trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements .
additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record .
issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs .

Period
SharesPurchased(a)
AveragePricePaid PerShare
SharesPurchasedas Part ofPubliclyAnnouncedPlans orPrograms
MaximumShares thatMay BePurchasedUnder thePlans orPrograms
October 2008
25,394
$-
-
19,201,518
November 2008
7,526
-
-
19,201,518
December 2008
40
-
-
19,201,518
Total
32,960
$-
-
19,201,518

( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp .
these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during october 2008?
Choices:
-0.77045
582.57033
0.0077
5.77045
0.77045
Correct choice index: 4
GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Note 18. Quarterly Consolidated Results of Operations Data (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth our quarterly consolidated results of operations data for each of the eight quarters in the period ended December 31, 2019. GS Holdings is our predecessor for accounting purposes and, accordingly, amounts prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO represent the historical consolidated operations of GS Holdings and its subsidiaries. The amounts during the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018 represent those of consolidated GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock is applicable only for the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period following the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. Prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO, GreenSky, Inc. did not engage in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and initial capitalization. See Note 1 for further information on our organization and see Note 2 for further information on our earnings per share.
(1) Year-to-date results may not agree to the sum of individual quarterly results due to rounding.

Year Ended December 31, 2019
First
Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Total
Total revenue
$103,700
$138,695
$153,415
$133,836
$529,646
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization)
58,037
56,228
64,957
69,358
248,580
Total costs and expenses
92,212
92,189
101,017
123,275
408,693
Operating profit
11,488
46,506
52,398
10,561
120,953
Total other income (expense), net
(4,682)
(11,779)
(6,790)
(8,854)
(32,105)
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
6,806
34,727
45,608
1,707
88,848
Net income
7,401
39,193
44,075
5,304
95,973
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests
4,502
26,877
29,349
3,265
63,993
Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc.
2,899
12,316
14,726
2,039
31,980
Earnings per share of Class A common stock:
Basic
$0.05
$0.20
$0.24
$0.03
$0.52
Diluted(1)
$0.05
$0.19
$0.23
$0.03
$0.49


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in operating profit between the third and fourth quarter?
Choices:
-398132
0
-45667
41837
-41837
Correct choice index: 4
the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher costs resulting from the grand gulf uprate .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effects of more favorable weather on residential sales and an increase in industrial sales primarily due to growth in the refining segment .
the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to : 2022 the deferral of increased capacity costs that will be recovered through fuel adjustment clauses ; 2022 the expiration of the evangeline gas contract on january 1 , 2013 ; and 2022 an adjustment to deferred fuel costs recorded in the third quarter 2012 in accordance with a rate order from the puct issued in september 2012 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of this puct order issued in entergy texas's 2011 rate case .
the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred since march 2010 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso rto .
the decommissioning trusts variance is primarily due to lower regulatory credits resulting from higher realized income on decommissioning trust fund investments .
there is no effect on net income as the credits are offset by interest and investment income .
entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2013 to 2012 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2012 net revenue
$1,854
Mark-to-market
(58)
Nuclear volume
(24)
Nuclear fuel expenses
(20)
Nuclear realized price changes
58
Other
(8)
2013 net revenue
$1,802

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 52 million in 2013 primarily due to : 2022 the effect of rising forward power prices on electricity derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges , including additional financial power sales conducted in the fourth quarter 2013 to offset the planned exercise of in-the-money protective call options and to lock in margins .
these additional sales did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment , and increases in forward prices after those sales were made accounted for the majority of the negative mark-to-market variance .
it is expected that the underlying transactions will result in earnings in first quarter 2014 as these positions settle .
see note 16 to the financial statements for discussion of derivative instruments ; 2022 the decrease in net revenue compared to prior year resulting from the exercise of resupply options provided for in purchase power agreements where entergy wholesale commodities may elect to supply power from another source when the plant is not running .
amounts related to the exercise of resupply options are included in the gwh billed in the table below ; and entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the mark-to-market as a percentage of the decrease in net revenue from 2012 to 2013?
Choices:
-22.30769
-0.03326
0.89655
111.53846
1.11538
Correct choice index: 4
Cash Flow
Cash flow from operating activities was up by €1.0 billion mainly driven by working capital improvement in 2019 compared to the prior year which was impacted by the disposal of spreads. Gross margin improvement had a favourable contribution a result of strong delivery from 5-S savings programmes. Overheads and brand and marketing efficiencies also had a favourable contribution as a result of our zero-based-budgeting programme.
(a) Restated following adoption of IFRS 16. See note 1 and note 24 for further details.
* Certain measures used in our reporting are not defined under IFRS. For further
information about these measures, please refer to the commentary on non-GAAP
measures on pages 27 to 32.
Net cash outflow as a result of investing activities was €2.2 billion compared to an inflow of €4.6 billion in the prior year which included €7.1 billion from the disposal of spreads business.
Net outflow from financing activities was €4.7 billion compared to €12.1
billion in the prior year. 2018 included €6.0 billion relating to repurchase of
shares. In 2019 borrowings net of repayments was €1.4 billion higher than
the prior year.

€ million
€ million
2019
2018
(Restated)(a)
Operating profit
8,708
12,639
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
1,982
2,216
Changes in working capital
(9)
(793)
Pensions and similar obligations less Payments
(260)
(128)
Provision less payments
7
55
Elimination of (profits)/losses on disposals
60
(4,313)
Non-cash charge for share-based compensation
151
196
Other adjustments
2
(260)
Cash flow from operating activities
10,641
9,612
Income tax paid
(2,532)
(2,294)
Net capital expenditure
(1,429)
(1,424)
Net interest and preference dividends paid
(548)
(461)
Free cash flow*
6,132
5,433
Net cash flow (used in)/from investing activities
(2,237)
4,644
Net cash flow (used in)/from financing activities
(4,667)
(12,113)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the Free Cash Flow?
Choices:
699000
699
-789
-699
0
Correct choice index: 1
The following table provides a reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable financial measure presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
(a) Represents new store marketing allowance of $1,000 for each store added to our distribution network, as well as the non-capitalized freight costs associated with Freshpet Fridge replacements. The expense enhances the overall marketing spend to support our growing distribution network.
(b) Represents additional operating costs incurred in connection with the start-up of our new manufacturing lines as part of the Freshpet Kitchens expansion project in 2016 that included adding two additional product lines.
(c) Represents the change of fair value for the outstanding common stock warrants. All outstanding warrants were converted to common stock in September 2017.
(d) Represents fees associated with secondary public offerings of our common stock
(e) Represents charges associated with our former Chief Executive Officer’s separation agreement as well as changes in estimates associated with leadership transition costs.
(f) Represents fees associated with two securities lawsuits

Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(Dollars in thousands)
Net loss
$(1,383)
$(5,361)
$(4,262)
$(3,161)
$(3,711)
Depreciation and amortization
15,921
14,068
12,692
9,887
7,574
Interest expense
991
296
910
698
455
Income tax expense
144
77
75
66
58
EBITDA
$15,673
$9,080
$9,414
$7,490
$4,376
Loss on disposal of equipment
787
142
104
190
94
Non-cash share-based compensation
7,834
6,808
4,438
4,193
3,924
Launch expense (a)
4,563
3,540
3,066
2,813
2,626
Plant start-up expenses (b)
—
—
—
1,628
—
Warrant fair valuation (c)
—
—
335
49
(503)
Secondary offering expenses (d)
302
362
—
—
593
Leadership transition expenses (e)
—
—
63
1,291
—
Litigation expense (f)
—
348
145
—
—
Adjusted EBITDA
$29,159
$20,280
$17,565
$17,654
$11,110
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of Net Sales
11.9%
10.5%
11.5%
13.6%
9.8%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between average EBITDA and average adjusted EBITDA for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
24718
7937
24293
-12374
12343
Correct choice index: 4
sacramento container acquisition in october 2017 , pca acquired substantially all of the assets of sacramento container corporation , and 100% ( 100 % ) of the membership interests of northern sheets , llc and central california sheets , llc ( collectively referred to as 201csacramento container 201d ) for a purchase price of $ 274 million , including working capital adjustments .
funding for the acquisition came from available cash on hand .
assets acquired include full-line corrugated products and sheet feeder operations in both mcclellan , california and kingsburg , california .
sacramento container provides packaging solutions to customers serving portions of california 2019s strong agricultural market .
sacramento container 2019s financial results are included in the packaging segment from the date of acquisition .
the company accounted for the sacramento container acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with asc 805 , business combinations .
the total purchase price has been allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on respective fair values , as follows ( dollars in millions ) : .

12/31/17 Allocation
Adjustments
Revised Allocation
Goodwill
$151.1
$5.5
$156.6
Other intangible assets
72.6
(5.5)
67.1
Property, plant and equipment
26.7
—
26.7
Other net assets
23.4
—
23.4
Net assets acquired
$273.8
$—
$273.8

during the second quarter ended june 30 , 2018 , we made a $ 5.5 million net adjustment based on the final valuation of the intangible assets .
we recorded the adjustment as a decrease to other intangible assets with an offset to goodwill .
goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired .
among the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill were sacramento container 2019s commitment to continuous improvement and regional synergies , as well as the expected increases in pca 2019s containerboard integration levels .
goodwill is deductible for tax purposes .
other intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , were assigned an estimated weighted average useful life of 9.6 years .
property , plant and equipment were assigned estimated useful lives ranging from one to 13 years. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for the revised total purchase price allocation , goodwill was what percentage of net assets acquired?
Choices:
0.57195
0.7791
1
6.69231
0.10957
Correct choice index: 0
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2008 , assuming that dividends were reinvested .
the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group .
snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Fiscal Year Ended<sup>(2)</sup>
Snap-onIncorporated
Peer Group<sup>(3)</sup>
S&P 500
December 31, 2008
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
December 31, 2009
111.40
127.17
126.46
December 31, 2010
153.24
169.36
145.51
December 31, 2011
140.40
165.85
148.59
December 31, 2012
223.82
195.02
172.37
December 31, 2013
315.72
265.68
228.19

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly .
( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 .
( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w .
grainger , inc .
24 snap-on incorporated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in the five-year stock performance graph what was the ratio of the of the snap-on incorporated to the peer group performance in december 31 2012
Choices:
-1.14768
1.11353
1.14768
0.98085
1
Correct choice index: 2
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 .
equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Plan category
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights<sup>(1)</sup> (a)(b)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options,Warrants and Rights
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding SecuritiesReflected in Column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
399,165
$0.00
3,995,600
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders<sup>(2)</sup>
—
—
—
Total
399,165
$0.00
3,995,600

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .
of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .
in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .
( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .
item 13 .
certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders remains available for future issuance?
Choices:
1.90917
5.00495
0.90917
0.00006
0.00909
Correct choice index: 2
Operating Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $9.6 million to $24.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $14.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Selling, general and administrative expense increased primarily due to $4.4 million of expenses associated with the legacy business of MOI and $2.0 million of expenses associated with the legacy business of GP , in addition to $1.0 million in transaction costs associated with the acquisition of GP, a $0.9 million increase in share-based compensation as a result of new awards, and a $1.1 million increase in expenses related to sales and marketing as a result of increased revenue.
Research, development and engineering expenses increased $3.7 million to $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily due to $1.1 million of research, development and engineering expense associated with the legacy business of MOI and $2.7 million of research, development and engineering expense associated with the legacy business of GP during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Years ended December 31,
2019
2018
$ Difference 
% Difference
Selling, general and administrative expense
$24,371,349
$14,794,205
$9,577,144
64.7%
Research, development and engineering expense
7,496,012
3,766,160
3,729,852
99.0%
Total operating expense
$31,867,361
$18,560,365
$13,306,996
71.7%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Selling, general and administrative expense for December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
39165554
39561166
180277366616272
19582777
5222074
Correct choice index: 3
Employee Share Ownership Plan
UK employees are eligible to participate in the Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP). The aim of the ESOP is to encourage increased shareholding in the Company by all UK employees and so there are no performance conditions. Employees are invited to join the ESOP when an offer is made each year. Individuals save for 12 months during the accumulation period and subscribe for shares at the lower of the price at the beginning and the end of the accumulation period under HMRC rules. The Company provides a matching share for each share purchased by the individual.
Shares issued under the ESOP have been measured using the Present Economic Value (PEV) valuation methodology. The relevant disclosures in respect of the Employee Share Ownership Plans are set out below.
The accumulation period for the 2019 ESOP ends in September 2020, therefore some figures are projections.

2015 Grant
2016 Grant
2017 Grant
2018 Grant
2019 Grant
Grant date
1st October
1st October
1st October
1st October
1st October
Exercise price
2,797.0p
4,477.3p
5,496.7p
7,240.0p
7,835.0p
Number of employees
1,038
1,040
1,229
1,294
1,318
Shares under scheme
34,449
22,173
22,411
16,687
16,820
Vesting period
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
Expected volatility
21%
21%
21%
19%
21%
Risk free interest rate
0.4%
0.1%
0.4%
0.8%
0.5%
Expected dividend yield
2.5%
2.5%
2.3%
2.0%
1.8%
Fair value
2,931.3p
4,696.7p
5,799.0p
7,623.7p
8,305.1p


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the number of employees in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
2400
20879
7011
0
24
Correct choice index: 4
Investing Activities. Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities changed from a source of$65.7 million in 2018 to a use of $13.8 million in 2019. This change of$79.5 million primarily resulted from a decrease of$62.9 million in cash proceeds from the sale of company-operated restaurants, including repayments of notes issued in connection with 2018 refranchising transactions, and an increase of $9.8 million in capital expenditures.
Capital Expenditures — The composition of capital expenditures in each fiscal year is summarized in the table below (in thousands):
Our capital expenditure program includes, among other things, restaurant remodeling, information technology enhancements, and investments in new locations and equipment. In 2019, capital expenditures increased by $9.8 million primarily due to an increase of $16.2 million in purchases of assets intended for sale or sale and leaseback, partially offset by a $8.7 million decrease in restaurant capital maintenance and facility improvement spending mainly from a decrease in the average number of company-operated restaurants compared to the prior year. The increase in purchases of assets intended for sale or sale and leaseback was primarily due to the Company’s purchase of a commercial property in Los Angeles, California, on which an existing company restaurant and another retail tenant are located. The purchase price was $17.3 million, and we currently intend to sell the entire property and lease back the parcel on which our company operated restaurant is located within the next 12 months.

2019
2018
Restaurants:
Restaurant facility expenditures
$9,202
$17,949
Purchases of assets intended for sale or sale and leaseback
21,660
5,497
New restaurants
1,381
2,088
Other, including information technology
3,597
7,572
35,840
33,106
Corporate Services:
Information technology
9,405
4,584
Other, including facility improvements
2,404
152
11,809
4,736
Total capital expenditures
$47,649
$37,842


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average capital expenditure spent on information technology for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
22622.5
7070.5
6.7
9405
6994.5
Correct choice index: 4