WARNING LETTER
Orchid Orthopedic Solutions, LLC
MARCS-CMS 580112 —
May 13, 2019
Delivery Method:
United Parcel Service
Overnight Delivery
Product:
Medical Devices
Recipient:
Recipient Name
Jerry Jurkiewicz
Recipient Title
Chief Executive Officer
Orchid Orthopedic Solutions, LLC
1489 Cedar Street
Holt
,
MI
48842
United States
Issuing Office:
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
One Montvale Avenue
Stoneham
,
MA
02180
United States
Dear Mr. Jurkiewicz:
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted an inspection of your firm’s medical device operations, Orchid Orthopedic Solutions, LLC, located at 23149 Commerce Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI, from February 4 through February 15, 2019.  During the inspection, an FDA investigator determined that your firm is a medical device manufacturer that specializes in applying coatings to orthopedic implants that promote bone ingrowth.  Under section 201(h) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act), 21 U.S.C. § 321(h), these products are devices because they are intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or to affect the structure or any function of the body.
This inspection revealed that your devices are adulterated within the meaning of section 501(h) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 351(h), in that the methods used in, or the facilities or controls used for, their manufacture, packing, storage, or installation are not in conformity with the current good manufacturing practice requirements of the Quality System regulation found at Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 820.
We received your written response dated, March 11, and April 12, 2019, from Jason W. Ratcliffe, General Manager, which responded to the FDA-483, List of Inspectional Observations issued to your firm on February 15, 2019.  We address your March 11, 2019 response below.
The violations include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Failure to establish and maintain procedures to control product that does not conform to specified requirements, as required by 21 CFR 820.90(a).
Your procedure QP-8.3QUA-01: Control of Non-Conforming Product (NCP), does not require documentation of reworks in Nonconforming Reports (NCR). Additionally, work instructions (WI-8.3.4QAU-01, WI-7.5PRD-89, WI-7.5PRD-63, WI-7.5ENG-02, WI-7.5PRD-26, WI-75PRD-24, WI-7.4PUR-03, WI-7.5PRD-02) do not require that reworks, defects or test failures be documented in NCRs. For example:
• Reworked nonconforming product is not routinely documented or associated in NCRs. For example, between March 10, 2016 and February 4, 2019 there were
(b)(4)
Rework Shop Orders, yet only
(b)(4)
NCRs for nonconformances, such as chipped coating, scratches, debris, etc.
• Reworks, such as using
(b)(4)
to remove tape debris after washing, are not documented as NCP.
•
(b)(4)
level defects, such as voids in the seal requiring rework
(b)(4)
, are not documented as NCP.
•
(b)(4)
coupons (simulated product) that do not pass acceptance criteria for tensile strength of
(b)(4)
coating, are not documented as NCP.
• Retests for tensile strength of your supplier’s
(b)(4)
powder or
(b)(4)
powder, although permitted
(b)(4)
, is not documented as NCP.
•
(b)(4)
tests for roughness failures are not documented as NCP.
We have reviewed your response dated, March 11, 2019, and have determined that it cannot be assessed at this time.  Your updated procedures and work instructions (QP-8.3QUA-01, WI-8.3.4QAU-01, WI-7.5PRD-89, WI-7.5PRD-63, WI-7.5ENG-02, WI-7.5PRD-26, WI-75PRD-24, WI-7.4PUR-03, WI-7.5PRD-02) although promised, have not been provided for evaluation.
2. Failure to establish and maintain procedures for monitoring and control of process parameters for validated processes to ensure that the specified requirements continue to be met, as required by 21 CFR 820.75(b).
Your procedures for monitoring the quality of
(b)(4)
water used in the device cleaning process (WI-6.4.2ENG-01:
(b)(4)
Water Testing) and procedures for monitoring the device cleaning process (WI-7.5PRD-95:
(b)(4)
Cleanline Monitoring) are inadequate and/or unfollowed. For example:
• Procedure WI-6.4.2ENG-01 requires sanitization of the
(b)(4)
water system in the event of bacterial endotoxin excursion (
(b)(4)
EU/mL); there were
(b)(4)
excursions between July 2, 2018 and January 31, 2019, yet the water system was only sanitized
(b)(4)
times.
• Procedure WI-6.4.2ENG-01 requires
(b)(4)
testing for Total organic carbon (TOC); testing was not performed in December 2018.
• Procedure WI-6.4.2ENG-01 requires an increase of bioburden or TOC testing from
(b)(4)
to
(b)(4)
in the event of an excursion, yet testing remained
(b)(4)
despite bioburden test results being “too numerous to count” in September 2018 and a TOC excursion of
(b)(4)
mg/L for November 2018.
• “Special Instructions” that govern monitoring of the manual cleaning process in your firm’s cleanroom are uncontrolled documents.
• Procedure WI-7.5PRD-95 instructions are unclear, lack statistical rational and does not define the type of coupon to be used for monitoring.
We have reviewed your response dated, March 11, 2019, and have determined that your response cannot be assessed at this time. Your updated procedures, including WI-6.4.2ENG-01, WI-7.5PRD-95, and others, although promised, have not been provided for evaluation.
3. Failure to establish and maintain procedures for implementing corrective and preventative action, as required by 21 CFR 820.100(a).
Your procedure, QP-8.5QAU-01: Corrective and Preventive Action, does not provide for handling and justification of changes to your approved CAPA plans, and there are no provisions for handling Supplier Corrective Action Requests (SCAR). For example:
• A change of your corrective plan for CAPA 18-024, regarding developing procedures for monitoring your
(b)(4)
water system and monitoring
(b)(4)
water, was not documented in your internal CAPA form.
• Failure to adequately establish procedures for analyzing sources of quality data used to identify existing and potential causes of NC product. For example, between March 2016 and February 2019,
(b)(4)
Rework Shop Orders were issued.  Our investigator found that you do not routinely analyze rework shop orders as a source of quality data to detect potentially recurring quality problems. Your procedures for governing analysis of data, QP-8.4QAU-01 and your CAPA procedure QP-8.5QAU-01, do not fully define or establish data inputs to the CAPA system, such as the requirement to analyze rework.
We have reviewed your response dated, March 11, 2019, and have determined that it is not adequate; your response does not address whether you are analyzing rework by performing a retrospective review to determine if you need to initiate CAPAs. Additionally, your updated procedures (QP-8.4QAU-01 and your CAPA procedure QP-8.5QAU-01) although promised, have not been provided for evaluation.
4. Failure to adequately validate a process whose results cannot be fully verified by subsequent inspection and test as required by 21 CFR 820.75(a).
The manual cleaning process for
(b)(4)
implants has not been adequately validated. For example, the investigator’s review of validation VAL-114-075 observed the following:
• There was no justification for using
(b)(4)
containing
(b)(4)
production-representative devices to support the manual cleaning process validation.
• There is no established limit of how much debris may remain on the device after completing the cleaning process.
• There is no assurance that the devices were processed under normal or worst-case operating conditions.
• Soak time during validation was not documented.
• Process qualifications for the validation of
(b)(4)
process were not conducted.
We have reviewed your response dated, March 11, 2019, and have determined that it is not adequate; your updated procedures, including QP-7.5.6PRD-01, WI-7.5PRD-95, WI-7.5PRD-02 and increased frequency of testing to
(b)(4)
samples per
(b)(4)
until at least
(b)(4)
data points are collected, and conducting process qualifications for the
(b)(4)
process, although promised, have not been provided for evaluation. Additionally, there is no documentation that the increased frequency of testing to
(b)(4)
samples per
(b)(4)
is based on statistical methodology. In response to this Warning Letter, you should provide confirmation that your proposed corrective actions are appropriate and effective. We will need to verify these corrective actions during a FDA re-inspection.
5. Procedures for receiving, reviewing and evaluating complaints by a formally designated unit have not been established, as required by 21 CFR 820.198(a).
Your procedure, QP-8.2.2.2QUA-01: Customer Feedback & Complaints, does not require that complaints are processed in a timely manner. For example:
• Complaint #18-079 was received September 4, 2018 due to “contamination in coating” and determined to require investigation. As of February 4, 2019, no investigation has been documented (153 days).
• Complaint #18-065 was received July 24, 2018, due to “tensile Test failure.”  On February 4, 2019, the evaluation complaint was closed and determined that no investigation was required (195 days).
• Complaint #18-054 was received May 24, 2018, due to “non-uniform coating.” The evaluation and investigation were documented as completed on October 29, 2018 (158 days).
Your response dated, March 11, 2019, cannot be assessed at this time. While we recognize statements that you’ve made, such as making procedure QP-8.2.2.2QUA-01 obsolete, implementing corporate procedure SP004, and creating procedure WI-8.2.2QAU-01 to address the violations, we will still need to verify these corrective actions during a FDA re-inspection.
6. Procedures for quality audits have not been adequately established, as required by 21 CFR 820.22.
• Your procedure QP-8.2.4QUA-01: Internal Audits requires that “All personnel conducting internal quality audits shall be qualified,” which “may be in the form of a certification” or by “on the job training.” The scope of training of your firm’s Quality Technician who was responsible for auditing the production and process controls (PPC) subsystem during a January 2019 audit, was limited to a review of your quality audit procedure.
• Your 2018 Internal Audit Schedule indicated that process validation was to be within the scope of the January 2019 PPC subsystem audit; however, an audit of process validation was not conducted.
Your response dated March 11, 2019, cannot be assessed at this time. Your updated procedure (QP-8.2.4QAU-01) and Audit Report (F239) although promised, have not been provided for evaluation.
Your firm should take prompt action to correct the violations addressed in this letter.  Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in regulatory action being initiated by the FDA without further notice.  These actions include, but are not limited to, seizure, injunction, and civil money penalties.  Also, federal agencies may be advised of the issuance of Warning Letters about devices so that they may take this information into account when considering the award of contracts.  Additionally, premarket approval applications for Class III devices to which the Quality System regulation violations are reasonably related will not be approved until the violations have been corrected.  Requests for Certificates to Foreign Governments will not be granted until the violations related to the subject devices have been corrected.
Please notify this office in writing within fifteen business days from the date you receive this letter of the specific steps your firm has taken to correct the noted violations, as well as an explanation of how your firm plans to prevent these violations, or similar violations, from occurring again.  Include documentation of the corrections and/or corrective actions (which must address systemic problems) that your firm has taken.  If your firm’s planned corrections and/or corrective actions will occur over time, please include a timetable for implementation of those activities.  If corrections and/or corrective actions cannot be completed within fifteen business days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which these activities will be completed.  Your firm’s response should be comprehensive and address all violations included in this Warning Letter.
If you have questions regarding any issues in this letter, please contact Compliance Officer, Richard Cherry at 215-717-3075 or at
richard.cherry@fda.hhs.gov
.   Please send your reply electronically to Gina Brackett, Director of Compliance Branch, at
gina.brackett@fda.hhs.gov
.
Finally, you should know that this letter is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of the violations at your firm’s facility.  It is your firm’s responsibility to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations administered by FDA.  The specific violations noted in this letter and in the Inspectional Observations, FDA 483, issued at the close of the inspection may be symptomatic of serious problems in your firm’s manufacturing and quality management systems.  Your firm should investigate and determine the causes of the violations, and take prompt actions to correct the violations and bring the products into compliance.
Sincerely,
/S/
Joseph Matrisciano, Jr.
Program Division Director
Office of Medical Device and Radiological Health
Division 1
Copy (via UPS) to:    Mr. Jason W. Ratcliffe, General Manager
Orchid Orthopedic Solutions, LLC
23149 Commerce Dr.
Farmington Hills, MI 48335-2723
jason.ratcliffe@orchid-ortho.com
Content current as of:
05/21/2019
Regulated Product(s)
Medical Devices