tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Summarized financial information concerning our segments is shown in the tables below (in millions):
text: (1) Revenues for Corporate and Other represent deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustments recorded in accordance with GAAP
text: (2) Operating expenses for Corporate and Other includes equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes, of $51.7 million, $51.4 million and $19.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
text: (4) Depreciation and amortization for Corporate and Other primarily represents net incremental depreciation and amortization adjustments associated with the application of purchase accounting recorded in accordance with GAAP.
text: (6) Receivables from related parties are included in Corporate and Other.
text: (7) Transition and integration costs primarily consists of legal and professional fees related to the Distribution and transition-related costs following the Distribution.

Table:
Year ended December 31, 2017
Software Solutions
Data and Analytics
Corporate and Other
Total
Revenues
$904.5
$151.6
$(4.5)
(1)
$1,051.6
Expenses:
Operating expenses
388.0
113.2
68.3
(2)
569.5
Transition and integration costs
—
—
13.1
(7)
13.1
EBITDA
516.5
38.4
(85.9)
469.0
Depreciation and amortization
101.2
12.8
92.5
(4)
206.5
Operating income (loss)
415.3
25.6
(178.4)
262.5
Interest expense, net
(57.5)
Other expense, net
(12.6)
Earnings before income taxes
192.4
Income tax benefit
(61.8)
Net earnings
$254.2
Balance sheet data:
Total assets
$3,223.5
$304.7
$127.7
(6)
$3,655.9
Goodwill
$2,134.7
$172.1
$—
$2,306.8

Questions:
text: Stock-based compensation expense categorized by various equity components for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is summarized in the table below (in thousands):
text: During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company granted stock options covering zero, zero and 70,000 shares, respectively. The 2017 estimated per share fair value of the grant was $4.62 before estimated forfeitures.
text: The total fair value of restricted stock awards and units vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $30.1 million, $30.4 million and $22.7 million, respectively.
text: The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $0.2 million, $1.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively. The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the market value on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the shares.
text: As of December 31, 2019, the unrecognized stock-based compensation balance after estimated forfeitures consisted of $0.1 million related to unvested stock options, to be recognized over an estimated weighted average amortization period of 1.5 years, and $40.3 million related to restricted stock awards and units, including performance-based awards and units, to be recognized over an estimated weighted average amortization period of 2.3 years.
text: As of December 31, 2018, the unrecognized stock-based compensation balance after estimated forfeitures related to unvested stock options was $0.3 million to be recognized over an estimated weighted average amortization period of 2.0 years and $40.6 million related to restricted stock awards and units, including performance-based awards and units, to be recognized over an estimated weighted average amortization period of 2.2 years.

Table:
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Employee stock options
$219
$438
$1,980
Restricted stock awards and units
29,031
27,974
28,909
Employee stock purchase plan
2,304
2,599
2,573
Total stock-based compensation expense
$31,554
$31,011
$33,462

Questions:
question: What is the proportion of employee stock options and employee stock purchase plans over total stock-based compensation expense in 2018?
answer: 0.1
derivation: (438+2,599)/31,011 
question: What is the percentage change in restricted stock awards and units’ expenses from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 3.78
derivation: (29,031-27,974)/27,974 
scale: percent
text: Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units
text: Performance-based restricted stock units are eligible to vest at the end of each fiscal year in a three-year performance period based on the Company’s annual growth rate in net sales and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (subject to certain adjustments) over a multiple of four times the related results for the fourth quarter of 2018 relative to the growth rates for a peer group of companies for the same metrics and periods.
text: For the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2019, 60% of each performance-based award is subject to the net sales metric for the performance period and 40% is subject to the non-GAAP diluted earnings per share metric for the performance period. The maximum percentage for a particular metric is2 50% of the target number of units subject to the award related to that metric, however, vesting of the performance stock units is capped at 30% and 100%, respectively, of the target number of units subject to the award in years one and two, respectively, of the three-year performance period.
text: As of December 31, 2019, the Company believes that it is probable that the Company will achieve performance metrics specified in the award agreement based on its expected revenue and non-GAAP diluted EPS results over the performance period and calculated growth rates relative to its peers’ expected results based on data available, as defined in the award agreement.
text: A summary of the Company’s performance-based restricted stock unit activity is as follows:
text: (1) Number of shares granted is based on the maximum percentage achievable in the performance-based restricted stock unit award.

Table:
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant-Date
(in thousands)
Fair Value per Share
Outstanding at December 31, 2018
—
$—
Granted(1)
445
22.21
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
445
22.21

Questions:
question: What is the number of shares Outstanding at December 31, 2019?
answer: 445
scale: thousand
question: What was the number of shares granted in 2019?
answer: 445
scale: thousand
question: What was the change in the outstanding from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 445
derivation: 445 - 0 
scale: thousand
question: What percentage of outstanding in 2019 was granted shares?
answer: 100
derivation: 445 / 445
scale: percent
question: In which year was outstanding shares less than 200 thousands?
answer: 2018
derivation: locate and analyze outstanding in rows 3 and 5
text: Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
text: For the Assemble Systems, PlanGrid, and BuildingConnected acquisitions that were accounted for as business combinations, Autodesk recorded the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The fair values assigned to the identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on estimates and assumptions determined by management. Autodesk recorded the excess of consideration transferred over the aggregate fair values as goodwill. The goodwill recorded is primarily attributable to synergies expected to arise after the acquisition. There is no amount of goodwill that is deductible for U.S. income tax purposes.
text: The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class for the business combinations that were completed during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2019:
text: (1) During Q4 of fiscal 2019, Autodesk recorded a measurement period adjustment related to the valuation of the deferred tax liability associated with the Assemble Systems acquisition. This adjustment increased goodwill and reduced net tangible assets by $0.1 million.
text: For the three business combinations in fiscal 2019, the determination of estimated fair values of certain assets and liabilities is derived from estimated fair value assessments and assumptions by Autodesk. For PlanGrid and BuildingConnected, Autodesk's estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). For the three business combinations in fiscal 2019, the tax impact of the acquisition is also subject to change within the measurement period. Different estimates and assumptions could result in different valuations assigned to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting amount of goodwill.

Table:
Assemble Systems (1)
PlanGrid
BuildingConnected
Total
Developed technologies
$4.4
$78.0
$12.5
$94.9
Customer relationships and other non-current intangible assets
12.0
98.0
26.9
136.9
Trade name
2.8
20.0
6.8
29.6
Goodwill
72.0
588.7
206.3
867.0
Deferred revenue (current and non-current)
(1.7)
(25.5)
(2.8)
(30.0)
Net tangible assets
4.1
18.4
3.5
26.0
Total
$93.6
$777.6
$253.2
$1,124.4

Questions:
question: What is the total amount of developed technologies?
answer: $94.9
scale: million
question: What is the total amount of net tangible assets for PlanGrid and BuildingConnected?
answer: 21.9
derivation: 18.4+3.5
scale: million
question: What is the total amount of developed technologies for Assemble Systems and Plan Grid?
answer: 82.4
derivation: 4.4+78
scale: million
question: How much does goodwill account for the total?
answer: 77.11
derivation: 867/1,124.4
scale: percent
text: Irish SIP
text: The weighted average market value per ordinary share for Irish SIP options exercised in 2019 was 350.0p (2018: 387.5p). The SIP shares outstanding at 31 March 2018 have fully vested (2018: had a weighted average remaining vesting period of 0.1 years). Options exercised prior to the vesting date relate to those attributable to good leavers as defined by the scheme rules.

Table:
2019
2018
Number
Number
Outstanding at 1 April
35,922
44,431
Dividend shares awarded
–
788
Forfeited
–
(7,950)
Exercised
(30,506)
(1,347)
Outstanding at 31 March
5,416
35,922
Vested and outstanding at 31 March
5,416
–

Questions:
question: In which year was the amount Outstanding at 1 April larger?
answer: 2018
derivation: 44,431>35,922
question: What was the change in the amount Outstanding at 1 April in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -8509
derivation: 35,922-44,431
question: What was the percentage change in the amount Outstanding at 1 April in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -19.15
derivation: (35,922-44,431)/44,431
scale: percent
text: Deferred Revenue The following table presents the breakdown of deferred revenue (in millions):
text: Deferred revenue decreased primarily due to the adoption of ASC 606 in the beginning of our first quarter of fiscal 2019. Of the total deferred revenue decrease related to the adoption of ASC 606 of $2.8 billion, $2.6 billion relates to deferred product revenue and $0.2 billion relates to deferred service revenue. Of the adjustment to deferred product revenue, $1.3 billion related to our recurring software and subscription offers, $0.6 billion related to two-tier distribution, and the remainder related to nonrecurring software and other adjustments. The decrease related to the adoption of ASC 606 was partially offset by an increase in product deferred revenue during the fiscal year. The increase in deferred service revenue was driven by the impact of contract renewals, partially offset by amortization of deferred service revenue.

Table:
July 27, 2019
July 28, 2018
Increase (Decrease)
Service
$11,709
$11,431
$ 278
Product
6,758
8,254
(1,496)
Total
$18,467
$19,685
$(1,218)
Reported as:
Current
$10,668
$11,490
$(822)
Noncurrent
7,799
8,195
(396)
Total
$18,467
$19,685
$(1,218)

Questions:
text: Contract Liabilities
text: Contract liabilities include payments received in advance of performance under the contract, and are realized with the associated revenue recognized under the contract. The changes in our contract liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
text: The revenue recognized from amounts included in contract liabilities primarily relates to prepayment contracts with customers as well as payments of activation fees.

Table:
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Beginning of period balance
$11,176
$12,678
Revenue deferred and acquired in current period
6,127
3,954
Revenue recognized from amounts included in contract liabilities
(6,805)
(5,456)
End of period balance
$10,498
$11,176

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in the End of period balance between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -6.07
derivation: (10,498-11,176)/11,176
scale: percent
text: Operating Income
text: Our operating income in fiscal year 2019 increased to $241.4 million, or 10.1 percent of net sales as compared with $189.3 million, or 8.8 percent of net sales in fiscal year 2018. Excluding surcharge revenue and special items, adjusted operating margin was 12.5 percent for the fiscal year 2019 and 10.6 percent for the same period a year ago. The increase in the operating margin reflects steady demand and improved product mix coupled with operating cost improvements offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses compared to the same period a year ago.
text: The following presents our operating income and operating margin, in each case excluding the impact of surcharge on net sales and special items. We present and discuss these financial measures because management believes removing the impact of these items provides a more consistent and meaningful basis for comparing results of operations from period to period. See the section “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for further discussion of these financial measures.

Table:
Fiscal Year
($ in millions)
2019
2018
Net sales
$2,380.2
$2,157.7
Less: surcharge revenue
438.1
365.4
Net sales excluding surcharge revenue
$1,942.1
$1,792.3
Operating income
$241.4
$189.3
Special items:
Acquisition-related costs
1.2
—
Adjusted operating income excluding special items
$242.6
$189.3
Operating margin
10.1%
8.8%
Adjusted operating margin excluding surcharge revenue and special items
12.5%
10.6%

Questions:
question: In which year was the operating margin larger?
answer: 2019
derivation: 10.1%>8.8%
question: What was the change in the amount of surcharge revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 72.7
derivation: 438.1-365.4
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the amount of surcharge revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 19.9
derivation: (438.1-365.4)/365.4
scale: percent
text: NOTE 7 - continued
text: Lease payments not recognized as a liability The Group has elected not to recognize a lease liability for short-term leases (leases of an expected term of 12 months or less) or for leases of low value assets. Payments made under such leases are expensed on a straight-line basis. The expenses relating to payments not recognized as a lease liability are insignificant.
text: Administrative expenses The total outflow for leases, USD 2.9m, is presented as “Depreciation” of USD 2.5m and “Financial expenses” (interest) of USD 0.4m, in contrast to the recording of an operating lease charge of a materially equivalent figure within the line item “Administrative expenses” under IAS 17.
text: Financial expenses
text: Financial expenses for the reporting periods:

Table:
USDm
2019
2018
2017
Interest expenses:
-
-
-
Financial expenses arising from lease liabilities regarding right-of-use assets
2.4
2.3
1.8
Other financial expenses
39.5
37.0
38.8
Total
41.9
39.3
40.6

Questions:
question: In which year was the amount of other financial expenses the largest?
answer: 2019
derivation: 39.5>38.8>37.0
question: What was the change in the total financial expenses in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 2.6
derivation: 41.9-39.3
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the total financial expenses in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 6.62
derivation: (41.9-39.3)/39.3
scale: percent
question: What is the total amount of financial expenses in 2019?
answer: 41.9
scale: million
text: Asset Retirement Obligations
text: At December 31, 2019, our asset retirement obligations balance was primarily related to estimated future costs of removing equipment from leased properties and estimated future costs of properly disposing of asbestos and other hazardous materials upon remodeling or demolishing buildings. Asset retirement obligations are included in other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets.
text: As of the Level 3 acquisition date, we recorded liabilities to reflect our fair values of Level 3’s asset retirement obligations. Our fair value estimates were determined using the discounted cash flow method.
text: The following table provides asset retirement obligation activity:
text: (1) The liabilities assumed during 2018 relate to purchase price adjustments during the year.
text: The 2019, 2018 and 2017 change in estimates are offset against gross property, plant and equipment.

Table:
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions)
Balance at beginning of year
$190
115
95
Accretion expense
11
10
6
Liabilities assumed in acquisition of Level 3(1)
—
58
45
Liabilities settled
(14)
(14)
(3)
Liabilities transferred to Cyxtera
—
—
(20)
Change in estimate
10
21
(8)
Balance at end of year
$197
190
115

Questions:
question: Which year has the largest accretion expense?
answer: 2019
derivation: 11>10>7
question: What is the change in balance at end of year in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 7
derivation: 197-190
scale: million
question: What is the average accretion expense across 2017, 2018 and 2019?
answer: 9
derivation: (11+10+6)/3
scale: million
text: Property and Equipment
text: Property and equipment is recorded at cost and consists of furniture, computers, other office equipment, and leasehold improvements. We depreciate the cost of furniture, computers, and other office equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives (five years for office equipment, seven years for furniture and fixtures). Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of their useful lives or the term of the lease. Depreciation and amortization expense for 2019, 2018, and 2017 was approximately $8.0 million, $8.6 million, and $9.1 million, respectively, and was included in “Depreciation and amortization” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Amortization expense on intangible assets in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was immaterial.
text: Property and equipment, at cost, consist of the following (in thousands):

Table:
December 31
2019
2018
Office equipment
$ 38,373
$ 39,633
Furniture and fixtures
5,017
4,610
Leasehold improvement
23,534
19,430
Property and equipment, gross
66,924
63,673
Less accumulated depreciation
(44,199 )
(49,355 )
Property and equipment, net
$ 22,725
$ 14,318

Questions:
text: The total compensation of the Executive Board members for each of the years 2019, 2018, and 2017 was as follows:
text: Executive Board Compensation
text: 1) Portion of total executive compensation allocated to the respective year

Table:
€ thousands
2019
2018
2017
Short-term employee benefits
17,378
18,652
16,634
Share-based payment1)
32,393
23,646
25,723
Subtotal1)
49,771
42,298
42,357
Post-employment benefits
2,825
1,106
1,312
Thereof defined-benefit
2,056
250
423
Thereof defined-contribution
769
856
889
Total1)
52,596
43,404
43,669

Questions:
question: In which year was the amount Thereof defined-contribution largest?
answer: 2017
derivation: 889>856>769
question: What was the change in Thereof defined-contribution in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -87
derivation: 769-856
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in Thereof defined-contribution in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -10.16
derivation: (769-856)/856
scale: percent
text: Inventories.
text: Inventories are stated at the lower-of-cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Finished products and work-in-process inventories include direct material costs and direct and indirect manufacturing costs. The Company records reserves for inventory that may be obsolete or in excess of current and future market demand. A summary of inventories is shown below:

Table:
(Dollars in Millions)
April 27, 2019
April 28, 2018
Finished Products
$40.2
$15.4
Work in Process
9.4
14.6
Materials
67.1
54.1
Total Inventories
$116.7
$84.1

Questions:
question: What was the value of finished products in 2019 and 2018 respectively?
answer: $40.2
$15.4
scale: million
question: What was the change in the value of finished products from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 24.8
derivation: 40.2 - 15.4
scale: million
question: What is the average work in progress value for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 12
derivation: (9.4 + 14.6) / 2
scale: million
question: In which year was materials value less than 60 million?
answer: 2018
derivation: locate and analyze materials in row 5
text: (8) Accounts Receivable
text: The following table presents details of our accounts receivable balances:
text: We are exposed to concentrations of credit risk from residential and business customers. We generally do not require collateral to secure our receivable balances. We have agreements with other communications service providers whereby we agree to bill and collect on their behalf for services rendered by those providers to our customers within our local service area. We purchase accounts receivable from other communications service providers primarily on a recourse basis and include these amounts in our accounts receivable balance. We have not experienced any significant loss associated with these purchased receivables.

Table:
As of December 31,
2019
2018
(Dollars in millions)
Trade and purchased receivables
$1,971
2,094
Earned and unbilled receivables
374
425
Other
20
21
Total accounts receivable
2,365
2,540
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts
(106)
(142)
Accounts receivable, less allowance
$2,259
2,398

Questions:
question: What are the types of accounts receivables highlighted in the table?
answer: Trade and purchased receivables
Earned and unbilled receivables
Other
question: How many types of accounts receivables are highlighted in the table?
answer: 3
derivation: Trade and purchased receivables##Earned and unbilled receivables##Other
question: What is the change in the earned and unbilled receivables?
answer: -51
derivation: 374-425
scale: million
question: What is the percentage change in the earned and unbilled receivables?
answer: -12
derivation: (374-425)/425
scale: percent