tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Cash Flow
text: Cash flow provided by operating activities. Cash flows provided by operating activities were $7.2 million in fiscal 2019. The provision of cash was due primarily to our operating loss of $13.2 million adjusted for $22.4 million in non-cash expense including depreciation, amortization, and share based compensation and an increase of approximately $2 million in net operating assets and liabilities.
text: Cash flows provided by operating activities were $6.9 million in fiscal 2018. The provision of cash was due primarily to our operating loss of $12.1 million adjusted for $19.2 million in non-cash expense including depreciation, amortization, and share based compensation.
text: Cash flows provided by operating activities were $3.4 million in fiscal 2017. The provision of cash included $6.4 million in increased collections on accounts receivable.
text: Cash flow used in investing activities. Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2019 were $5.5 million. This is primarily attributed to $2.2 million in development of proprietary software and $3.3 million for purchase of property and equipment, including internal use software.
text: Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2018 were $15.1 million. This is primarily attributed to $8.9 million in development of proprietary software and $6.1 million for purchase of property and equipment, including internal use software.
text: Cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2017 were $13.9 million. This is primarily attributed to $11.9 million in development of proprietary software and $4.2 million for purchase of property and equipment, including internal use software offset by $2.2 million in proceeds from corporate owned life insurance policies.
text: Cash flow used in financing activities. Respectively, in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, the $0.8 million, $1.3 million, and $0.8 million cash flows used in financing activities were primarily comprised of the repurchase of shares to satisfy employee tax withholding and to cover the exercise price of the options, and payments on capital lease obligations.

Table:
Year ended March 31,
(In thousands)
2019
2018
2017
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
$7,241
$6,874
$3,433
Investing activities
(5,534)
(15,085)
(13,865)
Financing activities
(767)
(1,295)
(847)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(112)
194
(74)
Cash flows provided by (used in) operations
$828
$(9,312)
$(11,353)

Questions:
question: What was the cash flow from operating activities in fiscal 2019?
question: What was Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities in 2017?
question: What was the cash provision in 2017?
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in operating activities from 2018 to 2019?
question: What was the average investing activities for 2018 and 2019?
question: What was the average financing activities for 2018 and 2019?
text: NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
text: Our pension plan asset allocation at December 31, 2019, and 2018, and target allocation for 2020 by asset category are as follows:
text: We employ a liability-driven investment strategy whereby a mix of equity and fixed-income investments are used to pursue a derisking strategy which over time seeks to reduce interest rate mismatch risk and other risks while achieving a return that matches or exceeds the growth in projected pension plan liabilities. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities and funded status. The investment portfolio primarily contains a diversified mix of equity and fixed-income investments. Other assets such as private equity are used modestly to enhance long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and asset/liability studies at regular intervals.

Table:
Target Allocations
Percentage of Plan Assets at December 31,
Asset Category
2020
2019
2018
Equity securities
13%
13%
12%
Debt securities
83%
83%
84%
Other
4%
4%
4%
Total
100%
100%
100%

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for the projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the company's Pension Plans?
question: What was the target allocation for Equity Securities in 2020?
question: What was the percentage of Plan Assets for Other assets in 2019?
question: Which years did the percentage of plan assets for Debt Securities exceed 80% for 2018 and 2019?
question: What was the change in the percentage of plan assets for Equity Securities between 2018 and 2019?
question: What was the difference between the target allocations of Debt Securities and Other assets in 2020?
text: 9. DEBT AND OTHER FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
text: 2021 Senior Convertible Notes
text: In 2017, the Company issued $300.0 million principal amount of 5.75% senior convertible notes (the “2021 Notes”) for a purchase price equal to 98% of the principal amount. The Company received net proceeds of $284.9 million, net of a discount of $6.0 million and issuance costs of $9.1 million. The debt discount is being accreted to interest expense over the term of the 2021 Notes using the interest method. The issuance costs were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the same term.
text: The 2021 Notes are governed by an Indenture, dated December 8, 2017 between the Company and US Bank National Association, as trustee (the “2017 Indenture”). The 2021 Notes mature on July 1, 2021, unless earlier repurchased or converted. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on January 1 and July 1, commencing January 1, 2018.
text: The 2021 Notes are convertible at an initial conversion rate of 23.8095 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2021 Notes, which represents an initial conversion price of $42.00 per share, subject to adjustment for anti-dilutive issuances, voluntary increases in the conversion rate, and make-whole adjustments upon a fundamental change. A fundamental change includes a change in control, delisting of the Company’s common stock, and a liquidation of the Company. Upon conversion, the Company will deliver the applicable number of the Company’s common stock and cash in lieu of any fractional shares. Holders of the 2021 Notes may convert their 2021 Notes at any time prior to the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date.
text: The holders of the 2021 Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their 2021 Notes at a cash repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes being repurchased, plus the remaining scheduled interest through and including the maturity date, upon a fundamental change and events of default, including non-payment of interest or principal and other obligations under the 2017 Indenture.
text: The net carrying amounts of the liability components of the 2021 Notes consist of the following (in thousands):
text: The effective interest rate of the liability component is 6.4% for the 2021 Notes.

Table:
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Principal amount
$300,000
$300,000
Unamortized debt discount
(2,691)
(4,348)
Net carrying amount before unamortized debt issuance costs
297,309
295,652
Unamortized debt issuance costs
(4,135)
(6,685)
Net carrying value
$293,174
$288,967

Questions:
question: What was the principal amount in 2019?
question: What was the net carrying amount before unamortized debt issuance costs in 2018?
question: What is the percentage change in net carrying amount before unamortized debt issuance costs between 2018 and 2019?
question: What is the change in net carrying value between 2018 and 2019?
question: What is the percentage change in net carrying value between 2018 and 2019?
question: What was the effective interest rate of the liability component?
text: Significant components of Teradyne’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
text: As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Teradyne evaluated the likelihood that it would realize deferred income taxes to offset future taxable income and concluded that it is more likely than not that a substantial majority of its deferred tax assets will be realized through consideration of both the positive and negative evidence. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, Teradyne maintained a valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets of $77.2 million and $69.9 million, respectively, primarily related to state net operating losses and state tax credit carryforwards, due to the uncertainty regarding their realization. Adjustments could be required in the future if Teradyne estimates that the amount of deferred tax assets to be realized is more or less than the net amount recorded.

Table:
2019
2018
(in thousands)
Deferred tax assets
Tax credits
$79,480
$69,091
Accruals
25,424
23,449
Pension liabilities
24,459
20,826
Inventory valuations
18,572
18,514
Deferred revenue
7,622
9,130
Equity compensation
7,042
7,190
Vacation accrual
4,768
4,772
Investment impairment
3,292
—
Net operating loss carryforwards
2,705
3,658
Marketable securities
—
962
Other
1,472
685
Gross deferred tax assets
174,836
158,277
Less: valuation allowance
(77,177)
(69,852)
Total deferred tax assets
$97,659
$88,425
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation
$(18,238)
$(14,028)
Intangible assets
(16,705)
(24,211)
Marketable securities
(1,601)
—
Total deferred tax liabilities
$(36,544)
$(38,239)
Net deferred assets
$61,115
$50,186

Questions:
question: What was the valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets in 2019?
question: What was the  Tax credits in 2019?
question: In which years were components of Teradyne’s deferred tax assets (liabilities) provided?
question: In which year was Other larger?
question: What was the change in Other in 2019 from 2018?
question: What was the percentage change in Other in 2019 from 2018?
text: Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
text: Stock-Settled Appreciation Rights (“SSARs”) are rights granted to an employee to receive value equal to the difference in the price of our common shares on the date of the grant and on the date of exercise. This value is settled only in common shares of Agilysys.
text: We use a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to estimate the fair value of SSARs. The following table summarizes the principal assumptions utilized in valuing SSARs granted in fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017:
text: The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield of a zero coupon U.S. Treasury bond whose maturity period approximates the expected life of the SSARs. The expected life is estimated using historical data representing the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding. The estimated fair value of the SSARs granted is recognized over the vesting period of the awards utilizing the graded vesting method. Under this method, the compensation cost related to unvested amounts begins to be recognized as of the grant date.

Table:
2019
2018
2017
Risk-free interest rate
2.68%
1.74%-1.94%
0.94%-2.14%
Expected life (in years)
5
5
5
Expected volatility
32.42%
32.42% - 32.84%
35.25%-40.22%
Weighted average grant date fair value
$4.72
$3.36
$3.69

Questions:
question: Which model is used for estimating the fair value of SSARs?
question: What was the risk free interest rate in 2019?
question: What was the risk free interest rate in 2018?
question: What is the average year-on-year change in Weighted average grant date fair value from 2017 to 2019? 
question: What was the percentage increase / (decrease) in Weighted average grant date fair value from 2018 to 2019?
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the Weighted average grant date fair value from 2018 to 2019?
text: Inventories and Inventory Valuation
text: Inventories are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market value. Market value is based upon an estimated average selling price reduced by estimated costs of disposal. Should actual market conditions differ from the Company’s estimates, the Company’s future results of operations could be materially affected. Reductions in inventory valuation are included in Cost of revenue in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company reviews inventory for excess quantities and obsolescence based on its best estimates of future demand, product lifecycle status and product development plans. The Company uses historical information along with these future estimates to reduce the inventory cost basis. Subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. Prices anticipated for future inventory demand are compared to current and committed inventory values.
text: The components of inventories are as follows:

Table:
March 31,
(in thousands)
2019
2018
Raw materials
$3,445
$2,969
Finished goods
6,356
6,253
Total inventories
$9,801
$9,222

Questions:
question: What are the components of inventories?
question: What is the percentage change in the value of raw materials in 2019 compared to 2018?
question: What is the proportion of the value of finished goods over total inventories in 2019?
question: What is the average value of raw materials and finished goods in 2018?
question: How is the market value calculated?
question: What does the Company use to reduce the inventory cost basis?
text: Research and Development Expense
text: Research and development expense increased by $8.7 million in 2019 compared to 2018. The increase was primarily due to a $5.4 million increase in employee-related costs, which includes stock-based compensation, associated with our increased headcount from 229 employees as of December 31, 2018 to 252 employees as of December 31, 2019, a $1.3 million increase in hosting and software related cost to support research and development activities and an increase of $0.4 million in office related expenses to support research and development activities. In addition, a total of $6.5 million of internally-developed software costs during 2019 and $7.7 million of internally-developed software costs during 2018 were capitalized, resulting in an increase of the expense by $1.2 million compared to 2018.

Table:
Year Ended December 31,
Change
2019
2018
$
%
(dollars in thousands)
Research and development
$ 50,024
$ 41,305
$ 8,719
21.1%
% of revenue
25%
28%

Questions:
question: What was the increase in the Research and development expense in 2019?
question: What was the cost of internally-developed software in 2019?
question: What was the % of revenue for Research and Development expense in 2019 and 2018?
question: What was the average Research and development expense for 2018 and 2019?
question: In which year was Research and development expenses less than 50,000 thousands?
question: What is the change in the % of revenue from 2018 to 2019?
text: NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data)
text: NOTE 5 — Property, Plant and Equipment
text: Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

Table:
As of December 31,
2019
2018
Land and land improvements
$1,095
$1,136
Buildings and improvements
68,350
70,522
Machinery and equipment
224,312
231,619
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(188,719)
(203,876)
Property, plant and equipment, net
$105,038
$99,401

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for the company's Property, plant and equipment?
question: What was the amount of buildings and improvements in 2019?
question: What was the amount of Machinery and equipment in 2018?
question: How many years did the amount of Machinery and equipment exceed $200,000 thousand?
question: What was the change in the amount of Buildings and Improvements between 2018 and 2019?
question: What was the percentage change in the the total net property, plant and equipment between 2018 and 2019?
text: The following table lists customers from which the Company derived revenues in excess of 10% of total revenues for the years ended years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018
text: In addition, accounts receivable from Customer A totaled approximately $0.3 million, or 1%, and approximately $1.1 million, or 9%, of total consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively. Accounts receivable and long term receivable from Customer B totaled approximately $7.4 million, or 36%, and approximately $0.2 million, or 2%, of total consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively. We believe that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to the accounts receivable with these customers as of September 30, 2019. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated accounts receivable as
of September 30, 2019.

Table:
For the years ended
September 30, 2019
September 30, 2018
Amount
% of Revenue
Amount
% of Revenue
(Amounts in millions)
Customer A
$3.8
5%
$7.5
10%
Customer B
$10.2
13%
1.1
3%

Questions:
question: What is the value of the accounts receivable due from Customer A in 2019?
question: Which are the  customers from which the Company derived revenues in excess of 10% of total revenues for the years ended years ended September 30, 2018 and 2019?
question: What is the total accounts receivable and long term receivable from Customer B as of September 30, 2019?
question: What is the percentage change in revenue earned from customer B between 2018 and 2019?
question: What is the value of customer A's accounts receivable as a percentage of the revenue derived from customer A in 2019?
question: What is the difference in revenue earned from customer A and customer B in 2019?
text: A non-employee director who is initially appointed after any annual meeting of stockholders will receive a restricted stock unit award or option grant on the date of his or her initial appointment to the Board of Directors equal to the pro-rated amount of the annual grant
text: Annual option grants and restricted stock unit awards (or any pro-rated grants for directors initially appointed between annual meetings) vest on the earlier to occur of the first anniversary of the date of grant or the next annual meeting of stockholders. No portion of an option automatically granted to a director is exercisable after the tenth anniversary after the date of option grant. Additionally, an option automatically granted to a director may be exercisable after the termination of the director’s services as described in the option agreement, generally ending three months after such termination.
text: The following table shows compensation information for our non-employee directors for fiscal year 2019.
text: 2019 Director Compensation Table
text: (1) The amounts reflected in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value for stock awards granted to our non-employee directors in 2019, measured in accordance with ASC 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures, and do not reflect whether the recipient has actually realized a financial benefit from these awards. For the methodology of how the aggregate grant date fair value amount is calculated, please see Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-K. The aggregate number of shares subject to unvested restricted stock unit awards outstanding for each non-employee director at December 31, 2019 was: Mr. Hill: 5,889; Ms. Antonellis: 5,889; Mr. Habiger: 5,889; Ms. Molina: 5,889; Mr. Riedel: 5,889 and Mr. Seams: 5,889. None of the non-employee directors held any stock options as of December 31, 2019.

Table:
Name
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
Stock Awards ($)
Option Awards ($)
Total($)
Richard S. Hill
$106,000
$149,987
—
$255,987
Darcy Antonellis
$55,333
$149,987
—
$205,320
David C. Habiger
$70,000
$149,987
—
$219,987
V. Sue Molina
$81,000
$149,987
—
$230,987
George A. Riedel
$68,333
$149,987
—
$218,320
Christopher A. Seams
$82,000
$149,987
—
$231,987

Questions:
question: What does the table show?
question: How does a non-employee director receive his/her restricted stock unit award or option grant?
question: How much are the total compensations for Richard S. Hill and Christopher A. Seams, respectively?
question: What is the ratio of Darcy Antonellis’ total compensation to David C. Habiger’s total compensation?
question: What is the average fee earned or paid in cash compensation for all non-employee directors?
question: Who has the highest compensation among all non-employee directors?
text: 23. Trade and other payables
text: Notes
text: 1. In 2018, government grants of $0.4 million and $0.9 million were included within payments received on account and accruals, respectively. These have been reclassified to government grants.
text: 2. In 2018, government grants of $1.0 million were included within other payables. These have been reclassified to government grants.
text: Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30 to 60-day terms. Other payables are non-interest bearing.
text: The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade payables approximates their fair value.

Table:
2019
2018
Note
Note
$ million
$ million
Current
Trade payables
24.6
12.9
Payments received on account1
2.3
1.0
Other taxes and social security costs
4.6
3.7
Other payables
1.5
1.0
Accruals1
49.3
43.2
Government grants1
24
1.8
1.3
84.1
63.1
Non-current
Other payables2
0.8
4.4
Government grants2
24
0.2
1.0
1.0
5.4
85.1
68.5

Questions:
question: What was the amount of government grants included within payments received on account in 2018?
question: What was the amount of government grants included within other payables in 2018?
question: What are the components under Non-current?
question: In which year was the amount of Accruals larger?
question: What was the change in the amount of Accruals?
question: What was the percentage change in the amount of Accruals?
text: Retail TV
text: (1) As of January 1, 2019, we are no longer reporting wholesale subscribers in our TV subscriber base reflecting our focus on the retail market. Consequently, we restated previously reported 2018 subscribers for comparability.
text: Retail IPTV net subscriber activations decreased by 17.4% in 2019, compared to last year, resulting from the impact of a maturing Fibe TV market, slower new service footprint growth and greater substitution of traditional TV services with OTT services, partly offset by higher Alt TV activations.
text: Retail satellite TV net customer losses improved by 4.3% compared to 2018, attributable to lower deactivations, reflecting a more mature subscriber base geographically better-suited for satellite TV service.
text: Total retail TV net subscriber activations (IPTV and satellite TV combined) decreased by 71.9% in 2019, compared to last year, due to lower IPTV net activations, moderated by fewer satellite TV net losses.
text: Retail IPTV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,767,182, up 5.5% from 1,675,706 subscribers reported at the end of 2018.
text: Retail satellite TV subscribers at December 31, 2019 totaled 1,005,282, down 7.8% from 1,090,705 subscribers at the end of last year.
text: Total retail TV subscribers (IPTV and satellite TV combined) at December 31, 2019 were 2,772,464, representing a 0.2% increase since the end of 2018.

Table:
2019
2018
CHANGE
% CHANGE
Retail net subscriber activations (losses) (1)
6,053
21,559
(15,506)
(71.9%)
IPTV
91,476
110,790
(19,314)
(17.4%)
Satellite
(85,423)
(89,231)
3,808
4.3%
Total retail subscribers (1)
2,772,464
2,766,411
6,053
0.2%
IPTV
1,767,182
1,675,706
91,476
5.5%
Satellite
1,005,282
1,090,705
(85,423)
(7.8%)

Questions:
question: What was the percentage change in the retail satellite TV net customer losses from 2018 to 2019?
question: What resulted in the change in the retail IPTV net subscriber activations in 2019?
question: What was the change in the total retail subscribers?
question: What is the change in the number of IPTV retail subscribers in 2019?
question: What is the percentage of Satellite subscribers out of the total retail subscribers in 2019?
question: What is the percentage of IPTV subscribers out of the total retail subscribers in 2019?