trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
At December 31, 2019, the Company’s net operating losses and credit carryforwards are:
(1) Excludes federal and state net operating losses of $60.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, from prior acquisitions that the Company expects will expire unutilized
(2) Excludes federal and state tax credits of $0.1 million and $8.3 million, respectively, that the Company expects will expire unutilized
Carryforward losses and credits expire between 2020 and 2038, except for the 2019 federal net operating loss of $43.9 million and $1 million of state credits, which both have unlimited carryforward periods.
The Company’s India subsidiary is primarily located in Special Economic Zones (“SEZs”) and is entitled to a tax holiday in India. The tax holiday reduces or eliminates income tax in India. The tax holiday in the Hyderabad SEZ is scheduled to expire in 2024. The tax holiday in the Bangalore SEZ is scheduled to expire in 2022. For 2019, 2018 and 2017, the income tax holiday reduced the Company’s provision for income taxes by $1.9 million, $1.3 million, and $1 million, respectively.

(in thousands)
Federal
State
Net operating losses (1)
$120,722
$3,337
Net operating losses due to acquisitions (1)
$76,827
$778
Credit carryforwards (2)
$8,202
$1,958
Credit carryforwards due to acquisitions
$640
$227


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between the company's federal and state net operating losses?
Choices:
-3329
124059
117385
36
119944
Correct choice index: 2
23. Investments continued
IFRS 9 was applied for the first time on 1 April 2018 and introduces new classifications for financial instruments, including investments. Under IAS 39, we classified investments as available-for-sale, loans and receivables, and fair value through profit or loss. On transition to IFRS 9 we have reclassified them as fair value through other comprehensive income, fair value through profit or loss, and amortised cost, as set out in note 1. The current year figures in the following table reflect the classifications under IFRS 9, and the prior year figures reflect the previous classifications under IAS 39.
Investments held at amortised cost consist of investments previously classified as loans and receivables and relate to money market investments denominated in sterling of £2,687m (2017/18: £416m, 2016/17: £35m), in US dollars of £26m (2017/18: £27m, 2016/17: £30m) in euros of £499m (2017/18: £nil, 2016/17: £nil) and in other currencies £2m (2017/18: £4m, 2016/17: £18m). They also include investments in liquidity funds of £2,522m (2017/18: £2,575m, 2016/17: £1,437m) held to collect contractual cash flows. In prior years these were classified as available-for-sale.

At 31 March
2019 £m
2018 £m
2017 £m
Non-current assets
48
-
-
Fair value through other comprehensive income
-
46
37
Available-for-sale
6
7
7
Fair value through profit or loss
54
53
44
Current assets
Fair value through other comprehensive income
-
-
-
Available-for-sale
-
2,575
1,437
Investments held at amortised cost
3,214
-
-
Loans and receivables
-
447
83
3,214
3,022
1,520


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Loans and receivables for 2017-2019?
Choices:
298
530
655.67
-176.67
176.67
Correct choice index: 4
ANG's revenues are principally derived from sales of compressed natural gas. ANG recognizes revenue from the sale of natural gas fuel primarily at the time the fuel is dispensed.
In December 2019, the U.S. Congress passed an alternative fuel tax credit ("AFTC") which will continue to support the use of natural gas. The AFTC is retroactive beginning January 2018 and extends through 2020.
The legislation extends the $0.50 per gallon fuel credit/payment for the use of natural gas as a transportation fuel, and the Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property Credit, which extends the 30 percent/$30,000 investment tax credit for alternative vehicle refueling property. Net revenue after customer rebates for such credits recognized in 2019 was $10.6 million.
As a result of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, signed into law on February 9, 2018, all AFTC revenue for vehicle fuel ANG sold in 2017 was collected in the second quarter of 2018. Net revenue after customer rebates for such credits recognized in 2018 was $2.6 million.
Disaggregation of Revenues The following table disaggregates ANG's revenue by type (in millions):

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Volume-related
$ 27.5
$ 16.5
Maintenance services
0.1
0.1
Total revenue from contracts with customers
27.6
16.6
RNG incentives
0.5
1.3
Alternative fuel tax credit
10.6
2.6
Other revenue
0.3
0.2
Total Energy segment revenue
$ 39.0
$ 20.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average maintenance services?
Choices:
1
0.1
0.3
2
0.4
Correct choice index: 1
GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Note 3. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
The following table summarizes, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis or disclosed, but not carried, at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates presented. There were no transfers into, out of, or between levels within the fair value hierarchy during any of the periods presented. Refer to Note 4, Note 7, Note 8, and Note 9 for additional information on these assets and liabilities.
(1) Disclosed, but not carried, at fair value.
(2) Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
(3) Measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis.

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Level
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
1
$195,760
$195,760
$303,390
$303,390
Loan receivables held for sale, net(2)
2
51,926
55,958
2,876
3,552
Servicing assets(3)
3
30,459
30,459
—
—
Liabilities:
Finance charge reversal liability(3)
3
$206,035
$206,035
$138,589
$138,589
Term loan(1)
2
384,497
392,201
386,822
386,234
Interest rate swap(3)
2
2,763
2,763
—
—
Servicing liabilities(3)
3
3,796
3,796
3,016
3,016


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the carrying value of the term loan between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-2325
-383806
2325
384495
381734
Correct choice index: 0
3.3 Fair value estimation The table below analyses the Group’s financial instruments carried at fair value as at 31 December 2019 by level of the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Such inputs are categorised into three levels within a fair value hierarchy as follows:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1);
Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2); and
Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable inputs) (level 3).
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is determined with reference to quoted market prices at the end of the reporting period. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service, or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. These instruments are included in level 1.
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. If all significant inputs required for evaluating the fair value of a financial instrument are observable, the instrument is included in level 2.
If one or more of the significant inputs are not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3.
Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments mainly include: • Dealer quotes for similar instruments; • The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield curves; and • Other techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for financial instruments.

Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
As at 31 December 2019
FVPL
14,766
5,091
116,079
135,936
FVOCI
74,707
–
7,014
81,721
OFA
–
375
–
375
Other financial liabilities
–
523
1,873
2,396
As at 31 December 2018
FVPL
10,875
5,009
81,993
97,877
FVOCI
41,578
–
1,941
43,519
OFA
–
2,032
–
2,032
Other financial liabilities
–
40
4,466
4,506


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much did the level 1 FVOCI change by from 2018 year end to 2019 year end?
Choices:
33129
0
2
-36487
33129000
Correct choice index: 0
Other loss
In May 2019, the Company completed a cash tender offer and purchased $460.9 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2020 Notes and issued $250.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 9.25% senior secured notes at par due November 2022. The Company recognized a loss of $10.6 million on the purchase of the 2020 Notes for the year ended December 31, 2019 (see Note 9).
During September 2019, Teekay LNG refinanced the Torben Spirit by acquiring the Torben Spirit from its original Lessor and then selling the vessel to another Lessor and leasing it back for a period of 7.5 years. As a result of this refinancing transaction, the Partnership recognized a loss of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 on the extinguishment of the original finance lease (see Note 11).
Following the termination of the finance lease arrangements for the RasGas II LNG Carriers in 2014, the lessor made a determination that additional rentals were due under the leases following a challenge by the UK taxing authority. As a result, in 2017 the Teekay Nakilat Joint Venture recognized an additional liability, which was included as part of other loss in the Company's consolidated statements of loss.
Related to settlements and accruals made prior to September 2017 as a result of claims and potential claims made against Logitel Offshore Holding AS (or Logitel), a company acquired by Altera in 2014. Altera was deconsolidated in September 2017 (see Note 4).

Year Ended
Year Ended
Year Ended
December 31,
December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
2017
$
$
$
Loss on bond repurchases (1)
(10,601)
(1,772)
—
Loss on lease extinguishment (2)
(1,417)
—
—
Tax indemnification guarantee liability (3)
—
(600)
(50,000)
Contingent liability (4)
—
—
(4,500)
Gain on sale / (write-down) of cost-accounted investment
—
—
1,250
Miscellaneous (loss) income
(2,457)
359
(731)
Other loss
(14,475)
(2,013)
(53,981)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Loss on lease extinguishment?
Choices:
1417
-1414
16194.33
-416.67
-472.33
Correct choice index: 4
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively .
for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material .
the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method .
merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method .
under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level .
costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory .
the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 .
current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method .
the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger .
the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively .
the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 .
in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs .
increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases .
the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary .
on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time .
store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred .
property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost .
the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Land improvements
20
Buildings
39-40
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
3-10

improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in held-to-maturity securities at cost and at fair value as of january 30 , 2009?
Choices:
-0.40984
-0.08333
-33.9
-2.5
-0.07962
Correct choice index: 4
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Below is a summary of the difference between income tax expense computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income before income tax expense and the actual income tax expense for the year.
Our effective income tax rate this year was 25.8% compared to 26.9% for 2018. The effective income tax rate for 2019 was lower than the statutory tax rate primarily as a result of a reduction to the Alberta corporate income tax rate over a four-year period.

(In millions of dollars, except tax rates)
Years ended December 31
2019
2018
%Chg
Adjusted EBITDA 1
6,212
5,983
4
Deduct (add):
Depreciation and amortization
2,488
2,211
13
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
-
(16)
(100)
Restructuring, acquisition and other
139
210
(34)
Finance costs
840
793
6
Other income
(10)
(32)
(69)
Income tax expense
712
758
(6)
Net income
2,043
2,059
(1)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Depreciation and amortization?
Choices:
0
2349.5
1.9
0.6
33.8
Correct choice index: 1
The following table summarizes the components of the intangible assets acquired and their estimated useful lives by VMware in conjunction with the acquisition (amounts in table in millions):
The excess of the purchase consideration over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The estimated fair value assigned to the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities were based on management's estimates and assumptions. The initial allocation of the purchase price was based on preliminary valuations and assumptions and is subject to change within the measurement period, including current and non-current income taxes payable and deferred taxes as additional information is received and tax returns are finalized. VMware expects to finalize the allocation of the purchase price within the measurement period. Management expects that goodwill and identifiable intangible assets will not be deductible for tax purposes.

Weighted-Average Useful Lives (in years)
Fair Value Amount
Purchased technology
4.2
$232
Customer relationships and customer lists
7.0
215
Trademarks and tradenames
5.0
25
Other
2.0
20
Total definite-lived intangible assets
$492


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the fair value amount between purchased technology and trademarks and tradenames?
Choices:
0
-260
207
-21
190
Correct choice index: 2
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock on january 2 , 2010 and in each index on december 31 , 2009 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of cadence 2019s fiscal year through january 3 , 2015 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/28/13 1/3/151/1/11 12/31/11 12/29/121/2/10 *$ 100 invested on 1/2/10 in stock or 12/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

1/2/2010
1/1/2011
12/31/2011
12/29/2012
12/28/2013
1/3/2015
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
100.00
137.90
173.62
224.37
232.55
314.36
NASDAQ Composite
100.00
117.61
118.70
139.00
196.83
223.74
S&P 400 Information Technology
100.00
128.72
115.22
135.29
173.25
187.84

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the rate of return in nasdaq of an investment from 2010 to 2011?
Choices:
17.61
-0.99
0.1761
3.522
1.761
Correct choice index: 2
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table summarizes our non-cancelable contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of the end of 2019 and the effect such obligations and commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future fiscal periods (in thousands):
(1) Certain of our wafer manufacturers require us to forecast wafer starts several months in advance. We are committed to take delivery of and pay for a portion of forecasted wafer volume.
(2) Other commercial commitments are included as liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets as of the end of 2019.
(3) Does not include unrecognized tax benefits of $2.1 million as of the end of 2019. See Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Payments Due by Period
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 Years
4-5 Years
More than 5 Years
Contractual cash obligations:
Operating leases
$2,040
$611
$902
$527
$—
Finance software lease obligations
514
214
300
—
—
Wafer purchases (1)
57
57
—
—
—
Other purchase commitments
413
386
27
—
—
Total contractual cash obligations
3,024
1,268
1,229
527
—
Other commercial commitments (2):
Revolving line of credit
15,000
15,000
—
—
—
Total commercial commitments
15,000
15,000
—
—
—
Total contractual obligations and commercial commitments (3)
$18,024
$16,268
$1,229
$527
—


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average finance software lease obligations due in less than 1 year and between 1 to 3 years?
Choices:
-43
214
257000000
257
16011
Correct choice index: 3
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations as of August 31, 2019 are summarized below. As disclosed below, while we have certain non-cancelable purchase order obligations for property, plant and equipment, we generally do not enter into non-cancelable purchase orders for materials until we receive a corresponding purchase commitment from our customer. Non-cancelable purchase orders do not typically extend beyond the normal lead time of several weeks, at most. Purchase orders beyond this time frame are typically cancelable.
(1) Consists of interest on notes payable and long-term debt outstanding as of August 31, 2019. Certain of our notes payable and long-term debt pay interest at variable rates. We have applied estimated interest rates to determine the value of these expected future interest payments.
(2) Consists of purchase commitments entered into as of August 31, 2019 primarily for property, plant and equipment and software pursuant to legally enforceable and binding agreements.
(3) Includes the estimated company contributions to funded pension plans during fiscal year 2020 and the expected benefit payments for unfunded pension and postretirement plans from fiscal years 2020 through 2029. These future payments are not recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets but will be recorded as incurred.
(4) Includes (i) a $28.5 million capital commitment, (ii) a $16.2 million obligation related to a new human resource system and (iii) $33.0 million related to the one-time transition tax as a result of the Tax Act that will be paid in annual installments through fiscal year 2026.
(5) As of August 31, 2019, we have $1.5 million and $103.7 million recorded as a current and a long-term liability, respectively, for uncertain tax positions. We are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of payments, or the amount by which our liability for these uncertain tax positions will increase or decrease over time, and accordingly, this liability has been excluded from the above table.

Payments due by period (in thousands)
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
After 5 years
Notes payable and long-term debt
$2,496,465
$375,181
$491,655
$1,134,733
$494,896
Future interest on notes payable and long-term debt(1)
373,762
109,506
142,082
55,463
66,711
Operating lease obligations
603,185
118,312
187,644
114,297
182,932
Capital lease obligations
77,829
6,038
11,726
10,928
49,137
Non-cancelable purchase order obligations(2)
351,230
289,516
61,537
177
—
Pension and post retirement contributions and payments(3)
14,618
1,135
1,904
2,396
9,183
Other(4)
77,669
17,922
27,863
14,214
17,670
Total contractual obligations(5)
$3,994,758
$917,610
$924,411
$1,332,208
$820,529


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is Notes payable and long-term debt as a percentage of the total contractual obligations?
Choices:
62.49
5738.78
-149829300
0.62
63922.75
Correct choice index: 0