The Washington Times

{{title-italics}}
[[File:The Washington Times Logo.png|thumb|What's that? You say that logo looks like the Washington Post's? That's just a coincidence.{{lie}}]]
{{media}}
'''''The 
Moonie
 Washington Times''''' is [[Washington, D.C.]]'s perpetual second fiddle to the ''[[Washington Post]]''.  

==Ownership and finances==
Started by [[Unification Church]] founder Sun Myung Moon in 1982, the ''Times'' has had [[Wingnut welfare|nearly $2 billion in church subsidies]] as of 2002.<ref name="Ahrens 2002">Ahrens, Frank. "[http://web.archive.org/web/20110629031755/http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A60061-2002May22 Moon Speech Raises Old Ghosts as the Times Turns 20]." ''The Washington Post'': March 23, 2002 (archived June 29, 2011). Accessed April 19, 2020. "As of this year, Moon and his businesses have plowed about $1.7 billion into subsidizing the Times, say current and former employees."</ref>  Although much of the early ''Times'' staff came from the defunct ''Washington Star'', the paper's board of directors was made up of members of the Unification Church, with the staff undergoing occasional purges, resignations, and faction fights over the direction of the paper.<ref group=note>Examples: Should the paper be [[neoconservative]] and a voice for [[Great Recession|robber barons]] and foreign policy [[Chickenhawk|hawks]], or should it be [[paleoconservative]] and keep company with neo-Confederates and [[Racialism|racialist]]s?  Should every staff member give total fealty to Rev. Moon or is fealty to the memory of Ronald Reagan sufficient?</ref>  No less an authority than the Rev. Moon himself has proclaimed the ''Times'' a "gift" to America to thank the [[U.S.]] for fighting [[Communism]] in [[Korea]], or something like that.<ref group=note>In reality it is more or less an attempt by the Moonie [[cult]] to insert themselves into the mainstream by owning a major newspaper, much as [[Christian Science]] has accomplished with the ''Christian Science Monitor'' - the difference being the ''CSM'' usually deals in ''facts''.</ref>  In 2002 Rev. Moon outdid himself by proclaiming he established the ''Times'' "in response to heaven's direction" and that "The ''Washington Times'' will become the instrument in spreading the truth about [[God]] to the world."<ref name="Ahrens 2002"/>

In April 2010, the Moonies cut off the paper's subsidy.<ref>Shapira, Ian. "[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/30/AR2010043002043.html Unification Church will put Washington Times up for sale]." ''The Washington Post'': May 1, 2010. Accessed April 19, 2020.</ref>  This was scooped March 30 by the [[Drudge Report]] and denied at the time by the ''Times''<ref>[http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2010/03/29/daily26.html Washington Times says it is not for sale], Washington Business Journal, Mar 30, 2010</ref> and reported May 1 in the ''Washington Post''. The paper was sold in September 2010 for $1,<ref>[http://archive.ph/kkDLL Washington Times Sold For $1, Just Like Newsweek]. US News and World Report, August 31, 2010. Archived from the original.</ref><ref name="money pit">Krepel, Terry. "[http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2013/bozellpapers.html The Right-Wing Paper Chase (And Money Pit)]." ConWebWatch: April 11, 2013. Accessed April 19, 2020.</ref>  apparently back to the elder Rev. Moon to solve a feud over the paper among his sons. The ''Washington Times'' is owned by Operations Holdings,<ref>[http://www.operationsholdings.com/about-us/ Operations Holdings: About Us]. www.operationsholdings.com</ref> a Moonie [[Front group|front company]], which in turn is owned by HSA-UWC ("Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity"), which could be called either another front group (since few people know what HSA-UWC is) or just a synonym of the Unification Church. Only by 2015 did the ''Times'' become profitable.<ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/14/washington-times-reaches-profitability-after-33-ye/ Washington Times reaches profitability after 33 years, $1 billion in losses]. The Washington Times, October 4,
 2015.</ref>

==Editorial slant and misinformation==
The editorial slant of the ''Washington Times'' is notably [[conservative]] and [[partisan]] in favor of the [[Republican Party]].  On occasion, they do some bang-up investigative [[journalism]] and muckraking, sometimes on other conservative groups which the Moonies are involved in intramural feuds with.  Usually though, the ''Times'' is a quaint bore, ever pining for a return to the [[Golden age|glory days]] of the [[Dred Scott v. Sandford|1850s]] or [[Roaring Twenties|1920s]], and [[Ronald Reagan]]'s befuddled dreams of [[reactionary]] radicalism.

The paper promotes all sorts of [[wingnut]] curiosities, including various [[pseudoscience]]s ([[creationism]], [[anti-environmentalism]], [[global warming denial]], false claims about [[abortion]] and [[abstinence-only sex education]]) and [[bigotry]] ([[homophobia]], [[transphobia]]<ref>Hunter. A. (December 28, 2022). "[https://www.washingtontimes.com/cartoons/ Playing with dolls ...]", ''The Washington Times'', Accessed December 29, 2022.</ref>, [[Islamophobia]], anti-[[secularism]]). 

Notable editorial tics: Until recently, The ''Washington Times'' had an inability to mention [[gay marriage]] anywhere in their pages, including AP wire stories, without putting gratuitous scare quotes around "marriage."<ref>The scare quote are still live as of April 19, 2020 in "[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/aug/31/iowa-gay-marriage-law-struck-down/ Iowa gay 'marriage' law struck down]" from August 31, 2007, a reprint of an Associated Press article.</ref> When ''Times'' editor John Solomon, formerly of the AP and ''[[Washington Post]]'', decided to drop that practice and the use of "illegal alien" in 2008,<ref>Wemple, Erik. "[http://web.archive.org/web/20090224090637/http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2008/02/25/washington-times-scare-quotes-are-history/ Washington Times “Scare Quotes” Are History]." ''Washington City Paper'': February 25, 2008. Accessed April 19, 2020.</ref> the move attracted some criticism from the [[Media Research Center]]: "...whatever the reigning liberal sensibilities are in our news template, often defined by minority journalist groups, are defined as 'neutral'...it does suggest that Solomon has his eyes on impressing the national media elite, and not just impressing the inside-the-Beltway readership of the Times."<ref>Graham, Tim. "[http://web.archive.org/web/20080228000446/http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/02/26/washington-times-editor-endorses-gay-banishes-illegal-alien Washington Times Editor Endorses 'Gay,' Banishes Illegal 'Alien']." NewsBusters: February 26, 2008.</ref> 

Since opposition to gay marriage is becoming politically untenable, ''The Washington Times'' has turned to a new target of the LGBT+ community: trans people. According to their transphobic scare op-ed by David Gortler,<ref>Gortler, D. (December 28, 20220. "[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/dec/28/transgenderisms-scientific-legitimacy-crisis/ Transgenderism’s scientific legitimacy crisis]". ''The Washington Times''. Accessed December 29, 2022.</ref> "Rare inborn chimeric disorders notwithstanding, science knows no other formal categories of humans (or any other mammals for that matter) other than male and female." This is easily refuted bullshit, with [[intersex]] people being one blatant example, though they were apparently dismissed as "rare inborn chimeric disorders"; this wasn't clarified further. ''The Washington Times'' could clearly put two and two together and see that if these disorders are possible, it's not out of realm of possibility that people's identities could also lie in a spectrum. Gortler's entire article is an ignorant appeal to the extremely reductionist "the fundamentals of biology", his personal disbelief that a transgender textbook is larger than a cardiovascular medicine one, and the infantile understanding of the complexities of sex and gender in biology (Wikipedia's {{wpl|Causes of gender incongruence}} and {{wpl|Gender identity}}, {{wpl|Social construction of gender}} are big pages for a reason).

===Coronavirus coverage===
A January 2020 [[BBC]] article reported that "two widely-shared Washington Times articles[,] both of which quote a former Israeli military intelligence officer" for a conspiracy theory that [[2019-20 COVID-19 outbreak|COVID-19]] likely resulted from a Chinese bioweapons program.<ref>"[https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-51271037 China coronavirus: Misinformation spreads online about origin and scale]." BBC: January 30, 2020. Accessed April 19, 2020.</ref>

In a column from March 13, 2020, "Coronavirus and the death of statesmanship," ''Times'' opinion writer Tim Constantine published a quote from a forged tweet attributed to Senator [[Chuck Schumer]] as fact in order to depict Schumer as hypocritical in criticizing President [[Donald Trump]]'s handling of the coronavirus pandemic.<ref>Constantine, Tim. "[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/mar/13/coronavirus-and-the-death-of-statemanship/ Coronavirus and the death of statesmanship]." ''The Washington Times'': March 13, 2020. Accessed April 19, 2020. "In a Feb. 5 tweet, Democrat and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said 'the premature travel ban to and from China by the administration is just an excuse to further his ongoing war against immigrants.' [...] The same Chuck Schumer who criticized the Trump administration for acting too quickly with the China travel ban took a different approach as the coronavirus crisis wore on. He deleted his earlier tweet and on Feb. 24 and issued a statement accusing Mr. Trump of 'towering incompetence' and saying that the “President has been slow to take action to confront the virus abroad.” Fact check: When the president took action there were 6 cases of coronavirus reported in the United States and no deaths."</ref> However, nearly a week earlier, the ''Times'' republished an Associated Press report disproving the existence of the tweet.<ref>Dupuy, Beatrice; Lajka, Arijeta; and Seitz, Amanda. "[https://apnews.com/048bf7c599c644ef38837cc9b52b226a NOT REAL NEWS: A look at what didn't happen this week]." Associated Press: March 6, 2020. Accessed April 19, 2020. [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/mar/6/not-real-news-a-look-at-what-didnt-happen-this-wee/ Republished] on WashingtonTimes.com on the same date.</ref> In late February, conservative blog Powerline acknowledged: "The allegedly deleted Schumer tweet does not appear in Pro Publica’s authoritative list of deleted Schumer tweets. I regret not verifying the authenticity of the deleted tweet before posting this. I’m declaring it a hoax."<ref>Johnson, Scott. "[https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/02/schuminations-hiding-the-truth.php Schuminations: Hiding the Truth (Hoaxed!)]" Powerline: February 29, 2020. One reader amazingly [https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/02/schuminations-hiding-the-truth.php#comment-4815425299 commented (with 6 upvotes)]: "... it certainly sounds like something he'd have said, so fake but accurate?"</ref>

==Mixed nuts==
The paper has employed some rather, er, ''controversial'' columnists:
*{{wpl|Samuel T. Francis|Sam Francis|,}} the [[white nationalist]] who they fired after he got a little bit more [[racist]] than usual. Found a warmer spot to roost at the [[Council of Conservative Citizens]] before he flew the coop of life.
*[[Frank Gaffney]], [[Islamophobia|Islamophobe]] extraordinaire and "[[Creeping Sharia]]" [[conspiracy theorist]].
*Jeffrey T. Kuhner, gibbering wingnut demagogue who thinks [[Obama]] is [[Godwin's Law|every historical tyrant under the sun]] and then some, also has a severe case of [[psychological projection]] that could give even [[Bryan Fischer]] a run for his money.
*Peter LaBarbera, rabid homophobe, now heads "[[Americans for Truth About Homosexuality]]."
*Robert Stacy McCain, member of the [[neo-Confederate]] group [[League of the South]].<ref>[http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2009/10/meet-robert-stacy-mccain-neo.html Meet Robert Stacy McCain, Neo-Confederate Wacko Extraordinaire], Holocaust Controversies</ref>
*[[Christine O'Donnell]], who is not a witch.<ref>[https://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/christine-odonnell/ Christine O’Donnell], ''The Washington Times''.</ref>
*Bill Sammon, see also [[Fox News]].
*
...and David Brooks
 Never mind, [[Bobo]] was far too sane for the Moonie Times and went on to [[New York Times|the other Times]].

==See also==
*[[Epoch Times]], another [[fake news]] rag run by [[Falun Gong|a cult]]
*''[[Washington Examiner]]'' — easy to lump this one with ''The Washington Times'' as they both regularly publish right-wing outrage bait.

==External links==
*[http://www.washingtontimes.com/ Moonie Times]

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{reflist|2|80%}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Washington Times}}
[[Category:American media]]
[[Category:Anti-intellectualism]]
[[Category:Birtherism]]
[[Category:Conservative deceit]]
[[Category:Conspiracy theorists]]
[[Category:COVID-19 denialists]]
[[Category:Creationists]]
[[Category:Fake news]]
[[Category:Global warming denialists]]
[[Category:Homophobia]]
[[Category:Islamophobia]]
[[Category:Newspapers]]
[[Category:Propaganda]]
[[Category:Pseudohistory promoters]]
[[Category:Pseudoscience promoting organizations]]
[[Category:Racism]]
[[Category:Transphobia]]
[[Category:Unification Church]]
[[Category:War on science]]

Categories: American media, Anti-intellectualism, Birtherism, Conservative deceit, Conspiracy theorists, COVID-19 denialists, Creationists, Fake news, Global warming denialists, Homophobia, Islamophobia, Newspapers, Propaganda, Pseudohistory promoters, Pseudoscience promoting organizations, Racism, Transphobia, Unification Church, War on science