trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Significant Suppliers
We purchase a significant amount of our inventory from certain manufacturers or suppliers including components, assemblies and electronic manufacturing parts. The inventory is purchased under standard supply agreements that outline the terms of the product delivery. The title and risk of loss of the product generally pass to us upon shipment from the manufacturers’ plant or warehouse. Some of these manufacturers accounted for more than 10% of our purchases and accounts payable as follows:
We are currently reliant upon these suppliers for products. Although we believe that we can obtain products from other sources, the loss of a significant supplier could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations as the products that are being purchased may not be available on the same terms from another supplier.

Year Ended February 28,
2019
2018
2017
Inventory purchases:
Supplier A
31%
33%
34%
Supplier B
20%
16%
14%
Supplier C
6%
9%
11%
As of February 28,
2017
2019
2018
Accounts Payable:
Supplier A
30%
40%
33%
Supplier B
18%
16%
18%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage change between inventory purchases from Supplier B from 2017 to 2018?
Choices:
88
-2
30
-20
2
Correct choice index: 1
entergy gulf states , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis .

(In Millions)
2002 net revenue
$1,130.7
Volume/weather
17.8
Fuel write-offs in 2002
15.3
Net wholesale revenue
10.2
Base rate decreases
(23.3)
NISCO gain recognized in 2002
(15.2)
Rate refund provisions
(11.3)
Other
(14.1)
2003 net revenue
$1,110.1

the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory .
billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors .
the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration .
the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 .
in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend .
the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning .
the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction .
the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life .
in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale .
entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income .
rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds .
gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions .
fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power .
other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy gulf states , inc.?
Choices:
-0.01822
-54.88835
-23292.42
-4.7907
1.46099
Correct choice index: 0
On a sequential basis, ADG revenues were up 3.3%, driven by an increase in volumes of approximately 8%, partially offset by a decrease in average selling prices of approximately 5%, mostly attributable to product mix.
AMS revenues increased 12.1% driven by Analog and Imaging products. AMS increase was due to an increase of approximately 5% in average selling prices, entirely due to product mix, and to higher volumes of approximately of 7%.
MDG revenues increased by 7.9%, mainly driven by Microcontrollers, due to both higher average selling prices of approximately 6%, entirely due to product mix, and higher volumes of approximately 2%.
On a year-over-year basis, fourth quarter net revenues increased by 4.0%. ADG revenues decreased 4.5% compared to the year-ago quarter on lower revenues in both Automotive and Power Discrete. The decrease was entirely due to lower average selling prices of approximately 4%, while volumes remained substantially flat. The decrease in average selling prices was a combination of less favorable product mix and lower selling prices.
AMS fourth quarter revenues grew 9.9% year-over-year, mainly driven by Analog and Imaging. The increase was entirely due to higher average selling prices of approximately 18%, entirely attributable to product mix,
partially offset by lower volumes of approximately 8%. MDG fourth quarter revenues increased by 7.6%, mainly driven by Microcontrollers. The increase was due to higher average selling prices of approximately 9%,
entirely due to improved product mix.

Three Months Ended
% Variation
December 31, 2019
September 29, 2019
December 31, 2018
Sequential
Year-Over-Year
(Unaudited, in millions)
Automotive and Discrete Group (ADG)
$924
$894
$967
3.3%
(4.5)%
Analog, MEMS and Sensors Group (AMS)
1,085
968
988
12.1
9.9
Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG)
742
688
689
7.9
7.6
Others
3
3
4
—
—
Total consolidated net revenues
$2,754
$2,553
$2,648
7.9%
4.0%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average net revenues from Microcontrollers and Digital ICs Group (MDG) for the period December 31, 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
371
854.5
1
689
715.5
Correct choice index: 4
The following securities have been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding as the inclusion of these securities would have an anti-dilutive effect:
Participating securities are composed of certain stock options granted under the 2015 Plan, and previously granted under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, that may be exercised before the options have vested. Unvested shares have a non-forfeitable right to dividends. Unvested shares issued as a result of early exercise are subject to repurchase by us upon termination of employment or services at the original exercise price. The common stock subject to repurchase is no longer classified as participating securities when shares revert to common stock outstanding as the awards vest and our repurchase right lapses.
Our redeemable noncontrolling interest relates to our 85% equity ownership interest in OpenEye. The OpenEye stockholder agreement contains a put option that gives the minority OpenEye stockholders the right to sell their OpenEye shares to us based on the fair value of the shares. The OpenEye stockholder agreement also contains a call option that gives us the right to purchase the remaining OpenEye shares from the minority OpenEye stockholders based on the fair value of the shares. The put and call options can each be exercised beginning in the first quarter of 2023. This redeemable noncontrolling interest is considered temporary equity and we report it between liabilities and stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of the net income or loss attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Stock options
223,259
229,294
258,917
Restricted stock awards
—
—
129
Restricted stock units
136,600
148,175
188,050
Common stock subject to repurchase
250
957
13,281


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Common stock subject to repurchase between 2018 and 2017?
Choices:
-123
0
14238
-12324
216013
Correct choice index: 3
Auditor Service Fees
The aggregate amounts paid or accrued by the Company with respect to fees payable to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the auditors of the Company, for audit (including separate audits of wholly-owned and non-wholly owned entities, financings, regulatory reporting requirements and SOX related services), audit-related, tax and other services in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
Audit fees relate to the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the review of our quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements and services in connection with our 2019 and 2018 public offerings of Class A subordinate voting shares
Audit-related fees consist of aggregate fees for accounting consultations and other services that were reasonably related to the performance of audits or reviews of our consolidated financial statements and were not reported above under "Audit Fees".
Tax fees relate to assistance with tax compliance, expatriate tax return preparation, tax planning and various tax advisory services.
Other fees are any additional amounts for products and services provided by the principal accountants other than the services reported above under "Audit Fees", "Audit-Related Fees" and "Tax Fees".

Fiscal 2019
Fiscal 2018
$
$
(in thousands)
Audit Fees
1,133
764
Audit-Related Fees
—
—
Tax Fees
—
—
All Other Fees
3
2
Total
1,136
766


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average audit fees for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
2.5
94850
568
1
948.5
Correct choice index: 4
Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable. Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are held and invested in high-credit quality financial instruments by recognized financial institutions and are subject to minimum credit risk.
Our accounts receivable are unsecured and represent amounts due to us based on contractual obligations of our customers. We mitigate credit risk in respect to accounts receivable by performing periodic credit evaluations based on a number of factors, including past transaction experience, evaluation of credit history and review of the invoicing terms of the contract. We generally do not require our customers to provide collateral to support accounts receivable.
Significant customers, including distribution channel partners and direct customers, are those which represent 10% or more of our total revenue for each period presented or our gross accounts receivable balance as of each respective balance sheet date. Revenues from our significant customers as a percentage of our total revenue are as follows
*represents less than 10% of total revenue
As of December 31, 2019, two customers accounted for 17% and 12% of our total gross accounts receivable.
As of December 31, 2018, two customers accounted for 16% and 12% of our total gross accounts receivable

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Customer A (a distribution channel partner)
*
14%
*
Customer B (a distribution channel partner)
12%
10%
*
Customer C (a distribution channel partner)
14%
*
*


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the company's total revenue earned from Customer A and B between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
36
22
36000000
260
20
Correct choice index: 0
As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, expense for grants beginning upon adoption on October 1, 2005 has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The forfeiture rates for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were based on actual forfeitures.
No cash was used to settle equity instruments granted under share-base payment arrangements in any of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2019.
The following tables provide summary data of stock option award activity:

Number of shares
Weighted average exercise price
Weighted average remaining contractual term
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at September 30, 2017
9,376
4.49
-
-
Granted
-
-
-
-
Expired
(1,250)
6.82
-
-
Forfeited
-
-
-
-
Exercised
(4,626)
4.67
-
-
Outstanding at September 30, 2018
3,500
$3.42
-
-
Granted
-
-
-
-
Expired
(500)
$2.99
-
-
Forfeited
-
-
-
-
Exercised
(1,000)
2.99
-
-
Outstanding at September 30, 2019
2,000
$3.75
.98 years
$19
Exercisable at September 30, 2019
2,000
$3.75
.98 years
$19
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2019
2,000
$3.75
.98 years
$19


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the amount lost from the expired shares in 2017?
Choices:
8525000000
-625000
58140
8525
13640
Correct choice index: 3
Service Revenue by Segment
The following table presents the breakdown of service revenue by segment (in millions, except percentages):
Amounts may not sum and percentages may not recalculate due to rounding
Service revenue increased 2%, driven by an increase in software and solution support offerings. Service revenue increased in the Americas and EMEA segments, partially offset by decreased revenue in our APJC segment.

Years Ended
2019 vs. 2018
Years Ended
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
July 29, 2017
Variance in Dollars
Variance in Percent
Service revenue:
Americas
$ 8,173
$ 7,982
$7,864
$191
2%
Percentage of service revenue
63.4%
63.3%
63.9%
EMEA
2,854
2,754
2,635
100
4%
Percentage of service revenue
22.1%
21.8%
21.4%
APJC
1,872
1,885
1,801
(13)
(1)%
Percentage of service revenue
14.5%
14.9%
14.7%
Total
$ 12,899
$ 12,621
$12,300
$278
2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in service revenue from EMEA between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
5389
7256790
-2634
-119
119
Correct choice index: 4
Deferred Revenue
The opening balances of current and long-term deferred revenue were $30,694 and $1,352, respectively, as of January 1, 2018.
Expressed in US $000's except share and per share amounts

Years ended
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
$
$
Current portion
56,691
39,180
Long term portion
5,969
1,881
62,660
41,061


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much has current deferred revenue changed from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018?
Choices:
69874
1
-29342
65177
8486
Correct choice index: 4
12 .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables the company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business .
citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices .
credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question .
citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines .
margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required .
where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level .
exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi .
credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

December 31,
In millions of dollars
2018
2017
Receivables from customers
$14,415
$19,215
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
21,035
19,169
Total brokerage receivables<sup>(1)</sup>
$35,450
$38,384
Payables to customers
$40,273
$38,741
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
24,298
22,601
Total brokerage payables<sup>(1)</sup>
$64,571
$61,342

total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 64571 $ 61342 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker-dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2018 what was the ratio of the total brokerage payables to total brokerage receivables
Choices:
1
0.63755
-1.82147
0.54901
1.82147
Correct choice index: 4
The accumulated benefit obligation for the United States defined benefit pension plans was $198.2 million and $172.8 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans was $39.9 million and $35.6 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets as of December 31:

2019
2018
United States
Foreign
United States
Foreign
(in millions)
Projected benefit obligation
$55.3
$44.0
$50.8
$39.1
Accumulated benefit obligation
53.2
39.9
48.6
35.6
Fair value of plan assets
—
1.6
—
1.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
4.3
38.5
0
75.5
39.9
Correct choice index: 0
The Company’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019, consist of our obligations as borrower under our 2019 Senior Secured Credit Facility, our obligations related to financing of our three 2018 Newbuildings.
The following table sets out financial, commercial and other obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2019.
Notes:
(1) Refers to obligation to repay indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2019.
(2) Refers to estimated interest payments over the term of the indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2019. Estimate based on applicable interest rate and drawn amount as of December 31, 2019.
(3) Refers to obligation to repay indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2019 for three 2018 Newbuildings.
(4) Refers to estimated interest payments over the term of the indebtedness outstanding as of December 31, 2019. Estimate based on applicable interest as of December 31, 2019 for the financing of the three 2018 Newbuildings.
(5) Refers to the future obligation as of December 31, 2019 to pay for operating lease liabilities at nominal values.
*The new five-year senior secured credit facility for $306.1 million is amortizing with a twenty-year maturity profile, carries a floating LIBOR interest rate plus a margin and matures in February 2024. Further, the agreement contains a discretionary excess cash amortization mechanism for the lender that equals 50% of the net earnings from the collateral vessels, less capex provision and fixed amortization.

Contractual Obligations in $’000s 
Total  
Less than 1 year  
1-3 years  
3-5 years  
More than 5 years
Senior Secured Credit Facility (1)*
291,798
18,749
30,610
242,439
-
Interest Payments (2)
82,255
21,690
39,624
20,941
-
Financing of 2018 Newbuildings (3)
119,867
7,630
16,287
17,849
78,101
Interest Payments 2018 Newbuildings (4)
47,517
7,674
13,739
11,526
14,578
Operating Lease Liabilities (5)  
1,937
500
638
587
212
Total  
543,374
56,243
100,898
293,342
92,891


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average total Senior Secured Credit Facility and Interest Payments?
Choices:
187
0.4
374053
187026.5
25.7
Correct choice index: 3
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization includes the following (in millions):
Computer software amortization for the year ended December 31, 2018 includes accelerated amortization of $1.7 million related to certain internally developed software. Deferred contract costs amortization for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 includes accelerated amortization of $6.2 million, $3.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Computer software
$97.3
$94.5
$84.0
Other intangible assets
59.3
57.2
67.8
Deferred contract costs
42.9
32.9
25.7
Property and equipment
36.7
32.4
29.0
Total
$236.2
$217.0
$206.5


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in property and equipment between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
3.4
40.1
3.9
177.5
-3.4
Correct choice index: 0
The following table provides detail of amounts reclassified from AOCL:
(1) These accumulated other comprehensive components are included in our derivative and hedging activities. See Note 15, “Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.

(In millions)
2019
2018
2017
Location of Amount Reclassified from AOCL
Defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits:
Prior service credits
$ 0.1
$0.3
$ 1.3
Actuarial losses
(4.9)
(3.1)
(10.0)
Total pre-tax amount
(4.8)
(2.8)
(8.7)
Other (expense) income, net
Tax benefit
1.2
0.7
2.5
Net of tax
(3.6)
(2.1)
(6.2)
Net gains (losses) on cash flow hedging derivatives:(1)
Foreign currency forward contracts
1.6
0.2
0.9
Cost of sales
Interest rate and currency swaps
—
—
(3.4)
Treasury locks
0.1
0.1
0.1
Interest expense, net
Total pre-tax amount
1.7
0.3
(2.4)
Tax (expense) benefit
(0.6)
(0.1)
0.8
Net of tax
1.1
0.2
(1.6)
Total reclassifications for the period
(2.5 )
(1.9 )
(7.8 )


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Total reclassifications for the period for the 3 years?
Choices:
-3.47
12.2
-4.07
-1.56
-4
Correct choice index: 2