trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years .
the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc .
s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending may 31 .
global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Global Payments
S&P 500
S&P Information Technology
May 31, 2002
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
May 31, 2003
94.20
91.94
94.48
May 31, 2004
129.77
108.79
115.24
May 31, 2005
193.30
117.75
116.29
May 31, 2006
260.35
127.92
117.14
May 31, 2007
224.24
157.08
144.11

issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million .
the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit .
there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization .
no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in comparison to overall information technology sector , how much percentage would global payments have earned the investor .
Choices:
-26.36
80.13
480.13
23.05
0.08
Correct choice index: 1
Free Cash Flow. Free cash flow represents net cash provided by operating activities minus capital expenditures and capitalized software development costs. Free cash flow is a measure used by management to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends and to generate future operating plans.
The exclusion of capital expenditures and amounts capitalized for internally-developed software facilitates comparisons of our operating performance on a period-to-period basis and excludes items that we do not consider to be indicative of our core operating performance. Free cash flow is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. We believe that free cash flow provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors.
Nevertheless, our use of free cash flow has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our financial results as reported under GAAP. You should consider free cash flow alongside our other GAAP-based financial performance measures, net cash provided by operating activities, and our other GAAP financial results. The following table presents a reconciliation of free cash flow to net cash for operating activities, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net cash provided by operating activities
$10,317
$3,295
$4,863
Capital expenditures
(5,269)
(1,721)
(1,667)
Capitalized software development costs
(7,819)
(8,499)
(6,160)
Free cash flow
$(2,771)
$(6,925)
$(2,964)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Net cash provided by operating activities from 2017-2019?
Choices:
3963.67
6158.33
18472
-1660.67
3817.67
Correct choice index: 1
(1) For the three-month period ended August 31, 2019, the average foreign exchange rate used for translation was 1.3222 USD/CDN. (2) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy. For further details, please consult the "Accounting policies" section. (3) Fiscal 2019 actuals are translated at the average foreign exchange rate of the comparable period of fiscal 2018 which was 1.3100 USD/CDN.
REVENUE Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter revenue increased by 7.0% (6.0% in constant currency). In local currency, revenue amounted to US$199.5 million compared to US$188.1 million for the same period of fiscal 2018. The increase resulted mainly from: • rate increases; • activation of bulk properties in Florida during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019; • continued growth in Internet service customers; and • the FiberLight acquisition completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2019; partly offset by • a decrease in video service customers.
OPERATING EXPENSES Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter operating expenses increased by 8.6% (7.6% in constant currency) mainly as a result of: • programming rate increases; • the FiberLight acquisition completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2019; • higher compensation expenses due to higher headcount to support growth; and • higher marketing initiatives to drive primary service units growth.
ADJUSTED EBITDA Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter adjusted EBITDA increased by 5.1% (4.1% in constant currency). In local currency, adjusted EBITDA amounted to US$87.4 million compared to US$83.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2018. The increase was mainly due to organic growth combined with the impact of the FiberLight acquisition.
ACQUISITIONS OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter acquisitions of property, plant and equipment decreased by 9.5% (10.5% in constant currency) mainly due to: • lower purchases of customer premise equipment due to the timing of certain initiatives; and • lower capital expenditures due to the timing of certain initiatives; partly offset by • additional capital expenditures related to the expansion in Florida.

Three months ended August 31,
2019(1)
2018(2)
Change
Change in constant currency(3)
Foreign exchange impact(3)
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
$
$
%
%
$
Revenue
263,738
246,443
7.0
6.0
2,427
Operating expenses
148,215
136,506
8.6
7.6
1,370
Adjusted EBITDA
115,523
109,937
5.1
4.1
1,057
Adjusted EBITDA margin
43.8%
44.6%
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment
65,967
72,914
(9.5)
(10.5)
704
Capital intensity
25.0%
29.6%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average Adjusted EBITDA?
Choices:
225460
54972
1
112730
2147238
Correct choice index: 3
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2011 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ended december 31 , 2016 .
( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana inc. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , goodyear tire & rubber co. , johnson controls international plc , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc .
company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Company Index
December 31, 2011
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2013
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016
Delphi Automotive PLC (1)
$100.00
$177.58
$283.02
$347.40
$414.58
$331.43
S&P 500 (2)
100.00
116.00
153.58
174.60
177.01
198.18
Automotive Supplier Peer Group (3)
100.00
127.04
188.67
203.06
198.34
202.30

dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 and $ 0.29 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2015 and 2016 , respectively .
in addition , in january 2017 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 15 , 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 6 , 2017. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage increase in cash dividend from 2015 to 2016?
Choices:
0.14
2.16
0.04
0.16
6.25
Correct choice index: 3
Customers and Markets
Our primary customers, in terms of our sales revenues, include premier integrated device manufacturers, such as Texas Instruments and Intel Mobile, plus leading fabless design companies, such as Broadcom, MediaTek, Realtek, Qualcomm and Novatek. Although we are not dependent on any single customer, a significant portion of our operating revenues has been generated from sales to a few customers. Our top ten customers accounted for approximately 51.3% of our operating revenues in 2019. Set forth below is a geographic breakdown of our operating revenues in 2017, 2018 and 2019 by the location of our customers.

Years Ended December 31,
Region
2017
2018
2019
%
%
%
Taiwan
32.8
36.4
36.4
Singapore
20.6
16.4
16.2
China (including Hong Kong)
12.7
12.2
12.9
Japan
3.2
3.9
6.6
USA
12.2
15.6
13.5
Europe
9.6
8.3
4.7
Others
8.9
7.2
9.7
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the customers from USA from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-0.3
2.1
-2.1
-0.2
954.4
Correct choice index: 2
Unrecognized deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of the following items, given the volatile nature of the semi-conductor equipment industry. Therefore it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available to offset deductible temporary differences.
1 These credits regards R&D credits generated in the US, in the state of Arizona. However, ASMI does not recognize these credits stemming from prior years due to the fact that utilization of prior year credits is only possibly if and when the credits generated in the current year are fully utilized. Given the level of R&D activity in the US, the company does not expect it could fully utilize the credits generated in the current year and, hence, does not expect to benefit from the available credits generated in prior years.

2019
Gross amount
Tax effect
Deductible temporary differences
20,642
4,842
Credits 1)
15,221
15,221
Unrecognized deferred tax assets
35,863
20,063


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in the gross amount of  Deductible temporary differences and Credits?
Choices:
-15220
-10379
-5421
5421
20641
Correct choice index: 3
Cubic Transportation Systems
Sales: CTS sales increased 16% to $670.7 million in 2018 compared to $578.6 million in 2017 and were higher in North America and the U.K., but were slightly lower in Australia. Sales in 2018 were higher in the U.S. primarily due to system development on the New York New Fare Payment System contract, which was awarded in October 2017. Increased work on both development and service contracts, including work on new change orders in London also increased CTS sales for the year. Sales were also positively impacted in the U.K. and Australia due to the impact of exchange rates. The average exchange rates between the prevailing currencies in our foreign operations and the U.S. dollar resulted in an increase in CTS sales of $12.4 million for 2018 compared to 2017, primarily due to the strengthening of the British Pound against the U.S. dollar.
Amortization of Purchased Intangibles: Amortization of purchased intangibles included in the CTS operating results totaled $5.2 million in 2018 and $5.7 million in 2017.
Operating Income: CTS operating income increased 52% in 2018 to $60.4 million compared to $39.8 million in 2017. For 2018, operating income was higher from increased volumes of system development work and services, including work on new projects and change orders, primarily in North America and the U.K. Operating income was also higher due to operational efficiencies and reductions in R&D spending. R&D expenses for CTS in 2017 included $6.4 million of system development expenses related to our anticipated contract with the New York Metropolitan Transit Authority that was awarded in early fiscal 2018; such expenses incurred in 2018 on this contract are classified as cost of sales. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 CTS implemented our new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, and as a result began depreciating the cost of certain capitalized software into its operating results. This resulted in a decrease in operating income of $4.2 million between fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018. The average exchange rates between the prevailing currency in our foreign operations and the U.S. dollar resulted in an increase in CTS operating income of $2.2 million for 2018 compared to 2017.
Adjusted EBITDA: CTS Adjusted EBITDA increased 50% to $73.3 million in 2018 compared to $48.8 million in 2017 primarily due to the same items described in the operating income section above. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily driven by the same factors that drove the increase in operating income described above excluding the increase in depreciation and decrease in amortization which are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

Fiscal 2018
Fiscal 2017
% Change
(in millions)
Sales
$ 670.7
$  578.6
16 %
Operating income
60.4
39.8
52
Adjusted EBITDA
73.3
48.8
50


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in CTS adjusted EBITDA?
Choices:
2450
122.1
24.5
-597.4
11.6
Correct choice index: 2
entergy arkansas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue .
net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2015 net revenue
$1,362.2
Retail electric price
161.5
Other
(3.2)
2016 net revenue
$1,520.5

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc .
the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 .
the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 .
a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the net change in net revenue during 2016 for entergy arkansas , inc.?
Choices:
1517.5
1473.4
158.3
-158.3
0
Correct choice index: 2
Operating Segments
The Company operates as one operating segment. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), which is the Company’s chief executive officer, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s CODM evaluates the Company’s financial information for the purpose of allocating resources and assessing the performance of these resources on a consolidated basis. The Company operates as one operating segment. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), which is the Company’s chief executive officer, in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s CODM evaluates the Company’s financial information for the purpose of allocating resources and assessing the performance of these resources on a consolidated basis.
Revenue by geographic country, based on ship-to destinations, which in certain instances may be the location of a contract manufacturer rather than the Company’s end customer, was as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
United States
$70,702
$56,839
$60,723
China
159,637
98,906
148,431
Germany
57,657
58,711
57,051
Thailand
82,413
68,217
48,016
Other
94,254
57,218
70,945
Total revenue
$464,663
339,891
385,166


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of revenue by US in the total revenue in 2019?
Choices:
0.21
0.15
0.18
535365
-0.15
Correct choice index: 1
Note: The scope of use of resources data is appended to include 12 new office buildings which were put into operation in 2019.
Total energy consumption is calculated based on the data of purchased electricity and fuel with reference to the coefficients in the National Standards of the PRC “General Principles for Calculation of the Comprehensive Energy Consumption (GB/T 2589-2008)”.
The Group’s water supply resources are from the municipal water supply.
Recycled water consumption is the reclaimed domestic water treated by the wastewater treatment system equipped at Tencent Tower A and Tower B in Chengdu.
Data of diesel consumption reported above only covers the data centres whose diesel fees are directly borne by the Group.
Average PUE (Power Usage Efficiency) is the annual average data of PUE of the Group’s data centres. PUE, an indicator of the power efficiency of a data centre, is the ratio of total facility energy over IT equipment energy.
Data of running water consumption reported above only covers those data centres wholly used by the Group where operators could provide such data.
Data of packaging materials is not applicable to the Group

2.1 Office Buildings
Indicators
For the year ended 31 December
2019
2018
Total energy consumption (MWh)
205,092.26
167,488.48
Direct energy consumption (MWh)
19,144.17
12,852.04
Including: Gasoline (MWh)
805.77
780.24
Diesel (MWh)
41.33
42.10
Natural gas (MWh)
18,297.07
12,029.70
Indirect energy consumption (MWh)
185,948.09
154,636.44
Including: Purchased electricity (MWh)
185,948.09
154,636.44
Total energy consumption per employee (MWh per employee)
3.44
3.28
Total energy consumption per floor area (MWh per square metre)
0.12
0.14
Running water consumption (tonnes)
1,283,749.73
973,413.06
Running water consumption per employee (tonnes per employee)
21.52
19.07
Recycled water consumption (tonnes)
4,076
5,461


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change between indirect energy consumption (MWh) in 2018 and 2019 year end?
Choices:
0
12852.04
-154633.16
31311.65
185905.99
Correct choice index: 3
as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

2018
$9,127
2019
8,336
2020
8,350
2021
7,741
2022
7,577
Thereafter
9,873
Total minimum future lease payments
$51,004

rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 9.4 million , $ 8.1 million and $ 5.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively .
financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters .
the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 .
based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period .
upon completion of construction in 2013 , we concluded that we had forms of continued economic involvement in the facility , and therefore did not meet with the provisions for sale-leaseback accounting .
we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate .
therefore , the lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and lease payments will be attributed to ( 1 ) a reduction of the principal financing obligation ; ( 2 ) imputed interest expense ; and ( 3 ) land lease expense , representing an imputed cost to lease the underlying land of the building .
at the conclusion of the initial lease term , we will de-recognize both the net book values of the asset and the remaining financing obligation .
as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 39.6 million and $ 41.2 million , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 1.9 million and $ 37.7 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively .
land lease expense under our lease financing obligation amounted to $ 1.3 million for each of the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 respectively. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the future future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases is due in the next 12 months?
Choices:
1.20457
0.92444
0.17895
465513508
0.00018
Correct choice index: 2