Spreadsheet: 41498647-96f1-4b26-9361-318a4fad145d
Sheet: Sheet1

NCCAT – D Data Analysis Worksheet | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7 | Unnamed: 8
CATEGORY 1.  CURRICULUM and INSTRUCTION
Indicator 1.1 The district ensures implementation of a curriculum that is aligned with state standards.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Common District-wide Curriculum |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
Indicator 1.2 The district ensures that a rigorous curriculum is provided to all students.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. All Students |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Grade Level Expectations |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 1.3 The district implements a process for monitoring, evaluating, and revising curriculum.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Evaluate |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. Revise |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 1.4  The district communicates clearly defined elements of effective instruction and monitors to ensure implementation.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Time Allocation |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Instructional Strategies |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. Student Needs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Student Work |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 1.5  The district implements a comprehensive system of supports for effective instruction for all students.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Interventions/ Enrichment |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Professional Development |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. Classroom Resources |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Collaboration |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
CATEGORY II.  ASSESSMENT and ACCOUNTABILITY
Indicator 2.1 The district implements an assessment system with multiple types of aligned measures.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Assessment Types |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 2.2 The district provides an effective data infrastructure.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Access |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. Rapid and Accurate |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Communication of Results |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 2.3  The district analyzes data and uses results to make instructional program decisions.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Instructional Program Evaluation |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Professional Development |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. Improvement Plans |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 2.4  The district holds administrators, teachers, and staff accountable for ensuring increased student achievement.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. System of Accountability |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. District Assistance/ Intervention |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
CATEGORY III. [NAME]
Indicator 3.1 District leaders have shared beliefs, vision, and mission that focus on high expectations of success for all students.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. High Expectations |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Communication |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. Implementation |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Revision |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 3.2  District leaders implement and promote a strategic planning process in the development and implementation of district and school performance plans.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Data-driven |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] to School Improvement     Plans & Processes |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Goal Setting |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
Indicator 3.3  District leaders and the local governing board promote and demonstrate a collaborative approach to determining policies and practices to support student achievement.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Collaboration |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Policies & Practices to      Support Student Achievement |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Roles |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
e. Professional Development |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 3.4  District leaders implement a transparent budget process that results in effective allocation of resources to support student achievement.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence:For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Transparent |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME]/Cost Effective |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] of      Effective Approaches |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Acquisition of      Additional Resources |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 3.5  District leaders effectively recruit, assign, support, evaluate, and retain personnel.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Recruit |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
[NAME] for Teachers &     Principals |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Staff Evaluation |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
e. Retention |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
1Rubric Score: | 1 = Area of Need;  2 = Area of Concern;  3 = Meets Expection;  4 = Exemplary
2Priority Score: | 3 = Highest Priority;  2 = Medium Priority;  1 = Lowest Priority
3Opportunity Score: | 3 = Relatively Easy to Address;    2 = Accomplished within Current Policy and Budget Conditions;     1 = Requires changes in Current Policy and Budget Conditions
4Index Score: | Index Score  =  Priority Score x Opportunity Score
Indicator 3.6  District leaders establish and support a district-wide culture and climate that is conducive to student achievement.
Indicator/Element | 1Rubric Score |  |  |  | 2Priority Score | 3Oppor- tunity Score | 4Index | Evidence: For each element, please list the evidence that was analyzed, and that supports the assigned scores. A minimum of 3 pieces of evidence must have been analyzed per element.
 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
a. Safe & Orderly Environment |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
b. Positive Social/ Emotional Skills |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
c. Recognition |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
d. Culturally Responsive |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0
Summarization of Evidence: In a narrative format, summarize your team's ratings and conclusions. If an element receives a rating of a 1 or 2, the team must provide justification specifically highlighting any evidence (e.g., quotations, artifacts, data) that illustrate and support the assigned rating and guided your team's conclusions.
Identify any "Key Insights", (trends, areas of concern, areas of strength, etc.), that highlight important observations drawn from the data and the analysis of the evidence.
Key Insight:
Key Insight:
Key Insight:
Key Insight:
Key Insight: