trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
alexion pharmaceuticals , inc .
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .

2008
$4,935
2009
3,144
2010
3,160
2011
3,200
2012
2,768
Thereafter
9,934

9 .
commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s .
district court for the district of delaware .
pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris .
pdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees .
alexion has denied pdl's claims .
in addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s .
patents held by pdl .
alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .
on february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc .
filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california .
sb2 , inc .
claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc .
patents due to sales of soliris .
sb2 , inc .
seeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees .
alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims .
the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages .
however , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) .
product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 .
we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 .
such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the average future minimum annual rental payment for the next five years?
Choices:
111030
6304
4441.2
3810.4
4908.8
Correct choice index: 2
Revenue by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
Revenues by geographic area are based upon the country of billing. The geographic location of distributors and OEM customers may be different from the geographic location of the ultimate end users of the products and services provided by us. No single non-U.S. country accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in fiscal years ended February 28, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Year Ended February 28,
2019
2018
2017
United States
268,453
265,613
259,974
Europe, Middle East and Africa
49,496
45,830
49,918
South America
15,134
20,699
17,738
Canada
9,815
14,958
8,412
Asia and Pacific Rim
13,958
12,873
8,967
All other
6,944
5,939
6,093
363,800
365,912
351,102


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much does the top 3 revenues in 2018 add up to?
Choices:
332142
432441
332
311443
66529
Correct choice index: 0
12 .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business .
citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices .
credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question .
citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines .
margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required .
where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level .
exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi .
credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive .
brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

December 31,
In millions of dollars
2017
2016
Receivables from customers
$19,215
$10,374
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
19,169
18,513
Total brokerage receivables<sup>(1)</sup>
$38,384
$28,887
Payables to customers
$38,741
$37,237
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
22,601
19,915
Total brokerage payables<sup>(1)</sup>
$61,342
$57,152

payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. as of december 31 2017 what is the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Choices:
1.17904
96.32663
-0.84815
0.84815
1
Correct choice index: 3
Restricted Stock Grants—During 2019 and 2018, the Company granted 0.321 and 0.410 shares, respectively, of restricted stock to certain employee and director participants under its share-based compensation plans. Restricted stock grants generally vest over a period of 1 to 4 years. The Company recorded $72.5, $109.7 and $63.0 of compensation expense related to outstanding shares of restricted stock held by employees and directors during 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In 2018, this expense included $29.4 associated with accelerated vesting due to the passing of our former executive chairman. A summary of the Company’s nonvested shares activity for 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
At December 31, 2019, there was $77.9 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested awards granted to both employees and directors under the Company’s share-based compensation plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. Unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested shares of restricted stock grants is recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in stockholder’s equity at December 31, 2019.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan—During 2019, 2018 and 2017, participants of the ESPP purchased 0.021, 0.020 and 0.020 shares, respectively, of Roper’s common stock for total consideration of $6.8, $5.4, and $4.2, respectively. All of these shares were purchased from Roper’s treasury shares.

Number of shares
Weighted-average grant date fair value
Nonvested at December 31, 2017
0.859
$ 187.01
Granted
0.410
278.29
Vested
(0.492)
204.24
Forfeited
(0.038)
191.51
Nonvested at December 31, 2018
0.739
$ 225.93
Granted
0.321
318.75
Vested
(0.290)
209.05
Forfeited
(0.061)
225.23
Nonvested at December 31, 2019
0.709
$ 275.00


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total price of shares that were forfeited between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0.04
16.39
4.75
13.74
50728.55
Correct choice index: 3
4. Income Taxes
Provision for Income Taxes
Income (loss) before income tax expense is summarized below (in thousands):
(1) Includes the elimination of intercompany foreign dividends paid to the U.S.

Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
2019
2018
2017
Domestic (1)
$(415,707)
$(426,897)
$(373,690)
Foreign (1)
866,411
800,298
629,923
$450,704
$373,401
$256,233


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Foreign income (loss) between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
-1216005
693386990478
66113
-544065
Correct choice index: 3
table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing .
the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends .
the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

12/9/2013
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
American Airlines Group Inc.
$100
$103
$219
Amex Airline Index
100
102
152
S&P 500
100
102
114

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the growth rate on the amex airline index from 12/31/2013 to 12/31/2014
Choices:
-0.4902
0.4804
0.4902
50
1.2941
Correct choice index: 2
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc .
all rights reserved. .

12/29/2007
1/3/2009
1/2/2010
1/1/2011
12/31/2011
12/29/2012
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
100.00
22.55
35.17
48.50
61.07
78.92
NASDAQ Composite
100.00
59.03
82.25
97.32
98.63
110.78
S&P 400 Information Technology
100.00
54.60
82.76
108.11
95.48
109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the five years ended 12/29/2012?
Choices:
-21.08
268.14
-31.86
-3186
-10.78
Correct choice index: 2
Statement of financial position
Guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries
Altium Limited has provided financial guarantees in respect of credit card facilities and office leases amounting to US$261,518 (2018: US$283,752).
Contingent liabilities
The parent entity had no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018.
Capital commitments - Property, plant and equipment
The parent entity had no capital commitments for property, plant and equipment at as 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018.
The accounting policies of the parent entity are consistent with those of the Group, as disclosed in the relevant notes to the financial statements.

Parent
2019
2018
US$’000
US$’000
Total current assets
121,041
73,202
Total assets
383,665
336,032
Total current liabilities
154,619
90,392
Total liabilities
155,521
92,364
Equity
Contributed equity
126,058
125,635
Foreign currency reserve
2,607
2,783
Equity compensation reserve
19,561
12,570
Retained profits
79,918
102,680
Total equity
228,144
243,668


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the current ratio in 2019?
Choices:
0
197511.88
4034.7
0.78
-33578
Correct choice index: 3
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations .
postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material .
the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 .
effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s .
pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

Pension Plans
(Millions of dollars)
2018
2017
2016
Service cost
$136
$110
$81
Interest cost
90
61
72
Expected return on plan assets
(154)
(112)
(109)
Amortization of prior service credit
(13)
(14)
(15)
Amortization of loss
78
92
77
Settlements
2
—
7
Net pension cost
$137
$138
$113
Net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans
$34
$43
$35

net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods .
the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s .
supplemental pension plan .
the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the average pension service cost from 2016 to 2018 in millions
Choices:
109.0
246
87.7
109000
35.7
Correct choice index: 0
The following direct customers accounted for 10% or more of our net revenues in one or more of the following periods:
Nokia was our largest customer in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017. Nokia purchases products directly from us and through contract manufacturers and distributors. Based on information provided to us by its contract manufacturers and our distributors, purchases by Nokia represented approximately 45%, 36% and 41% of our net revenues in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. To our knowledge, none of our other OEM customers accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues in any of these periods.

Fiscal Year Ended
March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Contract manufacturers and consignment warehouses:       
Flextronics Technology
21.8%
14.0%
10.4%
Sanmina
17.7
16.0
20.4
Distributors:       
Avnet Logistics
31.3
35.3
25.5
Nexcomm 
14.8
16.1
19.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average revenues from Avnet Logistics between 2017-2019?
Choices:
255.8
0.9
32.6
30.7
204.7
Correct choice index: 3
and penalties , resulting in a liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 .
in 2017 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 1 million for interest and penalties , resulting in no material liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017 .
the 2017 changes in interest and penalties related to statute of limitation expirations .
in 2016 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 2 million for interest and penalties , resulting in a total liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016 .
the 2016 changes in interest and penalties related to reductions in prior year tax positions and settlement with a taxing authority .
the following table summarizes the tax years that are either currently under examination or remain open under the applicable statute of limitations and subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which the company operates: .

Jurisdiction
Years
United States<sup>(1)</sup>
2011
-
2017
Connecticut
2016
-
2017
Mississippi
2012
-
2017
Virginia<sup>(1)</sup>
2011
-
2017

virginia ( 1 ) 2011 - 2017 ( 1 ) the 2014 tax year has been closed in these jurisdictions .
although the company believes it has adequately provided for all uncertain tax positions , amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than the company's accrued position .
accordingly , additional provisions for federal and state income tax related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are effectively settled or otherwise resolved .
conversely , the company could settle positions with the tax authorities for amounts lower than have been accrued .
the company believes that it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months the company's liability for uncertain tax positions may decrease by $ 14 million due to resolution of a federal uncertain tax position .
during 2013 the company entered into the pre-compliance assurance process with the irs for years 2011 and 2012 .
the company is part of the irs compliance assurance process program for the 2014 through 2018 tax years .
open tax years related to state jurisdictions remain subject to examination .
deferred income taxes - deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and for income tax purposes .
as described above , deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated as of the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates expected to be in effect when the deferred tax items reverse in future periods .
as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) under the tax act , the company revalued its net deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2017 .
net deferred tax assets are classified as long-term deferred tax assets in the consolidated statements of financial position. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016?
Choices:
2
0
1.0
5
-3
Correct choice index: 2
The following tables present the recorded investment by portfolio segment and by class, excluding commercial financing receivables and other miscellaneous financing receivables at December 31, 2019 and 2018. Commercial financing receivables are excluded from the presentation of financing receivables by portfolio segment, as they are short term in nature and the current estimated risk of loss and resulting impact to the company’s financing results are not material.
Write-offs of lease receivables and loan receivables were $16 million and $47 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Provisions for credit losses recorded for lease receivables and loan receivables were a release of $6 million and an addition of $2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The average recorded investment of impaired leases and loans for Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific was $138 million, $49 million and $45 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Both interest income recognized, and interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired leases and loans were immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2019.

($ in millions)
At December 31, 2019:
Americas
EMEA
Asia Pacific
Total
Recorded investment:
Lease receivables
$ 3,419
$1,186
$  963
$ 5,567
Loan receivables
6,726
3,901
2,395
13,022
Ending balance
$10,144
$5,087
$3,359
$18,590
Recorded investment, collectively evaluated for impairment
$10,032
$5,040
$3,326
$18,399
Recorded investment, individually evaluated for impairment
$   112
$   47
$   32
$   191
Allowance for credit losses
Beginning balance at January 1, 2019
Lease receivables
$    53
$   22
$   24
$     99
Loan receivables
105
43
32
179
Total
$   158
$   65
$   56
$   279
Write-offs
(42)
(3)
(18)
(63)
Recoveries
1
0
1
2
Provision
5
(7)
(3)
(5)
Other*
(1)
0
(1)
(2)
Ending balance at December 31, 2019
$   120
$   54
$   36
$   210
Lease receivables
$    33
$   23
$   16
$    72
Loan receivables
$    88
$   31
$   20
$   138
Related allowance, collectively evaluated for impairment
$    25
$   11
$    4
$    39
Related allowance, individually evaluated for impairment
$    96
$   43
$   32
$   171


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Recorded investment of Loan receivables for Americas and EMEA for December 2019?
Choices:
5313.5
10627
0
-5313.5
3395.5
Correct choice index: 0
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Unit Awards
For equity based restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards that contain only service conditions for vesting (time-based awards), we calculate the award fair value based on the closing price of CenturyLink common stock on the accounting grant date. We also grant equity-based awards that contain service conditions as well as additional market or performance conditions. For awards having both service and market conditions, the award fair value is calculated using Monte-Carlo simulations. Awards with service as well as market or performance conditions specify a target number of shares for the award, although each recipient ultimately has the opportunity to receive between 0% and 200% of the target number of shares. For awards with service and market conditions, the percentage received is based on our total shareholder return over the three-year service period versus that of selected peer companies. For awards with service and performance conditions, the percentage received depends upon the attainment of one or more financial performance targets during the two or three-year service period.
The following table summarizes activity involving restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards for the year ended December 31, 2019:
(1) Shares granted whose related performance conditions were not finalized at December 31, 2019, were excluded from this figure.
During 2018, we granted 9.7 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards at a weighted-average price of $17.02. During 2017, we granted 5.2 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards at a weighted-average price of $22.02. The total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2019, 2018 and 2017, was $118 million, $169 million and $60 million, respectively.

Number of shares
Weighed-Average Grant Date Fair Value
(In thousands)
Non-vested at December 31, 2018
17,059
$19.65
Granted(1)
9,780
12.41
Vested
(9,038)
19.54
Forfeited
(1,757)
18.62
Non-vested at December 31, 2019
16,044
15.42


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the sum of the total fair value of restricted stock vested during 2019, 2018 and 2017?
Choices:
238
359
-1528
347
398
Correct choice index: 3