tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Net Pool Allocation: Net pool allocation decreased by $22.1 million, from a positive $17.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 to a negative $4.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease in net pool allocation was attributable to the movement in the adjustment of the net pool results generated by the GasLog vessels in accordance with the pool distribution formula for the total fleet of the pool, as well as GasLog’s vessels exiting the Cool Pool in June and July 2019. GasLog recognized gross revenues and gross voyage expenses and commissions of $45.3 million and $8.1 million, respectively, from the operation of its vessels in the Cool Pool during the year ended December 31, 2019 (December 31, 2018: $102.3 million and $10.2 million, respectively). GasLog’s total net pool performance is presented below:
text: Voyage Expenses and Commissions: Voyage expenses and commissions increased by 16.7%, or $3.4 million, from $20.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 to $23.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in voyage expenses and commissions is mainly attributable to an increase of $3.4 million in bunkers and voyage expenses consumed during certain unchartered and off-hire periods for the vessels trading in the spot market.

Table:
For the year ended
2018
2019
Amounts in thousands of U.S. Dollars
Pool gross revenues (included in Revenues)
102,253
45,253
Pool gross voyage expenses and commissions (included in Voyage expenses and commissions)
(10,154)
(8,086)
GasLog’s adjustment for net pool allocation (included in Net pool allocation)
17,818
(4,264)
GasLog’s total net pool performance
109,917
32,903

Questions:
question: Which year was the pool gross revenues higher?
answer: 2018
derivation: 102,253 > 45,253
question: What is the change in pool gross revenues from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -57000
derivation: 45,253 - 102,253 
scale: thousand
question: What is the percentage change in total net pool performance from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -70.07
derivation: (32,903 - 109,917)/109,917 
scale: percent
text: Information as to Teradyne’s revenues by country is as follows:
text: (1) Revenues attributable to a country are based on location of customer site.
text: In 2019 and 2018, no single direct customer accounted for more than 10% of Teradyne’s consolidated revenues. In 2017, revenues from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. accounted for 13% of its consolidated revenues. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. is a customer of Teradyne’s Semiconductor Test segment. Teradyne estimates consolidated revenues driven by Huawei Technologies Co.Ltd. (“Huawei”), combining direct sales to that customer with sales to the customer’s OSATs, accounted for approximately 11% and 4% of its consolidated revenues in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Teradyne estimates consolidated revenues driven by another OEM customer, combining direct sales to that customer with sales to the customer’s OSATs (which include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.), accounted for approximately 10%, 13% and 22% of its consolidated revenues in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Table:
2019
2018
2017
(in thousands)
Revenues from customers (1):
China
$514,327
$348,942
$260,451
Taiwan
485,681
516,322
687,031
United States
333,059
282,869
252,516
Korea
239,504
163,224
206,819
Europe
219,015
223,207
163,715
Japan
175,322
158,281
169,093
Thailand
87,503
59,184
29,566
Singapore
84,111
108,618
101,085
Malaysia
58,200
122,797
124,048
Philippines
54,560
77,996
105,850
Rest of the World
43,683
39,362
36,432
$2,294,965
$2,100,802
$2,136,606

Questions:
question: How many different locations are listed in the table?
answer: 11
derivation: China##Taiwan##United States##Korea##Europe##Japan##Thailand##Singapore##Malaysia##Philippines##Rest of the World
question: What was the change in Rest of the World in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 4321
derivation: 43,683-39,362
scale: thousand
question: What was the percentage change in Rest of the World in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 10.98
derivation: (43,683-39,362)/39,362
scale: percent
text: Intellectual Property and Custom Development Income
text: Licensing of intellectual property including royalty-based fees decreased 49.2 percent in 2019 compared to 2018. This was primarily due to a decline in new partnership agreements compared to the prior year. The timing and amount of licensing, sales or other transfers of IP may vary significantly from period to period depending upon the timing of licensing agreements, economic conditions, industry consolidation and the timing of new patents and know-how development.

Table:
($ in millions)
Percent
For the year ended December 31:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent Change
Licensing of intellectual property including royalty-based fees
$367
$723
(43.2)%
Custom development income
246
275
(10.5)
Sales/other transfers of intellectual property
34
28
22.6
Total
$648
$1,026
(36.9)%

Questions:
question: What was the Custom development income in 2018?
answer: 275
scale: million
question: What was the Licensing of intellectual property including royalty-based fees average?
answer: 545
derivation: (367 + 723) / 2
scale: million
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the Custom development income from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -29
derivation: 246 - 275
scale: million
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the Sales/other transfers of intellectual property from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 6
derivation: 34 - 28
scale: million
text: AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Tabular amounts in millions, unless otherwise disclosed) net foreign currency losses
text: (“AOCL”) in the consolidated balance sheets and included as a component of Comprehensive income in the consolidated
statements of comprehensive income.
text: Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are reflected in Other expense in the consolidated statements of operations. However, the effect from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on intercompany debt for which repayment is not anticipated in the foreseeable future is reflected in AOCL in the consolidated balance sheets and included as a component of Comprehensive income.
text: The Company recorded the following net foreign currency losses:

Table:
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Foreign currency losses recorded in AOCL
$45.8
$385.8
$51.6
Foreign currency (gains) losses recorded in Other expense
(6.1)
4.5
(26.4)
Total foreign currency losses
$39.7
$390.3
$25.2

Questions:
question: What was the total percentage change in Total foreign currency losses between 2017 and 2019?
answer: 57.54
derivation: ($39.7-$25.2)/$25.2
scale: percent
text: Stock Options
text: Stock options are granted with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of Leidos' common stock on the date of grant and for terms not greater than ten years. Stock options have a term of seven years and a vesting period of four years, except for stock options granted to the Company's outside directors, which have a vesting period of the earlier of one year from grant date or the next annual meeting of stockholders following grant date.
text: The fair value of the Company's stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes- Merton option-pricing model. The fair value of the Company's stock option awards to employees are expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of four years, except for stock options granted to the Company's outside directors, which is recognized over the vesting period of one year or less.
text: During fiscal 2017, the Company ceased the usage of peer group volatility, as an input into its blended approach to measure expected volatility, and increased the reliance on historical volatility. The revised blended approach includes the Company's weighted average historical and implied volatilities. The Company continued the use of this approach during fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019.
text: The risk-free rate is derived using the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a maturity equal to the expected term of the stock option on the grant date. During fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2018, Leidos utilized the simplified method for the expected term, which represented an appropriate period of time that the options granted were expected to remain outstanding between the weighted-average vesting period and end of the respective contractual term.
text: Upon re-examining the Company's exercise history, the methodology used to calculate the expected term changed in fiscal 2019. Based on actual historical settlement data, the midpoint scenario is utilized with a one-year grant date filter assumption for outstanding options. The Company uses historical data to estimate forfeitures and was derived in the same manner as in the prior years presented.
text: The weighted average grant-date fair value and assumptions used to determine fair value of stock options granted for the periods presented were as follows:

Table:
Year Ended
January 3, 2020
December 28, 2018
December 29, 2017
Weighted average grant-date fair value
$11.89
$13.85
$11.53
Expected term (in years)
4.4
4.7
4.7
Expected volatility
24.3%
26.6%
29.7%
Risk-free interest rate
2.4%
2.6%
1.9%
Dividend yield
2.2%
2.0%
2.5%

Questions:
question: What was the Weighted average grant-date fair value in 2018 and 2017 respectively?
answer: $13.85
$11.53
question: In which year was Weighted average grant-date fair value less than 13.00?
answer: 2020
2017
derivation: locate and analyze Weighted average grant-date fair value in row 4
question: What was the average Expected volatility in 2018 and 2017?
answer: 28.15
derivation: (26.6 + 29.7) / 2
scale: percent
question: What was the change in the Risk-free interest rate from 2017 to 2018?
answer: 0.7
derivation: 2.6 - 1.9
scale: percent
text: As stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, expense for grants beginning upon adoption on October 1, 2005 has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The forfeiture rates for the years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were based on actual forfeitures.
text: No cash was used to settle equity instruments granted under share-base payment arrangements in any of the years in the two-year period ended September 30, 2019.
text: The following tables provide summary data of stock option award activity:

Table:
Number of shares
Weighted average exercise price
Weighted average remaining contractual term
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at September 30, 2017
9,376
4.49
-
-
Granted
-
-
-
-
Expired
(1,250)
6.82
-
-
Forfeited
-
-
-
-
Exercised
(4,626)
4.67
-
-
Outstanding at September 30, 2018
3,500
$3.42
-
-
Granted
-
-
-
-
Expired
(500)
$2.99
-
-
Forfeited
-
-
-
-
Exercised
(1,000)
2.99
-
-
Outstanding at September 30, 2019
2,000
$3.75
.98 years
$19
Exercisable at September 30, 2019
2,000
$3.75
.98 years
$19
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2019
2,000
$3.75
.98 years
$19

Questions:
question: What is the number of outstanding shares as at September 30, 2017?
answer: 9,376
scale: thousand
question: What is the number of shares vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2019
answer: 2,000
scale: thousand
question: What is the amount lost from the expired shares in 2017?
answer: 8525
derivation: 1,250 * 6.82 
scale: thousand
question: What is the total number of expired shares in 2017 and 2018?
answer: 1750
derivation: 1,250 + 500 
question: What is the percentage of outstanding shares as at September 30, 2019 expired between September 30, 2018 and 2019?
answer: 25
derivation: 500/2,000 
scale: percent
text: Stock-based Compensation Expense
text: The income tax benefit related to share-based compensation was $66 million, $158 million and $97 million for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The income tax benefits related to share-based compensation for the periods presented prior to the second quarter of 2018 were offset by an increase in the U.S. valuation allowance. Stock-based compensation expense of $30 million and $19 million was capitalized and remained in inventory as of August 29, 2019 and August 30, 2018, respectively. As of August 29, 2019, $439 million of total unrecognized compensation costs for unvested awards, before the effect of any future forfeitures, was expected to be recognized through the fourth quarter of 2023, resulting in a weighted-average period of 1.3 years.

Table:
For the year ended
2019
2018
2017
Stock-based compensation expense by caption
Cost of goods sold
$102
$83
$88
Selling, general, and administrative
73
61
75
Research and development
68
54
52
$243
$198
$215
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award
Restricted stock awards
$178
$140
$144
Stock options
33
55
71
ESPP
32
3
—
$243
$198
$215

Questions:
text: NOTE 14 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND VENDORS (CONTINUED)
text: Our accounts receivable includes 3 customers that individually make up more than 10% of our accounts receivable at December 31, 2019 in the percentages of 17.8%, 15.4% and 13.3%.
text: The Company had four key partners through which 10% or greater of its revenue was generated in either 2019 or 2018 as set forth below. The amounts in the table below reflect the amount of revenue generated through those customers.

Table:
2019
2018
$
%  
$
% 
Partner A  
1,315,706
5.3
6,841,386
32.3
Partner B  
9,210,347
37.4
5,350,393
25.2
Partner C  
4,051,217
16.5
2,584,103
12.2
Partner D  
1,007,573
4.1
2,159,356
10.2

Questions:
question: What are the amounts of revenue generated from Partner B in 2018 and 2019, respectively?
answer: 5,350,393
9,210,347
question: What are the amounts of revenue generated from Partner A in 2018 and 2019, respectively?
answer: 6,841,386
1,315,706
question: What is the percentage change in revenue generated from Partner C from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 56.77
derivation: (4,051,217-2,584,103)/2,584,103 
scale: percent
question: Which partner contributed the highest revenue to the Company in 2018?
answer: Partner A
derivation: 6,841,386>5,350,393>2,584,103>2,159,356
question: What is the average revenue generated from Partner D in the last 2 years, i.e. 2018 and 2019?
answer: 1583464.5
derivation: (1,007,573+2,159,356)/2
text: Net Sales
text: The following table presents our net sales and the percentage of total net sales by segment:

Table:
Fiscal
2019
2018
($ in millions)
Transportation Solutions
$  7,821
58 %
$ 8,290
59 %
Industrial Solutions
3,954
30
3,856
28
Communications Solutions
1,673
12
1,842
13
Total
$ 13,448
100 %
$ 13,988
100 %

Questions:
question: In which year was Industrial Solutions larger?
answer: 2019
derivation: 3,954>3,856
question: What was the change in Industrial Solutions in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 98
derivation: 3,954-3,856
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in Industrial Solutions in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 2.54
derivation: (3,954-3,856)/3,856
scale: percent
text: Stock Appreciation Rights Awards
text: During the second quarter of fiscal 2019, in connection with the completion of the Pinnacle acquisition, we granted 2.3 million cash-settled stock appreciation rights with a fair value estimated at closing date using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model and a grant date price of $36.37 per share to Pinnacle employees in replacement of their unvested stock option awards that were outstanding as of the closing date. Approximately $14.8 million of the fair value of the replacement awards granted to Pinnacle employees was attributable to pre-combination service and was included in the purchase price and established as a liability. As of May 26, 2019, the liability of the replacement stock appreciation rights was $0.9 million, which includes post-combination service expense, the mark-to-market of the liability, and the impact of payouts since acquisition.
text: The compensation income for our cash-settled stock appreciation rights totaled $13.7 million for fiscal 2019. Included in this amount is income of $14.0 million related to the mark-to-market of the liability established in connection with the Pinnacle acquisition and expense of $0.2 million for accelerated vesting of awards related to Pinnacle integration restructuring activities, net of the impact of marking-to-market these awards based on a lower market price of Conagra common shares. The related tax expense for fiscal 2019 was $3.4 million.
text: A summary of the stock appreciation rights activity as of May 26, 2019 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below:

Table:
Number of Options (in Millions)
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in Millions)
Granted
2.3
$27.09
Exercised
(0.1)
$24.79
$0.1
Expired
(1.8)
$26.92
Outstanding at May 26, 2019
0.4
$28.13
0.16
$0.6
Exercisable at May 26, 2019
0.4
$28.13
0.16
$0.6

Questions:
question: What was the total intrinsic value of exercisable stock appreciation rights during fiscal 2019?
answer: $0.6
scale: million
question: What is the total price of exercised and expired stocks?
answer: 50.94
derivation: (0.1*24.79)+(1.8*26.92) 
scale: million
question: What is the ratio of granted stocks to exercisable stocks?
answer: 5.75
derivation: 2.3/0.4 
question: What is the proportion of exercised and expired stocks over granted stocks?
answer: 0.83
derivation: (0.1+1.8)/2.3
text: 7 Employee benefits
text: Pension plans
text: The Company is accounting for pension costs in accordance with International Accounting Standard 19.
text: The disclosures shown here are in respect of the Company’s defined benefit obligations. Other plans operated by the Company were defined contribution plans.
text: The total expense relating to the Company’s defined contribution pension plans in the current year was £0.7m (2018: £0.6m).
text: At 31st December 2019 the post-retirement mortality assumptions in respect of the Company Defined Benefit Scheme follows 85%/96% (male/female) of SAPS S2, CMI 2017 projections with a long term trend of 1.25% p.a. At 31st December 2018 the postretirement mortality assumptions in respect of the Company Defined Benefit Scheme follows 85% of SAPS S2 Light base table for males and 96% of SAPS S2 base table for females with CMI Core Projection Model 2016 improvements commencing in 2007, subject to a 1.25% p.a. long-term trend. These assumptions are regularly reviewed in light of scheme-specific experience and more widely available statistics.
text: The financial assumptions used at 31st December were:
text: The assumptions used by the actuary are the best estimates chosen from a range of possible actuarial assumptions, which due to the timescale covered, may not necessarily be borne out in practice.

Table:
Weighted-average assumptions used to define the benefit obligations
2019
2018
%
%
Rate of increase in salaries
2.4
2.7
Rate of increase in pensions
2.8
2.9
Rate of price inflation
2.9
3.2
Discount rate
2.1
2.7

Questions:
question: In which year was the discount rate larger?
answer: 2018
derivation: 2.7%>2.1%
question: What was the absolute percentage change in the rate of price inflation from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -0.3
derivation: 2.9%-3.2%
scale: percent
question: What was the absolute percentage change in the discount rate from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -0.6
derivation: 2.1%-2.7%
scale: percent
text: 11. Taxation
text: The taxation charge for the year is lower than (2018: the same as) the effective rate of corporation tax in the UK of 19% (2018: 19%). The differences are explained below:
text: Taxation on items taken directly to equity was a credit of £0.6m (2018: £0.1m) relating to tax on share-based payments.
text: The tax charge for the year is based on the standard rate of UK corporation tax for the period of 19% (2018: 19%). Deferred income taxes have been measured at the tax rate expected to be applicable at the date the deferred income tax assets and liabilities are realised. Management has performed an assessment, for all material deferred income tax assets and liabilities, to determine the period over which the deferred income tax assets and liabilities are forecast to be realised, which has resulted in an average deferred income tax rate of 17% being used to measure all deferred tax balances as at 31 March 2019 (2018: 17%).

Table:
2019
(Restated) 2018
£m
£m
Profit before taxation
242.2
210.7
Tax on profit on ordinary activities at the standard UK corporation tax rate of 19% (2018: 19%)
46.0
40.0
Expenses not deductible for taxation purposes
0.3
0.8
Income not taxable
(1.7)
–
Adjustments in respect of foreign tax rates
(0.1)
(0.1)
Adjustments in respect of prior years
–
(1.1)
Total taxation charge
44.5
39.6

Questions:
question: In which year was Expenses not deductible for taxation purposes larger?
answer: 2018
derivation: 0.8>0.3
question: What was the change in Total taxation charge in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 4.9
derivation: 44.5-39.6
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in Total taxation charge in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 12.37
derivation: (44.5-39.6)/39.6
scale: percent
text: 6. Supplemental Financial Information
text: Cash and cash equivalents (in millions):
text: The following table presents cash and cash equivalents as reported in our consolidated balance sheets, as well as the sum of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as reported on our consolidated statement of cash flows in accordance with our adoption of the ASU discussed in Note 1 – Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies.

Table:
April 26, 2019
April 26, 2018
Cash
$ 2,216
$ 2,727
Cash equivalents
109
214
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 2,325
$ 2,941
Short-term restricted cash
5
5
Long-term restricted cash
1
1
Restricted cash
$ 6
$ 6
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
$ 2,331
$ 2,947

Questions: