trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
The following table presents the components of impairment and other charges, net, in each fiscal year (in thousands):
Restructuring costs decreased by $2.2 million as a result of lower severance expenses, as our general and administrative cost reduction initiative came to its conclusion as planned. Costs of closed restaurants and other increased by $3.8 million, primarily due to a $3.5 million charge recorded in 2019 related to the write- off of software development costs associated with a discontinued technology project. Gains on disposition of property and equipment, net, increased by $7.9 million, primarily due to a $5.7 million gain related to a sale of property and a$0.8 million gain related to an eminent domain transaction in 2019.
Refer to Note 9, Impairment and Other Charges, Net, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding these charges.

2019
2018
Restructuring costs
$8,455
$10,647
Costs of closed restaurants and other
8,628
4,803
(Gains) losses on disposition of property and equipment, net
(6,244)
1,627
Accelerated depreciation
1,616
1,130
Operating restaurant impairment charges
—
211
$12,455
$18,418


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average restructuring costs for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
5027
19102
8683
4228
9551
Correct choice index: 4
performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and two customized peer groups .
the old peer group includes intercontinentalexchange , inc. , nyse euronext and the nasdaq omx group inc .
the new peer group is the same as the old peer group with the addition of cboe holdings , inc .
which completed its initial public offering in june 2010 .
an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , an old peer group and a new peer group 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 cme group inc .
s&p 500 old peer group *$ 100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 31 .
copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved .
new peer group the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
CME Group Inc.
$139.48
$188.81
$58.66
$96.37
$93.73
S&P 500
115.80
122.16
76.96
97.33
111.99
Old Peer Group
155.58
190.78
72.25
76.11
87.61
New Peer Group
155.58
190.78
72.25
76.11
87.61

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the year 2006 , what is the percentual fluctuation of the return provided by s&p 500 and the one provided by old peer group?
Choices:
-71.38
-15.8
39.78
139.78
37.11
Correct choice index: 2
tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow are considered non-gaap financial measures .
we are required to provide these financial metrics by the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , and we have included them below because we consider the indentures for these notes to be material agreements , the covenants related to tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow to be material terms of the indentures , and information about compliance with such covenants to be material to an investor 2019s understanding of our financial results and the impact of those results on our liquidity .
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Tower Cash Flow, for the three months ended December 31, 2008
$188,449
Consolidated Cash Flow, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008
726,954
Less: Tower Cash Flow, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008
(741,565)
Plus: four times Tower Cash Flow, for the three months ended December 31, 2008
753,798
Adjusted Consolidated Cash Flow, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008
739,187
Non-Tower Cash Flow, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008
$(14,611)

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2008 is related to tower cash flow?
Choices:
-1.01977
1
1492985
-51.59113
1.01977
Correct choice index: 4
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Measurement PointDecember 31
The Priceline Group Inc.
NASDAQComposite Index
S&P 500Index
RDG InternetComposite
2010
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
2011
117.06
100.53
102.11
102.11
2012
155.27
116.92
118.45
122.23
2013
290.93
166.19
156.82
199.42
2014
285.37
188.78
178.29
195.42
2015
319.10
199.95
180.75
267.25

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the growth of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015
Choices:
2.1182
-251.64
33.73
-0.1182
0.1182
Correct choice index: 4
Summary of Consolidated Cash Flows
The below table summarizes the cash provided or used in our activities and the amount of the respective changes between the periods (in millions):
Operating Activities Cash provided by operating activities was $110.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $341.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The $230.9 million decrease was the result of the recapture of reinsurance treaties by our Insurance segment in 2018 and was offset in part by improved performance of the Insurance segment subsequent to the KIC acquisition, significant reduction of losses at the Broadcasting segment driven by the cost cutting measures, and an increase in the working capital at our Telecommunications segments.
Investing Activities Cash used in investing activities was $263.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to cash used in investing activities of $224.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The $39.1 million increase in cash used was a result of (i) an increase in net cash spent at our Insurance segment driven by purchases of investments from the residual cash received from the KIC acquisition and reinsurance recaptures in 2018, (ii) a decrease in cash proceeds received at our Life Sciences segment, from the 2018 upfront payment and 2019 escrow release related to the sale of BeneVir in the prior period, and (iii) an increase in cash used at our Energy segment to acquire ampCNG stations in 2019. These decreases were largely offset by a reduction in cash used by our Construction segment, driven by the acquisition of GrayWolf in 2018, and a reduction in cash used by our Broadcasting segment as less cash was used on its acquisitions in the current year compared to 2018.
This was largely offset by a reduction in net cash used by the Insurance segment's purchases of investments, as in the prior period the Insurance segment purchased investments from the cash received from the acquisition of KIC.
Financing Activities Cash provided by financing activities was $62.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to $115.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The $52.8 million decrease was a result of a decrease in net borrowings by the Construction and Broadcasting segments, and offset in part by the increase in net borrowings by the Energy segment and Corporate segment, and a decline in cash paid to noncontrolling interest holders driven by the proceeds from our Life Sciences segment's sale of BeneVir in 2018.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Increase / (Decrease)
Operating activities
$110.5
$341.4
$(230.9)
Investing activities
(263.7)
(224.6)
(39.1)
Financing activities
62.4
115.2
(52.8)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
1.0
(0.5)
1.5
Net decrease in cash,cash equivalents and restricted cash
$(89.8)
$231.5
$(321.3)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average investing activities?
Choices:
488.3
-486.3
-247.3
-244.15
-19.55
Correct choice index: 3
16. Segment, Geographic, and Significant Customer Information
With the exception of property and equipment, we do not identify or allocate our long-lived assets by geographic area. The following table presents property and equipment information for geographic areas based on the physical location of the assets (in millions):

April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
U.S.
$ 572
$ 566
International
187
190
Total
$ 759
$ 756


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in U.S. property and equipment between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
6
-550
578
385
382
Correct choice index: 0
performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

12/11
12/12
12/13
12/14
12/15
12/16
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
100.00
139.36
198.03
350.40
437.09
362.38
S&P 500
100.00
116.00
153.58
174.60
177.01
198.18
Dow Jones US Travel & Leisure
100.00
113.33
164.87
191.85
203.17
218.56

the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested .
past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage increase of the s&p 500 from 2011 to 2016?
Choices:
98.18
19.64
654.53
0.98
0
Correct choice index: 0
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense .
the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price .
as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt .
in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana .
grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million .
the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 .
system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 .
at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value .
in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy .
system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements .
for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation .
however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes .
consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Amount (In Thousands)
2017
$17,188
2018
17,188
2019
17,188
2020
17,188
2021
17,188
Years thereafter
257,812
Total
343,752
Less: Amount representing interest
309,393
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$34,359

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the total future minimum lease payments is used for interest in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions?
Choices:
90.00471
1.11105
1
9.00471
0.90005
Correct choice index: 4
Segment operating results
Enterprise Security segment
Revenue increased $199 million primarily due to increases of $331 million in revenue from sales of our network and web security solutions and $36 million from sales of endpoint and information protection solutions, partially offset by a $184 million decrease in revenue as a result of the divestiture of our WSS and PKI solutions. Revenue during fiscal 2018 was also unfavorably affected by a shift in the mix of sales towards subscription and cloud-delivered solutions subject to ratable revenue recognition, which resulted in less in-period recognized revenue and more revenue deferred to the balance sheet as compared to fiscal 2017. Operating income increased $286 million primarily due to higher revenue discussed above, a $51 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses and a $38 million decrease in cost of revenues.

Fiscal Year
Variance in
(In millions, except for percentages)
2018
2017
Dollars
Percent
Net revenues
$2,554
$2,355
$199
8%
Percentage of total net revenues
53%
59%
Operating income
$473
$187
$286
153%
Operating margin
19%
8%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Operating income for fiscal 2018 and 2017?
Choices:
-330
187
660
330
336
Correct choice index: 3
entergy texas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased by $ 14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
2010 compared to 2009 net income increased by $ 2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower other income , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$540.2
Retail electric price
36.0
Volume/weather
21.3
Purchased power capacity
(24.6)
Other
4.9
2011 net revenue
$577.8

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions , including an annual base rate increase of $ 59 million beginning august 2010 , with an additional increase of $ 9 million beginning may 2011 , as a result of the settlement of the december 2009 rate case .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 gwh , or 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year .
usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% ( 8.2 % ) primarily in the chemicals and refining industries .
the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Choices:
280
289.1
0.6
558
560.0
Correct choice index: 4
NOTE 17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Financial instruments include:
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable equal their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

December 31,
2018
2019
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
285,907
497,874
Accounts receivable
173,450
199,535
Financial liabilities:
Accounts payable
80,640
119,712


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the financial equity in 2018?
Choices:
173450
-378717
324979
205267
378717
Correct choice index: 4
Historically, a small number of OEM customers have accounted for a substantial portion of our net revenues, and we expect that significant customer concentration will continue for the foreseeable future. Many of our OEMs use contract manufacturers to manufacture their equipment. Accordingly, a significant percentage of our net revenues is derived from sales to these contract manufacturers and to consignment warehouses.
In addition, a significant portion of our sales are made to foreign and domestic distributors who resell our products to OEMs, as well as their contract manufacturers. Direct sales to contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses accounted for 41.3%, 34.9% and 39.0% of our net revenues for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Sales to foreign and domestic distributors accounted for 56.0%, 62.5% and 57.5% of our net revenues for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The following direct customers accounted for 10% or more of our net revenues in one or more of the following periods:
Nokia was our largest customer in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017. Nokia purchases products directly from us and through contract manufacturers and distributors. Based on information provided to us by its contract manufacturers and our distributors, purchases by Nokia represented approximately 45%, 36% and 41% of our net revenues in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Our revenues have been substantially impacted by significant fluctuations in sales to Nokia, and we expect that future direct and indirect sales to Nokia will continue to fluctuate substantially on a quarterly basis and that such fluctuations may significantly affect our operating results in future periods. To our knowledge, none of our other OEM customers accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues in fiscal 2019, 2018 or 2017.

Fiscal Year Ended
March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses:       
Flextronics Technology
21.8%
14.0%
10.4%
Sanmina
17.7
16.0
20.4
Distributors:       
Avnet Logistics
31.3
35.3
25.5
Nexcomm 
14.8
16.1
19.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the revenues from Sanmina from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
27.2
0
283.2
1.7
33.7
Correct choice index: 3
5.0 FY 2019 Financial Performance and Analysis
The discussions in this section relate to the consolidated, Rupee-denominated financial results pertaining to the year that ended March 31, 2019. The financial statements of Tata Consultancy Services Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as ‘TCS’ or ‘the Company’) are prepared in accordance with the Indian Accounting Standards (referred to as ‘Ind AS’) prescribed under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, as amended from time to time. Significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the financial statements are disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
The following table gives an overview of the consolidated financial results of the Company:
* EPS is adjusted for bonus issue

` crore
FY 2019
% of Revenue
% Growth
FY 2018
% of Revenue
Revenue
146,463
100.0
19.0
123,104
100.0
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (before other income)
39,506
27.0
21.5
32,516
26.4
Profit Before Tax (PBT)
41,563
28.4
21.9
34,092
27.7
Profit after tax attributable to shareholders of the Company
31,472
21.5
21.9
25,826
21.0
Earnings per share (in `)
83.05
-
23.8
67.10*
-


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the amount of expenses incurred for FY 2019?
Choices:
106957
-106957
1070
0
-39478
Correct choice index: 0
the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 14 .
leases ( continued ) to the sale transaction on april 12 , 1999 .
therefore , the remaining outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Remainder of 1999
$7,606
2000
7,583
2001
4,891
2002
3,054
2003
1,415
Thereafter
1,178
Total
$25,727

15 .
sale of assets in the second quarter of 1996 , packaging entered into an agreement to form a joint venture with caraustar industries whereby packaging sold its two recycled paperboard mills and a fiber recycling operation and brokerage business to the joint venture in return for cash and a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture .
proceeds from the sale were approximately $ 115 million and the group recognized a $ 50 million pretax gain ( $ 30 million after taxes ) in the second quarter of 1996 .
in june , 1998 , packaging sold its remaining 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture to caraustar industries for cash and a note of $ 26000000 .
the group recognized a $ 15 million pretax gain on this transaction .
at april 11 , 1999 , the balance of the note with accrued interest is $ 27122000 .
the note was paid in june , 1999 .
16 .
subsequent events on august 25 , 1999 , pca and packaging agreed that the acquisition consideration should be reduced as a result of a postclosing price adjustment by an amount equal to $ 20 million plus interest through the date of payment by packaging .
the group recorded $ 11.9 million of this amount as part of the impairment charge on the accompanying financial statements , representing the amount that was previously estimated by packaging .
pca intends to record the remaining amount in september , 1999 .
in august , 1999 , pca signed purchase and sales agreements with various buyers to sell approximately 405000 acres of timberland .
pca has completed the sale of approximately 260000 of these acres and expects to complete the sale of the remaining acres by mid-november , 1999. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the total in thousands in minimum rental payments in 2000 and 2001?
Choices:
5006
10637
33310
6069
12474.0
Correct choice index: 4