trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
(1) Vessel Calendar Days is the total number of days the vessels were in our fleet.
(2) Time Charter Equivalent (“TCE”) Rate, results from Net Voyage Revenue divided by total TCE days.
The change in Voyage revenue is due to two main factors:
i)  The number of TCE days
ii)  The change in the TCE rate achieved.
With regards to i), the decrease in vessel calendar days is mainly due to the disposal of ten vessels in 2018, offset by three 2018 Newbuildings delivered in the latter part of 2018.
With regards to ii), the TCE rate increased by $8,560, or 65.4%. The indicative rates presented by Clarksons Shipping increased by 91.7% for the twelve months of 2019 compared to the same twelve months in 2018 to $31,560 from $16,466, respectively. The rates presented by Clarksons Shipping were significantly influenced by the spike in the Suezmax tanker rates in the fourth quarter of both 2019 and 2018. Our average TCE was also positively impacted by the increased tanker rates towards the end of 2019, but not to the same extent as the rates reported by Clarksons Shipping. We expect this spike to materialize to a larger extent in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the rates reported by Clarksons Shipping.
As a result of i) and ii) net voyage revenues increased by 41.5% from $124.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, to $175.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Years Ended December 31,    
All figures in USD ‘000, except TCE rate per day 
2019
2018
Variance 
Voyage Revenue  
317,220
289,016
9.8%
Less Voyage expenses  
(141,770)
(165,012)
(14.1%)
Net Voyage Revenue  
175,450
124,004
41.5%
Vessel Calendar Days (1)  
8,395
9,747
(13.9%)
Less off-hire days  
293
277
5.8%
Total TCE days  
8,102
9,470
(14.4%)
TCE Rate per day (2) 
$21,655
$13,095
65.4%)
Total Days for vessel operating expenses
8,395
9,747
(13.9%)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average voyage expenses in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1
153391
334550
0
11621
Correct choice index: 1
Underlying effective tax rate
The underlying effective tax rate is calculated by dividing taxation excluding the tax impact of non-underlying items by profit before tax excluding the impact of non-underlying items and share of net profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates. This measure reflects the underlying tax rate in relation to profit before tax excluding non-underlying items before tax and share of net profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates.
Tax impact on non-underlying items within operating profit is the sum of the tax on each non-underlying item, based on the applicable country tax rates and tax treatment. This is shown in the table:
(a) Restated following adoption of IFRS 16. See note 1 and note 24 for further details.
(b) Refer to note 3 for further details on these items.
(c) Excludes €3 million (2018: €32 million) gain on disposal of spreads business by the joint venture in Portugal which is included in the share of net profit/(loss) of joint ventures and associates line. Including the gain, total non-underlying items not in operating profit but within net profit before tax is €35 million (2018: €154 million). See note 3.

€ million
€ million
2019
2018
(Restated)(a)
Taxation
2,263
2,572
Tax impact of:
Non-underlying items within operating profit(b)
309
(259)
Non-underlying items not in operating profit  Taxation before tax impact of non-underlying
(196)
(29)
Taxation before tax impact of non-underlying
2,376
2,284
Profit before taxation
8,289
12,360
Non-underlying items within operating profit before tax(b)
1,239
(3,176)
Non-underlying items not in operating profit but within net profit before tax(c)
(32)
(122)
Share of net (profit)/loss of joint ventures and associates
(176)
(185)
Profit before tax excluding non-underlying items before tax and share of net profit/ (loss) of joint ventures and associates
9,320
8,877
Underlying effective tax rate
25.5%
25.7%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in Profit before taxation from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-4071
5913
-12325
0
20649
Correct choice index: 0
Restricted Stock Units
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock unit activity is as follows:
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
Performance-based restricted stock units are eligible to vest at the end of each fiscal year in a three-year performance period based on the Company’s annual growth rate in net sales and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (subject to certain adjustments) over a multiple of four times the related results for the fourth quarter of 2018 relative to the growth rates for a peer group of companies for the same metrics and periods.
For the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2019, 60% of each performance-based award is subject to the net sales metric for the performance period and 40% is subject to the non-GAAP diluted earnings per share metric for the performance period. The maximum percentage for a particular metric is2 50% of the target number of units subject to the award related to that metric, however, vesting of the performance stock units is capped at 30% and 100%, respectively, of the target number of units subject to the award in years one and two, respectively, of the three-year performance period.
As of December 31, 2019, the Company believes that it is probable that the Company will achieve performance metrics specified in the award agreement based on its expected revenue and non-GAAP diluted EPS results over the performance period and calculated growth rates relative to its peers’ expected results based on data available, as defined in the award agreement.

Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant-Date
(in thousands)
Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
3,263
$20.23
Granted
1,580
23.23
Vested
(1,541)
20.16
Canceled
(378)
21.52
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
2,924
21.72


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the outstanding from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
1
0
6187
-1106157
-339
Correct choice index: 4
nbcuniversal media , llc consolidated statement of comprehensive income .

Year ended December 31 (in millions)
2015
2014
2013
Net income
$3,624
$3,297
$2,122
Deferred gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net
(21)
25
(5)
Employee benefit obligations, net
60
(106)
95
Currency translation adjustments, net
(121)
(62)
(41)
Comprehensive income
3,542
3,154
2,171
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
(210)
(182)
(154)
Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
29
—
—
Comprehensive income attributable to NBCUniversal
$3,361
$2,972
$2,017

see accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements .
147 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2014 to 2015?
Choices:
-0.26952
389
0.13089
1
0.12334
Correct choice index: 2
Operating Income
Our operating income in fiscal year 2019 increased to $241.4 million, or 10.1 percent of net sales as compared with $189.3 million, or 8.8 percent of net sales in fiscal year 2018. Excluding surcharge revenue and special items, adjusted operating margin was 12.5 percent for the fiscal year 2019 and 10.6 percent for the same period a year ago. The increase in the operating margin reflects steady demand and improved product mix coupled with operating cost improvements offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses compared to the same period a year ago.
The following presents our operating income and operating margin, in each case excluding the impact of surcharge on net sales and special items. We present and discuss these financial measures because management believes removing the impact of these items provides a more consistent and meaningful basis for comparing results of operations from period to period. See the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for further discussion of these financial measures.

Fiscal Year
($ in millions)
2019
2018
Net sales
$2,380.2
$2,157.7
Less: surcharge revenue
438.1
365.4
Net sales excluding surcharge revenue
$1,942.1
$1,792.3
Operating income
$241.4
$189.3
Special items:
Acquisition-related costs
1.2
—
Adjusted operating income excluding special items
$242.6
$189.3
Operating margin
10.1%
8.8%
Adjusted operating margin excluding surcharge revenue and special items
12.5%
10.6%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the amount of surcharge revenue from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-352.9
1576.7
-72.7
72.7
803.5
Correct choice index: 3
Effect of ASC 606 as of December 31, 2018 and for the Year Ended December 31, 2018
The following table summarizes the effect of adopting ASC 606 on our Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions):

As reported December 31, 2018
Effect of ASC 606 adoption
Amounts without adoption of ASC 606 December 31, 2018
Trade receivables, net
$172.3
$6.9
$179.2
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
67.3
(14.4)
52.9
Receivables from related parties
6.2
4.8
11.0
Computer software, net
405.6
(3.7)
401.9
Deferred contract costs, net
161.3
(17.2)
144.1
Other non-current assets
125.6
(7.0)
118.6
Total assets
3,653.4
(30.6)
3,622.8
Deferred revenues (current)
52.9
4.1
57.0
Deferred revenues (non-current)
106.8
(4.3)
102.5
Deferred income taxes
220.9
(8.1)
212.8
Total liabilities
1,866.9
(8.3)
1,858.6
Retained earnings
381.1
(22.3)
358.8
Total equity
1,786.5
(22.3)
1,764.2
Total liabilities and equity
3,653.4
(30.6)
3,622.8


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the reported amount in 2018 between net computer software and net deferred contract costs?
Choices:
3492.1
244.3
-244.3
0
261.5
Correct choice index: 1
Note 9. Receivables, Net
Receivables, net consisted of the following (in thousands):

December 31,
2019
2018
Trade accounts receivable, current
$378,616
$338,473
Income taxes receivable
1,571
916
Other
13,440
11,132
Receivables, gross
393,627
350,521
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
3,480
3,096
Receivables,net
$390,147
$347,425
Allowance for doubtful accounts as a percent of trade accounts receivable, current
0.9%
0.9%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Income taxes receivable in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
655
337557
349605
1562
0
Correct choice index: 0
entergy louisiana , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above .
the increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas .
other regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff .
2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

(In Millions)
2002 net revenue
$922.9
Deferred fuel cost revisions
59.1
Asset retirement obligation
8.2
Volume
(16.2)
Vidalia settlement
(9.2)
Other
8.9
2003 net revenue
$973.7

the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs .
the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 .
see "critical accounting estimates" for more details on sfas 143 .
the increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income .
the volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory .
billed usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy louisiana , inc.?
Choices:
2.05504
0.05217
0.05504
-0.05504
-5.52174
Correct choice index: 2
Applying the German group tax rate to the reported pre-tax result would result in an income tax expense of €216 million (2017/18: €176 million). The deviation of €81 million (2017/18: €40 million) from the reported tax expense of €298 million (2017/18: €216 million) can be reconciled as follows:
1 Adjustment of previous year according to explanation in notes.
The item ‘effects of differing national tax rates’ includes a deferred tax revenue of €6 million (2017/18: €23 million) from tax rate changes.
Tax expenses and income relating to other periods of the previous year include a repayment of approximately €20 million because of a retrospective change in foreign law in 2018.
Tax holidays for the current year include effects from real estate transactions in the amount of €30 million (2017/18: €2 million).

€ million
2017/2018
2018/2019
EBT (earnings before taxes)
576
709
Expected income tax expenses (30.53%)
176
216
Effects of differing national tax rates
−58
−62
Tax expenses and income relating to other periods
−21
−6
Non-deductible business expenses for tax purposes
41
51
Effects of not recognised or impaired deferred taxes
79
114
Additions and reductions for local taxes
11
13
Tax holidays
−14
−39
Other deviations
3
5
Income tax expenses according to the income statement
216
298
Group tax rate
37.6%
42.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in EBT in 2018/2019 from 2017/2018?
Choices:
-133
1285
133
1
0
Correct choice index: 2
Movements in total self‐insured risks, restructuring, onerous contracts, store exit costs, and other provisions
(1) The increase in restructuring, onerous contracts, and store exit costs in 2019 is primarily attributable to the recognition of provisions associated with the BIG W network review as outlined in Note 1.4.
A provision is recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made as to the amount of the obligation. The amount recognised is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the reporting date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation.
A liability is recognised for benefits accruing to employees in respect of annual leave and long service leave.
Liabilities expected to be settled within 12 months are measured at their nominal values using the remuneration rate expected to apply at the time of settlement.
Liabilities which are not expected to be settled within 12 months are measured as the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made by the Group in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date.
The provision for self-insured risks primarily represents the estimated liability for workers’ compensation and public liability claims.
Provision for restructuring is recognised when the Group has developed a detailed formal plan for the restructuring and has raised a valid expectation in those affected by the restructuring that the restructuring will occur.
An onerous contract is a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it. The unavoidable costs under a contract reflect the least net cost of exiting from the contract, which is the lower of the cost of fulfilling it and any compensation or penalties arising from failure to fulfil it.

RESTRUCTURING, ONEROUS
CONTRACTS, STORE EXIT COSTS,
SELF‑INSURED RISKS
AND OTHER
2019
2018
2019
2018
$M
$M
$M
$M
Movement:
Balance at start of period
596
593
679
800
Net provisions recognised/(reversed) (1)
177
161
225
55
Cash payments
(157)
(148)
(162)
(178)
Other
(13)
(10)
(5)
2
Balance at end of period
603
596
737
679
Current
173
177
280
256
Non‑current
430
419
457
423
603
596
737
679


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average cash payments for self-insured risks for both years?
Choices:
154.5
152.5
0.2
71.5
148
Correct choice index: 1
does not believe are in our and our stockholders 2019 best interest .
the rights plan is intended to protect stockholders in the event of an unfair or coercive offer to acquire the company and to provide our board of directors with adequate time to evaluate unsolicited offers .
the rights plan may prevent or make takeovers or unsolicited corporate transactions with respect to our company more difficult , even if stockholders may consider such transactions favorable , possibly including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares .
item 1b .
unresolved staff comments item 2 .
properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our significant properties used in connection with switching centers , data centers , call centers and warehouses were as follows: .

Approximate Number
Approximate Size in Square Feet
Switching centers
57
1,400,000
Data centers
8
600,000
Call center
16
1,300,000
Warehouses
16
500,000

as of december 31 , 2016 , we leased approximately 60000 cell sites .
as of december 31 , 2016 , we leased approximately 2000 t-mobile and metropcs retail locations , including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17000 square feet .
we currently lease office space totaling approximately 950000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in bellevue , washington .
we use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes .
we also lease space throughout the u.s. , totaling approximately 1200000 square feet as of december 31 , 2016 , for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative , engineering and sales purposes .
item 3 .
legal proceedings see note 12 2013 commitments and contingencies of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k for information regarding certain legal proceedings in which we are involved .
item 4 .
mine safety disclosures part ii .
item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market of the nasdaq stock market llc ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201ctmus . 201d as of december 31 , 2016 , there were 309 registered stockholders of record of our common stock , but we estimate the total number of stockholders to be much higher as a number of our shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the ratio of the call center to the switching centers in square feet
Choices:
2.16667
0.92857
928571.42857
0.35714
-0.92857
Correct choice index: 1
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 14 2014commitments and contingencies leases we conduct a major part of our operations using leased facilities and equipment .
many of these leases have renewal and purchase options and provide that we pay the cost of property taxes , insurance and maintenance .
rent expense on all operating leases for fiscal 2010 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 32.8 million , $ 30.2 million , and $ 30.4 million , respectively .
future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases at may 31 , 2010 were as follows : operating leases .

Operating Leases
2011
$9,856
2012
3,803
2013
2,538
2014
1,580
2015
928
Thereafter
1,428
Total future minimum lease payments
$20,133

we are party to a number of claims and lawsuits incidental to our business .
in the opinion of management , the reasonably possible outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations .
we define operating taxes as tax contingencies that are unrelated to income taxes , such as sales and property taxes .
during the course of operations , we must interpret the meaning of various operating tax matters in the united states and in the foreign jurisdictions in which we do business .
taxing authorities in those various jurisdictions may arrive at different interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to such operating tax matters , which could result in the payment of additional taxes in those jurisdictions .
as of may 31 , 2010 and 2009 we did not have a liability for operating tax items .
the amount of the liability is based on management 2019s best estimate given our history with similar matters and interpretations of current laws and regulations .
bin/ica agreements in connection with our acquisition of merchant credit card operations of banks , we have entered into sponsorship or depository and processing agreements with certain of the banks .
these agreements allow us to use the banks 2019 identification numbers , referred to as bank identification number for visa transactions and interbank card association number for mastercard transactions , to clear credit card transactions through visa and mastercard .
certain of such agreements contain financial covenants , and we were in compliance with all such covenants as of may 31 , 2010 .
on june 18 , 2010 , cibc provided notice that it will not renew its sponsorship with us for visa in canada after the initial ten year term .
as a result , their canadian visa sponsorship will expire in march 2011 .
we are .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. at december 2010 what was the percent of the total future minimum lease payments for all noncancelable leases that was due in 2012
Choices:
-0.48954
0.48954
489.54453
2.59164
0.18889
Correct choice index: 1