tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units ("Restricted Stock Awards")
text: As of August 29, 2019, there were 16 million shares of Restricted Stock Awards outstanding, 14 million of which contained only service conditions. For service-based Restricted Stock Awards, restrictions generally lapse in one-fourth or one-third increments during each year of employment after the grant date. Restrictions lapse on Restricted Stock granted in 2019 with performance or market conditions over a three-year period if conditions are met. At the end of the performance period, the number of actual shares to be awarded will vary between 0% and 200% of target amounts, depending upon the achievement level. Restricted Stock Awards activity for 2019 is summarized as follows:

Table:
Number of Shares
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
Outstanding as of August 30, 2018
15
$25.18
Granted
9
41.11
Restrictions lapsed
(6)
24.22
Canceled
(2)
24.79
Outstanding as of August 29, 2019
16
34.72

Questions:
question: What is the percentage change of the number of Restricted Stock Awards shares outstanding from August 30, 2018, to August 29, 2019?
answer: 6.67
derivation: (16-15)/15 
scale: percent
question: What is the Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Share for Granted stocks?
answer: 41.11
text: 16. INCOME TAXES
text: The components of (loss) income before (benefit from) income taxes are:

Table:
(in thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Domestic
$(51,396)
(27,494)
57,493
Foreign
(83,450)
15,951
28,742
(Loss) income before (benefit from) income taxes
$(134,846)
$(11,543)
$86,235

Questions:
text: 15 Goodwill and other intangible assets continued
text: Acquired intangibles
text: The disclosure by class of acquired intangible assets is shown in the tables below.
text: 2019
text: Customer relationships are amortised over their useful economic lives in line with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 1. Within this balance individually material balances relate to Thermocoax £32.6m. The remaining amortisation period is 14.3 years.
text: Brand names and trademark assets are amortised over their useful economic lives in line with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 1. Within this balance individually material balances relate to Chromalox £114.1m (2018: £125.4m), Gestra £28.4m (2018: £32.5m) and Thermocoax £13.6m. The remaining amortisation periods are 17.5 years, 12.3 years and 19.3 years respectively.
text: Manufacturing designs and core technology are amortised over their useful economic lives in line with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 1. Within this balance individually material balances relate to Chromalox £12.9m (2018: £15.1m), Gestra £10.8m (2018: £12.3m) and Aflex £8.5m (2018: £9.4m). The remaining amortisation period is 12.5 years for Chromalox, 12.3 years for Gestra and 10 years for Aflex.
text: Non-compete undertakings are amortised over their useful economic lives in line with the accounting policies disclosed in Note 1. There are no individually material items within this balance.

Table:
Customer relationships
Brand names and trademarks
Manufacturing designs and core technology
Non-compete undertakings and other
Total acquired intangibles
£m
£m
£m
£m
£m
Cost:
At 1st January 2019
57.1
187.3
56.0
20.2
320.6
Exchange and other adjustments
(3.0)
(7.8)
(2.2)
(0.9)
(13.9)
54.1
179.5
53.8
19.3
306.7
Acquisitions
34.9
14.3
7.2
3.8
60.2
At 31st December 2019
89.0
193.8
61.0
23.1
366.9
Amortisation and impairment:
At 1st January 2019
25.1
21.3
14.2
15.6
76.2
Exchange adjustments
(1.3)
(1.1)
(0.6)
(0.8)
(3.8)
23.8
20.2
13.6
14.8
72.4
Amortisation and impairment
7.1
10.4
5.6
3.7
26.8
At 31st December 2019
30.9
30.6
19.2
18.5
99.2
Net book value:
At 31st December 2019
58.1
163.2
41.8
4.6
267.7

Questions:
text: As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the fair value of the 2022 Notes, which was determined based on inputs that are observable in the market or that could be derived from, or corroborated with, observable market data, quoted price of the 2022 Notes in an over-the-counter market (Level 2), and carrying value of debt instruments (carrying value excludes the equity component of the Company’s convertible notes classified in equity) were as follows (in thousands):
text: In connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes, the Company entered into capped call transactions with certain counterparties affiliated with the initial purchasers and others. The capped call transactions are expected to reduce potential dilution of earnings per share upon conversion of the 2022 Notes.
text: Under the capped call transactions, the Company purchased capped call options that in the aggregate relate to the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock underlying the 2022 Notes, with an initial strike price of approximately $33.71 per share, which corresponds to the initial conversion price of the 2022 Notes and is subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the conversion rate of the 2022 Notes, and have a cap price of approximately $47.20.
text: The cost of the purchased capped calls of $12.9 million was recorded to shareholders’ equity and will not be re-measured.
text: Based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $78.08 on December 31, 2019, the if-converted value of the 2022 Notes was more than their respective principal amounts.

Table:
As of December 31,
2019
2018
Fair Value
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Carrying Value
2022 Notes
$215,801
$79,224
$ 189,802
$94,097

Questions:
question: What is the average fair value for the period December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: 202801.5
derivation: (215,801+189,802) / 2
scale: thousand
question: What is the average Carrying Value for the period December 31, 2019 to December 31, 2018?
answer: 86660.5
derivation: (79,224+94,097) / 2
scale: thousand
question: In which year was the 2022 Notes fair value less than 200,000 thousands?
answer: 2018
derivation: locate and analyze 2022 Notes in row 4
text: The pre-tax discount rate used within the recoverable amount calculations was 8.5% (2018: 8.0%) and is based upon the weighted average cost of capital reflecting specific principal risks and uncertainties. The discount rate takes into account the risk-free rate of return, the market risk premium and beta factor reflecting the average beta for the Group and comparator companies which are used in deriving the cost of equity.
text: The same discount rate has been applied to both CGUs as the principal risks and uncertainties associated with the Group, as highlighted on pages 30 to 33, would also impact each CGU in a similar manner. The Board acknowledges that there are additional factors that could impact the risk profile of each CGU, which have been considered by way of sensitivity analysis performed as part of the annual impairment tests.
text: Key drivers to future growth rates are dependent on the Group’s ability to maintain and grow income streams whilst effectively managing operating costs. The level of headroom may change if different growth rate assumptions or a different pre-tax discount rate were used in the cash flow projections. Where the value-in-use calculations suggest an impairment, the Board would consider alternative use values prior to realising any impairment, being the fair value less costs to dispose.
text: The key assumptions used for value-in-use calculations are as follows:
text: Having completed the 2019 impairment review, no impairment has been recognised in relation to the CGUs (2018: no impairment). Sensitivity
analysis has been performed in assessing the recoverable amounts of goodwill. There are no changes to the key assumptions of growth rate or
discount rate that are considered by the Directors to be reasonably possible, which give rise to an impairment of goodwill relating to the CGUs.

Table:
2019
2018
Annual growth rate (after plan period)
3.0%
3.0%
Risk free rate of return
3.0%
3.0%
Market risk premium
5.0%
4.9%
Beta factor
0.83
0.79
Cost of debt
3.3%
3.3%

Questions:
question: In which year was the market risk premium percentage larger?
answer: 2019
derivation: 5.0%>4.9%
question: What was the change in the Beta factor in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 0.04
derivation: 0.83-0.79
question: What was the percentage change in the Beta factor in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 5.06
derivation: (0.83-0.79)/0.79
scale: percent
text: Revenue
text: Both reported and adjusted revenue fell by 1% as growth in our Consumer business, was more than offset by regulated price reductions in Openreach and declines in our enterprise businesses in particular in fixed voice and also reflecting our strategy to reduce low margin activity such as equipment sales. Excluding the negative impact of £35m from foreign exchange movements, underlying revenue fell 0.9% (2017/18: fell 1%), which exceeds our expectation of down around 2%.
text: You can find details of revenue by customer-facing unit on pages 40 to 41. Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements shows a full breakdown of reported revenue by all our major product and service categories.
text: Operating costs
text: Reported operating costs were down 2% and adjustedb operating costs before depreciation and amortisation were down 1%. This was mainly driven by restructuring related cost savings and lower payments to telecommunications operators driven by Global Services strategy to de-emphasise low margin business, partly offset by higher costs of recruiting and training engineers to support Openreach’s ‘Fibre First’ programme and help deliver improved customer service.
text: Our cost transformation programme remains on track. c4,000 roles were removed in the year, with the largest elements being in Global Services and our Corporate Units. Overall savings from the programme are currently an annualised benefit of £875m with an associated cost of £386m. Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements shows a detailed breakdown of our operating costs.
text: Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements shows a detailed breakdown of our operating costs.
text: a Excluding depreciation and amortisation.

Table:
2019
2018
2017
Year ended 31 March
£m
£m
£m
Revenue
23,428
23,723
24,062
Operating costs a
(16,461)
(16,828)
(17,323)
Depreciation and amortisation
(3,546)
(3,514)
(3,572)
Operating profit
3,421
3,381
3,167
Net finance expense
(756)
(764)
(804)
Associates and joint ventures
1
(1)
(9)
Profit before tax
2,666
2,616
2,354
Tax
(507)
(584)
(446)
Profit for the period
2,159
2,032
1,908

Questions:
question: What is the revenue for 2017, 2018 and 2019 respectively?
answer: 24,062
23,723
23,428
scale: million
question: What is the change in the revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -295
derivation: 23,428 - 23,723
scale: million
question: What is the average operating costs for 2017-2019?
answer: -16870.67
derivation: -(16,461 + 16,828 + 17,323) / 3
scale: million
question: What is the average Depreciation and amortisation for 2017-2019?
answer: -3544
derivation: -(3,546 + 3,514 + 3,572) / 3
scale: million
text: (5) Earnings Per Share
text: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing Net earnings attributable to Black Knight by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
text: For the periods presented, potentially dilutive securities include unvested restricted stock awards and the shares of BKFS Class B common stock prior to the Distribution. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the numerator in the diluted net earnings per share calculation is adjusted to reflect our income tax expense at an expected effective tax rate assuming the conversion of the shares of BKFS Class B common stock into shares of BKFS Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis prior to the Distribution. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 was (16.7)%, including the effect of the benefit related to the revaluation of our net deferred income tax liability and certain other discrete items recorded during 2017. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the denominator includes approximately 63.1 million shares of BKFS Class B common stock outstanding prior to the Distribution. The denominator also includes the dilutive effect of approximately 0.9 million, 0.6 million and 0.6 million shares of unvested restricted shares of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
text: The shares of BKFS Class B common stock did not share in the earnings or losses of Black Knight and were, therefore, not participating securities. Accordingly, basic and diluted net earnings per share of BKFS Class B common stock have not been presented.
text: The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in millions, except per share amounts):

Table:
Year ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Basic:
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight
$108.8
$168.5
$182.3
Shares used for basic net earnings per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
147.7
147.6
88.7
Basic net earnings per share
$0.74
$1.14
$2.06
Diluted:
Earnings before income taxes and equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates
$192.4
Income tax benefit excluding the effect of noncontrolling interests
(32.2)
Net earnings
$224.6
Net earnings attributable to Black Knight
$108.8
$168.5
Shares used for diluted net earnings per share:
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
147.7
147.6
88.7
Dilutive effect of unvested restricted shares of common
stock
0.9
0.6
0.6
Weighted average shares of BKFS Class B common stock outstanding
—
—
63.1
Weighted average shares of common stock, diluted
148.6
148.2
152.4
Diluted net earnings per share
$0.73
$1.14
$1.47

Questions:
text: Concentrations
text: The Company may be subject to concentration of credit risk as a result of certain financial instruments consisting of accounts receivable and short term investments. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral in exchange for credit.
text: The following table sets forth major customers accounting for 10% or more of the Company’s net revenue:

Table:
Year Ended
June 30,
2019
June 30,
2018
June 30, 2017
Tech Data Corporation
18%
14%
16%
Jenne Corporation
17%
13%
15%
Westcon Group Inc.
12%
13%
12%

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for major customers accounting for 10% or more of the Company’s net revenue?
answer: 2019
2018
2017
text: 4.3 Operating revenues
text: BCE
text: BCE operating revenues grew by 2.1% in 2019, compared to last year, driven by growth across all three of our segments. Total operating revenues consisted of service revenues of $20,737 million and product revenues of $3,227 million in 2019, up 1.4% and 6.6%, respectively, year over year. Wireless operating revenues grew by 3.7% in 2019, driven by product revenue growth of 6.6% and service revenue growth of 2.5%. Wireline operating revenues grew by 0.7% in 2019 attributable to service revenue growth of 0.4% from higher data revenue, moderated by lower voice revenue, and also reflected higher product revenue of 7.2%. Bell Media revenues increased by 3.1% in 2019 reflecting both higher subscriber and advertising revenues

Table:
2019
2018
$ CHANGE
% CHANGE
Bell Wireless
9,142
8,818
324
3.7%
Bell Wireline
12,356
12,267
89
0.7%
Bell Media
3,217
3,121
96
3.1%
Inter-segment eliminations
(751)
(738)
(13)
(1.8%)
Total BCE operating revenues
23,964
23,468
496
2.1%

Questions:
question: What is the amount of $ CHANGE for Bell Wireless in 2019?
answer: 324
question: What is the percentage of operating revenues for Bell Media out of the total BCE operating revenues in 2019?
answer: 13.42
derivation: 3,217/23,964
scale: percent
question: What is the sum of revenues for Bell Wireless and Bell Wireline in 2018?
answer: 21085
derivation: 8,818+12,267
question: What is the total amount of revenue for Bell Media in 2018 and 2019?
answer: 6338
derivation: 3,217+3,121
text: NOTE 7 – LEASING
text: TORM has leases for the office buildings, some vehicles and other administrative equipment. With the exception of short-term leases and leases of low-value assets, each lease is reflected on the balance sheet as a right-of-use asset with a corresponding lease liability. The right-of-use assets are included in the financial statement line item in which the corresponding underlying assets would be presented if they were owned. Please refer to note 6.
text: As of 31 December 2019, TORM had recognized the following right-of-use assets:

Table:
USDm
Vessels and capitalized dry-docking
Land and buildings
Other plant and operating equipment
Cost:
Balance as of 1 January
43.3
-
-
Adjustment on transition to IFRS 16
-
9.9
0.3
Additions
1.8
0.5
0.4
Disposals
-2.7
-
-0.1
Balance as of 31 December
42.4
10.4
0.6
Depreciation:
Balance as of 1 January
13.4
-
-
Disposals
-2.7
-
-
Depreciation for the year
4.8
2.3
0.2
Balance as of 31 December
15.5
2.3
0.2
Carrying amount as of 31 December
26.9
8.1
0.4

Questions:
question: Which asset type has the largest depreciation of the year?
answer: Vessels and capitalized dry-docking
derivation: 4.8>2.3>0.2
question: What was the change in the depreciation balance as of 31 December from 1 January in 2019 for vessels and capitalized dry-docking?
answer: 2.1
derivation: 15.5-13.4
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in the depreciation balance as of 31 December from 1 January in 2019 for vessels and capitalized dry-docking?
answer: 15.67
derivation: (15.5-13.4)/13.4
scale: percent
text: 10.5. Intangible assets
text: Impairment testing of goodwill
text: Goodwill has been allocated to the listed group (NSR). Management have determined that the listed group, which is considered one operating segment (see note 4), is the appropriate CGU against which to allocate these intangible assets owing to the synergies arising from combining the portfolios of the Group.
text: The recoverable amount of the listed group has been determined based on the fair value less costs of disposal method using the fair value quoted on an active market. As at 1 July 2019, NSR had 773,343,956 stapled securities quoted on the Australian Securities Exchange at $1.745 per security providing a market capitalisation of $1,349.5m.
text: This amount is in excess of the carrying amount of the Group’s net assets at 30 June 2019 which includes the contract for future issue of equity recognised as contributed equity within the statement of financial position at this date (see note 13). Had the security price decreased by 2.5% the market capitalisation would still have been in excess of the carrying amount.

Table:
2019
2018
Notes
$'000
$'000
Goodwill
Opening and closing net book value
43,954
43,954
Other intangible assets
Opening net book value
2,051
1,582
Additions
1,079
864
Amortisation
6
(584)
(395)
Closing net book value
2,546
2,051
Total intangible assets
46,500
46,005

Questions:
question: What is the change in Other intangible assets Opening net book value from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 469
derivation: 2,051-1,582
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Other intangible assets Additions from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 215
derivation: 1,079-864
scale: thousand
question: What is the change in Other intangible assets Amortisation 2018 to 2019?
answer: 189
derivation: 584-395
scale: thousand
text: Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
text: (Amounts in thousands)
text: (1) Fiscal years ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
text: (2) Fiscal year ended March 31, 2018 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.
text: See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table:
Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Net income (1)
$206,587
$254,127
$47,157
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) (2)
(24,065)
35,271
(15,284)
Defined benefit pension plans
(927)
167
163
Defined benefit post-retirement plan adjustments
(86)
(255)
20
Equity interest in investee’s other comprehensive income (loss)
(11)
5,584
1,440
Foreign exchange contracts
(588)
(1,753)
3,274
Excluded component of fair value hedges
(2,249)
—
—
Other comprehensive income (loss) (2)
(27,926)
39,014
(10,387)
Total comprehensive income (1)
$178,661
$293,141
$36,770

Questions:
text: Research and Development
text: Research and development expenses increased $124.3 million, or 53.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018, due to an increase of $114.4 million in employee-related costs ($45.1 million of which related to stock-based compensation and related payroll taxes), a $7.4 million increase in computer hardware and software costs, and a $2.5 million increase in professional services fees, all as a result of growth in our research and development employee base and expanded development programs.
text: Research and development expenses increased $94.7 million, or 69.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017, due to an increase of $89.6 million in employee-related costs, an increase of $3.1 million in computer hardware and software costs, and a $2.0 million increase in professional services fees, all as a result of growth in our research and development employee base and expanded development programs.

Table:
Years ended December 31,
2019 vs 2018
2018 vs 2017
2019
2018
2017
% Change
% Change
(in thousands, except percentages)
Research and development
$ 355,015
$ 230,674
$ 135,997
53.9 %
69.6 %
Percentage of total revenues
22.5 %
21.5 %
20.2 %

Questions:
question: How much is the research and development expenses for the year ended 2019?
answer: $ 355,015
scale: thousand
question: How much is the research and development expenses for the year ended 2018?
answer: $ 230,674
scale: thousand
question: How much is the research and development expenses for the year ended 2017?
answer: $ 135,997
scale: thousand
question: What is the average research and development expenses for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 292844.5
derivation: (355,015+230,674)/2
scale: thousand
question: What is the average research and development expenses for 2017 and 2018?
answer: 183335.5
derivation: (230,674+135,997)/2
scale: thousand
question: Between year ended 2018 and 2019, which year had higher research and development expenses?
answer: 2019
derivation: 355,015> 230,674
text: NOTE 5 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
text: Property, plant and equipment is summarized as follows (in thousands):
text: We do not have leasehold improvements nor do we have capitalized leases. Costs of betterments are capitalized while maintenance costs and repair costs are charged to operations as incurred. When a depreciable asset is retired from service, the cost and accumulated depreciation will be removed from the respective accounts.
text: Depreciation expense was $66 thousand and $73 thousand for each of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Table:
December 31,
2019
2018
Building and improvements
$1,273
$1,273
Scientific equipment
597
598
Computer hardware and software
106
107
Machinery and equipment
274
275
Land and improvements
162
162
Other personal property
70
70
Office equipment
27
27
2,509
2,512
Less: accumulated depreciation
(1,969)
(1,906)
Total property, plant and equipment, net
$ 540
$ 606

Questions:
question: What is the percentage decrease in Net Total Property, Plant and Equipment from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 10.89
derivation: (606 - 540) / 606 
scale: percent
text: DEVELOPMENT OF EMPLOYEE NUMBERS BY SEGMENTS
text: By headcount1 as of closing date of 30/9
text: 1 Excluding METRO China.

Table:
2018
2019
METRO
92,603
89,574
METRO Germany
13,711
13,606
METRO Western Europe (excl.Germany)
27,207
27,227
METRO Russia
13,960
12,357
METRO Eastern Europe (excl.Russia)
29,060
28,375
METRO Asia
8,665
8,009
Others
7,008
7,152
METROAG
909
880
Total
100,520
97,606

Questions:
question: In which year was the amount in METRO Asia headcount larger?
answer: 2018
derivation: 8,665>8,009
question: What was the change in METRO AG headcount in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -29
derivation: 880-909
question: What was the percentage change in METRO AG headcount in 2019 from 2018?
answer: -3.19
derivation: (880-909)/909
scale: percent