Spreadsheet: 241421d2-e42d-4765-a5aa-c5c88bedda67
Sheet: Select Measures-Middle School

Selection of Measures for AECs - MIDDLE SCHOOL
 |  | School Name
 |  | School Code
 |  | School Level | H
 |  | Years for which Measures will apply
 |  | Select Measure   (Click on name of measure to jump to section) | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Select a Subject
 |  |  | ACADEMIC GROWTH |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | English
 |  |  | STUDENT ENGAGEMENT |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Language Arts
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reading
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reading & Language Arts (Acuity Only)
REQUIRED | CSAP/TCAP       Reading | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | NWEA MAPS | To receive the indicator rating, |  |  | English [NAME] (CELAPro/ACCESS Only)
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students |  | Mathematics
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  | Math/Algebra (Acuity Only)
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  | [NAME] (Accuplacer Only)
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  | Science
 |  | Cut-point values for percent of students scoring proficient and advanced were: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Select a Measure
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 54.8 |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90 |  | Accuplacer
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 35.4 |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60 |  | Acuity
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 26.7 |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40 |  | Galileo
 |  | Your school's actual percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | NWEA MAPS
 |  | Percent proficient and advanced | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Percent proficient and advanced |  |  | Scantron
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) |  |  | STAR Enterprise
REQUIRED | CSAP/TCAP        Writing | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure? |  |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE)
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Scantron | To receive the indicator rating, |  |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | Meets AEC norms | Approaching AEC norms | Does Not Meet AEC norms | Cut-point value for Exceeds | Cut-point value for Meets | Cut-point value for Approaching
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  | Select a Measure
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  | NWEA MAPS | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40
 |  | Cut-point values for percent of students scoring proficient and advanced were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  | Scantron | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 28.6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Acuity | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 14.6 |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90 |  | Galileo | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 10 |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60 |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40
 |  | Your school's actual percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40 |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE) | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40
 |  | Percent proficient and advanced | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accuplacer | at or above the score needed for college placement without remediation | at or above the score needed for placement in 090 level course | at or above the score needed for placement in 060 level course | below the score needed for placement in 060 level course | 80 | 62 | 40
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Percent proficient and advanced |  |  | STAR Enterprise | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40
REQUIRED | CSAP/TCAP            Math | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure? |  |  | the percent of students increasing at least one grade level was: |  |  |  | Number of students increasing at least one grade level | Percent of students increasing at least one grade level
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Acuity | To receive the indicator rating, |  |  | the percent of students scoring at grade level was: |  |  |  | Number of students scoring at grade level | Percent of students scoring at grade level
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  | Select a Measure
 |  | Cut-point values for percent of students scoring proficient and advanced were: |  |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  | NWEA MAPS | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 9.4 |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  | Scantron | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 4.4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Acuity | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 2 |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90 |  | Galileo | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Your school's actual percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60 |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Percent proficient and advanced | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40 |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE) | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accuplacer | Average [NAME]
REQUIRED | CSAP/TCAP          Science | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Percent proficient and advanced |  |  | CELAPro/ACCESS | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) |  |  | STAR Enterprise | Percent Proficient and Advanced
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure? |  |  | NWEA MAPS
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Galileo | To receive the indicator rating, |  |  | Scantron
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students |  | Acuity
 |  | Cut-point values for percent of students scoring proficient and advanced were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  | Galileo
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 30.3 |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 16.4 |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE)
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 10.8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accuplacer
 |  | Your school's actual percent of students scoring proficient and advanced was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90 |  | Other
 |  | Percent proficient and advanced | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Achievement #1  (Acuity, Galileo, NWEA MAP, Scantron, Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE), or Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)) | Name of Additional Measure | Select a Measure
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, | the percent of students increasing at least one grade level was: |  |  |  |  |  | Percent proficient and advanced
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure?
 |  | Meets AEC norms |  |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) | To receive the indicator rating,
 |  | Approaching AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were: |  |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  | Subject Area 1 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Percent proficient and advanced
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Subject Area 2 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure?
 |  |  |  |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE) | To receive the indicator rating,
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  | Subject Area 3 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Subject Area 4 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Percent proficient and advanced
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure?
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Achievement #2  (Acuity, Galileo, NWEA MAP, Scantron, Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE), or Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)) | Name of Additional Measure | Select a Measure |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Accuplacer | To receive the indicator rating, the school's average Accuplacer score was:
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, | the percent of students increasing at least one grade level was: |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the score needed for college placement without remediation
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 090 level course
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms |  |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Meets AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Approaching AEC norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 80
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 62
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets |  |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual average Accuplacer score was:
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching |  |  |  |  |  |  | Average Accuplacer score
 |  | Subject Area 1 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure?
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Subject Area 2 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Subject Area 3 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Subject Area 4 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Achievement  (Accuplacer ONLY) | Name of Additional Measure | Accuplacer
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | Reading
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the score needed for college placement without remediation
 |  | Meets AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 090 level course
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 80
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 62
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Number of students meeting metric expectations | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation
 |  | Name of Additional Measure | Accuplacer
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | English
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the score needed for college placement without remediation
 |  | Meets AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 090 level course
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 95
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 70
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 50
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Number of students meeting metric expectations | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation
 |  | Name of Additional Measure | Accuplacer
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | Early Algebra
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the score needed for college placement without remediation
 |  | Meets AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 090 level course
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | at or above the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the score needed for placement in 060 level course
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 85
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 61
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 45
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Number of students meeting metric expectations | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Achievement  (Other #1) | Name of Additional Measure | enter name of additional measure
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | enter subject area(s) for additional measure
 |  | Metric of Additional Measure | enter metric for additional measure
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | enter criteria for exceeding norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms | enter criteria for meeting norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | enter criteria for approaching norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | enter criteria for not meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | enter cut-point value for exceeding norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | enter cut-point value for meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | enter cut-point value for approaching norms
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Number of students meeting metric expectations | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Achievement  (Other #2) | Name of Additional Measure | enter name of additional measure
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | enter subject area(s) for additional measure
 |  | Metric of Additional Measure | enter metric for additional measure
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | enter criteria for exceeding norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms | enter criteria for meeting norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | enter criteria for approaching norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | enter criteria for not meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | enter cut-point value for exceeding norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | enter cut-point value for meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | enter cut-point value for approaching norms |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Select a Measure
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic achievement was: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Accuplacer | Number of Students achieving target | Percent achieving target
 |  | Number of students meeting metric expectations | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Acuity | Number of Students with typical or high growth | Percent with typical or high growth
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | CELAPro/ACCESS | Median growth Percentile | Median growth percentile
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation |  |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | NWEA MAPS Reading | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: |  |  |  | Galileo | Number of Students achieving target | Percent achieving target
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Achievement  (Other #3) | Name of Additional Measure | enter name of additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students |  |  | NWEA MAPS | Number of Students achieving target | Percent achieving target
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | enter subject area(s) for additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  |  | Scantron | Number of Students achieving target | Percent achieving target
 |  | Metric of Additional Measure | enter metric for additional measure |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  |  | STAR Enterprise | Number of Students achieving target | Percent achieving target
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic achievement was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE) | Number of Students achieving target | Percent achieving target
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | enter criteria for exceeding norms |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth were: |  |  |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) | Number of Students achieving target | Percent achieving target
 |  | Meets AEC norms | enter criteria for meeting norms |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | enter criteria for approaching norms |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | enter criteria for not meeting norms |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40 |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | Meets AEC norms | Approaching AEC norms | Does Not Meet AEC norms | Cut-point value for Exceeds | Cut-point value for Meets | Cut-point value for Approaching | 1st criteria | 2nd criteria | 3rd criteria
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic achievement were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was: |  |  |  | Select a Measure
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | enter cut-point value for exceeding norms |  |  |  |  |  | Percent achieving target |  |  |  | NWEA MAPS | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth were: | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | enter cut-point value for meeting norms |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) |  |  |  | Scantron | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth: | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | enter cut-point value for approaching norms |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Scantron Reading | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: |  |  |  | Acuity | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving typical or high growth was: | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving typical or high growth were: | Your school's actual percent of students achieving typical or high growth was:
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic achievement was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students |  |  | Galileo | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth: | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Number of students meeting metric expectations | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth: | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE) | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth: | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  |  | Accuplacer | at or above the score needed for college placement without remediation | at or above the score needed for placement in 090 level course | at or above the score needed for placement in 060 level course | below the score needed for placement in 060 level course | 80 | 62 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was: | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth: | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
BACK TO TOP |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth: |  |  |  | CELAPro/ACCESS | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 57 | 46 | 36 | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's median growth percentile was: | Cut-point values for the median growth percentile were: | Your school's actual median growth percentile was:
ACADEMIC GROWTH |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90 |  |  | STAR Enterprise | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 57 | 46 | 36 | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's median growth percentile was: | Cut-point values for the median growth percentile were: | Your school's actual median growth percentile was:
REQUIRED | CSAP/TCAP Reading | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's median growth percentile was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Percent achieving target
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Cut-point values for the median growth percentile were: |  |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Acuity   Reading & Language Arts | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving typical or high growth was:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 57.4 |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 46.8 |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 41.2 |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Your school's actual median growth percentile was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving typical or high growth were:
 |  | Median growth percentile | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 20) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
REQUIRED | CSAP/TCAP Writing | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's median growth percentile was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students achieving typical or high growth was:
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Percent with typical or high growth
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Galileo      Reading | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was:
 |  | Cut-point values for the median growth percentile were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 57.2 |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 43.4 |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 38.6 |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Your school's actual median growth percentile was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth:
 |  | Median growth percentile | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 20) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
REQUIRED | CSAP/TCAP Math | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's median growth percentile was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Percent achieving target
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) Reading Composite | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was:
 |  | Cut-point values for the median growth percentile were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 50.6
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 42 |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 33.6 |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  | Your school's actual median growth percentile was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Median growth percentile | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth:
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 20) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Growth #1  (Accuplacer, Acuity, CELApro Overall [NAME], Galileo, NWEA MAPS, Scantron, Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE), or Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)) | Name of Additional Measure | Select a Measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Meets AEC norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Percent achieving target
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  |  |  |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE)     Reading | To receive the indicator rating, the percent of students achieving their target growth was:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching |  |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  | Subject Area 1 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students achieving target growth:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  | Subject Area 2 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students achieving target growth was:
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Percent achieving target
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Subject Area 3 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject |  |  | OPTIONAL |  | CELAPro/ACCESS Overall English Language Proficiency | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's median growth percentile was:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  | Use measure? |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Subject Area 4 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for the median growth percentile were:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 57
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 46
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 36
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual median growth percentile was:
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Growth #1  (Accuplacer, Acuity, CELApro Overall [NAME], Galileo, NWEA MAPS, Scantron, Test for Adult Basic Education (TABE), or Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)) | Name of Additional Measure | Select a Measure |  |  |  |  |  | Median growth percentile | to be populated by CDE with 2011-2012 data
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching
 |  | Subject Area 1 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Subject Area 2 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Subject Area 3 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Subject Area 4 of Additional Measure | Select a Subject
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Growth  (Other #1) | Name of Additional Measure | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | enter subject area(s) for additional measure
 |  | Metric of Additional Measure | enter metric of additional measure
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic growth was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | enter criteria for exceeding norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms | enter criteria for meeting norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | enter criteria for approaching norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | enter criteria for not meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic growth were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | enter cut-point value for exceeding norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | enter cut-point value for meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | enter cut-point value for approaching norms
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic growth was:
 |  | Total number of students meeting measure | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Growth  (Other #2) | Name of Additional Measure | enter name of additional measure
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | enter subject area(s) for additional measure
 |  | Metric of Additional Measure | enter metric of additional measure
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic growth was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | enter criteria for exceeding norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms | enter criteria for meeting norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | enter criteria for approaching norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | enter criteria for not meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic growth were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | enter cut-point value for exceeding norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | enter cut-point value for meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | enter cut-point value for approaching norms
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic growth was:
 |  | Total number of students meeting measure | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Academic Growth  (Other #3) | Name of Additional Measure | enter name of additional measure
 |  | Subject Area of Additional Measure | enter subject area(s) for additional measure |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Measure | Exceeds AEC norms | Meets AEC norms | Approaching AEC norms | Does Not Meet AEC norms | Cut-point value for Exceeds | Cut-point value for Meets | Cut-point value for Approaching | 1st criteria | 2nd criteria | 3rd criteria
 |  | Metric of Additional Measure | enter metric of additional measure |  |  |  | OPTIONAL | 4, 5, 6, or 7 year Graduation Rate | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's 4, 5, or 6 year graduation rate was: |  |  |  | Select a Measure
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student academic growth was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students |  |  | Graduation Rate | Graduation rate | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 65.3 | 39.9 | 30.7 | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's 4, 5, 6, or 7 year graduation rate was: | Cut-point values for 4, 5, 6, or 7 year graduation rate were: | Your school's actual 4, 5, 6, or 7 year graduation rate was: | Number of students to graduate
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | enter criteria for exceeding norms |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  |  | Successful Transition Rate | Successful transition rate | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students to successfully transition was: | Cut-point values for percent of students to successfully transition were: | Your school's actual percent of students to successfully transition was: | Number of students to successfully transition
 |  | Meets AEC norms | enter criteria for meeting norms |  |  |  |  |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  |  | Post-Completion Success Rate | Post-completion success rate | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's post-completion success rate was: | Cut-point values for post-completion success rate were: | Your school's actual post-completion success rate was: | Number of students with post-completion success
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | enter criteria for approaching norms |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  |  | Workforce Readiness | Percent meeting benchmark | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students to meet or exceed readiness benchmark was: | Cut-point values for percent of students to meet or exceed readiness benchmark were: | Your school's actual percent of students to meet or exceed readiness benchmark was: | Number of students with workforce readiness
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | enter criteria for not meeting norms |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for 4, 5 or 6 year graduation rate were: |  |  |  | Credit/ Course Completion | Percent of students | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students completing courses to be on-track to graduate was: | Cut-point values for percent of students completing courses to be on-track to graduate were: | Your school's actual percent of students completing courses to be on-track to graduate was: | Number of students with credit/ course completion
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student academic growth were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 65.3
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | enter cut-point value for exceeding norms |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 39.9
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | enter cut-point value for meeting norms |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 30.7
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | enter cut-point value for approaching norms |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual 4, 5, or 6 year graduation rate was:
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student academic growth was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Graduation rate | to be populated by CDE with 2011-2012 data
 |  | Total number of students meeting measure | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) | to be populated by CDE with 2011-2012 data
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 20) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Percent of students meeting metric expectation |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students to meet or exceed readiness benchmark were:
BACK TO TOP |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
REQUIRED | Average Daily Attendance Rate             (required unless school is a facility) | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's average daily attendance rate was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students to meet or exceed readiness benchmark was:
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Percent meeting benchmark
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  | OPTIONAL | Credit/Course Completion | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's percent of students completing courses to be on-track to graduate was:
 |  | Cut-point values for average daily attendance rate were: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 92.5 |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 86.2 |  |  |  |  |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 81.3 |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Your school's actual average daily attendance rate rate was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for percent of students completing courses to be on-track to graduate were:
 |  | Attendance rate | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
REQUIRED | [NAME]  (required if any grades 7-12 are served and the school is not a facility) | To receive the indicator rating, the AEC's truancy rate was: |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above the 90th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  | Meets AEC norms | below the 90th percentile but at or above the 60th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual percent of students completing courses to be on-track to graduate was:
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | below the 60th percentile but at or above the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Percent of students
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below the 40th percentile of all AECs |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Cut-point values for truancy rate were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 0.8
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 7.7
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 12.1
 |  | Your school's actual truancy rate rate was:
 |  | Truancy rate | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16) | to be populated by CDE with 2013-2014 data
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Student Engagement #1  (Student Re-engagement Rate, Returning Student Rate, Postitive Socio-Emotional or Psychological Adjustment Rate) | Name of Additional Measure | Select a Measure
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Student Engagement #2  (Student Re-engagement Rate, Returning Student Rate, Postitive Socio-Emotional or Psychological Adjustment Rate) | Name of Additional Measure | Select a Measure
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms |  |  |  |  | OPTIONAL | Student Re-engagement Rate | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for student re-engagement rate was: |  |  |  |  | Measure | Exceeds AEC norms | Meets AEC norms | Approaching AEC norms | Does Not Meet AEC norms | Cut-point value for Exceeds | Cut-point value for Meets | Cut-point value for Approaching | 1st criteria | 2nd criteria | 3rd criteria
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students |  |  | Select a Measure
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students |  |  | Student Re-engagement Rate | Re-engagement rate | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for student re-engagement rate was: | Cut-point values for student re-engagement rate were: | Your school's actual value for student re-engagement rate was: | Number of students re-engaging
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds |  |  |  |  |  |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students |  |  | Returning Student Rate | Returning student rate | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student engagement was: | Cut-point values for additional measure of student engagement were: | Your school's actual value for additional measure of student engagement was: | Number of students returning
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students |  |  | Postitive Socio-Emotional or Psychological Adjustment Rate | Adjustment Rate | at or above 90 percent of students | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students | below 40 percent of students | 90 | 60 | 40 | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for socio-emotional or psychological adjustment was: | Cut-point values for socio-emotional or psychological adjustment were: | Your school's actual value for socio-emotional or psychological adjustment was: | Number of students with Postitive Socio-Emotional or Psychological Adjustment
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for student re-engagement rate were:
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | 40
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Your school's actual value for student re-engagement rate was:
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Student Engagement #3  (Student Re-engagement Rate, Returning Student Rate, Postitive Socio-Emotional or Psychological Adjustment Rate) | Name of Additional Measure | Select a Measure |  |  |  |  |  | Re-engagement rate
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Using following measure?
 |  | Meets AEC norms |  |  |  |  | OPTIONAL | Returning Student Rate | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure of student engagement was:
 |  | Approaching AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Exceeds AEC norms | at or above 90 percent of students
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms |  |  |  |  |  |  | Meets AEC norms | below 90 percent but at or above 60 percent of students
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Approaching AEC norms | below 60 percent but at or above 40 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds |  |  |  |  |  |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | below 40 percent of students
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point values for additional measure of student engagement were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | 90
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Cut-point value for Meets | 60
 |  |  | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
OPTIONAL | Additional Measure of Student Engagement--OTHER  (required for facility schools since attendance and truancy are not appropriate measures) | Name of Additional Measure | enter name of additional measure
 |  | Metric of Additional Measure | enter metric of additional measure
 |  | To receive the indicator rating, the criteria for the additional measure  of student engagement was:
 |  | Exceeds AEC norms | enter criteria for exceeding norms
 |  | Meets AEC norms | enter criteria for meeting norms
 |  | Approaching AEC norms | enter criteria for approaching norms
 |  | Does Not Meet AEC norms | enter criteria for not meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point values for additional measure  of student engagement were:
 |  | Cut-point value for Exceeds | enter cut-point value for exceeding norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Meets | enter cut-point value for meeting norms
 |  | Cut-point value for Approaching | enter cut-point value for approaching norms
 |  | Your school's actual value for additional measure  of student engagement was:
 |  | Total number of students meeting measure | enter number of students meeting measure
 |  | Total students contributing to measure (if N ≥ 16) | enter number of students contributing to additional measure
 |  | Total student count (if N ≥ 16)
BACK TO TOP