tokbokki/tatqa_dataset_filter huggingface dataset:
text: GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
text: The following table presents activities associated with our loan receivable sales and servicing activities during the periods indicated.

Table:
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
2017
Gain (loss) on sold loan receivables held for sale
$—
$—
$(500)
Cash Flows
Sales of loans
$91,946
$139,026
$72,071
Servicing fees
3,901
2,321
2,821

Questions:
text: GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
text: 26. Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued)
text: The fair value of the derivative liabilities is as follows:
text: Interest rate swap agreements
text: The Group enters into interest rate swap agreements which convert the floating interest rate exposure into a fixed interest rate in order to hedge a portion of the Group’s exposure to fluctuations in prevailing market interest rates. Under the interest rate swaps, the bank counterparty effects quarterly floating-rate payments to the Group for the notional amount based on the U.S. dollar LIBOR, and the Group effects quarterly payments to the bank on the notional amount at the respective fixed rates.
text: Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments
text: As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, there are no interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments for accounting purposes.

Table:
As of December 31,
2018
2019
Derivative liabilities carried at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)
Interest rate swaps
9,196
49,891
Forward foreign exchange contracts
1,467
41
Derivative liabilities designated and effective as hedging instruments carried at fair value
Cross currency swaps
1,429
—
Total
12,092
49,932
Derivative financial instruments, current liability
2,091
8,095
Derivative financial instruments, non-current liability
10,001
41,837
Total
12,092
49,932

Questions:
text: 15. Net Income per Share
text: The following is a calculation of basic and diluted net income per share (in millions, except per share amounts):
text: Potential shares from outstanding employee equity awards totaling 1 million, 1 million and 6 million for fiscal 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were excluded from the diluted net income per share calculations as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Table:
Year Ended
April 26, 2019
April 27, 2018
April 28, 2017
Numerator:
Net income
$ 1,169
$ 116
$ 481
Denominator:
Shares used in basic computation
254
268
275
Dilutive impact of employee equity award plans
5
8
6
Shares used in diluted computation
259
276
281
Net Income per Share:
Basic
$ 4.60
$ 0.43
$ 1.75
Diluted
$ 4.51
$ 0.42
$ 1.71

Questions:
question: What was the change in the basic net income per share between 2017 and 2018?
answer: -1.32
derivation: 0.43-1.75
text: GreenSky, Inc. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
text: Note 13. Income Taxes
text: GreenSky, Inc. is taxed as a corporation and pays corporate federal, state and local taxes on income allocated to it from GS Holdings based upon GreenSky, Inc.’s economic interest held in GS Holdings. GS Holdings is treated as a pass-through partnership for income tax reporting purposes and not subject to federal income tax. Accordingly, the Company is not liable for income taxes on the portion of GS Holdings' earnings not allocated to it. The results for the year ended December 31, 2017 do not reflect income tax expense because, prior to the Reorganization Transactions, the consolidated GSLLC (and subsequently GS Holdings) pass-through entity was not subject to corporate tax.
text: The Company's income before income tax expense of $88,848, $133,514 and $138,668 during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, consisted entirely of income earned in the United States.
text: Components of income tax expense consisted of the following for the years indicated: Year

Table:
Year Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Current income tax expense (benefit):
Federal
$5
$4
State
10
5
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
Federal
4,206
4,860
State
(11,346)
665
Income tax expense (benefit)
$(7,125)
$5,534

Questions:
text: 6. Property, Plant and Equipment
text: Property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:
text: Depreciation expense on property, plant and equipment, including assets accounted for as finance leases, totaled $290.2 million in 2019, $239.6 million in 2018 and $190.4 million in 2017. The portion of depreciation expense associated with cost of providing services was 87%, 85% and 84% in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. There are numerous assets included within network equipment resulting in a range of depreciable lives between 2 and 50 years, the majority of which fall within the range of 7 to 25 years
text: No asset impairment losses were recognized in 2019, 2018 or 2017 on property, plant and equipment.

Table:
December 31,
Depreciable
(dollars in millions)
2019
2018
Lives (Years)
Land and rights-of-way
$117.2
$117.2
20 - Indefinite
Buildings and leasehold improvements
315.4
305.2
5 - 40
Network equipment
4,044.6
3,913.3
2 - 50
Office software, furniture, fixtures and vehicles
229.3
216.3
2-14
Construction in process
38.9
47.1
n/a
Gross value
4,745.4
4,599.1
Accumulated depreciation
(2,964.6)
(2,755.1)
Property, plant and equipment, net
$1,780.8
$1,844.0

Questions:
question: How many years is the minimum lifespan of the land and rights-of-way?
answer: 20
question: What is the change in accumulated depreciation for PPE between December 31, 2018 and 2019?
answer: 7.6
derivation: (2,964.6 - 2,755.1)/2,755.1 
scale: percent
question: What is the total network equiption between 2018 to 2019?
answer: 7957.9
derivation: 4,044.6+3,913.3
scale: million
text: 3.3 Fair value estimation (continued)                                                       If one or more of the significant inputs are not based on observable market data, the instrument is included in level 3.
text: Specific valuation techniques used to value financial instruments mainly include:
text: Dealer quotes for similar instruments;
text: The fair value of interest rate swaps is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows based on observable yield curves; and
text: Other techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis, are used to determine fair value for financial instruments.
text: During the year ended 31 December 2019, there was 1 transfer between level 1 and 2 for recurring fair value measurements. For transfers in and out of level 3 measurements see the following table, which presents the changes of financial instruments in level 3 for the years ended 31 December 2019 and 2018:

Table:
Financial assets
Financial liabilities
2019
2018
2019
2018
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
Opening balance – IAS 39
77,131
2,154
Adjustment on adoption of IFRS 9
22,976
–
Opening balance – IFRS 9
83,934
100,107
4,466
2,154
Additions
39,116
51,185
75
3,301
Business combination
–
–
(977)
–
Disposals/Settlements
(6,714)
(9,899)
(1,193)
–
Transfers
(4,552)
(93,151)
–
–
Changes in fair value recognised in other comprehensive income
328
261
–
–
Changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss*
9,241
30,485
(463)
(1,063)
Currency translation differences
1,740
4,946
(35)
74
Closing balance
123,093
83,934
1,873
4,466
* Includes unrealised gains or (losses) recognised in profit or loss attributable to balances held at the end of the reporting period
3,265
6,861
(463)
(1,063)

Questions:
question: What is the 2018 IAS 39 opening balance of financial assets?
answer: 77,131
scale: million
question: What is the 2018 IAS 39 opening balance of financial liabilities?
answer: 2,154
scale: million
question: What is the 2018 IFRS9 opening balance of financial assets?
answer: 100,107
scale: million
question: How much is the change in additions of financial assets from 2018 to 2019?
answer: -12069
derivation: 39,116-51,185
scale: million
question: What is the 2019 financial assets closing balance expressed as a percentage of 2018 financial assets closing balance?
answer: 146.65
derivation: 123,093/83,934
scale: percent
question: How much is the change between 2018 and 2019 currency translation differences of financial assets?
answer: -3206
derivation: 1,740-4,946
scale: million
text: As of December 31, 2019, maturities of lease liabilities were as follows:
text: As of December 31, 2019, we had no material operating or finance leases that had not yet commenced.

Table:
Operating Leases
Finance Leases
(Dollars in millions)
2020
$460
47
2021
361
28
2022
308
22
2023
265
22
2024
194
21
Thereafter
686
170
Total lease payments
2,274
310
Less: interest
(516)
(90)
Total
$1,758
220
Less: current portion
(416)
(35)
Long-term portion
$1,342
185

Questions:
question: Which periods are highlighted in the table?
answer: 2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
question: How many periods are highlighted in the table?
answer: 6
derivation: 2020##2021##2022##2023##2024##Thereafter
question: What is the sum of finance leases from 2020 to 2024?
answer: 140
derivation: 47+28+22+22+21
scale: million
question: What is the percentage change in the amount of operating leases in 2021 from 2020?
answer: -21.52
derivation: (361-460)/460
scale: percent
text: 3.1 Financial risk factors (continued)
text: (a) Market risk (continued)
text: (iii) Interest rate risk (continued)
text: During the year ended 31 December 2019, the Group entered into certain interest rate swap contracts to hedge its exposure arising from borrowings carried at floating rates. Under these interest rate swap contracts, the Group agreed with the counterparties to exchange, at specified interval, the difference between fixed contract rates and floating-rate interest amounts calculated by reference to the agreed notional amounts. These interest rate swap contracts had the economic effect of converting borrowings from floating rates to fixed rates and were qualified for hedge accounting. Details of the Group’s outstanding interest rate swap contracts as at 31 December 2019 have been disclosed in Note 38.
text: The effects of the interest rate swaps on the Group’s financial position and performance are as follows:
text: Swaps currently in place cover majority of the floating-rate borrowing and notes payable principal outstanding.
text: As at 31 December 2019 and 2018, management considered that any reasonable changes in the interest rates would not result in a significant change in the Group’s results as the Group’s exposure to cash flow interest-rate risk arising from its borrowings and notes payable carried at floating rates after considering the effect of hedging is considered to be insignificant. Accordingly, no sensitivity analysis is presented for interest rate risk.

Table:
2019
2018
RMB’Million
RMB’Million
Interest rate swaps
Carrying amount (non-current (liabilities)/assets)
(494)
1,663
Notional amount
29,423
77,630
Maturity date
30/7/2021~
28/6/2019~
11/4/2024
8/12/2023
Hedge ratio
1:1
1:1
Change in fair value of outstanding hedging instruments since 1 January
(2,139)
181
Change in value of hedged item used to determine hedgeeffectiveness
(2,139)
181
Weighted average hedged rate for the year
2.10%
1.60%

Questions:
question: What is the 2019 carrying amount of interest rate swaps?
answer: (494)
scale: million
question: What is the 2018 carrying amount of interest rate swaps?
answer: 1,663
scale: million
question: What is the 2019 notional amount of the interest rate swaps?
answer: 29,423
scale: million
question: How much is the change between 2018 to 2019 carrying amount of the interest rate swaps?
answer: -2157
derivation: -494-1,663
scale: million
question: How much is the change between 2018 and 2019 notional amount of the interest rate swaps?
answer: -48207
derivation: 29,423-77,630
scale: million
question: How many percent did the weighted average hedged rate for the year change by from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 0.5
derivation: 2.10-1.60
scale: percent
text: Geographic Information
text: Revenue based on the geographic location of our customer's headquarters was as follows:
text: We ship our products to locations specified by our customers and, as a result, customers may have headquarters in one location with global supply chain and operations in other locations. Our customers may request we deliver products to countries where they own or operate production facilities or to countries where they utilize third-party subcontractors or warehouses. Based on the ship-to locations specified by our customers, revenue from sales into China (including Hong Kong) accounted for 53%, 57%, and 51% of total revenue in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively; revenue from sales into Taiwan accounted for 13%, 9%, and 13% of total revenue in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively; and revenue from sales into the United States accounted for 11%, 12%, and 14% of total revenue in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Table:
For the year ended
2019
2018
2017
United States
$12,451
$17,116
$11,359
Mainland China (excluding Hong Kong)
3,595
3,607
1,539
Taiwan
2,703
3,918
2,892
Hong Kong
1,614
1,761
1,429
Other Asia Pacific
1,032
1,458
1,078
Japan
958
1,265
1,042
Other
1,053
1,266
983
$23,406
$30,391
$20,322

Questions:
question: What is the revenue from the United States in 2018 based on the geographic location of the customer’s headquarters?
answer: $17,116
question: What is the percentage change of revenue from Hong Kong from 2017 to 2018, based on the geographic location of the customer’s headquarters?
answer: 23.23
derivation: (1,761-1,429)/1,429 
scale: percent
question: What is the total percentage of revenue from Taiwan and Japan over total revenue in 2019, based on the geographic location of the customer's headquarters?
answer: 15.64
derivation: (2,703+958)/23,406 
scale: percent
text: Share-Based Compensation
text: The following table shows a summary of share-based compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the periods presented (in thousands):
text: Amounts presented above include share-based compensation expense of $0.8 million for fiscal year 2017, which is recorded as discontinued operations related to employees of our Compute business.
text: As of September 27, 2019, the total unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards and units including awards with time-based, performance-based, and market-based vesting was $47.0 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years.

Table:
Fiscal Years
2019
2018
2017
Cost of revenue
$2,936
$3,869
$3,189
Research and development
8,551
13,448
10,565
Selling, general and administrative
12,305
14,620
22,581
Total
$23,792
$31,937
$36,335

Questions:
text: (5) GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
text: The carrying value of goodwill by segment was as follows:
text: Reclassifications and other during the year ended December 31, 2019 were due primarily to tax adjustments for acquisitions in 2019 and 2018. See Note 2 for information regarding acquisitions.

Table:
Application Software
Network Software & Systems
Measurement & Analytical Solutions
Process Technologies
Total
Balances at December 31, 2017
$ 4,565.4
$ 2,591.3
$ 1,345.4
$ 318.2
$    8,820.3
Goodwill acquired
684.4
33.1
—
—
717.5
Goodwill related to assets held for sale
—
—
(156.2)
—
(156.2)
Currency translation adjustments
(17.0)
(2.3)
(14.5)
(5.9)
(39.7)
Reclassifications and other
3.3
1.6
—
—
4.9
Balances at December 31, 2018
$ 5,236.1
$ 2,623.7
$ 1,174.7
$312.3
$  9,346.8
Goodwill acquired
143.4
1,303.6
—
—
1,447.0
Currency translation adjustments
8.3
8.8
3.3
2.2
22.6
Reclassifications and other
1.6
(2.6)
—
—
(1.0)
Balances at December 31, 2019
$ 5,389.4
$ 3,933.5
$ 1,178.0
$ 314.5
$ 10,815.4

Questions:
question: What were the balances of Application Software and Process Technologies on December 31, 2017, respectively?
answer: $ 4,565.4
$ 318.2
question: What is the total goodwill acquired in the Network Software & Systems segment from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 1336.7
derivation: 33.1+1,303.6 
question: What is the proportion of balances in the Application Software and Process Technologies segments over total balances in all segments at December 31, 2018?
answer: 0.59
derivation: (5,236.1+312.3)/9,346.8 
question: What is the percentage change in the total balance of goodwill of the Network Software & Systems segment in 2019 compared to 2018?
answer: 49.92
derivation: (3,933.5-2,623.7)/2,623.7 
scale: percent
text: Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
text: The carrying amount of indefinite-lived intangible assets were as follows (in millions):
text: The Broadcasting segment strategically acquires assets across the United States, which results in the recording of FCC licenses. Providing the Company acts within the requirements and constraints of the regulatory authorities, the renewal and extension of these licenses is reasonably certain at minimal costs. Accordingly, we have concluded that the acquired FCC licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets.
text: In 2019, FCC licenses increased $15.6 million, $18.2 million of which was through acquisitions, offset by $2.3 million of impairments and $0.3 million loss on the sale of licenses. Our Broadcasting segment recorded the impairment as a result of its decision to forfeit FCC licenses in certain lower-ranked markets, and does not expect any significant changes to future cash flows as a result of these forfeitures. The Company reports intangible impairment charges within the Asset impairment expense line of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Table:
December 31,
2019
2018
FCC licenses
$ 136.2
$ 120.6
State licenses
2.5
2.5
Total
$ 138.7
$ 123.1

Questions:
question: What was the state licenses in 2018?
answer: 2.5
scale: million
question: What was the increase / (decrease) in the FCC licenses from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 15.6
derivation: 136.2 - 120.6
scale: million
question: What was the average State licenses?
answer: 2.5
derivation: (2.5 + 2.5) / 2
scale: million
question: What is the percentage increase / (decrease) in the total from 2018 to 2019?
answer: 12.67
derivation: 138.7 / 123.1 - 1
scale: percent
text: Consolidated Net Revenues
text: The key drivers of changes in our consolidated net revenues, operating segment results, consolidated results, and sources of liquidity are presented in the order of significance.
text: The following table summarizes our consolidated net revenues, increase (decrease) in associated deferred net revenues recognized, and in-game net revenues (amounts in millions):
text: (1) In-game net revenues primarily includes the net amount of revenue recognized for downloadable content and microtransactions during the period.
text: Consolidated net revenues
text: The decrease in consolidated net revenues for 2019, as compared to 2018, was primarily driven by a decrease in revenues of $1.1 billion due to: • lower revenues recognized from the Destiny franchise (reflecting our sale of the publishing rights for Destiny to Bungie in December 2018); • lower revenues recognized from Hearthstone; • lower revenues recognized from Call of Duty franchise catalog titles; and • lower revenues recognized from Overwatch.
text: The decrease was partially offset by an increase in revenues of $236 million due to: • revenues from Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice, which was released in March 2019; and • revenues recognized from Crash Team Racing Nitro-Fueled, which was released in June 2019.
text: The remaining net decrease of $131 million was driven by various other franchises and titles.

Table:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2019
2018
Increase/(decrease)
% Change
Consolidated net revenues
$6,489
$7,500
$(1,011)
(13)%
Net effect from recognition (deferral) of deferred net revenues
101
238
(137)
In-game net revenues (1)
3,376
4,249
(873)
(21)%

Questions:
text: 8. Stock option and award plan: (Continued)
text: A summary of the Company’s non-vested restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2019 and the changes during the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows:
text: The weighted average per share grant date fair value of restricted stock granted was $53.53 in 2019 (0.5 million shares) $44.02 in 2018 (0.5 million shares) and $40.52 in 2017 (0.5 million shares). The fair value was determined using the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Valuations were obtained to determine the fair value for the shares granted to the Company’s CEO that are subject to the total shareholder return of the Company’s common stock compared to the total shareholder return of the Nasdaq Telecommunications Index. The fair value of shares of restricted stock vested in 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $20.8 million, $19.1 million and $12.6 million, respectively.
text: Equity-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock was $18.5 million, $17.7 million, and $13.3 million for 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The income tax benefit related to stock options and restricted stock was $3.0 million, $1.8 million, and $2.5 million for 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The Company capitalized compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock for 2019, 2018, and 2017 of $1.8 million, $1.7 million and $1.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, there was $31.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested equity-based compensation awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

Table:
Non-vested awards
Shares
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at December 31, 2018
1,187,586
$41.12
Granted
473,550
$53.53
Vested
(365,223)
$41.83
Forfeited
(12,632)
$50.49
Non-vested at December 31, 2019
1,283,281
$45.40

Questions:
question: What is the number of non-vested shares granted in 2019?
answer: 473,550
question: What is the number of non-vested shares vested in 2019?
answer: 365,223
question: What is the number of non-vested shares forfeited in 2019?
answer: 12,632
question: What is the percentage of non-vested shares granted in 2019 as a percentage of the total non-vested shares at December 31, 2019?
answer: 36.9
derivation: 473,550/1,283,281 
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage of non-vested shares vested in 2019 as a percentage of the total non-vested shares at December 31, 2019?
answer: 28.46
derivation: 365,223/1,283,281 
scale: percent
question: What is the percentage of non-vested shares forfeited in 2019 as a percentage of the total non-vested shares at December 31, 2019?
answer: 0.98
derivation: 12,632/1,283,281 
scale: percent
text: The following table presents the basic and diluted weighted-average number of shares of common stock (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
text: (1) Fiscal years ending March 31, 2018 and 2017 adjusted due to the adoption of ASC 606.

Table:
Fiscal Years Ended March 31,
2019
2018
2017
Numerator
Net income (1)
$206,587
$254,127
$47,157
Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic
57,840
52,798
46,552
Assumed conversion of employee stock grants
1,242
2,291
2,235
Assumed conversion of warrants
—
3,551
6,602
Diluted
$59,082
$58,640
$55,389
Net income per basic share (1)
$3.57
$4.81
$1.01
Net income per diluted share (1)
$3.50
$4.33
$0.85

Questions: