trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Contractual obligations
As of December 31, 2019, our contractual obligations were:
(1) See "9. Leases" in Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information.
(2) Represents the fixed or minimum amounts due under purchase obligations for hosting services and sales and marketing programs
(3) We are unable to reasonably estimate the timing of the cash outflow due to uncertainties in the timing of the effective settlement of tax positions.
(4) Represents the maximum funding that would be expected under existing investment agreements with privately-held companies. Our investment agreements generally allow us to withhold unpaid committed funds at our discretion.
A detailed discussion and analysis of the fiscal year 2017 year-over-year changes can be found in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Payments due by period
(in thousands)
2020
2021 - 2022
2023 - 2024
2025 and thereafter
Other
Total
Operating lease obligations (1)
19,373
36,373
19,683
1,666
-
$77,095
Purchase obligations (2)
$24,800
$8,129
$438
$ -
$ -
$33,367
Liability for uncertain tax positions (3)
-
-
-
-
5,386
$5,386
Investment commitments (4)
1,754
205
-
-
-
$1,959
Total
$45,927
$44,707
$20,121
$1,666
$5,386
$117,807


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the company's total operating lease obligations between 2020 to 2022?
Choices:
55746
-17000
1
38039
36383
Correct choice index: 0
9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
2021 Senior Convertible Notes
In 2017, the Company issued $300.0 million principal amount of 5.75% senior convertible notes (the “2021 Notes”) for a purchase price equal to 98% of the principal amount. The Company received net proceeds of $284.9 million, net of a discount of $6.0 million and issuance costs of $9.1 million. The debt discount is being accreted to interest expense over the term of the 2021 Notes using the interest method. The issuance costs were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the same term.
The 2021 Notes are governed by an Indenture, dated December 8, 2017 between the Company and US Bank National Association, as trustee (the “2017 Indenture”). The 2021 Notes mature on July 1, 2021, unless earlier repurchased or converted. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 1 and July 1, commencing January 1, 2018.
The 2021 Notes are convertible at an initial conversion rate of 23.8095 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2021 Notes, which represents an initial conversion price of $42.00 per share, subject to adjustment for anti-dilutive issuances, voluntary increases in the conversion rate, and make-whole adjustments upon a fundamental change. A fundamental change includes a change in control, delisting of the Company’s common stock, and a liquidation of the Company. Upon conversion, the Company will deliver the applicable number of the Company’s common stock and cash in lieu of any fractional shares. Holders of the 2021 Notes may convert their 2021 Notes at any time prior to the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date.
The holders of the 2021 Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their 2021 Notes at a cash repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes being repurchased, plus the remaining scheduled interest through and including the maturity date, upon a fundamental change and events of default, including non-payment of interest or principal and other obligations under the 2017 Indenture.
The net carrying amounts of the liability components of the 2021 Notes consist of the following (in thousands):
The effective interest rate of the liability component is 6.4% for the 2021 Notes.

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Principal amount
$300,000
$300,000
Unamortized debt discount
(2,691)
(4,348)
Net carrying amount before unamortized debt issuance costs
297,309
295,652
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(4,135)
(6,685)
Net carrying value
$293,174
$288,967


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage change in net carrying value between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0.01
1.43
-99.99
1.46
0.61
Correct choice index: 3
Provision for Income Taxes: Our effective income tax rates for each of the periods presented were the result of the mix of income earned in various tax jurisdictions that apply a broad range of income tax rates. In fiscal 2018, the Tax Act was signed into law. The more significant provisions of the Tax Act as applicable to us are described above under “Impacts of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017”. refer to Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual report for a discussion regarding the differences between the effective income tax rates as presented for the periods below and the U.S. federal statutory income tax rates that were in effect during these periods. Future effective income tax rates could be adversely affected by an unfavorable shift of earnings weighted to jurisdictions with higher tax rates, by unfavorable changes in tax laws and regulations, by adverse rulings in tax related litigation, or by shortfalls in stock-based compensation realized by employees relative to stock-based compensation that was recorded for book purposes, among others.
Provision for income taxes decreased in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018 primarily due to the absence of the initial accounting charges related to the Tax Act that were recorded in fiscal 2018. To a lesser extent, provision for income taxes also decreased in fiscal 2019 due to the net favorable impacts of our final accounting for the Tax Act in fiscal 2019; the net favorable impacts of the Tax Act on our tax profile during fiscal 2019; the favorable impact of a tax benefit arising from an increase in a deferred tax asset associated with a partial realignment of our legal structure in fiscal 2019; and lower income before provision for income taxes in fiscal 2019. These decreases to our provision for income taxes in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018 were partially offset both by lower excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation expense in fiscal 2019, and by less favorable changes in net unrecognized tax benefits due to settlements with tax authorities and other events in fiscal 2019 relative to fiscal 2018.

Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
Provision for income taxes
$1,185
-87%
-86%
$8,837
Effective tax rate
9.7%
71.1%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much was the average effective tax rate in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
833
80.8
-30.7
40.4
597.4
Correct choice index: 3
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2009 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

Balance, December 31, 2006
$740,507
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
96,454
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(80,258)
Balance, December 31, 2007
756,703
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
101,321
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(11,766)
Balance, December 31, 2008
846,258
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
103.698
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(11,869)
Balance, December 31, 2009
$938,087

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentual decline of the deductions during 2007 and 2008?
Choices:
-0.8534
-0.9987
-0.0905
-631947.0388
-0.0809
Correct choice index: 0
12 .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables the company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business .
citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices .
credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question .
citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines .
margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required .
where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level .
exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi .
credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

December 31,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Receivables from customers
$14,415
$19,215
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
21,035
19,169
Total brokerage receivables<sup>(1)</sup>
$35,450
$38,384
Payables to customers
$40,273
$38,741
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
24,298
22,601
Total brokerage payables<sup>(1)</sup>
$64,571
$61,342

total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 64571 $ 61342 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker-dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2017 where receivables from customers?
Choices:
3.1924
80557
0.00522
0.31324
0.31249
Correct choice index: 3
Cash Flow
Cash flow provided by operating activities. Cash flows provided by operating activities were $7.2 million in fiscal 2019. The provision of cash was due primarily to our operating loss of $13.2 million adjusted for $22.4 million in non-cash expense including depreciation, amortization, and share based compensation and an increase of approximately $2 million in net operating assets and liabilities.
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $6.9 million in fiscal 2018. The provision of cash was due primarily to our operating loss of $12.1 million adjusted for $19.2 million in non-cash expense including depreciation, amortization, and share based compensation.
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $3.4 million in fiscal 2017. The provision of cash included $6.4 million in increased collections on accounts receivable.
Cash flow used in investing activities. Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2019 were $5.5 million. This is primarily attributed to $2.2 million in development of proprietary software and $3.3 million for purchase of property and equipment, including internal use software.
Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2018 were $15.1 million. This is primarily attributed to $8.9 million in development of proprietary software and $6.1 million for purchase of property and equipment, including internal use software.
Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2017 were $13.9 million. This is primarily attributed to $11.9 million in development of proprietary software and $4.2 million for purchase of property and equipment, including internal use software offset by $2.2 million in proceeds from corporate owned life insurance policies.
Cash flow used in financing activities. Respectively, in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, the $0.8 million, $1.3 million, and $0.8 million cash flows used in financing activities were primarily comprised of the repurchase of shares to satisfy employee tax withholding and to cover the exercise price of the options, and payments on capital lease obligations.

Year ended March 31,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
$7,241
$6,874
$3,433
Investing activities
(5,534)
(15,085)
(13,865)
Financing activities
(767)
(1,295)
(847)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(112)
194
(74)
Cash flows provided by (used in) operations
$828
$(9,312)
$(11,353)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average investing activities for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-10309.5
4775.5
-6387.5
0.5
74651089.5
Correct choice index: 0
Pro Forma Results
The following table summarizes, on a pro forma basis, the combined results of operations of the Company and TOKIN as though the acquisition and the Sale of EMD had occurred as of April 1, 2016. The pro forma amounts presented are not necessarily indicative of either the actual consolidated results had the acquisition occurred as of April 1, 2016, or of future consolidated operating results (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
(1) The net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 excludes the following: 34% of the gain on sale of the EMD business of $75.2 million, the gain related to the fair value of KEMET’s previous 34% interest in TOKIN of $68.7 million, and the bargain gain on the acquisition of TOKIN of $62.2 million.
(2) The net income for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017 includes the following: 34% of the gain on sale of the EMD business of $123.4 million (which includes the release of a valuation allowance that was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 and the use of the deferred tax asset which was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018), the gain related to the fair value of KEMET’s previous 34% interest in TOKIN of $66.7 million, and the bargain gain on the acquisition of TOKIN of $60.3 million.
(3) Fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.

Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
2018 (1)
2017 (2)
Pro forma revenues (3)
$1,217,655
$1,060,777
Pro forma net income from continuing operations available to common stockholders (3)
51,975
226,086
Pro forma earnings per common share - basic (3)
0.98
4.86
Pro forma earnings per common share - diluted (3)
0.89
4.08
Pro forma common shares - basic
52,798
46,552
Pro forma common shares - diluted
58,640
55,389


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Pro forma revenues between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-156878
156878
0
-156272
1291660417935
Correct choice index: 1
The failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment had the following effects on our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
After factoring in the costs to sell the data centers and colocation business, excluding the impact from the failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment, the sale resulted in a $20 million gain as a result of the aggregate value of the proceeds we received exceeding the carrying value of the assets sold and liabilities assumed. Based on the fair market values of the failed-sale-leaseback assets, the failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment resulted in a loss of $102 million as a result of the requirement to treat a certain amount of the pre-tax cash proceeds from the sale of the assets as though it were the result of a financing obligation. The combined net loss of $82 million was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Effective November 3, 2016, which is the date we entered into the agreement to sell a portion of our data centers and colocation business, we ceased recording depreciation of the property, plant and equipment to be sold and amortization of the business’s intangible assets in accordance with applicable accounting rules. Otherwise, we estimate that we would have recorded additional depreciation and amortization expense of $67 million from January 1, 2017 through May 1, 2017.
Upon adopting ASU 2016-02, accounting for the failed sale leaseback is no longer applicable based on our facts and circumstances, and the real estate assets and corresponding financing obligation were derecognized from our consolidated financial statements. Please see “Leases” (ASU 2016-02) in Note 1— Background and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the impact the new lease standard will have on the accounting for the failed-sale-leaseback.

Positive (Negative) Impact to Net Income
December 31,
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions)
Increase in revenue
$74
49
Decrease in cost of sales
22
15
Increase in loss on sale of business included in selling, general and administrative expense
—
(102)
Increase in depreciation expense (one-time)
—
(44)
Increase in depreciation expense (ongoing)
(69)
(47)
Increase in interest expense
(55)
(39)
Decrease in income tax expense
7
65
Decrease in net income
$(21)
(103)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the increase in revenue in 2018 from 2017?
Choices:
-88
3626
25
18
-25
Correct choice index: 2
Note 12 – Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the fiscal years ended December 27, 2019, December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017 differed from amounts computed using the statutory federal income tax rate due to the following reasons:

December 27, 2019 
December 28, 2018 
December 29, 2017
Statutory U.S. Federal tax
$6,805
$5,847
$6,443
Differences due to:
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit 
2,078
1,906
1,112
Change in valuation allowance 
95
523
289
Impact of the Tax Act 
—
—
(3,573)
Stock compensation 
(676)
(197)
162
Other 
(92)
(637)
(391)
Income tax expense
$8,210
$7,442
$4,042


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Statutory U.S. Federal tax from 2017-2019?
Choices:
4227
0
6486
6365
636500
Correct choice index: 3
Total Restructuring Reserves
Restructuring reserves included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:

Fiscal Year End
2019
2018
(in millions)
Accrued and other current liabilities
$  245
$  141
Other liabilities
19
26
Restructuring reserves
$  264
$  167


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Other liabilities in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-7
-245
494
7
0
Correct choice index: 0
3. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

August 31,2019
August 31,2018
Raw materials
$2,310,081
$2,070,569
Work in process
468,217
788,742
Finished goods
314,258
659,335
Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory
(69,553)
(60,940)
Inventories, net
$3,023,003
$3,457,706


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in work in process between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
437016
320525
-320525
-191118
0
Correct choice index: 2
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2007 .
period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( b ) .

<i>Period</i>
<i>Total Number of</i><i>Shares Purchased</i>
<i>Average Price</i><i>Paid Per</i><i>Share</i>
<i>Total Number of Shares</i><i>Purchased as Part of</i><i>PubliclyAnnounced</i><i>Program<sup>(a)</sup></i>
<i>Maximum Number of</i><i>Shares That May Yet Be</i><i>Purchased Under the</i><i>Program<sup>(b)</sup></i>
October
127,100
$108.58
127,100
35,573,131
November
1,504,300
109.07
1,504,300
34,068,831
December
1,325,900
108.78
1,325,900
32,742,931

( a ) we repurchased a total of 2957300 shares of our common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2002 .
( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to 128 million shares of our common stock from time-to-time , including 20 million shares approved for repurchase by our board of directors in september 2007 .
under the program , management has discretion to determine the number and price of the shares to be repurchased , and the timing of any repurchases , in compliance with applicable law and regulation .
as of december 31 , 2007 , we had repurchased a total of 95.3 million shares under the program .
in 2007 , we did not make any unregistered sales of equity securities. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how many shares in millions are available to be repurchased under the approved share repurchase program?
Choices:
1.3
32.7
95.3
19.4
199.7
Correct choice index: 1
The following table summarizes the activity related to stock options during the year ended December 31, 2019
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $1,641 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to the stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
Aggregated Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Stock options outstanding - December 31, 2018
-
- -
Granted
5,835,724
$0.56
Forfeited or expired
(20,000)
$0.55
Stock options outstanding - December 31, 2019
5,815,724
$0.56
9.6 years
$2,725
Stock options exercisable - December 31, 2019
137,500
$0.55
9.6 years
$66


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total number of stocks outstanding as at December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
-5815724
1
5815725
5815724
Correct choice index: 4
Loss per share
Basic loss per share are computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings/loss per share reflect the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards. Included in the weighted average shares outstanding is the share consideration in connection with the Restaurant Magic Acquisition (See Note 2 - Acquisitions) in the amount of 908,192 for the period after the close of the transaction. The shares were issued in January 2020, however, no contingencies existed as of the date of the acquisition.
The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding for the basic and diluted loss per share computations (in thousands, except share and per share data):
At December 31, 2019 and 2018 there were 383,000 and 750,000 incremental shares, respectively, from the assumed exercise of stock options that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because of the anti-dilutive effect on earnings per share. There were 308,000 restricted stock awards excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the fiscal year ended 2019 and 113,000 for the fiscal year ended 2018.

2019
2018
Net Loss
$(15,571)
$(24,122)
Basic:
Weighted average shares outstanding at beginning of year
16,041
15,949
Weighted average shares issued during the year, net
182
92
Weighted average common shares, basic
16,223
16,041
Loss from per common share, basic
$(0.96)
$(1.50)
Diluted:
Weighted average common shares, basic
16,223
16,041
Dilutive impact of stock options and restricted stock awards
—
—
Weighted average common shares, diluted
16,223
16,041
Loss per common share, diluted
$ (0.96)
$ (1.50)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Net Loss between December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
884070
88878
-8551
-367429
-86
Correct choice index: 2