Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

{{Psychology}}{{pseudoscience}}
{{cquote|The MBTI is a [[horoscope]] for [[nerd]]s.|||Random Tumblr User<ref>http://coelasquid.tumblr.com/post/53521760472/extroverts-run-the-world-and-you-extroverts</ref>}}
{{cquote|There's no such thing as a pure extravert or a pure introvert. Such a man would be in the lunatic asylum... Classifications, they are only ''points de repère'', points for orientation. There is no such thing as a schematic classification.|||[[Carl Jung]], in an interview from August 1957<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=kl3sDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA304&lpg=PA304&dq=conversations+with+carl+jung+schematic+classification McGuire, W., & Hull, R. F. C. (1977). C.G. Jung speaking: Interviews and encounters.]  Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press. pp 304</ref>}}

The '''Myers-Briggs Type Indicator''' ('''MBTI''') is an alleged assessment of one's personality type — whatever <i>that</i> means. It aims to classify how individuals view the world through a questionnaire, categorizing people based on four different dichotomies. It was developed by a mother-and-daughter team (Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers) who had no formal education in any subject-related fields, but had a personal interest in [[Carl Jung]]'s Personality Types and wanted to make them accessible to a wide audience as a tool for [[Self-diagnosis|self-discovery]]. Despite its widespread use in business (particularly in human resources departments), it is widely recognized as [[pseudoscience]] among reputable psychologists.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/science/brain-flapping/2013/mar/19/myers-briggs-test-unscientific "Nothing personal: The questionable Myers-Briggs test"] by Dean Burnett, Guardian, 2013 March 19</ref><ref>[https://www.vox.com/2014/7/15/5881947/myers-briggs-personality-test-meaningless "Why the Myers-Briggs test is totally meaningless"] by Joseph Stromberg and Estrelle Caswell, Vox, 2015 October 8</ref>

In personality research, it only plays an [[Anecdotal evidence|anecdotal]] role — for a variety of reasons. One drawback lies in the origins of MBTI, since from the time of its Jungian roots (''Psychological Types'' by C. G. Jung, 1921), the first MBTI Handbook (1944) and the MBTI Manual (1962), the scientific field of psychology in general advanced considerably. Other models of personality have been proposed and developed, which by design and purpose satisfy more scientific criteria than the antiquated Myers-Briggs model. MBTI's popularity derives mainly from its relative simplicity and appeal, from the commercial profitability for its practitioners and from the [[echo chamber|self-amplifying effect]] of its own propagation. Several studies have linked the MBTI dichotomies to more accepted personality models like the Big5-based NEO PI-R (a 5-factor model with 5 subscales each),<ref>[https://jfdeschamps.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/correl-ocean-mbti-furnham-2003-6p.pdf The relationship between the revised neo-personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator] by Adrian Furnham et al. ''Social Behavior and Personality, 2003, 310(6), 577-584.</ref> which showed strong correlations between the two, as have other studies. Even Big 5 have been shown to not necessarily hold up well in non-western cultures.<ref name="non-weird">[https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/5/7/eaaw5226 Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations]</ref>

==Four dichotomies==
[[File:MyersBriggsTypes.png|thumb|right|A chart with descriptions of each Myers-Briggs personality types]]
In contrast to trait-based personality theories which assume a continuous, normal distribution around an expectancy value, MBTI, like other type theories (Keirsey Temperament Sorter, Socionics, etc.) postulates the existence of 16 distinct personality types. This [[hypothesis]] has the weakest [[empirical]] support, and is one of the major points of legitimate criticism. There is absolutely no support for it from any datasets; although there were some attempts at filtering large data sets with advanced statistical techniques, no evidence for a so-called bimodal distribution has been found.<ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11936208 Bimodal score distributions and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: fact or artifact?]</ref> 

===Extraversion – Introversion===
This scale is referred to as the "attitudes". Unlike the usual form of "extravert" and "introvert", these have a very specific definition based on how a person reacts to action or reflection. Carl Jung proposed that one's [[Energy#Pseudo-scientific use of the term|psychic energy]] was either directed outwards (extraversion) or inwards (introversion). 

An extravert's attention is drawn to the outer world of things and action, whereas the introvert's attention is drawn to the inner world of ideas and understanding.

===Sensing – iNtuition===
These are the "information gathering functions", and are fairly self-explanatory. '''S''' prefers to look at the world and describe what they sense while '''N''' people are more concerned with the meaning. For example, “the street has many tall brown houses and is crowded” (S) versus “this is a shopping street with historical houses” (N). Because of this, the temperament of '''S''' is separated by the ''Judging-Perceiving'' aspect while that of '''N''' is separated by ''Thinking-Feeling''.

===Thinking – Feeling===
This dichotomy is the "judging functions", based around how a person is, in theory, more likely to if judged to be ''Perceiving'', or will if judged to be ''Judging''; make decisions. '''T''' will rely on any factual information itself more, while '''F''' relies more on how they feel about the information in context, including rhetoric. Thinkers are not more logical, and Feelers are not more empathic. However, males prefer to answer as Thinkers beyond any reasonable margin of error while females do as Feelers; making this the exceptional dichotomy on a generally gender-neutral survey.

===Judging – Perceiving===
The final functions become more complicated based on whether an individual is judged extraverted or introverted. Depending on whether one is extraverted or introverted, it expresses whether the ''Sensing – iNtuition'' or the ''Thinking – Feeling'' aspect is exhibited to the outside. The logically-minded may perceive this as some kind of juggling to correct a flaw.

==Analysis==
Combining these four scales comes up with 16 different personality types: INTP, ESTJ, etc. The scales, except for the last, are nominally based on Jung's theory of personality (the last was somewhat arbitrarily added by Myers and Briggs).

==Criticism==
Many [[skeptic]]s consider the Myers-Briggs to be [[pseudoscience]], since no science-based evidence has been offered for the existence of these categories except for the introversion-extroversion scale,<ref group=note>The USA's National Research Council found the I-E scale to have sufficient construct validity, but none of the other scales. See [http://www.opd.net/abstracts5.html Nowack 1997.] The I-E scale has been found to correlate well with extraversion in the FFM, and the S-N scale to some degree with openness, though the MBTI is generally considered to be less reliable. See [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2709300 McCrae and Costa 1989.]</ref> although many find it useful as a wholly subjective frame of reference or categorization. Then again, there are also those who find the categorizations in [[Transactional Analysis]], [[William Strauss and Neil Howe]]'s generational types, the left-right [[political spectrum]], dividing popular [[culture]] by decade (the "Sixties," the "Seventies," etc.), useful methods of systematizing too, despite their lack of scientific nature. As with any subjective [[Social construct|construct]], your mileage may vary.

Though the MBTI is popular in [[school]]s and businesses, it's disfavored by many in the psychological community for its low reliability and lack of external validity. The most common personality assessment tools used by psychologists are the MMPI-2 or the MCMI-III.

A comedic aspect is the placement of [[real life]] personalities, e.g. [[John F. Kennedy]] being an introvert on one scale,<ref>[http://psychology.about.com/od/trait-theories-personality/a/intj.htm INTJ]</ref> and listed alongside [[Sarah Palin]] on another.<ref group=note>ESTP (It also implies that Palin and [[Donald Trump|Cheeto Benito]] are "thinkers".)</ref>

It should be mentioned that using a '''formal''' psychological test as part of the hiring procedure is viewed as a "medical examination" and therefore '''illegal''' in the [[United States]] under the ADA per ''Karraker v. Rent-A-Center Inc.''<ref>[http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1486883.html FindLaw: Karraker v. Rent-A-Center Inc.]</ref><ref>[http://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=luclj Karraker v. Rent-a-Center: Testing the Limits of the ADA, Personality Tests, and Employer Preemployment Screening ''The Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 37 Issue 4 Summer 2006'' article 6]</ref>. Use of the MMPI (or one similar to it) is definitely illegal and there are serious questions regarding using the MBTI:

"One large human resource consulting firm uses the '''MBTI''' and a 360-degree behavioral style assessment in its hiring process, no doubt not realizing that '''this use is illegal.'''" <ref>English, Gary  (2001)  ''Solving the People Puzzle'' pg 38.</ref>

The Myers & Briggs Foundation's own website warns "It is unethical and in many cases '''illegal''' to require job applicants to take the Indicator if the results will be used to screen out applicants."<ref>[http://www.myersbriggs.org/myers-and-briggs-foundation/ethical-use-of-the-mbti-instrument/ethical-guidelines.htm Ethical Guidelines]</ref>

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) requires that every factor used to make hiring decisions be job-related and “properly validated for the positions and purposes for which they are used.”, which all personality tests fail and are therefore of questionable legality.<ref>[https://blog.criteriacorp.com/4-reasons-you-should-never-use-the-myers-briggs-test-for-hiring/ 4 Reasons You Should Never Use the Myers-Briggs Test for Hiring]</ref>

"Annie Murphy Paul, a former senior editor for ''Psychology Today'' magazine, attacked the $400 million a year testing industry, comparing personality tests to [[phrenology]] &mdash; a popular and discredited 19<sup>th</sup> century personality instrument that measured mental traits by examining the 27 bumps on a person’s head."<ref>[http://www.cornellhrreview.org/personality-tests-in-employment-selection-use-with-caution/ H Beau Baez (January 26, 2013) "Personality Tests in Employment Selection: Use With Caution" ''Cornell HR Review'' Cornell University]</ref>

After taking the test, many individuals are astonished by the extent to which their personality type description actually fits their life. This is really an instance of the [[Forer effect]], the natural tendency of people to assign detail and specific meaning to generalized statements or events. There's also the fact that they were the ones who took the test and answered questions about their personality — why would they '''not''' agree with the results if they provided them?

==See also==
*[[Enneagram]]
*[[Keirsey Temperament Sorter]] 
*[[Psychological projection]] 
*[[Transactional Analysis]]

==External links==
*[http://www.skepdic.com/myersb.html Entry in The Skeptic's Dictionary]
*{{wpa|Myers–Briggs_Type_Indicator#Accuracy_and_validity}}
*The Myers-Briggs Foundation [http://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/take-the-mbti-instrument/ will charge you a fortune to take the copyrighted version] or you could [http://personality-testing.info/tests/JUNG.php take a cheap rip off for the same effect.]
*[https://archive.vn/5NzT8 Myers, Briggs, and the World's Most Popular Personality Test], Mental Floss
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/brain-flapping/2013/mar/19/myers-briggs-test-unscientific Nothing personal: The questionable Myers-Briggs test], ''The Guardian''
*[http://jobtalk.indiana.edu/HRMWebsite/hrm/articles/develop/mbti.pdf Measuring the MBTI...and Coming Up Short], David J. Pittenger
*[http://popwatch.ew.com/2013/11/07/star-wars-myers-briggs-chart/ Myers-Briggs: Where if you're a TJ, you're either stuck-up or a heartless asshole.] (Also parodied by [http://www.theonion.com/articles/im-an-entj-destroyer-of-worlds,36075/ ''The Onion''])

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

[[Category:Psychology]]
[[Category:Personality trait woo]]
[[Category:Scams]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]

Categories: Psychology, Personality trait woo, Scams, Psychoanalysis