trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Share-Based Compensation
The following table shows a summary of share-based compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the periods presented (in thousands):
Amounts presented above include share-based compensation expense of $0.8 million for fiscal year 2017, which is recorded as discontinued operations related to employees of our Compute business.
As of September 27, 2019, the total unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards and units including awards with time-based, performance-based, and market-based vesting was $47.0 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.

Fiscal Years
2019
2018
2017
Cost of revenue
$2,936
$3,869
$3,189
Research and development
8,551
13,448
10,565
Selling, general and administrative
12,305
14,620
22,581
Total
$23,792
$31,937
$36,335


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average cost of revenue for 2017-2019?
Choices:
9972.33
7141.67
0
3104.67
3331.33
Correct choice index: 4
Contractual obligations
As of December 31, 2019, our contractual obligations were:
(1) See "9. Leases" in Item 8 of this Annual Report for additional information.
(2) Represents the fixed or minimum amounts due under purchase obligations for hosting services and sales and marketing programs
(3) We are unable to reasonably estimate the timing of the cash outflow due to uncertainties in the timing of the effective settlement of tax positions.
(4) Represents the maximum funding that would be expected under existing investment agreements with privately-held companies. Our investment agreements generally allow us to withhold unpaid committed funds at our discretion.
A detailed discussion and analysis of the fiscal year 2017 year-over-year changes can be found in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Payments due by period
(in thousands)
2020
2021 - 2022
2023 - 2024
2025 and thereafter
Other
Total
Operating lease obligations (1)
19,373
36,373
19,683
1,666
-
$77,095
Purchase obligations (2)
$24,800
$8,129
$438
$ -
$ -
$33,367
Liability for uncertain tax positions (3)
-
-
-
-
5,386
$5,386
Investment commitments (4)
1,754
205
-
-
-
$1,959
Total
$45,927
$44,707
$20,121
$1,666
$5,386
$117,807


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage constitution of purchase obligations among the total contractual obligations in 2020?
Choices:
54
-54
1
1489
0
Correct choice index: 0
The Systems gross profit margin decrease year to year was driven by the mix away from IBM Z and margin declines in Power Systems and Storage Systems.
The pre-tax income decline was driven by the strong performance in IBM Z in the prior year and the continued investment in innovation across the Systems portfolio.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018
2017
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent/ Margin Change
Systems
External Systems Hardware gross profit
$2,590
$2,893
(10.5)%
External Systems Hardware gross profit margin
40.7%
44.6%
(3.8)pts
External Operating Systems Software gross profit
$1,412
$1,469
(3.9)%
External Operating Systems Software gross profit margin
84.5%
86.4%
(1.9)pts.
External total gross profit
$4,002
$4,362
(8.2)%
External total gross profit margin
49.8%
53.2%
(3.4)pts.
Pre-tax income
$ 904
$1,128
(19.9)%
Pre-tax margin
10.2%
12.6%
(2.4)pts.


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in External Systems Hardware gross profit from 2017 to 2018
Choices:
-2893
-2904
-303
5483
0
Correct choice index: 2
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 .
gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively .
gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively .
gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 .
there were no gross realized losses for 2003 .
maturities stated are effective maturities .
f .
restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash .
at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements .
g .
property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively .
in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized .
there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment .
additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated .
the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 .
h .
investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc .
( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 .
the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .

2005
2004
Furniture and equipment
$98,387
$90,893
Leasehold improvements
66,318
65,294
Computers
18,971
18,421
Software
18,683
16,411
Total property and equipment, gross
202,359
191,019
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
147,826
126,794
Total property and equipment, net
$54,533
$64,225

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of the 2005 gross total property and equipment value is related to software?
Choices:
0.3479
1
73216
342599.8936
0.3426
Correct choice index: 4
Base Salary
Base salary for our named executive officers is the fixed component of our executive compensation program. We use base salary to compensate our named executive officers for services rendered during the year and to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of each named executive officer. We apply no specific formula to determine adjustments to base salary. Adjustments to base salary have been made to reflect our economic condition and future expected performance. We continue to provide base salaries that are conservative relative to competitive market pay levels.
In April 2018, our compensation committee reviewed the base salaries of Mses. Friar, Henry, Reses and Whiteley, taking into consideration a competitive market analysis performed by Compensia, the recommendations of our CEO and our then-current People Lead, the desire to retain our highly qualified executive team and the other factors described above. Following this review, our compensation committee approved an increase in the annual base salary levels for Mses. Friar, Henry, Reses and Whiteley to $400,000, in each case effective as of April 1, 2018, in order to improve competitive alignment with our peers. In addition, our compensation committee determined that it was appropriate to leave our CEO’s 2018 base salary level at $2.75 per year, at the request of our CEO and with compensation committee approval.
The annualized base salaries of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017 were:
(1) Ms. Friar resigned from her position as Chief Financial Officer, effective as of November 16, 2018, at which time her annual base salary was $400,000.
(2) Ms. Whiteley was appointed to General Counsel and Corporate Secretary effective March 18, 2018, and her salary was adjusted to reflect her promotion to this role.
(3) The base salaries of Messrs. Daswani and Murphy were not adjusted in conjunction with their service as interim co-CFOs. Salary adjustments for Messrs. Daswani and Murphy made in April 2018, prior to their becoming named executive officers, were made as part of the company-wide compensation review program. Their salary adjustments were recommended by their direct manager and approved by the then-current People Lead. Messrs. Daswani and Murphy’s annualized base salaries at the time of their appointment as interim co-CFOs were $300,000 and $295,000, respectively.

Named Executive Officer
Annual Base Salary as of December 31, 2017
Annual Base Salary as of December 31, 2018
Percentage Increase
Mr. Dorsey
$2.75
$2.75
0%
Ms. Friar (1)
$350,000
$N/A
N/A
Ms. Henry
$350,000
$400,000
14%
Ms. Reses
$350,000
$400,000
14%
Ms. Whiteley (2)
$325,000
$400,000
23%
Mr. Daswani (3)
$280,000
$300,000
7%
Mr. Murphy (3)
$270,000
$295,000
9%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Ms Henry's annual base salary between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
50000
75000
750000
-55000
-50000
Correct choice index: 0
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

Shares (thous.)
<i>Weighted-Average</i><i>Grant-Date Fair Value</i>
Nonvested at January 1, 2009
873
$ 50.70
Granted
449
47.28
Vested
(240)
43.23
Forfeited
(22)
53.86
Nonvested at December 31, 2009
1,060
$ 50.88

at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years .
a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants .
5 .
retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans .
qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements .
other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees .
these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses .
the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 .
funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability .
the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets .
the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases .
the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases .
plan assets are measured at fair value .
we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. at december 31 , 2009 , what was the remaining compensation expense per share for the unvested awards?
Choices:
20.75472
-20.75472
0.0009
23.77402
0.9434
Correct choice index: 0
The income tax (benefit) provision was charged to continuing operations or accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as follows:
Prior year balances related to deferred tax assets and liabilities have been recast to net the federal effect of state taxes with the specific deferred tax asset or liability to which it relates

Year Ended December 31,
(dollars in millions)
2019
2018
2017
Income tax (benefit) provision related to:
Continuing operations
$(10.6)
$9.4
$26.7
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
0.2
1.3
(28.3)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the income tax (benefit) provision related to continuing operations in 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
251
36.1
27.8
17.3
-18.9
Correct choice index: 1
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 15 — Shareholders' Equity
A roll forward of common shares outstanding is as follows:

As of December 31,
2019
2018
Balance at beginning of the year
32,750,727
32,938,466
Repurchases
(420,770)
(342,100)
Restricted stock unit issuances
142,449
154,361
Balance at end of period
32,472,406
32,750,727


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Balance at beginning of the year between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
65689193
187739
-187739
-32796017
Correct choice index: 3
Seasonality
The Company’s sales, income and cash flow from operations vary between quarters, and are generally lowest in the first quarter of the from operations vary between quarters, and are generally lowest in the first quarter of the year and highest in the fourth quarter. This is mainly a result of the seasonal purchase patterns of network operators.

Most recent three-year average seasonality
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
Sequential change, sales
-25%
11%
4%
17%
Share of annual sales
22%
24%
25%
29%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in sequential change of sales between second and third quarter?
Choices:
7
0
-4
11
700
Correct choice index: 0
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
Our unrecognized tax benefits totaled $11.2 million and $7.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Included in these amounts are unrecognized tax benefits totaling $10.2 million and $5.4 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
these amounts are unrecognized tax benefits totaling $10.2 million and $5.4 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively,
which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within our global operations in income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized the following income tax expense: $0.5 million, $0.5 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, for the potential payment of interest and penalties. Accrued interest and penalties were $1.7 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. We conduct business globally and, as a result, files income tax returns in the United State federal jurisdiction and in many state and foreign jurisdictions. We are generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local, or non-US income tax examinations for the years before 2012. Due to the expiration of statutes of limitations in multiple jurisdictions globally during 2020, the Company anticipates it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by $3.1 million.

December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Unrecognized tax benefits at January 1,   
(7,113 )   
(7,419 )   
(6,938 ) 
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during a prior period
(2,428 )     
(873 )     
(789 ) 
Gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a Gross amount of decreases in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions taken during a prior period
445
233
145
Gross amount of increases in unrecognized tax benefits as a
result of tax positions taken during the current period
(2,489 )     
(78 )     
-
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits relating to settlements with taxing authorities
-
349
-
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations
346
675
163
Unrecognized tax benefits at December 31,   
(11,239 )   
(7,113 )   
(7,419 ) 


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in unrecognized tax benefits between the start and end of 2017?
Choices:
481
7186
14357
-6065
-481
Correct choice index: 0
Note 11: Income Taxes
The provision for income tax expense (benefit) is as follows (amounts in thousands):
(1) Fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
The Company realized a deferred tax expense (benefit) for fiscal years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017 of ($50.1) million, $0.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions based on changes in judgment about the realizability of deferred tax assets in future years.

Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Current:
Federal
$170
$223
$—
State and local
161
50
62
Foreign
9,966
8,295
4,247
Total current income tax expense from continuing operations
10,297
8,568
4,309
Deferred:
Federal
(43,804)
(807)
(6)
State and local
(773)
(96)
(97)
Foreign (1)
(5,180)
1,467
88
Deferred tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations (1)
(49,757)
564
(15)
Provision for income tax expense (benefit) (1)
$(39,460)
$9,132
$4,294


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in current foreign income tax expense between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
2
4048
-4048
8072
-3641
Correct choice index: 1
Amortization of Intangible Assets: Substantially all of our intangible assets were acquired through our business combinations. We amortize our intangible assets over, and monitor the appropriateness of, the estimated useful lives of these assets. We also periodically review these intangible assets for potential impairment based upon relevant facts and circumstances. Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual report has additional information regarding our intangible assets and related amortization.
Amortization of intangible assets increased in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 primarily due to additional amortization from intangible assets, which primarily included developed technology that we acquired in connection with our recent acquisitions, partially offset by a reduction in expenses associated with certain of our intangible assets that became fully amortized.

Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
Developed technology
$857
13%
14%
$758
Cloud services and license support agreements and related relationships
712
-3%
-3%
731
Other
120
-9%
-9%
131
Total amortization of intangible assets
$1,689
4%
4%
$1,620


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total amount amortized for the categories of cloud services and license support agreements and related relationships and other in 2018?
Choices:
262
131
862
862000000
1820
Correct choice index: 2
Autodesk applies fair value accounting for certain financial assets and liabilities, which consist of cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other financial instruments, on a recurring basis. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require Autodesk to develop its own assumptions. When determining fair value, Autodesk uses observable market data and relies on unobservable inputs only when observable market data is not available. Autodesk reviews for any potential changes on a quarterly basis, in conjunction with our fiscal quarter-end close.
Autodesk's cash equivalents, marketable securities, and financial instruments are primarily classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Autodesk values its securities on pricing from pricing vendors, who may use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly in determining fair value (Level 2). Autodesk's Level 2 securities are valued primarily using observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Autodesk's Level 3 securities consist of investments held in convertible debt securities, and derivative contracts.
A reconciliation of the change in Autodesk’s Level 3 items for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019 was as follows:
(1) Included in “Interest and other expense, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Fair Value Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Derivative Contracts
Convertible Debt Securities
Total
Balances, January 31, 2018
$1.0
$7.8
$8.8
Settlements
—
(3.5)
(3.5)
(Losses) Gains included in earnings (1)
(0.2)
0.5
0.3
Losses included in OCI
—
(0.4)
(0.4)
Balances, January 31, 2019
$0.8
$4.4
$5.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the balances for derivative contracts for 31 January 2018 and 31 January 2019?
Choices:
-2
1.8
0.2
-1.2
-4.2
Correct choice index: 2
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(i) Includes 3,416 shares that have been withheld by the Company to satisfy its tax withholding and remittance obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards. In addition, the Company exercised a pro-rata portion of the 2022 convertible note hedges (described in Note 12, Indebtedness, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) to offset the shares of the Company’s Class A common stock issued to settle the conversion of certain 2022 Notes. The note hedges were net share settled and the Company received 3,643,165 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock from the counterparties in October of 2018.
(ii) Excludes the shares received through the exercise of the note hedges.
(iii) The Company exercised a pro-rata portion of the 2022 convertible note hedges to offset the shares of the Company’s Class A common stock issued to settle the conversion of certain 2022 Notes. The note hedges were net share settled and the Company received 1,096,773 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock from the counterparties in November of 2018.

Period
Total number of Shares purchased
Average price paid per share
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs
Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
October 1 to October 31
3,646,581 (i)
97.28 (ii)
—
—
November 1 to November 30
1,096,773 (iii)
— (ii)
—
—
December 1 to December 31
—
—
—
—
Total
4,743,354
97.28 (ii)
—
—


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average total number of shares purchased?
Choices:
731182
1581
849936
1581118
4743351
Correct choice index: 3