Spreadsheet: f790a513-e442-4ffc-9dec-8e06940a04c5
Sheet: Sheet1

2010-2011CompleteListofDVM-DisciplineProbes | Unnamed: 1 | Unnamed: 2 | Unnamed: 3
Indicator | Description | Review Probes | On FDA template?
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Analyze by individual campus, disciplinary incidents in which students were assigned out-of-school suspension for more than three school days. | Yes
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Determine the extent to which incorrect use of the same incident number to report two or more separate incidents is contributing to the LEA's result on this indicator. | Yes
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of errors. | Yes
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Evaluate whether manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | Yes
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Evaluate the adequacy of training provided to campus/LEA administrators regarding the use of the board approved code of conduct, implementation of due process procedures, and appropriate coding of disciplinary incidents in accordance with the PEIMS Data Standards and, as applicable, TEC Chapter 37. | Yes
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Assess the effectiveness of processes the LEA uses to annually review and incorporate changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section 10 of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | Yes
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of any errors. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions regarding out-of-school suspension. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews, monitors, and adjusts the data collection and reporting process to ensure consistency across campuses. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Evaluate the systems in place to prevent unauthorized assignment under TEC, Chapter 37. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Evaluate systems in place for positive behavior interventions at the schoolwide, classroom, and individual student levels, and determine whether the implementation of positive behavior interventions has resulted in differentiated placement patterns (campus/[NAME] level). | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Evaluate general education systems in place to address behavior as an instructional, rather than discipline, issue.  [NAME] whether systems are in place to teach students good behavior, as opposed to providing punishment as a negative consequence. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Ensure that the local code of conduct and school board policy are implemented and in alignment with TEC, Chapter 37. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews and incorporates changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section X of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Ensure that campus/LEA administrators are routinely trained in the use of the board approved code of conduct and that sufficient training occurs to safeguard the appropriate coding of student discipline incidents in accordance with TEC, Chapter 37 and the PEIMS Data Standards. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with TEC §37.009(a). | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Evaluate the availability of regular, ongoing training for staff members responsible for discipline data reporting. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Determine whether local software packages contribute to errors in campus reporting of discipline data. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Implement appropriate programmatic activities to correct any issues of noncompliance not related to data reporting. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Ensure that manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | No
1 | Length of Out-of-School Suspension | Determine the extent to which incorrect use of the same incident number to report two or more separate incidents is contributing to the LEA’s result on this indicator. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Analyze by individual campus, disciplinary actions resulting in unauthorized expulsions. | Yes
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate the systems in place to prevent unauthorized expulsion by administrators. | Yes
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate the adequacy of training provided to campus/LEA administrators regarding the use of the board approved code of conduct, implementation of due process procedures, and appropriate coding of disciplinary incidents in accordance with the PEIMS Data Standards and, as applicable, TEC Chapter 37. | Yes
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate if the local code of conduct and school board policy are aligned and implemented in accordance with TEC Chapter 37; PEIMS Data Standards, Appendix E; and the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook, Section 10. | Yes
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate whether manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | Yes
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Assess the effectiveness of processes the LEA uses to annually review and incorporate changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section 10 of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | Yes
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of any errors. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions regarding unauthorized expulsion. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews, monitors, and adjusts the data collection and reporting process to ensure consistency across campuses. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate the systems in place to prevent unauthorized assignment under TEC, Chapter 37. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate systems in place for positive behavior interventions at the schoolwide, classroom, and individual student levels, and determine whether the implementation of positive behavior interventions has resulted in differentiated placement patterns (campus/[NAME] level). | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate general education systems in place to address behavior as an instructional, rather than discipline, issue.  [NAME] whether systems are in place to teach students good behavior, as opposed to providing punishment as a negative consequence. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Ensure that the local code of conduct and school board policy are implemented and in alignment with TEC, Chapter 37. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews and incorporates changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section X of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Ensure that campus/LEA administrators are routinely trained in the use of the board approved code of conduct and that sufficient training occurs to safeguard the appropriate coding of student discipline incidents in accordance with TEC, Chapter 37 and the PEIMS Data Standards. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with TEC §37.009(a). | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Evaluate the availability of regular, ongoing training for staff members responsible for discipline data reporting. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Determine whether local software packages contribute to errors in campus reporting of discipline data. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Implement appropriate programmatic activities to correct any issues of noncompliance not related to data reporting. | No
3 | Unauthorized Student Expulsion | Ensure that manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Analyze by individual campus, disciplinary actions resulting in unauthorized expulsions. | Yes
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate the systems in place to prevent unauthorized expulsion by administrators. | Yes
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate the adequacy of training provided to campus/LEA administrators regarding the use of the board approved code of conduct, implementation of due process procedures, and appropriate coding of disciplinary incidents in accordance with the PEIMS Data Standards and, as applicable, TEC Chapter 37. | Yes
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate if the local code of conduct and school board policy are aligned and implemented in accordance with TEC Chapter 37; PEIMS Data Standards, Appendix E; and the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook, Section 10. | Yes
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate whether manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | Yes
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Assess the effectiveness of processes the LEA uses to annually review and incorporate changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section 10 of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | Yes
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of any errors. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions that were taken contrary to statutory requirements. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews, monitors, and adjusts the data collection and reporting process to ensure consistency across campuses. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate the systems in place to prevent unauthorized assignment under TEC, Chapter 37. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate systems in place for positive behavior interventions at the schoolwide, classroom, and individual student levels, and determine whether the implementation of positive behavior interventions has resulted in differentiated placement patterns (campus/[NAME] level). | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate general education systems in place to address behavior as an instructional, rather than discipline, issue.  [NAME] whether systems are in place to teach students good behavior, as opposed to providing punishment as a negative consequence. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Ensure that the local code of conduct and school board policy are implemented and in alignment with TEC, Chapter 37. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews and incorporates changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section X of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Ensure that campus/LEA administrators are routinely trained in the use of the board approved code of conduct and that sufficient training occurs to safeguard the appropriate coding of student discipline incidents in accordance with TEC, Chapter 37 and the PEIMS Data Standards. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with TEC §37.009(a). | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Evaluate the availability of regular, ongoing training for staff members responsible for discipline data reporting. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Determine whether local software packages contribute to errors in campus reporting of discipline data. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Implement appropriate programmatic activities to correct any issues of noncompliance not related to data reporting. | No
4 | Unauthorized Expulsion of a Student Under Age 10 | Ensure that manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Analyze by individual campus, disciplinary actions resulting in unauthorized expulsions. | Yes
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate the systems in place to prevent unauthorized expulsion by administrators. | Yes
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate the adequacy of training provided to campus/LEA administrators regarding the use of the board approved code of conduct, implementation of due process procedures, and appropriate coding of disciplinary incidents in accordance with the PEIMS Data Standards and, as applicable, TEC Chapter 37. | Yes
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate if the local code of conduct and school board policy are aligned and implemented in accordance with TEC Chapter 37; PEIMS Data Standards, Appendix E; and the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook, Section 10. | Yes
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate whether manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | Yes
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Assess the effectiveness of processes the LEA uses to annually review and incorporate changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section 10 of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | Yes
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of any errors. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions that were taken contrary to statutory requirements. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews, monitors, and adjusts the data collection and reporting process to ensure consistency across campuses. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate the systems in place to prevent unauthorized assignment under TEC, Chapter 37. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate systems in place for positive behavior interventions at the schoolwide, classroom, and individual student levels, and determine whether the implementation of positive behavior interventions has resulted in differentiated placement patterns (campus/[NAME] level). | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate general education systems in place to address behavior as an instructional, rather than discipline, issue.  [NAME] whether systems are in place to teach students good behavior, as opposed to providing punishment as a negative consequence. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Ensure that the local code of conduct and school board policy are implemented and in alignment with TEC, Chapter 37. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews and incorporates changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section X of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Ensure that campus/LEA administrators are routinely trained in the use of the board approved code of conduct and that sufficient training occurs to safeguard the appropriate coding of student discipline incidents in accordance with TEC, Chapter 37 and the PEIMS Data Standards. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with TEC §37.009(a). | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Evaluate the availability of regular, ongoing training for staff members responsible for discipline data reporting. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Determine whether local software packages contribute to errors in campus reporting of discipline data. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Implement appropriate programmatic activities to correct any issues of noncompliance not related to data reporting. | No
5 | Unauthorized DAEP Placement of a Student Under Age 6 | Ensure that manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate if the local code of conduct and school board policy are aligned and implemented in accordance with TEC Chapter 37; PEIMS Data Standards, Appendix E; and the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook, Section 10. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Review data to determine whether multiple placements of the same student(s) contributed to the LEA's result on the indicator and, if so, determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of the strategy as a method to address the student's behavioral concerns. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions that were taken overall and for any subgroups, and review patterns of placement to determine whether removal reasons resulted in similar actions across subgroups of students. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with the adopted code of conduct. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate whether placement to the DAEP is a consequence that is appropriately aligned to the degree of behavioral concern. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Consider whether the LEA's application of disciplinary consequences for behavior are consistent and equitable for all student groups. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate whether manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the adequacy of training provided to campus/LEA administrators regarding the use of the board approved code of conduct, implementation of due process procedures, and appropriate coding of disciplinary incidents in accordance with the PEIMS Data Standards and, as applicable, TEC Chapter 37. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Assess the effectiveness of processes the LEA uses to annually review and incorporate changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section 10 of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | Yes
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of any errors. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions that were taken overall and for any subgroups, and review patterns of placement to determine whether similar removal reasons resulted in similar actions across subgroups of students. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Review data to determine whether multiple placements of the same student(s) contributed to the LEA’s result on the indicator and, if so, determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of the strategy as a method to address the student’s behavioral concerns. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews, monitors, and adjusts the data collection and reporting process to ensure consistency across campuses. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate systems in place for positive behavior interventions at the schoolwide, classroom, and individual student levels, and determine whether the implementation of positive behavior interventions has resulted in differentiated placement patterns (campus/LEA/subgroup level). | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate general education systems in place to address behavior as an instructional, rather than discipline, issue.  [NAME] whether systems are in place to teach students good behavior, as opposed to providing punishment as a negative consequence. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that the local code of conduct and school board policy are implemented and in alignment with TEC, Chapter 37 and evaluate whether removal to the DAEP is a consequence that is appropriately aligned to the degree of behavioral concern. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews and incorporates changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section X of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that campus/LEA administrators are routinely trained in the use of the board approved code of conduct and that sufficient training occurs to safeguard the appropriate coding of student discipline incidents in accordance with TEC, Chapter 37 and the PEIMS Data Standards. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with TEC §37.009(a). | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the availability of regular, ongoing training for staff members responsible for discipline data reporting. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Determine whether local software packages contribute to errors in campus reporting of discipline data. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Implement appropriate programmatic activities to correct any issues of noncompliance not related to data reporting. | No
6 | High Number of Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate if the local code of conduct and school board policy are aligned and implemented in accordance with TEC Chapter 37; PEIMS Data Standards, Appendix E; and the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook, Section 10. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Review data to determine whether multiple placements of the same student(s) contributed to the LEA's result on the indicator and, if so, determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of the strategy as a method to address the student's behavioral concerns. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions that were taken overall and for any subgroups, and review patterns of placement to determine whether removal reasons resulted in similar actions across subgroups of students. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with the adopted code of conduct. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate whether placement to the DAEP is a consequence that is appropriately aligned to the degree of behavioral concern. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Consider whether the LEA's application of disciplinary consequences for behavior are consistent and equitable for all student groups. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate whether manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the adequacy of training provided to campus/LEA administrators regarding the use of the board approved code of conduct, implementation of due process procedures, and appropriate coding of disciplinary incidents in accordance with the PEIMS Data Standards and, as applicable, TEC Chapter 37. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Assess the effectiveness of processes the LEA uses to annually review and incorporate changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section 10 of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | Yes
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of any errors. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Analyze, by individual campus, disciplinary actions that were taken overall and for this subgroup, and review patterns of placement to determine whether similar removal reasons resulted in similar actions across subgroups of students. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Review data to determine whether multiple placements of the same student(s) contributed to the LEA’s result on the indicator and, if so, determine the appropriateness and effectiveness of the strategy as a method to address the student’s behavioral concerns. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews, monitors, and adjusts the data collection and reporting process to ensure consistency across campuses. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate systems in place for positive behavior interventions at the schoolwide, classroom, and individual student levels, and determine whether the implementation of positive behavior interventions has resulted in differentiated placement patterns (campus/LEA/subgroup level). | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate general education systems in place to address behavior as an instructional, rather than discipline, issue.  [NAME] whether systems are in place to teach students good behavior, as opposed to providing punishment as a negative consequence. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that the local code of conduct and school board policy are implemented and in alignment with TEC, Chapter 37 and evaluate whether removal to the DAEP is a consequence that is appropriately aligned to the degree of behavioral concern. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews and incorporates changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section X of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that campus/LEA administrators are routinely trained in the use of the board approved code of conduct and that sufficient training occurs to safeguard the appropriate coding of student discipline incidents in accordance with TEC, Chapter 37 and the PEIMS Data Standards. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the LEA/campus due process procedures to ensure that they are aligned to and implemented in accordance with TEC §37.009(a). | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Evaluate the availability of regular, ongoing training for staff members responsible for discipline data reporting. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Determine whether local software packages contribute to errors in campus reporting of discipline data. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Implement appropriate programmatic activities to correct any issues of noncompliance not related to data reporting. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Ensure that manifestation determination review requirements are met for students with disabilities who are removed from their educational placements. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Determine whether professional development on cultural diversity, culturally responsive instructional and behavioral management strategies, or district/campus climate is needed, increasing the LEA’s/campus’s ability to address disproportionate discretionary placements of African American students in a DAEP. | No
7 | African American Discretionary DAEP Placements | Consider whether the LEA’s practices regarding the application of disciplinary consequences for behavior is effective with all student groups. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Identify campuses that reported no mandatory expellable incidents for 3 years. | Yes
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Conduct an internal data review to determine whether discipline incidents that should have resulted in expulsion (in accordance with TEC 37.007) occurred on campuses with no reported incidents. | Yes
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | If mandatory expellable incidents are identified, determine why they were not reported in the PEIMS 425 record. | Yes
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | For each mandatory expellable offense, identify and evaluate the disciplinary consequences assigned. | Yes
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Evaluate the adequacy of training provided to campus/LEA administrators regarding the use of the board approved code of conduct, implementation of due process procedures, and appropriate coding of disciplinary incidents in accordance with the PEIMS Data Standards and, as applicable, TEC Chapter 37. | Yes
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Evaluate if the local code of conduct and school board policy are aligned and implemented in accordance with TEC Chapter 37; PEIMS Data Standards, Appendix E; and the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook, Section 10. | Yes
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Assess the effectiveness of processes the LEA uses to annually review and incorporate changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section 10 of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | Yes
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Conduct an internal data review to identify whether discipline incidents occurred on campuses with no reported incidents. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Conduct interviews with LEA staff and parents to verify whether discipline incidents occurred on campuses with no reported incidents. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Delineate the source of any PEIMS reporting errors and note the frequency of any errors. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews, monitors, and adjusts the data collection and reporting process to ensure consistency across campuses. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Determine the availability of comprehensive reporting documentation and procedures, and determine the degree to which procedural standards are available to and followed by all LEA staff. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Ensure that the local code of conduct and school board policy are implemented and in alignment with TEC, Chapter 37 and that resulting actions are properly reported. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Ensure that the LEA annually reviews and incorporates changes to the PEIMS Data Standards (including [NAME] E) and Section X of the Student Attendance Accounting Handbook. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Ensure that campus/LEA administrators are routinely trained in the use of the board approved code of conduct and that sufficient training occurs to safeguard the appropriate coding of student discipline incidents in accordance with TEC, Chapter 37 and the PEIMS Data Standards. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Evaluate the effectiveness of systems used to transfer data between campuses and the district. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Evaluate the availability of regular, ongoing training for staff members responsible for data collections and discipline data reporting. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Determine whether local software packages contribute to errors in campus reporting of discipline data. | No
9 | No Mandatory Expellable Incidents Reported for Multiple Years | Implement appropriate programmatic activities to correct any issues of noncompliance not related to data reporting. | No