trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Tax Carryforwards
The amount and expiration dates of income tax net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, which are available to reduce future taxes, if any, as of August 31, 2019 are as follows:
(1) Net of unrecognized tax benefits.
(2) Calculated based on the deferral method and includes foreign investment tax credits

(dollars in thousands)
Last Fiscal Year of Expiration
Amount
Income tax net operating loss carryforwards:(1)
Domestic–state
2039
$57,299
Foreign
2039 or indefinite
$565,609
Tax credit carryforwards:(1)
Domestic–federal
2029
$39,784
Domestic–state
2027
$3,313
Foreign(2)
2027 or indefinite
$15,345


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the sum of all Income tax net operating loss carryforwards?
Choices:
0
605393
-508310
114598
622908
Correct choice index: 4
General and Administrative Expenses: General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel related expenditures for IT, finance, legal and human resources support functions; and professional services fees.
(1) Excluding stock-based compensation
Excluding the effects of currency rate fluctuations, total general and administrative expenses increased in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 primarily due to increased professional services fees

Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
General and administrative (1)
$1,093
-1%
2%
$1,102
Stock-based compensation
172
-5%
-5%
180
Total expenses
$1,265
-1%
1%
$1,282
% of Total Revenues
3%
3%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average total expenses in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1
-8.5
2
1273500000
1273.5
Correct choice index: 4
Cloud & Cognitive Software
* Recast to reflect segment changes.
** 2019 results were impacted by Red Hat purchase accounting.
Cloud & Cognitive Software revenue of $23,200 million increased 4.5 percent as reported (6 percent adjusted for currency) in 2019 compared to the prior year. There was strong growth in Cloud & Data Platforms, as reported and at constant currency, driven primarily by the acquisition of Red Hat in the third quarter of 2019. Red Hat had continued strong performance since the acquisition, in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), application development and emerging technologies, led by OpenShift and Ansible. Red Hat and IBM are driving synergies with strong adoption of Cloud Paks since their introduction, expansion of our combined client base and more than 2,000 clients using our hybrid cloud platform. Cognitive Applications also grew as reported and at constant currency. Transaction Processing Platforms declined year to year as reported, but grew 1 percent adjusted for currency driven by strong fourth-quarter performance.
Cognitive Applications revenue of $5,765 million grew 2.3 percent as reported (4 percent adjusted for currency) compared to the prior year, driven by double-digit growth as reported and adjusted for currency in Security, and growth in industry verticals such as IoT. The Security performance included continued strong results in threat management software and services offerings. Within IoT, we had good revenue performance across the portfolio as we continued to invest in new offerings and industry-specific solutions.
Cloud & Data Platforms revenue of $9,499 million increased 10.4 percent as reported (12 percent adjusted for currency) compared to the prior year. Performance was driven by the addition of RHEL and OpenShift and the continued execution of the combined Red Hat and IBM hybrid strategy.
Transaction Processing Platforms revenue of $7,936 million decreased 0.5 percent as reported, but grew 1 percent adjusted for currency in 2019, compared to the prior year. Revenue performance reflects the ongoing investment in IBM platforms, and the timing of larger transactions that are tied to client business volumes and buying cycles.
Within Cloud & Cognitive Software, cloud revenue of $4.2 billion grew 40 percent as reported and 42 percent adjusted for currency year to year, reflecting the acquisition of Red Hat and client adoption of our hybrid cloud offerings.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change **
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency **
Cloud & Cognitive Software external revenue
$23,200
$22,209
4.5%
6.2%
Cognitive Applications
$ 5,765
$ 5,633
2.3%
3.9%
Cloud & Data Platforms
9,499
8,603
10.4
12.3
Transaction Processing Platforms
7,936
7,974
(0.5)
1.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of Cloud & Data Platforms in 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
18102
9051
40859948
7870
9499
Correct choice index: 1
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 10. INVENTORIES
Our inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value and computed on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis. Components of inventories are as follows:

December 31,
2019
2018
Parts and raw materials
$134,816
$76,647
Work in process
10,269
6,644
Finished goods
84,934
14,696
Total
$230,019
$97,987


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in inventories of work in progress between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-6634
-124547
-3625
16913
3625
Correct choice index: 4
Interest and Other Income (Expense)
Interest and other income (expense), net changed by $3.3 million from a net expense of $13.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 to a net expense of $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The change in interest and other income (expense), net was primarily due to a decrease in interest expense pertaining to a lower average balance of debt outstanding under our term loan facility during the year.

Year Ended December 31,
% Change
2019
2018
2019
(dollars in thousands)
Interest and other income (expense), net
$(10,427)
$(13,755)
(24)%
% of net revenue
(3)%
(4)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average % of net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 to 2018?
Choices:
7
3
3.6
-5212
3.5
Correct choice index: 4
A summary of options outstanding and vested as of December 31, 2019 is as follows:
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $318.5 million, $17.4 million, and $6.6 million, respectively.
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, was $19.80, $9.07, and $6.44 per share, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 2,141,078 options vested. There were 2,939,947 options unvested as of December 31, 2019.
As of December 31, 2019, $30.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.5 years.

Options Outstanding
Options Vested and Exercisable
Exercise Prices
Number Outstanding
Weighted Average Life (in Years)
Number Vested and Exercisable
Weighted Average Life (in Years)
$1.50 to $1.90
32,913
1.4
32,913
1.4
2.86 to 6.40
209,126
3.3
209,126
3.3
8.04 to 11.72
498,869
4.2
498,869
4.2
12.20 to 15.06
2,227,421
6.7
1,587,924
6.5
16.06 to 24.00
1,772,062
8.1
560,632
8.1
31.99 to 42.21
847,010
9.0
42,839
8.7
55.10 to 79.25
297,341
9.5
12,492
9.3
5,884,742
2,944,795


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the number of outstanding options whose exercise price are between $1.50 to $6.40?
Choices:
75752
242039
330254
242
209128
Correct choice index: 1
the following table provides a summary of our historical capital expenditures related to the upgrading of our infrastructure and systems: .

For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)
2018
2017
2016
Transmission and distribution
$572
$551
$568
Treatment and pumping
231
171
151
Services, meter and fire hydrants
303
281
297
General structure and equipment
371
281
202
Sources of supply
26
54
59
Wastewater
83
96
34
Total capital expenditures
$1,586
$1,434
$1,311

in 2018 , our capital expenditures increased $ 152 million , or 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) , primarily due to investment across the majority of our infrastructure categories .
in 2017 , our capital expenditures increased $ 123 million , or 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) , primarily due to investment in our general structure and equipment and wastewater categories .
we also grow our business primarily through acquisitions of water and wastewater systems , as well as other water-related services .
these acquisitions are complementary to our existing business and support continued geographical diversification and growth of our operations .
generally , acquisitions are funded initially with short- term debt , and later refinanced with the proceeds from long-term debt .
the following is a summary of the acquisitions and dispositions affecting our cash flows from investing activities : 2022 the majority of cash paid for acquisitions pertained to the $ 365 million purchase of pivotal within our homeowner services group .
2022 paid $ 33 million for 15 water and wastewater systems , representing approximately 14000 customers .
2022 received $ 35 million for the sale of assets , including $ 27 million for the sale of the majority of the o&m contracts in our contract services group during the third quarter of 2018 .
2022 the majority of cash paid for acquisitions pertained to the $ 159 million purchase of the wastewater collection and treatment system assets of the municipal authority of the city of mckeesport , pennsylvania ( the 201cmckeesport system 201d ) , excluding a $ 5 million non-escrowed deposit made in 2016 .
2022 paid $ 18 million for 16 water and wastewater systems , excluding the mckeesport system and shorelands ( a stock-for-stock transaction ) , representing approximately 7000 customers .
2022 received $ 15 million for the sale of assets .
2022 paid $ 199 million for 15 water and wastewater systems , representing approximately 42000 customers .
2022 made a non-escrowed deposit of $ 5 million related to the mckeesport system acquisition .
2022 received $ 9 million for the sale of assets .
as previously noted , we expect to invest between $ 8.0 billion to $ 8.6 billion from 2019 to 2023 , with $ 7.3 billion of this range for infrastructure improvements in our regulated businesses .
in 2019 , we expect to .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for 2018 , wastewater was what percent of total capital expenditures?
Choices:
-0.05233
19.10843
0.27946
0.05233
0.06053
Correct choice index: 3
The following table sets forth the breakdown of revenues by category and segment. Travel revenue includes travel publications (Top 20, Website, Newsflash, Travelzoo Network), Getaway vouchers and hotel platform. Local revenue includes Local Deals vouchers and entertainment offers (vouchers and direct bookings) (in thousands).
Revenue by geography is based on the billing address of the advertiser. Long-lived assets attributed to the U.S. and international geographies are based upon the country in which the asset is located or owned.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Asia Pacific
Travel
$6,274
$7,351
Local
216
508
Total Asia Pacific revenues
6,490
7,859
Europe
Travel
32,081
30,856
Local
4,817
5,293
Total Europe revenues
36,898
36,149
North America
Travel
57,863
56,145
Local
10,161
11,169
Total North America revenues
68,024
67,314
Consolidated
Travel
96,218
94,352
Local
15,194
16,970
Total revenues
$111,412
111,322


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of the total Asia Pacific revenues in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
717.4
-7174.5
1.4
7174.5
0
Correct choice index: 3
Unfunded Status
The following table presents the unfunded status of the Combined Pension Plan and post-retirement benefit plans:
The current portion of our post-retirement benefit obligations is recorded on our consolidated balance sheets in accrued expenses and other current liabilities-salaries and benefits.

Combined Pension Plan
Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2019
2018
(Dollars in millions)
Benefit obligation
$(12,217)
(11,594)
(3,037)
(2,977)
Fair value of plan assets
10,493
10,033
13
18
Unfunded status
(1,724)
(1,561)
(3,024)
(2,959)
Current portion of unfunded status
—
—
(224)
(252)
Non-current portion of unfunded status
$(1,724)
(1,561)
(2,800)
(2,707)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the fair value of plan assets under the combined pension plan in 2019?
Choices:
-3260
0
460
-13070
20526
Correct choice index: 2
The Corporation’s segment profit (loss) is reported in two operating segments: Canadian broadband services and American broadband services. The reporting structure reflects how the Corporation manages its business activities to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and to assess their performance.
The Canadian and American broadband services segments provide a wide range of Internet, video and telephony services primarily to residential customers as well as business services across their coverage areas. The Canadian broadband services activities are carried out by Cogeco Connexion in the provinces of Québec and Ontario and the American broadband services activities are carried out by Atlantic Broadband in 11 states: Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia.
The previously reported Business ICT services segment, comprised of the Cogeco Peer 1 operations, is now reported in discontinued operations following the sale on April 30, 2019 of the Cogeco Peer 1 subsidiary. Information about the discontinued segment is provided in Note 8.
The Corporation and its chief operating decision maker assess the performance of each operating segment based on its segment profit (loss), which is equal to revenue less operating expenses. The other expenses, except for management fees, financial expense and income taxes, are reported by segment solely for external reporting purposes.
(1) Revenue by geographic market includes $1,294,967 in Canada and $1,036,853 in the United States. (2) Comprised of restructuring costs within the Canadian broadband services segment and acquisition and integration costs related to the FiberLight network acquisition in the American broadband services segment.

Year ended August 31, 2019
Canadian broadband services
American broadband services
Inter-segment eliminations and other
Consolidated
(In thousands of Canadian dollars)
$
$
$
$
Revenue (1)
1,294,967
1,036,853
—
2,331,820
Operating expenses
606,286
571,208
26,486
1,203,980
Management fees – Cogeco Inc.
—
—
19,900
19,900
Segment profit (loss)
688,681
465,645
(46,386)
1,107,940
Integration, restructuring and acquisition costs (2)
9,299
1,851
—
11,150
Depreciation and amortization
254,345
226,301
79
480,725
Financial expense
175,502
Profit before income taxes
440,563
Income taxes
83,655
Profit for the year from continuing operations
356,908
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
241,940
192,605
—
434,545


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Revenue between Canadian and American broadband services for year ended August 31, 2019?
Choices:
1120416
1165910
0
950626
647484
Correct choice index: 1
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances .
the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 .
the refund was made in december 2001 .
2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s .
utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas .
non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively .
the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 .
following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

2002
2001
2000
Net MW in operation at December 31
3,955
3,445
2,475
Generation in GWh for the year
29,953
22,614
7,171
Capacity factor for the year
93%
93%
94%

2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent change in operating revenues from 2001 to 2002?
Choices:
0.52091
0
-3.91971
1.91971
1.32316
Correct choice index: 3
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$5,051
Mark-to-market tax settlement sharing
(196)
Purchased power capacity
(21)
Net wholesale revenue
(14)
Volume/weather
13
ANO decommissioning trust
24
Retail electric price
49
Other
(2)
2011 net revenue
$4,904

the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 .
see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases .
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors .
weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers .
industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 .
entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions .
increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments .
the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales .
the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .
the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income .
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 .
these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the change in the entergy corporation and subsidiaries net revenue in 2011
Choices:
-0.0291
-0.7313
-0.03
-147
-0.0003
Correct choice index: 0
9. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:

December31,
2019
2018
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
$116.9
$105.9
Derivative liabilities
93.8
120.5
Current portion of operating lease liabilities
39.5
—
Tax-related accruals
30.8
38.4
Accrued legal and professional
28.7
10.9
Accrued marketing and advertising expenses
14.7
19.4
Accrued acquisition-related expenses and acquisition consideration payable
8.3
74.4
Accrued other
33.3
44.8
$366.0
$414.3


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average tax related accruals for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
24.6
20.8
8.3
-3.8
34.6
Correct choice index: 4