Spreadsheet: 78e8785b-8303-45e7-909b-7b90c1bf50ae
Sheet: Sheet1

COSTA RICA FOREVER PROJECT | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7 | Unnamed: 8
VISION. Costa Rica is positioned to be one of the first developing countries to achieve the goals of the Working Program on Protected Areas of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, through the consolidation of an ecologically representative system of terrestrial, marine and freshwater protected areas that are resilient to global climate change, effectively administered and financially stable for the long term.
Global Project Scope | GENERAL COUNTRY GOALS | SPECIFIC COUNTRY GOALS | Project Scope First Phase 2010-2015 | Estrategia | Objective | Resultado | [NAME] | Goal
Contribute to consolidating the ecological representation and integrity of biodiversity within the PAs. | By 2010, Costa Rica will have identified and mapped the conservation gaps in the terrestrial part with the respective conservation strategies; it will have begun to consolidate from 26% to 26.5% of the continental territory, a process that will be finalized in 2015, in addition to promoting types of conservation strategies other than these, such as Payments for Environmental Services (PES), Biological Corridors, and work with communities to be able to ensure that the rest of the gaps are identified. | By 2015, conserve up to 26.5% of the continental territory in the national system of protected wildlands. | Improve ecological representation and integrity of the continental biodiversity adding approximately 0.5% of the continental territory to the PAs. | [NAME] | By 2014, SINAC will have improved the ecological representation and integrity of continental biodiversity, incorporating 0.5% of the continental territory into the PAs. | El SINAC ha mejorado la [NAME] continental dentro de las ASP | Creación y/o [NAME] | By 2011, 2 new TPAs will be created or expanded under the national park or biological reserve category.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2014, 9 new TPAs will be created or expanded under the wildlife refuge (state, mixed and private), forest reserve or protection zone categories.
 | By 2012, Costa Rica will have identified and mapped the conservation gaps in the marine part with the respective strategies; it will have begun the process to consolidate MPAs, including the implementation of more participatory management categories such as marine reserves and marine management areas, for up to 17% of the surface area corresponding to total marine and coastal-marine gaps identified using conservation gap analysis. | By 2014, place up to 25% of the surface area corresponding to total marine and coastal-marine gaps identified by the Grúas II study (1,855,014 ha) under some kind management category  including more participatory categories such as marine reserves and marine management areas. | Improve ecological representation and integrity of marine-coastal biodiversity within the MPAs, from 1 to at least 2% protected marine territory. |  | By 2014, SINAC will have improved the ecological representation and integrity of marine-coastal biodiversity by creating or expanding 11 new MPAs under an ecosystemic approach, including consolidating the protection of 1 oceanic site. | El SINAC ha mejorado la [NAME] dentro de las ASP | Creación y/o [NAME] | By 2014, 11 new MPAs will have been declared under some management category, including the implementation of more participatory management categories such as marine reserves and marine management areas.
 |  | By 2012, consolidate 100% of the surface area of Coco Island National Park World Heritage Site, an oceanic site of global importance due to its uniqueness. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2012, 100% of the surface area of Coco Island National Park World Heritage Site, an oceanic site of global importance due to its uniqueness, will have been consolidated as an MPA.
 |  |  |  |  | By 2015, SINAC will have physically marked the boundaries of the terrestrial parts of 11 new MPAs, thus contributing to their consolidation. | El SINAC ha delimitado físicamente las porciones terrestres de las AMP | Establecimiento de mojones | By 2015, the terrestrial parts of 11 new MPAs will have properly marked boundaries.
Contribute to substantially improving PA management effectiveness |  |  | Expand surveillance and control capacity in the MPAs. | Desarrollo de instrumentos de planificación que permitan administrar las áreas, de manera eficaz y eficiente, conforme a sus objetivos de manejo | By 2015, SINAC will have prepared and/or updated and officialized 12 management plans for the recently expanded MPAs. | Las AMP creadas o ampliadas [NAME] con Planes de Manejos elaborados y/o atualizados Oficializados | Elaboración y Actualización de Instrumentos de Planificación Estratégica para AMP nuevas | By 2015, the 12 recently created or expanded MPAs will have official management plans.
 | By 2015, the national system of protected areas will have management plans for 70 % of its areas. | By 2011 prepare and/or update management plans for 75% (18 PAs) of the terrestrial PAs existing in 2008 with national park or biological reserve management categories. | Of the PAs existing in 2009, double the number that have management plans as strategic planning instruments. |  | By 2015, SINAC will have prepared and/or updated and officialized 24 management plans for the TPAs existing in 2009. | Las APT existentes al 2009 cuentan con Planes de Manejos Elaborados y/o Actualizados y Oficializados | Elaboración y Actualización de Instrumentos de Planificación Estratégica para APT existentes | By 2011, 5 TPAs in national park and biological reserve management categories will have updated management plans.
 |  | By 2011 75% (52 TPAs) of the TPAs with a national wildlife refuge management category (state, mixed or private) will have an updated management plant. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, 4 TPAs with a national wildlife refuge management category (state, mixed and private) will have updated management plans.
 |  | By 2013, 100% (24 PAs) of the terrestrial protected areas with national park and biological reserve management categories will have updated management plans. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2013, 6 TPAs in national park and biological reserve management categories will have updated management plans.
 |  | By 2013, 85% (70 PAs) of the terrestrial protected areas with a national wildlife refuge management category (state, mixed or private) will have updated management plans. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2013, 5 TPAs with a national wildlife refuge management category (state, mixed and private) will have updated management plans.
 |  | By 2015, 20% (8 PAs) of the TPAs with forest reserve and protection zone management categories will have updated management plans. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2015, 4 TPAs with forest reserve and protection zone management categories will have updated management plans.
 |  | By 2012, 85% (18 MPAs) of the MPAs existing in 2008 will have management plans. |  |  | By 2013, SINAC will have prepared and/or updated and officialized 9 management plans for the MPAs existing in 2009. | Las AMP existentes al 2009 cuentan con Planes de Manejos Elaborados y/o Actualizados y Oficializados | Elaboración y Actualización de Instrumentos de Planificación Estratégica para AMP existentes | By 2012, 6 MPAs will have updated management plans.
 |  | By 2013, all the MPAs (21 MPAs) existing in 2008 will have management plans. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2013, 3 MPAs will have updated management plans.
 | By 2010, Costa Rica will have an institutional framework for the supervision and evaluation of the national protected area system, and will be using the tool to monitor management effectiveness in 40% of the areas. | By 2010, consolidate a permanent, functional unit for the monitoring of management effectiveness. | Improve the management effectiveness monitoring system and systematize its application in 75% of the PAs existing in 2009. | [NAME] | By 2015, SINAC will have built the institutional capacity necessary for management effectiveness monitoring in both TPAs and MPAs and the tool will have been used, improved and updated in 75% of the PAs existing in 2009. | Creada la capacidad institucional necesaria para el monitoreo de la efectividad de manejo de las ASP | Desarrollo y aplicación de Herramientas de Monitoreo de Efectividad de Manejo | By 2010, there will be a properly consolidated, permanent functioning unit for monitoring TPA management effectiveness.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2010, a set of specific indicators will have been developed and validated for monitoring management effectiveness in the MPAs.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2010, a set of indicators will have been developed and validated for monitoring the ecological integrity of TPAs in the national park, biological reserve and wildlife refuge (state and mixed) categories.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, the current management effectiveness monitoring system will have been revised,  indicators will have been enhanced and a strategy for effective application in TPAs in the national park, biological reserve and refuge categories will have been developed.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2014, the management effectiveness monitoring system will have been newly revised, the indicators will have been improved and a strategy for its effective application in the TPAs in national park, biological reserve and refuge categories will have been developed.
 |  |  |  |  |  | Los instrumentos para el monitoreo de la efectividad de manejo, revisados y actualizados, están siendo aplicados |  | Starting in 2011, all personnel in charge of using the management effectiveness monitoring tools will be adequately trained in their use.
 |  | By 2011, the management effectiveness monitoring tool will be in use in 56 protected areas of the nation's PA system, in the terrestrial categories of national park, biological reserve, national wildlife refuge and mixed wildlife refuge. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, the updated management effectiveness tool is being systematically applied in 56 TPAs of the national park, biological reserve and wildlife refuge (state and mixed) categories.
 | By 2012, Costa Rica  will be using the tool to monitor management effectiveness in 75% of the national protected area system. | By 2012, the management effectiveness monitoring tool will be in use in 75% (126 PAs) of the PA system in the categories of forest reserve, protection zone and private wildlife refuge. For these purposes, the categories of wetland, national monument, and nature monument are not considered. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2012, the updated management effectiveness tool is being systematically applied in 68 TPAs in the forest reserve, protection zone and private wildlife refuge categories.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Starting in 2011, an annual report will be prepared and published with the results obtained from TPA management effectiveness monitoring.
 |  | By 2010 (2011), the management effectiveness monitoring tool will be in use in 100% (21 PAs) of the marine protected areas existing in 2008, including the preparation of specific indicators for those areas. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, the updated management effectiveness monitoring tool is being applied systematically in 21 MPAs existing in 2009.
 |  |  | Improve management effectiveness in 34% of the PAs existing in 2009. |  | By 2015, SINAC will have enhanced management effectiveness to acceptable or better levels in at least 43 TPAs of those existing in 2009, to maintain representation and improve the ecological integrity of the biodiversity under protection. | Las ATP han alcanzado una efectividad de manejo, [NAME], con una calificación de aceptable. | Desarrollo e implementación de propuestas de mejoramiento de la gestión en APT | By 2011, a proposal for improving management and overcoming deficiencies in 56 TPAs will be in execution.
 |  | By 2012, terrestrial protected area management effectiveness will be enhanced in  national park, biological reserve, national wildlife refuge and mixed wildlife refuge categries. 50% (27 TPAs) of these areas will have been scored acceptable or better in accord with the management effectiveness monitoring tool. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2012, 50%  (28 TPAs) of the 56 TPAs in national park, biological reserve, and wildlife refuge (state and mixed) categories that are being monitored for management effectiveness will obtain a score of acceptable or better.
 |  | By 2015, terrestrial protected area management effectiveness will be enhanced in national park, biological reserve, national wildlife refuge and mixed wildlife refuge categories. 65% of these areas (36 TPAs) will have been scored acceptable or better. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2015, 65%  (36 TPAs) of the 56 TPAs in national park, biological reserve, and wildlife refuge (state and mixed) categories that are being monitored for management effectiveness will obtain a score of acceptable or better.
 |  | By 2015, TPA management effectiveness will have been enhanced for the categories of forest reserve and protection zone. 20% (8 TPAs) of these areas will have a score of acceptable or better. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2015, 10% (7 TPAs) of the 68 TPAs in forest reserve, protection zone and private wildlife refuge categories that are being monitored for management effectiveness will obtain a score of acceptable or better.
 |  |  |  |  | By 2015, SINAC will have enhanced management effectiveness to acceptable or better levels in at least 14 MPAs of those existing in 2009, to maintain representation and improve the ecological integrity of the biodiversity under protection. | Las AMP han alcanzado una efectividad de manejo, [NAME], con una calificación de aceptable. | Desarrollo e implementación de propuestas de mejoramiento de la gestión en AMP | By 2012, a proposal for improving management and overcoming deficiencies in 21 MPAs will be in execution.
 |  | By 2013, 50% (11 MPAs) of the MPAs existing in 2008 will have a score of acceptable or better, according to the management effectiveness monitoring tool. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2013, 50% (11 MPAs) of the 21 MPAs existing in 2009 that are monitored for management effectiveness obtain a score of acceptable or better.
 |  | By 2015, 65% (14 MPAs) of the existing MPAs will have a score of acceptable or better, according to the management effectiveness monitoring tool. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2015, 65% (14 MPAs) of the 21 MPAs existing in 2009 that are being monitored for management effectiveness obtain a score of acceptable or better.
 |  |  | 100% of the MPAs created or expanded with the support of Costa Rica Forever will have surveillance and control tools to help enhance protection and effective management. | [NAME] y control dentro de las ASP | By 2013, SINAC will have prepared and officialized 22 Control and Surveillance Plans for the PAs recently created or expanded. | Las ASP cuentan con Planes de Control y [NAME] elaborados y oficializados | Desarrollo de Herramientas de Control y [NAME] | By 2013, the 11 created or expanded TPAs have Control and Surveillance Plans.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2013, the 11 created  or expanded MPAs have Control and Surveillance Plans.
 |  |  | Expand surveillance and control capacity of the MPAs. |  | By 2015, SINAC will have strengthened its capacity for marine-coastal vigilance and control and will be effectively implementing Surveillance and Control Plans in 11 MPAs. | [NAME] institucional del SINAC para realizar [NAME] y control en AMP | Implementación de Planes de Vigilancia y Control | By 2015, boat berths, docks, warehouses and dikes will have been built for maintenance and to support surveillance and control tasks within the MPAs.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2015, a total of 8 vessels will have been acquired for better surveillance and control of activities within the MPAs.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2015, inputs and equipment will have been acquired to support surveillance and control activities in the MPAs.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, 11 new MPAs will have consolidated the funds needed for surveillance and control tasks.
Sujpport processes that help integrate climate change adaptation measures into protected area planning, management strategies and the design of protected area systems. | By 2011, Costa Rica will have identified and mapped potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystemic services, adaptive capacity and management measures necessary for the protected areas to confront climate change and extreme weather events. | By 2011, the potential impacts and the adaptive capacity of the ecosystems most vulnerable to global climate change, climate variability and extreme weather events will have been identified in the national terrestrial and marine protected area system. | Identify the adaptive capacity of the ecosystems vulnerable to climate change and extreme weather events, along with potentially viable mitigation measures for the national terrestrial protected area system. | Desarrollo de mecanismos de planificación dinámica y adaptativa de las ASP ante [NAME] | By 2011, SINAC will have identified and mapped the potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystemic services,  adaptive capacity and viable mitigation measures to climate change and extreme weather events for protected areas. | Los impactos potenciales sobre la biodiversidad y servicios ecosistémicos, [NAME] adaptativa y medidas de mitigación viables para los ecosistemas  vulnerables [NAME] y los eventos meteorológicos extremos han sido identificados y mapeado | Generación de conocimiento sobre los impactos del cambio climático en la biodiversidad | By 2011, Costa Rica will have identified the expected impacts to biodiversity and ecosystemic services and the ecosystems most vulnerable to climate change and extreme weather events in the nation's terrestrial protected area system.
 | By 2014, Costa Rica will have identified and mapped the collateral impacts on biodiversity and ecosystemic services, potentially derived from adaptation and mitigation measures proposed or adopted by the country to confront climate change and extreme weather events, as well as the management measures needed for the protected areas. | By 2010, the threats and collateral impacts of climate change and the adaptation and mitigation activities that are positive and negative for the biodiversity present in the PAs will have been identified and mapped. |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, Costa Rica will have identified the adaptative capacity of the ecosystems vulnerable to climate change and extreme weather events, along with potentially viable measures for mitigation in the nation's terrestrial protected area system.
 |  |  | Develop an adaptation strategy for the TPAs to the potential impacts of climate change on biodiversity and ecosystemic services. |  | By 2012, SINAC will have consolidated a strategy to adapt protected areas to the impacts on biodiversity and ecosystemic services expected from climate change and extreme weather events and will be implementing it in one "pilot" area. | El proceso de capacitación del personal de las instituciones responsables de la aplicación de medidas adaptativas y de mitigación para las ASP se encuentra en proceso de implementación. | Generación de instrumentos estrategicos de actuación | By 2012, Costa Rica will have prepared and begun implementation of a plan to develop capacities related to climate change and its effect on vulnerable ecosystems, adaptive capacities and viable mitigation measures.
 | By 2015, Costa Rica will have formulated a strategy to adapt protected areas to the expected impacts of climate change and extreme weather events on biodiversity and ecosystemic services; there will be measures for adaptation and mitigation proposed and adopted by the country, in implementation in a"pilot" area. | By 2012, the country will have formulated and begun execution of a strategy to adapt protected areas to the impacts expected from climate change, climate variability and extreme weather events. |  |  |  | Una estrategia país para el seguimiento del estado de conservación y de la adaptación de las áreas protegidas frente a los impactos sobre la biodiversidad y servicios ecosistémicos esperados [NAME] y los eventos meteorológicos extremos e ini |  | By 2012, Costa Rica will have a country strategy to oversee conservation status and the adaptation of protected areas to the impacts on biodiversity and ecosystemic services expected from climate change and extreme weather events and the implementation of the action plan will have begun.
 | By 2015, Costa Rica will be implementing PROMEC-CR as an oversight and evaluation mechanism for the status of biodiversity conservation and ecosystemic services as a dynamic and adaptive planning mechanism against climate change and extreme weather events. | By 2011, Costa Rica will have an Institutional Strengthening Project (ISP) for PROMEC-CR. | Consolidate oversight and evaluation mechanisms. |  | By 2013, SINAC will have updated and implemented PROMEC-CR as an oversight and evaluation mechanism for biodiversity conservation status and ecosystemic services, as a dynamic and adaptive planning mechanism against climate change. | El PROMEC-CR se encuentra en operación. | Desarrollo y actualización de instrumentos técnicos para el PROMEC-CR | By 2012, Costa Rica  will be implementing PROMEC-CR and will have incorporated oversight and periodic evaluation of a) the potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystemic services from climate change, b) adaptation activities, and c) mitigation activities.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, Costa Rica will have prepared the country report for presentation at the CBD's CoP 10 during "the year of biodiversity."
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2011, Costa Rica will have an Institutional Strengthening Project (ISP) for PROMEC-CR.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2013, Costa Rica will have incorporated the duly validated indicators developed for ecological integrity of ecological systems in continental and marine-ccoastal waters into PROMEC-CR.
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By 2013, Costa Rica will have an information management system that will help qualify the conservation status of biodiversity and ecosystemic services.