Spreadsheet: jeff_dasovich__14028__CALIFORNIA STRATEGY 0928
Sheet: Sheet1

ISSUE | LEVEL OF BUSINESS PRIORTY (1= High, 5 = Low) | OBJECTIVES |  | ACTIONS |  | FORUM |  | TARGET DATE |  | ENRON VISIBILITY (*) |  | LIKELIHOOD (Achieve 100% of objective by target date)
HIGHEST PRIORITY ISSUES
***WHOLESALE PRICE CAPS*** | 1 | 1.Eliminate them |  | a. Change governance |  | ISO, Legislature, FERC, Courts |  | Q3/2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0
 |  |  |  | [NAME]Wolak
 |  |  |  | c. Work w/ISO and PX
 |  |  |  | d. Prominent economist papers
 |  |  |  | e. Presentations to ISO board
 |  |  |  | f. Informal lobbying of board members
 |  |  |  | g. Build anti-merger coalitions
 |  |  |  | AB 1890 Implementation Group
 |  |  |  | IEP
 |  |  |  | WPTF
 |  |  |  | Customers
 |  |  |  | h. Speak at conferences
 |  |  |  | i. Petition FERC
 |  |  |  | j. Educate PUC
 |  |  |  | k. Educate Legislature
 |  | 2. Raise caps |  | Same as #1 |  | ISO, Legislature, FERC, Courts |  | Q3/2001 |  |  |  | 0.1
 |  | 3. No lower |  | Same as #1 |  | ISO, Legislature, FERC, Courts |  | Q3/2001 |  |  |  | 0.5
***INVESTIGATIONS*** | 1 | 1. No Retroactive Ratemaking |  | a. Understand Enron trading practices |  | CA AG; CPUC; EOB; ISO; PX; FERC; CA auditor general |  | Q4/2000 |  | HIGH |  | 0.75
 |  |  |  | [NAME] questionning CA focus on investigations (witch hunts)
 |  |  |  | Gather intelligence
 |  |  |  | [NAME] paper by economist on market behavior
 |  |  |  | d. Ensure that behavior of all market participants' is scrutinized
 |  | 2. Get FERC to adopt Enron proposals |  | a. Work with Portland and DC |  | FERC |  | Q2/2001 |  |  |  | 0.2
***SOLUTIONS FOR PG&E & EDISON*** | 1 | Promote choice, maximize EES book value & pursue deals |  | a. Develop proposal to address hydro, undercollect, rate freeze |  | PUC, Legislature, Media, Governor |  | Q2/2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0.25
CTC ROLL OFF, OUTSOURCE, UNDERCOLLECTION & HYDRO |  |  |  | [NAME]/proposal
 |  |  |  | c. Work w/coalition & PG&E to support Enron proposal
 |  |  |  | d. Educate PUC and Legislature
 |  |  |  | e. Educate the press
 |  |  |  | f. Speaking engagements
 |  |  |  | g. Target nontraditional consumer groups
 |  |  |  | h .Get AB 1890 group on our side
INFORMATION | 1 | Get more released to the market, sooner |  | a. Presentations to ISO board |  | ISO, PUC, FERC |  | Q2/2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0.75
 |  |  |  | [NAME] staff
 |  |  |  | c. Informal lobbying of board members
 |  |  |  | d. Continue in FERC forums
 |  |  |  | e. Work w/[NAME]
 |  |  |  | f. Educate PUC
 |  |  |  | g. Prominent economist papers
***PUC APPOINTMENT*** | 1 | Pro-competition commissioner |  | a. Find candidates (x-leg; semi-retired biz folks) |  | Governor's Office |  | Q1/2001 |  | LOW |  | 0.1
 |  |  |  | [NAME]
 |  |  |  | c. Build coalition around candidate
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES
Retail
***UTILITY PROCUREMENT*** | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | MEDIUM
DEFAULT PROVIDER |  | 1. Competitive Default Provider |  | Coalition of retailers, wholesalers, IOUs and customers to support |  | Legislature, PUC, Media, Governor |  | Q1/2003 |  |  |  | 0.35
OUT OF MERCHANT FUNCTION |  | 2. IOU out for C&I |  | Coalition of retailers, wholesalers, IOUs and customers to support |  | Legislature, PUC, Media, Governor |  | Q1/2002 |  |  |  | 0.4
FORWARD MARKET FOCUS |  | 3. IOU gets unlimited flexibility & 100% at risk under fixed price |  | Coalition of retailers, wholesalers, IOUs and customers to support |  | PUC, Media, FERC |  | Q1/2002 |  |  |  | 0.25
***DEMAND RESPONSIVENESS*** | 5
ISO PROGRAM |  | Remove all ISO barriers to demand responsiveness (e.g., metering requirements, 10 minute settlements) |  | a. Develop a proposal |  | ISO (Staff and Board) |  | Q1/2001 |  | LOW |  | 0.6
 |  |  |  | [NAME] proposal to ISO staff
 |  |  |  | c. Build coalition to support
***DG*** | 5 | Remove major regulatory barriers at PUC/ISO |  | [NAME] active in CPUC/CEC/ISO/FERC proceedings |  | CPUC, CEC, ISO, FERC, Legislature |  | Q2/2001 |  | LOW |  | 0.5
 |  |  |  | b. Need consultant for ISO?
***INFORMATION*** | 5 | Transparent distribution operation (e.g., losses, congestion, maintenance, etc.) |  | Finish up DG proceeding at PUC on distribution wheeling |  | CPUC |  | Q2/2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0.35
WHOLESALE ISSUES
***ISO/PX GOVERNANCE*** | 3 | 1. Eastern ISO model |  | a. Continue with court case |  | Legislature, Courts, FERC |  | Q3/2001 |  | MEDIUM |  | 0.15
 |  |  |  | [NAME]/lobby legislature
 |  |  |  | c. Work with coalition to propose legislation
 |  |  |  | d. Work with utilities
 |  |  |  | e. Persuade ISO to petition FERC
 |  |  |  | f. Use as chit in SW RTO negotiations
 |  | 2. NEEPOOL model |  | g. Persuade ISO to petition FERC |  | Legislature, FERC |  | Q3/2001 |  |  |  | 0.15
***ISO/PX MERGER*** | 3 | Retain separation |  | a. Work w/Wolak |  | Legislature, FERC |  | 2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0.5
 |  |  |  | [NAME] and PX
 |  |  |  | c. Prominent economist papers
 |  |  |  | d. Presentations to ISO board
 |  |  |  | e. Informal lobbying of board members
 |  |  |  | f. Build anti-merger coalitions
 |  |  |  | AB 1890 Implementation Group
 |  |  |  | IEP
 |  |  |  | WPTF
 |  |  |  | Customers
 |  |  |  | [NAME] at conferences
 |  |  |  | h. Petition FERC
 |  |  |  | i. Educate PUC
 |  |  |  | j .Educate Legislature
***INTERCONNECTION***
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION | 4 | 1. Remove barriers |  | a. Educate FERC staff on Enron proposals |  | PUC/CEC/Legislature |  | Q4/2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0.5
 |  |  |  | [NAME] active at CPUC/CEC
 |  |  |  | [NAME] to adopt CEC recommendations
LARGE PLANTS | 2 | 2. Get IOUs out; get ISO in; standardize interconnection |  | a. Propose in FERC investigation |  |  |  | Q2/2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0.15
 |  |  |  | [NAME] 211 or 202 b request?
 |  |  |  | c. Make proposal to ISO to take IOUs out?
***PLANT SITING*** | 2 | 1. Get Enron-proposed changes in clean-up bill |  | a. Work with Legislature |  | Legislature/CEC |  | Q2/2001 |  | HIGH |  | 0.5
 |  |  |  | [NAME] coalition (IEP)
 |  |  |  | c. Develop PR strategy
 |  |  |  | d. Get CEC on our side and out in front
***FORWARD MARKETS*** | 3 | 1. Keep ISO out |  | [NAME] active at HEPG |  | HEPG, FERC, PUC, Legislature, ISO, PX |  | Q4/2001 |  | MEDIUM |  | 0.4
 |  | 2. Get IOUs in |  | b. Fight Amendment 30 at FERC
 |  | 3. Promote alternatives to PX |  | c. Educate FERC Commission and staff
 |  |  |  | d. See actions under "PX/ISO Merger"
 |  |  |  | e. Work PUC OII to permit alternative exchanges & end PX buy requirement
 |  |  |  | f. Educate legislature
***TRANSMISSION***
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT | 3 | Get ISO CM plan approved by FERC; prevent LMP |  | Lobby ISO Board; work with ISO staff; build coalition; educate FERC staff;meet with FERC Comm's; |  | FERC, ISO, EOB |  | Q1/2001 |  |  |  | 0.6
FTRS | 3 | Finish the job |  | Lobby ISO Board; work with ISO staff; build coalition; educate FERC staff;meet with FERC Comm's; |  | FERC, ISO, EOB |  | Q1/2001 |  |  |  | 0.6
RTOS | 4 | Fight ISO's contention at FERC that it is an RTO |  | Lobby ISO Board and staff; work with FERC team |  | FERC, ISO, EOB |  | Q3/2001 |  |  |  | 0.5
NATIVE LOAD (imports into CA) | 2 | Get rid of it |  | Work with Portland and DC and Houston |  | FERC/Congress |  | Q4/2001 |  |  |  | 0.1