Bret Weinstein

[[File:Bret Weinstein 2018 02 (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|165px|Weinstein in 2018. His signature move appears to be the single raised eyebrow. A cheap stand-in for ''actual'' scepticism, which would be much harder.]]
{{cquote| 
''"These are the best minds of our time and all they're talking about is if someone is [[Transgender glossary#Tucking|tucking their D***]]? Weinstein and Heather Heying… they talk about [[trans people]] for 9 hours! They just sit in a room with [[cat]]s running around… Like what the fuck is going on? These are all 'geniuses,' and you can't ask what any of them have done?"''

|||Comedian Tim Dillon describing Bret Weinstein's pathetic podcasting career.<ref>''[https://youtu.be/MW3goQ5bwWE?t=122 Comedian Tim Dillon on Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris and The Intellectual Dark Web.] 
</ref>}}

'''Bret Samuel Weinstein''' {{lived|1969}} is an American [[ultracrepidarian]] podcaster who used to be an [[evolutionary biologist]] before he became embroiled in a stupid controversy that catapulted him into punditry. Since 2020, he has been a leading spreader of [[FUD]] about [[COVID-19]] vaccines. Bret Weinstein is the brother of [[Eric Weinstein]], which is one of the reasons he is also commonly considered to be a part of the so-called [[Intellectual Dark Web]] (IDW).

==Evergreen State College "incident"==
Weinstein's career as a professor was spent at The Evergreen State College (TESC). By all accounts, he initially had no problems with a campus tradition called the {{wpl|Day of Absence||,}} which is based on the 1965 play by Douglas Turner Ward. TESC's Day of Absence had non-white students leaving for a day so that their contributions to campus culture could be better appreciated. In 2017, there was a slight change that set off Weinstein's political evolution. Organizers said that they would instead hold a program on-campus that address issues from the perspective of people of colour. At the same time, an event off-campus was held focused on allyship and anti-racism from a majority culture or white perspective. While this event has often been characterized as 'white people being forced off-campus', it should be made clear that ''the day-of-absence at Evergreen was, and always has been, a tradition where students and faculty voluntarily participated.'' Nobody would've been forced or disallowed from attending either venue. In fact, everyone was explicitly invited to "attend the program of their choice, wherever they feel most comfortable."<ref name="psmag">{{cite web|url=https://psmag.com/education/the-real-free-speech-story-at-evergreen-college|title=The real free speech story at Evergreen college|first=Noah|last=Berlatsky|publisher=Pacific Standard|date=2018-07-10}}</ref> When Weinstein objected by email, a group of students and possibly some professors accused him of [[racism]] and [[Quote mining|took his words out of context]] according to the most popular narrative.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/16/us/evergreen-state-protests.html|title=A campus argument goes viral. Now the college is under siege|first=Anemona|last=Hartocollis|publisher=NYT|date=2017-06-16}}</ref> 

What this leaves out is that most students were marching to protest the removal of two [[African American]] students from their own dormitory by [[police]]. Faculty said that Weinstein stepped out of his classroom and argued with them while someone recorded a video that would later go viral, and then the students just left him and went to the dean because ''Weinstein was never the center of the student protest.''<ref name = "psmag" />

The trivial story of angry students shouting at a professor and then walking away might not have spread beyond the local school newspaper if Weinstein hadn't wasted no time in telling his exaggerated story on [[Fox News]] to [[Tucker Carlson]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_j9nFced_eo Professor objects to no white people on campus demand] by Fox News, ''YouTube''</ref> Weinstein and his wife Heather Heying (who was also a professor of evolutionary biology at TESC) quickly penned op-eds in the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', cementing the court of public opinion against the students who were not interviewed there.<ref> https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-campus-mob-came-for-meand-you-professor-could-be-next-1496187482 </ref><ref> https://www.wsj.com/articles/inside-the-madness-at-evergreen-state-1506034740 </ref><ref> https://www.wsj.com/articles/first-they-came-for-the-biologists-1506984033 </ref>

All of this was then amplified and exaggerated by [[right-wing]] [[media]] resulting in the [[far-right]] group {{wpl|Patriot Prayer}} showing up to attack the brown "violent [[SJWs]]." Now that the national spotlight was focused on their tiny college, students began receiving death threats and Weinstein was told by police that he might be in physical danger, prompting him to teach outside and the university to hold its graduation in a secure location 30 miles away.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170623231051/https://www.king5.com/news/local/olympia/professor-told-hes-not-safe-on-campus-after-college-protests/443098670|title=Professor told he's not safe on campus after college protests|first=Drew|last=Mikkelsen|publisher=King 5|date=2017-05-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/added-security-for-graduation-at-the-evergreen-state-college/534597129/|title=Added security for graduation and The Evergreen State College|first=Kevin|last=McCarty|publisher=KIRO 7|date=2017-06-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/06/05/evergreen-state-college-reopens-after-violent-threat-and-property-damage-on-campus/|title=Evergreen State College reopens after violent threat and property damage on campus|first=Susan|last=Svrluga|publisher=WaPo|date=2017-06-05}}</ref> Students faced additional harassment when they tried to organize a Day of Absence the following year.<ref name = "psmag" /> Conservative [[propaganda]] about their goals is likely one of the factors that has led to declining enrollment at TESC.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/01/10/evergreen-addresses-enrollment-decline-academic-changes|title=A new path for Evergreen|first=Lilah|last=Burke|publisher=Inside Higher Ed|date=2020-01-10}}</ref> Following Tucker Carlson's interview of Bret Weinstein, perpetuating a narrative of 'reverse racism' enforced by a university, TESC was targeted by the far-right, facing severe physical threats to such an extent that law enforcement officers and the FBI were prompted to have the campus evacuated. Several students and staff have left TESC after having received harassment and hate mail.<ref>https://www.huffpost.com/entry/evergreen-state-college-another-side_b_598cd293e4b090964295e8fc</ref><ref>https://psmag.com/education/the-real-free-speech-story-at-evergreen-college</ref>

Weinstein, on the other hand, has gained tens of thousands of subscribers to stoke his ego as a perpetually online culture warrior, instead of living a more mundane life as a professor at a backwater college who has hardly published academically in decades. (Weinstein only has an {{wpl|h-index}} of about 2.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theolympian.com/news/local/article173710596.html|title=Evergreen settles with Weinstein, professor at center of campus protest|publisher=The Olympian|date=2017-09-18}}</ref>) Contrary to a popular narrative that Weinstein was forced to resign due to left-wing academic orthodoxy and/or a hate mob of students and staff falsely accusing him of racism; ''his resignation was an agreed part of a lucrative settlement resulting from a lawsuit that he instigated.'' Weinstein and his wife filed a lawsuit against TESC for $3.8 million, claiming that the university did not provide adequate protection for staff during the student protest; which - again - wasn't about Weinstein who willfully engaged with students protesting police racial bias. Furthermore, campus police were present on that day and they reported that Weinstein himself sent them off after offering their protection to him. Weinstein wasn't in any real danger and the college (to this day) insist of no wrongdoings. Thus, in all likelihood, this lawsuit wouldn't have held up in court. Weinstein opted for a settlement with TESC, receiving $500,000 in cash for agreeing to resign.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=9485|title=Weinstein files $3.8M claim against Evergreen|first=Nikita|last=Vladimirov|publisher=Campus Reform|date=2017-07-25}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2017/09/18/evergreen-professor-receives-500000-settlement|title=Evergreen professor receives $500,000 settlement|first=Nick|last=Roll|publisher=Inside Higher Ed|date=2017-09-18}}</ref> In contrast, some of the students and staff were prompted to leave TESC after facing harassment, hate mail, and threats that followed after Weinstein's spread a false narrative to the media. As you can imagine, they (unlike Weinstein) weren't able to effectively sell their position for half a million dollars. But - remember - Weinstein is the real victim here. 

As of 2021, they were probably making about $170,000 a year on Patreon alone.<ref name = "wweek" /> They eventually became research fellows at Princeton University. This should not be viewed as a "happily ever after" ending for them because of the strange nature of the fellowship.<ref>https://jmp.princeton.edu/announcements/james-madison-program-announces-2019-20-fellows</ref> It is an attempt at funding "[[heterodox]] research" by {{wpl|Robert P. George|Robby George}} &mdash; the professor who is ultra-conservative but still friends with [[Cornel West]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/08/cornel-west-jesus-progressives/619741/|title=Cornel West on why the left needs Jesus|first=Emma|last=Green|publisher=The Atlantic|date=2021-08-13}}</ref> In between leaving TESC and starting his own podcast, Weinstein was a regular guest of [[Dave Rubin]] and [[Joe Rogan]].

==Burgeoning political punditry==
Weinstein was feeling the Bern in 2016 and wrote [[Bernie Sanders]] on his ballot as a protest vote. By the 2020 campaign however, he had denounced Bernie Sanders for apparently becoming too [[Alt-right glossary#Woke|woke]].<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20211003183157/https://twitter.com/bretweinstein/status/1211773774913105920?lang=en I am one of few who supported @BernieSanders to the end in 2016--I wrote him in. Sad that I can't support him this time due to his embrace of the anti-equality "social justice" faction. It appears #PresidentSanders would be a tool of the DNC. True fairness is a bedrock principle] by Bret Weinstein (2:19 PM - 30 Dec 2019) ''Twitter'' (archived from October 3, 2021).</ref>

Instead, after the [[2020 Democratic Party presidential nomination]], Weinstein and his wife came up with a plan to help "bottom tier candidates" get 0.1% of the vote instead of 0%. Their initiative, called "Unity 2020", was to write-in a ticket consisting of candidates from opposite ends of the political spectrum.<ref>https://bigthink.com/the-present/unity2020/</ref> The list of names was narrowed down to {{wpl|Dan Crenshaw||,}} [[Tulsi Gabbard]], {{wpl|William H. McRaven||,}} [[Jesse Ventura]], {{wpl|Jocko Willink}} and [[Andrew Yang]], none of whom were actually running for president or showing any interest in the plan.<ref>https://gandt.substack.com/p/unity-2020-is-dead</ref> By a crowdsourced vote, Crenshaw and Gabbard were the winners.<ref name = "bi-unity">{{cite web|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/unity-2020-idw-patriotic-bipartisan-presidential-tulsi-gabbard-crenshaw-2020-9|title=A 'patriotic' bipartisan presidential ticket determined by a coin flip demands to be taken seriously|first=Anthony|last=Fisher|publisher=Business Insider|date=2020-09-20}}</ref> How exactly Crenshaw and Gabbard can be considered "from opposite ends of the political spectrum" is unclear. The decision of whether to propose Crenshaw as Gabard's VP or Gabbard as Crenshaw's VP was made by a coin flip. Weinstein somehow thought that most Americans were so uninvested in politics that they would bother to vote but be be okay with flipping a coin to choose between a Democrat or a Republican.

Some of Weinstein's advocacy of this wacky idea was [[censor]]ed by [[Twitter]] for his using the hashtag "#JustSayNotoDonaldandJoe"<ref>{{cite web|url=https://reclaimthenet.org/twitter-suspends-articles-of-unity/|title=Twitter suspends account of non-partisan group Articles of Unity|first=Cindy|last=Harper|publisher=Reclaim the Net|date=2020-08-31}}</ref><ref name = "bi-unity" /> after the presidential primaries had essentially ended and there was no realistic choice for president other than [[Donald Trump]] or [[Joe Biden]]. It couldn't be a last-ditch [[Russian]] [[troll]] campaign now, could it?

==Reactionary gaslighting==
Weinstein's very first episode of the ''Darkhorse Podcast'' was a soft-interview of [[alt-right]] propagandist [[Andy Ngo]].<ref> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aC4u1zo6OpQ </ref> In January 2021 after the {{wpl|2021 United States Capitol attack|fascist coup attempt by Trump supporters}}, Weinstein said that [[Mike Pence]] should have pardoned those involved and that Trump should've been prevented from running again.<ref>https://archive.ph/wip/ftmwo </ref><ref>[https://archive.ph/ftmwo#selection-3021.0-3021.255 The President encouraged supporters while maintaining formal deniability. Congress has the right and power to prevent him from seeking the office again. It should. Then President Pence should issue the pardons necessary to prevent political witch-hunting.] by Bret Weinstein (4:43 PM - 17 Jan 2021) ''Twitter'' (archived from 3 Oct 2021 19:17:23 UTC).</ref> Never mind that there was no legal path for Pence to issue a pardon short of Trump resigning in the 3 days between his tweet and Biden's inauguration. This would be like pardoning all [[Confederate States of America|Confederate]] soldiers of any wrongdoing days after [[Abraham Lincoln]] was assassinated.

==Conspiratorial COVID-19 punditry==
{{conspiracy|1}}
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, Weinstein's ''Darkhorse Podcast'' has focused heavily on countersignaling ''actual'' public health experts.

===Lab leak theory===
Weinstein and Heying discussed the lab leak theory on [[Bill Maher]]'s show in February 2021.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMGWLLDSA3c Heather Heying & Bret Weinstein: The Lab Hypothesis | Real Time (HBO)] ''YouTube''</ref>

He said “unfortunately it points toward the possibility of a laboratory leak, and that hypothesis deserves investigation.”{{citation needed}}

“We are still being told fairy tales, including by Dr. [Anthony] Fauci this last week, about other ways in which the virus could have emerged directly from nature”.<ref>https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/546190-biologist-bret-weinstein-says-covid-19-likely-came-from-a-lab/</ref>

===Ivermectin===
Weinstein and Heying tell all of their fans who are worried about the pandemic to take [[ivermectin]], which they take weekly. The evidence that ivermectin can lower the severity of COVID-19 symptoms is already dubious, but Weinstein and Heying take it a step further by claiming that it can even prevent infections in the first place. The widespread misuse of self-prescribed ivermectin has led to shortages of the anti-parasitic drug across the United States prompting many ivermectin die-hards to seek out the horse version.<ref name = "wweek" /><ref name="wapo-ivermectin">{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/09/01/ivermectin-covid-treatment/|title=Doctors dismayed by patients who fear coronavirus vaccines but clamor for unproven ivermectin|first1=Hannah|last1=Knowles|first2=Annie|last2=Gowen|first3=Julian|last3=Mark|publisher=WaPo|date=2021-09-21}}</ref>

In the month that Weinstein's ivermectin push started to go viral, calls about the drug to poison control centers increased by a factor of five. At least one person has directly died of it.<ref name="wapo-ivermectin" /> The claim that ivermectin was approved long ago and is therefore safe no matter what you do with it is clearly false. The dosage recommended by overzealous podcasters, and the dosage required to see any anti-viral effects in a Petri dish, is much higher than what people take to cure river blindness.<ref>https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/ivermectin-oral-route/proper-use/drg-20064397?p=1</ref> If you are still thinking about self-administering ivermectin, remember: you are not a horse, you are not a cow, you are not a Petri dish.

===Vaccine misinformation===
Like all good medical quacks, Weinstein and Heying know it's not enough to promote unproven remedies, no, they must also fearmonger about the proven remedies. As such, neither one has taken or plans to take the vaccine.<ref name="wweek">{{cite web|url=https://www.wweek.com/news/2021/09/15/a-progressive-biologist-from-portland-is-one-of-the-nations-leading-advocates-for-ivermectin/|title=A progressive biologist from Portland is one of the nation's leading advocates for Ivermectin|first=Anthony|last=Effinger|publisher=Williamette Week|date=2021-09-15}}</ref><ref>https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2021/09/16/bret-weinstein-and-heather-heying-go-unvaccinated-take-ivermectin/</ref> This position likely helped lead to the death of Leslie Lawrenson, a fan who linked to a vaccine-skeptical episode of their podcast on social media shortly before his death.<ref>https://yurideigin.medium.com/why-bret-weinstein-is-dangerous-9f320eae5983 </ref>

The episode in question was a now deleted interview of {{wpl|Robert W. Malone}} and {{wpl|Steve Kirsch}} that was advertised as the video that will [[red pill]] audiences on the vaccines. It is unclear why Kirsch was there but the virologist Malone was chosen because he describes himself as the inventor of [[mRNA]] (as if there was only one).<ref>https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/7NoRcK6j2cfxjwFcr/covid-vaccine-safety-how-correct-are-these-allegations</ref> He stated that spike proteins from COVID-19 vaccines are cytotoxic, especially to women &mdash; a claim which has been widely debunked.<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaccine-cytotoxic-idUSL2N2O01XP</ref> Weinstein did not push back at all on Kirsch's ludicrous claim that vaccines for SARS CoV-2 (the COVID virus) are more deadly than all other vaccines combined.<ref name = "q" />

In a later discussion with [[Joe Rogan]], Weinstein was a little more careful and stated that the vaccines would be appropriate if there were no pandemic infecting the world.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmy8znrLPc0 The Proliferation of COVID Variants] by PowerfulJRE, 9 September, 2021, ''YouTube''</ref> This idea that "vaccinating in a pandemic" is dangerous comes from Geert Vanden Bossche, a [[Belgian]] professor of veterinary medicine who last wrote in 1995, who has a clear [[conflict of interest]].<ref>[https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/03/26/geert-vanden-bossche/ Geert Vanden Bossche Stokes Fear of COVID-19 Vaccine To Promote His Own Flawed 'Solution'] by Alex Kasprak, March 26, 2021, ''Snopes''</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.houstonpress.com/news/a-possible-new-anti-vaccine-scam-is-on-the-rise-11591162|title=The Real Dangers in the False COVID Remedy Promoters Like Bret Weinstein|first=Jef|last=Rouner|publisher=Houston Press|date=2021-06-29}}</ref> In Weinstein's interview with Vanden Bossche, the two agreed that trying to stop the spread of a virus puts "evolutionary pressure" on the virus to spread.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyAovuUxro&t=1790s DarkHorse Podcast with Geert Vanden Bossche & Bret Weinstein]</ref> Becoming an anti-vaxxer over this [[tautology]] seems like a big leap, but Weinstein regards Vanden Bossche as especially credible because he was supposedly unique in predicting the Delta variant in 2021. In truth, there was no shortage of researchers writing that harmful variants would proliferate,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/1/can-a-waiver-on-ip-rights-solve-vaccine|title=Patently unfair: Can waivers help solve COVID vaccine inequality?|first=Virginia|last=Pietromarchi|publisher=Al Jazeera|date=2021-03-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/01/28/vaccine-rollout-covid-19-economic-unrest/|title=The Global Vaccine Rollout Is Failing—and That Puts Everyone, Everywhere, In Danger|first=Jonathan|last=Tepperman|publisher=Foreign Policy|date=2021-01-28}}</ref> they just finished the sentence with "if we don't vaccinate fast enough" rather than "if we vaccinate at all".

Authors of actual studies into the prophylactic use of ivermectin recognize that it would be foolish to rely on it as the only line of defense.<ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698683/The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with non-severe COVID-19: A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial] ''NIH''</ref><ref>[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30464-8/fulltext The effect of early treatment with ivermectin on viral load, symptoms and humoral response in patients with non-severe COVID-19: A pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial] ''The Lancet''</ref> Even if it were as effective as Weinstein claims, there would be no good reason to reject the vaccine. Unless one wants the type of crisis seen with [[HIV]]&nbsp;— resulting from the difficulty of taking medicine forever on a strict schedule. This obsession of Weinstein, and its potential to cause much more damage than his usual blather, looks like it has finally caused colleagues on the Intellectual Dark Web to turn on him.<ref name = "q">[https://archive.ph/HOxYI Looking for COVID-19 miracle drugs? We already have them. They're called vaccines] by Claire Berlinski and Yuri Deigin (July 6, 2021) [redacted] (archived from 7 Aug 2021 08:51:28 UTC).</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://areomagazine.com/2021/08/12/on-bret-weinstein-alternative-media-ivermectin-and-vaccine-related-controversies/|title=On Bret Weinstein, alternative media, Ivermectin and vaccine-related controversies|first=David|last=Fuller|publisher=Areo|date=2021-08-12}}</ref>

==HIV/AIDS denialism==
Weinstein, a frequent guest on [[Joe Rogan|The Joe Rogan Experience]], appeared on the show on a 2024 episode. Weinstein claimed that HIV was not the cause of AIDS and Rogan incredulously agreed with him. Both of them thought that the party drug known as "poppers" (alkyl nitrites).<ref>[https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuacohen/2024/02/15/joe-rogan-provides-a-platform-to-hivaids-denialists/ Joe Rogan Provides A Platform To HIV/AIDS Denialists] by Joshua Cohen (Feb 15, 2024,10:40pm EST) ''Forbes''.</ref> Poppers had long been discredited as causative of AIDS, but rather poppers had been ''associated'' with sexual behavior among [[gay]] men in the 1980s who had contracted HIV/AIDS,<ref>[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14740789/ Poppers: epidemiology and clinical management of inhaled nitrite abuse] by Frank Romanelli (2004) ''Pharmacotherapy'' 24(1):69-78. doi:10.1592/phco.24.1.69.34801.</ref><ref>[https://academic.oup.com/smr/article-abstract/12/1/67/7240000 Poppers use and HIV infection—a literature review] by Kalil B. Abdalla et al. (2023) ''Sexual Medicine Reviews'' 12(1);67–75. doi:0.1093/sxmrev/qead035.</ref> i.e. [[correlation does not imply causation]].

==Tinfoil hat quackery==
When Weinstein and Heying had technical trouble turning on their cameras during a podcast, Weinstein blamed it on "external interference" and literally put [[tinfoil hats]] on his cameras before concluding it was due to [[radiation]] from the [[Fukushima]] nuclear disaster.<ref> https://youtu.be/T9E3fRIZykA?t=499 </ref> They also describe the evidence for [[water fluoridation]] as preposterous, which they say comes from industrial waste and that it's insane to medicate in this way.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_iJaExg2_4 DarkHorse Podcast with Geert Vanden Bossche & Bret Weinstein] by Bret Weinstein, ''YouTube''</ref> Even though all of the Weinsteins are very proud of their thinking, the ''Weinsteins are probably not the next Galileo.''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.skeptic.org.uk/2021/06/youre-probably-not-galileo-scientific-advance-rarely-comes-from-lone-contrarian-outsiders/|title=You’re probably not Galileo: scientific advance rarely comes from lone, contrarian outsiders|first1=Matthew|last1=Browne|first2=Chris|last2=Kavanagh|publisher=The Skeptic|date=2021-06-23}}</ref>

==Other takes==
In May 2018, Weinstein testified before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRIKJCKWla4</ref> This was part of their hearing on "Challenges to the Freedom of Speech on College Campuses".<ref>https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=108337</ref> According to Weinstein, one of the perks of winning a midterm election is that this enables the winning party to go through the House archives and remove the videos of people it doesn't like.<ref name="harpers-letter" />

Many other [[free speech]] activists were hopeful in July 2020, when ''Harper's Magazine'' published their "Letter on Justice and Open Debate", signed by [[Noam Chomsky]], [[Salman Rushdie]] and a number of other academics and media figures.<ref>[https://harpers.org/a-letter-on-justice-and-open-debate/ A Letter on Justice and Open Debate]. Harpers, 7 July 2020.</ref> Weinstein had two complaints: first that he wasn't invited to sign it, and second that he wouldn't have signed it anyway because it didn't take a strong enough stance.<ref name="harpers-letter">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoVT_-ISDn8</ref>

Also in July 2020, Weinstein got into a dispute with Matt Lech, the producer and longtime friend of the late internationalist podcaster Michael Brooks.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ixkB2huVOQ</ref> This happened when Homeland Security agents in Portland, [[Oregon]], at the behest of then-President Trump, started rounding up suspected rioters for questioning in unmarked vans. Weinstein supported the crackdown and stated that one of his viewers, who works for the [[Department of Homeland Security]], had a discussion with him about the possibility of an impending [[race war]]. Lech tweeted that it was troubling to see such reactionary ideas elevated through what he [[Satire|sarcastically]] called "consulting work" by Weinstein. Lech, who has been more charitable to Weinstein than many of his critics, quickly deleted the tweet and posted a clarification that all of this advising was in fact unpaid.<ref>[https://archive.ph/yEmzU If the sole problem @BretWeinstein has with this thread is that his talk with a DHS official about possible race war is that it was voluntary and unpaid, I would be delighted to note that correction] by Matt Lech (12:35 PM · Jul 18, 2020) ''Twitter'' (archived from 3 Oct 2021 20:07:40 UTC).</ref> Nevertheless, Weinstein asked for Matt Lech to be fired and went on to explain how this is [[denialism|completely consistent with his distaste for]] [[cancel culture]].

Heying and Weinstain finally wrote their first book in September 2021, which was titled, ''A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21<sup>st</sup> Century''. It was perfectly summed up by ''[[The Guardian]]'' as ''"lazily written and really annoying,"'' and ''"self-help laced with pseudoscience."''<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/sep/24/a-hunter-gatherers-guide-to-the-21st-century-review-sciencey-self-help|title=A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21<sup>st</sup> Century review – self-help laced with pseudoscience|first=Stuart|last=Ritchie|publisher=The Guardian|date=2021-09-24}}</ref> The book's core argument is that human evolution hasn't caught up with our adaptations.<ref> https://youtu.be/2U5CfXuY8KI?t=605</ref> This is despite that our technological adaptations allow us to live much longer than our cavemen ancestors without worrying as much about food scarcity. One galaxy-brained takeaway from the book was that you should avoid eating foods that your ancestors didn't eat.<ref>[https://archive.ph/tEzoY Bret and Heather say: no race-mixing, but for your food] by @thebirdmaniac (5:16 PM · Sep 20, 2021) ''Twitter'' (archived from 4 Oct 2021 06:42:40 UTC).</ref> Perhaps someone needs to inform the Irish that "science" says it's time to take away their Incan potatoes for the {{wpl|Great Famine (Ireland)|second time}}? Their argument also doesn't take into account how non-historical modern ideas about ethnicities are, and how our contemporary ideas about nation-states don't at all map onto the genes of ancient moving peoples. It's simply a mistake to suppose that modern Italians are mostly the same as the diverse ethnic groups that {{wpl|Genetic history of Italy|lived and mixed together in the region}}.

Weinstein also believes that Justin Trudeau may be secretly gay.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkTe9TLDjys</ref> Makes one wonder why he cares so much about the sexuality of this man; perhaps his subconscious is trying to tell us something.

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Weinstein, Bret}}
[[Category:Anti-vaccination movement]]
[[Category:Biologists]]
[[Category:Denialists]]
[[Category:HIV/AIDS]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Intellectual Dark Web]]
[[Category:Shysters]]

Categories: Anti-vaccination movement, Biologists, Denialists, HIV/AIDS, Living people, Intellectual Dark Web, Shysters