge of $2.8 million at October 31, 2019 and of $9.6 million at October 31, 2018 to reduce the values of live broiler inventories on hand at those dates from cost to net realizable value.
The increases in feed, eggs and other, processed poultry and packaging materials inventories are also attributable to an increase in the inventory volume at the Tyler, Texas facility.
The increase in prepared chicken inventory is attributable to the mix of the different finished products in inventory at October 31, 2019, as compared to October 31, 2018, as well as an increase in production volume at the Company's prepared chicken facility in Flowood, Mississippi. During fiscal 2019, the facility processed approximately 129.1 million pounds of prepared chicken products, as compared to approximately 107.6 million pounds during fiscal 2018. Approximately 1.2 million pounds of that increase was in inventory at October 31, 2019, representing an approximately 12% increase in inventory volume.

October 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands)
Live poultry-broilers (net of reserve) and breeders 
$ 179,870
$150,980
Feed, eggs and other 
47,417
37,965
Processed poultry
35,121
30,973
Prepared chicken
20,032
13,591
Packaging materials
7,488
6,547
Total inventories 
$289,928
$240,056


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average value of Prepared chicken for October 31, 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
136127456
-16811.5
16811500000
13591
16811.5
Correct choice index: 4
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis regulatory asset associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , in which entergy mississippi agreed not to pursue recovery of the costs deferred by an mpsc order in the new nuclear generation docket .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation .
net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$5,735
Retail electric price
187
Volume/weather
95
Louisiana business combination customer credits
(107)
MISO deferral
(35)
Waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision
(32)
Other
(14)
2015 net revenue
$5,829

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 formula rate plan increases at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 ; 2022 an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2015 and july 2014 , and new energy efficiency riders at entergy louisiana and entergy mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014 .
energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income ; and 2022 an annual net rate increase at entergy mississippi of $ 16 million , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate and regulatory proceedings .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather .
the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers .
the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination .
consistent with the terms of an agreement with the lpsc , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. based on the analysis of the change in net revenue from 2014 to 2015 what was the percent of the change
Choices:
-0.01639
94
1.03505
0.01639
0
Correct choice index: 3