Spreadsheet: 0a7885bb-aad2-459f-a53d-7e560ed729c8
Sheet: Rejected Projects

List of Rejected Projects  (Sorted by rejection date, for bid opened from July 2011 to Sep 2012, as of 10/2/2012)
No. | Contract # | Bid Opening Date | Bid Rejection Date | Number of Bidders | Engineer's Estimate | [NAME] | Low Bid vs. EE | Program | Bid Rejection Reasons
1 | 08-334874 | 2011-07-28 00:00:00 | 2011-09-15 00:00:00 | 5 | 1593949.25 | 1572806.75 | -0.01326422406485024 | Other | Material defect.
2 | 07-4L2204 | 2011-09-15 00:00:00 | 2011-10-31 00:00:00 | 7 | 2846627 | 4300643.7 | 0.5107858177414885 | SHOPP | Overrun
3 | 10-0S1904 | 2011-10-12 00:00:00 | 2011-11-21 00:00:00 | 2 | 1184275.5 | 1642000 | 0.386501705050894 | SHOPP | Overrun
4 | 04-4A8824 | 2011-10-19 00:00:00 | 2011-11-21 00:00:00 | 2 | 281868 | 244425 | -0.132838775597088 | SHOPP | Materially unbalanced or nonresponsive bids.
5 | 04-4A07U4 | 2011-09-27 00:00:00 | 2011-12-23 00:00:00 | 11 | 56806166.5 | 37190532 | -0.3453081893846859 | SHOPP | The new conditions in the Incidental Take Permit (ITP) for the project were not addressed clearly in the contract specifications.
6 | 02-2E2904 | 2011-11-30 00:00:00 | 2012-01-05 00:00:00 | 4 | 4228636.04 | 6498609.84 | 0.536809926067792 | SHOPP | Overrun
7 | 08-0P9304 | 2011-11-10 00:00:00 | 2012-01-26 00:00:00 | 3 | 2044150 | 4029900 | 0.9714306680038157 | Maintenance | The first two bidders were nonresponsive  and the third one was overrun.
8 | 11-2M2404 | 2011-12-08 00:00:00 | 2012-02-01 00:00:00 | 3 | 2528060 | 3017894 | 0.19375885066019 | Maintenance | All three bidders were nonresponsive.
9 | 04-2E2604 | 2011-11-30 00:00:00 | 2012-02-08 00:00:00 | 4 | 976725.32 | 1056460.9 | 0.08163562300197148 | Maintenance | All four bidders did not meet the required DVBE goal.
10 | 04-0120M4 | 2012-01-18 00:00:00 | 2012-03-07 00:00:00 | 7 | 42924544.3 | 28704096.75 | -0.3312894238460208 | Other | The period of time to award this contract expired before there was a mutual agreement between the bidders and the Department to extend the bids.
11 | 09-349104 | 2011-11-30 00:00:00 | 2012-03-07 00:00:00 | 4 | 873765.33 | 929929 | 0.06427775064043803 | Maintenance | All four bidders did not meet the required DVBE goal and have been found to be nonresponsive.
12 | 04-2E5304 | 2012-02-01 00:00:00 | 2012-03-12 00:00:00 | 4 | 2697605 | 2951510 | 0.09412237892500941 | Maintenance | The period of time to award this contract expired before there was a mutual agreement between the bidders and the Department to extend the bids.
13 | 08-0P7904 | 2012-03-08 00:00:00 | 2012-03-21 00:00:00 | 3 | 1078795 | 739620 | -0.3144017167302407 | Maintenance | Subsequent to the bid opening, it was determined there was an error in the estimate which will put the State at a contract administrative disadvantage.  Therefore, the Department has decided to reject all bids.
14 | 07-1W0504 | 2012-01-26 00:00:00 | 2012-04-02 00:00:00 | 5 | 1168265.5 | 964092.9 | -0.1747655819674551 | Maintenance | The three lowest bidders were found to be nonresponsive.  In addition, the period of time to award this contract expired before there was a mutual agreement between the bidders and the Department to extend the bids.
15 | 08-0N1404 | 2012-03-01 00:00:00 | 2012-04-12 00:00:00 | 6 | 823684 | 1094580 | 0.3288834067433627 | Minor A | Six bids were received for this project.  The low bidder was determined to be nonresponsive, and the 2nd lowest bid is 32.89 percent above the Engineer's Estimate and exceeds available funding.  The Department has rejected all the bids.
16 | 09-348104 | 2012-03-28 00:00:00 | 2012-04-12 00:00:00 | 3 | 4462084 | 5195595 | 0.1643875373031973 | Maintenance | Three bids were received for this project.  The low bidder has asked for relief of bid, and the 3rd lowest bidder has been found nonresponsive.  The remaining bid is 40% over the Engineer's Estimate, and appears to be mathematically unbalanced.  The Department has decided to reject all bids.
17 | 03-4M2404 | 2012-03-28 00:00:00 | 2012-04-13 00:00:00 | 3 | 2402862.6 | 2199998 | -0.08442621729598691 | Maintenance | Three bids were received for this project.  Subsequent to bid opening, it was determined that there was a material defect in the bidding documents.  The Department has decided to reject all bids.
18 | 03-4M2904 | 2012-04-17 00:00:00 | 2012-05-03 00:00:00 | 6 | 2591182 | 2585585 | -0.002160018092129383 | Maintenance | Six bids were received for this project.  Subsequent to bid opening, it was determined that the two lowest bids appear to be unbalanced due to a material quantity defect in the Engineer's Estimate.  The Department has decided to reject all bids.
19 | 06-0M2204 | 2012-04-10 00:00:00 | 2012-05-11 00:00:00 | 5 | 1795452 | 1670000 | -0.06987209905917842 | Maintenance | Five bids were received for this project.  The first four bidders were found to be nonresponsive.   The fifth bidder is 57% over the Engineer's Estimate and exceeds available funding.  The Department has rejected the bid.
20 | 01-474414 | 2012-05-14 00:00:00 | 2012-05-22 00:00:00 | 4 | 4716086.5 | 3999726 | -0.1518972351334099 | SHOPP | Four bids were received on this project.  Subsequent to bid opening, it was determined that the contract specifications for this project were materially flawed.  The Department has decided to reject all bids.
21 | 04-2E2304 | 2012-01-31 00:00:00 | 2012-05-24 00:00:00 | 6 | 1552256.2 | 1658658 | 0.0685465453447698 | SHOPP | The Departmental Good Faith Effort Reconsideration Committee has determined that the low bidder (Truesdell), second bidder (Peterson-Chase) and the 3rd bidder (Bay Line Cutting & Coring) did not make a good faith effort to meet the UDBE goal and are no longer eligible for award.   We do not have current bid extensions for the remaining bidders, therefore there are no qualified bidders on this project.
22 | 08-0L9004 | 2012-05-17 00:00:00 | 2012-06-28 00:00:00 | 4 | 904633.12 | 1298000 | 0.4348358149876272 | Minor A | There were four bidders on this project.   The third and fourth bidders were found to be nonresponsive.   We did not receive bid extensions in the required timeframe for the 1st and 2nd bidders, so there are no qualified bidders.
23 | 05-1A9704 | 2012-06-13 00:00:00 | 2012-07-02 00:00:00 | 7 | 1636640 | 1385592 |  | SHOPP | There were seven bids on this project.   Caltrans was unable to complete all the administrative requirements necessary to extend the bid.  Therefore, there are no eligible bids for the project.
24 | 08-0L5904 | 2012-04-19 00:00:00 | 2012-07-24 00:00:00 | 8 | 591556 | 925000 |  | Minor A | There were eight bidders on this project.  The 1st and 5th bidder were found to be nonresponsive.  All other bidders did not return the bid extension requests within the required timeframe.  Therefore, there are no qualified bidders.
25 | 05-0M9704 | 2012-07-03 00:00:00 | 2012-07-24 00:00:00 | 2 | 1515103 | 2077777 |  | SHOPP | Two bids were received for this project.  The low bid is 37.14 percent over the Engineer's Estimate and both bids exceed available funding.  Subsequent to the bid opening, the district determined there is a more cost effective treatment for the metal beam guardrail.   The Department has rejected both bids.
26 | 11-289604 | 2012-07-26 00:00:00 | 2012-08-21 00:00:00 | 7 | 642790 | 444242 |  | SHOPP | Seven bids were received for this project.  The field site conditions for this project changed between when the design was completed and when bid opening took place.  Therefore, the current contract documents are obsolete.  The Department has decided to reject all bids.
27 | 04-3A23U4 | 2012-08-08 00:00:00 | 2012-09-14 00:00:00 | 5 | 25087733.7 | 29988888 |  | STIP | There were five bids received for this contract.  Subsequent to the bid opening, it was determined that there was a material defect in the contract documents, which creates a reasonable doubt that an award would result in the lowest ultimate cost to the State.  The Department has decided to reject all bids.  The scope of the work and the funding will be re-evaluated and the project will be re-advertised at a later date.
28 | 11-290304 | 2012-11-08 00:00:00 | 2012-12-19 00:00:00 |  |  |  |  |  | There was one bidder for this project.  The bidder has been found to be nonresponsive, therefore there are no qualfiied bidders. The plans are being retained in DES-OE for one month. Project BEES will be unlocked at receipt of the DES-CCD memo.  If District does not make material changes to the project within one month of bid rejection the plans will be returned for retention in the District and should be submitted as a new PS&E submittal.