trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Fiscal Year Ended 2019 and 2018 Revenues
* Adjusted IFRS balances to reflect the impact of the full retrospective adoption of IFRS 15. See Note 2 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further details.
Total revenues increased $329.1 million, or 37%, in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Growth in total revenues was attributable to increased demand for our products from both new and existing customers. Of total revenues recognized in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, over 90% was attributable to sales to customer accounts existing on or before June 30, 2018. Our number of total customers increased to 152,727 at June 30, 2019 from 125,796 at June 30, 2018.
Subscription revenues increased $223.3 million, or 54%, in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The increase in subscription revenues was primarily attributable to additional subscriptions from our existing customer base. As customers increasingly adopt cloud-based, subscription services and term-based licenses of our Data Center products for their business needs, we expect our subscription revenues to continue to increase at a rate higher than the rate of increase of our perpetual license revenues in future periods.
Maintenance revenues increased $68.0 million, or 21%, in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The increase in maintenance revenues was primarily attributable to growing renewal of software maintenance contracts from our customers related to our perpetual license software offerings.
Perpetual license revenues increased $10.4 million, or 13%, in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. A substantial majority of the increase in perpetual license revenues was attributable to additional licenses to existing customers.
Other revenues increased $27.5 million, or 45%, in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The increase in other revenues was primarily attributable to an increase in revenue from sales of third-party apps through our Atlassian Marketplace.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2019
2018
$ Change
% Change
(U.S. $ in thousands)
*As Adjusted
Subscription
$633,950
$410,694
$223,256
54%
Maintenance
394,526
326,511
68,015
21
Perpetual license
93,593
83,171
10,422
13
Other
88,058
60,602
27,456
45
Total revenues
$1,210,127
$880,978
$329,149
37


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. For fiscal year ended 2019, what is the difference in subscription revenue and maintenance revenue?
Choices:
239424
0
16284423360
-239424
239
Correct choice index: 0
Cost of Revenue, Gross Profit, and Gross Margin
Cost of revenue increased $4.9 million, or 3%, in 2019 as compared to 2018. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily due to $12.1 million in increased personnel expenses, stock-based compensation, and overhead costs, $3.9 million in increased content costs, $3.6 million in increased amortization of acquired intangible assets, and $1.6 million in increased capitalized software amortization. These increased costs were partially offset by $16.4 million in decreased external implementation professional service costs. These costs were incurred to service our existing customers and support our continued growth. The improvement in gross margin was primarily due to a higher mix of subscription revenue, which carries a higher gross margin.
Cost of revenue increased $1.5 million, or 1%, in 2018 as compared to 2017. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily due to $6.0 million in increased capitalized software amortization and $4.5 million in increased content costs. These increased costs were partially offset by $6.6 million in decreased amortization of acquired intangible assets and $2.9 million in external implementation service costs. These costs were incurred to service our existing customers and support our continued growth. The improvement in gross margin was primarily due to a higher mix of subscription revenue, which carries a higher gross margin.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue
$149,215
$144,349
$142,867
Gross profit
$427,308
$393,542
$339,118
Gross margin
74.1%
73.2%
70.4%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in cost of revenue between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-194769
0
1482
15
-142866
Correct choice index: 2
RSU Activity We grant RSUs, which represent the right to receive shares of our common stock. Vesting for RSUs is contingent upon the holders’ continued employment with us and may be subject to other conditions (which may include the satisfaction of a performance measure). Also, certain of our performance-based RSUs include a range of shares that may be released at vesting which are above or below the targeted number of RSUs based on actual performance relative to the grant date performance measure. If the vesting conditions are not met, unvested RSUs will be forfeited. Upon vesting of the RSUs, we may withhold shares otherwise deliverable to satisfy tax withholding requirements.
The following table summarizes our RSU activity with performance-based RSUs presented at the maximum potential shares that could be earned and issued at vesting (amounts in thousands except per share amounts):
Certain of our performance-based RSUs did not have an accounting grant date as of December 31, 2019, as there is not a mutual understanding between the Company and the employee of the performance terms. Generally, these performance terms relate to operating income performance for future years where the performance goals have not yet been set. As of December 31, 2019, there were 3.2 million performance-based RSUs outstanding for which the accounting grant date has not been set, of which 1.9 million were 2019 grants. Accordingly, no grant date fair value was established and the weighted average grant date fair value calculated above for 2019 grants excludes these RSUs.
At December 31, 2019, approximately $96 million of total unrecognized compensation cost was related to RSUs and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.64 years. Of the total unrecognized compensation cost, $50 million was related to performance-based RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.63 years. The total grant date fair value of vested RSUs was $147 million, $120 million and $64 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The income tax benefit from stock option exercises and RSU vestings was $47 million, $94 million, and $160 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Number of shares
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested RSUs at December 31, 2018
10,623
$40.39
Granted
4,426
45.55
Vested
(2,758)
47.86
Forfeited
(2,963)
54.61
Unvested RSUs at December 31, 2019
9,328
$32.60


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the weighted-average grant date fair value between granted and vested RSUs?
Choices:
-16.14
-4378.14
0.02
2.31
0.86
Correct choice index: 3
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 .
gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively .
gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively .
gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 .
there were no gross realized losses for 2003 .
maturities stated are effective maturities .
f .
restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash .
at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements .
g .
property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively .
in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized .
there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment .
additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated .
the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 .
h .
investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc .
( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 .
the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .

2005
2004
Furniture and equipment
$98,387
$90,893
Leasehold improvements
66,318
65,294
Computers
18,971
18,421
Software
18,683
16,411
Total property and equipment, gross
202,359
191,019
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
147,826
126,794
Total property and equipment, net
$54,533
$64,225

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the ratio of the net loss on the disposal of the unfully depreciated assets in 2005 compared 2004
Choices:
6.3
-343992
8.0
2.1
1.5
Correct choice index: 2
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense is included in the consolidated statements of operations as follows (in millions):
As of April 26, 2019, total unrecognized compensation expense related to our equity awards was $285 million, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average remaining service period of 2.1 years.

Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Cost of product revenues
$ 4
$ 3
$ 4
Cost of hardware maintenance and other services revenues
10
10
13
Sales and marketing
67
68
84
Research and development
48
49
59
General and administrative
29
31
35
Total stock-based compensation expense
$ 158
$ 161
$ 195
Income tax benefit for stock-based compensation
$ 15
$ 29
$ 41


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What would be the change in Research and development expense between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
-46
-10
-10000000
21
-11
Correct choice index: 1
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act .
the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28 , 2013 to december 29 , 2018 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period .
the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 28 , 2013 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends .
the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

12/28/2013
12/27/2014
12/26/2015
12/31/2016
12/30/2017
12/29/2018
Tractor Supply Company
$100.00
$104.11
$115.45
$103.33
$103.67
$117.18
S&P 500
$100.00
$115.76
$116.64
$129.55
$157.84
$149.63
S&P Retail Index
$100.00
$111.18
$140.22
$148.53
$193.68
$217.01

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how much of a greater return , in percentage , was gained in the s&p retail index compared to the tractor supply company?
Choices:
16.8382
1.0125
0.9983
0.6102
0.3674
Correct choice index: 2
SG&A costs during fiscal 2018 were $222.0 million, an increase of $5.7 million compared to the $216.3 million of SG&A during fiscal 2017. The following table shows the components of SG&A costs for the twelve months ended October 31, 2018 and 2017.
Regarding the table above, the change in start-up expense in any particular period relates to the stage of the start-up process in which a facility under construction is in during the period. Non-construction related expenses, such as labor, training and office-related expenses for a facility under construction are recorded as start-up expense until the facility begins operations. As a facility moves closer to actual start-up, the expenses incurred for labor, training, etc. increase. As a result, amounts classified as start-up expenses will increase period over period until the facility begins production. Once production begins, the expenses from that point forward are recorded as costs of goods sold. The increase in legal expenses was primarily attributable to our ongoing defense of the litigation described in “Part II, Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of this Form 10-K. The increases in trainee expense and administrative salaries were primarily attributable to increases in personnel that coincide with the Company's growth plans. The decrease in bonus expense, payouts of which are based on profitability, was the result of profitability not reaching the required levels for payout of that incentive. The decrease in ESOP expense, payouts of which are based on profitability, was attributable to the difference in the level of profitability between fiscal 2018 and 2017. The increase in all other SG&A expenses was the result of a net increase in various other categories of SG&A costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Costs (in thousands)
Description
Twelve months ended October 31, 2018
Twelve months ended October 31, 2017
Increase/(Decrease) 
Start-up expense (Tyler, Texas complex) 
$13,394
$403
$ 12,991
Legal services expense 
17,573
7,879
9,694
All other SG&A 
68,863
61,847
7,016
Administrative salary expense
42,288
36,193
6,095
Trainee expense 
21,553
16,182
5,371
Charter aircraft expense
2,167
900
1,267
Depreciation expense - machinery and equipment 
5,801
4,555
1,246
Stock compensation expense 
15,702
16,952
(1,250)
Marketing expense
32,624
34,272
(1,648)
Start-up expense (St. Pauls, North Carolina complex) 
—
4,022
(4,022)
Bonus award program expense 
—
15,098
(15,098)
Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense
2,000
18,000
(16,000)
Total SG&A 
$221,965
$216,303
$ 5,662


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") expense for fiscal years 2018 and 2017?
Choices:
10000
20000
4
2000
180000000
Correct choice index: 0
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
17. General and Administrative Expenses
An analysis of general and administrative expenses is as follows:
* Employee costs include restructuring costs of $3,975 pursuant to management’s decision to relocate more of its employees including several members of senior management to the Piraeus, Greece office.

For the year ended December 31,
2017
2018
2019
Employee costs*
18,789
20,980
24,863
Share-based compensation (Note 22)
4,565
5,216
5,107
Other expenses
16,496
15,797
17,415
Total
39,850
41,993
47,385


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in other expenses from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
1
1618
919
-11822
13440
Correct choice index: 1
In 2019 we recorded $5 million of impairment, restructuring charges and other related closure costs, mainly consisting of impairment of equipment and licenses dedicated exclusively to certain development projects that were cancelled, while no alternative future use was identified internally.
In 2018 we recorded $21 million of impairment, restructuring charges and other related closure costs, consisting of: (i) $19 million related to the set-top box restructuring plan and (ii) $2 million of impairment of acquired technologies, for which it was determined that they had no future alternative use.
In 2017 we recorded $45 million of impairment, restructuring charges and other related closure costs, primarily consisting of: (i) $34 million of net restructuring charges related to the set-top box restructuring plan; (ii) $13 million of restructuring charges related to the restructuring plan in Bouskoura, Morocco;
(iii) $3 million charge relating to the update of the existing unused lease provision and (iv) $5 million income for the reversal of provisions related to previously announced restructuring plans, mainly the Embedded Processing Solutions business restructuring plan, for which accrued provisions were not fully used at completion of the plan.

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(In millions)
Impairment, restructuring charges and other related closure costs
$(5)
$(21)
$(45)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Impairment, restructuring charges and other related closure costs?
Choices:
23666.67
44.67
23.67
9.67
20
Correct choice index: 2
3. Debtors
Accounting policies
Amounts owed to subsidiaries are classified and recorded at amortised cost (2018: classified as loans and receivables) and reduced by allowances for expected credit losses. Estimate future credit losses are first recorded on initial recognition of a receivable and are based on estimated probability of default. Individual balances are written off when management deems them not to be collectible. Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value through profit and loss.
Note: 1 Amounts owed by subsidiaries are unsecured, have no fixed date of repayment and are repayable on demand with sufficient liquidity in the group to flow funds if required. Therefore expected credit losses are considered to be immateria

2019
2018
€m
€m
Amounts falling due within one year:
Amounts owed by subsidiaries1
242,976
220,871
Taxation recoverable
233
–
Other debtors
32
199
Derivative financial instruments
183
163
243,424
221,233
Amounts falling due after more than one year:
Derivative financial instruments
3,439
2,449
Deferred tax
–
31
3,439
2,480


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the 2019 average total amount falling due after more than one year?
Choices:
2480
123207.5
5919
1973
2959.5
Correct choice index: 4
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of fiscal year end 2019, we had total unrecognized income tax benefits of $542 million. If recognized in future years, $397 million of these currently unrecognized income tax benefits would impact income tax expense (benefit) and the effective tax rate. As of fiscal year end 2018, we had total unrecognized income tax benefits of $566 million. If recognized in future years, $467 million of these currently unrecognized income tax benefits would impact income tax expense (benefit) and the effective tax rate. The following table summarizes the activity related to unrecognized income tax benefits:
We record accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense (benefit). As of fiscal year end 2019 and 2018, we had $42 million and $60 million, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, recorded primarily in income taxes. During fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, we recognized income tax benefits of $14 million, expense of $5 million, and benefits of $5 million, respectively, related to interest and penalties on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We file income tax returns on a unitary, consolidated, or stand-alone basis in multiple state and local jurisdictions, which generally have statutes of limitations ranging from 3 to 4 years. Various state and local income tax returns are currently in the process of examination or administrative appeal.
Our non-U.S. subsidiaries file income tax returns in the countries in which they have operations. Generally, these countries have statutes of limitations ranging from 3 to 10 years. Various non-U.S. subsidiary income tax returns are currently in the process of examination by taxing authorities.

Fiscal
2019
2018
2017
(in millions)
Balance at beginning of fiscal year
$ 566
$  501
$ 490
Additions related to prior years tax positions
13
14
40
Reductions related to prior years tax positions
(101)
(11)
(9)
Additions related to current year tax positions
98
105
70
Settlements
(2)
(7)
(4)
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations
(32)
(36)
(86)
Balance at end of fiscal year
$ 542
$  566
$ 501


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Additions related to prior years tax positions in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
-566
0
26
-1
1
Correct choice index: 3
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense increased by $8.6 million in 2018 compared to 2017. The increase was primarily due to a $3.7 million increase in employee-related costs, which includes stock-based compensation, associated with our increased headcount from 79 employees as of December 31, 2017 to 89 employees as of December 31, 2018. There was an additional increase of $2.8 million in depreciation and amortization, an increase of $1.5 million to support compliance as a public company, an increase of $0.4 million in software subscription cost and a $0.2 million increase in office related expenses to support the administrative team.

Year Ended December 31,
Change
2018
2017
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
General and administrative
$ 31,462
$ 22,895
$ 8,567
37.4%
% of revenue
21%
22%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average General and administrative expense for 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
36238
271785
54357
27178.5
4283.5
Correct choice index: 3
NOTE 10 – FREIGHT RECEIVABLES
As of 31 December 2019, freight receivables included receivables at a value of USD 0.0m (2018: USD 0.0m 2017: USD 0.0m) that are individually determined to be impaired to a value of USD 0.0m (2018: USD 0.0m, 2017: USD 0.0m).
Management makes allowance for expected credit loss based on the simplified approach to provide for expected credit losses, which permits the use of the lifetime expected loss provision for all trade receivables. Expected credit loss for receivables overdue more than 180 days is 25%-100%, depending on category. Expected credit loss for receivables overdue more than one year is 100%.

USDm
2019
2018
2017
Analysis as of 31 December of freight receivables:
Gross freight receivables:
Not yet due
39.8
44.0
25.5
Due < 30 days
22.5
18.8
26.0
Due between 30 and 180 days
25.3
20.5
18.4
Due > 180 days
6.0
4.4
2.7
Total gross
93.6
87.7
72.6
Allowance for expected credit loss
3.7
1.7
1.3
Total net
89.9
86.0
71.3


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the total net gross freight receivables in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
1.7
3.9
-3.9
2.2
17.3
Correct choice index: 1