trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases at may 31 , 2013 were as follows : fiscal years ending may 31: .

2014
$11,057
2015
8,985
2016
7,378
2017
6,700
2018
6,164
Thereafter
16,812
Total future minimum lease payments
$57,096

we are party to a number of claims and lawsuits incidental to our business .
in our opinion , the liabilities , if any , which may ultimately result from the outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations .
operating taxes we define operating taxes as taxes that are unrelated to income taxes , such as sales , property , value-add and other business taxes .
during the course of operations , we must interpret the meaning of various operating tax matters in the united states and in the foreign jurisdictions in which we do business .
taxing authorities in those various jurisdictions may arrive at different interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to such operating tax matters , which could result in the payment of additional taxes in those jurisdictions .
as of may 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we did not have liabilities for contingencies related to operating tax items based on management 2019s best estimate given our history with similar matters and interpretations of current laws and regulations .
bin/ica agreements we have entered into sponsorship or depository and processing agreements with certain banks .
these agreements allow us to use the banks 2019 identification numbers , referred to as bank identification number ( 201cbin 201d ) for visa transactions and interbank card association ( 201cica 201d ) number for mastercard transactions , to clear credit card transactions through visa and mastercard .
certain of such agreements contain financial covenants , and we were in compliance with all such covenants as of may 31 , 2013 .
our canadian visa sponsorship , which was originally obtained through a canadian financial institution , expired in march 2011 .
we have filed an application with the office of the superintendent of financial institutions canada ( 201cosfi 201d ) for the formation of a wholly owned loan company in canada which would serve as our financial institution sponsor .
on december 12 , 2012 , the loan company received a restricted order to commence and carry on business from osfi which will enable the loan company to become a direct visa member at such time that global payments concludes the appropriate bin transfer process with visa .
in march 2011 , we obtained temporary direct participation in the visa canada system , while the loan company application was pending .
we anticipate that the bin transfer process with visa will be completed by september 30 , 2013. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the future minimum lease payments are due in the next 12 months?
Choices:
68153
-0.19366
5.16379
1.49864
0.19366
Correct choice index: 4
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense .
the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price .
as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt .
in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana .
grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million .
the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 .
system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 .
at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value .
in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy .
system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements .
for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation .
however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes .
consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Amount (In Thousands)
2017
$17,188
2018
17,188
2019
17,188
2020
17,188
2021
17,188
Years thereafter
257,812
Total
343,752
Less: Amount representing interest
309,393
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$34,359

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the total future minimum lease payment for entergy louisiana will be used for interest payments?
Choices:
2.26
0.04
0
44.83
25
Correct choice index: 1
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly results for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follow (in thousands, except per share amounts).

June 30,
2019
March 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
September 30,
2018
Net revenues 
$252,359
$250,864
$252,680
$239,886
Gross profit 
$138,946
$138,919
$141,299
$132,071
Net (loss) income (1) 
$(17,055)
$(6,932)
$7,199
$(9,065)
Net (loss) income per share – basic 
$(0.14)
$(0.06)
$0.06
$(0.08)
Net (loss) income per share – diluted 
$(0.14)
$(0.06)
$0.06
$(0.08)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the net revenues between March 31 and June 30, 2019?
Choices:
1495
-1495
1816
1
1495000000
Correct choice index: 0
entergy mississippi , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider .
2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2006 net revenue
$466.1
Base revenue
7.9
Volume/weather
4.5
Transmission revenue
4.1
Transmission equalization
4.0
Reserve equalization
3.8
Attala costs
(10.2)
Other
6.7
2007 net revenue
$486.9

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .
the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 .
billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh .
the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector .
the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 .
the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies .
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the net change in net revenue in 2007 compare to 2006?
Choices:
-462.1
20.8
85.3
953
0
Correct choice index: 1
Cubic Mission Solutions
Sales: CMS sales increased 23% to $207.0 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $168.9 million in 2017. The increase in sales was primarily due to increased orders and shipments of expeditionary satellite communications products, tactical networking products, and Command and Control, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C2ISR) products and services. Businesses acquired during fiscal years 2018 and 2017 whose operations are included in our CMS operating segment had sales of $5.6 million and $1.5 million for fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Amortization of Purchased Intangibles: Amortization of purchased intangibles included in the CMS results amounted to $20.8 million in 2018 and $23.6 million in 2017. The $2.8 million decrease in amortization expense is related to purchased intangible assets that are amortized based upon accelerated methods.
Operating Income: CMS had an operating loss of $0.1 million in 2018 compared to $9.3 million in 2017. CMS realized increased profits from expeditionary satellite communications products, tactical networking products, and C2ISR products and services. As mentioned above, amortization of purchased intangibles decreased to $20.8 million in 2018 compared to $23.6 million in 2017. CMS increased R&D expenditures between 2017 and 2018 by $10.8 million, primarily driven by development of new antenna technologies. Businesses acquired by CMS in fiscal years 2018 and 2017 incurred operating losses of $4.7 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $2.9 million in fiscal 2017. Included in the operating loss incurred by acquired businesses are acquisition transaction costs of $1.6 million and $1.8 million incurred in fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA: CMS Adjusted EBITDA increased 82% to $26.2 million in 2018 compared to $14.4 million in 2017.
The increase in CMS Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to the same items described in the operating income section
above, excluding the changes in amortization expense and acquisition transaction costs discussed above as such items are
excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

Fiscal 2018
Fiscal 2017
% Change
(in millions)
Sales
$  207.0
$  168.9
23 %
Operating loss
(0.1)
(9.3)
(99)
Adjusted EBITDA
26.2
14.4
82


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in sales in 2018?
Choices:
375.9
205.4
0
-38.1
38.1
Correct choice index: 4
A discussion of operating income by reportable segment is presented below (in millions):
AMER. Operating income increased $19.2 million in fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018, primarily as a result of the increase in net sales and a positive shift in customer mix, partially offset by increased fixed costs to support new program ramps.
APAC. Operating income decreased $5.7 million in fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018, primarily as a result of a negative shift in customer mix and increased fixed costs to support new program ramps, partially offset by the increase in net sales.
EMEA. Operating income increased $3.0 million in fiscal 2019 as compared to fiscal 2018 primarily as a result of the increase in net sales and a positive shift in customer mix, partially offset by increased fixed costs to support new program ramps.
Other expense. Other expense for fiscal 2019 increased $5.4 million as compared to fiscal 2018. The increase in other expense for fiscal 2019 was primarily due to a $2.7 million decrease in interest income as a result of lower cash balances and a $1.5 million increase in factoring fees related to the Company's accounts receivable sale programs.

2019
2018
Operating income (loss):
AMER 
$57.8
$38.6
APAC 
208.2
213.9
EMEA 
4.5
1.5
Corporate and other costs 
(128.4)
(135.7)
Total operating income
$142.1
$118.3


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in the total operating income between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-208.54
16.75
23.8
497.06
20.12
Correct choice index: 4
Note A: Beginning from June 2015, the Company accounts for its investment in FARADAY as an associate given the fact that the Company obtained the ability to exercise significant influence over FARADAY through representation on its Board of Directors.
Note B: WINAICO SOLAR PROJEKT 1 GMBH and WINAICO IMMOBILIEN GMBH are joint ventures to the Company.
Note C: The Company follows international accounting practices in equity accounting for limited partnerships and uses the equity method to account for these investees.
The carrying amount of investments accounted for using the equity method for which there are published price quotations amounted to NT$1,733 million and NT$1,750 million, as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The fair value of these investments were NT$1,621 million and NT$2,244 million, as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

As of December 31,
2018
2019
Investee companies
Amount
Percentage of ownership or voting rights
Amount
Percentage of ownership or voting rights
NT$ (In Thousands)
NT$ (In Thousands)
Listed companies
CLIENTRON CORP.
$249,663
22.39
$276,515
21.90
FARADAY TECHNOLOGY CORP. (FARADAY) (Note A)
1,483,111
13.78
1,473,028
13.78
Unlisted companies
MTIC HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.
3,026
45.44
18,157
45.44
WINAICO IMMOBILIEN GMBH (Note B)
—
44.78
—
44.78
PURIUMFIL INC.
—
—
7,164
44.45
UNITECH CAPITAL INC.
568,005
42.00
642,660
42.00
TRIKNIGHT CAPITAL CORPORATION
1,520,575
40.00
2,281,631
40.00
HSUN CHIEH INVESTMENT CO., LTD.
1,608,551
36.49
1,686,502
36.49
YANN YUAN INVESTMENT CO., LTD.
2,032,013
30.87
2,761,821
30.87
HSUN CHIEH CAPITAL CORP.
161,319
30.00
122,060
30.00
VSENSE CO., LTD.
31,544
26.89
592
25.90
UNITED LED CORPORATION HONG KONG LIMITED
167,953
25.14
121,973
25.14
TRANSLINK CAPITAL PARTNERS I, L.P. (Note C)
120,440
10.38
172,414
10.38
WINAICO SOLAR PROJEKT 1 GMBH (Note B)
—
50.00
—
—
YUNG LI INVESTMENTS, INC.
2,213
45.16
—
—
Total
$7,948,413
$9,564,517


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average amount of investments of listed companies in 2019?
Choices:
0
1079.3
43738.6
874771.5
736520.9
Correct choice index: 3
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table contains information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of CalAmp or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act), of our common stock during the following months of our fourth quarter ended February 28, 2019:
(1) Average price paid per share for shares purchased as part of our share repurchase program (includes brokerage commissions).
(2) On December 10, 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $20.0 million of our outstanding common stock over the next 12 months. As of February 28, 2019, $10.0 million of the $20.0 million had been utilized. Our share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares. Under the program, shares may be repurchased in privately negotiated and/or open market transactions, including under plans complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act.

Total Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid per Share (1)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that may be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
December 1 - December 31, 2018
75,000
$12.96
75,000
$19,028,173
January 1 - January 31, 2019
524,577
$14.00
524,577
$11,685,543
February 1 - February 28, 2019
116,042
$14.53
116,042
$10,000,013
Total
715,619
$13.97
715,619
$10,000,013


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How many shares were purchased in 2019?
Choices:
17937332
599577
6406
831661
640619
Correct choice index: 4
the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s .
dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: .

October 30, 2010
October 31, 2009
Fair value of forward exchange contracts asset
$7,256
$8,367
Fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset
$22,062
$20,132
Fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability
$(7,396)
$(6,781)

fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s .
dollar .
in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive .
our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in the fair value of forward exchange contracts asset from 2009 to 2010?
Choices:
0
7255.86722
-1111
-111.1
-0.13278
Correct choice index: 4
entergy mississippi , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs .
other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider .
there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider .
2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2006 net revenue
$466.1
Base revenue
7.9
Volume/weather
4.5
Transmission revenue
4.1
Transmission equalization
4.0
Reserve equalization
3.8
Attala costs
(10.2)
Other
6.7
2007 net revenue
$486.9

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .
the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 .
billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh .
the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector .
the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 .
the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies .
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in net revenue in 2007 compare to 2006?
Choices:
486.9
1.03025
466.14463
0
0.04463
Correct choice index: 4
jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 .

December 31,(in dollars)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
JPMorgan Chase
$100.00
$136.18
$186.17
$204.57
$221.68
$298.31
KBW Bank Index
100.00
133.03
183.26
200.42
201.40
258.82
S&P Financial Index
100.00
128.75
174.57
201.06
197.92
242.94
S&P 500 Index
100.00
115.99
153.55
174.55
176.95
198.10

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the 5 year return of jpmorgan chase's stock?
Choices:
1.9831
0.3949
98.31
9.9155
0.6648
Correct choice index: 0