Ultimate fate of the Universe

{{Astronomy}}{{Physics}}
{{cquote|I had a dream, which was not all a dream.<br />
The bright sun was extinguish'd, and the stars<br />
Did wander darkling in the eternal space,<br />
Rayless, and pathless, and the icy earth<br />
Swung blind and blackening in the moonless air|||Lord Byron<ref>[https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43825/darkness-56d222aeeee1b ''Darkness''] by Lord Byron, Poetry Foundation.</ref>}}
The '''ultimate fate of the Universe''', based on scientific observations and not [[theological]] or [[myth]]ological belief, has been a topic of scientific research for decades. This article deals with the current [[scientific consensus]]{{efn|For history and what's behind what follows check, {{wpl|Ultimate fate of the Universe}} at the other Wiki.}} and includes some speculation on what would happen with [[life]] in any of the proposed scenarios for it.<ref group=note><b>SPOILER ALERT</b>. Do not hold too much hope for it.</ref>

==Role of cosmological parameters and shape==
The critical density of the [[Universe]], expressed by the [[Greek]] letter '''Ω''',<ref>A sum of the Universe's [[matter]] (both normal and [[Dark matter|dark]]) density '''Ω<sub>m</sub>''' &mdash; plus the dark energy density ('''Ω<sub>Λ</sub>''') now that it's known to exist</ref> has a very important role to determine what will happen to the Universe, as its shape depends on that value: a value less than 1 means a Universe of negative curvature ("Open Universe"), that will expand forever while if '''Ω''' was larger than 1 the Universe would have a positive curvature ("Closed Universe"), that would expand to a point before halting its expansion and imploding on itself (see further).<ref group=note>Unless dark energy dominated over matter, in which case the Universe would also expand forever.</ref> The case of '''Ω''' being exactly 1 is the one of a Universe of zero curvature ("Flat Universe"), that will keep expanding forever but with said expansion slowing with time until it stopped after an infinite time. Current measurements are coincident with a flat Universe,<ref group=note>There're [https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.02087 claims] of some of our best data supporting a closed Universe instead, but not only other datasets show preferences with a flat one this bringing conflicts with them, but also the claimants say more observations are required to confirm that.</ref> thus with exactly the critical density and that in theory would keep expanding forever, but slower and slower.<ref name=planck2018>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06209 Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameterss]. Note how the matter density parameter is less than one third of the critical density.</ref>

This simplistic view was changed in 1998 with the discovery of the ''acceleration'' of the Universe's expansion. Most models suggest that "[[dark energy]]", a negative pressure field that opposes [[gravity]] and whose most simplistic model is a cosmological constant (a value of [[Zero-point energy|vacuum's energy]] density) represented by the also Greek letter '''Λ''', is the thing to blame. Said acceleration means that even if '''Ω''' was larger than 1, unless '''Λ''' was small enough the Universe would not collapse again and as we'll see below has deep implications for the future of the Universe assuming it does not change with time<ref group=note>It's not known how will evolve dark energy in the future: if it will not change, will dissipate (and the Universe will keep expanding but not in runaway fashion), or will become positive (attractive), causing a collapse of the Universe (which seems unlikely). [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/544/1/975/8281988?login=false There's growing evidence] dark energy may have changed with time and the Universe's expansion may not be accelerating after all. However it's still too early to know how it will evolve with time and which of these three possibilities will happen (four if you include dark energy going bonkers and causing a Big Rip).</ref>

Before we go on, note how what follows it's if the laws of physics will not change in the future or at least not too much, which especially in the case of the most ludicrously high dates described further down is a ''very'' big "if".

===Big Freeze: everything fading away===
Based on an indefinite expansion of the Universe as stated above, the most likely scenario for its end is known as "Big Freeze", what considers that its expansion will continue indefinitely. However  while that looks like [[immortality]], it is actually much closer to a ''very'' slow death as the Universe will end up reaching heat death: a state of maximum entropy with similar temperatures (thus with no further possibilities to do any work) everywhere and too cold to support any kind of [[life]]. As we'll see in the next sections, the amounts of time needed for the processes that will take place in that future and will lead to that end are ''far beyond'' our grasp but compared to the eternity that awaits are nothing.<ref group=note>While according to our current understanding the events described further ''will'' happen, the times given are estimations so real ones could be more or less off. This of course also means that, say, the Degenerate Era will not begin ''exactly'' at 00:00 of January 1st of the year 100,000,000,000,000.</ref>

After the work of Fred Adams and Gregory Laughlin in 1997<ref name=adamslaughlin1997>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997RvMP...69..337A A dying universe: the long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects]</ref> the history of the Universe has been divided into five "ages": the "Primordial Era", the "Stelliferous Era", the "Degenerate Era", the "Black Hole Era" and the "Dark Era". The first one is far away in the past corresponding to the times between the [[Big Bang]] and the formation of the first [[star]]s, a few hundred million years after it.

==== Stelliferous Era ====
[[File:Expansion_of_the_universe,_comoving_coordinates_(Animation).gif|thumb|right|165px|The evolution of the universe and its horizons in {{wpl|Comoving_and_proper_distances|comoving distances}}, assuming dark energy keeps accelerating its expansion]]

The "Stelliferous Era" began a few hundred million years after the Big Bang, when the first stars formed,<ref group=note>More exactly, [http://sci.esa.int/planck/58193-first-stars-formed-even-later-than-previously-thought/ 700 million years] after the Big Bang</ref> and we're within it. As the name implies, it is an epoch in which stars are abundant objects and it's expected to last until 10<sup>14</sup> years into the future, when standard star formation will have ceased, having exhausted the available gas, and all of them up to their remnants have ceased to shine.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> However many things will happen before lights go out<ref group=note>We assume here that dark energy will not change and the Universe's expansion will keep its acceleration, albeit with no Big Rip. However, even if it stopped (as some recent observations suggest, see above) and the Universe expanded at a much slower rate details would not change very much except that the times given for processes that depend of dark energy (ie, the evolution of large-scale structure) would be considerably longer and there'd be no Hawking-like radiation coming from the cosmological horizon as it wouldn't exist</ref>.

The current large-scale structure of the Universe is 
[[Infinite regress|Turtles all the way down]] with one [[Discworld|turtle flying elsewhere]]
 an extensive web-like network of filaments and walls of galaxies, with its nodes corresponding to galaxy clusters and especially superclusters, surrounding large (sometimes {{wpl|KBC Void|''very'' large}}), empty, extensions. Under the accelerated expansion of the Universe caused by dark energy it's expected this structure will freeze its evolution and be torn apart stopping the growth of said galactic clusters and superclusters leaving isolated galaxies and clusters of galaxies that will have become "island universes" completely disconnected one from each other and separated by ever-expanding voids stopping structure formation. This is expected to culminate 150 billion years in the future, when all galaxies outside the {{Wpl|Local Supercluster}} (or whatever remains of it in those distant epochs) will be so redshifted that they will be unobservable.<ref name=kraussstarkman1999>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...531...22K Life, the Universe, and Nothing: Life and Death in an Ever-expanding Universe]</ref> Other research paints an even bleaker picture, in which our {{Wpl|Local Group}} will be entirely isolated within that time frame with no galaxies outside it visible, as the {{wpl|cosmological horizon}} (ie, the radius of the observable Universe), currently at more than 46 billion light-years from us, shrinks to "just" 41 million light-years, long before stars stop shining.<ref name=bushaadams2003>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596..713B Future Evolution of Cosmic Structure in an Accelerating Universe]</ref><ref group=note>In both cases such faraway galaxies, like an object that falls into a black hole once it passes through the event horizon as seen from an observer outside the hole, would appear frozen in the time they crossed the cosmological horizon and redshifting until they were totally unobservable. Compare also such future distance to the cosmological horizon to the present distance to the {{wpl|Virgo Cluster}}, the nearest large cluster of galaxies (54 million light years).</ref>

At smaller scales, it's expected that galactic clusters and superclusters will change their shape from the current, flattened, ones to almost spherical ones within a similar timeframe (around 100 billion years from now) losing their current structure and as noted above stopping their growth, and in the case of superclusters of galaxies {{Wpl|Mass segregation|mass segregation}} causing them to have their most massive galaxy clusters being concentrated on their central regions while the lightest ones are sent to the periphery, to finally merge ceasing to exist as distinct clusters of galaxies. However most of the current galaxies and groups of them will end up alone, not in said groupings.<ref name=arayameloetal2009>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.399...97A Future evolution of bound superclusters in an accelerating Universe]</ref> In ''clusters'' of galaxies, besides the continuation of processes that are currently going on as {{Wpl|Interacting_galaxy#Galaxy_harassment|galaxy_harassment}} and {{Wpl|Ram_pressure#Galactic_ram_pressure_stripping|ram-pressure stripping|,}} mass segregation at smaller scales will cause the lightest galaxies to be expelled to the outside of them, up to leaving said clusters due to gravitational interactions with others and accelerating that way said process, while the heaviest ones go to its core and given enough time those will merge to form large systems until there are no more galaxies to fuse with.<ref group=note>For the Local Group, where our galaxy &mdash; the Milky Way &mdash; lives, it's expected that its two largest galaxies, it and [[Andromeda Galaxy|Andromeda]] {{Wpl|Andromeda-Milky Way collision|will merge}} within 4-5 billion years even if others consider it will happen (much) later, followed by the gobble-up of all other galaxies in the Group between 100 billion and 1 trillion years in the future. Due to its much larger size, galaxy clusters as {{Wpl|Virgo cluster|Virgo}} may not experiment a similar fate until much later when all lights have gone out.</ref> Meanwhile in spiral and irregular galaxies remaining around, the trickle of infalling cosmic cold gas thought to fuel star formation<ref name=Schawinskietal2014>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440..889S The green valley is a red herring: Galaxy Zoo reveals two evolutionary pathways towards quenching of star formation in early- and late-type galaxies]</ref> will very likely be shut off too due the isolation mentioned above caused by dark energy, with star formation slowing down considerably.

Finally when we turn to the stars themselves while they return to the interstellar medium some of the gas they're made of in the course of their evolution not only more or less of the stars' mass is finally locked away on a compact, inert, remnant ({{Wpl|white dwarf}} (planet-sized, left behind by low and medium-mass stars), {{Wpl|neutron star||,}} (a city-sized corpse of high-mass ones), or [[black hole]] for the most massive of them) but also that the returned gas comes enriched (or polluted, as you prefer) with elements made in the nuclear reactions that took place in the stars' innards during their lives, means the hydrogen reserves to form new stars are being exhausted despite new gas accreted either from the {{wpl|Galactic corona|intergalactic medium}}<ref name=andromedacorona>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.6540 Evidence for a Massive, Extended Circumgalactic Medium Around the Andromeda Galaxy]</ref> or accreted gas-rich galaxies and star formation being self-regulated (the more the hydrogen reserve dwindles, the less star formation takes place), while helium, metallicity,<ref group=note>In astronomy, abundance of anything that is not hydrogen or helium in a given celestial body.</ref> and the number of stellar corpses are increasing with time. Star formation is expected to go on for hundreds of billions of years, and may last for up to a trillion (10<sup>12</sup>) years or even more.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> However stars of those very late times will be different than the current ones because of the mentioned ever-growing abundances of helium and heavier elements,<ref group=note>It's expected, by the way, in those late times said abundances will be 20% hydrogen/60% helium/20% metals (elements heavier than helium) compared to the current ones of 74% hydrogen/24% helium/2% metals (see {{wpl|Abundance of the chemical elements|here}}).
Heavy metal future indeed.</ref> with them having considerably shorter lifetimes than current stars (even if such high future metallicity could compensate it to a point, causing the star to be less luminous thus lasting longer<ref name=reddwarf/>) and the most massive of them being lighter than modern ones.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/><ref group=note>Besides both their {{wpl|Spectral classification|looks}} and evolution presumably being different because of such abundance of helium and metals, considering the higher the metallicity also the redder, thus cooler, the star. See [https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sept14/Conroy/Conroy5.html here]</ref> Conversely, that will cause low-mass stars to be still more likely to form than high-mass ones and even the minimum mass for an object to be able to fuse [[hydrogen]] may be lowered, the final consequence being the formation of "frozen stars" with temperatures of just a couple hundred K that would radiate in the infrared shining much less than even the smallest stars of today, thus lasting even more,<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> and presumably before such kind of stars others hotter and more luminous than these but much colder and fainter than present-day ones (i.e., just hot enough to shine with a very faint dull red) could also form in such distant days.

[[File:FutureLuminosityMilkyWay.gif|thumb|right|165px|The luminosity of the Milky Way galaxy (or rather the remnant of its future merger with Andromeda) through the Stelliferous era]]
As time goes on, there'll be a last star massive enough to go supernova, a last Sun-like star, and finally only the lowest-mass stars ({{Wpl|Red dwarf|red dwarfs}}) will remain after having literally buried all others. As their expected lifetimes (up to trillions of years) are considerably longer than the current age of the Universe, their evolution has been studied using computer modelling. The modelling shows how the least massive and longest lived of such stars do not expand into red giants, but instead become more luminous and hotter as they age, transforming into "{{Wpl|Blue dwarf (red-dwarf stage)|blue dwarfs}}", that exist for billions of years before dying as white dwarfs.<ref name=reddwarf>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004RMxAC..22...46A Red Dwarfs and the End of the Main Sequence]</ref><ref name=bluedwarf>[https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...482..420L/abstract The End of the Main Sequence]</ref> Thanks to such increase in luminosity that will compensate the death of more massive stars (and red dwarf stars being the most abundant type of star by far), future galaxies will be about as luminous as modern ones (and after having red dwarf colors for a time, they'll become bluer in a sort of apparent rejuvenation mimicking the evolution of their stars) for several hundred billion years before beginning to fade away once even the lowest mass red dwarfs, unable go red giant, begin to die as white dwarfs until the Universe finally goes dark at least in visible light ending this era.<ref name=reddwarf/>

An interesting caveat of the processes outlined above is that 
to the rejoice of [[Young Earth creationism|certain people]]
 the pillars that support the Big Bang theory (cosmic microwave background, existence of distant galaxies and expansion of the Universe, and the primordial abundances of hydrogen and helium) will go away leaving hypothetical aliens that could exist by those late epochs with no ways to know how everything began.<ref name=kraussscherrer2007>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007GReGr..39.1545K The return to an static universe and the end of cosmology]. As the only way to know the actual past history of the Universe would be records that managed to survive to those late ages, it has jokingly been suggested that cosmology may become a sort of religion. Also, those beings could fathom the origin and the fate of their island Universe, but that's all.</ref> It is also worth of special consideration in what regards to the cosmic microwave background how in just some hundreds of billions of years from now,<ref name=kraussstarkman1999/> when there're still many stars around, after having been redshifted into oblivion, it will be replaced by the equivalent of Hawking radiation emitted by the cosmological horizon, at an uniform temperature of 10<sup>-29</sup>K, which as noted further down will have quite unpleasant consequences in the still more distant future of the Universe.

What about [[Earth]] and the [[Sun]]?. The former will almost certainly be destroyed -like poor [[Mercury#The_planet|Mercury]] and [[Venus]]- around 7.59 billion years from now by the latter going red giant after it exhausts its central hydrogen supply roughly 4.8 billion years from now (stellar evolution takes its time), absorbing it,<ref name=mnras361>[https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.4031 Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited]</ref> but not before all of them having been burned to Hell and back (it seems Venus cannot catch a break), and leaving as all proof of its existence just a tiny increase of the Sun's metallicity.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> Meanwhile the latter after 120 million years of fusing on its core the helium result of hydrogen burning, some instabilities, and an ejection of its outer layers as a planetary [[nebula]] will become a white dwarf with half of its current mass<ref name=mnras361/> that will fade away as a black dwarf. The outer [[Solar System]] planets are expected to survive the ordeal and orbit the dead Sun.<ref name=veras2016>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05419 Post-main-sequence planetary system evolution]</ref>

==== Degenerate Era ====
[[File:FutureUniverse.png|thumb|right|165px|The Universe from the Degenerate Era onwards, as it would appear to human eyes (
Artist's
 impression).]]
The "Degenerate Era" will 
be an era of moral degeneration and depravity
 begin 10<sup>14</sup> years in the future, but its end depends on whether protons are unstable or not. If protons decay, depending on the latter's unknown half-life, may last from around 10<sup>30</sup> years,<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> to 10<sup>40</sup> years or up to 10<sup>200</sup> years,<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> far beyond the evaporation of black holes (see further).<ref group=note>Remember here the meaning of powers of ten: from, for example from 10<sup>14</sup> to 10<sup>15</sup> there're 10 times the amount from 0 to 10<sup>14</sup>. Times are, as stated at first, so long that seem like eternity. But they're not eternity.</ref> This Universe will be almost entirely dark to an organ such as the human eye, but not so in other wavelengths, plus will generally be ''very'' cold, as in almost absolute zero, and especially lonely for the reasons noted above.
The protagonists of those distant times will be the cooled corpses left behind by stars: {{wpl|Black dwarf|black dwarfs}} (white dwarfs that emit no [[radiation]] at all having finally cooled to the temperature of their surroundings and crystallized (read: become solid),<ref name=crystalstar>[https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...605L.133M/abstract  Testing White Dwarf Crystallization Theory with Asteroseismology of the Massive Pulsating DA Star BPM 37093]</ref>) neutron stars, and black holes (the first two are composed of {{Wpl|degenerate matter||,}} giving this epoch its name). Plus a veritable number of {{Wpl|Brown dwarf|brown dwarfs|,}}<ref group=note>Better said dense, Jupiter-sized, balls of hydrogen-rich ices with lakes of liquid helium after, as white dwarfs, having cooled to the temperature of their surroundings</ref> even more of what can be considered debris — planets, asteroids, comets, you name it —, and finally some gas that has managed not to have been incorporated into stars or dispersed away. All that stuff will keep orbiting around the centers of their dead galaxies. As time goes by, very close approaches between (dead) stars passing too close will be more likely to happen. They, if taking place too close, may even dislodge planetary systems that would have survived to those distant epochs, estimations suggesting that by around 10<sup>15</sup> years most stars will have lost their planets.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/>

Stellar collisions will also happen, their outcomes depending of the nature of the colliding bodies. Two colliding brown dwarfs may produce a red dwarf (plus planets around it if an accretion disk managed to form around,<ref group=note>As [[Phil Plait]] comments in one of his books, imagine the kind of legends that could imagine a hypothetical civilization born in such a planet and epoch where the night sky would be pitch black with no stars at all.</ref>) that will shine for around 10<sup>13</sup> years. This will be a channel to form new stars, which is estimated will form relatively many of them and will be able to let a [[Milky Way]]-sized galaxy have around 100 hydrogen-fusing stars for a long time, as long as there're brown dwarfs around to give birth new stars as the old ones die away. If the collisions are between black dwarfs, more exotic objects such as helium-burning or carbon-burning stars, whose lifetimes will be considerably shorter, may be born.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/><ref name=Schwab2016>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.02300 The Evolution and Fate of Super-Chandrasekhar Mass White Dwarf Merger Remnants]</ref> Another channel to form stars will be accretion with time of the very little remaining interstellar gas by said brown dwarfs.<ref name=Cirkovic2005>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005SerAJ.171...11C Brown Dwarf Accretion: Nonconventional Star Formation over Very Long Timescales]</ref> Far more energetic — and given the general darkness of the epoch far more spectacular than at present — events will also happen, among others {{Wpl|Type Ia supernova|Type Ia supernovae}} when either two black dwarfs massive enough collide or sufficient gas is accreted from the interstellar medium by a lone one,<ref name=Cirkovic2005/> plus {{Wpl|Gamma-ray burst|Gamma-ray bursts}} when two neutron stars are the objects that crash.

Time will keep ticking relentlessly and as time passes by those gravitational interactions — the so-called "dynamical relaxation" plus the already mentioned mass segregation — will disrupt with time [[Galaxy#Disk_galaxies|galactic disks]] still existing in those days and transform galaxies, disky or not, into systems composed of an extended halo and a dense core as the heaviest objects sink to the galactic center while the lightest ones are sent away or even expelled from the galaxy ("galactic evaporation"). The timeframe for this to happen is estimated to be 10<sup>20</sup> years onwards, and after it ends it will be supplemented by orbit decay due to emission of gravitational radiation, but on a considerably longer time scale (around 10<sup>24</sup> years).<ref group=note>On binary systems that have been able to survive to those ages, this will too be another channel to form stars. This will also be the fate of those planetary systems that managed to survive to such late epochs, their planets being {{wpl|Roche limit|disrupted}} by their long-dead stars.</ref><ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> On galaxy clusters and superclusters that still exist in that epoch, a similar process will occur at supergalactic scale with the most massive galaxies or whatever remains of them (read: supermassive black holes) falling to the center — to eventually merging, forming even more massive ones — and the lightest being sent to the periphery of the cluster.<ref name=blackhole>Frautschi, S., 1982. Entropy in an expanding universe. Science, 217(4560)</ref><ref group=note>Note also how besides that, galaxy mergers will still take place in this era, at least as long as galaxies as such instead of just supermassive black holes exist. However, besides them of course taking place in darkness, between galaxies of stellar corpses (so no way to see tidal tails and similar features), next to no hydrogen will mean no star formation marking them, and probably no active galactic nuclei too making them ''{{wpl|Galaxy_merger#By_gas_richness|extremely}}'' dry.</ref>

The final product of the processes outlined above will be that around 10<sup>30</sup> years, all that remain of galaxies and galaxy clusters will be supermassive (or more) black holes plus a lot of flotsam and jetsam roaming across the endless darkness<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> and if the Universe is still pressing the pedal to the metal way more alone than anything we can imagine, but not without a final display of fireworks as the mentioned objects that have fallen to the center of the galaxy will collide producing both a last burst of star formation<ref name=lambdaandsfr>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07301 The impact of the cosmological constant on past and future star formation]</ref> and an accretion disk around the central supermassive black hole, feeding a [[quasar]], which will last as long as matter is present, just around 10<sup>9</sup> years.<ref name=deeptime>''Deep Time'', David J. Darling, New York: Delacorte Press, 1989, ISBN 978-0-38529-757-8.</ref>

Assuming protons are unstable, their decay will be the next event of significance to happen in those distant epochs. While the time is dependent on the proton's unknown half-life, the results will be the same: a continuous decrease of the mass of a given object until it vanishes away plus decomposition of atoms until said object is just a lump of frozen hydrogen.<ref group=note>Remember that neutrons are unstable outside atomic bodies, with half-lives of less than 15 minutes</ref> This will also release a tiny trickle of energy heating said object, but just ''very'' little (a proton decay-powered black dwarf will emit just around 400 Watts).<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> For black dwarfs and neutron stars, the temperature that they will attain thanks to proton decay will be from 0.06K<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> to 1K<ref name=deeptime/> and in the case of neutron stars 100K,<ref name=deeptime/> in both cases quite hot compared to the tremendously cold Cosmos of that epoch. As their protons go away and they lose mass, they'll expand losing first their condition of degenerate objects, the black dwarf becoming then a frozen ball of hydrogen with the mass and diameter of Jupiter, and later their conditions of stars — when the object formerly known as a black dwarf is transparent to its radiation — to finally disappear.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> Neutron stars will suffer a similar fate, but their expansion may be explosive, destroying them.<ref name=adamslaughlin1998>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhRvD..58h3003A Gravitational demise of cold degenerate stars]</ref> As a final caveat, remember that the given lifetime of a proton is a ''half-life'', meaning that is the time needed for ''half'' of them to decay, plus that time again for half of the remaining ones to decay and so on. If a proton lasts 10<sup>37</sup> years, for example, by the year 10<sup>40</sup> they'll be no more, with the decay products being photons and leptons (electrons and positrons).

Were protons eternal, the Degenerate Era would last ''a whole lot'' more with [[Freeman Dyson]] among others having studied in depth what would happen in that case. First of all, with an Universe under runaway acceleration as ours where temperature is expected to reach an absolute minimum (10<sup>-29</sup>K)<ref name=bushaadams2003/><ref name=kraussstarkman1999/> while density is always decreasing, it's expected that matter would end up ionized, disintegrating anything material except stellar remnants and planets that still existed in such era leaving behind just stray atoms and subatomic particles,<ref>[http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/end.html End]</ref> event that could also happen if protons lasted enough. If it either did not happen or occurred much further away in time, quantum tunneling would cause matter to behave in scales of 10<sup>65</sup> years like a liquid, meaning everything would be roughly spherical with its chemical structure changed as atoms moved around (and those jokes about physicists and spherical cows in a vacuum would no longer be that). Much later the same process would begin to transform all normal matter into iron, and while Dyson gave originally a rough estimate of 10<sup>1500</sup> years for said event to be complete and considered it would be 
mostly
 harmless, finer calculations show how for at least the most massive black dwarfs this would take from 10<sup>1100</sup> years to an impressive 10<sup>32000</sup> years and would end with such stellar corpses exploding as supernovae,<ref name=caplan2020>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.02296 Black Dwarf Supernova in the Far Future]</ref> with presumably everything else surviving to having become composed of iron.<ref group=note>For the record, if the runaway expansion of the Universe was to continue indefinitely, then by the time black dwarf supernovae would begin, it is estimated it would have expanded approximately <i>e<sup>10<sup>1100</sup></sup>times</i>. 
Really truly [[Potentization|potentized]], way more so than when black holes went kaput
</ref> Much later on said quantum tunneling would cause the collapse of either anything with (more or less) [[mass]] into black holes after a nothing short of mind-blowing 10<sup>10<sup>26</sup></sup> years or normal stars into either neutron stars or black holes after an still more impressive 10<sup>10<sup>76</sup></sup> years, in both cases the holes decaying instantly in comparison with those time scales and the Dark Era (see further down) beginning. What would not go black hole, thus surviving for all eternity, is unclear, and Dyson suggests either ''nothing'' with mass (so the Universe would end up made of just photons), stuff less massive than the {{Wpl|Planck mass}} (ie, very small iron scraps in those faraway ages), things smaller than a low-mass asteroid, or finally those less massive than the {{Wpl|Chandrasekhar limit||.}}<ref name=dyson1979>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979RvMP...51..447D Time without end: Physics and biology in an open universe]</ref>. Much more recent calculations, however, suggest that even with no proton decay pretty much ''everything'' material, dark matter included, could decay in a way similar to black holes as noted in the next section and the denser an object is the sooner it would go out. The timeframe for everything fading out in such scenario goes from 10<sup>68</sup> years for a neutron star to 10<sup>78</sup> years for a white dwarf and much longer for objects that weren't dense stellar remnants, with similarly as above white dwarfs and neutron stars disappearing in a burst of neutrinos and high-energy particles once their mass was low enough<ref name=fws2025>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14734 An upper limit to the lifetime of stellar remnants from gravitational pair production]</ref>. This latter theory has, however, been disputed and at the very least white dwarfs and less denser objects would be unable to disappear in such way<ref>[https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.229001 Comment on Gravitational Pair Production and Black Hole Evaporation]</ref>.

For those who may be concerned, the ultimate fate of the dead Sun and whatever remains of the [[Solar System]] is unclear but most likely the latter will be disrupted by those close stellar approaches and its component bodies, like the black dwarf Sun, will be expelled of the galaxy to die of proton decay (if that was going to happen), assuming they did not collide with another rogue body before.

Finally, some models suggest [[dark matter]] may go down the drain too if composed of particles as {{Wpl|Weakly interacting massive particles|WIMPs}}. If that happens, it will occur via either annihilation among themselves or capture by astrophysical objects with the dark matter haloes that surround the galaxies being depleted after 10<sup>25</sup> years (i.e.: the times of galactic evaporation). Said dark matter annihilation will keep black dwarfs (relatively) warm, at 60K (which in contrast with the background temperature will be far from cold). Other subatomic particles that may form dark matter as {{Wpl|Axions|Axions}} will probably disappear in a timeframe similar to that of proton decay.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> This also means that galaxies will lose mass, thus their gravitational grip on the objects that form them will be weaker, that helping in the dynamical processes outlined above.

==== Black hole Era ====
After protons and neutrons are gone for good,<ref group=note>Assuming the shortest half-lives given above</ref> the Universe will be filled by an ''extremely'' thin plasma of electrons and positrons plus photons, neutrinos, dark matter if it does not decay the way described above... and black holes, the last vestiges of a Universe once filled with stars and galaxies.

Things will begin to be quite boring, as absolutely nothing will happen for countless eons except the ''very'' occasional fall of a particle into a black hole or the collision between an electron and a positron, producing a pair of gamma photons. Those two types of particle may form according to some models atoms of {{wpl|Positronium|positronium}}, with initial diameters larger than even the current observable Universe, whose orbits will decay with time but ''very'', ''very'' slowly until their final annihilation.<ref group=note>If the Universe kept accelerating into those ages, positrons and electrons would likely not form those atoms</ref> But [[entropy]] does not forbid and black holes will be its next victims. Emission of {{wpl|Hawking radiation}} will cause them to begin to lose mass and, once their evaporation is advanced, they'll shine like extremely hot and small fireflies in the darkness of this era,<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> to finally disappear in a burst of radiation. The time needed for a black hole to vanish goes from 2×10<sup>66</sup> years for one with the mass of the Sun to 1×10<sup>98</sup> years for a hole with the mass of a large galaxy,<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/> and finally 1.7×10<sup>106</sup> years for one with the mass of a galactic supercluster.<ref>Frautschi, S., 1982. Entropy in an expanding universe. Science, 217(4560), pp.593-599.</ref> Since during the very latest stages of black hole evaporation things go quantum and ''extremely'' hot, the ultimate fate of the hole is not known and {{wpl|Micro black hole#Conjectures for the final state|a tiny, dark matter-like, remnant}} could be left.

==== Dark Era ====
After the last of the supermassive black holes is history, the Universe will enter into the "Dark Era" for probably all eternity. It will be an unimaginably dark, cold (at just those 10<sup>-29</sup>K<ref group=note>Assuming the runaway expansion of the Universe continued, otherwise its temperature would continue decreasing forever, approaching absolute zero but never reaching it.</ref>, and ''especially'' nearly empty<ref group=note>As in the Universe, if it keeps pressing the pedal to the metal, having expanded to more than ''10<sup>10<sup>95</sup></sup> times'' its present size, meaning you'd be '''''extremely''''' lucky to find just a single subatomic particle in what once was our observable Universe. Quite [[Potentization|potentized]], indeed.</ref> place where electrons, positrons, photons, neutrinos, and (maybe) dark matter will roam free, only ''very'' rarely encountering each other, assuming they're not carried away by a Universe in perhaps runaway acceleration. The positronium atoms mentioned above are expected to decay in timescales of around 1.7×10<sup>106</sup> years, if they manage to form at all due to such accelerated expansion of the Universe. 

The Universe will be in the clutches of heat death, in an ''extremely'' low energy state, meaning very, very little energy will remain, with things taking a ''very'' long time to happen if they ever happen at all<ref group=note>To the point one could even talk of an end of [[time]] as while time itself would continue its progress to infinity no physical processes to measure its progress (and no observers for that matter, too) means there'd be no way to know if it is still advancing forward or it has stopped</ref>. It's highly speculative what will happen next (maybe a Big Rip in around 10<sup>2500</sup> years (see further)), maybe a vacuum metastability event in around 10<sup>10<sup>120</sup></sup> years (see further too), maybe just plain heat death... who knows?), as in those extreme conditions it's thought quantum effects will prevail and our understanding of what happens then is unknown, although the {{wpl|Poincaré recurrence theorem}} suggests that after an ''absurdly'' long time the universe would essentially reset itself back to a pre-Big Bang state.<ref name=adamslaughlin1997/>. Even {{wpl|Boltzmann brain|Boltzmann brains}} could pop up if you can wait 10<sup>10<sup>50</sup></sup> years and a new [[Big Bang]] could take place if you can wait 10<sup>10<sup>10<sup>56</sup></sup></sup> years.<ref name=Carroll2004>[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0410270 Spontaneous Inflation and the Origin of the Arrow of Time]</ref> Eternity is awful long time, especially towards the end,<ref group=note>Quite '''''far''''' more than some who offer "eternal life" think</ref> and given enough time anything could happen. Over an infinite amount of time, there could also be a spontaneous entropy decrease by a {{wpl|Poincaré recurrence theorem|Poincaré recurrence}} or through thermal fluctuations.<ref name=Xiu2007>[https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4624 Spontaneous entropy decrease and its statistical formula]</ref>

==== Life in an ever-expanding Universe ====
Of course there've been speculations about the kind of life that could develop in or adapt to live in an ever-expanding Universe. It's clear they'll have ''very hard'' times in store with a number of crises to face, most notably the isolation in space of their galaxies, the death of all stars (in other words, no more sources of abundant energy to tap into), their galaxies evaporating away, and especially proton decay for when it ends there'll be little more than a bunch of subatomic particles to use as a basic survival kit. 
For the stelliferous and degenerate eras it's clear (Loeb suggests Universe's peak habitability will be reached 10<sup>13</sup> years in the future assuming habitability of planets orbiting low-mass stars is not suppressed,<ref name=Loeb2016>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08926 On the Habitability of Our Universe]</ref> and Krauss and Starkman suggest that if protons did not decay life similar to ours could exist up to 10<sup>50</sup> years in the future<ref name=kraussstarkman1999/>) that even after the lights have gone out life like us (ideally, advanced civilizations, who should have things easier) could exist even if their existence would be rather dire, always on the search for energy and attempting to use on the most efficient way their scarce resources.<ref group=note>Even if meatware or equivalent was replaced by far more efficient cyberware until we basically had sentient robots and computers and even further still [[science fiction]] stuff as eldritch beings that used as substrate the [[spacetime]] itself. But what's more important: our current form of inefficient fluid sacks or our technological and cultural legacy?</ref> It's even conceivable that a civilization advanced enough could change things such as stellar orbits around a galaxy's center, forming stellar clusters to manage for their survival, or possibly even controlling a gas cloud to form stars from it, even if both would take ''a lot'' of time (but at least time would be the only resource they'd have a virtually endless supply of). In the end, nature could well have ended up "technologized" so the limit between what's natural and what's artificial had disappeared.<ref name=davies1994/>

Things will be considerably worse once protons decay and not just because matter will have dissolved into oblivion.<ref group=note>Assuming, of course, proton decay takes place before black holes are history. If they do not fizzle out we may be somewhat luckier, especially assuming you like iron</ref> Black holes, at least before they become the last non-subatomic objects in existence, may be a source of energy if civilization(s) are advanced enough to take advantage of Hawking radiation besides {{Wpl|Blandford–Znajek process|extracting energy from their rotation in one way}} {{Wpl|Penrose process|or another}}. but once they have disappeared whatever exists will be pretty much SOL. Freeman Dyson has suggested that beings composed of electrons, their energy coming from the electron-positron annihilation, could endure essentially forever even in the Dark era 'verse by combining periods of activity with longer and longer ones of hibernation, playing with their subjective time and an always declining metabolic rate.<ref name=dyson1979/> Unfortunately those ideas were proposed much before it was known the Universe is pressing the pedal to the metal, and with that in mind things would be ''much'' worse for them. Not only they'd have to face a severe dearth of resources caused by the runaway expansion of the Universe but also with or without the latter the sort of "alarm clocks" that they used to awake would sooner or later fail because of quantum effects, killing the being. If that's not enough Dyson assumed the temperature of the Universe would forever be decreasing so they could be in thermal equilibrium with it, but it's currently known it will reach a minimum as stated above (10<sup>-29</sup>K) meaning no more thermal equilibrium and no more life. The only way to survive would be if those beings practiced a sort of {{wpl|Reversible_computing|reversible computing}}, forever reshuffling their memories and with no communications of any kind with the outside world. It's certainly questionable to consider that "life".<ref name=kraussstarkman1999/><ref group=note>But who knows?. Since those things will happen in a future so far away maybe they'll not waste their time and resources just to delay a doom that cannot be averted and will simply learn how, for example, to design and produce a new Universe and will use wormholes to move there or at least transmit information to re-build themselves on that place. They could even discover a way to reverse entropy.</ref> Nonetheless, other research suggests that in an ever-expanding Universe with no cosmological constant (ie, one where dark energy dissipated away) information processing (read, life) could continue indefinitely by tapping into for example the temperature gradients caused by gravitational waves,<ref name=barrow2003>[https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302076 Indefinite information processing in ever-expanding universes]</ref> and even such luck could exist for universes under an accelerated expansion not brought by the dreaded cosmological constant,<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0205279 The ultimate fate of life in an accelerating universe]</ref> so life could not end FUBAR'ed.

Last but not least, assuming the theory of eternal inflation was true, it has been proposed a doomed civilization could send a message or even some sort of Ark-like capsule that contained its knowledge, cultural legacy, etc. up to the possibility of rebuilding its builders to any of the new Universes popping up in such scenario. However it has been shown it's far more likely they'd be either swallowed by a black hole, which would also be formed in such kind of multiverse, or drowned in countless fake messages and capsules formed by natural quantum processes in the same way as the already mentioned Boltzmann brains with the only solution being to build ''a whole lot'' of them.<ref name=garriga1999>[https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9909143 Eternal inflation, black holes, and the future of civilizations]</ref><ref name=garriga2001>[https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0102010 Many worlds in one]</ref>

===Big Crunch: All together again===
[[File:Big crunch to the left.png|thumb|right|165px|Representation of a "big crunch". Toasty!]]
The 
Gnab Gib
 "Big Crunch" is the opposite of the "Big Freeze", in which the Universe instead of expanding forever will halt its expansion, begin to contract, and finally implode on itself. This scenario was favored in the past, but observations show that unless dark energy gives us a prank of cosmological size it will not happen.<ref group=note>Remember that the density of matter, both normal and dark, is less than one third of the minimal density needed to have a close Universe.</ref> Don't worry, this will be considerably shorter than the previous section (but it will be ''much'' hotter and denser).

If the Universe was closed its contraction would not be instantaneous; putting on the brakes would take a considerable amount of time, meaning more time between expansion, slowdown, and the final implosion: as the expansion and contraction are symmetrical, the latter would require the same time as the former. The lower its density and closer to the critical one, the more events than are expected to happen in an open or flat Universe as depicted above would happen.<ref group=note>For dramatism we'll assume the Universe contracts when there're still plenty of stars around, for example as seen [https://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/courses/astr3740_19/evol.html here] assuming a value of Ω equal to 3, totally ruled out by observations and that would put the collapse of the Universe "just" 40 billions of years into the future, or a bit more than 576 billion years in the future letting you have enough money to pay the lunch at the Restaurant at the End of the Universe. Things will be more interesting than when there'd be just stellar corpses everywhere, and much more so than when there'd be just subatomic particles whizzing by</ref> Hypothetical observers who were still around because of the delay caused by the [[speed of light]] would see the Universe was beginning its implosion and how [[redshift]]s decreased and became blueshifts everywhere, first the closest and last the galaxies farthest away. As time passed by,<ref group=note>For the record, it was initially suggested that in a contracting Universe (nrob gnieb erofeb gniyd dna evarg eht ni nrob gnieb elpoep: ei) sdrawkcab wlof dluow emit. However better cosmological models have ruled out that possibility. More info [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg13918872-600-science-could-time-run-backwards/ here]</ref> the temperature of the cosmic microwave background would increase instead of decreasing, as had happened before during its expansion, and by the time the Universe had a size similar to the current one it would again have our current overall temperature of almost 3 Kelvin. However it would be a more aged Universe than now, with more dead stars and fewer shining ones.<ref name=davies1994>{{cite book |last=Davies |first=Paul |title=The Last Three Minutes: Conjectures About The Ultimate Fate Of The Universe |publisher=Basic Books |date=January 9, 1997 |isbn=978-0-465-03851-0}}</ref>

Billions of years later, the cosmic (no more microwave, now infrared) background radiation would have reached room temperature, meaning that a planet such as [[Earth|ours]] would be unable to radiate excess heat, thus maintaining its equilibrium.<ref name=davies1994/> [[Global warming]] would be something ''really'' global, not just a thing limited to a single planet.<ref group=note>Never mind that by that epoch Earth would have been burned to a crisp by the red giant Sun long ago</ref> Meanwhile superclusters would begin to merge being followed by galaxy clusters and finally the galaxies themselves leaving the Universe as a big hyper-galaxy, where everything would be bathed in a temperature of a few hundred K (thank the cosmic infrared background radiation) and rising, but at least stellar collisions and encounters would be rare ''for now''.<ref name=davies1994/>

Now the real fun begins. As the Universe kept contracting, stellar encounters first and collisions later would be more and more frequent, causing havoc among their planetary systems — but it would be trivial to worry about that since the increase in energy of the background radiation, now a mix of what was in the past the harmless cosmic microwave background plus all that energy emitted by stars, active galactic nuclei, etc during the many previous billions of years that would also suffer an ever-increasing blueshift, would cause the night sky to glow a dull red, later yellow, still later on white... you get the picture. The Universe would basically become a huge furnace, roasting all those life forms that had managed to survive the previous ordeal first and causing the stars to be unable to get rid of their internal heat, ''cooking'' them until they exploded later, beginning with the coldest ones (M-type stars as red dwarfs), following the hottest ones ({{wpl|Wolf-Rayet star|Wolf-Rayet stars}}), and ending with stellar remnants when temperatures were hot enough to fuse heavy elements as {{wpl|Triple-alpha process|helium}} or {{wpl|Carbon-burning process|carbon}}, with the background radiation having arrived to the Gamma ray range after its excursion up through the electromagnetic spectrum. All that would remain would be a hot, dense plasma where any structure left from before would have disappeared and that as time passed by would become hotter and denser, and things would almost happen symmetrically to what had happened during the Big Bang: temperatures and densities would be so high that atoms would decompose followed by subatomic particles, leaving just quarks.<ref name=davies1994/>

But we've said the final implosion would ''almost'' be symmetrical to the initial expansion. That's because during the latter there'd be a whole lot of black holes that were not present during the former. They, after surviving the ordeals experienced by everything else and having a good time sucking hot plasma, would begin an orgy of mergers while space's curvature and temperature kept increasing until there was basically just a single hypermassive black hole with the mass of the entire Universe: the Big Crunch singularity.<ref name=davies1994/> And then, at the Big Crunch, the black hole would consume the universe itself.

Game over. Just as the Universe and space-time had begun with the Big Bang they'd cease to exist in the Big Crunch and it would be meaningless to ask what would happen next. But for those who may be concerned, just like the gravitational singularity of null size and infinite temperature in the center of a black hole tends to be considered a failure of general relativity that would disappear in a [[Gravity#Quantum_gravity|quantum gravity]] theory, the same would happen in the Big Crunch, meaning that there's no way to know what would really happen after. It's even possible the Universe would "reboot" in a new Big Bang<ref name=davies1994/> with things starting again, maybe rewinding its entropy and/or with new physical laws, but with everything from the past Universe having been sent to oblivion.<ref group=note>Such theory -the {{wpl|Big Bounce}}- on its most basic formulation has the problem that in each cycle the amount of radiation increases at the expense of matter in nuclear fusion processes in stars (ie, entropy increases. Note how all that blueshifted starlight mentioned did not exist in the immediate moment after the Big Bang, nor all those black holes), to the point one would eventually get a scenario pretty much identical to the Big Freeze which also means the number of cycles before the current one has to be finite, needing either entropy to be somehow reset to zero in the moment of the Big Crunch at best or the previous Universe being totally annihilated in the collapse, the new one having totally different physical laws and constants and being totally disconnected of the old cosmos, at worst.</ref>

====Living in a collapsing Universe====
Yes, there've been speculations too about the fate of living beings in a collapsing Universe. It's clear that, unless the Universe needed a ''really'' long time to reverse expansion, enough to have protons and/or black holes fizzling out, life would be not very different from the one in an expanding Universe. When the cosmic radiation's energy screamed upward they'd have to change some things, and once everything was just searing hot plasma with black holes coming in hot they'd have to change ''a lot'' of things. Quoting Freeman Dyson in such regard:

{{quotebox|No matter how deep we burrow into the earth to
shield ourselves from the ever-increasing fury of the blue-shifted background radiation,
we can only postpone by a few million years our miserable end.<ref name=dyson1979/>}}

In this scenario the problem is not the lack of energy as in the Big Freeze but its excess instead and how to get rid of the surplus. More energy means physical processes going faster, thus the information-processing ability would increase too meaning that for those beings adapted to live in the Big Crunch the final collapse could be infinitely far away thanks to their subjective time accelerating more and more, even if the outside was just at seconds or much less.<ref name=davies1994/>

John Barrow and Frank Tipler have studied what exactly would happen in the final moments of the collapsing Universe, finding that as it's very likely the collapse would be far from symmetrical and the Universe would oscillate. A sort of super-being existing there would have to act very fast to take advantage of it and have all of its parts connected, but at least said oscillations would give the required energy to drive thought processes. To improve this, some models suggest said oscillations would be infinite, so for that... thing its subjective time would be infinite (if the implosion was symmetrical, thoughts would be limited due to limitations caused by the speed of light — the maximum speed of any physical process). With that plus so much computing power, Tipler has suggested it could even simulate ''a whole lot'' of imaginary worlds, not just being able to ponder about its existence as well as the Universe surrounding it.<ref name=davies1994/>

Now the bad news. Not only are those ideas based on physical models that could be unrealistic but also quantum effects during the last part of the collapse could limit the number of thoughts of that superbeing and it remains to be seen if it would be able to shed heat fast enough to be able to operate in a Universe that's increasing its temperature very fast. In the two latter cases the end would come sooner or later.<ref name=davies1994/>

===Ripping everything apart: Big Rip===
The "Big Rip" is another way everything could end and it's nastier than the two previous endings of above, at least for meatware beings such as us. When the Big Freeze came we'd be long gone. The Big Crunch would kill us before the black holes came, even if it was a slow death being roasted as the cosmic background radiation heated us. The Big Rip would not give us that luxury.<ref group=note>And it would come complete with an equivalent of the [[Rapture]], except that it would affect ''everyone'', and they'd be send to the skies, not to [[Heaven]].</ref>

In this scenario ''everything'' from galactic superclusters down to space-time itself and everything in between would be ripped apart at infinite distances by the runaway expansion of the Universe at a given time, this coming courtesy of dark energy or rather a nasty form of it named {{Wpl|Phantom energy}}, which in the equation of the state of dark energy appears when <math>w</math>, a ratio between dark energy's pressure and its density, is less than -1. If it was equal to -1 or higher there'd be no Big Rip.<ref group=note>In those cases, dark energy could either become irrelevant -and the Universe's expansion would stop accelerating more or less- or even become attractive to the point of causing a Big Crunch. See [https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/dark-energy-may-not-be-a-constant-which-would-lead-to-a-revolution-in-physics-9f399f9aa8eb here]</ref>

The paper<ref name=caldwell2003>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PhRvL..91g1301C Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with w<-1 Causes a Cosmic Doomsday]</ref> that proposed this takes <math>w</math> to be equal to -1.5. In their scenario, the Big Rip would take place just 22 billion years in the future (i.e., when the Universe still had long to live in other alternative endings). One billion years before the end, galaxy clusters would be ripped apart followed by the Milky Way when the Rip was 60 million years away. Three months before the finale the Solar System (or whatever remained of it, of course, since this event would happen after the Sun's death) would be unbounded, with the Earth, had it survived so long, exploding at 30 minutes before the end. Finally atoms themselves would be annihilated when the Big Rip singularity was just 10<sup>-19</sup> seconds away, followed by the very space-time itself transforming the Universe into an unusual form of singularity (as usual, "singularity" probably means our physics break down there, us being unable to fathom what would come next if anything).

Note also that subsequent studies have presented variants of this scenario: "pseudorips" where the runaway acceleration of the Universe would reach a maximum, and then decrease (and what structures would be destroyed depended of the moment when that happened),<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.2964 Pseudo-rip: Cosmological models intermediate between the cosmological constant and the little rip]</ref> "little rips", where the runaway expansion of the Universe would disrupt everything but the space time (this just at infinity), even if later on than in a Big Rip,<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.4996 The Little Rip]</ref> and "the little sibling of the Big Rip", similar to the former and that would also see the "Big Rip" happening in an infinite time.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.2446 The little sibling of the big rip singularity]</ref>. Finally, a related, highly speculative idea known as the "Big 
Bad
 Trip", is that phantom energy if accreted into a {{wpl|wormhole}} (''not'' a black hole), if they existed at all, could cause it to grow so large that would swallow the entire Universe before a Big Rip could take place even if it's anyone's guess where and how the latter would "regurgitate" the former<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0510771 On the accretion of phantom energy onto wormholes]</ref>.

The best measurements, from {{wpl|European Space Agency|ESA's}} "Planck" satellite, show <math>w</math> to be equal to -1.03 +/- 0.03,<ref name=planck2018/> meaning the Big Rip will occur farther away in time — ''if'' it happens, as <math>w</math> could well turn out to be -1 (note measurement errors and that previous analysis of the same data found a value of <math>w</math> of -1.006 +/- 0.045.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01589 Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters]</ref>.) Note also that it's to date unknown how will evolve dark energy in the future, and as commented in the last note were <math>w</math> to change funny things could happen-

====Life in the Big Rip (or rather, after it)====
{{crickets}}

Despite this, some speculations about the Rip suggest it could mark the beginning of a new cosmic inflation phase, as conditions (speed of that runaway expansion) would become similar to those during said epoch so a new Universe (or more) could be born from the ashes of the old.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312440 A Rejuvenated Universe Without Initial Singularity]</ref><ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405078 Quantum escape of sudden future singularity]</ref>

Other authors have suggested that just before the Big Rip, wormholes (if they existed at all, that is) would grow a lot and an advanced civilization could use them to escape from the dying Universe, or at least to send information through them;<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0404045 Achronal cosmic future]</ref> other authors, however, have claimed in such scenario nothing more complex than a proton could be able to transverse such wormholes.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0503433 Can we escape from the big rip in the achronal cosmic future?]</ref>

===Big Slurp: ???===
Last but not least the nastiest way our Universe could end: a "Big Slurp", also known as "vacuum metastability event". Compared to it, [[Book_of_Revelation|certain bad trips]] and other stuff that comes from Fundies are just a joke.

In this scenario, the vacuum that to us seems stable would actually be unstable and without warning a bubble of true vacuum would appear elsewhere, expanding at the speed of light and devouring everything on its path until the observable Universe first and the entire Universe (much) later had been wiped out that way. Within the bubble, everything from physical constants to physical laws would change... just to have unstable space there that would collapse into a singularity in microseconds or less. Game over, man. Game over.

Coleman & DeLuccia's paper where this was outlined<ref name=coleman1980>[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980PhRvD..21.3305C Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay]. A freely, seemingly legal, PDF version can also be found on the Net.</ref> has this gem that says it all:

{{quotebox|The possibility that we are living in a false vacuum has never been a cheering one to contemplate. Vacuum decay is the ultimate ecological catastrophe; in the new vacuum there are new constants of nature; after vacuum decay, not only is life as we know it impossible, so is chemistry as we know it. However, one could always draw stoic comfort from the possibility that perhaps in the course of time the new vacuum would sustain, if not life as we know it, at least some structures capable of knowing joy. This possibility has now been eliminated.<ref group=note>Again, remember that "singularity" means that our theories fail somewhere.{{cn}} Maybe things would be different, and maybe even something capable of feeling joy could exist after all.</ref>}}

The part that makes this nightmarish is that in theory this could happen ''anytime'', the next second, 10<sup>10000</sup> years in the future... whatever and ''anywhere'', in any part of the Universe, and that, as the bubble would come crashing at the speed of light we'd be unable to see it coming; the only positive side of this is that we'd be instantly destroyed without feeling anything. The good news is that measurements of the [[Higgs boson]] and the top quark masses suggest this would not happen for many billions of years,<ref>[http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/18/17006552-will-our-universe-end-in-a-big-slurp-higgs-like-particle-suggests-it-might?lite "Will our universe end in a 'big slurp'? Higgs-like particle suggests it might".]</ref> more exactly at least 10<sup>139</sup> years according to other calculations.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08124 Scale Invariant Instantons and the Complete Lifetime of the Standard Model]. As commented on the "Big Freeze" section above, this would most likely happen after everything had decayed into subatomic particles (at worst when black holes were the last remaining non-subatomic objects), so you can sleep better</ref><ref group=note>A derived consequence of this is that somewhere '''''far''''' beyond our cosmological horizon such phase transition could already have happened and a bubble of true vacuum would be expanding at lightspeed destroying everything on its path, with us being unable to know of its existence… and as noted later on, us being safer as the accelerated expansion of the Universe would keep us out of its reach</ref>In addition to that, there could be new still undiscovered physics that stabilized the vacuum, especially considering how the Standard Model of Particle Physics is seen as an {{wpl|Physics beyond the Standard Model|incomplete}} one, ''and'' there still remains the possibility of our Universe being stable.<ref>[http://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/108 Viewpoint: Are We on the Brink of the Higgs Abyss?]</ref><ref group=note>It's even conceivable the "Big Slurp" ''had'' actually happened in the past, corresponding to the [[Big_Bang#Inflation|cosmic inflation]] epoch</ref> It has also been suggested the most destructive form of false vacuum decay -the Coleman & DeLuccia's collapse into a singularity- could actually be impossible.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211160 Heretics of the False Vacuum: Gravitational Effects On and Of Vacuum Decay 2]</ref>

As per the Big Rip scenario above, theoretical research has presented milder variations of this scenario in which businesses would go more or less as usual, letting stars and galaxies<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.01991 Time-varying neutrino mass from a supercooled phase transition: current cosmological constraints and impact on the Ωm-σ8 plane]</ref><ref name=metastable>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.00428 Metastable dark energy]</ref> and even life<ref name=metastable/> continue existing even with things somewhat changed, while in others we're almost as FUBAR'ed.<ref>[http://ctp.lns.mit.edu/Wilczek_Nature/%2872%29vacuum_metastable.pdf Is our vacuum metastable?] (PDF file)</ref> Yet another proposal is that black hole decay could induce it but the possibility of true vacuum bubbles wiping the Universe out would depend of both how numerous they are as well as the rate of expansion of the latter;<ref name=chang2019>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00773 Connecting the Higgs Potential and Primordial Black Holes]</ref> later proposals suggest either the true vacuum bubble would implode into a black hole instead of the reversal,<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02865 Primordial black hole formation by vacuum bubbles]</ref> that such process is actually suppressed around fast rotating black holes.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01378 Vacuum decays around spinning black holes]</ref>

Note also that survival of the Universe as noted above depends of both how fast it would expand and the bubbles' nucleation rate, meaning that in the current scenario of an accelerated expansion of the Universe it could even outrun them with such bubbles being unable to percolate and merge; "you" would eat true vacuum sooner or later when one of them formed in your area of space but until then things would go as in the Big Freeze scenario of above with no danger of one coming in hot from beyond the cosmological horizon.<ref name=chang2019/>

Of course there've been fears (wild speculations, really) that our particle accelerators, especially the [[LHC#Fear.2C_uncertainty_and_doubt|Large Hadron Collider]], could bring this on. Never mind that even our most advanced instruments are ''toys'' compared with the energies the Universe can summon with things as cosmic rays,<ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My-God_particle As this one]</ref> with risk assessments having been published that point to the continued existence of the [[Moon]] (and other celestial bodies for the case) for several billions of years despite it being having been continuously pummeled by ''lots'' of cosmic rays with far more energies than those our particle accelerators can summon (nor it has been transformed into {{wpl|strange matter}} or has been sucked into a black hole either) as proof of no danger existing when one smashes atoms at relativistic speeds.<ref name=risksrhic>R.L. Jaffe, W. Busza, J.Sandweiss, F. Wilczek, [https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9910333 Review of Speculative "Disaster scenarios" at RHIC]. Rev.Mod.Phys.72:1125-1140,2000.</ref>

====Living beings during this scenario and after it====
{{crickets}}
Unless Coleman & DeLuccia were wrong and something alive could come into being in the new, post-Big Slurp, Universe of course (which, were physical laws and everything else different, would be truly ''alien''). Or unless the false vacuum ''had'' already decayed just after the [[Big Bang]], producing cosmic inflation as commented above.

===But wait, there's more!===
In the depths of [[ArXiv]] you can find still more ideas about the way everything will end courtesy of the arcane world of theoretical physics, such as [[time]] itself ending someday and this happening when Earth is still around.<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4698 Eternal inflation predicts that time will end]</ref> However other physicists have found a way to resolve the paradox that brings said idea and show the calculations that reach to that fate being wrong,<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0665 Eternal Inflation, Global Time Cutoff Measures, and a Probability Paradox]</ref> and as noted in the article even if that event could happen requires the [[Big_Bang#Inflation|eternal inflation]] model to be correct and even not all universes born on it would be affected. Another proposed ending in string theory (and that requires such theory to be correct, ie the existence of extra dimensions but so small that they'd be undetectable) is the formation of a "{{wpl|bubble of nothing}}", very similar to the false vacuum decay scenario described above except that the bubble's inside would contain absolutely ''nothing'' (not even spacetime)<ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01764 Nothing really matters]</ref><ref>[https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01111 Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications]</ref>, and of course if the [[simulation hypothesis]] was true when its operators decided it's time to turn it off to play some [[Video game|games]] instead/not having enough [[money]] to pay the server's bills/whatever it would be game over.

Stay tuned for more …

=== A song for Time’s last sigh ===
{{cquote|This is our last song, but what a song|||Ouroborus}}
{{video|youtube| https://youtu.be/7JBHyE18L3o}}

==See also==
*[[Expanding universe]]
*[[Big Bang]]
*[[Alternative cosmology]]
*[[Existential risk]] for the end of the human race
*[[List of predictions of the end of the world]] &mdash; the many theological guesses that have all been wrong thus far
*The ultimate level of ''Super Mario Galaxy'', which takes place in the fantasical center of the universe and is called "Fate of the Universe". It is as accurate as the theological guesses.

==External link(s)==
*In a nutshell: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_aOIA-vyBo Three ways to destroy the Universe].

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note|2|80%}}

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

[[Category:Astronomy]]
[[Category:End of the world]]
[[Category:Futurism]]
[[Category:Physics]]
[[Category:Time]]

Categories: Astronomy, End of the world, Futurism, Physics, Time