tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Provision for Income Taxes
text: The effective income tax rate is calculated by dividing the provision for income taxes by income before income taxes. The effective income tax rate for 2019 was 13.0% compared to 18.3% for 2018.
text: The decrease in the effective income tax rate and the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the recognition of approximately $2.2 billion of a non-recurring tax benefit in connection with the disposition of preferred stock, representing a minority interest in a foreign affiliate in 2019 compared to the non-recurring deferred tax benefit of approximately $2.1 billion as a result of an internal reorganization of legal entities within the historical Wireless business, which was offset by a goodwill charge that is not deductible for tax purposes in 2018.
text: A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the effective income tax rate for each period is included in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.

Table:
(dollars in millions) Increase/ (Decrease)
Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2019 vs. 2018
Provision for income taxes
$2,945
$ 3,584
$ (639)
(17.8)%
Effective income tax rate
13.0%
18.3%

Questions:
question: What is the change in Provision for income taxes from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -639
derivation: 2,945-3,584
scale: million
question: What is the change in Effective income tax rate from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -5.3
derivation: 13.0-18.3
scale: percent
question: What is the average Effective income tax rate for 2018 and 2019?
answer: 15.65
derivation: (13.0+18.3) / 2
scale: percent
text: Substantial shareholdings
text: The voting rights in the table below have been determined in accordance with the requirements of the UK Listing Authority’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules DTR 5, and represent 3% or more of the voting rights attached to issued shares in the Company as at 28th February 2020 and 31st December 2019. There are no Controlling Founder Shareholders.

Table:
As at 31.12.19
As at 28.02.20
Substantial shareholdings
Number of Ordinary shares
% of issued share capital
Number of Ordinary shares
% of issued share capital
The Capital Group Companies, Inc.
6,584,006
8.9%
6,598,428
8.9%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
5,566,823
7.5%
5,481,561
7.4%
BlackRock, Inc.
4,624,204
6.3%
4,913,790
6.7%
Fiera Capital Corporation
4,764,251
6.5%
4,768,688
6.5%
APG Groep N.V.
4,068,000
5.5%
4,068,000
5.5%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
2,569,081
3.5%
2,637,287
3.6%

Questions:
question: What are the companies under substantial shareholdings in the table?
answer: The Capital Group Companies, Inc.
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
BlackRock, Inc.
Fiera Capital Corporation
APG Groep N.V.
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
question: Which company has the largest % of issued share capital as at 28.02.20?
answer: The Capital Group Companies, Inc.
derivation: 8.9%>7.4%>6.7%>6.5%>5.5%>3.6%
question: What was the change in the number of ordinary shares for BlackRock, Inc. in 2020 from 2019?
answer: 289586
derivation: 4,913,790-4,624,204
question: What was the percentage change in the number of ordinary shares for BlackRock, Inc. in 2020 from 2019?
answer: 6.26
derivation: (4,913,790-4,624,204)/4,624,204
scale: percent
text: 11. Reportable Segments, Geographic Information and Major Customers
text: Reportable segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or group, in assessing performance and allocating resources. The Company uses an internal management reporting system, which provides important financial data to evaluate performance and allocate the Company’s resources on a regional basis. Net sales for the segments are attributed to the region in which the product is manufactured or the service is performed. The services provided, manufacturing processes used, class of customers serviced and order fulfillment processes used are similar and generally interchangeable across the segments. A segment’s performance is evaluated based upon its operating income (loss). A segment’s operating income (loss) includes its net sales less cost of sales and selling and administrative expenses, but excludes corporate and other expenses. Corporate and other expenses  fiscal 2019 and the $13.5 million one-time employee bonus paid to full-time, non-executive employees during fiscal 2018 due to the Company's ability to access overseas cash as a result of Tax Reform (the "one-time employee bonus"). These costs are not allocated to the segments, as management excludes such costs when assessing the performance of the segments. Inter-segment transactions are generally recorded at amounts that approximate arm’s length transactions. The accounting policies for the segments are the same as for the Company taken as a whole.
text: Information about the Company’s three reportable segments for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows (in thousands):

Table:
2019
2018
2017
Depreciation:      
AMER 
$22,531
$21,224
$19,694
APAC 
16,905
15,954
15,588
EMEA 
6,105
6,054
5,467
Corporate 
5,344
4,863
4,581
50,885
48,095
45,330
Capital expenditures:
AMER
$42,459
$17,690
$18,111
APAC
33,454
33,018
13,816
EMEA
5,186
7,923
5,748
Corporate
9,501
4,149
863
$90,600
$62,780
$38,538

Questions:
text: NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
text: NOTE 18 — Income Taxes
text: Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

Table:
As of December 31,
2019
2018
Post-retirement benefits
$1,100
$1,061
Inventory reserves
708
1,236
Loss carry-forwards
4,724
4,647
Credit carry-forwards
15,964
16,909
Accrued expenses
4,932
5,685
Research expenditures
17,953
16,847
Operating lease liabilities
6,211
—
Stock compensation
2,232
2,142
Foreign exchange loss
1,986
2,245
Other
230
207
Gross deferred tax assets
56,040
50,979
Depreciation and amortization
12,453
11,500
Pensions
13,552
11,736
Operating lease assets
5,963
—
Subsidiaries' unremitted earnings
1,903
1,258
Gross deferred tax liabilities
33,871
24,494
Net deferred tax assets
22,169
26,485
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
(8,011)
(8,274)
Total net deferred tax assets
$14,158
$18,211

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in the Gross deferred tax assets between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 9.93
derivation: (56,040-50,979)/50,979
scale: percent
text: Sales by Category
text: In addition to the above reporting segments, we also report revenue for the following three categories – (1) Access & Aggregation, (2) Subscriber Solutions & Experience and (3) Traditional & Other Products.
text: The following tables disaggregates our revenue by major source for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
text: (1) Subscriber Solutions & Experience was formerly reported as Customer Devices. With the increasing focus on enhancing the customer experience for both our business and consumer broadband customers and the addition of SmartRG during the fourth quarter of 2018, Subscriber Solutions & Experience more accurately represents this revenue category.

Table:
2019
(In thousands)
Network Solutions
Services & Support
Total
Access & Aggregation
$289,980
$58,894
$348,874
Subscriber Solutions & Experience (1)
144,651
8,269
152,920
Traditional & Other Products
20,595
7,672
28,267
Total
$455,226
$74,835
$530,061

Questions:
text: MEDIA FINANCIAL RESULTS
text: REVENUE
Media revenue is earned from:
text: • advertising sales across its television, radio, and digital media properties; • subscriptions to televised and OTT products; • ticket sales, fund redistribution and other distributions from MLB, and concession sales; and • retail product sales.
text: The 4% decrease in revenue this year was a result of: • the sale of our publishing business in the second quarter of 2019; and • lower revenue at the Toronto Blue Jays, primarily as a result of a distribution from Major League Baseball in 2018; partially offset by • higher revenue generated by Sportsnet and TSC. Excluding the sale of our publishing business and the impact of the distribution from Major League Baseball last year, Media revenue would have increased by 1% this year.
text: OPERATING EXPENSES
We record Media operating expenses in four primary categories:
text: • the cost of broadcast content, including sports programming
and production;
• Toronto Blue Jays player compensation;
• the cost of retail products sold; and
• all other expenses involved in day-to-day operations.
text: The 2% decrease in operating expenses this year was a result of:
• lower Toronto Blue Jays player compensation; and
• lower publishing-related costs due to the sale of this business;
partially offset by
• higher programming costs; and
• higher cost of sales as a result of higher revenue at TSC.
text: ADJUSTED EBITDA
The 29% decrease in adjusted EBITDA this year was a result of the
revenue and expense changes described above. Excluding the
impact of the sale of our publishing business in the second quarter
of 2019 and the distribution from Major League Baseball last year,
adjusted EBITDA would have increased by 1% this year.

Table:
Years ended December 31
(In millions of dollars, except margins)
2019
2018
%Chg
Revenue
2,072
2,168
(4)
Operating expenses
1,932
1,972
(2)
Adjusted EBITDA
140
196
(29)
Adjusted EBITDA margin
6.8%
9.0%
(2.2pts)
Capital expenditures
102
90
13

Questions:
question: What were the revenues in 2019 and 2018?
answer: 2,072
2,168
scale: million
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in revenue from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -96
derivation: 2,072 - 2,168
scale: million
question: What was the average Operating Expenses?
answer: 1952
derivation: (1,932 + 1,972) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the increase / (decrease) in Adjusted EBITDA from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -56
derivation: 140 - 196
scale: million
text: 10. Tax
text: The tax charge for the year ended 31 December 2019 was $11.6 million (2018 $5.4 million). This was after a prior year tax charge of $0.1 million and a tax credit on the adjusting items of $0.7 million (2018 prior year credit of $1.5 million and tax credit on adjusting items of $5.2 million). Excluding the prior year and tax credit on adjusting items, the effective tax rate was 13.0 per cent (2018 15.4 per cent).

Table:
2019
2018
$ million
$ million
Tax charge in the income statement
Current income tax
UK tax
0.3
0.1
Foreign tax
9.2
6.2
Amounts underprovided/(overprovided) in previous years
0.3
(1.2)
Total current income tax charge
9.8
5.1
Deferred tax
Recognition of deferred tax assets
(1.5)
(0.8)
Reversal of temporary differences
3.5
1.4
Adjustments in respect of prior years
(0.2)
(0.3)
Total deferred tax charge
1.8
0.3
Tax charge in the income statement
11.6
5.4

Questions:
question: Which are the broad categories of tax considered in the tax charge in the income statement?
answer: Current income tax
Deferred tax
question: In which year was the UK tax larger?
answer: 2019
derivation: 0.3>0.1
text: Deferred Revenue
text: The following table summarizes contract liabilities which are shown as deferred revenue (in thousands):
text: Total deferred revenue increased primarily due to the extended duration period of new maintenance contracts during fiscal year 2019.

Table:
June 30,
2019
June 30,
2018
Deferred maintenance
$192,955
$164,986
Other deferred revenue  
10,287
9,539
Total deferred revenue, net  
203,242
174,525
Less: current portion  
144,230
130,865
Non-current deferred revenue, net
$59,012
$43,660

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in the net Non-current deferred revenue between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 35.16
derivation: (59,012-43,660)/43,660
scale: percent
text: Note 3 – Inventories, net
text: Inventories consisted of the following:

Table:
December 31,
2019
2018
Ingredients
$ 1,942
$ 1,580
Packaging
2,230
2,072
Finished goods
2,220
2,165
Total inventories, net
$ 6,392
$ 5,817

Questions:
question: What is the value of ingredients in 2019?
answer: 1,942
question: What is the value of packaging in 2019?
answer: 2,230
question: What is the value of finished goods in 2019?
answer: 2,220
question: What is the percentage change in ingredients between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 22.91
derivation: (1,942-1,580)/1,580
scale: percent
question: What is the change in finished goods between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 55
derivation: 2,220-2,165
question: What is the average value of packaging for years 2018 and 2019?
answer: 2151
derivation: (2,230+2,072)/2
text: 6. Income Taxes
text: Income tax expense (benefit) for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in thousands):

Table:
2019
2018
2017
Current:
Federal 
$15,160
$63,814
$78
State 
—
234
33
Foreign 
11,943
10,134
10,016
27,103
74,182
10,127
Deferred:
Federal 
(3,498)
(2,958)
77
State 
827
(447)
38
Foreign 
(7,093)
23,793
(481)
(9,764)
20,388
(366)
$17,339
$94,570
$9,761

Questions:
text: Non-Management Director Compensation in Fiscal 2019
text: The non-management directors received the following compensation during fiscal 2019:
text: (1) This column represents the fair value of the stock award on the grant date determined in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718. As per SEC rules relating to executive compensation disclosure, the amounts shown exclude the impact of forfeitures related to service based vesting conditions. For additional information regarding assumptions made in calculating the amount reflected in this column, please refer to Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2019.
text: (2) Dividend equivalent payments on unvested restricted stock.

Table:
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($) (1)
Option Awards ($)
All Other Compensation ($) (2)
Total ($)
Robert D. Rosenthal
95,000
40,000
-
25,900
160,900
Chad M. Lindbloom
95,00
40,000
-
13,800
148,800
Paul S. Pearlman
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850
Lawrence Reinhold
65,000
40,000
-
850
105,850

Questions:
text: Operating income in the Industrial Solutions segment increased $78 million in fiscal 2019 from fiscal 2018. The Industrial Solutions segment’s operating income included the following:
text: Excluding these items, operating income increased in fiscal 2019 primarily as a result of higher volume and improved manufacturing productivity.

Table:
Fiscal
2019
2018
(in millions)
Acquisition-related charges:
Acquisition and integration costs
$  10
$  6
Charges associated with the amortization of acquisition-related fair value adjustments
3
4
13
10
Restructuring and other charges, net
63
80
Other items
2
—
Total
$  78
$  90

Questions:
question: In which year was Acquisition and integration costs larger?
answer: 2019
derivation: 10>6
question: What was the change in Acquisition and integration costs in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 4
derivation: 10-6
scale: million
question: What was the percentage change in Acquisition and integration costs in 2019 from 2018?
answer: 66.67
derivation: (10-6)/6
scale: percent
text: Note 4 – Fair Value Measurements
text: Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
text: The Company’s contingent earn-out liabilities are measured at fair value. These liabilities were estimated using Level 3 inputs. The fair value of contingent consideration was determined based on a probability-based approach which includes projected results, percentage probability of occurrence and the application of a discount rate to present value the payments. A significant change in projected results, discount rate, or probabilities of occurrence could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. Changes in the fair value of contingent earn-out liabilities are reflected in operating expenses on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.
text: The following table presents the changes in Level 3 contingent earn-out liabilities:
text: In May 2019, the Company fully settled its Del Monte earn-out liability for $200. The long-term portion of contingent earn-out liabilities was $7,957 and $2,792 as of December 27, 2019 and December 28, 2018, respectively, and are reflected as other liabilities and deferred credits on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The remaining short-term portion of earn-out liabilities are reflected as accrued liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Contingent earn-out liability payments in excess of the acquisition date fair value of the underlying contingent earn-out liability are classified as operating activities on the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows and all other such payments are classified as financing activities.

Table:
Del Monte 
Fells Point 
Bassian 
Other Acquisitions
Total
Balance December 29, 2017
$649
$4,579
$—
$—
$5,228
Acquisition value
—
—
—
1,414
1,414
Cash payments
—
(3,000)
—
—
(3,000)
Changes in fair value
(649)
2,070
—
27
1,448
Balance December 28, 2018
—
3,649
—
1,441
5,090
Acquisition value
—
—
7,450
479
7,929
Cash payments
(200)
(3,000)
—
(1,000)
(4,200)
Changes in fair value
200
3,895
507
1,277
5,879
Balance December 27, 2019
$—
$4,544
$7,957
$2,197
$14,698

Questions:
question: What is the total Balance in December 29, 2017?
answer: $5,228
question: What is the change in total balance between fiscal years 2017 and 2018?
answer: 138
derivation: 5,228-5,090
text: NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
text: The components of the prepaid (accrued) cost of the domestic and foreign pension plans are classified in the following lines in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31:

Table:
U.S.Pension Plans
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
2019
2018
2019
2018
Prepaid pension asset
$62,082
$54,100
$—
$—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
(100)
(100)
—
—
Long-term pension obligations
(1,045)
(992)
(1,214)
(1,331)
Net prepaid (accrued) cost
$60,937
$53,008
$(1,214)
$(1,331)

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in Long-term pension obligations for U.S. Pension Plans between 2018 and 2019?
answer: 5.34
derivation: (-1,045-(992))/-992
scale: percent
text: Net Income (Loss) Per Share
text: The Company calculates net income (loss) per share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260,Earnings per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share also gives effect to all potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period, such as restricted stock units (“RSUs”), stock options, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") shares, if dilutive. In a period with a net loss position, potentially dilutive securities are not included in the computation of diluted net loss because to do so would be antidilutive, and the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted net loss is the same.
text: For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the following potentially dilutive common shares were excluded from the net income (loss)
per share calculation, as they would have been antidilutive (amounts in thousands):

Table:
2019
2018
2017
Stock options
1,687
2,806
569
RSUs
2,352
2,580
83
ESPP common stock equivalents
74
71
—
ID Checker earnout shares
—
—
24
Total potentially dilutive common shares outstanding
4,113
5,457
676

Questions:
question: What is the percentage change in the amount of potentially dilutive common shares outstanding of ESPP common stock equivalents from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 4.23
derivation: (74-71)/71 
scale: percent
question: What is the ratio of the amount of stock options between 2018 to 2019?
answer: 1.66
derivation: 2,806/1,687
text: * 2019 results were impacted by Red Hat purchase accounting and acquisition-related activity.
text: Total expense and other (income) increased 13.7 percent in the fourth quarter with an expense-to-revenue ratio of 32.6 percent compared to 28.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2018. The year-to-year increase was a result of higher spending (15 points) driven by Red Hat (15 points) and higher acquisitionrelated charges and amortization of acquired intangible assets associated with the Red Hat transaction (4 points), partially offset by higher divestiture gains (3 points) and lower non-operating retirement-related costs (3 points).
text: Total operating (non-GAAP) expense and other income increased 14.7 percent year to year primarily driven by the higher spending, partially offset by the divestiture gains, as described above.

Table:
($ in millions)
For the fourth quarter:
2019
2018
Yr.-to-Yr. Percent/ Margin Change*
Total consolidated expense and other (income)
$7,107
$6,253
13.7%
Non-operating adjustments
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
(294)
(106)
176.0
Acquisition-related charges
(27)
(13)
104.7
Non-operating retirement related (costs)/income
(196)
(387)
(49.4)
Operating (non-GAAP) expense and other (income)
$6,591
$5,746
14.7%
Total consolidated expense-to-revenue ratio
32.6%
28.7%
3.9pts
Operating (non-GAAP) expense-to-revenue ratio
30.3%
26.4%
3.9pts

Questions:
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in Total consolidated expense and other (income) from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 854
derivation: 7,107 - 6,253
scale: million
question: What is the average Amortization of acquired intangible assets?
answer: -200
derivation: ( - 294 + (- 106)) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the average of Operating (non-GAAP) expense and other (income)?
answer: 6168.5
derivation: (6,591 + 5,746) / 2
scale: million
text: Trading profit
text: The Group reported Trading profit of £128.5m in the year, growth of £5.5m, up +4.5% compared to 2017/18. Divisional contribution increased by £6.1m to £161.9m. The Grocery business recorded Divisional contribution growth of £8.3m to £138.3m while Sweet Treats Divisional contribution was £2.2m lower than the prior year at £23.6m. Group & corporate costs were £0.6m higher than the prior year.
text: In the first half of the year, Grocery Divisional contribution benefitted from previous changes in the promotional strategy of Ambrosia. The business reduced the depth of promotional deals it offered which resulted in lower volumes and revenue in the period but growth in Divisional contribution.
text: Additionally, Divisional contribution margins in the Grocery business grew 2.1 percentage points in the first half compared to the prior year. This is in line with margins two years ago, whereby margins in the prior year were impacted by a longer than expected process to recover input cost inflation seen across the Group’s categories.

Table:
£m
2018/19
2017/18
Change
Divisional contribution2
Grocery
138.3
130.0
+6.3%
Sweet Treats
23.6
25.8
(8.4%)
Total
161.9
155.8
+3.9%
Group & corporate costs
(33.4)
(32.8)
(1.8%)
Trading profit
128.5
123.0
+4.5%

Questions:
question: What is the divisional contribution of grocery in 2018/19?
answer: 138.3
scale: million
question: What is the divisional contribution of grocery in 2017/18?
answer: 130.0
scale: million
question: What is the change in Divisional contribution of Grocery from 2018/19 to 2017/18?
answer: 8.3
derivation: 138.3-130.0
scale: million
question: What is the change in Divisional contribution of Sweet Treats from 2018/19 to 2017/18?
answer: -2.2
derivation: 23.6-25.8
scale: million
question: What is the change in Group & corporate costs from 2018/19 to 2017/18?
answer: 0.6
derivation: 33.4-32.8
scale: million