trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive .
shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded .
10 .
supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : .

2017
2016
2015
Interest, Net of Capitalized Interest
$275,305
$252,030
$222,088
Income Taxes, Net of Refunds Received
$188,946
$(39,293)
$41,108

eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively .
non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges .
non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) .
11 .
business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related .
the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements .
operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance .
eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers .
this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china .
for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the increase observed in accrued capital expenditures during 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
0
0.22423
224.2268
-415.77577
0.07216
Correct choice index: 1
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

December 31,(in dollars)
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
JPMorgan Chase
$100.00
$109.88
$119.07
$160.23
$203.07
$189.57
KBW Bank Index
100.00
109.36
109.90
141.23
167.49
137.82
S&P Financial Index
100.00
115.18
113.38
139.17
169.98
147.82
S&P 500 Index
100.00
113.68
115.24
129.02
157.17
150.27

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the estimated variation between the percentual decrease observed in the s&p 500 index and in the jpmorgan chase during the years 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
0.13131
-0.11038
0.02258
-1.97742
0.00699
Correct choice index: 2
5.2 Employee share plans (continued)
Shares issued under the FY2019, FY2018 and FY2017 Performance Rights plans
For the purposes of Sections 200B and 200E of the Corporations Act, iSelect shareholders have approved the giving of any potential benefits under the Performance Rights Plan provided in connection with any future retirement of a participant who holds a ‘managerial or Executive office’ such that for the purposes of the provisions, those benefits will not be included in the statutory limit.
Change in control
Upon a ‘change of control’, the Board has discretion to determine that some or all of the participants’ Performance Rights vest immediately.
FY2018 Performance Rights Plan
The following table illustrates the number of, and movements in, shares issued during the year:

2019 NUMBER
2018 NUMBER
Outstanding at the beginning of the period
547,949
-
Granted during the period
-
772,303
Forfeited during the period
(140,687)
(224,354)
Exercised during the period
-
-
Outstanding at the end of the period
407,262
547,949


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage of the number of outstanding shares at the end of the period from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-25.68
25.68
-1.34
-5.14
57603.34
Correct choice index: 0
The following table presents the effect of the adoption of the new revenue guidance on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2019 (in thousands):
(1) Differences primarily relate to the timing of revenue recognition for over-time customers and to the recovery of fulfillment costs.
(2) Differences primarily relate to the timing of cost recognition for over-time customers and the recognition of fulfillment costs.

Fiscal Year Ended
August 31, 2019
As reported
Balance without the adoption of ASU 2014-09
Net revenue(1)
$25,282,320
$24,864,754
Cost of revenue(2)
$23,368,919
$23,057,603
Operating income
$701,356
$595,105
Income tax expense
$161,230
$164,054
Net income
$289,474
$180,399


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the net income between the amount as reported and the balance without the adoption of ASU 2014-09?
Choices:
0
109075
469873
109075000
125420
Correct choice index: 1
eog utilized average prices per acre from comparable market transactions and estimated discounted cash flows as the basis for determining the fair value of unproved and proved properties , respectively , received in non-cash property exchanges .
see note 10 .
fair value of debt .
at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , eog had outstanding $ 6040 million and $ 6390 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes , which had estimated fair values of approximately $ 6027 million and $ 6602 million , respectively .
the estimated fair value of debt was based upon quoted market prices and , where such prices were not available , other observable ( level 2 ) inputs regarding interest rates available to eog at year-end .
14 .
accounting for certain long-lived assets eog reviews its proved oil and gas properties for impairment purposes by comparing the expected undiscounted future cash flows at a depreciation , depletion and amortization group level to the unamortized capitalized cost of the asset .
the carrying values for assets determined to be impaired were adjusted to estimated fair value using the income approach described in the fair value measurement topic of the asc .
in certain instances , eog utilizes accepted offers from third-party purchasers as the basis for determining fair value .
during 2018 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 139 million were written down to their fair value of $ 18 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 121 million .
during 2017 , proved oil and gas properties with a carrying amount of $ 370 million were written down to their fair value of $ 146 million , resulting in pretax impairment charges of $ 224 million .
impairments in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 included domestic legacy natural gas assets .
amortization and impairments of unproved oil and gas property costs , including amortization of capitalized interest , were $ 173 million , $ 211 million and $ 291 million during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively .
15 .
asset retirement obligations the following table presents the reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amounts of short-term and long-term legal obligations associated with the retirement of property , plant and equipment for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 ( in thousands ) : .

2018
2017
Carrying Amount at Beginning of Period
$946,848
$912,926
Liabilities Incurred
79,057
54,764
Liabilities Settled<sup>(1)</sup>
(70,829)
(61,871)
Accretion
36,622
34,708
Revisions
(38,932)
(9,818)
Foreign Currency Translations
1,611
16,139
Carrying Amount at End of Period
$954,377
$946,848
Current Portion
$26,214
$19,259
Noncurrent Portion
$928,163
$927,589

( 1 ) includes settlements related to asset sales .
the current and noncurrent portions of eog's asset retirement obligations are included in current liabilities - other and other liabilities , respectively , on the consolidated balance sheets. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the increase observed in the liabilities incurred during 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
443594.33204
2.44359
-928162.55641
-26212.55641
0.44359
Correct choice index: 4
The following table presents the principal components of the difference between the effective tax rate to the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate for the years ended March 31:
During fiscal 2018, we recorded a provisional tax benefit of approximately $3.3 million as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act") on December 22, 2017.
We completed the accounting for the Tax Act during Q3 fiscal 2019 and recorded an adjustment on December 31, 2018 of $0.2 million to increase our deferred tax liability associated with certain indefinite lived intangibles. We have elected to account for global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) inclusions in the period in which they are incurred.
Our tax provision includes a provision for income taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions where subsidiaries are profitable, but only a minimal benefit is reflected related to U.S. and certain foreign tax losses due to the uncertainty of the ultimate realization of future benefits from these losses.
The 2019 tax provision results primarily from foreign tax expense, the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions and the completion of our accounting for the Tax Act. The 2019 tax provision differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the recognition of net operating losses as deferred tax assets, which were offset by increases in the valuation allowance, state taxes and other U.S. permanent book to tax differences.
The 2018 tax provision primarily results from a reduction in the deferred rate and the ability to offset indefinite lived deferred tax liabilities with certain deferred tax assets due to passage of the Tax Act. The 2018 effective rate differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the impact of the Tax Act, recognition of net operating losses as deferred tax assets, which were offset by increases in the valuation allowance, certain foreign and state tax effects including a benefit of $0.4 million related to a settlement with the California Franchise Tax Board and other U.S. permanent book to tax differences.
The 2017 tax provision primarily results from state taxes, taxes withheld in foreign jurisdictions and foreign tax expense. The 2017 tax provision differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the recognition of net operating losses as deferred tax assets, which were offset by increases in the valuation allowance, state taxes and other U.S. permanent book to tax differences.

(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Income tax benefit at the US Federal statutory rate
$(2,718)
$(3,654)
$(4,019)
Benefit for state taxes
(304)
(642)
(142)
Impact of foreign operations
(310)
38
158
Indefinite life assets
130
335
102
Officer life insurance
3
(5)
(6)
Change in valuation allowance
3,302
3,328
4,007
Change in liability for unrecognized tax benefits
(400)
40
9
Impact of Tax Act, net
226
(3,287)
—
Meals and entertainment
60
81
163
Equity
2
476
—
Global intangible low-taxed income
94
—
—
Other
136
39
(36)
Total income tax expense (benefit)
$221
$(3,251)
$236


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average indefinite life assets for 2017-2019?
Choices:
189
4
2
567
-26838
Correct choice index: 0
Item 6: Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data is derived from our consolidated financial statements. This data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes, and Item 7: Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(1) Fiscal 2018 net income includes an income tax benefit of $75.8 million from a valuation allowance release against certain U.S. deferred tax assets. See Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. (2) Fiscal 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 net income (loss) includes restructuring charges, net, of $0.5 million, $0.2 million, $0.8 million, $7.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
(3) Fiscal 2016 net loss includes impairment charges of $12.4 million. (4) Fiscal 2015 net loss includes the following: i) a $1.5 million gain from a business interruption insurance claim relating to a factory fire at a customer's facility; and ii) a $1.0 million net gain from the sale of intellectual property.
(5) Fiscal 2016 includes the following as a result of the Cascade Microtech acquisition: i) $82.6 million in revenue; ii) $27.8 million of intangible amortization expense; and iii) a $7.6 million charge for inventory-related step-up amortization.

Fiscal 2019 (2)
Fiscal 2018(1)(2)
Fiscal 2017(2)
Fiscal 2016 (2)(3)(5)
Fiscal 2015(2)(4)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues
$589,464
$529,675
$548,441
$383,881
$282,358
Gross profit
237,496
210,339
215,597
102,682
85,738
Net income (loss)
39,346
104,036
40,913
(6,557)
(1,523)
Basic net income (loss) per share
0.52
1.42
0.57
(0.10)
(0.03)
Diluted net income (loss) per share
0.51
1.38
0.55
(0.10)
(0.03)
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
$220,872
$149,003
$140,172
$108,905
$187,589
Working capital
282,483
235,302
213,693
172,002
214,437
Total assets
839,882
728,222
646,574
618,982
342,723
Term loan, net of current portion
15,639
34,971
87,228
125,475
—
Total stockholders' equity
640,997
580,164
458,637
401,056
294,681
Number of employees
1,836
1,676
1,685
1,571
958


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Revenues from 2019 to 2018?
Choices:
50489
59789
379125
-529677
-59789
Correct choice index: 1
Note 21. Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The following table presents the Company's selected unaudited quarterly operating results for the eight quarters ended March 31, 2019. The Company believes that all adjustments of a normal recurring nature have been made to present fairly the related quarterly results (in millions, except per share amounts). Amounts may not add to the total due to rounding:
Refer to Note 11, Income Taxes, for an explanation of the one-time transition tax recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2018. Refer to Note 4, Special Charges and Other, Net, for an explanation of the special charges included in operating income in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018. Refer to Note 12, Debt and Credit Facility, for an explanation of the loss on settlement of debt included in other (loss) income, net of $4.1 million during the second quarter, $0.2 million during the third quarter, and $8.3 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019 and $13.8 million and $2.1 million for the first quarter and third quarter of fiscal 2018, respectively. Refer to Note 5, Investments, for an explanation of the impairment recognized on available-for-sale securities in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018.

Fiscal 2019
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Total
Net sales
$1,212.5
$1,432.5
$1,374.7
$1,329.8
$5,349.5
Gross profit
$642.0
$689.3
$779.6
$820.5
$2,931.3
Operating income
$132.3
$102.7
$194.7
$284.6
$714.3
Net income from continuing operations
$35.7
$96.3
$49.2
$174.7
$355.9
Diluted net income per common share
$0.14
$0.38
$0.20
$0.70
$1.42


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between the total net sales and gross profit?
Choices:
-2927.3
5313.8
2418.2
8280.8
2.4
Correct choice index: 2
( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building .
( 6 ) this property is owned by board of trade investment company ( botic ) .
kcbt maintains a 51% ( 51 % ) controlling interest in botic .
we also lease other office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers .
we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed .
item 3 .
legal proceedings see 201clegal and regulatory matters 201d in note 14 .
contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 91 for cme group 2019s legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures not applicable .
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities class a common stock our class a common stock is currently listed on nasdaq under the ticker symbol 201ccme . 201d as of february 13 , 2013 , there were approximately 3106 holders of record of our class a common stock .
in may 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors declared a five-for-one split of its class a common stock effected by way of a stock dividend to its class a and class b shareholders .
the stock split was effective july 20 , 2012 for all shareholders of record on july 10 , 2012 .
as a result of the stock split , all amounts related to shares and per share amounts have been retroactively restated .
the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our class a common stock on a quarterly basis , as reported on nasdaq. .

2012
High
Low
2011
High
Low
First Quarter
$59.73
$45.20
First Quarter
$63.40
$56.06
Second Quarter
58.24
50.70
Second Quarter
62.15
52.45
Third Quarter
59.35
49.83
Third Quarter
59.80
47.43
Fourth Quarter
57.89
50.12
Fourth Quarter
59.73
45.20

class b common stock our class b common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or traded in an organized over- the-counter market .
each class of our class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division of our cme exchange .
cme 2019s rules provide exchange members with trading rights and the ability to use or lease these trading rights .
each share of our class b common stock can be transferred only in connection with the transfer of the associated trading rights. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average sales price for the class b common shares in 2012 in the first quarter
Choices:
0.019
1
53.465
48.95
104.93
Correct choice index: 2
Shares Reserved for Issuance
The following are shares reserved for issuance (in thousands):

June 30,
2019
June 30,
2018
2013 Equity Incentive Plan shares available for grant
8,462
9,957
Employee stock options and awards outstanding
10,455
12,060
2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
10,085
5,365
Total shares reserved for issuance
29,002
27,382


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
3097
4720
15450
0
-17297
Correct choice index: 1
entergy louisiana , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates .
therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes .
the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired .
entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

2004
2003
2002
2001
(In Thousands)
$40,549
($41,317)
$18,854
$3,812

money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 .
see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool .
investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects .
the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects .
financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid .
the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 .
the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 .
see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt .
uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the difference of the payment for waterford lease obligation between 2003 and 2004?
Choices:
20.4
2173.3
14.2
6.4
20.6
Correct choice index: 4