trismik/FinRAG huggingface dataset:
united parcel service , inc .
and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures the 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 $ 276 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2030 .
these debentures have an 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) interest rate until april 1 , 2020 , and , thereafter , the interest rate will be 7.62% ( 7.62 % ) for the final 10 years .
these debentures are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time .
the redemption price is equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption ( at a benchmark treasury yield plus five basis points ) plus accrued interest .
2022 $ 424 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2020 .
these debentures are not subject to redemption prior to maturity .
interest is payable semiannually in april and october for both tranches and neither tranche is subject to sinking fund requirements .
we subsequently entered into interest rate swaps on the 2020 debentures , which effectively converted the fixed interest rates on the debentures to variable libor-based interest rates .
the average interest rate payable on the 2020 debentures , including the impact of the interest rate swaps , for 2016 and 2015 was 5.43% ( 5.43 % ) and 5.04% ( 5.04 % ) , respectively .
floating rate senior notes the floating rate senior notes bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points .
the average interest rate for 2016 and 2015 was 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) and 0.01% ( 0.01 % ) , respectively .
these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after 10 years at a stated percentage of par value .
the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2066 .
in march , june and august 2016 , we issued floating rate senior notes in principal balances of $ 118 , $ 74 and $ 35 million , respectively .
these notes bear interest at three-month libor less 30 basis points and mature in 2066 .
capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases .
some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased .
the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .

2016
2015
Vehicles
$68
$74
Aircraft
2,291
2,289
Buildings
190
207
Accumulated amortization
(896)
(849)
Property, plant and equipment subject to capital leases
$1,653
$1,721

these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2017 through 3005. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2015 to 2016?
Choices:
-6.0
6
-39
0
-444
Correct choice index: 0
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The primary objective of the Company’s capital management is to ensure that it maintains a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios to support its business and maximize the stockholders’ value. The Company also ensures its ability to operate continuously to provide returns to stockholders and the interests of other related parties, while maintaining the optimal capital structure to reduce costs of capital.
To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to stockholders, return capital to stockholders, issue new shares or dispose assets to redeem liabilities.
Similar to its peers, the Company monitors its capital based on debt to capital ratio. The ratio is calculated as the Company’s net debt divided by its total capital. The net debt is derived by taking the total liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets minus cash and cash equivalents. The total capital consists of total equity (including capital, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, other components of equity and non-controlling interests) plus net debt.
The Company’s strategy, which is unchanged for the reporting periods, is to maintain a reasonable ratio in order to raise capital with reasonable cost. The debt to capital ratios as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 were as follows:

As of December 31,
2018
2019
NT$
NT$
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Total liabilities
$158,199,746
$163,347,778
Less: Cash and cash equivalents
(83,661,739)
(95,492,477)
Net debt
74,538,007
67,855,301
Total equity
204,397,483
202,913,915
Total capital
$278,935,490
$270,769,216
Debt to capital ratios
26.72%
25.06%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the Net debt from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
5057798900925107
0
-668270600
-6682706
142393308
Correct choice index: 3
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The primary objective of the Company’s capital management is to ensure that it maintains a strong credit rating and healthy capital ratios to support its business and maximize the stockholders’ value. The Company also ensures its ability to operate continuously to provide returns to stockholders and the interests of other related parties, while maintaining the optimal capital structure to reduce costs of capital.
To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to stockholders, return capital to stockholders, issue new shares or dispose assets to redeem liabilities.
Similar to its peers, the Company monitors its capital based on debt to capital ratio. The ratio is calculated as the Company’s net debt divided by its total capital. The net debt is derived by taking the total liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets minus cash and cash equivalents. The total capital consists of total equity (including capital, additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, other components of equity and non-controlling interests) plus net debt.
The Company’s strategy, which is unchanged for the reporting periods, is to maintain a reasonable ratio in order to raise capital with reasonable cost. The debt to capital ratios as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 were as follows:

As of December 31,
2018
2019
NT$
NT$
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Total liabilities
$158,199,746
$163,347,778
Less: Cash and cash equivalents
(83,661,739)
(95,492,477)
Net debt
74,538,007
67,855,301
Total equity
204,397,483
202,913,915
Total capital
$278,935,490
$270,769,216
Debt to capital ratios
26.72%
25.06%


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase / (decrease) in the Total liabilities from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
-5148032
0
5148032
5148032000000
1
Correct choice index: 2
a. Analysis of revenue growth
On a reported basis, TCS’ revenue grew 19% in FY 2019, compared to 4.4% in the prior year. This was largely an outcome of greater demand for our services and solutions during the year, driven by expanding participation in our customers’ growth and transformation initiatives. In addition, there was some benefit from the movement in currency exchange rates.
FY 2019 saw volatility in USD-INR, ranging from `64.90 and `74.10, and averaging at `70.07. There was also significant volatility in exchange rates of emerging markets’ currencies. Average currency exchange rates during FY 2019 for the three major currencies are given below:
Movements in currency exchange rates through the year resulted in a positive impact of 7.6% on the reported revenue. The constant currency revenue growth for the year, which is the reported revenue growth stripped of the currency impact, was 11.4%.

Currency
Weightage (%)
FY 2019 `
FY 2018 `
% Change YoY
USD
53.6
70.07
64.49
8.7
GBP
13.9
91.60
86.05
6.5
EUR
10.1
80.82
76.16
6.1
Breakup of revenue growth
FY 2019 (%)
FY 2018 (%)
Business growth
11.4
6.7
Impact of exchange rate
7.6
(2.3)
Total growth
19.0
4.4


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in "impact of exchange rate" from FY 2018 to FY 2019?
Choices:
-3.3
9.9
7.6
0
-9.9
Correct choice index: 1
Net Revenues by Geographic Region
The following table details our consolidated net revenues by geographic region (amounts in millions):
(1) “EMEA” consists of the Europe, Middle East, and Africa geographic regions
Americas
The decrease in net revenues in the Americas region for 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily due to lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise (reflecting our sale of the publishing rights for Destiny to Bungie in December 2018).
EMEA
The decrease in net revenues in the EMEA region for 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily due to:
lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise; and lower revenues recognized from Call of Duty: Black Ops 4, which was released in October 2018, as compared to Call of Duty: WWII, which was released in November 2017.
Asia Pacific
The decrease in net revenues in the Asia Pacific region for 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily due to:
lower revenues recognized from Hearthstone, primarily due to the prior year including additional digital content delivered in connection with the renewal of our contract with NetEase, Inc. in December 2018, with no equivalent transaction for the franchise in 2019; and lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise.
The decrease was partially offset by:• revenues recognized from Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled, which was released in June 2019; • revenues from Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice, which was released in March 2019; and • higher revenues recognized from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, which was released in October 2019, as compared to Call of Duty: Black Ops 4.

2019
2018
Increase/ (decrease)
% Change
Net revenues by geographic region:
Americas
$3,341
$3,880
$(539)
(14)%
EMEA (1)
2,239
2,618
(379)
(14)
Asia Pacific
909
1,002
(93)
(9)
Consolidated net revenues
$6,489
$7,500
$(1,011)
(13)


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the total net revenues in 2019 of Americas and EMEA?
Choices:
-3341
5959
6682
5580
56
Correct choice index: 3
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing .
the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average .
the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

12/31/2010
12/31/2011
12/31/2012
12/31/2013
12/31/2014
12/31/2015
United Parcel Service, Inc.
$100.00
$103.88
$107.87
$158.07
$171.77
$160.61
Standard & Poor’s 500 Index
$100.00
$102.11
$118.43
$156.77
$178.22
$180.67
Dow Jones Transportation Average
$100.00
$100.01
$107.49
$151.97
$190.08
$158.23

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the standard & poor 2019s 500 index the for the five year period ending 12/31/2015?
Choices:
-0.2448
4.2441
-3.4274
1.7994
-0.2006
Correct choice index: 4
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index .
the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 .
comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc .
nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends .
indexes calculated on month-end basis .
copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc .
all rights reserved .
www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

December 29, 2001
December 28, 2002
January 3, 2004
January 1, 2005
December 31, 2005
December 30, 2006
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
100.00
54.38
81.52
61.65
75.54
79.96
S & P 500
100.00
77.90
100.24
111.15
116.61
135.03
NASDAQ Composite
100.00
71.97
107.18
117.07
120.50
137.02
S & P Information Technology
100.00
62.59
92.14
94.50
95.44
103.47

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock and the s&p 500 for the period ended december 30 , 2006?
Choices:
100.5507
-0.5507
79.6097
1.4493
-4.3583
Correct choice index: 1
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term .
the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively .
as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Amount (In Thousands)
2014
$51,637
2015
52,253
2016
13,750
2017
13,750
2018
13,750
Years thereafter
247,500
Total
392,640
Less: Amount representing interest
295,226
Present value of net minimum lease payments
$97,414

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the total future minimum lease payments represent the interest for system energy?
Choices:
1.33
0.7519
0.035
75.19
73245.5826
Correct choice index: 1
Note 5 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets consisted of the following:
Goodwill
The Company performed the annual impairment assessment of goodwill for our single reporting unit as of December 31, 2019, noting no impairment loss. The fair value exceeded the carrying value by 2.4%. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate goodwill for impairment. We estimate fair value using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flows and market multiples analysis with respect to our single reporting unit. These valuation approaches are dependent upon a number of factors, including estimates of future growth rates, our cost of capital, capital expenditures, income tax rates, and other variables. Assumptions used in our valuations were consistent with our internal projections and operating plans. Our discounted cash flows forecast could be negatively impacted by a change in the competitive landscape, any internal decisions to pursue new or different strategies, a loss of a significant customer, or a significant change in the market place including changes in the prices paid for our products or changes in the size of the market for our products. Additionally, under the market approach analysis, we used significant other observable inputs including various guideline company comparisons. We base our fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Changes in these estimates or assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and the conclusions of the quantitative goodwill test for our one reporting unit.
Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company performed the annual impairment assessment on the indefinite-lived intangible asset as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, resulting in no impairment losses.

December 31,
2019
2018
Goodwill
$ 10,368
$ 10,368
Accumulated impairment losses
(1,244 )
(1,244 )
Goodwill
9,124
9,124
Brand names
3,700
3,700
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets
$ 12,824
$ 12,824


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for 2018 and 2019?
Choices:
2
25648
12824000000
12824
6412
Correct choice index: 3
CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
(1) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued operations. For further details, please consult the "Accounting policies" and "Discontinued operations" sections. (2) For further details on the Corporation's cash flow attributable to discontinued operations, please consult the "Discontinued operations" section.
OPERATING ACTIVITIES Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter cash flow from operating activities increased by 19.3% compared to the same period of the prior year mainly from: • higher adjusted EBITDA; • the decreases in income taxes paid and financial expense paid; and • the increase in changes in non-cash operating activities primarily due to changes in working capital.
INVESTING ACTIVITIES Fiscal 2019 fourth-quarter investing activities decreased by 25.8% compared to the same period of the prior year mainly due to the acquisition of spectrum licenses in the Canadian broadband services segment in the comparable period of the prior year combined with a decrease in acquisitions of property, plant and equipment.

Three months ended August 31,
2019
2018 (1)
Change
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages)
$
$
%
Cash flow from operating activities
304,702
255,438
19.3
Cash flow from investing activities
(144,332)
(194,474)
(25.8)
Cash flow from financing activities
(50,198)
(52,127)
(3.7)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents denominated in a foreign currency
(1,405)
(63)
—
Net change in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations
108,767
8,774
—
Net change in cash and cash equivalent from discontinued operations(2)
—
13,133
(100.0)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
447,737
62,818
—
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
556,504
84,725
—


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the increase / (decrease) in cash flow from operating activities from 2018 to 2019?
Choices:
49264
304728
0
560140
499176
Correct choice index: 0
5. Accrued expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

October 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands)
Workers’ compensation claims
$9,687
$9,020
Accrued wages
19,525
14,142
Accrued rebates
13,529
7,828
Accrued vacation 
10,592
8,554
Accrued property taxes 
11,331
9,453
Accrued payroll taxes
8,290
9,034
Other accrued expenses 
9,986
11,922
Total accrued expenses
$82,940
$69,953


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Total accrued expenses between fiscal years 2019 and 2018?
Choices:
12987000
74650
-12987
5801901820
12987
Correct choice index: 4
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index .
the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 , and that any dividends have been reinvested .
the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock .
comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index january 3 , january 2 , january 1 , december 31 , december 29 , december 28 .

Company/Index
January 3, 2009
January 2, 2010
January 1, 2011
December 31, 2011
December 29, 2012
December 28, 2013
Advance Auto Parts
$100.00
$119.28
$195.80
$206.86
$213.14
$327.63
S&P 500 Index
100.00
119.67
134.97
134.96
150.51
197.62
S&P Retail Index
100.00
141.28
174.70
179.79
219.77
321.02

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total return for every dollar invested in s&p500 index in january 2009 and sold in january 2011?
Choices:
1.1314
0.0699
0.3497
1.0697
34.97
Correct choice index: 2
BIG W’s Store‐controllable VOC and VOC NPS improved on the prior year with higher customer scores translating into sales, with an increase in F19 of 4.2% on a normalised basis to $3.8 billion. Comparable sales increased by 5.3% in F19 and 7.2% in Q4 (Easter‐adjusted) with growth in all customer universes.
BIG W’s growth continues to be driven by an increase in customer transactions (F19: 4.0%) and customers increasingly putting more items in their baskets with comparable items per basket growth of 4.4%. Together this drove comparable item growth of 8.6%. Excluding reusable bags, comparable items increased by 5.2%.
With BIG W’s turnaround gaining momentum, and to build a sustainable network for the future, a store and DC network review was announced in April. BIG W intends to close approximately 30 stores over the next three years and two distribution centres at the end of their leases. The review of the store network is ongoing, with three stores recently announced to be closed in F20.
BIG W has remained price competitive, improved ranges and built a convenient online and in‐store experience in F19.
Normalised Online sales increased by 128% in F19 with Pick up consistently delivering strong sales growth. Apparel, which has been more challenging, improved steadily through H2 due to a focus on range, stock flow and in‐store execution.
Normalised gross profit declined 49 bps for F19 reflecting continued challenges in stockloss as well as slow sell‐through of seasonal apparel in H1. Category mix improved in H2 with improved apparel sell‐through.
Normalised CODB declined 132 bps resulting from store efficiencies and sales growth fractionalising fixed costs.
The LBIT of $85 million before significant items excludes a $371 million charge identified as part of the network review.
Funds employed declined primarily due to significant items provisions. Inventory quality has improved as a result of solid sales and improved apparel sell‐through in H2.
In F20, BIG W will focus on creating a sustainable business that is simpler to operate, and continue providing customers with low prices and more convenient, connected solutions in‐store and online.

F19
F18
CHANGE
$ MILLION
53 WEEKS
52 WEEKS
CHANGE
NORMALISED
Sales
3,797
3,566
6.5%
4.2%
LBITDA before
significant items
(5)
(30)
(82.2)%
(88.7)%
Depreciation and amortisation
(80)
(80)
0.7%
0.7%
LBIT before significant items
(85)
(110)
(22.2)%
(24.0)%
Significant items
(371)
–
n.m.
n.m.
LBIT after significant items
(456)
(110)
315.5%
313.7%
Gross margin (%)
31.1
31.7
(59) bps
(49) bps
Cost of doing business (%)
33.4
34.8
(142) bps
(132) bps
LBIT 2 to sales (%)
(2.3)
(3.1)
83 bps
84 bps
Sales per square metre ($)$)
3,629
3,369
7.7%
5.4%
Funds employed
204
502
(59.4)%
ROFE (%)
(23.0)
(23.3)
24 bps
77 bps


Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the nominal difference between sales per square metre for F19 and F18?
Choices:
-3369
-260
197
875940
260
Correct choice index: 4