Spreadsheet: 17404893-b8c9-496c-83e3-dbf1953d511d
Sheet: Sheet1

Organization | Commenter | Comment Category:  Need | Comment Category:  Document Revision | Comment Category:  Approach Revision | Comment Category:  Standard Content | Need | Reference FGDC Standards | Schedule | Funding | Size of Work Group | Information Sharing | Standard Creation Issues | Attribute Data
FGDC Comments
Standards Working Group | [NAME], Chair | yes | yes | yes |  | yes | ISO feature geometry, FGDC address, FGDC governmental units, FGDC national grid | schedule ambitious, needs revisions | concern over $15000 expected from CAP grant.  What happens if it is not granted?
Subcommittee on Cultural and Demographic Data | [NAME] | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |  | schedule ambitious |  | too large, create smaller committee within to write standards |  | create a draft standard ahead of time; create a data model to work from
Metadata Coordinator | [NAME] | yes |  |  |  | yes
Federal Agency Comments
USDA/NRCS | [NAME], FPO | yes |  |  |  | yes
US FWS | Deb Green, National GIS Coordinator | yes |  |  |  | no comment
FEMA | [NAME], FEMA/DHS IT-GIS | yes |  |  |  | yes |  |  | potential shortage if relying on grant
BLM | [NAME], National Data Sharing Coordinator | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt |  | should specify money to pay for SHPO travel to participate; should include expertise in standard creation | subgroups may be necessary to carry out standard creation |  | create data model to work from
USFS | [NAME], Geospatial Services | yes | yes | yes |  | yes | reference lack of FGDC standards specifically |  | funding should represent costs incurred by other agencies | need more communication
USFS | [NAME], FPO | yes |  |  |  | yes | FS has agency-wide standards, not specified if cultural resource
GSA | [NAME], Center for Historic Buildings | yes |  |  |  | not specified |  |  |  |  |  | does USGS already have sufficient cultural resource standard?
DoD | [NAME], DISDI Standards | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | need to research and identify more potential related standards | schedule ambitious | potential shortage if relying on grant | need more participation and more than one major meeting, may need subgroups | Concern over the inclusion of existing GIS or databases | clarify objectives and requirements, define scope, justify need, define benefits, criteria to determine when to use a pt/ln/py, criteria to define links to attribute data | concern over the standards applying to attribute data
SHPO/THPO Comments
Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria THPO | [NAME], [NAME] | yes |  | yes | yes | yes |  |  |  | include academic institutions and all THPOs |  |  | clarify that the standards will not address attribute data and will not produce a mandated Federal "system"
Alaska SHPO | [NAME], Deputy SHPO | yes |  | yes | yes | yes | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt |  | should specify money to pay for SHPO travel to participate and to implement | all SHPOs should be included in process |  | recognize that Alaska geographic scales and needs different | clarify that the standards will not address attribute data and will not produce a mandated Federal "system"
Kentucky SHPO | [NAME], GIS Specialist | yes |  |  |  | yes
Michigan SHPO | [NAME], Information Coordinator | yes |  | yes | yes | yes |  |  | should specify money to pay for SHPO travel to participate and to implement |  | Concern over the inclusion of existing GIS or databases |  | clarify that the standards will not address attribute data and will not produce a mandated Federal "system"
National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers | [NAME]. Executive Director | yes |  | yes |  | yes | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt | schedule ambitious | should specify money to pay for SHPO travel to participate and to implement |  | must include all agencies and SHPOs
New Hampshire SHPO | [NAME], Records Coordinator | yes |  |  |  | yes
New Jersey SHPO | [NAME], GIS Coordinator | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt and DoD |  | should specify money to pay for SHPO travel to participate and costs of SHPOs to implement | consider regionally focused smaller groups |  | scope should include minimum core attribute fields; should discuss the extraction of data to national dataset; describe core attribute data; should separate out types of cultural resources; create formal metadata profile;strategies for securing data
New Mexico SHPO | [NAME], Archaeological Records Management System | yes |  |  | yes | yes |  |  |  |  | Concern over the inclusion of existing GIS or databases |  | clarify that the standards will not address attribute data and will not produce a mandated Federal "system"
Nevada SHPO | unknown | yes |  |  |  | not specified
Pennsylvania SHPO | [NAME] | yes |  | yes |  | yes | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt | schedule ambitious |  | work group should represent geographic spread
South Carolina SHPO | [NAME], Deputy SHPO | yes |  | yes | yes | yes |  |  | should specify money to pay for SHPO travel to participate |  | how will the FGDC keep SHPOs informed over process? | concern over time and cost of upgrading to standards, would grant money be available for this
Wisconsin SHPO | [NAME], Digital Historic Preservation Coordinator | yes | yes | yes | yes | not specified | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt |  | should specify how many hours required by [NAME] and how much funding available for participation | clarify that Summit will be inclusive of all who want to participate and will involve the review of best practices |  | collect all state standards for comparison | clarify that the standards will not produce a national database, clarify relationship to "inventory" project
Wyoming SHPO | [NAME], Interim SHPO | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt | schedule ambitious | should specify money to pay for SHPO travel to participate, should provide funding for states to implement | work group should be primarily state experts | Concern over the inclusion of existing GIS or databases | need to address implementation strategy | clarify that the standards will not address attribute data and will not produce a mandated Federal "system"
Vermont SHPO | [NAME], State Archaeologist | yes |  |  |  | yes | need to reference previous SHPO sponsored attempt