trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 16.66 .
the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends .
performance graph 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2007 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Masco
$55.78
$71.52
$67.12
$52.15
$92.49
S&P 500 Index
$63.45
$79.90
$91.74
$93.67
$108.55
S&P Industrials Index
$60.60
$72.83
$92.04
$91.50
$105.47
S&P Consumer Durables & Apparel Index
$66.43
$90.54
$118.19
$127.31
$154.72

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise .
at december 31 , 2012 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 24 million shares .
during the first quarter of 2012 , we repurchased and retired one million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 8 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2012 grant of one million shares of long-term stock awards .
we have not purchased any shares since march 2012. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. as of december 2012 what was the ratio of the percent of the outstanding shares of the authorized repurchase of the company common stock
Choices:
0
-0.48
0.48
10
1.44
Correct choice index: 2
Depreciation and Amortization
The following table sets forth depreciation and amortization by segment for the periods presented (in millions):
(1) Depreciation and amortization for Corporate and Other primarily represents net incremental depreciation and amortization adjustments associated with the application of purchase accounting recorded in accordance with GAAP.
The increase in Depreciation and Amortization is primarily driven by implementation of new clients, accelerated amortization of deferred contract costs and hardware and software placed in service.

Year ended December 31,
Variance
2019
2018
$
%
Software Solutions
$123.9
$112.9
$11.0
10%
Data and Analytics
15.9
14.1
1.8
13%
Corporate and Other(1)
96.4
90.0
6.4
7%
Total
$236.2
$217.0
19.2
9%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the difference in the percent variance between Software Solutions and Data and Analytics?
Choices:
2
207
16
23
3
Correct choice index: 4
Note 21. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the respective periods and the further dilutive effect, if any, from stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and shares held in rabbi trust using the treasury stock method.
The number of shares used in the earnings per share computation were as follows (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Basic:
Weighted average common shares outstanding
41,649
42,090
41,822
Diluted:
Dilutive effect of stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and shares held in rabbi trust
153
156
319
Total weighted average diluted shares outstanding
41,802
42,246
42,141
Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation
69
44
46


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Anti-dilutive shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
112
25
113
3036
-25
Correct choice index: 1
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel .
the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment .
we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances .
see item 1 .
business 2014citadel investment .
performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .

12/02
12/03
12/04
12/05
12/06
12/07
E*TRADE Financial Corporation
100.00
260.29
307.61
429.22
461.32
73.05
S&P 500
100.00
128.68
142.69
149.70
173.34
182.87
S&P Super Cap Diversified Financials
100.00
139.29
156.28
170.89
211.13
176.62

2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends .
fiscal year ending december 31 .
2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between e*trade financial corporation and s&p super cap diversified financials for the five years ended 12/07?
Choices:
-0.7115
-3.012
0.3451
76.62
-1.0357
Correct choice index: 4
4. Earnings per Share
Reconciliations of the weighted average shares outstanding for basic and diluted Earnings per Share for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, were as follows (in thousands):
** For the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018, dilutive securities are excluded since the inclusion of such shares would be antidilutive due to the net loss for the period. The exercisable shares excluded for 2019 and 2018 are 1,216,000 and 1,259,500, respectively. The effect of dilutive securities for 2019 and 2018 would have been 242,874 and 127,536, respectively.

For the years ended April 30,
2019
2018
Basic EPS Shares outstanding (weighted average)
8,916,250
8,841,166
Effect of Dilutive Securities
**
**
Diluted EPS Shares outstanding
9,159,124
8,841,166


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total number of exercisable shares excluded for 2019 and 2018 altogether?
Choices:
1343536
2432000
2475500
1259530
247550000
Correct choice index: 2
corporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items .
at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. .

In millions of dollars
2009
2008
2007
Net interest revenue
$(1,663)
$(2,680)
$(2,008)
Non-interest revenue
(8,893)
422
(302)
Total revenues, net of interest expense
$(10,556)
$(2,258)
$(2,310)
Total operating expenses
$1,420
$510
$1,813
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims
(1)
1
(3)
(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes
$(11,975)
$(2,769)
$(4,120)
Income taxes (benefits)
(4,369)
(587)
(1,446)
(Loss) from continuing operations
$(7,606)
$(2,182)
$(2,674)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes
(445)
4,002
708
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests
$(8,051)
$1,820
$(1,966)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
2
Net income (loss)
$(8,051)
$1,820
$(1,968)

2009 vs .
2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s .
government .
revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t .
this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations .
operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves .
2008 vs .
2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities .
operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?
Choices:
-0.7187
-2362339
-0.7159
-2.5549
0.7187
Correct choice index: 0
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost and consists of furniture, computers, other office equipment, and leasehold improvements. We depreciate the cost of furniture, computers, and other office equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (five years for office equipment, seven years for furniture and fixtures). Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of their useful lives or the term of the lease. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2019, 2018, and 2017 was approximately $8.0 million, $8.6 million, and $9.1 million, respectively, and was included in “Depreciation and amortization” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Amortization expense on intangible assets in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was immaterial.
Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following (in thousands):

December 31
2019
2018
Office equipment
$ 38,373
$ 39,633
Furniture and fixtures
5,017
4,610
Leasehold improvement
23,534
19,430
Property and equipment, gross
66,924
63,673
Less accumulated depreciation
(44,199 )
(49,355 )
Property and equipment, net
$ 22,725
$ 14,318


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in property and equipment, net cost in 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
3295
8407
37043
35037
0
Correct choice index: 1
Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share):
TORM believes that the NAV/share is a relevant measure that Management uses to measure the overall development of the assets and liabilities per share. Such measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. NAV/share is calculated using broker values of vessels and excluding charter commitments. NAV/share is calculated as follows:

USDm
2019
2018
2017
Net Asset Value per share
Total vessel values including newbuildings (broker values)
1,801.5
1,675.1
1,661.1
Committed CAPEX on newbuildings
-51.2
-258.0
-306.9
Cash position
72.5
127.4
134.2
Loans receivables
4.6
-
-
Bunkers
34.8
39.4
33.2
Freight receivables
89.8
86.0
71.3
Other receivables
6.2
7.5
11.8
Other plant and operating equipment
4.3
3.0
1.9
Land and buildings
8.1
-
-
Investments in joint ventures
1.2
0.1
0.3
Prepayments
3.5
2.9
4.4
Borrowings
-863.4
-754.7
-753.9
Trade payables
-47.1
-35.1
-26.2
Other liabilities
-47.3
-36.5
-33.8
Current tax liabilities
-1.5
-1.0
-1.4
Total Net Asset Value (NAV)
1,016.0
856.1
796.0
Total number of shares excluding treasury shares (million)
74.4
73.9
62.0
Total Net Asset Value per share (NAV/share) (USD)
13.6
11.6
12.8


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Total Net Asset Value (NAV) in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
1.2
1872.1
159.9
-794.1
7.3
Correct choice index: 2
2022 net revenues in our connected fitness operating segment increased $ 34.2 million to $ 53.4 million in 2015 from $ 19.2 million in 2014 primarily due to revenues generated from our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 and growth in our existing connected fitness business .
operating income ( loss ) by segment is summarized below: .

Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2015
2014
$ Change
% Change
North America
$460,961
$372,347
$88,614
23.8%
EMEA
3,122
(11,763)
14,885
126.5
Asia-Pacific
36,358
21,858
14,500
66.3
Latin America
(30,593)
(15,423)
(15,170)
(98.4)
Connected Fitness
(61,301)
(13,064)
(48,237)
(369.2)
Total operating income
$408,547
$353,955
$54,592
15.4%

the increase in total operating income was driven by the following : 2022 operating income in our north america operating segment increased $ 88.6 million to $ 461.0 million in 2015 from $ 372.4 million in 2014 primarily due to the items discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our emea operating segment increased $ 14.9 million to $ 3.1 million in 2015 from a loss of $ 11.8 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating income in our asia-pacific operating segment increased $ 14.5 million to $ 36.4 million in 2015 from $ 21.9 million in 2014 primarily due to sales growth discussed above in the consolidated results of operations .
2022 operating loss in our latin america operating segment increased $ 15.2 million to $ 30.6 million in 2015 from $ 15.4 million in 2014 primarily due to increased investments to support growth in the region and the economic challenges in brazil during the period .
this increase in operating loss was offset by sales growth discussed above .
2022 operating loss in our connected fitness segment increased $ 48.2 million to $ 61.3 million in 2015 from $ 13.1 million in 2014 primarily due to investments to support growth in our connected fitness business , including the impact of our two connected fitness acquisitions in 2015 .
these acquisitions contributed $ 23.6 million to the operating loss for the connected fitness segment in 2015 .
seasonality historically , we have recognized a majority of our net revenues and a significant portion of our income from operations in the last two quarters of the year , driven primarily by increased sales volume of our products during the fall selling season , including our higher priced cold weather products , along with a larger proportion of higher margin direct to consumer sales .
seasonality could have an impact on the timing of accruals if the sales in the last two quarters of the year do not materialize .
the level of our working capital generally reflects the seasonality and growth in our business .
we generally expect inventory , accounts payable and certain accrued expenses to be higher in the second and third quarters in preparation for the fall selling season. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of total operating income was asia-pacific in 2015?
Choices:
0.0535
0.08899
36358
0.09765
-369.49187
Correct choice index: 1
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc .
altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 .
market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc .
peer group ( 1 ) .
the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis .
source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date .
( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc .
peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc .
and reynolds american inc .
note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc .
( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc .
( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc .
to mondel 0113z international , inc .
( mdlz ) .
on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc .
merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j .
heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) .
on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc .
( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc .
( lo ) .
on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc .
( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc .
( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc .
to conagra brands , inc .
( cag ) . .

Date
Altria Group, Inc.
Altria Group, Inc. Peer Group
S&P 500
December 2011
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
December 2012
$111.77
$108.78
$115.99
December 2013
$143.69
$135.61
$153.55
December 2014
$193.28
$151.74
$174.55
December 2015
$237.92
$177.04
$176.94
December 2016
$286.61
$192.56
$198.09

altria altria group , inc .
group , inc .
peer group s&p 500 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the roi of an investment in altria group inc . from december 2011 to december 2013?
Choices:
0.3041
1.4269
0.4369
0
2.4369
Correct choice index: 2
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2013
2012
Foreign currency losses, net
$(1,115)
$(1,401)
Other income (expense), net
69
(4)
Total other expense, net
$(1,046)
$(1,405)

income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) .
during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) .
in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 .
an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns .
in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year .
in january 2013 , the u.s .
congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 .
the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity .
the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s .
research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities .
when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 .
net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 .
the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
table of contents .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage decrease in net come for the year ended 2013 to the year ended 2012?
Choices:
203.3296
5.8684
0.1704
0.6123
-0.0298
Correct choice index: 2
Base Salary. The base salary for each NEO is determined on the basis of the following factors: scope of responsibilities, experience, skills, performance, expected future contribution, base salary levels in effect for comparable positions at the companies in the Peer Group (as described on page 42 below under “Use of Peer Group Compensation Data”) and other competitive market factors. Generally, the Committee reviews the base salary levels of our NEOs annually as part of the Company’s performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other change of position or level of responsibility. Merit-based increases to the base salaries of our NEOs (other than our CEO) are recommended by our CEO to the Committee, and all increases are based on the Committee’s (and in the case of our CEO, the Board’s) review and assessment of the factors described above.
The Compensation Committee reviews compensation levels at the beginning of each fiscal year and adjusts as needed based upon market data and executive achievement. The Committee reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers, including our NEOs, for fiscal year 2019 and increased the salaries of our CEO and CFO in light of their contributions in fiscal year 2018, including, among other considerations, the successful execution and integration of the AvComm and Wireless acquisition and to reflect the Committee’s review of current peer and market compensation data. Mr. Staley’s salary was also increased to reflect the Committee’s review of current peer and market compensation data as well as his contributions in fiscal year 2019, including the integration of AvComm and Wireless sales into our global sales organization. The Committee did not increase the salaries of any of our other NEOs because the Committee determined that the existing base salaries were appropriate for each of these NEOs.
Actual base salaries paid to our NEOs in fiscal year 2019 are set forth in the “Salary” column of the Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table on page 44.

Fiscal Year 2018
Fiscal Year 2019
Named Executive Officer
Base Salary
Base Salary
Percentage Increase
Oleg Khaykin
$750,000
$800,000
6.7%
Amar Maletira
$425,000
$500,000
17.7%
Paul McNab
$435,000
$435,000
—
Luke Scrivanich
$372,000
$372,000
—
Gary Staley
$360,000
$375,000
4.2%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in base salary between Paul McNab and Luke Scrivanch in 2018?
Choices:
-12000
63000
0
-372000
53000
Correct choice index: 1