management 2019s discussion and analysis fully phased-in capital ratios the table below presents our estimated ratio of cet1 to rwas calculated under the basel iii advanced rules and the standardized capital rules on a fully phased-in basis. .

As of December
<i>$ in millions</i>
2014
2013
Common shareholders’ equity
$ 73,597
$ 71,267
Deductions for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, net of deferred tax liabilities
(3,196)
(3,468)
Deductions for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions
(4,928)
(9,091)
Other adjustments
(1,213)
(489)
CET1
$ 64,260
$ 58,219
Basel III Advanced RWAs
$577,869
$594,662
Basel III Advanced CET1 ratio
11.1%
9.8%
Standardized RWAs
$627,444
$635,092
Standardized CET1 ratio
10.2%
9.2%

although the fully phased-in capital ratios are not applicable until 2019 , we believe that the estimated ratios in the table above are meaningful because they are measures that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements .
the estimated fully phased-in basel iii advanced and standardized cet1 ratios are non-gaap measures as of both december 2014 and december 2013 and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies ( as of those dates ) .
these estimated ratios are based on our current interpretation , expectations and understanding of the revised capital framework and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators .
see note 20 to the consolidated financial statements for information about our transitional capital ratios , which represent our binding ratios as of december 2014 .
in the table above : 2030 the deduction for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets , net of deferred tax liabilities , represents goodwill of $ 3.65 billion and $ 3.71 billion as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , and identifiable intangible assets of $ 515 million and $ 671 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively , net of associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 964 million and $ 908 million as of december 2014 and december 2013 , respectively .
2030 the deduction for investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions represents the amount by which our investments in the capital of nonconsolidated financial institutions exceed certain prescribed thresholds .
the decrease from december 2013 to december 2014 primarily reflects reductions in our fund investments .
2030 other adjustments primarily include the overfunded portion of our defined benefit pension plan obligation , net of associated deferred tax liabilities , and disallowed deferred tax assets , credit valuation adjustments on derivative liabilities and debt valuation adjustments , as well as other required credit risk-based deductions .
supplementary leverage ratio the revised capital framework introduces a new supplementary leverage ratio for advanced approach banking organizations .
under amendments to the revised capital framework , the u.s .
federal bank regulatory agencies approved a final rule that implements the supplementary leverage ratio aligned with the definition of leverage established by the basel committee .
the supplementary leverage ratio compares tier 1 capital to a measure of leverage exposure , defined as the sum of our quarterly average assets less certain deductions plus certain off-balance-sheet exposures , including a measure of derivatives exposures and commitments .
the revised capital framework requires a minimum supplementary leverage ratio of 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) ( comprised of the minimum requirement of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) and a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) buffer ) for u.s .
banks deemed to be g-sibs , effective on january 1 , 2018 .
certain disclosures regarding the supplementary leverage ratio are required beginning in the first quarter of 2015 .
as of december 2014 , our estimated supplementary leverage ratio was 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , including tier 1 capital on a fully phased-in basis of $ 73.17 billion ( cet1 of $ 64.26 billion plus perpetual non-cumulative preferred stock of $ 9.20 billion less other adjustments of $ 290 million ) divided by total leverage exposure of $ 1.45 trillion ( total quarterly average assets of $ 873 billion plus adjustments of $ 579 billion , primarily comprised of off-balance-sheet exposure related to derivatives and commitments ) .
we believe that the estimated supplementary leverage ratio is meaningful because it is a measure that we , our regulators and investors use to assess our ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements .
the supplementary leverage ratio is a non-gaap measure and may not be comparable to similar non-gaap measures used by other companies .
this estimated supplementary leverage ratio is based on our current interpretation and understanding of the u.s .
federal bank regulatory agencies 2019 final rule and may evolve as we discuss its interpretation and application with our regulators .
60 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in standardized rwas in 2014?
Choices:
-7648
1.98796
-0.01204
0.01204
-0.00001
Correct choice index: 2