Spreadsheet: 1ff3056c-9c36-4052-93f5-2e968c9d038b
Sheet: Sheet1

Unnamed: 0 | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | PAC REVIEW | Unnamed: 7 | Unnamed: 8 | Unnamed: 9 | Unnamed: 10 | PAC Assignment | Unnamed: 12 | Unnamed: 13 | Sub-PAC Assignment | Unnamed: 15 | Unnamed: 16 | Unnamed: 17 | Unnamed: 18
Reference | Date |  |  |  |  | Date | Assigned / | Tally |  |  | Date | Date Due |  | Date | Task Group | Date Due
No. | Submitted | Submitted By | Problem Statement | Areas of Impact |  | Reviewed | Denied | Yes | No |  | Assigned | to PAC |  | Assigned | Assigned To | to PAC |  | Recommendation
09-A-004 | 2008-12-08 00:00:00 | [NAME] | There is currently no requirement for counties to get background checks for APS staff. | APS; County Departments |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | Feb/March |  |  |  | April Update
09-A-009 | 2008-12-08 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Former APS PAC group reviewed all APS policies as they came due for review and update.   There are 20 policies that are either past due or due to be reviewed by 12/31/08 and an additional four policies due for review by 3/31/09. | APS; County Departments |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | Denied | 0 | 11 |  |  |  |  | Need more study-no end dates
09-A-012 | 2008-12-08 00:00:00 | [NAME] | No training requirements for APS staff. | APS; County Departments |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 |  |  |  | [NAME] | 2009-04-01 00:00:00
09-A-013 | 2709-02-01 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Establish ad hoc committee or task group of county and state staff to review the policies/guidelines and procedures to determine whether policy changes are recommended and/or necessary for the continued optimal functioning of the APS program statewide.  Because of lack of structure, the majority of policies/guidelines are past due for review and the remaining policies/guidelines are due for review not later than August 2009. | APS |  | 4/1/2009   5/6/09 resubmitted | Denied   Assigned | 13   14 | 0   0 |  | 5/9/09 | Ongoing - In July, will prioritize which ones to work on. |  | Need to identify if guidelines are a statute, rule, or policy and determine next steps. |  |  |  | Revised
09-A-013 revised | 2009-04-30 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The APS policy statements are related to APS statute and/or rule, with the exception of three.  This is a request to establish in the Aging Sub-PAC a task group of county and state staff to review the policies and procedures, as currently written, to determine whether changes are recommended and/or necessary for the continued optimal functioning of the APS program. | APS Program Staff |  | 2009-05-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 14 | 0 |  | 2009-05-06 00:00:00 | 2009-07-01 00:00:00
09-A-014 | 2009-10-30 00:00:00 | [NAME] / [NAME] | AND/SO purports to be a program that provides interim assistance.  However, the eligibility criteria does allow for a person to receive assistance for a long term. | AND/SO |  | 2009-11-05 00:00:00 | Assigned | 10 | 0 |  | 2009-11-05 00:00:00 | 2010-01-01 00:00:00 |  |  |  |  |  | 7/8/10 - returned to Sub-PAC for more information
09-CW-002 | 2008-12-06 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Families of DD children requiring out-of-home placement must be involved in the legal system through a D&N or PRNP action to receive services. The CW system must address the issues facing DD children  & their families under the same rules and practices as those requiring child protective services; and this is not in the best interests of the special population.  Families of developmentally disabled children need to be able to access services w/o being stigmatized as dependent or neglected. | Child Welfare, Developmental Disabilities, Community Center Boards, Behavioral Health, Courts |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | Assigned to Task Group |  |  |  |  | 2009-04-01 00:00:00
09-CW-005 (See 09-CW-005 revised below) | 3/24/2009 & 3/30/2009 | [NAME] | CPAs license foster homes without the knowledge of the Counties where they are being licensed.  [NAME] are then placed into those CPA foster homes without the knowledge of the Counties.  This is a problem particularly in small and medium sized rural counties. | County Foster Care |  | 2009-04-01 00:00:00 | Denied - Sent back to rewrite to address whole issue. | 0 | 13 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Revised
09-CW-005 revised | 2009-05-01 00:00:00 | [NAME] | County Departments of Social Services and Child Placement Agencies (CPAs) are placing children and certifying foster/kinship homes without the knowledge of the Counties where the foster homes are located.  Information regarding the certified foster homes and the children are not being shared at the time of placement.  This is a problem particularly in small and medium sized counties because this drives more intakes and creates community issues with Law Enforcement and School Districts. | County Foster Care |  | 5/6/2009  3/3/11 | Assigned  Approved | 13  13 | 0  0 |  | To be determined by Sub-PAC |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5/610 - PAC voted to forward to [NAME]  3/3/11 - PAC approved - forward to [NAME]
10-CW-010 | 2010-03-04 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The State and Counties are lacking codified and standardized best practices in serving undocumented children, youth, and families with culturally competent services within the complexity of immigration-related law provisions.  Volume 7 has no standardized reference for counties in policy, programming, or procedures related to caseworker best practices such as assessments and planning for citizenship options, eligibility, classifications, funding, legal issues/barriers, or resources  and supports for specialized services.  This may potentially reduce costs and strengthen the safety, permanency, and well being outcomes of the undocumented population within child welfare and in their aftercare plans upon discharge. | Homeland Security, ICE, Judicial, CDHS Refugee Services, DCW, DYC, ARD, CTUG, Counties, Providers and representatives, undocumented children, youth and families, community legal advocate/agency representatives |  | 2010-03-04 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | 2010-03-04 00:00:00 | July 2010-update |  | 2010-10-07 00:00:00 | Child Welfare | 2011-01-01 00:00:00 |  | 10/7/10-returned to Sub-PAC for further information.
10-CW-011 | 2010-04-30 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Medicaid Services/coverage is available to all Colorado children for which an agreement is in place to receive Title IV-E Subsidized Adoption Assistance, per Federal Statute and Colorado State Child Welfare Regulation.  There are no requirements for the adoptive parents of children in a Subsidized Adoption to carry private health insurance, regardless of availability of private health insurance or economic status of the adoptive parents.  However, in the event of a divorce or separation of the adoptive parents, there exists a conflict with Federal Child Support Statute that requires private insurance to be pursued by State IV-D agencies.  Considering the above, is appears there exists a conflict between program areas which causes unequal treatment between married and divorced/separated parents of children participating in the Subsidized Adoption Program, regarding requirements for the provision of private health insurance. | Federal and State Statute regarding Medical Support regarding Medical Support, Volume 6 Program Regulation regarding Medical Support, ACSES Programming, Training |  | 2010-05-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 12 | 0 |  | 2010-05-06 00:00:00 | 2010-08-01 00:00:00
10-CW-012 | 2010-07-08 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Currently, there is no requirement that county caseworkers complete Trails navigation training as offered by the OIT training team.  Given the importance of the data integrity in the Trails application and the potential consequences of inaccurate/incomplete data input, the question has been raised that this training be made mandatory.  Should this training be made part of the Child Welfare Training Academy curriculum? | Child Welfare (county/state), OIT, Child Welfare Training Academy |  | 2010-07-08 00:00:00 | Assigned | 12 | 0 |  | 2010-07-08 00:00:00
10-CW-013 | 2010-08-24 00:00:00 | [NAME] | There is concern among the counties regarding the review processes that occur when a child fatality is reviewed.  Potentially there are three reviews; a County Internal Review, a State Child Fatality Team Review, and a State On-Site Review.  Clarification around the purpose and procedure for each of the reviews and the possibility of condensing the reviews to one collaberative State/peer review.  Concern about the current format of the State Child Fatality Review Report which is a public docmument and question if there is any flexibility as to the formatting and content of such report . | Child Fatality Review Process and Child Fatality Review Report |  | 2010-09-02 00:00:00 | Assigned | 13 | 0 |  | 2010-09-02 00:00:00 | 90 days
10-CW-014 | 2010-09-30 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The Co-Occurring Issues Subcommittee of the Child Welfare Action Committee made the recommendation and received approval to conduct a review of the current child welfare training to ensure caseworkers can identify and appropriately address issues of domestic violence, mental health, and substance abuse if encountered. The training review should include all levels of the current training, and determine whether progressive opportunities for training should occur (i.e. advanced training). | Child Welfare, Domestic Violence Program, Division of Behavioral Health, [NAME], and potentially other program areas in CDHS. |  | 2010-10-07 00:00:00 | Assigned | 10 | 0 |  | 2010-10-07 00:00:00 | 90 days
10-CW-015 | 2010-09-30 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The Co-Occurring Issues Subcommittee of the Child Welfare Action Committee made the recommendation and received approval to identify and encourage inclusion of domesitc violence victim services and domestic violence offender treatment providers in local and county collaborations (i.e. 1451 collaborative efforts).  These local groups will also be encourgaged to develop interagency and agreements and training, as identified as a need to ensure integration of the domestic violence issues at the local level. | CDHS and Counties, statewide |  | 2010-10-07 00:00:00 | [NAME] to draft agency letter | 10 | 0
10-CW-016 | 2010-10-15 00:00:00 | [NAME] | P.L. 111-148 amended the section of the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act, section 422(b)(15)A (in which States are required to develop a Health Care Oversight and Coordination Plan), so that the plan includes “steps to ensure that the components of the transition plan development process… relate to the health care needs of children aging out of foster care, including the new requirement to include options for health insurance, information about a health care power of attorney, health care proxy, or other similar document recognized under State law, and to provide the child with the option to execute such a document, are met.”  This is a requirement for any youth served by the Chafee Program or who is leaving foster care, which requires an emancipation transition plan. |  |  | 2010-11-04 00:00:00 | CW Sub-PAC | 9 | 0
11-CW-001 | 2011-01-14 00:00:00 | [NAME] on behalf of Permanency Task Group | In the 2007 Foster Care Services Performance Audit, the Department agreed to address recommendation 1d, that information be shared with foster parents regarding the Family Services Plan (FSP).  In addition, the Permanency Task Group addressed the broader issue of information sharing and confidentiality to allow that care providers receive pertinent information to meet the needs of the children/youth for whom they care while maintaining the privacy of the biological family | programs, counties, training, and care providers. |  | 2011-03-03 00:00:00 | CW Sub-PAC | 13 | 0
11-CW-002 | 2011-01-28 00:00:00 | [NAME], Director, [NAME] and [NAME] | "With the implementation of the legislation requiring worker and supervisor certification, counties have identified a lack of clear expectation/policy regarding coverage of cases during absences of assigned workers/supervisors." Currently counties do not have a documented plan that ensures that certified child welfare caseworkers and certified child welfare supervisors’ cover all child welfare cases at al time as required by CRS 26-5-109 and CCR 12 2509-1 (Volume 7, Section 7.000.61). | County Departments Child Welfare Programs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2011-03-03 00:00:00 | 2011-04-07 00:00:00 |  |  |  |  |  | 3/3/11 - Returned for Revision
11-CW-003 | 2011-02-14 00:00:00 | [NAME] | State revenue is decreasing while the need for child welfare and other services increases. It is possible that Colorado may not be taking advantage of all IV-E eligible services. | Children in Colorado Would potentially increase IV-E draw down for services, training and administrative costs. |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2011-03-03 00:00:00 | 2011-05-05 00:00:00 |  |  |  |  |  | 3/3/11 - Needs revision will return in May
11-CW-004 | 2011-03-15 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The Department and counties do not have a clear process for granting county departments waivers for such things as child welfare staff qualifications (including Directors, supervisors and caseworkers), caseworker contact requirements, and other Volume 7 waiver requests. | Programs:  [NAME], Child Welfare Programs
09-SS-001 | 2010-12-03 00:00:00 | [NAME] | LEAP - Addition of Wood Burning Reimbursement | Clients in the county |  | 12/3/08 & 1/7/09 | Assigned | 9 | 0 |  | 12/3/08 & 1/7/09 | 2009-02-04 00:00:00
09-SS-002 | 2008-12-16 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The automated referral process between TRAILS & ACSES does not account for circumstances such as when placing parent is receiving TANF or when the child in placement is receiving CHRP funding. | Child Welfare, Child Support Enforcement |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | Denied | 0 | 11
09-SS-003 | 2008-12-16 00:00:00 | [NAME] | CSE should be able to utilize federal locate tools such as State Parent Locator Service and Federal Parent Locator Service to assist [NAME] with diligent search efforts to identify placement options w/o opening CSE case.  Currently, ACSES is unable to accommodate this need. | Child Welfare, TRAILS, [NAME], All Training entities (contract and state), ARD |  | 2009-01-07 00:00:00 | Denied | 0 | 11
09-SS-004 / 09-FI-001 | 2009-02-27 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The CCCAP Performance Audit Recommendation #19 states that the Department will “Ensure that counties bear an equal proportion of MOE payments by basing the MOE on a county’s proportionate share of actual CCCAP expenditures.”  The Department disagreed.  The LAC asked the Department to reconsider the response. The Department requests that PAC consider this issue for assessment and recommendation as to whether the Department would agree to Recommendation #19. | Self-Sufficiency, Financial |  | 2009-03-04 00:00:00 | Assigned | 12 | 0 |  | 2009-03-04 00:00:00 | 2009-07-01 00:00:00
09-SS-005 | 2009-03-10 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The County Departments are mandated by regulations contained in Volume 3, 3.110.2 – 3.110.4, Volume 4B, 4011.14 – 4011.16 and Volume 8, 8.100.36 – 8.100.37 to afford all applicants who apply for Public Assistance the opportunity to vote.  Arapahoe County proposes that the Single Purpose Application should contain the Designation and Application to Vote.  At this time, an additional form is required by all applicants in order to meet the requirements set forth by the regulations in [NAME], 4B and 8.  By adding the Voter Registration Designation and Application to the Single Purpose Application, the applicant will be able to complete the Designation and Application to Vote at the time of application on one form.  In addition, Arapahoe County proposes that the Designation and Application to Vote be attached to the Redetermination forms that are automatically generated by the Colorado Benefits Management System.  [NAME] is to streamline the application process and eliminate the need for additional forms. | Self-Sufficiency |  | 2009-04-01 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | 2009-04-01 00:00:00
09-SS-006 merged with 09-SS-005) | 2009-03-31 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) is a federal civil rights law that requires public assistance agencies to offer voter registration services to all persons applying for benefits, recertifying or renewing their eligibility, or whenever a client changes an address.  Colorado law requires agency sites to comply with the NVRA.  In 2003, the Executive Director, CDHS, was notified by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform now (ACORN) that Colorado was not in compliance with he National Voter Registration Act of 1993.  In reviewing the date, it appears that some counties perform well in registrations and others do not perform well. | Self-Sufficiency and Counties |  | 2009-04-01 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | 4/1/09 - Requested that this be merged with 09-SS-005 and add to SPA
09-SS-007 | 2009-04-18 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Attached is a proposal to expand homeless prevention and subsidized employment activities through CDHS in partnership with the counties by accessing TANF Emergency Contingency Funds distributed to the states via the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 with the goal of significantly impact low-income families throughout Colorado. | Self-Sufficiency -- Homeless Prevention, Job Creation, Community Economic Stabilization
09-SS-008 | 2009-04-28 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The Divisions of Behavioral Health/Childcare were awarded $1.0 million to establish a pilot project in three regions of the state that would provide mental health consultation to child care centers.  The goal of this project is to provide mental health consultation to parents, child care workers and children to address children's mental health/behavioral needs early to mange behavioral issues and prevent expulsion from day care and preschool. | State Department of Human Services, County Departments of Social Services (3 regions), early childhood programs, mental health centers, child care centers |  | 2009-05-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 13 | 0 |  | 5/6/2009-decided to keep at PAC level | 2009-06-01 00:00:00
09-SS-009 | 5/509 | [NAME] | Refugees receive [NAME] (RCA) through the Colorado Refugee Services Program (CRSP) that is 100% federally funded by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR).  CRSP has been informed by ORR that RCA will no longer be available for TANF-eligible refugees, and that such refugees will have to begin accessing cash assistance through Colorado's TANF program.  There are several administrative models.  Any model that is selected must ensure that the cultural and linguistic needs of refugees are effectively addressed. | Colorado Refugee Services Program, Colorado Works, Aging & Adult Services, Food Assistance |  | 2009-05-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 13 | 0 |  | 2009-05-06 00:00:00 | 2009-09-01 00:00:00 |  |  |  | 2009-09-01 00:00:00 |  | Signed 9/21/09 by ED
09-SS-010 | 2010-01-07 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Uncoordinated requirements for core benefit programs such as Medicaid, SCHIP, Food Assistance, TANF and CCAP causes undue hardship on participating families.  In addition, workers find it difficult to manage the workload when programs are not streamlined and integrated. | Aligning Policies and Procedures in Benefit Programs |  | 2010-01-07 00:00:00 | Assigned to subgroup of PAC | 11 | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2009-09-01 00:00:00 |  | Signed 9/21/09 by ED
09-SS-011 | 2010-04-08 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The Colorado Works Program is completing this Policy Advisory Committee Policy Submittal Form to request creation of an advisory committee to assist in the formation and implementation of the county-based evaluation project. | Consulting with and getting advice from those who best know the counties and the clients they serve increases the likelihood of a successful evaluation. |  | 2010-04-08 00:00:00 | Assigned to advisory committee to report to the PAC. |  |  |  | 2010-04-08 00:00:00
09-SS-012 | 2010-04-08 00:00:00 | [NAME] | A comprehensive rule rewrite for the Colorado Works Program is necessary to address ongoing issues surrounding the processes for Colorado Works applicants, recipients, and county departments of human/social services when determining eligibility for the program.  Many rules have not been updated since welfare reform started in Colorado 13 years ago, and contain language from AFDC.  This contradicts the direction the Colorado Works Program wants to take.  With the passage of SB10-068, further updates must be made to rules to align with federal regulations and to be in compliance with Colorado Revised Statutes. | All rules related to Colorado Works found in Volume 3 (specifically those at Sections: 3.100, 3.500, 3.600 and 3.800) will be updated to reflect these changes. |  | 2010-04-08 00:00:00 | Not in the PAC purview. |  |  |  | 2010-04-08 00:00:00 | Referred to Self-Sufficiency Sub-PAC.
10-SS-013 | 2010-03-24 00:00:00 | [NAME], [NAME], [NAME] | Case review requirements for the Food Assistance Program are stressing already limited staff resources. While [NAME], [NAME] and Jefferson Counties agrees with the aim of case review, the current requirements are unsustainable. As counties strive to implement process improvements, staff is forced to balance client services with reporting requirements. The result of excessive case reviews is that counties must invest limited staff resources in case reviews rather than in improving direct client services. | Existing case review requirements limit counties' ability to direct limited resources to improving client service in the most effective means possible, including vital quality improvement efforts based upon case review finding. |  | 2010-05-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 12 | 0 |  | 2010-05-06 00:00:00 | This is a rule.  [NAME] will give an update in 3 mos.  PAC does not need to review.
10-SS-014 | 2010-05-06 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Currently, the State provides all 64 counties with an Out of State Issuance Report.  Each county is required to work the report and submit the results to the State.  The first item that needs clarification is whether or not a participant received benefits in the other state at the same time he/she received benefits in Colorado.  This is done by all 64 counties contacting the state in question and inquiring about dual participation.  Currently states receive several different inquiries from all 64 counties about dual participation.  It would be more efficient if one entity, such as the  State's participation contact, inquired about dual participation.   States then would only be contacted once.  After the State's participation contact determined whether or not  a client received benefits in two or more states at the same time, the report could then be sent to the counties.  County workers would research what action(s) need to be taken and take them. | Counties |  | 2010-05-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 12 | 0 |  | 2010-05-06 00:00:00 | 2010-08-01 00:00:00
09-PA-001 | 2009-02-27 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The CCCAP Performance Audit Recommendation #20 states that the Department will “Improve the effectiveness of TANF funds used in CCCAP by (a) annually determining at the beginning of the fiscal year whether to designate that all or a portion of the TANF funds available for transfer to CCCAP will be transferred to CCCAP, (b) requesting that the General Assembly appropriate to CCCAP any funds designated for use in CCCAP in line with part “a”, and (c) allocating TANF funds appropriated for use in CCCAP based on the counties' proportionate CCCAP needs.”  The Department disagreed.  The LAC asked the Department to reconsider.  The Department requests that PAC consider this issue for assessment and recommendation as to whether the Department would agree to Recommendation #20. | Self-Sufficiency, Finance |  | 2009-03-04 00:00:00 | Assigned | 13 | 0 |  | 3/4/09-decided to keep at PAC Level. [NAME] will write response. | 4/1/2009    5/6/09-PAC approved extension to 9/1/09
09-PA-002 | 2009-04-23 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The Address Confidentiality Program (ACP) was created during the 2007 legislative session to provide domestic violence victims a legal, substitute mailing address, which is a designated post office box in Denver. The program is administered by the Secretary of State's Office.  Participants are provided with an ACP card reflecting this confidential address and for many service delivery areas, this may cause disruption in services or processes.  The CDHS (and HCPF) were provided an extended amount of time, by bill amendment, to come into compliance with the law.  The amendment expires July 1st, 2009. Laws governing the program are located at § 24-21-201, C.R.S (HB 07-1350).   A group was convened to determine impacts and recommendations for implementation. The recommendations included the development of a state department policy, to include the development of action plans for each departmental program, and development of an Administrative Rule to provide general guidance and direction to county departments and stakeholders regarding the implementation of the ACP in program areas and for clients. This rule would ensure that there is an under- standing that processes and procedures should  be in place, to ensure seamless delivery of  services. | State Departments of Human Services, HCPF, County Departments of Social Services and community stakeholders |  | 2009-05-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 14 | 0 |  | 2009-05-06 00:00:00 | 7/09 draft rule due
10-PA-003 | 2010-01-04 00:00:00 | [NAME], [NAME] | Although Colorado Works, Child Care, Child Welfare and Core Allocations serve many similar populations, needs, and share similar goals, the formulae for distributing funding to counties for those programs have been developed incrementally and independently over a number of years, using separate methodologies, and lacking consistent incentives, criteria, values and goals.  The Department has received several concerns, complaints and suggestions from a number of counties encouraging amore comprehensive review of these allocations. | Colorado Works, Child Care, Child Welfare |  | 2010-02-04 00:00:00 | Assigned to PAC | 10 | 0 |  | 2010-09-02 00:00:00 | 2011-01-01 00:00:00 |  |  |  |  |  | Recommendation
10-PA-004 | 2010-01-04 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The original legislation that created the Colorado Works program (SB97-120)  required that each county or group of counties enter into an "annual performance contract" with the state department concerning the implementation of the program in each county (26-2-715 C.R.S.).  That requirement has been met through an annually signed of a Memorandum of Understanding effective on July 1 of each year. Although much has changed through subsequent legislation, rule, and practice over the past 13 years, the language of the Memorandum of Understanding has not been reviewed for possible updates to remove obsolete language, to reflect current policy and practice, to address more recent program or policy areas that were not included, or to consider other changes that might be beneficial to streamline or improve the language or process related to the MOU. | Colorado Works - TANF |  | 2010-11-04 00:00:00 | [NAME] to work with CCI Chair and Co-Chair of the Health and Human Services Committee | 0 | 9 |  | 2010-09-02 00:00:00 | 2011-01-01 00:00:00 |  |  |  |  |  | Recommendation
09-FI-001 / 09-SS-004 | 2009-02-27 00:00:00 | [NAME] | The CCCAP Performance Audit Recommendation #19 states that the Department will “Ensure that counties bear an equal proportion of MOE payments by basing the MOE on a county’s proportionate share of actual CCCAP expenditures.”  The Department disagreed.  The LAC asked the Department to reconsider the response. The Department requests that PAC consider this issue for assessment and recommendation as to whether the Department would agree to Recommendation #19. | Self-Sufficiency, Financial |  | 2009-03-04 00:00:00 | Assigned | 12 | 0 |  | 2009-03-04 00:00:00 | 2009-07-01 00:00:00
09-FI-002  (formerly 09-SS-010) | 2009-09-23 00:00:00 | [NAME] | Counties have received the same Food Stamp Fraud allocation for the past five state fiscal years, despite changes at the county-level that would affect factors in the formula and the subsequent distribution of the funds.  Surpluses at fiscal year close-out suggest that total funding is adequate to cover Food Stamp fraud program expenditures.  The goal is an equitable distribution of the Food Stamp Fraud allocation among the counties. | Counties |  | 2009-03-04 00:00:00 | Assigned | 12 | 0 |  | 2009-03-04 00:00:00 | 2009-07-01 00:00:00 |  |  |  |  |  | Pauline Burton & Cheryl Ternes will write up Recommendation for Karen Beye  Reviewed 4/8/11 - Effective July 1, 2011, this will no longer be a separate allocation
11-FI-003 | 2011-02-03 00:00:00 | CDHS Finance Sub-Committee | Property Tax Based Relief has been eliminated in the budget proposal sent from CDHS to the Governor and JBC. In exhange, funding has been proposed to draw down funds to supplement the budgets of those counties with high Food Assistance applications. | County Departments of Human/Social Services families receiving public assistance and Medicaid |  | 2011-02-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | 2011-02-06 00:00:00
11-FI-004 | 2011-02-03 00:00:00 | CDHS Finance Sub-Committee | One of the LAC findings from the CCAP allocation.  The expertise needed to respond to the allocation finding indicates that the committee responding to the programmatic issues should be different that the committee responding to the allocation issues.  The committee was asked to make certain the right people are at the table for this discussion. | CDHS CCAP Office County Departments of Human/Social Services Finance Sub-PAC Current audit review committee |  | 2011-02-06 00:00:00 | Assigned | 11 | 0 |  | 2011-02-06 00:00:00