ticoAg/ChineseCorpus-Kaggle-fanti huggingface dataset:
雷筳殿，是一座位於臺灣臺中市后里區后里里的神壇，會祭祀棺材、並以棺材遶境臺灣島。
主持莊新田原先從事便當業，在大家樂風行時，返回后里住家開此神壇來主祀玄天上帝。
雷筳殿中供奉一口稱為「百壽棺木」、漆金漆的樟木棺材，周圍雕有八仙法器，棺蓋刻有一大型壽字，大壽字上雕有99個不同字體的壽字。廟方還稱此金棺為「金元玉天老祖」，並仿達摩祖師的傳說在棺內放一只草鞋。兩側則有稱作「黑棺」（玄棺）、「玉棺」的小棺材。
對於百壽棺木由來，莊新田講述是他自己一次午睡時夢見濟公介紹一口會飛的金棺，因此到臺南白河買回供俸。他說這口棺材原先是白河的蔡姓商人家族從柳州進口，半世紀前有一富翁為去世的父親買下，但入殮前棺木自行豎起，富人驚駭下將棺木退回。
2009年報導時，莊新田以經濟不景氣為由，因此決定讓百壽棺木遶境臺灣島祈福，經請示後決定6月15日從后里出發，向北後再轉南，依神明靈感停駕。共遶境36天。對此，臺中教育大學臺文系副教授林茂賢表示，棺材的小模型被視為開運法器、或是當成桌上飾品，至於抬棺遊行在傳統民俗中是表達抗議，但把抬棺當宗教儀式，為他首次聽聞。
2014年，廟方以近期歷經北捷隨機殺人、官員貪贓等事件，加上經濟低迷，在7月5日再度以此棺木全臺灣遶境。共遶境8天。當時莊新田表示，5年前首次遶境，民眾反應兩極，有人迴避也有人跪拜，還有一名臺商在臺北參拜棺木後，順利度過生意瓶頸，此後每年會南下后里來拜棺。
2017年6月4日，莊新田再度開車載送百壽棺木，展開計畫72天環臺之旅，出發前還有靈修人士進行靈修儀式。這次還有黑棺、玉棺同行。
在7月22日開到南投縣信義鄉雙龍村的布農族部落，因宗教信仰不同，被村長全得明勸阻下改道。莊新田則反應，棺材具有收煞作用，這次遶境是要環島祈福，除暴安良、收服惡靈，無法事先得知棺材想去何處，發生擋棺事件也讓他們相當不好意思，未來會多加注意。
奧浩哉，日本漫畫家，受到過大友克洋和池上遼一的影響，代表作為《殺戮都市》。在出道作《》的連載中，以筆名久遠 矢広創作，該作品準入選《YOUNG JUMP》青年漫畫大賞。作者的風格偏向殺戮形式，多部作品以殺戮點出人生的意義。
* 《》（1992年－1995年）
* 《HEN》（1995年－1997年）《變HEN》的續篇
* 《》（1999年－2000年）全3冊；尖端出版代理
* 《殺戮都市》（2000年－2013年）全37冊；尖端出版/文化傳信代理
* 《忘憂草的溫柔》（2006年－2007年）全3冊；尖端出版代理
* 《犬屋敷》（2014年－2017年）全10冊；尖端出版/玉皇朝代理
* 《GIGANT》（2018年－2021年）目前出版至8冊；玉皇朝代理
科威特酋長盃（Kuwait Emir Cup）是科威特國內一項足球盃賽賽事，於1962年創辦，由科威特足球協會主辦，是國內最有代表性的盃賽。
阿拉比曾於1962年至1972年期間，創下連續 11 屆賽事賽晉身決賽的紀錄，當中 6 次奪冠。而卡迪斯亞為奪冠次數最多的球隊，一共贏得 16 次冠軍。
賽事進入加時賽，以黃金入球決勝
球隊當季同時贏得科威特超級足球聯賽
+ 歷屆科威特酋長盃決賽
''因爆發波斯灣戰爭而暫停''
1965, 1967, 1968, 1972, 1974, 1975, 1979, 1989, 1994, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015
1962, 1964, 1976, 1977, 1992, 1997, 2006, 2014, 2019
1962, 1963, 1964, 1966, 1969, 1971, 1981, 1983, 1992, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2005, 2006, 2008
1965, 1967, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1974, 1989, 1990, 1995, 1998, 2009, 2016, 2018
1976, 1977, 1978, 1980, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2002, 2009, 2014, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019
1963, 1969, 1971, 1975, 1981, 1982, 2004, 2010, 2011
1982, 1984, 1990, 1995, 1997, 1998, 2011
1979, 1980, 1983, 1985, 1986, 1988, 2001, 2005, 2012, 2017
1966, 1973, 1978, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2015
1970, 1973
1984, 1987, 1994, 2000
1996, 2002, 2013
*  goalzz.com - Kuwait Emir Cup
《2017年度勁歌金曲頒獎典禮》於2017年12月30日晚上8時30分在將軍澳電視廣播城一號錄影廠舉行，本屆頒獎禮以「Music is Everywhere and Anywhere」為主題，並由陸浩明、馮盈盈及麥明詩擔任司儀。
本年度大會把「最受歡迎男歌星」及「最受歡迎女歌星」合併為「最受歡迎歌星獎」，男女歌手將一起競逐此獎項。
李克勤在本屆頒獎禮中勇奪四獎成為大贏家，亦是他相隔11年後再度獲頒「最受歡迎歌星獎」。
到此一遊、朋友身份
手中沙、一輩子守候
忘記我自己、久別重逢
地盡頭、風沙
霸氣情歌、行屍走肉
*金獎：陪著你走 - 王浩信、譚嘉儀
*銀獎：原來只因深愛著 - JW王灝兒、吳業坤
*銅獎：欲言又止 - 王浩信、HANA菊梓喬
** 上榜歌曲：兄兄我我、一刻戀上、靈魂進化、此刻無價
** 上榜歌曲：說再見了吧、靈感床
** 演繹歌曲：說再見了吧、長相廝守、喜氣洋洋（與ToNick合唱）
** 演繹歌曲：說再見了吧、長相廝守、喜氣洋洋（與Supper Moment合唱）
** 上榜歌曲：在這家、陽光小姐
** 派臺歌曲：深淵、U GOT ME MAD (給男神的面書)
** 上榜歌曲：從不信自己、小碎步、Be Water, My Friend
** 上榜歌曲：情人自擾、朋友身份、到此一遊、遙不可及
** 演繹歌曲：朋友身份、遙不可及（與蔣志光合唱）
** 上榜歌曲：七歲、一輩子守候、手中沙、久別重逢、忘記我自己
** 演繹歌曲：一輩子守候、忘記我自己
** 上榜歌曲：C3PO、失魂記、黑膠
** 演繹歌曲：C3PO、失魂記
** 最後五強：李克勤、胡鴻鈞、周柏豪、HANA菊梓喬、鄭俊弘
最受歡迎歌星獎候選名單（以歌手名稱筆劃序）
由於電視臺於2017年播出的劇集《降魔的》受到廣泛議論，主題曲《到此一遊》亦為觀眾所認識，故此電視臺亦安排五位香港小姐黃心穎、蔡思貝、馮盈盈、邵佩詩、張寶兒聯同藝員林師傑、周志康為此曲拍攝跳舞版音樂視頻，以間接宣傳《勁歌金曲頒獎典禮》，而五位香港小姐亦於頒獎典禮中作現場演出。
在2018年1月6日所播出的《失驚無神頒獎典禮》電視節目中，五位香港小姐所組成的歌唱組合，被電視臺的視頻平臺big big channel頒發《最噴血女團獎》，在電視畫面中，官方表示《到此一遊》的跳舞版音樂視頻共有1,110,593次點擊，並由主持人陸浩明於2017年12月30日在《勁歌金曲頒獎典禮》節目完成後，於後臺向五人頒發此獎項。
在節目播出後，網上出現了一些對節目的意見，包括：
*司儀麥明詩表情呆滯，未能及時回應其他主持人及嘉賓的發言，另因箍牙關係，當她講解賽果受會計師樓監察時，將會計師錯說成「會雞師」，引起現場觀眾發笑。
*司儀馮盈盈化妝妝容太濃烈，看起來像殭屍，同時馮盈盈亦咬字不清，並出現懶音，將「你有份」說成「你有搵」，在頒獎典禮尾段時，馮盈盈亦自嘲說「今晚我都已經錯咗好多」；但亦有網民認為，頒獎典禮並不吸引，馮盈盈才是吸引觀眾收看典禮的因素。
*李克勤要跟四名後輩爭奪「最受歡迎歌星獎」，被視為荒謬。
對於外界對節目的意見，三位司儀於典禮後翌日，分別於社交平臺留言回應：
*麥明詩：「感激昨晚有主持勁歌的機會，坦白來說由收到消息至到完成演出都是戰戰兢兢。演出當晚當然有很多做得不夠好的地方；深深地體會到做司儀是十分具挑戰性。歌手說話長短、反應全部也預計不到，也不能排練，所以每一部分都要臨時作出很大的改動。見到6號（陸浩明）如何去應變，令自己得益很多，亦漸漸學習去放鬆自己。凡事都有第一次，很開心在2017年完結之前又可以有一個不一樣的嘗試，希望2018年可以繼續努力，多看Do姐（鄭裕玲）主持的節目以作學習並且不斷進步，能帶給觀眾更多不同的節目和感覺。」
*馮盈盈：「2017年完結前，慶幸自己又有多一個第一次：第一次擔任大型典禮司儀，就是主持其中一個突發狀況最多的直播節目——《勁歌金曲頒獎典禮》。由收到通告那刻就知道這是一個大挑戰，即使再多準備和排練都一定會有變數，所以最考司儀的臨場應變和轉數。昨晚說我不緊張就騙人的，第一次主持就要對住一大班專業歌手，還要先又唱又跳表演，期間還因爲節目超時而不斷有改動，全日無一刻放鬆過。回看昨晚表現，自己還有很多地方要改善和學習。」她感謝另外兩位司儀陸浩明和麥明詩，表示：「從你們身上學到了很多主持技巧，自己也知道無論背後難處或苦衷如何，最著眼還是出來的表演成果，感謝臺前幕後的所有工作人員，全靠你們在背後用心策劃和籌備才有這個Good Show。當然還有所有出席參與的歌手，你們的表演十分出色，你們是整晚的主角，最後要恭喜所有得獎歌手，多謝你們為廣東歌作出的貢獻。2018年快到，寄予自己新一年繼續進步，吸收更多經驗，變得更熟練，2018年再見大家！」
*陸浩明：「第一次做勁歌金曲頒奬禮司儀，三粒鐘絕不簡單，有冇支持嗎？辛苦兩位新拍檔精彩嘅一晚，好感動可以頒奬比偶像！恭喜克勤！」他又勉勵另一司儀麥明詩，表示麥明詩第一次擔任大型現場直播電視節目，表現已不錯，自己也碰釘多次才稍為提升表現，下次再擔任司儀便不成問題了。
巴什泰，又作巴世泰，三等子碩翁科羅巴圖魯圖魯什之子，天聰八年（1634年）襲爵，擔任一等侍衛。此后，在順治七年、九年連遇恩詔，晉封一等伯，任侍衛領班。同年，蒙古侍衛索尼意圖謀逆，忌憚巴什泰之忠勇，將其刺殺。順治帝深感悲痛，特旨追晉為三等侯，以其子珠拉岱襲爵。
金融監督院（FSS）是韓國的金融監管機構，隸屬于大韓民國金融委員會，法律性質是從事金融監督業務的民間特殊法人。
Before the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) was established, Korea’s financial supervisory system was largely fragmented, with the banking, securities, insurance, and non-bank sectors individually managed and regulated by a separate agency. Furthermore, the authority of supervision was split between two governing entities, i.e. the supervisory agencies and the Ministry of Finance and Economy (formerly known as the Ministry of Finance; currently the Ministry of Strategy and Finance). Under this segregated supervisory system, the banking sector was overseen by the Bank of Korea and the ministry, the securities sector by the Securities Supervisory Board and the ministry, and the insurance sector by the Insurance Supervisory Board and the ministry.  As to non-bank financial institutions established after the 1970s, the overall authority lay with the ministry while functions of examination were delegated to the Banking Supervisory Authority within the Bank of Korea and the Korea Non-Bank Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The end of the 1980s marked a time of diversification in the financial industry and businesses’ crossover into other financial sectors. Meanwhile, the financial environment changed considerably with the opening of markets to foreign investments and the ongoing march of globalization. This led to an increasing number of complex financial transactions – such as derivatives – that blurred the boundaries of banking, securities, and insurance. The multifarious financial supervisory system of the past, in which the banking, securities, and insurance sectors were each regulated by their respective supervisory agencies, was no longer fit to address the innovations in the financial environment. As a result, the government established the Presidential Committee on Financial Reform in 1997, which announced a final report detailing the following recommendations for reform of the financial supervisory system:
* Consolidation of the existing supervisory agencies into one organization to better deal with market liberalization, business expansion into other financial sectors, and the rising uncertainty in the market;
* Establishment of an autonomous financial supervisory authority independent from macroeconomic, monetary and credit policies;
* Proper distribution of responsibilities and strengthened cooperation among related agencies
Following the guidelines set forth by the committee’s report, the government drafted financial reform bills in August 1997. Based on a recommendation by the International Monetary Fund to establish an integrated financial supervisory body, the National Assembly passed the bill on December 29, 1997. On April 1, 1998, the Financial Supervisory Commission (the predecessor to the Financial Services Commission) was launched as the FSS’s supreme decision-making body, laying the groundwork for the consolidation of the four supervisory bodies (the Banking Supervisory Authority, Securities Supervisory Board, Insurance Supervisory Board, and the Non-bank Deposit Insurance Corporation. To preserve sectoral characteristics while flexibly addressing businesses’ branching into other sectors, a committee of executives and staff from the four supervisory bodies was put together to work out a plan for the consolidated agency. On January 2, 1999, the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) was finally established.
The consolidation of the financial supervisory system helped Korea to quickly and efficiently recover from the Asian financial crisis that broke out at the end of 1997. The FSS led an intensive restructuring of the financial industry, eliminating insolvent financial companies and putting the financial system back on track. Over a six-year period extending from 1998 to 2003, 840 financial companies – including 14 banks – were removed from the market through M&As, P&As, or liquidation. To combat increased corporate insolvency resulting from the Asian financial crisis, the FSS successfully headed a corporate restructuring drive that implemented a series of measures like the improvement of conglomerates’ financial structure, liquidation of failing companies, and workout program. The FSS also reacted expeditiously to the credit card crunch and market distress of 2003 – caused by excessive credit card business expansion – by strengthening prudent supervision of credit card companies and encouraging the development of M&As in order to prevent uncertainty from spreading throughout the financial market.
The integrated supervisory agency also facilitated a systematic application and supervision of programs introduced in the aftermath of the crisis, such as forward-looking criteria (FLC), a system of financial holding companies, and the retirement pension plan. In enforcing prudent regulations such as prompt corrective action, business management evaluation, and capital adequacy ratio, it was also able to coordinate and maintain equity across financial sectors.
The purpose of the Financial Supervisory Service is to contribute to the growth of the national economy by 1) promoting the advancement of the financial industry and the stability of financial markets; 2) establishing sound credit order and fair financial transaction practices; and 3) protecting financial consumers, such as depositors. (Article 1, Act on the Establishment, etc. of Financial Services Commission)
The FSS was established for a special purpose and is legally based on the Act on the Establishment, etc. of Financial Services Commission. It administers public affairs independent from the central and regional governments of Korea. The intended effect of its legal status as an independent public entity rather than a governmental operation is twofold: 1) to minimize government interference of the FSS’s supervision of financial institutions; and 2) to ensure a fair and independent execution of its supervisory services.
Its current governor Kwon Hyouk-Se was named to his position in March 2011 after a career of nearly three decades in finance-related positions in the government, including with the Ministry of Finance and Economy(Mofe, predecessor to the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, and the Financial Services Commission.
:Kwon Hyouk-Se, Governor
:Park Soo Won, Chief  Executive Auditor
:Choi Soo Hyun, First Senior Deputy Governor
:Ho Joong Kim, Chief Accountant
The FSS headquarters in Seoul has 38 departments, and 13 offices. Regional offices are in operation in Busan, Daegu, Gwangju, and Daejeon, and representative offices in Jeonju, Chuncheon, Chungju, and Jeju. The FSS is also present in New York, London, Tokyo, and Beijing, and has residing staff in Washington D.C., Frankfurt and Hong Kong.
The FSS established Financial Consumer Protection Agency directly reporting to and under the supervision of the Governor on May 15, 2012, independent of supervision and examination divisions.
Pursuant to Article 51 of the Act on the Establishment, etc. of Financial Services Commission, the Financial Disputes Settlement Committee is a quasi-judicial body established within the FSS to promptly and fairly resolve financial disputes among users of financial institutions. When a user of or a party concerned with a financial institution applies for a settlement of a dispute, the committee will, depending on the nature of dispute, either recommend the parties involved to reach an agreement or deliberate to resolve the dispute upon verification of facts. The committee is composed of up to 30 members, including an FSS deputy governor who serves as the committee chairman. Other members of the committee include assistant deputy governors of the FSS and specialists representing the legal profession, customer groups, financial sectors, academia, and other relevant sectors. As an out-of-court dispute resolution body, the Financial Disputes Settlement Committee assumes a voluntary role in dispute mediation. However, when both parties to a dispute accept a mediator’s proposal, the proposal carries the same effect as an in-court settlement. In this sense, the functions performed by the committee can be said to be quasi-judicial. (Section 5 “Mediation of Financial Disputes,” Act on the Establishment, etc. Of Financial Services Commission)
The Sanctions Review Committee advises the Governor of the FSS regarding deliberation of sanctions pursuant to the Regulations on Examination and Sanctions of Financial Institutions. Charged with deliberating a variety of possible sanctions instituted by the Financial Services Commission and/or the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service, whether against a business' operations or employees, or financial sanctions, the committee is operated to ensure the fairness and equity of sanction measures. The committee is composed of nine members: head and deputy head of sanctions deliberation, head of case presentation, FSS legal advisor (these four members are internal members), FSC representative in charge of case presentation, and four external members chosen from among lawyers, professors, and/or financial experts with professional knowledge of finance-related statutes or scholarship and experience in finance. The three external members are appointed by the Governor of the FSS. Meetings of the committee shall be convened whenever a majority of its members deems it necessary, and resolutions are passed by majority consent of all attending members.
FSS acts as the executive supervisor for the FSC and principally carries out examination of financial institutions along with enforcement and other oversight activities as directed or charged by the FSC.
* Supervision of financial institutions: (Preliminary) review of license applications (for bank, non-bank, financial investment company, insurance company, credit card company, financial holding company, or any other kind of financial institution), review of the terms and conditions of financial institutions; supervision of the soundness of business management and business activities
* Examination of financial institutions: Analysis and evaluation of financial companies’ business activities, financial position, and risk management capacity; verification of companies’ compliance with relevant statutes
* Supervision of the capital  market: Operation of disclosure system to maintain the sound operation of primary and secondary markets for marketable securities; capital market investigation  to prevent unfair trade practices
* Supervision of accounting: Alignment of accounting standards to international accounting standards to achieve enhanced transparency; supervision of accounting to ensure a fair operation of the external audit system
* Protection of customers of financial services: Consultation and handling of customer complaints regarding financial services; protection of customer rights through dispute mediation; financial education of consumers
The Financial Services Commission (FSC) is a central public administration agency falling under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Prime Minister, and is charged with the deliberation and determination of financial policies and other important matters of financial supervision – such as the supervision, examination, and sanctioning of financial institutions, and authorization and licensing of financial institutions. Pursuant to the relevant legal provisions, the FSC may direct and supervise the operations of the FSS. In addition to its inherent responsibilities of supervising and sanctioning financial institutions, the FSS supports the operations of the FSC and its adjoined Securities & Futures Commission, and executes those FSC duties which are entrusted by the FSC to the FSS. (Article 37, Act on the Establishment, etc. of Financial Services Commission)
Prior to February 2008, the law provided that the Chairman of the Financial Supervisory Commission (the predecessor to the Financial Services Commission) be concurrently appointed as the Governor of the FSS, with the FSS directly assisting the operations of the commission. The revision of the Act in February 2008 clearly distinguishes the policy-making function of the FSC and the supervisory enforcement function of FSS, and provides that different persons be assigned to head each organization to ensure more effective checks and balances (Article 29 (2) of the Act). The revision also provides that the Governor of FSS may, as an ex-officio member of the FSC, request to the FSC chairman that matters necessary within the scope of FSS operation be included in the commission’s agenda.
The Bank of Korea may, when the Monetary Policy Committee deems it necessary for the implementation of monetary and credit policies, request the FSS to perform an examination of a bank and/or other financial institutions, or ask that its staff jointly participate in an FSS-led examination. The Bank of Korea may also request the FSS to send the result of examination and ask for certain necessary corrective measures based on the results. When the FSC takes measures that are directly related to monetary and/or credit policies, the Bank of Korea may ask for reconsideration of the measures if it has any objections.
Following the September 2009 signing of the memorandum of understanding (MOU) on information sharing and joint examination among the FSS, the Bank of Korea, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, the FSC, and the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation, the FSS and the Bank of Korea agreed to widen the range of information shared between the entities and increase cooperation to promptly execute joint examinations for emergency cases.
FSS signs a memorandum of understanding on information sharing and joint examination with FSC, BOK, and KDIC.
The Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation may, when deemed necessary for its operation, request the FSS to perform an examination of insured financial companies or ask that its staff jointly participate in an FSS-led examination. Based on the aforementioned MOU, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation and FSS share the financial information of financial companies with each other.
The FSC supervises the Korea Asset Management Corporation (KAMCO), gives directives in relation to its supervision, and receives reports from the corporation on its operations, accounting, and assets. Under instruction of the FSC, the Governor of the FSS may examine the operations, accounting, and assets of KAMCO.
Even before the breakout of the financial crisis, the key policy objective of the FSS was to stabilize the financial market and enhance the health and soundness of Korea’s financial institutions. During the recent period of credit expansion, the FSS took a series of strengthened measures of prudency such as Loan-to-Value (LTV) and Debt-to-Income DTI regulations in March 2006 and the 30% rule restricting savings banks’ project finance (PF) loans in August 2006. From August 2007, when the sub-prime mortgage crisis emerged in the United States, the FSS established and operated a comprehensive monitoring system to track new market developments.
In September 2008, amid rising distress in global financial markets in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the FSS committed itself to market stabilization to ensure an early recovery from the crisis. It operated a round-the-clock monitoring system that was linked with its offices overseas, government agencies, and financial institutions, while closely coordinating policies with the relevant organizations to promptly deal with potential instability factors. The FSS also established a contingency examination system that required its examination competence to focus on preventing systemic risks; its on-site general examination functions were deferred to accommodate the screening of potential risks.
In October 2008, the FSS set up the Foreign Debt Service Guarantee Task Force, thereby working to quickly recover the finance sector’s intermediary role by improving banks’ liquidity ratio and helping to ease the domestic and foreign liquidity crunch faced by local companies. To prevent bad loans from accumulating, the FSS urged banks to maintain a Bank for International Settlements (BIS) ratio of 12% or higher and a Tier 1 capital ratio of 9% or higher as of end of 2008.
The financial crisis was also an opportunity to crack down on unsound business practices that contributed to increased volatility in the foreign currency and stock markets. To ward off unwarranted concerns that served to undermine market confidence, the FSS regularly organized conference calls and issue briefings for domestic and international institutional investors and analysts, as well as briefings for the foreign press.
The expiration of the old Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act at the end of 2005 highlighted the need to address the limitations of creditor banks’ sole discretion over corporate restructuring. As a result, the new Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act was enacted in November 2007. After the fall of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 and the resulting shortage of liquidity and economic recession, industries particularly susceptible to global economic cycles – such as construction, shipbuilding, and shipping – were in dire need of restructuring. In November 2008, the FSS organized the Corporate Credit Task Force in a joint FSS-FSC undertaking to ease businesses’ financial distress and improve their financial position. In December of the same year, the FSS announced directives and policies for major corporate restructuring.11
From January to April 2009, credit risk evaluations were conducted on construction companies, shipbuilders, and shipping companies faced with solvency risks. Based on the results of the evaluations, 46 companies were placed on a corporate workout procedure. By the end of September 2009, six of the companies had been normalized, 17 were still undergoing the workout, and 23 were in the process of court receivership. Subsequent to the industry-specific restructuring drive, the FSS also initiated a restructuring process for the corporate sector at large. Large individual companies with outstanding credit lines of 50 billion won or more were subjected to credit risk evaluations; of 433 companies, 33 were selected for restructuring. By the end of September 2009, three had completed the workout program, 13 were in the process of normalizing their operations through workout, and 17 were in the process of court receivership program.
Given the large number of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the limited availability of information on which to determine restructuring, SME credit risk evaluations were performed in different stages based on the size of credit loans. In July 2009, the first round of evaluations screened 861 companies that were subject to external audits and had in excess of 5 billion won in debt; of them, 113 were selected for restructuring. In the second round of evaluations that ended in September 2009, 1,461 companies subject to external audits and carrying 3 billion won or more in debts were screened, of which 174 were ordered to restructure. In the third round of evaluations that ended in December 2009, companies subject to external audits with debts of 1 billion won or more and those not subject to external audits but with debts of 3 billion won or more were screened; of the 1,842 companies screened, 225 were selected to undergo restructuring.
In an effort to assist with the financial needs of low-income groups severely hit by the global financial crisis, the FSS launched the Microfinance 119 Service (s119.fss.or.kr) on its portal website in March 2009. The website was designed to offer microfinance information and other related services to low-income earners. The portal website offers eight services, including loan information, free credit checks, information on voice phishing fraud, checks on legally established financial institutions,  financial knowledge, credit recovery programs, rehabilitation support programs, and reports of illegal financial practices.