trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2013 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

2014
$4,067
2015
—
2016
500
2017
750
2018
125
2019 and thereafter
6,600
Total
$12,042

credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion syndicated , unsecured revolving line of credit ( the 201csenior credit facility 201d ) that matures on october 24 , 2018 .
however , prior to the maturity date , devon has the option to extend the maturity for up to one additional one-year period , subject to the approval of the lenders .
amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months .
such rates are generally less than the prime rate .
however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate .
the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears .
as of december 31 , 2013 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility .
the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant .
this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65 percent .
the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements .
also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments .
as of december 31 , 2013 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 25.7 percent .
commercial paper devon has access to $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program .
commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing .
the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor , or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market .
as of december 31 , 2013 , devon 2019s weighted average borrowing rate on its commercial paper borrowings was 0.30 percent .
other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note .
geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. based on the december 31 , 2013 , devon 2019s weighted average borrowing rate on its commercial paper borrowings what was the potential value of its commercial paper asset in billions
Choices:
7.7
603
0.9
3612.6
0.3
Correct choice index: 2
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Warranties
The Company’s standard warranty obligation to its customers provides for repair or replacement of a defective product at the Company’s discretion for a period of time following purchase, generally between 12 and 24 months. Factors that affect the warranty obligation include product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise. The estimated cost associated with fulfilling the Company’s warranty obligation to customers is recorded in cost of revenue.
Changes in the Company’s warranty liability, which is included as a component of accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, are set forth in the table below (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Warranty reserve, beginning of period
$8,220
$8,306
$2,158
Provisions made to warranty reserve during the period
13,708
11,775
16,597
Charges against warranty reserve during the period
(11,574)
(11,861)
(10,449)
Warranty reserve end of period
$10,354
8,220
8,306


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in warranty reserve from beginning to end of period 2019?
Choices:
2134
0
18574
3555
10342
Correct choice index: 0
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre .
the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period .
comparable cash dividends are expected in the future .
on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

2002
2001
Quarter Ended
High
Low
Dividend
High
Low
Dividend
December 31
$25.84
$21.50
$.455
$24.80
$22.00
$.45
September 30
28.88
21.40
.455
26.17
21.60
.45
June 30
28.95
25.46
.450
24.99
22.00
.43
March 31
26.50
22.92
.450
25.44
21.85
.43

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent change in quarterly cash dividend for the period ended march 31 2002 to the period ended december 31 2002?
Choices:
1.11111
26.95111
0.005
0.33333
0.5
Correct choice index: 0
the company granted 1020 performance shares .
the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period .
beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests .
the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .

Number of Shares
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
116,677
$280
Granted
134,245
275
Vested
(34,630)
257
Cancelled
(19,830)
260
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
196,462
283

the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively .
eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration .
shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq .
compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price .
in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees .
these shares are subject to a six-month holding period .
annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 .
non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution .
as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively .
these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions .
expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the weighted average grant date fair value , whats is the difference between how many actual shares vested during the year of 2010 and how many vested based on the average grant fair value?
Choices:
74707.82101
5447.82101
2824.54545
1765.75972
39987.82101
Correct choice index: 1
Review of operations
The Group’s operating performance for the fiscal year compared to last year is as follows:
1. The Directors believe the information additional to IFRS measures included in the report is relevant and useful in measuring the financial performance of the Group. These include: EBITDA, NPATA and EPSa. These measures have been defined in the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer’s Joint Report on page 2.
In 2019 the business continued to deliver strong results after the record 2018 year. Revenues and EBITDA were in line with guidance. Further details on the Group’s results are outlined in the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer’s Joint Report on page 2.
On 1 June 2019, Hansen acquired the Sigma Systems business (Sigma) and one month of these results are included in the FY19 result. Also included in the results are the transaction and other restructuring costs related to the acquisition, which we have identified as separately disclosed items in our results.
This acquisition has also resulted in the re-balancing of the Group’s market portfolio which, post the acquisition of Enoro in FY18, was initially weighted towards the Utilities sector. With Sigma’s revenues concentrated in the Communications sector, the Group’s revenue portfolio is now re-balanced to ensure greater diversification across multiple industries, regions and clients.
The Group has generated operating cash flows of $39.7 million, which has been used to retire external debt and fund dividends of $12.6 million during the financial year. With the introduction of a higher level of debt in June 2019 to fund the Sigma acquisition, the Group has, for the first time, used the strength of the Group’s balance sheet to fund 100% of an acquisition. With the Group’s strong cash generation, Hansen is well placed to service and retire the debt over the coming years.

2019
2018
A$ Million
A$ Million
Variance %
Operating revenue
231.3
230.8
0.2%
EBITDA1
53.0
59.3
(10.6%)
NPAT
21.5
28.9
(25.6%)
NPATA1
31.2
38.0
(17.9%)
Basic earnings per share (EPS) (cents)
10.9
14.8
(26.4%)
Basic EPSa1 (cents)
15.8
19.4
(18.6%)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average difference between EBITDA and NPAT for both FYs?
Choices:
478.8
30.95
31.5
4.54
26.1
Correct choice index: 1
18. Reconciliation of net cash flow from operating activities
The table below shows how our (loss)/profit for the year from continuing operations translates into cash flows generated from our operating activities.

2019
2018
2017
Notes
€m
€m
€m
(Loss)/profit for the financial year
(7,644)
2,788
(6,079)
Loss from discontinued operations
7
3,535
1,969
4,107
(Loss)/profit for the financial year from continuing operations
(4,109)
4,757
(1,972)
Non-operating expense
7
32
1
Investment income
(433)
(685)
(474)
Financing costs
2,088
1,074
1,406
Income tax expense/(credit)
6
1,496
(879)
4,764
Operating (loss)/profit
(951)
4,299
3,725
Adjustments for:
Share-based payments and other non-cash charges
147
128
95
Depreciation and amortisation
10, 11
9,795
10,409
11,086
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
3
33
36
22
Share of result of equity accounted associates and joint ventures
908
59
(47)
Impairment losses
4
3,525
–
–
Other expense/(income)
148
(213)
(1,052)
(Increase)/decrease in inventory
(131)
(26)
117
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
14
(31)
(1,118)
308
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables
15
739
286
(473)
Cash generated by operations
14,182
13,860
13,781
Net tax paid
(1,131)
(1,118)
(761)
Cash flows from discontinued operations
(71)
858
1,203
Net cash flow from operating activities
12,980
13,600
14,223


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average net cash flow from operating activities between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1
1329000
13600
13290
-310
Correct choice index: 3
Note A: Beginning from June 2015, the Company accounts for its investment in FARADAY as an associate given the fact that the Company obtained the ability to exercise significant influence over FARADAY through representation on its Board of Directors.
Note B: WINAICO SOLAR PROJEKT 1 GMBH and WINAICO IMMOBILIEN GMBH are joint ventures to the Company.
Note C: The Company follows international accounting practices in equity accounting for limited partnerships and uses the equity method to account for these investees.
The carrying amount of investments accounted for using the equity method for which there are published price quotations amounted to NT$1,733 million and NT$1,750 million, as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The fair value of these investments were NT$1,621 million and NT$2,244 million, as of December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

As of December 31,
2018
2019
Investee companies
Amount
Percentage of ownership or voting rights
Amount
Percentage of ownership or voting rights
NT$ (In Thousands)
NT$ (In Thousands)
Listed companies
CLIENTRON CORP.
$249,663
22.39
$276,515
21.90
FARADAY TECHNOLOGY CORP. (FARADAY) (Note A)
1,483,111
13.78
1,473,028
13.78
Unlisted companies
MTIC HOLDINGS PTE. LTD.
3,026
45.44
18,157
45.44
WINAICO IMMOBILIEN GMBH (Note B)
—
44.78
—
44.78
PURIUMFIL INC.
—
—
7,164
44.45
UNITECH CAPITAL INC.
568,005
42.00
642,660
42.00
TRIKNIGHT CAPITAL CORPORATION
1,520,575
40.00
2,281,631
40.00
HSUN CHIEH INVESTMENT CO., LTD.
1,608,551
36.49
1,686,502
36.49
YANN YUAN INVESTMENT CO., LTD.
2,032,013
30.87
2,761,821
30.87
HSUN CHIEH CAPITAL CORP.
161,319
30.00
122,060
30.00
VSENSE CO., LTD.
31,544
26.89
592
25.90
UNITED LED CORPORATION HONG KONG LIMITED
167,953
25.14
121,973
25.14
TRANSLINK CAPITAL PARTNERS I, L.P. (Note C)
120,440
10.38
172,414
10.38
WINAICO SOLAR PROJEKT 1 GMBH (Note B)
—
50.00
—
—
YUNG LI INVESTMENTS, INC.
2,213
45.16
—
—
Total
$7,948,413
$9,564,517


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average amount of investments of listed companies in 2018?
Choices:
-616724
1732774
14
861346
866387
Correct choice index: 4
3. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment as of September 28, 2019 and September 29, 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):

2019
2018
Land, buildings and improvements
$289,051
$267,809
Machinery and equipment
381,656
364,034
Computer hardware and software
136,227
130,645
Capital assets in progress
49,599
38,469
Total property, plant and equipment, gross 
856,533
800,957
Less: accumulated depreciation 
(472,309)
(459,651)
Total property, plant and equipment, net
384,224
341,306


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Computer hardware and software between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
-5582
670312
5582
-130617
266872
Correct choice index: 2
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
At December 31, 2019, the Company had net federal, state and foreign operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income. If not utilized, the Company’s NOLs expire as follows:

Years ended December 31,
Federal
State
Foreign
2020 to 2024
$—
$222.3
$11.9
2025 to 2029
141.6
285.7
104.8
2030 to 2034
7.0
41.4
19.6
2035 to 2039
3.6
159.5
—
Indefinite carryforward
22.8
—
853.8
Total
$175.0
$708.9
$990.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between Federal and State NOLs in the period 2025 to 2029?
Choices:
144.1
427.3
2
63.4
-100.2
Correct choice index: 0
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Our principal accountant for 2019 and 2018 was KPMG LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants. The following table shows the fees Teekay and our subsidiaries paid or accrued for audit and other services provided by KPMG LLP for 2019 and 2018.
(1) Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audits of our consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, reviews of our quarterly consolidated financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings for Teekay or our subsidiaries including professional services in connection with the review of our regulatory filings for public offerings of our subsidiaries.
Audit fees for 2019 and 2018 include approximately $928,300 and $859,000, respectively, of fees paid to KPMG LLP by Teekay LNG that were approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the general partner of Teekay LNG. Audit fees for 2019 and 2018 include approximately $588,200 and $517,000, respectively, of fees paid to KPMG LLP by our subsidiary Teekay Tankers that were approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Teekay Tankers.
(2) Audit-related fees consisted primarily of accounting consultations, employee benefit plan audits, services related to business acquisitions, divestitures and other attestation services. (3) For 2019 and 2018, tax fees principally included corporate tax compliance fees.
The Audit Committee has the authority to pre-approve audit-related and non-audit services not prohibited by law to be performed by our independent auditors and associated fees. Engagements for proposed services either may be separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee or entered into pursuant to detailed pre-approval policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee, as long as the Audit Committee is informed on a timely basis of any engagement entered into on that basis.
The Audit Committee separately pre-approved all engagements and fees paid to our principal accountants in 2019 and 2018.

Fees (in thousands of U.S. dollars)
2019
2018
Audit Fees (1)
2,723
2,529
Audit-Related Fees (2)
33
59
Tax Fees (3)
23
32
Total
2,779
2,620


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Audit Fees from 2019 to 2018?
Choices:
514471
2725
103
194
1
Correct choice index: 3
xii. Shareholding as on March 31, 2019:
a. Distribution of equity shareholding as on March 31, 2019:

Number of shares
Holding
Percentage to capital
Number of accounts
Percentage to total accounts
1 - 100
18,402,438
0.5
528,148
70.3
101 - 500
37,550,103
1.0
185,200
24.6
501 - 1000
14,900,327
0.4
20,749
2.8
1001 - 5000
27,199,737
0.7
13,897
1.9
5001 - 10000
9,150,929
0.2
1,292
0.2
10001 - 20000
8,811,580
0.2
622
0.1
20001 - 30000
5,636,878
0.2
230
-
30001 - 40000
5,424,479
0.1
154
-
40001- 50000
4,808,196
0.1
106
-
50001 -100000
21,790,964
0.6
304
-
100001 - above
3,598,709,075
96.0
903
0.1
GRAND TOTAL
3,752,384,706
100.0
751,605
100.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. Excluding shareholding of 100001 shares and above, what is the percentage to capital of the rest?
Choices:
92
4808100
4
1
400
Correct choice index: 2
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
NOTE 18 — Income Taxes
Earnings before income taxes consist of the following:

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
U.S.
$15,103
$30,815
$9,315
Non-U.S.
35,163
27,288
30,938
Total
$50,266
$58,103
$40,253


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the earnings from U.S. between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
21500
15712
40130
0
-21500
Correct choice index: 0
NOTE 19—SEGMENT INFORMATION
ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting” (Topic 280), establishes standards for reporting, by public business enterprises, information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas, and major customers. The method of determining what information, under Topic 280, to report is based on the way that an entity organizes operating segments for making operational decisions and how the entity’s management and chief operating decision maker (CODM) assess an entity’s financial performance. Our operations are analyzed by management and our CODM as being part of a single industry segment: the design, development, marketing and sales of Enterprise Information Management software and solutions.
The following table sets forth the distribution of revenues, by significant geographic area, for the periods indicated:

Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
2017
Revenues:
Canada
$153,890
$149,812
$227,115
United States
1,490,863
1,425,244
1,090,049
United Kingdom
182,815
201,821
159,817
Germany
203,403
198,253
166,611
Rest of Europe
534,204
517,693
394,132
All other countries
303,580
322,418
253,333
Total revenues
$2,868,755
$2,815,241
$2,291,057


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase in revenue for Canada from Fiscal year 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-28925
0
-4078
4078
153610
Correct choice index: 3
a. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, the Company recognized NT$118,252 million, NT$123,795 million and NT$122,999 million, respectively, in operating costs, of which NT$2,256 million, NT$1,698 million and NT$820 million in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, were related to write-down of inventories.
b. None of the aforementioned inventories were pledged.

As of December 31,
2018
2019
NT$
NT$
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Raw materials
$3,766,056
$5,102,571
Supplies and spare parts
3,133,737
3,548,376
Work in process
10,034,488
11,309,718
Finished goods
1,268,838
1,754,137
Total
$18,203,119
$21,714,802


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Supplies and spare parts?
Choices:
-3341056.5
-207319.5
1
3548376
3341056.5
Correct choice index: 4
Note 8. Property, Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
(1) Useful lives for leasehold and building improvements represent the term of the lease or the estimated life of the related improvements, whichever is shorter.
Depreciation expense from continuing operations was $12,548 and $12,643 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which $9,028 and $9,189, respectively, related to internal use software costs.
Amounts capitalized to internal use software related to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $3,800 and $6,690, respectively.

December 31
Useful life (in years)
2019
2018
Computer equipment and software
3-5
14,689
14,058
Furniture and equipment
5-7
2,766
3,732
Leasehold and building improvements (1)
7,201
7,450
Construction in progress - PPE
949
—
Property, plant, and equipment, excluding internal use software
25,605
25,240
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
(19,981)
(17,884)
Property, plant and equipment, excluding internal use software, net
5,624
7,356
Internal use software
3
33,351
31,565
Construction in progress - Internal use software
2,973
903
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization, internal use software
(25,853)
(16,846)
Internal use software, net
10,471
15,622
Property, plant and equipment, net
$16,095
$22,978


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total value of computer equipment and software at the end of 2018 and 2019 altogether?
Choices:
631
14688
28747
-5292
42805
Correct choice index: 2