trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
12/31/2016
LKQ Corporation
$100
$140
$219
$187
$197
$204
S&P 500 Index
$100
$113
$147
$164
$163
$178
Peer Group
$100
$111
$140
$177
$188
$217

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference .
information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. based on the review of the comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s . ) index and the peer group what was the ratio of the lkq performance to the peer group in 2013
Choices:
0.63927
1.55
1.4898
1.56429
0.12857
Correct choice index: 3
BELL WIRELESS RESULTS
REVENUES
Bell Wireless operating revenues increased by 3.7% in 2019, compared to 2018, driven by greater postpaid and prepaid service revenues and higher product revenues.
Service revenues increased by 2.5% in 2019, compared to last year, driven by: • Continued growth in our postpaid and prepaid subscriber base coupled with rate increases • A greater mix of customers subscribing to higher-value monthly plans including unlimited data plans launched in June 2019 • The favourable year-over-year impact from the 2018 CRTC retroactive decision on wireless domestic wholesale roaming rates
These factors were partly offset by: • Greater sales of premium handsets and more customers subscribing to higher-value monthly plans • Lower data and voice overages driven by increased customer adoption of monthly plans with higher data allotments and richer voice plans
Product revenues increased by 6.6% in 2019, compared to last year, driven by greater sales of premium handsets and the impact of higher-value rate plans in our sales mix.

2019
2018
$ CHANGE
% CHANGE
External service revenues
6,427
6,269
158
2.5%
Inter-segment service revenues
49
48
1
2.1%
Total operating service revenues
6,476
6,317
159
2.5%
External product revenues
2,660
2,497
163
6.5%
Inter-segment product revenues
6
4
2
50.0%
Total operating product revenues
2,666
2,501
165
6.6%
Total Bell Wireless revenues
9,142
8,818
324
3.7%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the Total Bell Wireless revenues in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
11484
8818
17960000
17960
18284
Correct choice index: 3
15. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Impact of Adopting Topic 606
The effects of the adoption on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2019 was as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year Ended
September 28, 2019
As Reported
Adjustments due to Topic 606
September 28, 2019
As Adjusted - Without
Adoption of Topic 606
Net sales
$3,164,434
$14,880
$3,149,554
Cost of sales
2,872,596
12,934
2,859,662
       Gross profit
291,838
1,946
289,892
       Operating income
142,055
1,946
140,109
       Income before income taxes
125,955
1,946
124,009
Income tax expense
17,339
440
16,899
           Net income
$108,616
$1,506
$107,110


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the amount as reported between Operating income and income before income taxes?
Choices:
1610000
-16100
16100
268010
1946
Correct choice index: 2
12. Derivative Instruments
(a) Summary of Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments primarily to manage exposures to foreign currency exchange rate, interest rate, and equity price risks. Our primary objective in holding derivatives is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and equity prices. Our derivatives expose us to credit risk to the extent that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of the agreement. We do, however, seek to mitigate such risks by limiting our counterparties to major financial institutions. In addition, the potential risk of loss with any one counterparty resulting from this type of credit risk is monitored. Management does not expect material losses as a result of defaults by counterparties.
The notional amounts of our outstanding derivatives are summarized as follows (in millions):

July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency derivatives—cash flow hedges
$663
$147
Interest rate derivatives
4,500
6,750
Net investment hedging instruments
309
250
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency derivatives
2,708
2,298
Total return swaps—deferred compensation
574
566
Total
$8,754
$10,011


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Net investment hedging instruments between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
59
2458
162
-6441
1
Correct choice index: 0
Liquidity, Going Concern and Capital Resources
See Note 1 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of liquidity.
Cash used in operating activities of continuing operations is presented below (in thousands).
We used $13.5 million in operating cash during 2019, compared to $5.2 million of operating cash in 2018. We also funded $4.4 million of capital expenditures in 2019, compared to $3.3 million in the prior year. These capital expenditures relate primarily to our capacity expansion and debottlenecking at Golden Ridge, leasehold improvements at our Riverside facility, and our specialty ingredients’ equipment in our Dillon plant. Offsetting these uses of cash was $19.4 million of proceeds from issuances of common stock and a prefunded warrant, as well as $2.2 million of proceeds from option and warrant exercises.
As of December 31, 2019, our cash and cash equivalents balance was $8.4 million (see Note 1), compared to $7.0 million and $0.2 million of restricted cash as of December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2019, management believes the Company has sufficient capital reserves and borrowing capacity to fund the operations of the business; however, we may seek external sources of funding for investment initiatives and/or general operations if we determine that is the best course of action.

Year Ended December 31
2019
2018
Cash flow from operating activities of continuing operations:
Loss from continuing operations
$ (13,735)
$ (8,101)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
1,930
773
Stock and share-based compensation
1,360
886
Settlement with Sellers of Golden Ridge
( 849)
-
Provision for bad debts
472
-
Other
13
(14)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
(1,102)
331
Inventories
332
(138)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
(296)
935
Commodities payable
(1,340)
176
Other
(235)
(89)
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations
$(13,450)
$(5,241)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average loss from continuing operations in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
21836
3380
7832
-10918
10918
Correct choice index: 4
Cost of Services Cost of services decreased $204 million, or 1.9%, during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily due to lower access costs resulting from a decline in voice connections, as well as lower employee-related costs associated with the lower headcount resulting from the Voluntary Separation Program, offset by an increase in regulatory fees.
Cost of Wireless Equipment Cost of wireless equipment increased $173 million, or 3.8%, during 2019 compared to 2018, primarily driven by a shift to higher priced units in the mix of wireless devices sold and an increase in the number of wireless devices sold.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense Selling, general and administrative expense increased $499 million, or 6.5%, during 2019 compared to 2018, due to increases in advertising expenses and sales commission expense, which were partially offset by decreases in employee-related costs resulting from the Voluntary Separation Program. The increase in sales commission expense was primarily due to a lower net deferral of commission costs in 2019 as compared to 2018 as a result of the adoption of Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective approach.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $153 million, or 3.6%, during 2019 compared to 2018, driven by the change in the mix of total Verizon depreciable assets and Business’s usage of those assets.

(dollars in millions) Increase/ (Decrease)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2019 vs. 2018
Cost of services 
$10,655
$10,859
$(204)
(1.9)%
Cost of wireless equipment 
4,733
4,560
173
3.8
Selling, general and administrative expense 
8,188
7,689
499
6.5
Depreciation and amortization expense 
4,105
4,258
(153)
(3.6)
Total Operating Expenses 
$ 27,681
$ 27,366
$ 315
1.2


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Cost of services from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
1
10502
-10655
21514
-204
Correct choice index: 4
Lease liabilities regarding right-of-use assets are included on the balance sheet under “Borrowings”.
Extension and termination options are included in several leases in order to optimize operational flexibility in terms of managing contracts. The lease term determined by TORM is the noncancellable period of a lease, together with any extension/termination options if these are/are not reasonably certain to be exercised.

USDm
2019
2018
Maturity analysis - contractual undiscounted cash flow
Less than one year
7.5
5.2
One to five years
27.6
25.6
More than five years
0.1
-
Total undiscounted lease liabilities as of 31 December
35.2
30.8
Lease liabilities included under "Borrowings" as of 31 December
30.6
25.3
Non-current
10.2
3.2
Current
20.4
22.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in non-current lease liabilities?
Choices:
5
-7
0
-20
7
Correct choice index: 4
3.1 Financial risk factors (continued)
(a) Market risk (continued)
(iii) Interest rate risk (continued)
During the year ended 31 December 2019, the Group entered into certain interest rate swap contracts to hedge its exposure arising from borrowings carried at floating rates. Under these interest rate swap contracts, the Group agreed with the counterparties to exchange, at specified interval, the difference between fixed contract rates and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts. These interest rate swap contracts had the economic effect of converting borrowings from floating rates to fixed rates and were qualified for hedge accounting. Details of the Group’s outstanding interest rate swap contracts as at 31 December 2019 have been disclosed in Note 38.
The effects of the interest rate swaps on the Group’s financial position and performance are as follows:
Swaps currently in place cover majority of the floating-rate borrowing and notes payable principal outstanding.
As at 31 December 2019 and 2018, management considered that any reasonable changes in the interest rates would not result in a significant change in the Group’s results as the Group’s exposure to cash flow interest-rate risk arising from its borrowings and notes payable carried at floating rates after considering the effect of hedging is considered to be insignificant. Accordingly, no sensitivity analysis is presented for interest rate risk.

2019
2018
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
Interest rate swaps
Carrying amount (non-current (liabilities)/assets)
(494)
1,663
Notional amount
29,423
77,630
Maturity date
30/7/2021~
28/6/2019~
11/4/2024
8/12/2023
Hedge ratio
1:1
1:1
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments since 1 January
(2,139)
181
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedgeeffectiveness
(2,139)
181
Weighted average hedged rate for the year
2.10%
1.60%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much is the change between 2018 and 2019 notional amount of the interest rate swaps?
Choices:
-482
-48207
107053
48207
0
Correct choice index: 1
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the payments due by fiscal year for our outstanding contractual obligations as of June 30, 2019:
(a) Refer to Note 11 – Debt of the Notes to Financial Statements.
(b) Refer to Note 7 – Property and Equipment of the Notes to Financial Statements.
(c) Refer to Note 15 – Leases of the Notes to Financial Statements.
(d) Refer to Note 12 – Income Taxes of the Notes to Financial Statements.
(e) Amounts represent purchase commitments, including open purchase orders and take-or-pay contracts that are not presented as construction commitments above.
(f) We have excluded long-term tax contingencies, other tax liabilities, and deferred income taxes of $14.2 billion from the amounts presented as the timing of these obligations is uncertain. We have also excluded unearned revenue and non-cash items.

(In millions)
2020
2021-2022
2023-2024
Thereafter
Total
Long-term debt: (a)
Principal payments
$ 5,518
$ 11,744
$ 8,000
$ 47,519
$ 72,781
Interest payments
2,299
4,309
3,818
29,383
39,809
Construction commitments (b)
3,443
515
0
0
3,958
Operating leases, including imputed interest (c)
1,790
3,144
2,413
3,645
10,992
Finance leases, including imputed interest (c)
797
2,008
2,165
9,872
14,842
Transition tax (d)
1,180
2,900
4,168
8,155
16,403
Purchase commitments (e)
17,478
1,185
159
339
19,161
Other long-term liabilities (f)
0
72
29
324
425
Total
$  32,505
$  25,877
$  20,752
$  99,237
$  178,371


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. How much do the top 3 contractual obligation terms add up to in 2020?
Choices:
93702
22996
79175228
26439
-8517
Correct choice index: 3
Retirement-Related Plans
The following table provides the total pre-tax cost for all retirement-related plans. Total operating costs/(income) are included in the Consolidated Income Statement within the caption (e.g., Cost, SG&A, RD&E) relating to the job function of the plan participants.
Total pre-tax retirement-related plan cost decreased by $994 million compared to 2018, primarily driven by a decrease in recognized actuarial losses ($1,123 million), primarily due to the change in the amortization period in the U.S. Qualified Personal Pension Plan and higher expected return on plan assets ($143 million), partially offset by higher interest costs ($203 million).
As discussed in the “Operating (non-GAAP) Earnings” section, we characterize certain retirement-related costs as operating and others as non-operating. Utilizing this characterization, operating retirement-related costs in 2019 were $1,457 million, a decrease of $37 million compared to 2018. Non-operating costs of $615 million in 2019 decreased $957 million year to year, driven primarily by the same factors as above.

($ in millions)
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Retirement-related plans—cost
Service cost
$385
$431
(10.7)%
Multi-employer plans
32
38
(16.9)
Cost of defined contribution plans
1,040
1,024
1.5
Total operating costs/ (income)
$1,457
$1,494
(2.5)%
Interest cost
$2,929
$2,726
7.4%
Expected return on plan assets
(4,192)
(4,049)
3.5
Recognized actuarial losses
1,819
2,941
(38.2)
Amortization of prior service costs/(credits)
(9)
(73)
(87.6)
Curtailments/settlements
41
11
262.2
Other costs
28
16
76.2
Total non-operating costs/(income)
$615
$1,572
(60.9)%
Total retirement-related plans—cost
$2,072
$3,066
(32.4)%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in service cost from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
165935
816
184
-572
-46
Correct choice index: 4
1. Sales revenues
Commencing with financial year 2018/19, METRO has been applying IFRS 15 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers). The sales revenues reported for the current financial year relate exclusively to revenues from contracts with customers.
Sales revenues are allocated to the following categories:

€ million
2017/2018
2018/2019
Store-based and other business
22,585
22,487
METRO Germany
4,128
4,075
METRO Western Europe (excl. Germany)
8,904
8,885
METRO Russia
2,550
2,406
METRO Eastern Europe (excl. Russia)
5,893
5,986
METRO Asia
1,074
1,097
Others
35
38
Delivery sales
4,207
4,595
METRO Germany
633
660
METRO Western Europe (excl. Germany)
1,704
1,867
METRO Russia
265
257
METRO Eastern Europe (excl. Russia)
1,059
1,205
METRO Asia
538
599
Others
7
7
Total sales
26,792
27,082
METRO Germany
4,761
4,735
METRO Western Europe (excl. Germany)
10,609
10,752
METRO Russia
2,815
2,662
METRO Eastern Europe (excl. Russia)
6,952
7,191
METRO Asia
1,612
1,696
Others
43
46


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in Delivery sales in 2018/2019 from 2017/2018?
Choices:
0
388
4983
19331165
1933
Correct choice index: 1
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 .
the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock .
stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns .
comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc .
nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .

July 27,  2000
December 29,  2000
December 28,  2001
December 27,  2002
December 26,  2003
Illumina, Inc.
100.00
100.39
71.44
19.50
43.81
NASDAQ Composite Index
100.00
63.84
51.60
35.34
51.73
NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index
100.00
93.20
82.08
51.96
74.57

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the cumulative total stockholder return percentage for illumina inc . common stock for the four years end 2003?
Choices:
99.4381
-0.5619
-1.7797
-0.73
-0.281
Correct choice index: 1
table of contents valero energy corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 11 .
equity share activity activity in the number of shares of common stock and treasury stock was as follows ( in millions ) : common treasury .

CommonStock
TreasuryStock
Balance as of December 31, 2015
673
(200)
Transactions in connection withstock-based compensation plans
—
1
Stock purchases under purchase program
—
(23)
Balance as of December 31, 2016
673
(222)
Transactions in connection withstock-based compensation plans
—
1
Stock purchases under purchase programs
—
(19)
Balance as of December 31, 2017
673
(240)
Stock purchases under purchase programs
—
(16)
Balance as of December 31, 2018
673
(256)

preferred stock we have 20 million shares of preferred stock authorized with a par value of $ 0.01 per share .
no shares of preferred stock were outstanding as of december 31 , 2018 or 2017 .
treasury stock we purchase shares of our common stock as authorized under our common stock purchase program ( described below ) and to meet our obligations under employee stock-based compensation plans .
on july 13 , 2015 , our board of directors authorized us to purchase $ 2.5 billion of our outstanding common stock with no expiration date , and we completed that program during 2017 .
on september 21 , 2016 , our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion with no expiration date , and we completed that program during 2018 .
on january 23 , 2018 , our board of directors authorized our purchase of up to an additional $ 2.5 billion ( the 2018 program ) with no expiration date .
during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we purchased $ 1.5 billion , $ 1.3 billion , and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , of our common stock under our programs .
as of december 31 , 2018 , we have approval under the 2018 program to purchase approximately $ 2.2 billion of our common stock .
common stock dividends on january 24 , 2019 , our board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.90 per common share payable on march 5 , 2019 to holders of record at the close of business on february 13 , 2019 .
valero energy partners lp units on september 16 , 2016 , vlp entered into an equity distribution agreement pursuant to which vlp offered and sold from time to time their common units having an aggregate offering price of up to $ 350 million based on amounts , at prices , and on terms determined by market conditions and other factors at the time of .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how much , in billions , was spent purchasing common stock under the programs from 2016-2018?
Choices:
4.1
23.8
4.3
5.3
2.8
Correct choice index: 0
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees by categories specified below in connection with certain professional services rendered by Ernst & Young, our principal external auditors, for the years indicated.
(1) Audit fees consist of fees associated with the annual audit, review of our quarterly financial statements, statutory audits and internal control review. They also include fees billed for those services that are normally provided by the independent accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.
(2) Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and services related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements but not described in footnote (1) above. These services include certification of our Singapore Branch to Singapore authorities and application for corporation registration.
(3) Tax fees include fees billed for professional services rendered by Ernst & Young, primarily in connection with our tax compliance activities.
All audit and non-audit services performed by Ernst & Young were pre-approved by our audit committee. In certain circumstances, the audit committee delegates to one designated member to pre-approve such audit and non-audit services. Pre-approval by a designated member should be reported to the audit committee at its upcoming meeting.

Years ended December 31,
2018
2019
NT$
NT$
US$
(in thousands)
Audit Fees (1)
52,794
62,040
2,074
Audit-related Fees (2)
1,283
1,095
37
Tax Fees (3)
4,304
3,943
132
Total
58,381
67,078
2,243


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage increase / (decrease) in Tax fees from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-74.56
-8.39
-0.08
-107.61
1697067100
Correct choice index: 1