trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
LKQ Corporation
$100
$55
$93
$108
$143
$201
NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index
$100
$59
$86
$100
$98
$114
Peer Group
$100
$83
$100
$139
$187
$210

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .
information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. based on the review of the comparison of the cumulative return among lkq corporation , what was the performance ratio the nasdaq stock to the lqk corporation in 2018
Choices:
0.68531
1.46853
0.6014
-0.68531
0.70504
Correct choice index: 0
entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$933.6
Retail electric price
(20.1)
Volume/weather
(5.2)
Fuel recovery
14.8
Transmission revenue
12.4
Other
(2.1)
2011 net revenue
$933.4

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing .
see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer .
the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what as the percent of the net revenue from transmission in 2011
Choices:
0.06169
0.01328
-0.01328
12.4
1.32848
Correct choice index: 1
Property, plant and equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
We periodically assess the estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment whenever applicable facts and circumstances indicate a change in the estimated useful life of an asset may have occurred. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we revised the estimated useful lives of certain core Series 6 manufacturing equipment from 10 years to 15 years. Such revision was primarily due to the validation of certain aspects of our Series 6 module technology, including the nature of the manufacturing process, the operating and maintenance cost profile of the manufacturing equipment, and the technology’s compatibility with our long-term module technology roadmap. We expect the revised useful lives to reduce depreciation by approximately $15.0 million per year. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment was $176.4 million, $109.1 million, and $91.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

2019
2018
Land
$14,241
$14,382
Buildings and improvements .
664,266
567,605
Machinery and equipment .
2,436,997
1,826,434
Office equipment and furniture .
159,848
178,011
Leasehold improvements
48,772
49,055
Construction in progress
243,107
405,581
Property, plant and equipment, gross
3,567,231
3,041,068
Accumulated depreciation .
(1,386,082)
(1,284,857)
Property, plant and equipment, net
$2,181,149
$1,756,211


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase in machinery and equipment from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-1162168
4263431
-1648423
-610563
610563
Correct choice index: 4
FLNG segment
Total operating revenues: On May 31, 2018, the Hilli was accepted by the Customer and, accordingly, commenced operations. As a result, she generated $127.6 million total operating revenues in relation to her liquefaction services for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Vessel operating expenses: This represents the vessel operating expenses incurred by the Hilli since she commenced operations.
Project development expenses: This relates to non-capitalized project-related expenses comprising of legal, professional and consultancy costs. The increase for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 was primarily as a result of increased engineering consultation fees and front-end engineering and design costs in relation to the Gimi GTA project.
Depreciation: Subsequent to the Customer's acceptance of the Hilli, we determined her to be operational and, therefore, depreciation commenced during the second quarter of 2018.
Other operating gains: Includes the realized and unrealized gain on the oil derivative instrument. In 2018, we recognized a realized gain of $26.7 million, and an unrealized fair value loss of $10.0 million, relating to the LTA oil derivative instrument as a result of the increased price of Brent Crude during the year. The derivative asset was recognized upon the LTA becoming effective in December 2017. In 2017, we recognized an unrealized fair value gain of $15.1 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, this is partially offset by a $1.3 million write off of capitalized conversion costs in relation to the Gandria. In addition, subsequent to the decision to wind down OneLNG, we wrote off $12.7 million of the trading balance with OneLNG as we deem it to be no longer recoverable.
Equity in net losses of affiliates: Pursuant to the formation of OneLNG in July 2016, we equity account for our share of net losses in OneLNG. Given the difficulties in finalizing an attractive debt financing package along with other capital and resource priorities, in April 2018, Golar and Schlumberger decided to wind down OneLNG and work on FLNG projects as required on a case-by-case basis. As a result, activity levels have been substantially reduced for the year ended December 31, 2018 and the carrying value of the investment was written down to $nil.

December 31,
(in thousands of $)
2018
2017
Change
% Change
Total operating revenues
127,625
—
127,625
100%
Vessel operating expenses
(26,317)
(2)
(26,315)
1,315,750%
Voyage expenses
(1,363)
(121)
(1,242)
1,026%
Administrative expenses
175
(1,736)
1,911
(110)%
Project development expenses
(16,526)
(2,506)
(14,020)
559%
Depreciation and amortization
(28,193)
—
(28,193)
100%
Other operating gains
2,749
15,100
(12,351)
(82)%
Operating income
58,150
10,735
47,415
442%
Equity in net losses of affiliates
(2,047)
(8,153)
6,106
(75)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total operating revenues between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
127624
114468
58150
127625
255250
Correct choice index: 3
item 5 .
market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Loews Common Stock
100.0
97.37
106.04
126.23
110.59
101.72
S&P 500 Index
100.0
102.11
118.45
156.82
178.29
180.75
Loews Peer Group (a)
100.0
101.59
115.19
145.12
152.84
144.70

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r .
berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p .
( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd .
and the travelers companies , inc .
dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 .
regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2012?
Choices:
106.04
2.0604
1
0.057
0.0604
Correct choice index: 4
Disaggregation of Revenue
The following table presents the Company's revenue disaggregated by major product category (amounts in thousands):
Software and hardware revenue is generated from on premise software license sales, as well as sales of hardware scanner boxes and on premise appliance products. Service and other revenue is generated from the sale of transactional SaaS products and services, maintenance associated with the sale of software and hardware, and consulting and professional services.

Twelve Months Ended September 30,
2019
2018
2017
Major product category
Deposits software and hardware
$41,860
$33,071
$25,407
Deposits service and other
15,170
8,437
6,963
Deposits revenue
57,030
41,508
32,370
Identity verification software and hardware
4,985
7,627
4,240
Identity verification service and other
22,575
14,424
8,780
Identity verification revenue
27,560
22,051
13,020
Total revenue
$84,590
$63,559
$45,390


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of the Company’s total revenue from 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
64513
13
39
645
6451
Correct choice index: 0
NOTE 7—ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The components of accounts receivable are as follows (in thousands):
Amounts billed include $60.3 million and $80.5 million due on U.S. federal government contracts at September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As further described in Note 2, effective October 1, 2018, the component of accounts receivable that consisted of unbilled contract receivables as reported under ASC 605 has been reclassified as contract assets under ASC 606.
In our normal course of business, we may sell trade receivables to financial institutions as a cash management technique. We do not retain financial or legal obligations for these receivables that would result in material losses. Our ongoing involvement is limited to the remittance of customer payments to the financial institutions with respect to the sold trade receivables; therefore, our sold trade receivables are not included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet in any period presented. As of September 30, 2019, we sold $31.1 million of outstanding trade receivables to financial institutions.

September 30,
2019
2018
Accounts receivable
Billed
$  127,406
$  156,948
Unbilled
—
242,877
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(1,392)
(1,324)
Total accounts receivable
126,014
398,501
Less estimated amounts not currently due
—
(6,134)
Current accounts receivable
$  126,014
$ 392,367


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the sum of amounts billed due on U.S. federal government contracts in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
14080
-20.2
120.6
140.8
126074.3
Correct choice index: 3
1 As defined by the International Monetary Fund.
Revenue related to external customers went up moderately yearover- year on growth in nearly all industrial businesses. SGRE and Siemens Healthineers posted the highest growth rates, while revenue at Gas and Power declined moderately in a difficult market environment. The revenue decline in emerging markets was due mainly to lower revenue in Egypt, where in fiscal 2018 Gas and Power recorded sharply higher revenue from large orders.
Revenue in Europe, C. I. S., Africa, Middle East increased moderately on growth in a majority of industrial businesses, driven by substantial growth at SGRE. Gas and Power posted a clear decline in a difficult market environment. In Germany, revenue was up moderately with significant growth in Mobility and Gas and Power, partly offset by a decline in SGRE.
In the Americas, revenue came in clearly higher year-over-year, benefiting from positive currency translation effects. Siemens Healthineers, Smart Infrastructure and Gas and Power recorded the largest increases, while SGRE posted clearly lower revenue in the region. In the U. S., all industrial businesses posted higher revenues year-over-year, with SGRE and Smart Infrastructure recording the strongest growth rates.
Revenue in Asia, Australia rose moderately year-over-year on growth in the majority of industrial businesses, led by Siemens Healthineers and Digital Industries. Gas and Power and SGRE posted lower revenue year-over-year. In China, revenue was also
up in the majority of industrial businesses, led by Siemens Healthineers. In contrast, SGRE posted substantially lower revenue year-over-year in that country.

Fiscal year
% Change
(in millions of €)
2019
2018
Actual
Comp.
Europe, C. I. S., Africa, Middle East
44,360
42,782
4%
4%
therein: Germany
12,282
11,729
5%
4 %
Americas
23,796
22,115
8%
3%
therein: U. S.
17,993
16,012
12%
6%
Asia, Australia
18,693
18,147
3%
2%
therein: China
8,405
8,102
4%
3%
Siemens
86,849
83,044
5 %
3 %
therein: emerging markets1
27,607
28,272
(2) %
(2) %


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average orders in the Americas region in 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
22955.5
15303.7
11898
17762.5
840.5
Correct choice index: 0
Note 21. Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The following table presents the Company's selected unaudited quarterly operating results for the eight quarters ended March 31, 2019. The Company believes that all adjustments of a normal recurring nature have been made to present fairly the related quarterly results (in millions, except per share amounts). Amounts may not add to the total due to rounding:
Refer to Note 11, Income Taxes, for an explanation of the one-time transition tax recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2018. Refer to Note 4, Special Charges and Other, Net, for an explanation of the special charges included in operating income in fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018. Refer to Note 12, Debt and Credit Facility, for an explanation of the loss on settlement of debt included in other (loss) income, net of $4.1 million during the second quarter, $0.2 million during the third quarter, and $8.3 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019 and $13.8 million and $2.1 million for the first quarter and third quarter of fiscal 2018, respectively. Refer to Note 5, Investments, for an explanation of the impairment recognized on available-for-sale securities in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018.

Fiscal 2019
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Total
Net sales
$1,212.5
$1,432.5
$1,374.7
$1,329.8
$5,349.5
Gross profit
$642.0
$689.3
$779.6
$820.5
$2,931.3
Operating income
$132.3
$102.7
$194.7
$284.6
$714.3
Net income from continuing operations
$35.7
$96.3
$49.2
$174.7
$355.9
Diluted net income per common share
$0.14
$0.38
$0.20
$0.70
$1.42


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the gross profit between the first and second quarter?
Choices:
-47.3
0
2289.3
47.3
178.5
Correct choice index: 3
The following table reconciles the theoretical corporation tax expense to the reported tax expense using the UK corporation tax rate. The reconciling items represent the impact of rate differentials in tax jurisdictions and the impact of non-taxable benefits and non-deductible expenses arising from differences between the local tax base and the reported Financial Statements.
The Group’s taxation strategy is published at www.sophos.com/en-us/medialibrary/PDFs/legal/sophos-group-tax-poli
The Group’s taxation strategy is published at www.sophos.com/en-us/medialibrary/PDFs/legal/sophos-group-tax-policyfy19. pdf and is aligned to its business strategy and operational needs. Oversight of taxation is within the remit of the Audit and Risk Committee. The Chief Financial Officer is responsible for tax strategy supported by a global team of tax professionals. Sophos strives for an open and transparent relationship with all revenue authorities and is vigilant in ensuring that the Group complies with current tax legislation. The Group proactively seeks to agree arm’s length pricing with tax authorities to mitigate tax risks of significant cross-border operations. The Group actively engages with policy makers, tax administrators, industry bodies and international institutions to provide informed input on proposed tax measures, so that it and they can understand how those proposals would affect the Group. However, a tax authority may seek adjustment to the filing position adopted by a Group company and it is accepted that interpretation of complex regulations may lead to additional tax being assessed. Uncertain tax positions are monitored regularly and a provision made in the accounts where appropriate.

Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018 Restated See note 2
$M
$M
Profit / (loss) for the year before taxation
53.6
(41.0)
Loss for the year before taxation multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of 19% (2018: 19%)
10.2
(7.7)
Effects of:
Adjustments in respect of previous years
0.8
7.1
Change in tax rate during the year
1.4
3.6
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
11.8
9.4
Losses not recognised
(0.9)
–
Higher tax rates on overseas earnings
7.7
3.8
Research and development and other tax credits
(1.9)
(0.6)
Impact of US tax reform on deferred tax
–
5.4
Other movements
(2.4)
(1.1)
Charge for taxation on profit / (loss) for the year
26.7
19.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Charge for taxation on profit  for the year in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
6.8
0.1
46.6
531.3
0
Correct choice index: 0
Asia Pacific
Asia Pacific net revenues decreased $1.4 million in 2019 compared to 2018 (see “Revenues” above). Asia Pacific expenses decreased $203,000 from 2018 to 2019. This decrease was primarily due to a $503,000 decrease of salary expense, offset partially by a $303,000 increase in member acquisition costs.
Foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted our local currency loss from our operations in Asia Pacific by approximately $136,000 for 2019. Foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar positively impacted our local currency loss from our operations in Asia Pacific by approximately $127,000 for 2018.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands)
Revenues
$6,490
$7,859
(Loss) from operations
$(7,488)
$(6,322)
(Loss) from operations as a % of revenues
(115)%
(80)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average amount of revenues in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
7174.5
7174500
-7174.5
67429.5
3205
Correct choice index: 0
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
United Parcel Service, Inc.
$100.00
$103.88
$107.87
$158.07
$171.77
$160.61
Standard & Poor’s 500 Index
$100.00
$102.11
$118.43
$156.77
$178.22
$180.67
Dow Jones Transportation Average
$100.00
$100.01
$107.49
$151.97
$190.08
$158.23

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . for the five year period ending 12/31/2015?
Choices:
60.61
160.61
1.6499
0.3774
0.6061
Correct choice index: 4