trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Financials
1. EBITDA is a non-IFRS term, defined as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation, and excluding net foreign exchange gains (losses).
2. NPATA is a non-IFRS term, defined as net profit after tax, excluding tax-effected amortisation of acquired intangibles. This is used to determine EPSa as disclosed here and in the audited Remuneration Report.
3. Underlying EBITDA, underlying NPAT and underlying NPATA exclude separately disclosed items, which represent the transaction and other restructuring costs associated with the Sigma acquisition (2018: Enoro acquisition) and the exiting of a premises lease in the Americas. Further details of the separately disclosed items are outlined in Note 4 to the Financial Report.
Operating revenue for FY19 was $231.3 million, $0.5 million up on FY18. With Sigma contributing $5.0 million of revenue in June (the first month since acquisition), revenues for the remainder of Hansen excluding Sigma were $4.5 million lower. This decline was a result of lower non-recurring revenues, due primarily to both lower one-off licence fees and reduced project work following the large body of work completed in the first half of FY18 associated with implementing Power of Choice in Australia. Conversely, recurring revenues grew to represent 63% of total operating revenue.
Underlying EBITDA for the year was $55.8 million, 7.0% down on the $60.0 million in FY18. This resulted in an underlying EBITDA margin decline to 24.1% from 26.0% in FY18. Sigma only contributed a modest $0.1 million of EBITDA in June, which we do not see as representative of the business going forward. Excluding Sigma, the underlying EBITDA margin was 24.6%. This reduced margin was the direct result of the lower non-recurring revenue, as we were able to maintain operating expenses at the same level as FY18, even after the investment in the Vietnam Development Centre.

A$ Million
FY19
FY18
Variance %
Operating revenue
231.3
230.8
0.2%
Underlying EBITDA 1, 3
55.8
60.0
(7.0%)
Underlying NPAT 3
24.0
29.5
(18.7%)
Underlying NPATA 2, 3
33.7
38.7
(12.9%)
Basic EPS based on underlying NPATA (cents) 2
17.1
19.8
(13.6%)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average basic EPS for the 2 FYs?
Choices:
11.4
1
-18.45
18.45
9.97
Correct choice index: 3
Note 8 Property and Equipment, net
The following table details our property and equipment, net.
(1) Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, $28.3 million of assets that were included in property and equipment, net as of December 31, 2018 are now included in other non-current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019. These assets were related to capital leases, primarily for warehouse, office and small manufacturing facilities, IT equipment and automobiles, which are now ROU assets. Refer to Note 4, “Leases,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our ROU assets.

December 31,
(In millions)
2019
2018(1)
Land and improvements
$ 50.7
$ 41.2
Buildings
747.0
728.6
Machinery and equipment
2,453.2
2,325.7
Other property and equipment
141.3
135.6
Construction-in-progress
127.9
155.1
Property and equipment, gross
3,520.1
3,386.2
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(2,378.2)
(2,350.0)
Property and equipment, net
$ 1,141.9
$ 1,036.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the Property and equipment, net value expressed as a percentage to  Property and equipment, gross value for 2019?
Choices:
45.84
24232.25
32.44
0.32
336.14
Correct choice index: 2
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

DATE
CITI
S&P 500
S&P FINANCIALS
31-Dec-2010
100.00
100.00
100.00
30-Dec-2011
55.67
102.11
82.94
31-Dec-2012
83.81
118.45
106.84
31-Dec-2013
110.49
156.82
144.90
31-Dec-2014
114.83
178.28
166.93
31-Dec-2015
110.14
180.75
164.39

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the ratio of the growth of the cumulative total return for citi compared to s&p 500 in 2013
Choices:
56.82
-0.23663
0.79021
0.18462
0.04085
Correct choice index: 3
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future. The selected financial data should be read together with Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following tables set forth our selected consolidated financial and other data for the years ended and as of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except share and per share data).
Information about prior period acquisitions that may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below is included in Item 1. Business. Information about the $28.0 million expense recorded in general and administrative expense in 2018, which relates to the agreement reached to settle the legal matter alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, and may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below, is disclosed in Item 3. “Legal Proceedings.” Information about the $1.7 million of interest recorded within interest income and the $6.9 million of gain recorded within other income, net, in 2019, which relates to promissory note proceeds received from one of our hardware suppliers and proceeds from an acquired promissory note, and may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below, is disclosed in Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation to reflect interest income as a separate line item, which was previously included in other income, net.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Stock-based compensation expense data:
Sales and marketing
$2,075
$1,196
$561
$536
$372
General and administrative
6,474
4,901
2,638
1,430
2,486
Research and development
12,054
7,332
4,214
2,035
1,266
Total stock-based compensation expense
$20,603
$13,429
$7,413
$4,001
$4,124


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the amount of research and development between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-2610
6097
4722
12052
11518
Correct choice index: 2
NOTE 6—INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET, AND GOODWILL
Intangible assets include patents, domain name and other intangibles purchased from GVR, including customer relationships, technology and a trademark. Certain patents were acquired from STI as a result of an asset contribution and were recorded at their carryover basis. The fair value of the patents remained substantially the same as their carrying value at the exchange date. In addition, we acquired other patents and the domain name www.resonant.com through the normal course of business. Intangibles acquired as part of the purchase of GVR were initially recorded at their fair value. Issued patents are amortized over their approximate useful life of 17 years, or 20 years in the case of new patents, once they are approved by their respective regulatory agency. For the patents acquired from STI, we are amortizing them over the remaining useful life of 1 to 11 years as of December 31, 2019. The domain name is amortized over the approximate useful life of 10 years. The other intangibles acquired from GVR are amortized over their useful life of three to five years.
Intangible assets, net, consists of the following as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
(1) Includes the impact of foreign currency translation. The total impact at December 31, 2018 was $1,000 and there was no impact at December 31,
2019.
During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, we wrote-off $145,000 and $96,000, respectively, of patents we are no longer pursuing. The write-offs are included in research and development expense. There were no impairments to any other intangibles.

2019
2018
Cost:
Patents
$1,801,000
$1,507,000
Domain name
22,000
22,000
Client Base (1)
144,000
142,000
Trademark (1)
18,000
17,000
Backlog (1)
13,000
13,000
Technology
77,000
77,000
2,075,000
1,778,000
Less: Accumulated amortization
(499,000)
(404,000)
Intangible assets, net
$ 1,576,000
$ 1,374,000


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total cost?
Choices:
297000
-297000
3689350000000
23000
2075001
Correct choice index: 0
table of contents valero energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) commodity price risk we are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of crude oil , refined products ( primarily gasoline and distillate ) , grain ( primarily corn ) , and natural gas used in our operations .
to reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows , we use commodity derivative instruments , including futures , swaps , and options .
we use the futures markets for the available liquidity , which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations .
we use swaps primarily to manage our price exposure .
our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors .
for risk management purposes , we use fair value hedges , cash flow hedges , and economic hedges .
in addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk , we also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes .
our objective for entering into each type of hedge or trading derivative is described below .
fair value hedges fair value hedges are used to hedge price volatility in certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories .
the level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our operating inventories , and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our previous year-end lifo inventory levels .
as of december 31 , 2011 , we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories and commodity derivative instruments related to the physical purchase of crude oil and refined products at a fixed price .
the information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity ( volumes in thousands of barrels ) .
notional contract volumes by year of maturity derivative instrument 2012 .

Derivative Instrument
Notional Contract Volumes by Year of Maturity 2012
Crude oil and refined products:
Futures – long
15,398
Futures – short
35,708
Physical contracts – long
20,310

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how many total derivative instruments matured by 2012?
Choices:
71416.0
7141600
102212
51106
2.5
Correct choice index: 0
14. Income Taxes
Income before income taxes is as follows (in millions):

Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Domestic
$ 678
$ 589
$ 166
Foreign
590
610
455
Total
$ 1,268
$ 1,199
$ 621


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in foreign income before income taxes between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1200
562
-21
-20
-31
Correct choice index: 3
Stock Options
Stock options granted pursuant to the 2016 Incentive Plan are granted at an exercise price not less than the market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Under the 2016 Incentive Plan, the term of the outstanding options may not exceed ten years nor be less than one year. Vesting of options is determined by the compensation committee of the board and the administrator of the 2016 Incentive Plan and can vary based upon the individual award agreements. In addition, outstanding options do not have dividend equivalent rights associated with them under the 2016 Incentive Plan.
A summary of stock option activity is as follows:
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, was $7.03 and $6.24, respectively. The Company did not grant stock options during the year ended December 31, 2019. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, was $16.0 million, $15.8 million, and $13.4 million, respectively.

Number of Shares
Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value of In-the- Money Options ($)
Outstanding, December 31, 2018
4,864,836
$17.76
Exercised
-854,524
15.78
Forfeited
-3,496
17.89
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
4,006,816
$18.18
3.71
$78,949,941
Exercisable, December 31, 2019
3,462,664
$17.86
3.70
$69,349,255


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the Weighted Average Exercise Price between Exercised and Forfeited stock options?
Choices:
2.4
2.08
2.11
0
-2.11
Correct choice index: 2
(1) For a description and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures presented in this document, please see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures page, or visit the Black Knight Investor Relations website at https://investor.blackknightinc.com.
(2) In 2019, the effect of our indirect investment in The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation was a reduction of Net earnings of $73.9 million primarily due to the effect of its purchase accounting adjustments, restructuring charges and other non-operating charges. In 2017, Net earnings includes a one-time, non-cash net tax benefit of $110.9 million related to the revaluation of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Reform Act”).

(in millions, except per share data)
2019
2018
2017
Revenues
$1,177.2
$1,114.0
$1,051.6
Adjusted Revenues(1)
$1,177.7
$1,116.5
$1,056.1
Earnings before equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
$182.8
$168.5
$254.2
Net earnings(2)
$108.8
$168.5
$254.2
Net earnings margin
9.2%
15.1%
24.2%
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight
$108.8
$168.5
$182.3
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight, per diluted share
$0.73
$1.14
$1.47
Adjusted Net Earnings(1)
$295.4
$277.9
$209.6
Adjusted EPS(1)
$1.99
$1.87
$1.38
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$583.4
$542.5
$505.8
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1)
49.5%
48.6%
47.9%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in net earnings between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-85.7
-14.3
0
0.7
-0.9
Correct choice index: 0
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments not applicable .
item 2 .
properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2.1 6.0 8.1 .

(Square Feet in Millions)
UnitedStates
OtherCountries
Total
Owned facilities<sup>1</sup>
30.7
17.2
47.9
Leased facilities<sup>2</sup>
2.1
6.0
8.1
Total facilities
32.8
23.2
56.0

1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 .
2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option .
our principal executive offices are located in the u.s .
and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s .
we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead .
we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 .
a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies .
incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use .
our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 .
outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china .
our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 .
additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory .
our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam .
in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers .
we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it .
we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment .
for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 3 .
legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent of the square foot in millions of owned facilities in the other countries to the of the total owned facilities
Choices:
0.35908
1
-0.35908
35.90814
0.74138
Correct choice index: 0
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Unit Awards
For equity based restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards that contain only service conditions for vesting (time-based awards), we calculate the award fair value based on the closing price of CenturyLink common stock on the accounting grant date. We also grant equity-based awards that contain service conditions as well as additional market or performance conditions. For awards having both service and market conditions, the award fair value is calculated using Monte-Carlo simulations. Awards with service as well as market or performance conditions specify a target number of shares for the award, although each recipient ultimately has the opportunity to receive between 0% and 200% of the target number of shares. For awards with service and market conditions, the percentage received is based on our total shareholder return over the three-year service period versus that of selected peer companies. For awards with service and performance conditions, the percentage received depends upon the attainment of one or more financial performance targets during the two or three-year service period.
The following table summarizes activity involving restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards for the year ended December 31, 2019:
(1) Shares granted whose related performance conditions were not finalized at December 31, 2019, were excluded from this figure.
During 2018, we granted 9.7 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards at a weighted-average price of $17.02. During 2017, we granted 5.2 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards at a weighted-average price of $22.02. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2019, 2018 and 2017, was $118 million, $169 million and $60 million, respectively.

Number of shares
Weighed-Average Grant Date Fair Value
(In thousands)
Non-vested at December 31, 2018
17,059
$19.65
Granted(1)
9,780
12.41
Vested
(9,038)
19.54
Forfeited
(1,757)
18.62
Non-vested at December 31, 2019
16,044
15.42


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage change in the number of non-vested shares in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-5194.47
0
11.23
-5.95
-1691.67
Correct choice index: 3
Share Options
The Company estimates the fair value of employee share options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which requires the use of highly subjective estimates and assumptions. The Company estimates the expected term of share options for service-based awards utilizing the “Simplified Method,” as it does not have sufficient historical share option exercise information on which to base its estimate. The Simplified Method is based on the average of the vesting tranches and the contractual life of each grant.
The risk-free interest rate is based on a treasury instrument whose term is consistent with the expected life of the share option. Since there was no public market for the Company’s ordinary shares prior to the IPO and as its shares have been publicly traded for a limited time, the Company determined the expected volatility for options granted based on an analysis of reported data for a peer group of companies that issue options with substantially similar terms.
The expected volatility of options granted has been determined using an average of the historical volatility measures of this peer group of companies. The Company uses an expected dividend rate of zero as it currently has no history or expectation of paying dividends on its ordinary shares. The fair value of the Company’s ordinary shares at the time of each share option grant is based on the closing market value of its ordinary shares on the grant date.
The fair value of each share option grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model that used the following weighted-average assumptions:
The weighted-average per share fair value of share options granted to employees during the years ended March 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $16.48, $11.12 and $8.65 per share, respectively.

Year ended March 31, 
2019
2018
2017
Expected term (in years)
6.1
6.1
6.1
Risk-free interest rate
2.7%
2.2%
2.1%
Expected volatility
41.5%
39.8%
41.0%
Expected dividend yield  
—%
—%
—%
Estimated grant date fair value per ordinary share
$37.15
$26.52
$20.22


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Risk-free interest rate from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-0.5
3.9
0.5
0
4.9
Correct choice index: 2