Scofield Reference Bible

[[File:ScofieldBible.jpg|thumb|165px|right|Scofield's Bible was the most heavily annotated Protestant popular Bible since the ''[[Geneva Bible]]''.]]{{biblenav}}
The '''Scofield Reference Bible''' is a widely circulated annotated study [[Bible]] that was edited and annotated by [[lawyer]], failed [[politician]], bribery convict, and Bible scholar {{wpl|Cyrus I. Scofield||.}} 

This edition of the [[Bible]] first appeared in 1909, and was revised in 1917. The first edition was published by [[Oxford University]] Press in London for British distribution, with {{wpl|Charles Scribner’s Sons}} (Scribner's) handling the United States.{{efn|The American market primarily dependent on the Scribner's editions.}} The original version of the Bible contained the traditional [[King James Version]] text of the Bible itself. It is popular with [[Independent Baptists]] and [[fundamentalists]].

==Features==
This Bible was widely popular, as a result of several innovative features.  It introduced a chain cross-referencing system that tied together related verses of Scripture and allowed the reader to follow Biblical themes from one book and chapter to the next.  It featured an attempt to date the events of the Bible chronologically, and the text contains a running commentary that sets a year or approximate year for each page of the Bible text.  It was in the pages of the ''Scofield Reference Bible'' that many [[Christian fundamentalists]] encountered Archbishop [[James Ussher]]'s calculation fixing the date of Creation at 4004 BCE, and it was largely on the authority of Scofield's Bible that [[creationism]] became the subject of major controversy among Christian fundamentalists.<ref name="Mangum">R. Todd Mangum and Mark S. Sweetnam, The Scofield Bible: Its History and Impact on the Evangelical Church (Colorado Springs: Paternoster Publishing, 2009)</ref>

==Theology==
Scofield's theology begins with the proposition that the Bible is a closed system: "[T]he Bible story and message is like a picture wrought out in mosaics: each book, chapter, verse, and even word forms a necessary part, and has its own appointed place."  The task of the interpreter is to puzzle out the meaning of Biblical texts from within the Bible alone, based on the assumption that it is a single book whose every word is true.<ref>[http://www.communityrenewalsociety.org/Scofield#8 The Most Famous Study Bible of Them All: The Scofield Reference Bible]</ref> 

The ''Scofield Reference Bible'' taught the interpretative school of [[dispensationalism]], and it was the chief vehicle by which this school of Bible interpretation became highly influential in the [[United States]]. Scofield's annotations to the [[Book of Ezekiel]], ch. 38, [[Prophecy|prophesied]] that [[Russia]] would play a part in the Battle of [[Armageddon]].  This passage of Scofield's notes is illustrative of his interpretations and method:

{{cquote|That the primary reference is to the northern ([[Europe]]an) powers, headed up by [[Russia]], all agree. The whole passage should be read in connection with {{bible|Zechariah|12|1|4}}; {{bible|Zechariah|14|1|9}}; {{bible|Matthew|24|14|30}}; {{bible|Revelation|14|14|20}}; {{bible|Revelation|19|17|21}}, "[[gog]]" is the prince, "[[Magog]]," his land. The reference to Meshech and Tubal (Moscow and Tobolsk) is a clear mark of identification. Russia and the northern powers have been the latest persecutors of dispersed [[Israel]], and it is congruous both with divine justice and with the covenants (e.g. "{{bible|Genesis|15|18}}" See  "{{bible|Deuteronomy|30|3}}" that destruction should fall at the climax of the last mad attempt to exterminate the remnant of Israel in [[Jerusalem]]. The whole prophecy belongs to the yet future "day of [[Jehovah]]" ; {{bible|Isaiah|2|10|22}}; {{bible|Revelation|19|11|21}} and to the battle of [[Armageddon]] {{bible|Revelation|16|14}} See "{{bible|Revelation|19|19}}" but includes also the final revolt of the nations at the close of the kingdom-age. {{bible|Revelation|20|7|9}}.<ref>Cyrus Scofield, ''Scofield Reference Bible'', notes to Ezekiel, ch. 38</ref>}}

Ezekiel spoke words of doom against Gog, in all likelihood King {{wpl|Gyges of Lydia}} in Anatolia (Greek: ''Γύγης'', ''Guges'').  Gog/Gyges was not around to suffer his doom any more.  This didn't mean that the prophecy was fulfilled, had served its purpose as a warning, or was no longer relevant.  Instead, someone must be cast in the role of Gog, so that someone can be destroyed as Gog and the inerrancy of the prophecy might be fulfilled. Scofield's method tried to preserve inerrancy at the expense of literalism; the prophecy against Gog must come true, but "Gog" would no longer be the name of the actual victim.  Similar considerations led Scofield to prophesy the revival of the [[Roman Empire]], which figured in all the [[New Testament]] writers' visions of the future; and the reconstruction of a Temple at Jerusalem so that the Antichrist can [[abomination of desolation|desecrate]] it.<ref>Cyrus Scofield, ''Scofield Reference Bible'', notes to Daniel, ch. 2; notes to Revelation, ch. 13</ref>

Similarly fanciful interpretations are found throughout Scofield's text. He refers the most straightforward text in the [[Book of Revelation]], the epistles to seven churches of Asia Minor, to periods of church history without any warrant from the text.<ref>Cyrus Scofield, ''Scofield Reference Bible'', introduction to Revelation and notes to chs. 1-2.</ref>

Scofield's theology flowed from the contemporary idea of [[Biblical inerrancy]].  According to Scofield, prophecy in the Bible was not a call to repentance but a set of infallible dooms that must come to pass. Scofield called his approach to Bible interpretation 'rightly dividing the word of truth'.  In practice, this meant identifying prophecies as already fulfilled, and therefore inerrant but belonging to the past. Those whose fulfillment could not be identified in the past must therefore refer to the future.  The result was to treat Bible texts as absolutely inerrant by introducing the assumption that they had been edited by incompetents, who mixed fulfilled and future prophecies haphazardly in the same chapters.<ref>Cox, William E. [http://www.reformedontheweb.com/Why%20I%20left%20Scofieldism.pdf Why I Left Scofieldism], Reformed on the Web.</ref>

==Influence==
These and similar passages were a major source of [[Hal Lindsey]]'s earlier prophecies.  Scofield's extensive notes to the [[Book of Revelation]] are a major source of the various timetables, judgments, and [[plague]]s predicted by Lindsey and other fundamentalists' computations of the [[End Times]]. It was mainly a result of the success of the ''Scofield Reference Bible'' that dispensationalism has largely displaced the [[Calvinist]] understanding of the [[Book of Revelation]] and [[Bible prophecy]]; it is a result of the success of dispensationalism that [[conservative]] [[Protestantism]] in the U.S.A. lays such a great emphasis on end-times speculation.<ref name="Mangum" />

The original and 1917 text of the ''Scofield Reference Bible'' has fallen into the [[public domain]] in the United States. Oxford University Press continues to publish revised editions of this Bible under the title ''Oxford Scofield Study Bible'', which it offers with a variety of translations in addition to the original King James Version. The revisions have muted somewhat the more extravagant claims of Scofield's [[theology]].

==External links==
*[http://sacred-texts.com/bib/cmt/sco/index.htm The Scofield Bible Commentary]
*[http://www.preteristarchive.com/Books/pdf/1988_canfield_scofield-and-book.pdf The Incredible Scofield And His Book], Joseph M. Canfield
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20120205015142/http://www.founders.org/journal/fj09/article1.html ''A History of Dispensationalism in America''], Ernest Reisinger

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note|2}}

==References==
{{reflist}}

[[Category:Bible]]
[[Category:Books]]

Categories: Bible, Books