S. Fred Singer

[[File:S Fred Singer 2011.jpg|right|thumb|165px|S. Fred Singer in 2011.]]{{pseudoscience|1}}{{denialism|1}}
{{cquote|[Singer] has testified before [[Congress]] numerous times, and is probably the most widely quoted skeptic on the [[ozone layer|ozone hole]] and [[global warming]] issues. Unfortunately, Dr. Singer cannot be considered an active [[scientist]] publishing in the [[peer-reviewed]] literature, or even an objective informed critic. Dr. Singer touts himself as having "published more than 200 peer-reviewed scientific papers over the course of his career". However, Dr. Singer's contributions to atmospheric science have been essentially zero since 1971.|||Jeffrey Masters, Ph.D. Director of Meteorology, [https://www.wunderground.com Weather Underground]<ref>[http://www.wunderground.com/resources/climate/ozone_skeptics.asp? Ozone Skeptics, Weather Underground]</ref> (No, not ''that'' [[Weather Underground]])}}
'''Siegfried Fred Singer''' {{lived|September 27, 1924|April 6, 2020}} was a [[physicist]] who formerly held posts at the University of Virginia and [[George Mason University]] until 2000. He was the definition of an [[expert for hire]].

==Actual science==
Early in his career, Singer did prolific work in technology and engineering. After defecting from [[Austria]], he graduated from Princeton University and served in the US Navy during the end of [[World War II]] and the beginning of the [[Cold War]]. There, he worked on mine detection technology as well as studying atmospheric physics, concentrating on the ionosphere and the [[ozone layer]]. In the 1950s and 1960s, he held various positions at governmental agencies including the [[EPA]] and [[NOAA]]. He was most famous for designing satellites, satellite instrumentation, and related technology.

==Transition to corporate mouthpiece==
In the 1980s and 1990s, Singer decided to sell his soul and become a corporate shill. Despite not having published on atmospheric issues since the last decade with the exception of two papers, Singer entered the [[ozone]] fray and attempted to pass himself off as a cutting-edge researcher. He decided he didn't need no steenkin' [[peer review]], employing the classic [[denialism|denialist]] tactic of side-stepping scientific journals to publish op-eds and give testimonies before [[Congress]]. He liberally [[quote mining|quote mined]] the science on ozone depletion and claimed that the measurements were incorrect, that there had always been a hole in the ozone and it was natural. What he "forgot" to mention was that he was being heavily bankrolled by petroleum companies at the time, including Exxon and Shell, through his [[think tank]] called The Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP).<ref>[http://www.wunderground.com/resources/climate/ozone_skeptics.asp Skeptics vs.the Ozone Layer]</ref> Singer also downplayed the threat of [[acid rain]] in his role on the Acid Rain Peer Review Panel during this period and SEPP has been labeling acid rain as a fake crisis since then. As we now know, Singer was on the wrong side of history – in 1995, the scientists who discovered the chemistry behind the ozone hole were awarded the [[Nobel Prize]] for their work.<ref>[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1995/press.html Press release: The 1995 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.]</ref> Strike one.

In addition to ozone denial, Singer became involved in Philip Morris [[front group]]s as well as other [[tobacco]]-backed think tanks in the early 1990s. He helped lead the charge in [[tobacco smoking|second-hand smoke]] denial. He wrote a number of articles denying or minimizing any link between second-hand smoke and [[cancer]] and accused the EPA of cooking its data when it determined that second-hand smoke posed a risk.<ref>[http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/action/document/page?tid=ymo86b00&page=1 A 1994 paper by Singer on second-hand smoke]</ref><ref>[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1446867/ Junking Science to Promote Tobacco]</ref> Singer, of course, denied any connection to tobacco companies. Strike two for Singer.

{{anchor|Climate denial, or, Singer rides again}}
==Climate denial, or, Singer rides again==
Singer used SEPP to open up his final frontier of scientific denialism: [[Global warming]]. Besides funding from [[oil]] interests, SEPP was taking in money from a [[Moonies|Moony]] front group.<ref>[http://motherjones.com/politics/1997/12/wingnuts-sheeps-clothing Wingnuts in Sheep's Clothing]</ref> Singer later decided that even ''he'' shouldn't sink that low and cut ties with them.
In 1995, after the second IPCC report was released, Singer put out a bogus petition called the Leipzig Declaration. While not quite as big as the more famous [[Oregon Petition]], it did include a number of people who denied signing it, TV meteorologists, and industry shills.<ref>[http://naturalscience.com/ns/letters/ns_let08.html How many climate scientists support the "Leipzig Declaration"?], Natural Science (dead link)</ref> Singer went on to churn out mountains of [[bullshit]] throughout the 1990s and 2000s through SEPP. In 2004, he set up a denialist version of the IPCC called the '''Nongovernmental International Panel''' on Climate Change (NIPCC). The NIPCC excreted a report primarily authored by Singer in 2008 through the [[conservative]] [[Heartland Institute]]. In the report, he managed to roll two decades' worth of [[crank|crankery]] into one paper, citing his own junk as often as possible. On top of that it referenced nearly every piece of discredited, bogus, or outright [[deceit|fraudulent]] denialist "research" including papers by such luminaries as [[Steve McIntyre]], [[Ross McKitrick]], [[Richard Lindzen]], [[Wegman Report|Edward Wegman]], the [[Idso family]], [[Patrick Michaels]], [[Christopher Booker]], and [[Bjorn Lomborg]]. It manages to roll just about every [[PRATT|denier talking point]] into one paper, from solar cycles to "[[CO2 is Green|CO<sub>2</sub> is plant food]]!" It is truly a masterwork of denialism.<ref>[http://www.heartland.org/custom/semod_policybot/pdf/22835.pdf Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate]</ref> And Singer's out on three consecutive strikes!

Singer had been associated with other [[libertarian]] [[think tank]]s known for their denialism at various points, including the [[Cato Institute]] and the [[Competitive Enterprise Institute]].<ref>Some of Singer's articles at [https://www.cato.org/research/natur-st.html Cato] and [http://cei.org/contributor/s-fred-singer CEI]</ref> [[Frederick Seitz]] also held a position at SEPP for some time and the two published some "research" together.

In 2009, Singer distributed a bogus climate petition asking the American Physical Society (APS) to change its stance on global warming. All he got was a bunch of signatures from other deniers and the APS subsequently blew him off.<ref>[http://www.desmogblog.com/another-silly-climate-petition-exposed Another Silly Climate Petition Exposed]</ref>

Despite being dead wrong on every issue he wrote on since the 1980s and having his shady connections brought to light, Singer still managed to be taken seriously by the [[media]] as an "expert", most likely due to their obsession with creating a [[balance fallacy|false equivalence]]. When the [[Climategate]] story broke, Reuters allowed him to declare victory for 
skeptics
 deniers and do a little victory dance in their news outlet.<ref>[http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/12/14/climate-skeptic-we-are-winning-the-science-battle/ We are winning the Science Battle]</ref> However, it seems that his [[Bullshit|blatherskite]] became limited mostly to [[wingnut]] outlets like ''[[American Thinker|American 
Stinker
 Thinker]]'' where he continued to claim that he was right about the ozone layer, second-hand smoke, and climate change and that those who pointed out his industry ties were merely spreading [[conspiracy theories]] to discredit his magnificent work.<ref>[http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/12/second_hand_smoke_lung_cancer.html Secondhand Smoke, Lung Cancer, and the Global Warming Debate]</ref>

It's tough to do, but Singer made guys like McIntyre seem almost honest in comparison. Singer is thought to be responsible for the destruction of thousands of bullshit detectors, possibly being even more shilltacular than [[Steve Milloy]].

==Singer's ''Bad Science''==
{{cquote|Too often, [[Hypocrisy|science is manipulated to fulfill a political agenda]]. Science that is used to guide public policy must be based on sound science &mdash; not on emotions or beliefs that are viewed by some as "politically correct."|||S. Fred Singer, ''Bad Science''<ref>[http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/snc52c00/pdf ''Bad Science''] by Fred Singer, archived at the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library</ref>}}
In 1993, Singer wrote a book called ''Bad Science''.<ref>No relation to the book or blog by [[Ben Goldacre]]. In fact, they are diametric opposites.</ref> The tract is essentially a how-to guide for [[bullshit]]ters. In it, he claims that science has been [[Evil Liberal Science Conspiracy|hijacked by liberal do-gooders]] seeking to impose their will on people through the tyranny of the EPA and other governmental bodies. He muddies the waters by mixing [[moral panic|media-driven health scares]] with actual health and environmental problems (indeed, much of his "research" includes newspaper clippings from the likes of ''[[Investor's Business Daily]]''). It is quite a good read if you want to see the typical [[framing|rhetorical]] techniques and [[meme]]s of the [[anti-environmentalism|anti-environmental]] movement packed into a single publication. It often includes weapons-grade [[psychological projection|projection]] as in the quote above, in which he masterfully invokes [[sound science]].

==''Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years''==
In 2007, Singer wrote a book of global warming denial with Dennis T. Avery of the Hudson Institute (updated in 2008). The book is thin on citations and most, if not all, of its arguments appear in the 2007 film, [[The Great Global Warming Swindle]]. Singer and Avery propose a variety of counter-arguments for anthropogenic global warming: either global warming isn't happening (recent higher temperature readings are caused by urban heat islands) or it's caused by solar cycles. They claim past rises in CO<sub>2</sub> have lagged behind past rises in temperature, therefore, CO<sub>2</sub> does not cause global warming. They also claim CO<sub>2</sub> will become saturated and have a diminishing effect on climate.
{{cquote|In times past, we could have counted on skeptical scientists to blow the whistle on a fraudulent science scare. Does scientific peer review protect the public from a misguided belief in human responsibility for Earth's natural climate changes? Apparently not. Much of the news about climate change is now being produced by highly qualified scientists, using multi-million dollar supercomputers to run billion-dollar coupled global circulation models projecting unverified climate guesses a hundred years into the future&mdash;where any mistakes will be hugely amplified. Other scientists are putting up highly sophisticated satelites, running long-range aircraft to monitor atmospheric trends, packing research ships with equipment for voyages to the Antarctic&mdash;and writing scary press releases to keep the research funds flowing.|||S. Fred Singer & Dennis T. Avery, ''Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years'', P. 116-71.}}
{{cquote|Man-made warming proponents have tried to discredit all opposition, of course. In the case of the [[Oregon Petition]], the detractors got a few fake names added to the petition and then reported them to the media, as if this discredited the thousands of valid names.|||S. Fred Singer & Dennis T. Avery, ''Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years'', P. 125.}}

==External links==
*[http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=S._Fred_Singer SourceWatch entry]
*[http://www.sepp.org/ SEPP homepage]
*[http://www.desmogblog.com/people/fred-singer DeSmog Blog] has a category for Fred Singer to keep tabs on his copious amounts of bullshit.
*Real Climate: [http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/11/not-the-ipcc-nipcc-report/ Not the IPCC ("NIPCC") Report], [http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/11/avery-and-singer-unstoppable-hot-air/ Avery and Singer: Unstoppable Hot Air]
*[http://profmandia.wordpress.com/2010/07/21/fred-singer-is-a-lot-like-george-costanza/ Fred Singer is a lot like George Costanza], Prof. Mandia
*[http://ossfoundation.us/projects/environment/global-warming/myths/s.-fred-singer Singer profile at OSS]
*[http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/12/hard-times-s.html Hard Times], Eli Rabett
*[http://davidappell.blogspot.com/2011/05/fred-singers-lousy-prediction-on-oil.html Fred Singer's Lousy Prediction on Oil], another truthy prediction from Singer

==Bibliography==
*Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. [http://pubs.acs.org/cen/books/89/8903books.html ''Merchants of Doubt''.] Bloomsbury Press, 2011. ISBN 1-608-19394-2

==References==
{{reflist}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Singer, Siegfried Fred}}
[[Category:Physicists]]
[[Category:Global warming denialists]]
[[Category:Shysters]]

Categories: Physicists, Global warming denialists, Shysters