trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
corporate/other corporate/other includes treasury results , unallocated corporate expenses , offsets to certain line-item reclassifications reported in the business segments ( inter-segment eliminations ) , the results of discontinued operations and unallocated taxes .
in millions of dollars 2008 2007 2006 .

<i>In millions of dollars</i>
2008
2007
2006
Net interest revenue
$(1,288)
$(461)
$(345)
Non-interest revenue
438
(291)
(599)
Revenues, net of interest expense
$(850)
$(752)
$(944)
Operating expenses
526
1,830
202
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims
1
(2)
4
Loss from continuing operations before taxes and minority interest
$(1,377)
$(2,580)
$(1,150)
Income tax benefits
(421)
(922)
(498)
Minority interest, net of taxes
(2)
3
2
Loss from continuing operations
$(954)
$(1,661)
$(654)
Income from discontinued operations
4,410
628
1,087
Net income (loss)
$3,456
$(1,033)
$433

2008 vs .
2007 revenues , net of interest expense declined primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher inter-segment eliminations partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .
operating expenses declined primarily due to lower restructuring charges in the current year as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense .
discontinued operations represent the sale of citigroup 2019s german retail banking operations and citicapital .
see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements on page 136 for a more detailed discussion .
2007 vs .
2006 revenues , net of interest expense improved primarily due to improved treasury results and a gain on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets , partially offset by higher inter-segment eliminations .
operating expenses increased primarily due to restructuring charges , increased staffing , technology and other unallocated expenses , partially offset by higher inter-segment eliminations .
income tax benefits increased due to a higher pretax loss in 2007 , offset by a prior-year tax reserve release of $ 69 million relating to the resolution of the 2006 tax audits .
discontinued operations represent the operations in the sale of the asset management business and the sale of the life insurance and annuities business .
for 2006 , income from discontinued operations included gains and tax benefits relating to the final settlement of the life insurance and annuities and asset management sale transactions and a gain from the sale of the asset management business in poland , as well as a tax reserve release of $ 76 million relating to the resolution of the 2006 tax audits. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in non-interest revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Choices:
2.50515
0.50515
3.60891
3.56357
1.66438
Correct choice index: 0
Discontinued Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared with the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
On December 31, 2018, we sold all of the Class A Common Units of Netsmart owned by the Company. Prior to the sale, Netsmart comprised a separate reportable segment, which due to its significance to our historical consolidated financial statements and results of operations, is now reported as a discontinued operation as a result of the sale for all periods presented. The loss from discontinued operations represents the net of losses incurred by Netsmart for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 partly offset by earnings attributable to two solutions acquired during the fourth quarter of 2017 as part of the EIS Business that we no longer support effective as of March 31, 2018. Refer to Note 17, “Discontinued Operations” to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding discontinued operations.

Year Ended December 31,
2019 %
2018 %
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Change from 2018
Change from 2017
Loss from discontinued operations
$ 0
$(72,836)
$(11,915)
(100.0%)
NM
Gain on sale of Netsmart
$ 0
500,471
0
(100.0%)
NM
Income tax effect on discontinued operations
$ 0
(32,497)
42,263
(100.0%)
(176.9%)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
$ 0
$395,138
$30,348
(100.0%)
NM


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Income tax effect on discontinued operations between 2017-2019?
Choices:
28175.33
3255.33
0
5520.63
-0.13
Correct choice index: 1
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period .
the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 .
it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends .
the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies .
the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
State Street Corporation
$100
$159
$172
$148
$178
$227
S&P 500 Index
100
132
151
153
171
208
S&P Financial Index
100
136
156
154
189
230
KBW Bank Index
100
138
151
151
195
231

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent returns did shareholders of state street corporation
Choices:
1.3
0.51
1.27
-0.48
0.79
Correct choice index: 2
Fair Value Disclosures
Under the fair value standards fair value is based on the exit price and defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement should reflect all the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. A fair value hierarchy is established in the authoritative guidance outlined in three levels ranking from Level 1 to level 3 with Level 1 being the highest priority.
Level 1: observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets
Level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly
Level 3: unobservable inputs (e.g., a reporting entity’s or other entity’s own data)
The Company had no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring (except our pension plan assets, see Note 15) or
non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2019 or September 30, 2018.
To estimate fair value of the financial instruments below quoted market prices are used when available and classified within Level 1. If this data is not available, we use observable market based inputs to estimate fair value, which are classified within Level 2. If the preceding information is unavailable, we use internally generated data to estimate fair value which is classified within Level 3.
Cash and cash equivalents
Carrying amount approximated fair value
Accounts and long term receivable with original maturity over one year
Fair value was estimated by discounting future cash flows based on the current rate with similar terms.
Note payable
Fair value was estimated based on quoted market prices.
Fair value of accounts receivable with an original maturity of one year or less and accounts payable was not materially different from their carrying values at September 30, 2019, and 2018.

As of September 30, 2019
As of September 30, 2018
Carrying amount
Fair value
Carrying amount
Fair value
Fair Value Level
References
(Amounts in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$18,099
$18,099
$25,107
$25,107
1
Consolidated Balance SSheets
Accounts & long term receivable*
7,087
7,087
-
-
3
Note 3
Liabilities:
Note payable
1,001
1,001
-
-
2
Note 11
*Original maturity over one year


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in fair value of cash and cash equivalents between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-7008
-25104
11091
18069
43206
Correct choice index: 0
Net debt
Net debt is a measure that provides valuable additional information on the summary presentation of the Group’s net financial liabilities and is a measure in common use elsewhere.
Prior to this quarter, all financial asset derivatives were current financial assets and so reduced net debt. Following a recent review we now also have financial asset derivatives that are non-current in nature. As all of these derivatives relate to financial liabilities, we continue to exclude them for the purposes of our net debt calculation and have expanded our definition to reflect this.
Net debt is now defined as the excess of total financial liabilities, excluding trade payables and other current liabilities, over cash, cash equivalents and other current financial assets, excluding trade and other current receivables, and non-current financial asset derivatives that relate to financial liabilities.
(a) Restated following adoption of IFRS 16. See note 1 and note 24 for further details.

€ million
€ million
2019
2018
(Restated)(a)
Total financial liabilities
(28,257)
(26,738)
Current financial liabilities
(4,691)
(3,613)
Non-current financial liabilities
(23,566)
(23,125)
Cash and cash equivalents as per balance sheet
4,185
3,230
Cash and cash equivalents as per cash flow statement
4,116
3,090
Add bank overdrafts deducted therein
69
140
Other current financial assets
907
874
Non-current financial assets derivatives that relate to financial liabilities
114
–
Net debt
(23,051)
(22,634)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the Cash and cash equivalents as per balance sheet from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-955
8876
955
0
2275
Correct choice index: 2
Assumptions
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine costs for the plans for each period were as follows:
The weighted-average expected long-term rate of return for the plan assets is 3.3%. The weighted-average expected longterm rate of return on plan assets is based on the interest rates guaranteed under the insurance contracts, and the expected rate of return appropriate for each category of assets weighted for the distribution within the diversified investment fund. The assumptions used for the plans are based upon customary rates and practices for the location of the plans. Factors such as asset class allocations, long-term rates of return (actual and expected), and results of periodic asset liability modeling studies are considered when constructing the long-term rate of return assumption for our defined benefit pension plans.

Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
2019
2018
2017
Discount rate
2.5%
2.4%
3.2%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
3.3%
3.3%
4.3%
Rate of compensation increase
2.3%
2.3%
2.2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average discount rate over the 3 year period from 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
2.7
0.4
1.6
1.9
253.1
Correct choice index: 0
The assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019 filed with the SEC on August 27, 2019.
(2) Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the NEO. Instead, the amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair values of stock options issued pursuant to the Company’s 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and certain inducement grants, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts for fiscal 2019 are set forth under Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2019 filed with the SEC on August 27, 2019.
(3) All non-equity incentive plan compensation was paid pursuant to the Variable Pay Plan.
(4) The amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column for fiscal 2019 include: $4,000 401(k) matching contribution by the Company for each NEOs other than Mr. McNab.
(5) The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Maletira a one-time discretionary bonus in the amount of $180,000 in connection with his work on the AvComm and Wireless acquisition. Please see “Discretionary Bonuses” under the Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 36 of this proxy statement.
(6) Mr. Staley was awarded a $60,000 sign-on bonus when he joined the Company in February 2017.
The amounts in the salary, bonus, and non-equity incentive plan compensation columns of the Summary Compensation Table reflect actual amounts paid for the relevant years, while the amounts in the stock awards column reflect accounting values. The tables entitled “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table” provide further information on the named executive officers’ potential realizable value and actual value realized with respect to their equity awards. The Summary Compensation Table should be read in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the subsequent tables and narrative descriptions.

Name
Fiscal Year
Maximum Possible Value of MSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Maximum Possible Value of PSUs Using Grant Date Fair Value
Oleg Khaykin
2019
4,067,526
—
2018
2,457,750
909,900
2017
659,618
—
Amar Maletira
2019
1,379,350
—
2018
1,015,870
454,950
2017
574,500
—
Paul McNab
2019
591,150
—
2018
442,395
—
2017
373,425
—
Luke Scrivanich
2019
591,150
—
2018
442,395
—
2017
393,600
—
Gary Staley
2019
591,150
—
2018
943,527
—
2017
303,948
—


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much does the top 2 maximum possible value of MSUs in 2019 add up to?
Choices:
5446876
5083396
4977426
2758700
1379366
Correct choice index: 0
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation .

Final Purchase Price Allocation
Non-current assets
$2
Property and equipment
3,590
Intangible assets (1)
1,062
Other non-current liabilities
(91)
Fair value of net assets acquired
$4,563
Goodwill (2)
89

( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million .
the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years .
( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes .
the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment .
colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a .
e.s.p .
( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million .
from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments .
through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a .
( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco .
under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements .
based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 .
during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the approximate purchase price for the unit communication sites from colombia movil
Choices:
0.09454
0.00086
-91
0.06406
0.08561
Correct choice index: 4
Movements in ordinary share capital
Ordinary Shares
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on the winding up of the company in proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held. The fully paid ordinary shares have no par value and the company does not have a limited amount of authorised capital.
On a show of hands every member present at a meeting in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll each share shall have one vote.

Issue price
Details
Date
Shares
AU$US
$’000
Balance
1 July 2017
130,215,813
125,177
Shares issued
23 February 2018
69,129
$8.52
458
Balance
30 June 2018
130,284,942
125,635
Shares issued
24 August 2018
69,129
$8.46
423
Share issued
24 August 2018
28,407
$0.00
-
Share issued
21 December 2018
129,044
$0.00
-
Balance
30 June 2019
130,511,522
126,058


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage change in the shares balance from 30 June 2018 to 30 June 2019?
Choices:
120.22
200.17
0.17
0
-0.17
Correct choice index: 2
For 2019, we reported a net income of $1,032 million, compared to a net income of $1,287 million and $802 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The 2019 net income represented diluted earnings per share of $1.14 compared to $1.41 and $0.89 for 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(In millions)
Net income attributable to parent company
$1,032
$1,287
$802
As percentage of net revenues
10.8%
13.3%
9.6%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in net income attributable to parent company from 2017 to 2018?
Choices:
0
-802
485
388970
-485
Correct choice index: 2
In November 2017, GMSL acquired the trenching and cable laying services business from Fugro N.V. ("Fugro"). As part of the transaction, Fugro became a 23.6% holder of GMSL's parent, Global Marine Holdings, LLC ("GMH"). GMSL, in the normal course of business, incurred revenue and expenses with Fugro for various services.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, GMSL recognized $11.3 million and $9.3 million respectively, of expenses for transactions with Fugro. For the year ended December 31, 2019 GMSL recognized $0.8 million of revenues. The parent company of GMSL, GMH, incurred management fees of $0.6 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
GMSL also has transactions with several of their equity method investees. A summary of transactions with such equity method investees and balances outstanding are as follows (in millions):

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Net revenue
$ 6.4
$ 21.8
Operating expenses
$ 1.0
$ 4.8
Interest expense
$ 1.0
$ 1.3
December 31,
2019
2018
Accounts receivable
$ 1.2
$ 5.0
Long-term obligations
$ 22.5
$ 28.5
Accounts payable
$ 0.1
$ 2.2
Dividends
$ 4.5
$ 25.8


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average interest expense?
Choices:
0.24
11.4
1
0.2
1.15
Correct choice index: 4
Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin
Cost of revenues in 2019 decreased by $4.3 million, or 16%, as compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by a reduction in the number of global services and cloud infrastructure personnel, which led to a decrease of $2.2 million in compensation and benefits expense, including stock-based compensation expense, as compared to 2018. This reduction in headcount also contributed to a decrease in allocated facilities and information technology costs of $0.5 million in 2019. We also experienced a decrease of $0.9 million in hosting costs in 2019, due to a decline in the usage of our hosted platform as compared to 2018. Additionally, depreciation decreased $0.5 million in 2019, due to the nature and timing of capital expenditures and internal projects as compared to 2018.
Our gross margin decreased to 53% during 2019, as compared to 54% during 2018. This was primarily due to our revenues, net declining during the year at a slightly faster rate than the corresponding decrease in costs.

Years Ended December 31,
Change
2019
2018
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenues
$22,843
$27,154
$(4,311)
(16)%
Gross profit
26,193
31,477
(6,284)
(17)
Gross margin
53%
54%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document.  What is the company's average gross profit in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
29
57670
3
29316
28835
Correct choice index: 4
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 141 $ 137 sources of supply .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
404 303 total utility plant .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
18099 16891 nonutility property .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations .
the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 .
note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: .

2015
2014
2013
Balance as of January 1
$(35)
$(34)
$(27)
Amounts charged to expense
(32)
(37)
(27)
Amounts written off
38
43
24
Recoveries of amounts written off
(10)
(7)
(4)
Balance as of December 31
$(39)
$(35)
$(34)

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2013 as part of the company's noncollectable amounts what was the ratio of that amounts written off to the amount recovered
Choices:
0.10617
0.06143
19.57143
6.14286
1.10256
Correct choice index: 3