Substack

[[File:Substack_logo.png|right|180px|thumb|Substack's logo]]
{{Internet}}
{{cquote|Compared to overt Holocaust deniers, (high-earning Substack blogger Darryl) Cooper is subtle—even shifty. He has not, like [[Richard Spencer]], Sieg Heil-ed at a public event. His references often require research. Cooper, for example, wrote “Guten morgen” to a user on [[Twitter|X]] last August, along with a picture of himself holding a coffee mug. It might take a moment to realize the user is a self-identified Nazi, and the mug Cooper holds is sold on a website where you can buy a T-shirt in which a Nazi SS sword plunges through the Star of David. Cooper implores his followers not to fall into the morass of “low-[[IQ]] vulgar antisemitism.” He leaves his views on high-IQ sophisticated antisemitism more ambiguous.|||Noah Lanard, ''Mother Jones'', 2025<ref>Noah Lanard, [https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/07/martyr-made-darryl-cooper-nazi-jews-juggernaut-nihilism-tucker-carlson-joe-rogan-substack/ How a Nazi-Obsessed Amateur Historian Went From Obscurity to the Top of Substack], ''Mother Jones'', July 31, 2025</ref>
}}

{{cquote|'''Why Writers and Creators Choose Substack''' <br>Aligned Incentives. Substack only makes money when creators do. ... This model aligns our success with yours|||Substack PR<ref>https://substack.com/about</ref>}}

{{cquote|I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either&nbsp;— we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don't think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.|||Substack founder Hamish McKenzie<ref>[https://substack.com/@hamish/note/c-45811343 Hamish McKenzie] (Dec 21, 2023, 7:35 AM) ''Substack''.</ref>}}
'''Substack''' (est. 2017) is a [[social media]] platform and [[crowdfunding]] service headquartered in [[California]] which emphasizes delivering blog posts by email to paying subscribers. Like most software startups, it was not technically innovative- old school blogging tools like {{w|Typepad}} and {{w|Wordpress}} could put posts behind a paywall and land them in inboxes.<ref>"TypePad Traffic Tip #8. Add Email Alerts," everything.typepad.com, November 14, 2009 [https://web.archive.org/web/20250328051203/https://everything.typepad.com/blog/2009/11/feedburner-typepad-email.html Internet Archive]</ref> Instead, it took a lot of other people's money to build a polished interface, buy lots of favorable publicity, and pay people to come onboard. This leads to rapid growth but not necessarily profits. Its owners are the kind of [[free speech]] absolutists who fight hard for the right of [[Nazis]] to say Nazi shit but fold like an umbrella when their payment processor asks if they host any [[pornography|sexy writing]].<ref>https://substack.com/@hamish/note/c-45811343</ref><ref>Noah Berlatsky, [https://www.everythingishorrible.net/p/ban-nazis-unban-sex-workers-on-substack Ban Nazis, Unban Sex Workers on Substack], ''Everything is Horrible'', April 28, 2023</ref>

== Why people blog there ==

Many bloggers moved to Substack because it had a convenient interface, offered a turnkey service, and emphasized writers getting paid by subscribers. Classic blogging software like [[Dreamwidth]] was created when web ads paid well, online crowdfunding did not yet exist, and hardly anyone was Internet-famous, so it focused on getting people to read your blog first and hoped that the money would come later. Substack was designed for mobile devices and a world where people are used to paying for things online. Visitors to a Substack blog frequently encounter a full-page popup encouraging them to subscribe with the only options being "yes" and "maybe later." Other services like Ko-Fi and Patreon can be used to send email newsletters to paid subscribers, but are not focused on supporting bloggers. Substack now hosts audio and video, but these are generally in support of medium-length serial text.

Substack brands its blogs as newsletters. When Substack launched in 2017, blogs sounded old-fashioned compared to audio and video content, so the new name helped them present blogs as the hip new thing. Substack recruited many Old Media figures, and in the early days of blogging there was tension between the old guard of newspaper and magazine journalists and the upstart bloggers. Changing the name to "newsletter" also avoided bringing up memories of the bad old days.

Whereas early blogging services were free or on a fees-for-services basis, Substack collects a percentage of subscription fees (10% plus transaction-processing fees as of 2025).<ref>https://substack.com/signup</ref> Substack therefore makes money when a blog gets lots of paying subscribers, regardless of what those blogs contain. On sites funded by ads, some blogs are much more monetarizable than others, because most brands don't want to have their ads next to heartbreaking stories of abuse or naughty cartoons.

Substack used its investors' money to pay advances and bonuses to some bloggers who moved to Substack, and provide them with legal aid or editing services.<ref>Peter Kafka, [https://www.vox.com/recode/22338802/substack-pro-newsletter-controversy-jude-doyle Substack writers are mad at Substack. The problem is money and who’s making it], ''Vox'', March 19, 2021</ref> The largest of these programs were Substack Pro and Substack Defender. While Substack refuses to share names, beneficiaries include [[Scott Alexander]], {{wpl|Freddie deBoer}}, {{wpl|Alexis Coe}}, {{wpl|Lauren Wolfe}}, and [[Matthew Yglesias]].<ref>Peter Kafka, [https://www.vox.com/recode/22338802/substack-pro-newsletter-controversy-jude-doyle Substack writers are mad at Substack. The problem is money and who’s making it], ''Vox'', March 19, 2021</ref><ref>Sarah Krolewski, [https://web.archive.org/web/20250625021035/https://thefineprintnyc.com/article/substack-pro-deals-expire/ What Is Substack For?] ''The Fine Print'', February 1, 2022</reF> Writing on the Internet does not pay well, so many writers can be lured by a promise that they will make good money for the first year.

Whereas traditional blogs had a blogroll of links to any website, Substack allows creators to recommend other Substack newsletters (and experiments with suggesting "people who read this might like that" similarly to [[Amazon]], [[Facebook]], or [[Twitter]] as in the push notice below).<ref>https://support.substack.com/hc/en-us/articles/5036794583828-How-can-I-recommend-other-publications-on-Substack</ref> In 2024, Substack said its internal referral network drove more than 30 percent of new paid subscriptions.<ref>Jessica Testa and Benjamin Mullin, [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/business/media/substack-politics-newsletters.html Substack Bets on Politics, With Millions at Stake], ''The New York Times'', November 18, 2024 https://archive.ph/mv8eW</ref> The site recommends that some new accounts follow the "health politics" category which is mainly [[antivax]] and [[alternative medicine]] blogs.<ref>Kat O'Brien and Media and Democracy Project, [https://mediaanddemocracyproject.substack.com/p/substack-has-a-nazi-problem-and-a Substack has a Nazi problem AND a health disinformation problem], ''The Media and Democracy Project Blog'', November 25, 2025</ref> Restricting links to non-Substack blogs and newsletters keeps readers and their ad views, personal information, and subscription money onsite, although Substack promises that bloggers can always export their list of subscribers and payment details if they want to move to another service.<ref>[https://support.substack.com/hc/en-us/articles/360037466012-How-do-I-export-my-posts How do I export my posts?] ''Substack Help Center''</ref> Some popular bloggers have done so but the procedure can be involved.<ref>Molly White, [https://www.citationneeded.news/substack-to-self-hosted-ghost/ Migrating from Substack to self-hosted Ghost: the details], ''Citation Needed'', January 13, 2024</ref>

== Relationship to Twitter / X ==

Substack has a conflicted relationship with [[Twitter]]. Executives describe Substack as a place for serious discussion, without the soundbites, insults, and dogpiling of services like Twitter. On the other hand, many Substack bloggers built their audience on corporate services like twitter, and Substack also emphasizes recruiting journalists and writing about policy and politics in the USA.<ref>Jessica Testa and Benjamin Mullin, [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/business/media/substack-politics-newsletters.html Substack Bets on Politics, With Millions at Stake], ''The New York Times'', November 18, 2024 https://archive.ph/mv8eW</ref> Whereas early blogs tended to be by unknowns (often anonymous), Substack recruited the sort of people who might be featured in a New York City paper or magazine for white-collar professionals. Substack press releases use language like "the future of media belongs to you" and "shaping a media ecosystem" which implies that they want to replace legacy [[media]].<ref>Chris Best, Hamish McKenzie, and Jairaj Sethi, [https://post.substack.com/p/substack-series-c A Media Future to Believe In], ''The Substack Post'', July 17, 2025 </ref> At its height, Twitter was also the social media service where journalists and political commentators networked and built their audiences, and which reporters frequently quoted. The two services therefore aim to recruit the same people to write about the same topics, although one emphasizes long essays and the other short paragraphs.

[[Elon Musk]] attempted to buy Substack in 2023, and after he bought Twitter / X in 2022 it turned hard to the right.<ref>Jessica Testa and Benjamin Mullin, [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/18/business/media/substack-politics-newsletters.html Substack Bets on Politics, With Millions at Stake], ''The New York Times'', November 18, 2024 https://archive.ph/mv8eW</ref> After Substack introduced its own microblog called Notes, Musk suppressed posts on Twitter with links to Substack. Hamish McKenzie, one of Substack's founders, once worked for Musk's company [[Tesla Motors]] and wrote a book about the company called ''Insane Mode.''<ref>Bill Rice, Jr., [https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-backstory-of-substack The Backstory of Substack], May 13, 2025 NB. that Rice is a COVID crank and an anti-vaxxer</ref>

In 2025, right-wing writers aimed at an audience in the USA usually have both a twitter microblog and a Substack newsletter. This implies that they find these sites more useful than the alternatives such as [[Bluesky]], Medium, or a self-hosted blog. Not all of them succeed: white nationalist [[F. Roger Devlin]] gave the [[manosphere]] concepts like [[hypergamy]], but his Substack has only 112 subscribers as of December 2025.<ref>https://frogerdevlin.substack.com/</ref>

== Bigger is better? ==

Substack boasts of having bloggers who earn at least $1 million a year on Substack.<ref>Alex Heath, [https://www.theverge.com/creators/679036/substack-ceo-50-people-1-million-dollars “More than 50 people” are making over $1 million a year on Substack], ''The Verge'', June 3, 2025</ref> This created an ecosystem of people [[Self help|selling lessons]] on how you can [[Get-rich-quick scheme|get rich quick]] by [[Sympathetic magic|imitating the habits]] of these wealthy newsletter creators,<ref>Meena Rohith, [https://meenarv2829.substack.com/p/what-every-top-substack-is-doing What Every Top Substack Is Doing Differently And You’re Probably Not], ''The Online Wallet'', June 5, 2025</ref> and veteran journalists who point out that most of these wealthy writers were already Internet-famous or well-connected.<ref>Eric Levitz, [https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/03/substack-scam-journalism-media.html Substack Is a Scam in the Same Way That All Media Is], ''New York Intelligencer'', March 24, 2021</ref> Large online businesses with support staff can produce more newsletters, audio, and video than one creator with a day job and childcare responsibilities, but that does not imply that someone who posts more will get rich.

Like Twitter, Substack shares how many subscribers a newsletter has (and who subscribes to it) by default. This is one of the only facts about a blog on the landing page next to the logo, title, author, and a brief slogan. It also has leaderboards with the most popular newsletters in each of twenty categories, and leaderboards with newsletters which are growing quickly. Neither was customary with the early blogging services, which treated each blog as its own publication, shared traffic stats with the blog owner alone unless he or she chose to share, and did not share who followed a blog on RSS or by email.

While subscriber count provides a quick way of deciding how important a Substack blog is, like Twitter's follower count and Blue Check system, it also exposes that attention on the Internet is incredibly unequal, and helps newsletters which are already popular get more readers. Someone browsing a bookstore or a magazine rack is not encouraged to know how well the book or magazine in their hand has sold, just to decide whether they want to buy it. This can also discourage bloggers whose audiences don't grow so big, even if they are reaching more people than if they just shared their ideas with their friends after work or their crochet club on Sundays.<ref>Summer Brennan, [https://www.awritersnotebook.org/p/how-to-succeed-on-substack How to Succeed on Substack], ''A Writer's Notebook'', November 29, 2023</ref> Some writers strategize by picking less popular categories so they have a better chance of approaching the top and being promoted by Substack.<ref>Crazy Old Man, [https://wordcraftshots.substack.com/p/the-no-bs-guide-to-substack-categories Substack Categories Demystified], ''Wordcraft Shots'', May 15, 2025</ref>

Rewarding blogs with the greatest number of subscribers rewards general-interest blogs for Americans rather than specialist blogs or blogs aimed at smaller countries. A newsletter about developments in the Malaysian foreign-exchange market might have a potential audience smaller than a newsletter on personal finance in the USA, but that does not make it less important. If the head of the Malaysian central bank drops in to the comments, the fact that his Substack has only 73 subscribers and 2 posts is not a good reason to ignore what he has to say - especially if it includes "subject to prosecution" and "criminal liability"! Substack puts writers in competition with one another, implies that bigger is always better, and discourages them from showing offline credentials. The most controversial aspect of the site also reflects this vaguely [[Libertarian]] ideology.

== Recommending hateful posts ==

Unlike classic blogging software, Substack encourages readers who follow one blog to follow others on their service. The more Substack blogs someone follows, the more they are likely to spend, and the bigger Substack's cut. Researchers at [[The Guardian]] tested what happens when you subscribe to one Neo-Nazi newsletter:

{{quotebox|Within two hours of subscribing to NatSocToday for the purposes of this investigation, the Substack algorithm directed the Guardian’s account to 21 other profiles featuring similar content. ... The Guardian account was shown separate posts that promoted conspiracy theories about Jewish power and influence and suggested antisemitism was a myth. The algorithm also promoted other extremist content, including newsletters relating to the “[[great replacement]]” conspiracy theory – the suggestion that there is a plot to replace white Europeans with people from other races.<ref name="mckelvie">Gerandine McKelvie, [https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/feb/07/revealed-how-substack-makes-money-from-hosting-nazi-newsletters Revealed: How Substack makes money from hosting Nazi newsletters], ''The Guardian'', February 7, 2026</ref>}}

Suggesting that someone follow a Nazi newsletter is different than hosting that newsletter!

== Substack has a Nazi opportunity ==

Substack received a lot of attention in 2022 for hosting anti-vax blogs,<ref>[https://counterhate.com/research/substack-anti-vaxx-newsletters/ Substack & Anti-Vaxx Newsletters: Who are the anti-vaxx Substack millionaires?], ''Center for Countering Digital Hate'', January 27, 2022</ref> and in 2023 for hosting Nazi and anti-trans blogs.<ref>Jonathan M. Katz, [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/11/substack-extremism-nazi-white-supremacy-newsletters/676156/ Substack has a Nazi Problem], ''The Atlantic'', November 28, 2023</ref> In both cases, Substack executives insisted that they were a neutral platform and [[Streisand effect|censorship would just make things worse]].<ref>Hamish McKenzie, Chris Best, and Jairaj Sethi, [https://on.substack.com/p/society-has-a-trust-problem-more Society has a trust problem. More censorship will only make it worse], ''On Substack'', January 26, 2022</ref><ref>https://substack.com/@hamish/note/c-45811343</ref> One reason this argument is not valid is that Substack seeks out bloggers like Scott Alexander and makes special deals with them. That is not neutral, any more than a publisher is neutral when it tries to recruit new writers. Substack sends push notices to users recommending blogs to read, in one case including a blog with a [[Swastika]] logo for "the National Socialist and White Nationalist Community."<ref>Taylor Lorenz, [https://www.usermag.co/p/substack-sent-a-push-alert-promoting-nazi-white-supremacist-blog Substack sent a push alert promoting a Nazi blog], ''UserMag'', July 29, 2025</ref> While Substack apologized, that confirms that they use judgement about which blogs on their site to promote. American lawyer and blogger Ken White further explained that Substack does not allow many things which are protected by the First Amendment in the United States, such as [[doxing]] and [[pornography]].<ref>Ken White, [https://popehat.substack.com/p/substack-has-a-nazi-opportunity Substack Has A Nazi Opportunity], ''The Popehat Report'', December 21, 2023</ref> That is not absolute free speech, but judgement about what kind of speech to allow on its platform.

White argued that Substack chose to encourage Nazi bloggers and discourage erotica as part of their marketing strategy. By the 2020s the chattering class in the USA were more comfortable hanging out with Nazis than with sex workers, and Substack wanted famous and respectable figures to sign up. Anti-vax bloggers are not respectable but they pay. 

Taylor Lorenz noted that Substack depends on loans from Andreessen Horowitz, "a firm whose founders have pushed extreme far right rhetoric."<ref>Taylor Lorenz, [https://www.usermag.co/p/substack-sent-a-push-alert-promoting-nazi-white-supremacist-blog Substack sent a push alert promoting a Nazi blog], ''UserMag'', July 29, 2025</ref> Marc Andreessen's Techno-Optimist Manifesto shares many themes with [[Futurism#Italian_futurism|Italian Futurism]], an artistic movement founded in 1909 which glorified war and violent technological change, and praises [[John Galt]], [[Ludwig von Mises]], and [[Nick Land]]. Nonprofit newsletter platform Ghost explains that their payment processor Stripe is very strict about nudity and erotic content, but only objects to Nazis if they actually threaten unlawful violence (so Stripe would process payments for a Nazi blog which says "our government should pass a law and [[Ethnic cleansing|expel all the $expletives"]]).<ref>[https://ghost.org/help/tips-donations/#requirements Tips & donations], ''Ghost Help''</ref> 

In 2020 and 2024, Substack executives said they they were not profitable yet but could absolutely be if they wanted to (their Canadian girlfriends probably help with the accounting).<ref>Wes Davis, [https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/18/24299484/substack-newsletters-politics-not-profitable-frustrated-investors Substack says it could be profitable — but it still isn’t], ''The Verge'', November 18, 2024 https://archive.ph/2E1fu</ref> Substack borrowed $100 million from venture capitalists in 2025 alone and planned to spend it on things like audio livestreaming services.<ref>[https://www.podcastnewsdaily.com/news/substack-secures-100-million-investment-to-boost-audio-and-creator-features/article_93af1e7a-2d8a-410d-af84-27207072d187.html Substack Secures $100 Million Investment To Boost Audio And Creator Features], ''Podcast News Daily'', July 22, 2025</ref> Frontline staff told a visiting economist that they were not sure how the company would spend all this money except continue operating at a loss while they grew (''extend the runway'' in the language of venture-capital-backed startups).<ref>Brad DeLong, [https://braddelong.substack.com/p/notes-on-substack-these-days Notes on Substack Theses Days], ''Grasping Reality'', August 4, 2025 "Front-line workers for SubStack have no idea what SubStack is going to do with its new money other then bank it and so extend the runway."</ref> The nonprofit platform Ghost borrowed $300,000 from the public in 2013 and has been profitable since 2014.<ref>John O'Nolan, [https://chartmogul.com/blog/ghost-chartmogul-dashboard/ Ghost's Public ChartMogul Dashboard], ChartMogul</ref> A company with $100 million of cash to throw around can look very important and powerful but the investors want something for their money, either profits or influence. This leads to what Cory Doctorow calls [[Enshittification|enshittification]], as the site squeezes creators and consumers to regain the lost money or maximize its propaganda value. Sometimes this succeeds, and other times the site fades away, with more ads and paywalls and cheap, sensational content.

As of 2025, Substack has managed to keep both mainstream figures and a wild world of extremists, although some prominent bloggers have left or been banned. It remains to be seen whether the site will become another [[Paradox of tolerance|Nazi bar]], or if the Nazis and antivaxxers and people who are very concerned about the chromosones of teenagers will remain segregated from the rest of the site.

{{cquote|Hi everyone. Chris, Jairaj, and I wanted to let you know that we’ve heard and have been listening to all the views being expressed about how Substack should think about the presence of [[fringe]] voices on the platform (and particularly, in this case, Nazi views).<BR>

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either&nbsp;— we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don't think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.|||Hamish McKenzie<ref>[https://substack.com/@hamish/note/c-45811343 Hamish McKenzie] (Dec 21, 2023, 7:35 AM) ''Substack''.</ref>}}

McKenzie and his co-founders might not agree with Nazis and antivaxxers, but they set up a win-win business relationship with them (''aligned incentives''). The more paid subscribers they get, the more money Substack makes; the wider Substack spreads their ideas, the more likely they are to use the site.<ref name="mckelvie"/> Because the owners of Substack profit from Nazi businesses, their anti-Nazi beliefs don't seem deep or sincere.

==Fringe figures on Substack==
* [[Aella]] - [[LessWrong]], [[eugenics]], risky [[BDSM|kink]] practices (137,000 subscribers as of early 2026)
* [[Scott Alexander]] - [[LessWrong]], [[eugenics]], race and IQ (subscriber count secret, but Substack income let him leave full-time work as a psychiatrist) 
* [[Steve Bannon]]<ref>https://warroomposse.substack.com/</ref> - [[alt-right]] (over 1,000 subscribers as of early 2026)
* [[Vault-Co|Cleve Blakemore]] - old-fashioned conspiracy theories about the [[Nephilim]] and a Plot Against Men  (2,000 subscribers as of early 2026)
* [[Alex Berenson]] - [[Anti-vaxxerism|anti-vaxxer]] (234,000 subscribers as of early 2026)
* [[Ozy Brennan]] - LessWrong, longtermist [[Effective Altruism]]
* [[Bronze Age Pervert]]<ref>https://www.bronzeagepervert.yoga/</ref> - [[misogyny]], xenophobia, strange diets (19,000 subscribers as of early 2026) 
* {{wpl|Darryl Cooper||}} - totally not a Nazi but wants you to sympathize with Adolf Hitler and [[David Irving]] and not with Zionists or [[Winston Churchill]]<ref>Noah Lanard, [https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/07/martyr-made-darryl-cooper-nazi-jews-juggernaut-nihilism-tucker-carlson-joe-rogan-substack/ How a Nazi-Obsessed Amateur Historian Went From Obscurity to the Top of Substack], ''Mother Jones'', July 31, 2025</ref><ref>Joseph Bernstein, [https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/style/darryl-cooper-martyr-made-podcast.html The Podcaster Asking You to Side With History’s Villains], ''New York Times'', April 13, 2024 </ref> (190,000 subscribers as of early 2026)
* Freddie deBoer<ref>Nathan J. Robinson, [https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2020/09/we-dont-know-our-potential We Don't Know our Potential], ''Current Affairs'', September 20, 2020</ref> - hereditarian [[Marxist]] (but careful not to argue that some races have stupid genes, just that some ''classes'' have stupid genes)
* [[Glenn Greenwald]] - contrarian
* {{wpl|John Michael Greer||}}<ref>https://archdruid.substack.com/</ref> - [[mystic]], [[Magick|ritual magician]], [[Peak Oil]], ecological doomer
* [[Graham Linehan]] - anti-trans
* [[Joseph Mercola]] - anti-vaxxer (333,000 subscribers in early 2026)
* NatSocToday: Nazi  (2,800 subscribers in early 2026)
* Venkatesh Rao - [[postrationalism]]
* Crémieux Recueil
* [[Christopher Rufo]] - far-right, anti-LGBTQ+ (122,000 subscribers in early 2026)
* [[Steve Sailer]]
* [[Richard Spencer]]<ref>https://radixjournal.substack.com/</ref> - white nationalist who got punched and promises he has reformed
* [[Curtis Yarvin]] - [[neoreaction]] (67,000 subscribers as of early 2026)
* White Rabbit: [[Neo-Nazi]], [[Antisemite]], [[Fourteen Words]] (10,000 subscribers in early 2026)<ref name="mckelvie"/>
* Ava Wolfe: [[holocaust denialism]]  (3,000 subscribers in early 2026)<ref name="mckelvie"/>

Antivax and far-right accounts like Cooper's and Mercoa's are some of the most popular in their respective categories, although smaller accounts have more shocking language and images.<ref>https://substack.com/leaderboard/</ref>

==See also==
* [[Neutral_point_of_view#NPOV_on_Substack|NPOV on Substack]]
* [[Deplatform]] - what Substack does not want to do to Nazis and antivaxers (but is willing to to to doxxers and pornographers)

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

[[Category:Alt-tech]]
[[Category:Anti-vaccination movement]]
[[Category:California]]
[[Category:Eugenics supporters]]
[[Category:LessWrong]]
[[Category:Media]]
[[Category:Pseudoscience promoters]]
[[Category:Social media]]
[[Category:Websites]]

Categories: Alt-tech, Anti-vaccination movement, California, Eugenics supporters, LessWrong, Media, Pseudoscience promoters, Social media, Websites