trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Expected realisation of remaining performance obligations at year end
The Group applies the practical expedient in paragraph 121 of IFRS 15 and does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations that have original expected durations of one year or less.
For contracts that exceed one year, deferred income that relates to unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations at year end is expected to be recognised as revenue in the future as follows:
The above information represents the revenue the Group will recognise when it satisfies the remaining performance obligations in the contracts. The amounts presented do not include orders for which the Group has not performed.

2019
2018
$ million
$ million
Within one year
18.3
15.5
Greater than one year
10.3
12.7
28.6
28.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the amount for contracts within one year?
Choices:
0
-2.8
2.8
2800000
33.8
Correct choice index: 2
18. Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists of the following:

Years Ended June 30,
($ in millions)
2019
2018
2017
Unrealized gains on company owned life insurance contracts and investments held in rabbi trusts
$0.8
$1.5
$1.7
Interest income
0.1
0.3
0.3
Foreign exchange
(0.4)
(0.7)
(0.4)
Pension earnings, interest and deferrals
(0.1)
(2.1)
(23.8)
Pension curtailment
—
—
(0.5)
Other
0.2
0.2
1.2
Total other income (expense), net
$0.6
$(0.8)
$(21.5)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in interest income in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-0.7
-0.1
-200000
-0.2
0.4
Correct choice index: 3
This section highlights the Group’s transactions with its related parties, such as its subsidiaries and Key Management Personnel.
During the reporting period and previous reporting periods, Woolworths Group Limited advanced loans to, received and repaid loans from, and provided treasury, accounting, legal, taxation, and administrative services to other entities within the Group.
Entities within the Group also exchanged goods and services in sale and purchase transactions. All transactions occurred on the basis of normal commercial terms and conditions. Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note.
All transactions with directors and Key Management Personnel (including their related parties) were conducted on an arm’s length basis in the ordinary course of business and under normal terms and conditions for customers and employees. Related parties of Key Management Personnel who are employees received normal employee benefits on standard terms and conditions.
The total remuneration for Key Management Personnel of the Group is as follows:
Details of equity instruments provided as compensation to Key Management Personnel and shares issued on exercise of these instruments, together with the terms and conditions of the instruments, are disclosed in the Remuneration Report.

2019
2018
$
$
Short-term employee benefits
12,175,184
14,217,931
Post employment benefits
322,733
297,319
Other long-term benefits
161,569
139,776
Share-based payments
9,177,425
6,594,300
21,836,911
21,249,326


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in short-term employee benefits between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
14056362
2042747
2042747000
-12013615
24870820590448
Correct choice index: 1
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The table below details where reclassifications of realized transactions out of AOCI are recorded on the consolidated statements of income (amounts in millions).

Year ended March 31,
Description of AOCI Component
2019
2018
2017
Related Statement of Income Line
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities
$(5.6)
$(15.2)
$(1.5)
Other income, net
Amortization of actuarial loss
(1.0)
(0.8)
—
Other income, net
Reclassification of realized transactions, net of taxes
$(6.6)
$(16.0)
$(1.5)
Net Income


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Amortization of actuarial loss between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-1.8
-15.2
-0.2
0.2
-4.8
Correct choice index: 2
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/02
12/31/03
12/31/04
12/31/05
12/31/06
12/31/07
United Parcel Service, Inc.
$100.00
$119.89
$139.55
$124.88
$127.08
$122.64
S&P 500 Index
$100.00
$128.68
$142.68
$149.69
$173.33
$182.85
Dow Jones Transportation Average
$100.00
$131.84
$168.39
$188.00
$206.46
$209.40

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage five year cumulative total return for united parcel service inc . versus the s&p 500 index for the period ended 12/31/07?
Choices:
-0.8092
-1.0549
-0.6439
-0.6021
-1.1544
Correct choice index: 3
Capitalized software development costs consisted of the following (in thousands):
The Company capitalized software development costs of $8.8 million, $8.8 million and $6.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Amortized expense for capitalized software development costs was $7.0 million, $5.9 million and $5.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Amortization of capitalized software development costs is classified within cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company retired $4.6 million of fully amortized capitalized software development costs.

As of December 31, 2019
Gross carrying amount
Amortization period
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Capitalized software development costs
$ 49,909
3 years
$ (35,622)
$ 14,287
Total capitalized software development costs
$ 49,909
$ (35,622)
$ 14,287
As of December 31, 2018
Gross carrying amount
Amortization period
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Capitalized software development costs
$ 45,677
3 years
$ (32,784)
$ 12,893
Total capitalized software development costs
$ 45,677
$ (32,784)
$ 12,893


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Net carrying amount: Capitalized software development costs from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
Choices:
0
184202291
139400
-31390
1394
Correct choice index: 4
8 Directors’ emoluments
Directors represent the key management personnel of the Group under the terms of IAS 24 (Related Party Disclosures). Total remuneration is shown below.
Further details of salaries and short-term benefits, post-retirement benefits, share plans and long-term share incentive plans are shown in the Annual Report on Remuneration 2019 on pages 102 to 132. The share-based payments charge comprises a charge in relation to the Performance Share Plan and the Employee Share Ownership Plan (as described in Note 23).

2019
2018
£m
£m
Salaries and short-term benefits
4.1
3.7
Post-retirement benefits
0.5
0.4
Share-based payments
1.7
1.3
Total Directors' remuneration
6.3
5.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the total directors' remuneration in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-95.7
11.7
90
1.2
0.9
Correct choice index: 4
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

December 31,(in dollars)
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
JPMorgan Chase
$100.00
$109.88
$119.07
$160.23
$203.07
$189.57
KBW Bank Index
100.00
109.36
109.90
141.23
167.49
137.82
S&P Financial Index
100.00
115.18
113.38
139.17
169.98
147.82
S&P 500 Index
100.00
113.68
115.24
129.02
157.17
150.27

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the estimated average return for the s&p financial index and the s&p 500 index in the firs year of the investment of $ 100?
Choices:
0.1443
0.0684
0.6443
0.0025
0.0017
Correct choice index: 0
future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases at may 31 , 2013 were as follows : fiscal years ending may 31: .

2014
$11,057
2015
8,985
2016
7,378
2017
6,700
2018
6,164
Thereafter
16,812
Total future minimum lease payments
$57,096

we are party to a number of claims and lawsuits incidental to our business .
in our opinion , the liabilities , if any , which may ultimately result from the outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations .
operating taxes we define operating taxes as taxes that are unrelated to income taxes , such as sales , property , value-add and other business taxes .
during the course of operations , we must interpret the meaning of various operating tax matters in the united states and in the foreign jurisdictions in which we do business .
taxing authorities in those various jurisdictions may arrive at different interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to such operating tax matters , which could result in the payment of additional taxes in those jurisdictions .
as of may 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we did not have liabilities for contingencies related to operating tax items based on management 2019s best estimate given our history with similar matters and interpretations of current laws and regulations .
bin/ica agreements we have entered into sponsorship or depository and processing agreements with certain banks .
these agreements allow us to use the banks 2019 identification numbers , referred to as bank identification number ( 201cbin 201d ) for visa transactions and interbank card association ( 201cica 201d ) number for mastercard transactions , to clear credit card transactions through visa and mastercard .
certain of such agreements contain financial covenants , and we were in compliance with all such covenants as of may 31 , 2013 .
our canadian visa sponsorship , which was originally obtained through a canadian financial institution , expired in march 2011 .
we have filed an application with the office of the superintendent of financial institutions canada ( 201cosfi 201d ) for the formation of a wholly owned loan company in canada which would serve as our financial institution sponsor .
on december 12 , 2012 , the loan company received a restricted order to commence and carry on business from osfi which will enable the loan company to become a direct visa member at such time that global payments concludes the appropriate bin transfer process with visa .
in march 2011 , we obtained temporary direct participation in the visa canada system , while the loan company application was pending .
we anticipate that the bin transfer process with visa will be completed by september 30 , 2013. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in the expected minimum payments from 2014 to 2015?
Choices:
-2072.0
-7827
0.8
-11045
-4357
Correct choice index: 0
BENEFIT OBLIGATION AND PLAN ASSETS FOR PENSION BENEFIT PLANS
The vested benefit obligation for a defined-benefit pension plan is the actuarial present value of the vested benefits to which the employee is currently entitled based on the employee’s expected date of separation or retirement.
1 The projected benefit obligation was approximately 35% in the U.S. and 65% outside of the U.S. as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018.
2 The fair value of plan assets was approximately 55% in the U.S. and 45% outside of the U.S. as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018.
3 The accumulated other comprehensive loss (income), before tax, was approximately 35% in the U.S. and 65% outside of the U.S. as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018.
Changes in actuarial gains and losses in the projected benefit obligation are generally driven by discount rate movement. We use the corridor approach to amortize actuarial gains and losses. Under this approach, net actuarial gains or losses in excess of 10% of the larger of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets are amortized on a straight-line basis.

(In Millions)
Dec 28, 2019
Dec 29, 2018
Changes in projected benefit obligation:
Beginning projected benefit obligation
$3,433
$3,842
Service cost
54
65
Interest cost
113
113
Actuarial (gain) loss
829
(204)
Currency exchange rate changes
(2)
(121)
Plan curtailments
—
(150)
Plan settlements
(57)
(74)
Other
(86)
(38)
Ending projected benefit obligation 1
4,284
3,433
Changes in fair value of plan assets:
Beginning fair value of plan assets
2,551
2,287
Actual return on plan assets
193
(38)
Employer contributions
30
480
Currency exchange rate changes
3
(62)
Plan settlements
(57)
(74)
Other
(66)
(42)
Ending fair value of plan assets 2
2,654
2,551
Net funded status
$1,630
$882
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Other long-term assets
$—
$244
Other long-term liabilities
$1,630
$1,126
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income), before tax 3
$1,730
$1,038


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much is the ending projected benefit obligation outside of the US in 2018?
Choices:
2784.6
2231.45
1888.15
2497.3
18.2
Correct choice index: 1
condition are valued using a monte carlo model .
expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years .
the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s .
treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date .
the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted average grant date fair values of psus granted for the years ended december 31: .

2018
2017
2016
Expected volatility
17.23%
17.40%
15.90%
Risk-free interest rate
2.36%
1.53%
0.91%
Expected life (years)
3.0
3.0
3.0
Grant date fair value per share
$73.62
$72.81
$77.16

the grant date fair value of psus that vest ratably and have market and/or performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method .
if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus and psus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus and psus were shares of company common stock .
when the rsus and psus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued .
the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling $ 1 million , less than $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at a discount .
prior to february 5 , 2019 , the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp was the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three -month purchase period .
on july 27 , 2018 , the espp was amended , effective february 5 , 2019 , to permit employee participants to acquire company common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the purchase period .
as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 1.9 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp .
the espp is considered compensatory .
during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company issued 95 thousand , 93 thousand and 93 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by how much did the grant date fair value per share increase from 2017 to 2018?
Choices:
0.01112
0.0105
0
0.009
1
Correct choice index: 0
For purposes of reconciling the Company’s provision for income taxes at the statutory rate and the Company’s provision (benefit) for income taxes at the effective tax rate, a notional 26% tax rate was applied as follows (in thousands):
The difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate in 2019, 2018 and 2017 is primarily attributable to the effect of state income taxes, difference between the U.S. and foreign tax rates, deferred tax state rate adjustment, share-based compensation, true up of deferred taxes, other non-deductible permanent items, and change in valuation allowance. In addition, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are subject to varied applicable statutory income tax rates for the periods presented.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Income tax at federal statutory rate
$(10,883)
$(9,811)
$(6,659)
Increase (decrease) in tax resulting from:
State income tax expense, net of federal tax effect
(3,657)
(2,749)
(421)
Nondeductible permanent items
3,522
(1,522)
1,506
Foreign rate differential
(367)
552
599
Tax rate change
—
134
7,226
Adjustment to deferred taxes
(1,904)
307
37
Change in valuation allowance
22,481
15,805
(2,291)
Uncertain tax positions
128
143
76
Nonqualified stock option and performance award windfall upon exercise
(9,128)
(1,983)
—
Other
233
(80)
(26)
Total
$425
$796
$47


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Tax rate change from 2017-2019?
Choices:
2.45
2451.33
2453.33
2498
2408.67
Correct choice index: 2
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future .
if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years .
we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell .
the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 .
see item 8 .
financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition .
net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

Net Undeveloped Acres Expiring Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2016
2017
2018
U.S.
68
89
128
E.G.
—
92
36
Other Africa
189
4,352
854
Total Africa
189
4,444
890
Other International
—
—
—
Total
257
4,533
1,018

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for 2016 , what was the total african and us net undeveloped acres expiring , in thousands ? \\n
Choices:
257000
2.8
958
257.0
17476
Correct choice index: 3
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
JKHY
100.00
127.44
148.62
205.60
263.21
290.88
Peer Group
100.00
136.78
148.10
174.79
239.10
301.34
S&P 500
100.00
130.69
137.81
166.20
207.10
222.47

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .
total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .
peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .
companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. .
micros systems , inc .
was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in the 5 year annual performance of the peer group stock from 2010 to 2011
Choices:
-0.08276
0.08276
82760.63752
18.08276
-0.84157
Correct choice index: 1