Spreadsheet: 8d78cc48-477b-48fc-a7ab-d5042718e1e1
Sheet: Sheet1

GENERAL | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7 | Unnamed: 8 | Unnamed: 9 | Unnamed: 10 | Unnamed: 11 | Unnamed: 12 | Unnamed: 13 | Unnamed: 14 | Unnamed: 15 | Unnamed: 16
Ordinance Fact Sheet |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Ordinance Number
Brief Title |  |  | Approval Deadline |  |  | Reason
Authorizing the Director of City Planning to enter into an |  |  |  |  |  | Authorizing the Director of City Planning to enter into an agreement
agreement on behalf of the City of Kansas City, Missouri |  |  |  |  |  | on behalf of the City of Kansas City, Missouri for the Cerner Data Center
for the Cerner Data Center Project. |  |  |  |  |  | Project.  The agreement outlines the business deal as it relates to the
 |  |  |  |  |  | Ch. 100 Plan to be executed in calendar 2006.
Details |  |  |  |  |  | Positions/Recommendations
 | Reason for Legislation |  |  |  |  | Sponsor |  | [NAME]
 | Authorizing the Director of  City Planning to enter into an agreement on behalf of Kansas City, Missouri (the “City”) with Cerner to outline a proposed [NAME]. 100 Plan to be executed in calendar 2006.  The agreement outlines the business deal as it relates to an estimated $425 million dollars of investment by the company. |  |  |  |  | Programs,
 |  |  |  |  |  | Departments,
 |  |  |  |  |  | or Groups |  | City Planning
 |  |  |  |  |  | Affected
 |  |  |  |  |  | Applicants / |  | Applicant
 |  |  |  |  |  | Proponents
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | City Department
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other
 | Discussion |  |  |  |  | Opponents |  | Groups or Individuals
 | Cerner proposes to develop a data center consisting of approximately 105,000 square feet, together with approximately 15,000 square feet of office space.  Cerner has determined that it will not carry out the project unless it is able to obtain sufficient economic incentives related to its investment in the project. |  |  |  |  |  |  | Basis of opposition
 |  |  |  |  |  | Staff
 |  |  |  |  |  | Recommendation |  |  |  | For
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Against
 | The City finds that the project serves a public purpose in that it will promote economic development in the City and serve as a catalyst for additional investment.  The City finds that the expansion of Cerner's economic presence in the City, the creation of new jobs in the City and Cerner's investment in the project serves a public purpose by furthering the City's policy of encouraging economic stability and growth.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reason Against
 |  |  |  |  |  | Board or
 |  |  |  |  |  | Commission |  | By
 |  |  |  |  |  | Recommendation
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | For |  |  |  | Against |  | No action taken
 | The company anticipates investing $70 million dollars in year one and additionally investing $355 million in the following nine years.  This investment estimates payment in lieu of taxes to all affected taxing jurisdictions in the amount of $23.7 million.  The abatement is projected to be $27.5 million over the same period. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | For, with revisions or conditions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (see details column for conditions)
 |  |  |  |  |  | Council
 |  |  |  |  |  | Committee Actions |  |  |  | Do pass
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Committee Sub.
 | The company expects to break ground in January of 2006.  To ensure that the company can move forward without an approved Ch. 100 plan, the City proposes to execute the attached agreement to provide assurances to the company that the City will execute a Ch. 100 plan in calendar 2006. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Without Recommendation
 | the company can move forward without an approved Ch. 100 plan, the City
 | proposes to execute the attached agreement to provide assurances to the |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Hold
 | company that the City will execute a Ch. 100 plan in calendar 2006.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Do not pass
 | The school district and county are aware of the project.  Staff has met with the affected jurisdictions and they are in agreement with the project and process by which the City is moving forward to execute the Ch. 100 plan.
 | the company can move forward without an approved Ch. 100 plan, the City
 | proposes to execute the attached agreement to provide assurances to the
 | company that the City will execute a Ch. 100 plan in calendar 2006.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (Continued on reverse side)
Details |  |  |  |  |  | Policy/Program Impact
 |  |  |  |  |  | Policy or Program
 |  |  |  |  |  | Change |  |  |  | No |  |  |  | Yes
 |  |  |  |  |  | Operational
 |  |  |  |  |  | Impact
 |  |  |  |  |  | Assessment
 |  |  |  |  |  | Finances
 |  |  |  |  |  | Cost & Revenue
 |  |  |  |  |  | Projections --
 |  |  |  |  |  | Including Indirect
 |  |  |  |  |  | Costs
 |  |  |  |  |  | Financial Impact
 |  |  |  |  |  | Fund Source (s)
 |  |  |  |  |  | and Appropriation
 |  |  |  |  |  | Account Codes
Applicable Dates:
Created By:   [NAME]
Reviewed by:  [NAME]
Reference Numbers