Spreadsheet: richard_shapiro__32601__Accomplishment-june5th2001-Masteredit
Sheet: MIDWest

Accomplishment for the Period November 2000 to April 2001
No. | Accomplishments | Customer | Value | Area |  |  |  |  | Methodology
 | (description) | (B. Unit) | ($) | Deal Support | Origination | Risk Management | [NAME] | Other
Name: | Roy Boston | Region/Country: |  | Great Lakes Region | Primary Activity: | Electricity | Secondary Activity: | Gas
 | Deal support for Project Lincoln | EESI | 500000 | Support origination for mid market customer leads.  Coordinate product development with Structuring. Provide briefings and edication to originators and other personnel as needed regarding Illinois market and tariff choices for customer service | Provide sales call support.  Participate in customer premise vists  to explain market and utility risks and how EESI's product addresses those risks. | Provide analysis and advice regarding protection of current book of business in Illinois.
 | Deal support for Project Lincoln | EESI | 1500000 | Support origination for large commodity deals. | Provide sales call support.  Participate in customer premise vists  to explain market and utility risks and how EESI's product addresses those risks.
 | Deal support for Project Motown | ENA | 100000 | Support for restructuring of MPLP contract and for protection of current revenue streams from the project. |  | Provide regulatory advice regarding how Consumers Energy recovers capacity payment costs through its rates and how that compares to colpayments received by MPLP under the PPA.
 | Deal support for ENA Chicago. | ENA | $ ? | Provide a description and analysis of fixed price and PBR proposals for LDCs across the country for the purpose of providing options to Peoples Energy for its review and consideration.
 | Support for Accounts Management | EESI | 300000 | Provide eductaion, descriptions analysis and advice regarding the tarifss and service choices available to current electric customers in Illinois.customers |  | Assist accounts management in its optimization of current customer taroiffed service choices and to mitigate price risks attendant to changes in the Market Value component of the PPO. | Provide tariff and terms analysis to support customers self gen run capability behind IP for rate classes SC 24 and SC 21. | Make customer premises visits as needed.  Explain service choices and regulatory steps to be taken to support customer choices.
 | Provide briefings as needed to Structuring to explain changes in the Illinois Market. | EESI | 1000000 | Support product development and bring new personnel up to speed in market relevant issues. |  | Provide analysis and estimates for market direction and highlight steps that need to be taken to protect current book of business.
 | Provide briefings as needed to URM to explain changes in the Illinois Market. | EESI | 1000000 |  |  | Meet with EESI and GA personnel to evaluate changes in product curves to better reflect risks implicit in the market.
 |  |  |  | Mid West | Primary Activity: | Electricity | Secondary Activity:
Name: | [NAME] | Region/Country:
1 | Assist ENA | OPPD | 15-35 Million | close open position | [NAME]
2 | Assit ENA | OPPD | ? | build generation | [NAME]
3 | Reduce MAPP budget | EPMI | 200000
4 | Operate control area | Enron SE | ? | continue operation in ECAR/main in spite of Enron selling the units | [NAME]
5 | Encourage open markets as well as a real time energy market.  Customer is EPMI | EPMI | ? | MISO Day 2 congestion management | [NAME]
[NAME]
1 | FE-MSG Protocal Regulatory Negotiations to facilitate market entry | Multiple | $6.5 mil gross margin |  | X |  | X |  | EES#- mark to market
2 | FE Resale issue briefed and pursued issue at PUCO for win. | [NAME] | $1.5 mil | X |  | X | X |  | EES value for resale opportunity
3 | Refund from [NAME] (part of negotiation) | Enron Gov't Affairs | 171000 |  |  |  | X |  | Check received by [NAME] delivered to [NAME]
4 | Opposed siting legislation that could have adversely affected sale of plant | ENA West Fork (Indiana) | $300 mil | X |  | X | X |  | Sale price of plant to Alleghany
5 | Get commercial cost exempt from certificate and payment of assessment in proposed Ohio law that passed applicable only to residential | EES | $400,000/yr in avoiced assessments |  |  | X | X |  | Gross x PUCO and OCC assessment rate
[NAME]
 | Derailed Ameren UE sponsored legislation to estalblish anti-competitive gencos. | EES ENA | N/A |  |  |  | X |  | N/A
 | Analyzed and critiqued Alliance RTO filings providing comments to Tabors and Watkiss | EES ENA | N/A |  |  |  | X |  | N/A
 | Led Enron effort to shap Michigan PSC implementation of 1/02 retail access | EES ENA | N/A |  | X |  | X |  | N/A
 | Provide analysis on case-by-case basis for  ENA and EES inquiries re: gas commodity price hedging, rates and tariffs inquiries | EES ENA | N/A |  | X |  | X |  | N/A
 | Engaged in legislative/rulemaking activities in Louisiana, Arkansas and West Virginia to develop and implement retail access. | EES ENA | N/A |  |  |  | X |  | N/A
Name: | [NAME] | Region/Country: |  | Midwest Region | Primary Activity: | Electricity | Secondary Activity: | Gas
 | Inauguration.  Efficiently managed the state government affairs interests and participation at the Inagural in January | All |  |  |  |  | X | X
 | Energy bill passed in Minnesota.  This bill streamlines siting for generation and transmission; requires development of interconnection standards; allows municipal and cooperative utilities to enter into joint financing and other agreements | ENA/EES |  |  |  |  | X |  | Valuation would be based on whether we developed a generating plant; whether we entered into deals with munis and coops, whether we installed distribution generation behind a customer site, whether the transmission system was sufficiently upgraded to improve the overall liquidity of the MAPP region.
 | Western states governors effort on price caps.  Along with [NAME], was able to very quickly mobilize and sustain support against implemention on weterns wide price caps. | ENA/EES | immeasurable | X | X | X | X |  | Efforts are ongoing.  Measurement would be difficult, and would have to include consideration of all future business that would be impacted by a mandated price cap.
 | [NAME] nuclear decommissioning.  Successful advocacy in ICC docket that reduced [NAME] collection of nuclear decommissioning costs by $7 million over 6 years for a total reduction of at least $42 million.  This reduction positively impacts our margin on customer contracts that were sold "all in" contracts. | EES | $420,000 to $840,000 |  |  | X |  |  | Questimate.  Took total $42 million reduction and allocated 1% to 2% as olur share of customers.  A more precise measure should be made by comparing our customer load to the total [NAME] load
 | Ensured that legislationo r other administrative action did not occur in Illinois to negatively impact the sale of one power plant and value of two development sites | ENA | Go back to last year report ([NAME] and [NAME] worked a forumal last year. | X |  | X |  |  | As I recall, the methodology we used last year was to put a value on what we through the plant would sell for and then assign a percentage of that value to gov. affaris.  I believe that the value to gov affairs was in the 3 to 6% range.  This year's calculation should include the two development values as well.