Spreadsheet: 04bd0add-f372-44a8-8097-ad5a881d9f75
Sheet: Sheet1

Forest [NAME] -- Landscape-Level Urban Forest Analysis
Site Description (Commercial Parking Lot, Residential Community, Portion of Road Right-of-Way, etc.)
Criteria | Vegetation Resource - Performance Indicators | Scale | Score
1. Canopy [NAME] |  |  | 0
Excellent | The existing canopy cover equals 75%-100% of the goal | 4
Good | The existing canopy cover equals 50%-75% of the goal | 3
Fair | the existing canopy cover equals 25%-50% of the goal | 2
Poor | the existing canopy cover equals 0%-25% of the goal | 1
Comments:
2. Diversity of Tree Sizes |  |  | 0
Excellent | 25% of the tree population is in each of four RDBH classes | 4
Good | No RDBH class represents more than 50% of the tree population | 3
Fair | Any RDBH class represents  50% to 75% of the tree population | 2
Poor | Any relative DBH class represents > 75% of the tree population | 1
Comments:
3. Species Suitability for Climate Zone |  |  | 0
Excellent | All trees are of species suitable for Broward County (BC) USDA-10b | 4
Good | More than 75% of trees are of species considered suitable for BC | 3
Fair | 50%-75% of trees are of species considered suitable for BC | 2
Poor | Less than 50% of trees are of species considered suitable for BC | 1
Comments:
4. Tree Health - Environmental Stress |  |  | 0
Excellent | Greater than 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 4
Good | 50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 3
Fair | 25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 2
Poor | Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 1
Comments:
5. Tree Health -- Human Stress |  |  | 0
Excellent | Greater than 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 4
Good | 50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 3
Fair | 25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 2
Poor | Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 1
Comments:
6. Tree Health -- Insect Damage |  |  | 0
Excellent | Greater than 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 4
Good | 50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 3
Fair | 25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 2
Poor | Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 1
Comments:
7. Tree Health -- Disease Damage |  |  | 0
Excellent | > 75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 4
Good | 50%-75% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 3
Fair | 25%-50% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 2
Poor | Less than 25% of trees rated as excellent health condition | 1
Comments:
8. Tree Health -- Adequate Root Zone |  |  | 0
Excellent | > 75% of trees have adequate root zone | 4
Good | 50%-75% of trees have adequate root zone | 3
Fair | 25%-50% of trees have adequate root zone | 2
Poor | Less than 25% of trees have adequate root zone | 1
Comments:
9. Wind Resistance of Tree Species |  |  | 0
Excellent | > 75% of trees are rated on highest category of wind resistance | 4
Good | 75% of trees rated in high category of wind resistance | 3
Fair | 50% of trees rated in moderate category of wind resistance | 2
Poor | 75% of trees rated in lowest category of wind resistance | 1
Comments:
10. Diversity of Tree Species |  |  | 0
Excellent | No tree species represent more than 10% of the tree population | 4
Good | No tree species represent more than 20% of the tree population | 3
Fair | No tree species represent more than 40% of the tree population | 2
Poor | One tree species represents more than 50% of the tree population | 1
Comments:
11. Tree Species Longevity |  |  | 0
Excellent | More than 75% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC | 4
Good | 50%-75% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC | 3
Fair | 25%-50% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC | 2
Poor | Less than 25% of trees are of species considered long-lived for BC | 1
Comments:
12. Tree Site Suitability |  |  | 0
Excellent | Right tree Right Place with vision for the future | 4
Good | Right tree Right Place | 3
Fair | Guidelines were considered for the selection of suitable species | 2
Poor | Tree species were considered in planting site selections | 1
Comments:
13. Nuisance Exotic Vegetation Management |  |  | 0
Excellent | No trees impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation | 4
Good | <10% impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation | 3
Fair | 25% -10% impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation | 2
Poor | > 25% of trees impacted by nuisance exotic vegetation | 1
Comments:
14. Canopy heterogeneity |  |  | 0
Excellent | Canopy is not uniform, has emergents and understory species | 4
Good | Canopy is uniform only in small patches, has emergents & understory | 3
Fair | Canopy is uniform throughout (present or absent) or in large patches | 2
Poor | Canopy is completely uniform or entirely absent | 1
Comments:
 |  | TOTAL
 |  | Excellent | 52
 |  | Good | 39 - 51
 |  | Fair | 26 - 38
 |  | Poor | 13 - 25