trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Systems revenue of $7,604 million decreased 5.3 percent year to year as reported (4 percent adjusted for currency). Systems Hardware revenue of $5,918 million declined 7.0 percent as reported (6 percent adjusted for currency), driven primarily by declines in Power Systems and Storage Systems. Operating Systems Software revenue of $1,686 million grew 0.9 percent as reported (3 percent adjusted for currency) compared to the prior year.
Within Systems Hardware, IBM Z revenue decreased 1.1 percent as reported but was essentially flat adjusted for currency, reflecting the mainframe product cycles. Revenue declined through the first three quarters due to the end of the z14 product cycle, but there was strong growth in the fourth quarter driven by z15 shipments. The z15’s strong performance demonstrates client demand for technology that offers improved data privacy and resiliency in the hybrid cloud environment.
The z15 mainframe’s capabilities extend the platform’s differentiation with encryption everywhere, cloud-native development and instant recovery. In October, we announced OpenShift for IBM Z, bringing together the industry’s most comprehensive enterprise container and Kubernetes platform with the enterprise server
platforms of IBM Z and LinuxONE. IBM Z continues to deliver a high-value, secure and scalable platform for our clients.
Power Systems revenue decreased 13.5 percent as reported (12 percent adjusted for currency) year to year, due to the strong performance during the second half of 2018 driven by Linux and the introduction of the POWER9-based architecture in our mid-range and high-end products.
Storage Systems revenue decreased 8.9 percent as reported (8 percent adjusted for currency) year to year, with improvements in year-to-year performance in the fourth quarter of 2019, driven primarily by the launch of the next generation high-end storage
system DS8900 in November.
Within Systems, cloud revenue of $2.9 billion declined 4 percent as reported and 3 percent adjusted for currency.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change Adjusted for Currency
Systems external revenue
$7,604
$8,034
(5.3)%
(4.1)%
Systems Hardware
$5,918
$6,363
(7.0)%
(5.9)%
IBM Z
(1.1)
(0.3)
Power Systems
(13.5)
(12.1)
Storage Systems
(8.9)
(7.6)
Operating Systems Software
1,686
1,671
0.9
2.6


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Systems external revenue?
Choices:
7819
9
1955
6015
7821
Correct choice index: 0
NOTE 9 – CONTINGENT PURCHASE PRICE
Our purchase of CareSpeak Communications contains a contingent element that will be paid only if the Company achieves certain patient engagement revenues in 2019 and 2020. The total contingent payment may be up to $3.0 million. The target patient engagement revenues were achieved in 2019 and are expected to be achieved in 2020. The calculated fair value of the contingent payment was $2,365,000 at December 31, 2018 and $3,000,000 at December 31, 2019.
Our purchase of RMDY Health, Inc. also contains a contingent element that will be paid only if the Company achieves certain revenues in 2020 and 2021 related to the RMDY business. The total contingent payment may be up to $30.0 million. The minimum payment is $1.0 million in each of the two years. The calculated fair value of the contingent payment was $3,720,000 at December 31, 2019. We determined the fair value of the Contingent Purchase Price Payable at December 31, 2019 using a Geometric-Brownian motion analysis of the expected revenue and resulting earnout payment using inputs that include the spot price, a risk free rate of return of 1.4%, a term of 2 years, and volatility of 40%. Changes in the inputs could result in a different fair value measurement.
The total fair value of contingent purchase price payable at December 31, 2019 is as follows.

Current
Long-Term  
Total 
CareSpeak Communications, Inc. 
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$3,000,000
RMDY Health, Inc.  
-
3,720,000
3,720,000
Total 
$1,500,000
$5,220,000
$6,720,000


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of total long-term fair value of contingent purchase price payable over total fair value of contingent purchase price payable?
Choices:
-1500000
0.78
5220000.78
-0.78
1.29
Correct choice index: 1
Changes in the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
We had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $20.6 million and $19.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. If the current gross unrecognized tax benefits were recognized, the result would be an increase in our income tax benefit of $20.7 million and $19.6 million, respectively. These amounts are net of accrued interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits of $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
We believe that it is reasonably possible that $0.2 million of our currently remaining unrecognized tax benefits may be recognized by the end of 2020, as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations.

Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Beginning balance as of January 1
$ 19,821
$ 10,939
$ 10,616
Increases for tax positions related to the current year
1,240
8,977
640
Decreases for tax positions related to prior years
0
0
(146)
Increases for tax positions related to prior years
95
367
153
Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities
0
0
0
Increases acquired in business acquisitions
0
540
0
Foreign currency translation
3
(5)
10
Reductions due to lapsed statute of limitations
(555)
(997)
(334)
Ending balance as of December 31
$ 20,604
$ 19,821
$ 10,939


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Increases for tax positions related to prior years between 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
-272
0
-214
-445
272
Correct choice index: 0
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 company for an aggregate proceeds of approximately $ 234 million .
the company recognized a gain on disposal of $ 6 million , net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2010 .
ras laffan was previously reported in the asia generation segment .
23 .
acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions dpl 2014on november 28 , 2011 , aes completed its acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the common stock of dpl for approximately $ 3.5 billion , pursuant to the terms and conditions of a definitive agreement ( the 201cmerger agreement 201d ) dated april 19 , 2011 .
dpl serves over 500000 customers , primarily west central ohio , through its operating subsidiaries dp&l and dpl energy resources ( 201cdpler 201d ) .
additionally , dpl operates over 3800 mw of power generation facilities and provides competitive retail energy services to residential , commercial , industrial and governmental customers .
the acquisition strengthens the company 2019s u.s .
utility operations by expanding in the midwest and pjm , a regional transmission organization serving several eastern states as part of the eastern interconnection .
the company expects to benefit from the regional scale provided by indianapolis power & light company , its nearby integrated utility business in indiana .
aes funded the aggregate purchase consideration through a combination of the following : 2022 the proceeds from a $ 1.05 billion term loan obtained in may 2011 ; 2022 the proceeds from a private offering of $ 1.0 billion notes in june 2011 ; 2022 temporary borrowings of $ 251 million under its revolving credit facility ; and 2022 the proceeds from private offerings of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) in october 2011 by dolphin subsidiary ii , inc .
( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , which was merged into dpl upon the completion of acquisition .
the fair value of the consideration paid for dpl was as follows ( in millions ) : .

Agreed enterprise value
$4,719
Less: fair value of assumed long-term debt outstanding, net
(1,255)
Cash consideration paid to DPL’s common stockholders
3,464
Add: cash paid for outstanding stock-based awards
19
Total cash consideration paid
$3,483

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how much of the dpl purchase price was funded by existing credit facilities as opposed to new borrowing?
Choices:
13.94422
0.07171
-0.07171
0.00029
1
Correct choice index: 1
The following table illustrates the classification of pre-payroll tax and social contribution stock-based compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
The fair value of the shares vested in 2019 was $114 million compared to $68 million for 2018 and $38 million for 2017.
Compensation cost, excluding payroll tax and social contribution, capitalized as part of inventory was $6 million as of December 31, 2019, compared to $6 million as of December 31, 2018 and $3 million as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2019, there was $138 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the grant of unvested shares, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 9 months.
The total deferred income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of income related to unvested share-based compensation expense amounted to $9 million, $7 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017
Cost of sales
22
23
12
Selling, general and administrative
46
67
31
Research and development
77
35
18
Total pre-payroll tax and social contribution compensation
145
125
61


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average of Selling, general and administrative?
Choices:
45
48000000
144
1
48
Correct choice index: 4
The fair value of the derivative feature of the 127,346 and 295,945 warrants issued to the placement agent of the Company’s 2016 private offering and to a holder of its debt for debt cancellation in connection with the Merger, respectively on the issuance dates and at the balance sheet date were calculated using a Black-Scholes option model valued with the following assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate: The Company uses the risk-free interest rate of a U.S. Treasury Note with a similar expected term on the date of measurement.
Dividend yield: The Company uses a 0% expected dividend yield as the Company has not paid dividends to date and does not anticipate declaring dividends in the near future.
Volatility: The Company calculates the expected volatility of the stock price based on the corresponding volatility of the Company’s peer group stock price for a period consistent with the warrants’ expected term.
Expected term: The Company’s expected term is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the warrants.
During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company marked the derivative feature of the warrants to fair value and recorded a loss of $343,857 and a gain
of $250,241 relating to the change in fair value, respectively.

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
Exercise price
1.25
1.25
Risk-free interest rate
2.46%
1.59%
Dividend yield
0.00%
0.00%
Expected volatility
152%
133%
Contractual term
2.15 years
1.15 years


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the risk-free interest rate between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0.87
3.91
0
3.33
2.44
Correct choice index: 0
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

DATE
CITI
S&P 500
S&P FINANCIALS
31-Dec-2011
100.0
100.0
100.0
31-Dec-2012
150.6
116.0
128.8
31-Dec-2013
198.5
153.6
174.7
31-Dec-2014
206.3
174.6
201.3
31-Dec-2015
197.8
177.0
198.2
31-Dec-2016
229.3
198.2
243.4

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2016 what was the ratio of the five-year cumulative total return for citi compared to s&p 500
Choices:
0.4336
131.6701
1.2164
1316700.611
1.3167
Correct choice index: 4
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in thousands, except per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
The Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and the Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 were derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements not included in this Form 10-K. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future. You should read the following financial information together with the information under Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Item 8.
GS Holdings and GSLLC are our predecessors for accounting purposes and, accordingly, amounts prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO represent the historical consolidated operations of either GS Holdings or GSLLC and its subsidiaries. The amounts as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and during the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2019 represent those of consolidated GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO, GreenSky, Inc. did not engage in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and initial capitalization. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information on our organization.
(1) Basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock are applicable only for the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2019, which is the period following the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. See Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information.

Year Ended December 31,
Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Total revenue
$529,646
$414,673
$325,887
$263,865
$173,457
Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
248,580
160,439
89,708
79,145
36,506
Total costs and expenses
408,693
261,883
180,288
144,054
80,351
Operating profit
120,953
152,790
145,599
119,811
93,106
Total other income (expense), net
(32,105)
(19,276)
(6,931)
4,653
713
Income before income tax expense
88,848
133,514
138,668
124,464
93,819
Income tax expense (benefit)
(7,125)
5,534
—
—
—
Net income
95,973
127,980
138,668
124,464
93,819
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
63,993
103,724
N/A
N/A
N/A
Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc.
31,980
24,256
N/A
N/A
N/A
Earnings per share of Class A common stock(1):
Basic
$0.52
$0.43
N/A
N/A
N/A
Diluted
$0.49
$0.41
N/A
N/A
N/A


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the cost of revenue between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
70731000
324965
-70731
49080
70731
Correct choice index: 4
Other Key Financial Measures
The following is a summary of our other key financial measures for fiscal 2019 compared with fiscal 2018 (in millions):
(1) Deferred revenue decreased primarily due to the adoption of ASC 606 in the beginning of our first quarter of fiscal 2019. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of this adoption.

Fiscal 2019
Fiscal 2018
Cash and cash equivalents and investments
$33,413
$46,548
Cash provided by operating activities
$15,831
$13,666
Deferred revenue (1)
$18,467
$19,685
Repurchases of common stock—stock repurchase program
$20,577
$17,661
Dividends
$5,979
$5,968
Inventories
$1,383
$1,846


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in inventories between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
3229
2553018
-463
0
-4585
Correct choice index: 2
NOTE 7. INVENTORIES
The following table details the components of inventories (in thousands).

December 31
2019
2018
Finished goods
$698
$853
Raw materials
90
3
Packaging
110
102
Inventories
$ 898
$ 958


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average value of raw materials in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
91
4650
46.5
43.5
31
Correct choice index: 2
C. Remuneration to Key Managerial Personnel other than MD / Manager / WTD
Note: For more information, please refer to the Corporate Governance Report.

Particulars of Remuneration
Key Managerial Personnel
Ramakrishnan V Chief Financial Officer
Rajendra Moholkar Company Secretary
Total
1. Gross salary
(a) Salary as per provisions contained in Section 17(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
72.06
21.66
93.72
(b) Value of perquisites u/s 17(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
43.54
1.20
44.74
(c) Profits in lieu of salary under Section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
-
-
-
2. Stock Option
-
-
-
3. Sweat Equity
-
-
-
4. Commission
-
-
-
as % of profit
-
-
-
5. Others, Allowances
297.47
117.29
414.76
Total
413.07
140.15
553.22


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in Others, Allowances between the CFO and Company Secretary?
Choices:
0
180.18
-114.29
-72.55
414.76
Correct choice index: 1
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 16.66 .
the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .
performance graph 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2007 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Masco
$55.78
$71.52
$67.12
$52.15
$92.49
S&P 500 Index
$63.45
$79.90
$91.74
$93.67
$108.55
S&P Industrials Index
$60.60
$72.83
$92.04
$91.50
$105.47
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index
$66.43
$90.54
$118.19
$127.31
$154.72

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .
at december 31 , 2012 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 24 million shares .
during the first quarter of 2012 , we repurchased and retired one million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 8 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2012 grant of one million shares of long-term stock awards .
we have not purchased any shares since march 2012. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the increase in the performance of the s&p 500 index from 2008 to 2009
Choices:
0.25926
16.45
0.20588
0.31544
0.45059
Correct choice index: 0
D) SHARE-BASED PAYMENT PLANS
The Corporation offers an Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the benefit of its employees and those of its subsidiaries and a Stock Option Plan to its executive officers and designated employees. No more than 10% of the outstanding subordinate voting shares are available for issuance under these plans. Furthermore, the Corporation offers an Incentive Share Unit Plan ("ISU Plan") and a Performance Share Unit Plan ("PSU Plan") for executive officers and designated employees, and a Deferred Share Unit Plan ("DSU Plan") for members of the Board of Directors ("Board").
Stock purchase plan The Corporation offers, for the benefit of its employees and those of its subsidiaries, an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which is accessible to all employees up to a maximum of 7% of their base annual salary and the Corporation contributes 25% of the employee contributions. The subscriptions are made monthly and employee subordinate voting shares are purchased on the stock market.
Stock option plan A total of 3,432,500 subordinate voting shares are reserved for the purpose of the Stock Option Plan. The minimum exercise price at which options are granted is equal to the market value of such shares at the time the option is granted. Options vest equally over a period of five years beginning one year after the day such options are granted and are exercisable over ten years.
Under the Stock Option Plan, the following options were granted by the Corporation and are outstanding at August 31:
(1) For the year ended August 31, 2019, the Corporation granted 97,725 (126,425 in 2018) stock options to Cogeco's executive officers as executive officers of the Corporation. (2) The weighted average share price for options exercised during the year was $92.43 ($83.46 in 2018).

Years ended August 31,
2019
2018
Options
Weighted average exercise price
Options
Weighted average exercise price
$
$
Outstanding, beginning of the year
819,393
65.27
652,385
56.61
Granted (1)
201,525
65.62
281,350
85.08
Exercised (2)
(170,754)
57.28
(60,337)
57.77
Cancelled
(134,550)
72.43
(54,005)
72.28
Outstanding, end of the year
715,614
65.93
819,393
65.27
Exercisable, end of the year
264,374
55.99
277,108
49.76


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the Options Outstanding, beginning of the year shares from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
1471778
1
63229
21113986400
167008
Correct choice index: 4
Share Repurchase
In September 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $150.0 million of our common stock over a thirty-month period. In November 2017, our Board of Directors approved an extension of the share repurchase program to December 2019 from its original maturity of March 2018. In May 2018, our Board of Directors approved a $50 million increase in its authorization to repurchase shares of our common stock under this same program.
On December 18, 2019, the Board of Directors authorized to remove the expiration date to the Company’s share repurchase program and increase the authorized amount by $25.1 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Company is authorized to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock of up to a total of $50.0 million.
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts)
In order to execute the repurchase of shares of our common stock, the Company periodically enters into stock repurchase agreements. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 the Company has repurchased the following shares of common stock:

Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2019
2018
2017
Amount paid to repurchase shares
$  —
$95,125
$29,993
Number of shares repurchased
—
1,696
422
Average repurchase price per share
$  —
$56.07
$71.07


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in number of shares repurchased between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-1274
4
2118
1274
-366
Correct choice index: 3