trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Contract Balances
Our contract assets consist of unbilled amounts for technology development contracts as well as custom product contracts. Also included in contract assets are royalty revenue and carrying amounts of right of returned inventory. Long-term contract assets include the fee withholding on cost reimbursable contracts that will not be billed within a year. Contract liabilities include excess billings, subcontractor accruals, warranty expense, extended warranty revenue, right of return refund, and customer deposits. The net contract (liabilities)/assets changed by $1.0 million, due primarily to increased contract liabilities in addition to a slight increase in contract assets. The increase in contract liabilities is a result of the increased number of government research programs in addition to an increase in the number of our fixed-price contracts that have reached milestones as designated in their respective contracts, but revenue has not yet been recognized. The increase in contract assets is primarily driven by the unbilled fee required by our cost-reimbursable government contracts, which cannot be fully billed until after the specific contract is complete.
The following table shows the components of our contract balances as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:

December 31,
2019
2018
Contract assets
$3,208,206
$2,759,315
Contract liabilities
(3,887,685)
(2,486,111)
   Net contract assets
$(679,479)
$273,204


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Contract assets for December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1604103.5
3208206
11935042
5967521
2983760.5
Correct choice index: 4
16. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
The majority of NAT and its subsidiaries’ transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in United States dollars, the functional currency of the Company. There is no significant risk that currency fluctuations will have a negative effect on the value of the Company’s cash flows.
The Company categorizes its fair value estimates using a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value for those assets that are recorded on the Balance Sheet at fair value. The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
Level 1. Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments and other financial assets.
-  The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
-  The estimated fair value for the long-term debt is considered to be equal to the carrying values since it bears spreads and variable interest rates which approximate market rates.
The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company`s financial instruments at December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows:
* The 2019 Senior Secured Credit Facility and Vessel financing 2018 Newbuildings carry a floating LIBOR interest rate, plus a margin and the fair value is assumed to equal the carrying value.

All figures in USD ‘000 
Fair Value
Hierarchy
Level
2019
Fair
Value
2019
Carrying
Value
2018
Fair
Value
2018
Carrying
Value
Recurring:               
Cash and Cash Equivalents  
1
48,847
48,847
49,327
49,327
Restricted Cash  
1
12,791
12,791
-
-
Credit Facility  
2
-
-
(313,400)
(313,400)
2019 Senior Secured Credit Facility*  
2
(291,798)
(291,798)
-
-
Investment Securities  
1
825
825
4,197
4,197
Vessel financing 2018 Newbuildings*  
2
(119,867)
(119,867)
(127,140)
(127,140)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average value of the 2018 and 2019 fair value of the company's cash and cash equivalents?
Choices:
98174
49087
240
1204737984
30819
Correct choice index: 1
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION
During the 2019 and 2018 financial years, the Group operated wholly within one business segment being the operation and management of storage centres in Australia and New Zealand.
The Managing Director is the Group’s chief operating decision maker and monitors the operating results on a portfolio wide basis. Monthly management reports are evaluated based upon the overall performance of NSR consistent with the presentation within the consolidated financial statements. The Group’s financing (including finance costs and finance income) are managed on a Group basis and not allocated to operating segments.
The operating results presented in the statement of profit or loss represent the same segment information as reported in internal management information.
The revenue information above excludes interest income and is based on the location of storage centres.

2019
2018
$'000
$'000
Revenue from external customers
Australia
144,621
129,431
New Zealand
13,036
8,912
Total
157,657
138,343


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the revenue from Australia from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
15190
6278
131585
-129427
-13036
Correct choice index: 0
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward .
unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : .

2009
2008
Balance at January 1
$86
$70
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
2
5
Additions for tax positions of prior years
5
12
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
(11)
(11)
Settlements
(10)
(4)
Lapse of statute of limitations
(3)
(1)
Acquisitions
6
21
Foreign currency translation
2
(6)
Balance at December 31
$77
$86

as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized .
aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months .
the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes .
aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 .
aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 .
as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively .
aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s .
federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions .
aon has substantially concluded all u.s .
federal income tax matters for years through 2006 .
material u.s .
state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 .
aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the variation observed in the foreign currency translation , in millions?
Choices:
0
8.0
-12
-4
258
Correct choice index: 1
The increase in Global Financing total revenue was driven by an increase in internal revenue, partially offset by a decrease in external revenue. Internal revenue grew 9.5 percent driven by increases in internal financing (up 17.6 percent) and internal used equipment sales (up 6.8 percent).
External revenue declined 6.3 percent due to a decrease in external used equipment sales (down 30.8 percent), partially offset by an increase in external financing (up 4.9 percent).
The increase in Global Financing pre-tax income was primarily driven by an increase in gross profit and a decrease in total expense.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2018
2017
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Results of Operations
External revenue
$1,590
$1,696
(6.3)%
Internal revenue
1,610
1,471
9.5
Total revenue
$3,200
$3,168
1.0%
Pre-tax income
$1,361
$1,278
6.5%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of Internal Revenue?
Choices:
808.4
1540.5
1530.5
100
1
Correct choice index: 1
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consists of the following (in millions):
Sales related reserves represent price concessions and stock rotation rights that the Company offers to many of its distributors. For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018, these sales related reserves were recorded within accounts receivable, and therefore did not exist within accrued liabilities. The Company made this change in classification as part of its adoption of ASC 606. For additional information regarding the Company's adoption of ASC 606, refer to Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements.

March 31,
2019
2018
Accrued compensation and benefits
$133.2
$87.6
Income taxes payable
46.9
27.5
Sales related reserves
366.9
—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
240.3
114.5
Total accrued liabilities
$787.3
$229.6


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in total accrued liabilities between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
2.4
5.9
242.9
442.9
152
Correct choice index: 2
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation .

Final Purchase Price Allocation
Non-current assets
$2
Property and equipment
3,590
Intangible assets (1)
1,062
Other non-current liabilities
(91)
Fair value of net assets acquired
$4,563
Goodwill (2)
89

( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million .
the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years .
( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes .
the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment .
colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a .
e.s.p .
( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million .
from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments .
through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a .
( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco .
under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements .
based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 .
during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the cost per tower in the colombia movil acquisition?
Choices:
182000000
0.00001
171374.7646
85606.77328
1000000
Correct choice index: 3
Non-marketable investments
Non-marketable equity securities are measured at fair value using market data, such as publicly available financing round valuations. Financial information of private companies may not be available and consequently we will estimate the fair value based on the best available information at the measurement date.
The following table presents the reconciliations of Level 3 financial instrument fair values:
There were transfers out from Level 3 due to initial public offerings of the respective investees during fiscal year 2019. There were no transfers between levels during fiscal year 2018.

Capped Call
Embedded exchange feature of Notes
Non-marketable investments
(U.S. $ in thousands)
Balance as of June 30, 2017
$—
$—
$—
Purchases
87,700
(177,907)
—
Gains (losses)
Recognized in other non-operating (expense) income, net
12,232
(24,646)
Balance as of June 30, 2018
99,932
(202,553)
—
Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held as of June 30, 2018
Recognized in other non-operating income (expense), net
12,232
(24,646)
—
Balance as of June 30, 2018
$99,932
$(202,553)
$—
Purchases
—
—
23,000
Transfer out
—
—
(20,942)
Gains (losses)
Recognized in finance income
—
—
270
Recognized in other non-operating (expense) income, net
114,665
(648,573)
—
Recognized in other comprehensive income
—
—
672
Balance as of June 30, 2019
$214,597
$(851,126)
$3,000
Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities held as of June 30, 2019
Recognized in other non-operating income (expense), net
114,665
(648,573)
—


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the balance of capped call between fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
314529
114665
2
-114665
14733
Correct choice index: 1
Executive Director Fixed Pay increases
The Committee has approved Fixed Pay increases of 4% for the CEO and 3% for the CFO, effective from 1 January 2020. This is in line with the average increase awarded to the wider Unilever workforce in 2019 of 3.6%. These increases were awarded to recognise the strong leadership of both individuals in 2019, which was Alan Jope’s first year in the CEO role and a year of transformation for Unilever generally. We also wanted to recognise Graeme Pitkethly’s seniority in his role, coming into his 5th year as CFO.
When our CEO Alan Jope was appointed on 1 January 2019 he was appointed with Fixed Pay 14% below that of what the Committee proposed for his predecessor and at the lower quartile of our remuneration benchmarking peer group, despite Unilever being one of the largest companies in this peer group. This positioning was intentional, given Alan’s internal promotion on appointment. However, subject to Alan’s continuing good performance the Committee will, over time, continue to review his Fixed Pay positioning and progress this towards the market median benchmark.
* MCIP at maximum (67%) investment of bonus.

Alan Jope CEO €'000 p.a.
Graeme Pitkethly CFO €'000 p.a.
2019
2020
2019
2020
Fixed Pay
1,450
1,508
1,103
1,136
Annual Bonus
2,175
2,262
1,323
1,363
MCIP* Match share award
2,186
2,273
1,330
1,370
Target Total Pay
5,811
6,043
3,756
3,869
Personal MCIP* Investment in
67%
67%
67%
67%
Unilever shares
1,457
1,516
886
913


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in Fixed Pay for Alan Jope CEO from 2019 to 2020?
Choices:
-51
-1508
58
-58
2958
Correct choice index: 3
(1) Mr. Clark did not receive a FY19 EAIP payout.
(2) Pursuant to the terms of Mr. Noviello’s Transition Services Agreement dated January 31, 2019 (the ‘‘Transition Services Agreement’’), Mr. Noviello received 75% of his target FY19 EAIP amount under the Company’s Executive Severance Plan because it was greater than the amount that he would have earned under the FY19 EAIP irrespective of individual performance.
(3) Ms. Cappellanti-Wolf and Messrs. Kapuria and Taylor each earned an individual performance factor of 100%. In determining the appropriate individual performance factor for each of these executives, the Compensation Committee, with recommendation of the CEO, considered leadership, contributions to NortonLifeLock’s achievement of its goals, and strategic planning among other factors.
(4) The Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion to reduce any payouts.

FY19 EAIP NEO Payout Amounts
NEO
Base Salary
Annual Incentive Target (%)
Company Performance Funding (%)
Individual Performance Factor (%)
Individual Payout Amount ($)(4)
Gregory S. Clark(1)
1,000,000
150
n/a
n/a
0
Nicholas R. Noviello(2)
650,000
100
n/a
n/a
487,500
Amy L. Cappellanti-Wolf(3)
440,000
70
35.6
100
109,648
Samir Kapuria(3)
450,000
100
35.6
100
152,172
Scott C. Taylor(3)
600,000
100
35.6
100
213,600


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average FY19 individual payout amount?
Choices:
962925
192584
180298
597148
-2416
Correct choice index: 1
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
NM—Not meaningful
Total selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense increased 6.4 percent in 2019 versus 2018, driven primarily by the following factors: • Higher spending (5 points) driven by Red Hat spending (5 points); and • Higher acquisition-related charges and amortization of acquired intangible assets associated with the Red Hat acquisition (3 points); partially offset by • The effects of currency (2 points).
Operating (non-GAAP) expense increased 3.4 percent year to year primarily driven by the same factors excluding the acquisition-related charges and amortization of acquired intangible assets associated with the Red Hat transaction.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Selling, general and administrative expense
Selling, general and administrative—other
$17,099
$16,438
4.0%
Advertising and promotional expense
1,647
1,466
12.3
Workforce rebalancing charges
555
598
(7.2)
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
762
435
74.9
Stock-based compensation
453
361
25.2
Bad debt expense
89
67
32.5
Total consolidated selling, general and administrative expense
$20,604
$19,366
6.4%
Non-operating adjustments
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
(762)
(435)
74.9
Acquisition-related charges
(282)
(15)
NM
Operating (non-GAAP) selling, general and administrative expense
$19,560
$18,915
3.4%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the Stock-based compensation from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
41676
460
-92
92
-20151
Correct choice index: 3
Below is the summary of the FY17 PRUs vested and earned by each NEO.
(1) The Compensation Committee did not exercise its discretion to reduce any payouts.

NEO
Total FY17 PRUs Vested at end of FY18
Total FY17 PRUs Vested at end of FY19
Total FY17 PRUs Earned and Vested (1)
Gregory S. Clark
2,404,175
175,023
2,579,198
Nicholas R. Noviello
606,935
44,184
651,119
Amy L. Cappellanti-Wolf
207,142
15,080
222,222
Samir Kapuria
148,322
10,798
159,120
Scott C. Taylor
414,287
30,160
444,447


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between Total FY17 PRUs Earned and Vested between Gregory S. Clark and  Nicholas R. Noviello?
Choices:
1679364822562
2549038
1928079
1753056
1928
Correct choice index: 2
humana inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) amortization expense for other intangible assets was approximately $ 75 million in 2017 , $ 77 million in 2016 , and $ 93 million in 2015 .
the following table presents our estimate of amortization expense for each of the five next succeeding fiscal years: .

(in millions)
For the years ending December 31,
2018
$64
2019
54
2020
52
2021
19
2022
16

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average amortization expense between 2015 and 2017
Choices:
81.66667
81666666.66667
0.01224
15.3125
152
Correct choice index: 0
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes to those consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Year-over-year comparisons are significantly affected by our acquisitions, dispositions and construction of towers. Our transaction with Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon” and the transaction, the “Verizon Transaction”) and the acquisition of a controlling ownership interest in Viom Networks Limited (“Viom” and the acquisition, the “Viom Acquisition”), which closed in March 2015 and April 2016, respectively, significantly impact the comparability of reported results between periods. Our principal 2019 acquisitions are described in note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
(2) As of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015, amounts include $76.8 million, $96.2 million, $152.8 million, $149.3 million, and $142.2 million, respectively, of restricted funds pledged as collateral to secure obligations and cash, the use of which is otherwise limited by contractual provisions.
(3) Total assets as of December 31, 2019 includes the Right-of-use asset recognized in connection with our adoption of the new lease accounting standard described in note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report

As of December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
(In millions)
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) (2)
$1,578.0
$1,304.9
$954.9
$936.5
$462.9
Property and equipment, net
12,084.4
11,247.1
11,101.0
10,517.3
9,866.4
Total assets (3)
42,801.6
33,010.4
33,214.3
30,879.2
26,904.3
Long-term obligations, including current portion
24,055.4
21,159.9
20,205.1
18,533.5
17,119.0
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
1,096.5
1,004.8
1,126.2
1,091.3
—
Total American Tower Corporation equity
5,055.4
5,336.1
6,241.5
6,763.9
6,651.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total assets between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-203900000
1
-203.9
66224.7
1140.4
Correct choice index: 2