trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
table of contents the foreign provision for income taxes is based on foreign pre-tax earnings of $ 33.6 billion , $ 30.5 billion and $ 36.8 billion in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
the company 2019s consolidated financial statements provide for any related tax liability on undistributed earnings that the company does not intend to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s .
substantially all of the company 2019s undistributed international earnings intended to be indefinitely reinvested in operations outside the u.s .
were generated by subsidiaries organized in ireland , which has a statutory tax rate of 12.5% ( 12.5 % ) .
as of september 27 , 2014 , u.s .
income taxes have not been provided on a cumulative total of $ 69.7 billion of such earnings .
the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these temporary differences is estimated to be approximately $ 23.3 billion .
as of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s .
dollar-denominated holdings .
amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s .
income taxation on repatriation to the u.s .
a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ) to income before provision for income taxes for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , is as follows ( dollars in millions ) : the company 2019s income taxes payable have been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock plan awards .
for stock options , the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the tax effect of the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the exercise price .
for rsus , the company receives an income tax benefit upon the award 2019s vesting equal to the tax effect of the underlying stock 2019s fair market value .
the company had net excess tax benefits from equity awards of $ 706 million , $ 643 million and $ 1.4 billion in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively , which were reflected as increases to common stock .
apple inc .
| 2014 form 10-k | 64 .

2014
2013
2012
Computed expected tax
$18,719
$17,554
$19,517
State taxes, net of federal effect
469
508
677
Indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries
(4,744)
(4,614)
(5,895)
Research and development credit, net
(88)
(287)
(103)
Domestic production activities deduction
(495)
(308)
(328)
Other
112
265
162
Provision for income taxes
$13,973
$13,118
$14,030
Effective tax rate
26.1%
26.2%
25.2%

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in millions in the computed expected tax from 2013 to 2014?
Choices:
23463
0
1165.0
1963
36273
Correct choice index: 2
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the following selected consolidated financial data for the five-year period ended March 31, 2019 in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in Items 7 and 8 of this Form 10-K. Our consolidated statements of income data for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2019, and the balance sheet data as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The statement of income data for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 and balance sheet data as of March 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included herein (in the tables below all amounts are in millions, except per share data).
(1) Refer to Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for an explanation of our material business combinations during fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2017.
(2) Refer to Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the special charges and other, net.
(3) Refer to Note 12 Debt and Credit Facility for further discussion.

Year ended March 31,
2019 (1)
2018
2017 (1)
2016
2015
Consolidated Statements of Income data:
Net sales
$5,349.5
$3,980.8
$3,407.8
$2,173.3
$2,147.0
Special charges and other, net (2)
$33.7
$17.5
$98.6
$4.0
$2.8
Loss on settlement of debt (3)
$(12.6)
$(16.0)
$(43.9)
$—
$(50.6)
Net income from continuing operations
$355.9
$255.4
$170.6
$323.9
$365.3
Basic net income per common share from continuing operations
$1.51
$1.10
$0.79
$1.59
$1.84
Diluted net income per common share from continuing operations
$1.42
$1.03
$0.73
$1.49
$1.65
Dividends declared per common share
$1.457
$1.449
$1.441
$1.433
$1.425
Consolidated Balance Sheets data:
Total assets
$18,350.0
$8,257.2
$7,686.9
$5,537.9
$4,780.7
Net long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less current maturities (3)
$8,956.0
$1,769.1
$2,912.1
$2,465.8
$1,840.0
Microchip Technology stockholders' equity
$ 5,287.5
$ 3,279.8
$3,270.7
$ 2,150.9
$ 2,044.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in net sales between 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
1106.5
901.2
12.3
-2176.3
1234.5
Correct choice index: 4
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value .

Share Awards
Weighted Average  Grant-Date  Fair Value
Non-vested at May 31, 2007
278
$37
Granted
400
38
Vested
(136)
30
Forfeited
(24)
40
Non-vested at May 31, 2008
518
39
Granted
430
43
Vested
(159)
39
Forfeited
(27)
41
Non-vested at May 31, 2009
762
42

the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively .
the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively .
we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .
as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years .
employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized .
employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock .
the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period .
as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance .
the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount .
note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure .
we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion .
beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer .
the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is an employees total annual compensation?
Choices:
0
5000
125000.0
124999.8
641
Correct choice index: 2
Long-lived assets by geographic area, which primarily include property and equipment, net, as of the periods presented were as follows (table in millions):
No individual country other than the U.S. accounted for 10% or more of these assets as of January 31, 2020 and February 1, 2019
VMware’s product and service solutions are organized into three main product groups:
• Software-Defined Data Center
• Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Computing
• Digital Workspace—End-User Computing
VMware develops and markets product and service offerings within each of these three product groups. Additionally, synergies are leveraged across these three product areas. VMware’s products and service solutions from each of its product groups may also be bundled as part of an enterprise agreement arrangement or packaged together and sold as a suite. Accordingly, it is not practicable to determine revenue by each of the three product groups described above.

January 1, 2020
February 1, 2019
United States
$860
$849
International
209
113
Total
$1,069
$962


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the international net property and equipment between 2019 and 2020?
Choices:
96
849
208
2
0
Correct choice index: 0
there were no changes in the company 2019s valuation techniques used to measure fair values on a recurring basis as a result of adopting asc 820 .
pca had no assets or liabilities that were measured on a nonrecurring basis .
11 .
stockholders 2019 equity on october 17 , 2007 , pca announced that its board of directors authorized a $ 150.0 million common stock repurchase program .
there is no expiration date for the common stock repurchase program .
through december 31 , 2008 , the company repurchased 3818729 shares of common stock , with 3142600 shares repurchased during 2008 and 676129 shares repurchased during 2007 .
all repurchased shares were retired prior to december 31 , 2008 .
there were no shares repurchased in 2009 .
as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 65.0 million of the $ 150.0 million authorization remained available for repurchase of the company 2019s common stock .
12 .
commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital commitments of approximately $ 41.7 million and $ 43.0 million as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment .
in addition , commitments at december 31 , 2009 for the major energy optimization projects at its counce and valdosta mills totaled $ 156.3 million .
lease obligations pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 91000 acres of timberland under long-term leases .
the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases with a duration of two to seven years .
the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows: .

(In thousands)
2010
$28,162
2011
25,181
2012
17,338
2013
11,557
2014
7,742
Thereafter
18,072
Total
$108,052

total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 41.3 million , $ 41.6 million and $ 39.8 million , respectively .
these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses .
pca was obligated under capital leases covering buildings and machinery and equipment in the amount of $ 23.1 million and $ 23.7 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
during the fourth quarter of 2008 , the company entered into a capital lease relating to buildings and machinery , totaling $ 23.9 million , payable over 20 years .
this capital lease amount is a non-cash transaction and , accordingly , has been excluded packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2009 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are due in 2011?
Choices:
0.26063
0.00759
1.45236
-0.23305
0.23305
Correct choice index: 4
at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus .
this reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment .
in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities .
cash flows .

Millions
2015
2014
2013
Cash provided by operating activities
$7,344
$7,385
$6,823
Cash used in investing activities
(4,476)
(4,249)
(3,405)
Cash used in financing activities
(3,063)
(2,982)
(3,049)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
$(195)
$154
$369

operating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments .
federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 .
as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years .
congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 .
similarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 .
bonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 .
higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments .
2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation .
investing activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 .
higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 .
significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects .
capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?
Choices:
0.08237
2.08237
7385
-1.65602
2.15326
Correct choice index: 0
(6) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable intangible assets as of June 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
The weighted average remaining amortization period for the Company’s customer relationships asset is 14.3 years. The Company has determined that certain underlying rights (including easements) and the certifications have indefinite lives. The amortization period for underlying rights (including easements) is 13.0 years. The amortization of intangible assets for the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $95.1 million, $97.2 million, and $80.0 million, respectively.

Gross Carrying Amount
Accumulated Amortization
Net
(in millions)
June 30, 2019
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Customer relationships
$1,597.6
$(498.7)
$1,098.9
Underlying rights and other
3.4
(1.5)
1.9
Total
1,601.0
(500.2)
1,100.8
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Certifications
3.5
—
3.5
Underlying rights and other
14.5
—
14.5
Total
1,619.0
(500.2)
1,118.8
June 30, 2018
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
Customer relationships
$1,597.0
$(405.6)
$1,191.4
Underlying rights and other
2.7
(0.6)
2.1
Total
1,599.7
(406.2)
1,193.5
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Certifications
3.5
—
3.5
Underlying rights and other
15.1
—
15.1
Total
$1,618.3
$(406.2)
$1,212.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total accumulated amortization for June 30, 2017?
Choices:
-503
1082
309
-83
376
Correct choice index: 2
Fair Value of Convertible Notes held at amortized cost
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value and carrying value of the Company's Convertible Notes were:
The fair value shown above represents the fair value of the debt instrument, inclusive of both the debt and equity components, but excluding the derivative liability. The carrying value represents only the carrying value of the debt component.
The fair value of the Convertible Notes was determined by using unobservable inputs that are supported by minimal non-active market activity and that are significant to determining the fair value of the debt instrument. The fair value is level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Fair value
Carrying value
Face value
5.5% convertible senior notes due December 15, 2021:
Balance as of December 31, 2019
Related party
$6,727
$8,864
$10,000
Others
65,257
84,648
97,000
$71,984
$93,512
$107,000
Balance as of December 31, 2018
Related party
$5,879
$8,378
$10,000
Others
57,031
79,433
97,000
$62,910
$87,811
$107,000


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average fair value of related party and other 5.5% convertible senior notes due December 15, 2021 in 2019?
Choices:
35992
0
360
51864
23995
Correct choice index: 0
6. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following components at June 30, 2019 and 2018:
If the FIFO method of inventory had been used instead of the LIFO method, inventories would have been $178.4 million and $210.3 million higher as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Current cost of LIFO-valued inventories was $793.0 million at June 30, 2019 and $760.8 million at June 30, 2018. The reductions in LIFO-valued inventories decreased cost of sales by $0.0 million during fiscal year 2019 and $0.6 million during fiscal year 2018 and $0.0 million during fiscal year 2017.

June 30,
($ in millions)
2019
2018
Raw materials and supplies
$169.8
$157.5
Work in process
425.7
372.5
Finished and purchased products
192.2
159.2
Total inventory
$787.7
$689.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Raw materials and supplies in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-12.3
369
12.3
10.6
12300
Correct choice index: 2
Key Metrics
In addition to our results determined in accordance with GAAP, we believe the following operating metrics are useful as supplements in evaluating our ongoing operational performance and help provide an enhanced understanding of our business:
Total bookings. Total bookings represents cash receipts from the sale of products to customers in a given period adjusted for products where we recognize revenue on a net basis and without giving effect to certain adjustments, primarily net refunds granted in the period. Total bookings provides valuable insight into the sales of our products and the performance of our business since we typically collect payment at the time of sale and recognize revenue ratably over the term of our customer contracts. We report total bookings without giving effect to refunds granted in the period because refunds often occur in periods different from the period of sale for reasons unrelated to the marketing efforts leading to the initial sale. Accordingly, by excluding net refunds, we believe total bookings reflects the effectiveness of our sales efforts in a given period.
Total customers. We define a customer as an individual or entity, as of the end of a period, having an account with one or more paid product subscriptions. A single user may be counted asacustomer more than once if the user maintains paid subscriptions in multiple accounts. Total customers is one way we measure the scale of our business and is an important part of our ability to increase our revenue base
Average revenue per user (ARPU). We calculate ARPU as total revenue during the preceding 12 month period divided by the average of the number of total customers at the beginning and end of the period. ARPU provides insight into our ability to sell additional products to customers, though the impact to date has been muted due to our continued growth in total customers.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(unaudited)
Total bookings (in millions)
$3,401.2
$3,011.5
$2,618.2
$2,155.5
$1,914.2
Total customers at period end (in thousands)
19,274
18,518
17,339
14,740
13,774
Average revenue per user
$158
$148
$139
$130
$121


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the average total bookings between 2017-2018, and 2018-2019?
Choices:
194.8
3206.4
196.6
391.5
512.5
Correct choice index: 3
Foreign Currency Translation Impact on Consolidated Financial Results
Since we are a U.S. domiciled company, we translate our foreign currency-denominated financial results into US Dollars. Due to the changes in the value of foreign currencies relative to the US Dollar, translating our financial results from foreign currencies to US Dollars may result in a favorable or unfavorable impact. Historically, the most significant currencies that have impacted the translation of our consolidated financial results are the euro, the Australian dollar, the Mexican peso, the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Chinese Renminbi.
The following table presents the approximate favorable or (unfavorable) impact foreign currency translation had on certain of our consolidated financial results

(In millions)
2019 vs. 2018
2018 vs. 2017
Net sales
$ (137.2)
$ (43.4)
Cost of sales
98.4
31.7
Selling, general and administrative expenses
16.3
1.0
Net earnings
(15.7)
(8.2)
Non-U.S. GAAP Adjusted EBITDA
(25.3)
(11.1)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between the impact of cost of sales for 2019 vs. 2018 and 2018 vs. 2017?
Choices:
66700000
0
141.8
-66.7
66.7
Correct choice index: 4
Net Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted EPS is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares include outstanding RSUs.
A reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations follows (in thousands, except per share data):
In 2019, 2018 and 2017, approximately 42,000, 17,000 and 40,000, respectively, of our RSUs were not included in the diluted EPS calculations because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. These share-based awards could be dilutive in the future. In the year ended December 31, 2019, certain potential outstanding shares from convertible senior notes and warrants were not included in the diluted EPS calculations because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Numerator:
Netearnings
$159,407
$163,677
$90,683
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic EPS
35,538
35,586
35,741
Dilutive potential common shares due to dilutive:
RSUs, net of tax effect
421
423
466
Weighted-average shares used to compute diluted EPS
35,959
36,009
36,207
Net earnings per share:
Basic
$4.49
$4.60
$2.54
Diluted
$4.43
$4.55
$2.50


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Weighted-average shares used to compute basic EPS from 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
55097
-55145
-48
-128139
-35586
Correct choice index: 2