trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Cubic Mission Solutions
Sales: CMS sales increased 23% to $207.0 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $168.9 million in 2017. The increase in sales was primarily due to increased orders and shipments of expeditionary satellite communications products, tactical networking products, and Command and Control, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C2ISR) products and services. Businesses acquired during fiscal years 2018 and 2017 whose operations are included in our CMS operating segment had sales of $5.6 million and $1.5 million for fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Amortization of Purchased Intangibles: Amortization of purchased intangibles included in the CMS results amounted to $20.8 million in 2018 and $23.6 million in 2017. The $2.8 million decrease in amortization expense is related to purchased intangible assets that are amortized based upon accelerated methods.
Operating Income: CMS had an operating loss of $0.1 million in 2018 compared to $9.3 million in 2017. CMS realized increased profits from expeditionary satellite communications products, tactical networking products, and C2ISR products and services. As mentioned above, amortization of purchased intangibles decreased to $20.8 million in 2018 compared to $23.6 million in 2017. CMS increased R&D expenditures between 2017 and 2018 by $10.8 million, primarily driven by development of new antenna technologies. Businesses acquired by CMS in fiscal years 2018 and 2017 incurred operating losses of $4.7 million in fiscal 2018 compared to $2.9 million in fiscal 2017. Included in the operating loss incurred by acquired businesses are acquisition transaction costs of $1.6 million and $1.8 million incurred in fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA: CMS Adjusted EBITDA increased 82% to $26.2 million in 2018 compared to $14.4 million in 2017.
The increase in CMS Adjusted EBITDA was primarily due to the same items described in the operating income section
above, excluding the changes in amortization expense and acquisition transaction costs discussed above as such items are
excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

Fiscal 2018
Fiscal 2017
% Change
(in millions)
Sales
$  207.0
$  168.9
23 %
Operating loss
(0.1)
(9.3)
(99)
Adjusted EBITDA
26.2
14.4
82


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average adjusted EBITDA in 2018 and 2017?
Choices:
8
-406
0.2
22.6
20.3
Correct choice index: 4
NOTE L – INCOME TAXES
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to, the following that impact the Company: (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent; (2) eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax; (3) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense; (4) limiting the deductibility of certain executive compensation; and (5) limiting certain other deductions.
The Company follows ASC 740-10 “Income Taxes” which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
A reconciliation of tax expense computed at the statutory federal tax rate on loss from operations before income taxes to the actual income tax (benefit) /expense is as follows:

2019
2018
Tax benefit computed at the statutory rate
$(427,244)
$(631,497)
State taxes
6,525
6,874
Book expenses not deductible for tax purposes
2,980
2,882
Rate Change
45,656
–
Other
2,517
(27,286)
(369,566)
(649,027)
Change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
269,203
658,650
Income tax (benefit) expense
$(100,363)
$9,623


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in state taxes from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-6877
0
13399
38782
-349
Correct choice index: 4
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2012 versus 2011 .
net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 .
the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , and collateralized agreements .
2011 versus 2010 .
net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 5.19 billion for 2011 , 6% ( 6 % ) lower than 2010 .
the decrease compared with 2010 was primarily due to higher interest expense related to our long-term borrowings and higher dividend expense related to financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , partially offset by an increase in interest income from higher yielding collateralized agreements .
operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity .
compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits .
discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment .
in the context of more difficult economic and financial conditions , the firm launched an initiative during the second quarter of 2011 to identify areas where we can operate more efficiently and reduce our operating expenses .
during 2012 and 2011 , we announced targeted annual run rate compensation and non-compensation reductions of approximately $ 1.9 billion in aggregate .
the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff. .

Year Ended December
<i>$ in millions</i>
2012
2011
2010
Compensation and benefits
$12,944
$12,223
$15,376
U.K. bank payrolltax
—
—
465
Brokerage, clearing, exchange anddistribution fees
2,208
2,463
2,281
Market development
509
640
530
Communications and technology
782
828
758
Depreciation and amortization
1,738
1,865
1,889
Occupancy
875
1,030
1,086
Professional fees
867
992
927
Insurance reserves<sup>1</sup>
598
529
398
Other expenses
2,435
2,072
2,559
Total non-compensation expenses
10,012
10,419
10,428
Total operating expenses
$22,956
$22,642
$26,269
Total staff atperiod-end<sup>2</sup>
32,400
33,300
35,700

total staff at period-end 2 32400 33300 35700 1 .
related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d on the consolidated statements of earnings .
2 .
includes employees , consultants and temporary staff .
48 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in the number of staff in 2012?
Choices:
1.97297
-37
-0.02703
-27027.02703
-900
Correct choice index: 2
Summarized financial information concerning our segments is shown in the tables below (in millions):
(1) Revenues for Corporate and Other represent deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustments recorded in accordance with GAAP.
(2) Operating expenses for Corporate and Other includes equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes, of $51.7 million, $51.4 million and $19.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(4) Depreciation and amortization for Corporate and Other primarily represents net incremental depreciation and amortization adjustments associated with the application of purchase accounting recorded in accordance with GAAP.
(5) Transition and integration costs primarily consists of costs associated with executive transition, transition-related costs as we transferred certain corporate functions from FNF and acquisitions.
(6) Receivables from related parties are included in Corporate and Other.

Year ended December 31, 2018
Software Solutions
Data and Analytics
Corporate and Other
Total
Revenues
$962.0
$154.5
$(2.5)
(1)
$1,114.0
Expenses:
Operating expenses
394.8
115.0
115.6
(2)
625.4
Transition and integration costs
—
—
6.6
(5)
6.6
EBITDA
567.2
39.5
(124.7)
482.0
Depreciation and amortization
112.9
14.1
90.0
(4)
217.0
Operating income (loss)
454.3
25.4
(214.7)
265.0
Interest expense, net
(51.7)
Other expense, net
(7.1)
Earnings before income taxes
206.2
Income tax expense
37.7
Net earnings
$168.5
Balance sheet data:
Total assets
$3,227.8
$310.2
$115.4
(6)
$3,653.4
Goodwill
$2,157.6
$172.1
$—
$2,329.7


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference between Total Assets and Total Goodwill?
Choices:
1.6
5983.1
898.1
1323.7
-2157.6
Correct choice index: 3
Long-term state receivables include receivables related to funding and receivables related to tax refund. Funding are mainly public grants to be received from governmental agencies in Italy and France as part of longterm research and development, industrialization and capital investment projects. Long-term receivables related to tax refund correspond to tax benefits claimed by the Company in certain of its local tax jurisdictions, for which collection is expected beyond one year.
In 2019 and 2018, the Company entered into a factoring transaction to accelerate the realization in cash of some non-current assets. As at December 31, 2019, $131 million of the non-current assets were sold without recourse, compared to $122 million as at December 31, 2018, with a financial cost of less than $1 million for both periods.
Other non-current assets consisted of the following:

December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Equity securities
23
19
Long-term state receivables
358
391
Deposits and other non-current assets
56
42
Total
437
452


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Long-term state receivables?
Choices:
13.4
-374.5
1
374.5
358
Correct choice index: 3
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 .
the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested .
comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

DATE
CITI
S&P 500
S&P FINANCIALS
31-Dec-2012
100.0
100.0
100.0
31-Dec-2013
131.8
132.4
135.6
31-Dec-2014
137.0
150.5
156.2
31-Dec-2015
131.4
152.6
153.9
31-Dec-2016
152.3
170.8
188.9
31-Dec-2017
193.5
208.1
230.9

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ended 31-dec-2017 of citi common stock?
Choices:
1
0.405
1.07
0.935
4.675
Correct choice index: 3
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2011 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

December 31,
Company/Index
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.
$100
$112
$161
$241
$317
$348
S&P 500 Retail Index
100
125
180
197
245
257
S&P 500
$100
$113
$147
$164
$163
$178

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total return generated if $ 10 million are invested in s&p500 in 2011 and sold in 2013 , in millions?
Choices:
24.7
-530
9.4
4.7
21.3
Correct choice index: 3
Combined Incentive Plan Information
RSU share activity under the 2004 Plan is set forth below:
The total intrinsic value of RSUs which vested during the years ended March 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $229.3 million, $146.0 million and $166.1 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of RSUs outstanding at March 31, 2019 was $522.0 million, calculated based on the closing price of the Company's common stock of $82.96 per share on March 29, 2019. At March 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining expense recognition period was 1.91 years.

Number of Shares
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested shares at March 31, 2016
6,307,742
$36.76
Granted
1,635,655
51.46
Assumed upon acquisition
2,059,524
46.57
Forfeited
(722,212)
43.58
Vested
(2,861,253)
38.60
Nonvested shares at March 31, 2017
6,419,456
42.06
Granted
1,267,536
77.26
Forfeited
(279,051)
49.65
Vested
(1,735,501)
38.00
Nonvested shares at March 31, 2018
5,672,440
50.79
Granted
1,951,408
77.83
Assumed upon acquisition
1,805,680
91.70
Forfeited
(408,242)
73.36
Vested
(2,729,324)
61.51
Nonvested shares at March 31, 2019
6,291,962
$64.81


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the weighted average grant date fair value of nonvested shares between 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
-36.8
6.8
1.8
1.1
5.3
Correct choice index: 4
2019 Compared to 2018
Net Sales. Net sales increased 9%, or $651 million, in 2019 compared to 2018. Net sales of products (hardware and software) increased 8% and net sales of services increased 20% in 2019 compared to 2018. Our net sales by operating segment for 2019 and 2018 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

2019
2018
%Change
NorthAmerica
$6,024,305
$5,362,981
12%
EMEA
1,526,644
1,530,241
—
APAC
180,241
186,914
(4%)
Consolidated
$7,731,190
$7,080,136
9%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Net sales of North America between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
32308233253205
66132400
-3832740
11387286
661324
Correct choice index: 4
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors .
our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion .
stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing .
the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 .
the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends .
the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

12/9/2013
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
American Airlines Group Inc.
$100
$103
$219
$175
Amex Airline Index
100
102
152
127
S&P 500
100
102
114
113

purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. by how much did american airlines group inc . common stock out preform the s&p 500 index over the 4 year period?
Choices:
0.48
0.75
-0.13
-2.25
-1.15
Correct choice index: 0
ii) Amounts in the financial statements
The assets and liabilities on the balance sheet are as follows:
3. Pensions continued

2019
2018
£ million
£ million
Schemes in net asset position
UK defined benefit pension plan – Staff Plan
7.8
1.1
UK defined benefit pension plan – Cash Plan
1.0
0.9
8.8
2.0
Schemes in net liability position
UK unfunded plan
(0.5)
(0.5)
Net pension plan surplus on the balance sheet
8.3
1.5


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the net pension plan surplus on the balance sheet?
Choices:
0
6.8
-0.4
9.8
7.4
Correct choice index: 1
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and payroll related benefits expenses, related overhead, audit fees, other professional fees, contract labour and consulting expenses and public company costs.
General and administrative expenses increased by $2.7 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year. This was primarily due to an increase in payroll and payroll-related benefits of $4.1 million and an increase in other miscellaneous expenses of $2.2 million, which includes professional fees such as legal, audit and tax related expenses. These were partially offset by a reduction in the use of facility and related expenses of $4.5 million. The remainder of the change was attributable to other activities associated with normal growth in our business operations. Overall, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenue, remained at approximately 7%.
Our general and administrative labour resources increased by 119 employees, from 1,501 employees at June 30, 2018 to 1,620 employees at June 30, 2019.

Change between Fiscal increase (decrease)
(In thousands)
2019 and 2018
2018 and 2017
Payroll and payroll-related benefits
$4,089
$22,908
Contract labour and consulting
(618)
(1,054)
Share-based compensation
768
(1,709)
Travel and communication
794
80
Facilities
(4,537)
5,777
Other miscellaneous
2,186
8,872
Total change in general and administrative expenses
$2,682
$34,874


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the Total change in general and administrative expenses from Fiscal year 2017 to 2019?
Choices:
5364
93532068
37556
37556000
25590
Correct choice index: 2
a. Analysis of revenue growth
On a reported basis, TCS’ revenue grew 19% in FY 2019, compared to 4.4% in the prior year. This was largely an outcome of greater demand for our services and solutions during the year, driven by expanding participation in our customers’ growth and transformation initiatives. In addition, there was some benefit from the movement in currency exchange rates.
FY 2019 saw volatility in USD-INR, ranging from `64.90 and `74.10, and averaging at `70.07. There was also significant volatility in exchange rates of emerging markets’ currencies. Average currency exchange rates during FY 2019 for the three major currencies are given below:
Movements in currency exchange rates through the year resulted in a positive impact of 7.6% on the reported revenue. The constant currency revenue growth for the year, which is the reported revenue growth stripped of the currency impact, was 11.4%.

Currency
Weightage (%)
FY 2019 `
FY 2018 `
% Change YoY
USD
53.6
70.07
64.49
8.7
GBP
13.9
91.60
86.05
6.5
EUR
10.1
80.82
76.16
6.1
Breakup of revenue growth
FY 2019 (%)
FY 2018 (%)
Business growth
11.4
6.7
Impact of exchange rate
7.6
(2.3)
Total growth
19.0
4.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average INR-GBP exchange rate in FY 2019?
Choices:
92.6
0
0.01
0.76
0.15
Correct choice index: 2
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2012 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

2013
$3,189
2014
500
2015
—
2016
500
2017
750
2018 and thereafter
6,725
Total
$11,664

credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion syndicated , unsecured revolving line of credit ( the 201csenior credit facility 201d ) .
the senior credit facility has an initial maturity date of october 24 , 2017 .
however , prior to the maturity date , devon has the option to extend the maturity for up to two additional one-year periods , subject to the approval of the lenders .
amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months .
such rates are generally less than the prime rate .
however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate .
the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears .
as of december 31 , 2012 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility .
the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant .
this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65 percent .
the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements .
also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments .
as of december 31 , 2012 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 25.4 percent .
commercial paper devon has access to $ 5.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program .
commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing .
the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor , or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market .
as of december 31 , 2012 , devon 2019s weighted average borrowing rate on its commercial paper borrowings was 0.37 percent .
other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2012 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of debt matured between 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
-150
202702.7
150.0
547.5
5
Correct choice index: 2