Parsimony

{{sources needed}}{{philosophy}}
{{hatnote|Not to be confused with {{wpl|simony}} or {{wpl|persimmon||.}}}}

'''Parsimony''', or the "principle of parsimony", is a method for selecting between equally valid [[hypothesis|hypotheses]] based on the complexity of each. Using the principle of parsimony, the simplest hypothesis, or the one with the fewest free parameters, will be preferred over more complex hypotheses if other selection criteria are equal between them. For example, if there is an empty cookie package sitting on the counter with no cookies, the idea that someone living there simply ate the last one and didn't dispose of it is a preferable theory to one where an intruder broke into the house, ate the last cookie, danced the macarena, and then left the house. This is an example used to discount silly or overwrought theories; however, in principle, it can be used in more serious cases when weighing between two rational or scientific theories. Parsimony is a tool for selecting or discarding theories, but does not count as proof or evidence to back-up a theory.

==Parsimony and God==

[[Science|Scientific]] and tangible [[evidence]] for the existence of [[God]] is either weak and non-compelling, or completely non-existent (depending on how much credit you give to [[Anecdotal evidence|personal experience]] or [[Holy book|holy texts]]). Therefore, with the existence and non-existence of God as hypotheses being on roughly equal footing with respect to the complete lack of physical evidence, the principle of parsimony may be applied to them. [[Theism|Theistic]] scholars sometimes [[Presuppositionalism|pre-assume]] the existence of God because of this principle. This is based on the idea that God's existence and its [[omnipotence]] creates a simple solution of the origin of the [[universe]] and [[life]] in comparison to the far more complex conjectures involved in [[cosmology]].

[[Rationalist]]s and [[atheist]]ic scholars generally reject this conclusion on the basis that God, whatever it is, ''must'' be more complex than the universe itself in order to create and control it in an omnipotent manner. God must hold within it the information contained within the universe in addition to its past, future, and potential states, and, on top of all of this, information about "how to be God". This results in an ''incredibly'' complex hypothesis to pre-assume, and should therefore be rejected on the grounds of parsimony.

==Use in literature and oratory==

The term parsimony is also used in grammar and literature (in narratives, extended commentary, and speeches), where it is preferable to be scarce with words and get to the point. For many artists and critics, such as {{wpl|Seneca}} and {{wpl|Kurt Vonnegut||,}} the best form of writing is minimalist — avoiding repetition and cutting trivial details and unimportant characters. Writers like [[Ayn Rand]] and orators like [[Adolf Hitler]] were completely unfamiliar with literary parsimony and could speak/write for hours/pages about the same thing. Religious texts are usually the antithesis of parsimony, such as the Bible or Quran, where repetition and needlessly descriptive and verbose passages are the norm.<ref group=note>In fairness, repetition ''has'' been shown to be an effective way to get a point across… at least when it's not [[Argumentum ad nauseam|taken to the point of causing annoyance]]. It also helps when each successive repetition is used ''with supporting evidence and examples'' to ''illustrate and reinforce the core point'' rather than trying to just drive it in to the listener's brain like some sort of crude drill.</ref>

==See also==
*[[Hanlon's razor]]
*[[Occam's razor]]

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

[[Category:Philosophy]]

Categories: Philosophy