american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements related contingent consideration , and any subsequent changes in fair value using a discounted probability- weighted approach .
this approach takes into consideration level 3 unobservable inputs including probability assessments of expected future cash flows over the period in which the obligation is expected to be settled and applies a discount factor that captures the uncertainties associated with the obligation .
changes in these unobservable inputs could significantly impact the fair value of the liabilities recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations .
as of december 31 , 2012 , the company estimates the value of all potential acquisition-related contingent consideration required payments to be between zero and $ 43.6 million .
during the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , the fair value of the contingent consideration changed as follows ( in thousands ) : .

2012
2011
Balance as of January 1
$25,617
$5,809
Additions
6,653
19,853
Payments
(15,716)
(5,742)
Change in fair value
6,329
5,634
Foreign currency translation adjustment
828
63
Balance as of December 31
$23,711
$25,617

items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , certain long-lived assets held and used with a carrying value of $ 5379.2 million were written down to their net realizable value of $ 5357.7 million as a result of an asset impairment charge of $ 21.5 million , which was recorded in other operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , long-lived assets held and used with a carrying value of $ 4280.8 million were written down to their net realizable value of $ 4271.8 million , resulting in an asset impairment charge of $ 9.0 million .
these adjustments were determined by comparing the estimated proceeds from sale of assets or the projected future discounted cash flows to be provided from the long-lived assets ( calculated using level 3 inputs ) to the asset 2019s carrying value .
there were no other items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
fair value of financial instruments 2014the carrying value of the company 2019s financial instruments , with the exception of long-term obligations , including the current portion , reasonably approximate the related fair value as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 .
the company 2019s estimates of fair value of its long-term obligations , including the current portion , are based primarily upon reported market values .
for long-term debt not actively traded , fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis using rates for debt with similar terms and maturities .
as of december 31 , 2012 , the carrying value and fair value of long-term obligations , including the current portion , were $ 8.8 billion and $ 9.4 billion , respectively , of which $ 4.9 billion was measured using level 1 inputs and $ 4.5 billion was measured using level 2 inputs .
as of december 31 , 2011 , the carrying value and fair value of long-term obligations , including the current portion , were $ 7.2 billion and $ 7.5 billion , respectively , of which $ 3.8 billion was measured using level 1 inputs and $ 3.7 billion was measured using level 2 inputs .
13 .
income taxes the company has filed , for prior taxable years through its taxable year ended december 31 , 2011 , a consolidated u.s .
federal tax return , which includes all of its wholly owned domestic subsidiaries .
for its taxable year commencing january 1 , 2012 , the company intends to file as a reit , and its domestic trss intend to file as c corporations .
the company also files tax returns in various states and countries .
the company 2019s state tax returns reflect different combinations of the company 2019s subsidiaries and are dependent on the connection each subsidiary has with a particular state .
the following information pertains to the company 2019s income taxes on a consolidated basis. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. level 1 inputs are generally more accurate than level 2 . in 2012 , what percentage of long-term obligations , was not measured using level 1 inputs?
Choices:
-0.47872
0.52128
2.25
0.47872
2.08889
Correct choice index: 3