ArXiv

{{DISPLAYTITLE:arXiv}}{{sciencenav}}
'''arXiv''' is a preprint archive, serving up [[peer review|unreviewed]] papers in "[[Physics]], [[Mathematics]], [[Computer]] Science, Quantitative [[Biology]], Quantitative Finance and [[Statistics]]." It is the standard way to quickly get the word out (and stake out credit) in [[physics]], particularly particle physics and [[astrophysics]].

Anyone can upload a paper to arXiv if they have an endorsement, leading to the expected seas of [[green ink]]. Fortunately, papers for most topic categories require at least one other person to endorse them and the moderators are quite experienced in dealing with [[crank]]s. The ''unfiltered'' topic categories ("general physics", "general mathematics") are pretty much "abandon brain all ye who enter here."  Whether that paper appears in the intended category is determined by the moderators, who in many cases are anonymous.

==viXra==
In defence of the spirit of free science and enquiry, '''viXra''' (an arXiv of their own) was founded "by scientists who find they are unable to submit their articles to arXiv.org because of Cornell University's policy of endorsements and moderation designed to filter out e-prints that they consider inappropriate."<ref>http://vixra.org/</ref>

Given some of the lunacy available on arXiv, you can guess what sort of content viXra accumulates: lots of [[Electric Universe]] [[crankery]] and occasional [[global warming denialism]], and [[Pseudomathematics|"proofs"]] of famous mathematical conjectures, notably the {{wpl|Riemann hypothesis}} and the {{wpl|Goldbach conjecture}}, which for some reason no serious mathematician gives a hoot about. viXra also directly invokes the [[Galileo gambit]] with their blog category "'Crackpots' who were right".<ref>http://blog.vixra.org/category/crackpots-who-were-right/</ref>

viXra also features blog-style comments for each abstract, which are a delight even by the standards of the bottom half of the Internet.<ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0018 An excellent example.]</ref>

The scientific world is mostly amused, insofar as it takes any notice at all.<ref>[http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2009/07/whats_arxiv_spelled_backwards.html What's arXiv spelled backwards? A new place to publish] (''The Great Beyond'', Nature Blogs, July 16 2009</ref><ref>[http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/07/archives-vixraorg-against-arxivorg.html Archives: viXra.org against arXiv.org] (''[[Luboš Motl|The Reference Frame]]'', 16 July 2009)</ref><ref>[http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/39845 Fledgling site challenges arXiv server] (physicsworld.com, 15 July 2009)</ref><ref>[http://tsm2.blogspot.com/2010/06/arxiv-or-vixra.html arXiv or viXra?] (''the blog formerly known as The Statistical Mechanic'', June 10 2010)</ref> The founder claims [[Stopped clock|some papers of value]] that made it to peer-reviewed publication, though.<ref>http://blog.vixra.org/2010/07/11/they-call-me-a-crank-now-lol/#comment-894</ref>

The culmination of the entire viXra knowledge is being condensed in a single, high-density website, called Vixrapedia.<ref>[https://www.vixrapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Vixrapedia]</ref>

==snarXiv==
The other alternative to arXiv's oppressive and hidebound strictures, the '''snarXiv'''<ref>http://snarxiv.org/</ref> generates abstracts of papers that damn well ''should'' exist.<ref>http://davidsd.org/2010/03/the-snarxiv/</ref> Play [http://snarxiv.org/vs-arxiv/ ''arXiv vs snarXiv''] and see how well you can avoid [[Postmodernism#Sokal affair|Sokaling]] yourself!

==Ruining the joke==
''arXiv'' is pronounced as ''archive''; In Greek, the capital letter chi (Χ) became ex (X) in the [[Latin]] alphabet by way of Etruscan.<ref group=note>Or rather, the same letterform was used in Western Greek for /ks/ and Eastern Greek for /kʰ/.</ref>

==External links==
*[http://www.arxiv.org arXiv]
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/01/science/world-science-becomes-global-village-archive-opens-new-realm-research.html The World of Science Becomes a Global Village; Archive Opens a New Realm of Research], [[The New York Times]], '''2001''' (among the other stuff mentions the rise of [[Luboš Motl]])
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11960756 Bangs big and small in cosmic origins debate] - the world of fast-moving preprint debate.

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{reflist}}

[[Category:Science]]
[[Category:Websites]]

Categories: Science, Websites