trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our ordinary shares have been publicly traded since november 17 , 2011 when our ordinary shares were listed and began trading on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) under the symbol 201cdlph . 201d on december 4 , 2017 , following the spin-off of delphi technologies , the company changed its name to aptiv plc and its nyse symbol to 201captv . 201d as of january 25 , 2019 , there were 2 shareholders of record of our ordinary shares .
the following graph reflects the comparative changes in the value from december 31 , 2013 through december 31 , 2018 , assuming an initial investment of $ 100 and the reinvestment of dividends , if any in ( 1 ) our ordinary shares , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 index and ( 3 ) the automotive peer group .
historical share prices of our ordinary shares have been adjusted to reflect the separation .
historical performance may not be indicative of future shareholder returns .
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2013 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ended december 31 , 2018 .
( 1 ) aptiv plc , adjusted for the distribution of delphi technologies on december 4 , 2017 ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive peer group 2013 adient plc , american axle & manufacturing holdings inc , aptiv plc , borgwarner inc , cooper tire & rubber co , cooper- standard holdings inc , dana inc , dorman products inc , ford motor co , garrett motion inc. , general motors co , gentex corp , gentherm inc , genuine parts co , goodyear tire & rubber co , lear corp , lkq corp , meritor inc , motorcar parts of america inc , standard motor products inc , stoneridge inc , superior industries international inc , tenneco inc , tesla inc , tower international inc , visteon corp , wabco holdings inc company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Company Index
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2018
Aptiv PLC (1)
$100.00
$122.75
$146.49
$117.11
$178.46
$130.80
S&P 500 (2)
100.00
113.69
115.26
129.05
157.22
150.33
Automotive Peer Group (3)
100.00
107.96
108.05
107.72
134.04
106.89

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the difference in percentage performance for aptiv plc versus the automotive peer group for the five year period ending december 31 2018?
Choices:
0.2391
-0.5609
-0.0689
0.2216
-688.692
Correct choice index: 0
Note 3 – Net Income per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

Fiscal Year Ended
December 27, 2019 
December 28, 2018 
December 29, 2017
Net income per share:
Basic
$0.82
$0.71
$0.55
Diluted
$0.81
$0.70
$0.54
Weighted average common shares:
Basic
29,532,342
28,703,265
26,118,482
Diluted
30,073,338
29,678,919
27,424,526


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in net income per diluted share between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
-0.59
0.11
1.51
0.12
Correct choice index: 2
the fair value of our grants receivable is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using an appropriate yield curve .
as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of our grants receivable was classified within other current assets and other long-term assets , as applicable .
our long-term debt recognized at amortized cost is comprised of our senior notes and our convertible debentures .
the fair value of our senior notes is determined using active market prices , and it is therefore classified as level 1 .
the fair value of our convertible long-term debt is determined using discounted cash flow models with observable market inputs , and it takes into consideration variables such as interest rate changes , comparable securities , subordination discount , and credit-rating changes , and it is therefore classified as level 2 .
the nvidia corporation ( nvidia ) cross-license agreement liability in the preceding table was incurred as a result of entering into a long-term patent cross-license agreement with nvidia in january 2011 .
we agreed to make payments to nvidia over six years .
as of december 28 , 2013 , and december 29 , 2012 , the carrying amount of the liability arising from the agreement was classified within other accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities , as applicable .
the fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model , which discounts future cash flows using our incremental borrowing rates .
note 5 : cash and investments cash and investments at the end of each period were as follows : ( in millions ) dec 28 , dec 29 .

(In Millions)
Dec 28,2013
Dec 29,2012
Available-for-sale investments
$18,086
$14,001
Cash
854
593
Equity method investments
1,038
992
Loans receivable
1,072
979
Non-marketable cost method investments
1,270
1,202
Reverse repurchase agreements
800
2,850
Trading assets
8,441
5,685
Total cash and investments
$31,561
$26,302

in the third quarter of 2013 , we sold our shares in clearwire corporation , which had been accounted for as available-for-sale marketable equity securities , and our interest in clearwire communications , llc ( clearwire llc ) , which had been accounted for as an equity method investment .
in total , we received proceeds of $ 470 million on these transactions and recognized a gain of $ 439 million , which is included in gains ( losses ) on equity investments , net on the consolidated statements of income .
proceeds received and gains recognized for each investment are included in the "available-for-sale investments" and "equity method investments" sections that follow .
table of contents intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total cash and investments as of dec . 28 2013 was comprised of available-for-sale investments?
Choices:
1.74505
0.18013
57.3049
0.57305
-0.57305
Correct choice index: 3
NOTE 14. PROVISION FOR WARRANTY
The changes in the amount of provision for warranty are as follows:
Costs of warranty include the cost of labor and materials to repair a product during the warranty period. The main term of the warranty period is one year. The Company accrues for the estimated cost of the warranty on its products shipped in the provision for warranty, upon recognition of the sale of the product. The costs are estimated based on actual historical expenses incurred and on estimated future expenses related to current sales, and are updated periodically. Actual warranty costs are charged against the provision for warranty.

December 31,
2018
2019
Balance January 1
6,562
7,955
Charged to cost of sales
18,408
26,301
Deductions
(8,985)
(12,232)
Releases of expired warranty
(8,214)
(5,684)
Foreign currency translation effect
184
84
Balance December 31
7,955
16,424


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in balance at start of year from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
-6548
-12246
14517
1393
Correct choice index: 4
Pension benefit commitments
For fiscal 2019, Managing Board members were granted contributions under the BSAV totaling € 5.6 million (2018: € 5.4 million), based on a Supervisory Board decision from November 7, 2019. Of this amount, € 0.02 million (2018: € 0.03 million) relates to the funding of pension commitments earned prior to the transfer to the BSAV.
The expense recognized in fiscal 2019 as a service cost under IFRS for Managing Board members’ entitlements under the BSAV in fiscal 2019 totaled € 5.4 million (2018: € 5.3 million).
Contributions under the BSAV are added to the individual pension accounts in the January following each fiscal year. Until pension payments begin, members’ pension accounts are credited with an annual interest payment (guaranteed interest) on January 1 of each year. The interest rate is currently 0.90%.
The following table shows the individualized contributions (allocations) under the BSAV for fiscal 2019 as well as the defined benefit obligations for pension commitments:
In fiscal 2019, former members of the Managing Board and their surviving dependents received emoluments within the meaning of Section 314 para. 1 No. 6 b of the German Commercial Code totaling € 21.09 million (2018: € 39.9 million).
The defined benefit obligation (DBO) of all pension commitments to former members of the Managing Board and their surviving dependents as of September 30, 2019, amounted to €175.7 million (2018: €168.2 million). This figure is included in NOTE 17 in B.6 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
1 Deferred compensation totals € 4,125,612 (2018: € 4,115,237), including € 3,703,123 for Joe Kaeser (2018: € 3,694,439), € 361,494 for Klaus Helmrich (2018: € 362,606) and € 60,995 for Prof. Dr. Ralf P. Thomas (2018: € 58,192).
2 In accordance with the provisions of the BSAV, benefits to be paid to Lisa Davis are not in any way secured or funded through the trust associated with the Company’s BSAV plan or with any other trust. They represent only an unsecured, unfunded legal obligation on the part of the Company to pay such benefits in the future under certain conditions, and the payout will only be made from the Company’s general assets.

Total contributions for
Defined benefit obligation for all pension commitments excluding deferred compensation 1
(in €)
2019
2018
2019
2018
Managing Board members in office as of September 30, 2019
Joe Kaeser
1,234,800
1,210,440
14,299,267
12,970,960
Dr. Roland Busch
616,896
604,800
6,071,233
5,121,226
Lisa Davis 2
616,896
604,800
5,701,811
5,322,537
Klaus Helmrich
616,896
604,800
6,473,904
5,714,522
Janina Kugel
616,896
604,800
2,674,432
2,157,427
Cedrik Neike
616,896
604,800
2,349,895
1,757,258
Michael Sen
616,896
604,800
1,862,660
1,239,785
Prof. Dr. Ralf P. Thomas
616,896
604,800
6,184,498
5,235,121
Total
5,553,072
5,444,040
45,617,700
39,518,836


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase in Joe Kaeser salary from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
24360
0
2445240
4342632
-24360
Correct choice index: 0
item 1a .
risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities .
if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly .
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses .
prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio .
although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future .
there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years .
such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings .
our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events .
we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism .
any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations .
by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of reinsurance , were as follows: .

Calendar year:
Pre-tax catastrophe losses
(Dollars in millions)
2017
$1,472.6
2016
301.2
2015
53.8
2014
56.3
2013
194.0

our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections .
we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool .
we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area .
these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2013 to 2017
Choices:
1065.85
-431.15
0
455.75
1041.45
Correct choice index: 4
As of December 31, 2019, our required annual payments relating to these contractual obligations were as follows (in millions):
(1) Includes finance lease obligations.
(2) These calculations include the effect of our interest rate swaps and assume that (a) applicable margins remain constant; (b) our term A loan and revolving credit facility variable rate debt is priced at the one-month LIBOR rate in effect as of December 31, 2019; (c) only mandatory debt repayments are made; and (d) no refinancing occurs at debt maturity.
(3) Other includes commitment fees on our revolving credit facility and rating agencies fees.

Payments due by period
Total
2020
2021-2022
2023-2024
Debt(1)
$1,554.8
$80.0
$184.1
$1,290.7
Interest on debt (2)
171.5
54.7
102.0
14.8
Data processing and maintenance commitments
103.4
44.5
46.5
12.4
Operating lease payments
27.5
12.6
11.5
3.4
Other(3)
3.9
1.2
2.4
0.3
Total
$1,861.1
$193.0
$346.5
$1,321.6


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between Total Debt and Total Interest on Debt?
Choices:
-91.5
1500.1
266648.2
1383.3
1370.7
Correct choice index: 3
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 .
the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

2012
2011
Statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes
35%
35%
Effects of foreign operations, including foreign tax credits
18
6
Change in permanent reinvestment assertion
—
5
Adjustments to valuation allowances
21
14
Tax law changes
—
1
Effective income tax rate on continuing operations
74%
61%

the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income .
the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments .
the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below .
effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent .
change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s .
tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations .
offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million .
in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s .
tax on previously undistributed earnings .
adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s .
benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes .
discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what were total adjustments to valuation allowances in millions?
Choices:
35
29
35.0
125
7
Correct choice index: 2
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis .
date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index .

Date
PMI
PMI Compensation Survey Group<sup>(1,2)</sup>
S&P 500 Index
December 31, 2010
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
December 31, 2011
$139.80
$114.10
$102.10
December 31, 2012
$154.60
$128.00
$118.50
December 31, 2013
$167.70
$163.60
$156.80
December 31, 2014
$164.20
$170.10
$178.30
December 31, 2015
$186.20
$179.20
$180.80

( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc .
( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc .
( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc .
( nasdaq : krft ) .
international , inc .
was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint .
the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc .
and kraft foods group , inc .
on october 2 , 2012 .
note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment in s&p 500 in 2010 and liquidated in 2011?
Choices:
0.004
0.021
2.1
2.021
0
Correct choice index: 1
The determination of which country a particular sale is allocated to is based on the destination of the product shipment. No other individual country accounted for more than 10% of net revenue during these periods. Although a large percentage of the Company’s products is shipped to Asia, and in particular, China, the Company believes that a significant number of the systems designed by customers and incorporating the Company’s semiconductor products are subsequently sold outside Asia to Europe, Middle East, and Africa, or EMEA markets and North American markets.
Long-lived assets, which consists of property and equipment, net, leased right-of-use assets, intangible assets, net, and goodwill, by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
(1) Amounts do not include leased right-of-use assets in the prior period due to the adoption of ASC 842 under the modified retrospective method with a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2019.

As of December 31,
2019
2018(1)
Amount
% of total
Amount
% of total
United States
$385,302
85%
$426,321
85%
Singapore
63,556
14%
71,945
14%
Rest of world
5,034
1%
3,368
1%
Total
$453,892
100%
$501,634
100%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the United States amount from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-68590
-41019
-41019000000
811623
385302
Correct choice index: 1
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 .
total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

Total Number ofShares (or Units)Purchased<sup>1</sup>
Average Price Paidper Share (or Unit)<sup>2</sup>
Total Number ofShares (or Units)Purchased as Part ofPublicly AnnouncedPlans or Programs<sup>3</sup>
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value)of Shares (or Units) that MayYet Be Purchased Under thePlans or Programs<sup>3</sup>
October 1 - 31
13,566
$10.26
0
$148,858,924
November 1 - 30
5,345,171
$9.98
5,343,752
$195,551,133
December 1 - 31
8,797,959
$10.87
8,790,000
$99,989,339
Total
14,156,696
$10.53
14,133,752

1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) .
we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period .
2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program .
3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations .
on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock .
on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock .
the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program .
there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the withheld shares repurchased in october during the three-month period
Choices:
0.59127
1322.22222
13566
2713.2
311258304
Correct choice index: 0