Spreadsheet: 701921d1603987641-formula-for-specific-cell-to-trigger-from-a-drop-down-leed-if-problem
Sheet: Commented

√ | + | ? | - | X
Pts |  | 1 |  |  | Integrative Process
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Consultants' comments | LEMAY's Comments | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4 | D | Integrative Process |  | This work was completed in January 2017, and included preliminary water and energy analyses, along with the completion of the IP credit worksheet. | 1-MGB to send documents to Lemay. | LEED Coordinator |  |  |  | 1. Integrative Process worksheet
Pts |  |  |  |  | Location and Transportation
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 16 | v4.1 | D | [NAME] for Neighborhood Development Location | Locate the project within the boundary of a development certified under [NAME] ND. | Neighborhood is not [NAME] ND certified. | No comments | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Sensitive Land Protection | Locate the development footprint on land that has been previously developed. | This project site is previously developed. | The project is located on an existing industrial site, therefore meets the [NAME] credit intent. Provide site plan for LEED Online submisson. | Lemay |  |  |  | 1. Plan de site, limite de projet, zones de végétation, plans détaillés 2. Narratif du site actuel et passé 3. Narratif sur l'abscence des terres agricoles, risques d'innondation, habitats sensibles
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | High Priority Site | Locate the project in (1) a historic district, (2) a site with priority designation, (3) or a brownfield 	 site. | This site is not expected to meet any of the above criteria and thus will not be targeted. | No comments |  |  |  |  | Option 1:  1. Carte des environs indiquant des terrains déjà aménagés dans les ½ mile (800 mètres) de la limite de projet. 2. Document de l'entité de préservation historique confirmant l'emplacement dans le quartier historique Option 2:  3. Carte des environs ou tout autre document confirmant la désignation du site de priorité Option 3:  4. Documentation de l'autorité compétente déclarant l'existence d'une contamination spécifique et confirmant que la remise en état a été ou sera achevée à sa satisfaction
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 5 | v4.1 | D | Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses |  | Credit cannot be earned. | No comments | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 5 | v4.1 | D | Access to Quality Transit | Locate any functional entry of the project within a 400-meter walking distance of existing or planned bus, streetcar, or rideshare stops, or within a 800-meter walking distance of existing or planned bus rapid transit stops, light or heavy rail stations, commuter rail stations, or commuter ferry terminals. | Non compliant | No comments | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Bicycle Facilities |  | Non compliant | No comments | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Reduced Parking Footprint | Achieve a 20% reduction of parking spaces from the baseline (~50 parking stalls or less for this 	    building, exact requirements TBD). The team has suggested this credit will not be achievable 	 based on many parking stall being available, and additional parking being provided. | Non compliant | With 66 parking spaces, credit compliance hase been confirmed by Lemay with ITE standard. | Lemay
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Green Vehicles | Provide 5% of preferred parking for green vehicles. Provide 2% of all parking with 208-240 v, networked, demand-response ready EV charging stations. | The City may choose to target this credit by limiting the onsite parking and providing the required charging stations. The design of the parking area will be explored in the D.D. phase. | Analysis : Electric plugs to be integrated in the construction documents : equals to 2% of parking capacity as per [NAME].   1.Architecture to provide with numbers of car parking dedicated to green vehicules and locate them on the parking plan.  2. M+B to ensure that the EV plugs meet with [NAME] requirements (network, demand response ready). | Lemay  Mulvey + Banani
Pts |  |  |  |  | Sustainable Sites
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | C | Construction Activity Pollution Plan | Erosion and sedimentation control and verification to be implemented.
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Site Assessment | Conduct a site assessment in pre-design of: (1) topography, (2) hydrology, (3) climate, (4) vegetation, (5) soils, (6) human use, and (7) human health effects. Demonstrate how these topics influences project design.
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | Site Development - Protect or restore Habitat | If a floor-area ratio of 1.5 is achieved, vegetated roof can contribute to the restoration of 30% pre-developed area requirement for 2 points. Else, provide financial support (USD $4/m²) to a conservation organization for 1 point.
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Open Space | Provide 30% of site area as open space, and 25% of this space as vegetated (not turf grass).
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 3 | v4.1 | D | Rainwater Management | Manage on site the runoff from the developed site for the 98th percentile of regional or local rainfall events using low-impact development (LID) and green infrastructures.
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | Heat Island reduction | Provide a combination of green roof, high SRI roof, high SRI hardscape, or shading over hardscape.
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Light Pollution Reduction | Reduce nighttime light pollution by reducing exterior uplighting and site boundary light trespass
Pts |  |  |  |  | Water Efficiency
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Outdoor Water Use Reduction | Provide no irrigation or reduce landscape water use by 30% from baseline as determined by the EPA WaterSense Water Budget Tool. | It is expected no potable water irrigation will be provided. | No comments. | [NAME]Lemay
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Indoor Water Use Reduction | Reduce indoor non-process water use by 20% over baseline, and ensure fixtures are water sense labeled or local equivalent. Clothes washers, dishwashers, prerinse spray values, and ice machines must meet specific standards. | Expected to be achievable. | No comments. | [NAME]Lemay
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Building-Level Water Metering | Install a building water meter and share water use data with the USGBC. | Expected to be achievable. | No comments. | [NAME]Lemay
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | Outdoor Water Use Reduction | Provide no irrigation or reduce landscape water use by 50% from baseline as determined by the EPA WaterSense Water Budget Tool. | No potable water use for irrigation is expected. | Detailed calculations to come at construction documents stage. 2 points targeted.  A narrative detailing water needs for establishment and why no irrigation is necessay thereafter will be provided by landscape architect (it has also been requested by the City) | Lemay
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 6 | v4.1 | D | Indoor Water Use Reduction | Reduce indoor non-process water use by at least 40% over baseline. Consider installing low- flow plumbing fixtures. Consider installing the following: WC ≤ 4.2 LPF, UR ≤ 0.5 LPF, LAV ≤ 1.9 LPM, KS ≤ 5.7 LPM, SH ≤ 5.7 LPM. These flow and flush rates typically produce ±35% water use savings, which equates to 3 WEc1 points. All dishwashers and clothes washers must be ENERGY STAR (or equivalent) rated.  Additional water savings may be achieved by further reducing flow and flush volumes e.g. 1.3 LPM lavatories, 3.8 LPF WCs. Innovative wastewater technologies such as waterless urinals should be considered if more points are desired. 40% reduction - 4 points 45% reduction - 5 points 50% reduction - 6 points 55% reduction - 6 points + 1 Exemplary performance point | Client is willing to go to 1.3 LPM LAV and lower than 5.7 for shower. Remedy reluctant to go to lower than 4.2 WCs. Waterless urinals are a no. The expected water use reduction with current fixture selection is 40%. | 1-Mechanical engineers to send the latest water calculation sheet, along with the plumbing specifications; recalculated to 40%.AS High efficiency appliances-ice machine, dishwashers must be Energy Star certified or equivalent, and  compliant laboratory a equipment such as reverse-osmosis water purifier (75% recovery), steam sterilizer (6.3 or 7.5 gal/US tray), sterile process washer (0.35 gal/US tray), X-ray processor, 150 mm or more in any dimension (film processor water recycling unit), digital imager, all sizes (no water use)  DETAILED CALCULATIONS TO BE SENT AT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS STAGE. | [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | [NAME] | For cooling towers and evaporative condensers, conduct a one-time potable water analysis, measuring at least 5 control parameters, which are Ca (as CaCO3), total alkalinity, [NAME], Cl, Conductivity. Calculate the number of cooling tower cyclers by divideing the maximum allowed concentration level of each parameter by the actual concentration level of each parameter found in the potable makeup water. Limit cooling tower cycles to avoid exeeding maximum values for any parameters. | Not applicable as no cooling tower will be installed. | No comments. | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Water Metering | Install additional water metering for two or more of the following sub systems: (1) irrigation system, (2) indoor plumbing fixtures, (3) domestic hot water, (4) boiler, (5) reclaimed water, or (6) other process water. | This credit is targeted as the City has shown interest in submetering. | 1- Mechanical engineers and CoC to confirm which systems and subsystems are to be metered.   To ensure compliance with this [NAME] credit, the following water usages must be metered :  '- Irrigation - Indoor plumbing fixtures - Domestic Hot Water - Boilers - Reclaimed water (ex : rainwater) - Other process water TO BE DETAILED AT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS STAGE. | [NAME] CoC
Pts |  |  |  |  | Energy and Atmosphere
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | C | Fundamental Commissioning and Verification |  | For the 0-50% design development phase, the City will be acting as commissioning authority until the appointment of a 3rd party consultant.  MGB will be providing fundamental commissionning services. | 1- [NAME]; 2-Ensure the proper documents are updated: OPR, BOD; 3-The Cx Agent must review the OPR, BOD and project design; develop and implement a Cx plan; confirm incorporation of Cx requirements into the construction documents; develop construction checklist; develop a system test procedure ; Verify system test execution; Maintain an issues and benefits log throughout the Cx process, Prepare a final CX process report ; Document all findings and recommendations and report directly to the owner throughtout the process.  20200821 : a kick off meeting has been held with Stantec. Review of OPR and BOD should be executed early septembre 2020. | Stantec
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Minimum Energy Performance |  | Option 1 : This is expected to be achievable.  Achieve modeled energy saving of a minimum of 24% over ASHRAE 90.1 - 2010 or NECB 2011. Target 35% energy use reduction. | Provide the latest energy model update, confirming the energy efficiency gain (to be updated during the value management process). | Integral
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Building-Level Energy Metering | Install a building energy meter and share energy use data with the USGBC. | Expected to be achievable. | No comments. | [NAME]
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Fundamental Refrigerant Management | Do not use chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-based refrigerants in new heating, ventilating, air-conditioning, and refrigeration (HVAC&R) systems. | This is expected to be achievable. | No comments. | [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 6 | v4.1 | C | Enhanced Commissioning |  | City of Calgary has shown an interest in targeting these items. MGB will be providing enhanced commissioning and monitoring based commissioning for 4 points. The City has suggested that the project team include envelope commissioning, though it is not targeted at this time. | 1- [NAME]; 2- [NAME] the comissionning agents activities to the master schedule;  3- These activities are (in addition to the [NAME] activities) reviewing contractor submittals; Including systems manual requirements in construction documents; Including operator and occupant training requirements in construction documents; Verifying systems manual updates and delivery; Verifying operator and occupant training delivery and effectiveness; Verifying seasonal testing ; Reviewing building operations 10 months after sustantial completion; Developing an on-going comissioning plan.    20200821 : a kick off meeting has been held with Stantec. Review of OPR and BOD should be executed early septembre 2020.  20201001: It has been confirmed by [NAME] that the Enhanced Commissioning of the CHP plant has not been included in Stantec's scope of work. As such, 3 points have been moved to maybe awaiting answer from CaGBC on: if the Cx of the CHP plant can be performed in house. | Stantec
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 18 | v4.1 | D | Optimize Energy Performance |  | Achieve modeled energy saving of a minimum of 24% over ASHRAE 90.1 - 2010 or NECB 2011. Target 35% energy use reduction.   Increased energy savings to gain additional LEED points will be discussed with the project team. Cost/benefit analysis will be used to determine capital cost vs. payback for any energy-related systems proposed. | 20200420 : Integral has provided a preliminary energy report showing 32.7% energy cost reduction compared to the baseline. Further energy modelling efforts are to be made to refine the parameters for night time ventilation and DES production system, in line with COC objectives.  20200825 : Integral has confirmed that integrating DES in the energy model would increase substancially the energy efficiency gain for BBC, up to a maximum of 15 points. The energy simulation will be updated accordingly with information provided by COC (detailed list of input sent by Integral). Assumption of 15 points for this scorecard. | Integral
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Advanced Energy Metering | Provide sub-metering for any energy end-use that represents 10% or more of the total annual consumption of the building. | The City has shown an interest in sub-metering thus this credit will be targeted. | 1-Mechanical engineers  to confirm which systems and subsystems are to be metered.  [NAME] requires to install advanced energy metering for the following: • all whole-building energy sources used by the building; and • any individual energy end uses that represent 10% or more of the total annual consumption of the building.  TO BE DETAILED AT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS STAGE. | [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | Demand Response | Since demand response programs are not currently available in Calgary, complete the following: (1) ensure [NAME] has the ability to accept an external price or control signal, (2) develop a plan for shedding at least 10% of the building estimated peak electricity demand, (3) include demand response process in the commissioning scope, (4) contact local utility representatives to discuss participation in future DR programs. | This credit is expected to be achieved. Due to the critical nature of this building, the appropriateness of including it in a demand response program is under review with the project team. | Not targeted | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 3 | v4.1 | D | Renewable Energy Production |  | The City has stated renewable energy systems based on bio-gas are used on site with peak performance of 4.7 MW. This is expected to have the capacity to provide all heat and electricity for the building, though further investigation is required. | 1- Confirm peak performance of the bio-gaz system and the percentage of the energy needs it can fullfill (1% - 1 pt, 5% - 2 pts or 10% - 3 pts).   March 2020 : An email has been sent to CaGBC on March 12, 2020 asking if this credit is achievable considering: 1.	That the co-gen plant is not within the LEED project boundary 2.	The biogas is an eligible biofuel  CAGBC confirmed that biogas is an eligible biofuel for this credit. | [NAME] CoC Lemay
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Enhanced Refrigerant Management |  | Building uses low ozone and global warming impact refrigerants. This is expected to be achievable though investigation of existing an new mechanical system is needed. | 1.	A list of equipment must be provides indicating, quantity, capacity, refrigerant type, refrigerant charge, equipment life. 2.	For projects with variable refrigerant flows systems, provide supporting documentation for how the refrigerant charge value was calculated. 3.	For projects with commercial refrigeration systems, provide documentation that Leak testing has been conducted using the procedures in GreenChill's best practices guideline for leak tightness at installation.  DETAILED CALCULATIONS TO BE SENT AT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS STAGE. | [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | C | Carbon Offsets | Engage in a contract for qualified resources that have come online since January 1, 2005, for a minimum of five years to be delivered at least annually. The contract must specify the provision of at least 50% or 100% of the project's energy from green power, carbon offsets, or renewable energy certificates (RECs). | City purchases green power for 100% of their building's energy use. Two points expected | Based on preliminary energy calculations, a quote for a combination of Green Power and [NAME] has been asked by Lemay (under confidentiality) to cover 5 year commitment (100% of electricity related emissions). Price : 9,400 $. | Lemay
Pts |  | 13 |  |  | Materials and Resources
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Storage and Collection of Recyclables | Provide dedicated areas accessible to waste haulers and building occupants for the collection and storage of recyclable materials for the entire building. | Recycling room to be provided. Ensure program is included that addresses two of : (1) batteries (2) mercury-containing lamps or (3) electronics | 1- City to confirm its space needs for recycling activities;  2- Architects to locate dedicated areas for the recycling program; 3-Include all types of materials specified by [NAME] | Lemay
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning | Develop and implement a construction and demolition waste management plan :  Establish waste diversion goals for the project by identifying at least five materials (both structural and nonstructural) targeted for diversion. Specify whether materials will be separated or comingled and describe the diversion strategies planned for the project. Describe where the material will be taken and how the recycling facility will process the material including expected diversion rates for each material stream.. | Contractor to develop a construction waste management plan. | 1- Requirements to be included in the specifications by [NAME];  2-The construction waste management plan to be developed by General Contractor;  3- Review of the construction waste management plan to be completed by Lemay+Toker | Lemay General Contractor
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 5 | v4.1 | C | Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction |  | Life Cycle Assessment can be conducted. City to decide if this will be targeted. This will be an additional scope of work for which MGB can provide a fee proposal. | COC to confirm to pursue this credit (3 potential points). The Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) credit requires an analysis of the environmental impacts of the building, especially the carbon footprint. Based on a comparison betwen a reference building and the proposed design, an impact reduction of 10% should be demonstrated. (14,000$ fee allocation to Lemay). | CoC
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | C | Building Product Disclosure - Environmental Product Declarations |  | It is expected that one of these points will be achievable by directly specifying products with EPDs. As [NAME] v4 is still new, the availability of EPDs in general is somewhat limited. While some older and industry-wide EPDs exist for comparative purposes, the likelihood of being able to quantify environmental impact reductions for 50% (by cost) of all building products at this time is low. The design team will have to balance the need to achieve [NAME] points through hard- specifying particular products against the owner's requirements for durability, standardization, competitive bidding, fit, and finish. | 1.	Specify products that have compliant EPDs 2.	Compile EPDs for all the materials listed to confirm credit compliance. | Lemay
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | C | Building Product Disclosure  - Sourcing of Raw Materials |  | It is expected that one of these points will be achievable by directly specifying products with EPDs. As [NAME] v4 is still new, the availability of EPDs in general is somewhat limited. While some older and industry-wide EPDs exist for comparative purposes, the likelihood of being able to quantify environmental impact reductions for 50% (by cost) of all building products at this time is low. The design team will have to balance the need to achieve [NAME] points through hard- specifying particular products against the owner's requirements for durability, standardization, competitive bidding, fit, and finish. | Based on the experience of previous projects, compliance to this credit is very difficult to attain. We recommend not to pursue it. | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | C | Building Product Disclosure - Material Ingredients |  | It is expected that one of these points will be achievable by directly specifying products with EPDs. As [NAME] v4 is still new, the availability of EPDs in general is somewhat limited. While some older and industry-wide EPDs exist for comparative purposes, the likelihood of being able to quantify environmental impact reductions for 50% (by cost) of all building products at this time is low. The design team will have to balance the need to achieve [NAME] points through hard- specifying particular products against the owner's requirements for durability, standardization, competitive bidding, fit, and finish. | Based on the experience of previous projects, compliance to this credit is very difficult to attain. We recommend not to pursue it. | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | C | Construction and Demolition Waste Management |  | Contractor to develop a construction waste management plan. | 1- Requirements to be included in the specifications by [NAME];  2-The construction waste management plan to be developed by General Contractor;  3- Review of the construction waste management plan to be completed by Lemay+Toker | Lemay General Contractor
Pts |  |  |  |  | Indoor Environmental Quality
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance |  | Design ventilation to comply with ASHRAE 62.1-2010. Achievement is expected. | Compliance confirmed.  1- MEP Engineers to confirm compliance; 2- Provide [NAME] calculations for [NAME] submissions | [NAME]
Y |  |  |  |  | Pr | Ø | v4.1 | D | Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control | Locate the project in a building that prohibits smoking by all occupants and users both inside the building and outside the building except in designated smoking areas located at least 25 feet (7.5 meters) from all entries, outdoor air intakes, and operable windows. Signage must be posted within 10 feet (3 meters) of all building entrances indicating the no-smoking policy. | Designate smoking areas to be at least 7.5 m from outdoor air intakes, operable windows, and entrances. | 1- [NAME] to identify zones. 2- Signalling to be integrated by Coc | Lemay
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies |  | Costs of implementing these measures will vary depending on mechanical systems and will require discussion with the design team.  2017-04-10- CoC indicated that CO monitoring and other additional measures will not be implemented for achievement of 2nd point. | Compliance confirmed during Phase 1 B (Option 1), including : - Entryways systems; -Exhaust of each space where hazardous gases or chemicals may be present and used; -MERV13 filters | [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | C | Low-Emitting Materials |  | [NAME] v4 has set VOC emissions requirements in addition to the VOC limits which were the sole requirement in previous versions of LEED. The manufacturing industry is adapting to this change and many standard products are completing the required 3rd party certification testing. 3rd party-verified low-emitting flooring, carpet, paints and coatings, composite wood, and furniture are all readily available. The adhesives and sealants industries have been completing the required testing as well, but the design team may find difficulty in finding a product for every use which is VOC emissions compliant. The design team will have to balance the need to achieve [NAME] points through hard-specifying particular products against the owner's requirements for durability, standardization, competitive bidding, fit, and finish. | As for the Materials credits, experience on previous projects has showed us this credit is hard to achieve. Design phase should include selecting products that are compliant with the requirements for this category, and confirm their availability in the market. 1 point could be targeted. | Lemay
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | C | Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan | Develop and implement an indoor air quality (IAQ) management plan for the construction and  preoccupancy phases of the building.  The plan must address all of the creteria. | Develop and implement an indoor air quality management plan for the construction and preoccupancy phases of the building. | 1- Requirements will be included in the specifications;  2- General Contractor to provide the IAQ plan; 3- [NAME] to approve the IAQ plan | Lemay General Contractor
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | Indoor Air Quality Assessment |  | IAQ testing in LEED v4 is not cost effective and many IAQ testing firms do not possess the ability to comply with the new requirements. A building flushout will be incorporated into the project schedule. | 1-Include requirements for building flush out in the specifications; 2-Integrate the building flush out activity in the master schedule | [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Thermal Comfort |  | Not recommended as it may be costly to provide sufficient occupant comfort controls. | No comments. | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 2 | v4.1 | D | Interior Lighting |  | Lighting retrofits may allow for achievement of 1 lighting quality point. Another point is available if task lights are provided though this is not of interest to the City. | 20200818 : Compliance confirmed. This will be done at the construction documents stage.  INFORMATION TO BE SENT DURING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS STAGE. | Mulvey + Banani
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 3 | v4.1 | D | Daylight |  | Not recommended as it is costly to document compliance through computer simulation or on 	 site measurement. | No comments. | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Quality Views | Achieve a direct line of sight to the outdoors via vision glazing for 75% of all regularly occupied floor area. View glazing in the contributing area must provide a clear image of the exterior, not obstructed by frits, fibers, patterned glazing, or added tints that distort color balance. Additionally, 75% of all regularly occupied floor area must have at least two of the indicated 4 kinds of views | Appropriate views may be achievable. MGB to review design when available. | Not targeted | N/A
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | Acoustic Performance |  | Requirements and costs will be reviewed and hiring an acoustic engineering firm will be considered if building occupants will expect to be subject to a high noise environment.  Not expected to be pursued.  2017-04-10 - CoC requested project to target one point | 'Approach to be confirmed with COC. | CoC
Pts |  | 6 |  |  | Innovation
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 5 |  |  | Innovation
 |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | v4.1 | D | Innovation | Green Building Education | Green education program to be evaluated. Options include a program of tours and signage. | Approach to be confirmed with COC. To take advantage of the educational value of the green building features of a project and to earn a LEED point, any approach should be actively instructional. Two of the following three elements must be included in the educational program: '- A comprehensive signage program built into the building's spaces. - The development of a manual, guideline or case study.  - An educational outreach program or guided tour. | Lemay
 |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | v4.1 | D | Innovation | Purchasing Lamps | Impact of older lighting in lab building to be evaluated. Lighting retrofit would all this point to be earned. | This credit is named [NAME] under [NAME] V4 (instead of Low Mercury in [NAME] v3). Requirements are : Implement the lighting purchasing plan that specifies an overall building average of 70 picograms of mercury per lumen-hour or less for all mercury-containing lamps purchased for the building and associated grounds within the project boundary. Include lamps for both indoor and outdoor fixtures, as well as both hard-wired and portable fixtures. [NAME] containing no mercury may be counted only if their energy efficiency at least equals that of their mercury-containing counterparts. | Mulvey + Banani
 |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | v4.1 | D | Innovation | Ergonomics | City ergonomics plan may allow for achievement of this credit. | Approach to be confirmed with COC. ' - Engage an Ergonomist or Health and Safety Specialist to assist in the development of the ergonomics strategy - Make a commitment to integrate ergonomics principles into the overall design | CoC / Lemay
 |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | v4.1 | D | Innovation | Assessment and Planning for Resilience. To encourage designers, planners and building owners/operators to proactively plan before design commences for the potential impacts of natural disasters or disturbances as well as address issues that impact long-term building performance such as changing climate conditions. | Risk analysis | Pilot credit to be confirmed. The city of Calgary has issued in 2018 a disaster [NAME] that identifies risk and a Climate Resilience Strategy-Mitigation and Adaptation Action Plan that identifies strategies. A readyrating score from the Red Cross is needed to complete credit documentation. | CoC / Lemay
 |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | v4.1 | D | Innovation | ≥ 15% Renewable Energy | Greater than 15% renewable energy expected to be provided by bio-gas system. | 1- Confirm peak performance of the bio-gaz system and the percentage of the energy needs it can fullfill (1% - 1 pt, 5% - 2 pts or 10% - 3 pts). | [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | Credit | 1 | v4.1 | D | LEED Accredited Professional | There is a PA LEED ID+C on the project | N/A | Lemay has several LEED Accredited Professionals. | Lemay
Pts |  |  |  |  | Regional Priority
 |  |  |  |  | Statut | Pts | Version | Phase | Name | Requirement | Comments MGB | Comments LEMAY | Responsible |  | LEEDonline | Responsible | [NAME] | Deliverables status
 |  |  |  |  | PRc1 | 4 | v4.1 |  | Regional Priority | Earn up to 4 of the 6 Regional Priority credits. They have been identified by the USGBC regional councils and chapters as having additional regional importance for the project’s region. |  |  | PA [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | 1.1 | 1 | v4.1 |  | Regional Priority | Light pollution reduction (1 pt) |  |  | PA [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | 1.2 | 1 | v4.1 |  | Regional Priority | Indoor water use reduction (4pts) |  |  | PA [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | 1.3 | 1 | v4.1 |  | Regional Priority | Energy Performance (10pts) |  |  | PA [NAME]
 |  |  |  |  | 1.4 | 1 | v4.1 |  | Regional Priority | Building Life Cycle Impact Reduction ( 3 pts) |  |  | PA [NAME]
√ |  | ? |  | X