No Child Left Behind

{{uspolitics}}
{{hatnote|Were you looking for the [[Christian]] [[apocalyptic]] book series [[Left Behind]]?}}
{{Outdated}}
{{cquote|Education! Politicians know that word. They use it on you. Politicians have traditionally hidden behind three things: the Flag, the [[Bible]] and [[children]]. No child left behind! No child left behind! Oh really? It wasn't long ago you were talking about giving kids a head start. Head start? Left behind? Someone's losing fucking ground here.|||[[George Carlin]]<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLRQvK2-iqQ George Carlin on Fat People] (Nov 4, 2009) ''YouTube''.</ref>}}
{{cquote|Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?"|||President Dubya, who was left behind<ref>[https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/make-the-pie-higher/ Make the Pie Higher!] by David Mikkelson (Feb 26, 2003) ''Snopes''.</ref><ref>[https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/why-dubya-cant-read/ Why Dubya Can’t Read] by Christopher Hitchens (October 9, 2000) ''The Nation''.</ref>}}
'''No Child Left Behind''', or '''NCLB''', was an [[education]] scheme that became [[United States]] law during the [[George W. Bush]] administration.  Just guess how well it was implemented. It was succeeded in 2015 by the Every Student Succeeds Act.

==Implementation and effects==
NCLB requires that school districts focus maximum attention on developing basic reading and [[mathematics]] skills.  In order to measure success, schools must administer several aptitude tests on a regular basis.  Unfortunately, this has had two negative effects on schools: 1) Many teachers now "teach to the test" rather than teach using a broad base of [[information]]; and 2) many other subjects like [[music]], [[art]], [[science]], social studies, health, physical, and vocational education have suffered budget cuts as school districts scramble to fund basic skills education.<ref>Schools Cut Back Subjects to Push Reading and Math: ''New York Times'', 26 March 2006 [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/26/education/26child.html]</ref>

Another problem with NCLB is the stress it puts on teachers to perform at unreasonably high levels.  This has led to a rapid increase of teacher turnover since NCLB was introduced.  Among the more unrealistic expectations:

*Students are required to read in [[English]] at grade level by the end of the school year even if they began the year two or more grade levels behind.  Unfortunately, many students live in non-English-speaking households and/or illiterate households.  Many others come from households where reading is of little importance.<ref>Where you fall in poll of U.S. reading habits: ''CNN'', 21 August 2007 [http://web.archive.org/web/20070903022912/http://www.cnn.com/2007/LIVING/wayoflife/08/21/reading.ap/index.html]</ref>  Unless the student is labeled "learning disabled," the federal [[government]] allows no exemptions in these cases.  Students ''must'' read at grade level to avoid failing, period.
*If a school meets all but one NCLB requirement, that school as a whole still fails.
*If a school fails its NCLB requirements, the federal government punishes the school by cutting its funding, causing drastic cuts in programs.  Schools quickly find themselves in financial holes they cannot climb out of.

As of March 2006, twenty-seven percent of U.S. schools failed to meet minimum NCLB standards.<ref>Bush's 'No Child' Goals Not Met by Quarter of Schools (Update 2):  ''Bloomberg.com'', 28 March 2006 [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=arbiUu65lqTM&refer=us]</ref>

Apart from changing educational provisions, NCLB also extended the access of military recruiters to the schools' students: upon request, schools have to release name, phone number and home address of all students who haven't (or whose parents haven't) opted out of this until a certain deadline. Additionally, if a school allows postsecondary institutions or prospective employers to advertise themselves at the school grounds, military recruiters have to be given the same access. The schools face the loss of funding if they do not comply with these rules.<ref>[http://www.nyclu.org/milrec/nochild The ACLU on No Child Left Behind]</ref><ref>[http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/pdf/ht100902b.pdf The Federal Government's Q&A about the new rights for military recruiters]</ref>

==Theories about why NCLB was introduced==
:''See also: [[conspiracy theory]]''
*NCLB makes [[Public education|public schools]] look worse than they actually are. This lends false credibility to the [[argument]] that all schools should be [[privatize]]d.
*NCLB readies public school [[children]] for a lifetime as a cog in the corporate machine. It does so by requiring that certain fields of study be defunded in favor of basic skills curriculum. By defunding arts, music, [[literature]], and science education, NCLB discourages the teaching of creativity. NCLB also reduces the ability to teach [[social science]]s, which would expose students to the true structure and nature of American [[society]]. As a result, NCLB leaves most students with few skills beyond sitting in a cubicle all day to do the bidding of mid-level management.
*NCLB is a long-range strategy for the liquidation of public education: impose unreachable norms, punish those who cannot reach those norms by reducing sustenance required for function, rinse and repeat until target is dead.
*NCLB is an attempt to deprive children of the [[critical thinking]] skills necessary to realize that any right-of-center ideology is a steaming pile of moronic [[bullshit]], the Republican Party is nothing but a pack of racist, homophobic, misogynistic, pitch-black-hearted grifters and sociopaths, and [[rationalism]] and progressivism is necessary for humanity to survive, let alone prosper.

However, the reader should be careful to appreciate the distinction between ''purpose'' and ''function'':  the fact that a policy, in practical application, functions in a particular way provides no evidence that that function was the intended purpose of the policy rather than the result of unintended consequences or {{wpl|Perverse incentive|perverse incentives|.}}

==External links==
*[http://www.cta.org/en/Issues-and-Action/Education-Improvement/ESEA-NCLB.aspx California Teachers Association calls for revision of NCLB]
*[http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html It's Time for a Change! NEA Offers Plan to Improve NCLB]
*''The News Hour With Jim Lehrer'' ([[PBS]]) three-part series on NCLB (14–16 August 2007):
**[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/education/no_child/ In Depth Coverage (overview)]
**[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/education/july-dec07/nclb_08-14.html Part 1]
**[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/education/july-dec07/nclb_08-15.html Part 2]
**[http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/education/july-dec07/nclb_08-16.html Part 3]

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

[[Category:Education]]
[[Category:Government incompetence]]
[[Category:Political strategery]]
[[Category:United States law]]
[[Category:United States politics]]

Categories: Education, Government incompetence, Political strategery, United States law, United States politics