Spreadsheet: 018ca39e-b3a4-4006-9da4-ebbfd756532f
Sheet: Sheet1

REF NO | Suggested Response
DCSR1 | Atherstone Canal - amend wording
[NAME] | Support welcomed
DCSR3 | Hartshill - amend description.  Amend wording to seek after use of mineral sites.  Decommissioning of quarries - clarify wording.  Sites fro Gypsy & Travellers will be taken forward through Gypsy & Traveller DPD.
DCSR4 | No change to the housing target due to reductions in housing numbers by local authorities in the Coventry & Warwickshire area.   New & Old Arley surrounded by Green Belt so increase in housing numbers would be modest
DCSR4 | Housing target to be revised
DCSR5 | Concerns over delivery of housing noted
DCSR5 | NW12 - amend wording
DCSR6 | NW7 - amend wording
DCSR6 | NW7 - amend wording
DCSR6 | NW8 - amend wording
DCSR6 | NW8 - amend wording
[NAME] | HCA support welcomed
[NAME] | HCA support welcomed
DCSR8 | No retail study proposed at this time
DCSR8 | No retail study proposed at this time
DCSR9 | Support welcomed - consider mentioning [NAME] in descriptions of places
DCSR10 | Employment - accept small employment sites can be appropriate in varying sizes of settlements.  Housing - consider increased numbers for Warton and need for elderly accommodation
DCSR11 | Link between [NAME] and Tamworth is noted
DCSR12 | No change to where Ansley Common sits in settlement hierarchy
DCSR12 | Need to explain character of co-joined settlements important and so developments need to take this in to account.
DCSR12 | No change to where Ansley Common sits in settlement hierarchy
[NAME] | When revising plan look at consistency of terminology.  Provide a separate Glossary document for the LDF process that can be used for all documents that are being prepared and then highlight key words in each document.  [NAME]
DCSR14 | Refer to possible HS3 but can do no more until announcement has been made where this line will go.  Understand the concern of number of units at Newton Regis but suggest no change at present
DCSR14 | Concern of loss of services noted
DCSR15 | No change to allow Green Belt to be released for housing
DCSR15 | Issue over housing supply noted
DCSR15 | No change to allow Green Belt to be released for housing
DCSR15 | No change to what being suggested to be permitted in Category 4 settlements
DCSR15 | No change to what being suggested to be permitted in Category 4 settlements
DCSR15 | No Green Belt release for housing being proposed
 | Clarification will be provided on how housing figures have been developed
DCSR16 | More clarity on minerals needed in the document and link to Minerals LDF
DCSR17 | Affordable housing could come through as a Community Right to Build in Furnace End - no changes to Green Belt boundaries or allocation of housing numbers
[NAME] | No Green belt changes to allow land for employment use at Curdworth
[NAME] | No Green belt changes to allow land for employment use at Curdworth
[NAME] | No Green belt changes to allow land for employment use at Curdworth
[NAME] | No Green belt changes to allow land for employment use at Curdworth
DCSR19 | Gypsy & Traveller DPD Issues and Options going out for consultation in June 2012
DCSR19 | Issue of further study of need to be considered in Issues for Gypsy & Traveller DPD
DCSR20 | Refer to importance of broadband in the Core Strategy.  No specific policy at this time.
DCSR21 | SHLAA is part of the evidence base and sites shown would require to be consistent with the Core Strategy as well as other relevant planning policies
DCSR22 | Development being sort on industrial site in countryside - no change
DCSR22 | Development being sort on industrial site in countryside - no change
DCSR23 | Next stage of Core Strategy production is [NAME].  Allocations to come through Site Allocations DPD
DCSR23 | Direction of development will be considered in the Site Allocations DPD
DCSR23 | Housing target to be revised
DCSR23 | Support for 40% affordable housing requirement welcomed but housing target only being revised to cover extension in Plan period
DCSR23 | Note focus of development should be on Main / Market Towns
DCSR24 | No Green Belt boundary changes being proposed - no change
[NAME] | Water Orton - no Green belt revision proposed.  Need to comment on route of HS2
DCSR26 | No change to overall strategy. Sites will be brought forward through the Site Allocations DPD.
DCSR26 | No change to overall strategy.
DCSR26 | NW1 - no change to over thrust of policy.  [NAME] will be brought forward but for a specific end user.
DCSR26 | Issue of employment land noted but no change recommended
DCSR26 | Issue of where employment land will be located will be taken forward through the Site Allocations DPD
DCSR26 | NW2 - no change
DCSR26 | Clarify wording to ensure that the Core Strategy is strategic and directs development appropriately
DCSR27 | Comments over the Plan being inflexible is noted but is not accepted.  It is flexible where appropriate.
DCSR27 | [NAME] of a policy on the re-use of rural buildings will be brought forward through the Development Management DPD
DCSR28 | Detailed policy on conversion of rural buildings will be in the Development Management DPD
DCSR29 | Refer to Minerals planning more in the document and cross reference to Minerals LDF, which will be prepared by the County Council
DCSR30 | No Green Belt review being proposed - no change
DCSR30 | Work on the Site Allocations DPD will ensure the delivery of housing sites.  This work has commenced and will follow the Core Strategy.
DCSR30 | NW1 - make clear that development boundary can be altered through the Site Allocations DPD.  NW3 - clarification on viability testing.  NW12 to be revised
DCSR30 | Housing growth is permitted inside development boundaries of those settlements surrounded by Green Belt.  The housing target is a Borough wide target and the strategy directs this growth mainly to those areas outside of the Green Belt.
DCSR31 | Consider through Site Allocations DPD if appropriate
DCSR32 | Support for Affordable housing policies welcomed
[NAME] | Support for how Plan deals with [NAME] is welcomed
[NAME] | Support for how Plan deals with Curdworth is welcomed
DCSR35 | Information on waterways noted
DCSR35 | Information on waterways noted
DCSR35 | Information on waterways noted
DCSR35 | Information on waterways noted
DCSR36 | NW1 - consider revision of use of maximum in light of NPPF
DCSR37 | NW1 - objection to housing outside of Atherstone noted
DCSR37 | NW2 - objection to more employment land noted
DCSR37 | Support noted
DCSR37 | NW5 - issue of loss of historical building noted
DCSR37 | Concern noted
DCSR37 | Development of Magistrates Court in Atherstone noted
DCSR37 | NW12 - support noted
DCSR38 | No Green Belt review proposed.  Development of sites in the Green Belt would only come forward if "appropriate".
[NAME] | NW1 - overall housing target to be amended but Kingsbury is a settlement surrounded by Green Belt so limited development to take place inside development boundary
[NAME] | Plan period to be revised
DCSR40 | NW12 - policy to be revised
DCSR41 | Update status of [NAME] and implications especially from proposed Interchange Station at NEC
DCSR42 | NW7 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW7 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW7 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW7 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW8 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW8 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW8 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW8 - amend wording
DCSR42 | NW13 - amend wording
DCSR43 | No change
DCSR43 | NW2 - no change
DCSR43 | NW3 - comment noted
DCSR43 | NW4 - no change
DCSR43 | NW6 and NW7 - no change
DCSR43 | NW9 - support welcomed
[NAME] | Housing figure - no change for settlement
DCSR45 | Changes around the Whitacre Garden site would involve land being taken out of Green Belt - no change
DCSR46 | No comment
DCSR47 | Land at Hams Hall - wording to be revised.
DCSR47 | Change to wording of employment policy - no change