trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Remaining Performance Obligation Associated with Non-Lease Arrangements
A majority of the Company’s revenue is provided over a contract term. When allocating the total contract transaction price to identified performance obligations, a portion of the total transaction price relates to performance obligations that are yet to be satisfied or are partially satisfied as of the end of the reporting period.
In determining the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations, the Company does not include non- recurring charges and estimates for usage.
Remaining performance obligations associated with the Company’s contracts reflect recurring charges billed, adjusted to reflect estimates for sales incentives and revenue adjustments.
The table below reflects an estimate of the remaining transaction price of fixed fee, non-lease revenue arrangements to be recognized in the future periods presented. The table below does not include estimated amounts to be recognized in future periods associated with variable usage-based consideration.

Year Ended June 30,
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
(in millions)
Reportable Segment
Zayo Networks
621.4
295.9
117.4
36.7
14.1
17.5
1,103.0
zColo
21.7
11.0
6.2
3.5
2.5
2.0
46.9
Allstream
110.3
26.7
11.8
1.6
0.3
—
150.7
Total
$753.4
$333.6
$135.4
$41.8
$16.9
$19.5
$1,300.6


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much remaining transaction price of fixed fee, non-lease revenue arrangements does the company expect to recognize from Zayo Networks and zColo in 2020?
Choices:
157.1
35.8
640.9
643.1
23.7
Correct choice index: 3
Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plans
Pension Benefit Plan
We maintain a defined benefit pension plan covering employees in certain foreign countries.
The pension benefit plan obligations and funded status as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, were as follows:
The accumulated benefit obligation was $43.9 million and $37.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in the accumulated benefit obligation and the actuarial loss was primarily attributable to a decrease in the discount rate during 2019.

(In thousands)
2019
2018
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period
$37,245
$34,893
Service cost
1,471
1,193
Interest cost
634
727
Actuarial loss - experience
453
38
Actuarial loss - assumptions
5,091
2,139
Benefit payments
(166)
(138)
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate changes
(826)
(1,607)
Projected benefit obligation at end of period
43,902
37,245
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
24,159
26,624
Actual gain (loss) on plan assets
4,392
(2,024)
Contributions
—
688
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate changes
(535)
(1,129)
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
28,016
24,159
Unfunded status at end of period
$(15,886)
$(13,086)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in service cost between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
264
-278
278
36052
1
Correct choice index: 2
Revenues. Revenues increased by 25% to RMB105.8 billion for the fourth quarter of 2019 on a year-on-year basis. The following table sets forth our revenues by line of business for the fourth quarter of 2019 and the fourth quarter of 2018:
Revenues from VAS increased by 20% to RMB52,308 million for the fourth quarter of 2019 on a year-on-year basis. Online games revenues grew by 25% to RMB30,286 million. The increase was primarily driven by revenue growth from smart phone games in both domestic and overseas markets, including titles such as Peacekeeper Elite and PUBG Mobile, as well as revenue contributions from Supercell titles, partly offset by lower revenues from PC client games such as DnF. Social networks revenues increased by 13% to RMB22,022 million. The increase mainly reflected greater contributions from digital content services such as live broadcast and music streaming services. Total smart phone games revenues (including smart phone games revenues attributable to our social networks business) were RMB26,035 million and PC client games revenues were RMB10,359 million for the fourth quarter of 2019.
Revenues from FinTech and Business Services increased by 39% to RMB29,920 million for the fourth quarter of 2019 on a year-on-year basis. The increase was primarily due to greater revenue contributions from commercial payment, as well as revenue growth from cloud services as a result of deeper penetration in key verticals.
Revenues from Online Advertising increased by 19% to RMB20,225 million for the fourth quarter of 2019 on a year-onyear basis. Social and others advertising revenues increased by 37% to RMB16,274 million. The increase was mainly driven by advertising revenue growth from Weixin Moments and our mobile advertising network. Media advertising revenues decreased by 24% to RMB3,951 million. The decrease primarily reflected lower advertising revenues from our media platforms including Tencent Video and Tencent News due to uncertain broadcasting schedules and fewer telecasts of sports events.

Unaudited
Three months ended
31 December 2019
31 December 2018
% of total
% of total
Amount
revenues
Amount
revenues
(Restated)
(Restated)
(RMB in millions, unless specified)
VAS
52,308
50%
43,651
51%
FinTech and Business Services
29,920
28%
21,597
26%
Online Advertising
20,225
19%
17,033
20%
Others
3,314
3%
2,615
3%
Total revenues
105,767
100%
84,896
100%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much is the change in FinTech and Business Services revenue between the fourth quarter of 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
51517
-20646
29695
8323000000
8323
Correct choice index: 4
Underlying operating profit and underlying operating margin
Underlying operating profit and underlying operating margin mean operating profit and operating margin before the impact of non-underlying items within operating profit. Underlying operating profit represents our measure of segment profit or loss as it is the primary measure used for making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the segments.
The Group reconciliation of operating profit to underlying operating profit is as follows:
Further details of non-underlying items can be found in note 3 on page 96 of the consolidated financial statements.
Refer to Note 2 on page 94 for the reconciliation of operating profit to underlying operating profit by Division. For each Division operating margin is computed as operating profit divided by turnover and underlying operating margin is computed as underlying operating profit divided by turnover.

€ million
€ million
€ million
2019
2018
2017
(Restated)(a)
(Restated)(a)
Operating profit
8,708
12,639
8,957
Non-underlying items within
operating profit (see note 3)
1,239
(3,176)
543
Underlying operating profit
9,947
9,463
9,500
Turnover
51,980
50,982
53,715
Operating margin
16.8%
24.8%
16.7%
Underlying operating margin
19.1%
18.6%
17.7%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the operating margin from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-25
-8
-22
42
-50965
Correct choice index: 1
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/05
12/31/06
12/31/07
12/31/08
12/31/09
12/31/10
United Parcel Service, Inc.
$100.00
$101.76
$98.20
$78.76
$84.87
$110.57
Standard & Poor’s 500 Index
$100.00
$115.79
$122.16
$76.96
$97.33
$111.99
Dow Jones Transportation Average
$100.00
$109.82
$111.38
$87.52
$103.79
$131.59

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the difference in total cumulative return on investment between united parcel service inc . and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the five year period ending 12/31/10?
Choices:
1.0545
-0.0142
1056.8801
-0.1199
3.8801
Correct choice index: 1
Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes the components of total stock-based compensation included in VMware’s consolidated statements of income during the periods presented (table in millions):
As of January 31, 2020, the total unrecognized compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock was $1.8 billion and will be recognized through fiscal 2024 with a weighted-average remaining period of 1.5 years. Stock-based compensation related to VMware equity awards held by VMware employees is recognized on VMware’s consolidated statements of income over the awards’ requisite service periods.

For the Year Ended
January 31, 2020
February 1, 2019
February 2, 2018
Cost of license revenue
$1
$1
$2
Cost of subscription and SaaS revenue
13
7
5
Cost of services revenue
83
58
53
Research and development
459
391
363
Sales and marketing
293
226
205
General and administrative
168
117
84
Stock-based compensation
1,017
800
712
Income tax benefit
(347)
(253)
(232)
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax
$670
$547
$480


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Cost of subscription and SaaS revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
8
0
53
2
12
Correct choice index: 3
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
* $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes .
copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial .
all rights reserved .
copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co .
all rights reserved .
september september september september september september .

September 2010
September 2011
September 2012
September 2013
September 2014
September 2015
Apple Inc.
$100
$138
$229
$170
$254
$294
S&P 500 Index
$100
$101
$132
$157
$188
$187
S&P Information Technology Index
$100
$104
$137
$147
$190
$194
Dow Jones U.S. Technology Supersector Index
$100
$103
$134
$141
$183
$183

apple inc .
| 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in the s&p 500 index between 2010 and 2015?
Choices:
87.0
30
0
-79
88
Correct choice index: 0
4 .
business restructuring and cost reduction actions the charges we record for business restructuring and cost reduction actions have been excluded from segment operating income and are reflected on the consolidated income statements as 201cbusiness restructuring and cost reduction actions . 201d 2014 charge on 18 september 2014 , we announced plans to reorganize the company , including realignment of our businesses in new reporting segments and organizational changes , effective as of 1 october 2014 .
refer to note 25 , business segment and geographic information , for additional details .
as a result of this initiative , we will incur ongoing severance and other charges .
during the fourth quarter of 2014 , an expense of $ 12.7 ( $ 8.2 after-tax , or $ .04 per share ) was incurred relating to the elimination of approximately 50 positions .
the 2014 charge related to the businesses at the segment level as follows : $ 4.4 in merchant gases , $ 4.1 in tonnage gases , $ 2.4 in electronics and performance materials , and $ 1.8 in equipment and energy .
2013 plan during the fourth quarter of 2013 , we recorded an expense of $ 231.6 ( $ 157.9 after-tax , or $ .74 per share ) reflecting actions to better align our cost structure with current market conditions .
the asset and contract actions primarily impacted the electronics business due to continued weakness in the photovoltaic ( pv ) and light-emitting diode ( led ) markets .
the severance and other contractual benefits primarily impacted our merchant gases business and corporate functions in response to weaker than expected business conditions in europe and asia , reorganization of our operations and functional areas , and previously announced senior executive changes .
the remaining planned actions associated with severance were completed in the first quarter of 2015 .
the 2013 charges relate to the businesses at the segment level as follows : $ 61.0 in merchant gases , $ 28.6 in tonnage gases , $ 141.0 in electronics and performance materials , and $ 1.0 in equipment and energy .
the following table summarizes the carrying amount of the accrual for the 2013 plan at 30 september 2014 : severance and other benefits actions contract actions/other total .

Severance and Other Benefits
Asset Actions
Contract Actions/Other
Total
2013 Charge
$71.9
$100.4
$59.3
$231.6
Amount reflected in pension liability
(6.9)
—
—
(6.9)
Noncash expenses
—
(100.4)
—
(100.4)
Cash expenditures
(3.0)
—
(58.5)
(61.5)
Currency translation adjustment
.4
—
—
.4
30 September 2013
$62.4
$—
$.8
$63.2
Cash expenditures
(51.7)
—
(.8)
(52.5)
Currency translation adjustment
(.6)
—
—
(.6)
30 September 2014
$10.1
$—
$—
$10.1

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. taking into account the 2014 charge related to the businesses for a segment , what is the percentage of the merchant gases segment concerning all of them?
Choices:
0.32283
12.7
0.05183
0.34646
0.34321
Correct choice index: 3
Our CODM evaluates each segment based on Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), and we therefore consider Adjusted EBITDA to be a primary measure of operating performance of our operating segments. We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before investment income, interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation and other adjustments as identified below. The adjustments to our financial results prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to calculate Adjusted EBITDA are itemized below (in thousands):
It is not practicable for us to report identifiable assets by segment because these businesses share resources, functions and facilities
We do not have significant long-lived assets outside the United States.

Year Ended February 28,
2019
2018
2017
Net income (loss)
$18,398
$16,617
$(7,904)
Investment income
(5,258)
(2,256)
(1,691)
Interest expense
16,726
10,280
9,896
Income tax provision (benefits)
(1,330)
10,681
(1,563)
Depreciation and amortization
20,016
22,957
23,469
Stock-based compensation
11,029
9,298
7,833
Impairment loss and equity in net loss of affiliate
6,787
1,411
1,284
Loss on extinguishment of debt
2,033
-
-
Acquisition and integration related expenses
935
-
4,513
Non-recurring legal expenses, net of reversal of litigation
provision
(11,020)
10,738
9,192
Gain on LoJack battery performance legal Settlement
(18,333)
(28,333)
-
Restructuring
8,015
-
-
Other
217
989
4,339
Adjusted EBITDA
$48,215
$52,382
$49,368


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in stock-based compensation between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
3519123
1837
1731
10718
12359
Correct choice index: 2
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2018
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of awards made to our named executive officers during 2018. We did not grant any plan-based cash awards during 2018.
(1) The amounts included in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs, RSAs and option awards calculated in accordance with ASC 718. The valuation assumptions used in determining the grant date fair value of the RSUs, RSAs and options reported in this column are described in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

Name
Grant Date
Number of Securities Underlying Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units (#)
Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh)
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (1)
Mr. Dorsey
—
—
—
—
—
Ms. Friar
4/25/2018
38,159
109,026
44.75
3,479,299
Ms.Henry
4/25/2018
38,159
109,026
44.75
3,479,299
Ms. Reses
4/25/2018
38,159
109,026
44.75
3,479,299
Ms. Whiteley
4/25/2018
16,695
47,699
44.75
1,522,215
Mr. Daswani
4/25/2018
4,198
—
—
187,861
Mr. Murphy
4/25/2018
4,962
—
—
222,050


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between the smallest and largest amount of Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards?
Choices:
-3291438
19
3291438
3069388
3667160
Correct choice index: 2
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 .
data points on the graph are annual .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
fiscal year ending september 30 .
copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved .
copyright 2013 dow jones & co .
all rights reserved .
*$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

September 30, 2008
September 30, 2009
September 30, 2010
September 30, 2011
September 30, 2012
September 30, 2013
Apple Inc.
$100
$163
$250
$335
$589
$431
S&P 500 Index
$100
$ 93
$103
$104
$135
$161
S&P Computer Hardware Index
$100
$118
$140
$159
$255
$197
Dow Jones US Technology Supersector Index
$100
$111
$124
$128
$166
$175

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the 6 year total shareholder return on apple . inc.?
Choices:
331
0.77
0
3.31
-3.31
Correct choice index: 3
NOTE 11—FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
Maturities of long-term debt for each of the five years in the period ending September 30, 2024, are as follows: 2020 — $10.7 million; 2021 — $35.7 million; 2022 — $35.7 million; 2023 — $35.7 million; 2024 — $35.7 million.
In March 2013, we entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement pursuant to which we issued $100.0 million of senior unsecured notes, bearing interest at a rate of 3.35% and maturing on March 12, 2025. Pursuant to the agreement, on July 17, 2015, we issued an additional $25.0 million of senior unsecured notes, bearing interest at a rate of 3.70% and maturing on March 12, 2025. Interest payments on the notes issued in 2013 and 2015 are due semi-annually and principal payments are due from 2021 through 2025. On February 2, 2016 we revised the note purchase agreement and we issued an additional $75.0 million of senior unsecured notes bearing interest at 3.93% and maturing on March 12, 2026. Interest payments on these notes are due semi-annually and principal payments are due from 2020 through 2026.
The agreement pertaining to the aforementioned notes also contained a provision that the coupon rate would increase by a further 0.50% should the company’s leverage ratio exceed a certain level.

September 30,
2019
2018
Series A senior unsecured notes payable to a group of insurance companies, interest fixed at 3.35%
$  50,000
$  50,000
Series B senior unsecured notes payable to a group of insurance companies, interest fixed at 3.35%
50,000
50,000
Series C senior unsecured notes payable to a group of insurance companies, interest fixed at 3.70%
25,000
25,000
Series D senior unsecured notes payable to a group of insurance companies, interest fixed at 3.93%
75,000
75,000
200,000
200,000
Less unamortized debt issuance costs
(175)
(207)
Less current portion
(10,714)
—
$189,111
$199,793


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the total amount of long-term debt in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
388904
-10889
-10682
10682
207
Correct choice index: 2
Land, Property and Equipment
Land, property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or for leasehold improvements, the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life. The estimated useful lives for machinery and equipment range from 5 to 7 years and for office, computer and research equipment from2 to 5 years. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements that extend the useful life of property and equipment are capitalized.
Depreciation and amortization expense was $0.6 million and $0.8 million for fiscal years2019 and 2018, respectively. In accordance with ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment (ASC 360), the Company assesses all of its long-lived assets, including intangibles, for impairment when impairment indicators are identified. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss may be necessary. An impairment loss is calculated as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the asset.
The Company acquired 16 acres of land with an acquisition and sold4 acres in April 2015 for$264,000. The Company still owns 12 acres of land that remains on the market. The Company concluded that a sale transaction for the remaining land is not probable within the next year; therefore, unsold land is classified as held-and-used as of March 31, 2019 and 2018.
The components of fixed assets are as follows:

March 31,
(in thousands)
2019
2018
Land
$672
$672
Machinery and equipment
1,372
1,296
Office, computer and research equipment
5,267
5,175
Leasehold improvements
798
1,238
Land, property and equipment, gross
$8,109
$8,381
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(6,811)
(6,780)
Land, property and equipment, net
$1,298
$1,601


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of land and leasehold improvements over the gross cost of land, property, and equipment in 2019?
Choices:
0.17
0.18
181.28
0.92
0.25
Correct choice index: 1