trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Stock-based Compensation Expense
The income tax benefit related to share-based compensation was $66 million, $158 million and $97 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The income tax benefits related to share-based compensation for the periods presented prior to the second quarter of 2018 were offset by an increase in the U.S. valuation allowance. Stock-based compensation expense of $30 million and $19 million was capitalized and remained in inventory as of August 29, 2019 and August 30, 2018, respectively. As of August 29, 2019, $439 million of total unrecognized compensation costs for unvested awards, before the effect of any future forfeitures, was expected to be recognized through the fourth quarter of 2023, resulting in a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.

For the year ended
2019
2018
2017
Stock-based compensation expense by caption
Cost of goods sold
$102
$83
$88
Selling, general, and administrative
73
61
75
Research and development
68
54
52
$243
$198
$215
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award
Restricted stock awards
$178
$140
$144
Stock options
33
55
71
ESPP
32
3
—
$243
$198
$215


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of income tax benefit related to share-based compensation over the total stock-based compensation expense in 2019?
Choices:
0.9
1
0.27
0.28
2.06
Correct choice index: 2
(12) Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive shares of common stock. Basic and diluted net loss per share of common stock were the same for all periods presented as the impact of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding was anti-dilutive. The Company uses the if converted method for calculating any potential dilutive effect on diluted loss per share.
The following common equivalent shares were excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
In connection with the issuance of the 2024 Notes in December 2019, the Company paid $44.9 million to enter into capped call option agreements to reduce the potential dilution to holders of the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the 2024 Notes. In connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes in November 2017, the Company paid $12.9 million to enter into capped call option agreements to reduce the potential dilution to holders of the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the 2022 Notes.
In December 2019, the Company partially terminated capped call options related to the 2022 Notes and received $5.8 million. The capped call option agreements are excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders as their effect is antidilutive.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Convertible senior notes
6,733,914
3,411,199
3,411,199
Stock-based compensation grants
2,038,174
2,562,274
3,268,610
Total
8,772,088
5,973,473
6,679,809


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Stock-based compensation grants for the period December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
Choices:
793181
2300224000
2300224
2562274
1
Correct choice index: 2
item 2 : properties information concerning applied's properties at october 25 , 2015 is set forth below: .

(Square feet in thousands)
United States
Other Countries
Total
Owned
3,748
1,624
5,372
Leased
556
1,107
1,663
Total
4,304
2,731
7,035

because of the interrelation of applied's operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country .
the company's headquarters offices are in santa clara , california .
products in silicon systems are manufactured in austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore .
remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas .
products in the display segment are manufactured in tainan , taiwan and santa clara , california .
products in the energy and environmental solutions segment are primarily manufactured in alzenau , germany and treviso , italy .
applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan .
these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support .
applied also owns a total of approximately 139 acres of buildable land in texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space .
applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements .
applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. based on the table , how much more square feet is owned outside the united states?
Choices:
1068
5372
-2641
3287
2731.0
Correct choice index: 4
The movement of contract liabilities is mainly caused by the timing difference of the satisfaction of a performance of obligation and the consideration received from customers.
The Company recognized NT$3,815 million and NT$616 million, respectively, in revenues from the contract liabilities balance at the beginning of the period as performance obligations were satisfied for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019.

As of January 1,2018
As of December 31,2018
As of December 31,2019
NT$(In Thousands)
NT$(In Thousands)
NT$(In Thousands)
Sales of goods and services
$3,951,414
$932,371
$1,470,195
Current
$3,951,414
$932,371
$988,115
Noncurrent
—
—
482,080
Total
$3,951,414
$932,371
$1,470,195


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What are the average Sales of goods and services for December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
2
960243
1201
1201283
3900
Correct choice index: 3
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018
Operating revenues. Operating revenues decreased by 2.0% from NT$151,253 million in 2018 to NT$148,202 million (US$4,955 million) in
2019, primarily due to decreased other operating revenues, decreased foundry wafer sale, and 2.5% depreciation of the NTD in 2019 from 2018. The decreased foundry wafer sale came from a decline of 2.9% in average selling price from 2018 to 2019, partially offset by a 1.1% increase in foundry wafer shipment from 7,108 thousand 8-inch equivalent wafers in 2018 to 7,189 thousand 8-inch equivalent wafers in 2019.
Operating costs. Operating costs decreased by 1.2% from NT$128,413 million in 2018 to NT$126,887 million (US$4,242 million) in 2019, primarily due to the decreased depreciation expense and other operating costs, which was partially offset by the increased direct material costs.
Gross profit and gross margin. Gross profit decreased from NT$22,840 million in 2018 to NT$21,315 million (US$713 million) in 2019. Our gross margin decreased from 15.1% in 2018 to 14.4% in 2019, primarily due to an annual decline of 2.9% in average selling price.

Years Ended December 31,
2017
2018
2019
%
%
%
Operating revenues
100.0
100.0
100.0
Operating costs
(81.9)
(84.9)
(85.6)
Gross profit
18.1
15.1
14.4
Operating expenses
Sales and marketing
(2.8)
(2.6)
(2.6)
General and administrative
(2.8)
(3.2)
(3.6)
Research and development
(9.2)
(8.6)
(8.0)
Expected credit losses
—
(0.3)
(0.4)
Subtotal
(14.8)
(14.7)
(14.6)
Net other operating income and expenses
1.1
3.4
3.5
Operating income
4.4
3.8
3.3
Non-operating income and expenses
0.7
(2.4)
(0.1)
Income from continuing operations before income tax
5.1
1.4
3.2
Income tax benefit (expense)
(0.6)
0.7
(0.1)
Net income
4.5
2.1
3.1
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(3.2)
0.6
1.9
Total comprehensive income
1.3
2.7
5.0
Net income attributable to:
Stockholders of the parent
6.5
5.1
5.5
Non-controlling interests
(2.0)
(3.0)
(2.4)
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
Stockholders of the parent
3.3
5.7
7.4
Non-controlling interests
(2.0)
(3.0)
(2.4)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Operating income?
Choices:
14.5
8.2
3.83
-2.53
0.26
Correct choice index: 2
The purchase was accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control. Assets and liabilities transferred were recorded at historical carrying amounts of Pivotal on the date of the transfer, except for certain goodwill and intangible assets that were recorded in the amounts previously recognized by Dell for Pivotal in connection with Dell’s acquisition of EMC during fiscal 2016. VMware’s previous investment in Pivotal, including any unrealized gain or loss previously recognized in other income (expense), net on the consolidated statements of income, were derecognized. Transactions with Pivotal that were previously accounted for as transactions between related parties were eliminated in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented. All intercompany transactions and account balances between VMware and Pivotal have been eliminated upon consolidation for all periods presented.
The effect of the change from the combination to the consolidated statements of income was as follows (amounts in millions, except per share amounts):

For the Year Ended
January 31, 2020
February 1, 2019
February 2, 2018
Total revenue
$777
$639
$474
Operating income
(287)
(247)
(239)
Net income
(204)
(832)
(234)
Net income attributable to VMware
(148)
(772)
(222)
Net income per weighted-average share attributable to VMware common stockholders, basic for Classes A and B
$(0.63)
$(1.95)
$(0.56)
Net income per weighted-average share attributable to VMware common stockholders, diluted for Classes A and B
$(0.67)
$(1.93)
$(0.56)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
$—
$(26)
$35


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in total revenue between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
165
2
1113
878
0
Correct choice index: 0
Other non-current assets
Other non-current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Right of use assets
$33,014
$—
Deferred contract acquisition costs
3,297
3,184
Deposits
2,338
1,975
Other
3,197
3,461
Total other non-current assets
41,846
$8,620


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total value of other non-current assets between 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
17240
33226
50466
50466000000
45307
Correct choice index: 2
Other financial assets and liabilities consists of derivatives, the Group’s holdings in listed and unlisted investments, and loans provided to related parties.
The Group’s investments in listed equity securities are designated as financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income. Investments are initially measured at fair value net of transaction costs and, in subsequent periods, are measured at fair value with any change recognised in other comprehensive income. Upon disposal, the cumulative gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive income is transferred to retained earnings.
Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence but not control or joint control over the financial and operating policies. Investments in associates are initially recognised at cost including transaction costs and are accounted for using the equity method by including the Group’s share of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of associates in the carrying amount of the investment until the date on which significant influence ceases. Dividends received reduce the carrying amount of the investment in associates.

2019
2018
$M
$M
Current
Derivatives
45
53
Total current other financial assets
45
53
Non‑current
Derivatives
501
366
Listed equity securities
91
96
Investments in associates
59
57
Loans provided to related parties
41
3
Total non‑current other financial assets
692
522
Total other financial assets
737
575
Current
Derivatives
58
50
Total current other financial liabilities
58
50
Non‑current
Derivatives
24
61
Total non‑current other financial liabilities
24
61
Total other financial liabilities
82
111


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average of the total other financial liabilities for both 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
96.5
0.1
193
82
3.9
Correct choice index: 0
The Company utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value the stock options. The Company used an expected life as defined under the simplified method, which is using an average of the contractual term and vesting period of the stock options. The risk-free interest rate used for the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company accounted for forfeitures as they occur. The historical volatility was calculated based upon implied volatility of the Company's historical stock prices.
The fair value of 2019 and 2018 stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
As of December 31, 2019, there was approximately $419,000 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding 2019 stock options, expected to be recognized over 3.4 and approximately $418,000 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding 2018 stock options, expected to be recognized over 2.4 years. There was no unrecognized stock-based compensation expense relating stock options granted prior to 2018.

2019
2018
Weighted-average fair value of options granted per share
$8.78
$6.63
Historical volatility
60%
46%
Risk-free interest rate
2.10%
2.84%
Dividend yield
—
—
Expected life in years
3.6
5.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average risk-free interest rate used in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
4.94
2.47
0.4
2470000
4.27
Correct choice index: 1
Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEM”) are the end-customers to which we provide direct marketing application engineering support, while Distribution customers refers to the distributors and representatives that we engage to distribute our products around the world.
Our revenues weight in Distribution registered a decrease of 5 percentage point compared to 2018, reaching a 30% share of total revenues in 2019. In 2018 as compared to 2017, our revenues weight in Distribution registered an increase of 1 percentage point.

Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(As percentage of net revenues)
(As percentage of net revenues)
(As percentage of net revenues)
OEM
70%
65%
66%
Distribution
30
35
34
Total
100%
100%
100%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average percentage of net revenues of OEM?
Choices:
67
287
44
0
135
Correct choice index: 0
Provision for income taxes
We are a U.S.-based multinational company subject to tax in multiple U.S. and international tax jurisdictions. A substantial portion of our international earnings were generated from subsidiaries organized in Ireland and Singapore. Our results of operations would be adversely affected to the extent that our geographical mix of income becomes more weighted toward jurisdictions with higher tax rates and would be favorably affected to the extent the relative geographic mix shifts to lower tax jurisdictions. Any change in our mix of earnings is dependent upon many factors and is therefore difficult to predict.
The increase in our effective tax rate in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018 was primarily due to one-time benefits from the 2017 Tax Act in fiscal 2018. In addition, increases in tax expense in fiscal 2019 are attributable to the valuation allowance on capital losses for which we cannot yet recognize a tax benefit.

Fiscal Year
(In millions, except for percentages)
2019
2018
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
$108
$437
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
$92
$(690)
Effective tax rate on income from continuing operations
85%
(158)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average  Income from continuing operations before income taxes for fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2018?
Choices:
-272.5
272.5
320.6
641.2
-0.8
Correct choice index: 1
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2017 .
the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2012 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
12/31/2017
HUM
$100
$152
$214
$267
$307
$377
S&P 500
$100
$132
$150
$153
$171
$208
Peer Group
$100
$137
$175
$186
$188
$238

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the highest return for the second year of the investment?
Choices:
-88
114.0
0.5
-114
114000000
Correct choice index: 1
The line “Construction in progress” in the table above includes property, plant and equipment under construction and equipment under qualification before operating.
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new guidance on lease accounting and lease right-of-use assets are included in plant, property and equipment. The impact of the adoption of this new guidance is further described in Note 11.
The depreciation charge was $785 million, $727 million and $592 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
As described in Note 7, the acquisition of Norstel resulted in the recognition of property, plant and equipment of $11 million.

December 31, 2019
Gross Cost
Accumulated Depreciation
Net Cost
Land
78
—
78
Buildings
905
(505)
400
Facilities & leasehold improvements
3,193
(2,762)
431
Machinery and equipment
15,336
(12,790)
2,546
Computer and R&D equipment
382
(335)
47
Operating lease right-of-use assets
266
(60)
206
Other tangible assets
110
(93)
17
Construction in progress
282
—
282
Total
20,552
(16,545)
4,007
December 31, 2018
Gross Cost
Accumulated Depreciation
Net Cost
Land
79
—
79
Buildings
902
(487)
415
Facilities & leasehold improvements
3,170
(2,748)
422
Machinery and equipment
14,882
(12,582)
2,300
Computer and R&D equipment
381
(334)
47
Other tangible assets
123
(93)
30
Construction in progress
202
—
202
Total
19,739
(16,244)
3,495


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Gross Cost?
Choices:
10417
40291
397652024.5
0
20145.5
Correct choice index: 4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
Our pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2019, and 2018, and target allocation for 2020 by asset category are as follows:
We employ a liability-driven investment strategy whereby a mix of equity and fixed-income investments are used to pursue a derisking strategy which over time seeks to reduce interest rate mismatch risk and other risks while achieving a return that matches or exceeds the growth in projected pension plan liabilities. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities and funded status. The investment portfolio primarily contains a diversified mix of equity and fixed-income investments. Other assets such as private equity are used modestly to enhance long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and asset/liability studies at regular intervals.

Target Allocations
Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31,
Asset Category
2020
2019
2018
Equity securities
13%
13%
12%
Debt securities
83%
83%
84%
Other
4%
4%
4%
Total
100%
100%
100%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the percentage of plan assets for Equity Securities between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
1
25
8
-1
0
Correct choice index: 0
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 .
the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock .
stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns .
comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc .
nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .

July 27,  2000
December 29,  2000
December 28,  2001
December 27,  2002
December 26,  2003
Illumina, Inc.
100.00
100.39
71.44
19.50
43.81
NASDAQ Composite Index
100.00
63.84
51.60
35.34
51.73
NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index
100.00
93.20
82.08
51.96
74.57

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in cumulative total stockholder return percentage for illumina inc . common stock versus the nasdaq pharmaceutical index for the four years end 2003?
Choices:
30.76
-0.25
-27.63
-230.76
-30.76
Correct choice index: 4
The Systems gross profit margin increased 3.2 points to 53.1 percent in 2019 compared to the prior year. The increase was driven by actions taken in 2018 to better position the cost structure over the longer term, a mix to IBM Z hardware and operating systems and margin improvement in Storage Systems.
Pre-tax income of $701 million declined 22.4 percent and pre-tax margin of 8.4 percent decreased 1.8 points year to year driven by the declines in Power Systems and Storage Systems revenue and the continued investment in innovation across the Systems portfolio, mitigated by the benefit from the new hardware launches in the second-half 2019.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr Percent/ Margin Change
Systems
External Systems Hardware gross profit
$2,622
$2,590
1.2%
External Systems Hardware gross profit margin
44.3%
40.7%
3.6pts.
External Operating Systems Software gross profit
$1,412
$1,412
0.0%
External Operating Systems Software gross profit margin
83.8%
84.5%
(0.7)pts.
External total gross profit
$4,034
$4,002
0.8%
External total gross profit margin
53.1%
49.8%
3.2pts.
Pre-tax income
$701
$904
(22.4)%
Pre-tax margin
8.4%
10.2%
(1.8)pts.


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average External Systems Hardware gross profit?
Choices:
1294
9815
0
98
2606
Correct choice index: 4
Note 13 Contract costs
The table below provides a reconciliation of the contract costs balance.
Contract costs are amortized over a period ranging from 12 to 84 months.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
2019
2018
Opening balance, January 1
707
636
Incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs
602
567
Amortization included in operating costs
(523)
(477)
Impairment charges included in operating costs
(3)
(19)
Ending balance, December 31
783
707


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total incremental costs of obtaining a contract and contract fulfillment costs in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
579
1
1169
12
1204
Correct choice index: 2