Spreadsheet: 34fbfa14-f018-4d35-a320-f50a4d6a65c4
Sheet: Risk Behaviours

Risk Behaviours |  |  |  |  | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008-2009 | 2008 | 2007-2008 | 2007 | 2006-2007 | 2006 | 2005-2006 | 2005 | 2004-2005 | 2004 | 2003-2005 | 2003-2004 | 2003 | 2002-2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000-2001 | 2000 | 1999-2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996
Key populations at higher risk
People who inject drugs (PWID)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  | 35 (77) |  |  |  | 16 (282)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 35 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  | 42.6 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 32.8 (7)
 |  | Bangladesh |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.7 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.4 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.9 (7)
 |  | China |  | Total |  |  | 35.8 (7) |  |  |  | 34.2 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  | 42.2 (7) |  |  |  | 42.9 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 34.5 (7) |  |  |  | 31.5 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 37.8 (97) |  |  |  | 35.6 (25)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 35.6 (97) |  |  |  | 54 (25)
 |  | Indonesia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.8 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.1 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.8 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.5 (47)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.3 (47)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.9 (35)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (35)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.2 (35)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25 (35)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.8 (35)
 |  | India |  | Male |  |  | 15.9 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  | 12.7 (27)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 17.5 (27)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 95 (21)
 |  |  | Karnataka | Total |  |  | 92 (21)
 |  |  | Maharashtra | Total |  |  | 77 (21)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  | 15.9 (21)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 79 (21)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  | 94 (21)
 |  | Japan |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65 (7)
 |  | Myanmar |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 77.6 (41)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 77.6 (7) | 77.6 (41)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 78.6 (41)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  | 76.7 (41)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 78.6 (7) | 78.6 (41)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 76.7 (7) | 76.7 (41)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  | 27.8 (7) |  |  |  |  | 5.1 (102) |  |  |  |  | 5 (7)
 |  | Nepal |  | Male |  |  | 50.8 (7) |  |  |  | 38 (7) | 37.67 (71)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  | 49.3 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 45.3 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.03 (71) |  |  |  | 60.5 (71)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.7 (71)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.8 (71)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | Male |  |  | 50.8 (283)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male |  |  | 52.2 (283)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 30.8 (74)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 30.8 (7) |  | 21 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 29.2 (74) |  | 13 (62)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 31.2 (74) |  | 22.7 (62)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 29.2 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 31.2 (7)
 |  | Philippines |  | Total |  |  | 22.1 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  | 0 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 23.1 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 25.7 (58)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 19.4 (58)
 |  | Thailand |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 42 (7) |  | 35 (7) | 35 (22)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  |  |  | 28.6 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 44.6 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 40 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 42.1 (7)
 |  | Vietnam |  | Total |  |  |  | 57 (224)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 51.9 (7) |  |  |  | 36 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  | 53.6 (24)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 51.1 (24)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a casual partner | Percent | Myanmar | Myitkyina | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 57.8 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 77 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 13.8 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 50.1 (41)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.4 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.2 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.6 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.3 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.6 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.3 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.4 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.0 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.7 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.0 (255)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a female sex worker | Percent | Bangladesh |  | Chapainawabganj |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.7 (259)
 |  |  | Chandpur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.9 (259)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.1 (259)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.9 (259)
 |  | Nepal |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.8 (71) |  | 75 (71)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 31.0 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 16.6 (257)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (185)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.9 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.2 (185) | 6 (250)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.7 (125)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83.7 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90.7 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78.7 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.6 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.9 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.7 (125)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a male sex worker or transgender | Percent | Pakistan | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.1 (185)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.6 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.3 (185) | 3 (250)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a non-regular female partner | Percent | Nepal |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.6 (71) |  | 64.7 (71)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a non-regular partner | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79.0 (264)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.1 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.5 (73)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.1 (260)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.3 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.5 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.8 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.4 (260) | 44.4 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50 (260) | 50 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.1 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.9 (260) | 26.9 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 70 (260) | 70 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.6 (260) | 14.6 (4)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a paid sexual partner | Percent | Bangladesh |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.0 (279)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.8 (100) |  |  |  | 78.9 (100)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.3 (100) |  |  |  | 23.6 (100)
 |  | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.0 (264)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83.3 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.4 (73)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.4 (260)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 94.7 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85.5 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.8 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 93.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.1 (260) | 57.1 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 100 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80 (260) | 80 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79.5 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74.4 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.3 (260) | 56.3 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64 (260) | 64 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42 (260) | 42 (4)
 |  | Myanmar | Myitkyina | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 73.4 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 46 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 61 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 86.8 (41)
 |  | Pakistan | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.9 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.3 (185)
 |  | Philippines |  | IDUs as clients |  |  | 22.0 (245)
 |  |  |  | IDUs as sex workers |  |  | 11.0 (245)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 82.4 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83.7 (255)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.0 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.5 (255)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.1 (255)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a regular female partner | Percent | Nepal |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.7 (71) |  |  |  | 40.3 (71)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last sex with a regular partner | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.5 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.3 (73)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34 (260)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.8 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.3 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.2 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.8 (260) | 20.8 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.5 (260) | 57.5 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.2 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.8 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28 (260) | 28 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.5 (260) | 37.5 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.8 (260) | 23.8 (4)
 |  | Myanmar | Myitkyina | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 34.5 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 26.3 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 10.4 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 31.3 (41)
 |  | Pakistan | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.6 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.2 (185)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.9 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.4 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.7 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.8 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.6 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.6 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.2 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.9 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.7 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.0 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.3 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.9 (255)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use in the last 12 months | Percent | India |  | Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.8 (260)
 |  |  |  | Non-regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.9 (260)
 |  |  |  | Regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.1 (260)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.4 (260)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Non-regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.1 (260)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.3 (260)
 |  |  | Manipur | Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.3 (260)
 |  |  | Manipur | Non-regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (260)
 |  |  | Manipur | Regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.8 (260)
 |  |  | Chennai | Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.5 (260)
 |  |  | Chennai | Non-regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.5 (260)
 |  |  | Chennai | Regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8 (260)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40 (260)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Non-regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (260)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.8 (260)
 |  |  | Delhi | Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.4 (260)
 |  |  | Delhi | Non-regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.3 (260)
 |  |  | Delhi | Regular partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.8 (260)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use with casual partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.1 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.6 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.7 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.5 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.4 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.1 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.7 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.0 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.1 (255)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use with female sex workers in the last 12 months | Percent | Nepal |  | Western to Far-Western Terai Male |  |  | 51.0 (283) |  |  |  |  | 48.4 (283) |  | 46.5 (283)
 |  |  | Eastern [NAME] | Male |  |  | 44.5 (283) |  |  |  |  | 57.3 (283) |  | 50.0 (283) |  |  |  |  | 41.4 (283)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | Male | 76 (5) |  | 49.4 (284) |  |  |  | 67.8 (284) |  |  |  | 33.9 (284) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.3 (284)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male | 70 (5) |  | 70 (285) |  |  |  | 80.5 (285) |  |  |  | 49.6 (285) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.6 (285)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.1 (125)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.1 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.4 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.1 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.2 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.0 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.8 (125)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use with female sex workers in the last 6 months | Percent | Pakistan | Rawalpindi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.3 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.0 (250)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use with non-regular partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.7 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.0 (73)
 |  | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.1 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.6 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.7 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.1 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.4 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.5 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.3 (4)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | Male |  |  | 33.4 (284) |  |  |  | 33.5 (284) |  |  |  | 35.3 (284) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48 (284)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male |  |  | 46.6 (285) |  |  |  | 52.9 (285) |  |  |  | 39.6 (285) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.9 (285)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use with paid sexual partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Bangladesh |  | Chapainawabganj Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.6 (259)
 |  |  | Chandpur | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (259)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.8 (259)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.2 (259)
 |  | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.0 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.7 (73)
 |  | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78.9 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.5 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.5 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.4 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.3 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.6 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.9 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.5 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.4 (4)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.9 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.0 (255)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.8 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.2 (255)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.1 (255)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use with paid sexual partners in the last 6 months | Percent | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 96.6 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 60 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 71 (41)
Injecting drug users who reported consistent condom use with regular partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.1 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.2 (73)
 |  | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.8 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.6 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.3 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.8 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.7 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.8 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.8 (4)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | Male |  |  | 5.6 (284) |  |  |  | 43.1 (284) |  |  |  | 13 (284) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.5 (284)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male |  |  | 5.4 (285) |  |  |  | 21.7 (285) |  |  |  | 12.4 (285) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.3 (285)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.1 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.8 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.9 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.2 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.9 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.2 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.4 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.9 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.5 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.5 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.1 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.6 (255)
Injecting drug users who used sterile injecting equipment at the last time they injected | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  | 94 (77) |  |  |  | 46 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 94 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  | 95.1 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 93.6 (7)
 |  |  | Kabul | Total |  |  | 94 (77)
 |  |  | Provincial Center Of Balkh ( Mazar-i-sharif ) | Total |  |  | 98 (77)
 |  |  | Herat | Total |  |  | 86 (77)
 |  | Bangladesh |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 (286)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.8 (100) |  |  |  | 60 (100)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (7) |  |  |  | 51.8 (100)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.5 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.6 (7)
 |  | China |  | Total |  |  | 71.5 (7) |  |  |  | 41 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  | 68 (7) |  |  |  | 32 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 71.9 (7) |  |  |  | 42 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 61.6 (97) |  |  |  | 34 (25)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 72.5 (97) |  |  |  | 41 (25)
 |  | Indonesia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  |  |  |  |  | 94.4 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.8 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87 (47)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88.5 (47)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  | 86.5 (7) |  |  |  |  |  | 29-98 (4)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  | 90 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 83.1 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 85.2 (27)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 87.1 (27)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  | 86.5 (21)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  | 73.1 (21)
 |  | Japan | Japan | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47 (7)
 |  | Maldives |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 71.5 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  |  |  | 28.6 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 74 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 71 (86)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 72.1 (86)
 |  | Myanmar |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 80.6 (41)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 80.6 (7) | 80.6 (41)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 83.2 (41)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  | 78.8 (41)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 83.3 (7) | 83.2 (41)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 78.8 (7) | 78.8 (41)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  | 83.5 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28 (7) |  | 27.6 (287)
 |  | Nepal |  | Male |  |  | 99.1 (7) |  |  |  | 95.7 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.3 (283)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.9 (283)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  | 98 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 100 (7)
 |  |  |  | Western to Far-Western Terai Male |  |  | 96.2 (283)
 |  |  | Eastern [NAME] | Male |  |  | 92.8 (283)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | Male |  |  | 99.1 (283)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | Male <25 yr |  |  | 98 (283)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 100 (283)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male |  |  | 98.5 (283)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 77.3 (74)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 77.3 (7) |  | 28 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 79.3 (42)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 76.9 (42)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 79.3 (62) |  | 29.5 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 76.9 (62) |  | 27.52 (7)
 |  |  | Lahore | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28 (185)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 82.4 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28 (185) | 84 (250)
 |  | Philippines |  | Total |  |  | 85 (7) |  |  |  | 48 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  | 93.9 (7) |  |  |  | 63 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 84.3 (7) |  |  |  | 47 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 82.9 (58) |  |  |  | 40 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 87.5 (58) |  |  |  | 56 (7)
 |  | Thailand |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 63.2 (7)
 |  |  |  | Female |  |  |  |  | 64.3 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 63 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 60.9 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 63.2 (7)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | Female |  |  |  |  | 10.7 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 3.3 (7)
 |  | Vietnam |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89 (7) |  |  | 88.8 (125) | 85 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  | 94.6 (7)
 |  |  |  | Male <25 yr |  |  | 94 (24)
 |  |  |  | Male 25+ yr |  |  | 94.9 (24)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90.4 (125)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 93 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 98.9 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.5 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92.6 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85.6 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 91.2 (125)
Injecting drug users who reported sharing injecting equipment at the last time they injected drugs | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.6 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.5 (73)
 |  | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.3 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.6 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.6 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55.3 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.9 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.4 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.5 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.6 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.7 (4)
 |  | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 31 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 23 (86)
 |  | Myanmar | Myitkyina | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 22 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 5.2 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 19.3 (41)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 18 (74)
 |  |  | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 22.3 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 1.3 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Always shared |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | Any time shared |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 82 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | Last time shared |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.7 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 1.8 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 28 (185)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.5 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 24.1 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Always shared |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Any time shared |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Last time shared |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.4 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Total |  |  |  |  | 22.8 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 46.2 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 22.7 (42)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.8 (125)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.8 (125)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.3 (125)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.7 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.6 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.4 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.5 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.7 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.8 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.1 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.0 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.0 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.5 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.1 (125)
Average age at first drug use | Year | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 16 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 17 (86)
 |  | Myanmar | Myitkyina | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 18.5 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 19.5 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 19.3 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 20.6 (41)
Average age at first injecting drug use | Year | Myanmar | Myitkyina | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 20.6 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 21.8 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 21.4 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 26.4 (41)
 |  | Pakistan | Pakistan | Total |  |  |  |  | 28.5 (74)
 |  |  | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 28.1 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 28.5 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 29.4 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 27.6 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 31.3 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Total |  |  |  |  | 26.8 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 29.1 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 26.9 (42)
Average number of years of injecting drug use | Year | Pakistan | Pakistan | Total |  |  |  |  | 4.6 (74)
 |  |  | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.9 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 4.6 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 6 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 3.6 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 6.7 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Total |  |  |  |  | 5.2 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 4.5 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.1 (42)
Injecting drug users who always shared equipment in the last week they injected | Percent | Indonesia | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.4 (35)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.6 (35)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.4 (35)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.6 (35)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.1 (35)
Injecting drug users who always used clean or new needles and syringes in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.9 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.7 (73)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Male |  |  |  |  | 48.3 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 21.9 (257)
 |  |  | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 22.8 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 74.1 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 86.3 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 73.4 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 26.6 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi Central | Total |  |  |  |  | 44.8 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 21.0 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 22.3 (42)
Injecting drug users who are younger than 25 years of age | Percent | Nepal | Kathmandu | Male | 58 (5)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male | 55 (5)
Injecting drug users who discarded last needle safely | Percent | Indonesia | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59 (118)
 |  |  | Semarang | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 86 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 (118)
Injecting drug users who injected drugs more than once a day in the last week | Percent | Nepal | Kathmandu | Male | 19 (5) |  | 37 (5) |  |  |  | 34 (5) |  |  |  | 60 (5) |  |  |  |  |  | 72 (5)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male | 12 (5) |  | 31 (5) |  |  |  | 24 (5) |  |  |  | 29 (5) |  |  |  |  |  | 44 (5)
Injecting drug users who never injected drugs which had been dissolved in someone else's blood in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.5 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.0 (73)
Injecting drug users who never shared a cooker/vial/container, cotton/filter, or rinse water when injecting drugs in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.0 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.5 (73)
Injecting drug users who never shared needles in the last month | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.5 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.3 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.1 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.7 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.9 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.4 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.7 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.4 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.8 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.2 (4)
Injecting drug users who never used used needles and syringes in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.5 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.4 (73)
Injecting drug users who reported avoiding sharing equipment at last injection | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53 (280)
 |  | Bangladesh |  | Female |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.8 (100) |  |  |  | 60 (100)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.6 (100) |  |  |  | 51.8 (100)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.2 (281)
 |  | India | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.7 (260)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.9 (260)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.4 (260)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.8 (260)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.2 (260)
 |  |  | Cambodia | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66 (264)
 |  |  | Malaysia | SWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.4 (102)
 |  |  | Philippines | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.0 (93)
Injecting drug users who reported sharing injecting equipment in the last week | Percent | Nepal | Kathmandu | Male | 33 (5)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male | 80 (5)
Injecting drug users who reported sharing needles in the last week | Percent | Indonesia | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 (118)
 |  |  | Semarang | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56 (118)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | Male | 2 (5)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male | 2 (5)
Injecting drug users who reported sharing needles/syringes in the last month | Percent | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 30 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 28 (86)
Injecting drug users who reported the use of non sterile injecting equipment at the last injection | Percent | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 23 (74)
 |  |  | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 43.7 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 5.3 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 7 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 7.2 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 26.4 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Total |  |  |  |  | 21.8 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 44.4 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 30 (42)
Injecting drug users who reported unprotected paid sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Indonesia | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26 (35)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 (35)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29 (35)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45 (35)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35 (35)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | Male | 24 (5)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley Male | 30 (5)
Injecting drug users who shared injecting equipment in the last 6 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.0 (125)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.7 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.9 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.6 (125)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.3 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.2 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.2 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.5 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.0 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.3 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.7 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.8 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.8 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.3 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.3 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.0 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Shared both drug and injecting equipment |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.3 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.4 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.6 (255)
Injecting drug users with average injections per day | Number | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.2 (74)
 |  |  | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.1 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.7 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.7 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 3.1 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 1 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi Central | Total |  |  |  |  | 1.1 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.4 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.2 (42)
Injecting drug users with average injections per day in the last 6 months | Number | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 2.6 (76)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 1.8 (78)
 |  |  | Provincial Center Of Balkh ( Mazar-i-sharif ) | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 3.1 (76)
Prevalence of injecting drug use among population (15-64) | Percent (Estimate) | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.05 (132)
 |  | Bangladesh |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.03 (133)
 |  | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.02 (110)
 |  | China |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.25 (134)
 |  | Indonesia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.14 (108)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.02 (109)
 |  | Japan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.47 (139)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.33 (112)
 |  | Myanmar |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.23 (111)
 |  | Nepal |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.15 (113)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.14 (115)
 |  | Thailand |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.38 (116)
 |  | Vietnam |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.25 (135)
 | Percent (High estimate) | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.05 (132)
 |  | Bangladesh |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.04 (133)
 |  | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.09 (110)
 |  | China |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.31 (134)
 |  | Indonesia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.16 (108)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.03 (109)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.56 (112)
 |  | Myanmar |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.27 (111)
 |  | Nepal |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.19 (113)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.16 (115)
 | Percent (Low estimate) | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.05 (132)
 |  | Bangladesh |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.02 (133)
 |  | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.01 (110)
 |  | China |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.19 (134)
 |  | Indonesia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.13 (108)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.01 (109)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.11 (112)
 |  | Myanmar |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.18 (111)
 |  | Nepal |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.11 (113)
 |  | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.13 (115)
Injecting drug users who bought sex from female sex workers in the last 12 months | Percent | Bangladesh |  | Chapainawabganj Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.6 (259)
 |  |  | Chandpur | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.6 (259)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.4 (259)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.9 (259)
Injecting drug users who bought sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 38 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 52 (86)
Injecting drug users who have ever paid a female for sex | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 48 (76)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 52 (78)
 |  |  | Provincial Center Of Balkh ( Mazar-i-sharif ) | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 45 (76)
Injecting drug users who have ever reported sex with a sex worker | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  | 55-70 (77) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.7 (258)
Injecting drug users who paid a female for sex in the last 6 months | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  | 9-12 (77) |  |  | 0.5 (76)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (78)
 |  |  | Provincial Center Of Balkh ( Mazar-i-sharif ) | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 4 (76)
Injecting drug users who reported condom use at last non-paid sex | Percent | Bangladesh |  | Female |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.1 (100) |  |  |  | 43.9 (100)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.5 (100) |  |  |  | 18.9 (100)
 |  | Pakistan | Rawalpindi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.4 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.6 (250)
Injecting drug users who reported having paid sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Indonesia | [NAME] | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (118) |  |  |  |  | 31.6 (35)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9 (118) |  |  |  |  | 26.9 (35)
 |  |  | Bandung | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46 (118) |  |  |  |  | 40.2 (35)
 |  |  | Semarang | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54 (118)
 |  |  | Malang | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44 (118) |  |  |  |  | 51.6 (35)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.1 (35)
 |  | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.8 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.5 (4)
 |  |  | Punjab | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55.6 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.7 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.9 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.9 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.2 (4)
Injecting drug users who reported having paid sex in the last 6 months | Percent | Myanmar | Myitkyina | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 31.1 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 47.7 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 41.5 (41)
 |  |  | Lashio | Total |  |  |  |  |  | 9.1 (41)
 |  | Pakistan | Rawalpindi | Non-paid sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.9 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | With FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.2 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | With MSW or transgender |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.8 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Non-paid sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78.8 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | With FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.5 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | With MSW or transgender |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.3 (250)
Injecting drug users who reported selling sex for drugs or money in the last 6 months | Percent | Pakistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 16.8 (74)
Injecting drug users who reported sex with female sex workers in last 6 months | Percent | Pakistan | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 34 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 11 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 16 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 12 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 24 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Total |  |  |  |  | 11 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 9 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 32 (42)
Injecting drug users who reported sex with female sex workers in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.5 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.1 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.3 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.0 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.9 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.4 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.5 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.0 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.0 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.7 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.7 (255)
Injecting drug users who reported sex with male sex workers/ [NAME] sex workers in the last 6 months | Percent | Pakistan | Dera Ghazi [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 39 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 6 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | Total |  |  |  |  | 8 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 8 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | Total |  |  |  |  | 10 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | Total |  |  |  |  | 11 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 13 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | Total |  |  |  |  | 24 (42)
Injecting drug users who sold sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Indonesia |  | Female |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19 (118)
 |  |  |  | Male |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 (118)
 |  |  | Semarang | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (118)
 |  | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 16 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 4 (86)
Injecting drug users engaged in male-to-male sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDUs in community |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.1 (73)
 |  |  |  | IDUs in rehabilitation center |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (73)
Men who have sex with men (MSM) and [NAME])
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last anal sex with a male partner | Percent | Bangladesh |  | MSM |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31 (286) |  |  | 49.2 (14)
 |  |  |  | MSM <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.2 (100) |  |  |  | 52.9 (14)
 |  |  |  | MSM 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.5 (100) |  |  |  | 48.8 (14)
 |  |  |  | MSM Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.5 (100) |  |  |  | 49.2 (91)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] sex |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.3 (100) |  |  |  | 37 (91)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.7 (7) |  |  |  | 49 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.8 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.9 (7)
 |  | Cambodia |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78 (295)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 86 (7) | 86.5 (70)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88.7 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.7 (7)
 |  |  |  | With non-regular clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53 (295)
 |  |  |  | With regular clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74 (295)
 |  | China |  | Total |  |  | 73 (7) |  | 75 (56) |  | 64 (7) |  |  |  | 41 (7) |  | 44.2 (96)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 77.2 (97) |  |  |  | 69.3 (25)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 70.4 (97) |  |  |  | 60.5 (25)
 |  | Fiji |  | Police and military |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.3 (43)
 |  |  |  | STI clinic attendees |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (63)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.2 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 16-46 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (53)
 |  | Hong Kong SAR of China |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66 (87) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.1 (294)
 |  | Indonesia |  | MSM |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.8 (35)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.3 (35)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57 (7) |  |  |  | 48 (7) | 56.4 (55)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55.7 (47) |  |  |  | 46 (14) | 54 (55)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.2 (47) |  |  |  | 49 (14) | 57.7 (55)
 |  | India |  | Total |  |  | 58 (7) |  |  |  |  |  | 13-87 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19-67 (54)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 43.8 (27)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 68.8 (27)
 |  |  | Manipur | Total |  |  | 57.6 (21)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 48.9 (21)
 |  | Japan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 65 (7) |  |  |  | 55 (7)
 |  | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 (7)
 |  | Mongolia |  | MSM |  |  | 78.1 (29) |  |  |  | 67 (192) |  |  |  | 66.7 (299)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  | 78 (7) |  |  |  | 67 (7) |  |  |  | 13 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 80.3 (51)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 76.7 (51)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 21 (7)
 |  | Myanmar |  | MSM |  |  | 81.6 (288)
 |  |  |  | MSM <25 yr |  |  | 84 (288)
 |  |  |  | MSM 25+ yr |  |  | 78.4 (288)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  | 82 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 84 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 78.4 (7)
 |  | Nepal |  | Total |  |  | 75 (7) |  |  |  | 74 (7) | 73.5 (71)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 74.6 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.5 (71)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 76.1 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39 (71)
 |  | Pakistan |  | MSM <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.8 (14)
 |  |  |  | MSM 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.9 (14)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 (7) |  |  |  | 8 (7) |  |  | 7.6 (14)
 |  |  | Lahore | Non-paying |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.7 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | One time client |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.6 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | With regular clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.8 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | Non-paying |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.7 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | One time client |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.9 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | With regular clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.1 (185)
 |  | [NAME] |  | Total |  |  | 51 (7) |  |  |  | 88 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 40.9 (57) |  |  |  | 88.89 (18)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 60.3 (57) |  |  |  | 87.76 (18)
 |  |  |  | With MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.8 (296)
 |  |  |  | With non-paying male partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.2 (296)
 |  |  |  | With one-time partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.5 (296)
 |  |  |  | With regular male partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.7 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.8 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With non-paying male partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.2 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With one-time partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.5 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With regular male partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.7 (296)
 |  | Philippines |  | Total |  |  | 32 (7) |  |  |  | 32 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 29.7 (58)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 35.3 (58)
 |  | Singapore |  | Total |  |  | 17 (7)
 |  | [NAME] |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.5 (26)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.4 (26)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67 (3)
 |  | Thailand |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88 (7) | 88.2 (22)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88.7 (22)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.5 (22)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | MSM |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21 (182)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 38 (7)
 |  | Vietnam |  | Total |  |  | 66 (7) |  |  |  | 61 (7) |  |  | 61.6 (125)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 69.5 (24)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 63.5 (24)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75.5 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.4 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last anal sex with non-commercial partner in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87 (192) |  |  |  | 67 (191)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last paid sex | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 18 (290)
 |  |  | Kabul | Total |  |  |  |  | 28 (290)
 |  |  | Provincial Center Of Balkh ( Mazar-i-sharif ) | Total |  |  |  |  | 8 (290)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14 (182)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 100.0 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.8 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a casual female partner | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 52 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a casual male partner | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 68 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a consensual partner | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.3 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.5 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a female client | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 64 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a female partner | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.2 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.5 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.8 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.9 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.3 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.2 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.9 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.5 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.5 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.5 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a female sex worker | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 96 (88)
 |  | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 59 (40)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.7 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.4 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a male client | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79 (88)
 |  | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 66 (40)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 65 (40)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 75 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a male sex worker | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 78 (40)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.2 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a non-commercial female partner in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.4 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.4 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a non-commercial male partner | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 94 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83 (88)
 |  | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.6 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.7 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 70.4 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.7 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.1 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.4 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.5 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.8 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.7 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.8 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a paid female partner in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.6 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.4 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a paid [NAME] in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.9 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.8 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a paid male partner | Percent | Cambodia | Cambodia | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 96 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92 (88)
 |  | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85.5 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.1 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67.6 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.7 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63.7 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.3 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.9 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.4 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a paid male partner in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.5 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.8 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a regular female partner | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 55 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a regular male partner | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 67 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported condom use at last sex with a regular transgender partner | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 13 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use at anal sex with non-commercial partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54 (192) |  |  |  | 41 (191)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use at insertive anal sex in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.1 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 70.8 (297)
 |  | Indonesia | Batam | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.4 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.6 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.8 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.6 (118)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use at paid sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.5 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.4 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use at receptive anal sex in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.9 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.8 (297)
 |  | Indonesia | Batam | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.5 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.2 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.2 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.4 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.4 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.8 (118)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use in the last three months | Percent | Thailand | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36 (300)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 56.3 (300)
 |  |  | Phuket | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44 (300)
 |  |  | Phatthalung | Total |  |  |  |  | 57 (300)
 |  |  | Bangkok | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66 (300)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with consensual partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.8 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.7 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female casual partners in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.4 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.5 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female clients in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.4 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female partners in the last 6 months | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.1 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.6 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.9 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.8 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.6 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.9 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.3 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.3 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.2 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female partners in the last month | Percent | [NAME] | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64.2 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.2 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With non-paying female |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.9 (296)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female sex workers in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.8 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.1 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female sex workers in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 30 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female sex workers in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.3 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.7 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with female sweethearts in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.1 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67.7 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male casual partners in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 37 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male casual partners in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.1 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.6 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male clients in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 40 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male clients in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.8 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63.1 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male partners in the last month | Percent | [NAME] | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.2 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With non-paying male |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.6 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With one-time male client |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr With regular male client |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.3 (296)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (182)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Sex with consensual partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.0 (125)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | Sex with MSW |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.4 (125)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | Sold sex to partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.3 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Sex with consensual partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.2 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Sex with MSW |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.8 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Sold sex to partner |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.6 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male sex workers in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 51 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male sex workers in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.5 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.6 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with male sweethearts in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.7 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with non-commercial female partners in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.2 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with non-commercial male partners in the last 6 months | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.4 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.8 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.2 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.7 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.7 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.4 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.2 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.8 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.6 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.3 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with non-commercial non-regular partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | Total |  |  | 57 (29)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with non-regular partners in the last 6 months | Percent | Hong Kong SAR of China |  | Men Attending AIDS counselling |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81 (225) |  | 82 (225) |  |  | 83 (225) |  | 81 (225) | 78 (225) |  | 79 (225) |  | 76 (225) | 77 (225)
 |  |  |  | Men Attending social hygiene services |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72 (225) |  | 73 (225) |  |  | 75 (225) |  | 76 (225) | 75 (225) |  | 70 (225) |  | 80 (225) | 82 (225)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 75 (248) |  |  |  | 73 (248)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with paid female partners in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.7 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.9 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with paid [NAME] in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with paid male partners in the last 6 months | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.9 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.2 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.3 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.9 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.4 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.3 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.6 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.6 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.5 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.9 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with paid male partners in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.6 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.6 (72)
Men who have sex with men who reported consistent condom use with regular partners in the last 6 months | Percent | Hong Kong SAR of China |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 45 (248) |  |  |  | 41 (234)
Men who have sex with men who bought sex from female sex workers in the last 12 months | Percent | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 49 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 16 (86)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (182)
Men who have sex with men who had been forced to have sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Afghanistan |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 17 (290)
 |  |  | Kabul | Total |  |  |  |  | 28 (290)
 |  |  | Provincial Center Of Balkh ( Mazar-i-sharif ) | Total |  |  |  |  | 6 (290)
Men who have sex with men who have ever injected drugs | Percent | Indonesia | Batam | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.5 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.2 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.8 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.4 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.6 (118)
 |  | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 16 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 25 (86)
Men who have sex with men who have ever sold sex | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36 (88)
Men who have sex with men who have ever tried any drug | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.4 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.5 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.7 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.1 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.6 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.8 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.9 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.4 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.7 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported anal sex with multiple partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | Total |  |  | 43 (29) |  |  |  | 75 (192) |  |  |  | 56 (191)
Men who have sex with men who reported having sex with non-commercial male partners in the last month | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90.4 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 96.4 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89.6 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.2 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.8 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64.2 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.8 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74.2 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported having sex with paid male partners in the last month | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.8 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.8 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.3 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.9 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.6 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.7 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.4 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.8 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.2 (4)
Men who have sex with men who reported injecting drug use in the last 12 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 12 (40)
Men who have sex with men who reported paid sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Timor Leste |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (182)
Men who have sex with men who reported selling sex to a man in the last 12 months | Percent | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 44 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 18 (86)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with consensual female partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.9 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.8 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female casual partners in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Provinces |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.6 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.5 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female clients in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Provinces |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.7 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female paid partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50 (88)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.6 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.5 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66 (88)
 |  | Timor Leste | Timor Leste | Total |  |  |  |  | 94 (215)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female partners in the last 6 months | Percent | India | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.8 (4)
 |  |  | Goa | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.4 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.7 (4)
 |  |  | Bangalore | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.8 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.4 (4)
 |  |  | Mumbai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.6 (4)
 |  |  | Chennai | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.6 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.5 (4)
 |  |  | Calcutta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.2 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.8 (4)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  | 16.1 (220)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female regular partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.5 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.0 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female sex workers in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.6 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.7 (125)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with female sex workers in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Provinces |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.9 (297)
 |  |  | Phnom Penh | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15 (297)
Men who have sex with men who reported sex with multiple female sex workers in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31 (88)
Men who have sex with men who reported unprotected sex with female partners within the last 12 months | Percent | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 83 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 98 (86)
Men who have sex with men who reported unprotected sex with male partners within the last 6 months | Percent | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 64 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 79 (86)
Men who have sex with men who sold sex to multiple women in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10 (88)
Men who have sex with men who sold sex to women in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | Long hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 (88)
 |  |  |  | Short hair |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18 (88)
 |  | Maldives | Male | Total |  |  |  |  | 29 (86)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 5 (86)
Men who have sex with men who were forced to have sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Timor Leste |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 52 (301)
 |  | [NAME] | East New Britain | Total 16+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60 (296)
Men who have sex with men who were raped in the last 12 months | Percent | Bangladesh | Sylhet | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.8 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.2 (72)
Transgender ([NAME]) who injected drugs in the last 12 months | Percent | Bangladesh | Dhaka | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.2 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (263)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  | 3.1 (197)
Transgender (Waria) who have ever injected drugs | Percent | Indonesia | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.2 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.8 (118)
 |  |  | Semarang | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.5 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.2 (118)
Transgender (Waria) who reported consistent condom use at receptive anal sex with clients in the last month | Percent | Indonesia | Jakarta | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15 (118)
 |  |  | Bandung | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50 (118)
 |  |  | Semarang | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.9 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.2 (118)
Transgender raped by gangsters in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.3 (305)
Transgender raped by policemen in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.2 (305)
Transgender who reported condom use with their most recent client | Percent | Bangladesh |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.5 (92) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.6 (92)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  | 94 (197)
Transgender who reported multiple sex partners | Percent | Indonesia |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89 (35)
Prevalence of men who have sex with men among population (15-64) | Percent | Lao PDR | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.5-4.5 (48)
Sex workers (SWs)
Sex workers who reported condom use with their most recent client | Percent | Afghanistan |  | FSWs |  |  | 58 (7) |  |  |  | 24.3 (282)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 59.6 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 56.3 (7)
 |  | Bangladesh |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.81 (7) |  |  |  | 31.8 (7) |  |  |  | 30.9 (314)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.7 (314)
 |  |  |  | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (314)
 |  |  |  | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.1 (314)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.23 (7) |  |  |  | 44.1 (7) |  |  |  | 44.1 (314)
 |  |  |  | MSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (100)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.71 (7) | 63 (286) |  |  | 39.8 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.61 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64.87 (7)
 |  | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 99 (88)
 |  |  |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 98.99 (7) |  |  |  | 96 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 99.3 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 98.69 (7)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs |  |  | 97 (318) |  |  |  | 93 (88)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs Less than or equal to 2 sexual partners per day |  | 94.8 (183)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs More than 2 sexual partners per day |  | 97.7 (183)
 |  | China |  | FSWs |  |  | 85.1 (7) |  | 85 (56) |  | 82.05 (7) |  |  |  | 68.5 (7) | 68.5 (96)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 85.8 (97) |  |  |  | 83.4 (25)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 84.4 (97) |  |  |  | 80.3 (25)
 |  |  | Sichuan | FSWs 14-38 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.1 (315)
 |  |  | Yunnan | FSWs 14-38 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.2 (315)
 |  | Indonesia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76 (35)
 |  |  |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.98 (7) |  |  |  | 56.2 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41 (313) |  | 48 (313) | 37 (313) | 37 (313) | 36 (313)
 |  |  |  | Gay |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75 (35)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81 (35)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79.12 (7) |  |  |  | 47.5 (7) | 49 (35)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67.8 (7) |  |  |  | 54.7 (7) |  |  |  |  |  | 48.4 (19)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63.56 (47)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.95 (47)
 |  | India |  | Central region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54 (312)
 |  |  |  | Eastern region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62 (312)
 |  |  |  | FSWs |  |  | 82.95 (7) |  |  |  |  |  | 87.5 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76 (4)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 87.5 (27) |  |  |  |  |  | 89.45 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 11-49 yr Non-brothel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75 (317)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 81.94 (27) |  |  |  |  |  | 86.6 (7)
 |  |  |  | Goa and Daman & Diu FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 96.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77 (4)
 |  |  |  | Gujarat and Dadra & Nagar Haveli FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.1 (4)
 |  |  |  | Kerala & Lakshadweep FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.8 (4)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50 (7)
 |  |  |  | North-east region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77 (312)
 |  |  |  | Northern region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71 (312)
 |  |  |  | Other North Eastern States FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64.1 (4)
 |  |  |  | Punjab & Chandigarh FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79 (4)
 |  |  |  | Southern region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 96 (312)
 |  |  |  | Tamil Nadu & Puducherry FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83.3 (4)
 |  |  |  | West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar Islands FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 91.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 86.5 (4)
 |  |  |  | Western region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 94 (312)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 93.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78.9 (4)
 |  |  | Assam | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 98.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75.2 (4)
 |  |  | Bihar | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 91.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.3 (4)
 |  |  | Gujarat | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90 (312)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.6 (4)
 |  |  | Himachal Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.8 (4)
 |  |  | Jammu & Kashmir | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.7 (4)
 |  |  | Karnataka | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.4 (4)
 |  |  | Kerala | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89 (312)
 |  |  | Madhya Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 70.9 (4)
 |  |  | Maharashtra | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.4 (312)
 |  |  | Maharashtra | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 98.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.7 (4)
 |  |  | Maharashtra | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.9 (312)
 |  |  | Manipur | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 95.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.8 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73 (4) |  | 71 (312)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 96.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67.8 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.2 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.9 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 99.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.5 (4)
 |  |  | Uttaranchal | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67.8 (4)
 |  |  | Chhattisgarh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 86.5 (4)
 |  |  | Jharkhand | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.6 (4)
 |  | Japan |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 65 (7)
 |  | Lao PDR |  | FSWs |  |  | 94 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 93.9 (49)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 95.57 (49)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.8 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83.2 (7)
 |  | Mongolia |  | FSWs |  |  | 90 (7) |  |  |  | 92 (7) |  |  |  | 96 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 89.19 (51)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 90.17 (51)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 94.1 (7)
 |  | Malaysia |  | FSWs |  |  | 61 (7) |  |  |  | 35 (7)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  | 61.3 (197) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.4 (102)
 |  | Myanmar |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 96 (7) | 95.8 (41)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 95.63 (7) | 95.6 (41)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 95.94 (7) | 95.9 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 96.3 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 95.8 (41)
 |  | Nepal |  | 16 districts of East-West region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68 (37)
 |  |  |  | 22 Highway Districts FSWs |  |  | 84.8 (87) |  |  |  |  | 77.2 (71) | 66.3 (37) |  |  |  |  |  | 53.3 (320)
 |  |  |  | 6 districts of West-far west region FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63 (37)
 |  |  |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 75 (7) |  | 77 (7) | 77.2 (71) | 63 (322) |  | 67 (7) |  |  |  | 74 (321) | 79.7 (319) |  |  | 87.3 (180) |  | 86 (179) |  | 67 (178)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 77.5 (107)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 71 (107)
 |  |  |  | FSWs Divorced/separated |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79.5 (319)
 |  |  |  | FSWs Married |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74.1 (319)
 |  |  |  | FSWs Never married |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92 (319)
 |  |  |  | FSWs Widowed |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.5 (319)
 |  |  |  | Injecting FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.9 (254)
 |  |  |  | Kathmandu Valley FSWs |  |  |  |  | 75 (107)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 37.8 (7) |  | 93.33 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.7 (71)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.63 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.7 (177)
 |  |  |  | Total Kathmandu Valley |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 91.5 (320)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs | 83 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Establishment-based | 82 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Street-based | 84 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 79 (6) |  |  |  | 64.5 (107)
 |  | Pakistan |  | FSWs |  |  | 43.3 (7) |  |  |  | 45 (7) |  |  |  | 37 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 49.5 (62) |  |  |  | 50.5 (95)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 39.6 (62) |  |  |  | 42.3 (95)
 |  |  |  | Hijra SWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.4 (95)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] SWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.2 (95)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  | 33 (7) |  | 33.12 (7) |  | 21 (7) |  |  |  | 7 (7)
 |  |  |  | MSWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (95)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.3 (95)
 |  |  |  | MSWs/Hijra SWs |  |  |  |  | 33.1 (74) |  | 21.5 (95)
 |  |  |  | MSWs/Hijra SWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 32.4 (74)
 |  |  |  | MSWs/Hijra SWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 34 (74)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  | 37.81 (7) |  |  |  | 33.59 (7) |  |  |  | 23 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 38.71 (62) |  |  |  | 32.28 (95)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 37.03 (62) |  |  |  | 34.68 (95)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.2 (198)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.5 (198)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22 (198)
 |  |  | Lahore | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.5 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.2 (198)
 |  |  | Lahore | FSWs (last week) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.1 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68 (198)
 |  |  | Lahore | FSWs (with one time client) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.8 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | FSWs (with regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.3 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs (with non-paying partner) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.2 (185)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.3 (198)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.8 (198)
 |  |  | [NAME] | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26 (198)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.3 (316)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.3 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.3 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs [NAME] (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.7 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs [NAME] (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.3 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs Street-based (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.7 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs Street-based (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.4 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.9 (205)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.3 (205)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | MSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | MSWs (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.2 (250)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.5 (199)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.9 (199)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.6 (199)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.7 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.7 (199)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (last week) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.3 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.8 (199)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.2 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (with one time client) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.4 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.7 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (with regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.5 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | [NAME] (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.7 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | [NAME] (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.1 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs [NAME] (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 64.3 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs [NAME] (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs Street-based (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.1 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs Street-based (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.1 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.5 (199)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.6 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs (with non-paying partner) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.4 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi West | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.7 (316)
 |  |  | Karachi West | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.8 (205)
 |  |  | Karachi West | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.8 (205)
 |  |  | Karachi West | MSWs (last month) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.9 (185)
 |  |  | Sukkur | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.3 (199)
 |  |  | Sukkur | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.1 (199)
 |  |  | Sukkur | MSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.7 (199)
 |  |  | Peshawar | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16 (204)
 |  |  | Peshawar | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23 (204)
 |  |  | Peshawar | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17 (204)
 |  |  | Quetta | FSWs (anal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13 (205)
 |  |  | Quetta | FSWs (vaginal sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38 (205)
 |  |  | Quetta | [NAME]-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43 (205)
 |  |  | Quetta | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36 (205)
 |  |  | Quetta | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44 (205)
 |  | [NAME] |  | FSWs |  |  | 53 (7) |  |  |  | 94 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs (with regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.7 (33)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 94.57 (18)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 93.12 (18)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  | 42 (7)
 |  |  |  | Port Moresby Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 86 (296)
 |  |  |  | Port Moresby Non-paying sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79 (296)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  | 50 (7)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  | 52.5 (57)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  | 48.1 (57)
 |  |  | Goroka | Commercial sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.3 (296)
 |  |  | Goroka | Non-paying sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.7 (296)
 |  |  | Lae | FSWs (with non-regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.3 (33)
 |  |  | East New Britain | FSWs (with non-regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.3 (33)
 |  |  | East New Britain | FSWs (with regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.3 (33)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Port Moresby FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.2 (33)
 |  | Philippines |  | Freelance FSWs |  |  | 62 (289)
 |  |  |  | FSWs |  |  | 65 (7) |  |  |  | 65 (7)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 65.4 (58)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 65.1 (58)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  | 30.3 (245) |  |  |  | 50 (7)
 |  |  |  | Registered FSWs |  |  | 72 (289)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65 (7)
 |  | Singapore |  | FSWs |  |  | 99 (7) |  | 99 (323) |  | 99 (7)
 |  | [NAME] |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89 (7) |  |  |  | 65 (7) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40 (302)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.5 (26)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  | 89.6 (26)
 |  | Thailand |  | FSWs |  |  | 92 (60) |  | 92 (7) |  | 96 (7) | 96.2 (22)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 95.6 (22)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 96.5 (22)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 65 (7)
 |  | Vietnam |  | FSWs |  |  | 78 (7) |  |  |  | 97 (7) |  |  | 97.1 (34) | 90 (7) |  | 90.44 (104)
 |  |  |  | FSWs <25 yr |  |  | 78.6 (24)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  | 77.1 (24)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex | Percent | Timor Leste |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 65 (215)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with a new client in the last week | Percent | Bangladesh | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.6 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.4 (72)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with a non-commercial female partner in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.8 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.6 (72)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with a non-commercial partner | Percent | India |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.8 (4)
 |  |  |  | Goa and Daman & Diu FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.2 (4)
 |  |  |  | Gujarat and Dadra & Nagar Haveli FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.5 (4)
 |  |  |  | Kerala & Lakshadweep FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48 (4)
 |  |  |  | Other North Eastern States FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 52.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.2 (4)
 |  |  |  | Punjab & Chandigarh FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.4 (4)
 |  |  |  | Tamil Nadu & Puducherry FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25 (4)
 |  |  |  | West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar Islands FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.6 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.2 (4)
 |  |  | Assam | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.5 (4)
 |  |  | Bihar | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.6 (4)
 |  |  | Himachal Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.7 (4)
 |  |  | Jammu & Kashmir | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.3 (4)
 |  |  | Karnataka | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.6 (4)
 |  |  | Madhya Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.2 (4)
 |  |  | Maharashtra | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.3 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67.9 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.6 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25.6 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.8 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.5 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 93.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.7 (4)
 |  |  | Uttaranchal | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.2 (4)
 |  |  | Chhattisgarh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.5 (4)
 |  |  | Jharkhand | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.1 (4)
 |  | Vietnam |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85 (104)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.61 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.5 (309)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.79 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.3 (309)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.45 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.8 (309)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.33 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.3 (309)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.2 (34)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 51.56 (34)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.81 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.9 (309)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.47 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.1 (309)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.95 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.6 (309)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.62 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.6 (309)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.75 (34)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.04 (34)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.53 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.3 (309)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.23 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.6 (309)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with a non-commercial partner in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.6 (72)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.8 (72)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.7 (72)
 |  |  | Sylhet | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.7 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.8 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55.9 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.0 (72)
 |  |  | Khulna | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 (72)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with a non-commercial, non-regular partner in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43 (192) |  |  |  | 57 (191)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with a regular client in the last week | Percent | Bangladesh | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.0 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.1 (72)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with a regular partner in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27 (192) |  |  |  | 47 (191)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last sex with an occasional client | Percent | India | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  | 99.6 (21)
 |  |  | Karnataka | FSWs |  |  | 98.7 (21)
 |  |  | Manipur | FSWs |  |  | 83 (21)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  | 92.6 (21)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | FSWs |  |  | 84.5 (21)
Sex workers who reported condom use at last vaginal sex with their client | Percent | Hong Kong SAR of China |  | FSWs |  |  | 96 (267)
 |  |  |  | Total |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 93 (266)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use during anal sex with male partners in the last month | Percent | Pakistan | Lahore | MSWs with non-paying male partners |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.4 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs with paid sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.4 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs with regular clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.4 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs with non-paying male partners |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.7 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs with paid sex |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.1 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs with regular clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.9 (185)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use during anal sex with opposite-sex clients in the last 6 months | Percent | [NAME] |  | FSWs |  | 34 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  | 20 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total |  | 30 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs |  | 24 (44)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use during anal sex with opposite-sex non-commercial partners in the last 6 months | Percent | [NAME] |  | FSWs With casual partner |  | 31 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs With regular partner |  | 22 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs With casual partner |  | 36 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs With regular partner |  | 29 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total With casual partner |  | 31 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total With regular partner |  | 24 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs With casual partner |  | 18 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs With regular partner |  | 27 (44)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use during anal sex with same-sex clients in the last 6 months | Percent | [NAME] |  | MSWs |  | 42 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total |  | 46 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs |  | 51 (44)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use during anal sex with same-sex non-commercial partners in the last 6 months | Percent | [NAME] |  | MSWs With casual partner |  | 32 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs With regular partner |  | 26 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total With casual partner |  | 36 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total With regular partner |  | 29 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs With casual partner |  | 41 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs With regular partner |  | 33 (44)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use during vaginal sex with clients in the last 6 months | Percent | [NAME] |  | FSWs |  | 38 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  | 27 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total |  | 37 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs |  | 44 (44)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use during vaginal sex with non-commercial partners in the last 6 months | Percent | [NAME] |  | FSWs With casual partner |  | 39 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs With regular partner |  | 23 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs With casual partner |  | 40 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs With regular partner |  | 29 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total With casual partner |  | 38 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total With regular partner |  | 24 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs With casual partner |  | 18 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs With regular partner |  | 24 (44)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use in the last month | Percent | [NAME] |  | FSWs (with non-regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9 (33)
 |  |  |  | FSWs (with regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.7 (33)
 |  |  |  | Port Moresby FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9 (33)
 |  |  |  | Port Moresby FSWs (with non-paying sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.5 (296)
 |  |  |  | Port Moresby FSWs (with paying sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 62.6 (296)
 |  |  | Goroka | FSWs (with non-paying sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16 (296)
 |  |  | Goroka | FSWs (with paying sex) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.4 (296)
 |  |  | Lae | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.5 (33)
 |  |  | East New Britain | FSWs (with non-regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9 (33)
 |  |  | East New Britain | FSWs (with regular clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.5 (33)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with casual partners in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34 (297)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with new clients in the last week | Percent | Bangladesh |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.4 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.2 (263) |  |  | 2.4 (265)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (263)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.7 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.9 (263) |  |  | 2.7 (265)
 |  |  | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.7 (72)
 |  |  | Sylhet | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.8 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.4 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.9 (263) |  |  | 4 (265)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.3 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.3 (263) |  |  | 1.6 (265)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.0 (72)
 |  |  | Khulna | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.7 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.4 (263)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with non-commercial female partners in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.9 (72)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with non-commercial partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 12 (6) |  |  |  | 5 (6) |  |  |  | 7 (6) |  |  |  | 18 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 8 (6) |  |  |  | 7 (6) |  |  |  | 7 (6) |  |  |  | 13 (6)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.96 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15.50 (309)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.03 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 22.40 (309)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.81 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.70 (309)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.09 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.50 (309)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.19 (34)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.69 (34)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.44 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.10 (309)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.03 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.70 (309)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21.05 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.00 (309)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.14 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.60 (309)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.25 (34)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.65 (34)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.54 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.90 (309)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.93 (34) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.00 (309)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with non-commercial partners in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.9 (72)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (72)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55.9 (72)
 |  |  | Sylhet | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.9 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.9 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.2 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (72)
 |  |  | Khulna | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (72)
 |  | India |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.5 (4) |  | 52 (312)
 |  |  |  | Goa and Daman & Diu FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32.6 (4)
 |  |  |  | Gujarat and Dadra & Nagar Haveli FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.8 (4)
 |  |  |  | Kerala & Lakshadweep FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.2 (4)
 |  |  |  | Other North Eastern States FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.5 (4)
 |  |  |  | Punjab & Chandigarh FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 21 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.7 (4)
 |  |  |  | Tamil Nadu & Puducherry FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.2 (4)
 |  |  |  | West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar Islands FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.5 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.1 (4)
 |  |  | Assam | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.6 (4)
 |  |  | Bihar | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.3 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.3 (4)
 |  |  | Himachal Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.3 (4)
 |  |  | Jammu & Kashmir | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.3 (4)
 |  |  | Karnataka | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.7 (4)
 |  |  | Madhya Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.5 (4)
 |  |  | Maharashtra | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 7.1 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.9 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38.5 (4) |  | 21 (89)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.3 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.5 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 13.8 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.8 (4)
 |  |  | Uttaranchal | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.8 (4)
 |  |  | Chhattisgarh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 36.8 (4)
 |  |  | Jharkhand | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.8 (4)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with non-commercial, non-regular partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | FSWs |  |  | 34 (29) |  |  |  | 21 (192) |  |  |  | 11 (191)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with one-time clients in the last 12 months | Percent | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.22 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.90 (255)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 71.67 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.30 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.24 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75.60 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75.40 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.90 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43.61 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.29 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 90.63 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 75.70 (255)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.68 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79.00 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.25 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.50 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.85 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55.20 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.30 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.93 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 94.61 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 76.40 (255)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92.16 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.50 (255)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with regular clients in the last 12 months | Percent | Mongolia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 (192) |  |  |  | 11 (191)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 75 (6) |  |  |  | 57 (6) |  |  |  | 65 (6) |  |  |  | 63 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 68 (6) |  |  |  | 72 (6) |  |  |  | 51 (6) |  |  |  | 48 (6)
 |  | Vietnam | Ha Noi City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.14 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.40 (255)
 |  |  | Ha Noi City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.09 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 40.10 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.77 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 59.00 (255)
 |  |  | Hai Phong City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63.86 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 47.30 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.19 (125)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.75 (125)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79.34 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.50 (255)
 |  |  | Da Nang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.98 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.50 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.16 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.70 (255)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63.64 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42.90 (255)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 68.55 (125)
 |  |  | An Giang Province | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 83.03 (125)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Karaoke-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88.67 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 81.70 (255)
 |  |  | Can Tho City | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 91.11 (125) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.30 (255)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with regular clients in the last month | Percent | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 53.5 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 52.3 (41)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with regular clients in the last week | Percent | Bangladesh | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.5 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.8 (72)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with sweethearts in the last 3 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54 (16) |  |  | 53 (16) |  |  |  | 47 (16) | 24 (16) | 20 (16)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs Beer promoters |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.0 (16) |  |  | 37.0 (16) |  |  |  | 26.0 (16) | 19.0 (16) | 8.0 (16)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs Karaoke workers |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41.7 (16)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs Less than or equal to 2 sexual partners per day |  | 39.4 (183)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs More than 2 sexual partners per day |  | 48.3 (183)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with sweethearts in the last month | Percent | Cambodia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25 (297)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with sweethearts in the last week | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs 15-45 yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.8 (16)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with their clients in the last 12 months | Percent | Maldives | Male | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 12 (119)
 |  | Maldives | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 2 (119)
 |  | Mongolia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41 (192)
 |  | Nepal |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44.8 (180) |  | 51.0 (179) |  | 40.3 (178) | 33.0 (177)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs | 73 (6) |  |  |  | 54 (6) |  |  |  | 56 (6) |  |  |  | 57 (6) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.0 (276)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 61 (6) |  |  |  | 49 (6) |  |  |  | 37 (6) |  |  |  | 35 (6)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 16 (215)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with their clients in the last 3 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDFSWs Less than or equal to 2 sexual partners per day |  | 81.5 (183)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs More than 2 sexual partners per day |  | 83.7 (183)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with their clients in the last month | Percent | India |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.3 (4) |  | 52 (312)
 |  |  |  | Goa and Daman & Diu FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 92.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.3 (4)
 |  |  |  | Gujarat and Dadra & Nagar Haveli FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.4 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.1 (4)
 |  |  |  | Kerala & Lakshadweep FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 88.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 73.7 (4)
 |  |  |  | Other North Eastern States FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.7 (4)
 |  |  |  | Punjab & Chandigarh FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 78 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45.8 (4)
 |  |  |  | Tamil Nadu & Puducherry FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.1 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 54.1 (4)
 |  |  |  | West Bengal and Andaman & Nicobar Islands FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 77.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.1 (4)
 |  |  | Assam | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 84.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 26.9 (4)
 |  |  | Bihar | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.5 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.9 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 74 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.6 (4)
 |  |  | Himachal Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 56.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 41 (4)
 |  |  | Jammu & Kashmir | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.8 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 50.9 (4)
 |  |  | Karnataka | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 55.7 (4)
 |  |  | Madhya Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 60.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65 (4)
 |  |  | Maharashtra | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 91.9 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.5 (4)
 |  |  | Manipur | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.3 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 53.3 (4)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.7 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65.2 (4) |  | 21 (89)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 85.2 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.8 (4)
 |  |  | Sikkim | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11 (4)
 |  |  | Uttar Pradesh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 61.9 (4)
 |  |  | Delhi | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 91.6 (4) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 63.6 (4)
 |  |  | Uttaranchal | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.7 (4)
 |  |  | Chhattisgarh | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.7 (4)
 |  |  | Jharkhand | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.8 (4)
 |  | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 97.1 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 82.7 (41)
 |  | Pakistan |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.0 (324)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 19.7 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 21 (324)
 |  |  |  | Hijra SWs <20 yr |  |  |  |  | 22 (42)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] SWs 20-24 yr |  |  |  |  | 18 (42)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] SWs 25-29 yr |  |  |  |  | 22 (42)
 |  |  |  | Hijra SWs 30-34 yr |  |  |  |  | 18 (42)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] SWs 35+ yr |  |  |  |  | 17 (42)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 24 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 24.0 (324)
 |  |  |  | MSWs <20 yr |  |  |  |  | 20 (42)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 20-24 yr |  |  |  |  | 21 (42)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 25-29 yr |  |  |  |  | 28 (42)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 30-34 yr |  |  |  |  | 43 (42)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 35+ yr |  |  |  |  | 44 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 4.5 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 0.0 (324)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 34.3 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 28.4 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 3.0 (324)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 36.6 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 5.1 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6.4 (185)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs (with one-time client) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.2 (185)
 |  |  | [NAME] | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (324)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16.7 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.8 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs [NAME] (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.6 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs [NAME] (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.3 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs Street-based (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.9 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | FSWs Street-based (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14.5 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4.0 (324)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | MSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (250)
 |  |  | Rawalpindi | MSWs (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 (250)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 3.5 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 3.0 (324)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 6.1 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.3 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.1 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | [NAME] (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.1 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | [NAME] (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8.9 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs [NAME] (non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs [NAME] (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs Street-based (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 10.8 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | FSWs Street-based (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 19.9 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 16 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 3.9 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs (with one-time client) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.9 (185)
 |  |  | Karachi East | MSWs (with paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 9.1 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi West | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 18.1 (250)
 |  |  | Karachi West | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 21.8 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 9.0 (324) | 7.6 (316)
 |  |  | Karachi West | MSWs (with non-paying clients) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.9 (185) | 8.3 (250)
 |  |  | [NAME] | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 37.2 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 32.2 (42)
 |  |  | Sukkur | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (324)
 |  |  | Peshawar | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 23.6 (42) |  |  |  |  |  | 7.0 (324)
 |  |  | Peshawar | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 18 (42)
 |  |  | Quetta | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20.0 (324)
Sex workers who reported consistent condom use with their clients in the last week | Percent | Indonesia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 29.8 (35)
 |  |  |  | Gay |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 37.2 (35)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35.6 (35)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.3 (35)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 72 (118)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 42 (118)
 |  |  |  | Transgender |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.1 (35)
 |  |  | Batam | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30 (118)
 |  |  | Batam | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 16 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 45 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 44 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30 (118)
 |  |  | Bali | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 38 (118)
 |  | Cambodia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80.2 (297)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs Less than or equal to 2 sexual partners per day |  | 81.5 (183)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs More than 2 sexual partners per day |  | 89.15 (183)
Sex workers who are younger than 20 years of age | Percent | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 28 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Establishment-based | 35 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Street-based | 18 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 42 (6)
 |  | [NAME] |  | FSWs |  | 17 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  | 11 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total |  | 16 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs |  | 9 (44)
Sex workers who have ever injected drugs | Percent | Maldives | Male | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 32 (86)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 2 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Establishment-based | 2 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Street-based | 2 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 5 (6)
Sex workers who reported injecting drug use in the last 12 months | Percent | Bangladesh | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5.0 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3.9 (263)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.0 (72) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.5 (263)
 |  | Indonesia |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.3 (118)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.3 (118)
 |  |  | Batam | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.2 (118)
 |  |  | Batam | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.4 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2.6 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.4 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.9 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.2 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.1 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.1 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.4 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 (118)
 |  |  | Bali | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0.8 (118)
 |  | Cambodia |  | IDFSWs Less than or equal to 2 sexual partners per day |  | 0.6 (183)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs More than 2 sexual partners per day |  | 0 (183)
 |  | Malaysia |  | Total |  |  | 5.6 (197)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 10.7 (301)
Sex workers who reported injecting drug use in the last 6 months | Percent | Pakistan |  | FSWs |  |  | 6.0 (75)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 4.6 (42)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 4.2 (74)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 0 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 0.5 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 2 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 7.4 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 0.5 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 1 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 0.9 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 4.5 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 23.6 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 8 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 0.6 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 4 (42)
Sex workers who reported number of clients on their last working day | Percent | Cambodia | Cambodia | FSWs 0 Client |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.3 (297)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 10+ Clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.6 (297)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 1-3 Clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.8 (297)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 4-10 Clients |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 39.3 (297)
 |  | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | FSWs 1 Client |  |  |  |  |  | 32.1 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | FSWs 2 Clients |  |  |  |  |  | 24 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | FSWs 3 Clients |  |  |  |  |  | 15.6 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | FSWs 4-10 Clients |  |  |  |  |  | 26.9 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 1 Client |  |  |  |  |  | 51.3 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 2 Clients |  |  |  |  |  | 31.9 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 3 Clients |  |  |  |  |  | 10.6 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 4-10 Clients |  |  |  |  |  | 5.5 (41)
Sex workers who reported sex with injecting drug users in the last 6 months | Percent | Pakistan |  | FSWs |  |  | 7.0 (75)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 6.3 (42)
 |  |  |  | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 6.4 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 1.0 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 6.4 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 2.0 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 12.8 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 0.5 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 1.0 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 2.7 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 8.5 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 22.1 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 6.0 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 11.2 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 3.5 (42)
Sex workers gang raped by clients in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 79.8 (305)
Sex workers gang raped by policemen in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 49.4 (305)
Sex workers raped by a single client in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.0 (305)
Sex workers raped by a single gangster in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.1 (305)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 46.3 (305)
Sex workers raped by a single policeman in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 57.1 (305)
 |  |  |  | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.9 (305)
Sex workers raped by a sweetheart in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 87.5 (305)
Sex workers raped by gangsters in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 48.7 (305)
Sex workers raped by policemen in the last 12 months | Percent | Cambodia |  | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30.4 (305)
Sex workers who were forced to have sex in the last 6 months | Percent | [NAME] |  | FSWs By casual non-commercial partner |  | 11 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs By client |  | 16 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs By police |  | 15 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs By regular non-commercial partner |  | 15 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs By casual non-commercial partner |  | 6 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs By client |  | 15 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs By police |  | 9 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs By regular non-commercial partner |  | 8 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total By casual non-commercial partner |  | 10 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total By client |  | 16 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total By police |  | 14 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total By regular non-commercial partner |  | 13 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs By casual non-commercial partner |  | 11 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs By client |  | 16 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs By police |  | 21 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs By regular non-commercial partner |  | 4 (44)
Sex workers who were forced to have sex in the last 12 months | Percent | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 22 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Establishment-based | 18 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Street-based | 27 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 21 (6)
 |  | [NAME] | Goroka | FSWs 16+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 66.5 (296)
 |  |  | Goroka | FSWs 16+ yr (sex under the influence of marijuana) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 30 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | FSWs 16+ yr (sex under the influence of marijuana) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 34.6 (296)
 |  |  | East New Britain | Port-Moresby FSWs 16+ yr |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 58.4 (296)
 |  | Timor Leste |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  | 64 (301)
Sex workers who were raped in the last 12 months | Percent | Bangladesh |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 (72)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.7 (72)
 |  |  | Chittagong | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 28.3 (72)
 |  |  | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24.1 (72)
 |  |  | Sylhet | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 69.5 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Hotel-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31.6 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 32 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17.2 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 33.2 (72)
 |  |  | Khulna | FSWs Street-based |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 27.4 (72)
Sex workers who reported having been forced or convinced not to use condoms in the last week | Percent | Cambodia |  | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 67 (297)
Sex workers who reported having sex with non-commercial female sexual partners in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Chittagong | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12.3 (72)
 |  |  | Dhaka | MSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 23.3 (72)
Sex workers who reported having sex with non-commercial male sexual partners in the last month | Percent | Bangladesh | Dhaka | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1.9 (72)
Age at first sex work among sex workers | Percent | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | FSWs 14-16 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 6.3 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | FSWs 17-19 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 18.4 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | FSWs 20-24 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 38.3 (41)
 |  |  | Mandalay Division | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  | 37.1 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 14-16 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 6.7 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 17-19 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 10.8 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 20-24 yr |  |  |  |  |  | 29.7 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs 25+ yr |  |  |  |  |  | 52.8 (41)
 |  | [NAME] |  | FSWs <11 yr |  | 1 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs >25 yr |  | 14 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 11-15 yr |  | 10 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 16-20 yr |  | 63 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 21-25 yr |  | 12 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs <11 yr |  | 1 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs >25 yr |  | 9 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 11-15 yr |  | 6 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 16-20 yr |  | 57 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 21-25 yr |  | 27 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total <11 yr |  | 1 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total >25 yr |  | 13 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total 11-15 yr |  | 9 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total 16-20 yr |  | 63 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total 21-25 yr |  | 14 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs >25 yr |  | 9 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs 11-15 yr |  | 11 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs 16-20 yr |  | 71 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs 21-25 yr |  | 9 (44)
Average age of initiation into sex work | Year | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 23.5 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 25.2 (41)
 |  | Pakistan | Pakistan | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 15.5 (42)
 |  |  | Pakistan | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 16.2 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 14.4 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 14.3 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 14.9 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 18 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 16.2 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 17.1 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 18.6 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 17.2 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 13.6 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 16.8 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 14.9 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 14 (42)
Average duration of sex work | Year | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 4.7 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 6.1 (41)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 2.5 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Establishment-based | 2.3 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Street-based | 2.8 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 2.1 (6)
 |  | Pakistan | Pakistan | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 11.8 (42)
 |  |  | Pakistan | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 5.5 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 12.5 (42)
 |  |  | Faisalabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 6.6 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 13.5 (42)
 |  |  | Lahore | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 8.8 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 14.2 (42)
 |  |  | Hyderabad | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 3.2 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 9 (42)
 |  |  | Karachi West | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 4.7 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 12.8 (42)
 |  |  | [NAME] | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 4.4 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 8.5 (42)
 |  |  | Peshawar | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 5 (42)
Average number of clients in last week among sex workers | Number | Myanmar | Mandalay Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 14.6 (41)
 |  |  | Yangon Division | FSWs |  |  |  |  |  | 6.5 (41)
 |  | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 5 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Establishment-based | 5 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Street-based | 5 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 5.7 (6)
Average number of clients per day among sex workers | Number | Nepal | Kathmandu | FSWs | 1.6 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Establishment-based | 1.5 (6)
 |  |  | Kathmandu | FSWs Street-based | 1.8 (6)
 |  |  | Kaski | Pokhara Valley FSWs | 2.1 (6)
 |  | Pakistan | Pakistan | FSWs |  |  | 4 (75)
 |  |  | Pakistan | [NAME] |  |  |  |  | 2.6 (74)
 |  |  | Pakistan | MSWs |  |  |  |  | 1.9 (74)
Duration of sex work | Percent | [NAME] |  | FSWs <1 yr |  | 10 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs >20 yr |  | 9 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 11-20 yr |  | 24 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 1-2 yr |  | 19 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 3-5 yr |  | 19 (44)
 |  |  |  | FSWs 6-10 yr |  | 19 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs <1 yr |  | 13 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs >20 yr |  | 1 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 11-20 yr |  | 19 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 1-2 yr |  | 17 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 3-5 yr |  | 22 (44)
 |  |  |  | MSWs 6-10 yr |  | 28 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total <1 yr |  | 10 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total >20 yr |  | 8 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total 11-20 yr |  | 24 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total 1-2 yr |  | 17 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total 3-5 yr |  | 19 (44)
 |  |  |  | Total 6-10 yr |  | 21 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs <1 yr |  | 9 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs >20 yr |  | 7 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs 11-20 yr |  | 30 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs 1-2 yr |  | 7 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs 3-5 yr |  | 16 (44)
 |  |  |  | Transgender SWs 6-10 yr |  | 30 (44)
Median number of clients reported by sex workers in the last week | Number | Indonesia |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 (118)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 (118)
 |  |  | Batam | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 (118)
 |  |  | Batam | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 4 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 8 (118)
 |  |  | Jakarta | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (118)
 |  |  | [NAME] | IDFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 3 (118)
 |  |  | Bali | DFSWs |  |  |  |  |  |  | 14 (118)
Service women who reported condom use at last sex with a casual partner | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 81 (40) |  | 68 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 71 (40) |  | 66 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 70 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 90 (40) |  | 72 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 76 (40) |  | 37 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 64 (39)
 |  |  | Saravan | Total |  |  | 91 (40)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 74 (39)
 |  |  | Attapeu | Total |  |  | 90 (40)
Service women who reported condom use at last sex with a client | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 97 (40) |  | 95 (39)
 |  |  |  | Total <25 yr |  |  |  |  | 94 (39)
 |  |  |  | Total 25+ yr |  |  |  |  | 96 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 95 (40) |  | 95 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 98 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 98 (40) |  | 94 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 97 (40) |  | 95 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 88 (39)
 |  |  | Saravan | Total |  |  | 97 (40)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 97 (39)
 |  |  | Attapeu | Total |  |  | 98 (40)
Service women who reported condom use at last sex with a regular client | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 49 (40) |  | 90 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 50 (40) |  | 92 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 88 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 54 (40) |  | 91 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 49 (40) |  | 77 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 89 (39)
 |  |  | Saravan | Total |  |  | 48 (40)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 93 (39)
 |  |  | Attapeu | Total |  |  | 42 (40)
Service women who reported condom use at last sex with a regular partner | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 33 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 28 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 36 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 33 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 5 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 21 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 44 (39)
Service women who reported consistent condom use with casual partners in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 49 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 47 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 53 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 54 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 31 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 42 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 51 (39)
Service women who reported consistent condom use with clients in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 60 (304) |  | 70 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 74 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 81 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 60 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 44 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 48 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 78 (39)
Service women who reported consistent condom use with regular partners in the last 12 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 48 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 56 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 15 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 11 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 39 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 39 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 34 (39)
Service women who reported consistent condom use with their clients in the last month | Percent | Lao PDR |  | FSWs |  |  | 83 (40)
 |  |  |  | [NAME] drivers and driver's assistants |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 31 (45)
 |  |  |  | Military personnel |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 12 (45)
 |  |  |  | Police |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 24 (45)
 |  |  |  | Seasonal migrant workers |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 6 (45)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  | 79 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  | 85 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | FSWs |  |  | 77 (40)
 |  |  | Saravan | FSWs |  |  | 89 (40)
 |  |  | Attapeu | FSWs |  |  | 91 (40)
Service women who reported injecting drug use in the last 12 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 1 (40) |  | 1 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 1 (40) |  | 0 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 2 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 0 (40) |  | 2 (39) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 11 (184)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 1 (40) |  | 0 (39) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 (184)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 0 (39)
 |  |  | Saravan | Total |  |  | 2 (40)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 1 (39)
 |  |  | Attapeu | Total |  |  | 0 (40)
Service women having sex with non-commercial, non-regular partners in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Had multiple casual partners (Total of 6 provinces) |  |  |  |  | 17 (39)
 |  |  |  | Had one casual partner (Total of 6 provinces) |  |  |  |  | 34 (39)
 |  |  |  | No casual partner (Total of 6 provinces) |  |  |  |  | 50 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had multiple casual partners |  |  |  |  | 12 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had one casual partner |  |  |  |  | 20 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | No casual partner |  |  |  |  | 68 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Had multiple casual partners |  |  |  |  | 23 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Had one casual partner |  |  |  |  | 42 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | No casual partner |  |  |  |  | 35 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had multiple casual partners |  |  |  |  | 13 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had one casual partner |  |  |  |  | 36 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | No casual partner |  |  |  |  | 52 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had multiple casual partners |  |  |  |  | 5 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had one casual partner |  |  |  |  | 45 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | No casual partner |  |  |  |  | 50 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had multiple casual partners |  |  |  |  | 14 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Had one casual partner |  |  |  |  | 24 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | No casual partner |  |  |  |  | 62 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Had multiple casual partners |  |  |  |  | 20 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Had one casual partner |  |  |  |  | 42 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | No casual partner |  |  |  |  | 38 (39)
Service women who had been threatened by clients for unprotected sex in the last month | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 36 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 38 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 43 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 19 (40)
 |  |  | Saravan | Total |  |  | 24 (40)
 |  |  | Attapeu | Total |  |  | 55 (40)
Service women who were forced by clients not to use condoms in the last 3 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 52 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 48 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 52 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 48 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 64 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 67 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 42 (39)
Service women who were forced into sex by clients in the last 12 months | Percent | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  |  |  | 22 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 22 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 25 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 27 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 18 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 21 (39)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 19 (39)
Service women with average duration of selling sex | Month | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 14 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 15 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 15 (40)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 12 (40)
 |  |  | Saravan | Total |  |  | 12 (40)
 |  |  | Attapeu | Total |  |  | 18 (40)
Service women with average number of clients in the last week | Number | Lao PDR |  | Total |  |  | 2.5 (40) |  | 2.6 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 2.3 (40) |  | 2.2 (39)
 |  |  | Savannakhet | Total |  |  |  |  | 2.1 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 3.4 (40) |  | 3.9 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  | 2.4 (40) |  | 1.6 (39)
 |  |  | [NAME] | Total |  |  |  |  | 3.3 (39)
 |  |  | Saravan | Total |  |  | 2.4 (40)
 |  |  | Champasak | Total |  |  |  |  | 3 (39)
 |  |  | Attapeu | Total |  |  | 2.3 (40)
Sources
(1)  WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF_Global HIV/AIDS Response - Epidemic Update and Health Sector Progress Towards Universal Access - Progress Report, 2011.
(2)  Bangladesh_National AIDS/STD Programme (NASP), Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh . (2011). National HIV Serological Surveillance, 2011, Bangladesh - 9th Round Technical Report.
(3)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(4)  India_National Behavioural Surveillance Survey, 2006
(5)  Nepal_National Centre for AIDS and STD Control Nepal, New ERA & Intrepid Nepal (2011), Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance among Injecting Drug Users (Fact Sheet), Kathmandu and [NAME], round V, 2011
(6)  Nepal_National Centre for AIDS and STD Control Nepal, New ERA & Intrepid Nepal (2011), Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance among Female Sex Workers (Fact Sheet), Kathmandu and [NAME], round IV, 2011
(7)  UNAIDS_Report on The Global AIDS Epidemic, 2010
(8)  UNAIDS_Epidemiological fact sheets, 2008
(9)  Cambodia_National Center for HIV/AIDS Dermatology and STD Cambodia. (2011). Estimation of the HIV Prevalence among General Population in Cambodia (Dissemination Presentation), 2010.
(10)  WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF_Towards Universal Access - Scaling up Priority HIV/AIDS Interventions in the Health Sector Progress Report, 2010
(11)  UNAIDS_Epidemiological fact sheets update, 2006
(12)  UNAIDS_Epidemiological fact sheets update, 2008
(13)  UNAIDS_Epidemiological fact sheets, 2006
(14)  UNAIDS_Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, 2006
(15)  UNAIDS_Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, 2008
(16)  Cambodia_Behavioral Sentinel Survey (BSS), Sexual Behaviour among Urban Sentinel Groups, 2003
(17)  Myanmar_NACP, Behavioral Surveillance Survey, 2003, National AIDS Control programme, Ministry of Health, 2005
(18)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(19)  Indonesia_Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), 2007
(20)  Indonesia_IBBS 2007 cited in Indonesia UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(21)  India_Behavioural Surveillance Survey 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(22)  Thailand_UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(23)  UNICEF/UNAIDS/WHO_Children and AIDS: A stocktaking report, 2007
(24)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(25)  China_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(26)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(27)  India_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(28)  UNAIDS_Epidemiological fact sheets, December, 2006
(29)  Mongolia_Preliminary Data, Second Generation Sentinel Surveillance 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(30)  WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF_Towards Universal Access - Scaling up Priority HIV/AIDS Interventions in the Health Sector Progress Report, 2009
(31)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing Programme Monitoring, Ministry of Health
(32)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(33)  [NAME], NAC, [NAME] on STI, HIV and AIDS Epidemiology Papua New Guinea, 2000; National AIDS Council
(34)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(35)  Indonesia_CDC&EH, Behavioral Surveillance Survey, 2004-2005, Communicable Disease Control and Environment Health, Ministry of Health, Indonesia, Sep 2005
(36)  UNICEF/UNAIDS/WHO_Children and AIDS: Country fact sheets, 2009
(37)  Nepal_Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), 2006
(38)  India_Family Health International (FHI), 2001, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in Maharashtra, 2000
(39)  Lao PDR_Integrated Behavioral Biological Surveillance, 2008
(40)  Lao PDR_Behavioral survey among servie women and integrated biological and behavioral surveillance survey among men who have sex with men in Luang Prabang, 2009
(41)  Myanmar_Behavioural Surveillance Survey, Injecting Drug Users and Female Sex Workers, Myanmar, 2008
(42)  Pakistan_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, National Report Round III, 2008
(43)  WHO_Second Generation Surveillance Surveys of HIV, Other STIs and Risk Behaviors in 6 Pacific Island Countries, 2004-2005
(44)  [NAME], A., Kupul, M., Man, [NAME], Nosi, S., et [NAME]. (2011). [NAME] (Ask and Understand): People Who Sell and Exchange Sex in Port Moresby.
(45)  Lao PDR_BSS Lao People's Democratic Republic, 2000-2001
(46)  Indonesia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(47)  Indonesia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(48)  [NAME] PDR_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(49)  [NAME] PDR_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(50)  Mongolia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(51)  Mongolia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(52)  Myanmar_Report from the Technical Working Group on HIV Estimates and Impact Analysis in Myanmar, Mandalay August 15-16, 2007
(53)  Fiji_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2006
(54)  India_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(55)  Indonesia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(56)  China_Comprehensive surveillance among FSW, IDU, and MSM, 2008 reported in Country health sector progress report, [NAME], 2009
(57)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(58)  Philippines_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(59)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report 2003
(60)  Thailand_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(61)  Nepal_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(62)  Pakistan_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(63)  Fiji_Burnet Institute, HIV in the Pacific, 1984-2007
(64)  Indonesia_Directorate General of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Ministry of Health (2011). Progress Report HIV & AIDS situation in Indonesia Up to June 2011, the Ministry of Health (Laporan Situasi Perkembangan HIV & AIDS di Indonesia Sam
(65)  India_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(66)  Myanmar_Service Coverage for HIV and AIDS by Dr. [NAME], MoH, [NAME] at 8th International Conference on AIDS in Asia and the Pacific, Colombo, Sri Lanka August 2007
(67)  Bangladesh_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(68)  Cambodia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(69)  Pakistan_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(70)  Cambodia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(71)  Nepal_UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(72)  Bangladesh_BSS, 2006-2007
(73)  Cambodia_National Center for HIV/AIDS, Dermatology and STD (NCHADS) HIV Prevalence Among Drug Users in Cambodia (Dissemination Presentation by Dr. [NAME], Surveillance Unit), 2007
(74)  Pakistan_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, National Report Round III 2008 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(75)  Pakistan_NACP, MOH, HIV/ AIDS Surveillance Project, IBBS Special Round for FSW 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(76)  Afghanistan_The World Bank, Mapping and Situation Assessment of Key Populations at High Risk of HIV in Three Cities of Afghanistan, April 2008
(77)  Afghanistan_IBBS-2009 cited in Afghanistan UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(78)  Afghanistan_The World Bank, Mapping and Situation Assessment of Key Populations at High Risk of HIV in Three Cities of Afghanistan, April 2009
(79)  Nepal_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing IBBS 2005-2007 for Data on MARPs
(80)  Vanuatu_Burnet Institute, HIV in the Pacific, 1984-2007
(81)  Samoa_Burnet Institute, HIV in the Pacific, 1984-2007
(83)  WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF_IHBSS 2007 reported in Towards Universal Access Scaling up Priority HIV/AIDS Interventions in the Health Sector Progress Report, 2009
(84)  Cambodia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(85)  Myanmar_NAP, DOH, WHO, Report of the HIV Sentinel Sero-Surveillance Survey, 2008, Myanmar
(86)  Maldives_Biological and behavioral survey on HIV/AIDS, 2008
(87)  Hong Kong SAR_Recommended HIV/AIDS Strategies for Hong Kong 2007-2011. Hong Kong Advisory Council on AIDS. 2007 available at: http://www.info.gov.hk/aids/english/new2007/nm07, 2.pdf
(87)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 2009
(88)  Cambodia_National Center for HIV/AIDS, Dermatology and STD (NCHADS), Behavioral [NAME] (Dissemination Presentation by [NAME] at Sun Way Hotel, 28th April 2008), 2007
(89)  India_FHI, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in Orissa, 2000, Family Health International, 2001
(90)  Lao PDR_Integrated Behavioral Biological Survey - Lao PDR, 2008
(91)  Bangladesh_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(92)  Bangladesh_BSS 2006-2007 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(93)  Philippines_IHBSS 2007 reported in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(94)  Bangladesh_BSS 2003-2004 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(95)  Pakistan_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(96)  China_Office of the State Council Working Committee on AIDS, Progress on Implementing UNGASS Declaration of Commitment in China, 2005
(97)  China_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(98)  Hong Kong SAR_Recommended HIV/AIDS Strategies for Hong Kong 2007-2011. Hong Kong Advisory Council on AIDS, 2007
(99)  Mongolia_Behavioral [NAME], 2005
(100)  Bangladesh_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(101)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing Behaviour Surveillance Survey, Malaysia, 2004
(102)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(103)  Nepal_IBBS among IDUs in Kathmandu Valley,Pokhara Valley and Eastern Terai, Round IV, 2009; Western to Far-Wetern Terai, Round III, 2009
(104)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(105)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing IBBS 2005-2006
(106)  [NAME], First Round Behavioral Surveillance Survey 2006 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(107)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 2008
(108)  Indonesia_Mathers B.M. et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(109)  India_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(110)  Cambodia_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(111)  Myanmar_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(112)  Malaysia_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(113)  Nepal_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(114)  Nepal_Ministry of Health and Population, National Centre for AIDS and STD Control, National Estimates of HIV Infections, 2009, August 2010
(115)  Pakistan_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(116)  Thailand_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(117)  Malaysia_Malaysian AIDS Council, Preliminary Findings on Integrated Bio-Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) Survey 2009, presented at Malaysia HIV Roundtable Discussion, Royale [NAME], 16 November 2009
(118)  Indonesia_IBBS among most-at-risk groups, 2007
(119)  Maldives_Biological and behavioral survey on HIV/AIDS, October 2008
(120)  [NAME] PDR_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010 citing Second Generation Surveillance, 2004, 2008 and Behavoural Surveillance Survey, 2009
(121)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(122)  Malaysia_Behaviour Surveillance Survey, 2004. Malaysia, UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing Behaviour Surveillance Survey, Malaysia, 2004
(123)  Malaysia_Integrated Bio-Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) 2009 cited in UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(124)  Pakistan_NACP, MOH, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Project, IBBS round III, 2008 and special round for FSW 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(125)  [NAME], FHI, Results from the HIV/STI Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) in Vietnam, 2005-2006, National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, MoH
(126)  China_UNAIDS China, HIV/AIDS Brief (unpublished)
(127)  Hong Kong SAR_Department of Health, Special Prevention Programme, HIV Surveillance Report-2009 Update, December 2010
(128)  Hong Kong SAR_Special Preventive Programme, Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health, HIV Surveillance Report, 2008
(129)  Sri Lanka_National STD/AIDS Control Programme, [NAME] for HIV Prevention in Sri Lanka, March 2010
(130)  Indonesia_CDC-EH, WHO, Briefing Document prepared for External Review of the Health Sector Response to the HIV/AIDS Epidemic in Indonesia, 5-17 Feb 2007, Disease Control & Environment Health of Ministry of Health, Indonesia
(131)  Viet Nam_General Department of Preventive Medicine and HIV/AIDS Control, MOH, 2005
(132)  Afghanistan_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(133)  Bangladesh_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(134)  China_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(135)  Viet Nam_Mathers B.M. et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(136)  Myanmar_DOH WHO Report from the Technical Working Group on Estimation and Projection of HIV and AIDS, 2007
(137)  [NAME], National Estimates of Adult HIV Infection, 2002, Ministry of Health, Indonesia
(138)  India_National AIDS Control Organisation India, Department of AIDS Control, & Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. (2011). Annual Report 2010-11.
(139)  Japan_Mathers [NAME] et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. The Lancet (online edition), September 24th, 2008
(140)  Cambodia_National Centre for HIV/AIDS Dermatology and STD Cambodia. (2007). Report of a Consensus Workshop HIV Estimates and Projections for Cambodia 2006 - 2012.
(141)  Lao PDR_National Committee for the Control of AIDS Lao PDR. (2010). National Strategy and Action Plan on HIV/AIDS/STI 2011-2015.
(142)  Malaysia_Ministry of Health cited in  UNODC, & UNAIDS. (2009). United Nations Regional Task Force on Injecting Drug Use and HIV/AIDS for Asia and the Pacific: Malaysia Country Advocacy Brief- Injecting Drug Use and HIV
(143)  Malaysia_Malaysian AIDS Council (2010) Integrated Bio-Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) Survey with IDU, SW, TG. [NAME], presented on 11 March 2010 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(144)  Nepal_National Centre for AIDS and STD Control Nepal. (2010). National Estimates of HIV Infections: 2009 Nepal.
(145)  Indonesia_National AIDS Programme, Ministry of Health cited in WHO. (2010). HIV/AIDS in the South-East Asia Region: Progress Report 2010.
(146)  Pakistan_National AIDS Control Programme cited in UNODC, & UNAIDS. (2010). United Nations Regional Task Force on Injecting Drug Use and HIV/AIDS for Asia and the Pacific: Pakistan Country Advocacy Brief- Injecting Drug Use and HIV.
(147)  Thailand_FHI, Analysis and Advocacy Project, & Bureau of AIDS TB and STIs Department of Disease Control Ministry of Public Health Thailand. (2008). The Asian Epidemic Model (AEM) Projections for HIV/AIDS in Thailand: 2005-2025
(148)  Viet Nam_Administration of HIV/AIDS Control. (2009). [NAME] and Projections 2007–2012.
(149)  UNODC_Ministry of Counter Narcotics, & Ministry of Public Health Afghanistan. (2009). Drug Use in Afghanistan: 2009 Survey.
(150)  UNODC_retrieved from http://www.unodc.org/india/ost_interventions_scenario.html.
(151)  Myanmar_National AIDS Programme Myanmar, & WHO. (2008). Report from the Technical Working Group on Estimation and Projection of HIV and AIDS in Myanmar.
(152)  Philippines_National AIDS Council. (2011). 5th AIDS Medium Term Plan (2011- 2016):The Philippine Strategic Plan on HIV and AIDS
(153)  Hong Kong SAR_Mok, P. (2011). Sex Between Men in Your City.
(154)  Cambodia_FHI, USAID, & PRASIT. (2008). Population Size Estimation of MSM in Cambodia, 2008.
(155)  Myanmar_Ministry of Health Myanmar. (2011). Myanmar National Strategic Plan & Operational Plan on HIV and AIDS 2011 - 2015.
(156)  Malaysia_Ministry of Health and World Health Organization (2009). National consensus workshop on estimation and projection of the Malaysian  HIV epidemic. Revised version 20th March 2010 cited in AIDS/STD Section Disease Control Division Malaysia.
(157)  Malaysia_Ministry of Health and WHO, 2009, National Consensus Workshop on Estimation and Projection of Malaysian HIV Epidemic, Revised Version 20th March 2010 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(158)  Nepal_National Centre for AIDS and STD Control. (2010). National Estimates of HIV Infections: 2009 Nepal. Kathmandu
(159)  Singapore_Mok, P. (2011). Sex Between Men in Your City.
(160)  [NAME]). HIV/AIDS among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Populations in South-East Asia 2010:The Current Situation and National Responses
(161)  UNAIDS_China AIDS fact sheet 2009 (Unpublished)
(162)  [NAME]). HIV/AIDS among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Populations in South-East Asia 2010.
(163)  WHO_(2009). HIV/AIDS in the South-East Asia Region 2009.
(164)  Mongolia_National Committee on HIV/AIDS. (2010). National Strategic Plan on HIV, AIDS and STIs : 2010-2015. Ulaanbaatar.
(165)  Timor-Leste_Lee, [NAME], Rawstorne, P., & Worth, H. (2008). Behavioural surveillance survey and capacity development in Timor-Leste mapping exercise, National Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales cited in International HIV Resea
(166)  Afghanistan_Chase R, Foran J, Rasheed A, et [NAME]. (2008). Mapping and Situation Assessment of Key Populations at High Risk of HIV in Three Cities of Afghanistan.
(167)  Bangladesh_National AIDS Committee Bangladesh. (2006). UNGASS Indicators Country Progress Report: Bangladesh
(168)  Cambodia_HIV estimates and projections 2006 cited in The National AIDS Authority Cambodia. (2010). UNGASS Country Progress Report: Cambodia.
(169)  Malaysia_WHO and MOH, Estimation and projection of the HIV epidemic in Malaysia, in Report of the National Consensus Workshop, May 2009  (unpublished)
(170)  Malaysia_Lim [NAME], Ang Chooi Leng and [NAME] (2010), Size Estimation for Local Responses in Malaysia for HIV Prevention in Sex Work, UNFPA Project cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(171)  Brunei Darussalam_Aceijas, C., [NAME], [NAME], [NAME], M., et [NAME]. (2004). Global overview of injecting drug use and HIV infection among injecting drug users. AIDS, 18(17), 2295-2303
(172)  Timor-Leste_Lee, [NAME], Rawstorne, P., & Worth, H. (2008). Behavioural surveillance survey and capacity development in Timor-Leste mapping exercise, National Centre in HIV Social Research,University of New South Wales cited in International HIV Resear
(173)  ADB_(2005). Socioeconomic Implications of HIV/AIDS in the Pacific.
(174)  Hong Kong SAR_Hong Kong Advisory Council on AIDS. (2006). Report of Community Assessment and Evaluation of HIV Prevention for Commercial Sex Workers and their Clients in Hong Kong 2006.
(175)  Sri Lanka_National STD/AIDS Control Programme Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition Sri Lanka. (2010). [NAME] for HIV Prevention in Sri Lanka.
(176)  Mongolia_National Committee on HIV/AIDS, UN, & gtz. (2008). Comprehensive Review of the National Response to HIV and STIs in Mongolia.
(177)  Nepal_FHI, 1999, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in the Highway Route of Nepal: Round No. 1 May 1999
(178)  Nepal_FHI, 2000, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in the Highway Route of Nepal: Round No. 2 August 2000
(179)  Nepal_FHI, 2001, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in the Highway Route of Nepal: Round No. 3 2001
(180)  Nepal_FHI, 2002, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in the Highway Route of Nepal: Round No. 4 2002
(181)  Maldives_Biological and behavioral survey, October 2008 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(182)  Timor-Leste_FHI, HIV, STIs and Risk Behavior in East Timor: A Historic Oppurtunity for Effective Action, 2004, Family Health International
(183)  Cambodia_National Center for HIV/AIDS Dermatology and STD Cambodia. (2010). Behavioral [NAME] (Dissemination Presentation), 2010.
(184)  Lao PDR_Center for HIV/AIDS/STI, Second Generation Surveillance 2nd Round on HIV, STI and Behaviors, 2004
(185)  Pakistan_NACP, National Study of Reproductive Tract and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Survey of high-risk groups in Lahore and Karachi, [NAME], National AIDS Control Programme, Ministry of Health
(186)  Philippines_National Epidemiology Center, This is it!, in IHBSS National Dissemination Forum, M. National Epidemiology Center -Department of Health, Philippines, Editor. 2009: Manila
(187)  Thailand_Central Provincial Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand: Results of HIV Sentinel Surveillance, 2009
(188)  Thailand_Central Provincial Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand: Results of HIV Sentinel Surveillance, 2003
(189)  Thailand_Central Provincial Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand: Results of HIV Sentinel Surveillance, 2001
(190)  Indonesia_CDC&EH, Behavioral Surveillance Survey, 2004-2005, Indonesia, September 2005
(191)  Mongolia_Second generation sentinel surveillance, 2005 reviewed in "Comprehensive review of the National response to HIV & STIs in Mongolia, 2008"
(192)  Mongolia_Second generation sentinel surveillance, 2007 reviewed in "Comprehensive review of the National response to HIV & STIs in Mongolia, 2008"
(193)  Bangladesh_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing National HIV Serological Surveillance for Round 6 and 7 (2005 and 2006)
(194)  Bangladesh_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005 citing 6th round of National HIV Serological Surveillance (NHSS), 2004-2005
(195)  UNAIDS_Epidemiological fact sheets December, 2006 Update
(196)  Cambodia_STI Sentinel Surveillance 2005 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(197)  Malaysia_Integrated Bio-Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) Survey 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(198)  Pakistan_NACP, Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey in three cities of Punjab: Lahore, Faisalabad and [NAME], HIV/AIDS Surveillance Project, 2005, National AIDS Control Programme, Ministry of Health, May 2006
(199)  Pakistan_NACP, Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey in three cities of Sindh: Karachi, Hyderabad and [NAME], HIV/AIDS Surveillance Project, 2005, National AIDS Control Programme, Ministry of Health, May 2006
(200)  India_HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation in India 2007, NACO, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, October 2008
(201)  Myanmar_DOH and WHO, Report of the HIV Sentinel Sero-surveillance Survey 2007, Myanmar
(202)  Myanmar_NAP, DOH and WHO, Report of the HIV Sentinel Sero-Surveillance Survey, 2008, Myanmar
(203)  Myanmar_Ministry of Health, Department of Health, National AIDS Programme, Results of HIV Sentinel Sero-Surveillance, 2009, May 2010
(204)  Pakistan_NACP, Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey in NWFP: Peshawar, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Project, 2005, National AIDS Control Programme, Ministry of Health, May 2006
(205)  Pakistan_NACP, Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey in Balochistan: Quetta, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Project, 2005, National AIDS Control Programme, Ministry of Health, May 2006
(206)  Thailand_CDC, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), August 2006, HIV Prevalence among Populations of Men who Have Sex with Men-Thailand, 2003 and 2005
(207)  China_Gao [NAME], Characteristic of Sexual Behaviour and HIV Prevalence among MSM in Selected Cities of China, China J AIDS STC, Vol.14 No.6 December 2008
(208)  China_Choi KH et.al, The Influence of Social and Sexual Networks in the Spread of HIV and Syphilis among MSM in Shanghai, China, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2007, 45:77-84
(209)  China_Sichuan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cited in UNAIDS China, AIDS in China, Background Information on the Epidemic and the Response, August 2009 (unpublished)
(210)  Hong Kong SAR_Report of Community Assessment and Evaluation of HIV effort on Men who have Sex with Men in Hong Kong 2006. Working Group on Men who have Sex with Men in Hong Kong Community Forum on AIDS Hong Kong Advisory Council on AIDS. September
(211)  Hong Kong SAR_Report of Community Assessment and Evaluation of HIV Prevention for People Living with HIV/AIDS in Hong Kong 2006. Working Group on – HIV Prevention on People Living with HIV/AIDS in Hong Kong Community Forum on AIDS Hong Kong Advisor
(212)  Afghanistan_Todd CS, Seroprevalence and behavioral correlates of HIV, Syphilis, and Hepatitis B & C among High Risk Groups in Three Afghanistan Cities 2008 cited in Understanding HIV in Afghanistan: The Emerging Epidemic and Opportunity for Prevent
(213)  India_Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report 2006
(214)  India_Provisional Estimate of HIV Sentinel Surveillance 2008-2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(215)  WHO_HIV and AIDS in The South East Asia Region, 2009
(216)  Lao PDR_Behavioral survey among servie women and integrated biological and behavioral surveillance survey among men who have sex with men in Luang Prabang 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(217)  Sri Lanka_National STD/AIDS Control Programme, HIV Sentinel Sero-Surveillance Survey, 2008
(218)  Myanmar_DOH, WHO, Report of the HIV Sentinel Sero-surveillance Survey 2007, Myanmar
(219)  Myanmar_DOH WHO, Report of the HIV Sentinel Sero-surveillance Survey, 2007
(220)  Malaysia_Venue-Day-Time-Sampling (VDTS) Study 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(221)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 2004-2009
(222)  Thailand_HIV Sentinel Surveillance (HSS) of BOE, DDC, Thailand 2003-2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(223)  Thailand_HIV Sentinel Surveillance (HSS) of BOE, DDC, Thailand cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(224)  Viet Nam_IBBS 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(225)  Hong Kong SAR_HIV Surveillance Report 2005 Update. Special Preventive Programme. Centre for Health Protection, Department of Health. HKSAR, December 2006
(226)  China_National HIV/AIDS Sentinel Surveillance Results 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(227)  Sri Lanka_National STD/AIDS Control Programme (NSACP), Department of Health Services (September 2010), HIV [NAME] in Sri Lanka, 2009
(228)  [NAME], HIV [NAME], 2006, National STD/AIDS Control Programme, Department of Health Services, June, 2007
(229)  UNAIDS_Conflict and Health, Increase Coverage of HIV and AIDS Services in Myanmar Dec 2007 Citing MoH 2006 Unpublished. Report from the Technical Working Group on HIV Estimates and Impact Analysis in Myanmar, Mandalay August 15-16, 2007
(230)  Afghanistan_University of California San Diego, High-risk Behaviors Could Lead to HIV Epidemic in Afghanistan, August 2008
(231)  Afghanistan_Todd CS et al, HIV, Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B infections and associated risk behavior in IDUs, Kabul.Emerg.Infect.[NAME], 13(9):1327-1331 cited in Understanding HIV in Afghanistan: The Emerging Epidemic and Opportunity for Preve
(232)  World Bank_Afghanistan HIV/AIDS Prevention Project Implementation Support Mission (June 1-9) Aide Memoir 2008 cited in Understanding HIV in Afghanistan:The Emerging Epidemic and Opportunity for Prevention, NAP, The Johns Hopkins University & The In
(233)  China_Map report, AIDS in Asia: Face the Facts, A comprehensive analysis of the AIDS epidemics in Asia, 2004
(234)  Hong Kong SAR_HIV Prevalence and Risk Behavioural Survey of Men who have sex with men in Hong Kong (PRiSM), 2006
(235)  Indonesia_Department of Health Indonesia, Statistics Indonesia, National AIDS Commission, USAID, et [NAME]. (2007). Integrated Biological- Behavioral Surveillance among Most-at-Risk Groups in Indonesia, 2007: Surveillance Highlights- Injecting Drug Use
(236)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Report, 2008 citing IDUs Sentinel Survey and MSM VCT Site Survey and MOH. Malaysia, UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005 citing MOH 2004
(237)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 2005
(238)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, IDUs, Eastern Terai, Kathmandu Valley, Pokhara Valley, Round III ; Western Terai Round II, 2007
(239)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 2003
(240)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 2007
(241)  Nepal_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005
(242)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 2002
(243)  Pakistan_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report 2005 citing various studies conducted nationwide
(244)  Pakistan_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report 2005 cited Baseline Study on HIV and STIs Risks Among IDUs in Lahore, Sargodha, Faisalababd and [NAME], June-July 2005
(245)  Philippines_Integrated HIV and Behaviour Serologic Surveillance (IHBSS) 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(246)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing Sentinel Surveillance, 2001-2006
(247)  Bangladesh_HSS 2007 reported in Country Health Sector Progress Report, Towards Universal Access, Scaling Up Priority HIV/AIDS Interventions in the Health Sector, 2009
(248)  Hong Kong SAR_HIV Prevalence and Risk Behavioural Survey of Men who have sex with men in Hong Kong (PRiSM), 2008
(249)  Cambodia_HSS 2006 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(250)  Pakistan_NACP, Integrated Behavioral and Biological Surveillance, A Pilot Study in Karachi and [NAME], 2004-2005, National AIDS Control Programme, Government of Pakistan
(251)  Indonesia_IBBS 2007 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(252)  Nepal_IBBS among IDUs in Western to Far-Western Terai, Round III, 2009; Kathmandu Valley, Pokhara Valley, and Eastern Terai, Round IV, 2009
(253)  UNAIDS_UNAIDS, (2006). Report on the Global AIDS epidemic, A UNAIDS 10th Anniversary Special Edition
(254)  Nepal_FHI, 2003, Behavioral Seropervalence Survey Among Injecting Drug Users in Pokhara Valley, Nepal, 2003
(255)  [NAME], FHI, HIV/AIDS Behavioral Surveillance round 1 Vietnam, 2000, National AIDS Standing Bureau, 2001
(256)  Pakistan_NACP, MOH, HIV/ AIDS Surveillance Project, HIV Second Generation Surveillance in Pakistan, IBBS round III, 2008
(257)  Pakistan_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey in NWFP, Sindh, Balochistan and Punjab, May 2006
(258)  Afghanistan_HIV Knowledge and Risk Behaviours Among Pakistani and Afghani Drug Users in Quetta, Pakistan. [NAME], 2003
(259)  Bangladesh_BSS 2006-2007 cited in The World Bank, UNAIDS, 20 years of HIV in Bangladesh: Experiences and Way Forward, December 2009
(260)  India_National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), National Baseline High-Risk and Bridge Population Behavioral Surveillance Survey among MSM and IDUs, 2002
(261)  Afghanistan_Zafar T., [NAME], [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME] among Pakistani and Afghani Drug Users in Quetta, Pakistan, 2003
(262)  Afghanistan_Todd and et.al, Association between expatriation and HIV awareness and knowledge among injecting drug users in Kabul, Afghanistan: A cross-sectional comparison of former refugees to those remaining druing conflict. Conflict and Health,
(263)  Bangladesh_BSS, 2003-2004
(264)  Cambodia_Drug User HIV Prevalence and Behavioral Survey 2007 reported in Country Health Sector Progress Report, Towards Universal Access Scaling up Priority HIV/AIDS Interventions in the Health Sector Progress Report, 2009
(265)  Bangladesh_BSS, 2002
(266)  Hong Kong SAR_Community Based Risk Behavioural and Seroprevalence Survey for Female Sex Workers in Hong Kong (CRiSP), 2006
(267)  Hong Kong SAR_Community Based Risk Behavioural and Seroprevalence Survey for Female Sex Workers in Hong Kong (CRiSP), 2009
(268)  Indonesia_Robert Magnani, [NAME], Nurhayati, et [NAME]. Sexual Risk Behaviors, HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections among Female Sex Workers in Indonesia, sti.bmj.com_published online June 3, 2010
(269)  Indonesia_Robert Magnani, [NAME], Nurhayati, et [NAME]. Sexual Risk Behaviors, HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections among Female Sex Workers in Indonesia, sti.bmj.com, published online June 3, 2010
(270)  Cambodia_National Center for HIV/AIDS, Dermatology and STD (NCHADS) Beharioral Sentinel Survey (BSS), 2000
(271)  [NAME], UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing National STD/AIDS Control Programme, 2006
(272)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005 citing MOH 2004
(273)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, FSWs, Kathmandu Valley and Pokhara Valley, Round I to Round III (2006, 2004, 2008); Round I to Round IV in 22 Highway Districts (1999, 2003,2006, 2009)
(274)  Nepal_IBBS among [NAME] workers in East-West Highways of Nepal covering 22 Districts, round III, 2006
(275)  Nepal_Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey, 1999-2009
(276)  Nepal_Kathmandu FSW Seroprevalance Study, November 1999 to May 2000
(277)  India_National AIDS Control organization (NACO), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2002, National Baseline High Risk and Bridge Population Behavioral Surveillance Survey (MSM and IDUs), 2002
(278)  India_NACO, National Baseline High Risk and Bridge Population Behavioral Surveillance Survey (MSN and IDUs), 2002
(279)  Bangladesh_BSS 2006-2007 reported in Country Health Sector Progress Report, Towards Universal Access, Scaling Up Priority HIV/AIDS Interventions in the Health Sector, 2009. UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report citing BSS 2006-2007
(280)  Afghanistan_Annual Project Report July 2007 - June 2008,(AHAPP), MoPH, August 2008 citing Social Mapping of HIV Risk Key Populations in Three Cities of Afghanistan, University of Manitoba, 2007 and NACP Afghainstan, Universal Access Report, 2008
(281)  Bangladesh_ICDDRB, National Household Surveillance Survey, the 5th round, International Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases and [NAME], 2003-2004
(282)  Afghanistan_Annual Project Report July 2007 - June 2008, Afghanistan HIV/AIDS Prevention Project (AHAPP), MoPH, August 2008 citing Social Mapping of HIV Risk Key Populations in Three Cities of Afghanistan, University of Manitoba, 2007 and NACP Afgh
(283)  Nepal_IBBS among IDUs in Kathmandu Valley, Pokhara Valley, and Eastern Terai, Round I to Round IV, 2003-2009; Western to Far-Western Terai, Round I to Round III, 2005-2009
(284)  Nepal_New ERA, Kathmandu, [NAME] and STD/AIDS Counseling and Training Services,  Kathmandu, Nepal (July 2009). Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance Survey (IBBS) among Injecting Drug Users in Kathmandu Valley, Round IV - 2009
(285)  Nepal_New ERA, Kathmandu, [NAME] and STD/AIDS Counseling and Training Services,  Kathmandu, Nepal (July 2009). Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance Survey (IBBS) among Injecting Drug Users in Pokhara Valley, Round IV - 2009
(286)  Bangladesh_BSS 2006-2007 reported in Country Health Sector Progress Report, Towards Universal Access, Scaling Up Priority HIV/AIDS Interventions in the Health Sector, 2009
(287)  Malaysia_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing Behavioral Surveillance Survey, 2004
(288)  Myanmar_IBBS, Myanmar 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(289)  Philippines_IHBSS 2009 cited in National Epidemiology Center, This is it!, in IHBSS National Dissemination Forum, M. National Epidemiology Center -Department of Health, Philippines, Editor. 2009: Manila
(290)  [NAME], et al., Rapid assessment of male vulnerabilities to HIV and sexual exploitation in Afghanistan, March 2009
(291)  Singapore_2006 MSM survey, conducted by Action for AIDS Singapore..Available at www.afa.org.sg/thinkagain under the heading 'About the Campaign
(292)  [NAME] Lanka_Stover, [NAME], and [NAME]. 2006. Coverage of Selected Services for HIV/AIDS Prevention, Care, and Treatment in Low- and Middle-income Countries in 2005: Country Annex Tables. (Excel file.) Washington, DC: Constella Futures, POLICY Pro
(293)  Nepal_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010 used information from IBBS-NCASC, FHI
(294)  Hong Kong SAR_Lau J T F, [NAME], Lau M, [NAME] related behaviors and attitudes among Chinese men who have sex with men in Hong Kong: population based study. Sex. Transm. Inf. 2004; 80; 459-465
(295)  Cambodia_Behavioral Sentinel Survey (BSS), Sexual Behaviour, STI and HIV among MSMs in Phnom Pehn, Cambodia, 2000
(296)  [NAME], Final Pre-Intervention Report, Baseline Research for Poro Sapot Project, 2005, PNG Institute of Medical Research, Sep 2005
(297)  Cambodia_National Center for HIV/AIDS, Dermatology and STD (NCHADS) , Cambodia STI Sentinel Survey, 2005
(298)  [NAME] monitoring data from Save the Children Poro Sapot Project, NCD 2009 cited in PNG, UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(299)  Mongolia_STI/HIV/AIDS KAP Survey among Youths Aged 15-24 in Mongolia cited by UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008
(300)  Thailand_Bureau of Epidemiology Surveys, 2007 and 2008 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(301)  Timor-Leste_Behavioral Surveillance Study (BSS) 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(302)  Sri Lanka_MDG Report, 2005
(303)  Lao PDR_Behavioral surveillance survey among servie women and integrated biological and behavioral surveillance survey among men who have sex with men in Luang Prabang, 2009
(304)  Lao PDR_Behavioral surveillance survey among servie women and integrated biological and behavioral surveillance survey among men who have sex with men in Luang Prabang 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(305)  USAID_USAID/ [NAME]. "Violence and Exposure to HIV Among Sexworkers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia", 2006
(306)  USAID_Violence and Exposure to HIV among Sex Workers in Phnom Penh
(307)  Nepal_IBBS among Female Sex Workers in Kathmandu Valley and Pokhara Valley, Round III, 2008
(308)  Nepal_IBBS among Female Sex Workers in 22 Highway Districts, Round IV, 2009
(309)  [NAME], FHI, HIV/STI Integrated Biological and Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) in Vietnam, 2005-2006
(310)  Cambodia_BSS 2007 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(311)  Hong Kong SAR_Community Based Risk Behavioural and Seroprevalence Survey for Female Sex Workers in Hong Kong (CRiSP) 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(312)  India_FHI, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in Healthy Highways Project, 2000
(313)  Indonesia_Online HIV/AIDS database at www.measuredhs.com
(314)  Bangladesh_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005 citing 5th round of BSS 2003-2004
(315)  China_Horizon Market Research, Futures Group Europe . 2001 Behavioral Surveillance Survey in Yunnan and Sichuan: Sex Worker Report, 2002
(316)  Pakistan_Integrated Behavioral and Biological Surveillance, A Pilot Study in Karachi & Rawalpindi, 2004-2005
(317)  India_NACO, National Baseline High Risk and Bridge Population Behavioral Surveillance Survey (FSWs and clients), 2001
(318)  Cambodia_PSI, TRaC( Tracking Results Continuously) survey 2009 cited in UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2010
(319)  Nepal_FHI, 2003, Behavioral Surveillance Survey in Western to Far-Western Sector of [NAME] of Nepal, 2003
(320)  Nepal_FHI, 2003, Behavioral Surveillance Survey of Female Sex Workers and Clients in Kathmnadu Valley, Nepal: Round 1, 2003
(321)  Nepal_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2008 citing IBSS 2001-2007 for MARPs Data
(322)  Nepal_FHI, Integrated Bio-behavioral Survey among [NAME] workers in East-West Highways of Nepal covering 22 Districts, round III, 2006
(323)  Singapore_UNICEF, UNAIDS and WHO, Children and AIDS: Country fact sheets, 2009
(324)  Pakistan_UNAIDS, UNGASS Country Progress Report, 2005. Pakistan, Integrated Biological and Behavioral Survey in NWFP, Sindh, Balochistan and Punjab, May 2006
(325)  UNAIDS_Data retrieved from http://www.aidsinfoonline.org