Spreadsheet: b281f083-8a56-4897-b191-efdeb4d90e22
Sheet: Sheet1

GENERAL | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7 | Unnamed: 8 | Unnamed: 9 | Unnamed: 10 | Unnamed: 11 | Unnamed: 12 | Unnamed: 13 | Unnamed: 14 | Unnamed: 15
Ordinance Fact Sheet |  |  |  |  |  |  | Ordinance Number
Brief Title |  |  | Approval Deadline |  | Reason
 | To establish appropriations for the Forensic
 | DNA Unit Efficiency Improvement Program
Details |  |  |  |  | Positions/Recommendations
 | Reason for Legislation |  |  |  | Sponsor
 | To estimate revenues of $120,000 in the Police |  |  |  | Programs,
 | Grants Fund and provide appropriations for the |  |  |  | Departments, |  |  |  | Police Department
 | same amount related to the Forensic DNA Unit |  |  |  | or Groups
 | Efficiency Improvement Program. |  |  |  | Affected
 |  |  |  |  | Applicants / |  | Applicant
 |  |  |  |  | Proponents
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | City Department
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Police Department
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Other
 |  |  |  |  | Opponents |  | Groups or Individuals
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | None known.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Basis of opposition
 | This ordinance applies to Investigations.
 | The Department Of Justice has awarded the
 | Forensic DNA Unit Effiency Improvement |  |  |  | Staff |  | x |  | For
 | Program to the Police Department to fund |  |  |  | Recommendation
 | equipment and consultants to automate |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Against
 | the DNA validation process.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | Reason Against
 |  |  |  |  | Board or
 | This grant is 100% federally funded. |  |  |  | Commission |  | By |  |  | Board of Police Commissioners
 |  |  |  |  | Recommendation
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | x | For |  |  |  | Against |  |  | No action taken
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | For, with revisions or conditions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (see details column for conditions)
 |  |  |  |  | Council |  |  |  | Do pass
 |  |  |  |  | Committee Actions
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Do pass (as amended)
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Committee Sub.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Without Recommendation
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Hold
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Do not pass
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | (Continued on reverse side)
Details |  |  |  |  | Policy/Program Impact
 |  |  |  |  | Policy or Program
 |  |  |  |  | Change |  |  |  | No |  |  |  | Yes
 | Is this ordinance "good for the children"?
 | Yes, because it helps protect public safety in
 | Kansas City.
 | How will this contribute to a sustainable Kansas City? |  |  |  | Operational
 | This grant has no environmental impact. |  |  |  | Impact
 |  |  |  |  | Assessment
 |  |  |  |  | Finances
 |  |  |  |  | Cost & Revenue |  |  | The $120,000 increase in revenues and charge
 |  |  |  |  | Projections -- |  |  | outs offsets related expenditures of $120,000.
 |  |  |  |  | Including Indirect
 |  |  |  |  | Costs
 |  |  |  |  | Financial Impact |  |  | The impact of this ordinance is neutral since the
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | increase in revenues equals the increase in
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | expenditures.
 |  |  |  |  | Fund Source (s)
 |  |  |  |  | and Appropriation
 |  |  |  |  | Account Codes
Applicable Dates:
Reviewed by:
Reference Numbers