Spreadsheet: 73055d1273711551-radio-button-evaluation-programming-contractor-evaluation-0511a
Sheet: Sheet1

r
r |  |  |  | CONTRACTOR:
 | TEAMWORK/SERVICE FOCUS |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Total Count
 |  |  |  |  |  | U | I | ME | EE | EX |  | U | I | ME | EE | EX
1 | Did the contractor communicate with the contract administrator in accordance with the contract documents? |  |  |  |  | r
2 | Was the contractor cooperative and accommodating to the City and contract administrator? |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | r |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3
3 | Did the contractor encourage cooperation and collaboration and work in partnership with the project team? |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | r
 | ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
4 | Did the contractor promptly commence the work? |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | r
5 | Did the contractor adequately staff the project and work to meet the owner's schedule? Was the project workforce qualified and capable of maintaining an accelerated project schedule? |  |  |  |  |  |  | r
6 | Did the contractor employ adequate site supervision consistently on-site when work was performed? |  |  |  |  | r
7 | Did a person with decision-making authority represent the contractor at pay/progress meetings? |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | r
8 | Were shop drawings submitted on time, and were they complete? |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | r
9 | Did the contractor understand the scope of work?
 | WORK PERFORMANCE
10 | Did the contractor submit, follow, and update a written schedule in accordance with the contract documents?
11 | Did the contractor effectively coordinate and manage the work of its subcontractors?
12 | Did the contractor provide effective quality assurance and quality control?
13 | Did the contractor keep the site clean and free of trash and debris?
14
15 | Was the quality and submissions timelines of the following items acceptable?
16 | ● | two week look ahead schedule
17 | ● | accurate and complete record documents (as-builts)
18 | ● | FATS, SATS and training instructions
19 | ● | complete operations and maintenance manuals
20 | ● | testing and balancing reports
21 | Did the contractor comply with all warranty provisions and requests for warranty work
22 | Did the contractor have authorization in the performance of additional work?
 | PROACTIVE PERFORMANCE/DILIGENCE
23 | Did the contractor actively work to respond to problems on timely fashion.
24 | Did the contractor suggest solutions and display an initiative to implement solutions?
25 | Did the contractor share accountability for results where applicable?
26 | Was the contractor responsive to directivesor instructions from the City?
27 | Did the contractor coordinate to minimize disruption of  operations with the city and customers?
 | QUALITY OF WORK/COMPLIANCE WITH ECHNICAL STANDARDS
28 | Did the contractor value the importance of delivering high-quality services and products?
29 | Did the contractor understand and comply with Toronto Water and all applicable standards?
30 | Were the materials and workmanship in compliance with the contract documents?
31 | Did the contractor promptly correct defective work as the project progressed?
32
 | QUALITY OF SAFETY STANDARDS
33 | Did the contractor comply with OHSA requirements?
34 | Did the contractor meet the environmental requirements of the contract?
35 | Did the contractor take adequate precautions with any hazardous materials?
36 | Did the contractor properly report all injuries or damage associated with this project?
 | TORONTO WATER
 | Customerservice-Claims
 | Work performance-Did the contractor address third party claims in a timely manner.
 | Change Orders/
 | Did the contractor address customer service issues promptly?
r
r
r