State religion

{{politics}}{{religion}}
A '''state religion''' is the endorsement or enforcement of a particular [[religion]] by a state.

This can be thought of as two positions; ''endorsement'' and ''enforcement'':

* The former, '''endorsement''', is benign for the most part.<ref group=note>Well, as benign as any one religion being in a position of dominance over others ''can'' be, anyways. (In practice, it may only mean that the government isn't participating in any religious persecution, while still ([[Hanlon's razor|intentionally or otherwise]]) encouraging such persecution. There's a ''reason'' why the United States has an [[Establishment Clause]].)</ref> England, for example, has [[Christianity]] (specifically the [[Church of England]] with the King at its head) as its official state religion, although in practice the country is almost entirely [[secular]].
* The latter position, that of '''enforcement''', is less benign: it can lead to repression of [[infidel|other religions]] and of [[atheism|lack of religion]]. Even today, a number of countries have repressive policies regarding their state religion and severe punishments that may be meted out to those who break them. These are, for the most part, the [[Islamic]] [[fundamentalist]] states in the [[Middle East]], such as [[Saudi Arabia]] and [[Iran]]. Some are surprised to learn that in [[Israel]], [[Orthodox Judaism]] controls family law, and that the Orthodox [[rabbi]]nate is state-funded; only Orthodox rabbis may legally marry people in-country.<ref>http://www.wrmea.org/2013-october-november/israel-and-judaism-little-religious-freedom-for-non-orthodox-jews-in-the-self-proclaimed-jewish-state.html</ref><ref>http://hiddush.org/article-15754-0-2015_Religion__State_Index__support_for_religious_freedom_rises.aspx</ref> 

Political rulers have often used state religions to uphold [[nationalist]] régimes — note for example [[Nazi]] [[Germany]]'s use of "[[Positive Christianity]]"<ref>http://www.truefreethinker.com/articles/adolf-hitler%E2%80%99s-nazi-reich-church-1942-ad-new-york-times-article{{dead link}}</ref> and the development of "State [[Shinto]]" in Imperial [[Japan]]. A unified religion allegedly promotes social cohesion,<ref>{{cite book | last1 = Furseth | first1 = Inger | author-link1 =  | last2 = Repstad | first2 = Pål | chapter = Religion, social unity, and conflict | title = An Introduction to the Sociology of Religion: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives | url =  https://books.google.com/books?id=g2K-jRfkRC8C | edition = reprint | location = Aldershot, Hampshire | publisher = Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. | publication-date = 2006 | page = 151 | isbn = 9780754656586 | access-date = 22 October 2019 | quote = Whereas many sociologists of religion have focused on the role religion plays in creating social integration, religion's contribution to conflict has been perceived to be more problematic. [...] Religion can clearly be an important contributing factor in social cohesion.}}</ref> regardless of private beliefs or of the actual [[ideology]] of [[ruling class]]es. There is also the "Religion of the State" as exemplified in [[fascism|fascist]] [[Italy]] (1922-1943), in [[communist]] [[China]], and formerly in the [[USSR]].<ref>https://www.bolshevik.info/religion-soviet-union170406.htm</ref>

In addition to giving a religion powers and status, being a state religion can also subject it to state control, with the government able to appoint church officials, set church policy, and even influence [[theology]].<ref name=casefordis>[https://www.secularism.org.uk/uploads/nss-disestablishment-report-2017-3.pdf Separating Church and State: The Case for Disestablishment], National Secular Society (UK)</ref> (The Russian Orthodox Church<ref>{{wpa|History of the Russian Orthodox Church}}</ref> in Imperial Russia (1721-1917)<ref>{{wpa|Russian Empire}}</ref> provides an instructive example.) State-religion status can also impose duties on a church, such as requiring it to marry or minister to everybody rather than picking and choosing.<ref name=casefordis/>

Note that the UK, ''with'' a state religion, has only 10% or less attending church ceremonies once a week,<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6520463.stm#graphic BBC report of Christian charity Tearfund's survey]</ref> while the US, ''without'' a state religion, has a comparative figure of over 40%.<ref>http://www.religioustolerance.org/rel_rate.htm</ref>

One should distinguish a state religion or state church from a {{wpl|national church||,}} which is any body that sees itself as connected with or ministering to an entire nation. A state church will usually be a national church, but many national churches have no relation to the state (e.g. Scandinavian Lutheran churches).

Having a state religion (as opposed to an authentic religion of [[true believer|True Believers]]) may also encourage the phenomenon of genuinely-held public collective beliefs in opposition to genuinely-held private beliefs, as studied by {{wpl|Margaret Gilbert}} {{lived|1942|}}. (Compare the dichotomy between [[Rousseau]]ian {{wpl|general will}} and any right to personal freedom.<ref>Compare: {{cite book | last1 = Jung | first1 = Carl Gustav | author-link1 = Carl Jung | editor1-last = Read | editor1-first = Herbert | editor1-link = Herbert Read | editor2-last = Fordham | editor2-first = Michael | editor2-link = Michael Fordham | editor3-last = Adler | editor3-first = Gerhard | editor3-link = Gerhard Adler | title = Collected Works | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Guc4CQAAQBAJ | publisher = Routledge | publication-date = 1973 | page =  | isbn = 9781317530152 | access-date = 22 October 2019 | quote = Anyone who has once learned to submit absolutely to a collective belief and to renounce his eternal right to freedom and the equally eternal duty of individual responsibility will persist in this attitude, and will be able to march with the same [[credulity]] and the same lack of criticism in the reverse direction, if another and manifestly 'better' belief is foisted upon his alleged idealism.}}</ref>)

==Examples==
===[[Christianity]]===
* [[Argentina]] ([[Roman Catholic]]ism)
* [[Denmark]] ([[Lutheranism]])
* {{wpl|El Salvador}} (Roman Catholicism)
* [[England]] (Church of England, see below)
* [[Greece]] ([[Eastern Orthodox Church|Greek Orthodox Church]])
* [[Iceland]] (Lutheranism)
* Malta (Roman Catholicism)
* [[Norway]] (Lutheranism)
* [[Roman Empire]] {{wpl|State church of the Roman Empire|from 380 CE}} ([[Council of Nicaea|Nicene]] Christianity)
* [[Russia]] ({{wpl|Russian Orthodox Church}} (''de facto'' but not ''the jure''))<ref>{{cite book|last=Bourdeaux|first=Michael|chapter=Trends in Religious Policy|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EPP3ti4hysUC&pg=PA46|title=Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia|publisher=Taylor and Francis|year=2003|isbn=9781857431377|pages=46–52|ref=harv}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.christianpost.com/news/russia-s-de-facto-state-religion.html|title=Russia's De-Facto State Religion|date=24 April 2008|publisher=[[The Christian Post]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/russian-orthodox-church-from-farce-to-tragedy/|title=The Russian Orthodox Church: from farce to tragedy?|publisher=openDemocracy|date=3 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jan/07/russia.ameliagentleman|title=Backlash of faith shakes atheists|quote=It is only natural there has been a surge in interest in religion over the past decade, given the repression that went before,' Levinson said. 'But we are particularly concerned about the growing influence of the Russian Orthodox Church - which has become the de facto state religion - to the exclusion of all other convictions.|publisher=[[The Guardian]]|date=7 January 2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/world/europe/24church.html|title=At Expense of All Others, Putin Picks a Church|quote=Just as the government has tightened control over political life, so, too, has it intruded in matters of faith. The Kremlin’s surrogates in many areas have turned the Russian Orthodox Church into a de facto official religion|publisher=[[The New York Times]]|date=24 April 2008}}</ref>
* Holy See ([[Vatican City]]) (Roman Catholicism)

===Islam===
* [[Afghanistan]]
* [[Algeria]]
* [[Bahrain]]
* [[Brunei]] (on 1 May 2014, strict ''[[sharia]]'' law was introduced and applies to both Muslims and non-Muslims)
* [[Bangladesh]]
* [[Egypt]]
* [[Iran]] (specifically Shia)
* [[Iraq]]
* [[Jordan]]
* [[Libya]]
* [[Malaysia]]
* {{wpl|Mauritania}}
* {{wpl|Oman}}
* [[Pakistan]]
* [[Qatar]]
* [[Saudi Arabia]] 
* [[United Arab Emirates]]
* Aceh (part of [[Indonesia]])
* Parts of [[Somalia]] are ''de jure'' secular but ''de facto'' ruled by [[theocracy|theocratic]] courts
* Several states of {{wpl|Nigeria}}

===Orthodox Judaism (only applies to Jewish population)===
* [[Israel]]

===[[Buddhism]]===
* {{wpl|Bhutan}}
* [[Cambodia]]
* [[Myanmar]]
* [[Thailand]]
* [[Tibet]]'s government-in-exile

===Shinto===
* Pre-[[WWII]] [[Japan]]

===Atheism===
* [[Albania]] (banned all religious practice 1967–1990)
* [[China]]<ref name="Dillon2001">{{cite book |last1=Dillon |first1=Michael |title=Religious Minorities and China |date=2001 |publisher=Minority Rights Group International |language=English}}</ref>
* The former [[Soviet Union|USSR]]<ref name="Adappur2000">{{cite book|last=Adappur|first=Abraham|title=Religion and the Cultural Crisis in India and the West|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=44DYAAAAMAAJ|accessdate=14 July 2016|year=2000|publisher=Intercultural Publications|language=English |isbn=9788185574479|quote=Forced Conversion under Atheistic Regimes: It might be added that the most modern example of forced "conversions" came not from any theocratic state, but from a professedly atheist government — that of the Soviet Union under the Communists.}}</ref>

===Juche===
{{main|Juche}}
*[[North Korea]] (nominally state atheist)

==Counterexamples==
These countries, among others, have officially enshrined [[freedom of religion]]:
* [[Australia]]<ref group=note>Technically. The High Court, led by Lionel Murphy, a pissed-off atheist, ruled that the government couldn't declare what was and wasn't a religion, which is why it's one of the countries where [[Scientology]] is a tax-exempt religion. Murphy suggested that if they didn't want to give Scientology a free ride, they should stop the tax exemption of religion in general.</ref>
* [[Belgium]] (even if it came multiple times under fire from ruling Catholics)
* [[Brazil]]
* [[France]] 
* [[Germany]] (less staunchly so, see below)
* [[India]] 
* [[Indonesia]] (except Aceh, see above)
* [[Japan]]
* [[Mexico]]
* [[Netherlands]] 
* [[New Zealand]]
* [[South Africa]]
* [[South Korea]]
* [[Sweden]] (after having a Lutheran state church up to 2000)
* [[Turkey]] (despite numerous attempts to undermine secularism by the current government) 
* [[United States]] (thanks [[Thomas Jefferson|Mr. Jefferson]])
* [[Uruguay]]

==Weird borderline cases==
Many states, while not having a state religion, are not precisely secular either. This ranges from mention of "god" in the constitution, e.g. [[Poland]], Germany, [[Hungary]] and [[Canada]] on the one hand,<ref group=note>Although the Charter of Rights and Freedoms mentions God in the preamble, it also guarantees the freedom of conscience and religion. There is no established church.</ref> to on the other state-funded religion classes in public schools, e.g. Spain and Belgium<ref group=note>In both countries, state-funded classes on Christianity, or rather its variants (Catholicism and Protestantism) are about as publicly funded as classes on Judaism, Islam, [[Sikhism]], and non-confessional ethics. Classes on other religions than those mentioned may, however, be out of luck, especially those that are highly personal and lack a central dogma, such as [[Neopaganism]].</ref> and the state paying the upkeep of religious infrastructure. Also, these in-between countries can pay the wages of priests and ministers or even collect tithes for the church as in Germany. While [[Militant atheism|"radical" atheists]] often advocate for full secularism and try to repeal these laws and those prohibiting "[[blasphemy]]", religious advocates often defend these statutes with [[non sequitur]]s such as: "It's [[not as bad as]] Saudi Arabia."

Israel also falls in this category; despite being a Jewish state, its laws are mostly based on secular principles with contentious exceptions — mostly in family law. This issue is as much a political football as prayer in public schools or gay marriage have been in the US. Israel has no civil marriage, but secular and leftist parties want to introduce it, while Likud and religious parties remain opposed. Israel does, however, recognize marriages (including [[same-sex marriage]]s) that were validly entered abroad.

==United Kingdom==
===England===
The state [[religion]] or Established Church of England is "The [[Church of England]]" or "Anglican Church",<ref>http://www.cofe.anglican.org/</ref> familiarly known as the "C of E", and was founded by Henry VIII to get around the papal ban on his desires for possible manchild-bearing spouses. Said Henry became officially "of the Church of England in Earth Supreme Head" in 1535. Take that, assorted [[Pope|Bishops of Rome]].

Some senior clergy actually have the right, ''by virtue of their job'', to sit in the upper house of the legislature ([[House of Lords]]). The bishops of the C of E are also (nominally) selected from a shortlist by the monarch (in fact, by the Prime Minister). (The other methods of gaining entry to the House of Lords — originally gained ''by virtue of their birth'' — are, of course, perfectly legitimate.)

The fact that the religion is officially part of the government gives the clergy an influence out of proportion to the active popular support for their denomination, but nobody takes any notice of them, so it doesn't matter. On the other hand, it also gives the government and parliament control over the church, including the appointment of bishops and the approval of liturgy.<ref name=newhumanist/> Even devout Christians might object to (possibly atheist) politicians having a say on these things.

The word ''antidisestablishmentarianism'', once the longest word in the OED, was coined (allegedly by future [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] William Ewart Gladstone<ref>http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=antidisestablishment</ref>) to refer to opposition to disestablishing the Church of England.

Note that the Church of England is established in England only and not in the rest of the UK (plus the [[Isle of Man]] and the Channel Islands). The Anglicans became disestablished in [[Ireland]] in 1871 and in [[Wales]] in 1920 due to low take-up by the populations there.<ref name=newhumanist>[https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/5240/disestablish-and-be-damned Disestablish and be damned], New Humanist, 16 Nov 2017</ref> Anglicanism has never been established in Scotland (it being a separate kingdom during Henry VIII's time and all). As for the "C of E" in other outposts of [[British Empire|The Empire]]: Canadian Anglicans officially stopped calling themselves "the Church of England in the Dominion of [[Canada]]" as early as 1955.

===Scotland===
The [[Church of Scotland]] formerly had a close relationship with the state and was effectively the established church; the 1921 Declaratory Act changed its status to free it of government control, although people still can't agree on whether the church is truly disestablished.<ref name=newhumanist/><ref name=glasgowlaw>[https://www.uofgschooloflaw.com/blog/2017/05/12/scots-law-and-the-church-of-scotland-the-establishment-question-a-roundtable-seminar Scots law and the Church of Scotland: the “establishment” question – a roundtable seminar], University of Glasgow School of Law Blog, May 12, 2017</ref>

However, certain Christian denominations still have some statutory powers. Council education boards, responsible for the administration of state schools in a council area, must include three religious representatives: a Protestant (in practice Church of Scotland), a Roman Catholic, and a third of any faith. In 2019 some councils stopped allowing these religious representatives to vote, but they still get the chance to speak and influence decisions.<ref>[https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2019/04/council-ends-church-officials-education-committee-voting-rights/ Council ends church officials’ education committee voting rights], National Secular Society, 25 April 2019</ref><ref>[http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/speak_out/investing_in_young_people/the_church_of_scotland_and_education Education and the Church], Church of Scotland, accessed 5 Sep 2019</ref> Church of Scotland court citations can legally be enforced by warrants issued by the secular courts, although in practice church courts only consider ecclesiastical matters and secular officials are not involved.<ref name=glasgowlaw/> Scotland's four ancient universities still train candidates for ministry in the Church of Scotland, and the Church has a privileged position in prisons and other institutions.<ref name=glasgowlaw/>

==U.S.A.==
The US specifically doesn't have a state religion, with the [[establishment clause]] of the [[First Amendment]] saying "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" — commonly referred to as the [[separation of church and state]], although the phrase derives from a letter by [[Thomas Jefferson]] and is not found in the law itself. Despite this, many on the [[Religious Right]] believe the US was established as a [[The United States as a Christian nation|Christian nation]], and actively support state-sponsored religion, including using the [[Ten Commandments]] as a basis for law and displaying them prominently in public.

==Scandinavian Lutheranism==
The Scandinavian and German [[Lutheran]] churches have traditionally enjoyed a close relationship with the state, including features such as parliamentary control or oversight of the church and funding via taxation. However in the last century or so, these links have weakened. The Church of Sweden ended its state role in 2000; and the General Synod of the Church of Norway voted for separation of church and state in 2006. The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland has been independent since 1869, although until 1908 the law required church members to attend at least once a year. It still receives funding from taxation (which you can avoid paying by leaving the church); today Finland has two national churches, the Lutheran and the Finnish Orthodox Church, but they're independent of the state.<ref name=britluth>[https://www.britannica.com/topic/Lutheranism/Organization Lutheranism: Organization], Britannica</ref><ref>{{wpa|Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland}}</ref>

==Germany==
The German Lutheran church was closely linked to the state, with government figures exerting overall control, until after World War One when the relationship was dismantled.<ref name=britluth/> Germany has two national churches, the Evangelical Church in Germany and Catholic Church in Germany, reflecting the division between Catholic and Protestant areas that goes back to the [[Protestant Reformation]]. Members are required to pay a church tax collected on top of income tax, although church membership is not compulsory and the churches are independent of state control (the Evangelical Church is a loose grouping of Protestant denominations, while the Catholic is under the control of the [[Vatican]]). Today, any religious community can get the government to collect church tax from its members, with part of the money withheld for administrative costs, although some choose to be funded directly by members and avoid paying administration fees.<ref>{{wpa|Evangelical Church in Germany}}</ref><ref>[https://wwkn.de/en/about-german-taxes/church-tax-kirchensteuer/ German church tax (Kirchensteuer)], WW+KN</ref> Hence Germany has no state church.

==Russia==
The [[Russia]]n [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Orthodox Church]] acts like it's the official state religion, and receives significant support and cooperation from [[Vladimir Putin]] and other nationalists, although it has no formal status — freedom of religion in post-Communist Russia has been affirmed by legal cases such as the {{wpl|Bhagavad Gita trial in Russia||,}} in which the Orthodox Church unsuccessfully tried to ban [[Hare Krishna]] scriptures.<ref>{{wpa|Religion in Russia}}</ref>

==See also==
*[[American Taliban]]
*[[Theocracy]]

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{reflist|1|90%}}

[[Category:Political terms]]
[[Category:Religious terms]]

Categories: Political terms, Religious terms