Doomsday Clock

{{Cquote|'''Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.'''<br />
Who watches the watchmen?|20px|20px|Quoted as the epigraph of the Tower Commision Report, 1987}}

[[File:Doomsday_clock_(1.5_minutes).svg|thumb|right|160px|The clock's current setting.]]
{{politics}}
The '''Doomsday Clock''' is a device maintained by the [[United States|American]] periodical and nonprofit organization '''''{{w|Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists||,}}''''' which is used to indicate the threat of a [[nuclear war|nuclear]], biological, or [[global warming|environmental]] disaster. It is a clock face, where midnight represents a nuclear war or an environmental catastrophe, and noon represents world [[peace]]. It has been "operational" since 1947 when it first appeared on the cover of the ''Bulletin'', where it has appeared ever since. It has changed 27 times since 1947, moving forwards 19 times whilst moving backwards 8 times. The lowest time it reached was 11:43 in 1991, following the Soviet Union's collapse. It was previously closest to midnight during 1953, after the US and the USSR tested their thermonuclear weapons, where it read 11:58.<ref>"Doomsday Clock Timeline." ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,'' 9 Sept 2009, http://www.thebulletin.org/content/doomsday-clock/timeline Doomsday Clock Timeline.</ref> This record would later be broken in 2026, where it read 11:58.35, a mere 85 seconds to midnight.<ref>[https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2026-statement/ 2026 Doomsday Clock statement] (Jan. 27, 2026). ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists''</ref>

==Timeline==
[[Image:Doomsday Clock graph.svg|thumb|center|500px|Graph of the changes to the Doomsday Clock time since 1947. Note: The lower the graph becomes, the higher the probability of catastrophe is deemed to be.]]

In recent times, the clock has been changing for the worse, albeit slowly. On January 22, 2015, it was set "3 minutes to midnight", due to "unchecked climate change, global nuclear weapons modernizations, and outsized nuclear weapons arsenals", and the failure of "international leaders" to do anything about it.<ref>Mecklin, John. "Press release: It is now 3 minutes to midnight." ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists'', https://thebulletin.org/2015/01/press-release-it-is-now-3-minutes-to-midnight/. Accessed 4 February 2015.</ref> In January 2017, it was set "2.5 minutes to midnight", due to [[Donald Trump]].<ref>Chappell, Bill. "The Doomsday Clock Is Reset: Closest To Midnight Since The 1950s." ''National Public Radio'', https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/26/511592700/the-doomsday-clock-is-now-30-seconds-closer-to-midnight. Accessed 26 January 2017.</ref> The clock changed in January 2018, when it was again set "2 minutes to midnight" — a level unseen since 1953 — mostly due to [[Donald Trump]] once more.<ref>Borger, Julian. "Doomsday Clock ticked forward 30 seconds to 2 minutes to midnight." ''The Guardian'', https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/25/doomsday-clock-ticked-forward-trump-nuclear-weapons-climate-change. Accessed 6 October 2021.</ref> The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists said it saw an increase in dangers to humanity, from climate change to nuclear warfare.<ref>"2018 Doomsday Clock Statement." ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,'' 26 Jan 2018, https://thebulletin.org/2018-doomsday-clock-statement]</ref> On January 23rd, 2020, the clock was set ''100 seconds'' to midnight, the closest the clock had ever been to midnight.<ref>Mecklin, John. "2020 Doomsday Clock Statement." ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,'' https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/2020-doomsday-clock-statement/. Accessed 26 March 2020.</ref> The clock's time was reaffirmed on January 27th, 2021.<ref>Mecklin, John. "2021 Doomsday Clock Statement." ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,'' https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/. Accessed 29 July 2021.</ref> In January 2023 it moved to 90 seconds, due to the war in [[Ukraine]], which not only risked escalation into a wider conflict but also caused damage to wider norms about how nations interact with each other.<ref>[https://info.thebulletin.org/2023-Doomsday-Clock-Statement 2023 Doomsday Clock Statement], ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,'' Jan 24, 2023</ref>

The worst part regarding all of this is that nobody seems to acknowledge nor care about these solemn warnings.

[[Image:Debtclock.jpg|thumb|center|300px|A different kind of clock, counting towards a different kind of doom]]

<div style="text-align:center;font-size:40px;" aria-hidden="true">&#10086;</div>

{{Cquote|It would be a stronger world, a stronger loving world, to die in.|20px|20px|John Cale}}

==Criticism==
The clock has received a variety of criticism, over its form, its accuracy, and transparency. One internet humorist remarked sarcastically:
<blockquote>Our metaphor for the apocalypse will be the clock, a thing that moves irregularly and doesn’t change unless you manually adjust it<ref>[https://twitter.com/pixelatedboat/status/1617984667151634432 Our metaphor for the apocalypse will be the clock, a thing that moves irregularly and doesn’t change unless you manually adjust it], @pixelatedboat on Twitter, Jan 24, 2023</ref></blockquote>
There is a basic problem in taking two separate factors, the risk of nuclear war and the risk of climate change, and combining them into a single numerical value, when the two risks are not particularly similar — a countdown to a nuclear apocalypse makes some sense conceptually, but the metaphor is less successful for a more gradual process where the exact tipping point into catastrophe is unclear and may already have happened. Arguably the clock should tick forwards a little with each quantity of carbon dioxide expelled into the atmosphere, but instead it mostly sits stationary.<ref>[https://www.wired.co.uk/article/doomsday-clock-climate-change Is It Time to Call Time on the Doomsday Clock?], Wired, Jan 24, 2023</ref> There has also been criticism that the clock doesn't have a transparent rubric explaining how the various factors are translated into a time.<ref>[https://thebulletin.org/2022/06/some-disagree-that-it-is-100-seconds-to-midnight-these-undergrads-held-a-debate/ Some disagree that it is 100 seconds to midnight. These undergrads held a debate], Nitish Vaidyanathan, ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists'', June 2, 2022</ref>

==See also==
*[[Rapture]]
*[[Mutually assured destruction]]
*[[Cold War]]
*[[Death clock]]

==External links==
*[http://www.thebulletin.org/ ''Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists'']

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

[[Category:Cold War]]
[[Category:End of the world]]
[[Category:Environmentalism]]
[[Category:Nuclear energy]]
[[Category:Science]]

Categories: Cold War, End of the world, Environmentalism, Nuclear energy, Science