DeviantArt

[[File:DeviantArt Logo.svg|thumb|right|165px|Current logo for DeviantArt]]
{{internet}}

'''DeviantArt''', historically stylized as '''deviantART''', is an American online [[art]] portal and community, first launched on August 7, 2000 by Angelo Sotira, Scott Jarkoff, and Matthew Stephens among others. The site started off as a user-submitted repository for those interested in user interface customisation, e.g. {{wpl|WindowBlinds}} themes and skins for software such as {{wpl|Winamp}} and cellphones such as those from {{wpl|Nokia}}, but has since expanded{{efn|Pardon the pun, please.}} its scope towards art in general, particularly traditional illustration, photography and CGI.

While it has been a go-to venue for those wanting to express themselves through art and maybe gain commissions on the side, the site experienced a decline in its reputation in recent years, in part due to an influx of [[Autism rights movement#Neurodiversity|neurodivergent]] and/or special needs people—mostly [[children]] or adults with an affinity for children's media such as ''[[My Little Pony]]'' and ''[[Pokemon]]'', as well as [[Paedophilia|actual miscreants]] who pose a serious threat to aforementioned children on the site.

==Controversies==
===Ableism and cringe culture===
{{main|1=Ableism|3=Cringe culture}}
There had been a surge of users in recent years from communities deemed by the usual [[edgelord]]s and [[asshole]]s as so-called "[[lolcow]]s", i.e. people with eccentricities who are susceptible to [[trolling]] and are easily mocked and [[Cyber-bullying|bullied]]. Because of dA's lenient moderation and ease of registration, it became quite easy for those perceived as "freaks" and "weirdos" to post any and all content, namely crude MS-Painted 'fan art' of their favourite fandoms such as ''Super Mario'', ''Sonic the Hedgehog'', ''Pokemon'', ''My Little Pony'', ''The Loud House'', ''Thomas the Tank Engine'', and ''Bluey'', among others. This unsurprisingly led to said users (and the site as a whole) becoming an easy [[scapegoat]] and target of [[reactionary]] ridicule and scorn, and is often cited as a textbook example of cringe culture.

===Adult and fetish content===
[[File:DeviantArt fetish content.jpg|thumb|220px|left|"Such bizarre obnoxious fetish artwork makes me nervous, I don't want my feet exposed; it feels like a disservice!"{{efn|If you don't get the caption, sing it to the tune of "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious".}}]]
Despite dA initially adopting a policy against outright [[pornography]],<ref>[https://www.deviantartsupport.com/en/article/what-is-mature-content-453216 DeviantArt FAQ: What is Mature Content?] on the DeviantArt Help Center.</ref> they allow what they define as "tasteful" nudity, even photographs,<ref>[https://www.deviantartsupport.com/en/article/what-is-deviantarts-policy-around-sexual-themes "What is DeviantArt's policy around 'sexual themes'?"] on the DeviantArt Help Center.</ref> and later updated their policy to allow illustrative smut provided it is paywalled or not otherwise easily accessible,<ref>[https://www.deviantart.com/team/journal/An-Update-to-DeviantArt-s-Mature-Content-Policies-908472076 An Update to DeviantArt's Mature Content Policies]</ref> the site did gain a rather dubious reputation for being a fetishist hotbed,<ref>[https://www.reddit.com/r/HobbyDrama/comments/meieqw/deviantartart_community_the_amuria_drama_how_a/ The Amuria drama - how a popular "13 year old artist" on DeviantArt fell from grace and ruined Artist Alley]</ref> often if not always featuring [[rule 34]] art of cartoon characters having their clothes ripped, feet and/or bodies inflated to kingdom come, and many more,<ref>[https://www.reddit.com/r/artbusiness/comments/u18ckp/whats_the_opinion_on_deviantart_now_in_2022/ What's the opinion on DeviantArt now in 2022?]</ref> a notable subject of which is Sega mascot {{wpl|Sonic the Hedgehog||,}} whose fandom in general has been the subject of ridicule and parody<ref name="KillScreenEsposito">{{cite web |last1=Kotzer |first1=Zack |title=Confessions of an online prankster: a good laugh with Ben Esposito |url=https://killscreen.com/articles/good-laugh-ben-esposito/ |website=[[Kill Screen]] |access-date=June 2, 2018 |date=June 14, 2016 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180102123851/https://killscreen.com/articles/good-laugh-ben-esposito/ |archive-date=January 2, 2018 }}</ref> for their eccentric obsession with the blue blur.<ref>[https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/02/why-is-there-so-much-sonic-the-hedgehog-fetish-art-online.html Why Is There So Much Sonic the Hedgehog Fetish Art Online?]</ref>

While it need not to be said that porn isn't necessarily the morally bankrupt medium [[conservatives]] often paint it to be (provided it is done within reason, mind you), but the aforementioned lax enforcement and content moderation on dA allowed certain users to post even more disturbing submissions such as those of characters who are canonically underage.<ref>[https://www.deviantart.com/jcfanfics/art/Jeremy-Against-The-dA-Purge-981204772 Jeremy Against The dA Purge]</ref> That being said, the kink deluge understandably turned at least some people away, especially considering how minors which make up a not-so-insignificant chunk of the user base [[Think of the children|could very well easily access such mature content]]; an announcement by DeviantArt regarding 18+ submissions was interpreted by some as a veiled crackdown on fetish art, much to the consternation of those demanding [[free speech|freedom of expression]].<ref>[https://www.pillowfort.social/posts/3707008 deviantART allegedly cracks down on kink art]</ref>

===Manchildren and sex predators===
And alongside fetish content is the ever-recurring issue of [[paedophilia]] and [[child sexual abuse]] imagery, while not unique to dA, is still a matter of concern especially with underage members congregating on the site (and unfortunately becoming easy lolcow bait in the process).<ref>[https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-glatz-14 United States v. Glatz]</ref> This unfortunately became a ''cause célèbre'' for the [[transphobia]] crowd, particularly when a certain 'news' site [[fake news|of questionable veracity]] ran an article about a supposed [[transgender]] sex offender whom they also deadnamed;<ref>[https://archive.ph/DiTfi South Dakota Sex Offender Indicted On Charges Related To Child Sexual Exploitation Material]</ref> searching for the person online only leads to the article in question, putting said report in doubt.

===Generative AI and the issue of copyright===
In keeping with the [[artificial intelligence]] boom of the 2020s, DeviantArt wholeheartedly embraced the use of generative and [[deepfake]] "art" for those who want to churn out randomly-generated "paintings" with none of the effort that legitimate artists have spent years perfecting. On top of its recent dubious reputation regarding mature content and appeal to [[autistic]] kids and special needs people, a significant portion of the dA community expressed outrage over what it deems to be an affront to creativity especially as the artwork generated by AI models are by and large culled from copyrighted images without the consent of those whom the AI models' authors kanged wholesale.<ref>[https://slate.com/technology/2024/05/deviantart-what-happened-ai-decline-lawsuit-stability.html DeviantArt’s Downfall Is Devastating, Depressing, and Dumb]</ref> A number of artists, including but not limited to former dA members, filed suit against the site and numerous other generative AI services for [[copyright]] infringement over the datasets used to generate AI art;<ref>[https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/16/23557098/generative-ai-art-copyright-legal-lawsuit-stable-diffusion-midjourney-deviantart James Vincent "AI art tools Stable Diffusion and Midjourney targeted with copyright lawsuit" The Verge, 16 January, 2023.]</ref> In July 2023, U.S. District Judge William Orrick was inclined to dismiss most of the lawsuit filed by Andersen, McKernan, and Ortiz but allowed them to file a new complaint.<ref name="Reuters-SDLawsuit">{{Cite news |last=Brittain |first=Blake |date=2023-07-19 |title=US judge finds flaws in artists' lawsuit against AI companies |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/us-judge-finds-flaws-artists-lawsuit-against-ai-companies-2023-07-19/ |access-date=2023-08-06}}</ref> Not helping matters is with the AI art generators being abused by some members to churn out disturbing material involving children, especially considering how a portion of the datasets used do involve juvenile images culled from the web.<ref>[https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/risks-of-posting-photos-of-children-online.2414845/page-2 Risks of Posting Photos of Children Online]</ref>

==See also==
*[[Kiwi Farms]], a forum dedicated to perpetrating cringe culture and is just overall composed of creeps
*[[Lolcow]], a general term used to describe the common victim of cringe culture, created by the below wiki but popularized by the above forum
*[[Encyclopædia Dramatica]], one of dA's harshest critics no less, though for all the wrong reasons

==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

[[Category:Ableism]]
[[Category:Arts]]
[[Category:Copyright]]
[[Category:Culture]]
[[Category:Homophobia]]
[[Category:Internet]]
[[Category:Media hysteria]]
[[Category:Moral panics]]
[[Category:Paedophilia]]
[[Category:Porn]]
[[Category:Sexuality]]
[[Category:Social justice]]
[[Category:Transphobia]]
[[Category:Websites]]

Categories: Ableism, Arts, Copyright, Culture, Homophobia, Internet, Media hysteria, Moral panics, Paedophilia, Porn, Sexuality, Social justice, Transphobia, Websites