Penn & Teller: Bullshit!

{{significantly problematic}}{{title-italics}}[[Image:Penn & Teller- Bullshit!.jpeg|165px|right|thumb|"Hi! I'm Penn, and this is my partner Teller..."]]{{film|2}}{{denialism}}
[[Category:Non-stub articles needing expansion]]
{{Messagebox|info|class=mb-brainwatermark plainlinks|'''This article requires expansion.''' Please '''[{{fullurl:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|action=edit}} help].'''
{{messagebox|question|Though not a '''[[RationalWiki:Stub|stub]]''', this article is not yet complete. Many episodes have not yet received a rating and/or full review.}}}}
'''''Penn & Teller: Bullshit!''''' was a TV infotainment show in which a wide range of topics were investigated and debunked. The show ran for eight seasons starting in 2003 and ending in 2010. As the name suggests, it featured magicians [[Penn & Teller]].

Covered topics of interest to [[skeptic]]s and [[rationalist]]s included [[religion]]s, [[cult]]s, [[New Age]], [[alternative medicine]], [[conspiracy theories]], the [[anti-vaccination movement]], and so on.

Unfortunately a number of episodes are bullshit themselves and veer off into [[pseudoscepticism]] and [[denialism]], making the show as a whole a bit of a paradoxical combination of [[stopped clock]] and [[inverse stopped clock]]. Generally speaking, the show's coverage of [[woo]] and general [[crank]]ery is pretty good, while episodes that deal with social trends, [[politics]], [[environmentalism]], and [[economics]] vary in quality — in no small part due to the then pretty strong [[libertarianism|libertarian]] beliefs of Penn & Teller.

We keep articles on most, if not all, topics they cover. Many of the episodes are educational, and — if nothing else — humorous to watch if you have about a half an hour to kill, and several of the episodes have grown to become classics within the skeptical community.

It is like a more profane, less broad version of ''[[Adam Ruins Everything]]''.

<div class="toclimit-3">
__TOC__
</div>

==Bullshit on ''Bullshit!''==
{{cquote|You know, we first started doing ''Bullshit!''—I say with a great deal of shame, that I pitched it a little cynical. I pitched it with the idea that "Well, even if people hate us and we get hate mail you'll still get attention". Which I now find repulsive. But I did that.|||Penn Jillette<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lbBtUcJ1y0&feature=player_detailpage#t=68</ref>}}
The show has been criticized for focusing on [[appeal to emotion|appeals to emotion]], especially on topics related to libertarianism. For example, in an episode about the [[Endangered species|Endangered Species Act]], the show uses a highly [[disabled]] woman in a wheelchair who cannot build her dream house on a specific lot because it is also a habitat for an endangered [[bird]] as an argument against the Act (they also misidentify the {{wpl|Florida scrub jay}} as the more common {{wpl|Woodhouse's scrub jay}}/{{wpl|California scrub jay}}). One person losing her dream home is not too bad compared to a struggling species that are constantly losing ''their'' homes. Whatever valid criticisms they may have of a subject are sometimes obscured by over-reliance on shock and emotion instead of [[logic]] and facts.

The show is also well-known for ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks against people who support the position being questioned by the show. The format of ''Bullshit!'' is such that individuals on both sides of an issue are interviewed by themselves, not in a debate format, allowing Penn to take potshots at them through post-production narration.<ref group=note>In the ''Family values'' episode, Penn did explain that the show tries to be fair and honest to interviewees by sending tapes of previous episodes to show the nature of the show.</ref> Penn has explained this is a comedy tactic and that he does not really support insulting a person if you debate them,{{fact}} and it also forms part of their apparent defense against libel, as it's fine to insult people quite dramatically, but you can't call them [[charlatan]]s, as explained on the show.

Some episodes of the show feature individuals from the [[Cato Institute]], a libertarian think tank opposed to nearly ''every'' form of regulation of [[business]], to argue Penn and Teller's position. The two are both fellows at the Institute<ref>http://www.cato.org/people/penn-jillette</ref><ref>http://www.cato.org/people/-teller</ref> but the potential conflict of interest is never mentioned; in one episode, Penn even describes the Cato Institute as "some wonky think tank in Washington".<ref>episode 2.02, ''Safety Hysteria''</ref>

However, Penn and Teller at least have the decency to openly admit both their usage of emotional appeals and their bias, and regularly point out the unscientific and simplified format of their show. They also planned to make a "Bullshit of ''Bullshit!''" finale, but the show ended too abruptly for this to be realized.{{fact}} In November 2015 Penn said "we may still do "Bullshit of Bullshit".<ref name="nov_2015_bullshit">https://twitter.com/pennjillette/status/667933485965799424</ref>

==Episode guide==
This is a list of all '''''Penn & Teller: Bullshit!''''' episodes, alongside a brief synopsis and our own rating of the quality of the episode. Since the name of the show is ''Bullshit!'', the basic presupposition of the programme is that the topic covered in each episode of the show is indeed to be considered bullshit, which Penn & Teller spend the episode trying to argue that it is.

Thus, a positive rating from us for an episode will read <span style="background-color: #adf0ad;">Bullshit!</span> (meaning that ''the topic'' of that episode was indeed bullshit), while <span style="background-color: #ffa8a8;">Not Bullshit!</span> means that Penn & Teller were mistaken in calling bullshit on that particular topic. Episodes rated with <span style="background-color: #ffcb6b;">Partial Bullshit!</span> denote, as the name suggests, instances where the jury is still out on Penn & Teller's decision to call bullshit on the topic in question, or where the episode consists of a mixed bag of fact and error.

A few first-season episodes treat 2 subjects; those are listed separately with an ''a'' or ''b'' suffix.

===Season 1 (2003)===
====Talking to the Dead====
{{Permalink|Talking to the Dead}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.01
| ''Talking to the Dead''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examines [[medium|mediums]] and the techniques they use such as [[cold reading]] and [[hot reading]]. It's all [[bullshit]]; in other news, the [[Earth]] is round. Features [[Rosemary Altea]] doing a few readings, and interviews with [[John Edward]] and [[James van Praagh]]. [[Joe Nickell]] and a guy from the [[Center for Inquiry]] provide some comments, and mentalist [[Mark Edward]] does the same tricks without a hotline to the dead.
|}

====Alternative Medicine====
{{Permalink|Alternative Medicine}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.02
| ''Alternative Medicine''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Features a 
foot masseuse
 [[Reflexology|reflexologist]] claiming to want to revolutionize healthcare. Next up is [[William H. Philpott]] who claims [[Magnetic field therapy|magnets]] can basically [[panacea|cure everything]], and even warns that magnets are so powerful you can get you addicted to them; [[Robert L. Park|Robert Park]] replies calling it "[[Placebo effect|mental masturbation]]".

Last but not least is an insufferable [[chiropractic|chiropractor]] who also claims he can cure everything, and whose youngest patient was "about a minute and a half old". If you think exposing your newborn baby to a chiropractic "treatment" is anything but dangerous, irresponsible, and abusive, you are not fit to keep custody of children for another minute. The [[reform chiropractic]] Charles E. Duvall responds to all of this.
|}

====Alien Abductions====
{{Permalink|Alien Abductions}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.03
| ''Alien Abductions''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| ''ALIENS!'' ... and those who claim they were [[Alien abduction|abducted]] by them. Coverage of the 2003 Bay Area UFO Expo, including; [[David Icke]] (lecturing on—what else—[[Reptilians]]),<ref group=note>[http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/17458-victoria-jack/ he also seems to have a beef with the oranizer Victoria Jack]</ref> mad surgeon [[Roger Leir]], eerie twins Shurlene Wallace & Earlene Carr, as well as a buffet of different crank visitors. In the words of one disappointed visitor: "the only thing I've seen here is a lot of [[New Age]], what I call, fu-fu".<ref group=note>Full quote: "I came here expecting to hear more scientifically based data on the occurrence of the UFO phenomenon. The only thing I've seen here is a lot of new age, what I call, fu-fu; they don't have facts, they have experiences and they have lots of plugs for their books and their information and their tapes. Coming here is like being at a vendor's fair. They are selling everything, they're selling the information, they're selling the lectures, they are selling jewellery, and I'm not interested in that, I'm here for the science and there just isn't any."</ref> There are some good comedy moments here.<ref group="note">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKk8bN8Ka5g such as the scene with the authentic extraterrestrial probe]</ref> The episode also features "[[Hypnosis|regression therapist]]" Barbara Lamb and some of her 
patients
 victims, recounting various implanted memories about marrying and honeymooning aliens.
|}

====End of the World====
{{Permalink|End of the World}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.04
| ''End of the World''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Follows the eccentric (but clearly well-meaning) Bruce Beach, doomsday [[Survivalism|prepper]] extraordinnaire, on an outdoor promenade above and around his [[Ark Two|Ark Two DIY fallout shelter]], takes part in [[Tom Brown, Jr.|Tom Brown's]] Survival School, where they teach you how to build a 
coffin
 makeshift shelter from tons of wet leaves and branches.<ref group=note>Naturally, ''the'' most important thing to do after the bombs fall. [[Duck and Cover]] everyone!</ref> Self-described "rogue scholar" [[John Hogue]] explains the [[bullshit|art]] of [[shoehorning]] various [[Quote_mining|mined quotes]] from [[Nostradamus]]' [[Bullshit|prophecies]] into any and all context of your choice, e.g. current world events. [[James Randi]] demonstrates what an asshole Hogue is, by proving that his predictions retroactively change in new editions of his books after the predictions turn out wrong. Taking the crank nonsense to a crescendo, [[Christian]] [[Book of Revelation]] literalists [[Hal Lindsey]] and [[Texe Marrs]] provide an abundance of crackpot quotes for us to decorate their RationalWiki pages with.
|}

====Second Hand Smoke====
{{Permalink|Second Hand Smoke}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.05a
| ''Second Hand Smoke''
| style="background-color: #ffa8a8; text-align: center;" | Not Bullshit!
| This episode proclaims that smoking bans are bullshit since they infringe on personal freedom, and to "back up" this opinion, it tries to claim that [[second-hand smoke]] is not damaging. Whether smoking bans are bullshit is a matter of opinion, and the episode presents a rather one-sided debate of the argument, but it's not bullshit as such (at least not objectively). A complete discussion of this topic is beyond the scope of this synopsis.

The claim that second-hand smoke is not damaging is just complete bullshit.

Fairly early on the old "I've been a bartender 40 years and it hasn't affected me, and I know someone who's been in the business 60 years and he's still fine at 85" argument comes oozing out of the TV screen. Well, good for them, but we all know this sort of [[anecdotal evidence]] has no value. Penn & Teller rightfully point out the bullshit of this type of argument on the woo-related episodes, but [[hypocrisy|use it themselves here]]. Shame on you!

It then attempts to debunk some science reports; mainly the 1993 [[EPA]] report<ref>[http://oaspub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm.getfile?p_download_id=36793 Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders]</ref> which claims about 3,000 deaths in the [[US]] annually from second-hand smoke.

Several "experts" claim that the report shows no [[statistical significance|statistically significant]] risks. This claim relies on a technicality surrounding the cut-off for significant {{wpl|p-value|''p''-values|;}} although 0.05 is the most common number used, different kinds of studies and experiments may use a different significance level. Epidemiological studies sometimes use 0.1, and the results were significant at this level. In addition to this, the critics of the report falsely claim that a {{wpl|risk ratio}} of 2 or 3 is generally considered significant, but it's actually about 1.1-1.3.<ref name="skepdic">[http://www.skepdic.com/news/newsletter61.html#4 Mea culpa: Secondhand smoke and the politics of science], [[The Skeptic's Dictionary]] newsletter</ref> Basically, they bought into the [[FUD]] of the tobacco industry.

Several tobacco companies took [[FUD|legal action]] against the report, which was ruled in favour of the tobacco industry in 1998.<ref>http://archive.tobacco.org/Documents/980717osteen.html</ref> Therefore, the report is false, [[appeal to authority|because rooms full of lawyers are a great way to solve scientific disputes]].<ref>[http://archive.tobacco.org/Documents/980717osteen.html Here's the ruling]</ref>

It also examines a 1998 WHO report,<ref>[http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/19/1440.full.pdf Multicenter Case–Control Study of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer in Europe]</ref> and claims that it didn't find any correlation between second-hand smoke exposure and lung cancer. This is not entirely true, as it ''did'' show a correlation between second-hand smoke exposure and lung cancer (just look at the graphs). Depending on the type of exposure, the chance of getting lung cancer increases 11% to 16%.

The study did conclude that this was "not statistically significant", and it's not a very strong link (risk ratio of 1.44<ref name="skepdic"/>), but that doesn't mean it's non-existent; especially if many ''other'' studies have come to the same conclusion. In the end, "statistically significant" is just what you define it to be.

Another claim is that "[[Appeal to consequences|businesses are being forced to shut down]]" due to smoking bans. There have been no reputable studies linking smoking bans with negative economic impact; all studies which did show such a link were supported by the tobacco industry (94% of such sponsored studies showed a negative impact).<ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1759095/ Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry]</ref><ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24529192 Systematic review and meta-analysis of the economic impact of smoking bans in restaurants and bars.]</ref>

P&T later admitted in a Q&A session at The Amaz!ng Meeting that they were 
absolutely
 very likely wrong about the dangers of second-hand smoke, but Penn claimed that the research at the time [[bullshit|did not support it well]]. Penn also says that the science is also discussed for just "3 lines" and that it was mostly about personal freedom. This is complete bullshit, as the episode spends significant amounts of time on the science and doesn't mince words about it with quotes such as "in short, they lied" and "not one study anywhere offers conclusive proof that breathing in second-hand smoke causes cancer. ''[shouting]'' '''NOT ONE!'''".

They issued a correction on the DVD release of the show.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s8yqj3EL7A Penn and Teller Second-Hand Smoke Correction]</ref>
|}

====Baby Bullshit====
{{Permalink|Baby Bullshit}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.05b
| ''Baby Bullshit''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Focuses on some of the crap being peddled to young parents to make their babies smarter, such as [[Mozart effect]] products, Robert Titzer's [[Baby reading|Your Baby Can Read]] method and "baby whisperer" Tracy Hogg, who shares some helpful advice such as "All babies [..] need to eat" and "We really want to be gentle with our babies". Thanks Tracy!

Paediatrician Harvey Karp, explains his book ''The Happiest Baby on the Block'' as "I take scientific information and convert it into information that's easy to follow for everybody", to which Penn replies, "In other words, he's collected age-old parental techniques and packaged them into a slick message that desperate parents are only too eager to buy". While the book does seem somewhat light in content,<ref>[http://www.amazon.com/Happiest-Baby-Block-Harvey-Karp/product-reviews/0553381466/ref=cm_cr_pr_hist_1?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addOneStar&showViewpoints=0&sortBy=helpful&reviewerType=all_reviews&formatType=all_formats&filterByStar=one_star&pageNumber=1 based on one-star Amazon reviews]</ref> it seems to be helpful for many people, and "age-old" techniques are [[Appeal to tradition|not necessarily "good" techniques]]. 
|}

====Sex, Sex, Sex====
{{Permalink|Sex, Sex, Sex}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.06
| ''Sex, Sex, Sex''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Features some sex-related bullshit, mostly on [[penis enlargement]] and breast enlargement woo, and that the focus on the size of these parts is bullshit in the first place.

Even size king {{wpl|Ron Jeremy}} admits that dick size doesn't really matter. He peddles {{wpl|ExtenZe}} herbal penis enlargement pills anyway which, guess what? Don't work. ExtenZe has since been convicted for false advertising claims several times, and has been strongly criticized for causing various side-effects (though never penis growth).

Apparently boob enlargement by [[hypnosis]] is also a thing. WTF?
|}

====Feng Shui====
{{Permalink|Feng Shui}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.07a
| ''Feng Shui''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| This episode is one of the classics.{{efn|We must, however, point out a rather strange and erroneous remark: "Of course, most of the people in Feng Shui [[China]] are dirt poor and have only recently, with our help, been able to feed their own people". This is just wrong, the last famine in China was the great famine in 1958-1962 [[Mao]]'s "great leap forward", but there haven't been famines in China since.<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_famines_in_China]</ref> In 2003, when this episode was aired, China was well on the way to become the power that it is today (and to which the U.S. is indebted a trillion dollars [http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/moneymatters/ss/How-Much-US-Debt-Does-China-Own.htm]). It should perhaps also be pointed out that while China does receive foreign aid, it also ''spends'' foreign aid; about $1.7 billion in 2001 (and $189.3 billion in 2011). [http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR118.html]}} Three [[Feng Shui]] practitioners separately rearrange the same living room according to their "scientific" Feng Shui standards to maximize the flow of [[chi]]; 
to everyone's surprise
 as expected, the result is three very different arrangements. Feng Shui is "explained" by one woo-meister as  "what we're looking for is how the energies of chi are playing a game of cosmic game of musical chairs", and by another as "Chi is life force [[energy]], it's what the molecules are made out of. I can't explain it in super-[[scientific]] terms, but it's energy". Super scientific energy games of cosmic musical chairs! Yowzers! Also shows a beauty parlour that does "Feng Shui haircuts" for $150 which is indistinguishable from a $16 haircut.
|}

====Bottled Water====
{{Permalink|Bottled Water}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.07b
| ''Bottled Water''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Another classic. Handles the increasing popularity of [[bottled water]] sold in stores. The general premise of the episode is that bottled water is neither safer nor better tasting than regular tap water. (While this is not addressed on the show, it is still a healthier alternative to soda.) The water steward scene is brilliant.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFKT4jvN4OE Which can be seen on YouTube]… [http://jezebel.com/i-paid-for-a-water-tasting-flight-because-im-an-assh-1051240099 Water sommeliers are apparently a real thing] though. [[Poe's law]] in action!</ref>

This is Teller's favourite episode.<ref>[https://youtu.be/99_upx8URLI?t=2090 at about 34:50].</ref>
|}

====Creationism====
{{Permalink|Creationism}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.08
| ''Creationism''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Ah, [[Creationism|creationists]] are always fun. The renowned stand-up comedian [[Duane Gish]] from the [[Institute for Creation Research]] offers comic relief in the form of [[Grand Canyon]] flood geology and other nonsense, which [[Eugenie Scott]] needlessly refutes. Much of the episode focuses on the battle to [[teach the controversy]] in {{wpl|Cobb County, Georgia||.}} Note that the ruling did ''not'' rule that creationism can be taught in schools, and specifically disallows teaching it,<ref>http://ncse.com/news/2002/09/creationism-not-to-appear-cobb-county-public-schools-00272</ref> something quite a few press accounts got wrong (including this episode) due to some unfortunate wording. The "Evolution is a theory, not a fact" sticker shown in the episode was removed in 2006 following a {{wpl|Selman v. Cobb County School District|lawsuit}} initiated by several sane parents (the lead plaintiff featured in this episode).

It is perhaps interesting to note that the ''first'' argument put forward against teaching creationism isn't that it's complete bollocks, but "if we pay for it with taxes, it can't have religion in it.[..] As long as we're all paying, ''no religion in school''", which is a rather fundamentalist position on the separation of church and state.
|}

====Self-Helpless====
{{Permalink|Self-Helpless}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.09
| ''Self-Helpless''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Some of the more [[woo|wootastic]] and erroneous [[self help]] bullshit. One of the methods promises to get rid of all inner fears and problems by walking on glass and {{wpl|fire walking}} based on {{wpl|Tony Robbins||'s}} magical methods. {{wpl|David Willey (physicist)|David Willey}} shows how this works sans magic. Hale Dwoskin shows his [[Sedona Method]]. A "stage counsellor" is shown cracking spectacularly bad jokes.
|}

====ESP====
{{Permalink|ESP}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.10
| ''ESP''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Features various [[ESP]]/[[psychic]] bullshit.
Jack Houck is shown giving a [[spoon bending party]], where people bend spoons by shouting "BEND!" at them while at the same time wiggling them around with their hands; guess which of the two actions cause the spoon to bend, [[psychokinesis]] or wiggling them with your hands? Marc Klaas, father of the kidnapped (and {{wpl|Murder of Polly Klaas|later found murdered}}) Polly Klaas recounts his experiences with [[psychic detective]]s, which of course didn't find jack shit. {{wpl|Russel Targ}} "explains" somehow his [[remote viewing]] program; this [[PRATT|has been refuted many times]], and {{wpl|Ray Hyman}} and [[James Randi]] does it once more.

If the spoon-bending class wasn't enough for you, [[Wayne Carr]] (alleged Dr.) gives a class in remote viewing. Monica Diedrich, [[animal communicator]]; talks to [[goat]]s. All-round [[crank]] [[Bruce Goldberg]] goes into his [[past life regression therapy]], which makes the outlandish claim that he's regressed one patient into 5 million years ago.<ref group=note>To give some sense of scale, ''Homo Sapiens'' didn't evolve until about 200.000 years ago, our most direct ancestor, the ''Homo Erectus'', first appeared about 1.9 Mya, and the ''Homo'' genes separated from ''Panina'' (chimps) about 7.5 Mya.</ref>
|}

====Eat This!====
{{Permalink|Eat This!}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.11
| ''Eat This!''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| About several food-related topics. The first part is about weight loss and the "magical" [[fad diet]]s that turn out to be not so magical after all.  After this is a part about [[GMO]], [[organic food]] (which is not ''completely'' bullshit),<ref group=note>''Bullshit!'' did a full episode on organic food in the 7th series.</ref> and [[raw foodism]]. Features [[Greenpeace]] at its craziest, {{wpl|Organic Consumers Association||,}} and a bunch of raw food neohippies.

[[Norman Borlaug]] shows up to point out the bullshit on GMO; the raw food proponents are batshit crazy, and provided us with quotes to decorate the [[GMO]] and [[raw foodism]] pages.

Features Dennis T. Avery from the {{wpl|Hudson Institute||,}} who is opposed to any organic farming, and whose organization receives "donations" from the food industry (such as [[Monsanto]]).<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/17/dining/eating-well-anti-organic-and-flawed.html</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20070126180507/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jan2006/nf20060113_2851_db035.htm</ref>
|}

====Ouija Boards====
{{Permalink|Ouija Boards}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.12a
| ''Ouija Boards''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Shows several witches from modern Salem use a [[ouija board]] to contact the spirit of a burnt witch. It's painfully embarrassing to watch as these people seem genuinely sincere. Some random people use a spirit board at the location of {{wpl|William Frawley||'s}} death, and "answer" some basic questions with it, which only "works" due to the [[ideomotor effect]], and fails when they're blindfolded.
|}

====Near Death Experiences====
{{Permalink|Near Death Experiences}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.12b
| ''Near Death Experiences''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Shows several [[near-death experience]] (NDE) survivors, NDE "inventor" {{wpl|Raymond Moody||,}} and woosters in wedlock Jan and John Price who wrote a book about it. {{wpl|Barry Beyerstein||,}} {{wpl|Loren Pankratz||,}} and James Whinnery show up with reality based explanations.
|}

====Environmental Hysteria====
{{Permalink|Environmental Hysteria}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 1.13
| ''Environmental Hysteria''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| By far the biggest bullshit in this ''Bullshit!'' episode is the FUD surrounding global warming; Penn shouts: [[Bullshit|"WE'RE NOT SURE YET"]] at the top of his voice. To help them with this is Jerry Taylor of the [[Cato Institute]], who trots out the [[ice age fallacy]]. In 2003, when this episode aired, there was already abundant data available on global warming to be reasonably sure that it's real, and caused by human activity.<ref>[http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/climate/ipcc_tar/vol4/english/095.htm IPCC Third Assessment Report from 2001], "the balance of evidence suggests that there is a discernible human influence on global climate".</ref> At the same time, Taylor [[handwave|handwaves]] any potential harmful impact on the basis that we're doing fine so far.

In later interviews, Penn stated that anthropogenic global warming was probably real, but claimed that he was talking about not knowing whether "the whole package" (i.e. the need for [[government]] intervention, presumably as opposed to a self-correcting market) was real.<ref>[http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xmelsx_penn-jillette-discusses-anthropogenic-climate-change_tech Penn Jillette discusses anthropogenic climate change]</ref><ref>"Although I used to be more skeptical it seems like the information, and by that I do not mean Hurricane Sandy, but the preponderance of information seems to be there is climate change and it is anthropogenic. Although I still don’t know that the best solution is just a stronger government." [http://americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2012-12-morality-religion-and-bullsht-an-interview-with-penn Morality, Religion and Bullsh*t: An Interview with Penn Jillette]</ref>

The rest of the episode focuses on the perceived "hysterical" and "political" aspects of environmentalism. The show does a bit of [[Nutpicking]]: {{wpl|Julia Butterfly Hill||,}} who believes she can communicate with trees, and {{wpl|Ross Gelbspan||,}} an activist (''not'' scientist) who is indeed rather alarmist.<ref group=note>e.g. "unchecked global warming will bankrupt the global economy by 2065" sounds a bit [[PIDOOMA]].</ref>

A refutation is offered in the form of [[Bjørn Lomborg]], ''also'' not a scientist, whose work has been excoriated by numerous actual scientists such as E.O. Wilson<ref>[https://www.google.com/amp/s/grist.org/article/point/amp/| On Bjorn Lomborg and extinction], E.O. Wilson, December 12 2001. Retrived at July 23, 2019</ref> and Stephen Schneider{{fact}} and not just hippies and eco-nuts, and a 20-something old spokesperson at an environmentalist rally who's asked critical questions (but doesn't really have an answer ready at any of them). {{wpl|Patrick Moore (environmentalist)|Patrick Moore|,}} the [[Greenpeace]]-founder-turned-critic, provides commentary on most issues throughout the episode.

In the episodes that focus on woo, Penn often points out people's lack of credentials and counters woomeisters' nonsense with ''actual'' scientists, but here, only ''non-scientists'' represent the environmentalist view. There is very little actual content.

It laments some of the anti-corporation views of the environmentalists. Well, little wonder, given that corporations have proven to be untrustworthy time and time again in the case of tobacco, asbestos, global warming, ozone depletion, etc.
|}

===Season 2 (2004)===
====P.E.T.A.====
{{Permalink|P.E.T.A.}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.01
| ''P.E.T.A.''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| The show dismisses the [[animal welfare]] movement by pointing out a few [[extremist]]s ([[Steven Best]], {{wpl|Pamelyn Ferdin||,}} {{wpl|Jerry Vlasak||,}} {{wpl|Rod Coronado||,}} {{wpl|Gary Yourofsky||,}} [[ALF]]) who believe in using violence to achieve their ends and attempting to establish a spurious link between them and [[PETA]] (PETA officially opposes the use of violence<ref>http://www.debate.org/peta/</ref>), and interviewing a few hippies who make illogical arguments for animal liberation rather than intellectuals in the movement—so yes, nutpicking again. The issue of factory farming (what most serious animal welfare thinkers consider as the biggest problem) is hardly mentioned at all.

Invites on questionable experts and non-experts, such as David Martosko of the [[Newspeak|Center for Consumer Freedom]], an organization that [[Lobbying|lobbies]] on behalf of the [[fast food]], [[alcohol]], and [[tobacco]] industries.<ref>http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Center_for_Consumer_Freedom</ref><ref>http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_Martosko</ref><ref>http://www.consumerfreedom.com/about/</ref> [[Dennis Prager]] and [[Ted Nugent]] both respond in character: ignorant, loud-mouthed, and obnoxious.

Penn makes repeated [[ad hominem]] attacks on the "skinny vegetarians". Ironically, Penn switched to a mostly vegan diet in 2015 in order to lose weight after being hospitalized for [[Karma|high blood pressure]].<ref>http://greatideas.people.com/2015/04/08/penn-jillette-weight-loss-las-vegas-home/</ref> Guess being obese isn't so great, after all.

To be fair, there is plenty of bullshit in PETA and the animal rights movement in this episode such as PETA's staunch opposition to animal testing, its euthanasias of animals, and the aforementioned extremists.

We'll leave you with this quote: "Teller and I would personally kill every chimp in the world with our bare hands to save one streetjunkie with AIDS".  Charming.
|}

====Safety Hysteria====
{{Permalink|Safety Hysteria}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.02
| ''Safety Hysteria''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Irrational fear of [[terrorism]], [[crime]], [[electromagnetism]], [[Cell phone radiation]], [[germs]], [[school shooting|school shootings]], [[mad cow disease]], and the [[media]]'s [[fear mongering]] about some of these topics.

Features questionable [[expert for hire]] [[Steve Milloy]] and his [[webshite]] "junkscience.com" being a [[stopped clock]] in refuting [[Sam Milham]]'s EM radiation nonsense and the [[Waveshield]] device which offers "protection" against it.

Other experts are {{wpl|David Ropeik||,}} {{wpl|Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting||,}} [[ACLU]], and {{wpl|Michael Thun||.}}

The claim that you can't get Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease from eating beef is astonishingly wrong, as a clear link is well known, and has been for some time. The risk is extremely rare though — not in the least due to government regulations regarding the quality of beef,<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1671737.stm</ref> so it ''is'' bullshit to be afraid of it, but for different reasons than P&T tell you.
|}

====The Business of Love====
{{Permalink|The Business of Love}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.03
| ''The Business of Love''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit with ♥!
| Examines some nonsense about love, chiefly the bogus "advice" that some people peddle. This is one of those episodes that's more on the entertainment side of infotainment. A lot of the episode is about some girl doing a speed-dating thing, where you basically repeat the same conversation 25 times.<ref group=note>Let me give you a little piece of dating advice here, don't be afraid of starting a conversation about a random controversial topic, for example "What do you think about abortion?", "Who did you vote for last time, and why?", "Do you believe God exists?" Don't be afraid to disagree either; a good conversation about such a topic will do far more for you than talking about your job or where you're from or some such boring bullshit.</ref>

{{wpl|David P. Barash||,}} co-author of ''The myth of monogamy'', explains that "virtually no such thing as a truly monogamous species" and looks at the balls of a [[goat]].

{{wpl|Sherrie Schneider||,}} co-author of "''The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right''", who gives phone advice whether to "keep him or dump him", phone advice based on critical information such as whether "the guy" called a day too soon or late. Another piece of sage advice is "''4 hours''?! We never talk to them for 4 hours!" Having a good conversation! Shocking indeed! All men are dogs and must be manipulated into having a relationship with you, apparently.

[[John Gray]], author of ''Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus'' parts with ground-breaking revolutionary wisdom, such as that actively listening to your partner when they're talking is appreciated, and that "I love you so much" is a good thing to say to your partner.

{{wpl|Helen Fisher (anthropologist)|Helen Fisher}} explains the physiology of love a little bit.
|}

====War on Drugs====
{{Permalink|War on Drugs}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.04
| ''War on Drugs''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| That the [[war on drugs]] is an epic failure has become only more apparent since this episode first aired.

As one would expect of libertarians, P&T advocate full [[Drug#Drug liberalization|drug liberalization]] (including manufacture and trade). Whether this is such a great idea remains to be seen, as not all drugs are created equal (meth, for example, is much more addicting and dangerous than something like [[MDMA]]).

{{wpl|Robert S. Weiner|Bob Weiner}} and David Evans of the "Drug free schools coalition" try to make a case ''for'' the war on drugs. {{wpl|Jacob Sullum}} from ''[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]'' magazine, former drug smuggler Richard Stratton from {{wpl|High Times|''High Times''|,}}, and {{wpl|Keith Stroup}} make a counter to this; note that both are opinionated magazine publishers, not actual experts, which might explain some of the goofs described below.

Self-styled "America's Toughest Sheriff" [[Joe Arpaio]] quite possibly says some of the stupidest things on this show, such as implying that if drugs were legalized doctors would start operating on people while under the influence of drugs.

Finally, it briefly makes a case for [[medical marijuana]].

A note on the statistics on drug use that are given: it's true that drug use increased in the late 1990s and early 2000s,<ref>http://ns.umich.edu/Releases/2007/Dec07/mtf/drug_tables.pdf</ref> but it was much higher in the late 1970s and early 1980s (earlier figures are difficult to come by).<ref>http://www.vox.com/cards/war-on-drugs-marijuana-cocaine-heroin-meth/war-on-drugs-success-failure-working</ref><ref>http://www.briancbennett.com/charts/nsduh/past-month-percent.htm</ref> The people in favor of the war on drugs claim that drug use is "lower across the board", and this seems to be ''correct'' if you look at the number since the 1970s (Penn claims they're "pulled out of his ass", which they're not). Whether this is the ''result'' of the War on drugs, or due to other factors, is of course up for debate.

The claim that you can buy "a bag" of 80 to 90 percent of pure heroin at $4 also seems strange. One source has lists $10 for a "stamp bag" which is about 25% pure,<ref>http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/03/heroin-america-s-silent-assassin.html</ref> another mentions that prices can "go as low" as $6 in the larger cities, but are $30 to $40 in other areas,<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/04/nyregion/hoffmans-heroin-points-to-surge-in-grim-trade.html?hp&_r=1</ref> yet another mentions that one gram is about $131,<ref>http://www.economist.com/node/13917432</ref> and a fourth source lists $400 for a gram at 40% purity.<ref>https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/policy-and-research/bullet_5.pdf page 9</ref> While it's true that heroin prices have fallen (which mostly has to do with increased supply), the figures don't even come close to "$4 a bag at 90% purity".

But even if a single dose is (fairly) cheap, that doesn't mean an addiction is cheap. A single dose is about 0.1 gram, but an addict requires about 5 to 10 shots a day, so that's at least $50/day at a $100/gram price. So even though the price per shot is fairly low, it's still a $1500/month hobby.<ref>http://heroin.net/about/how-much-does-heroin-cost/</ref>

Finally a slight update to this episode: five states have legalized [[cannabis]] ([[Colorado]], [[Washington]], [[Alaska]], [[Oregon]], and [[Washington, D.C.]]), but it's still illegal at the federal level, although the federal government is no longer being a dick about it by raiding legal (at the state level) growers — though that could change at a moment's notice.
|}

====Recycling====
{{Permalink|Recycling}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.05
| ''Recycling''
| style="background-color: #ffa8a8; text-align: center;" | Not Bullshit!
| Argues that the [[government]] has no business spending [[tax]] dollars on [[recycling]], and that's it's wasted money anyway since recycling doesn't work. Whether recycling should be government funded is a political question you can answer for yourself (it probably should though), but like a number of other episodes relating to [[libertarianism]] Penn & Teller's [[Confirmation bias|desperate search for evidence to support their pre-conceived notions]] leads to misrepresentation, [[cherry picking]], and general terrible research.

For example, Daniel K. Benjamin's "Eight Great Myths"<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20070120002847/http://www.perc.org/pdf/ps28.pdf</ref> is described as a "landmark paper" by Penn, and describes how recycling paper pollutes ''more'' than creating new paper. Problem is that much of it is based on a ''1989'' study and ignores a 1995 and 2002 update which show that recycling is ''less'' polluting.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080607201604/http://www.de-fact-o.com/fact_read.php?id=62 Recycling paper pollutes more than making new paper], De-Fact-O</ref><ref>[http://waste360.com/mag/waste_bullshit Bullshit!], Waste360</ref> The statement that "Recycling does not save trees" is also not exactly true.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080506215505/http://www.de-fact-o.com/fact_read.php?id=63]</ref>

They comment that it costs more energy to recycle than it does to make a new plastic bottle, and include in the list of reasons for this the cost of transportation. But there's also a transportation cost associated with moving trash to a landfill, and the fact that the landfill is not the final destination of recycled materials would seem to bear this out. They also comment that cities often make a net loss on recycling, while failing to mention that this is also true of landfills, and that the recycled material is often then given or sold to manufacturers, so while the city takes a loss, you end up paying less for recycled goods.

They claim that [[aluminum]] is the only substance that is economical to recycle, and showed as evidence scenes of homeless people rooting around in dumpsters for empty soda cans. They neglected to mention that most U.S. states have enacted "redemption" legislation, which collects a 2-5 cent deposit on each can when purchased and pays 2-5 cents for each can turned in to a redemption station — in other words, the empty can collectors aren't being paid based on the scrap value of the aluminum: they're being paid based on what essentially amounts to a government subsidy. (This doesn't mean it ''isn't'' economical to recycle aluminum, just that their example was a bad one.)

The only thing the episode really got right is that landfill space isn't running out, although there were genuine concerns in the 1980s as many smaller landfills closed due to new safety and environmental regulations, and it took some time for the larger (and conforming) landfills to be built and take up the slack. The trend since the 1980s has been toward fewer but much larger landfills. This was somewhat misjudged and hugely overblown by various media and politicians, but the problem wasn't non-existent or "made up" as was claimed.

It should be noted that in a [[Reddit]] interview, Penn expressed a shift in personal belief while researching the recycling episode, saying "it's not that we're not open minded, it's just that we're working on it. So our opinions don't change when we do the show, they change when we're working on the show."<ref name="reddit-questions">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57r5xEsvftM&t=11m29s</ref> Yeah.
|}

====12-Stepping====
{{Permalink|12-Stepping}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.06
| ''12-Stepping''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Chiefly about the religious aspect of [[Alcoholics Anonymous]], and the complete lack of studies on the effectiveness of the program.
|}

====Yoga, Tantric Sex, Etc.====
{{Permalink|Yoga, Tantric Sex, Etc.}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.07
| ''Yoga, Tantric Sex, Etc.''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Various forms [[New Age]] nonsense:

Interviews some of the more [[woo]]ceptible participants in a [[Yoga]] class. The show goes on to mention that holding positions longer than 30 seconds is not beneficial. Sure, that may be, but Yoga is a combination of [[exercise]] and [[meditation]], something they seem to forget.

At an [[herb]] convention, they found someone stating "I believe that plants contain innate wisdom based on the wisdom of our planet as a being itself. They work together in synergistic ways to provide everything that we need in terms of medicine, food, all kind of healing". Well, ehh, okay...

They test [[Tarot cards]] reading with a guy from the [[Center for Inquiry]]. He goes to three different "readers", but dresses and acts different for each one: first a loser bum, then a busy businessman, and finally a family man. The readings vary wildly and are matched to his appearance and behavior, which is hardly surprising as the readers are using the same old [[cold reading]] tricks.

Next up is the capital of all things woo: [[Sedona]] and its all-powerful vortexes which can do all sorts of stuff for you. Two people follow a guide to benefit from the magic vortex powers. A great deal of [[Indian woo]] is involved, but when asked "is that an authentic native American ceremony?" the guide admits that "in no way is this a Native American traditional ceremony. I was trained by grandpa Roberts of Cherokee descent, and he told me, as long as I come from the heart, anything that I do is okay". [[Pete Sanders]] offers some "[[pseudoscience|scientific]]" proof (and he studied at MIT, so he ''must'' be right!)

Last is some [[Tantra]] sex which basically seems to amount to clothed men trying to please naked women while the "instructor" imitates [[Deepak Chopra]] minus the accent.

"Cult and New Age researcher" [[Rick Ross]] provides commentary throughout the episode.
|}

====Fountain of Youth====
{{Permalink|Fountain of Youth}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Synopsis

|-
| 2.08
| ''Fountain of Youth''
| style="background-color:#ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
|Plastic surgery trades appearance for health. The effects of wrinkle-removing skin cream are over-exaggerated, often leading to it being over-priced — and just as effective as the generic brand, which is only hardly noticeable after consistent frequent use over a long period of time. Nutrition does certainly help and data suggests plant-based diets correlates with longer lives, but it is difficult to control for how processed the foods in the diets are, which could be just as great of a factor because the two are so closely related. In any case, having less processed foods and low or no meat intake will increase the likelihood of a longer life. Human growth hormone, which has more negative side effects than positive ones. The biggest bullshit of all is the stigma against aging. It is indicative of a culture that values vanity over wisdom. Although there is a bit of hypocrisy in how they treat the full bodied tattoo people with silicone implants not for the sake of aging as they are guilty of valuing bodily image in the same way only the people they are critiquing are they just appreciate a different aesthetic. 
|}

====Death, Inc.====
{{Permalink|Death, Inc.}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.09
| ''Death, Inc.''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examines various aspects of 
death
 [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msGvEtmR970 hamburger time], such as the taboo on [[death]], death denialism, and the death care industry.

Mony Vital, a [[Breatharianism|breatharian]],<ref>[http://www.librarising.com/health/monyvital.html Mony Vital: A Breatharian Speaks Out]</ref> says he will "never ever ever ever die". In a moment of both sadness and great hilarity, he died in 2013 after lecturing on his alleged immortality. He was in his late 50s. According to some of his followers, he "[[Moving the goalposts|made a choice to leave this existence for a higher calling]]".<ref>http://cosmicconnie.blogspot.nl/2013/01/vital-signs-immortal-breatharian-dies.html</ref>

It discusses the high profit margins of the death care industry and the taboo of death in the States. Some of the content seems to come straight from an episode of ''Six Feet Under''. To help them with this are {{wpl|Mary Roach||,}} {{wpl|David Kessler (writer)|David Kessler|,}} {{wpl|Robert Bryce (writer)|Robert Bryce|,}} and a number of people not notable enough for Wikipedia or us.

Lastly, it discusses [[cryonics]]. Some people from the cryogenic company "trans time" explain the whole shebang, while {{wpl|Wallace Sampson}} points out it's all bullshit.
|}

====Profanity====
{{Permalink|Profanity}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.10
| ''Profanity''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | <strike>Humbug!</strike><br />Bullshit!
| Opinion piece on the [[censorship]] of profanity; as one would expect, P&T take the position that government should not regulate ''anything''.

Ginny Foster, from the now-defunct hush-up.com, claims that "when we say ugly things then that living language becomes an agent of death". Apparently, this only applies to what ''she'' considers "ugly", as it's perfectly fine to piss over [[Buddha]]: "A substitute that I have is, when I'm dealing with my students or even in my home, I would say, I swear to Buddha. Because if you're going to profane a deity, I guess it might as well not be your own." She claims she was [[Bullshit|"misunderstood" or that it was "edited wrong"]].<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20050206032107/http://hush-up.com/</ref>

Other people with similar views are Jim Lafferty from the [[Traditional Values Coalition]], who proclaims  "there are classes of words, and profanity is the lowest denomination among the classes of words." ([[Conservapedia:Best New Conservative Words|sound familiar]]?) and James O'Connor, author of {{wpl|Cuss Control||.}}

To refute this are linguist {{wpl|John McWhorter||,}} John Morse, "shock jock" {{wpl|Mancow Muller||,}} {{wpl|Ronald K. L. Collins|Ron Collins|,}} and {{wpl|Robert Corn-Revere||.}}

It also features {{wpl|Lenny Bruce||'s}} and [[George Carlin]]'s legal troubles on the subject.

The piece ends with a cringe-worthy rant, set to the backdrop of a quote by [[Gerald Ford]], which the [[Cato Institute]] morons misattribute to Thomas Jefferson.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lg5zodsZdds Bullshit! Misquotes Thomas Jefferson] ''YouTube''</ref>
|}

====The Bible: Fact or Fiction?====
{{Permalink|The Bible: Fact or Fiction?}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.11
| ''The Bible: Fact or Fiction?''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Holy Bullshit!
| One of the better episodes of the series.<ref group=note>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=lb52oT1kA0Q#t=68 Elvis never did no drugs!]</ref> Discusses the historicity, morality, and origins of the [[Bible]] with [[Michael Shermer]] and {{wpl|Paul L. Maier||.}} Topics covered are [[Genesis#The two creation myths in Genesis|the two creation myths in Genesis]], the [[global flood]], [[Noah's ark]], [[flood geology]], [[Evidence for the Exodus|evidence for the Exodus]], [[evidence for the historical existence of Jesus Christ]], and the [[resurrection|resurrection of Jesus]].

It also features [[Roy Moore]]'s refusal to remove the monument depicting the [[Ten Commandments]] from the Alabama supreme court.
|}

====Exercise vs. Genetics====
{{Permalink|Exercise vs. Genetics}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.12
| ''Exercise vs. Genetics''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Exercise helps, but the extent of it is greatly over exaggerated for the purpose of selling something. Genetics and diet play a much greater role. You don't need any memberships, gimmicky devices or supplements. 
|}

====Hypnosis====
{{Permalink|Hypnosis}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 2.13
| ''Hypnosis''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| Penn has stated on several occasions that he regrets this episode, as they were too focused on "debunking" [[hypnosis]] and not enough on actually finding out the truth about it.<ref name="reddit-questions"/> [[Denmark|Danish]] mentalist [[Jan Hellesøe]] has made a convincing case that hypnosis can influence behavior and may be a basis of [[faith healing]] and [[exorcism]], and some weak medical evidence that hypnosis may be therapeutically effective exists.<ref>[Enck, P., et al. "Sensitivity and specificity of hypnosis effects on gastric myoelectrical activity," ''PLOS One'', Dec. 16, 2013,  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083486]</ref>
|}

===Season 3 (2005)===
====Circumcision====
{{Permalink|Circumcision}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.01
| ''Circumcision''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Tackles the controversial subject of routine [[circumcision]] of new-born infants in the [[United States]]. The chief arguments against it are lack of [[informed consent#Medicine|informed consent]], reduced of sexual pleasure later in life, and lack of any significant benefits.

Non-therapeutic  [[circumcision]] on babies and children who can't consent is a violation of children's right to [[Circumcision#Bodily_autonomy_and_integrity|bodily integrity and autonomy]]. Circumcision causes unnecessary [[Circumcision#Pain_and_trauma|bodily injury, pain, and potentially trauma]]. It may also cause [[Circumcision#Adverse_sexual_effects|adverse sexual effects]], although the scientific evidence and consensus on this is unclear. Clearly though, circumcision ablates healthy, functional<ref name="pmid8800902">{{cite journal| author=Taylor JR, Lockwood AP, Taylor AJ| title=The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision. | journal=Br J Urol | year= 1996 | volume= 77 | issue= 2 | pages= 291-5 | pmid=8800902 | doi=10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.85023.x | pmc= | url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=8800902  }} </ref> tissue from children's genitalia, precluding sexual activity that uses this tissue, and is therefore inherently harmful and unethical. Whilst circumcision confers some [[Circumcision#Purported_prophylactic_benefits|health benefits]], we find that they are not nearly enough to justify cutting off healthy parts of children's genitals without consent.
|}

====Family Values====
{{Permalink|Family Values}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.02
| ''Family Values''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Points out that the [[religious right]]'s narrative of the [[family values]] and "traditional family" is perhaps not entirely conforming to [[history]] and [[reality]]. Shocking, innit?

{{wpl|Family Institute of Connecticut}} and [[Michael Medved|Michael "Hitler was gay and held gay orgies" Medved]] espouse the common tropes that society is going to hell if we allow [[same-sex marriage]] and that children will grow up to be psychotic suicidal drug-abusing homicidal maniacs unless they grow up in a "one man and one woman"-family.

Also shows a [[Polyamory|polyamorous]] couple, a lesbian couple 
[[Gay agenda|corrupting]]
 raising their adopted children, and crank ex-gay [[Richard Cohen]] who's using "the law of physics" (his words) to 
help
 fuck up a client with [[Reparative therapy]].

{{wpl|Stephanie Coontz||,}} {{wpl|Judith Stacey||,}} and {{wpl|Nanette Gartrell}} help pointing out the bullshit in all of this.
|}

====Conspiracy Theories====
{{Permalink|Conspiracy Theories}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.03
| ''Conspiracy Theories''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examines [[9/11 conspiracy theories]], the [[Moon landing hoax]], and [[John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory|JFK assassination conspiracy theories]]. We have extensive pages on all those topics; all the points made in the show have been [[PRATT|refuted a thousand times]].

Cranks: [[Clyde Lewis]], [[Eric Hufschmid]], {{wpl|Jimmy Walter||,}} [[Ralph René]], {{wpl|Jim Marrs||,}} {{wpl|conspiracy museum}}

Sane: [[Phil Plait]], {{wpl|Jodi Dean||,}} {{wpl|Vincent Bugliosi}}

Especially in the 9/11 "truther" segments, it uses a lot of [[appeal to emotion]] and [[ad hominem]]. The chief "refutation" is a NYC firefighter who was present at 9/11, introducing him as "if anybody knows that 9/11 conspiracies are bullshit, it's this guy [..] he lost 50 friends when the towers collapsed", although to be fair, they did include a brief but clear refutation from an actual expert. Many (but not all) 9/11 truthers consider themselves "good guys" in the sense that they think their motives are patriotic. [[appeal to motive|Not that it ''really'' matters]], as such, but it makes the appeal to emotion even that much more wrong. The time would have been better spent actually refuting the bullshit arguments the "truthers" make.

Apparently this episode "pissed off enough nuts that we, and even some of our crew, received ''serious'' threats".<ref>Intro of episode 6.04, ''Dolphins''</ref>
|}

====Life Coaching====
{{Permalink|Life Coaching}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.04
| ''Life Coaching''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Mostly Bullshit!
| Examines the phenomenon of "life coaching", which is roughly similar to hiring any ol' bum to play your therapist or psychologist (minus the many years of study and proper qualifications, of course).

The show follows several "life coaches" and some of their clients. To make a life coach, add equal parts of [[pop psychology]], [[management speak]], [[PIDOOMA]], and stating the obvious. [[Woo]] is not required, but can be added in large doses according to taste.

Anti-cult activist [[Rick Ross]] doesn't like life coaches and offers commentary.

The whole "Cuddle Party" phenomenon got a bit of an unfair treatment, as it's not a "life coach" but more of a socializing event. Some of the claims are rather overblown, but if people enjoy such an event, who are we to argue? It certainly beats some asshole claiming to channel a spirit telling you to "just be happy" and charging $100 for the service.
|}

====Holier Than Thou====
{{Permalink|Holier Than Thou}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.05
| ''Holier Than Thou''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| Criticizes the idolization of the three most popular contemporary "[[saint]]s": [[Mother Teresa]], [[Mahatma Gandhi]], and the [[Dalai Lama]].

[[Christopher Hitchens]] appears doing three of his favourite things: smoking, drinking, and calling Mother Teresa a fraud. {{wpl|Aroup Chatterjee}} and a former nun back him up. Of course, whenever Hitch talks about Mother Teresa, you can be sure that [[Bill Donohue]] will come out to defend her, and this episode is no exception.

Mohandas Gandhi is introduced as a wise person from who many can learn a great deal, but Penn & Teller object to the excessive idolization and show some of his more human flaws: his famous experiments with sleeping naked next to naked women, his blatant [[racism]] against blacks in [[South Africa]] (where he lived from 1893 to 1914), his love of [[enema]]s, and that he wasn't always as non-violent as he's perceived to be. Features grandson {{wpl|Arun Gandhi}} and Gandhi-critic {{wpl|G. B. Singh}} feature (whose book, {{wpl|Gandhi: Behind the Mask of Divinity||,}} is rather controversial).

The views on the 14th Dalai Lama reflected in the episode was inspired by the work of {{wpl|Michael Parenti||,}} who wrote ''Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth''.<ref>http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html</ref> While the show's portrayals of Mother Teresa and Gandhi are rather spot on, the inclusion of the Dalai Lama drew some controversy, as has Parenti, for assuming a strong position on an issue that is still ongoing.<ref>http://www.swans.com/library/art9/mparen01.html</ref>

The episode mentions that the CIA funded guerilla fighters in Tibet. This did happen, but the situation was more nuanced than presented.
Although it mentions that the funding was ended, it doesn't mention that the program was ended way back in '''1974'''. The Dalai Lama claims he didn't know about the program (it's up to you whether you believe him) and formally denounced it. <ref>http://articles.latimes.com/1998/sep/15/news/mn-22993</ref>

It claims that independent [[Tibet]] had a priest class living in luxury and serfs living in utter misery. Although it is true that independent Tibet was hardly ideal and had a large amount of inequality, matters are more complicated than presented.<ref>{{wpa|Serfdom in Tibet controversy}}</ref>

It goes on to mention that punishments like eye gouging, pulling out of tongues, and disembowelment were common. There were indeed some incidents of torture and extreme cruel punishments, but it was rare and controversial in Tibet. It certainly wasn't common.<ref>http://info-buddhism.com/Human-Rights-in-Tibet-before-1959_Robert_Barnett.html</ref>

The most bullshit claim however, is that Dalai Lama would like "old Tibet with a few reforms".

In the end, there is certainly a good case to be made to debunk the Dalai Lama's perceived "holiness" among some people and the notion of independent Tibet as some sort of "paradise lost", but here Penn & Teller spread as much misinformation as they try to rectify.
|}

====College====
{{Permalink|College}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.06
| ''College''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| Much is made of how you don't need higher education to succeed, with mention of some of the usual dropout success stories. While many higher education programs are of dubious use, if ''nobody'' went to university, we'd have no doctors, engineers, pharmacists, etc., and society would collapse.
|}

====Big Brother====
{{Permalink|Big Brother}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.07
| ''Big Brother''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Looks at the (in)famous [[Patriot Act]] that expired in 
2005
 
2009
 
2019
 2020. The risk of it being renewed in the near future, however, is still a very real possibility.
|}

====Hair====
{{Permalink|Hair}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.08
| ''Hair''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examines hair woo.
|}

====Gun Control====
{{Permalink|Gun Control}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.09
| ''Gun Control''
| style="background-color: #ffa8a8; text-align: center;" | Not Bullshit!
| America's favo
u
rite controversial topic. Penn & Teller very strongly advocate against gun control and in favo
u
r of unrestricted gun ownership and carry.

A full discussion on the topic is beyond the scope of this review; see our pages on [[gun control]] and the [[Second Amendment]] for that.

They advocate heavily from [[originalism]], which is — especially from people outside the States — a rather strange thing to do. Whatever was a good idea in 1791 is not necessarily a good idea well over 200 years later in a society that's substantially different.

It also advocates heavily that citizens need guns to protect themselves from the government and police, stating that "we need the government to be afraid of its citizens". When a pro-gun control advocate states "Call the police if you see a crime", Penn comments "Call a cop! I guess he would have a different view if he were black or Hispanic in central LA" and "But who does he call against the police?". In another instance, Penn uses [[Thomas Jefferson|Jefferson's]] famous "the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" quote — the same quote that [[Timothy McVeigh]] had on his shirt when bombing Oklahoma.<ref>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-horwitz/thomas-jefferson-and-the_b_273800.html</ref>

There are some very deep problems with this that are not even mentioned, let alone discussed. The way it is presented in the show, it's almost as if citizens can just disobey laws if they feel it infringes on their freedom (not too dissimilar to the [[sovereign citizen|sovereign citizen movement]] and [[militia movement]]) or fight back against police if they feel they're unjust. No reasonable person will deny that [[police brutality]] is real and a serious problem (this has only become more obvious since this episode aired), but is arming people (like "black[s] and Hispanic[s] in central LA") with guns really a solution to this problem? There can really be only two possible outcomes when citizens start to take up arms against the police: a full-out war, or a lawless wasteland.

The second argument is the familiar "we need guns for protection" and the familiar "if we have guns we can stop bad people", "Don't punish the gun", etc. For bonus points, {{wpl|Suzanna Hupp}} [[Appeal to emotion|recounts her surviving a mass shooting]] where her parents and 21 others were killed. This would, of course, have been prevented if more people had guns. Somehow. What is not mentioned is that the mass shooting would ''also'' have been prevented if the perpetrator hadn't had access to a gun.

Penn casually [[handwave]]s "150 accidental deaths a year under 17" away as a minor sacrifice for liberties, ignoring accidental deaths ages 18 and older, suicides, escalated conflicts, and all other deaths by guns that would ''not'' have happened with significantly fewer guns.

The slogan "you see drops in violent crime when more people are allowed to carry concealed handguns" is unproven by serious academic research.

Oh, and one of the pro-gun "[[experts for hire|experts]]" presented is [[Fox News]] columnist<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/archive/author/john-lott/index.html</ref> {{wpl|John Lott#Controversy|John Lott}}, who has conducted (and [[PIDOOMA|fabricated]]) some highly questionable "research."<ref>See [http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~lambert/guns/lott/ Tim Lambert's debunking of ''More Guns, Less Crime''.]</ref>

{{wpl|Jackie Mason}} also makes a brief appearance being profoundly stupid. "Chairs should be illegal! Do you know how many people are killed by chairs?" This is such a [[not as bad as|silly reasoning]] that it hardly deserved a reply.
|}

====Ghost Busters====
{{Permalink|Ghost Busters}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.10
| ''Ghost Busters''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| [[Ghosts]]. Yeah, people actually believe that sort of stuff :-/
|}

====Endangered Species====
{{Permalink|Endangered Species}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.11
| ''Endangered Species''
|
|
|}

====Signs from Heaven====
{{Permalink|Signs from Heaven}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.12
| ''Signs from Heaven''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| The omnipotent creator of the universe communicating with his creation though sandwiches, bathroom doors, and oily statues.

One woman discovers Maria in a cheese sandwich, and another found Jesus' eyes in a wooden bathroom door. The door apparently cured a headache, so it must be true! Briefly shows comatose abuse victim {{wpl|Audrey Santo||.}} {{wpl|Frederick Zugibe}} attempts to "prove" the [[shroud of Turin]] is genuine by simulating Jesus' crucifixion — as if that proves anything about the Turin shroud — by wearing reinforced leather gloves (just like Jesus).

{{wpl|James Alcock}}, [[Joe Nickell]], and [[James Randi]] offer reality-based commentary in the form of [[psychology]] (e.g. [[pareidolia]]) and criticism of the [[Vatican]] and its plausible deniability policy on [[miracles]].
|}

====The Best====
{{Permalink|The Best}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 3.13
| ''The Best''
|
|
|}

===Season 4 (2006)===
====The Boy Scouts====
{{Permalink|The Boy Scouts}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.01
| ''The Boy Scouts''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Shows how the Boy Scouts of America has been hijacked by the [[Mormons]] who use it to promote their moral agenda and all the bullshittery that entails. In particular, their exclusion of [[gays]] and [[atheists]], who are not allowed to join.

The ban on gay youth members was lifted in January 2014. The ban on gay leaders was lifted in July 2015.<ref>http://www.latimes.com/la-na-nn-boy-scouts-gay-leaders-20150713-story.html#page=1</ref> As of 2021, you still need to believe in [[God]] to be permitted. From their guidelines: ''“All that is required is the acknowledgment of belief in a God as stated in the Declaration of Religious Principle and the Scout Oath, and the ability to be reverent as stated in the Scout Law.”''<ref>{{a|1=https://www.scouting.org/resources/guide-to-advancement/special-considerations/#5050|2=Special Considerations, Boy Scouts of America}}</ref> Any kind of religion is accepted, including [[polytheism|polytheistic]] ones, just not atheists or agnostics, as it is well known that without [[God|magical sky-daddy]] to watch their every move, these people will rape, loot, and pillage every chance they get (this is, in fact, a favourite activity at RationalWiki meetups. True story!)
|}

====Prostitution====
{{Permalink|Prostitution}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.02
| ''Prostitution''
|style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
|What?! You can have random sex with another person, but you can't pay for it?!
|}

====The Death Penalty====
{{Permalink|The Death Penalty}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.03
| ''The Death Penalty''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Makes the argument against [[capital punishment]] from both moral and pragmatic standpoints. 
|}

====Cryptozoology====
{{Permalink|Cryptozoology}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.04
| ''Cryptozoology''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Features the two most famous [[Cryptid|cryptids]]: the [[Loch Ness Monster]] and [[Bigfoot]]. Well, by "features", we mean "they're talked about", as both seem to be rather shy creatures.

{{wpl|Richard Freeman (cryptozoologist)|Richard Freeman}} and {{wpl|Jonathan Downes}} of the {{wpl|Centre for Fortean Zoology}} hunt for the Loch Ness monster. Like everyone before them, they fail. They believe that Nessie is a giant castrated eel. The Loch Ness Monster has been debunked so many times over the course of 90 years, it would be a waste of time to do so again here.

P&T made their own Bigfoot video roughly similar to the 1967 {{wpl|Patterson–Gimlin film}} and put it on a fake webpage. Bigfoot enthusiasts went crazy over it, even offering thousands of dollars for the rights to the film and interviews...

Oh, and some pesky scientists offer some reality-based criticism.
|}

====Ground Zero====
{{Permalink|Ground Zero}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.05
| ''Ground Zero''
|
|
|}

====Pet Love====
{{Permalink|Pet Love}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.06
| ''Pet Love''
|
|
|}

====Reparations====
{{Permalink|Reparations}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.07
| ''Reparations''
|
|
|}

====Manners====
{{Permalink|Manners}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.08
| ''Manners''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examination of claims that today's society has less manners than every other generation before. Manners are, in most cases, just a mimicking-situation game, which is against nature of our species (monkey brain).

Some aspects of manners, like saying "thank you" and "please" have logical foundation. The rest of it is pretty much bullshit.
|}

====Numbers====
{{Permalink|Numbers}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.09
| ''Numbers''
|
|
|}

====Abstinence====
{{Permalink|Abstinence}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 4.10
| ''Abstinence''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examines [[abstinence]], especially [[abstinence-only sex education]]. Also looks at anti-[[masturbation]], anti-[[contraception]], anti-[[pornography]], [[homophobia]], [[Condom|condom denialism]], and anti-[[abortion]], all of which are prevalent in abstinence-only advocates.

{{wpl|Joycelyn Elders||,}} {{wpl|Betty Dodson||,}} [[Planned Parenthood]], and the Center For Sex & Culture help P&T point out the bullshit in all of this.

Since the episode aired, matters have improved somewhat; funding for abstinence-only programs has been reduced while funding for more comprehensive sex education has improved.<ref>http://www.nomoremoney.org/index.cfm?pageid=947</ref>
|}

===Season 5 (2007)===
====Obesity ====
{{Permalink|Obesity}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.01
| ''Obesity''
|
|
|}

====Wal-Mart====
{{Permalink|Wal-Mart}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.02
| ''Wal-Mart''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| Mostly examines the popular criticism of [[Wal-Mart|Walmart]] over running small/family run stores out of business, but also explores employee treatment, overseas sweatshops, and union activities. Not surprisingly, P&T preach to the big business choir with Walmart's typical capitalist policies.

Featured on the anti-Walmart side are two nutjobs who founded and ran the now defunct website HelMart.com, film maker Robert Greenwald, corrupt career Chicago alderman Joe Moore, anti-sprawl activist, and '''Walmart's Number One Enemy''' Al Norman. On the pro Wal-Mart side is a conservative Manhattan Institute fellow, a New York Times columnist, a SJSU professor, a New York labor lawyer, and Chicago alderman Emma Mitts.

While the more jobs point may be true, P&T themselves admit early on that Walmart are [[Fun:Asshole|assholes]] 
most of the time
 sometimes (Walmart paying $50 million to settle for workers who were forced to work off the clock in Colorado, or in another case paying $172 million for workers who weren't given a mandated 30 minute lunch break in California). P&T also probably left out other instances of employee mistreatment from the time this episode came out.

Also tries for a sympathy case with a worker in Chicago who states that she would have still been looking for a job had Walmart not opened in her neighborhood due to a living wage ordinance sponsored by alderman Moore, which was later vetoed due to the efforts of alderman Mitts.

P&T then go on that mom and pop stores would have gone out of business anyway without Walmart opening as seen in Greenfield, Massachusetts due to Al Norman, who states that the Walmart's 20 miles away in each direction caused Greenfield's economic struggle.

The biggest bullshit in this episode by far would have to be the open defense of sweat shops compared to alternative jobs in third world countries (which are usually just as bad).

P&T get into a short segment of Union politics with a labor lawyer. Specifically the food workers union's failed attempts to get Walmart unionized, people not wanting to pay more for union wages, the usual flim flam.
|}

====Breast Hysteria====
{{Permalink|Breast Hysteria}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.03
| ''Breast Hysteria''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| In 2004, a single {{wpl|wardrobe malfunction}} consumed US news for weeks. "Free the nipple," babies need to eat, and all that.
|}

====Detoxing====
{{Permalink|Detoxing}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.04
| ''Detoxing''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| You get to watch a [[Enema|tube being stuck up a guy's ass and getting the shit flushed out of him]]. So if you're into that kind of thing, this is your episode!
|}

====Exorcism====
{{Permalink|Exorcism}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.05
| ''Exorcism''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Wait what?! [[Exorcism]]s don't work?! But there was a movie about it!!
|}

====Immigration====
{{Permalink|Immigration}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.06
| ''Immigration''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Some people's irrational fear of both legal and [[illegal immigration]] is not entirely founded in reality. Attacks the ideas of border walls and border patrol projects. This has only gotten more relevant since the [[Syria|Syrian war]] and [[Donald Trump]]'s severe anti-immigration bullshit.

Also see [[Myths and facts about immigration to the United States]].
|}

====Handicap Parking====
{{Permalink|Handicap Parking}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.07
| ''Handicap Parking''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| There are areas where it makes little sense to have as many handicapped spots as there are. However, Penn's argument against handicapped spots ''in general'', in usual libertarian fashion, is "Look, here's a handicapped spot that's not being used!" A bit of an [[overgeneralization]]. Shocking numbers are thrown around about what proportion of people could apply for handicapped spots using ''one'' definition of disability. There's a bit of [[bait-and-switch]] because individual states have various requirements, but many require physician certification. There's also some [[ableism]], because with many conditions, people who may require a permit one day may not require it the next, or vice versa. 
|}

====Mount Rushmore====
{{Permalink|Mount Rushmore}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.08
| ''Mount Rushmore''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| [[Image:Ronnie-on-rushmore.jpeg|thumb|right|100px|It could be worse...]]
|}

====Nukes, Hybrids, and Lesbians====
{{Permalink|Nukes, Hybrids, and Lesbians}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.09
| ''Nukes, Hybrids, and Lesbians''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| They are pro-nuclear energy and pro-lesbian...but anti-hybrids, because the acceleration isn't as much as a fuel engine. If we're to cut down on greenhouse gases and fight climate change, though, hybrids are probably a necessity in the short term, at least in areas where charging stations are not widespread — and provided the electrical energy that powers them is cleaner than petroleum. Close, guys!
|}

====Anger Management====
{{Permalink|Anger Management}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 5.10
| ''Anger Management''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Mostly Bullshit!
| Court-mandated anger management programs are common across the US. While there is some evidence that [[CBT]] may diminish anger associated with crime,<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178915001263 | title = A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of CBT informed anger management | author1 = Kevin Sammut Henwood | author2 = Shihning Chou | website = Elsevier | accessdate = June 16, 2023}}</ref> whether the strategies these mandated programs use do reduce crime, is unclear. Similarly unclear is whether the people who deliver them — often not mental health professionals, and who may simply have been sports coaches or pastors who spent money to sit through a three-day course — are in any way qualified to deliver effective programs. Neither is it clear that a random judge is a good assessor of who would benefit from anger management programs and who is qualified to deliver them. Finally, because the observed success rate even for competently delivered CBT for anger-induced criminality is non-trivial but not even remotely approaching 50%, the benefit of routinely sending people to anger management therapy that is not CBT, and which is not delivered by specialist mental health professionals, is questionable.
|}

===Season 6 (2008)===
====War on Porn====
{{Permalink|War on Porn}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.01
| ''War on Porn''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| This episode goes to bat against the anti-pornography movement. Defends pornographic content as being protected under free speech laws, examines myths on the supposed harmful effects of porn viewing, and notes that critics who wish to censor obscene materials are motivated by political reasons.
|}

====New Age Medicine====
{{Permalink|New Age Medicine}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.02
| ''New Age Medicine''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| [[Woo]], woo, and more woo... When will the woo stop?! Features [[acupuncture]], [[cupping]], [[acutonics]] (acupuncture with sound), and [[therapeutic touch]] (with {{wpl|Emily Rosa||'s}} debunking of it).

The funniest is a woman doing [[color therapy]]/crystal healing, which "cleans out and realigns your chakras", who has some special machine for that, but "since the instructions came in Portuguese, and I don't read that, I basically abode by what I feel and intuitively sense". Right. She also "[[PIDOOMA|invented]]" her own bullshit: "quantum [spinal] alignment therapy is what I call it, because I don't have another word to give it until I create my own word". She tries it on a patient with a bad knee, but "feels" the pain on the wrong knee. Oops! Saves this by saying that "this knee must be stressed from carrying all the weight from the other bad knee over here".
|}

====NASA====
{{Permalink|NASA}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.03
| ''NASA''
| style="background-color: #ffa8a8; text-align: center;" | Not Bullshit!
| They do a good job at covering some of [[NASA]]'s worst accidents as well as the toxic work culture there, but that's where the good stuff ends. They suggest the solution to these issues is complete privatization because of the incorrect notion that private companies are magically better at everything than the government is. 
|}

====Dolphins====
{{Permalink|Dolphins}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.04
| ''Dolphins''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| [[New Age]] [[dolphin]] [[woo]]; the hyper intelligent telepathic healing 
fish
 mammals of the oceans; yadayada; we all know this.

''BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE!''

One couple claim to be able to communicate with dolphin souls, or something: "I felt and saw … several dolphin spirits come to me and they asked me to become one of their ambassadors on land". Riiighht. For a $2,000 workshop, she will "lead you through an internal experience to call forth your inner dolphin, and then we'll bring our inner dolphin out, so that we're completely immersed in our dolphin aspect … that is us". There's a great example of the [[Retroductive reasoning]] (i.e. retroactively fitting your reasoning with unexpected facts) that woomeisters and wooceptible often commit. One woman wants some career advice from the dolphins (yeah, really), and when she picks the choice the dolphins "choose" for her, she's very upset as she's not happy with that choice. This is then "explained" that the dolphins "revealed the depth of your feeling" and that she "needed the experience". She replies with "so for me it worked!"…

All of this happens in [[Sedona]]; which — by the way — is in the middle of a desert and some 650 kilometers removed from any ocean.

Then there's an [[asshole]] who does "dolphin assisted births". [[Poe's law|Yeah]]. She explains that dolphins will "help massage your baby down" and that "dolphin babies are usually very easy to have". But she never actually ''did'' one of these magical births: "a typical dolphin birth, that would be pretty hard for us to answer right now since we've yet to make it that far."
|}

====Sleep, Inc.====
{{Permalink|Sleep, Inc.}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.05
| ''Sleep, Inc.''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examines the "sleep industry", various sleep problems, and their supposed "magical solutions." Also examines sleep pills and interviewed Dr. Daniel Kripke as to why they don't work.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890308/ | title = Hypnotic drug risks of mortality, infection, depression, and cancer: but lack of benefit | author = Daniel F. Kripke | website = National Library of Medicine | date = November 12, 2018 | accessdate = June 11, 2023}}</ref>
|}

====Being Green====
{{Permalink|Being Green}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.06
| ''Being Green''
| style="background-color: #ffa8a8; text-align: center;" | Not Bullshit!
| Recycles (see what we did there?) some of the earlier bullshit from the first-season episode ''Environmental Hysteria''. It starts with the age-old stupid [[ice age fallacy]] even before the opening credits run. In the last minute of the episode, Penn says that "we don't know" if [[global warming]] is real, but you wouldn't know that if you watched the rest of the episode; most of the "good-guy guests" outright deny global warning, and no refutation to that is offered at all. Like most episodes relating to [[environmentalist|environmentalism]] the format consists of hippies vs. [[think tank]] hacks — the fact that scientists are ignored should set off your own bullshit detector.

It adds in criticism of [[carbon offset]]s, which are indeed ''partly'' — but not entirely — bullshit, but comparing them to [[indulgences]] is probably not really accurate. Also contains a lot ''[[Gore's Law|Argumentum ad Gorem]]'' — some of which is valid, some less so, but none of it says anything meaningful about either global warming or carbon offsets.

1970s weatherman {{wpl|John Coleman (news weathercaster)|John Coleman}} tells us that "global warming is a scam" and that global warming is caused by the sun. Predictably, we also have some [[libertarian]] think tank hacks, this time from the {{wpl|Cascade Policy Institute}} and {{wpl|Beacon Center of Tennessee}} with the same [[PRATT|point that have been refuted a thousand times]].

The only thing it got [[stopped clock|sort-of right]] is that some people ''can'' indeed be suckered and guilt-tripped into spending money on "the environment"; but it's mixed in with so much bullshit — like the suggestion that people are suckered into believing global warming — that it's like dollar bills in a truck of shit: not worth digging out.

As if all of that wasn't enough bullshit on this ''Bullshit!'' episode, the Cascade Policy Institute hack also casually drops that the [[PRATT]] that [[DDT]] bans are bullshit and have murdered tens of millions of people '''''*groan*'''''.
|}

====Sensitivity Training====
{{Permalink|Sensitivity Training}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.07
| ''Sensitivity Training''
|
|
|}

====Stranger Danger====
{{Permalink|Stranger Danger}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.08
| ''Stranger Danger''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Exposes the narrative of children being kidnapped by pedophiles as largely being a media-fueled, kneejerk, moral panic that grossly exaggerates the odds of strangers harming youngsters. Penn and Teller point out that such misconceptions do not prevent actual instances of child molestation, and that standard child sexual abuse is in fact performed by people the child already knows quite well, as opposed to outsiders.
|}

====World Peace====
{{Permalink|World Peace}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.09
| ''World Peace''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Mostly Bullshit!
| Examines, criticizes, and often denounces so-called "peace groups" and the [[United Nations]] (while also opposing deliberate aggression), as well as arguing that [[free trade]] is the sole way to ensure world peace. Economic freedom does help to some extent, but diplomacy plays just as much of an important role, if not more so. However, when looking at the activities of most modern-day activists (especially those who are [[Left wing|left-leaning]]): While they do have reasonable motivations and intentions, most of their activities/demonstrations are rather impractical. As a result, the chances of the overall effectiveness/results of such activities/demonstrations being in their favor are practically second to none. This is especially the case with {{wpl|Code Pink}} (one of two "peace groups" featured in the episode, alongside {{wpl|A.N.S.W.E.R.}}), who is often notorious for disrupting inaugural hearings and the like. Code Pink potentially showed its true colors (no pun intended) in February 2023 when its activists disrupted a hearing relating to [[China]] and protested that China was "not the enemy," which only gave out bad implications that the group was denying the existence of the country's ongoing [[Uyghur genocide]].<ref>{{cite web | url = https://thehill.com/homenews/house/3878446-protesters-disrupt-house-china-panels-first-hearing/ | title = Protesters disrupt House China panel’s first hearing | author = Jared Gans | website = The Hill | date = February 28, 2023 | accessdate = June 16, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/fairness-justice/code-pinks-denial-of-the-uyghur-genocide-makes-it-a-hate-group | title = Code Pink’s denial of the Uyghur genocide makes it a hate group | author = Michael Rubin | website = Washington Examiner | date = February 4, 2023 | accessdate = June 16, 2023}}</ref> To quote Dan Griswold of the [[Cato Institute]]: "...When I watch what a lot of these 'peace activist' groups are doing, it seems to me [[Slacktivism|it's more about ''feeling'' good than ''doing'' good.]]"

In regards to the United Nations: while it's not ''entirely'' worthless, it barely gets anything done in terms of ensuring world peace. The five permanent countries that make up the organization's Security Council are the [[United States|U.S.]], the [[United Kingdom|U.K.]], [[France]], China, and [[Russia]]. Considering how bitter or potentially hostile some countries' relations are to one another (particularly {{wpl|France–United Kingdom relations|the U.K. and France}}), the chances of literally ''all'' of those countries agreeing on an agenda that benefits every one of their individual beliefs are close to nonexistent. But when they do agree on something (usually when they agree to dispatch U.N. peacekeepers to a country of conflict), things usually don't go as intended, especially since the peacekeepers and U.N. diplomats alike have the magical power of "diplomatic immunity", which tends to be abusable, especially in terms of sexual abuse, as pointed out in the episode.

The only real bullshit in this episode was Penn's brief remark as to how "[[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]] called himself a socialist" when arguing that [[socialism]] doesn't do anything to ensure world peace. While [[Nazism]] is technically an abbreviation for '''National Socialism''', Nazism and regular socialism are two separate entities.
|}

====Good Ol' Days====
{{Permalink|Good Ol' Days}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 6.10
| ''Good Ol' Days''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | ''Probably'' Bullshit?
| Examines cultural nostalgia, specifically the overexaggerated woo of the 80's, the 50's, and the [[Middle Ages]], establishing that each of those time periods had their respective negatives (such as the [[HIV/AIDS]] pandemic and [[Cold War]] paranoia in the 80s, the [[Segregation]]/[[Jim Crow laws]] present in the 50s, and the [[Plague]] and {{wpl|Science in the Middle Ages|primitive forms of medicine}} used in the Middle Ages), as well as their positives. But the episode's overall execution will make it difficult to determine if the audience was to actually learn anything, at least for the first time around.
|}

===Season 7 (2009)===
====Orgasms====
{{Permalink|Orgasms}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.01
| ''Orgasms''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| [[Sex woo]], such as [[Vagina myths#gspot|G-spot]], bogus orgasm/ejaculation inducing methods, and a couple of con artists (including a [[New Age]] one) posing as [[sex education|sex ed]] teachers.
|}

====Astrology====
{{Permalink|Astrology}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.02
| ''Astrology''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| [[Astrology]]: it makes no sense and has been debunked more often than you can count, but people still believe this shit. Penn & Teller could be criticized for picking such an easy target if it weren't that so many people still believe this type of nonsense.
|}

====Video Games====
{{Permalink|Video Games}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.03
| ''Video Games''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Mostly Bullshit!
| Looks at the [[video games]]-causes-violence claims. The claim that games have no effect on aggression levels doesn't really have good scientific backing, but [[moral panic|moral panics]] about it are, of course, bullshit. Includes interviews from former lawyer [[Jack Thompson]], notorious in the video game community for being an ambulance chaser from between 2003 and 2008. Thompson had been disbarred the year prior to this episode being aired, though that didn't prevent him from referring to himself as an attorney and "[the] video game industry's worst nightmare" in his introduction. It's mostly him repeating baseless claims about video games affecting players minds without referring to studies (sorely misrepresenting actual results), plus him referencing the story of King Cnut the Great and the tides (though he fails to understand the meaning of the story, which is that laws aren't going to change nature, not even human nature).

Also has an appearance from anti-videogame advocate Chris Cooney, who argues that school shootings only occur when there are troubled kids, guns, and mass-killing simulators. This "School-Shooting Triangle" is debunked by P&T pointing out [[W:Charles Whitman|Charles Whitman]] (the 25-year old Texas Tower Sniper who killed 17 people at the University of Texas in 1966, six years before Pong was invented); while the largest school killing spree (at the time of the episode) was the work of 55-year old [[W:Andrew Kehoe|Andrew Kehoe]], who used explosives (not guns) to kill 45 people (38 of them schoolchildren), in 1927 (45 years before Pong). Ironically, towards the end of the episode, Cooney admits that he's a huge gun nut who collects firearms and films himself using them; and demonstrates a rather disturbing fascination with assault weapons.

Also includes Lawrence Kutner and Cheryl K. Olson, co-directors of the Center for Mental Health and Media. Both point out that most "studies" tend to be very agenda-driven and ignore the fact that video game consoles and games are common in most households. School-shooter profiles tend to have only two things in common — they are male, and they often show signs of depression.

The episode finishes with a clever argument which includes a hypothetical scenario where video games are created before football and reach the same popular status, while football comes later, then points out that hundreds of children have been severely injured and even killed while playing the sport despite its widespread popularity and attention.
|}

====The Apocalypse====
{{Permalink|The Apocalypse}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.04
| ''The Apocalypse''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| About the (then-upcoming) [[2012 apocalypse]]. As most would agree in {{#time: Y}}, it probably didn't happen.
|}

====Lie Detectors====
{{Permalink|Lie Detectors}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.05
| ''Lie Detectors''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| The infamous [[polygraph]].
|}

====Organic Food====
{{Permalink|Organic Food}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.06
| ''Organic Food''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Calls out [[Organic food#Organic woo|organic woo]] and mentions some of the drawbacks of organic food.
|}

====Taxes====
{{Permalink|Taxes}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.07
| ''Taxes''
| style="background-color: #ffa8a8; text-align: center;" | Not Bullshit!
| P&T take on the [[Internal Revenue Service|IRS]] over [[Tax|taxes]] with [[Grover Norquist]], [[Ron Paul]], [[Dick Armey]], [[Boston Tea Party]] cosplayers, and a couple of other anti-tax no names. On the pro-tax side is [[The Huffington Post|Huffington Post]] editor Roy Sekoff who advocates a poll tax and [[progressive taxation|progressive taxes]], and an ex-IRS executive who is fine with the current system. If you haven't already guessed, it's a whole lot of meaningless libertarian and conservative anti-tax arguments along with a touch of anti-welfare arguments.
|}

====Lawns====
{{Permalink|Lawns}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.08
| ''Lawns''
|
|
|}

====Stress====
{{Permalink|Stress}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.09
| ''Stress''
|
|
|}

====The Vatican====
{{Permalink|The Vatican}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 7.10
| ''The Vatican''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Covers [[Child sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church]] and then-[[pope]] [[Benedict XVI]]'s role in it.

This episode is not on the season 7 DVD, and is no longer listed on the show's official website. During an Q&A session, Penn noted that this is one of his favourite episodes and also doesn't know why it doesn't appear on the DVD, having learned of this fact during an interview.<ref>https://youtu.be/99_upx8URLI?t=2207, at about 36:45</ref>
|}

===Season 8 (2010)===
====Cheerleaders====
{{Permalink|Cheerleaders}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.01
| ''Cheerleaders''
|
| <!-- Perhaps of interest?  http://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2015/12/13/9888858/high-school-sports-dangerous -->
|}

====Fast Food====
{{Permalink|Fast Food}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.02
| ''Fast Food''
|style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
|This episode is not for empty stomach. The biggest bullshit claim from P&T is comparison numbers of calories from [[fast food]] menus vs. slow food restaurants. The real problem with fast food isn't the fact that they have high caloric menu items, but lack of option for low calorie items with combination of small prices and quick and easy access to them. The second part of the episode shows some valid points about American lifestyle and its contribution to the [[obesity]] epidemic. There are many factors for obesity (lack of exercise, overusing [[automobile]] transport, overeating etc.). So yeah, fast food is a real problem in society, but claims that it is the ''only'' problem is pretty much bullshit. We can end it with Penn Jillette's words: "We eat too much, we eat too often."
|}

====Martial Arts====
{{Permalink|Martial Arts}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.03
| ''Martial Arts''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Dubious [[martial arts]] practices, as well as some of the martial arts [[woo]].
|}

====Teen Sex====
{{Permalink|Teen Sex}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.04
| ''Teen Sex''
|style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
|Covers teen sex, texting (or sexting?) trends, and irrational fear of teenage pregnancies. It's a little-known fact that today's generation has the lowest desire for sex and lowest teen pregnancy rates.
|}

====Easy Money====
{{Permalink|Easy Money}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.05
| ''Easy Money''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Explains why you'll most likely lose money — or make so little that you're better off getting a minimum wage job — if you join a 
pyramid scheme
 [[multi-level marketing]] company, and points out that if you want to get rich, you have to trick plenty of other people into joining. 
|}

====Area 51====
{{Permalink|Area 51}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.06
| ''Area 51''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Rebukes conspiracy theories about the presence of supposed extraterrestrial technology at Area 51.
|}

====Criminal Justice====
{{Permalink|Criminal Justice}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.07
| ''Criminal Justice''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | Partial Bullshit!
| The duo made (or rather, supported) some rather bullshit claims with regards to the validity of forensic science, unsurprisingly with the aid of a couple more of their libertarian buddies. In fact, the entire opposition to forensics during the course of the episode consisted of nothing but a [[lawyer]] from (shock) the Cato institute, and a writer from [[Reason (magazine)|''Reason'' magazine]], neither of whom it might be noted are scientists. Though they made some valid points with regards to forensics (such as the imprecise sciences of fingerprint & bite mark analysis), they also made (or rather, acted as the vehicle for and then didn't dispute) some rather eyebrow-raisingly crank statements, such as the following from Radley Balko, senior editor of ''Reason'': 

{{cquote|The problem with forensic science in general is that it isn't science, it was basically invented by the police [...] There's never been sort of a rigorous, scientific review that we've seen in every other field of science [...] There's no peer review in forensic science, there's no blind testing in forensic science.}}

Which is, of course, why there are no credible [[scientific journal|journals]] relating to forensic science. None.<ref>[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1556-4029 Journal of Forensic Sciences]</ref> At.<ref>[http://www.fsijournal.org/ Forensic Science International]</ref> All.<ref>[http://www.scienceandjusticejournal.com/aims Science & Justice]</ref>

It's also rather interesting that both of the actual forensic scientists in the episode are mocked to a greater or lesser degree. On the other hand, Radley Balko is introduced as "a serious guy" with a "super cool comic book detective name" who's been "studying and writing about our [...] criminal justice system for years."
|}

====Old People====
{{Permalink|Old People}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.08
| ''Old People''
| style="background-color: #ffcb6b; text-align: center;" | A deep and resounding '''{{smallcaps|meh}}'''.
| [[Stereotype]]s against old folk. They smell, bad drivers, ugly [[intercourse|sex]], etc.

Old people discuss when and how often they have sex, young people smell at old people, and "humorist" [[Maddox]] comes off as an "oldophobe" (<sub>is that a word?</sub> <sup>It is now!</sup>) with quotes like "I think old people should be shot into space", "when I think of old people I think of smell, laziness, and bitterness", etc.

Maddox commented on the episode in 2015, stating that "they had a narrative in mind, and they cut the interview to fit their narrative", and that his quotes were attempts at humour. He then proceeds to explain his main points (which weren't in the episode at all).<ref>[http://maddox.xmission.com/c.cgi?u=penn_teller_bullshit Penn & Teller: My take on their bullshit]</ref> This accusation seems more than plausible. The irony is that his ''actual'' points contain enough bullshit for an episode, so there was no need for the out-of-context shit. Penn replied to Maddox stating that it's "the worst episode we did" and apologized.<ref name="nov_2015_bullshit"/> Not sure if it's the worst episode (denying the hazards of second-hand smoke was pretty awful), but yeah, it's not very good.

Also briefly covers [[euthanasia]] with a terminally ill cancer patient. This part is actually fairly balanced for both sides, but also very short at about 4 minutes.
|}

====Self-Esteem====
{{Permalink|Self-Esteem}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.09
| ''Self-Esteem''
|style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
|Focusing on parents, school programs, life coaches and other crap promoting to boost your self-esteem to achieved better school and job performances, and the complete lack of scientific evidence for this claim.
|}

====Vaccinations====
{{Permalink|Vaccinations}}
{|class="wikitable"
!No.
! style="min-width: 10em;" | Title
! style="min-width: 7em;" | Bullshit?
!Synopsis
|-
| 8.10
| ''Vaccinations''
| style="background-color: #adf0ad; text-align: center;" | Bullshit!
| Examines the [[anti-vaxx]] movement, with an emphasis on debunking the bogus claims of a link between autism and vaccines.

Penn lists this as the episode he's "most proud of".<ref>https://youtu.be/99_upx8URLI?t=2207, at about 36:45</ref>
|}

==External links==
*[http://www.sho.com/site/ptbs/home.do ''Bullshit!'' homepage], which for some reason has never been updated after the third season.
*[http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0346369/ ''Bullshit!'' IMDb page], especially useful as it contains the names of all the guests.

==Notes==
{{reflist|group="note"}} 

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

[[Category:Libertarianism]]
[[Category:Media]]
[[Category:Skepticism]]
[[Category:Television programmes]]

Categories: Non-stub articles needing expansion, Libertarianism, Media, Skepticism, Television programmes