tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
text: ADTRAN’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol ADTN. As of February 19, 2020, ADTRAN had 163 stockholders of record and approximately 6,972 beneficial owners of shares held in street name. The following table shows the high and low closing prices per share for our common stock as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated.

Table:
COMMON STOCK PRICES
2019
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
High
$15.40
$17.81
$16.40
$11.59
Low
$10.49
$13.76
$ 9.92
$ 8.09

Questions:
question: What was the high closing price for common stock price in the First Quarter of 2019?
answer: $15.40
question: What was the high closing price for common stock price in the Fourth Quarter of 2019?
answer: $11.59
question: What was the difference between the high and low closing prices per share for common stock in the second quarter of 2019?
answer: 4.05
derivation: $17.81-$13.76
question: What was the average low closing price for 2019?
answer: 10.57
derivation: ( $10.49 + $13.76 + $ 9.92 + $ 8.09 )/4
question: What was the percentage change in the high closing price between the third and fourth quarter in 2019?
answer: -29.33
derivation: ($11.59-$16.40)/$16.40
scale: percent
text: Note 12 – Income Taxes
text: Income tax expense for the fiscal years ended December 27, 2019, December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017 differed from amounts computed using the statutory federal income tax rate due to the following reasons:

Table:
December 27, 2019 
December 28, 2018 
December 29, 2017
Statutory U.S. Federal tax
$6,805
$5,847
$6,443
Differences due to:
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit 
2,078
1,906
1,112
Change in valuation allowance 
95
523
289
Impact of the Tax Act 
—
—
(3,573)
Stock compensation 
(676)
(197)
162
Other 
(92)
(637)
(391)
Income tax expense
$8,210
$7,442
$4,042

Questions:
question: What is the Statutory U.S. Federal tax for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: $6,805
$5,847
$6,443
question: What is the Income tax expense for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: $8,210
$7,442
$4,042
question: What is the change in valuation allowance for 2017?
answer: 289
question: Which year has the highest Statutory U.S. Federal tax?
answer: 2019
derivation: 6,805> 6,443> 5,847
question: What is the change in Statutory U.S. Federal tax between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 958
derivation: 6,805-5,847
question: What is the average Statutory U.S. Federal tax from 2017-2019?
answer: 6365
derivation: (6,805+ 5,847+ 6,443)/3
text: Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
text: Depreciation expense was $1.2 million and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
text: Amortization of capitalized internal-use software and website development costs was $157,000 and $247,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Table:
December 31,
2019
2018
Computer hardware and software
$3,427
$3,353
Office equipment and office furniture
8,148
7,814
Capitalized internal-use software and website development
4,390
4,383
Leasehold improvements
6,247
6,140
22,212
21,690
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(19,230)
(17,900)
Total
$2,982
$3,790

Questions:
question: What is the percentage change in the leasehold improvements amount from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 1.74
derivation: (6,247-6,140)/6,140
scale: percent
text: Warranty Obligations
text: We offer warranties on certain products and record a liability for the estimated future costs associated with warranty claims at the time revenue is recognized. The warranty liability is based upon historical experience and our estimate of the level of future costs. While we engage in product quality programs and processes, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure.
text: We continuously monitor product returns for warranty and maintain a reserve for the related expenses based upon our historical experience and any specifically identified field failures. As we sell new products to our customers, we must exercise considerable judgment in estimating the expected failure rates. This estimating process is based on historical experience of similar products, as well as various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
text: We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. Warranty costs are reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Income as a Cost of revenues. A reconciliation of the changes in our warranty liability is as follows (in thousands):

Table:
Fiscal Year Ended
December 28,
2019
December 29, 2018
December 30, 2017
Balance at beginning of year
$2,102
$ 3,662
$2,972
Accruals
3,881
3,181
8,115
Settlements
(4,041)
(4,741)
(7,425)
Balance at end of year
$1,942
$2,102
$3,662

Questions:
text: (1) Represents accelerated vesting of 48,849 stock options. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley’s stock option agreements (dated January 17, 2019),
if Mr. Dooley’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason within six months following a “change in control”, he will
become immediately vested in all outstanding unvested stock options, and all of Mr. Dooley’s outstanding options shall remain
exercisable in accordance with their terms, but in no event for less than 90 days after such termination.
text: (2) Represents accelerated vesting of 15,000 unvested restricted stock units. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley’s restricted stock unit agreement
(dated March 1, 2012), upon a “change in control” all non-vested units shall accelerate and be vested as of the date of the “change in
control” and if Mr. Dooley’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason, all non-vested units shall accelerate and be
vested as of the date of termination
text: (3) Represents accelerated vesting of 7,500 unvested restricted stock units. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley’s restricted stock unit agreement
(dated March 1, 2012), on the event of Mr. Dooley’s death or total disability, 7,500 restricted stock units (50% of the unvested restricted
stock units granted under such agreement at December 31, 2018) would vest.
text: (4) Represents accelerated vesting of 10,630 unvested performance restricted stock units. Pursuant to Mr. Dooley's performance restricted
stock unit agreement (dated January 17, 2019), if Mr. Dooley’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason within six
months following a “change in control” or if Mr. Dooley's employment is terminated due to death or total disability, all non-vested units
shall accelerate and be vested as of the date of termination.

Table:
Type of Payment
Termination by Systemax without “Cause” or Resignation by Employee for “good reason” ($)
Termination Due to Death or Total Disability ($)
Change In Control Only ($)
Termination by Systemax without “Cause” or Resignation by Employee for “good reason” within a certain period of time following a Change in Control ($)
Cash Compensation (Salary & Non-Equity Incentive Compensation)
-
-
-
-
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Stock Option Awards
-
-
-
505,100 (1)
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Restricted Stock Unit Awards
377,400 (2)
188,700 (3)
377,400 (2)
-
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Performance Restricted Stock Unit Awards
-
267,500 (4)
-
267,500 (4)
Medical and Other Benefits
-
-
-
-
Total
377,400
456,200
377,400
772,600

Questions:
question: What is Robert Dooley's total payment due to change in control only?
answer: 377,400
question: What is the percentage of payment due as a result of change in control as a percentage of the payment due to termination without cause within a certain period following a change in control?
answer: 48.85
derivation: 377,400/772,600 
scale: percent
text: Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
text: Our common stock is listed on NASDAQ under the symbol ‘‘CSGS’’. On January 31, 2020, the number of holders of record of common stock was 126.
text: Stock Price Performance
text: The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock, the Russell 2000 Index, and our Standard Industrial Classification (“SIC”) Code Index: Data Preparation and Processing Services during the indicated five-year period. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2014, in our common stock and in each of the two indexes, and that all dividends, if any, were reinvested.

Table:
As of December 31,
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
CSG Systems International, Inc.
$100.00
$146.72
$200.85
$185.42
$137.31
$227.96
Russell 2000 Index
100.00
95.59
115.95
132.94
118.30
148.49
Data Preparation and Processing Services
100.00
110.52
129.67
159.46
174.32
245.10

Questions:
question: What is the cumulative total stockholder return of Russell 2000 Index as of 31 December, 2018?
answer: 118.30
text: Total assets for the Company decreased $76.4 million as of December 31, 2019 as compared to December 31, 2018.  Entertainment and Communications assets decreased $58.8 million due to a decrease in property, plant and equipment primarily as a result of the increased depreciation in 2019 related to Hawaiian Telcom property, plant and equipment exceeding capital expenditures. IT Services and Hardware assets increased by $32.6 million primarily due to the Company’s recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets upon adoption of ASU 2016-02.
text: Corporate assets decreased $50.2 million primarily due to decreased receivables. Lower receivables is partially due to timing of sales in the fourth quarter as well as additional sales of certain receivables under the factoring arrangement as of December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018. Deferred tax assets and liabilities totaled $59.3 million and $11.7 million as of December 31, 2019, respectively. Deferred tax assets and liabilities totaled $47.5 million and $11.4 million as of December 31, 2018, respectively. The increase in deferred tax assets in 2019, as compared to 2018, is due to increased net operating losses in 2019.

Table:
As of December 31,
(dollars in millions)
2019
2018
Assets
Entertainment and Communications
$1,840.0
$1,898.8
IT Services and Hardware
500.7
468.1
Corporate and eliminations
313.1
363.3
Total assets
$2,653.8
$2,730.2

Questions:
question: What is the company's total assets as at December 31, 2019?
answer: $2,653.8
scale: million
question: What is the company's total assets as at December 31, 2018?
answer: $2,730.2
scale: million
question: What is the sum of company's total assets between 2018 to 2019?
answer: 5384
derivation: $2,653.8  +$2,730.2
scale: million
question: What is the company's 2019 assets under IT services and hardware?
answer: 500.7
scale: million
question: Which asset classification makes up the biggest proportion of the company's assets as at December 31, 2019?
answer: Entertainment and Communication
derivation: $1,840.0 is the biggest value
question: What is the change in the value of the company's total assets between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -76.4
derivation: $2,653.8 - $2,730.2 
scale: million
text: Revenues
text: Fiscal 2019 revenues from satellite programs, one of the Company’s largest business area, increased by $8.6 million, or 61%, compared to the prior fiscal year. For Fiscal 2019 satellite program revenues for government end use were 46% of total revenues as compared to 36% for the prior fiscal year. Satellite program revenues for commercial end use were 5% and 14% of total revenue for Fiscal 2019 and Fiscal 2018, respectively. Revenues on satellite program contracts are recorded in the FEI-NY segment and are recognized primarily under the POC method. Sales revenues from non-space U.S. Government/DOD customers increased by approximately $5.2 million or 29% in Fiscal 2019 compared to prior fiscal year. These revenues are recorded in both the FEI-NY and FEI-Zyfer segments and accounted for approximately 46% and 45% of consolidated revenues for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. For the year ended April 30, 2019, other commercial and industrial sales accounted for approximately 8% of consolidated revenues compared to approximately 19% for fiscal year 2018. Sales in this business area were $3.9 million for the year ended April 30, 2019 compared to $7.6 million for the preceding year. Changes in revenue for the current year are partially due to implementation of ASU 2014-09 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Table:
Fiscal years ended April 30, (in thousands)
Change
2019
2018
$
%
FEI-NY
$38,096
$26,936
$11,160
41%
FEI-Zyfer
12,235
15,272
(3,037 )
(20%)
Intersegment sales
(822)
(2,801)
1,979
(71%)
$49,509
$39,407
$10,102
26%

Questions:
question: What is the amount of revenue from FEI-NY in 2018 and 2019 respectively?
answer: 26,936
38,096
scale: thousand
question: What is the amount of revenue from FEI-Zyfer in 2018 and 2019 respectively?
answer: 15,272
12,235
scale: thousand
text: The following table summarizes net revenues by significant product and services categories:
text: Endpoint and information protection products include endpoint security, advanced threat protection, and information protection solutions and their related support services. Network and web security products include network security, web security, and cloud security solutions and their related support services. WSS and PKI products consist of the solutions we divested on October 31, 2017. Other products and services primarily consist of email security products, managed security services, consulting, and other professional services.
text: Consumer security products include Norton security, Norton Secure VPN, and other consumer security solutions. Identity and information protection products include LifeLock identity theft protection and other information protection solutions.
text: Products and service revenue information

Table:
Year Ended
(in millions)
March 29, 2019
March 30, 2018
March 31, 2017
Enterprise Security:
Endpoint and information protection
$1,027
$983
$947
Network and web security
748
782
451
WSS and PKI
-
238
422
Other products and services
548
551
535
Total Enterprise Security
$2,323
$2,554
$2,355
Consumer Cyber Safety:
Consumer security
$1,471
$1,504
$1,527
Identity and information protection
937
776
137
Total Consumer Cyber Safety
2,408
2,280
1,664
Total net revenues
$4,731
$4,834
$4,019

Questions:
question: What is the Total net revenues for year ended march 29, 2019?
answer: $4,731
scale: million
question: For year ended march 29, 2019, what is Total Enterprise Security expressed as a percentage of Total net revenues?
answer: 49.1
derivation: 2,323/4,731
scale: percent
question: What is the average Total net revenues for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017?
answer: 4528
derivation: (4,731+4,834+4,019)/3
scale: million
question: For year ended march 29, 2019, what is the difference between  Total Consumer Cyber Safety and Total Enterprise Security?
answer: 85
derivation: 2,408-2,323
scale: million
text: PSUs – Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
text: The PSUs granted based on TSR are contingently awarded and will be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock subject to the condition that the number of PSUs, if any, earned by the employees upon the expiration of a three-year award performance period is dependent on the Company’s TSR ranking relative to a peer group of companies. The fair value of the PSUs based on TSR was estimated on the grant date using a Monte Carlo Simulation. Other assumptions include the expected volatility of all companies included in the TSR, the historical share price returns analysis of all companies included in the TSR and assumes dividends are reinvested. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility for a period of time that approximates the duration between the valuation date and the end of the performance period. The risk-free interest rate is based on the Zero-Coupon Treasury STRIP yield curve matching the term from the valuation date to the end of the performance period. Compensation expense for the PSUs based on TSR (which is considered a market condition) is a fixed amount determined at the grant date fair value and is recognized 100% over the three-year award performance period regardless of whether PSUs are awarded at the end of the award performance period.
text: The number of PSUs granted based on TSR and the assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the PSUs based on TSR are shown in the following table:
text: (1) For 2019, this represents the weighted average fair value for PSU awards approved during the first and third quarter.
text: (2) For 2019, values represent weighted average assumptions for PSU awards approved during the first and third quarter.
text: (3) On May 18, 2017, the O&C Committee approved a change in the vesting policy regarding the existing 2017 Three year PSU Awards for Ilham Kadri. The modified vesting terms resulted in award modification accounting treatment. The weighted average fair value on grant date reflects the impact of the fair value on date of modification for these awards.

Table:
2019
2018
2017
Number of units granted
70,543
56,829
100,958
Weighted average fair value on grant date(1) (3)
$ 57.53
$ 43.40
$ 44.24
Expected Price volatility(2)
22.86%
22.00%
25.31 %
Risk-free interest rate(2)
2.36%
2.00%
1.56 %

Questions:
question: What is the average Risk-free interest rate for the 3 years?
answer: 1.97
derivation: (2.36+2.00+1.56)/3
scale: percent
question: What is the number of units granted for 2019 expressed as a percentage of all units granted?
answer: 30.9
derivation: 70,543/(70,543+56,829+100,958)
scale: percent
question: What is the average Number of units granted for the 3 years?
answer: 76110
derivation: (70,543+56,829+100,958)/3
text: The carrying amounts of other financial instruments not listed in the table below approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments not recorded at fair value in the financial statements were as follows:
text: The fair values of long-term debt as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 were determined by using current interest rates for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Company’s existing debt arrangements and accordingly would be classified as Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.
text: The carrying amount of company-owned life insurance reflects cash surrender values based upon the market values of underlying securities, using Level 2 inputs, net of any outstanding policy loans. The carrying value associated with the cash surrender value of these policies is recorded in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
text: For purposes of performing Step 1 of goodwill impairment testing, the Company uses certain nonrecurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Fair value of each reporting unit for purposes of the goodwill impairment test is based on a weighting of an income approach and a market approach. Under the income approach, fair value is determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis that uses estimates of cash flows discounted to present value using rates commensurate with the risks associated with those cash flows. Under the market approach, a market-based value is derived by relating multiples for earnings and cash flow measures for a group of comparable public companies to the same measure for each reporting unit to estimate fair value. The assumptions used by the Company to determine fair value of the reporting units are similar to those that would be used by market participants performing valuations.

Table:
June 30, 2019
June 30, 2018
($ in millions)
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Long-term debt
$550.6
$560.6
$545.7
$558.3
Company-owned life insurance
$17.9
$17.9
$16.4
$16.4

Questions:
question: What is the carrying value of long-term debt in 2019?
answer: $550.6
scale: million
question: What is the fair value of long-term debt in 2018?
answer: $558.3
scale: million
question: In which year was the fair value of Company-owned life insurance larger?
answer: 2019
derivation: 17.9>16.4
question: What was the change in the fair value of Company-owned life insurance in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 1.5
derivation: 17.9-16.4
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the fair value of Company-owned life insurance in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 9.15
derivation: (17.9-16.4)/16.4
scale: percent
text: During the year ended 31 December 2019, the Company repurchased 3,486,700 shares on the Stock Exchange for an aggregate consideration of approximately HKD1.16 billion before expenses. The repurchased shares were subsequently cancelled. The repurchase was effected by the Board for the enhancement of shareholder value in the long term. Details of the shares repurchased are as follows:
text: Save as disclosed above and in Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements, neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has purchased, sold or redeemed any of the Company’s shares during the year ended 31 December 2019.

Table:
Purchase consideration per share
Aggregate
No. of shares
Highest
Lowest
consideration
Month of purchase in 2019
purchased
price paid
price paid
paid
HKD
HKD
HKD
August
362,200
327.00
312.40
116,330,916
September
2,294,500
351.00
323.60
776,104,729
October
830,000
327.80
317.40
268,272,462
Total:
3,486,700
1,160,708,107

Questions:
question: How many shares was purchased in August?
answer: 362,200
question: What percentage of total shares purchased is the August share purchase?
answer: 10.39
derivation: 362,200/3,486,700
scale: percent
question: What percentage of total shares purchased is the September share purchase?
answer: 65.81
derivation: 2,294,500/3,486,700
scale: percent
question: What percentage of the total aggregate consideration paid is the August aggregate consideration paid?
answer: 10.02
derivation: 116,330,916/1,160,708,107
scale: percent