trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
as of december 31 , 2006 , we also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through july 2011 .
these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years .
as of december 31 , 2006 , our contractual obligations were ( in thousands ) : contractual obligation total less than 1 year 1 2013 3 years 1 2013 5 years more than 5 years .

Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligation
Total
Less Than   1 Year
1 – 3 Years
1 – 5 Years
More Than   5 Years
Operating leases
$37,899
$5,320
$10,410
$9,371
$12,798
Total
$37,899
$5,320
$10,410
$9,371
$12,798

the above table does not include orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business that are not enforceable or legally binding .
item 7a .
quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk .
interest rate sensitivity our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio .
the fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases in interest rates .
under our current policies , we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes .
we attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk , market risk and reinvestment risk .
we mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities .
we have historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for our investment portfolio , and we believe a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments .
foreign currency exchange risk although most of our revenue is realized in u.s .
dollars , some portions of our revenue are realized in foreign currencies .
as a result , our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets .
the functional currencies of our subsidiaries are their respective local currencies .
accordingly , the accounts of these operations are translated from the local currency to the u.s .
dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date for the balance sheet accounts , and using the average exchange rate during the period for revenue and expense accounts .
the effects of translation are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders 2019 equity. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent of the operating leases that are due in 1 2013 3 years to the total leases .
Choices:
3470
0.27468
-0.27468
0.14037
-27489
Correct choice index: 1
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis .
as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions .
as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Amount (In Thousands)
2009
$32,452
2010
35,138
2011
50,421
2012
39,067
2013
26,301
Years thereafter
137,858
Total
321,237
Less: Amount representing interest
73,512
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$247,725

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million .
the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf .
the leases expire in 2015 .
under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases .
at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate .
in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf .
the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs .
system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements .
for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation .
however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes .
consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of total lease payments is in 'years thereafter'?
Choices:
0.22884
-0.42915
429.14733
0.42915
0.08187
Correct choice index: 3
Interest Expense:
Interest expense increased in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 primarily due to higher average borrowings resulting from our issuance of $10.0 billion of senior notes in November 2017, which was partially offset by a reduction in interest expense resulting primarily from the maturities and repayments of $2.0 billion of senior notes during fiscal 2019 and $6.0 billion of senior notes during fiscal 2018.

Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
Interest expense
$2,082
3%
3%
$2,025


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total maturities and repayments of senior notes in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018?
Choices:
8
12
-4
-2
2
Correct choice index: 0
Single figure table for total remuneration (audited)
Single figure for the total remuneration received by each executive director for the 52 weeks ended 30 March 2019 (2018/19) and 31 March 2018 (2017/18).
Gavin Darby
Mr Darby received a basic salary of £700,000 per annum and a salary supplement in lieu of pension of 20% of base salary on a pro rata basis for the period up to 31 January 2019. Mr Darby received a pro rata bonus of £525,500 for the financial period to 31 January 2019. Benefits were provided for the period up to 31 January 2019 relating to the provision of an executive driver service, private health insurance and annual medical assessment.
Alastair Murray
Mr Murray received a basic salary for the period of £416,201 per annum and an annualised supplement in lieu of pension of 7.5% of the Earnings Cap (£160,800 for the 2018/19 tax year) which equates to £12,060 for the period together with an additional RPI adjusted pensions supplement of £24,348. He was appointed Acting CEO on 1 February 2019, in addition to his current role of Chief Financial Officer, on a temporary basis whilst the Board conducts a search process for a new CEO.
In recognition of this significant additional responsibility, it was agreed that Mr Murray would receive a monthly salary supplement of £20,000 (which does not count towards pension, annual bonus or long-term incentives) whilst he carries out this role.
Mr Murray received a bonus of £231,615 for the financial period. Benefits related to the provision of a company car, use of an executive driver service (following his appointment as Acting CEO) and private health insurance. In line with the current Remuneration Policy, one-third of his annual bonus award will be in the form of shares deferred for three years.
Full details of the annual bonus performance assessments for Mr Darby and Mr Murray are set out on pages 53 to 55.

Gavin Darby
Alastair Murray
2018/19
2017/18
2018/19
2017/18
£’000
£’000
£’000
£’000
Salary
583
700
416
408
Salary supplement
–
–
40
–
Taxable benefits
17
22
27
24
Pension
117
140
36
35
Annual Bonus
525
368
232
153
Share based awards
–
–
–
–
Total
1,242
1,230
751
620


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average salary of Alastair Murray in 2017/18 and 2018/19?
Choices:
496
412000000
0
412
214
Correct choice index: 3
The service cost component of net pension expense represents the estimated cost of future pension liabilities earned associated with active employees. The pension earnings, interest and deferrals (“pension EID”) is comprised of the expected return on plan assets, interest costs on the projected benefit obligations of the plans and amortization of actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs.
Net pension expense is recorded in accounts that are included in both the cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses based on the function of the associated employees and in other income (expense), net. The following is a summary of the classification of net pension expense for the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
As of June 30, 2019 and 2018, amounts capitalized in gross inventory were $1.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

Years Ended June 30,
($ in millions)
2019
2018
2017
Cost of sales
Service cost
$10.0
$10.5
$20.2
Total cost of sales
10.0
10.5
20.2
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Service cost
1.5
1.6
3.9
Total selling, general and administrative expenses
1.5
1.6
3.9
Other expense
Pension earnings, interest and deferrals
0.1
2.1
23.8
Curtailment charge
—
—
0.5
Total other expense
0.1
2.1
24.3
Net pension expense
$11.6
$14.2
$48.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Total selling, general and administrative expenses in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-0.1
-100
-12.7
-18.7
-28.5
Correct choice index: 0
the company 2019s stock performance the following graph compares cumulative total return of the company 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the nasdaq stock market-united states , and ( ii ) the nasdaq biotechnology index .
the graph assumes ( a ) $ 100 was invested on july 31 , 2001 in each of the company 2019s common stock , the stocks comprising the nasdaq stock market-united states and the stocks comprising the nasdaq biotechnology index , and ( b ) the reinvestment of dividends .
comparison of 65 month cumulative total return* among alexion pharmaceuticals , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq biotechnology index alexion pharmaceuticals , inc .
nasdaq composite nasdaq biotechnology .

7/02
7/03
7/04
7/05
12/05
12/06
12/07
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
100.00
108.38
102.64
167.89
130.56
260.41
483.75
NASDAQ Composite
100.00
128.98
142.51
164.85
168.24
187.43
204.78
NASDAQ Biotechnology
100.00
149.29
146.51
176.75
186.10
183.89
187.04

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the difference between the percent change between 7/02 and 7/03 of the investments into axion and the nasdaq composite?
Choices:
0.206
-0.248
-0.245
-0.206
0.084
Correct choice index: 3
7. Property, Plant and Equipment and Leases
Property, plant and equipment at April 30, 2019 and 2018, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018 was $2,802,000 and $2,484,000, respectively.
Maintenance and repairs charged to operations for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $309,000 and $466,000, respectively.
The Company leases its Long Island, New York headquarters building. On July 25, 2018, the Company signed an amendment to the lease which extends the current lease terms ten years and eight months through September 30, 2029. Pursuant to the amendment to the lease agreement, the annual rent will increase from $1,046,810 in 2019 to $1,276,056 in 2029. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is required to pay its proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance and other charges.
In addition, the Company’s subsidiaries in New Jersey and California lease their office and manufacturing facilities. On February 1, 2018, FEI-Elcom entered into a new lease agreement in New Jersey for office and manufacturing space encompassing approximately 9,000 square feet. The monthly rent is $9,673 through the end of the lease which expires in January 31, 2021. FEI-Zyfer has signed a second amendment to its lease in California, which extends the lease an additional 88 months, beginning October 1, 2017 and expiring January 31, 2025. The average annual rent over the period of the amendment is approximately $312,000. FEI-Zyfer leases office and manufacturing space encompassing 27,850 square feet.
Rent expense under operating leases for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The Company records rent expense on its New York building and FEI-Zyfer facility on the straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases. As a result, as of April 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet included deferred rent payable of approximately $236,000 and $110,000, respectively, which will be recognized over the respective rental periods.

2019
2018
Buildings and building improvements
$2,692
$2,790
Machinery, equipment and furniture
57,157
57,503
59,849
60,293
Less, accumulated depreciation
(46,811 )
(46,166)
$13,038
$ 14,127


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change between the value of machinery, equipment and furniture between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
-52843
3286698971
-346
-57501
Correct choice index: 3
(C.5) Income Taxes
Judgments and Estimates
We are subject to changing tax laws in multiple jurisdictions within the countries in which we operate. Our ordinary business activities also include transactions where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain due to different interpretations of tax laws, such as those involving revenue sharing and cost reimbursement arrangements between SAP Group entities. In addition, the amount of income taxes we pay is generally subject to ongoing audits by domestic and foreign tax authorities. In determining our worldwide income tax provisions, judgment is involved in assessing whether to consider each uncertain tax treatment separately or together with one or more other uncertain tax treatments and whether to reflect the respective effect of uncertainty based on the most likely amount or the expected value. In applying these judgments, we consider the nature and the individual facts and circumstances of each uncertain tax treatment as well as the specifics of the respective jurisdiction, including applicable tax laws and our interpretation thereof.
The assessment whether a deferred tax asset is impaired requires judgment, as we need to estimate future taxable profits to determine whether the utilization of the deferred tax asset is probable. In evaluating our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are recoverable. Our judgment regarding future taxable income is based on assumptions about future market conditions and future profits of SAP.
Judgment is also required in evaluating whether interest or penalties related to income taxes meet the definition of income taxes, and, if not, whether it is of financial nature. In this judgment, we particularly consider applicable local tax laws and interpretations on IFRS by national standard setters in the area of group financial reporting.
Tax Expense by Geographic Location

€ millions
2019
2018
2017
Current tax expense
Germany
625
733
935
Foreign
1,153
1,019
716
Total current tax expense
1,778
1,752
1,651
Deferred tax expense/income
Germany
–3
57
–584
Foreign
–549
–298
–84
Total deferred tax income
–552
–241
–668
Total income tax expense
1,226
1,511
983


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in current tax expense in Germany in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-91
-108
0
841
-108000000
Correct choice index: 1
entergy mississippi , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue .
2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2007 net revenue
$486.9
Attala costs
9.9
Rider revenue
6.0
Base revenue
5.1
Reserve equalization
(2.4)
Net wholesale revenue
(4.0)
Other
(2.7)
2008 net revenue
$498.8

the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider .
the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes .
the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below .
the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 .
the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .
the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of the change in net revenue was due to rider revenue?
Choices:
0.005
11.9
0.5042
0.012
-0.2269
Correct choice index: 2
part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

2007
High
Low
Quarter ended March 31
$41.31
$36.63
Quarter ended June 30
43.84
37.64
Quarter ended September 30
45.45
36.34
Quarter ended December 31
46.53
40.08
2006
High
Low
Quarter ended March 31
$32.68
$26.66
Quarter ended June 30
35.75
27.35
Quarter ended September 30
36.92
29.98
Quarter ended December 31
38.74
35.21

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse .
as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders .
dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock .
we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business .
the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants .
the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied .
in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization .
for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the fair value of class a stockholders equity at february 29 , 2008?\\n .
Choices:
1153.2
15212584915.28
15212584871.44
1024.81
395748864.44
Correct choice index: 2