tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Actual STI Bonus Amounts Authorized. The actual amounts of the NEOs’ 2019 bonuses were calculated as
follows:
text: (1) Determined based on earned salary and applicable STI target bonus percentage during 2019 and includes pro-rations for any changes to salary and/or STI target bonus percentage described below.
text: a) Target Bonus Opportunity for Mr. Storey reflects his salary earned during 2019 of $1,800,011 and a STI target bonus percentage of 200%.
text: b) Target Bonus Opportunity for Mr. Dev reflects his salary earned during 2019 of $650,000 and a STI target bonus percentage of 120%.
text: c) Target Bonus Opportunity for Mr. Goff reflects his salary earned during 2019 of $600,018 and a STI target bonus percentage of 120%.
text: d) Target Bonus Opportunity for Mr. Trezise reflects his salary earned during 2019 with a salary increase, from $475,010 to $500,011, effective on February 23, 2019, and an increase of STI target bonus percentage from 80% to 90%, also effective on February 23, 2019.
text: e) Target Bonus Opportunity for Mr. Andrews reflects his salary earned during 2019 with a salary increase, from $425,006 to $525,000, effective on August 21, 2019, and a STI target bonus percentage of 100%.
text: (2) Calculated or determined as discussed above under “—2019 Performance Results.”
text: (3) Determined based on achievement of individual performance objectives as described further above in this Subsection.
text: Committee Discretion to Pay in Cash or Shares. The Committee may authorize the payment of annual bonuses in cash or shares of common stock. Since 2000, the Committee has paid these bonuses entirely in cash, principally to diversify our compensation mix and to conserve shares in our equity plans.
text: Recent Actions (February 2020). In connection with establishing targets for the 2020 STI program, the Committee increased Mr. Dev’s STI Target Bonus Percentage to 125%, in light of his position to market and performance as CFO, and made no changes to the target bonus percentage for any of our other NEOs.

Table:
2019 STI Bonus Amounts
Named Officer
Target Bonus Opportunity (1)
X
Company Performance % (2)
X
Discretionary Adjustment for Individual Performance(3)
=
STI Bonus Amount
Current Executives:
Jeffrey K. Storey
$3,600,022
97%
100%
$3,492,021
Indraneel Dev
780,000
97%
110%
832,260
Stacey W. Goff
720,021
97%
100%
698,420
Scott A. Trezise
439,654
97%
110%
469,111
Shaun C. Andrews
461,442
97%
110%
492,359

Questions:
question: How many current executives have a STI bonus amount greater than $500,000?
answer: 3
derivation: Jeffrey K. Storey##Indraneel Dev##Stacey W. Goff
text: Stock options
text: The following tables summarize our stock option activities and related information:
text: (1) The aggregate intrinsic value represents the excess of the closing price of our common stock of $6.87 as of December 31, 2019 over theexercise price of the outstanding in-the-money options.

Table:
Number of Shares (thousands)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1) (thousands)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018
4,674
$5.19
Granted
—
$ —
Exercised
(842)
$2.84
Canceled
(130)
$9.41
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019
3,702
$5.57
3.52
$6,395
Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2019
3,427
$5.49
3.56
$6,210

Questions:
question: What is the number of outstanding shares granted as of December 31, 2018? 
answer: 4,674
scale: thousand
question: What is the number of shares exercised as of December 31, 2018? 
answer: (842)
scale: thousand
question: What is the number of shares canceled as of December 31, 2018? 
answer: (130)
scale: thousand
question: What is the total amount spent on the canceled shares?
answer: -1223.3
derivation: (130)* $9.41 
scale: thousand
question: What is difference on the aggregate intrinsic value between Outstanding and Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2019?
answer: 185
derivation: $6,395-$6,210
scale: thousand
question: What is the difference in outstanding shares as of December 31, 2018 and 2019?
answer: 972
derivation: 4,674 - 3,702 
scale: thousand
text: Interest expense and financing costs
text: Fees and discounts associated with the issuance of our debt instruments are recorded as debt discount, which reduces their respective carrying values, and are amortized over their respective terms. Amortization expense is recorded within “Interest and other expense (income), net” in our consolidated statement of operations.
text: For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017: interest expense was $86 million, $134 million, and $150 million, respectively; amortization of the debt discount and deferred financing costs was $4 million, $6 million, and $12 million, respectively.
text: A summary of our outstanding debt is as follows (amounts in millions):
text: With the exception of the 2026 and the 2047 Notes, using Level 2 inputs (i.e., observable market prices in less-than-active markets) at December 31, 2019, the carrying values of the Notes approximated their fair values, as the interest rates were similar to the current rates at which we could borrow funds over the selected interest periods. At December 31, 2019, based on Level 2 inputs, the fair value of the 2026 and the 2047 Notes were $893 million and $456 million, respectively.
text: Using Level 2 inputs at December 31, 2018, the carrying values of the 2021 Notes and the 2022 Notes approximated their fair values, as the interest rates were similar to the current rates at which we could borrow funds over the selected interest periods. At December 31, 2019, based on Level 2 inputs, the fair values of the 2026 Notes, the 2027 Notes, and the 2047 Notes were $800 million, $376 million, and $360 million, respectively.

Table:
At December 31, 2019
Gross Carrying Amount
Unamortized Discount and Deferred Financing Costs
Net Carrying Amount
2021 Notes
$650
$(2)
$648
2022 Notes
400
(2)
398
2026 Notes
850
(7)
843
2027 Notes
400
(5)
395
2047 Notes
400
(9)
391
Total long-term debt
$2,700
$(25)
$2,675
At December 31, 2018
Gross Carrying Amount
Unamortized Discount and Deferred Financing Costs
Net Carrying Amount
2021 Notes
650
(3)
647
2022 Notes
400
(3)
397
2026 Notes
850
(8)
842
2027 Notes
400
(5)
395
2047 Notes
400
(10)
390
Total long-term debt
$2,700
$(29)
$2,671

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in the net carrying amount of total long-term debt between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 0.15
derivation: ($2,675-$2,671)/$2,671
scale: percent
text: Capital stock 2019
text: Capital stock at December 31, 2019, consisted of the following:
text: The capital stock of the Parent Company is divided into two classes: Class A shares (quota value SEK 5.00) and Class B shares (quota value SEK 5.00). Both classes have the same rights of participation in the net assets and earnings.Class A shares, however, are entitled to one vote per share while Class B shares are entitled to one tenth of one vote per share.
text: At December 31, 2019, the total number of treasury shares was 19,853,247 (37,057,039 in 2018 and 50,265,499 in 2017) Class B shares.

Table:
Capital stock
Parent Company
Number of shares
Capital stock (SEK million)
Class A shares
261,755,983
1,309
Class B shares
3,072,395,752
15,363
Total
3,334,151,735
16,672

Questions:
question: What is the difference in the number of shares between class A and class B?
answer: 2810639769
derivation: 3,072,395,752-261,755,983
question: What is the difference between capital stock value in class A and B shares?
answer: 14054
derivation: 15,363-1,309
scale: million
question: What is the price of each class A share? 
answer: 5
derivation: 1,309*1million/261,755,983
text: 4.6 Adjusted EBITDA
text: BCE
text: BCE’s adjusted EBITDA grew by 6.0% in 2019, compared to 2018, attributable to growth from all three of our segments. Higher revenues coupled with reduced operating expenses drove the year-over-year growth in adjusted EBITDA. This corresponded to an adjusted EBITDA margin of 42.2% in 2019, up 1.6 pts over last year, mainly driven by the favourable impact from the adoption of IFRS 16 in 2019, and greater service revenue flow-through, moderated by greater low-margin product sales in our total revenue base.

Table:
2019
2018
$ CHANGE
% CHANGE
Bell Wireless
3,842
3,521
321
9.1%
Bell Wireline
5,414
5,321
93
1.7%
Bell Media
850
693
157
22.7%
Total BCE adjusted EBITDA
10,106
9,535
571
6.0%

Questions:
question: What was the $ CHANGE in Bell Media?
answer: 157
question: What is the total Adjusted EBITDA for Bell Wireless in 2018 and 2019?
answer: 7363
derivation: 3,842+3,521
question: What is the percentage of Bell Wireline of the total BCE adjusted EBITDA in 2019?
answer: 53.57
derivation: 5,414/10,106
scale: percent
question: What is the difference in the Adjusted EBITDA for Bell Wireless and Bell Wireline in 2018?
answer: 1800
derivation: 5,321-3,521
text: Other intangible assets at fiscal year ends 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
text: Goodwill, trademarks and tradenames are considered to have indefinite useful lives and therefore no amortization has been taken on these assets. The Company’s retail reporting unit recorded intangible asset (trademarks and tradenames) impairment charges of approximately $2.9 million during fiscal 2019 and goodwill impairment charges of approximately $1.9 million during fiscal 2018 when it was determined that the carrying values of these assets exceeded their fair values. These impairment charges arose from a range of considerations including, but not limited to, heightened competition in the industry, retail sector market conditions, and earning shortfalls which impacted the Company’s projections of future cash flows to be generated. These impairment charges were recorded in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations as a component of operating income.
text: Goodwill recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet represents amounts allocated to its wholesale reporting unit which totaled $4.4 million at both September 2019 and September 2018. The Company determined that the estimated fair value of its wholesale reporting unit exceeded its carrying value at both September 2019 and September 2018.

Table:
September 2019
September 2018
Trademarks and tradenames (Retail Segment)
$500,000
$3,373,269
ustomer relationships (Wholesale Segment) (less accumulated amortization of approximately $2.1 million at both September 2019 and September 2018)
—
41,667
$  500,000
$3,414,936

Questions:
question: What are the respective trademarks and tradenames at the end of fiscal year 2018 and 2019?
answer: $3,373,269
$500,000
question: What is the percentage change in the value of the company's trademarks and tradenames between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -85.18
derivation: (500,000 - 3,373,269)/3,373,269 
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage change in the value of company's customer relationships between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -100
derivation: (0 - 41,667)/41,667 
scale: percent
question: What is the value of the company's trademarks and tradenames as a percentage of its total intangible assets in 2018?
answer: 98.78
derivation: 3,373,269/3,414,936 
scale: percent
text: Non-GAAP Financial Measures
text: To complement our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows, we use non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted operating income, Adjusted net income, and Adjusted EBITDA. We believe that Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted operating income, Adjusted net income, and Adjusted EBITDA are complements to U.S. GAAP amounts and such measures are useful to investors. The presentation of these non-GAAP measures is not meant to be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity.
text: The following table provides a reconciliation from U.S. GAAP Gross margin to non-GAAP Adjusted gross margin (amounts in thousands):
text: (1) Fiscal years ending March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
text: (2) $0.9 million in costs incurred during fiscal year 2018 related to the relocation of the Company's tantalum powder facility equipment from Carson City, Nevada to its existing Matamoros, Mexico plant were reclassified from “Plant start-up costs” to “Restructuring charges” during fiscal year 2019.

Table:
Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net sales (1)
$1,382,818
$1,200,181
$757,338
Cost of sales (1)
924,276
860,744
571,944
Gross Margin (GAAP) (1)
458,542
339,437
185,394
Gross margin as a % of net sales
33.2%
28.3%
24.5%
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Plant start-up costs (2)
(927)
929
427
Stock-based compensation expense
2,756
1,519
1,384
Adjusted gross margin (non-GAAP) (1)
$460,371
$341,885
$187,205
Adjusted gross margin as a % of net sales
33.3%
28.5%
24.7%

Questions:
text: 24. Operating lease commitments
text: The Group has lease agreements in respect of property, plant and equipment, for which future minimum payments extend over a number of years.
text: Leases primarily relate to the Group’s properties, which principally comprise offices and factories. Lease payments are typically subject to market review every five years to reflect market rentals, but because of the uncertainty over the amount of any future changes, such changes have not been reflected in the table below. Within our leasing arrangements there are no significant contingent rental, renewal, purchase or escalation clauses.
text: The future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases for continuing operations are as follows:
text: The Group has made provision for the aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases. The Group sub-lets various properties under non-cancellable lease arrangements. Sub-lease receipts of £0.2m (2017/18: £0.2m) were recognised in the statement of profit or loss during the period. The total future minimum sub-lease payments at the period end is £0.2m (2017/18: £0.2m).

Table:
As at 30 Mar 2019
As at 31 Mar 2018
Property
Plant and Equipment
Property
Plant and Equipment
£m
£m
£m
£m
Within one year
1.8
1.3
2.5
1.8
Between 2 and 5 years
6.3
2.4
5.3
1.9
After 5 years
6.0
0.5
9.4
–
Total
14.1
4.2
17.2
3.7

Questions:
text: The following tables summarize information for operating income (loss), depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges, gain (loss) on write down and disposal of long-lived assets, and capital expenditures by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017 and total assets by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands): The following tables summarize information for operating income (loss), depreciation and amortization, restructuring charges, gain (loss) on write down and disposal of long-lived assets, and capital expenditures by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017 and total assets by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended 2019 and 2018 (amounts in thousands):
text: (1) March 31, 2018 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.

Table:
March 31,
2019
2018
Total assets:
Solid Capacitors
$794,402
$704,851
Film and Electrolytic (1)
219,711
240,968
MSA
234,419
254,193
Corporate
69,563
22,911
$1,318,095
$1,222,923

Questions:
text: Share Repurchase Program
text: In both fiscal 2019 and 2018, our board of directors authorized increases of $1.5 billion in our share repurchase program. Common shares repurchased under the share repurchase program were as follows:
text: At fiscal year end 2019, we had $1.5 billion of availability remaining under our share repurchase authorization.

Table:
Fiscal
2019
2018
2017
(in millions)
Number of common shares repurchased
12
10
8
Repurchase value
$ 1,014
$ 966
$ 621

Questions:
question: Which year was the Number of common shares repurchased the largest?
answer: 2019
derivation: 12>10>8
question: What was the change in the Number of common shares repurchased in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 2
derivation: 12-10
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the Number of common shares repurchased in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 20
derivation: (12-10)/10
scale: percent
text: Equity Method We own 20.51%of GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (“RSA #17”), 16.67% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(I) Limited Partnership (“RSA 6(I)”) and 23.67% of Pennsylvania RSA 6(II) Limited Partnership (“RSA 6(II)”). RSA #17 provides cellular service to a limited rural area in Texas.
text: RSA 6(I) and RSA 6(II) provide cellular service in and around our Pennsylvania service territory. Because we have significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these three entities, we account for the investments using the equity method. In connection with the adoption of ASC 606 by our equity method partnerships, the value of our combined partnership interests increased $1.8 million, which is reflected in the cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings during the year ended December 31, 2018.
text: In 2019, 2018 and 2017, we received cash distributions from these partnerships totaling $19.0 million, $21.8 million and $17.2 million, respectively. The carrying value of the investments exceeds the underlying equity in net assets of the partnerships by $32.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
text: The combined results of operations and financial position of our three equity investments in the cellular limited partnerships are summarized below:

Table:
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Total revenues
$ 349,640
$ 346,251
$ 350,611
Income from operations
100,182
100,571
104,973
Net income before taxes
99,146
99,408
103,497
Net income
99,146
99,408
103,497
Current assets
$ 80,655
$ 75,040
$ 78,782
Non-current assets
156,672
103,996
95,959
Current liabilities
33,292
24,719
22,472
Non-current liabilities
92,477
51,840
51,463
Partnership equity
111,558
102,478
100,806

Questions:
question: What is the Total revenues for 2019?
answer: $ 349,640
scale: thousand
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the total revenues from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 3389
derivation: 349,640 - 346,251
scale: thousand
question: What was the average income from operations for 2017-2019?
answer: 101908.67
derivation: (100,182 + 100,571 + 104,973) / 3
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage increase / (decrease) in the net income from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -0.26
derivation: 99,146 / 99,408 - 1
scale: percent
text: ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
text: The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future. The selected financial data should be read together with Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following tables set forth our selected consolidated financial and other data for the years ended and as of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except share and per share data).
text: Information about prior period acquisitions that may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below is included in Item 1. Business. Information about the $28.0 million expense recorded in general and administrative expense in 2018, which relates to the agreement reached to settle the legal matter alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, and may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below, is disclosed in Item 3. “Legal Proceedings.” Information about the $1.7 million of interest recorded within interest income and the $6.9 million of gain recorded within other income, net, in 2019, which relates to promissory note proceeds received from one of our hardware suppliers and proceeds from an acquired promissory note, and may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below, is disclosed in Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
text: Certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation to reflect interest income as a separate line item, which was previously included in other income, net.

Table:
As of December 31,
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
Balance sheet and other data:
Cash and cash equivalents
$119,629
$146,061
$96,329
$140,634
$128,358
Working capital
167,879
152,793
119,433
150,485
131,971
Total assets
557,799
440,985
371,641
261,245
226,095
Total long-term obligations
115,143
88,126
94,311
30,297
26,885
Total stockholders' equity
355,651
277,589
232,827
191,249
170,131

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in the total assets between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 26.49
derivation: (557,799-440,985)/440,985
scale: percent
text: The reconciliation of the United Kingdom statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is as follows:
text: Although the Company’s parent entity is organized under Jersey law, our affairs are, and are intended to be, managed and controlled ongoing in the United Kingdom. Therefore, the Company is resident in the United Kingdom for tax purposes. The Company’s parent entity is domiciled in the United Kingdom and its earnings are subject to 19%, 19% and 20% statutory tax rate for the years ended March 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
text: The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate each year primarily due to windfall tax benefits on equity award exercises, the valuation allowance maintained against the Company’s net deferred tax assets, the jurisdictional earnings mix, tax credits, withholding taxes, and other permanent differences primarily related to non-deductible expenses.

Table:
Year ended March 31, 
2019
2018
2017
Tax at statutory rate
19.0%
19.0%
20.0%
U.S. state taxes, net of federal
31.1
14.1
(1.0)
Foreign rate differential  
26.3
36.8
(39.3)
Meals and entertainment  
(11.4)
(3.1)
(7.4)
Branch income / loss  
(0.6)
0.4
0.9
Share-based compensation
172.3
105.3
(4.0)
Foreign exchange  
—
—
(24.8)
Non-deductible interest expense  
—
—
(3.3)
Tax credits
7.7
8.1
15.6
Unremitted earnings  
(3.8)
(1.2)
—
Change in valuation allowance  
(249.9)
(110.7)
124.7
Deferred tax true-ups  
(3.5)
8.4
(12.4)
Tax reserves  
(4.9)
(21.5)
(117.7)
Provision to return  
(0.1)
0.4
(0.7)
Withholding taxes  
(2.6)
(3.5)
—
Other foreign taxes  
—
—
(6.7)
Non-deductible expenses  
(5.2)
(2.4)
(10.6)
Deferred tax rate change  
(6.3)
(77.8)
(1.3)
Acquisition related costs  
(7.6)
—
—
Other  
(0.5)
(0.2)
—
Effective Tax Rate  
(40.0)%
(27.9)%
(68.0)%

Questions:
question: What was the Tax at statutory rate in 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: 19.0%
19.0%
20.0%
question: What was the change in the U.S. state taxes, net of federal from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 17
derivation: 31.1 - 14.1
scale: percent
question: What was the average Share-based compensation between 2017-2019?
answer: 91.2
derivation: (172.3 + 105.3 - 4.0) / 3
scale: percent
question: In which year was Tax credits less than 10.0?
answer: 2019
2018
derivation: locate and analyze Tax credits in row 11