Nineteen Eighty-Four

[[File:Future.gif|thumb|right|165px]]
[[File:1984 first edition cover.jpg|right|thumb|165px|First edition. Should be worth a few quid.]]
{{books}}
{{cquote|If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.|||O'Brien, ''Nineteen Eighty-Four''<ref>[http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/19.html ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'', Part 3, Chapter 3]</ref>}}

'''''Nineteen Eighty-Four''''' (also printed as ''1984'') is a dystopian novel and cautionary tale by [[George Orwell]] first published in June 1949. Set in the eponymous year,<ref group=note>Except the main character admits he's not sure of the date. This is one of the main 'running themes' of the work; Winston Smith is unsure of almost anything, and what few things he ''is'' are psychologically assaulted later on.</ref> it is mainly on the consequences of [[totalitarianism]], mass surveillance, economic deprivation and of [[indoctrination]]. Most clearly modelled on [[Stalin|Stalin's]] [[Soviet Union]] and of [[Nazi Germany]], it also draws inspiration from the economic situation of [[Great Britain]] (and the rest of Europe) in the aftermath of the [[Second World War]]; a worn-out, almost-bankrupt nation with rickety buildings, cold rooms, empty shelves and mystery meat for dinner.<ref>[https://www.cooksinfo.com/british-wartime-food/ British Wartime Food] ''Cook's Info'', 3 May 2011</ref>

As a somewhat clunky critique of the 'Soviet system' turned up to eleven, it was promptly banned in the [[Eastern Bloc]], which gave it a boost in being translated into other languages for worldwide distribution,<ref group=note>Sometimes assisted by Western intellgence services.</ref> including behind the Iron Curtain via {{wpl|samizdat||}}.<ref group=note>Meaning that Goldstein's book is now samizdat ''within'' samizdat.</ref> A cynic can also suspect its 'anti-Communist' message might have led the book being put on more school reading lists than its literary worth alone would justify.<ref group=note>Some schools choose their lists on the pragmatic criteria of 'what we have in sufficient stock', which means if ''someone'' donates to each school a couple of hundred copies, it's more likely to be studied.</ref> Its internal language – 'Newspeak' – has led to a clutch of terms to enter the English language, 'Orwellian' to be a shorthand for totalitarian/dystopian systems and 'Big Brother' to become a reference towards any (apparently) omnipresent system of surveillance and/or cults of personality.

Now celebrating its seventy-fifth anniversary,<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/inner-hebrides-orwell-jura-artist-edinburgh-college-of-art-b2469748.html Artist collecting 1,984 copies of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four for display] ''The Independent'', 23 December 2023</ref> the book is still relevant; that while the 'bleak privations' of Airstrip One have not come to pass,<ref group=note>At least for the vast majority in the advanced world.</ref> the powers of surveillance, propaganda and general paucity of facts have at least in part. It is one of those few novels you should read, or if you really ''cannot'' read it (or found your school experience of it poor), either read the 2021 graphic novel drawn by Fido Nesti or watch the 1984<ref group=note>Yes, 1984, filmed in 1984.</ref> film by Michael Radford. Expect more adaptations to come along in the next few years, as it left copyright and is in the public domain (except in the USA) in 2021.<ref>[https://www.irwinmitchell.com/news-and-insights/newsandmedia/2021/january/copyright-public-domain-and-george-orwell Copyright, Public Domain And George Orwell] ''Irwin Mitchell'', 1 January 2021</ref>

==Background==
Some works have a complex and secretive backstory; ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'' is not one of them. Take the geopolitical and societal predictions of {{wpl|James Burnham||}} (in particular his 1941 work ''The Managerial Revolution''), pinch much of the plot of {{wpl|Yevgeny Zamyatin||'s}} 1921 {{wpl|We_(novel)||}},<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2009/jun/08/george-orwell-1984-zamyatin-we 1984 thoughtcrime? Does it matter that George Orwell pinched the plot?] ''The Guardian'', 8 June 2008</ref> while absorbing the atmosphere and techniques of [[Arthur Koestler]] as shown in {{wpl|Darkness at Noon||}} (1940) and {{wpl|The Yogi and the Commissar||}} (1945). It is also a clear counter to [[Aldous Huxley]]'s ''[[Brave New World]]'' (1931);<ref group=note>Partly as they are both derivatives of ''We''</ref> in which Orwell expressed doubts of how such a hedonistic society would survive long-term as well as questioning the motivations of the novel's ruling class in doing what they did. Not that this is conjecture, either; Orwell wrote essays on Burnham<ref>[https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/second-thoughts-on-james-burnham/ Second Thoughts on James Burnham] ''The Orwell Foundation''</ref> and Koestler,<ref>[https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/arthur-koestler/ Arthur Koestler] ''The Orwell Foundation''</ref> knew Koestler<ref>[https://www.walesartsreview.org/to-the-detriment-of-us-all-the-untouched-legacy-of-arthur-koestler-and-george-orwell/ The untouched legacy of Arthur Koestler and George Orwell] ''Wales Arts Review'', 24 February 2016</ref> and Huxley<ref>[https://www.thevintagenews.com/2017/01/30/aldous-huxley-was-george-orwells-french-teacher-at-eton-college/ Aldous Huxley was George Orwell’s French teacher at Eton College] ''Vintage News'', 30 January 2017</ref> personally and had reviewed ''We''.<ref>[https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/freedom-and-happiness-review-of-we-by-yevgeny-zamyatin/ Freedom and Happiness (Review of ‘We’ by Yevgeny Zamyatin)] ''The Orwell Foundation''</ref> In some of Orwell's other essays in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War, a sharp eye can almost see bones of ''Nineteen'' poking through, such as a proto-Newspeak in his 'Politics and the English Language' essay in 1946.<ref>[https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/politics-and-the-english-language/ Politics and the English Language] ''The Orwell Foundation''</ref>

When Orwell actually started to write ''Nineteen'' is a bit more blurry; his surviving notebooks suggest he had started to outline and produce short sketches in late 1943<ref>[https://lithub.com/orwells-notes-on-1984-mapping-the-inspiration-of-a-modern-classic/ Orwell’s Notes on 1984: Mapping the Inspiration of a Modern Classic] ''LitHub'', 18 October 2019</ref> and told his ''[[Animal Farm]]'' publisher in mid-1944 that he had started drafting what would become ''Nineteen''.<ref group=note>Then titled 'Last Man in Europe'</ref> Progress throughout was slow due to a myriad of issues worthy of a melodrama; Orwell's London home was destroyed by a V-1 rocket that year,<ref>[https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/lifestyle/21383795.plaque-unveiled-george-orwells-animal-farm-almost-went-flames/ Plaque unveiled where George Orwell’s Animal Farm almost went up in flames] ''Ham & High'', 12 September 2012</ref> his first wife died (leaving him a single parent of a small child) the following year as well as psychologically unable to return to his Hertfordshire home due to (apparent) grief,<ref>[https://www.hertfordshiremercury.co.uk/news/hertfordshire-news/tiny-village-hertfordshire-home-george-6996388 The tiny village in Hertfordshire which was home to George Orwell and inspired Animal Farm] ''Hertfordshire Mercury'', 20 April 2022</ref> had to produce 'hackwork' (journalism and reviews) for money to live on until ''Animal Farm'''s financial success and then decided to move to an isolated farmhouse on a remote Scottish island with few 'creature comforts'<ref>[https://orwellsociety.com/in-search-of-orwells-scottish-retreat-by-sylvia-topp/ “You Can’t Get to Barnhill from Here”] ''Orwell Society'', 8 April 2012</ref><ref>[https://www.scotsman.com/news/people/george-orwells-determination-to-finish-nineteen-eighty-four-on-island-of-jura-responsible-for-his-premature-death-1396094 George Orwell's determination to finish Nineteen Eighty-Four on island of Jura 'responsible for his premature death'] ''The Scotsman'', 26 January 2020</ref> – perhaps not the wisest move for a man in clear declining heath.<ref group=note>Getting out of ''London'' (and her damp and smogs), good idea. But a self-confessed 'semi-invalid' going to a remote island which didn't even have a doctor? There's a good chance that he only went to Jura because a friend owned the house.</ref>

Once at Jura, illness attacked Orwell again, sending him back to London for six months, much of the time he was unable to work,<ref group=note>However, this meant he avoided Jura during the terrible {{wpl|winter of 1946-47 in the United Kingdom||}} which would have killed him.</ref> a situation which was repeated the next winter. If you want a vision of Orwell in 1948, it is of a haggard, hacking man in a dressing-gown, sustained on Marmite and cups of tea as he worked on his final draft; the clacking of the typewriter within a nicotine fug in a gloomy-looking fortress of a house in one of the most remote locations of Great Britain – deliberately not seeking medical attention due to the (correct) suspicion that it would lead him to be hospitalised again.

In this race between the reaper and publication, the latter won – just; seven months after British launch, Orwell was dead.

{{anchor|Orwellian}}

=='Orwellian'==
It is from this work (and this work ''alone'') which the popular definition 'Orwellian' is derived; that if a state is described as such, it is suggestive that they are a totalitarian system in which not even the contents of your head are your own, similar to if a policy is described as 'Big Brother' it is assumed to be regarding intrusive mass surveillance (the British libertarian 'civil liberties' organisation is called 'Big Brother Watch',<ref>[https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/ Big Brother Watch UK]</ref> for example<ref group=note>Yes, funded by Tufton Street, so [[astroturfing|turf of the astro type]] shall be involved.</ref>). Other aspects of 'Orwellian' – such as a new realistic expose on poverty might be called such a la ''Road to Wigan Pier'' – is ignored.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2014/nov/11/reading-group-orwellian-1984 Do you really know what ‘Orwellian’ means?] ''The Guardian'', 11 November 2014</ref>

Orwell himself wouldn't have been that surprised (perhaps a bit proud, though) to learn that 'Orwellian' has become a cliché itself which his own 'Rules for Writing' would advise you to avoid at almost all costs. The term 'Orwellian' has also undergone Orwellian treatment itself; in which some folks will call anything they remotely don't like "Orwellian" in an attempt to smear enemies.<ref>[https://www.vox.com/culture/22233197/orwellian-definition-george-orwell-1984-politics-english-language-josh-hawley-donald-trump-jr The word “Orwellian” has lost all meaning] ''Vox'', 16 January 2021</ref> 

{{anchor|Newspeak}}

=='Newspeak'==
'''Newspeak''' is the 'official language' of the state of Oceania; or more correctly (from the appendix) a ''future'' official language.<ref group=note>Supposed to be in general use by 2050, but as of 1984 it is in no real use past ''tour de force'' applications such as ''The Times'' front pages which (according to the expert Smythe) were 'merely translations'.</ref> In short, it is a variant of Basic English taken to the extreme; where the language has not only been pruned down to the bare minimum of words, but the bare minimum of ''meanings'' too, with the general goal to make 'incorrect thoughts' impossible (or at least, [[Heresy|heresies]] blatant, such as 'Big Brother is ungood'). Newspeak is to reduce language to the status of a mere ''tool''; to communicate simple facts and basic needs, and no more. This was only really possible in a society which had no need for [[literature]] or [[science]] ([[engineering]] and [[Technology|technical]] terms being covered by the 'C' vocabulary) and desired to make 'normal conversions' almost impossible.<ref group=note>If people cannot discuss things with each other, they cannot conspire or 'lead' others into thoughtcrime by accident.</ref>

There is a small (and frankly pedantic) debate whether the new terms Orwell introduced were in fact 'Newspeak'; for how (for example) can a 'Ministry of Love' (Miniluv) exist in Newspeak if the word 'love' has been eliminated? Technically, several of the terms may simply represent [[jargon]] to represent 'new' concepts or situations. Like the totalitarian systems the novel was modelled on, many of the terms are simply political [[euphemism]]s ('joycamp' = forced labour camp) but Orwell also coined some new terms which entered the English language, such as:

{{anchor|Crimestop}}
*'''Crimestop''' is the ability to quit thinking about a topic before you reach ''thoughtcrime''. That you accept at face value what you are taught/told without 'thinking things through' and seeing the contradictions, holes or simple incoherence within them. It is perhaps closest to being learned [[Willful ignorance|wilful ignorance]] meaning that leaders are never challenged.

{{anchor|Doublethink}}
*'''Doublethink''' is the ability to believe two incompatible viewpoints at the same time, while being aware that they are incompatible (as opposed to merely being unaware of the contradiction). A close sibling of ''crimestop'', likely used when they are topics which cannot be ignored. In short; techniques to 'compartmentalise' the conflicting topics so they do not cause [[cognitive dissonance]] and lead to ''thoughtcrime''.

{{anchor|Memory hole}}
*'''Memory hole''' is not strictly a Newspeak term, more a particular device (a huge incinerator fed with rubbish transported via pneumatic tubes<ref>[https://www.vox.com/2015/6/24/8834989/when-the-pneumatic-tube-carried-fast-food-people-and-cats The golden era of the pneumatic tube — when it carried fast food, people, and cats] ''Vox'', 24 June 2015</ref>) which became a verb; to ''memory hole'' something, you are [[burning the evidence]] of things which are 'inconvenient' to you; be it photos, letters, textbooks etc. In the modern age, it is also in electronic medium too, such as trying to erase your 'embarrassing' social media history and evidence of past transgressions.

{{anchor|Oldthink}}
*'''Oldthink''' are the views or ideals that predated the revolution,<ref group=note>Presumed to be some time in the 1950s.</ref> now considered dangerous (such are objectivity, [[religion]], notions of privacy etc). This is close to the Stalinist mantra of 'continuation of [the] [[Communist glossary#Class struggle|class struggle]]' which was used to justify the series of bloody purges which ultimately claimed almost all the Old [[Bolsheviks]]<ref group=note>Members of the Communist Party before 1917, and thus riddled with 'oldthink'.</ref> themselves.

{{anchor|Ownlife}}
*'''Ownlife''' is the activity/ies of a Party member which is not organised and communal<ref group=note>With the exception of a very few activities which neither is realistically possible, for example shopping.</ref>&nbsp;— it suggests individualism and eccentricity (both of which suggest a habitual thought-criminal) and simply makes the target harder to monitor. The clearest analogy is the 'asocial' category used in Nazi Germany; a catch-all for folks who cannot be booked otherwise but were still viewed as 'undesirable' to the ''volk'' and thrown into the camps.<ref>[https://arolsen-archives.org/en/about-us/statements/stigmatized-their-whole-lives-long/ Stigmatized their whole lives long] ''Arolsen Archives''</ref>

{{anchor|Thoughtcrime}}
*'''Thoughtcrime''' are beliefs which run counter to the Party's teachings, or a simply lack of ''genuine'' belief in said teachings. That unlike in most authoritarian systems – where surface orthodoxy is sufficient – the Party demands intellectual and emotional orthodoxy too. The nearest analogy for this is the 'sins of the heart' [[dogma]] in some [[Christian]] sects; where merely ''wanting'' to commit a [[sin]] (even if unfulfilled) is in fact the sin. Thoughtcrime is, in fact, the only crime in Oceania; every lesser offence is merely a reflection of a person's personal thoughtcrime.

{{anchor|Unperson}}
*'''Unperson''' is when a person is not only removed from the present (i.e., [[death]]), but also past historical records&nbsp;— that they never existed. Prior achievements are attributed to others, photographs doctored or destroyed, nobody ever mentions them etc. While this has been done on/off throughout history, Orwell was quite clearly inspired about how former leading figures such as [[Leon Trotsky]] and {{wpl|Ernst Röhm||}} were erased from the appropriate Party's histories after their fall.<ref>[https://archive.ph/6IhdQ The Photo Book That Captured How the Soviet Regime Made the Truth Disappear] Archived from ''The New Yorker'', 15 July 2018</ref>

==External links==
*[http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/index.html Nineteen Eighty-Four], via George-Orwell.org.
*[https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/n/1984/1984-at-a-glance Plot summary], via Cliff Notes.
*[https://www.theguardian.com/books/2009/may/10/1984-george-orwell 'The masterpiece that killed George Orwell'], ''The Observer'' 'long read'.

==Notes==
{{notelist|2|80%}}

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}
{{title-italics}}
[[Category:Authoritarianism]]
[[Category:Books]]
[[Category:Cold War]]
[[Category:Films]]
[[Category:International relations]]
[[Category:Numbers]]
[[Category:Science fiction]]

Categories: Authoritarianism, Books, Cold War, Films, International relations, Numbers, Science fiction