trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
sacramento container acquisition in october 2017 , pca acquired substantially all of the assets of sacramento container corporation , and 100% ( 100 % ) of the membership interests of northern sheets , llc and central california sheets , llc ( collectively referred to as 201csacramento container 201d ) for a purchase price of $ 274 million , including working capital adjustments .
funding for the acquisition came from available cash on hand .
assets acquired include full-line corrugated products and sheet feeder operations in both mcclellan , california and kingsburg , california .
sacramento container provides packaging solutions to customers serving portions of california 2019s strong agricultural market .
sacramento container 2019s financial results are included in the packaging segment from the date of acquisition .
the company accounted for the sacramento container acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with asc 805 , business combinations .
the total purchase price has been allocated to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on respective fair values , as follows ( dollars in millions ) : .

12/31/17 Allocation
Adjustments
Revised Allocation
Goodwill
$151.1
$5.5
$156.6
Other intangible assets
72.6
(5.5)
67.1
Property, plant and equipment
26.7
—
26.7
Other net assets
23.4
—
23.4
Net assets acquired
$273.8
$—
$273.8

during the second quarter ended june 30 , 2018 , we made a $ 5.5 million net adjustment based on the final valuation of the intangible assets .
we recorded the adjustment as a decrease to other intangible assets with an offset to goodwill .
goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired .
among the factors that contributed to the recognition of goodwill were sacramento container 2019s commitment to continuous improvement and regional synergies , as well as the expected increases in pca 2019s containerboard integration levels .
goodwill is deductible for tax purposes .
other intangible assets , primarily customer relationships , were assigned an estimated weighted average useful life of 9.6 years .
property , plant and equipment were assigned estimated useful lives ranging from one to 13 years. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for the revised total purchase price allocation , property plant and equipment was what percentage of net assets acquired?
Choices:
0.09752
0.10957
-4.85455
-0.09752
156.69752
Correct choice index: 0
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period , and the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 .
the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s information technology index on may 31 , 2012 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .
5/12 5/165/155/145/13 global payments inc .
s&p 500 s&p information technology 12/16 12/17 comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2012 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
global payments 500 index information technology .

GlobalPayments
S&P500 Index
S&PInformationTechnology Index
May 31, 2012
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
May 31, 2013
113.10
127.28
115.12
May 31, 2014
161.90
153.30
142.63
May 31, 2015
246.72
171.40
169.46
May 31, 2016
367.50
174.34
174.75
December 31, 2016
328.42
188.47
194.08
December 31, 2017
474.52
229.61
269.45

30 2013 global payments inc .
| 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage gained by investing $ 100 into global payments in comparison to the technology index?
Choices:
205.07
0.89
543.97
5.07
-194.93
Correct choice index: 0
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019 increased by $387 million in 2019 to $7,146 million. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:
The additions to unrecognized tax benefits related to the current and prior years were primarily attributable to U.S. federal and state tax matters, as well as non-U.S. tax matters, including transfer pricing, credits and incentives. The settlements and reductions to unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions of prior years were primarily attributable to U.S. federal and state tax matters, non-U.S. audits and impacts due to lapse of statute of limitations.
The unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019 of $7,146 million can be reduced by $584 million associated with timing adjustments, U.S. tax credits, potential transfer pricing adjustments and state income taxes. The net amount of $6,562 million, if recognized, would favorably affect the company’s effective tax rate. The net amounts at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $6,041 million and $6,064 million, respectively.

($ in millions)
2019
2018
2017
Balance at January 1
$6,759
$ 7,031
$3,740
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
816
394
3,029
Additions for tax positions of prior years
779
1,201
803
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (including impacts due to a lapse of statute)
(922)
(1,686)
(367)
Settlements
(286)
(181)
(174)
Balance at December 31
$7,146
$ 6,759
$7,031


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of Balance at December 31?
Choices:
6888
6978.67
2472.67
32588685
0
Correct choice index: 1
3.1 Financial risk factors (continued)
(a) Market risk (continued)
(iii) Interest rate risk (continued)
During the year ended 31 December 2019, the Group entered into certain interest rate swap contracts to hedge its exposure arising from borrowings carried at floating rates. Under these interest rate swap contracts, the Group agreed with the counterparties to exchange, at specified interval, the difference between fixed contract rates and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts. These interest rate swap contracts had the economic effect of converting borrowings from floating rates to fixed rates and were qualified for hedge accounting. Details of the Group’s outstanding interest rate swap contracts as at 31 December 2019 have been disclosed in Note 38.
The effects of the interest rate swaps on the Group’s financial position and performance are as follows:
Swaps currently in place cover majority of the floating-rate borrowing and notes payable principal outstanding.
As at 31 December 2019 and 2018, management considered that any reasonable changes in the interest rates would not result in a significant change in the Group’s results as the Group’s exposure to cash flow interest-rate risk arising from its borrowings and notes payable carried at floating rates after considering the effect of hedging is considered to be insignificant. Accordingly, no sensitivity analysis is presented for interest rate risk.

2019
2018
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
Interest rate swaps
Carrying amount (non-current (liabilities)/assets)
(494)
1,663
Notional amount
29,423
77,630
Maturity date
30/7/2021~
28/6/2019~
11/4/2024
8/12/2023
Hedge ratio
1:1
1:1
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments since 1 January
(2,139)
181
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedgeeffectiveness
(2,139)
181
Weighted average hedged rate for the year
2.10%
1.60%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How many percent did the weighted average hedged rate for the year change by from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
1.5
1.1
0.5
-0.5
3.4
Correct choice index: 2
Other payables and accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
Derivative instruments are further described in Note 27.
As of December 31, 2019, payables to equity-method investments was nil compared to $49 million as of December 31, 2018, as a result of the wind-down of the joint venture with Ericsson.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new guidance on lease accounting and the current portion of the lease obligation is now included in other payables and accrued liabilities. The impact of the adoption of this new guidance is further described in Note 11.
Other payables and accrued liabilities also include individually insignificant amounts as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, presented cumulatively in line “Others”.

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Employee related liabilities
375
384
Employee compensated absences
138
125
Taxes other than income taxes
53
60
Advances
63
77
Payables to equity-method investments
—
49
Derivative instruments
7
34
Provision for restructuring
10
22
Defined benefit plans – current portion
10
12
Defined contribution plans – accrued benefits
20
18
Other long-term benefits – current portion
7
6
Royalties
21
26
Current lease obligation
55
—
Deferred consideration for business combinations
10
—
Others
62
61
Total
831
874


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Employee related liabilities?
Choices:
379500
222
0
379.5
14.3
Correct choice index: 3
Note 8. Other Financial Statement Details
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consists of the following (in millions):

March 31,
2019
2018
Trade accounts receivable
$875.8
$557.8
Other
6.8
8.1
Total accounts receivable, gross
882.6
565.9
Less allowance for doubtful accounts
2.0
2.2
Total accounts receivable, net
$880.6
$563.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Trade accounts receivable between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-550
-318
0
318
876
Correct choice index: 3
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data)
NOTE 8: INTANGIBLE ASSETS/LIABILITIES OTHER THAN GOODWILL
Net Book Value of Intangible Assets other than Goodwill as at December 31, 2018
(**) During the year ended December 31, 2018, acquisition costs of $1,150 of favorable lease terms were capitalized as part of the cost of one vessel due to the exercise of the purchase option (See also Note 2(n)). As of December 31, 2018, intangible assets associated with the favorable lease terms included an amount of $31,342 associated with the favorable lease terms of certain charter out contracts of Navios Containers which were recognized as of November 30, 2018 (see Note 3). During the year ended December 31, 2017, acquisition costs of $10,398 and accumulated amortization of $7,001 of favorable lease terms were considered impaired and were written off resulting in a loss of $3,397 included in the statement of comprehensive (loss)/income within the caption of “Impairment loss/ loss on sale of vessels, net”.

Acquisition Cost
Accumulated Amortization
Transfer/ Write off
Net Book Value December 31, 2018
Trade name
$100,420
$(47,966)
$—
$52,454
Port terminal operating rights
53,152
(11,838)
—
41,314
Customer relationships
35,490
(19,520)
—
15,970
Favorable lease terms(**)
32,492
(2,143)
(1,150)
29,199
Total Intangible assets
$221,554
$(81,467)
$(1,150)
$138,937


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the net book value between trade name and port terminal operating rights?
Choices:
11140
45453
93768
16964
-11140
Correct choice index: 0
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued) For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 (All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)    6. Tangible Fixed Assets and Vessels Under Construction
The movements in tangible fixed assets and vessels under construction are reported in the following table:
Vessels with an aggregate carrying amount of $4,407,156 as of December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018: $4,304,252) have been pledged as collateral under the terms of the Group’s loan agreements (Note 13).
As of December 31, 2019, a number of increasingly strong negative indicators such as the difference between ship broker estimates of the fair market values and the carrying values of the Group’s Steam vessels, the lack of liquidity in the market for term employment for Steam vessels and reduced expectations for the estimated rates at which such term employment could be secured, together with the continued addition of modern, larger and more fuel efficient LNG carriers to the global fleet, prompted the Group to perform an impairment assessment of its vessels in accordance with the

Vessels
Office property and other tangible assets
Total tangible fixed assets
Vessels under construction
Cost
As of January 1, 2018
4,217,866
19,224
4,237,090
166,655
Additions
49,036
4,678
53,714
637,046
Transfer from vessels under construction
642,776
—
642,776
(642,776)
Transfer under ‘‘Other non-current assets’’
—
—
—
(1,650)
Fully amortized fixed assets
(10,000)
(192)
(10,192)
—
As of December 31, 2018
4,899,678
23,710
4,923,388
159,275
Additions
26,233
1,454
27,687
450,918
Return of capital expenditures
(11,224)
—
(11,224)
—
Transfer from vessels under construction
406,870
—
406,870
(406,870)
Fully amortized fixed assets
(7,209)
—
(7,209)
—
As of December 31, 2019
5,314,348
25,164
5,339,512
203,323
Accumulated depreciation
As of January 1, 2018
460,815
3,709
464,524
—
Depreciation
144,611
863
145,474
—
Fully amortized fixed assets
(10,000)
(192)
(10,192)
—
As of December 31, 2018
595,426
4,380
599,806
—
Depreciation
156,826
875
157,701
—
Impairment loss on vessels
162,149
—
162,149
—
Fully amortized fixed assets
(7,209)
—
(7,209)
—
As of December 31, 2019
907,192
5,255
912,447
—
Net book value
As of December 31, 2018
4,304,252
19,330
4,323,582
159,275
As of December 31, 2019
4,407,156
19,909
4,427,065
203,323


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in vessel cost from end 2018 to end 2019?
Choices:
0
-414670
573945
414670
10214026
Correct choice index: 3
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2009 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

Balance, December 31, 2006
$740,507
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
96,454
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(80,258)
Balance, December 31, 2007
756,703
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
101,321
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(11,766)
Balance, December 31, 2008
846,258
Additions during period—depreciation and amortization expense
103.698
Deductions during period—disposition and retirements of property
(11,869)
Balance, December 31, 2009
$938,087

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the years 2006-2009 , what is the value of the average additions?
Choices:
0.4
72872.8
102113.3
100491.0
-3890408.3
Correct choice index: 3
The amount of our operating expenses increased by $43 million on a sequential basis, mainly driven by seasonality and salary dynamic.
On a year-over-year basis, our operating expenses increased by $42 million, mainly due to salary dynamic and increased spending on certain R&D programs, partially offset by favorable currency effects, net of hedging.
Fourth quarter 2019 R&D expenses were net of research tax credits in France and Italy, which amounted to $37 million, compared to $29 million in the third quarter of 2019 and $39 million in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Three Months Ended
% Variation
December 31, 2019
September 29, 2019
December 31, 2018
Sequential
Year-Over-Year
(Unaudited, in millions)
Selling, general and administrative expenses
$(285)
$(267)
$(285)
(6.3)%
0.4%
Research and development expenses
(387)
(362)
(345)
(7.0)
(12.3)
Total operating expenses
$(672)
$(629)
$(630)
(6.7)%
(6.6)%
As percentage of net revenues
(24.4)%
(24.7)%
(23.8)%
+30 bps
-60 bps


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in total operating expenses from the period December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
42
1
1302
1034
714
Correct choice index: 0
the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: .

2018
2017
2016
Intrinsic value
$9
$10
$18
Exercise proceeds
7
11
15
Income tax benefit realized
2
3
6

stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable .
rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by how much did the intrinsic value decrease from 2016 to 2018?
Choices:
-2
0.5
-0.5
-9
-3.5
Correct choice index: 2
Disaggregated Revenue
The Company has disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers into categories which depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Consequently, the disaggregation below is based on contract type.
Since the terms within these contract types are generally standard in nature, the Company does not believe that further disaggregation would result in increased insight into the economic factors impacting revenue and cash flows.
The following table shows the Company's shipping revenues disaggregated by nature of the charter arrangement for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
(1) Voyage charter revenues include approximately $10,152 and $7,600 of revenue related to short-term time charter contracts for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Time and bareboat charter revenues
$263,683
$213,923
Voyage charter revenues(1)
33,275
83,542
Contracts of affreightment revenues
58,589
68,698
Total shipping revenues
$355,547
$366,163


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Time and bareboat charter revenues from Years Ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
49760
477606
-49760
0
4976000
Correct choice index: 0
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

2016
$76,676
2017
75,874
2018
75,849
2019
50,320
2020
48,000
Thereafter
64,000
Total minimum lease payments
390,719
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments
(186,742)
Net minimum lease payments
203,977
Less: Amount representing interest
(37,485)
Present value of net minimum lease payments
166,492
Less: Current portion
(30,849)
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
$135,643

the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2015 is included in the commitments table in note 15 .
11 .
income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .
deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .
we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .
determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .
we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s .
the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s .
tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity .
as of december 31 , 2015 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 39 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes , which are partially offset by a valuation allowance .
the state nols begin to expire in the year 2017 .
in addition , there are $ 61 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance .
the state credit carryforwards began to expire in .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due in 2020?
Choices:
0.00012
0.63263
0.12285
8.13998
0.19413
Correct choice index: 2
(1) Using the euro per US dollar exchange rate on December 31, 2019 of €1 = $1.1213.
(2) Since May 23, 2019 Mr. Manzi has not been a member of the Supervisory Board.
(3) Global indirect employees are all employees other than those directly manufacturing our products.
We do not have any service agreements with members of our Supervisory Board. We did not extend any loans or overdrafts to any of our Supervisory Board members. Furthermore, we have not guaranteed any debts or concluded any leases with any of our Supervisory Board members or their families.

2019
2018
2017
Directors' remuneration
Average remuneration of Supervisory Board Members(1)
$105,066(2)
$ 115,618
$ 123,281
Company's performance
Net revenues (amounts in millions)
$ 9,556
$ 9,664
$ 8,347
Operating income (amounts in millions)
$ 1,203
$ 1,400
$ 1,005
Average remuneration of all global indirect employees (FTE basis) (3)
Employees
$ 97,300
$ 100,600
$ 93,500


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in the Average remuneration of Supervisory Board Members from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
220684
-10552
-18215
96719
Correct choice index: 2