trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs): RSUs represent the right to receive one share of NortonLifeLock common stock for each vested RSU upon the settlement date, subject to continued employment through each vesting date.
(1) Mr. Clark did not receive an RSU award for FY19.
(2) In FY19, Messrs. Taylor and Noviello, as FY18 NEOs, were granted a mix of PRUs and RSUs at 70% and 30%, respectively. All other executives, other than Mr. Clark, received a mix of PRUs and RSUs at 50% and 50%, respectively.

NEO
FY19 RSU Award Amount (#)(2)
Grant Date Value ($)
Gregory S. Clark(1)
0
0
Nicholas R. Noviello
95,416
2,106,785
Amy L. Cappellanti-Wolf
78,620
1,683,254
Samir Kapuria
238,243
5,100,783
Scott C. Taylor
61,339
1,354,365


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total grant date value for all NEOs?
Choices:
9129065
10245187
8138400
12041418138030
5144404
Correct choice index: 1
entergy arkansas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income .
2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2016 net revenue
$1,520.5
Retail electric price
33.8
Opportunity sales
5.6
Asset retirement obligation
(14.8)
Volume/weather
(29.0)
Other
6.5
2017 net revenue
$1,522.6

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc .
a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 .
the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings .
see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase .
the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers .
see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent increase in net income was experienced between 2015 and 2016
Choices:
0.06051
0.06507
-0.06507
0.06249
0.02368
Correct choice index: 1
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash: Cash equivalents include short-term highly liquid investments and are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy described below. Restricted cash represents cash received from customers to settle invoices sold under accounts receivable purchase agreements that is contractually required to be set aside. The restrictions will lapse when the cash is remitted to the purchaser of the receivables. Restricted cash is also classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy described below.
As of September 28, 2019 and September 29, 2018, cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash consisted of the following (in thousands):

2019
2018
Cash
$85,688
$99,197
Money market funds and other
138,073
198,072
Restricted cash
2,493
417
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
226,254
297,686


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Restricted cash between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
2076
0
-2076
-388
2910
Correct choice index: 0
table of contents valero energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) cash flow hedges cash flow hedges are used to hedge price volatility in certain forecasted feedstock and refined product purchases , refined product sales , and natural gas purchases .
the objective of our cash flow hedges is to lock in the price of forecasted feedstock , product or natural gas purchases or refined product sales at existing market prices that we deem favorable .
as of december 31 , 2011 , we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were entered into to hedge forecasted purchases or sales of crude oil and refined products .
the information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity ( volumes in thousands of barrels ) .
notional contract volumes by year of maturity derivative instrument 2012 .

Derivative Instrument
Notional Contract Volumes by Year of Maturity 2012
Crude oil and refined products:
Swaps – long
5,961
Swaps – short
5,961
Futures – long
38,201
Futures – short
36,637
Physical contracts – short
1,564

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how many more long future notional contracts mature by 2012 than short futures?
Choices:
0
74838
36637
1564
1564.0
Correct choice index: 4
MARKET PRICES OF COMMON STOCK
The common stock of the Company is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “FEIM.”

Fiscal Quarter
High Sale
Low Sale
2019
First Quarter
$8.95
$7.30
Second Quarter
11.38
7.80
Third Quarter
13.38
9.60
Fourth Quarter
13.52
10.80
2018
First Quarter
$10.76
$ 7.91
Second Quarter
10.00
7.53
Third Quarter
9.94
8.66
Fourth Quarter
10.59
8.55


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average quarterly low sale price for 2019?
Choices:
3.29
4.98
8.98
8.88
0.01
Correct choice index: 3
s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s .
dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006(in millions of U.S. dollars)
Direct Amount
Ceded To Other Companies
Assumed From Other Companies
Net Amount
Percentage of Amount Assumed to Net
2008
$16,087
$6,144
$3,260
$13,203
25%
2007
$14,673
$5,834
$3,458
$12,297
28%
2006
$13,562
$5,198
$3,461
$11,825
29%

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage of amount ceded to direct amount in 2007?
Choices:
2.5151
-0.3976
0.4187
0.3976
85602282
Correct choice index: 3
11. Stock Award Plan
Total recognized stock-based compensation expense is included in our consolidated statements of operations as shown in the table below. Stock-based compensation expense includes both non-cash expense related to grants of stock-based awards as well as cash expense related to the employee discount applied to purchases of our common stock under our employee stock purchase plan.
The estimated income tax benefit of stock-based compensation expense included in the provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2019 is approximately $5.3 million. No stock-based compensation costs were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. The calculation of stock-based compensation expenses includes an estimate for forfeitures at the time of grant.
This estimate can be revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates, which are based on historical trends. Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to nonvested awards and options was $62.4 million as of December 31, 2019, and this expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.

Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Cost of revenue:
Software delivery, support and maintenance
$ 2,075
$ 2,184
$ 2,879
Client services
4,067
3,997
4,484
Total cost of revenue
6,142
6,181
7,363
Selling, general and administrative expenses
27,348
24,213
23,497
Research and development
9,200
8,937
8,605
Total stock-based compensation expense
$ 42,690
$ 39,331
$ 39,465


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Client services for 2017-2019?
Choices:
4182.67
22168.13
5455.65
0
10759
Correct choice index: 0
Other Non-current Liabilities
Other non-current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

2019
2018
Lease liabilities
$28,046
$—
Other
708
534
Total other non-current liabilities
$28,754
$534


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total non-current liabilities between 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
29288
-28754
1068
57508
28220
Correct choice index: 0
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2015 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

2016
$76,676
2017
75,874
2018
75,849
2019
50,320
2020
48,000
Thereafter
64,000
Total minimum lease payments
390,719
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments
(186,742)
Net minimum lease payments
203,977
Less: Amount representing interest
(37,485)
Present value of net minimum lease payments
166,492
Less: Current portion
(30,849)
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
$135,643

the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2015 is included in the commitments table in note 15 .
11 .
income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .
deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .
we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .
determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .
we file consolidated tax returns in the u.s .
the income taxes of domestic and foreign subsidiaries not included in the u.s .
tax group are presented in our consolidated financial statements on a separate return basis for each tax paying entity .
as of december 31 , 2015 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 39 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes , which are partially offset by a valuation allowance .
the state nols begin to expire in the year 2017 .
in addition , there are $ 61 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance .
the state credit carryforwards began to expire in .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligations is due after 2020?
Choices:
20.1638
163.8006
0.1638
1
6.105
Correct choice index: 2
Uncertain Tax Positions
In accordance with authoritative guidance, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018,and 2017 (amounts shown in thousands):
Of the total unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2019, $1.6 million will impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company does not anticipate that there will be a substantial change in unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
The Company's practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of September 30, 2019, no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recorded in the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is subject to income taxation in the U.S. at the federal and state levels. All tax years are subject to examination by U.S., California, and other state tax authorities due to the carryforward of unutilized net operating losses and tax credits. The Company is also subject to foreign income taxes in the countries in which it operates. The Company’s U.S. federal tax return for the year ended September 30, 2017 is currently under examination. To our knowledge, the Company is not currently under examination by any other taxing authorities.

2019
2018
2017
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year
$1,321
$1,181
$—
Additions from tax positions taken in the current year
213
140
140
Additions from tax positions taken in prior years
73
—
1,041
Reductions from tax positions taken in prior years
—
—
—
Tax settlements
—
—
—
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of the year
$1,607
$1,321
$1,181


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the proportion of addition from tax positions taken in the current year and prior years over gross unrecognized tax benefit at the end of the year 2019?
Choices:
1
0.24
0.18
3.92
0.13
Correct choice index: 2
the agencies consider many factors in determining the final rating of an insurance company .
one consideration is the relative level of statutory surplus necessary to support the business written .
statutory surplus represents the capital of the insurance company reported in accordance with accounting practices prescribed by the applicable state insurance department .
see part i , item 1a .
risk factors 2014 201cdowngrades in our financial strength or credit ratings , which may make our products less attractive , could increase our cost of capital and inhibit our ability to refinance our debt , which would have a material adverse effect on our business , financial condition , results of operations and liquidity . 201d statutory surplus the table below sets forth statutory surplus for the company 2019s insurance companies as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013: .

2014
2013
U.S. life insurance subsidiaries, includes domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013
$7,157
$6,639
Property and casualty insurance subsidiaries
8,069
8,022
Total
$15,226
$14,661

statutory capital and surplus for the u.s .
life insurance subsidiaries , including domestic captive insurance subsidiaries in 2013 , increased by $ 518 , primarily due to variable annuity surplus impacts of $ 788 , net income from non-variable annuity business of $ 187 , increases in unrealized gains from other invested assets carrying values of $ 138 , partially offset by returns of capital of $ 500 , and changes in reserves on account of change in valuation basis of $ 100 .
effective april 30 , 2014 the last domestic captive ceased operations .
statutory capital and surplus for the property and casualty insurance increased by $ 47 , primarily due to statutory net income of $ 1.1 billion , and unrealized gains on investments of $ 1.4 billion , largely offset by dividends to the hfsg holding company of $ 2.5 billion .
the company also held regulatory capital and surplus for its former operations in japan until the sale of those operations on june 30 , 2014 .
under the accounting practices and procedures governed by japanese regulatory authorities , the company 2019s statutory capital and surplus was $ 1.2 billion as of december 31 , 2013. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in balance of u.s . life insurance subsidiaries from 2013 to 2014?
Choices:
0.5
518.0
-7504
-6636.5
13796
Correct choice index: 1
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co .
( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index .
the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s .
equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors .
the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s .
and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts .
the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 .
the firm is a component of all three industry indices .
the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices .
the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested .
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

December 31,(in dollars)
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
JPMorgan Chase
$100.00
$102.30
$81.87
$111.49
$152.42
$167.48
KBW Bank Index
100.00
123.36
94.75
125.91
173.45
189.69
S&P Financial Index
100.00
112.13
93.00
119.73
162.34
186.98
S&P 500 Index
100.00
115.06
117.48
136.27
180.39
205.07

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. based o n the review of the simultaneous investments of the jpmorgan chase common stock in the various index what was the ratio of the performance in the kbw bank index to the s&p financial index in 2010
Choices:
1.10015
1100.15161
235.49
135.7147
-1.10015
Correct choice index: 0
Equity Incentive Plan
Our board of directors administers the plan, determines vesting schedules on plan awards and may accelerate the vesting schedules for award recipients. The stock options granted under the plan have terms of up to 10 years. As of December 31, 2019, awards for the purchase of 4,236,719 shares have been granted and remain outstanding (common stock options, common stock and restricted stock units) and 2,063,281 shares are reserved for future grants under the 2014 Plan.
Share-based compensation expenses related to stock options, stock and restricted stock units issued to employees and directors are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The following table provides a detail of share-based compensation expense (in thousands).

Year Ended December 31
2019
2018
Common stock, vested at issuance and nonvested at issuance
$721
$555
Stock options
354
132
Restricted stock units
225
103
Compensation expense related to common stock awards issued under equity incentive plan
$          1,300
$            790


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total value of stock options in 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
235
46728
1432
486
357
Correct choice index: 3
sources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 .

Years Ended(In Millions)
Dec 29,2018
Dec 30,2017
Dec 31,2016
Net cash provided by operating activities
$29,432
$22,110
$21,808
Net cash used for investing activities
(11,239)
(15,762)
(25,817)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
(18,607)
(8,475)
(5,739)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$(414)
$(2,127)
$(9,748)

md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in net cash provided by operating activities between 2016 and 2017?
Choices:
0.01385
302
1574797.56291
6586016
0.01366
Correct choice index: 0
Inventories.
Inventories are stated at the lower-of-cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Finished products and work-in-process inventories include direct material costs and direct and indirect manufacturing costs. The Company records reserves for inventory that may be obsolete or in excess of current and future market demand. A summary of inventories is shown below:

(Dollars in Millions)
April 27, 2019
April 28, 2018
Finished Products
$40.2
$15.4
Work in Process
9.4
14.6
Materials
67.1
54.1
Total Inventories
$116.7
$84.1


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average work in progress value for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
0
24
12
-12
26
Correct choice index: 2
Earnings Per Share
Calculations of net income per common share attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation are as follows (in millions, except per share data):
Basic income per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
To calculate the diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding, the number of incremental shares from the assumed exercise of stock options and assumed issuance of shares relating to RSUs is calculated by applying the treasury stock method. Share-based awards whose impact is considered to be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method were excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation.
The excluded number of anti-dilutive share-based awards was approximately 0.8 million, 0.6 million and 0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The dilutive impact related to the Company’s 1.00% Notes and 1.625% Notes is determined in accordance with the net share settlement requirements, under which the Company’s convertible notes are assumed to be convertible into cash up to the par value, with the excess of par value being convertible into common stock.
Additionally, if the average price of the Company’s common stock exceeds $ 25.96 per share, with respect to the 1.00% Notes, or $30.70 per share, with respect to the 1.625% Notes, during the relevant reporting period, the effect of the additional potential shares that may be issued related to the warrants that were issued concurrently with the issuance of the convertible notes will also be included in the calculation of diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding.
Prior to conversion, the convertible note hedges are not considered for purposes of the earnings per share calculations, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. Upon conversion, the convertible note hedges are expected to offset the dilutive effect of the 1.00% Notes and 1.625% Notes, respectively, when the stock price is above $18.50 per share, with respect to the 1.00% Notes, and $20.72 per share, with respect to the 1.625% Notes.

Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net income attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation
$211.7
$627.4
$810.7
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
410.9
423.8
421.9
Add: Incremental shares for:
Dilutive effect of share-based awards
1.9
4.3
5.5
Dilutive effect of convertible notes
3.2
7.8
0.9
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
416.0
435.9
428.3
Net income per common share attributable to ON Semiconductor Corporation:
Basic
$0.52
$1.48
$1.92
Diluted
$0.51
$1.44
$1.89


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Basic weighted average common shares outstanding from year ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
0
-12900000
-12.9
1
-11
Correct choice index: 2