Samuel Alito

[[File:010 alito.jpg|thumb|165px|2007 official portrait.]]{{law}}
{{cquote|At present, no one — including [[social scientist]]s, [[philosopher]]s, and [[historians]] — can predict with any certainty what the long-term ramifications of widespread acceptance of [[same-sex marriage]] will be.|||Alito, imagining the [[Homosexual agenda|gay onslaught]] in his head.<ref>[https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/06/in-supreme-court-gay-marriage-decision-justices-reach-for-equality/438105/ In Supreme Court Gay Marriage Decision, Justices Reach for Equality: In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional.] by Matt Berman et al. (June 26, 2013) ''The Atlantic''.</ref>}}
'''Samuel Alito''' {{lived|1950}} is an American [[conservative]] [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court Justice]] appointed by former President [[George W. Bush]] to replace [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] after she retired in 2005. His appointment pushed the Court well to the right. His nomination was quite controversial, and many [[liberal]]s believed he would not be an impartial Justice; they were right.

His wife seemed to be crying during his confirmation while he was being questioned by [[Democratic Party|Democratic]] [[Senator]]s; a cheap way to try to milk sympathy for him.
He is one of six [[Roman Catholic]]s on the Supreme Court as of September 2025, and the second Italian American on the Court. His father was an [[Italian]] immigrant.

As of 2022 Alito is considered to be part of the most conservative faction of court along with [[Clarence Thomas]], even going so far as to sign on to Thomas' dissent that supported the [[anti-vaxxer]] movement.<ref>[https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/justice-thomas-cites-debunked-claim-covid-vaccines-are-made-cells-abor-rcna36156 Justice Thomas cites claim that Covid vaccines are made with cells from 'aborted children': Thomas cited the claim in a dissent to the Supreme Court’s refusal to take up a challenge by health care workers who opposed New York's vaccine mandate on religious grounds.] by Adam Edelman & Aria Bendix (June 30, 2022, 9:58 AM PDT) ''NBC News''.</ref> 

==Corruption and ethics violations==
{{cquote|The message was, we could do terrible things to you, and nobody would be able to do anything about it.|||Emily Baden, one of Alito's neighbors who was indirectly threatened by Alito for putting up anti-Trump yard signs<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/31/samuel-alito-flag-neighbor-interview Neighbors say Alitos used security detail car to intimidate them after sign dispute: Emily Baden says after a disagreement over political lawn signs with the US supreme court justice’s wife, a black car began parking at her mother’s home] by Andrew Gumbel (31 May 2024 13.57 EDT) ''The Guardian''.</ref>}}
On June 20 2023, the same organization ({{wpl|ProPublica}}) that published a detailed exposé on Thomas' friendship with a [[Republican]] billionaire (complete with many undisclosed "gifts" and largesse), published a detailed exposé on Alito receiving a "gift" from a Republican billionaire. In this case, in 2008, {{wpl|Paul Singer (businessman)|Paul Singer|,}} who is the longtime manager and founder of a [[vulture fund]] called Elliott Associates as well as a longtime chairman of the board of trustees of the [[Manhattan Institute]],<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2011/nov/15/vulture-funds-jersey-decision "Vulture funds await Jersey decision on poor countries' debts"] by Greg Palast, Maggie O'Kane and Chavala Madlena, Guardian, 2011 November 15</ref><ref>[https://www.elliottmgmt.com/who-we-are/paul-singer/ "Who We Are: Paul Singer",] Elliott Management</ref><ref>[https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-the-manhattan-institute-new-york-city "Remarks to the Manhattan Institute in New York City"], George W. Bush, The American Presidency Project, 2008 November 13</ref> flew Alito up to [[Alaska]] on a private jet to enjoy fishing at a remote luxury fishing lodge that cost more than $1,000 a day. ProPublica estimated that the entire trip could have cost over $100,000. Like Thomas, Alito did not report the 2008 fishing trip on his annual financial disclosures. The trip was organized by Leonard Leo, the longtime leader of the [[Federalist Society]]. Not coincidentally, in 2014, Alito voted with the 7-1 majority in favor of Singer when a dispute came up in the Supreme Court between Singer's hedge fund and the nation of [[Argentina]]. (Alito did not recuse himself from the case, as one would ethically expect.)<ref>[https://www.propublica.org/article/samuel-alito-luxury-fishing-trip-paul-singer-scotus-supreme-court "Justice Samuel Alito Took Luxury Fishing Vacation With GOP Billionaire Who Later Had Cases Before the Court"] by Justin Elliott, Joshua Kaplan, and Alex Mierjeski (June 20, 2023, 11:49 p.m. EDT) ''Pro Publica''.</ref>

==Coup supporter==
{{cquote|He is putting the vex in {{wpl|vexillology||,}} but not the lol.|||Alexandra Petri<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/05/23/alito-flag-wife-trump-controversy-satire/ What the flag your Supreme Court justice is flying means: Including the Jolly Roger, the rainbow flag and all orientations of the Stars and Stripes.] by Alexandra Petri (May 23, 2024 at 1:51 p.m. EDT) ''The Washington Post''.</ref>}}
In May 2024, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported that in January 2021&nbsp;— around the same time that the Supreme Court was considering a case concerning the [[2020 U.S. presidential election]]&nbsp;— Alito flew the American flag upside down outside his house for several days.<ref>[https://newrepublic.com/post/181725/samuel-alito-upside-down-flag-explanation Samuel Alito Can’t Even Lie Properly About That Upside-Down Flag: The Supreme Court justice tried to explain away reports of a “Stop the Steal” symbol outside his home. That only made things worse.] by Talia Jane (May 17, 2024/2:41 p.m. ET) ''The New Republic''.</ref> Alito gave the feeble excuse of blaming his wife for the upside-down flag&nbsp;— doesn't he live there too? At the time, supporters of the [[2021 U.S. coup attempt]] frequently inverted the flag to show their support for [[Donald Trump]]'s [[Big Lie]]. According to judicial experts, the flag inversion was a clear violation of ethics rules, and the event raised doubts about Alito's impartiality in cases related to both the [[2024 U.S. presidential election]] and the coup attempt.<ref name=kantor>[https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/us/justice-alito-upside-down-flag.html "At Justice Alito’s House, a ‘Stop the Steal’ Symbol on Display"] by Jodi Kantor, New York Times, 2024 May 16</ref> Alito along with Clarence Thomas (husband of a coup plotter) was notably among the minority view in the court that it should hear a GOP election denialist lawsuit that preceded the coup.<ref name=kantor/><ref>[https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/justice-alito-upside-down-flag-jan-6/678410/ Why Was Alito Flying the Flag Upside Down After January 6? Justice Alito blamed his wife for the incident, but he did not disavow what the symbol stands for.] by Adam Serwer (May 17, 2024) ''The Atlantic''.</ref>

Alito's explanation for the flag flying was so arrogant and disbelievable that it caused New York University law professor Melissa Murray to say that Alito was [[trolling]].<ref>[https://archive.is/9OPz3 'She makes her own decisions, and I honor her right to do so.' / Folks, he is trolling TF out of us.] by Melissa Murray (6:13 PM · May 29, 2024) ''Twitter'' (archived from 2 Jun 2024 20:01:18 UTC).</ref><ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/06/02/alito-letter-flags-controversy/ Five ways to respond to Alito’s contemptuous letter: The latest Supreme Court controversy makes clear that it’s past time to rein in this institution.] by Jennifer Rubin (June 2, 2024 at 7:45 a.m. EDT) ''The Washington Post''.</ref> In support of that, the various explanations that Alito has given have been contradicted by facts.<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/05/justice-alito-flags-unanswered-questions/ Alito’s account of the upside-down flag doesn’t fully add up. Here’s why. A look at the major discrepancies in Justice Samuel Alito’s comments about controversial flags flown at his property and what he still has not fully answered.] by Justin Jouvenal (June 5, 2024 at 2:15 p.m. EDT) ''The Washington Post''.</ref>

==Dominionism supporter==
The ''New York Times'' reported that between July and September of 2023, Alito flew the {{wpl|Pine Tree Flag}} a.k.a. the "Appeal to Heaven" flag outside of his beach house. This once obscure flag was popularized by Dutch Sheets, a prominent figure within the [[New Apostolic Reformation]] movement, as a symbol of this movement's ambitions to [[Dominionism|take over the country's government]] and remake it into a "Christian" theocracy. This flag was subsequently also flown at the 2021 U.S. coup attempt, as well as hung within the office of the Dominionist House of Representatives speaker [[Mike Johnson]]. This revelation further troubled ethics experts, as it was yet another instance of Alito outright publicly supporting coup attempt related symbols away from the courtroom. This raised even more questions on his impartiality on judging coup-related and Big Lie-related cases.<ref>[https://archive.ph/RVXcb "Another Provocative Flag Was Flown at Another Alito Hom"] by Jodi Kantor, Aric Toler, and Julie Tate, New York Times, 2024 May 22</ref> 

Alito has long had the opinion that religion is "[[persecution complex|under attack]]" in the United States; many of his decisions have thus used this framework in order to erode the [[separation of church and state]], [[First Amendment]] be damned.<ref>[https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/justice-alito-says-religion-is-under-attack-and-jokes-about-reaction-to-overturning-roe-v-wade-in-speech-from-rome/ "Justice Alito Says Religion Is ‘Under Attack’ and Jokes About Reaction to Overturning Roe v. Wade in Speech from Rome"] by Elura Nanos, Law and Crime, 2022 July 29</ref> To underscore how far this concept reaches, in a case relating to {{wpl|Kim Davis}} in October 2020, Alito (along with [[Clarence Thomas]], who wrote the opinion) questioned the right of [[gay marriage]] with the bizarre opinion that those who labeled religious-traditionalist [[homophobes]] as bigots somehow violated "religious liberty".<ref>[https://archive.ph/s0qVr "Justices Thomas and Alito Question Same-Sex Marriage Precedent"] by Adam Liptak, New York Times, 2020 October 5</ref>

==Misogyny==
{{main|Misogyny}}
While many Republicans wish for the [[good old days]] of [[Kinder, Küche, Kirche|1950]], or sometimes even [[Slavery|1850]], Alito's leaked draft ruling<ref name=draft>[https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/read-justice-alito-initial-abortion-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade-pdf-00029504 Justice Alito's initial draft abortion opinion which would overturn Roe v. Wade] ''Politico''.</ref> on overturning ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' in May 2022 showed that he yearns for the days of [[Renaissance|1650]], or perhaps [[Middle Ages|1250]]. In his leaked draft, Alito refers to [[English]] judge {{wpl|Matthew_Hale_(jurist)|Matthew Hale}} {{lived|1609|1676}} as a "great" and "eminent" [[common law]] legal authority;<ref name=draft/>{{rp|16,26}}<ref name=hasday>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/09/alito-roe-sir-matthew-hale-misogynist/ On Roe, Alito cites a judge who treated women as witches and property] by Jill Elaine Hasday (May 10, 2022) ''The Washington Post''.</ref> Hale is cited nine times in the draft.<ref name=draft/>{{rp|16-19,26,44}} Hale sentenced two [[European witch-hunts|'witches' to death]].<ref name=hasday/> Hale was largely responsible for the longstanding legal distrust of women's accusations of [[rape]], as well as the [[marital rape]] exemption from prosecution.<ref name=hasday/> Two problems in Alito's use of Hale in the draft are:<ref name=hasday/>
# America did not regulate abortion with regard to 'quickening' (first movement of the [[fetus]]) for many decades, contrary to Hale's cited posthumous book ''Intimate Lies and the Law''.
#Alito relies on sources, including Hale, that support male supremacy, where females are treated as property.
Alito also cites judge Henry de Bracton {{lived|c. 1210|1288}} six times with his book ''De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae''.<ref name=draft/>{{rp|16,17,25,26,44}} Bracton describes the 'proper' procedure for determining whether a woman is pregnant: "carefully examine her by feeling her breasts and abdomen and in every way", and if the exam was inconclusive she would be locked in a castle at her own expense and examined every day until conclusion.<ref name=milbank>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/09/alito-13th-century-law-roe-opinion-snl/ That 13<sup>th</sup>-century law treatise Alito uses? Here’s what else it says.] by Dana Milbank (May 9, 2022) ''The Washington Post''.</ref> Bracton also states that in cases of suspected fraud, "the woman cannot exceed the gestation period by a single day, even where the issue dies in utero or turns into a monster."<ref name=milbank/> Although [[democracies]] did not exist at the time of Bracton, he did emphasize the point that England was a [[theocracy]] in his book by stating that the [[king]] was the "vicar of [[God]]" with no equal.<ref name=milbank/>

==Stopped clock==
Despite deserving a lot of criticism, there are also [[Stopped clock|some occasions]] in which Alito should be praised. For example, he was the sole member of the Supreme Court to dissent in {{wpl|Snyder v. Phelps|''Snyder v. Phelps''|,}} where he ruled that the [[Westboro Baptist Church]] had entrapped the participants of a funeral despite their speech, in its self, not being unconstitutional. This opinion earned the praise of {{wpl|John Paul Stevens||,}} who had then only recently retired from the Supreme Court. He was also the sole dissenter in {{wpl|United States v. Stevens|''United States v. Stevens''|,}} ruling that the [[state]] has an obligation to protect animals, like children, since they are vulnerable and, therefore, images of animal abuse (the law in question was intended to ban {{wpl|crush films||,}} and Congress was later able to get a variant that passed constitutional muster through) do not constitute speech.

==References==
{{reflist|1|80%}}

{{stub|law}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Alito, Samuel}}
[[Category:Anti-abortion activists]]
[[Category:Anti-LGBT bigots]]
[[Category:Antifeminism]]
[[Category:Anti-vaccination movement]]
[[Category:Catholics]]
[[Category:Conservative deceit]]
[[Category:Culture wars]]
[[Category:Educators]]
[[Category:Homophobes]]
[[Category:Lawyers]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Sexists]]
[[Category:Theocracy]]
[[Category:Trolls]]
[[Category:Trumpism]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Justices]]

Categories: Anti-abortion activists, Anti-LGBT bigots, Antifeminism, Anti-vaccination movement, Catholics, Conservative deceit, Culture wars, Educators, Homophobes, Lawyers, Living people, Sexists, Theocracy, Trolls, Trumpism, United States Supreme Court Justices