Pornography

[[File:Pan copulating with goat 2.JPG|thumb|right|165px|Pan copulating with a [[goat]], a statue from Pompeii, [[Italy]] (c. 70 CE). Pornography has been around for a long time.]]
{{sex}}
{{cquote|We have a constitutional guarantee of homosexuals, lesbians, masochists, sadists, misfits, complete nudity, pornographic literature, abnormal sex, crime and violence, moral decay, mail order obscenity, hardcore pornography, bestiality, wild, flagrant abuses, abnormal sex practises of every kind...|||George Putnam, ''Things I'm Into''<ref>[https://youtu.be/h_4jmLj5778 George Putnam: Things I'm Into] (parody, '''[[NSFW]]'''), [[YouTube]].</ref>}}
'''Pornography''', or '''porn''', is [[media]] of 
[[sex]]y
 people doing sexy things, usually to other 
sexy
 people.

[[Fundamentalism|Fundamentalists]] don't like it because it makes their pants fit funny and makes them forget that they're nasty, rotten, pathetic little slime that deserve nothing better than to be tied up and forced to lick [[George Rekers|God's boots]] [[Larry Craig|in a men's room]]... [[Ted Haggard|naked]]. Giddyup!

Pornography is the subject of much legislation; it is illegal to produce, sell, or possess pornography in {{wpl|Pornography laws by region|a great number of countries around the world}} (for example, most nations in Africa and Asia have such legislation).

Almost all of the [[American Freedom Coalition|far right]] and some of the [[Andrea Dworkin|far left]] hate porn, mostly for silly, ideological reasons (despite the little-known fact that [[wingnuts]] actually [[Haggard's Law|consume surprising amounts of porn in secret]]).

So far, some argue that [[RationalWiki]] is not ''really'' part of the [[Internet]], because it contains no porn.

==Rule 34==
[[File:NopeInternet.gif|right|thumb|Beware of Rule 34 when "researching" pornography.]]Of course, porn is not limited to the conventional.<ref>Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices by Brenda Love (ISBN 1569800111).</ref><ref>Deviant Desires: Incredibly Strange Sex by Katharine Gates (ISBN 1890451037)</ref> According to Rule 34, for ''anything'' that exists, porn of that thing also exists.<ref>[http://xkcd.com/305/ xkcd 305], [[xkcd|Randall Munroe]] (And while it may not have been a thing when "xkcd 305" was posted, if you Google "wetriffs" now... well...)</ref> This is most commonly seen in the hilarious titles that are available for (ahem) consumption. Although these are usually just mainstream porn with funny themes and titles so aren't really Rule 34 in action, they are pretty damn funny. Examples include:

*''Womb/Nude Raider''
*''Star Whores''
*''In Diana Jones and the Temple of Poon''
*''E3 The Extra Testicle''
*''Romancing the Bone''
*''Super Hornio Bros.''
*''Porn on the 4th of July''
*''Independence Gay''
*''Schindler's Fist''{{efn|What? Too soon?}}
*''Lord of the G-strings''
*''Poonemon''
*''The Flintbones''
*''The Sexorcist''
*''Spongeknob Squarenuts''
*''Strokémon''
*''Fortnut''
*''Bukkake To The Future''
*''Sex Toy Story''
*''The Sperminator''
*''COVID-69''{{efn|As if pandemics like [[COVID-19]] are exempt from the rule.<ref>[https://www.amazon.co.uk/Covid-69-Erotic-Coronavirus-Quarantine-Story-ebook/dp/B086BJMWBX Covid-69: An Erotic Coronavirus Quarantine Story]</ref>}}
*''Cockhead''/''Cunthead''/''Cuckhead''

The list is almost endless.<ref>[http://www.scroll.demon.co.uk/porfilms.htm A slightly longer list]</ref> However, some porn parodies tend to be a little unimaginative with their titles and simply name them like ''Not The Bradys XXX'' or ''Star Wars XXX: A Porn Parody'' to name a few.

Strictly, Rule 34 is about the explicit content rather than the superficial differences — and there are no exceptions to Rule 34 (per Rule 41: "No matter what it is, it is somebody's fetish. No exceptions"). Imagine the possibilities: if your sexual fantasy involves ketchup, mailboxes, potato chips, [[Goat#Pornography|barnyard animals]], plaster casts, bananas, and floppy discs all at the same time, you ''will'' find pr0n involving all those things if you but look on the [[Internet]]. A good place to start would be the restricted "adult content" section of [[DeviantArt]] or FurAffinity. There are also multiple websites dedicated to it, some focusing on just standard ''hentai'', and others that actually deal entirely with characters from cartoons, or Orthodox Jews looking for "frum porn" starring other Orthodox Jews<ref>https://vice.com/read/who-is-watching-all-the-porn-marketed-to-orthodox-jews-915</ref>, ''et cetera''. Even the character of {{wpl|Luce (mascot)|Luce|,}} an anime-influenced mascot made by the lifestyle brand {{wpl|tokidoki}} as part of the {{wpl|2025 Jubilee||,}} isn't spared from Rule 34.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-11-02 |title=&quot;LUCE&quot;, LA WAIFU OFICIAL DEL VATICANO (y su Rule 34) |url=https://zonatiranetas.over-blog.com/2024/11/luce-la-waifu-oficial-del-vaticano-y-su-rule-34.html |access-date=2025-03-09 |website=ZONA TIRANETAS |language=es}}</ref> Remember, there are no exceptions. Attempting to invoke an exception will lead to Rule 35: If there's no porn of it, porn will be made of it.

Great care should be taken when browsing Rule 34 websites, however, as they may contain sexually explicit imagery of characters that are [[child sexual abuse|canonically underage]]. While some jurisdictions may have lenient or lax {{wpl|Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors|laws regarding illustrated porn}} of fictional youth (e.g. Japan with their infamous ''lolicon'' and ''shotacon'' imagery, or the United States where it is considered a "gray area", although there have been prosecutions, such as {{wpl|''United States v. Handley''}}), others such as the UK and Canada have far stricter rules banning the sexualised depiction of children, fictional or otherwise.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Madill|first=Anna|title=Children, Sexuality and Sexualization|date=2015|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |isbn=978-1-349-55581-9|editor-last=Renold|editor-first=Emma|location=London|pages=5|chapter=Boys' Love Manga for Girls: Paedophilic, Satirical, Queer Readings and English Law|oclc=964842174|editor-last2=Ringrose|editor-first2=Jessica|editor-last3=Egan|editor-first3=R. Danielle|chapter-url=http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/101791/}}</ref> In any case, having racy images of kids (even if fictional) would certainly land you in a LOT of trouble, so, unless you don't mind becoming a societal pariah as a registered sex offender for the rest of your miserable life, don't even bother.{{nofact}}

===Not to be confused with===
* [[Star Trek|Ferengi]] Rule of Acquisition #34: [[War]] [[Military-industrial complex|is good for]] [[business]].
* Gibbs' Rule #34 (from ''NCIS'', yet to be revealed)
* Wolfram's Rule 34, which moves one cell to the left every generation.
* Maxim #34 of Schlock Mercenary; if you are leaving scorch marks, you need a bigger gun
* (With respect to Rule #35) [United States] Federal Criminal Rule 35

==Addiction==
{{main|NoFap}}
Some people feel that porn has taken over too much of their lives and believe the best thing for them is to cut back on consumption. And, as with any other real or supposed addiction, programs pop up to "cure" your addiction.<ref>[http://www.sexualrecovery.com/pornography-addiction.php For Pornography Addicts] ''Relativity''.</ref> These programs<ref>[http://candeohealthysexuality.com/getting-started-2/?gclid=CNyVwLeXvq4CFeImtAodWzPT0g Pornography: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly] ''Candeo Healthy Sexuality''.</ref><ref>[http://www.helpaddictions.org/porn/?gclid=CLf9ze2Yvq4CFVRItAod0X9GCg Help Porn Addiction] (archived from July 30, 2014).</ref> rarely have any data to support their efficacy and have been subject to serious scientific critiques.<ref>[http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11930-014-0016-8 The Emperor Has No Clothes: A Review of the 'Pornography Addiction' Model] by David Ley et al. (2014) ''Current Sexual Health Reports'' 6:94–105.</ref>

A 2019 review of pornography consumption and sexual dysfunctions was restricted to observational studies because there were no longitudinal studies (i.e. studies across time and changing pornography-usage patterns); the lack of longitudinal studies hampered the ability to draw firm conclusions.<ref name=dwulit>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6679165/ The Potential Associations of Pornography Use with Sexual Dysfunctions: An Integrative Literature Review of Observational Studies] by Aleksandra Diana Dwulit & Piotr Rzymski (2019) ''J. Clin. Med.'' 8(7):914. doi: 0.3390/jcm8070914.</ref> The study concluded that "[t]here is little if no evidence that pornography use may induce delayed ejaculation and erectile dysfunction", but that pornography use may decrease sexual satisfaction under some circumstances.<ref name=dwulit/>

Anecdotal evidence of something called "pornography-induced erectile dysfunction" (PIED) abounds on websites like [[Reddit]], but this alleged condition would be very difficult to scientifically substantiate since ED is notoriously susceptible to the [[placebo effect]] (except for {{wpl|Peyronie's disease}}). A 2019 study published in ''The Journal of Sexual Medicine'' which examined this issue found "no evidence that mere pornography use is associated with changes in erection function."<ref>Joshua B Grubbs, Mateusz Gola [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30621919/ "Is Pornography Use Related to Erectile Functioning? Results From Cross-Sectional and Latent Growth Curve Analyses"], ''The Journal of Sexual Medicine''</ref><ref>https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/all-about-sex/201908/does-pornography-cause-erectile-dysfunction</ref>  Intense masturbation ''can'' cause a condition known as "delayed ejaculation", a form of ED, but this is not from porn itself.<ref>[https://www.webmd.com/men/features/overcoming-ejaculation-problems Overcoming ejaculation problems, WebMD]</ref>  You probably shouldn't sit on your ass watching porn for hours every day, but the same could be said for [[football]], sitcoms, professional wrestling, and [[Bible]] study.

Pornography addiction is a highly debated and controversial topic.<ref name="apabeliefs">[https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2020/02/religious-moral-porn-addiction "Religious, Moral Beliefs May Exacerbate Concerns About Porn Addiction"] by Joshua B. Grubbs, American Psychological Association, 2020 February 6</ref> There currently is no classification for "pornography addiction" within the {{wpl|American Psychological Association|American Psychological Association's}} {{wpl|DSM-5||.}}<ref>[https://www.webmd.com/connect-to-care/addiction-treatment-recovery/are-sex-addiction-and-porn-addiction-the-same-thing "Are Sex Addiction and Pornography Addiction The Same Thing?"] by Michael LoRe, WebMd.com</ref> On the other hand, a diagnosis of compulsive issues with pornography ''is'' currently included within the {{wpl|World Health Organization|World Health Organization's}} {{wpl|International Classification of Diseases||,}} as a portion of a diagnosis called {{wpl|compulsive sexual behaviour disorder||.}}<ref>[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41585-020-0343-7#citeas Briken, P. An integrated model to assess and treat compulsive sexual behaviour disorder.] Nat Rev Urol 17, 391–406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-020-0343-7]</ref> However, the ICD-11 classifies CSBD under "impulsive disorders, not the group of addictive and substance use disorders. Whether these behaviors can or should be described as an addiction is far from supported or accepted."<ref>https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/women-who-stray/201801/compulsive-sexual-behavior-disorder-in-icd-11</ref>

Accurate diagnosis of compulsive pornography issues is complicated by the fact that that people who disapprove of ''any'' amount of pornography, notably those who are religious, may believe that they are addicted to pornography, even when their porn use is low or average.<ref name="apabeliefs"/> In other words, some people constitute ''any'' non-zero use of pornography as an addiction, no matter how minor.

In some cases, the anguish experienced by this moral conflict, along with the conflation of religious morality with pornography viewership and the usage of scientifically unproven [[evangelical]] "treatment" for supposed "sex addiction" (a term popularized by Patrick Carnes, a man with "no training in human sexuality"),<ref>https://thehumanist.com/magazine/july-august-2012/features/youre-addicted-to-what/</ref> may in itself cause significant mental health issues, or much worse.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/20/us/evangelical-sex-addiction-atlanta-suspect.html "Sexual Anguish of Atlanta Suspect Is Familiar Thorn for Evangelicals"] by Ruth Graham, New York Times, 2021 March 20</ref>

==Crime, violence, and abuse==
As with movies, [[video games]], [[heavy metal]], [[rock and roll]], [[Comics Code Authority|comic books]], and [[Dungeons & Dragons]], porn has been blamed for corrupting the youth and influencing people to commit crimes.<ref>Nicola Davis, [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/29/is-pornography-to-blame-for-rise-in-culture Is pornography to blame for rise in 'rape culture'?] [[The Guardian]], 29 March 2021.</ref> However, numerous studies have demonstrated that "there is no connection between pornography consumption and sexual violence."<ref>Sandar Carr, [https://www.utsa.edu/today/2020/08/story/pornography-sex-crimes-study.html Study: Pornography does not cause violent sex crimes]. UTSA Today, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 5 August 2020.</ref> In fact, "[i]t has been found everywhere it was scientifically investigated that as pornography has increased in availability, sex crimes have either decreased or not increased."<ref>Milton Diamond, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160252709000715 Pornography, public acceptance and sex related crime: A review]. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 32:5, September–October 2009, Pages 304-314.</ref>

It has also been suggested that porn is becoming more violent. According to a study cited by anti-pornography "activists" such as [[Gail Dines]] and Julie Bindel, "90% of the most-watched porn scenes contain violence against women".<ref>Julie Bindell, [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/25/how-to-talk-to-your-kids-about-porn-pornography How to talk to your kids about porn (before the pornographers do)]. The Guardian, 25 October 2018.</ref> However, the definition of violence in this particular study, which was published in 2010, was fantastically broad, and included "spanking"<ref name="Bridges">Ana J Bridges, Robert Wosnitzer, Erica Scharrer, Chyng Sun, Rachael Liberman, [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20980228/ "Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: a content analysis update"], ''Violence Against Women''</ref> and "name-calling".<ref name="Bridges" /> Other studies conducted between 1986 and 2005, all of which used varying definitions of violence, produced numbers which ranged from as high as 36% to as low as 2%; however, only one of these studies took into account acts of consensual [[BDSM]], and thus the others may have "vastly overestimated the extent to which porn depicts violence against women."<ref>Ekua Hagan, [https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-about-sex/201606/how-much-porn-depicts-violence-against-women How Much of Porn Depicts Violence Against Women?] Psychology Today, 15 June 2016.</ref> Interestingly enough, even allowing for the authors overlooking issues like consent, these studies demonstrate a consistent decrease in violent pornography over time. A more recent study, which was published in 2018 in ''The Journal of Sex Research'',<ref>Eran Shor & Kimberly Seida, [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499.2018.1451476?journalCode=hjsr20 "“Harder and Harder”? Is Mainstream Pornography Becoming Increasingly Violent and Do Viewers Prefer Violent Content?"], ''The Journal of Sex Research''</ref> concluded that "mainstream pornography is not becoming increasingly violent",<ref>Eric W. Dolan, [https://www.psypost.org/2018/05/study-finds-not-becoming-increasingly-violent-51220 Study finds pornography is not becoming increasingly violent]. psypost.org, 12 May 2018.</ref> although their analysis was confined to the website ''Pornhub''. 

Another study from the same journal, which sampled the mental health of 177 porn actresses,<ref>James D Griffith, Sharon Mitchell, Christian L Hart, Lea T Adams, Lucy L Gu, [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23167939/ "Pornography actresses: an assessment of the damaged goods hypothesis"], ''The Journal of Sex Research''</ref> also "found no evidence to support the "damaged goods hypothesis" that actresses involved in the porn industry come from desperate backgrounds and are less psychologically healthy compared with typical women."<ref>Roger Dobson, [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/porn-stars-and-the-naked-truth-8348388.html Porn stars and the naked truth]. The Independent, 25 November 2012.</ref>

==Do Mormons and right wingers really hate porn as much as they claim?==
In October 2000, Larry W. Peterman, the owner of a chain of video stores, went on trial in Provo, [[Utah]] — home of [[Brigham Young University]] — for selling hardcore videos.  The prosecution used the "community standards" argument against Mr. Peterman, which turned out to be the case's undoing. Peterman's lawyer, Randy Spencer, noticed that a local Marriott<ref group=note>While not directly owned by the [[Mormon]] church, the Marriott chain is owned by a Mormon family who make it a point to show that they support [[family values]].</ref> Hotel sat across the street from the courthouse. He sent an assistant to the hotel to find out which pornographic films were available on its pay-per-view system. He then sent the assistant to the local cable and satellite companies to gather statistics on how many people in the Provo area viewed porn on a pay-per-view basis.

Guess what? The [[God]]-fearing locals, who claimed to live in the most [[conservative]] county in the [[United States]], absolutely ''love'' to watch other people screw. In fact, their viewership was disproportionately large compared to the rest of the country. Based on this information, the court found Mr. Peterman not guilty.<ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/23/technology/23PORN.html?ex=1207713600&en=f7ce1cc13c29f816&ei=5070&pagewanted=all "Wall Street Meets Pornography"], ''New York Times'' website, posted 23 October 2000, accessed 21 May 2010.</ref>

In the Winter, 2009 issue of the ''Journal of Economic Perspectives'',<ref>Edelman, Benjamin.  [http://people.hbs.edu/bedelman/papers/redlightstates.pdf "Red Light States: Who Buys Online Adult Entertainment?"], ''Journal of Economic Perspectives'', Winter 2009, 23:1, pp 209-220.</ref> Harvard Business School associate professor Benjamin Edelman surveyed credit-card records of Internet porn-sites. He found that Utah had the nation's highest percentage of porn-site subscribers in all four of the categories that he studied: per capita (1.69 per 1000 residents), per number of Internet users (2.49 per 1000 users), per broadband Internet connections (5.47 subscribers per 1000 connections), and number of users relative to subscription rates predicted based on demographics<ref group=note>Those demographic variables being income, age, education, and marital status.</ref> (1.89 per thousand users).  In the category regarding percentage of broadband subscribers (the one that got the most attention), the top ten states were as follows:

#Utah: 5.47 subscribers per 1000 connections. (They get 70 virgins in heaven or something.)
#[[Alaska]]: 5.03 (There really isn't much else to do here &mdash; confirmed by an Alaskan.)
#[[Mississippi]]: 4.30 (The nation's poorest state can still afford enough porn to fill the Mississippi River.)
#[[Hawaii]]: 3.61 (To be fair, people in this tropical paradise are all gorgeous and awesome, so are likely watching it while they do the deed for real.)
#[[Oklahoma]]: 3.21 (The sooner state… where everyone comes sooner.)
#[[Arkansas]]: 3.12 (Almost exclusively by the Walton family, [[Wal-Mart]] is sick in more ways than one.)
#North Dakota: 3.05 (Now we know where all that oil goes…)
#[[Louisiana]]: 3.01 (Britney Spears' home state… need we say more?)
#[[Florida]]: 3.01 (What better way to take your mind off the fact that [[Global warming|your state will be the ocean floor in 20 years]] thanks to [[Global warming denialism|your ignorant legislators]]?)
#[[West Virginia]]: 2.94 (When the [[coal]] boom ended, [[Republicans]] could no longer fuck black rocks all day.)

Of course, the Utah media  [[Denialism|begs to differ]] with Edelman's findings.<ref>Hollenhorst, John. [http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=5744801 "Utah not necessarily No. 1 in porn consumption"], KSL-TV website, posted 3 March 2009, accessed 6 June 2010. - "[...]  Utah's more repressive culture pushes some people to the Internet. 'It's because we don't have the adult movie stores as much as they do in other states. [...]' [...] 'There is more consumption in areas where there's a concentration of 15- to 24-year-olds, and just last spring it was reported that Utah has the youngest population in the nation.' [...] state-to-state variance is actually rather small, and the paid-subscription data may not be truly representative. 'Approximately 80 to 90 percent of pornography use online is free, where people are not paying a subscription to use that. So, I think that just focusing on one provider is very misleading and does not give us a sense of the larger issue [...]' [...]."</ref>  

In fairness, the data gathered technically only indicates an increased tendency to pay for porn, not necessarily to consume it — thus it may well indicate that Utah residents do not consume more porn per capita than the rest of the country, only that a greater proportion of them than average are 
stupid enough to subscribe to porn pay-sites, rather than just making use of the Internet's ever-growing reserves of free porn, which already are large and diverse enough to cater to just about any preference or kink
 generous enough to support the pornographic industry.<ref group=note>Or they have already watched all there is to be watched for free and started paying to see whether there is anything new.</ref>

In 2013, ''Pornhub'' compiled<ref name=pornhub>[http://public.tableausoftware.com/shared/HR9SZ66TW Pornhub's US Top 3 Search Terms by State and Top 3 Search Terms by State]. public.tableausoftware.com.</ref> information on the most commonly used terms that Americans enter into search engines.  They then sorted out the top three porn-related search-terms by state, and the average amount of time that each user stayed on one site.<ref name=pornhub /> (The difference between shortest average duration and longest by state was a mere one minute and fifty-nine seconds.)  When these average durations by state were then grouped by 20-second increments into six groups, Utah was actually in the second-lowest group.  But most of the rest of [[Jesusland]] sure did try to make up for it.<ref>[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/30/time-spent-on-porn-america_n_3832321.html This Is How Much Time America Spends On Porn] - from ''[[HuffPo]]'', with infographics </ref>  And it also seems that certain regions, and even a few individual states, have some very specific sexual appetites.<ref>
[http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/the-7-most-baffling-porn-trends-across-united-states/ The 7 Most Baffling Porn Trends Across the United States] &mdash; from ''[[Cracked]]''.
</ref>

==Porn from the ''Cave Man'' era==
[[Archaeologist]]s have recently found what is the oldest known engraving in Abri Castanet, a shallow cave in southern France's Vezere valley. The engraving in question? An item with "vulvar" representations.<ref>Randall White, ''et. al.,'' [http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2012/05/08/1119663109 Context and dating of Aurignacian vulvar representations from Abri Castanet, France]. pnas.org, 14 May 2012.</ref> At around 37,000 years old, it's quite an... ''interesting'' piece of evidence against the [[Young Earth]] theory.  Sex toys are actually quite common finds,<ref>[https://www.theregister.com/2005/07/27/ancient_phallus/ 28,000 year old dildo, The Register]</ref> though there's always a debate as to whether these were actually used as sex toys or were just some primitive trinkets.

==Porn and feminism==
[[File:Jacques Louis David - Madame François Buron - 1963.205 - Art Institute of Chicago.jpg|thumb|right|225px|Madame François Buron is horrified by such filth.]]
{{cquote|If you enjoy porn, but do not respect the labor or the workers that create it, get that shitty [[cognitive dissonance]] worked out right now.|||Eric Sprankle, assistant professor of clinical [[psychology]]<ref>https://twitter.com/DrSprankle/status/748869474405670912</ref><ref name="MSU">http://sbs.mnsu.edu/psych/eric_sprankle.html</ref>}}
Pornography was a primary catalyst for a massive schism in the [[feminist]] movement in the 1970s and 1980s, called the Feminist Sex Wars (even though pornography and sex are not the same thing), a split which eventually ended second-wave feminism and launched the third wave.

One side, the "old guard" of feminism, took the ''sex-negative'' position, holding that sex in general (as currently conceptualized in society), and pornography in particular, [[sexual objectification|objectifies]] women, turning their bodies into vessels for male domination, [[rape]], and capitalist exploitation. The most extreme or doctrinaire position in this camp was perhaps that of [[Andrea Dworkin]], who held that "[[rape|violation]] is a synonym for [[Sexual intercourse|intercourse]]."<ref>Dworkin, Andrea. ''Intercourse:  Occupation/Collaberation''. 1987. The Andrea Dworkin Online Library. http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/IntercourseI.html.</ref> Today people holding this position are often pejoratively labeled "SWERFS" (Sex Work Exclusionary Radical Feminists).

The other side are the ''[[sex-positivity|sex-positive]]'' feminists. They are also called "fun-feminists," presumably because their opponents apparently don't know the meaning of that adjective. Sex-positive feminists hold that "[[sexism]], not sex, degrades women",<ref name="FFEStatement"/> that the stifling of sex is the fault of [[patriarchy]], and that women can use sex as a tool to liberate themselves (some use the portmanteau "sexpression" to describe this process), with which radical feminists counter that liberation from male domination happens for women as a whole, not for individual women.{{fact}} Liberal feminists also believe that women should be allowed to decide for themselves what does and does not degrade them. One well-known sex-positive feminist is {{wpl|Betty Dodson||,}} a sex educator who would be the ''last'' person brought in to teach the [[abstinence-only sex education|abstinence-only]] curriculum.

This divide within the feminist community succeeded in making a mark on the real world, mainly due to the attempts of the "sex-negative" camp to institute [[censorship]] of pornography. A favorite tactic of this lot was to [[Correlation does not imply causation|cite rape statistics, then claim a correlation between these statistics and the viewing of pornography]], conveniently not mentioning that said correlation was based on their own [[dogma]] rather than any credible research.<ref name="FFEStatement">http://www.ffeusa.org/html/statements/statements_pornography.html</ref> This gave them a fig leaf for accusing anyone opposing their position of being an "apologist for rape" or something similar. Later research on availability of internet porn indicated that it actually reduced the incidence of rape.<ref>[http://freakonomics.com/2011/08/04/porn-and-rape-the-debate-continues/ Porn and Rape: The Debate Continues]</ref>

Dworkin, along with her fellow [[radical feminist]] Catharine MacKinnon, began to push for an "Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance" that would allow anybody to make class-action lawsuits "on behalf of all women"{{fact}} against any publisher who dealt in "media in which women are subordinated in a sexually explicit fashion, by pictures and/or words". The idea is, if you get sexually assaulted, and the way in which you were assaulted reproduces forms of body punishment that appears in pornography, you can sue the pornographer for broadcasting that form of body punishment.<ref>''Pornography and Civil Rights.'' Dworkin, Andrea and MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1988.</ref> The only reason anyone else noticed this was that right-wingers were slobbering at the mouth at the thought of using this to get around that pesky [[First Amendment]].{{fact}} Their ordinance was written into law in Indianapolis, but was quickly found to be unconstitutional.

After the {{wpl|Meese Report|Meese Commission|,}} instituted by [[Saint Reagan]] for the express purpose of finding that pornography was nasty and harmful and exploitative and whatever else could be thrown at it, disregarded this mandate and delivered a tepid (if at times hilarious) report stating that arguments against pornography would have to be [[philosophical]] rather than [[empirical]],<ref>David M. Edwards, [http://archive.is/bsFB Politics and Pornography: A Comparison of the Findings of the President's Commission and the Meese Commission and the Resulting Response,] 1992. Archived from the original at earthlink.net.</ref> this controversy slowly drained away. As third-wave and sex-positive feminism grew in popularity through the next decade, the body of feminists opposing it grew smaller (ha, see what we did there?). However, with the rise of internet pornography, anti-porn feminism is gradually (and very unfortunately) re-entering the feminist mainstream. In fact, some of the third wave's most respected figures, like Naomi Wolf and Feministing, have voiced strong opposition to pornography and porn culture; although Wolf does not claim that porn causes rape and other sexual crimes, she does argue that it desensitizes people and promotes sexism and objectification.

===Buy-in from the industry===
{{cquote|Criticizing porn by saying "real people don't look like that" is like criticizing ''Finding Nemo'' by saying "real fish can't talk."|||Eric Sprankle, assistant professor of clinical psychology<ref>https://twitter.com/DrSprankle/status/749226984245305344</ref><ref name="MSU"/>}}
Some production companies are responding to the desires of its audiences, in order to promote [[informed consent]] and mitigate [[rape culture]]. There are companies dedicated to "porn for women" (which we at RationalWiki applaud: it's only fair that women should have porn tailored to their inclinations, providing they want it). Many movies include (what are claimed to be) candid interviews with the cast members before and/or after the main action, dispelling the illusion that one actor might be harming another without their consent or engaging in [[incest]], for example.

One porn actor, James Deen,{{efn|Not to be confused with the early 50s Hollywood heartthrob {{wpl|James Dean}}.}} has this disclaimer at the beginning of all of his movies:

{{quotebox|ATTENTION: The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposes only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life, sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear and ongoing communication with your partner(s) to ensure that all sex is consensual. All actors in this film have consented to participate in the acts you see. Have fun, respect each other, and practice safer sex.}}

However, Deen has been [[Hypocrisy|accused of off-set rape]], so make of that what you will.<ref name="Grinberg">{{Cite web |last=Grinberg |first=Emanuella |date=2015-12-02 |title=Porn star James Deen accused by women of rape, assault |url=https://www.cnn.com/2015/12/01/entertainment/james-deen-rape-assault-allegations-feat/index.html |access-date=2024-05-30 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref>

==The driving force for technology?==
[[File:VHS-Video-Tape-Top-Flat (cropped).jpg|thumb|220px|right|The rise of home video (VHS tape pictured) has at least in part been attributed to pornography, whose inherent issues with exhibition at adult movie theatres prompted pornographers to turn to alternative means of distribution.]]
It is often stated that advancements in technology have been driven at least in part by porn, from classical [[literature]] to e-commerce and [[deepfake]]s. Whenever a new and novel piece of tech comes out, pornographers are quick to adopt and innovate in emerging industries and categories, like for example the rapid adoption of VCRs in the United States which supplanted adult movie theaters as it afforded viewers the ability to jack off to smut without the risk of humiliating oneself from being seen at such seedy venues,<ref name="digitaltrends">{{Cite web |date=2015-08-20 |title=Does porn still have the power to push new tech? |url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/does-porn-still-have-the-power-to-push-new-tech/ |access-date=2024-06-30 |website=Digital Trends |language=en}}</ref> or [[Video game#Sex|eroge]] such as the seminal Atari 2600 porn game ''Custer's Revenge'', which caused a public relations scandal as people mistook the arguably [[racist]] depiction of [[Native American]]s as Atari's handiwork;<ref>Herman, Leonard (1997). Phoenix: The Fall & Rise of Videogames. p. 88.</ref> the game's publisher, American Multiple Industries (who licensed the ''Swedish Erotica'' brand from porn studio {{wpl|Caballero Home Video}}), purposely made the game overtly racist and misogynistic as a [[proll]] move to generate publicity from all the ensuing outrage.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://slate.com/podcasts/decoder-ring/2021/12/custers-revenge-racist-sexist-trolling | title=Custer's Revenge Was Denounced, Protested, and Banned Even Before It Hit Stores | date=December 23, 2021 | access-date=April 30, 2023 | archive-date=April 30, 2023 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230430043422/https://slate.com/podcasts/decoder-ring/2021/12/custers-revenge-racist-sexist-trolling | url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="slate">{{Cite web |title=Transcript - Custer’s Revenge |url=https://slate.com/transcripts/bXlrUmZNRGIyMXVjcFVoU0tXU2lYZkhaRXFjUUZLeTc0ZWxDeC9ZenJkUT0= |access-date=2024-07-03 |website=slate.com |language=en}}</ref> The ''Custer'' scandal also inadvertently drove video game hardware manufacturers to implement licensing enforcement schemes on their consoles to prevent both porn games and low-quality shovelware from being published,{{efn|Ironically enough, ''Custer'' itself ''did'' have copy protection built in according to a former [[furry]] AtariAge member who made [https://forums.atariage.com/topic/363661-gator-love-custers-revenge-hack/ a ROM hack] of the game themed around alligators.}} and it may have also led to the three major console makers (Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft) to bar any and all AO (Adults Only) rated games from being published for their hardware. Almost immediately after the launch of the {{wpl|PlayStation Portable||,}} adult films on {{wpl|Universal Media Disc}} format have been released in Japan<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.gamespot.com/articles/psp-procures-porn-in-japan/1100-6126863/ | title = PSP procures porn in Japan | publisher = GameSpot.com | date=June 2, 2005 | access-date=2017-11-19}}</ref> much to Sony's chagrin, though they claimed there was little they could do with porn studios releasing their videos on UMD,<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.gameinformer.com/NR/exeres/C25BD059-CD15-485F-A2F6-DFA5EF61277C.htm|title=Sony Computer Entertainment Frowns On PSP UMD Porn, Can't Stop Sales|publisher= GameInformer|date=June 17, 2005|access-date=2009-01-06 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080731191816/http://www.gameinformer.com/NR/exeres/C25BD059-CD15-485F-A2F6-DFA5EF61277C.htm |archive-date = 2008-07-31}}</ref> regardless of the fact that Sony themselves were the ones who developed and manufactured UMD media to begin with and thus should be in a position to veto any UMD release.

The {{wpl|Lenna}} test image–derived from a 512x512 pixel crop of ''{{wpl|Playboy}}'' model {{wpl|Lena Forsén}}–was used to test digital image processing algorithms such as compression and dithering among others.{{efn|Lenna wasn't actually the first Playmate photo to be appropriated for image processing, however. That honour goes to a certain Teddi Smith who appeared in a July 1960 issue.<ref>Roberts, Lawrence G. (1961). [https://web.archive.org/web/20060926134827/http://www.packet.cc/files/pic-code-noise.html "Picture Coding Using Pseudo-Random Noise"]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Archived from the [http://www.packet.cc/files/pic-code-noise.html original] on 26 September 2006. Retrieved 3 February 2017.</ref>}} ''Playboy'' initially took offence as the Lenna image was used without their consent, but eventually conceded when it became apparent that its widespread use generated free publicity for the magazine.<ref name="Brown">{{Cite web |last=Brown |first=Janelle |title=Playmate Meets Geeks Who Made Her a Net Star |url=https://www.wired.com/1997/05/playmate-meets-geeks-who-made-her-a-net-star/ |access-date=2024-06-30 |website=Wired |language=en-US}}</ref> The use of Lenna was eventually deprecated in recent years as some felt that co-opting a ''Playboy'' centerfold's mug amounted to [[sexism]] and gave the impression that technological fields were a realm reserved for men only.<ref name="oleary">{{cite web|last=O'Leary|first=Dianne P.|date=June 25, 1999 |title=But the instructor's attitude can't make the female student fail, can it? |url=http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/oleary/faculty/node8.html |work=Accessibility of Computer Science: A Reflection for Faculty Members |publisher=[[University of Maryland]], Department of Computer Science |access-date=October 26, 2013 |archive-date=5 November 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151105072752/https://www.cs.umd.edu/users/oleary/faculty/node8.html |url-status=live }}</ref>

In the late 2010s to the 2020s, the rise of [[artificial intelligence]] technologies spurred the development of [[deepfake]] algorithms which allow for mimicking or transplanting the likeness of people onto other scenarios among other things. This naturally led to some pervs indiscriminately using such tech to churn out nudes of celebrities who certainly do not approve of the smut made out of them, or worse yet, revenge porn.<ref name="Cole1">{{Cite web |last=Cole |first=Samantha |date=2019-06-27 |title=Creator of DeepNude, App That Undresses Photos of Women, Takes It Offline |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/qv7agw/deepnude-app-that-undresses-photos-of-women-takes-it-offline |access-date=2024-07-23 |website=Vice |language=en}}</ref> Concern on the ability to create non-consensual pornography with deepfake technology therefore is very legitimate, and even more so when enterprising [[pedophilia|pedophiles]] take advantage of AI algorithms to churn out sexualised imagery of children and youths.<ref name="wpr">{{Cite news |last=Casey |first=Evan |date=2024-05-23 |title=People using AI to create child porn is a 'growing problem,' Wisconsin AG says |url=https://www.wpr.org/news/people-using-ai-to-create-child-porn-is-a-growing-problem-wisconsin-ag-says |access-date=2024-07-23 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name="lat">{{Cite news |first=Anabel |last=Sosa |date=April 15, 2024 |title=AI-generated child pornography is circulating. This California prosecutor wants to make it illegal. |url=https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-04-15/ai-generated-child-pornography-is-circulating-this-california-prosecutor-wants-to-make-it-illegal |access-date=2024-07-23 |language=en-US}}</ref> While most AI technology companies such as OpenAI and ChatGPT have taken steps to curb AI child porn by detecting suspicious prompts and blocking them on sight, these have been circumvented from time to time; that being said, the mere fact that AI image generation algorithms have used datasets kanged from countless images all over the web, some of them containing photos of minors who ''definitely'' did not consent to their use, made some people leery of such art generators.

==Other related terms==
Owing to its racy connotations as a media meant to, ahem, stimulate the senses, the word "porn" has since been used idiomatically for otherwise unrelated phenomena seen as [[inspiration porn]], a pejorative term used to describe and/or criticise media which is seen as objectifying [[disabled]] or special needs people just for their mere existence or accomplishments, as well as poverty porn, where the poor, impoverished and severely disadvantaged are also similarly objectified to generate sympathy through [[appeal to emotion]] (e.g. lurid and disturbing images of frail and starving children in Africa, slum dwellings, etc.), notable examples of which are the 2008 British drama film ''{{wpl|Slumdog Millionaire}}''<ref>{{cite news | url = http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-chin/slumdog-millionaire-debat_b_172646.html |title=Richard Chin: Slumdog Millionaire: Debate Poverty not "Poverty Porn" | work = Huffington Post | date = March 6, 2009 |access-date=2014-01-19}}</ref> and {{wpl|charity record|charity records}} such as "We Are The World" by the "USA for Africa" supergroup,<ref name="wearetheworld">{{Cite web |date=2018-02-22 |title="Poverty porn" awards poke fun at charity stereotypes |url=https://philanthropydaily.com/poverty-porn-awards-poke-fun-at-charity-stereotypes/ |access-date=2024-07-07 |website=Philanthropy Daily |language=en-US}}</ref> {{wpl|pessimism porn||,}} the thrill that some people derive from predicting, reading and fantasizing about the [[end times]] and/or societal collapse, through means such as doomscrolling and sharing lurid tales about how the world is supposedly going to end as well as ways to cope with it such as [[survivalism]] and the prepper culture, and {{wpl|outrage porn||,}} a form of [[clickbait]] which uses media narratives weaved to provoke, agitate or invite heightened emotional discourse towards topical issues such as politics and social issues e.g. [[culture war]]s and [[partisan]]ism. Political [[pundit]] channels on sites such as [[Facebook]], [[TikTok]] and [[YouTube]] are dime a dozen owing to the relatively low barrier to entry for content creators compared to traditional media (thus making them lucrative for grifters to profiteer out of), allowing them to become their own "news anchor" and spin the narratives to their own twisted tastes. Said pundits have been branded as "presstitutes" by commentators and watchdogs who likened them to whoring themselves in front of the camera for attention and revenue.

A term related to "poverty porn" is {{wpl|Social pornography}} (Norwegian: ''sosialpornografi''), a word used in [[Norway]] and elsewhere used to describe certain forms of journalism which focuses on individuals and/or groups of people in a rather uncomfortably intimate way especially in matters or situations of private or tragic nature,<ref>[https://www.naob.no/ordbok/sosialpornografi sosialpornografi – Det Norske Akademis ordbok]</ref> as a form of entertainment to satisfy a need to "watch" (akin to "[[Voyeurism|''peeping'']]").<ref>[https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/skattelistene-er-sosialpornografi/65201739 – Skattelistene er sosialpornografi – Dagbladet]</ref><ref>[https://www.banett.no/skatt/article302642.ece – Dette er sosialpornografi – Brønnøysunds Avis]</ref> As an example, [[Raffy Tulfo]]'s programmes and ''[[Jerry Springer: The Opera|The Jerry Springer Show]]'' could be described as "social porn" based on their premise, i.e. the public exposure of vulnerable individuals such as those involved in domestic disputes for the sake of low-brow entertainment masked as "action-based public service".

==See also==
*[[Castillo v. Texas]]
*[[Judith Reisman]]
*[[Andrea Dworkin]]
*[[NoFap]] - addresses the claimed existence of "pornography addiction"
*[[goat|Porn]]
*[[Voyeurism]]

==External links==
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pciD9gd3my0 Perversion for Profit]: A 1960s film on how pornography leads to [[Communism]]. Note its use of [[Nazi]]-style caricatures. Note also the reference to the "Communist Masters of Deceit" (4:33), and that the pursuit of profit is sort of the ''opposite'' of communism.
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IofUC8itDBI The Internet is for Porn]: "Avenue Q"-''cum''-anime.  (Pun very much intended.)
*[https://vimeo.com/134513431 Pornography: A Winnable War]: Clip from a [[Focus on the Family]] video.  [[James Dobson]] gives a lecture on his fact-finding tour of the sex industry.  The reaction shots of his audience are priceless.
*[http://www.funnytitles.com/ FunnyTitles.com]: Just about every crazy title that pornographers have ever thought of.
*From the Internet Filter Software Review section of TopTenReviews.com, [https://archive.is/QcuAd a rather comprehensive article—with lots of tables and graphs—on internet porn statistics] (as of 2006).
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YFsS_HPydw Every Young Man's Battle]: Video based on the [[moral panic]] book of the same name.  If you don't yell "[[bullshit|BULLSHIT!!!]]" at the screen at least once before the 42:07 mark (where a Christian counselor claims to have met a man who was in a six-month treatment facility for a porn addiction), you are either a very mellow person, or extremely gullible.  And, of course, clips of James Dobson's interview with [[psychopath]]ic [[murder|serial killer]] Ted Bundy are included.
*[http://flashbak.com/the-gonzo-insanity-of-1960s-israeli-holocaust-porn-377523/ The Gonzo Insanity of 1960s Israeli Holocaust Porn]: Just an example of how far people have been willing to push the Rule 34 envelope.  (The cited examples are books, magazines and artwork.  No movies.)

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note|2|80%}}

==References==
{{Reflist|2|80%}}

[[Category:Conspiracy theorist scapegoats]]
[[Category:Porn]]
[[Category:Purity culture]]
[[Category:Media]]
[[Category:Moral panics]]
[[Category:Internet]]

Categories: Conspiracy theorist scapegoats, Porn, Purity culture, Media, Moral panics, Internet