tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: 11. Segment Information and Geographic Area Information
text: The following table sets forth certain geographic financial information for fiscal 2019, fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017. Geographic net sales are determined based on our sales from our various operational locations.

Table:
Fiscal Year Ended
(Dollars in Millions)
April 27, 2019
April 28, 2018
April 29, 2017
Net Sales:
U.S.
$540.5
$487.5
$506.9
Malta
148.5
184.0
155.5
China
113.7
117.3
127.7
Canada
101.6
54.4
—
Other
96.0
65.1
26.4
Total Net Sales
$1,000.3
$908.3
$816.5
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net:
U.S.
$83.9
$63.3
$44.9
Malta
33.0
36.8
26.4
Belgium
22.1
25.0
—
China
18.6
7.2
5.9
Other
34.3
29.9
13.4
Total Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
$191.9
$162.2
$90.6

Questions:
question: What were the net sales in Malta in 2019?
answer: 148.5
scale: million
question: What were the net sales in U.S. in 2018?
answer: $487.5
scale: million
question: What were the net sales in U.S. in 2019?
answer: $540.5
scale: million
question: What was the change in the net sales from U.S. from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 53
derivation: 540.5 - 487.5
scale: million
question: What was the average net sales from Malta for 2017-2019?
answer: 162.67
derivation: (148.5 + 184.0 + 155.5) / 3
scale: million
question: In which year was Total Net Sales less than 1,000.0 million?
answer: 2018
2017
derivation: locate and analyze total net sales in row 10
text: Note 12 – Income Taxes
text: The provision for income taxes consists of the following for the fiscal years ended December 27, 2019, December 28, 2018 and December 29, 2017:

Table:
December 27, 2019 
December 28, 2018 
December 29, 2017
Current income tax expense:
Federal 
$4,003
$2,945
$3,342
State 
2,144
1,943
1,403
Total current income tax expense 
6,147
4,888
4,745
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
Federal 
1,617
2,363
(1,059)
Foreign 
17
(472)
215
State 
429
663
141
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)
2,063
2,554
(703)
Total income tax expense
$8,210
$7,442
$4,042

Questions:
question: What is the total current income tax expense for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: 6,147
4,888
4,745
question: What is the total income tax expense for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: $8,210
$7,442
$4,042
question: What is the Total deferred income tax expense (benefit) for 2019, 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: 2,063
2,554
(703)
question: What is the change in total income tax expense between 2019 and 2018?
answer: 768
derivation: 8,210-7,442
question: What is the average Total income tax expense for 2019, 2018 and 2017?
answer: 6564.67
derivation: (8,210+ 7,442+ 4,042)/3
question: Which year has the highest Total income tax expense?
answer: 2019
derivation: 8,210> 7,442> 4,042
text: Note 8. Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
text: The following table reflects changes in the net carrying amount of the components of intangible assets (in thousands):

Table:
Customer Relationships
Developed Technology
Trade Name
Total
Balance as of January 1, 2018
$88,526
$5,532
$228
$94,286
Amortization
(11,262)
(3,854)
(103)
(15,219)
Balance as of December 31, 2018
77,264
1,678
125
79,067
Intangible assets acquired
19,805
16,583
2,219
38,607
Amortization
(12,673)
(1,441)
(122)
(14,236)
Balance as of December 31, 2019
$84,396
$16,820
$2,222
$103,438

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in the total balance between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018? 
answer: -16.14
derivation: (79,067-94,286)/94,286
scale: percent
text: Profitability Measures
text: Net Income:
text: Our net income in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2019 was $18.4 million as compared to net income of $16.6 million in the same period last year. The increase is due to a $11.7 million increase in operating income, $3.0 million increase in investment income and $12.0 million decrease in income tax provision. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to $21.0 million decrease in general and administrative expense due to reduced legal provision and related costs as further discussed in Note 19 and partially offset by $8.0 million of restructuring expense.
text: Adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2019 decreased $8.1 million compared to the same period last year due to lower revenues as described above and the impact of high margin revenue earned on a strategic technology partnership arrangement in fiscal 2018. These factors were coupled with higher operating expenses in Telematics Systems as a result of increased headcount and outsourced professional service fees. Adjusted EBITDA for Software and Subscription Services increased $4.9 million compared to the same period last year due primarily to continued growth in revenues and gross profit from our Italia market and higher gross profit from our fleet management services.
text: See Note 20 for reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA by reportable segments and a reconciliation to GAAP-basis net income (loss).

Table:
Fiscal years ended
February 28,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
$ Change
% Change
Segment
Telematics Systems
$40,821
$48,943
$(8,122)
(17.0%)
Software & Subscription Services
13,093
8,233
4,860
59.0%
Corporate Expense
(5,699)
(4,794)
(905)
19.0%
Total Adjusted EBITDA
$48,215
$52,382
$(4,167)
(8.0%)

Questions:
question: What was the Total Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2018?
answer: 52,382
scale: thousand
question: What was the Total Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2019?
answer: 48,215
scale: thousand
question: What is the total Adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems and Software & Subscription Services in 2019? 
answer: 53914
derivation: (40,821+13,093)
scale: thousand
question: What is the total Adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems and Software & Subscription Services in 2018?
answer: 57176
derivation: (48,943+8,233)
scale: thousand
question: What was the average Corporate Expense for both years, 2018 and 2019?
answer: -5246.5
derivation: (-5,699-4,794)/(2019-2018+1)
scale: thousand
text: RSUs/PSUs
text: RSUs/PSUs are granted to executives and other eligible employees. The value of an RSU/PSU at the grant date is equal to the value of one BCE common share. Dividends in the form of additional RSUs/PSUs are credited to the participant’s account on each dividend payment date and are equivalent in value to the dividend paid on BCE common shares. Executives and other eligible employees are granted a specific number of RSUs/PSUs for a given performance period based on their position and level of contribution. RSUs/PSUs vest fully after three years of continuous employment from the date of grant and, in certain cases, if performance objectives are met, as determined by the board of directors.
text: The following table summarizes outstanding RSUs/PSUs at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
text: (1) The weighted average fair value of the RSUs/PSUs granted was $58 in 2019 and $57 in 2018
text: (2) The RSUs/PSUs vested on December 31, 2019 were fully settled in February 2020 with BCE common shares and/or DSUs.

Table:
NUMBER OF RSUs/PSUs
2019
2018
Outstanding, January 1
2,812,697
2,740,392
Granted (1)
975,348
1,006,586
Dividends credited
149,648
149,258
Settled
(932,133)
(1,027,321)
Forfeited
(90,442)
(56,218)
Outstanding, December 31
2,915,118
2,812,697
Vested, December 31 (2)
904,266
880,903

Questions:
question: In which year is the amount of dividends credited larger?
answer: 2019
derivation: 149,648>149,258
question: What is the average vested amount in 2018 and 2019?
answer: 892584.5
derivation: (904,266+880,903)/2
text: 2019 vs 2018
text: Cost of revenue decreased for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to the prior year, primarily due to net revenue declining.
text: Gross margin decreased for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the prior year. Gross margin was negatively impacted by the imposition of Section 301 tariffs originally announced in late 2018 and cost inefficiencies experienced in our new manufacturing locations outside of China, an increase in channel promotional activities relative to revenue as well as foreign exchange headwinds due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar.
text: 2018 vs 2017
text: Cost of revenue decreased for the year ended December 31, 2018 primarily due to improved product margin performance, lower proportionate provisions for warranty expense, and lower air freight costs compared to the prior year.
text: Gross margin increased for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the prior year primarily due to improved product margin performance, lower proportionate provisions for sales returns and warranty expense, favorable foreign exchange rate movements and lower air freight costs compared to the prior year.
text: For fiscal 2020, we expect gross margins to improve from fiscal 2019 primarily as our U.S. bound inventory will primarily not be subject to Section 301 tariffs in fiscal 2020. Forecasting gross margin percentages is difficult, and there are a number of risks related to our ability to maintain or improve our current gross margin levels. Our cost of revenue as a percentage of net revenue can vary significantly based upon factors such as: uncertainties surrounding revenue levels, including future pricing and/or potential discounts as a result of the economy or in response to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar in our international markets, and related production level variances; import customs duties and imposed tariffs; competition; changes in technology; changes in product mix; variability of stockbased compensation costs; royalties to third parties; fluctuations in freight and repair costs; manufacturing and purchase price variances; changes in prices on commodity components; warranty costs; and the timing of sales, particularly to service provider customers. We expect that revenue derived from paid subscription service plans will increase in the future, which may have a positive impact on our gross margin. From time to time, however, we may experience fluctuations in our gross margin as a result of the factors discussed above.

Table:
Year Ended December 31
2019
% Change
2018
% Change
2017
(In thousands, except percentage data)
Cost of revenue
$704,535
(1.8)%
$717,118
(2.0)%
$731,453
Gross margin percentage
29.5%
32.3%
29.6%

Questions:
question: What was the cost of revenue in 2019?
answer: $704,535
scale: thousand
question: Which year has the highest gross margin percentage?
answer: 2018
derivation: 32.3% > 29.6% > 29.5%
question: What is the gross margin percentage change from 2017 to 2018?
answer: 2.7
derivation: 32.3%-29.6% 
scale: percent
question: What was the percentage change in cost of revenue from 2017 to 2019?
answer: -3.68
derivation: (704,535-731,453)/731,453 
scale: percent
text: Free cashflow
text: The Group achieved another year of strong cashflow performance with operating cashflow for FY19 of $836.3m again exceeding EBITDA. Tax payments in FY19 were significantly lower than the prior year because FY18 included tax paid on the capital gain realised on the sale of investments in FY17.
text: Capital expenditure
text: Business as usual (‘BAU’) capital expenditure of $198.7m was $59.3m lower than last year principally due to the substantial completion in the prior year of the build for the VHA fibre contract.
text: Mobile spectrum capex of $352.4m in FY19 reflects the payment during the year of the second instalment for the Australian 700MHz spectrum acquired at auction in April 2017. The first instalment of $597.3m was paid in FY18 and the third and final instalment of $352.4m is payable in January 2020. A further $86.1m of capex was also incurred in FY19 in relation to the Australian mobile network rollout up until the project ceased. This expenditure on spectrum and mobile assets in Australia was partly impaired as part of the impairment review that was undertaken following the cessation of the project as described above.
text: Capex for the mobile network build in Singapore in FY19 was $80.1m taking the aggregate capex incurred on the project up to $147m (excluding spectrum).

Table:
FY19
FY18
$m
$m
Operating cashflow
836.3
868.3
Tax
(128.6)
(194.5)
IRU / finance lease payments
(5.5)
(34.1)
Capex - BAU
(198.7)
(258.0)
Capex - mobile spectrum
(352.4)
(597.3)
Capex - mobile networks (Aus)
(86.1)
(38.7)
Capex - mobile networks (Sg)
(80.1)
(62.3)
Free cashflow
(15.1)
(316.6)

Questions:
question: Which capital expenditures had increased from FY18 to FY19?
answer: Capex - mobile networks (Aus)
Capex - mobile networks (Sg)
question: What is the percentage change of free cashflow from FY18 to FY19?
answer: -95.23
derivation: (15.1 - 316.6) / 316.6
scale: percent
text: 10 Auditor’s Remuneration
text: The Group paid the following amounts to its auditor in respect of the audit of the historical financial information and for other non-audit services provided to the Group.

Table:
Year-ended 31 March 2019
Year-ended 31 March 2018
$M
$M
Audit of the Financial Statements
0.4
0.4
Subsidiary local statutory audits
0.2
0.3
Total audit fees
0.6
0.7
Other assurance services
0.1
0.1
Total non-audit fees
0.1
0.1

Questions:
question: What is the Audit of the Financial Statements fees for 2019?
answer: 0.4
scale: million
question: What are the items under Total audit fees in the table?
answer: Audit of the Financial Statements
Subsidiary local statutory audits
question: In which year was the amount of Total audit fees larger?
answer: 2018
derivation: 0.7>0.6
question: What was the change in Total audit fees in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -0.1
derivation: 0.6-0.7
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in Total audit fees in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -14.29
derivation: (0.6-0.7)/0.7
scale: percent
text: The fair value of plan assets, summarized by level within the fair value hierarchy described in Note 20, as of May 27, 2018, was as follows:
text: Level 1 assets are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. The majority of the Level 1 assets listed above include the common stock of both U.S. and international companies, mutual funds, master limited partnership units, and real estate investment trusts, all of which are actively traded and priced in the market.
text: Level 2 assets are valued based on other significant observable inputs including quoted prices for similar securities, yield curves, indices, etc. Level 2 assets consist primarily of individual fixed income securities where values are based on quoted prices of similar securities and observable market data.
text: Level 3 assets consist of investments where active market pricing is not readily available and, as such, fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs.
text: Certain assets that are measured at fair value using the NAV (net asset value) per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. Such investments are generally considered long-term in nature with varying redemption availability. For certain of these investments, with a fair value of approximately $51.0 million as of May 26, 2019, the asset managers have the ability to impose customary redemption gates which may further restrict or limit the redemption of invested funds therein. As of May 26, 2019, funds with a fair value of $4.2 million have imposed such gates.
text: As of May 26, 2019, we have unfunded commitments for additional investments of $48.3 million in private equity funds and $17.0 million in natural resources funds. We expect unfunded commitments to be funded from plan assets rather than the general assets of the Company.
text: Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Table:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Cash and cash equivalents
$1.0
$65.0
$—
$66.0
Equity securities:
U.S. equity securities
319.8
124.0
—
443.8
International equity securities
256.5
1.0
—
257.5
Fixed income securities:
Government bonds
—
1,854.8
—
1,854.8
Corporate bonds
—
4.7
—
4.7
Mortgage-backed bonds
—
9.3
—
9.3
Real estate funds
7.7
—
—
7.7
Master limited partnerships
0.4
—
—
0.4
Net receivables for unsettled transactions
10.9
—
—
10.9
Fair value measurement of pension plan assets in the fair value hierarchy
$596.3
$2,058.8
$—
$2,655.1
Investments measured at net asset value
700.0
Total pension plan assets
$3,355.1

Questions:
text: Stock-based Compensation Expense
text: The following table sets forth our stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
text: Stock-based compensation awards include employee stock options, restricted stock awards and units, and employee stock purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2019, stock-based compensation expense was $31.6 million, of which $0.2 million related to employee stock options, $29.1 million related to restricted stock awards and units and $2.3 million related to employee stock purchases. For the year ended December 31, 2018, stock-based compensation expense was $31.0 million, of which $0.4 million related to employee stock options, $28.0 million related to restricted stock awards and units and $2.6 million related to employee stock purchases. The increase in stock-based compensation expense in 2019 compared to 2018 was due primarily to a higher volume of restricted stock unit grants.

Table:
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Research, development and other related costs
$14,643
$13,168
$13,277
Selling, general and administrative
16,911
17,843
20,185
Total stock-based compensation expense
$31,554
$31,011
$33,462

Questions:
question: What is the percentage change in total stock-based compensation expense in 2018 compared to 2017?
answer: -7.32
derivation: (31,011-33,462)/33,462 
scale: percent
text: Financial position and cash flow
text: Capital expenditure and cash flow
text: Net operating cash inflow was $4,709,000, which was $4,081,000 lower than last year. The reduction in operating revenue was offset by lower operational costs. However, net cash was impacted by the increase in trail to upfront revenue mix. In addition, as a result of the loss position reported for FY18, the Group received a net tax refund of $2,327,000 during the year, compared to the prior year net tax paid of $172,000.
text: Net investing cash outflows for the year was $12,337,000. The $7,755,000 decrease in spend in investing activities relates to the Group’s controlling interest acquisition of iMoney in December 2017.
text: Net financing cash outflows for the 2019 year totalled $3,471,000. This included $2,839,000 lease payments and $497,000 interest expense related to leases. The material decrease against the prior year comparative period relates to $32,918,000 paid in share buy-backs and dividends in the prior period.

Table:
CASH FLOW SUMMARY
2019 $’000
2018 $’000 RESTATED
CHANGE
Net cash provided  from operating  activities
4,709
8,790
46%
Net cash used in  investing activities
(12,337)
(20,092)
(39%)
Net cash used in financing activities
(3,471)
(36,014)
(90%)
Net change in cash and cash equivalent
(11,099)
(47,316)
(77%)

Questions:
question: What is the percentage change in the net cash provided from operating activities?
answer: 46%
question: What is the percentage change in the net cash provided from investing activities?
answer: (39%)
question: What is the percentage change in the net cash provided from financing activities?
answer: (90%)
question: What is the change in the net cash provided from operating activities from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -4081
derivation: 4,709-8,790
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Net cash used in financing activities from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 32543
derivation: (3,471)-(36,014)
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Net change in cash and cash equivalent from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 36217
derivation: (11,099)-(47,316)
scale: thousand
text: (1) For a description and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures presented in this document, please see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures page, or visit the Black Knight Investor Relations website at https://investor.blackknightinc.com.
text: (2) In 2019, the effect of our indirect investment in The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation was a reduction of Net earnings of $73.9 million primarily due to the effect of its purchase accounting adjustments, restructuring charges and other non-operating charges. In 2017, Net earnings includes a one-time, non-cash net tax benefit of $110.9 million related to the revaluation of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Reform Act”).

Table:
(in millions, except per share data)
2019
2018
2017
Revenues
$1,177.2
$1,114.0
$1,051.6
Adjusted Revenues(1)
$1,177.7
$1,116.5
$1,056.1
Earnings before equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
$182.8
$168.5
$254.2
Net earnings(2)
$108.8
$168.5
$254.2
Net earnings margin
9.2%
15.1%
24.2%
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight
$108.8
$168.5
$182.3
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight, per diluted share
$0.73
$1.14
$1.47
Adjusted Net Earnings(1)
$295.4
$277.9
$209.6
Adjusted EPS(1)
$1.99
$1.87
$1.38
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
$583.4
$542.5
$505.8
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1)
49.5%
48.6%
47.9%

Questions:
question: What was the revenues in 2018?
answer: 1,114.0
scale: million
question: What were the net earnings in 2017?
answer: 254.2
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the Net earnings margin between 2017 and 2019?
answer: -15
derivation: 9.2-24.2
scale: percent
question: What was the percentage change in revenues between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 5.67
derivation: (1,177.2-1,114.0)/1,114.0
scale: percent
text: Balance sheet
text: Under IAS 12 Income Taxes, provision is made for the deferred tax assets and liabilities associated with the revaluation of assets and liabilities at the corporate tax rate expected to apply to the Group at the time the temporary differences are expected to reverse. For those UK assets and liabilities benefiting from REIT exemption the relevant tax rate will be 0 per cent (2018: 0 per cent), and for other UK assets and liabilities the relevant rate will be 19 per cent if the temporary difference is expected to be realised before 1 April 2020 and 17 per cent if it is expected to be realised on or after 1 April 2020 (2018: 19 per cent before 1 April 2020, 17 per cent thereafter). For Spanish assets and liabilities the relevant tax rate will be 25 per cent (2018: 25 per cent).
text: Movements in the provision for deferred tax:
text: The net deferred tax provision of £0.9 million predominantly arises in respect of the revaluation of development property at intu Costa del Sol, partially offset by associated tax losses.

Table:
£m
Investment and development property
Other temporary differences
Total
Provided deferred tax provision/(asset):
At 1 January 2018
24.6
(0.9)
23.7
Recognised in the income statement
(5.5)
(0.3)
(5.8)
Foreign exchange movements
0.1
–
0.1
At 31 December 2018
19.2
(1.2)
18.0
Recognised in the income statement
(16.4)
(0.2)
(16.6)
Foreign exchange movements
(0.5)
–
(0.5)
At 31 December 2019
2.3
(1.4)
0.9

Questions:
question: What is the percentage change in the provided deferred tax provision for investment and development property from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019?
answer: -90.65
derivation: (2.3-24.6)/24.6
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage change in the total provided deferred tax provision from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019?
answer: -25.33
derivation: (0.9-23.7)/0.9
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage change in the provided deferred tax provision for investment and development property from 31 December 2018 to 31 December 2019?
answer: -88.02
derivation: (2.3-19.2)/19.2
scale: percent