Spreadsheet: mark_taylor__25074__Weekly Marketing Report22_26Oct01
Sheet: Weekly Report

 |  |  | Weekly Marketing Report
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Since Launch
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  | Distinct | Total | Distinct
Production User Information
Logins
 | All Users
 | Client Users
 | Commodity Logic Users
Guest User Information
Logins
 | All Users
 | Client Users
Production Users During 10/22-10/26/2001 (5) |  |  |  |  |  |  | Guest User During 10/22-10/26/2001 (4)
Enron North America Corp. |  |  |  |  |  |  | Allegheny Energy Service Corporation
Reliant Energy Services, Inc. |  |  |  |  |  |  | El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
Panaco, Inc. |  |  |  |  |  |  | EnSerCo, Inc.
Dynegy Marketing and Trade |  |  |  |  |  |  | Oneok NGL Marketing, L.P.
National Steel Corporation
Kaztex Energy Management Inc. |  |  |  |  |  |  | New Guest Users ID's issued during 10/22-10/26/2001
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Alleghney
Production User Update
Site Usage During the Month of October
October Usage
Production User Update
 |  |  | **Bank Logic |  | Invoice Logic |  | *** Confirm Logic | [NAME] | Total
# of Paying Customers |  |  | 6 |  | n/a |  | n/a | n/a
Potential Revenue Generating Transactions |  |  | 18 |  | 33575 |  | 7190 | 149464
Revenue from Potential Transactions |  |  | 132990.38 |  | 26137.5 |  | 21235 | 281895.5
 | $ Financed Through Bank Logic |  | 76554767.11
 | * Tenor |  | 11.17
Footnotes
Please note that the change in this weeks revenue generating transactions is due to a new method of calculation
*  Average # of Days Bank Logic Transaction takes place to standard transaction dates
** All Numbers are recorded from Bank Logic's initial production launch date of 1/21/2001  .   Transaction in all other modules (Invoice, Confirm, and [NAME]) are recorded from a Production Launch Date of 8/6/2001.
*** There are currently no [NAME] users in our production site
NomLogic - Transactions & Revenue have increased due to the implementation of the new billing query.  We are now counting deal days, however we have also increased base transactions to 100 per month.  This "pricing change" went into effect Oct. 1 for this process.
Year End Goal Progress
Goals |  |  |  |  |  |  | % Complete
100,000 Potential Revenue Generating Transactions
$100 M Financied Through Bank Logic
20 Paying Customers using Production
Amendment Progress
Amendment Revision Status
Company | Contacted [NAME] | Notified Enron Legal | Amendment Template Sent to Counterparty | Amendment Revisions Status |  |  | Customer Reviewing Amendment Changes | In Negotiations | Revised Amendment Signed
 |  |  |  | Power |  | Gas
 |  |  |  | P | F | F
Sempra | x | x |  |  |  |  | x
Duke | x | x
[NAME] | x | x
Reliant | x | x |  | x
Dynegy | x | x |  | x
[NAME] | x | x |  | x
Entergy-Koch | x | x | x
Mirant | x | x |  | x
Cargil | x | x |  | x
AEP | x | x
Morgan Stanley | x | x
Ameren | x | x
Current Agreement Status
Company | ISDA Agreement in Place | ENA Master Agreement in Place | CounterParty Agreement in Place | No Agreement in Place
Sempra |  | x
Duke
[NAME]
Reliant
Dynegy |  |  | x
[NAME]
Entergy-Koch |  |  |  | x
Mirant
Cargill
AEP | x
Morgan Stanley |  | x
Ameren
Sales Update Information
 |  |  | This Week | To Date |  |  | Additional Information
 | New Companies Contacted |  | 0 | 91
 | # Companies Mailed Information |  | 0 | 62 |  |  | See Notes
 | # [NAME] |  | 5 | 26 |  |  | Bridgeline
 | # Meetings Attended |  | 6 | 29 |  |  | See Notes
 | Upcoming Meetings |  | 0 | n/a |  |  | See Notes
 | Guest User Agreements Signed |  | 3 | 29 |  |  | El Paso, Allegheny
 | Subscribers Signed |  | 0 | 6
Meetings
10/22-10/26/2001 |  |  | 10/29-11/02/2001 |  |  |  |  | During November
Date | Company |  | Date |  |  |  |  | Date | Company
2001-10-24 00:00:00 | Calpine |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2001-11-07 00:00:00 | Bridgeline- ConfirmLogic
2001-10-24 00:00:00 | Cargill
2001-10-24 00:00:00 | El Paso
2001-10-24 00:00:00 | AEP
2001-10-25 00:00:00 | Allegheny
2001-10-25 00:00:00 | Allegheny
Additional Marketing Information
Note that there is a change in total and distinct numbers of log ins for both [NAME] and Production.  Today, we began using a better query in obtaining our data.  The ratios of Test to Company users still remains fairly consistent despite the use of a new query