trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
entergy arkansas , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges .
the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue .
2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 .
the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges .
net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

(In Millions)
2003 net revenue
$998.7
Deferred fuel cost revisions
(16.9)
Other
(3.4)
2004 net revenue
$978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis .
deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million .
the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 .
gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy arkansas inc.?
Choices:
-20326.42435
-0.02033
-20.3
1.97967
-0.02075
Correct choice index: 1
The following table sets forth the components of identifiable intangible assets acquired and their estimated useful lives as of the date of acquisition.
The amount recorded for developed technology represents the estimated fair value of AgileCraft’s enterprise agile planning technology. The amount recorded for customer relationships represents the fair value of the underlying relationships with AgileCraft’s customers. The amount recorded for backlog represents the fair value of AgileCraft’s backlog as of acquisition date.

Fair Value
Useful Life
(U.S. $ in thousands)
(years)
Developed technology
$34,600
5
Customer relationships
16,900
7
Backlog
1,400
3
Total intangible assets subject to amortization
$52,900


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in fair value between developed technology and customer relationships?
Choices:
51500
33200
-16897
16900
17700
Correct choice index: 4
A. Selected Financial Data
The following selecte The following selected historical financial information should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes, which are included herein, together with Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. The Statements of Operations data for each of the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and selected Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 have been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this document. The Statements of Operations financial information for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and selected balance sheet information as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been derived from our audited financial statements not included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA Year ended December 31, 
All figures in thousands of USD except share data 
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Voyage Revenues  
317,220
289,016
297,141
357,451
445,738
Voyage Expenses  
(141,770)
(165,012)
(142,465)
(125,987)
(158,656)
Vessel Operating Expense  
(66,033)
(80,411)
(87,663)
(80,266)
(66,589)
General and Administrative Expenses  
(13,481)
(12,727)
(12,575)
(12,296)
(9,790)
Depreciation Expenses  
(63,965)
(60,695)
(100,669)
(90,889)
(82,610)
Impairment Loss on Vessel  
-
(2,168)
(110,480)
-
-
Impairment Loss on Goodwill  
-
-
(18,979)
-
-
Loss on Disposal of Vessels  
-
(6,619)
-
-
-
Settlement Received  
-
-
-
5,328
-
Net Operating (Loss) Income  
31,971
(38,616)
(175,690)
53,341
128,093
Interest Income  
298
334
347
215
114
Interest Expense  
(38,390)
(34,549)
(20,464)
(11,170)
(10,855)
Other Financial (Expense)  
(4,160)
(14,729)
(644)
(98)
(167)
Total Other Expenses  
(42,252)
(48,944)
(20,761)
(11,053)
(10,908)
Income Tax Expense  
(71)
(79)
(83)
(102)
(96)
(Loss) Gain on Equity Method Investment  
-
(7,667)
(8,435)
(46,642)
(2,462)
Net (Loss) Income  
(10,352)
(95,306)
(204,969)
(4,456)
114,627
Basic Earnings (Loss) per Share  
(0.07)
(0.67)
(1.97)
(0.05)
1.29
Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share  
(0.07)
(0.67)
(1.97)
(0.05)
1.29
Cash Dividends Declared per Share  
0.10
0.07
0.53
1.37
1.38
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding  
142,571,361
141,969,666
103,832,680
92,531,001
89,182,001
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding  
142,571,361
141,969,666
103,832,680
92,531,001
89,182,001
Market Price per Common Share as of December 31,  
4.92
2.00
2.46
8.40
15.54


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average voyage revenue in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
158612
30311800
606236
303118
293078
Correct choice index: 3
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period , and the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 .
the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s information technology index on may 31 , 2012 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .
5/12 5/165/155/145/13 global payments inc .
s&p 500 s&p information technology 12/16 12/17 comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2012 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global .
all rights reserved .
global payments 500 index information technology .

GlobalPayments
S&P500 Index
S&PInformationTechnology Index
May 31, 2012
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
May 31, 2013
113.10
127.28
115.12
May 31, 2014
161.90
153.30
142.63
May 31, 2015
246.72
171.40
169.46
May 31, 2016
367.50
174.34
174.75
December 31, 2016
328.42
188.47
194.08
December 31, 2017
474.52
229.61
269.45

30 2013 global payments inc .
| 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in s&p500 in may 31 , 2012 and liquidated in may 31 , 2015?
Choices:
357
355223.9
714000.0
100000000
171400000
Correct choice index: 2
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
22. Share-Based Compensation (Continued)
Movement in RCUs and PCUs
The summary of RCUs and PCUs is presented below:
The total expense recognized in respect of share-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $5,107 (December 31, 2018: $5,216 and December 31, 2017: $4,565). The total accrued cash distribution as of December 31, 2019 is $1,176 (December 31, 2018: $1,265).

Number of awards
Weighted average contractual life
Aggregate fair value
RCUs
Outstanding as of January 1, 2018
67,475
1.38
1,429
Granted during the year
24,608
—
576
Vested during the year
(16,999)
—
(410)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018
75,084
1.25
1,595
Granted during the year
26,308
—
605
Vested during the year
(24,925)
—
(410)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019
76,467
1.26
1,790
PCUs
Outstanding as of January 1, 2018
67,475
1.38
1,429
Granted during the year
24,608
—
576
Vested during the year
(16,999)
—
(410)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018
75,084
1.25
1,595
Granted during the year
26,308
—
605
Vested during the year
(24,925)
—
(410)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019
76,467
1.26
1,790


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total expense recognized from 2017 to 2018?
Choices:
9781
-71251
70519
542
651
Correct choice index: 4
Geographic Information
The following table is a summary of our long-lived assets which include property and equipment, net and right of use assets based on the physical location of the assets (in thousands):

December 31,
December 31,
2019
2018
United States
$35,964
$5,525
Japan
2,689
1,108
Other
2,017
629
Total
$40,670
$7,262


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total value of long-lived assets in the U.S. and Japan in 2019?
Choices:
3797
33275
2689
38653
37981
Correct choice index: 3
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at March 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of the following (amounts in thousands):
Although not reflected in the table above, the tax effect on the pension balances was $2.4 million and $2.3 million as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Pension
Other Benefits
2019
2018
2019
2018
Net actuarial loss (gain)
$16,864
$15,691
$(793)
$(879)
Prior service cost
1,325
1,413
—
—
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
$18,189
$17,104
$(793)
$(879)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss for Pension between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1085
1325
19068
0
1
Correct choice index: 0
in direct competition with other co2 pipelines .
we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area .
terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our petroleum , chemical , ethanol and other liquids terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk material services facilities , including all transload , engineering , conveying and other in-plant services .
our terminals are located throughout the u.s .
and in portions of canada .
we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide us opportunities for expansion .
we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products .
in addition , we have jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined products in the u.s .
the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2014 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .

Number
Capacity(MMBbl)
Liquids terminals
39
78.0
Bulk terminals
78
n/a
Materials Services locations
8
n/a
Jones Act qualified tankers
7
2.3

competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in the u.s , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity .
our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical and pipeline companies .
our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminal services .
in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures .
our rail transloading ( material services ) operations compete with a variety of single- or multi-site transload , warehouse and terminal operators across the u.s .
our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets .
table of contents .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the average capacity per liquids terminal in mmbbl?
Choices:
2.0
200
0.2
1
9.8
Correct choice index: 0
Fiscal 2017 Plan
We initiated a restructuring plan in the first quarter of fiscal 2017 to reduce complexity by means of long-term structural improvements (the Fiscal 2017 Plan), under which we reduced headcount and closed certain facilities. These actions were completed in fiscal 2019 at a cumulative cost of $289 million.
Our restructuring, transition and other costs are presented in the table below:
Included in our fiscal 2018 other exit and disposal costs is a $29 million impairment charge related to certain land and buildings previously reported as property and equipment that were reclassified to assets held for sale.
As of March 29, 2019, the restructuring liabilities were not significant.

Year Ended
(In millions)
March 29, 2019
March 30, 2018
March 31, 2017
Severance and termination benefit costs
$28
$61
$76
Other exit and disposal costs
15
52
80
Asset write-offs
2
25
23
Transition costs
196
272
94
Total restructuring, transition and other costs
$241
$410
$273


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the Total restructuring, transition and other costs for the fiscal years 2019, 2018, 2017?
Choices:
9
924
274
104
787
Correct choice index: 1
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data set forth below was derived from our historical audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, and other financial data included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our historical results of operations are not indicative of our future results of operations.
(2) Fiscal 2018 and 2017 have been adjusted for our retrospective adoption of the new accounting standard Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). Refer to Note 7 – Revenue of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details.

April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018 (2)
April 28, 2017 (2)
April 29, 2016
April 24, 2015
(In millions)
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
$ 3,899
$ 5,391
$ 4,921
$ 5,303
$ 5,326
Working capital
$ 1,743
$ 3,421
$ 2,178
$ 2,786
$ 4,064
Total assets
$ 8,741
$ 9,991
$ 9,562
$ 10,037
$ 9,401
Total debt
$ 1,793
$ 1,926
$ 1,993
$ 2,339
$ 1,487
Total deferred revenue and financed unearned services revenue
$ 3,668
$ 3,363
$ 3,213
$ 3,385
$ 3,197
Total stockholders' equity
$ 1,090
$ 2,276
$ 2,949
$ 2,881
$ 3,414


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in working capital between 2015 and 2016?
Choices:
-1183
2779
1508
-1113
-1278
Correct choice index: 4
Revenues
Revenues for our reportable segments were as follows:
The increase in Semiconductor Test revenues of $60.2 million, or 4%, from 2018 to 2019 was driven primarily by an increase in semiconductor tester sales for 5G infrastructure and image sensors and higher service revenue, partially offset by a decrease in sales in the automotive and analog test segments.
The increase in Industrial Automation revenues of $36.6 million, or 14%, from 2018 to 2019 was primarily due to higher demand for collaborative robots. The MiR acquisition was completed in April 2018.
The increase in System Test revenues of $71.4 million, or 33%, from 2018 to 2019 was primarily due to higher sales in Storage Test of 3.5” hard disk drive testers, higher sales in Defense/Aerospace test instrumentation and systems, and higher sales in Production Board Test from higher 5G demand.
The increase in Wireless Test revenues of $25.3 million, or 19%, from 2018 to 2019 was primarily due to higher demand for millimeter wave and cellular test products driven by new wireless standards and 5G, partially offset by lower sales in connectivity test products and services.

2019
2018
2018-2019 Dollar Change
(in millions)
Semiconductor Test
$1,552.6
$1,492.4
$60.2
Industrial Automation
298.1
261.5
36.6
System Test
287.5
216.1
71.4
Wireless Test
157.3
132.0
25.3
Corporate and Other
(0.5)
(1.2)
0.7
$2,295.0
$2,100.8
$194.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average total revenue in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
120.1
6279.7
2295
2197.9
61.6
Correct choice index: 3
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Executive officers of our Company are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to all executive officers of our Company.
CHRISTOPHER H. ATAYAN has served in various senior executive positions with the Company since March 2006, including his service as Chairman of the Board since January 2008 and Chief Executive Officer since October 2006, and has been a director of the Company since 2004. Mr. Atayan has served as the Senior Managing Director of Slusser Associates, a private equity and investment banking firm, since 1988, and has been engaged in private equity and investment banking since 1982. He also serves on the Board of Eastek Holdings, LLC, a manufacturing company.
ANDREW C. PLUMMER has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2018, as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2007, and as our Secretary from January 2007 to October 2018. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Plummer served our company in various roles including Acting Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, and Manager of SEC Compliance. Prior to joining our company in 2004, Mr. Plummer practiced public accounting, primarily with the accounting firm Deloitte and Touche, LLP (now Deloitte).
CHARLES J. SCHMADERER has served as the Company’s Vice President and Corporate Controller since April 2018 and as Secretary since October 2018. From 2006 to 2018, Mr. Schmaderer served the Company in various roles including as the Vice President of Financial Reporting and Assistant Secretary, and as the Director of Financial and SEC Reporting. Prior to joining AMCON in 2006, Mr. Schmaderer practiced public accounting, primarily with the accounting firm Grant Thornton, LLP and also holds a Master of Business Administration (MBA).

Name
Age
Position
Christopher H. Atayan
59
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Andrew C. Plummer
45
President, Chief Financial Officer, Director
Charles J. Schmaderer
50
Vice President, Corporate Controller, Secretary


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average age of the company's executive officers?
Choices:
51.33
0.51
53
901.67
21.33
Correct choice index: 0
apple inc .
| 2017 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index for the five years ended september 30 , 2017 .
the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s .
technology supersector index as of the market close on september 28 , 2012 .
note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .
* $ 100 invested on 9/28/12 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends .
data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes .
copyright a9 2017 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial .
all rights reserved .
copyright a9 2017 dow jones & co .
all rights reserved .
september september september september september september .

September2012
September2013
September2014
September2015
September2016
September2017
Apple Inc.
$100
$74
$111
$128
$129
$179
S&P 500 Index
$100
$119
$143
$142
$164
$194
S&P Information Technology Index
$100
$107
$138
$141
$173
$223
Dow Jones U.S. Technology Supersector Index
$100
$105
$137
$137
$167
$214

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in the apple stock return between 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
50.0
-321
0
308
44
Correct choice index: 0
2. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings per share, or EPS, is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted-average number of dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method.
For purposes of this calculation, common stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards are considered to be common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted EPS when their effect is dilutive. In periods in which the Company has a net loss, dilutive common stock equivalents are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.
The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company incurred net losses and accordingly excluded common stock equivalents for outstanding stockbased awards, which represented all potentially dilutive securities, of 2.5 million, 3.7 million, and 4.5 million, respectively, from the calculation of diluted net loss per share due to their anti-dilutive nature.

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net loss
$(19,898)
$(26,199)
$(9,187)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic
71,005
68,490
66,252
Dilutive common stock equivalents
—
—
—
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted
71,005
68,490
66,252
Net loss per share:
Basic
$(0.28)
$(0.38)
$(0.14)
Diluted
$(0.28)
$(0.38)
$(0.14)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Numerator: Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 to 2018?
Choices:
18438.8
9951.2
45451.5
23048.5
92194
Correct choice index: 3