Christocel

Categories: religion

A '''Christocel''', or '''Christcel''' is someone whose [[volceldom]] or [[inceldom]] is purportedly partially caused by their adherence to Christian teachings. It may also mean someone who is simultaneously Christian and incel.

==Origin of a christocel==
Generally, Christianity promotes total [[Fapstinence|abstinence from masturbation]] and abstinence from [[sex]] until [[marriage]]. However, global increase in the average age of first marriage<ref>https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/love-marriage-and-development-4-observations</ref> and virginity loss has strained Christian sexual morality that was conceived for societies with lower age averages. 

Psychological trauma can result from Christian puritanism, often from the guilt building up and spilling over in some way or another.
==History==
Marriage, such as in Christianity, is considered a cultural universal. Since marriage is valued, premarital sex is often discouraged.

The Catholic Church, through its allocation of [[celibacy]] on its members, has elevated [[inceldom]] into something honorable; that is, a choice and a calling. Although lifetime celibacy is considered appropriate for relatively few people such as priests or monks. It has sanctified notable historical Incels such as Saint Drogo as well.

Catholicism has been a source of inspiration to the Western world for millennia. Even traditionally Protestant nations have been influenced by the legacy of Catholicism. After all, the very word "Protestant" implies protest against Catholic rule. However, these Protestant churches did not wholly dismantle Catholic teachings. In many cases they simply tweaked some aspects of Catholicism or renounced the authority of the Pope. A major example of such a Protestant church that mainly maintained Catholic doctrines is the Anglican Church. The Protestant churches which made a few adjustments to their teachings in the medieval era in a sense simply became "neo-Catholic". 

In the 1800s, the protestant Christian book, ''Pillars of Truth'', by Erastus Otis Haven criticized the Catholic Church for enforcing inceldom.<ref>https://books.google.com/books?id=-kdWAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA171&dq=%22Involuntary+celibacy,+or+celibacy+assumed+as+a+badge+of+a+class,+binding+its+members+against+matrimony,+has+proved+productive+of+great+evils.+This+is+a+great+error+of+that+sect+calling+itself+the+Roman+Catholic+Church.+History+abundantly+proves+...%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiIiI2Az-TkAhXBUt8KHUJ3CqwQ6AEwAXoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Involuntary%20celibacy%2C%20or%20celibacy%20assumed%20as%20a%20badge%20of%20a%20class%2C%20binding%20its%20members%20against%20matrimony%2C%20has%20proved%20productive%20of%20great%20evils.%20This%20is%20a%20great%20error%20of%20that%20sect%20calling%20itself%20the%20Roman%20Catholic%20Church.%20History%20abundantly%20proves%20...%22&f=false</ref>
[[File:Wwee.png|full|center]][[Tertullian]] can be seen as an early Christocel, as he wrote very much against female hypergamy and was celibate himself.

The first Christian, Jesus Christ, arguably a volcel, understood the blackpill. 

His Mystical Body, the Church, divinely inspired, knew that if the secret of evolution was ever allowed to spread to the masses, they will act like how women act now, accepting the idea of evolution for 'eugenics' purposes, thwarting the family and depriving men of the opposite sex.

So in a counter-intuitive way, the Church — then the ruler of the world —understood that if you want humans to “evolve” away from their animal nature into a civilized form, you must keep the secret of evolution... a secret.

Christian groups in Texas want schools to teach Creationism along with Evolution. Perhaps the Church is trying to turn back the damage caused by letting masses study “evolution”.

There might, likewise, be a similar reason why the Church opposed Heliocentrism. 

Humans will act more civilized if we think we are special and the center of the universe. Tinder and other modern-day ills happen because people think we are simply evolved apes who are on a tiny rock orbiting a small star which is among billions of other similar stars.

Therefore, the church knew about evolution but opposed Charles Darwin because they understood that if the masses were given this knowledge it would lead to disaster. 

Tinder proved them right.

We can learn a similar secret in Jesus, who stood at 4’6 short.


The official physical description of Jesus from Bishops to Emperor Theodosius in the 4th Century, which is the official Catholic Church's description of Jesus' physical appearance, as quoted by Eisler,([26]:393–394,414–415), describes Him, quoting "both Hierosolymitanus and John of Damascus, [...] as having had connate eyebrows with goodly eyes and being [...] long-faced, crooked and well-grown. In a letter of certain bishops to the Emperor Theophilus, Jesus's height is described as 3 cubits (four foot six), which was also the opinion of Ephrem Syrus (320–379 AD): "God took human form and appeared in the form of three human ells (cubits); he came down to us small of stature." 

Theodore of Mopsuestia likewise claimed that the appearance of Christ was smaller than that of the children of Jacob (Israel). 

Jesus's prediction that he would be taunted "Physician, heal yourself" may suggest that Jesus was indeed physically deformed ("crooked" or hunch-backed), as claimed in the early Christian texts. 

And here's the most interesting part: "Justin Martyr, Tertullian, and Ambrose considered lack of physical attractiveness in Jesus as fulfilling the messianic prophecy Suffering Servant narrative of Isaiah 53."

Ancients weren’t stupid, they knew the truth. 

They knew that tall, chads get respected and short incels get mocked. They knew that if the messiah came down, he won’t come as chad, that would be too easy. He would instead come in the form of a short man.

Jesus came to suffer and sacrifice himself for short and ugly men, the fact that he is short already shows that God knows that short, ugly men came to suffer. It seems that ties into a greater pattern of Jesus’s external circumstances (such as his background and physical appearance).

Let’s face it, He wasn’t tall, handsome and well built with blue eyes (contrary to the way he’s been regularly illustrated over the course of history, since many simply cannot comprehend such a divine figure looking like an average guy, or 'worse' — lookism at work). 

For the Son of God, he was quite unremarkable when it comes to physical appearance.

But I am fairly certain that’s the whole point; why would Jesus need to be a good looking guy born into luxury and greatness? What lesson would be learnt? What suffering would he need to go through?

Our Jesus Christ was a short, ugly man. He didn’t come down as a chad, instead he came in the form of a short man.

"For he grew up before him like a young plant, and like a root out of dry ground; he had no form or majesty that we should look at him, and no beauty that we should desire him. – Book of Isaiah, Chapter 53, Verse 2.

==Subsets==
The Catholic Church is a strong proponent of [[fapstinence|no fap]], [[volcel|voluntary celibacy]], [[marriage]], and [[desexualization]].
<youtube>X3Py7ecgUE0</youtube>
{{S}}
==References==
<references />
==See also==
*[[Monk]]
*[[Brutti]]
*[[Muslimcel]]
*[[Tertullian]]
*[[Volcel]]
{{cel_see_also}}
[[category:religion]]{{C}}