Dwight D. Eisenhower

{{bronze}}[[File:Dwight D. Eisenhower, official photo portrait, May 29, 1959.jpg|thumb|right|165px|Portrait of the president, 1959.]]{{uspolitics}}
{{cquote|I hate [[war]] as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its stupidity.|||Uncle Ike on war.<ref>[https://www.gilderlehrman.org/sites/default/files/inline-pdfs/Eisenhower%20Quotes.pdf Dwight D. Eisenhower Quotes]</ref>}}
{{cquote|If the right wing wants a fight, they’re going to get it. If they want to leave the Republican Party and form a third party, that’s their business, but before I end up, either this Republican Party will reflect progressivism or I won’t be with them anymore.|||[[Liberal Republican]]s ''did'' exist!<ref>[https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/rand-paul-and-the-eisenhower-dream Rand Paul and the Eisenhower Dream]</ref>}}

'''General Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower''' {{lived|1890|1969}} was an American war hero, the 34<sup>th</sup> [[President of the United States|President]] of the [[United States]], and one of the only notable things to come from the US state of [[Kansas]] (though he was born in [[Texas]]). He was Supreme Allied Commander in Europe and one of only five five-star generals in US history,<ref>[https://history.army.mil/html/faq/5star.html How many U.S. Army five-star generals have there been and who were they?]</ref> and his leadership helped engineer the Allied invasion of [[Italy]], D-Day, and the final western offensive against [[Nazi Germany]] in [[France]] and eastern Germany during 1944 and 1945. Together with the [[Soviet Union]] pushing from Eastern Europe, soldiers fighting under Eisenhower helped destroy what was the evilest regime so far in human [[history]]. After the war, Eisenhower served as the US Military Governor of the American Zone in occupied Germany (1945), then Army Chief of Staff (1945–1948), then president of Columbia University (1948–1953), and finally the first Supreme Commander of [[NATO]] (1951–1952). He was a pretty busy guy.

In 1952, he finally allowed himself to be dragged into the clusterfuck that was (and is) US politics. He entered the presidential race as the [[Republican Party]]'s candidate in order to prevent the nomination from going to [[Ohio]] Senator [[Robert Taft]], whose isolationist foreign policy would have endangered the US' position as the leading world power. During his campaign, Eisenhower utilized television advertisements, and famously aired an all-time classic American ad jingle.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDBYuAxyT4E Ike for President]</ref> 

Eisenhower won that election in a landslide, and he focused on ending the [[Korean War]], keeping [[communist]] [[China]] away from [[Taiwan]], and holding the US' position in the [[Cold War]]. On the domestic front, he continued the [[New Deal]] policies, enforced the ''[[Brown v. Board of Education]]'' decision's mandatory desegregation of public schools, and undertook the construction of the Interstate Highway System. He won reelection in a landslide and spent much of his second term emphasizing [[science]] education in public schools in order to create an economically competitive US workforce. On the negative side, he boosted the political career of [[Richard Nixon|Tricky Dick]] by selecting him as a running mate and keeping him on as Vice President, although historian Brooke Berger points out how that was more the decision of his advisors as opposed to something he himself chose.<ref>[https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2013/02/15/eisenhower-and-nixon-secrets-of-an-unlikely-pair Eisenhower and Nixon: Secrets of an Unlikely Pair]</ref> He also provided aid to [[France]] in suppressing separatist rebels in [[Vietnam]] and ordered the [[CIA]] to overthrow [[Iran]]'s democratically-elected prime minister. 

In most respects, Eisenhower governed as a moderate [[conservative]], and occasionally an outright [[liberal]]. His presidency happened during an unprecedented period of US economic expansion, with the Gross National Product (GNP) jumping from $212 billion in 1945 to $504 billion in 1960.<ref>[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/eisenhower-domestic/ Domestic Politics under Eisenhower]. ''PBS.''</ref> Most white Americans enjoyed increased incomes and purchasing power, and white Americans began flocking out of the cities into suburban single-family homes.<ref>[https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-64 Suburbanization in the United States after 1945]. Becky Nicolaides and Andrew Wies. ''Oxford Research Encyclopedias.''</ref> Unfortunately, [[African-Americans]] were excluded from these benefits due to the ongoing [[Jim Crow laws]], a situation Eisenhower did little to directly address. His greatest [[civil rights]] legacy would come though the liberal judges he appointed, as Chief Justice Earl Warren{{efn|Also a Republican, even serving as Thomas Dewey's running mate during the 1948 Presidental Election.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/biography/Earl-Warren Earl Warren]</ref>}} and Associate Justice William Brennan{{efn|Who was a Democrat.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-Joseph-Brennan-Jr William Brennan]</ref>}} pushed the [[Supreme Court]] to declare constitutional rights to [[Griswold v. Connecticut|privacy]], [[Miranda warning|remain silent]], [[Classroom prayer|not be compelled to pray in school]], and more.{{efn|It has been reported that Eisenhower said of those two “I made two mistakes and both of them are sitting on the Supreme Court.” However, we have no first-hand evidence he actually did say this.<ref>[https://www.governing.com/context/amy-coney-barrett-is-in-an-impossible-position-so-are-we.html Amy Coney Barrett Is in an Impossible Position. So Are We.]</ref>}}

In President Eisenhower's final days in office, he famously warned against the danger that out-of-control military spending would fuel an expansion of the influence that private military contractors would hold over the government, a phenomenon he called the "[[military-industrial complex]]". After his presidency, Eisenhower occasionally offered advice and counsel to his successor, President [[John F. Kennedy]], most notably during the Cuban Missile Crisis. 

Eisenhower is today considered to be a pretty decent president, and most historians Like Ike.<ref>[https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2017/?personid=3465 Presidential Historians Survey 2017: Dwight D. Eisenhower.] C-SPAN.</ref>

==Ike in the Army==
[[File:Lieutenant Colonel Dwight D Eisenhower 1919.PNG|thumb|right|350px|Lieutenant Colonel Eisenhower with a prototype tank at Fort Meade, [[Maryland]] in 1919.]]
{{cquote|War is mankind's most tragic and stupid folly; to seek or advise its deliberate provocation is a black crime against all men. |||Ike at the 1947 West Point Graduation Ceremony.<ref name="quotes">[https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/eisenhowers/quotes Quotes] Eisenhower Library.</ref>}}
As the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, Eisenhower is rightfully remembered as the man who crossed the Channel, liberated France, and socked ol' Adolf on the jaw. However, his military leadership in the Second World War got off to a rough start, and his leadership style showed serious flaws. To be frank, he wasn't much of a battlefield commander - but hey, then neither was [[George Washington]].{{efn|Washington even had the advantage of not having those insubordinate egomaniacs Montgomery and Patton under his command.}} It should also be stressed that Ike's lack of prowess as a soldier did not make him a poor fit for the war's demands. What made him a valuable Supreme Commander were his organizational abilities and ability to juggle the various Allied governments' competing demands and requirements. As Jean Edward Smith writes in the biography, ''Eisenhower in War and Peace'':

{{cquote| No other general officer, British or American, could have dealt as effectively with Washington and London, kept headstrong subordinates working in harmony, and [...] amassed the materiel that ensured ultimate victory. Ike [...] absorbed what was coming down from above, shielded his commanders from higher authority, and allowed them to fight the war without excessive second-guessing.<ref name=Smith>''Eisenhower in War and Peace'' by Jean Edward Smith</ref>{{rp|292}}}}

===The early days===
Eisenhower's rise through the military command became quite steep during the aftermath of Pearl Harbor. He was assigned to the War Plans Division and served under General {{wpl|George Marshall}}, quickly impressing the man with his organizational skills and his ability to coordinate British and American war efforts.<ref name="war">[https://www.thoughtco.com/general-dwight-d-eisenhower-2360505 A Military Profile of General Dwight D. Eisenhower]</ref> Eisenhower's time with Marshall in Washington also saw him involved with reorganizing the Allied war effort under the newly-established Combined Chiefs of Staff (CCS). He personally drafted the letter of instruction, which would be used to define the powers and responsibilities of the Supreme Commanders of each front.<ref name=Smith/>{{rp|92-118}}

However, as impressive as it was, this post also saw the first significant demonstration of Eisenhower's inexperience as a commander. Under instruction by Marshall, Eisenhower put together a plan for a cross-channel invasion of France (codenamed BOLERO), which was to take place in late 1942. Unfortunately, such an endeavor would have been entirely impossible this early in the war due to the US military's inexperience and the Wehrmacht's largely-intact strength. However, Eisenhower's relationships with his British counterparts, his intricate understanding of Allied command structures, and his organizational skills convinced Marshall to appoint him Supreme Allied Commander in North Africa.<ref>[https://www.dday-overlord.com/en/d-day/preliminary-operations/bolero Operation Bolero in April 1943 – Normandy landings]</ref>

===Baptism by TORCH===
[[File:Major General Dwight Eisenhower, 1942 TR207.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Major General Eisenhower in 1942.]]
Operation TORCH, the Allied assault on Northern Africa, was Eisenhower's first real test of his command abilities, and ''oh boy'' did it show. Allied planning nearly-catastrophically misread [[Vichy France]]'s willingness to resist the invasion.<ref>[http://www.historynet.com/operation-torch-allied-invasion-of-north-africa.htm Operation Torch: Allied Invasion of North Africa]</ref> Eisenhower's leadership was also deeply flawed, as he stayed hundreds of miles away in Gibraltar during the battle and often gave orders that had no bearing on reality.<ref name=Smith/>{{rp|230-265}} While the sheer numbers of Allied troops were able to seize Morocco and Algeria, Eisenhower then hesitated and let Axis troops escape to Tunisia. This mistake came under harsh criticism from General Sir {{wpl|Alan Brooke}}, who said, "Eisenhower seemed unable to grasp the urgency of pushing on to Tunis before the Germans built up their resistance there. [...] I had little confidence in his ability to handle the military situation confronting him, and he caused me great anxiety."<ref>Bryant, ''Turn of the Tide''. p430</ref>

After an admonishment from Marshall, Ike traveled to the Tunisian front. He found that rains had softened the ground, making his planned assault completely impossible.<ref name=Smith/>{{rp|230-265}} Had he not done so, he would have ordered his troops forward with no knowledge of this complication. This humiliation was quickly followed by another, as during a meeting of the CCS, Eisenhower's proposed plan to take Tunisia (codenamed SATIN) was ripped into by General Brooke and General Marshall, as it would have let the Germans crush the entire Allied front between Libya and Algeria.<ref name=Smith/>{{rp|230-265}} By this time, Ike was getting jittery. Patton commented that "He thinks his thread is about to be cut."<ref>''The Patton Papers 1940-1945'' by Martin Blumenson</ref>{{rp|154-5}}

Luckily, Eisenhower was never in real danger. Brooke, Marshall, and the Allied national leaders all respected his unique ability to handle and prioritize the many, many demands of leading such a massive international coalition. Brooke said that Eisenhower "possessed an exceptional ability to handle Allied forces, to treat them all with strict impartiality, and to get the best out of an inter-Allied force."<ref>''Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History'' by Robert E. Sherwood</ref>{{rp|667}}

In other words, as we would later see with his presidency, Eisenhower was much more a leader than a warrior.

===The Patton problem===
[[File:Pattonphoto.jpg|thumb|right|165px|Patton also bashed a subordinate's head in with a shovel during [[WWI]] and possibly killed him.<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/wwii-made-george-patton-a-hero-but-the-great-war-made-him-a-commander/2017/03/09/6b086dce-0026-11e7-8f41-ea6ed597e4ca_story.html?utm_term=.fd385aa69012 WWII made George Patton a hero, but the ‘Great War’ made him a commander] ''Washington Post.''</ref>]]
Eisenhower's subordinate during Operation TORCH and Operation HUSKY, {{wpl|George Patton}}, ended up being a bit of a problem. Eisenhower's less-than-upfront handling of this problem should be acknowledged.

Patton had a bad habit of physically abusing his soldiers. There were two separate incidents where Patton visited a field hospital and beat a man he didn't think was wounded enough to be there.<ref name=Smith/>{{rp|266-289}} On the second occasion, Patton drew his sidearm and threatened to execute his subordinate, causing distress among the medical staff. Striking an enlisted man was a court-martial offense under Articles 95 and 96 of the Articles of War.

Eisenhower's first instinct was to cover it up, and he said, "If this thing ever gets out they'll be howling for Patton's scalp, and that will be the end of Georgie's service in the war. I simply cannot let that happen."<ref>''The Supreme Commander: The War Years of Dwight D. Eisenhower'' by Stephen E. Ambrose</ref>{{rp|229}} Eisenhower's immediate response was limited to writing a private reprimand to Patton and demanding an apology be delivered to the soldiers he struck; he did not inform either Marshall or the War Department.<ref name=Smith/>{{rp|266-289}} When some news reporters flew to Sicily to ask Ike about the incident, he convinced them to suppress the story.<ref name="badboy">Axelrod, Alan (2006), ''Patton: A Biography'', London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, ISBN 978-1-4039-7139-5</ref> Eventually, of course, the media broke the story, and things got much worse after Eisenhower's subordinates admitted that there had been no official reprimand over the incident.<ref name=Smith/>{{rp|266-289}} However, with the war going on, Eisenhower successfully swept the incident under the rug after new and more pressing news stories distracted the press.

Ike later commented to his driver, Kay Summersby, that "Georgie is one of the best generals I have. But he's just like a time bomb. You never know when he's going to go off. All you can be sure of is that it will probably be in the wrong place at the wrong time."<ref>Kay Summersby Morgan, ''Past Forgetting'' 145.</ref>

===D-Day===
[[File:Eisenhower d-day.jpg|thumb|350px|Underpaid, undersexed, and under Eisenhower: the general meets his men on the eve of D-Day.]]
{{cquote|You are about to embark upon the Great [[Crusade]], toward which we have striven these many months. The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. In company with our brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other Fronts, you will bring about the destruction of the German war machine, the elimination of Nazi tyranny over the oppressed peoples of Europe, and security for ourselves in a free world.|||Ike to his troops on the eve of D-Day.<ref>[http://www.3ad.com/history/wwll/feature.pages/d.day.letters.htm D-Day Message to the Troops]</ref>}}
Eisenhower's most famous moments came after Roosevelt appointed him Supreme Allied Commander in the European Front with Churchill's consent. This placed Ike in command of the massive proposed naval invasion of France (OVERLORD). The invasion planning had a rough start, as British General {{wpl| Bernard Montgomery}} and Ike both saw major flaws in OVERLORD, not least that the invasion front was far too narrow, and the follow-on failed to recognize the importance of capturing a port.<ref name="overlord">Smith, Jean Edward. ''Eisenhower in War and Peace'', 2012 Random House Publishing. "D-Day".</ref> Eisenhower was able to notice these flaws primarily because of his involvement in the naval landings at Salerno in Italy, which had been a disaster that almost cost the USA an entire army. Once again, Eisenhower's planning and negotiation skills allowed him to coordinate with Monty and de Gaulle to develop a finished product.

[[File:Into the Jaws of Death 23-0455M edit.jpg|thumb|right|250px|That famous photo of Omaha Beach that everyone in creation has seen at some point.]]

The landings went as planned in all areas but Omaha beach, where American forces struggled against bad weather conditions and some glaringly bad command decisions. Low-lying clouds prevented close air support, and a veteran German division straight from the front lines in Russia was crewing the fortifications.<ref name="dday">Smith, Jean Edward. ''Eisenhower in War and Peace'', 2012 Random House Publishing. "The Liberation of France".</ref> Rather than order a naval bombardment, Ike's subordinates pressed the attack, even ordering the assault craft to debark further from shore than normal, meaning that soldiers were horribly seasick when they finally stumbled onto the beach.<ref name="dday"></ref> As a result of all these misfortunes, the assault regiments were barely clinging onto a hundred yards of beach by noon of the invasion, as they were pinned down by German forts and under constant bombardment. The success on Omaha beach happened ''despite'' command decisions, not due to them. It was a near thing, despite Hitler being caught with his pants down (sorry for that image). Eisenhower bears much of the responsibility for this, as he appointed his inexperienced but close friend Gee Gerow to lead on Omaha beach despite knowing this was likely a bad idea.<ref name="dday"></ref>

Directly after issuing the order for the D-Day Landings, he scribbled a few words down on a piece of paper which he discovered in his tunic pocket a few weeks later, written in case D-Day ended in disaster<ref>{{cite book |title=Five Armies in Normandy |last=Keegan |first=John |publisher=Pimlico |year=1992 |isbn=0-7126-5579-4 |page=66 }}</ref><ref>[http://www.businessinsider.com/d-day-in-case-of-failure-letter-by-general-eisenhower-2012-6 D-Day In case of failure letter], Business Insider</ref>

{{Cquote|Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place were based on the best information available. The troops, the air and navy did all that bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt it is mine alone.}}

Accepting responsibility? What a wimp! No wonder he never made it to a 6-star general!

===''Alpenfestung'': Why Ike went south===
[[File:Final Operations - 19 April-7 Mai 1945.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Map of Allied Operations in Germany April-May 1945. See the huge push into Bavaria for seemingly no reason.]]
What also may be seen as an Allied failure during the war came after the successful landings. Eisenhower's strategy in Europe could have gone in two primary paths: adopt a broad front strategy and push the Germans back everywhere, or just make an overwhelming mad dash for Berlin. Ike controversially took the first option and reoriented his advance into southern Germany and Austria. The people to blame for this decision are the Allied intelligence workers; they had supplied a large amount of intercepted German communications (codenamed ULTRA), which led them to believe that Hitler was planning a last stand in southern Germany.<ref name="ultra">[http://www.allworldwars.com/Ultra-and-The-Myth-of-the-National-Redoubt-by-Marvin-Meek.html ULTRA AND THE MYTH OF THE GERMAN "NATIONAL REDOUBT"] Meek, Marvin L. ''All World Wars''.</ref> General Eisenhower would write after the war that,

{{cquote|"For many weeks we had been receiving reports that the Nazi intention, in extremity, was to withdraw the cream of the SS, Gestapo, and other organizations fanatically devoted to Hitler, into the mountains of southern Bavaria, western Austria, and northern Italy. There they expected to block the tortuous mountain passes and to hold out indefinitely against the Allies.... The evidence was clear that the Nazi[s] intended to make the attempt and I decided to give him no opportunity to carry it out."}}

This was the myth of the "Alpine Fortress" or the "National Redoubt." The whole thing was a nothing-burger. Himmler proposed the plan, but Hitler never seriously considered it.<ref>[http://atlanticsentinel.com/2016/06/the-german-national-redoubt-that-wasnt/ The German National Redoubt That Wasn’t] Ottens, Nick. ''Atlantic Sentinel.'' 3.JUN.16</ref> At any rate, the rumor suckered the Western Allies, and Eisenhower pushed south instead of east to chase a ghost. On the flip side, this may have been a case of making the right decision for the wrong reasons: the Soviets weren't going to just let the Western Allies take Berlin, which they viewed as theirs by right of conquest and just rewards for the enormous blood price they had paid to break the Wehrmacht, and there would have been the real possibility of a disastrous Soviet vs. Anglo-American clash had the latter tried to suddenly rush for Berlin.<ref>Historian Max Hasting raised this troubling possibility in "Armageddon: The Battle for Germany, 1944-1945"</ref>

==Ike in the Elections==
[[File:1952 Eisenhower Political Ad - I Like Ike - Presidential Campaign Ad.webm|thumb|right|250px|1952 advertisement from the Eisenhower campaign.]]
{{cquote|"When I was a small boy in Kansas, a friend of mine and I went fishing and as we sat there in the warmth of the summer afternoon on a river bank, we talked about what we wanted to do when we grew up. I told him that I wanted to be a real major league baseball player, a genuine professional like Honus Wagner. My friend said that he'd like to be president of the United States. Neither of us got our wish.<ref>[https://www.loc.gov/collections/jackie-robinson-baseball/articles-and-essays/early-baseball-pictures-1860s-to-1920s/game-day-in-the-majors/ Game Day in the Majors]</ref>}}
Due to Eisenhower's hand in the Allied victory in the Second World War, he became immensely popular with the American people. Many politicians, both [[Republican]] and [[Democratic]], attempted to recruit him to run for national office on their side.

===Election of 1948===
In the run-up to the 1948 election season, President [[Truman]] was fairly unpopular with his approval rating dropping to as low as 36%,<ref>[https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/harry-s-truman-public-approval Harry S. Truman Public Approval]</ref> and he was facing internal divisions within his own party. His reelection hopes became vanishingly thin after [[Strom Thurmond]] and the [[Dixiecrats]] split from the party after Truman embraced [[civil rights]] for black Americans.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/biography/Strom-Thurmond Strom Thurmond] ''Britannica''</ref> Truman would later go so far as to desegregate the armed forces with an executive order.<ref>[https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=84 Text of Executive Order 9981]</ref>

Realizing that his political future was in jeopardy (and fearing [[Douglas MacArthur]]'s attempt to win the Republican nomination, which many Republicans had attempted to convince him to do<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/biography/Douglas-MacArthur Douglas MacArthur]</ref>), Truman had a private conversation with Eisenhower where he urged the former general to run for president as a Democrat, with Truman as the vice president.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/11/us/truman-wrote-of-48-offer-to-eisenhower.html?fta=y Truman Wrote of '48 Offer to Eisenhower]''New York Times''. JULY 11, 2003</ref> Eisenhower would refuse this offer, and McArthur would fail to receive his party's nomination. Truman's political vulnerability induced the Americans for Democratic Action (ADA) to also approach Eisenhower and offer him their support if he sought the nomination.<ref>[https://millercenter.org/president/truman/campaigns-and-elections HARRY S. TRUMAN: CAMPAIGNS AND ELECTIONS] Alonzo L. Hamby. ''Miller Center''</ref><ref>Michael Gardner. Harry Truman and Civil Rights (SIU Press, 2002), 92.</ref> Eisenhower, however, had no interest in running for the White House, so he declined this offer as well.

===Elections of 1952 and '56===
[[File:ElectoralCollege1952.svg|thumb|right|350px|1952: The kind of election victory you get when you ''sorta'' throw your former commanding officer under the bus.]]
[[File:Results of the 1956 Presidential Election.png|350px|thumb|right|Results of the 1956 Presidential Election]]
{{cquote|Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Their number is negligible and they are stupid.|||Ike on the New Deal; seriously, this is what Republicans used to sound like.<ref>[https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/social-insecurity/ President Eisenhower on Social Security] ''Snopes''</ref>}}
With no Republican having taken the presidency since Hoover, the Republicans were desperate for an excellent candidate. Senator {{wpl|Henry Cabot Lodge Jr.}} began pestering Ike to run for office as a Republican,<ref>[https://millercenter.org/president/Eisenhower/campaigns-and-elections DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER: CAMPAIGNS AND ELECTIONS] Alonzo L. Hamby. ''Miller Center''</ref> although Ike was resistant and wished to focus on his role as leader of [[NATO]] forces in Europe. Senator {{wpl|Robert Taft}} would change his mind. Taft led the old-school conservative wing of the GOP, which called for a withdrawal from foreign affairs and a complete reversal of [[FDR]]'s social programs, both of which Ike found unacceptable.<ref>[https://www.hoover.org/research/what-1952-republican-primary-teaches-us-about-todays-primary What The 1952 Republican Primary Teaches Us About Today’s Primary] Kori Schake. ''Hoover Institution.'' SEP.2.15</ref>

After a messy open convention floor fight, Taft accused Eisenhower of, God forbid, "delegate stealing." But both the party and the nation survived anyway.<ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/political-playback-the-first-contested-republican-convention/ The First Republican Contested Convention], Face the Nation, CBS News.</ref><ref>{{wpl|United States presidential election, 1952#Republican Convention}}</ref> Ike then chose [[Richard Nixon|Tricky Dick]] as his running mate.<ref>[https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/politics/camp/520712convention-gop-ra.html Eisenhower Nominated on the First Ballot; Senator Nixon Chosen as His Running Mate; General Pledges 'Total Victory' Crusade] W.H. Lawrence. ''New York Times'' Archive. July 12, 1952</ref> (He was nearly dropped from the ticket a few months later after a scandal occurred involving his use of secret funds, which eventually lead to the famous "Checkers Speech."<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/nixon.htm Richard Nixon's 'Secret Fund' – 1952]</ref>)

Although nominated for the Republican ticket to lead a "crusade" against his "wasteful and corrupt" predecessors,<ref>[http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=75626 Full Text of Eisenhower's Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Chicago]</ref> Eisenhower mostly ran as a liberal. No, really.<ref>Vincent P. DeSantis, “Eisenhower Revisionism.” The Review of Politics 38, no. 02 (1976): 191. JSTOR (1405936), http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1405936.pdf.</ref> Much of Eisenhower's success in that election came about because of his personal beliefs; he yanked many progressive platforms right out from under his Democratic opponent {{wpl|Adlai Stevenson}}. Ike was friendly towards the last decade's labor laws and social programs, to the point that {{wpl|Henry Wallace}} of the very left-wing Progressive Party would later support his reelection.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20060207002600/http://www.cooperativeindividualism.org/schlesinger_wallace_bio.html Who Was Henry A. Wallace?]</ref>

Ultimately, given the two candidates' similar policies, Eisenhower had to take his best chance and win by proving his anti-communist creds. He did this at least in part by shamefully allowing [[Joseph McCarthy]] and his ilk to run wild during the election, even standing by silently when he accused freaking General George Marshall of being a commie sympathizer.<ref name="marshallbad">[http://vanderbilthistoricalreview.com/eisenhowers-campaign/ Eisenhower’s Campaign and the Election of 1952] Winston Du. ''Vanderbilt Historical Review''. </ref> He also pandered to anti-communists through picking Nixon, who had famously exposed Alger Hiss in the later 1940s.<ref>[https://www.fbi.gov/history/famous-cases/alger-hiss Alger Hiss]</ref> Ike would win the election in a landslide. He was the fourth ([[Zachary Taylor|out]] [[Ulysses S. Grant|of]] [[Herbert Hoover|five]] [[Donald Trump|overall]]) president to take office without any prior elected experience.

In 1956 Eisenhower {{wpl|Robert_B._Anderson#Federal_government_service|wanted to dump Nixon}} but couldn't get Nixon to go along. Once again, he ran against Adlai Stevenson, and he ran on a similar platform. Interestingly, in 2014, liberals circulated a viral meme about Eisenhower's 1956 election platform, longing for the "good old days."<ref>[http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/oct/28/facebook-posts/viral-meme-says-1956-republican-platform-was-prett/ Viral meme says 1956 Republican platform was pretty liberal] Nai Issa, Louis Jacobson. ''Politifact.'' OCT.28.14</ref>

==Ike in the White House==
===Domestic Policies===
Ike was a pragmatic and forward-thinking president. His domestic policies enacted historic change within the US, and many were far more progressive than we in the 21st century might expect from someone with an "(R)" next to their name. Of course, it all makes more sense when you remember that political parties used to be far more ideologically mixed.

====Civil Rights====
[[File:Little-Rock-TIME-1957.jpg|thumb|right|250px|''Time'' Magazine issue from October 1957, showing the 101<sup>st</sup> Airborne at Little Rock Central High School.]]
{{cquote|I believe that the United States as a government, if it is going to be true to its own founding documents, does have the job of working toward that time when there is no discrimination made on such inconsequential reason as race, color, or religion.|||Ike on civil rights.<ref>[https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/10/eisenhower-apologizes-racial-insult-1957-880971 Eisenhower apologizes for racial insult, Oct. 10, 1957]</ref>}}
{{cquote|President Eisenhower was a fine general and a good, decent man, but if he had fought World War II the way he fought for civil rights we would all be speaking German today.|||Roy Wilkins, of the [[NAACP]]<ref>"The Southern Strategy" by Kevin M. Kruse. In: ''Myth America: Historians Take On the Biggest Legends and Lies About Our Past'', edited by Kevin M. Kruse & Julian E. Zelizer (2022) Basic Books. ISBN 1541601394. Pages 169-196.</ref>{{rp|176}}}}
Ike signed the first set of [[civil rights]] bills into law since [[Reconstruction]] and pushed the [[desegregation]] process forward.<ref name="rightshero">[http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/why-dont-we-ike-civil-rights Why don’t we remember Ike as a civil rights hero?], MSNBC</ref> However, Ike's record on civil rights is something of a mixed bag.

In the "Good Ike" column, we have the {{wpl|Civil Rights Act of 1957}}, which was intended to empower federal prosecutors to crack down on voter suppression in the South. Unfortunately, much of its scope was reduced when it was hamstrung by the Dixiecrats in Congress.<ref>[http://crdl.usg.edu/events/civil_rights_act_1957/?Welcome Civil Rights Act of 1957] ''Civil Rights Digital Library''</ref> Even so, it signaled the federal government's changing attitude towards civil rights, and it was the first piece of legislation of its kind since Reconstruction. Also in the good column were Ike's judges; he nominated several liberal judges to the federal courts, and they would help offset the segregationists appointed by Kennedy (he'd been arm twisted by the Dixiecrats).<ref name="rightshero"></ref> His nomination of [[Earl Warren]] as Chief Justice is usually seen as one of the most important in the [[Supreme Court]]'s history.

However, Eisenhower's most famous encounter with the Civil Rights Movement came when he supported schools' desegregation as mandated by the Supreme Court under the {{wpl|Brown v Board}} decision. Arkansas' governor {{wpl|Orval Faubus}} famously used his state's national guard to block nine black children from attending Little Rock Central High School. Ike responded by sending the famous {{wpl|101st Airborne}} to escort the children and later nationalized the National Guard.<ref>[https://www.politico.com/story/2007/09/eisenhower-was-key-desegregation-figure-005885 Eisenhower was key desegregation figure] Kasey S. Pipes. ''Politico''. 09/18/2007 </ref> Enforcing desegregation infuriated the Dixiecrats, and at least one would explicitly compare Ike's troops to Hitler's stormtroopers.

The "Bad Ike" column is mainly due to his reluctance to use overt federal power; Ike was no crusader, and he preferred to be as slow and deliberative as possible with his racial reforms.<ref name="rightshero"></ref> His racial beliefs were far from modern, and he had an unfortunate tendency to attempt to endear himself to the segregationist South with his rhetoric and many of his actions.<ref>[http://www.blacksandpresidency.com/dwighteisenhower.php Sympathy for the South: Eisenhower Resists Desegregation]</ref> And with his purge of any and all gay people from Federal civil service during the Lavender scare, he showed himself to be no ally to the gay community, although in the interest of fairness nobody in mainstream politics was.

====Education, Infrastructure, and Science====
[[File:040i eisenhower arw.jpg|thumb|right|275px|An "Eisenhower Interstate System" sign seen in [[Arkansas]], commemorating the president's role in creating America's highway network.]]
{{cquote|You know, Jim, this bunch of [[scientist]]s was one of the few groups that I encountered in Washington who seemed to be there to help the country and not to help themselves.|||Uncle Ike on his deathbed.<ref>[http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2007/06/26/201574/hansen-on-president-eisenhower-and-his-scientists/ Hansen on Pres. Eisenhower and his scientists], ThinkProgress</ref>}}
When you drive on the Interstate Highway System, you can thank Ike for starting that. Shortly after [[WWI]], the US Army sent 81 of its vehicles across the country from Washington DC to San Francisco to evaluate how easy it would be to move an army through the countryside.<ref>[https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2006/summer/interstates.html Ike's Interstates at 50] David A. Pfeiffer ''National Archives'' "Prologue Magazine". Summer 2006, Vol. 38, No. 2</ref> Eisenhower accompanied this expedition. The interest in roads it instilled with him would only be emphasized once more when he experienced the vastly superior autobahn highways of Germany during the Second World War. As President, Ike would go on to sign the {{wpl|Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956}}, which mandated the construction of at least 41,000 miles of the Interstate Highway System and financed it through the newly-established {{wpl|Highway Trust Fund}}.

Although this is widely seen as one of his best moves, Eisenhower was doing so at the request of private companies. The Federal Highway Act was primarily based on a plan created by the automotives industry in the late 1940s, with one of the men behind it, former General Motors CEO Charles Erwin Wilson, even serving as Secretary of Defense at the time.<ref name=SMN>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sayw3TOhykg Do Cities Really Need All These Cars? - SOME MORE NEWS]</ref> When asked if this counted as a conflict of interest, he said:

{{cquote|I cannot conceive of one because for years I thought what was good for our country was good for General Motors, and vice versa. The difference did not exist. Our company is too big. It goes with the welfare of the country. Our contribution to the Nation is quite considerable.<ref name=SMN/>}}

It should also be noted that the interstate highways systems had a series of negative, including reinforcing segregation and ruining local communities.<ref name=SMN/> One of the most famous examples of a community being lost because of this was Route 66, where "the popularity of the old road began to decline" as a direct result of the new roads.<ref>[https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/back0303.cfm Route "66" The Mother Road]</ref>{{efn|This story was famously retold in the 2006 Pixar film ''Cars''.<ref>[https://insidethemagic.net/2020/09/cars-inspired-route-66-locations-lt1/ Real Route 66 Locations that Inspired ‘Cars’]</ref>}}

He also created [[NASA]],<ref>[http://www.astronautix.com/astros/eishower.htm Eisenhower] on Encyclopedia Astronautica</ref> instituted the Department of [[health care|Health]], [[Education]], and [[Welfare]], and the expansion of [[Social Security]] was one of his signature domestic policies. Eisenhower also established ARPA (now DARPA), which was eventually responsible for inventing and building the [[Internet]].<ref>[http://www.elon.edu/e-web/predictions/early90s/internethistory.xhtml A Quick Look at the Early History of the Internet], Elon University</ref>

Eisenhower saw public education as an urgent national security concern, saying,

{{cquote|"Our immediate national security aims — to continue to strengthen our armed forces and improve the weapons at their command — can be furthered only by the efforts of individuals whose training is already far advanced. But if we are to maintain our position of leadership, we must see to it that today's young people are prepared to contribute the maximum to our future progress. Because of the growing importance of science and technology, we must necessarily give special — but by no means exclusive — attention to education in science and engineering."}}

Ike's views on education became even more urgent and popular with the American people after the Soviet Union's launch of {{wpl|Sputnik 1}}, humanity's first successful artificial satellite.<ref>[https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/sputnik-memo Eisenhower Sputnik Conference Memo: Background]</ref> With fears over ballistic missile warfare already high, the event increased public demands for science education and space expenditures.

Despite his support for science and education, Eisenhower occasionally expressed [[Anti-intellectualism|disdain for intellectuals and expertise]], stating:<ref name=hofstadter>''Anti-intellectualism in American Life'' by Richard Hofstadter (1964) Alfred A. Knopf.</ref>{{rp|10}}
{{cquote|By the way, I heard a definition of an intellectual that I thought was very interesting: a man who takes more words than are necessary to tell more than he knows.}}
And he later defended a totally unqualified candidate for ambassador to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), who could not even name the prime minister during a confirmation hearing, by saying:<ref name=hofstadter/>{{rp|11}}
{{cquote|Now, as to the man's ignorance, this is the way he was appointed: he was selected from a group of men that were recommended highly by a number of people I respect. His business career was examined, the F.B.I, reports on him were all good. Of course, we knew he had never been to Ceylon, he wasn't thoroughly familiar with it; but certainly he can learn if he is the kind of character and kind of man we believe him to be.}}

====Ike vs. McCarthy====
[[File:Photograph of Dwight D. Eisenhower - NARA - 518138.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The face Ike makes when he's preparing to help destroy a man's political career and send him to an early grave.]]
Eisenhower entered the White House at the height of [[Joseph McCarthy]]'s power, and the two did not get along. McCarthy quickly began using his Senate seat to interfere with the President's executive appointees, most notably holding up Eisenhower's ambassador to Moscow, which left the seat empty during the aftermath of Stalin's death.<ref name="badjoe">[https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/who-stopped-mccarthy/517782/ Who Stopped McCarthy?] ''The Atlantic''</ref> Unfortunately, McCarthy also had a sizable number of Senators supporting him; these were Robert Taft's friends, here to take revenge. The 1952 election would too haunt Ike in another way: he had previously stood by silently after McCarthy began accusations against his former commanding officer, George Marshall, losing his chance to establish a record of public confrontation.<ref name="marshallbad"></ref>

McCarthy also managed to force the President to the right. To prove his anti-communist beliefs, Ike would support legislation to expand espionage and surveillance laws and empower the [[FBI]] to expand its efforts to root out the "Reds."<ref name="ikemccarthy">[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/eisenhower-politics/ Eisenhower and McCarthy] ''PBS'' "The American Experience."</ref> Eisenhower would receive broad criticism from the media over his "appeasement" of McCarthyism.

Ike hated McCarthy and his anti-communist campaign, seeing that he was treading the line between thorough investigation and overt persecution. Ultimately, though, Eisenhower would restrain himself to only criticizing the man in private; he believed that getting embroiled in a public feud would be a national distraction and would only serve to harm the image of the presidency as a whole.<ref>[https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/eisenhower-criticizes-mccarthy Eisenhower criticizes McCarthy] ''History Channel'' "On this Day in History"</ref> [[Donald Trump|If only he knew...]]

Eventually, McCarthy overstepped. He began going after this military, and this naturally pissed Ike right off. Throughout the hearings, Eisenhower stealthily worked to sabotage McCarthy. First, he had his aides uncover proof that McCarthy had engaged in his own shady dealings with the Army. He invoked {{wpl|executive privilege}} when McCarthy demanded to know how Ike got that information.<ref name="ikemccarthy"></ref> The Senate Subcommittee on Investigations then held its own hearings over the accusations against McCarthy. The whole affair essentially broke down at this point, and the resulting hash of unfounded and often verbally abusive bullshit claims resulted in a successful vote to censure McCarthy for abuse of a Senate committee.<ref>[https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/censure_cases/133Joseph_McCarthy.htm The Censure Case of Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin (1954)] United States Senate.</ref> This event shattered McCarthy's power, and he died several years later.<ref>[https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-the-senate-censures-joseph-mccarthy On this day: The Senate censures Joseph McCarthy] ''National Constitution Center''</ref> It is generally accepted that McCarthy's death was a result of alcoholism; he developed an addiction to multiple drugs after his fall from grace.<ref>Oshinsky, David M. (2005) [1983]. A Conspiracy So Immense: The World of Joe McCarthy. New York: Free Press. pp. 503–504. ISBN 0-19-515424-X.</ref>

====Religious bullshit====
[[File:Eisenhower dollar obverse1.jpg|thumb|right|185px|"In God We Trust" motto featured on the Eisenhower dollar.]]
Unfortunately, the "[[In God We Trust]]" national motto, as well as the "under God" addition to the [[Pledge of Allegiance]], occurred under Eisenhower's tenure.<ref>Though he ''could'' probably be excused for this as it's nearly fucking impossible to get rid of even today. [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/02/us/house-of-representatives-affirms-in-god-we-trust-motto.html?_r=1 Seriously, 396 to 9?]</ref> Ike saw religion as the crucial factor which defined Anglo-American culture and prevented the evils of the Soviet Union from taking hold in the United States. It wasn't just [[Christianity]] that Ike liked. He was persuaded by a lengthy 1954 National Security Council (NSC) memorandum, "The Religious Factor" by Edward P. Lilly, to cultivate [[Islamist]] sentiment as an ideological weapon in the [[Cold War]].<ref>Ian Johnson, 2011. ''A Mosque in Munich''. New York: Mariner Books. Pp. 69-75. ISBN 978-0-547-42317-3.</ref> (How could something like that [[blowback|ever come back]] [[9/11|to haunt you?]]) This was part of a wider belief in religious tolerance Eisenhower had, once famously saying "our form of government has no sense unless it is founded in a deeply felt religious faith, and I don't care what it is."<ref name="quotes"/> Eisenhower didn't just talk the talk, he also made sure to walk the walk, dedicating a D.C. Islamic Center in 1957, and telling a group of Muslims:

{{quotebox|And I should like to assure you, my Islamic friends, that under the American Constitution, under American tradition, and in American hearts, this center, this place of worship, is just as welcome as could be a similar edifice of any other religion. Indeed, America would fight with her whole strength for your right to have here your own church and worship according to your own conscience.<ref>[https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/28/eisenhower-dedicates-dc-islamic-center-june-28-1957-667325 Eisenhower dedicates D.C. Islamic Center, June 28, 1957]</ref>}}

Islam was not the only religion Eisenhower was fine with, as he also fought against the rampant antisemitism in red states during his time as President.<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/1953/01/30/archives/eisenhower-decries-red-antisemitism-american-jewish-committee-gets.html EISENHOWER DECRIES RED ANTI-SEMITISM; American Jewish Committee Gets Message Calling for Steady Fight on Bigotry]</ref>

This was largely because "Eisenhower believed religious faith was the single most important distinction between American freedom and Communist oppression," because of this "Eisenhower played a very personal role in popularizing religious faith in America." Although this was mostly a revitalization of protestant Christianity, Eisenhower was fine with people of all faiths.<ref>[https://www.history.com/news/eisenhower-billy-graham-religion-in-god-we-trust How Dwight Eisenhower Found God in the White House]</ref> Given he viewed faith and secularism as just as much what was being fought out in he Cold War as capitalism and communism, he naturally was willing to build a coalition of religious men as long as they disliked communism. He also attempted to tie these ideals together more than a few times, such as when he said:

{{quotebox|Without God, there could be no American form of Government, nor an American way of life. Recognition of the Supreme Being is the first--the most basic--expression of Americanism. Thus the Founding Fathers saw it, and thus, with God's help, it will continue to be.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20180816100653/http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=10414 38 - Remarks Recorded for the "Back-to-God" Program of the American Legion.]</ref>}}

Again, notice the specific mention of the vague concept of "God" as opposed to the Christian religion specifically. This had the effect of appeasing Christians, who viewed their God as the one true one anyway, while also allowing those of other faiths to have a seat at the table.

Eisenhower's religious beliefs also led him into conflict with the Warren Court, as Ike publicly disapproved of the 1963 decision to ban required Bible readings from public schools. According to his son, Ike thought that “Warren Court’s bias against the church undermined its promotion of equal rights because sociology was no substitute for moral teaching.”<ref>[https://spectator.org/38107_eisenhowers-religion/ Eisenhower’s Religion] MARK TOOLEY, ''American Spectator''.</ref> Sounds a lot like those damn fools today who think Christians suffer persecution, don't it?

After Ike signed the bill that modified the Pledge of Allegiance, he gave the following statement:

{{cquote|"From this day forward, the millions of our school children will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural school house, the dedication of our nation and our people to the Almighty. To anyone who truly loves America, nothing could be more inspiring than to contemplate this rededication of our youth, on each school morning, to our country's true meaning. Especially is this meaningful as we regard today's world. Over the globe, mankind has been cruelly torn by violence and brutality and, by the millions, deadened in mind and soul by a materialistic philosophy of life. Man everywhere is appalled by the prospect of atomic war. In this somber setting, this law and its effects today have profound meaning. In this way we are reaffirming the transcendence of religious faith in America's heritage and future; in this way we shall constantly strengthen those spiritual weapons which forever will be our country's most powerful resource, in peace or in war."<ref>[http://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/god-in-the-white-house/ God in the White House] ''PBS.'' "Eisenhower."</ref>}}

====War for the GOP====
[[File:Ike Dick.png|thumb|right|150px|Campaign brochure with Nixon.]]
Although Eisenhower's presidency is often portrayed as benefiting a calm political climate, the reality is pretty different. The GOP, however, was embroiled in a bitter contest to determine the path for its future. McCarthy's wing of the party (also supported by Ike's own VP, Nixon), publicly believed that the GOP's east coast moderates should be viewed with suspicion, that big government was an existential threat, and that America's most significant danger was its own left-wing.<ref>[https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/who-stopped-mccarthy/517782/ Who Stopped McCarthy?] ''The Atlantic''.</ref> These were the people Theodore White discovered while writing his article "Texas: Land of Wealth and Fear," who believed that McCarthy was America's greatest patriot, organized labor would destroy Texas, and that both political parties had traitors in their ranks.<ref>[http://www.unz.com/print/Reporter-1954jun08-00030/ Text of "Texas: Land of Wealth and Fear"</ref>

Eisenhower was always a believer in his "middle way" politics, which he saw as meaning calm leadership that de-emphasized America's constant feeling of crisis.<ref>[http://tucson.com/news/opinion/eisenhower-s-middle-way-is-lesson-for-our-times/article_8b5341a3-a292-5eb2-9cc7-2e66f31a23ab.html Eisenhower's 'Middle Way' is lesson for our times]</ref> Ike governed from the middle, and he earned the permanent hatred of the right-wing of the party, which wanted him to do away with the New Deal and attack the cultural left. The current far-right leadership in much of the GOP is the heir of Ike's opposition, the people who eventually gave America [[Barry Goldwater]].<ref>[https://newrepublic.com/article/101442/dwight-eisenhower-memorial-controversy 
Why Won’t the GOP Stick Up For Dwight Eisenhower?]</ref> Ike beat McCarthy, but his attempt to push the GOP to the center backfired horrifically.

===Foreign policy===
Ike's foreign policy was 
commie [[appeasement]]
 a hybrid of dove and hawk. Ike had run for the Republican nomination against [[Robert Taft]], who ran as a [[United States isolationism|non-interventionist]], on the platform of both ending the [[Korean War]] and fighting [[communism]]. Eisenhower was critical of [[Truman]]'s handling of Korea, and he popularized the "[[Domino theory#Wars|domino effect]]" concept of foreign policy, believing that communism would spread like falling dominoes. However, he quickly withdrew from Korea and left a [[South Korea]] that could (with some help that continues to today) defend itself from the [[North Korea|North]].

====Korean War====
[[File:1951 Chung Baik Eisenhower.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Eisenhower visiting Korea, back when presidents actually felt a need to fulfill campaign promises.]]
The 1952 election and Ike's first year in office happened against a backdrop of a dramatically soured public opinion towards the [[Korean War]]. About 70% of Americans wanted an armistice, and less than a third viewed the war as worth fighting.<ref>[https://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/research/online_documents/korean_war/Public_Opinion_1953_06_02.pdf Public opinion on the Korean War, 1953. Memorandum on recent polls, June 2, 1953.] Eisenhower Presidential Library.</ref> Close to the election date, and in response to challenges from Truman and other Democrats to outline a better Korea policy, Eisenhower made a dramatic campaign promise to personally visit the front lines in Korea to evaluate the course of the war.<ref>[https://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/research/online_documents/korean_war/I_Shall_Go_To_Korea_1952_10_24.pdf Presidential candidate Dwight D. Eisenhower makes 1952 campaign pledge, “I shall go to Korea.” Speech, October 24, 1952] Papers of Dwight D. Eisenhower, Speech Series, Box 2, Oct 23, 1952, to Nov 3, 1952, and Dec 1952 (1); NAID #12012607</ref> This was likely a significant tipping point in the election in Ike's favor, as voters had every reason to be convinced that the man who defeated the Nazis would know what to do in Korea.

Shortly after his election victory, Eisenhower visited Korea and spent three days touring the front lines, noting the rugged terrain and fortified enemy positions. The whole thing reminded him of Tunisia, where he had his first major military humiliation.<ref>[https://100days.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/11/how-to-end-a-war-eisenhowers-way/ How to End a War, Eisenhower’s Way] Smith, Jean Edward. ''New York Times''. 4.11.09</ref> He concluded that "small attacks on small hills" would not bring any victory and that "we could not stand forever on a static front and continue to accept casualties without any visible result.”

The visit convinced Ike that the war had to end. To accomplish this aim, he began to threaten the Communists with increasing intensity, insinuating that he might involve the Nationalist Chinese and possibly deploy nuclear weapons.<ref>[https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/eisenhower-goes-to-korea Eisenhower goes to Korea] ''History Channel''</ref> Negotiations began in earnest, and both sides finally reached a settlement on the status of POWs, and eventually armistice terms which granted the South additional territory and mandated a demilitarized zone between the two nations.<ref>[https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/armistice-ends-the-korean-war Armistice ends the Korean War]''History Channel''</ref> After the war, Eisenhower focused on training the South Koreans to defend themselves with only minimal assistance. In 1954, he controversially withdrew many American troops from the peninsula, defending himself by saying this show of faith in South Korea's strength would do more to ward off the North than any show of American force.<ref>[https://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/research/online_documents/korean_war/Post_Armistice_Policy_1954_01_05.pdf President Eisenhower on his administration's post-Armistice policy toward Korea. Staff note, January 5, 1954.] Records of the White House Staff Secretary, L. Arthur Minnich Series, Box 1, Miscellaneous - K</ref>

====Cold War tensions====
[[File:WB-47E.jpg|thumb|right|250px|The B-47 bomber, a centerpiece of US New Look deterrence.]]
Eisenhower made multiple attempts to deescalate tensions during the Cold War. He famously gave the {{wpl|Chance for Peace speech}}, where he spoke against increased military spending, along with the famous quote,

{{cquote|"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some 50 miles of concrete highway. We pay for a single fighter with a half million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. This, I repeat, is the best way of life to be found on the road the world has been taking. This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron."}}

In 1955, he also presented his "Open Skies" plan, which proposed that the Soviet Union and the United States could allow each other's surveillance planes to monitor their missile sites to reduce fears of a surprise attack.<ref>[https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/eisenhower-presents-his-open-skies-plan Eisenhower presents his “Open Skies” plan] ''History Channel''</ref> [[Khrushchev]] rejected it out of hand as an "espionage plot."

To decrease federal spending, Eisenhower adopted the "New Look" policy toward military spending. This called for reducing ground forces in favor of air force strategic arms, hoping to deter any attacks through Mutually Assured Destruction.<ref>[https://www.britannica.com/topic/New-Look-United-States-history New Look] ''Britannica''</ref> This policy would be replaced with "Flexible Response" by President Kennedy, which called for a focus on Special Forces.<ref>[http://www.thehistoryreader.com/contemporary-history/president-kennedy-berlin-laos-flexible-response/ President Kennedy: Berlin, Laos, and “Flexible Response”] ''The History Reader''. 5.4.12</ref>

====Trouble in the Suez====
One of the most severe crises of the Eisenhower administration was the Suez affair. Egyptian President [[Gamal Abdel Nasser]], infuriated by British military presence in his nation, American refusal to fulfill its obligations in funding the Aswan River Dam, and Western support for Israel, ordered the nationalization of the Suez canal. The primary motivating factor was the Aswan Dam, however, which impelled Nasser to seek another source of funding: taxes on shipping through the Suez.<ref>[https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/united-states-withdraws-offer-of-aid-for-aswan-dam https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/united-states-withdraws-offer-of-aid-for-aswan-dam] ''History Channel''</ref> The nationalization greatly surprised and angered the British and French governments, as the canal was theoretically theirs.<ref>Eayrs, James (1964). The Commonwealth and Suez: A Documentary Survey. Oxford University Press.</ref>

[[File:Port Said from air.jpg|thumb|right|220px|The initial Anglo-French assault on Port Said.]]
Eisenhower's immediate response was to warn his allies away from military action and to do so publicly. His primary interest was in proving America's credibility as an anti-imperialist power<ref name="ikesuez">[https://www.economist.com/node/7218678 An affair to remember] ''The Economist'' 7.26.06</ref> (to show newly-liberated nations that they didn't need to stand with the Soviets to stand against colonialism). His State Department attempted to mediate the situation, but none of the proposals attracted full support, and the French and British were increasingly eager to invade Egypt.

British Prime Minister {{wpl|Anthony Eden}} was perfectly aware that he was on an uncertain legal ground for an invasion, and his solution was Israel. The Israelis viewed Nasser as a threat, and the British and French approached them with the following plan:<ref name="ikesuez"></ref>

*Israel would "preemptively" invade Egypt and (appear to) attempt to take the canal.
*The British and French would demand a cease-fire, which Israel would refuse.
*The British and French would respond by deploying a "peacekeeping" force to "temporarily protect" the Suez canal, "guarantee free shipping," and "separate the Israelis and Egyptians."

Israel, the UK, and France proceeded to carry out the plan in full, and Israel invaded through the Sinai, and Britain and France landed at Port Said. Eisenhower, who had not been informed of this plan, was furious and proceeded to join the Soviets in voting for UN resolutions condemning the invasion.<ref>[https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/suez The Suez Crisis, 1956]''Department of State'' Office of the Historian.</ref>

While a military success, the invasion was a political disaster for the British. Antiwar protests broke out, junior ministers resigned, and many who stayed on expressed deep reservations over the whole thing.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2001/mar/14/past.education1 1956: Suez and the end of empire] Brown, Derek. ''The Guardian''.</ref> Matters became much worse when the Soviets threatened nuclear war to protect Egypt.<ref name="baduk">[http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/1956-russia-almost-launched-nuclear-war-against-britain-18978?page=2v In 1956, Russia Almost Launched a Nuclear War against Britain, France and Israel] ''The National Interest''</ref> The final straw, came, however, when Eisenhower threatened sanctions against Israel, withheld loans from the UK, and suggested he might destroy the value of the pound by selling off British bonds.<ref name="baduk"></ref>

The Suez crisis ended British and French superpower status, and the Anglo-American "special relationship" became characterized by American dominance.<ref>[http://www.mariapalasinska.com/sanpietro/eng/anno1/n5/problemi/dunneeng5.pdf The Suez Crisis and the Politics of the
Anglo-American Special Relationship]</ref> The Soviets and Americans both came to view the Middle East as a new front in the Cold War, which had some horrific consequences as detailed below. And this would also mark the first and final time an American president would make a serious and dangerous threat against Israel.

====CIA adventures====
On the downside, he started the trend of allowing the [[CIA]] to dick around in foreign countries to support [[dictatorship]]s. Ike caught the "[[red scare|commies under every bed]]" bug for a few brief moments in his presidency. The first time was in 1953 when [[Winston Churchill]] convinced him that [[Mohammad Mossadegh]], the democratically elected prime minister of [[Iran]], was [[red-baiting|turning Red]]. This was actually [[bullshit]] as Mosaddegh himself was anti-communist, albeit his chicanery while in office<ref>https://books.google.com/books?id=qh_QotrY7RkC&pg=PA274</ref> also wouldn't lead one to confuse him with a great guy either — Churchill was just pissed because he nationalized Iran's [[oil]] industry.<ref>Including the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company - in 1954, renamed British Petroleum (BP).</ref> The [[British|Brits]] and Americans took out Mosaddegh and replaced him with the [[Mohammad Reza Pahlavi|Shah]]. This came back to bite the US in the ass in [[Jimmy Carter|1979]]. Ike also sent contingents of "military advisors" to [[Vietnam War|Vietnam]], and although it was really barely anything at that point, it paved the way for [[JFK]], [[LBJ]], and [[Nixon]] to completely fuck it up.

He also let the CIA take out Jacobo Arbenz of Guatemala, another democratically elected leader. At the time, Guatemala had been completely fucked over by the US railroad and fruit monopolies. Arbenz enacted land reform to allow farmers to use the fallow land owned by the [[United Fruit Company]] (UFC, later Chiquita). The CIA then cooked up some bogus connections between Arbenz and the [[Soviet Union]] to intervene on behalf of the UFC. Ike signed off on it, and professional propagandist [[Edward Bernays]] then spread this bullshit [[conspiracy]] through one of the first big [[Public relations|PR]] campaigns in history. The fact that the Arbenz thing "worked" so well convinced the CIA that they could easily topple unwanted governments if they so chose and inspired their confidence to go forward with a plan that would become known as the Bay of Pigs invasion in [[Cuba]] under JFK.

====Military-industrial complex====
{{main|Military-industrial complex}}
Ike's farewell speech in 1961 is arguably the most famous in US history behind [[George Washington]]'s farewell speech. Andrew J. Bacevich in ''Washington Rules'' says Eisenhower "offered the American people a glimpse of the powerful forces that lay behind and beyond presidential control."<ref>Bavevich, Andrew J., 2010. ''Washington Rules - America's Path to Permanent War''. New York: Metropolitan Books. P. 32. ISBN 978-0-8050-9141-0</ref> Eisenhower warned the American people of the growing influence of a "military-industrial complex." {{quotebox|This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.<ref>[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex" Speech: Origins and Significance], National Archives</ref>}}Too bad no one listened to him and let lobbies fuck up his restructuring of the armed forces in the pursuit of profits over deterrence of war.

==Legacy==
[[File:Dwight D. Eisenhower, official Presidential portrait.jpg|thumb|Ike's presidential portrait]]
Despite his CIA screw-jobs, religious apologizing and failure to publicly fight [[McCarthyism]] (though he hated [[Joseph McCarthy]] in private and worked to undermine him in secret), Ike is remembered as one of the more practical and competent, if not outstanding, presidents of the 20th century. However, today's Republicans seem to have ''forgotten he even existed''.<ref>[http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/12/us-eisenhower-legacy-idUSBRE82B02C20120312 Forgotten in Republican campaign, Eisenhower rises in stature], Reuters</ref> Probably because, as the [[John Birch Society]] claimed at the time, he was a total 
war hero
 [[RINO]] [[pinko commie]] ("a dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist conspiracy" — Robert H. Welch, Jr.<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/01/15/john-birch-society-qanon-reagan-republicans-goldwater/ Long before QAnon, Ronald Reagan and the GOP purged John Birch extremists from the party] by Erick Trickey (January 15, 2021).</ref>).

Welch, before he had founded the John Birch Society, even wrote a book in the 1950s called ''[[The Politician]]'' which accused Eisenhower of being a communist sympathizer.<ref>''The Politician: A look at the political forces that propelled Dwight David Eisenhower into the Presidency'' by Robert Welch</ref>

Ike was a fiscal [[conservative]]. Still, he continued the [[progressive income tax|90% top tax rate]] to maintain a balanced budget (and was the ''last'' Republican to do so, and ironically, it was then cut by a [[John F. Kennedy|Democrat]]). This is, of course, 
[[John Maynard Keynes|social liberalism]]
 
[[social democracy]]
 [[socialism]]. Never mind that he oversaw the post-war economic boom, which would later be called "The [[golden age|Golden Age]] of [[Capitalism]]." Ike also totally trashed those calling for a repeal of [[New Deal]] programs, saying:

{{cquote|Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, '''you would not hear of that party again in our political history'''. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are {{wpl|H.L. Hunt}} (you possibly know his background), a few other [[Texas]] oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or businessman from other areas. Their number is negligible, and they are stupid.<ref>[http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/ikesocial.asp Ike says they're stupid]</ref>}}

He also said some other pretty socialist things, such as:
{{cquote|No people on earth can be held, as a people, to be an enemy, for all humanity shares the common hunger for peace and fellowship and justice... No nation's security and well-being can be lastingly achieved in isolation but only in effective cooperation with fellow-nations.<ref name=Peace>[http://perspective.usherbrooke.ca/bilan/servlet/BMDictionnaire?iddictionnaire=1962 American Presidential Address on "The Chance for Peace"], Sherbrooke University</ref>}}
{{cquote|I believe that the United States as a government, if it is going to be true to its own founding documents, does have the job of working toward that time when there is no [[discrimination]] made on such inconsequential reason as race, color, or religion.<ref>[http://faculty.wagner.edu/lori-weintrob/dwight-david-ike-eisenhower/ Dwight David “Ike” Eisenhower], Wagner College</ref>}}
{{cquote|Every [[gun]] that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who [[poor|hunger]] and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its [[working class|laborers]], the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children... This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron.<ref name=Peace/>}}
{{cquote|A preventive war, to my mind, is an impossibility today. How could you have one if one of its features would be several cities lying in ruins, several cities where many, many thousands of people would be dead and injured and mangled, the transportation systems destroyed, sanitation implements and systems all gone? That isn't preventive war; that is war.
I don't believe there is such a thing; and, frankly, I wouldn't even listen to anyone seriously that came in and talked about such a thing... It seems to me that when, by definition, a term is just ridiculous in itself, there is no use in going any further.<ref>[http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=9977 This wasn't the first or last time he attacked the concept.]</ref>}}

Goddamn Red.

==See also==
*[[Rockefeller Republican]]
*[[Cloth coat Republican]]
*[[Orval Faubus]]

==External links==
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0r6IKXZsjUY ''Waging Peace'' interview], if you ever wanted to see the man having a casual conversation.
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKqHZcXvUAs Remember this while you pick up the remote... or Netflix.]

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note|2}}

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

{{POTUS}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Eisenhower, Dwight}}
[[Category:Centrism]]
[[Category:Christians]]
[[Category:Cold War]]
[[Category:Homophobes]]
[[Category:Military]]
[[Category:Moderate Republicans]]
[[Category:Presidents of the United States]]
[[Category:Racists]]
[[Category:Texas]]
[[Category:United States politicians]]
[[Category:World War II]]

Categories: Centrism, Christians, Cold War, Homophobes, Military, Moderate Republicans, Presidents of the United States, Racists, Texas, United States politicians, World War II