Spreadsheet: 85fd7d5f-ddc4-45eb-9319-d84beba04bdd
Sheet: Sheet1

PROJECT NAME | ClimateMark | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3 | Unnamed: 4 | Unnamed: 5 | Unnamed: 6 | Unnamed: 7
IMPACT | Impact Indicator 1 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (Jan '13) | Milestone 2 (2015) | Target (2020)
 | Number of people food insecure | Planned | 8 million (SADC only) | 7 million (SADC only) | 4 million (SADC only) | 3 million (SADC only)
Improved food and agricultural security for the poor in East and Southern Africa in times of climate change |  | Achieved
 |  |  | Source
 |  |  | RVAA regional synthesis reports and Tripartite documentation
 | Impact Indicator 2 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2014) | Milestone 2 (2015) | Target (2020)
 | Prevalance of malnutrition | Planned | Stunting 36%; underweight 15%; (mean of [NAME] population) | Stunting 33%; underweight 12%; (mean of [NAME] population) | Stunting 30%; underweight 10%; (mean of [NAME] population) | Stunting 18%; underweight 7.5%; (mean of [NAME] population)
 |  | Achieved
 |  |  | Source
 |  |  | RVAA regional synthesis reports and [NAME] (for parts outside of SADC)
 | Impact Indicator 3 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2014) | Milestone 2 (2015) | Target (2020)
 | Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) is standard smallholder practice | Planned | No countries have taken CSA to scale. Around 100,000ha under smallholder [NAME] (FAO stat 2009) | 4 national governments are implementing CSA to scale | 1.2 millions farmers will be sustainably practicing or being trained in climate smart agriculture. 8 national governments have introduced plans to take CSA to scale and global climate funds have been committed | CSA reaches 10 million farmers. 2.5 million Ha under CSA.
 |  | Achieved
 |  |  | Source
 |  |  | ClimateSmart
OUTCOME | Outcome Indicator 1 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015) | Assumptions
Improved knowledge, policies and longer-term incentives drive increased uptake of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) in COMESA-EAC-SADC member states | Number of farmers using climate smart agriculture practices (CSA) based on sound evidence | Planned | Using CA - Zambia 48,000; Mozambique ?, Zimbabwe 130,000, Madagascar 8,000, [NAME] 12,000, [NAME] 174,000. (FAO 2011 - Analysis of the Status and Potential of Conservation Agriculture in Southern Africa - figures weak and need revising by research partner) | Evidence base available to support farmer uptake. Systems in place to measure Outcome. | Additional 200,000 farmers participating in CSA programmes | Additional 250,000 direct beneficiary farmers using CSA appoaches. 2 million indirect beneficiary farmers benefited from research, training materials and policy changes. | A critical mass of farmers practising CSA, combined with appropriate financial incentives and evidence based policies will lead to wide-scale adoption of CSA and additional sustained finance.                                                                                                                   Use of CSA coupled with effective response to VAA results in reduced food insecurity and reduced malnutrition. Policy and revised farming practices will impact household nutrition. This causal link has not been proven and will be explored using impact evaluation during programme implementation. Improvement in household yieldss translates to reduced food security or increased incomes. Impact level food security milestones and targets also rely on no major droughts and heavy flooding, during inception shadow trends will be included which estimate trends that incorporate flooding/drought potential.
 |  | Achieved
 |  |  | Source
 |  |  | Evidence Research Partner (Output 4)
 | Outcome Indicator 2 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
 | Finance for climate smart agriculture received from international community and national governments | Planned | 0 | $100m | $200m | Additional $300m climate finance commitments for ESA
 |  | Achieved
 |  |  | Source
 |  |  | COMESA Policy Team and Global climate fund reports
 | Outcome Indicator 3 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
 | Climate resilient policy and programme responses informed by climate smart regional and national vulnerability assessments | Planned | VAA institutions and approaches established in 10 SADC member states | Tripartite and governments of at least 12 SADC member states make climate resilient policy and programme responses to regional and national vulnerability assessments. | Tripartite and governments of at least 14 SADC member states make climate resilient policy and programme responses to regional and national vulnerability assessments. | Tripartite and governments of at least 15  member states make climate resilient policy and programme responses to regional and national vulnerability assessments.
 |  | Achieved
 |  |  | Source
 |  |  | RVAA Team
INPUTS (£) | DFID (£) 38 million |  | Govt (£) | Other (£) | Total (£) | DFID SHARE (%)
 |  |  |  | 32m | 70m | 0.55
INPUTS (HR) | DFID (FTEs)
 | 1 (0.6 technical and 0.4 administrative)
OUTPUT 1 | Output Indicator 1.1 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2011) | Milestone 2 (2013) | Target (2015) | Assumption
 | Africa Climate Solution accepted by the global community | Planned | Agriculture marginal to COP15 debate | [NAME] position at COP17 | African climate solution incorporated into the post 2012 UNFCCC global agreement | African Climate Solution attracting finance to the tripartite and member governments | Climate finance commitments, investment frameworks and carbon trading funds are implemented in a way that provide sufficient incentive for farmers to adopt climate smart agriculture
Improved policy on climate smart agriculture, informed by evidence, supported by the global community and attracting adaptation and mitigation finance. |  | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | COMESA Policy Team
 | Output Indicator 1.2 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
 | Member States have developed gender sensitive climate smart agriculture investment frameworks and strategies. | Planned | 0 | 3 | 10 | 14 member States
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | COMESA Policy Team
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) | Output Indicator 1.3 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
0.1 | Mitigation solutions being applied in the COMESA-EAC-SADC region with carbon trading benefits (related to agriculture sequestration) | Planned | 0 | Robust evidence base enables agriculture sequestration to receive carbon credits | Tripartite regional carbon fund operational | Benefit stream accruing
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source |  |  |  |  | RISK RATING
 |  | COMESA Policy Team |  |  |  |  | medium
INPUTS (£) | DFID (£) £3 Million |  | Govt (£) | Other (£) | Total (£)
 |  |  |  | 14.75m | 3m | 0.16
INPUTS (HR) | DFID (FTEs)
 | 0.15
OUTPUT 2 | Output Indicator 2.1 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015) | Assumptions
 | National VAA procedures operational | Planned | At least 10 SADC member states competent in climate smart VAA procedures and reports. | At least 12 SADC member states competent in climate smart VAA procedures and reporting. | National annual VAA reports that inform climate resilient programmes and policies produced for at least two years in at least 10 SADC member states. | VAC and VAA costs fully covered by domestic budgets in at least 5 SADC member states | Climate aware vulnerability analysis leads to improved policies that encourage uptake of climate smart agriculture and effective vulnerability reducing responses.
Policy responses to vulnerability constantly informed and influenced by improved assessment of climate vulnerability (who, where, why) across the region |  | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | RVAA regional synthesis reports
 | Output Indicator 2.2 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
 | National VAA output reflected in policy and programmes | Planned | At least 6 SADC member states have infomed their poverty reduction and/or food security policies with VAA | At least 8 poverty reduction and/or climate mitigation/adaptation policies and/or programmes make demonstable use of VAA | At least 10 poverty reduction and/or climate mitigation/adaptation policies and/or programmes make demonstable use of VAA | At least 15 poverty reduction and/or climate mitigation/adaptation policies and/or programmes make demonstable use of VAA
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | RVAA regional synthesis reports
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) | Output Indicator 2.3 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
0.2 | Regional VAA output accessible and communicated | Planned | Regional Vulnerability Assessment Committee meets once a month, has one annual regional dissemination meeting.  and one annual meeting of VACs. One regional synthesis report and 8 national VAA reports available on SADC website and in print. | Regional VAA Steering and Technical Committees meets and reports (including one regional synthesis of VAA assessment) at least twice per year. One regional synthesis report and 10 national VAA reports available on SADC website and in print. | At least one analytical or methodological report of regional relevance and/or with multinational coverage, one regional VAA dissemenation report and 12 national vaa reports published on SADC website annually | At least one analytical or methodological report of regional relevance and/or with multinational coverage, one regional VAA dissemenation report and 15 national VAA reports published on SADC website annually
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source |  |  |  |  | RISK RATING
 |  | RVAA regional synthesis reports |  |  |  |  | low
INPUTS (£) | DFID (£) £6 Million |  | Govt (£) | Other (£) | Total (£) | DFID SHARE (%)
 |  |  |  |  | 6m | 100
INPUTS (HR) | DFID (FTEs)
 | 0.25
OUTPUT 3 | Output Indicator 3.1 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2012) | Milestone 2 (2013) | Target (2015) | Assumptions
Farmers using improved, locally relevant, climate smart agricultural practices in order to increase their climate resilience. | Number of smallscale farmers trained in locally specific climate smart agricultural practices | Planned | CA initiatives and training varied and lacking cohesion as described in FAO country and regional reviews (2010 ref) | SACAU and EAFF developing CSA awareness work and capacity with national partner associations. | 5 gender sensitive locally relevant training packages being used. Innovative information and communication technologies developed for training of farmers to strengthen quality and reach | 2 million farmers trained using programme derived training materials. Commercial farmers linking with neighbouring smallholders in support of CSA adoption. | Training in climate smart agriculture and participation in conservation agriculture and agroforestry projects leads to longer-term adoption of CSA
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | Evidence Partner (Output 4)
 | Output Indicator 3.2 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2012) | Milestone 2 (2013) | Target (2015)
 |  | Planned | 0 | Multi-donor results facility operational. 3 CA fast track investments supported | 5 CA Fast track supported and 7 CA anchor investment projects piloted. | 14  CA anchor investment projects piloted. 5 CA fast track investments undrway with outputs and impacts being monitored.
 | Conservation Agriculture, agroforestry and CSA projects piloted and scale-up fast-tracked | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | Facility Manager
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) | Output Indicator 3.3 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
 |  | Planned | 170,000 (CFU Zambia) | 150000 | 200000 | 250000
0.55 | Number of farmers involved in CA/CSA fast track pilot and anchor investment projects - at least 40% women (milestone targets are additional to baseline) | Achieved
 |  | Source |  |  |  |  | RISK RATING
 |  | Evidence Partner (Output 4) |  |  |  |  | medium
INPUTS (£) | DFID (£) £24 million |  | Govt (£) | Other (£) | Total (£) | DFID SHARE (%)
 |  |  |  | 7.24m | 31.241m | 0.76
INPUTS (HR) | DFID (FTEs)
 | 0.45
OUTPUT 4 | Output Indicator 4.1 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015) | Assumptions
Evidence and learning on climate smart agricultural practices used to enhance effectiveness of programme delivery and global knowledge | Robust evidence of the impact (including on income and nutrition) and operational lessons of climate smart agricultural interventions. | Planned | Evidence not robust - as described in 'Evidence base for climate resilient and productive agriculture in Southern Africa' (DFID/Whiteside M 2011) | Synthesis of existing knowledge on select agricultural practices that may enhance climate resilience in the Eastern and Southern African regions.                         Impact and lesson learning systems in-place in pilot and anchor projects | Lessons learnt from programmes in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe informing scale-up elsewhere including gender relevant lessons. At least two peer reviewed publications produced. Research disseminated through range of channels in Southern and Eastern Africa. | Robust evidence of the impact of and operational lessons available from selected CA/CSA programmes across the intervention region | Sufficient locally appropriate agricultural practices can be identified  that are sufficiently advantageous to farmers.  Good research evidence does get used for improved policy and is used to improve farmer practice.
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | Evidence Partner reports
 | Output Indicator 4.2 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2013) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
 | Action research tested and tailored selected agricultural practices to diverse agro-ecological, socio-economic conditions and by gender | Planned | Evidence of varying quality and completeness - as identified in the 2012 synthesis (see Output 4.1 above) | At least 3 agro-ecological and socio-economic specific advice packages available, backed by robust evidence | At least 6 agro-ecological and socio-economic specific advice packages reflecting gender considerations available, backed by robust evidence | At least 6 advice packages in use and the outcome of using them being monitored.
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source
 |  | Evidence Partner reports
IMPACT WEIGHTING (%) | Output Indicator 4.3 |  | Baseline | Milestone 1 (2012) | Milestone 2 (2014) | Target (2015)
0.15 | Learning on CSA in Southern and Eastern Africa being used to improve policy and practice | Planned | Limited sharing of practitioner experience (see FAO reports) | Research uptake strategy designed | Evidence of research, combined with practitioner experience being shared and being used to improve scale-up | Selected research reaching women and men farmers in an appropriate format and results being monitored.
 |  | Achieved
 |  | Source |  |  |  |  | RISK RATING
 |  | Evidence Partner reports |  |  |  |  | low
INPUTS (£) | DFID (£) £5 Million |  | Govt (£) | Other (£) | Total (£) | DFID SHARE (%)
 |  |  |  | 1.27m | 6.27m | 0.8
INPUTS (HR) | DFID (FTEs)
 | 0.15