Charles Carreon

[[File:Charles carreon.jpg|thumb|right|165px|Carreon in 2017]]
{{internet}}
'''Charles Carreon''' is a lawyer living in Tucson, [[Arizona]] with his wife, Tara. His claim to fame prior to 2012 was as a [[First Amendment]] champion in the Sex.com case.<ref>[http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/06/13/1055220758649.html Six-year battle over sex.com settled], ''The Sun-Herald''</ref> In 2012 he has become known for being a frivolous litigant and censorious butthurt nutcake after attempting to shake down Matt Inman, owner of webcomic site [http://theoatmeal.com/ TheOatmeal.com], for $20,000 because of complaints Inman made about his work being illegally hosted on FunnyJunk.com, an aggregator of user-submitted "funny" content. Inman told him to fuck off and instead raised 200 grand via crowdfunding to donate to the American Cancer Society and the American Wildlife Federation; Carreon's response was to file suit against Inman, Indiegogo, and both the organizations Inman donated to.

As of September 2013, sanity seems to have prevailed and he's failed to interest Wikipedia editors since.<ref name=arstechnica2013/><ref>{{wpa|Charles Carreon}}</ref>

==FunnyJunk and The Oatmeal==

[[Image:Theoatmeal_fj_message.jpg|thumb|width114|Expert PR skills at work.]] The case began in 2011 when Inman made a complaint<ref>[http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk The Oatmeal Blog - What should I do about FunnyJunk.com?] (theoatmeal.com)</ref> about image-hosting crap-site FunnyJunk stealing Inman's images - FunnyJunk being a website notorious for that sort of thing. FunnyJunk responded<ref>[http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk2 The Oatmeal Blog - An update on the FunnyJunk situation]</ref> with about as much maturity and decency as one might expect from a site where the entire business model is to slather advertising all over copyrighted content.  A brief flame-war between the two sites would have been an end to it until Carreon got involved a year later. Representing FunnyJunk, Carreon threatened to sue Inman for defamation (for not updating his blog post from a full year earlier to reflect that FunnyJunk had taken down the many specific uploads he had listed) and attempted a $20,000 shakedown to make the problem go away. Inman's first response<ref>[http://theoatmeal.com/blog/funnyjunk_letter The Oatmeal - FunnyJunk letter]</ref> is best summed up as follows:

{{quotebox|You want ME to pay YOU $20,000 for hosting MY unlicensed comics on YOUR shitty website for the last three years? No, I've got a better idea.

# I'm going to try and raise $20,000 in donations.
# I'm going to take a photo of the raised money.
# I'm going to mail that photo to you along with this picture of your mom seducing a kodiak bear.
# I'm going to donate one half of the money to the National Wildlife Association and the other half to the American Cancer Society.}}

[[Image:funnyjunksmomandbear.png|thumb|widthpx|FunnyJunk's mom, seducing a bear for charity.]]

Inman's "Operation Bear-Love Good Cancer Bad" campaign raised the $20,000 in 64 minutes, and had netted over $100,000 by the end of the first day. Despite his earlier experience with the Sex.com case, Charles seems to not have spent much time on the Internet, as he was bewildered by Inman's tactics.<ref>[http://digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/12/12187665-cartoonist-turns-lawsuit-threat-into-100k-charity-fundraiser Digital Life - Cartoonist turns lawsuit threat into $100K charity fundraiser] (digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com)</ref> Carreon foreshadowed the clusterfuck of hilarity and butthurt that was to come in a quote given to Digital Life:

{{quotebox|"I really did not expect that he would marshal an army of people who would besiege my website and send me a string of obscene emails," he says. 

"I'm completely unfamiliar really with this style of responding to a legal threat — I've never really seen it before," Carreon explains. "I don't like seeing anyone referring to my mother as a sexual deviant," he added, referencing the drawing Inman posted.}}

The fact that Inman's letter was clearly directed to FunnyJunk and not Carreon himself is something Charles seems to have missed. He also falsely accused Inman of directing fans to contact Carreon – he seems to have never considered that the Internet might have risen up to smack him in the face on its own initiative without needing to be directed. (In fact, Inman later asked people ''not'' to contact or harass Carreon.) Curiously, this '''is''' the very tactic that Carreon's client, FunnyJunk, did about a year before.

==Charles Takes Charge==

At this point, the FunnyJunk aspect of the case was almost forgotten, and Carreon went ''pro se'' (aka, representing himself) and ''fucking nuts''. Through the course of Carreon's legal complaints, the following were sued in one way or another:<ref>[http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120618/00025519366/charles-carreon-sues-matthew-inman-charities-hes-raising-money.shtml Charles Carreon Sues Matthew Inman... And The Charities He's Raising Money For]</ref>

# The American Cancer Society and the National Wildlife Association. Yes, he sued the charities for the money.
# Inman himself (obviously).
# IndieGoGo (the fundraising website) for breach of terms and conditions.
# An injunction against PayPal to stop the money being transferred - ostensibly to stop Inman mishandling or laundering the money, but everyone just ''knows'' it was to stop him taking the photo of it to humiliate Carreon. (spoiler alert, this didn't work.)<ref>[http://theoatmeal.com/blog/charity_money The Oatmeal - As promised, here's the picture]</ref>
# Various unnamed people supposedly impersonating Carreon on [[Twitter]].

Carreon dropped the case by the beginning of July, [[Danth's Law|declaring "Mission Accomplished"]] before the judge could actually act on it and determine how many times he'd be hit with the Rule 11 stick (which is to say, fines for knowingly bringing a lawsuit that has no basis in law when he should've known better) and disbarment from the California bar.<ref>[http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/127139 He's already been suspended once for stealing money from a client trust fund and practicing law in British Columbia without a license.]</ref>

==Rapeutation.com==
The tastefully-named '''Rapeutation.com''' is a website started by Carreon and his wife in 2012. The initial post was a bizarre [[Christmas]]-themed (in the middle of July) music video called "Psycho Santa." The video<ref>[http://rapeutation.com/ Psycho Santa]</ref>  is said to be related to the controversy, but the Carreons seem to use the [[Timecube]] approach to context, sanity, and relevance in their posts,<ref>No, seriously. [http://www.naderlibrary.com/bulletin_board/viewtopic.php?t=896 This is Tara Carreon's "scrapbook" forum] where she's duplicated tons of comments and news stories (with no regard to copyright) about the Oatmeal/Carreon affair. Read with sanity goggles in their locked-on position.</ref> not to mention the fact that Tara Carreon apparently wants to "get rid of you ALL if I could. I wouldn't leave a one of you," referring to men<ref>[http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/rapeutation-charles-carreon-still-not-done-with-the-oatmeal/ via Ars Technica]. Also, don't miss the "go out with a BANG!" suicide (murder-suicide? double suicide? just nuts?) stuff.</ref> — except Carreon himself, presumably.

In addition to the strange video, Rapeutation includes calls for substantial expansion of US defamation law for the "social media" era. Carreon defines a new acronym called "Distributed Internet Reputational Attack (DIRA)" and writes a rambling "legal analysis" calling for oppressive, litigious tools to be brought to bear on any criticism issued over the internet.<ref>[http://rapeutation.com/legal-analysis/ Distributed Internet Reputational Attack-Legal Analysis]</ref> Because when your outrage is irreparable, invent legislation to sue for it instead of ignoring it.

In September 2013 he had a sudden attack of sanity and dropped the remaining lawsuit, calling his entire legal battle "a dumb thing".<ref name=arstechnica2013>[https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/09/charles-carreon-withdraws-final-appeal-says-entire-affair-was-a-dumb-thing/ Charles Carreon finally quits fighting, calls Oatmeal battle “a dumb thing”], Ars Technica, Sep 19, 2013</ref>

==External links==

*[http://rapeutation.com/ Rapeutation.com]
*{{wpl|The Oatmeal and FunnyJunk legal dispute||,}} one of the best-named Wikipedia pages out of six million.

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Carreon, Charles}}
[[Category:Internet kooks]]
[[Category:Lawyers]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Websites]]

Categories: Internet kooks, Lawyers, Living people, Websites