tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Seasonality and Backlog
text: We experience a slight seasonal pattern to our business. Overall, the third and fourth fiscal quarters are typically the strongest quarters of our fiscal year, whereas the first fiscal quarter is negatively affected by holidays and the second fiscal quarter may be affected by adverse winter weather conditions in some of our markets.
text: Certain of our end markets experience some seasonality. Our sales in the automotive market are dependent upon global automotive production, and seasonal declines in European production may negatively impact net sales in the fourth fiscal quarter. Also, our sales in the energy market typically increase in the third and fourth fiscal quarters as customer activity increases.
text: Customer orders typically fluctuate from quarter to quarter based upon business and market conditions. Backlog is not necessarily indicative of future net sales as unfilled orders may be cancelled prior to shipment of goods. Backlog by reportable segment was as follows:
text: We expect that the majority of our backlog at fiscal year end 2019 will be filled during fiscal 2020.

Table:
Fiscal Year End
2019
2018
(in millions)
Transportation Solutions
$ 1,639
$ 1,779
Industrial Solutions
1,315
1,245
Communications Solutions
361
441
Total
$ 3,315
$ 3,465

Questions:
question: In which year was Communications Solutions larger?
answer: 2018
derivation: 441>361
question: What was the percentage change in total backlog in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -4.33
derivation: (3,315-3,465)/3,465
scale: percent
text: The failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment had the following effects on our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
text: After factoring in the costs to sell the data centers and colocation business, excluding the impact from the failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment, the sale resulted in a $20 million gain as a result of the aggregate value of the proceeds we received exceeding the carrying value of the assets sold and liabilities assumed. Based on the fair market values of the failed-sale-leaseback assets, the failed-sale-leaseback accounting treatment resulted in a loss of $102 million as a result of the requirement to treat a certain amount of the pre-tax cash proceeds from the sale of the assets as though it were the result of a financing obligation. The combined net loss of $82 million was included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
text: Effective November 3, 2016, which is the date we entered into the agreement to sell a portion of our data centers and colocation business, we ceased recording depreciation of the property, plant and equipment to be sold and amortization of the business’s intangible assets in accordance with applicable accounting rules. Otherwise, we estimate that we would have recorded additional depreciation and amortization expense of $67 million from January 1, 2017 through May 1, 2017.
text: Upon adopting ASU 2016-02, accounting for the failed sale leaseback is no longer applicable based on our facts and circumstances, and the real estate assets and corresponding financing obligation were derecognized from our consolidated financial statements. Please see “Leases” (ASU 2016-02) in Note 1— Background and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the impact the new lease standard will have on the accounting for the failed-sale-leaseback.

Table:
Positive (Negative) Impact to Net Income
December 31,
2018
2017
(Dollars in millions)
Increase in revenue
$74
49
Decrease in cost of sales
22
15
Increase in loss on sale of business included in selling, general and administrative expense
—
(102)
Increase in depreciation expense (one-time)
—
(44)
Increase in depreciation expense (ongoing)
(69)
(47)
Increase in interest expense
(55)
(39)
Decrease in income tax expense
7
65
Decrease in net income
$(21)
(103)

Questions:
question: What is the 2018 increase in revenue?
answer: $74
scale: million
question: Which year had a larger decrease in the cost of sales?
answer: 2018
derivation: 22>15
question: What is the change in the increase in revenue in 2018 from 2017?
answer: 25
derivation: $74-$49
scale: million
question: What is the average increase in revenue across 2017 and 2018?
answer: 61.5
derivation: ($74+$49)/2
scale: million
text: Fiscal 2021 LTIP
text: Grants made in Fiscal 2019 under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP took effect on August 6, 2018 with the goal of measuring performance over the three year period starting July 1, 2018. The table below illustrates the target value of each element under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP for each Named Executive Officer.
text: Awards granted in Fiscal 2019 under the Fiscal 2021 LTIP were in addition to the awards granted in Fiscal 2018, Fiscal 2017, and prior years. For details of our previous LTIPs, see Item 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the appropriate year.

Table:
Named Executive Officer
Performance Share Units
Restricted Share Units
Stock Options
Total
Mark J. Barrenechea
$2,815,000
$1,407,500
$1,407,500
$5,630,000
Madhu Ranganathan
$500,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
Muhi Majzoub
$550,000
$275,000
$275,000
$1,100,000
Gordon A. Davies
$500,000
$250,000
$250,000
$1,000,000
Simon Harrison
$218,750
$109,375
$109,375
$437,500

Questions:
question: Who are the Named Executive Officers?
answer: Mark J. Barrenechea
Madhu Ranganathan
Muhi Majzoub
Gordon A. Davies
Simon Harrison
question: What is the total target value for Mark J. Barrenechea?
answer: 5,630,000
question: What is the average total target value for all Named Executive Officers?
answer: 1833500
derivation: (5,630,000+1,000,000+1,100,000+1,000,000+437,500)/5
question: What is Mark J. Barrenechea's Total target value expressed as percentage of total target values for all Named Executive Officer?
answer: 61.41
derivation: 5,630,000/(5,630,000+1,000,000+1,100,000+1,000,000+437,500)
scale: percent
question: What is Simon Harrison's Total target value expressed as percentage of total target values for all Named Executive Officer?
answer: 4.77
derivation: 437,500/(5,630,000+1,000,000+1,100,000+1,000,000+437,500)
scale: percent
text: Summary of Results
text: The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain key operating results and other financial information (in thousands, except per share data):

Table:
Fiscal Year Ended August 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net revenue
$25,282,320
$22,095,416
$19,063,121
Gross profit
$1,913,401
$1,706,792
$1,545,643
Operating income
$701,356
$542,153
$410,230
Net income attributable to Jabil Inc
$287,111
$86,330
$129,090
Earnings per share – basic
$1.85
$0.50
$0.71
Earnings per share – diluted
$1.81
$0.49
$0.69

Questions:
text: NOTE 9 – CONTINGENT PURCHASE PRICE
text: Our purchase of CareSpeak Communications contains a contingent element that will be paid only if the Company achieves certain patient engagement revenues in 2019 and 2020. The total contingent payment may be up to $3.0 million. The target patient engagement revenues were achieved in 2019 and are expected to be achieved in 2020. The calculated fair value of the contingent payment was $2,365,000 at December 31, 2018 and $3,000,000 at December 31, 2019.
text: Our purchase of RMDY Health, Inc. also contains a contingent element that will be paid only if the Company achieves certain revenues in 2020 and 2021 related to the RMDY business. The total contingent payment may be up to $30.0 million. The minimum payment is $1.0 million in each of the two years. The calculated fair value of the contingent payment was $3,720,000 at December 31, 2019. We determined the fair value of the Contingent Purchase Price Payable at December 31, 2019 using a Geometric-Brownian motion analysis of the expected revenue and resulting earnout payment using inputs that include the spot price, a risk free rate of return of 1.4%, a term of 2 years, and volatility of 40%. Changes in the inputs could result in a different fair value measurement.
text: The total fair value of contingent purchase price payable at December 31, 2019 is as follows.

Table:
Current
Long-Term  
Total 
CareSpeak Communications, Inc. 
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$3,000,000
RMDY Health, Inc.  
-
3,720,000
3,720,000
Total 
$1,500,000
$5,220,000
$6,720,000

Questions:
question: What is the total current fair value of contingent purchase price payable on December 31, 2019?
answer: $1,500,000
question: What is the proportion of total long-term fair value of contingent purchase price payable over total fair value of contingent purchase price payable?
answer: 0.78
derivation: 5,220,000/6,720,000
text: 14. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
text: Authorized, issued and outstanding common shares roll-forward is as follows:
text: In December 2017, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 40,000,000 common shares which increased its equity by $103.7 million.
text: In December 2018, the Annual General Meeting of the Company approved to increase the Company’s authorized share capital from $1.8 million to $3.6 million.
text: During 2019, the Company has issued 5,260,968 shares through the ATM program and raised net proceeds of $17.9 million.

Table:
Authorized
Shares
Issued and Out-
standing Shares
Common Stock
Balance as of January 1, 2017  
180,000,000
101,969,666
1,020
Common Shares Issued in Follow-on Offering
-
40,000,000
400
Balance as of December 31, 2017  
180,000,000
141,969,666
1,420
Authorization of additional authorized shares  
180,000,000
-
-
Balance as of December 31, 2018  
360,000,000
141,969,666
1,420
At-the-Market Offering  
-
5,260,968
52
Balance as of December 31, 2019  
360,000,000
147,230,634
1,472

Questions:
text: The ESPP provides for annual increases in the number of shares available for issuance under the ESPP on the first day of each fiscal year beginning in fiscal 2014, equal to the least of: (i) 1% of the outstanding shares of all classes of common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding year; (ii) 1,250,000 shares; or (iii) such other amount as may be determined by the board of directors. During the year ended December 31, 2019, a total of 810,459 shares of Class A common stock were added to the ESPP Plan in connection with the annual increase provision. At December 31, 2019, a total of 3,918,712 shares were available for issuance under the ESPP.
text: The weighted-average assumptions used to value ESPP rights under the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model and the resulting offering grant date fair value of ESPP rights granted in the periods presented were as follows:
text: As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was approximately $2.3 million and $1.5 million of unrecognized share-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to ESPP, which will be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining weighted-average vesting periods of approximately 0.4 years, respectively

Table:
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Expected term (in years)
0.5
0.5
0.5
Expected volatility
47%
42%
34%
Risk-free interest rate
2.01%
2.31%
1.20%
Expected dividend yield
0%
0%
0%
Offering grant date fair value of ESPP rights
$33.66
$18.07
$9.52

Questions:
text: 5. Accrued expenses
text: Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

Table:
October 31,
2019
2018
(In thousands)
Workers’ compensation claims
$9,687
$9,020
Accrued wages
19,525
14,142
Accrued rebates
13,529
7,828
Accrued vacation 
10,592
8,554
Accrued property taxes 
11,331
9,453
Accrued payroll taxes
8,290
9,034
Other accrued expenses 
9,986
11,922
Total accrued expenses
$82,940
$69,953

Questions:
question: What is the Workers’ compensation claims for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 respectively?
answer: $9,687
$9,020
scale: thousand
question: What is the Accrued wages for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 respectively?
answer: 19,525
14,142
scale: thousand
question: What is the average Workers’ compensation claims for fiscal years 2019 and 2018?
answer: 9353.5
derivation: (9,687+ 9,020)/2
scale: thousand
question: What is the average Accrued payroll taxes for fiscal years 2019 and 2018?
answer: 8662
derivation: (8,290+ 9,034)/2
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Total accrued expenses between fiscal years 2019 and 2018?
answer: 12987
derivation: 82,940-69,953
scale: thousand
text: STOCK OPTIONS
text: The following is a summary of stock option activity during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Table:
Number of Options Outstanding
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (thousands)
Outstanding – December 31, 2017
2,341,340
$1.77
5.78
$1,087
Options granted
376,667
2.41
Options exercised
224,400
1.59
Options forfeited
6,961
1.42
Outstanding – December 31, 2018
2,486,646
$1.89
7.01
$1,550
Options granted
50,832
3.02
Options exercised
-
Options forfeited
181,281
2.23
Outstanding – December 31, 2019
2,356,197
$1.89
5.93
$628
Exercisable – December 31, 2019
1,843,468
$1.75
5.34
$624

Questions:
question: What are the respective outstanding options as at December 31, 2017 and 2018?
answer: 2,341,340
2,486,646
question: What are the respective outstanding options as at December 31, 2018 and 2019?
answer: 2,486,646
2,356,197
question: What are the respective outstanding and exercisable options at December 31, 2019?
answer: 2,356,197
1,843,468
question: What is the average number of outstanding options as at December 31, 2017 and 2018?
answer: 2413993
derivation: (2,341,340 + 2,486,646)/2 
question: What is the percentage change in outstanding options between 2017 and 2018?
answer: 6.21
derivation: (2,486,646 - 2,341,340)/2,341,340 
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage change in outstanding options between 2018 and 2019?
answer: -5.25
derivation: (2,356,197 - 2,486,646)/2,486,646 
scale: percent
text: GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
text: 14. Other Payables and Accruals
text: An analysis of other payables and accruals is as follows:
text: The unearned revenue represents charter hires received in advance in December 2019 relating to the hire period of January 2020 for 22 vessels (December 2018: 17 vessels).

Table:
As of December 31,
2018
2019
Unearned revenue
38,680
48,183
Accrued off-hire
7,376
6,968
Accrued purchases
18,578
9,759
Accrued interest
38,107
36,746
Other accruals
24,709
34,586
Total
127,450
136,242

Questions:
text: Capitalized software development costs consisted of the following (in thousands):
text: The Company capitalized software development costs of $8.8 million, $8.8 million and $6.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
text: Amortized expense for capitalized software development costs was $7.0 million, $5.9 million and $5.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Amortization of capitalized software development costs is classified within cost of revenue in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company retired $4.6 million of fully amortized capitalized software development costs.

Table:
As of December 31, 2019
Gross carrying amount
Amortization period
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Capitalized software development costs
$ 49,909
3 years
$ (35,622)
$ 14,287
Total capitalized software development costs
$ 49,909
$ (35,622)
$ 14,287
As of December 31, 2018
Gross carrying amount
Amortization period
Accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
Capitalized software development costs
$ 45,677
3 years
$ (32,784)
$ 12,893
Total capitalized software development costs
$ 45,677
$ (32,784)
$ 12,893

Questions:
question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Gross carrying amount: Capitalized software development costs from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: 4232
derivation: 49,909-45,677
scale: thousand
question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Accumulated amortization: Capitalized software development costs from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: 2838
derivation: 35,622-32,784
scale: thousand
question: What is the increase/ (decrease) in Net carrying amount: Capitalized software development costs from December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: 1394
derivation: 14,287-12,893
scale: thousand
text: During the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold marketable securities for proceeds of $52.0 million and realized no gain or loss on such sales. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we sold marketable securities for proceeds of $10.8 million and $118.3 million, respectively, and realized gains of less than $0.1 million on such sales in each respective period. See Note 11. “Fair Value Measurements” to our consolidated financial statements for information about the fair value of our marketable securities.
text: The following tables summarize the unrealized gains and losses related to our available-for-sale marketable securities, by major security type, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
text: As of December 31, 2019, we had no investments in a loss position for a period of time greater than 12 months. As of December 31, 2018, we identified 15 investments totaling $207.2 million that had been in a loss position for a period of time greater than 12 months with unrealized losses of $1.8 million. The unrealized losses were primarily due to increases in interest rates relative to rates at the time of purchase. Based on the underlying credit quality of the investments, we generally hold such securities until we recover our cost basis. Therefore, we did not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

Table:
As of December 31, 2019
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
Foreign debt .
$387,775
$551
$506
$387,820
Foreign government obligations
21,991
20
—
22,011
U.S. debt
65,970
176
12
66,134
Time deposits
335,541
—
—
335,541
Total .
$811,277
$747
$518
$811,506

Questions:
question: What percentage of the total amortized marketable securities is made up of amortized foreign debt?
answer: 47.8
derivation: 387,775 / 811,277 
scale: percent
question: What percentage of the total fair value marketable securities is made up of fair value time deposits?
answer: 41.35
derivation: 335,541 / 811,506 
scale: percent
text: ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts)
text: The final fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from our acquisitions in 2018 are as follows:

Table:
Trek
Electrostatic Product Line
LumaSense
Total
Accounts and other receivable, net
$ 2,818
$  77
$  7,167
$ 10,062
Inventories
3,941
292
9,372
13,605
Property and equipment
594
50
1,353
1,997
Goodwill
—
1,220
36,258
37,478
Intangible assets
788
1,400
43,240
45,428
Deferred income tax assets
606
—
6,331
6,937
Other assets
854
—
6,004
6,858
Total assets acquired
9,601
3,039
109,725
122,365
Accounts payable
747
39
5,734
6,520
Deferred income tax liabilities
—
—
11,699
11,699
Other liabilities
2,782
—
7,608
10,390
Total liabilities assumed
3,529
39
25,041
28,609
Total fair value of net assets acquired
$ 6,072
$  3,000
$  84,684
$ 93,756

Questions:
text: NOTE 11 - STOCK CAPITAL (Cont.)
text: Share-based compensation to employees and to directors: (Cont.)
text: Restricted Stock:
text: The Company awards stock and restricted stock to certain employees, officers, directors, and/or service providers. The restricted stock vests in accordance with such conditions and restrictions determined by the GNC Committee. These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain performance goals and/or continued employment with the Company through a specified restricted period. The purchase price (if any) of shares of restricted stock is determined by the GNC Committee. If the performance goals and other restrictions are not attained, the grantee will automatically forfeit their unvested awards of restricted stock to the Company. Compensation expense for restricted stock is based on fair market value at the grant date.
text: The total compensation expense recorded by the Company in respect of its stock and restricted stock awards to certain employees, officers, directors, and service providers for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $392 and $506, respectively.

Table:
Number of Restricted Stock
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Nonvested as of December 31, 2017
126,808
4.25
1.31
Granted
144,447
3.59
Vested
118,347
3.81
Forfeitures
-
-
Nonvested as of December 31, 2018
152,908
3.96
1.56
Granted
113,012
3.98
Vested
64,535
3.88
Forfeitures
-
-
Nonvested as of December 31, 2019
201,385
4.00
1.95

Questions:
question: What is the percentage of granted restricted stock in total noninvested stock as of December 31, 2018?
answer: 94.47
derivation: 144,447/152,908
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage change in the number of noninvested restricted stock from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 31.7
derivation: (201,385-152,908)/152,908
scale: percent
question: What is the change in the granted restricted stocks from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -31435
derivation: 113,012-144,447
text: MARKET PRICES OF COMMON STOCK
text: The common stock of the Company is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “FEIM.”

Table:
Fiscal Quarter
High Sale
Low Sale
2019
First Quarter
$8.95
$7.30
Second Quarter
11.38
7.80
Third Quarter
13.38
9.60
Fourth Quarter
13.52
10.80
2018
First Quarter
$10.76
$ 7.91
Second Quarter
10.00
7.53
Third Quarter
9.94
8.66
Fourth Quarter
10.59
8.55

Questions:
question: What is the difference in the high and low sale of the first quarter in 2019?
answer: 1.65
derivation: 8.95-7.30
question: What is the average quarterly low sale price for 2019?
answer: 8.88
derivation: (7.30+7.80+9.60+10.80)/4
question: What is the average quarterly high sale price for 2019?
answer: 11.81
derivation: (8.95+11.38+13.38+13.52)/4
text: 16. Segment, Geographic, and Significant Customer Information
text: With the exception of property and equipment, we do not identify or allocate our long-lived assets by geographic area. The following table presents property and equipment information for geographic areas based on the physical location of the assets (in millions):

Table:
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
U.S.
$ 572
$ 566
International
187
190
Total
$ 759
$ 756

Questions: