tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: Contractual Obligations
text: The following table sets forth our future payments due under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
text: (1) Our debt obligations consist of principal and interest repayments due on our Credit Facility based on current interest rates.
text: (2) Amounts represent the minimum contractual cash commitments, including the effects of fixed rental escalation clauses and deferred rent, exclusive of certain contingent rents that are not determinable for future periods.
text: (3) Our purchase obligations consist of purchase commitments with various manufacturing suppliers to ensure the availability of components.
text: (4) Income tax obligations are a result of the Tax Act and include a transition tax on unremitted foreign earnings and profits, of which we have elected to pay the estimated amount over an eight-year period.
text: (5) Our pension funding commitments represent the amounts that we are required to pay to fund our pension plans.

Table:
Total
1 year
Less than 1-3 years
3-5 years
More than 5 years
Debt obligations(1)
$341,250
$17,500
35,000
288,750
—
Interest payments associated with debt obligations(1)
36,555
8,532
15,726
12,297
—
Operating lease obligations(2)
152,778
22,727
33,275
20,387
76,389
Purchase obligations(3)
192,981
192,803
178
—
—
Income tax obligations(4)
11,724
1,117
2,234
4,884
3,489
Pension funding commitment(5)
173,830
6,113
12,712
20,203
134,802
Total
$909,118
$ 248,792
$ 99,125
$ 346,521
$ 214,680

Questions:
question: What does the company's debt obligations consist of?
question: What was the total purchase obligations?
question: What was the total debt obligations?
question: What was the difference between total debt obligations and purchase obligations?
question: What was the difference between total operating lease obligations and total purchase obligations?
question: What was income tax obligations as a percentage of the total Contractual Obligations ?
text: Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
text: The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol NTAP.
text: Price Range of Common Stock
text: The price range per share of common stock presented below represents the highest and lowest intraday sales prices for the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ during each quarter of our two most recent fiscal years.
text: Holders
text: As of June 7, 2019 there were 413 holders of record of our common stock.

Table:
Fiscal 2019
Fiscal 2018
High
Low
High
Low
First Quarter
$ 83.14
$ 63.81
$ 45.24
$ 37.43
Second Quarter
$ 88.08
$ 70.26
$ 45.14
$ 37.55
Third Quarter
$ 83.95
$ 54.50
$ 64.06
$ 43.24
Fourth Quarter
$ 78.35
$ 61.00
$ 69.75
$ 52.00

Questions:
question: Which fiscal years does the table provide information for the price range per share of common stock?
question: What was high price per share in the first quarter of 2019?
question: What was the low price per share in the third quarter of 2018?
question: In the first quarter of 2018, what was the difference between the high and low price per share?
question: In 2019, how many quarters did the high share price exceed $85.00?
question: What was the the percentage change in the high price per share in the second quarter between 2018 and 2019?
text: Restructuring Expenses: restructuring expenses resulted from the execution of management approved restructuring plans that were generally developed to improve our cost structure and/or operations, often in conjunction with our acquisition integration strategies. restructuring expenses consist of employee severance costs and may also include charges for duplicate facilities and other contract termination costs to improve our cost structure prospectively. For additional information regarding our restructuring plans, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual report.
text: Restructuring expenses in fiscal 2019 primarily related to our 2019 restructuring Plan. restructuring expenses in fiscal 2018 primarily related to our 2017 restructuring Plan, which is substantially complete. Our management approved, committed to and initiated these plans in order to restructure and further improve efficiencies in our operations. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, our management supplemented the 2019 restructuring Plan to reflect additional actions that we expect to take. The total estimated restructuring costs associated with the 2019 restructuring Plan are up to $584 million, of which approximately $108 million remained as of May 31, 2019, and will be recorded to the restructuring expense line item within our consolidated statements of operations as the costs are incurred through an expected end date during fiscal 2020. Our estimated costs are subject to change in future periods. We may incur additional restructuring expenses in future periods due to the initiation of new restructuring plans or from changes in estimated costs associated with existing restructuring plans .

Table:
Year Ended May 31,
Percent Change
(Dollars in millions)
2019
Actual
Constant
2018
restructuring expenses
$443
-25%
-22%
$588

Questions:
question: How much was the average restructuring expenses in 2018 and 2019?
question: What was the difference in restructuring expenses in 2019 and 2018?
question: What was the total amount spent on restructuring expenses across 2018 and 2019?
question: What is included in restructuring expenses?
question: How much was the total estimated restructuring costs associated with the 2019 restructuring plan, and how much remained as of May 31, 2019?
question: Does the company expect to incur additional restructuring expenses in future periods?
text: Employee Stock Purchase Plan
text: Eligible employees are offered shares through a 24-month offering period, which consists of four consecutive 6-month purchase periods. Employees may purchase a limited number of shares of the Company’s stock at a discount of up to 15% of the lesser of the market value at the beginning of the offering period or the end of each 6-month purchase period. On September 13, 2018, the ESPP was amended to increase the shares reserved for issuance by 2 million shares of common stock. As of April 26, 2019, 7 million shares were available for issuance. The following table summarizes activity related to the purchase rights issued under the ESPP (in millions):

Table:
Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Shares issued under the ESPP
3
4
4
Proceeds from issuance of shares
$ 96
$ 85
$ 80

Questions:
question: Which years does the table provide information for activity related to the purchase rights issued under the ESPP?
question: What were the shares issued under the ESPP in 2019?
question: What were the Proceeds from issuance of shares in 2017?
question: What was the change in the Proceeds from issuance of shares between 2017 and 2018?
question: How many years did Shares issued under the ESPP exceed $2 million?
question: What was the percentage change in the Proceeds from issuance of shares between 2018 and 2019?
text: Revenue by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):
text: Revenues by geographic area are based upon the country of billing. The geographic location of distributors and OEM customers may be different from the geographic location of the ultimate end users of the products and services provided by us. No single non-U.S. country accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in fiscal years ended February 28, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Table:
Year Ended February 28,
2019
2018
2017
United States
268,453
265,613
259,974
Europe, Middle East and Africa
49,496
45,830
49,918
South America
15,134
20,699
17,738
Canada
9,815
14,958
8,412
Asia and Pacific Rim
13,958
12,873
8,967
All other
6,944
5,939
6,093
363,800
365,912
351,102

Questions:
question: What were revenues by geographic area based on?
question: What was the revenue from Canada in 2017?
question: What was the revenue from Asia and Pacific Rim in 2018?
question: What was the change in revenue from South America between 2017 and 2018?
question: What is the revenue from Canada in 2019 as a percentage of the total revenue in 2019?
question: How much does the top 3 revenues in 2018 add up to?
text: Key Business Metrics
text: In addition to the measures presented in our consolidated financial statements, we use the following key metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, develop financial forecasts, and make strategic decisions.
text: Devices Sold
text: Devices sold represents the number of wearable devices that are sold during a period, net of expected returns. Devices sold does not include sales of accessories. Growth rates between devices sold and revenue are not necessarily correlated because our revenue is affected by other variables, such as the types of products sold during the period, the introduction of new product offerings with differing U.S. manufacturer’s suggested retail prices, or MSRPs, and sales of accessories and premium services.
text: Active Users
text: We grow our community of users through device sales and investment in software to drive engagement. We define an active user as a registered Fitbit user who, within the three months prior to the date of measurement, has (a) an active Fitbit Premium or Fitbit Coach subscription, (b) paired a wearable device or Aria scale with his or her Fitbit account, or (c) logged at least 100 steps with a wearable device or a weight measurement using an Aria scale. Active users can be new users who joined the community during the past 90 days, existing users who have remained active, or previously active users who were inactive for 90 days or greater, if they meet the preceding definition of an active user. The active user number excludes users who have downloaded our mobile apps without purchasing any of our wearable devices and users who have downloaded free versions of Fitbit Coach but are not subscribers to its paid premium offerings.

Table:
For the Year Ended or As of December 31,
2019
2018
2017
(in thousands)
Devices sold
15,988
13,939
15,343
Active users
29,566
27,627
25,367
Adjusted EBITDA
$(128,333)
$(31,361)
$(52,158)
Free cash flow
$(193,363)
$60,327
$(24,919)

Questions:
question: What does 'Devices sold' represent?
question: How does the company grow their community of users?
question: How many devices were sold in 2019?
question: What is the average number of devices sold from 2017-2019?
question: What is the change in the number of active users between 2018 and 2019?
question: What is the percentage change of devices sold from 2018 to 2019?
text: The reconciliation from non-current segment assets to non-current group assets is shown in the following table: non-current assets according to segment reporting only include the values of continuing operations in the previous year. Therefore, the non-current assets of METRO China must be taken into account in the previous year and are therefore part of the reconciliation:
text: 1 Adjustment of previous year according to explanation in notes.

Table:
€ million
30/9/2018
30/9/2019
Non-current segment assets
6,348
6,268
plus non-current segment assets METRO China
560
0
Financial assets
88
97
Investments accounted for using the equity method
178
179
Deferred tax assets
329
191
Other
1
1
Non-current group assets
7,503
6,736

Questions:
question: What was the adjustment for the values for 2018?
question: What do the non-current assets according to segment reporting only include?
question: What are the broad categories of non-current assets in the table?
question: In which year was the amount of financial assets larger?
question: What was the change in Other in FY2019 from FY2018?
question: What was the percentage change in Other in FY2019 from FY2018?
text: 30. RECONCILIATION OF LIABILITIES FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES (Cont’d)
text: Note: (1) The cash flows comprise the net amount of proceeds from borrowings and repayments of borrowings, net interest paid on borrowings, and settlement of swaps for bonds repaid in the statement of cash flows.

Table:
Bonds
Bank loans
Finance lease liabilities
Interest payable
Derivative financial instruments
Group - 2018
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
S$ Mil
As at 1 April 2017
8,726.6
2,306.3
198.2
142.7
(245.3)
Financing cash flows (1)
(506.2)
222.6
(28.3)
(379.9)
61.4
Non-cash changes:
Fair value adjustments
(65.4)
-
-
-
107.8
Amortisation of bond discount
3.2
-
-
-
-
Foreign exchange movements
(273.3)
(58.5)
(0.5)
(8.5)
11.5
Acquisition of subsidiary
-
31.3
8.7
-
Additions of finance lease
-
-
4.8
-
-
Interest expense
-
-
-
383.6
-
Adjustment
-
-
(78.3)
-
-
(335.5)
(27.2)
(65.3)
375.1
119.3
As at 31 March 2018
7,884.9
2,501.7
104.6
137.9
(64.6)

Questions:
question: What is the topic of this note?
question:  Which year does the information in the table relate to?
question: What is included in the line item "financing cash flows"?
question: How many categories of liabilities are there?
question: How many types of non-cash changes are there?
question: Which type of non-cash change has the largest impact in terms of the categories of liabilities that it affects?
text: Film and Electrolytic
text: The table below sets forth net sales, operating income (loss) and operating income (loss) as a percentage of net sales for our Film and Electrolytic reportable segment for the fiscal years 2018 and 2017 (amounts in thousands, except percentages):
text: (1) Fiscal years ending March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606
text: Net Sales
text: Film and Electrolytic net sales of $202.0 million in fiscal year 2018 increased $19.7 million or 10.8% from $182.2 million in fiscal year 2017. The increase in net sales was primarily driven by an increase in net sales in the distributor channel across all the APAC and EMEA regions of $13.7 million, a $3.3 million increase in net sales in the OEM channel of the EMEA region and a $4.2 million increase in the EMS channel across the Americas, EMEA, and APAC regions. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of $1.2 million in the OEM channel across the Americas, APAC, and JPKO regions. In addition, there was a favorable impact of $7.6 million from foreign currency exchange primarily due to the change in the value of the Euro compared to the U.S. dollar.
text: Reportable Segment Operating Income (Loss)
text: Segment operating income of $3.6 million in fiscal year 2018 improved $12.7 million from $9.0 million of operating loss in fiscal year 2017. The improvement was primarily attributable to a $4.3 million increase in gross margin driven by higher net sales, as well as the benefit of completed restructuring activities. The increase was also attributed to an $11.7 million improvement in (gain) loss on the write down and disposal of long-lived assets. These improvements were partially offset by a $2.1 million increase in restructuring charges, a $0.7 million increase in SG&A expenses, and a $0.6 million increase in R&D expenses.

Table:
For the Fiscal Years Ended
March 31, 2018
March 31, 2017
Amount
% to Net Sales
Amount
% to Net Sales
Net sales (1)
$201,977
$182,228
Segment operating income (loss) (1)
3,622
1.8%
(9,028)
(5.0)%

Questions:
question: How much did net sales change between 2017 and 2018?
question: How much did segment operating income change between 2017 and 2018?
question: What was the amount of net sales in 2017?
question: How many years did net sales exceed $200,000 thousand?
question: What was the change in the percentage to net sales for segment operating income (loss) between 2017 and 2018?
question: What was the percentage change in the segment operating income (loss) between 2017 and 2018?
text: Non-Recurring Fair Value
text: Certain assets, under certain conditions, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis utilizing Level 3 inputs, as described in Note 1, Overview and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, like those associated with acquired businesses, including goodwill, other intangible assets, other long-lived assets and equity method investments. For these assets, measurement at fair value in periods subsequent to their initial recognition would be applicable if these assets were determined to be impaired.
text: The adjusted carrying values for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (no liabilities) subject to the requirements of ASC 820 were not material at December 31, 2019 and 2018. The following table summarizes the total impairment losses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations related to nonrecurring fair value measurements of certain assets (no liabilities):
text: In connection with the closure of certain under-utilized customer engagement centers and the consolidation of leased space in the U.S. and Canada, the Company recorded impairment charges of $1.7 million, $9.4 million and $5.2 million during the years ended December 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, related to the exit of leased facilities as well as leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture and fixtures which were not recoverable. See Note 5, Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, for further information.
text: Also, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.2 million related to the write-down of a vacant and unused parcel of land in the U.S. to its estimated fair value during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Table:
Years Ended December31,
2019
2018
2017
Americas:
Property and equipment, net
$(343)
$(9,401)
$(5,410)
Operating lease right-of-use assets
(1,368)
—
—
$(1,711)
$(9,401)
$(5,410)

Questions:
question: How are certain assets measured under certain conditions?
question: Which assets had non-material adjusted carrying values?
question: What are the types of impairment losses under Americas in the Consolidated Statements of Operations?
question: In which year was Property and equipment, net largest?
question: What was the change in Property and equipment, net in 2018 from 2017?
question: What was the percentage change in Property and equipment, net in 2018 from 2017?
text: (b) Credit Quality of Financing Receivables
text: Gross receivables, excluding residual value, less unearned income categorized by our internal credit risk rating as of July 27, 2019 and July 28, 2018 are summarized as follows (in millions):
text: We determine the adequacy of our allowance for credit loss by assessing the risks and losses inherent in our financing receivables by portfolio segment. The portfolio segment is based on the types of financing offered by us to our customers, which consist of the following: lease receivables, loan receivables, and financed service contracts.
text: Our internal credit risk ratings of 1 through 4 correspond to investment-grade ratings, while credit risk ratings of 5 and 6 correspond to non-investment grade ratings. Credit risk ratings of 7 and higher correspond to substandard ratings.

Table:
INTERNAL CREDIT RISK RATING
July 27, 2019
1 to 4
5 to 6
7 and Higher
Total
Lease receivables
$1,204
$991
$35
$2,230
Loan receivables
3,367
1,920
151
5,438
Financed service contracts
1,413
939
17
2,369
Total
$5,984
$3,850
$203
$10,037

Questions:
question: How did the company determine the adequacy for their allowance for credit loss?
question: What does the company's credit risk rating of 7 and higher refer to?
question: What was the total gross receivables for credit ratings 1 to 4 in 2019?
question: How many gross receivables had a total that exceeded $4,000 million?
question: What was the difference in the total between Loan Receivables and Financed service contracts?
question: What was the total for lease receivables as a percentage of the total of all gross receivables?
text: The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
text: The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at May 26, 2019 was $44.1 million, excluding a related liability of $11.7 million for gross interest and penalties. Included in the balance at May 26, 2019 are $1.0 million of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Any associated interest and penalties imposed would affect the tax rate. As of May 27, 2018, our gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $32.5 million, excluding a related liability of $7.7 million for gross interest and penalties. Interest and penalties recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations was an expense of $1.2 million in fiscal 2019, an expense of $1.6 million in fiscal 2018, and a benefit of $0.3 million in fiscal 2017.
text: Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - (Continued) Fiscal Years Ended May 26, 2019, May 27, 2018, and May 28, 2017 (columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Table:
May 26, 2019
May 27, 2018
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Property, plant and equipment
$—
$240.7
$—
$141.0
Inventory
15.2
—
2.6
—
Goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets
—
1,187.0
—
406.2
Accrued expenses
11.8
—
15.5
—
Compensation related liabilities
35.9
—
34.1
—
Pension and other postretirement benefits
54.6
—
45.8
—
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
—
185.4
—
165.8
Other liabilities that will give rise to future tax deductions
123.5
—
109.7
—
Net capital and operating loss carryforwards
766.5
—
762.5
—
Federal credits
18.0
—
3.5
—
Other
37.6
24.0
23.6
9.5
1,063.1
1,637.1
997.3
722.5
Less: Valuation allowance
(738.1)
—
(739.6)
—
Net deferred taxes
$325.0
$1,637.1
$257.7
$722.5

Questions:
question: How much was the liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits during fiscal 2019?
question: Why was the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period?
question: How much were the assets of inventory during fiscal 2018 and 2019, respectively?
question: What is the percentage change in the deferred tax assets of accrued expenses as well as federal credits of 2019 compared to 2018?
question: What is the proportion of the goodwill, trademarks, and other intangible assets, as well as investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries over total liabilities in 2018?
question: What is the total net deferred taxes for assets and liabilities from 2018 to 2019?
text: NOTE 7 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
text: Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
text: Depreciation expense was $8.6 million, $8.0 million, and $8.4 million in fiscal years ended February 28, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
text: Fixed assets not yet in service consist primarily of capitalized internal-use software and certain tooling and other equipment that have not been placed into service.

Table:
February 28,
2019
2018
Leasehold improvements
$3,522
$3,157
LoJack system components and law enforcement
tracking units
20,326
20,558
Plant equipment and tooling
13,078
16,842
Office equipment, computers and furniture
11,553
14,206
Software
31,349
31,427
79,828
86,190
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(58,641)
(69,585)
21,187
16,605
Fixed assets not yet in service
5,836
4,657
$27,023
$21,262

Questions:
question: What was the depreciation expense in fiscal year 2019?
question: How much were leasehold improvements in 2019?
question: How much were software in 2019?
question: What are leasehold improvements in 2019 as a percentage of the total property equipment before depreciation, amortization and fixed assets not in service?
question: How much do the top 3 property and equipment add up to in 2018?
question: What was the change in fixed assets not yet in service from 2018 to 2019?