trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers are appointed annually by our Board of Directors or, in some cases, appointed in accordance with our bylaws. Each officer holds office until
the next annual appointment of officers or until a successor has been duly appointed and qualified, or until the officer’s death or resignation, or until the officer has
otherwise been removed in accordance with our bylaws. The following table provides certain information regarding the current executive officers of the Company.
John Sarvis
Chief Executive Officer and President since April 2015. Chairman of the Board since 2016. Vice President of Ceramic Products from 2005 to 2015. Divisional Vice President
– Ceramics Division from 1998 to 2005. Prior to 1998, held various Marketing and Operational positions. Employed by the Company since 1973
Jeffrey Schmersal
Chief Operating Officer since April 2018. Senior Vice President since 2017. Divisional Vice President of Specialty Products from 2014 to 2017. Global Business Manager of
various product groups from 2006 to 2014. Prior to 2006, held various Quality and Supply Chain positions. Employed by the Company since 1994.
Michael Hufnagel
Chief Financial Officer since July 2018. Vice President of Corporate Finance since 2016. Director of Corporate Finance from 2015 to 2016. Director of Accounting and
Reporting from 2002 to 2015. Employed by the Company since 2002.
John Lawing
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since 2015. Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from April 2014 to 2015. President and Chief Operating
Officer from 2013 to March 2014. Vice President of Advanced Products from 2005 to April 2013. Divisional Vice President of Advanced Products from 2002 to 2005 and
Divisional Vice President of Leaded Products from 1997 to 2002. Prior to 1997, held positions in Engineering, Technical, Operational, and Plant management. Employed by
the Company since 1981.
S. Willing King
Senior Vice President of Tantalum Products since 2015. Vice President of Tantalum Products from 2013 to 2015. Deputy General Manager of Tantalum Products from 2012
to 2013. Vice President of Product Marketing from 2004 to 2012. Director of Product Marketing from 2000 to 2004. Prior to 2000, held positions in Technical Service, Sales,
and Marketing. Employed by the Company since 1984.

Name
Age
Position
John Sarvis
69
Chief Executive Officer and President
Jeffrey Schmersal
50
Chief Operating Officer
Michael Hufnagel
65
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
John Lawing
68
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
S. Willing King
56
Senior Vice President of Tantalum Products
Eric Pratt
59
Senior Vice President of Marketing
Evan Slavitt
61
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary
Steven Sturgeon
50
Senior Vice President of Connector Products
Alexander Schenkel
44
Senior Vice President of Sales


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average age of the company's Senior Vice Presidents?
Choices:
0.02
94.57
57.57
58
248
Correct choice index: 2
NOTE 19—RESTRUCTURING
In 2019, we initiated projects to restructure and modify our supply chain strategy, functional responsibilities, methods, capabilities, processes and rationalize suppliers with the goal of reducing ongoing costs and increasing the efficiencies of our worldwide procurement organization. The majority of the costs associated with these restructuring activities are related to consultants that we have engaged in connection with these efforts, and such costs have been recognized by our corporate entity. The total costs of this restructuring project are expected to exceed amounts incurred to date by $0.9 million and these efforts are expected to be completed early in fiscal 2020. Also, in fiscal 2019 our CTS and CGD segments incurred restructuring charges, consisting primarily of employee severance costs related to headcount reductions initiated to optimize our cost positions. The total costs of each of these restructuring plans initiated thus far are not expected to be significantly greater than the charges incurred to date.
Our fiscal 2018 restructuring activities related primarily to expenses incurred by our corporate entity to establish a North American shared services center. Our fiscal 2017 restructuring activities included corporate efforts to increase the centralization and efficiency of our manufacturing processes, as well as restructuring charges incurred by our CGD businesses related to the elimination of a level of management in the CGD simulator business.
Restructuring charges incurred by our business segments were as follows (in millions):

Years Ended September 30,
2019
2018
2017
Restructuring costs:
Cubic Transportation Systems
$  3.2
$  0.4
$  0.4
Cubic Mission Solutions
—
0.2
—
Cubic Global Defense
3.3
1.3
0.9
Unallocated corporate expenses
8.9
3.1
1.0
Total restructuring costs
$  15.4
$  5.0
$  2.3


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the amount of total restructuring costs in 2019 from 2018?
Choices:
10.4
-2.7
-1.9
13.1
20.4
Correct choice index: 0
entergy mississippi , inc .
management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue .
2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses .
net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2007 net revenue
$486.9
Attala costs
9.9
Rider revenue
6.0
Base revenue
5.1
Reserve equalization
(2.4)
Net wholesale revenue
(4.0)
Other
(2.7)
2008 net revenue
$498.8

the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider .
the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes .
the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below .
the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 .
the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income .
the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 .
the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below .
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue during 2008?
Choices:
0.48392
-0.99384
0.02444
11.9
0
Correct choice index: 2
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 .
equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Plan category
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights<sup>(1)</sup> (a)(b)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options,Warrants and Rights
Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding SecuritiesReflected in Column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
448,859
$0.00
4,087,587
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders<sup>(2)</sup>
—
—
—
Total
448,859
$0.00
4,087,587

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc .
2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation .
of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan .
in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement .
( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders .
item 13 .
certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year .
item 14 .
principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders is to be issued upon the exercise of options warrants and rights?
Choices:
0.10981
4536446
0.99913
0.00004
0.09895
Correct choice index: 4
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed)
Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains its deposits at high-quality financial institutions and monitors the credit ratings of those institutions.
Restricted Cash—Restricted cash includes cash pledged as collateral to secure obligations and all cash whose use is otherwise limited by contractual provisions.
The reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the applicable balance sheet that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the statements of cash flows is as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Cash and cash equivalents
$1,501.2
$1,208.7
$802.1
Restricted cash
76.8
96.2
152.8
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$1,578.0
$1,304.9
$954.9


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in restricted cash between 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
7388.2
-1940
56.6
-19.4
-878.1
Correct choice index: 3
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : .

2018
2017
Balance at January 1
$11
$11
Balance at December 31
$11
$11

all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s .
federal income tax rate of 21% ( 21 % ) ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2017 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year .
we expect a decrease to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of the reporting date of approximately $ 3 million .
as of december 31 , 2018 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2015-2018 .
there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 .
8 .
leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel .
ground leases as of december 31 , 2018 , all or a portion of 25 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases .
for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the fixed portion of the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease .
certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts .
other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased .
these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods .
the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases .
our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2018 .
we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote .
our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems .
equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement .
equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease .
the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in million of the unrecognized tax benefits between 2017 and 2018?
Choices:
22
0.0
1
-1
0
Correct choice index: 1
entergy arkansas , inc .
and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities .
results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense .
2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses .
net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) .
following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 .
amount ( in millions ) .

Amount (In Millions)
2010 net revenue
$1,216.7
Retail electric price
31.0
ANO decommissioning trust
26.4
Transmission revenue
13.1
Volume/weather
(15.9)
Net wholesale revenue
(11.9)
Capacity acquisition recovery
(10.3)
Other
3.2
2011 net revenue
$1,252.3

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 .
see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement .
the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment .
the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the ratio of the net income increase in 2010 to the decrease in 2011
Choices:
26.1039
13.72727
1372.72727
0.07285
-10.52727
Correct choice index: 1
We measure and report our annual scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions. As part of our commitment to reduce our Greenhouse Gas (‘GHG’) emissions, we moved to a certified green tariff renewable electricity supply contract for
our UK operations from the beginning of the financial year.
The GHG emissions summary below shows our gross emissions including location-based scope 2 emissions, as well as our net emissions accounting for the market-based scope 2 reporting for our certified green electricity tariff.
The reduction in emissions is driven by continued progress in energy efficiency, a reduction in emissions associated with refrigerants as we continue to move away from fluorinated gas refrigerants, and the general reduction in UK grid carbon factor as more renewables make up a greater proportion of the fuel mix.
Over the last six years, we have made good progress in our water consumption per tonne of product, reducing it by 15% over the period. There was also a significant improvement in FY19, and one of the contributing factors to the improvement was the closure of the Evercreech desserts facility which had a higher water intensity than most sites within the business.
* Our GHG emissions have been calculated using the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, and emissions factors from DEFRA’s UK government GHG conversion factors for company reporting (where factors have not been provided directly by a supplier). ** UK & Ireland only – comparable with FY19 Group structure. *** Full Group including US business.

Emissions are summarised below, all reported as CO2 equivalent (‘CO2e’)
Emissions reported in tonnes CO2e*
Emissions from:
FY19**
FY18**
FY18***
Combustion of fuel and operation of facilities (Scope 1)
59,495
66,336
75,600
Electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased for own use (Scope 2)
27,633
32,389
67,754
Total gross emissions (Scope 1 and 2)
87,128
98,725
143,354
Green tariff
-27,603
0
0
Total net emissions (Scope 1 and 2)
59,525
98,725
143,354
Ratio (KgCO2e per £1 sales revenue)
0.060
0.066
0.056


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the Combustion of fuel and operation of facilities (Scope 1) from FY18 to FY19 for UK and Ireland only?
Choices:
-6811
-6841
-8259
-16105
6841
Correct choice index: 1
The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 26, 2019 was $44.1 million, excluding a related liability of $11.7 million for gross interest and penalties. Included in the balance at May 26, 2019 are $1.0 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Any associated interest and penalties imposed would affect the tax rate. As of May 27, 2018, our gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $32.5 million, excluding a related liability of $7.7 million for gross interest and penalties. Interest and penalties recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations was an expense of $1.2 million in fiscal 2019, an expense of $1.6 million in fiscal 2018, and a benefit of $0.3 million in fiscal 2017.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

May 26, 2019
May 27, 2018
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
$—
$240.7
$—
$141.0
Inventory
15.2
—
2.6
—
Goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets
—
1,187.0
—
406.2
Accrued expenses
11.8
—
15.5
—
Compensation related liabilities
35.9
—
34.1
—
Pension and other postretirement benefits
54.6
—
45.8
—
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
—
185.4
—
165.8
Other liabilities that will give rise to future tax deductions
123.5
—
109.7
—
Net capital and operating loss carryforwards
766.5
—
762.5
—
Federal credits
18.0
—
3.5
—
Other
37.6
24.0
23.6
9.5
1,063.1
1,637.1
997.3
722.5
Less: Valuation allowance
(738.1)
—
(739.6)
—
Net deferred taxes
$325.0
$1,637.1
$257.7
$722.5


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total net deferred taxes for assets and liabilities from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
2942.3
2982.3
2492.2
3009.6
2942300000
Correct choice index: 0
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

2011
$82,184
2012
77,110
2013
75,970
2014
75,970
2015
75,970
Thereafter
390,239
Total minimum lease payments
777,443
Less: Amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs (primarily insurance and maintenance) including profit thereon, included in total minimum lease payments
(357,982)
Net minimum lease payments
419,461
Less: Amount representing interest
(132,490)
Present value of net minimum lease payments
286,971
Less: Current portion
(24,801)
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
$262,170

the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2010 is included in the commitments table in note 14 .
10 .
income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards .
deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized .
we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance .
determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities .
as of december 31 , 2010 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes .
the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 .
in addition , there are $ 11 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 42 million of capital loss carryforwards which were fully offset by a valuation allowance .
the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2011. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total minimum lease payments are due after 2015?
Choices:
0.50195
303388578877
0.93033
1.99222
-15.73481
Correct choice index: 0