trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The data for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 and as of August 31, 2019 and 2018 are derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes that are included elsewhere in this report. The data for fiscal 2016 and 2015 and as of August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes that are not included in this report. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included elsewhere in this report.
(1) Effective September 1, 2018, we adopted FASB ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and eliminated our net revenues presentation and FASB ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation.
(2) Includes the impact of a $258 million charge associated with tax law changes recorded during fiscal 2018. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations for Fiscal 2018 Compared to Fiscal 2017—Provision for Income Taxes.”
(3) Includes the impact of a $312 million, post-tax, pension settlement charge recorded during fiscal 2017. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations for Fiscal 2018 Compared to Fiscal 2017—Pension Settlement Charge.”
(4) Includes the impact of a $745 million, post-tax, gain on sale of businesses recorded during fiscal 2016.
(5) Includes the impact of a $39 million, post-tax, pension settlement charge recorded during fiscal 2015.

Fiscal
2019
2018 (1) (2)
2017 (1) (3)
2016 (1) (4)
2015 (1) (5)
(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Income Statement Data
Revenues
$43,215
$40,993
$36,177
$34,254
$32,406
Operating income
6,305
5,899
5,191
4,846
4,526
Net income
4,846
4,215
3,635
4,350
3,274
Net income attributable to Accenture plc
4,779
4,060
3,445
4,112
3,054
Earnings Per Class A Ordinary Share
Basic
$7.49
$6.46
$5.56
$6.58
$4.87
Diluted
7.36
6.34
5.44
6.45
4.76
Dividends per ordinary share
2.92
2.66
2.42
2.20
2.04


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total dividends per ordinary share in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0.26
1.1
14.84
5.58
-2.34
Correct choice index: 3
Expected Future Pension Benefit Payments
Future benefit payments are expected to be paid as follows:

United States
Foreign
(in thousands)
2020
$8,027
$1,237
2021
8,416
985
2022
9,163
982
2023
9,785
1,258
2024
10,558
1,098
2025-2029
59,665
6,129


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What would the change in Expected Future Pension Benefit Payments under the United States in 2022 from 2021 be?
Choices:
7905
8065
747
17579
0
Correct choice index: 2
republic services , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc .
2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc .
2006 incentive stock plan ( the 2006 plan ) ) .
allied 2019s shareholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 .
the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect republic as the new sponsor of the plan , and that any references to shares of common stock are to shares of common stock of republic , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the allied acquisition .
the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provided for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards .
awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the allied acquisition .
no further awards will be made under the 2006 stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants .
we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier .
expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option .
the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option .
we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options .
when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes .
the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $ 5.74 , $ 5.27 and $ 4.77 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

2014
2013
2012
Expected volatility
27.5%
28.9%
27.8%
Risk-free interest rate
1.4%
0.7%
0.8%
Dividend yield
3.2%
3.2%
3.2%
Expected life (in years)
4.6
4.5
4.5
Contractual life (in years)
7.0
7.0
7.0

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013
Choices:
0.78777
0.03957
1
702.58182
2.03957
Correct choice index: 1
Consolidated Comparison of Fiscal Year 2019 to Fiscal Year 2018
Net Sales
Net sales of $1.4 billion in fiscal year 2019 increased 15.2% from $1.2 billion in fiscal year 2018 primarily due to an increased in Solid Capacitor net sales $164.6 million. In addition, Film and Electrolytic net sales increased by $4.3 million, and MSA net sales increased by $13.8 million.
The increase in Solid Capacitors net sales was primarily driven by a $111.8 million increase in distributor sales across the Americas, APAC, and EMEA regions. The $111.8 million increase consisted of a $72.8 million increase in Ceramic product line sales and a $39.0 million increase in Tantalum product line sales. Also contributing to the increase in net sales was a $30.6 million increase in OEM sales across the APAC, EMEA, and JPKO regions, and a $28.0 million increase in EMS sales across all regions. These increases in net sales were partially offset by a $3.2 million decrease in distributor sales in the JPKO region and a $2.7 million decrease in OEM sales in the Americas region. In addition, Solid Capacitors net sales was unfavorably impacted by $0.5 million from foreign currency exchange due to the change in the value of the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar.
The increase in Film and Electrolytic net sales was primarily driven by a $10.5 million increase in distributor sales across the Americas and EMEA regions. Also contributing to the increase in net sales was $1.7 million increase in EMS sales in the Americas region and a $0.8 million increase in OEM sales in the JPKO region. These increases in net sales were partially offset by a $5.6 million decrease in OEM sales across the APAC and EMEA regions and a $3.1 million decrease in distributor sales across the APAC and JPKO regions. In addition, there was an unfavorable impact of $0.1 million from foreign currency exchange primarily due to the change in the value of the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar.
The increase in MSA net sales was primarily driven by a $15.0 million increase in OEM sales in the JPKO region. Also contributing to the increase in net sales was a $4.3 million increase in EMS sales across all regions and a $3.7 million increase in distributor sales across the Americas and EMEA regions. These increase in net sales were partially offset by a $5.5 million decrease in distributor sales across the APAC and JPKO regions and a $3.8 million decrease in OEM sales across the Americas, APAC, and JPKO regions.
In fiscal years 2019 and 2018, net sales by channel and the percentages of net sales by region to total net sales were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Fiscal Year 2019
Fiscal Year 2018
Net Sales
% of Total
Net Sales
% of Total
APAC
$533,340
38.6%
$479,987
40.0%
EMEA
315,535
22.8%
277,898
23.1%
Americas
337,842
24.4%
259,105
21.6%
JPKO
196,101
14.2%
183,191
15.3%
Total
$1,382,818
$1,200,181


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the net sales in 2019 between APAC and EMEA?
Choices:
1
195498
533340
-217805
217805
Correct choice index: 4
14 2018 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2018 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company .
historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
JKHY
100.00
128.02
141.48
193.46
233.19
296.19
Peer Group
100.00
137.07
171.80
198.44
231.11
297.44
S&P 500
100.00
124.61
133.86
139.20
164.11
187.70

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2013 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends .
total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period .
peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses .
companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc .
dst systems , inc. , which had previously been part of the peer group , was acquired in 2018 and is no longer a public company .
as a result , dst systems , inc .
has been removed from the peer group and stock performance graph .
the stock performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage growth of the jkhy
Choices:
120
628.02
228.02
228020000
28.02
Correct choice index: 2
2.4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS
The following key performance indicators are closely monitored to ensure that business strategies and objectives are closely aligned with shareholder value creation. The key performance indicators are not measurements in accordance with IFRS and should not be considered an alternative to other measures of performance in accordance with IFRS. The Corporation's method of calculating key performance indicators may differ from other companies and, accordingly, these key performance indicators may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The Corporation measures its performance, with regard to these objectives by monitoring revenue, adjusted EBITDA(1), free cash flow(1) and capital intensity(1) on a constant currency basis(1).
(1) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued operations. For further details, please consult the "Accounting policies" and "Discontinued operations" sections.
(2) Following the announcement of the agreement on February 27, 2019 to sell Cogeco Peer 1, fiscal 2019 financial guidelines were revised.
(3) Actual results are presented in constant currency based on fiscal 2018 average foreign exchange rates of 1.2773 USD/CDN.
For further details on the Corporation's operating results, please refer to the "Operating and financial results", the "Segmented operating and financial results" and the "Cash flow analysis" sections.

(in millions of dollars, except percentages)
Actual Fiscal 2018 (1) $
Revised projections (2) Fiscal 2019 (constant currency) (3)
Actual Fiscal 2019 (constant currency) (3) $
Actual Fiscal 2019 (constant currency) (3) %
Achievement of the projections Fiscal 2019
Financial guidelines
Revenue
2,147
Increase of 6% to 8%
2,294
6.8
Achieved
Adjusted EBITDA
1,007
Increase of 8% to 10%
1,092
8.5
Achieved
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment
458
$450 to $470
425
(7.1)
Surpassed
Capital intensity
21.3%
20% to 21%
18.5%
-
Surpassed
Free cash flow
302
Increase of 38% to 45%
453
50.0
Surpassed


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the revenue from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-1140
2441
147
4441
2295
Correct choice index: 2
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

December 29, 2001
December 28, 2002
January 3, 2004
January 1, 2005
December 31, 2005
December 30, 2006
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
100.00
54.38
81.52
61.65
75.54
79.96
S & P 500
100.00
77.90
100.24
111.15
116.61
135.03
NASDAQ Composite
100.00
71.97
107.18
117.07
120.50
137.02
S & P Information Technology
100.00
62.59
92.14
94.50
95.44
103.47

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the rate of return of an investment in cadence design systems inc from 2001 to 2004?
Choices:
0.7652
-0.1848
0.1848
-0.3835
-18.48
Correct choice index: 1
The breakout of product and service revenues was as follows:
Our product revenues increased $158.1 million, or 9%, in 2019 from 2018 primarily due to higher sales in Semiconductor Test of testers for 5G infrastructure and image sensors, higher sales in Storage Test of 3.5” hard disk drive testers, and higher demand in Industrial Automation, partially offset by a decrease in sales in Semiconductor Test automotive and analog test segments. Service revenues increased $36.1 million or 10%.
In 2019 and 2018, no single direct customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated revenues. In 2019 and 2018, our five largest direct customers in aggregate accounted for 27% and 27% of our consolidated revenues, respectively.
We estimate consolidated revenues driven by Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. (“Huawei”), combining direct sales to that customer with sales to the customer’s OSATs, accounted for approximately 11% and 4% of our consolidated revenues in 2019 and 2018, respectively. We estimate consolidated revenues driven by another OEM customer, combining direct sales to that customer with sales to the customer’s OSATs, accounted for approximately 10% and 13% of our consolidated revenues in 2019 and 2018, respectively.

2019
2018
2018-2019 Dollar Change
(in millions)
Products revenues
$1,887.7
$1,729.6
$158.1
Services revenues
407.3
371.2
36.1
$2,295.0
$2,100.8
$194.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average services revenues in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
407.3
371.2
1.91
389.25
21.57
Correct choice index: 3
14. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Selected quarterly financial data for 2019 and 2018 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Quarter Ended
March 31,
June 30,
September 30,
December 31,
2019
2019
2019
2019
Revenue
$50,290
$49,189
$52,833
$60,316
Gross profit
$38,040
$37,918
$40,913
$46,876
Net income (loss)
$(12,272)
$(5,771)
$173
$51
Net loss per share-basic
$(0.16)
$(0.08)
$—
$—
Net loss per share-diluted
$(0.16)
$(0.08)
$—
$—
Quarter
Ended
March 31,
June 30,
September 30,
December 31,
2018
2018
2018
2018
Revenue
$49,183
$60,713
$60,502
$61,825
Gross profit
$37,299
$47,526
$47,488
$48,014
Net loss
$(19,670)
$(4,532)
$(1,807)
$(1,608)
Net loss per share-basic
$(0.27)
$(0.06)
$(0.02)
$(0.02)
Net loss per share-diluted
$(0.27)
$(0.06)
$(0.02)
$(0.02)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in revenue between December 31,2018 to December 31,2019?
Choices:
-61795
-397
61825
-150900
-1509
Correct choice index: 4
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common shares for (i) owners of more than five percent of our common shares and (ii) our directors and officers, of which we are aware of the date of this annual report.
(1) Based on 147,230,634 common shares outstanding as of the date of this annual report.
(2) The holdings of High Seas AS, which are for the economic interest of members of the Hansson family, as well as the personal holdings of our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Mr. Herbjorn Hansson, and our director, Alexander Hansson, are included in the amount reported herein.
* Less than 1% of our common outstanding shares.
As of April 14, 2020, we had 575 holders of record in the United States, including Cede & Co., which is the Depositary Trust Company’s nominee for holding shares on behalf of brokerage firms, as a single holder of record. We had a total of 147,230,634 Common Shares outstanding as of the date of this annual report.

Title
Identity of Person
No. of Shares
Percent of Class(1)
Common
Hansson family(2)
4,380,659
2.98%
Jim Kelly
* 
Richard Vietor
* 
David Workman
* 
Bjørn Giæver
* 


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average number of shares owned by the Hanssen family and Jim Kelly?
Choices:
287.5
2190329.5
219032950
7618.5
-2190329.5
Correct choice index: 1
Statement of financial position
Guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries
Altium Limited has provided financial guarantees in respect of credit card facilities and office leases amounting to US$261,518 (2018: US$283,752).
Contingent liabilities
The parent entity had no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018.
Capital commitments - Property, plant and equipment
The parent entity had no capital commitments for property, plant and equipment at as 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018.
The accounting policies of the parent entity are consistent with those of the Group, as disclosed in the relevant notes to the financial statements.

Parent
2019
2018
US$’000
US$’000
Total current assets
121,041
73,202
Total assets
383,665
336,032
Total current liabilities
154,619
90,392
Total liabilities
155,521
92,364
Equity
Contributed equity
126,058
125,635
Foreign currency reserve
2,607
2,783
Equity compensation reserve
19,561
12,570
Retained profits
79,918
102,680
Total equity
228,144
243,668


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the debt-to-asset ratio in 2018?
Choices:
1
0.6
3.64
428396
0.27
Correct choice index: 4
Capitalized software development costs consisted of the following (in thousands):
The Company capitalized software development costs of $8.8 million, $8.8 million and $6.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Amortized expense for capitalized software development costs was $7.0 million, $5.9 million and $5.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Amortization of capitalized software development costs is classified within cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company retired $4.6 million of fully amortized capitalized software development costs.

As of December 31, 2019
Gross carrying amount
Amortization period
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Capitalized software development costs
$ 49,909
3 years
$ (35,622)
$ 14,287
Total capitalized software development costs
$ 49,909
$ (35,622)
$ 14,287
As of December 31, 2018
Gross carrying amount
Amortization period
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Capitalized software development costs
$ 45,677
3 years
$ (32,784)
$ 12,893
Total capitalized software development costs
$ 45,677
$ (32,784)
$ 12,893


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Accumulated amortization: Capitalized software development costs from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
Choices:
12893
2838
0
35619
2838000000
Correct choice index: 1
xvi. Equity shares in the suspense account:
In accordance with the requirement of Regulation 34(3) and Part F of Schedule V to the SEBI Listing Regulations, details of equity shares in the suspense account are as follows:
*Pursuant to allotment of 1:1 bonus equity shares.
The voting rights on the shares outstanding in the suspense account as on March 31, 2019 shall remain frozen till the rightful owner of such shares claims the shares.

Particulars
Number of shareholders
Number of equity shares
Aggregate number of shareholders and the outstanding shares in the suspense account lying as on April 1, 2018
26
820
Shareholders who approached the Company for transfer of shares from suspense account during the year
-
-
Shareholders to whom shares were transferred from the suspense account during the year
-
-
Shareholders whose shares are transferred to the demat account of the IEPF Authority as per Section 124 of the Act
-
-
Aggregate number of shareholders and the outstanding shares in the suspense account lying as on March 31, 2019
26
1,640*


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How many bonus equity shares were alloted during the year?
Choices:
672400
820
819
21320
3
Correct choice index: 1