trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Investing Activities. Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities changed from a source of$65.7 million in 2018 to a use of $13.8 million in 2019. This change of$79.5 million primarily resulted from a decrease of$62.9 million in cash proceeds from the sale of company-operated restaurants, including repayments of notes issued in connection with 2018 refranchising transactions, and an increase of $9.8 million in capital expenditures.
Capital Expenditures — The composition of capital expenditures in each fiscal year is summarized in the table below (in thousands):
Our capital expenditure program includes, among other things, restaurant remodeling, information technology enhancements, and investments in new locations and equipment. In 2019, capital expenditures increased by $9.8 million primarily due to an increase of $16.2 million in purchases of assets intended for sale or sale and leaseback, partially offset by a $8.7 million decrease in restaurant capital maintenance and facility improvement spending mainly from a decrease in the average number of company-operated restaurants compared to the prior year. The increase in purchases of assets intended for sale or sale and leaseback was primarily due to the Company’s purchase of a commercial property in Los Angeles, California, on which an existing company restaurant and another retail tenant are located. The purchase price was $17.3 million, and we currently intend to sell the entire property and lease back the parcel on which our company operated restaurant is located within the next 12 months.

2019
2018
Restaurants:
Restaurant facility expenditures
$9,202
$17,949
Purchases of assets intended for sale or sale and leaseback
21,660
5,497
New restaurants
1,381
2,088
Other, including information technology
3,597
7,572
35,840
33,106
Corporate Services:
Information technology
9,405
4,584
Other, including facility improvements
2,404
152
11,809
4,736
Total capital expenditures
$47,649
$37,842


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in total capital expenditure for restaurants and total capital expenditure for corporate services in 2018?
Choices:
28522
37842
28370
-28370
0
Correct choice index: 2
F. Contractual Obligations as at December 31, 2019:
Payment due by period ($ in millions) (unaudited)
(1) The amount identified does not include interest costs associated with the outstanding credit facilities, which are based on LIBOR rates, plus the costs of complying with any applicable regulatory requirements and a margin ranging from 2.75% to 3.25% per annum. The amount does not include interest costs for the 2022 Senior Secured Notes, the 2022 Notes, the 2024 Notes, the NSM Loan, the 2022 Logistics Senior Notes, the Term Loan B Facility and the Navios Logistics Notes Payable. The expected interest payments are: $127.8 million (less than 1 year), $166.6 million (1-3 years), $3.8 million (3-5 years) and nil (more than 5 years). Expected interest payments are based on outstanding principal amounts, currently applicable effective interest rates and margins as of December 31, 2019, timing of scheduled payments and the term of the debt obligations.
(2) Approximately 41% of the time charter payments included above is estimated to relate to operational costs for these vessels.
(3) Navios Logistics has several lease agreements with respect to its operating port terminals and various offices. Following the sale of the management division effected on August 30, 2019 Navios Holdings has no office lease obligations (see also Note 16 included elsewhere in this Annual Report). See also Item 4.B. “Business Overview — Facilities.”
(4) Represent total amount of lease payments on an undiscounted basis.
(5) Represents principal payments of the future remaining obligation for the acquisition of six liquid barges, which bear interest at fixed rate. The amounts in the table exclude expected interest payments of $0.3 million (less than 1 year), $1.8 million (1-3 years), $0.9 million (3-5 years) and 0.1 million (more than 5 years). Expected interest payments are based on the terms of the shipbuilding contract for the construction of these barges.

Contractual Obligations
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Long-term debt(1)
$1,581.8
$51.7
$1,461.0
$69.1
$—
Operating Lease Obligations (Time Charters) for vessels in operation(2)(4)
367.4
109.6
142.7
81.6
33.5
Operating Lease Obligations (Time Charters) for vessels to be delivered(4)
63.4
5.5
13.6
12.9
31.4
Acquisition of six liquid barges (5)
12.4
0.5
4.4
5.3
2.2
Rent Obligations(3)
1.3
0.8
0.4
0.1
—
Land lease agreements (3)
25.8
0.6
1.1
1.1
23.0
Total
$2,052.1
$168.7
$1,623.2
$170.1
$90.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between the total Acquisition of six liquid barges and long-term debt?
Choices:
1569400
-7.1
-1569.4
-7.4
1569.4
Correct choice index: 4
7. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES
The total carrying value of our equity method investments at the end of fiscal 2019 and 2018 was $796.3 million and $776.2 million, respectively. These amounts are included in other assets and reflect our 44% ownership interest in Ardent Mills and 50% ownership interests in other joint ventures. Due to differences in fiscal reporting periods, we recognized the equity method investment earnings on a lag of approximately one month.
In fiscal 2019, we had purchases from our equity method investees of $39.4 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2019 were $55.0 million.
In fiscal 2018, we had purchases from our equity method investees of $34.9 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2018 were $62.5 million.
In fiscal 2017, we had purchases from our equity method investees of $41.8 million. Total dividends received from equity method investments in fiscal 2017 were $68.2 million.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts) Summarized combined financial information for our equity method investments on a 100% basis is as follows:

2019
2018
2017
Net Sales:
Ardent Mills .
$3,476.0
$3,344.1
$3,180.0
Others
195.4
198.8
177.7
Total net sales .
$3,671.4
$3,542.9
$3,357.7
Gross margin:
Ardent Mills .
$281.9
$386.5
$340.3
Others
45.5
34.8
34.6
Total gross margin
$327.4
$421.3
$374.9
Earnings after income taxes:
Ardent Mills .
$151.9
$197.0
$152.0
Others
18.1
10.1
10.1
Total earnings after income taxes
$170.0
$207.1
$162.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of Ardent Mills’ net sales from 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
2193.03
3333.37
0
10000.1
33.33
Correct choice index: 1
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .
the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .
s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending may 31 .
global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Global Payments
S&P 500
S&P Information Technology
May 31, 2002
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
May 31, 2003
94.20
91.94
94.48
May 31, 2004
129.77
108.79
115.24
May 31, 2005
193.30
117.75
116.29
May 31, 2006
260.35
127.92
117.14
May 31, 2007
224.24
157.08
144.11

issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million .
the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit .
there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization .
no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Choices:
-0.3776
0.3557
0.3776
3350.694
0.3746
Correct choice index: 2
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term obligations consist of the following (in thousands):
(1) Net of debt issuance costs of $4.6 million and $4.7 million at September 28, 2019 and September 29, 2018, respectively.

Fiscal year-end
2019
2018
Current portion of Euro Term Loan(1)
$2,748
$3,092
1.3% Term loan due 2024
1,367
1,448
1.0% State of Connecticut term loan due 2023
378
374
Capital lease obligations
370
158
Line of credit borrowings
10,000
—
Total current portion of long-term obligations
$14,863
$5,072


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Capital lease obligations from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
341
212
528
-54
216
Correct choice index: 1
Contractual Obligations
Obligations under long-term debt; non-cancelable operating leases; purchase obligations relating to feed grains, other feed ingredients and packaging supplies; construction contracts and claims payable relating to the Company’s workers’ compensation insurance policy at October 31, 2019, were as follows:

Payments Due By Period (in thousands) 
Contractual Obligations
Total
Less than 1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5  Years
5 Years
Operating leases 
47,774
$15,363
$22,919
$ 9,382
$110
Long-term debt 
55,000
—
—
55,000
—
Purchase obligations:   
Feed grains, feed ingredients and packaging supplies
199,097
199,097
—
Construction contracts and other 
8,996
8,996
—
—
—
Claims payable 
20,587
9,687
10,900
—
—
Total 
331,454
$233,143
$33,819
$ 64,382
$110


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total operating leases due within 3 years?
Choices:
38
22922
24359
38282
0
Correct choice index: 3
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 .
the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes .
the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 .
on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan .
the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no .
133 .
the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes .
a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities .
the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness .
it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes .
principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

December 31,   2006
January 18, 2007   Refinancing
2007
$61,661
$96,161
2008
257,541
282,041
2009
68,129
145,129
2010
33,586
215,586
2011
941,875
165,455
Thereafter
1,646,709
2,105,129
Total
$3,009,501
$3,009,501

fidelity national information services , inc .
and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges from 2005 to 2006?
Choices:
-0.05769
-0.05263
-0.00006
0
-0.3
Correct choice index: 0
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million .
the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio .
cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period .
the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days .
of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days .
these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio .
during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures .
other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads .
this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve .
however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period .
the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors .
debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .

(in millions)
One basis-point increase inJPMorgan Chase’s credit spread
December 31, 2012
$34
December 31, 2011
35

economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk .
while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets .
the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices .
the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread from 2011 to 2012
Choices:
1
0.00498
-0.02941
34
0.02941
Correct choice index: 4
entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c .
management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$933.6
Retail electric price
(20.1)
Volume/weather
(5.2)
Fuel recovery
14.8
Transmission revenue
12.4
Other
(2.1)
2011 net revenue
$933.4

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing .
see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period .
the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer .
the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2011?
Choices:
0.01318
11480.82
-933.38682
0.04039
75.88618
Correct choice index: 0
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense increased by $19.1 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $18.1 million increase in employee-related costs, which includes stock-based compensation, associated with our increased headcount from 159 employees as of December 31, 2017 to 229 employees as of December 31, 2018. The remaining increase was principally the result of a $2.9 million increase in hosting and software related cost to support research and development activities and an increase of $0.3 million in software subscription cost which was offset by a $1.0 million decrease in office related expenses to support research and development activities. A total of $7.8 million of internally-developed software costs during 2018 and $6.3 million of internally-developed software costs during 2017 were capitalized, resulting in a decrease of the expense by $1.4 million compared to 2017.

Year Ended December 31,
Change
2018
2017
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Research and development
$ 41,305
$ 22,241
$ 19,064
85.7%
% of revenue
28%
21%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the % of revenue?
Choices:
7
49
-22213
-3
-18
Correct choice index: 0
2019 Performance Target and Payout: The ultimate number of our PBRS that vest, can range between 0% to 200%, and will be based on our achievement of the absolute Adjusted EBITDA Run Rate target (measured from fourth quarter of 2018 to fourth quarter of 2020), as illustrated in the table below.
(1) Determined by dividing (i) the Adjusted EBITDA actually attained for the fourth quarter of 2020 minus the Adjusted EBITDA actually attained for the fourth quarter of 2018 by (ii) the Adjusted EBITDA actually attained for the fourth quarter of 2018.
(2) Linear interpolation is used when our Adjusted EBITDA Run Rate performance is between the threshold, target and maximum amounts to determine the corresponding percentage of target award earned.

Performance Level
Adjusted EBITDA Run Rate(1)
Payout as % of Target Award(2)
Maximum
≥ 2.8%
200%
Target
0.0%
100%
Threshold
(2.8)%
50%
Below Threshold
< (2.8)%
0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the ratios of the payout expressed as % of Target Award for Maximum over Target compared against Target over Threshold?
Choices:
1
-4
0
3
2
Correct choice index: 2
Research and Development
Research and development expenses increased $124.3 million, or 53.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018, due to an increase of $114.4 million in employee-related costs ($45.1 million of which related to stock-based compensation and related payroll taxes), a $7.4 million increase in computer hardware and software costs, and a $2.5 million increase in professional services fees, all as a result of growth in our research and development employee base and expanded development programs.
Research and development expenses increased $94.7 million, or 69.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017, due to an increase of $89.6 million in employee-related costs, an increase of $3.1 million in computer hardware and software costs, and a $2.0 million increase in professional services fees, all as a result of growth in our research and development employee base and expanded development programs.

Years ended December 31,
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
% Change
% Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
Research and development
$ 355,015
$ 230,674
$ 135,997
53.9 %
69.6 %
Percentage of total revenues
22.5 %
21.5 %
20.2 %


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average research and development expenses for 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
0
366671
183335.5
1833.4
680280.1
Correct choice index: 2
By region of shipment, in the 2019 fourth quarter, Asia Pacific revenues grew sequentially by 10.6%, principally in Imaging, Analog and Microcontrollers, Americas was up by 10.5%, mainly driven by Digital and Power Discrete, and EMEA decreased by 2.0%.
On a year-over-year basis, revenues grew 9.9% in Asia Pacific, mainly due to Analog, Microcontrollers and Imaging. In Americas, revenues grew 5.4%, mainly driven by Digital and Power Discrete, while it decreased by 12.8% in EMEA, mainly due to lower sales in Automotive, Power Discrete and  analog.

Three Months Ended
% Variation
December 31, 2019
September 29, 2019
December 31, 2018
Sequential
Year-Over-Year
(Unaudited, in millions)
EMEA
$538
$549
$617
(2.0)%
(12.8)%
Americas
360
326
342
10.5
5.4
Asia Pacific
1,856
1,678
1,689
10.6
9.9
Total
$2,754
$2,553
$2,648
7.9%
4.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Americas revenue in 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
351
702
360
342
5484
Correct choice index: 0