trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income
Interest income represents interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents, and investments.
Interest income increased by $16.9 million in fiscal year 2019. The increase in our interest income is associated with the increase in invested funds, primarily as a result of proceeds of approximately $600 million related to the common stock and convertible note offering in March 2018 and, to a lesser extent, higher yields on those invested funds.
Interest Expense
Interest expense includes both stated interest and the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs associated with the $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of our Convertible Senior Notes that were issued in March 2018. Accordingly, interest expense in fiscal year 2019 is higher than fiscal year 2018 as the notes were only outstanding for part of fiscal year 2018.
Interest expense increased $10.9 million in fiscal year 2019, compared to the same period a year ago. Interest expense for fiscal year 2019 consists of noncash interest expense of $12.2 million related to the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs and stated interest of $5.0 million.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on monetary asset and monetary liability balances that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity in which they are recorded. We currently have entities with a functional currency of the Argentine Peso, Australian Dollar, Brazilian Real, British Pound, Canadian Dollar, Euro, Japanese Yen, Malaysian Ringgit, and Polish Zloty.
We realized a net currency exchange loss of $1.9 million in fiscal year 2019 as compared to a net currency exchange gain of $0.5 million in fiscal year 2018 as a result of exchange rate movements on foreign currency denominated accounts against the US Dollar.

Fiscal years ended July 31,
2019
2018
Change
Amount 
Amount 
($)
(%)
(In thousands, except percentages)
Interest income
$30,182
$13,281
16,901
127
Interest expense
$(17,334)
$(6,442)
(10,892)
169
Other income (expense), net
$(1,867)
$509
(2,376)
(467)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average interest expense for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
4755
2033
0
23776
11888
Correct choice index: 4
The following table summarizes net revenues by significant product and services categories:
Endpoint and information protection products include endpoint security, advanced threat protection, and information protection solutions and their related support services. Network and web security products include network security, web security, and cloud security solutions and their related support services. WSS and PKI products consist of the solutions we divested on October 31, 2017. Other products and services primarily consist of email security products, managed security services, consulting, and other professional services.
Consumer security products include Norton security, Norton Secure VPN, and other consumer security solutions. Identity and information protection products include LifeLock identity theft protection and other information protection solutions.
Products and service revenue information

Year Ended
(in millions)
March 29, 2019
March 30, 2018
March 31, 2017
Enterprise Security:
Endpoint and information protection
$1,027
$983
$947
Network and web security
748
782
451
WSS and PKI
-
238
422
Other products and services
548
551
535
Total Enterprise Security
$2,323
$2,554
$2,355
Consumer Cyber Safety:
Consumer security
$1,471
$1,504
$1,527
Identity and information protection
937
776
137
Total Consumer Cyber Safety
2,408
2,280
1,664
Total net revenues
$4,731
$4,834
$4,019


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Total net revenues for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017?
Choices:
4494
3743
4528
5
21888352
Correct choice index: 2
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .

(Dollars in thousands)
2010
2009
2008
Balance at January 1
$29,010
$34,366
$29,132
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
7,119
6,997
5,234
Additions for tax positions of prior years
-
-
-
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
-
-
-
Settlements with taxing authorities
(12,356)
(12,353)
-
Lapses of applicable statutes of limitations
-
-
-
Balance at December 31
$23,773
$29,010
$34,366

the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized .
in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand .
in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
the company is no longer subject to u.s .
federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 .
the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes .
during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties .
included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit .
the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date .
for u.s .
income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 .
in addition , for u.s .
income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire .
management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented .
tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2010 what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits,
Choices:
-0.18052
-0.22029
0.18052
29010.18052
-5237
Correct choice index: 0
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Measurement PointDecember 31
The Priceline Group Inc.
NASDAQComposite Index
S&P 500Index
RDG InternetComposite
2011
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
2012
132.64
116.41
116.00
119.34
2013
248.53
165.47
153.58
195.83
2014
243.79
188.69
174.60
192.42
2015
272.59
200.32
177.01
264.96
2016
313.45
216.54
198.18
277.56

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage change in priceline group and the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2016?
Choices:
1.6391
2.1559
1.1527
0.2407
-0.3008
Correct choice index: 2
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc .
altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc .
peer group ( 1 ) .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis .
source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date .
( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc .
peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc .
and reynolds american inc .
note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc .
( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc .
( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc .
to mondel 0113z international , inc .
( mdlz ) .
on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc .
merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j .
heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) .
on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc .
( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc .
( lo ) .
on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc .
( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc .
( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc .
to conagra brands , inc .
( cag ) . .

Date
Altria Group, Inc.
Altria Group, Inc. Peer Group
S&P 500
December 2011
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
December 2012
$111.77
$108.78
$115.99
December 2013
$143.69
$135.61
$153.55
December 2014
$193.28
$151.74
$174.55
December 2015
$237.92
$177.04
$176.94
December 2016
$286.61
$192.56
$198.09

altria altria group , inc .
group , inc .
peer group s&p 500 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 from december 2011 to december 2013?
Choices:
0.5355
0.5174
-0.5355
0.2664
-200.4645
Correct choice index: 0
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc .
comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

12/31/02
12/31/03
12/31/04
12/31/05
12/31/06
12/31/07
United Parcel Service, Inc.
$100.00
$119.89
$139.55
$124.88
$127.08
$122.64
S&P 500 Index
$100.00
$128.68
$142.68
$149.69
$173.33
$182.85
Dow Jones Transportation Average
$100.00
$131.84
$168.39
$188.00
$206.46
$209.40

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance .
these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2002 to 2003?
Choices:
0.1989
0.3989
1
-0.8657
1.1589
Correct choice index: 0
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans for employees of certain of its foreign subsidiaries. Such plans conform to local practice in terms of providing minimum benefits mandated by law, collective agreements or customary practice. The Company recognizes the aggregate amount of all overfunded plans as assets and the aggregate amount of all underfunded plans as liabilities in its financial statements.
The Company's expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is updated at least annually, taking into consideration its asset allocation, historical returns on similar types of assets and the current economic environment. For estimation purposes, the Company assumes its long-term asset mix will generally be consistent with the current mix. The Company determines its discount rates using highly rated corporate bond yields and government bond yields.
Benefits under all of the Company's plans are valued utilizing the projected unit credit cost method. The Company's policy is to fund its defined benefit plans in accordance with local requirements and regulations. The funding is primarily driven by the Company's current assessment of the economic environment and projected benefit payments of its foreign subsidiaries. The Company's measurement date for determining its defined benefit obligations for all plans is December 31 of each year.
The Company recognizes actuarial gains and losses in the period the Company's annual pension plan actuarial valuations are prepared, which generally occurs during the fourth quarter of each year, or during any interim period where a revaluation is deemed necessary.
The following is a summary of the status of the Company's foreign defined benefit pension plans and the net periodic pension cost (dollars in millions):
The long term rate of return on plan assets was determined using the weighted-average method, which incorporates factors that include the historical inflation rates, interest rate yield curve and current market conditions.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Service cost
$9.4
$9.6
$10.0
Interest cost
5.0
4.7
4.3
Expected return on plan assets
(6.0)
(6.1)
(5.5)
Curtailment gain
—
(0.3)
—
Actuarial and other loss
15.6
6.1
1.9
Total net periodic pension cost
$24.0
$14.0
$10.7
Weighted average assumptions
Discount rate used for net periodic pension costs
1.74 %
1.66 %
1.60 %
Discount rate used for pension benefit obligations
1.43 %
1.74 %
1.66 %
Expected return on plan assets
3.23 %
3.18 %
3.22 %
Rate of compensation increase
3.07 %
3.22 %
3.22 %


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Service cost from December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-0.2
-25
19
0.2
0
Correct choice index: 0
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis regulatory asset associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , in which entergy mississippi agreed not to pursue recovery of the costs deferred by an mpsc order in the new nuclear generation docket .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation .
net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2014 net revenue
$5,735
Retail electric price
187
Volume/weather
95
Louisiana business combination customer credits
(107)
MISO deferral
(35)
Waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision
(32)
Other
(14)
2015 net revenue
$5,829

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 formula rate plan increases at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 ; 2022 an increase in energy efficiency rider revenue primarily due to increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2015 and july 2014 , and new energy efficiency riders at entergy louisiana and entergy mississippi that began in the fourth quarter 2014 .
energy efficiency revenues are largely offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have a minimal effect on net income ; and 2022 an annual net rate increase at entergy mississippi of $ 16 million , effective february 2015 , as a result of the mpsc order in the june 2014 rate case .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate and regulatory proceedings .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather .
the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers .
the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination .
consistent with the terms of an agreement with the lpsc , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in october 2015 , what was the ratio of the entergy recorded a regulatory liability to the tax liability
Choices:
0.62121
-2.62121
-0.9697
-65.37879
2.62121
Correct choice index: 0
Minimising our environmental impact
During FY19 we have undertaken energy audits across all our UK manufacturing sites as part of our Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme (‘ESOS’) compliance programme, which is a mandatory energy assessment scheme for UK organisations. Our progress on energy efficiency improvements remains good, and we have delivered a further 4.9% improvement in our primary energy per tonne of product against last year, and 26.5% over the last six years.

Category
Destination
FY19
FY18
Tonnes
% of production
Tonnes
% of production
Redistribution for human consumption
950
0.3%
791
0.2%
Waste avoided
Animal feed
4,454
1.2%
4,895
1.3%
Total
5,404
1.5%
5,686
1.5%
Co/Anaerobic digestion
24,978
6.6%
32,202
8.3%
Food waste
Controlled combustion
1,650
0.4%
1,964
0.5%
Sewer
8,280
2.2%
6,746
1.7%
Total
34,908
9.2%
40,912
10.5%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average redistribution for human consumption for FY18 and FY19?
Choices:
870.5
0.9
870500
6569.8
0
Correct choice index: 0
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
19. Financial Income and Costs
An analysis of financial income and costs is as follows:

For the year ended December 31,
2017
2018
2019
Financial Income
Interest income
2,650
4,784
5,318
Total financial income
2,650
4,784
5,318
Financial Costs
Amortization and write-off of deferred loan/bond issuance costs/premium
12,398
12,593
14,154
Interest expense on loans and realized loss on cash flow hedges
85,813
111,600
122,819
Interest expense on bonds and realized loss on CCSs
27,085
30,029
34,607
Lease charge
10,875
10,520
10,506
Loss arising on bond repurchases at a premium (Note 13)13)
1,459
—
2,119
Other financial costs, including unrealized foreign exchange losses on cash and bonds
1,551
1,885
6,276
Total financial costs
139,181
166,627
190,481


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in lease charge from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-14
75293
-369
14
-8969
Correct choice index: 0
Contract Balances
The following table provides information about contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers (amounts in thousands):
Contract assets, reported within current assets and other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets, primarily result from revenue being recognized when a license is delivered and payments are made over time. Contract liabilities primarily relate to advance consideration received from customers, deferred revenue, for which transfer of control occurs, and therefore revenue is recognized, as services are provided. Contract balances are reported in a net contract asset or liability position on a contract-by-contract basis at the end of each reporting period. The Company recognized $4.4 million of revenue during the year ended September 30, 2019 that was included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period.

September 30, 2019
October 1, 2018
Contract assets, current
$2,350
$169
Contract assets, non-current
581
507
Contract liabilities, current
5,612
4,281
Contract liabilities, non-current
736
485


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the ratio of contract liabilities to contract assets in 2018?
Choices:
4.7
7.05
7.29
-14.1
0
Correct choice index: 1
For 2019, we reported a net income of $1,032 million, compared to a net income of $1,287 million and $802 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The 2019 net income represented diluted earnings per share of $1.14 compared to $1.41 and $0.89 for 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(In millions)
Net income attributable to parent company
$1,032
$1,287
$802
As percentage of net revenues
10.8%
13.3%
9.6%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in net income attributable to parent company from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-25500
-255
2319
0
255
Correct choice index: 1